WEBVTT - Instant Reaction: Intel and Apple Earnings Results

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Intel are just surging as we speak right now.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Taking a look at shares in the after hours, they

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 2>were up as much as fifteen percent. This after the

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 2>company gave a fourth quarter revenue forecast slightly above estimates.

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>It sparked optimism that it's capable of reclaiming some lost

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>market share. Shares are just absolutely surging right now. Remember

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>shares down going into this print, close to sixty percent.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>We got with us Ed Ludlow joining us from our

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco bureau. I know he's looking closely at these

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>results because he's got a chat with Pat Gelsinger coming

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>up at six pm Wall Street Time, a special edition

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Technology on Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio, YouTube, and

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Originals. We'll get to that in just a minute. First, though,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Ed expectations were pretty low going into this print.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there's a lot to unpick here.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not straightforward because in the core to gone, Intel,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>which was previously like one of the world's leading chip makers,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 3>has given us a mixed bag. Its data centerships business

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>did better than expected, but it's PC business where it

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>has historically been the leader did worse. The answer to

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 3>that is customers had inventories and they worked through backlogs.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>And when we speak to Pat later, I think there's

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 3>a discussion to be had about the future of Intel

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 3>and the PC market. But the most important thing to

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 3>note is the stock is up significantly and after hours,

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and that is in spite of almost three billion dollars

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of impairment charges that Intel took relating to headcount reduction

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>canceled projects. And what's so interesting about that is if

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>you look at the estimates going into this quarter, and

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>lists on Wall Street had not factored that in.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's a surprise, a negative surprise.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 3>And even so the stock is up significantly because, as

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 3>you point out, the top line of the story is

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's some hope here for Intel.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>It is there. There's also a headline ed and I'm

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>just getting caught up. I know you've made some time

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to look at this, but there's the news is coming

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 2>fast and furious. They're reducing headcount by sixteen five hundred employees.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Is that on top of the other headcount productions this year.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>This is a confirmation of the previously stated plan for

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>headcount reduction, and that the literal update is that the

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 3>Audit Committee of Intel, a section of its board, has

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>approved that plan. So the number is final sixteen thy

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>five hundred staff to be cut. And again I go

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 3>back to the impairment charges. If you look at the

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 3>adjusted loss per share in the quarter gone much much

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 3>wider than anyone on the Wall Street had anticipated. And

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a part of that was that the impairment charges it

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>disclosed relative to headcount reduction, but there's other things in there.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 3>They just hadn't factored that in for this quarter. Intel

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 3>wasn't able to guide for it into this quarter. So

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a timing and an accounting issue, which you know

0:02:58.120 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 3>sometimes can be a bit dry.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>There's much more to discuss.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well' speina, much more to discuss. The Intel CEO

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Pat Gelsinger, who you're going to speak with a little

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>later today, saying in a statement that he intends to

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>keep the company together. Yeah, he says that distinct, but

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.839
<v Speaker 2>better together is the strategy. The context for this is

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>is reporting from earlier this year that said they were

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>exploring a separation of parts of the company.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's complicated.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 3>And first off, the headlines from Pat Gelsinger were a

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>part of a brief conversation that our colleague and King

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>had with him on the phone. And the context is, yes,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Intel is a chip company. It offers chip products processes

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>that go into computers and data centers and other business areas.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>But it also has a manufacturing business, which historically the

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>reason that Intel was so good at chips is it

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>built them or manufactured them for itself. As many of

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>your listeners have learned in the last two or three years,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>there's a company in Taiwan called TSMC that has basically

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 3>taken over the vast majority of cutting edge chip manufacturing

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>on a contract basis for everyone else, and Intel had

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>really fallen behind. But Intel's ambition is to have a

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 3>company where it has its own products, it manufactures its

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>own products, but it also wants to manufacture chips with others,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>just like TSMC does. And that's a long answer, but

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the short of it is, this is Pat Gelsinger saying, yes,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 3>we're going to run the company that way to separate divisions,

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>but no, we're not going to sell off one part

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>to a third party or be acquired by a third party.

