WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: What Stood Out vs. the Giants

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for a break? Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com wa

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, September seventeenth, twenty eighteen, Season fourteen, episode

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>number forty one. Welcome to another edition of The Break

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>live in the SWNBC Morgan Studios at the Star. We

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>got a lot to get into today. Cowboys got to win.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I get the first win of the season against the

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants on Sunday Night Football. They win twenty

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen. We'll break down for you guys everything that

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>went right and went wrong for the Cowboys because there

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>were some things that weren't perfect for them last night,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but they still did have a Why are you looking like, yeah,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of late celebrating last night or let's see sound

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of horse here? Hey, you're just like wooing all

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the way home stadium this weekend. There's been a lot

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of barking. There's been a lot of stepping and a

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>light of a lot of celebrations. Alumni weekend, good weekend.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I was telling somebody, and Nicol can probably identify with

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this because I know he has a few teams that

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he roots for. I got three teams I'm affiliated with,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and they all won this weekend, which never happens. It's

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the third one, the Lobos. You know, I'm a nephew

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>down there. Oh yeah, Mexico. So now I'm I'm New Mexico,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Texas, and I'm and I'm I'm the Cowboys and

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and all three he got wins this weekend. So I

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>really will jump across this table. You can't touch me.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Can't touch me, all right, But but we got a

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about, though. We do need to get

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>into this Cowboys victory twenty to thirteen over the Giants.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to start by just getting a big picture

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>from eating you guys. I want you to tell me.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go across the table. Everybody give me a

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>storyline that they think was the most important storyline coming

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>out of this game. Let's start with you, Dave. I

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wish you had done that. Tell you what. Let's go

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with Nick first, Let's go to Nick, let's got the

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Elder Statesman first. Nick, h Um, the defense, you know,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they spread it around. I mean six different guys getting

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>sacks is means that different guys can can fly around

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball and and you know hurt you. I mean,

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Marcus Lawrence is the leader. But I think

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for the most part that whole defense was was doing

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a good job. Um. You know, the Giants are really

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>really bad, and they'll they'll pick a quarterback high in

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the draft, but um, you know, I thought it was

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>I thought they were better than that. I wrote thought

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Giants were better than that. I know I picked

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the Giants to win, but I thought the Giants would

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be better than that. I think this Cowboys team is

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, one and one. That's how you get to

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>eight and Nate when you do that kind of stuff. Um, oh,

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you were tuning in for Sunshine and this morning kids

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so much. In that one little statement we got, we

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>got to dive into defense looked really really good. The

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>defense looked good. Offenses will be better than that, but

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they took advantage of a really bad There you go,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, I feel better about what I was going

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to say now that Nick said that because I mean,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to rain on anybody's parade. There's no

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a dominant win, and you don't get a

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of dominant wins in the NFL. So and I mean, okay, whatever,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the final margin was seven, even with the muffed extra,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>even with the muffed onside kick, it was never in doubt.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's good. But yeah, that's not a good Giants team.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the main takeaway is obviously, like the defense

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was a phenomenal, but how much weight does that really hold?

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see it against somebody better. Having said that,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>combine that with week one, so now you know your

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>two week averages two hundred and seventy four yards per

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>game and fourteen and a half points per game. I mean,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be close to tops in the league

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on both fronts. I haven't looked at it yet. We

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just got into work, but they look suffocating. They look

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really really good. All sorts of reason for optimism about that.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, to the next points, that's not a

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>good team that they played. So you know, they're not

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>doomsday yet, but certainly a lot of reason to feel

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about it. Amber Aside from the defense, I'm hoping

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that when they come back today and watch film and

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all that they can really take a look and realize

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that do work out for this offense. You know,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we got to see Dak Prescott be a little more

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>mobile rushing the ball, and I think that's one of

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the keys. When you don't have a perfect quarterback that

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can make those perfect throws down the field, it can

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>work for him when you utilize him in those ways.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you start utilizing Tavon Austin Ezekiel Eliot, you

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>start giving him the ball and see those things. Clearly,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw how it started not working for them when

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they took Tavon Austin now and they started doing different

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>things that It's like, why are you going to change

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the game when you see it working? And they came

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>back later on what was a fourth quarter, maybe they

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>started doing it again what was working. So I'm hoping

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>I saw some positive there from the offense and saw

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a more confident in Dak Prescott, and I think those

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of things that they need to allow

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>him to do in order for him to keep that

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>confidence up and keep the offense moving. Almost get the sense,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and this is probably not accurate, but you get the

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>sense sometimes with the play calling that it's like they'll

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>do things just to kind of shut people up. Everyone's

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>saying all week, throw the ball down the field, get

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball to Austin, run the ball was Dak, and

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>they do these kind of things to kind of like, see,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we can do this, But then they kind of revert

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>back to what they really want to do in the

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>second and third quarter, like this is kind of the

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>way we really want to play and it doesn't work.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a reason why I'm not saying that media

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is smarter than them, but there's a reason why people

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are saying throw the ball down the field, get the

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>ball to Austin because the other stuff isn't working. Yeah,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like they do it and again this probably

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't accurate as well, but it just feels like they

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>do it because they feel like they only want to

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>do it when they have to do it, Like at

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of game, if I want got the fast starts,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So they did it, and then they get into this

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>thing where they're like, all right, now we're settling in.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's do what we really want to do, like you said, Nick,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and then they get to the end of the game, like,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we gotta have this drive, we need this drive right now.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And then again they go back to doing what you

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do. You need to do what you need

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to do now, and that's what I'm going back to.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Like watch the field to this week, Notice, look at

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what was working and keep doing that. You don't have no,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you lost that privilege. My favorite thing about Amber is

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>that if given the opportunity, she would walk right into

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the coaches meeting rum and say that she wouldn't give up.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>She certainly would say that. And I guarantee if she

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>seizes them in the hall, so she'll probably say it

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>then too. So I I love it. I agree that.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, God, as good as they look to start,

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>they I like, I have like a mental lapse from

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the mental two quarters of that game because I was

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>so bored, like it, just do something where like did

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a drive longer than five plays after the

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>first two? I don't think so. You kind of figure

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I think I said to you, that sounds like

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the offensive line kind of wears down.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this isn't the same line that we've seen

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>where they just kind of overpower people. It's almost like

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they they wear down just a little bit, um, you know,

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because this is you know, this is different for um

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>uh Looney to play that, you know this much and

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the start and all that, and the same with Connor Williams.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>So you know, they're still trying to figure this out today.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>They did a nice job early in the game, but

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it was hard to kind of sustain that, and you know,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>leaning on Damon Harrison for that long. I mean, they

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>wear on you. And that's the fact they I mean,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they they actually they didn't give up a sack, so

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's better. That's improvement, right, But there were there were

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>plays I saw out there where Looney was having some

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>difficulty with with snacks Harris in the middle of that defense,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and there were some plays that that Lyle didn't look

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>great on the outside. And I'm getting a little I'm

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>starting to get a little bit concerned by Lyle because