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of reading between the lines because he was

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 3>not explicit.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Ed. You have to wonder how much patience investors have

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>right now to see this turnaround play out, because, like

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Tim had mentioned, Intel stock is down almost sixty percent

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 4>year to date. So what do we know right now

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 4>about just how urgent the need for the turnaround is.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 4>When you think about the share price.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do we have to wait for those listening

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.679
<v Speaker 3>on radio. I'm looking at a chart and the line

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 3>goes straight up in the air with a thirteen percent

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 3>next to it, And if you're watching on YouTube, maybe

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>we can put the chart up. And it's an astonishing

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 3>market reaction because of the pain of the quarter gone

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 3>that I just told you, and what Intel told us

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>for the final three months of this year is here's

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>a range of revenues we think we're going to have.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 3>At the midpoint of that range, it was just slightly

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>ahead of consensus estimates. But the market is you know,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>what's the saying, you guys that the investors vote with

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 3>their feet, right, And you know, I think that's the

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>read here. They look at the commentary from Intel and say,

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>you've done some really painful things in the quarters gone.

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 3>You've let go of a lot of people canceled a

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of projects. You had a pretty rough quarter in

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 3>your PC business where you were once a leader and

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>you've fallen behind. But as we look to the next

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>three months and beyond that, there are signs that you

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 3>might be turning a corner here. And that's great because

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 3>that gives us a lot to ask Pat Gelsinger about

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 3>to today.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't give away the questions, ed, I would never ask

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 2>you to do that, but what is top of mind

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>for you ahead of this conversation, especially given that you

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>got to read a little bit of what Ian's conversation

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>went with him earlier, and then also you get the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>most recent numbers that we're talking about right now.

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because of the analyst call as well, and you

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 3>never know what's going to come up in an analyst call.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 3>There's definitely a technology to discussion to have here. You know,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 3>one of the interesting parts of Qualcomm, or the report

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 3>that Qualcomm was Qualcom was interested in buying some all

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of Intel, is that they had made inroads themselves into

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the PC market where Intel had once been dominant. And

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, a theoretical idea that came out of that is,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>why would Qualcom want to buy Intel if they're doing

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 3>so well on their own, But you could flip that

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 3>on its head and say, the story of twenty twenty

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 3>four has been about the AIPC PC laptops that have

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>new chips in them that are not made by Intel.

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>So when's Intel going to come to the races on that?

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, a number of our audience, but also

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>like executives in the world of tech, have asked me

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 3>to ask Pat about that issue, because if Intel's so

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>good at PC chips, why is it not doing the

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>latest thing? These are technology questions, but I think we

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 3>should probably be explicit. Was Intel or was Intel not

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 3>approached by some of its peers about an acquisition?

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Simple stuff.

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Ed In just three minutes, we should be getting Apple's

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 4>earnings reports.

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>What goodness?

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 4>What should people be watching hump for for the iPhone?

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, iPhone sixteen and China very simple, leading product, most

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 3>important market, and that's probably what it will come down to.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Will those iPhone sixteen's are they flying off the shelves?

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>So we've learned in the newsroom a really painful lesson

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>this year, which is treat the third party data with caution.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>You guys will probably have done it on the show

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>right these stories about some of the market researchers, who

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>is you report saying the first six weeks of iPhone

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 3>sixteen sales are down relative to the first six weeks

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 3>of iPhone fifteen according to xyz data set Counterpoint research

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>is one.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But there's also evidence that in recent.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Quarters, Apple's actual data has proven the third party data

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>to be off the mark a little bit. And there's

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 3>a very interesting phenomena happening in China. Apple won't make

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 3>its latest generf generative AI tech available in China for

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 3>some time until the regulator says it's okay. But there

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>is evidence that the consumer in China is buying the

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 3>iPhone anyway in anticipation they might have access at some

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 3>point to like the latest and greatest software, which I

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 3>think is so interesting. Right, You're buying something without having

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 3>been able to experience it and like look at it

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>because it's not available in that market.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, So okay, let's talk a little bit about China.

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Just thirty seconds here, ed because these numbers are coming

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 2>out in thirty seconds. Sure, what are the numbers we

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 2>need to see in China indicate that that Apple is

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 2>not losing market share to Samsung show me and the.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 3>Like numbers or commentary, so they'll report something for Gray

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to China. They won't be as sort of candid about

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 3>category specific stuff, but on the call they would tell

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>us how they think they do or rank in that market.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're going to get numbers from Apple in just

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 2>about fifteen seconds. Going into today, shares for the year

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 2>up seventeen percent, so underperforming the S and P five

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred shares today down one point eight percent. We are

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 2>getting a slew of earnings continuing and now we're getting

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Apple results. Bear with me while I bring these up.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Fourth quarter revenue meets estimates coming in at ninety four

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>point nine three billion dollars. Estimates were for ninety four

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>point three six billion dollars. As we look at the

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>different parts of the reportable categories, services revenue for the

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter coming in below estimates, twenty four point nine

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to seven billion. Estimates for twenty five point two seven

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 2>billion fourth quarter earnings per share coming in way below

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>estimate and are not excuse me, not below estimates below

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 2>what they were last year ninety seven cents versus one

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>dollar and forty six year over year fourth quarter revenue

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>once again beating estimates, coming in at ninety four point

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>nine three billion dollars. Estimates were for ninety four point

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>three six billion dollars. Apple also declaring a cash dividend

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 2>of twenty five cents per share.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That's I'm not done that much.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Let's look at fourth quarter iPhone revenue coming in

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>above estimates at forty six point twenty two billion.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Estimate.

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Weres for forty five billion dollars, fourth quarter Greater China

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>revenue coming in just shy of estimates fifteen point zero

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>three billion dollars. Estimates are for fifteen point eight billion.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Dollars, and their fourth quarter Wearables, Home and Accessories slightly

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 4>missing estimates nine billion dollars. The MAC revenue seven point

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 4>seventy four billion, right in line with estimates, and iPad

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 4>revenue slightly below estimates six point ninety five billion versus

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 4>estimates of seven billion. The red headline crossing the Bloomberg

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 4>terminal is that the Apple fourth quarter Greater China revenue

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 4>missed estimates. It's fifteen point oh three billion versus estimates

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 4>of fifteen point eight billion.

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was a that's a pretty significant miss right there.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Seeing shares bounce around a little. They were higher when

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>these numbers came out. Now they're down about one point

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>three percent. Some of these certainly worth repeating. Fourth quarter

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>iPhone revenue coming in above estimates at forty six point

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>two to two billion dollars, fourth quarter revenue coming in

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 2>at ninety four billion, ninety four point ninety three billion

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars above estimates, but fourth quarter Greater China revenue coming

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>in below estimates. I do want to go back to

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Ed Ludlow, who's standing by in San Francisco. He's only

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 2>had two minutes to look at these numbers China. That

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>certainly seems like a story here.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Ed, Yeah, I mean you want wonderful summary. I mean, all,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>how do you follow that? But I think that that's

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 3>the simple calculus. Overall iPhone revenue beat right, Greater China

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>slightly missed. It's not until the analyst call that you

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 3>get the commentary. It's usually from the CFO rather than

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Tim Kirk that says, actually, by category or products are

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 3>be it iPhone, mac wearables, here's how we did, and

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 3>in that explanation we will find out did iPhone grow

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>in China or not? It's interesting, you know the miss

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>is it's a miss, you know, it's slight. The only

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 3>other thing that I point out is that you have

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to read between the lines a bit. And the Apple

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 3>once again has a new record high of number of

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 3>installed devices around the world. That's the number of people

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 3>with an Apple hardware product or device somewhere in the world.

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>It's growing. But where in particular, which product line. That's

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of the question next.

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>But that's an important number because increasingly, as people hold

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>onto these devices for longer, the more of them that

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 2>are out there, the more people are spending on services

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 2>like Apple TV plus, Apple Music, iCloud and the like.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm certainly not buying new devices right now,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>but I'm still spending each month quite a bit on

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Apple and Apple loves that it's a high margin business.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the timing of this very interesting.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 3>So in the release they talk about the rollout of

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Apple Intelligence, which is staggered. As Mark German has reported

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 3>here at Bloomberg News. Apple Intelligence is the company's proprietary

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 3>AI or generative AI offering. It's a suite of software

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>tools in iOS that can do various things. This past week,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I was offered to upgrade MYOS to eighteen point one.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Then I was put on a wait list for Apple Intelligence.