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he played great in Week one. I

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think he played great yesterday either, And I was

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting again, this is the fallacy of what we do

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>expected when a guy has a good year. Let's say,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, last year, I thought Lyle played really well.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>My expectations in are the next year he's going to

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>be even better. And it doesn't always work like that.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think right now it's starting to worry me

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit because he's just not taking that

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>next step beyond where he was last year. No, my opinion,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in first two games, nobody's defended him harder than I

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have over the last year or so. Yeah. I thought

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he played. I thought he was outstanding in the second

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>half of last season after some growing pains. To start

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been good, no way around it. Um Again, I

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's too early, especially, I mean, you get a win,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you ran the ball effectively, and you got the job done.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to tinker with anything. Um right, Yeah, no,

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>no need to change. And you know he was. He

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>was not great in the first month of last season either,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so that's not what you want. But maybe it takes

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>him more time than others. I don't know, but I

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>can't argue with you. Once again. For the Vets, we're

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason right now. Yeah, just say, we're in

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. But this, you know, as I wrote last night,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is, without it out, a defensive football team.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>They built this thing to be offensive. They built you

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>know this line in the running game, and they drafted

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>really high for running back to have this kind of

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive attack. But that's not what this team is anymore.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's a defensive team, and that's okay, but

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they're asking the defense to be really really good. They

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>were really really good last night. Let's see if they

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>can continue to do that. But and I just thought

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought Jeff Heath was flying around the ball. I

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thought Damien Wilson was flying around. Every time I looked up,

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>they were doing it, you know. And Barkley's a load man,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that guy. I'm still pissed at Cleveland for not drafting him.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>They have issues with him for years. Yeah, he is

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a good running back. Yeah, I still don't understand why

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't draft him because he was He's just so dynamic,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>ready to play week one, ready to go right now.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Well for Cleveland, if you get your quarterback of the

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>future and the cornerback that you got it four already

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has two picks this year. Yeah, I just question where

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>be a quarterback that'll be a good quarterback for them

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the future. So Bailey goes to Cleveland? Is that

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened? That's gonna happen, Bailey, No, I mean for Minnesota,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and Minnesota was a ton of It's been reported now

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that Minnesota's moving on. I don't ms M. Is it

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the Rams Rams kicker got hurt yesterday? Okay, Minnesota? No,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Browns are expected to sign somebody else, got it? Okay? Yeah,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there were there were a ton of kicking problems around

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Yeah, I think I had no chance of

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>making that kick. You know, like when they drove that

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland drove down and he's just confidence wise and you

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>see it, And that's kind of what the Cowboys were fearing.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>With Dan Bailey, they would get to that point. You know,

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it would be that bad. I want

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to go back to your point real quick though, because

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'll contradict myself a little bit, I guess, because

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a very good Giants team and

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as good as the past rush. Look, you gotta keep

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in mind that that Giant's offensive line is a wreck.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But like all three levels of the defense looked very,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>very impressive, Like your linebackers were flying around, still more

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>mistackles than you would prefer. It seemed, I mean, nobody

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>brought down sae Quon Barkley on first contact. Nobody which

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>easier said than done. I know, but we said that

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was an important aspect of the game than they did

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not do it. But the safeties were all over the place.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean Jeff that I know he was out of bounds,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but the re Jeff Heath made on that ball in

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the end zone not surprising though he does that none

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff like he just has that ability. They tested Byron

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and Cheeto down the field several times. Cheeto gave up

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a long one to Sterling Shepherd. I think it wasn't

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>even Odell Beckham, but it was just a beautifully placed ball,

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like the coverage was good. Byron didn't give up mean

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just every all three levels. I think everybody on the

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>defense had at least one play that that was really outstanding.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And there was no I don't think I remember a

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>single time when a Giants receiver was running free other

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>than the touchdown there and the I guess it would

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the fourth quarter, but there really that's the part.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that was great because you're right, the cornerbacks

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>were tested at times, they tried to go downfield, but

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>every time they were in lockstep with those guys, And

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's still just a continuation of what we've

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>been seeing during training camp and during the preseason and

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>these first two weeks of the season, they haven't really

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been tested yet, I don't think, because they haven't run

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>up against an offense that has enough protection for the

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>quarterback to really challenge them and the receivers to challenge them.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It might happen in Week four against Detroit, but I

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think for the test that they've had so far, they

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly have passed those tests, Like, yeah, I mean, you

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can only play who's in front of you. And even

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in a loss against Carolina after a sloppy start, they

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>were outstanding there at fourteen and a half points. And actually,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>for the story I wrote about the defense last night,

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee talked about, you know, you know, we still

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of work to do, all that cliche stuff,

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but he said, he's like, you know, if you go

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>back to like December of last year, when we all

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>got back healthy and they put the young guys in,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of when I started to get an inkling

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that this defense might be pretty good. I went back

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last five games of last season, starting with

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins win, which was right after the blowout that

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they lost on Thanksgiving to the Chargers. They allowed sixty

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>points in the last five games of the year, which

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is an average of twelve points something per game. Wow.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>So for you know, you're giving up two pressent, you're

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>giving up two touchdowns per game so far this season

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and less than that in the last five games last year.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to talk about how the offensive

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>trends go back to last season and that's cause for concern,

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>well you can add a few more games onto that

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>defense and say, hey, this is a growing sample size

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that gives you a good cause for optimism. And you know,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, if if all things being considering,

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at all the different phases of your game

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and you say, oh, there's a team that's going to

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be good at this, not good at this. If you

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>give me a team that can play really outstanding defense

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and can run the ball, I will be okay with

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea that they're not the great greatest passing team,

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because at least I've seen that model work. I've seen

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>teams that have won Super Bowls with that kind of model.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Not to say this team is in Super Bowl I'm

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not even saying that, but I'm saying that model. That's

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a model that we've seen work in the NFL. And

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have that model than have a team that

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>can throw the ball all around the yard but has

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>no defense. We've that model fail quite a bit. I

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>actually like it if you can get this defensive the

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>point where they're playing at that kind of level. I

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna get to the point later in the

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>season and we're gonna say, you know what, that Carolina game.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>What we learned from that game is that, you know,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this really good defense had some problems with Cam Newton.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That was the problem that they really had. It was

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this and he was just early too. Yeah, but it

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was this dynamic, unique type of skill set that just

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not anybody really in the league, not that many players

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in the league have that. And I think, I mean,

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys will never admit this, but I think they

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>saw that and was like, you know what, our guy's

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not that much different than that. He doesn't throw the

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>ball that great. He's a big, strong linebacker type body.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Do that, you know? And I think that you saw that.

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just run, you know, read option there and

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and take off with it. I thought if he if

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he actually makes different cuts, he probably gets twenty or

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty more yards, so he'll get better at that. And

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we're gonna find out that that

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>game right there kind of helped him and we'll see

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>more of that with that. I hope you're right and

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on it. And I said this this morning on Twitter

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>tavon Austin too. He got eighteen snaps, which is up

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>from last week. Still not enough in my opinion that

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>he needs more touches. And I think just I think

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they motioned him on the fourth down, just like they've

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just brought him across the formation again, just to give

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you that half second. Do more of that too, Like

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he just he should just be involved as a constant

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>threat to touch it even if he's not going to

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>what I've said so many times over the last few years,

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>not only that I wanted to see a deep threat

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>like that, but how many times have I told you

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>first series of the game, throw it deep with your guy,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't connect it. What you're showing is

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is this is what we've got. This guy just ran

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>by you. We'll connect on this later. You're safety better

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>watch out and of course it led to a touchdown,

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But that play can really help you as the season

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>goes on. Next week, you're sitting there in Seattle that

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>safety knows there's number ten out there. That stuff can

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>really help. Yeah, he'll definitely know. Oh yeah, yeah, he'll know.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna know, he'll know. All right, let's let's go

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead and get a little bit deeper into the conversation. Actually,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>let's take our first break. When we come back, I

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do want to talk specifically about Dak's today. I want

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Ezekiel Elliott. Did he get enough touches?

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you look at his overall production yesterday, pretty good average,

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but the number of touches that he had was probably

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a little less than you would think is what you'd

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>expect from a guy like Ezekiel Llot. But we'll talk

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about it when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. It can be hard to find

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the right resource for learning about important financial matters. You

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>search how to build savings, you end up reading about

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why Bank of America build Better Money Habits dot

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Com a safe, little corner of the Internet for answering

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>your financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Money Habits can show you how to make the most

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of your money without resorting to random searches that always

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit better Money Habits dot com. I

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely have an Instagram foody thing, but the low light

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>camera on my new Samsung Galaxy S nine from ATNT

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is getting me a whole new world of likes and chairs,

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>baskets of bread by candlelight, colorful fruit plates in full sun.

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Even a dimly lit cob salad was recently hailed as

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a masterpiece. Come in now and ask how to get

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>half off the new Samsung Galaxy S nine from AT

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and T. AT and T won't for your thing. That's

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>our thing, Limited time only. See store for details or

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>att dot com. Slaft Samsung fifer du Laperture supports F

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>one five NICK two former du lapiatur is installed on

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the rear camera. Oh I am craving a doctor Pepper.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I got some soda. I asked not for soda, I

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>asked for ice. Cold cravable Doctor Pepper Its flavor is

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>more one of a kid been a foretold sloth with

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a thirst for speed. Stop settling for soda and start

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>demanding doctor Pepper. I love sloths. When you crave a

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper, nothing else will do. Grab an ice cold

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty ounce of doctor Pepper today, Doctor Pepper, the one

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you crave. To work this big land. You need equipment

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>with values rooted as deep in texts as soil as

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you are. Like John dear compact tractors for the six

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>year your power training. Warrant to him big features that

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>help you work less so you have more time to

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>do what you love. John Deer was first in the

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Texas fields, and we're proud to be on the field

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>as the official agg and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Texas sized deals at my John Deer Dealer dot com.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty limitations apply, so

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you love for details. Back to the break, Welcome back.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>It is the second segment of the Great Black in

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC Mortgage Studio that the star Talking Cowboys win.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys win and I'm sorry they win. Twenty to thirteen

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of the giants on Sunday night football. Um, nickle you

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>got for us? Oh da, David, we just talked about this.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm out of it. It's okay, it's a

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>little I always say, you know, I don't really want

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to endorse products that I don't personally really trust and like,

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and so Jack Black gave us a bunch of soap

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>before training camp started, got face scrub, got beard oil,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and beardwash, and I got this awesome some charcoal bar

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of soap that exfoliates my skin. The point I'm trying

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to make is they make awesome soap products for your

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>everyday needs. I mean honest. I mean you think of

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>something for your skin and they make it. And I've

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>tried a lot of it because they gave a bunch

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of it to me, and it's all awesome. So you

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>should try Jack Black. Their website is get Jack Black

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You don't want to confuse him with the actor.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a company, Get Jack Black dot com. Go try

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it out. I wouldn't steer you wrong. I have great

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>taste and Jack Black is good. So go. Do you

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>ever think there'll come a day when you'd be endorsing products? No?

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. Who would take my word for anything. Yeah,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but you should. But you should, You absolutely should, You

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely should. Okay, let's get back into this Cowboys versus Giants,

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys win twenty thirteen. Let's dive a little deeper into

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott yesterday was sixteen to twenty five, sixty four

0:19:55.359 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>percent completion rate, one hundred and sixty yards passing, one touchdown,

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>and ninety five point four passers I mean COMQB writing

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and then he ran four He ran seven times for

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five yards, which I thought was the best part

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of what he did yesterday. All that being said, we

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>saw some things yesterday that we hadn't seen it in

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the first game. Threw down phil a few times, connected

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on one big touchdown, He ran the ball effectively with

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the zone read. Here's my question for you guys. Was

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it enough? What you saw yesterday certainly wasn't enough for

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>him to win yesterday against what you call bad team Nick.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it enough when you start playing the likes of Jacksonville,

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>when you start playing the likes of Philadelphia and a

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of the other teams that are on the schedule

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that are tough for teams, is it going to be

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>enough the way that they played offense yesterday, has had

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>enough for them to continue and win. No, I mean

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not enough points and some of those games, and

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's got to make He's got to make

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>throws that are there, you know. I mean, I'm sorry,

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but he's got I mean, he got a tight end

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the back of the end zone, who's got

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a really big wingspan. You gotta get him the football

0:20:58.080 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's there, and you know, and there's no reason

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and overthrown. Now I understand kind of his mentality. You

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>can tell he's gun chat when it comes to the

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>red zone. He's not throwing the pick in there. He's really,

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, gonna make sure he doesn't do that. So

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, he threw that up there from

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that wheel route to Beasley in the back corner. That

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>back corner, he's gonna throw it in that back corner.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That was I did not love that decision. I thought

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his decision making was pretty good for the most part.