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>That's all lot preamble to say, we don't know anything

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 3>from this release. And you noted that services missed right,

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>that all this work they put in AI and all

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 3>of the delay translates to consumers spending more money within

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the iOS or Apple ecosystem. And I know that many

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>analysts investors are going to be listening carefully for that.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's go through some of these numbers again. If you're

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>just joining us. Apple shares down about one point seven

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>percent in the after hours. They reported just about four

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>minutes ago, five minutes ago, our fourth quarter revenue came

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>in above estimates at ninety four point ninety three billion dollars.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Quarter iPhone revenue came in above estimates at forty six

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>point two two billion dollars. That's a billion dollars more

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 2>than what analysts were expecting. Fourth quarter greater China revenue,

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>though coming in below estimates, Does that mean the iPhone

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 2>sixteen is a huge success ad.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 3>You have to read between the lines again until an

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 3>executive says it definitively on the call, you don't know.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 3>But there were other areas that were a bit of

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>a surprise, right. iPad was a surprising miss despite having

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>released new generations.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So take that.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>MAC revenue came in at one hundred million more than

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the same period a year ago, or maybe sequentially in

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>line with expectations, so that's not giving a surprise contribution.

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>What's left we know revenue services revenue missed, maybe iPhone.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Piecing it together, well, how much of the iPhone sixteen

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>was sold in this most recent quarter? Like, do we that? No,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 2>we do in terms of availability.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of availability, I'm trying to go through

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the tank, you and the thing to look at the

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 3>inventory number because that's the next place that I can.

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I can't find it yet because to me with another one,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'll try catch.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Out, Okay, So I'll give you some time to look

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>for that. The reason I always am interested in that

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>is because they announced this thing in September, goes on

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>sale a few weeks later. The quarter ends after only

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple weeks after that, iPhone goes on sale. In

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 2>some years Emily, they haven't even been able to put

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the new phone on sale before the quarter of learning.

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's just a question of okay, how many people

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 2>were buying the old iPhone versus the new iPhone right

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>here as an indication of how well is that new

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>model selling.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 4>I'll also add Tim that we are seeing Apple stock

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 4>extending some losses. You know, nothing huge here, and it is.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 4>It has only been six minutes since Arnais came out,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 4>but we do now see shares of Apple down about

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 4>one point seven percent, despite the fact that fourth quarter

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>revenue met estimates and was still up six percent year

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 4>over year, and also that service revenue up twelve percent

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>year over year but did slightly miss estimates.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Taking a look now at our live blog. If you

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>have access to this on the Bloomberg terminal, do check

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it out our own. Mark German, adding to what Ed

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>said that iprad is a surprising miss, coming out just

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 2>shy of seven billion, despite the release of that new

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>iPad Pro and iPad Air models earlier this year. That

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>new iPad Mini released this month unlikely to help materially.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Mark Kerman also writing that the Mac came in with

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred million dollars annual revenue increase, meeting Wall

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Street estimates of seven point seven billion dollars. New Max

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>released this week should help that product segment in the

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>current quarter, and I want to go back to you.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I know you've been diving into that ten Q speed

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 2>reading it. What sticks out to you from there.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, not the inventries. They're basically very similar to the

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>same period a year ago. So I'm going to spend

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 3>a bit more time pondering that. You know, a story

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>of the megacaps so far in twenty twenty four has

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>been sweetness for shareholders and this is more dry stuff.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 3>But you know that your audience on this show, whether

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>they're listening or watching, there are so many different types

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 3>of Apple investors out there where the role of a

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 3>dividend or shareholder returns is really important. And so whatever's

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 3>happening with any given products line or category, Remember this

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Apple is a cash machine twenty seven billion dollars of

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>operating cash flow generated in the quarter. Hence they're able

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 3>to return relatively the same twenty nine billion dollars back

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 3>to investors. The differences is that in prior quarters, when

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 3>we've seen a sweetener like a divvy or a boost

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 3>into a buyback program, that's been a great thing for investors,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 3>they've responded positively. On EM's note, just then, the stock

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 3>isn't really responding to that, right, there isn't some sort

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 3>of relief in that sense, knowing that the bar too

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>is high.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you bring up a really good point that

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 4>I know you said it's dry, but it's not as

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 4>dry to me. I interview a lot of I know,

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 4>full managers.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a nice little mix for you.