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Last night. I did not love that throw. But I

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, he's just gonna, Yeah, he's gonna throw

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it back there like that. He's not gonna fire it

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in there. And he definitely overshot rico and which is

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>probably good for everybody in the place. I'm just asking

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what back of the ends on wide open right? Hands up? Yeah,

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope so, I don't know. If not, then if

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>he didn't run the right route, and then you know

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what changed the play because the play was right. Whatever happened,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest target you can possibly get too. But

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>question what would have happened to the internet? I mean

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it would have broken. Yeah. I was kind of relieved

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>he overthrew it because I wouldn't have been able to

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>use Twitter for the rest of the night, just been

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>flipping place. Would have just gotten nuts. Scoreboard probably falls down,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>which isn't Yeah, well that never happens there. Yeah right,

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it would have been nuts if he

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>would have got that beast nuts. Now what if he

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>would have dropped it a little less nuts but still

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty nice press box? Would have gotten nuts. I can

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>promise you that What were you going to say? I

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was going back to your question as far as is

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this enough, I don't think so. But it's definitely the

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>right step, a step to the right direction. And I

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>think this and you kept saying we can keep arguing

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about this. Whether it wasn't must win or not, I

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>don't care what you say. I definitely believe it was

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a must win just because of the confidence I think

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that we I mean, imagine how much it would have

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>sucked had they lost this game and their confidence. I

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that that is just what they needed, especially going

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>up against the Seahawks this upcoming week. You needed to

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>gain that confidence back in Dak Prescott. I feel that

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>he did gain some of that, and the way he

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was moving around and also not really overthinking. You didn't

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>see him just staying there in the pocket really you know,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking what to do and then messing it up. He

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was making some decisions and sometimes it went his way,

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it didn't, but it's still it goes along. And

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the defense, look how much how

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>good that energy is within the group, and how that

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>infects everyone else, and it just it keeps going, it

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>keeps growing. So that's the kind of thing you need.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And when they started doing those things, you start progressing.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Now is it to that level yet, I don't know,

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>And to be honest with you, maybe doesn't have to

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>be that level right now. I do believe that you

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Seattle and I've had that conversation I think with

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>each of you at some point over the last day

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>about Seattle. I personally don't know if I'm believing that

0:23:58.240 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is as good as they've been in the past.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to see how they played a night. But

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>last week they certainly didn't impress me. And they've lost

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys, including now their top receiver, who

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they already didn't have a I don't think

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a great contingent of receivers. They lost their top one.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm not convinced that Seattle is the Seattle

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that we've been used to seeing. They're definitely not. But

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this go I mean, this is a philosophical conversation that

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought about starting with you in the last segment

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because you're like, oh, I'll take a great defense and

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>an adequate offense because I've seen that work, and you're right.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you have one of those transcendent quarterbacks, you're

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in any game like we've I mean this, oh, absolutely,

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>this team. I think if there's one thing I feel

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>comfortable saying even after two games, and it's kind of

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like what I said last week, is like when the

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>game plans working and when the Cowboys are throwing punches.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a great formula. Yeah, but I don't know that

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this team is designed to dig out of holes and

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>fix it when it's going bad. And when you have

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a player like Russell Wilson, you can do that. Yes,

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but here's the deal. The fact of the matter is,

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, there are maybe five transcendent quarter No, no, no no,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're don't don't mistake my argument. I'm not like, I'm

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not worried that Dak is not that quarterback. I think

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to just say, it's almost harder to find

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that transcendent quarterback and get him on your team than

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it is to find and create a good defense, a

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>really good defense. I'm just saying you still have to

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>account for that. And the Cowboys aren't there themselves right now,

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but the Seahawks might be because they have a quarterback

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's on that level. That's a different conversation. Um, I

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>thought Dak was fine, Like he was fine, Like I

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>agree with what you said. I like the way you

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>say it too. He was fine, he was fine, Like

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we should not be. We should not just be hyping

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it up like this transcendent performance. You shouldn't be killing

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy either. I really I thought he looked confident

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and determined, Like he comes right out of the gate

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and fires a slant to Alan Hearns on the you know,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>first throw of the game, then goes deep even you know,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>his deep ball to Gallop wasn't complete, but I didn't

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>think it was a terrible throw. Um. He had a

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>great completion on a third and ten to Deontay Thompson,

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>which it was it was solid coverage. He was not

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>wide open, but he fired it right in there and

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>hit him in stride. Then he misses Rico Gathers and

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>he may be a questionable throw to Cole Beasley in

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the end zone the on the you know, the game

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>clinching touchdown drive. He had a nice third down conversion

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to Cole as well. So there were four or five

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>really nice throws last night, and probably three or four

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not very good. And then factor that in with fifty

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, I thought he was fine. I think Dak

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and Tavon need to have an impact like that in

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the running game damn near every week. In my opinion,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it keeps defenses honest, It keeps the wear and tear

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>down on Zeke and allows him to compliment them a

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Passing games gotta be better, but not like

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a ton better. I think you know, if he hits

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Rico and maybe one of I mean, if he finishes,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>great about the night, if he hit Rico, if he

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>finishes if he finishes seven, it was an eleven yard pass.

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So if he if he finishes seventeen for twenty five

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for one seventy one and two touchdowns on top of

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the running, I think people even I know that sounds dumb,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>but I think people feel a lot better. And you

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>can't have those plays back, I get it, but there's

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>enough there to feel encouraged about. You want him to

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>take what's there. I think that's what you really care

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about at the end of the day, don't He doesn't

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to be that quarterback that manufactures a whole

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>lot in the passing game, but if it's there and

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>available to you. That was the part that I think

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>most of us criticized last week, was that there were

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that were sitting in front of him that he

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't he wasn't able to take advantage of. That's the

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>ones that you really want him to be able to hit.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't have to be Aaron Rodgers. You don't have to

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be Drew Brees. Just take what's there. If it's there,

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>take it, and if not, then move on to punt

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and move on to another series. If he just hits Rico,

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>then we would be saying that right now. We'd be

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>like he hit he hit all the easy plays. He

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>did what the defense gave him and so still got

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>some work to do. It wasn't great by any stretch.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him play a lot better, but it was

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>an improvement from week one, So that's a start. All right.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about Ezekiel. He had a

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>seventeen carries, seventy eight yards four point six average, and

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. He caught five or six targets, but only

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>nine yards on those catches one point eight average. Looks

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to me like that was If you think about it's

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>only twenty two touches that I would have said at

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of season there would probably not be a

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>game where he had especially if you told me what

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this offense looked like, I would probably think there wouldn't

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be a game where he had less than twenty five touches.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is under utilization? Of Ezekuel Elliott

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>or do you think it just played out that way

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in the game and this is what you had, is

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what you were presented with. I mean, I don't know

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>when else he could have gotten the ball. I mean

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they were that was part of the end game plan

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and Lanta Collins kind of gave away the game plan

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they're gonna go and try to stop him.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, everyone always says they should have run

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball more. You would run the ball more if

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you're moving the sticks, and that's and I thought they

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>did a pretty good job with that. There was a

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a part part in the second drive where

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>there was five consecutive first down plays. You know, they

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>were twelve, nine, and ten, and I thought that really

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>helped open things up later for for Zeke. But you know,

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it was not an easy day to run. It never

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>has been really against the Giants um even though they've

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>changed defensive fronts, they still always make it tough on him.

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it was it was pretty good. I

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know about it really, yeah, I don't know about

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>under utilization. I thought it was it was pretty good,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they they tried to run it out

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, run out the clock a little bit

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>with him, and he kind of warmed down there later

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on in the game, So that was good. Yeah, the

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown drive was super encouraging because it's what Garrett

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>talks about all the time, that you know, you bang

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>on them enough times they're worn out. Nineteen yard gain

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>against that, you know, against Snacks on that drive and

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>then the touchdown was phenomenal. I mean it was second

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and third effort. I mean that's just that's just being

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>better than everybody and being fresh when everybody else is tired.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, I'd like to see more than seventeen carries,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not gonna quibble about it, pat, I mean,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>passing game is just come on. So I hate it,

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I hate it. I can talk about it

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>till I'm blue in the face. But at this point,

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said last week, like you lose the benefit

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt, I'm I'm now just I'm making peace

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with the thought that this is what it's going to be.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Like why aren't they doing it yet? If they were

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to do it at all? Like I'm I'm no,

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like you see sixteen sixteen targets and fourteen

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>catches and like they weren't. It wasn't anything crazy with

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>him either, But every single time Zeke goes out. When

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>when I was looking at the stats last night and

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>saw that, I'm like, oh, they did with Barkley what

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do it. Honestly, that's overkill because they

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get anything going in the run game. I don't

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 1>even want sixteen targets for Zeke how I mean, honestly,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the targets and receptions is great, six and five. Can

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we do something other than screens? And Zeke is all

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he's always at the line of scrimmage and half the

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>time his back is turned to the line of scrimmage

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>when he gets the ball, and I think that's dumb.

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And I will say this though, I mean, I look

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at what they did last night. I think that's what

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>any team should do. When you have a player that's

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as good as Ezekiel Elliott, as good as Saquon Barkley,

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're having a hard time running the ball with them,

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>then I have no problem with the idea of them

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>getting fourteen catches. They should get fourteen catches because to me,

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that's how maybe you can get your offense rolling because

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>guess what the best thing that the Giants did last

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>night last night offensively was get the ball in Saquon

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Barkley's hands out on the outside. It did end up

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>getting the points in the yards that they really wanted,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 1>but it was the best thing that they did. And

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I think when you've got a player that's that much

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>better then your other players, he is that much of

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a weapon. Getting him out of space with the ball

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is never a badt is such a basketball type reference,

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know a lot of guys can make plays

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>without showing up in the stat sheet. One of his

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>best plays is not a stat but when he took

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that ball and didn't get freaked out by Landon Collins

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>being right there, pitches it to Tavon and then lowers

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder and actually crushed Landon Collins to the ground.

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Perfect pitch that had disaster written all over it with

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Landon Collins just blasting to the play right there. But

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he did a nice job of keeping the pitch available

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and then lowering the shoulder. That's where the toughness comes in.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not a stat at all, it's not even a carry,

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing, but he certainly you know, his strength and

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>his poise actually came into play. That's my favorite play

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of knocking him down like that. Yeah, that was that

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>was really good play. I mean, did you think about that,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you would be like at all, no hesitation. Yeah, and

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what being a big, strong guy will do. Like

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, that's gonna hurt. But okay, Tavon Austin got

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards and didn't get any more carries after that.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, you know, actually, speaking of which you think

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about it like this, there were every every series last

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>night where Tavon Austin touched the ball they scored. There

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>were only three of them. It's it's just kind of

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's just coincidence. Don't get me wrong,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just coincidence. But I do think there is something

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that when Tavon Austin is involved in

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this offense, this offense is going to be better. They

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta figure out ways to keep him involved throughout the

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>entire game. It can't just be in spurts. I'm not

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>saying he needs to play one hundred percent of the snaps,

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>but he can do far better than thirty four. Especially,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who in this receiver corp is just really

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>jumping out at you. Cole Beasley's off to a pretty

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:31.239
<v Speaker 1>nice start this season. Um, Deonte Thompson. Okay, but like no,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these guys aren't light in the world on fire.

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Williams is m I A U. We can get

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to that. But maybe wait, maybe we can get to

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that when we have a little more clarity. Yeah, yeah,

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Cowboys are rumored to be talking with

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Butler. Nobody really has a clear idea. Why you

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>only left to assume, right, We'll have to have some

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>resolution as the week goes. But get loud in the

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>locker room. I don't know Bryce coming back music music.

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been yelling, yelling being Bryce uber Um. I mean,

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>he's he's been the best receiver. He Beasley has been

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the best receiver, but Tavan has been in the conversation

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's only had I think he's got eight touches

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. Per if you do it by

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you kind of delimit it by the

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>number of touches of a a number of times on the field,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's no question that Tavon Austin is the best receiving

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and they got and both of his catches were down

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the field. I mean obviously the bomb, but then you

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>know he had a nice comeback route, So like he

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can do these things that they showed in training camps.

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So do it use him? Using and that he is

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't make sense why you wouldn't be using him

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>all the time? Him, him, him and Zeke both. I

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>mean the fact that so what Zeke had seventeen receiving

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>yards last week, So Zeke is at twenty six yards

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>through two games. Come on, man, yeah, come on, all right,

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>let's take let's take our final break when we come back,

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's dive a little more into this defense and the

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>really exceptional game they had yesterday. Really two weeks I

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>think of exceptional play with and come right back. This

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. Cowboys fans know that

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the second best of anything simply won't cut it, and

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.839
<v Speaker 1>your skincare should be no different. A long time locker

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>room favorite of the players and the official men's skincare

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black is

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the number one best selling men's skincare brand in the country.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Because we make products that help guys look, smell, and

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to get ten dollars off your first order of fifty

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more. Jack Black Look Good, Smell good, feel good,

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboy. Star Sports

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Tours is the only official fan travel partner of the

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>access and photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders.

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk xs and

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us. You

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>can trust the official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro. Is a

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Travel dot Com to book your travel package today.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Before there was a draft, you could size up a

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. The crease at his hat,

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him.

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>made with pride right here in Texas. There's still the

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot com Slash Cowboys.

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan?

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It means you've got the passion and the heart to

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>do your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>why when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team. All at T is

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back to the brink.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I say it all the time. On the field, Woys,

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and somebody gives you a present, you know, fumbles the

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>ball in the red zone or something. Take advantage of

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>it when they give you a present. Open the gift.

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>We got presents. We're gonna open the gift. John excited

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>than John John best underwear on the planet really is.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You can get twenty percent off your first order Timmy

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>John dot com for slash Cowboys. But check out what

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got here day this. I mean, I can already

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>see the screenshots right now the other side, yes, yes,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>see all right, see now the ones that we've been

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>promoting this whole time, Like I don't have until right now, cowboys,

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I have. I have the basics. Amber, I was okay,

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>stay away from my quick draw off pouch. Broy you

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>got yeah, you got that? Mean okay, very soft material,

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>very soft. Imagine going to work on Victory Monday with

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>these bad boys keeping you comfortable. Huh, no doubt. Yeah,

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and nobody knows why you're smiling. And the thing is this,

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John. Tommy John is really excited with the fact

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's four of these here and not everyone or

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone has one. No one's left out. Amber's got somewhere.

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this. I'm not gonna show it, but it

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the softest underwear I've ever felt in

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>my life. And I like soft material. Also think about

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the oh God, think about it's very nice, Tommy John.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>It um more than just the underwear. They also have

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the T shirts and stuff like that. That stuff's really good.

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you got something there as well. So Tommy John,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks John, Thank you John. Stuff, And so we will

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely have some some smiles. I guess on game day,

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is this game day or or victory Monday, that we

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>would it's that you would think this is a good time.

0:38:55.920 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>This feels like victory Monday. Maybe maybe game day game

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>day when you kind of just getting yourself ready to go.

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Either way. All right, let's jump back in. We've talked

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>about the offense quite a bit today. I do think, though,

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>we do need to get into this defense because as

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we've already kind of animated this, this defense was the

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>best part of what they did yesterday and it's s

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>led by in my opinion, to Marcus Lawrence, I just

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>love what they're doing up front right now. Those guys

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are getting after it, and it seems like it's every

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>game where they're just bringing tons of pressures. They did

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the sacks didn't reflect how much they were getting after

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Carolina in Week one. Last night, they definitely showed up

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on the stat sheet when it came to six sacks

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and six sacks by six different players, which I was

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>talking to one of our HR one of our PR guys,

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, honestly, I don't even know how

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna find this stat It's a hard thing to

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>figure out they did first time time nineteen ninety seven. Wow, yeah, yeah,

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you're born barely Yeah yeah, yeah, it's been a while.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It just shows that that, you know, like I said earlier,

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>just there are being creative and how they're getting there too.

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the different blitzes. I mean, I think the

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're seeing different guys, like not just pass rushers,

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but in the last two weeks, Jalen Smith has a sack,

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Damian Wilson had a really key play in the game.

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I thought that that kind of I don't know about

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>change the momentum, but really, you know, you just expect

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the second half that the Giants would

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>go down and probably score, and they had a good

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>field position, and that that play really changed all of

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that led to a field goal. I told you though,

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought it should have been four down territory for

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. But I agree with that. Well okay, but

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but then again, I mean, because it's a

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, Lenahan, they don't feel that way. They don't

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like they have problems on offense, which is a problem,

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's the opposite for me, like I

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>feel like they do have problems on offense, So you

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>get it. You don't have it. You don't have the

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>luxury of being able to be flip about points if

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you got a chance at a field goal. You don't

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>just say, well, we're going four to four downs and

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>if we don't get it, so what No, No, no,

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you need the three because you might not be back right.

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So did you're trusting you're trusting that your three money?

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And I and I watched the league. Yes, and he

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>has never made a kick yet, so I'm still not

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking that he's gonna make it. Is not until he

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>gets opportunities that we're gonna see. And he did good

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs for him, I will. I mean, you gotta feel

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.879
<v Speaker 1>good about the fact. And then again it's early. But

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if if you can get to twenty points, which hopefully

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>you can do in the NFL, you feel pretty good

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>about your ability to hold onto it. With the way

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys would look, I mean, nine sacks in two games,

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy four yards, I don't honestly, like

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 1>most of those websites haven't updated their stats this Yeah, um,

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it probably doesn't. If I had to guess, I mean,

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers had six last week, so what I don't know,

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's got to be close. And on top on

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>top of that, every position group on the defense had

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a pressure last night. Cavan had a sack from safety.

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously your pass rushers Damian Wilson had a sack. Anthony

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Brown even had a pressure on a corner blitz, which

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me that that's Rod Marinelli all you want,

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and I don't believe you, which Sean Lee was like, well,

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Rod's Rod's done that stuff before and he

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 1>has I've vivid this clip. I vividly remember in twenty

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen when they beat the Redskins on Monday Night Football.

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>They blitzed a lot in that game. And but that's

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like it, So don't try to tell me that Like

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this just reeks of Chris Richard to me, and I

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>love it. They look they look active and like you

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.959
<v Speaker 1>flying around like I mean, everybody's flying around. And yes,

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>they had some trouble tackling last night, but after every

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>mistackle there were about five guys on top of Sequon

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Barkley right after, so they're flowing to the ball. They

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>look impressed. How about Jalen Smith, He I mean, what

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>a beast? What a beast. I am so excited to

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see him play this way and how he I mean,

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I bet um Eli's Jalen took his breath away literally

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like after that hit, which it was a ton of

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>fun and that's going to steal the headlines and it's

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 1>all the memes, but way more exciting to me than

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.479
<v Speaker 1>that was. Like it it might have been the first

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>play of the game. Sequon Barkley went off left tackle

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen just ran him down loss and I mean

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the speed is just amazing. It's back, yes, it's back.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>It looks really encouraging. I was just waiting for a

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>penalty there. I don't know, he did nothing wrong, but

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I just like, if you hit a quarterback, the established

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback really hard, something just seem like, oh man, you

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, and it was. It was a huge hit. Yeah, yeah,

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I wish you know, I mean, don't get

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the pocket like you were asking for. Green

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Bay absolutely lost a football game yesterday because of a

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>rule like that with what's his name for the second

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>week in a rule. I mean that was happy. It

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>was not happy. Yeah, what's funny is that this rule

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about you know, putting your body weight on a quarterback.

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gonna happen where a safety is going

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to be doing that and it hit um Cam Newton

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, and it's like you've got your way more

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>than me, Like you know, like I haven't even Cam

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>took a dirty shot by all accounts yesterday. I haven't

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>seen the replay yet, but so I don't I don't

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 1>know where I'm going back to this defense. And I

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>thought this was a really big game because you know,

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we've we've talked about it. I don't think it's dead yet.

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they if they decide that they want

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 1>some an upgrade at safety and if they want to,

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, make a move, they can still do that. Um.

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I think after this weekend it could happen. You know,

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but you had to win this game. You cannot be

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>O and two and be like, all right, now you

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>go to Seattle. You could be oh and three. You

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give up any draft pick because you

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know how bad you're going to be. This was

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a really big game to see Ari, what do we have.

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Our offense is pretty it's okay, it's average, and the

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>defense is above average. You could maybe get a player

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that could make your deep because you're gonna have to

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>win games with an exceptional defense, and I think they're

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>really good. I think you can get exceptional though, And

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the other side of that is also true.

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think if they should have some struggles a night,

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>if Seattle has some struggles a night, and then the

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys go to Seattle and beat them as well, then

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that could also on the other side, make

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 1>them say what are we playing for? Right now, you're

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>talking I was just talking in general, you're actually specifically. Okay,

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about it from the standpoint of it has

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a two way deal. Everybody's got to give him.

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's got to get making a trade. You mean that guy, Yes,

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that guy. I'm talking. Who would you trade for if

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>not that guy? Oh? I mean, there's a lot of

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>safeties in the league. Everybody's got four. We can go

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>down the list, got four and now I'm just kidding, Okay,

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>bring him home? What is it own home? Yeah, let's go.

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is nothing against the safeties that

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they have. I thought Cavon's pretty good time tackles out there,

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know, like his role would be perfectly fine

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if it was if he was the third safety. Yeah,

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I really I love him being the third safety. Play

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot on special teams, come into the game, your

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:00.959
<v Speaker 1>physical you know, box player. Great, same was Davier Woods

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 1>when he comes back. There's a good role for these guys.

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>He actually plays in the slot. You can get better

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>than what you have with maybe Anthony Brown. How unlike

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>our how often do you just see blockbuster player trades

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL? Isn't just let me let me make

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>them a lot? Not a lot, but but more lately,

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think every season you see a couple how often?

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm this is gonna be good, so just bear

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>with me, But just how often do you see that

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>happen once the season has started? Not as much. So

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>if against all odds it does happen, I'm gonna go

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on record and say I'm gonna buy Nick a cookie

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>cake for all of his hard work and determination to

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>see this thing. So you think you think Nick will

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.399
<v Speaker 1>have influenced that if it actually happens, No, just it's

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's amber in the East and it comes back to you.

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.720
<v Speaker 1>To quote shy La buff don't let your dreams be dreams,

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you know. So we'll just you know, we'll have a

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>cookie cake party cream. If it happens no cookie, it's nick,

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll talk about it. Cookie cake. Yeah yeah, maybe

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he'd rather just have a twelve hack of beer. I

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. All I know is there's some sugar. Isn't

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>always knicks, friends, They might not be the cookie cuts right.

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>That might be a bad idea. But you look at

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this defense last night. Think about this. They held in

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>New York to a punt on the first five possessions.

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>They didn't allow them past midfield in the first half,

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the entire first half, they forced to fumble in

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the third quarters, getting turnovers. They had the six sacks.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like all the different things measures you look

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>at for what a defense does and how you want

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate their performance, they did it. So here's my question,

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>what is this defense not doing well where they need

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to improve before? Before we get to that, before we

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>get that, we just talked about a bunch of food. Yea,

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>these these two guys, I mean Taco Cheeto. Seriously, they

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>both played Somebody stopped Odell Beckham from doing anything. They

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>covered in well and Tacco Byron too. Don't those corners

0:47:57.680 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are doing really well? But I really like what Cheetos

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ringing on the outside. I think he is a physical presence.

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They just haven't had the same with Byron Taco Charlton

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>though he's really taking that next level. We're not even

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fact that I think your most freakish

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 1>defensive player with the best talent it is not here yet.

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that he might be. No, I still don't think so.

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's true. I think your most freakish

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>defensive player is was an active in Randy Gregory. And

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if Randy Gregory comes back and does the snaps that

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Dorrance Armstrong was getting, Um asked the Actually, I wasn't

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about Earl Thomas. I meant David Irving, by the way, Actually,

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.879
<v Speaker 1>and we forget about David Irving and David Irving. You're

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>right when it comes to he's with time and seasons

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 1>before he gets in there for some reason. As soon

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as he gets in there, he makes it. He makes

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>an impact, right, I mean all three of those guys

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with what you have. You replace Cavan with whoever, that

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>guy somebody. You Replacedrance Armstrong with that guy, and you

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>replaced um probably Antoine Woods. No, just replace Antoine. He's

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a hot boy. I'm not cutting rans Armstrong either. I'm

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm talking about in your rotation of third and eight,

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we got to get off the field. You're looking at Gregory,

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at d Law, Irving, Tyrone Crawford, maybe Taco

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. You got that guy out at safety.

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We're just putting them here already. It's gonna happen. I

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>want my damn out in the eight there, man, I'm

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>telling he's just there. I'm like, I took this is

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a bad Giants team, and I don't want to overreact

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for the millionth time, but it's awful. I mean, it's

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it is encouraging, and it's not crazy to think that

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this could be the first time that the Dallas defense

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is an asset that's going to help them win games,

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>like actively win games games for the first time in

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I make just one slight adjustment to that,

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least I'll make the point. You guys tell

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>me I could be crazy on this one. I know

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys say the Giants aren't a good team. Have

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we thought about the fact that last week they played

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 1>what might be the best team in the NFL in

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars and played them to five point deficit. Right,

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:20.359
<v Speaker 1>And then they played the Cowboys this week. And again

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying Cowboys are great, but could the Cowboys

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:24.879
<v Speaker 1>be better than what you're thinking and the Giants could

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good team. They just played two equally

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>good you know, you know, one much better than last year.

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a similar game nineteen to three Cowboys a

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>week one of the season, and you know, you kind

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of thought, wow, this is really good because the Giants

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>were good last year and we were kind of three

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of us kind of were like, this is a really

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>good win. It was a good win. But Amber was saying,

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I saw some issues there. You know, it

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>was still a good win, but the fact of like,

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can see some problems. Yeah, but are

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you talking about where the Cowboys are for the Giants, Well,

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about really for the for the Cowboys here,

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but because we didn't really think the Giants were gonna

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>go four and twelve. Yeah, and the wheels fell off

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>off there them because of the players that they lost.

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They did so. But my point is is that sometimes

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 1>still early in the year like that, it's hard to

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>tell what's going to happen. You can still see some missues.

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>We see some issues on offense. Here, defense looks pretty good.

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>It'll get better. They'll face some better teams, but you know,

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just different types of challenges. I think you've got a

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>combination of the Week one and Week two quarterback. You

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>have a combination or that. In Week three, you got

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 1>a better passer, you got a mobile guy. He's not

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna drag defenders like that, but he's gonna get away

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from him. Yeah, but you don't. Honestly, I think these

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks, I think the Cowboys will face what

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 1>they've already faced from the standpoint that they will be

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>teams that are really good at something, so whatever that

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is. Like Detroit, the challenge is gonna be. They

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>got some good receivers over there in Detroit, right And

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 1>with Seattle's gonna be you're probably gonna face the best

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback you face so far this year. So there's kind

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of different. But all of them have their awards, just

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys have their awards. It's not until you

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 1>get into the month of October that you're gonna face

0:51:56.280 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>some teams there that have that do a few things, well,

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a few things really well, and then you got to

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 1>try to stop that, right iron I mean we say,

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we say it all the time, like, oh, don't don't

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>try to assign wins and losses before the season starts.

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Bucks are two and oh no doubt.

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>December just got hard. The Texans are oh and two. Now.

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Of course, if Jamis comes back, then maybe maybe that's

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 1>not that's hard. I want. I want to. I want

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to Patrick is playing his butt off if they don't,

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if they do sit him, I mean, you're kind of

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>hoping if you're a Cowboys fan, by December, he's not

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>playing anymore, because, trust me, he's playing better than Jamis

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has played since he's been in ten. Trust mean, when

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a guy gets hurt and he comes back at quarterback

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and keeps his job right, it doesn't matter how well

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the guy's playing. You keep your job right. Ways you

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't get you can't lose your job to injury, and

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that the same. I want to. I want to steal

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just one more thing. I love this stats from a

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Giant speed reporter, actually, Dan duggan U. The Giants had

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty five yards last night. One hundred

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and eight of those came on their last two drives

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>when the Cowboys were very clearly basically playing prevent, which

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't like, but it's I mean, they went into

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>when the Cowboys went up twenty to three, the Giants

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>had what's that I can't do math? They had like

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty yards of offense. I mean it's awesome.

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it. It's frustrating when you're when you're having

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this great success and then all of a sudden, the

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>score looks a lot closer than the game really was.

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But the only way we saw this and you guys

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>were barely born, but I mean, we saw this game

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five. I don't know if you remember

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Redskins Week two. I'm just stalling

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 1>high school, you know, I mean two. I think it

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand and five. Remember they thirteen nothing or

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Redskins, they had the triplets and the Ring

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of Honors. Great night. All of a sudden, Mark Brunel

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:49.919
<v Speaker 1>hit Santana Moss two deep touchdowns, Boom boom. You lose

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen thirteen. The only way you're gonna lose is if

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you give up something cheap and quick, and he's got

0:53:55.680 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you gotta play the clock and grinded Ingramming Barkley touch

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 1>down and then Blake Jarwin's is great hands missus the

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>plan and the clock is on your on your team

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 1>at that point, you gotta use it, right, Which from

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, like Jarwin giving you anything? Is he doing anything?

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean seriously, I mean what does he do? He? Um?

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I made his case to not be on hands team, right,

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to just say that because that's

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>what we think about, but I mean, well, but no, Honestly,

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>at this point, what you're getting is you're getting what

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you kind of expect that you would get from a

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. You knew what you get from Swam.

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>He was going to be solid, right, and that's what

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of getting from him. But you didn't. Did

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you really expect that Jarwin was gonna bust on the

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>scene and give you anything? Did you really expect that?

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Which you watch the rookie and training camp, I'd expected

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 1>nothing from him. So if you want to do this,

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't. I mean, honestly, Jeff Swain is acquitting himself

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>quite nicely. I think. I mean, he's not gonna catch

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 1>sixty passes for six hundred yards, Like, but he's doing

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what you expect. No, I mean he had several really

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.879
<v Speaker 1>key blocks that opened up other plays ye last week

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and passes, he's opening the end zone on one play.

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's doing his job. Why do we have

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to do this twelve and thirteen personnel stuff? Like? Why

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.319
<v Speaker 1>why are they going out there in an empty set

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>with two tight ends? Why? Yes? Why? Yeah? Get Why

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 1>why can't they get smaller and spread the field? I

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:19.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Those are the opportunities where I'm like, if

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to find a reason a way to get

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Tavon Austin on the field, there you go right there,

0:55:24.440 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>get the two tight ends off the field. I want

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to read it out anyway. I wanted to do it

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>last year with Ryan Switzer and they, I mean and

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Tavon Austin. It certainly appears to be better than Ryan Switzer.

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't understand it, and I've never I've

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>never designed a game plan in my life. I bet

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I would be sucky at it. The only thing I

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 1>don't like it at all. The only thing I could

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think of is that it's it's their way of being

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 1>able to force a particular personnel group onto the field.

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So if they want to keep linebackers on the field

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:55.839
<v Speaker 1>rather than extra dbs, that's a way to do it.

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You show twelve personnel and then you spread them out.

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Now again, that's the only thing I can think of

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>that would why do you want why why do you

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>want linebackers on the field instead of dbs when you

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have a two hundred and twenty pound running back and

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at two hundred and thirty pound quarterback. Let's see, Okay,

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:13.879
<v Speaker 1>well they're not at that point. The running back isn't

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the back. I get your point. I get your

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:17.919
<v Speaker 1>point there. But the problem is is your your tight

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>ends that you have aren't these dual threat tight ends

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>where you're like, oh, you want to bring linebackers watch this,

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna spread swam here when you're coming downfield. This

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is an ingram. They can't do that. Because I'm with you,

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I'm saying that's the only thing I can

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:33.320
<v Speaker 1>come up with that makes it to where it's like, okay,

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that could be a reason why they would do it.

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I still don't get the logic of it, but that

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 1>would be the only thing I think I'm telling you,

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and I've said this a couple of weeks ago. I'm

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it again. I really think this team needs

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to utilize Jama's old Wally more. I think he can

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 1>be a versatile fullback. I think he can get the

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>ball out in the backfield. I think he can do

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>those types of things that you want and with a

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:56.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit of versatility. They're not utilizing him enough, and

0:56:56.880 --> 0:56:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be more of a lead blocker.

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>But he also can play that h BA role tight end.

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not using him a lot now. He played more

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, did some blocking. I still think that there's

0:57:06.960 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a role for him. Yeah, I think they have to

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 1>find a way. In my opinion, if they're looking for

0:57:11.800 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ways to get those receivers on the field and involve more,

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it means taking the tight ends off the field, and

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's better for this team overall. I think

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Age made a really good point at the top of

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the show, which is like there's a difference between what

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to do and what they need to do.

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>She said they've given up they right well to. Unfortunately

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:32.360
<v Speaker 1>she's wrong about that, Like they can do whatever the

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 1>hell they want. There's only like one or two people

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that have the power to change that, but well, it's

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy. Do you want to win or do you

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:42.919
<v Speaker 1>want to lose? Please, let's get you into this meeting room.

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's get you in there. But I so there's there's

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what they what they want to do is that stuff,

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it works very well. And we've

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>gotten two game sample size to back me up on that.

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see where it goes from here. Well, we'll

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. They got some some challenges coming up.

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact as though, that these next two

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks they do have a little bit of a reprieve

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to try to figure some other things out because they're

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 1>not playing great teams. They're playing teams that are probably

0:58:07.360 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>where they are pretty good, have some things they do well,

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>also have some warts. I think these next two weeks

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you got to try to figure something out before you

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get into the media schedule. That's saying college football, man,

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not how this works. What do you mean? I

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:22.439
<v Speaker 1>mean like every week is gonna like no reprieve going

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:24.439
<v Speaker 1>on the road to see I don't know, you don't

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, that's not what I was saying. The point

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of our winnables not yes, you're not going up against

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the best teams in the league. These next two weeks,

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You're going up against good teams that have certain things

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that they do really well. You're gonna have to defend

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and certain ways that you may be able to exploit them,

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but you also can get exploited. But there aren't the

0:58:39.480 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>best teams in the league you're facing these next two weeks,

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so you do have a little room to figure some

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 1>things out before you have to face a team like Jacksonville,

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>before you have some other teams that are on your

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule that are much tougher competition than what you're what

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you face so far. You know, like I said earlier on,

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you're one and one for these two games.

0:58:55.960 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 1>You have a good chance probably you could be two

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and two there. That's just how it works. Building. Just

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 1>work your way right on update and Nate, is that

0:59:03.560 --> 0:59:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. Yes, that's the way. That's the way

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it's looking right now. Let's hope not. Let's hope that.

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope not. All right, We appreciate you guys, join us.

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We're back tomorrow. We'll give you a big picture look

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>at around the NFL, around the NFC East and get

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys ready, start getting you ready for Cowboys versus

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. Till then for Nick even, Dave Hellman, aber Garcia.

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Derek Eagles and this has been the Break live

0:59:20.680 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:30.480
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Football Club