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, people always talk about cash rich companies and

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 4>how those kinds of companies are despite what the macro

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 4>economic environment is doing. If you buy a large company

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 4>that has a big, strong balance sheet, no matter what

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 4>the FED does, no matter what other earnings do, you'll

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 4>be safe. And I think that sentiment has really carried

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 4>these mega tex stocks this year, all the volatility.

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>It's important because again there's a badge of honor for

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 3>many that comes with holding Apple stock, whether you're the

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 3>smallest retail investor or the giant on Wall Street.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>That's been the case for so long.

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 3>But at the end of the day, you have in

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the world of technology, two main operating systems for smartphones

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 3>iOS and the iPhone, and then Android, where a number

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 3>of handset makers are involved. And it comes back to

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 3>what's happened to Apple, and the cores are just gone.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 3>It grew in every market around the world apart from

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 3>one greater China. Tim's question is did the iPhone do

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 3>great well? The question outstanding is as important as the

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 3>data that we've related to the audiences we don't know.

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Let us answer the question on the call.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 3>The iPhone grow in China and all of these things

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 3>investors take into account just as much as they do

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the sweeteners that have put before them.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>All Right, We're going to hear from Apple executives on

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the call a little later.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 4>ED.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 2>It's notable because it is I believe Luka Maistri's last

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 2>earnings call at Apple. He's going to be passing the

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 2>torch to his top deputy when the calendar turns to

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. Is that something that is meaningful to

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 2>you in terms of how this There's not a lot

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 2>of executive turnover at this company. These people have been

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>there for years. Can text you like that for us?

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 3>On the one hand, Kevan Perek, who's you're like right,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>his deputy and steps up to being CFO, is a

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 3>known quantity because he's been there and this was telegraphed.

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 3>But I've often posted in the Bloomberg Top Life blog

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>it's the blog we run during these big moments that

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 3>it's often my Strey rather than cook that gives you

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the information that we'd consider news. It is some more

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 3>granular detail about performance of a specific product in a

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>specific market, like iPhone in China. He is widely seen

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 3>as being a master of the margin, right you think

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>about it, talked about cash generation but the bottom line

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 3>in general and Apple being a highly profitable company with

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 3>just insane amounts of cash on the balance sheet. You know,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Luke and Maistreet has been a big part of that story.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Does can Correct have the same prowess in that field?

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 3>It takes some quarters to find out, but you know,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 3>when you're a journalists and an investor, you become familiar

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 3>with these names and you listen closely when they say

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>things because you know that they choose their words with purpose.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Ed.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>We're going to give you a break in just a minute.

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>But last question to you is just give us the

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>high level view of Apple for people who are just

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>joining us right now.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in the quarter, Apple posted sales that were about

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 3>what everyone expected. They grew their sales in every geography

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>around world world apart from China. An iPhone which is

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 3>basically everything still for anyone that cares about Apple beat

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>estimates overall, but there's a lingering question about how it's

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 3>doing in China because it's such an important market. The

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 3>next phase, or the forward looking bit, is the work

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>they've done in AI. Working for them is a business

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 3>because services revenue came in a bit light.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Apple Intelligence is only just this week, last couple of

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>days been rolling out in markets like North America. It

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 3>is not available in the EU. It is not available

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 3>in China. But some explanation because we don't have it

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 3>in the release of how this amazing AI tech is

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>going to drive growth for them in terms of sales

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and profit is probably the next logical thing to look at.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 2>D Love though, is the cohost of Bloomberg Technology on

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV.