WEBVTT - Mistakes and Unknowns: Election Polls, Poker Tournaments, and the NBA Finals

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:26.404
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:26.444 --> 0:00:29.324
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova.

0:00:29.124 --> 0:00:31.924
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver. Today on the show, we'll talk

0:00:31.924 --> 0:00:35.044
<v Speaker 2>about former President Donald Trump, who was convicted last week

0:00:35.044 --> 0:00:36.684
<v Speaker 2>on thirty four at Filamy Charges.

0:00:37.244 --> 0:00:40.604
<v Speaker 1>And we're also going to be talking about an update

0:00:40.684 --> 0:00:44.084
<v Speaker 1>from the first week of the World Series. I'm going

0:00:44.164 --> 0:00:47.284
<v Speaker 1>to go into some of the psychological mistakes I've seen

0:00:47.364 --> 0:00:50.004
<v Speaker 1>people make. But we're also going to give a big

0:00:50.044 --> 0:00:52.684
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Nate, who is deep in an event

0:00:52.724 --> 0:00:55.244
<v Speaker 1>of his own, fifteenth out of over twenty five hundred

0:00:55.284 --> 0:00:56.604
<v Speaker 1>players who started this event.

0:00:57.284 --> 0:00:59.324
<v Speaker 2>And this week Thursday night, if you listen to this

0:00:59.404 --> 0:01:03.244
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday, the NBA Finals begin. The Boston Celtics are

0:01:03.324 --> 0:01:06.204
<v Speaker 2>at home against Dallas Mavericks. There's a big gap between

0:01:06.684 --> 0:01:09.884
<v Speaker 2>betting markets and Cisco models. We will discuss why.

0:01:15.924 --> 0:01:18.804
<v Speaker 1>So, Nate, before we get into the Trump verdict, I

0:01:18.804 --> 0:01:21.524
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about I just want to nod to

0:01:21.564 --> 0:01:24.924
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're even here this morning, so in

0:01:25.164 --> 0:01:27.564
<v Speaker 1>at like four thirty am, so I'm back on the

0:01:27.564 --> 0:01:32.044
<v Speaker 1>East coast right now taping this from New Haven. So

0:01:32.364 --> 0:01:35.604
<v Speaker 1>I get a text because as it turns out, I

0:01:35.604 --> 0:01:40.044
<v Speaker 1>forgot to turn off my phone, so that was good. Sorry,

0:01:40.324 --> 0:01:42.724
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, it's okay. Then I turned it off after

0:01:42.764 --> 0:01:46.764
<v Speaker 1>that from Nate saying, you know, just bagged for the

0:01:46.844 --> 0:01:50.684
<v Speaker 1>day in the fifteen hundred six Max. I am number

0:01:50.804 --> 0:01:54.124
<v Speaker 1>fifteen of like three hundred and something left in chips.

0:01:54.244 --> 0:01:57.004
<v Speaker 1>I'll still make the recording. And this is ten am

0:01:57.124 --> 0:02:01.164
<v Speaker 1>my time, so Eastern time at seven am, Vegas time,

0:02:01.444 --> 0:02:04.244
<v Speaker 1>and Nate is here and let the record show risky

0:02:04.284 --> 0:02:07.404
<v Speaker 1>business listeners. Nate is a much more devoted host than

0:02:07.444 --> 0:02:10.964
<v Speaker 1>I am, because damned if I would be recording after

0:02:11.084 --> 0:02:14.964
<v Speaker 1>bagging at two am, five hours later, I would have

0:02:15.284 --> 0:02:18.164
<v Speaker 1>sent a text to everyone being like, guys, we're really

0:02:18.204 --> 0:02:23.884
<v Speaker 1>really sorry, we can't record today. I am fifteenth in

0:02:24.004 --> 0:02:27.244
<v Speaker 1>chips and right now recording is negative ev for me.

0:02:27.484 --> 0:02:29.604
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Nate, thank you for being here. Let's get

0:02:29.604 --> 0:02:32.324
<v Speaker 1>into Trump, so we'll.

0:02:32.164 --> 0:02:35.004
<v Speaker 2>Talk about that. But look, I mean it happens. We're

0:02:35.004 --> 0:02:36.684
<v Speaker 2>going to talk on this episode about kind of real

0:02:36.724 --> 0:02:40.884
<v Speaker 2>life intruding into best laid plans, because we'd be hypocrites

0:02:40.924 --> 0:02:43.564
<v Speaker 2>if we if we didn't. By the way, I don't

0:02:43.604 --> 0:02:46.004
<v Speaker 2>want to make this Trump thing about us and me also,

0:02:46.044 --> 0:02:48.524
<v Speaker 2>but It's another thing that, like, I did not plan

0:02:48.684 --> 0:02:53.284
<v Speaker 2>on Trump getting convicted of all these felony charges while

0:02:53.284 --> 0:02:56.084
<v Speaker 2>I was out at the World Series, and that also

0:02:56.164 --> 0:02:58.164
<v Speaker 2>kind of blew up a day. But you know, we'll

0:02:58.164 --> 0:03:00.244
<v Speaker 2>talk about Trump first on his own terms and then

0:03:00.644 --> 0:03:03.204
<v Speaker 2>in the polast I would get more into planning versus reality.

0:03:03.604 --> 0:03:08.084
<v Speaker 1>So let's do that. So, as our listeners probably know,

0:03:08.924 --> 0:03:13.444
<v Speaker 1>last week, former President Donald Trump was convicted guilty on

0:03:13.604 --> 0:03:17.564
<v Speaker 1>all thirty four charges that he was up on in

0:03:17.804 --> 0:03:21.324
<v Speaker 1>New York. So Nate, let's talk about that. Let's talk

0:03:21.364 --> 0:03:25.284
<v Speaker 1>about what that means. And actually let's start with the

0:03:25.324 --> 0:03:27.284
<v Speaker 1>fact that you said that you did not expect this

0:03:27.404 --> 0:03:29.724
<v Speaker 1>to happen while you were at the World Series. Is

0:03:29.764 --> 0:03:32.444
<v Speaker 1>that because you thought that the verdict would be later

0:03:32.684 --> 0:03:34.724
<v Speaker 1>or because you did not expect him to be convicted

0:03:34.764 --> 0:03:36.284
<v Speaker 1>on all of the thirty four charges.

0:03:36.924 --> 0:03:39.684
<v Speaker 2>Marie, I think you would probably have a better term

0:03:39.724 --> 0:03:43.684
<v Speaker 2>for this than I would. It's a cognitive load kind

0:03:43.684 --> 0:03:46.004
<v Speaker 2>of thing. Does some extent. I think people who are

0:03:46.204 --> 0:03:49.284
<v Speaker 2>able to navigate multiple tasks are able to kind of

0:03:49.844 --> 0:03:52.324
<v Speaker 2>shut things out and say I'm going to ignore this

0:03:52.804 --> 0:03:55.644
<v Speaker 2>for now. Right at some point I understand that like

0:03:56.044 --> 0:03:58.724
<v Speaker 2>Trump is before this jury, and if you've actually like

0:03:58.764 --> 0:04:01.044
<v Speaker 2>looked at prediction markets, I'll took about that on the

0:04:01.044 --> 0:04:03.884
<v Speaker 2>show from time to time. They had expected a verdict

0:04:04.124 --> 0:04:06.684
<v Speaker 2>last week, and in fact expected a guilty verdict more

0:04:06.724 --> 0:04:09.604
<v Speaker 2>likely than not. But no, this is not like two

0:04:10.404 --> 0:04:13.124
<v Speaker 2>kind of the smart sharp traders. This is not an

0:04:13.204 --> 0:04:16.924
<v Speaker 2>unexpected outcome. Trump had not been I didn't watch the trial,

0:04:16.964 --> 0:04:18.924
<v Speaker 2>I want to be clear about that, but by the

0:04:18.924 --> 0:04:21.404
<v Speaker 2>conventional wisdom people who watch it more closely, Trump had

0:04:22.204 --> 0:04:26.364
<v Speaker 2>had not offered very much compelling argumentation. He had fallen

0:04:26.404 --> 0:04:29.244
<v Speaker 2>asleep at various points during the trial. I think he's

0:04:29.284 --> 0:04:32.284
<v Speaker 2>a little bit defiant obviously about seeing it as an

0:04:32.324 --> 0:04:37.924
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for like a campaign exercise, spin exercise. And you know,

0:04:38.004 --> 0:04:41.484
<v Speaker 2>I assume he thinks he won't go to actual jail

0:04:41.604 --> 0:04:44.004
<v Speaker 2>at any point, although there's some chance in theory that

0:04:44.044 --> 0:04:48.244
<v Speaker 2>he could. We are not legal analysts. I don't know

0:04:48.244 --> 0:04:49.684
<v Speaker 2>if we're going not for much opinion about like is

0:04:49.724 --> 0:04:51.604
<v Speaker 2>this the right case quote unquote to bring against Trump.

0:04:52.004 --> 0:04:54.964
<v Speaker 2>I'm here to analyze public opinion a little bit more.

0:04:55.004 --> 0:04:57.044
<v Speaker 2>And our guess is about what effect this might have

0:04:57.204 --> 0:05:01.924
<v Speaker 2>on the polls most members of the public, if they

0:05:01.924 --> 0:05:06.244
<v Speaker 2>were aware of the trial at all, did not expect

0:05:06.364 --> 0:05:09.404
<v Speaker 2>a guilty verdict. I think because Trump has kind of

0:05:09.564 --> 0:05:14.964
<v Speaker 2>of skated by so often with with relatively few consequences

0:05:14.964 --> 0:05:17.124
<v Speaker 2>to become president after all for four years and may

0:05:17.164 --> 0:05:21.644
<v Speaker 2>become president again for another four years. Expected there not

0:05:21.724 --> 0:05:24.924
<v Speaker 2>to be consequences for his actions. So that's one reason

0:05:25.004 --> 0:05:27.444
<v Speaker 2>why you might expect it to affect the polls, is

0:05:27.484 --> 0:05:31.684
<v Speaker 2>because it comes as a surprise to to rank and

0:05:31.684 --> 0:05:32.644
<v Speaker 2>file voters.

0:05:32.724 --> 0:05:35.204
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it true? And please correct me if I'm

0:05:35.244 --> 0:05:36.924
<v Speaker 1>wrong that New York is the only state where he

0:05:36.964 --> 0:05:41.164
<v Speaker 1>has actually faced consequences because he did have to pay

0:05:41.684 --> 0:05:44.684
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the hush many payments he did, and

0:05:44.724 --> 0:05:46.564
<v Speaker 1>the defamation earlier, which.

0:05:46.444 --> 0:05:50.124
<v Speaker 2>Is a separate case, right, and each Jan Carol sexual

0:05:50.204 --> 0:05:52.044
<v Speaker 2>assault case. So yeah, New York is kind of and

0:05:52.324 --> 0:05:55.524
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I don't know how much you want

0:05:55.564 --> 0:05:59.244
<v Speaker 2>to get into the I mean, this was considered of

0:05:59.284 --> 0:06:01.764
<v Speaker 2>the four criminal cases, which is separate, by the way

0:06:01.804 --> 0:06:04.324
<v Speaker 2>from the defamation case, which is a civil case, right.

0:06:04.644 --> 0:06:08.404
<v Speaker 1>This one was considered the weakest. Is is kind of

0:06:08.444 --> 0:06:11.564
<v Speaker 1>the background that I had seen.

0:06:12.724 --> 0:06:17.484
<v Speaker 2>Correct, I mean, the way Republicans would convey it is

0:06:17.524 --> 0:06:20.004
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like al Capone being convicted on income

0:06:20.044 --> 0:06:22.564
<v Speaker 2>tax fraud instead of all the other stuff that al Capone, the.

0:06:22.484 --> 0:06:25.124
<v Speaker 1>Guy was convicted, it didn't matter, that was on income

0:06:25.164 --> 0:06:25.804
<v Speaker 1>tax fraud.

0:06:27.604 --> 0:06:29.804
<v Speaker 2>Look, let me so let me you want to give

0:06:29.884 --> 0:06:32.084
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit. You know, I am worried a

0:06:32.084 --> 0:06:35.284
<v Speaker 2>little bit because the argument that worries me a bit

0:06:35.924 --> 0:06:40.924
<v Speaker 2>is that in authoritarian countries, oftentimes, if there is an

0:06:41.364 --> 0:06:48.004
<v Speaker 2>opposition leader who you want to disenfranchise, then you trump

0:06:48.084 --> 0:06:51.044
<v Speaker 2>up some legal charges that may range from technically correct

0:06:51.084 --> 0:06:57.204
<v Speaker 2>but exaggerated to entirely fabricated. You know, Alvin Bragg, the prosecutor,

0:06:57.284 --> 0:07:00.724
<v Speaker 2>had had talked about, I mean kind of campaigned on

0:07:00.804 --> 0:07:04.364
<v Speaker 2>being tougher on Trump. Right, it's in Manhattan, the place

0:07:04.404 --> 0:07:06.884
<v Speaker 2>where something like eighty five nine of the voters that

0:07:07.004 --> 0:07:09.644
<v Speaker 2>jurypool voted for Biden, although to be fair, there are

0:07:09.644 --> 0:07:12.724
<v Speaker 2>some of them consumed media from sites like truth Social

0:07:12.724 --> 0:07:16.684
<v Speaker 2>Trump's alternative to Twitter slash x. But look, the fact

0:07:16.724 --> 0:07:22.724
<v Speaker 2>that Trump has been prosecuted and criticized and persecuted that

0:07:22.764 --> 0:07:29.044
<v Speaker 2>may feed into his appeal for a certain strain of voter. However,

0:07:29.844 --> 0:07:32.844
<v Speaker 2>given that reality, which you cannot undo, for better or worse,

0:07:32.924 --> 0:07:37.084
<v Speaker 2>this point I think Biden is much better off with

0:07:37.124 --> 0:07:40.324
<v Speaker 2>a guilty verdict than an acquittal, right, because you can't

0:07:40.324 --> 0:07:42.764
<v Speaker 2>take back the fact that there are all these charges.

0:07:42.804 --> 0:07:45.044
<v Speaker 2>You can't take back the fact that, like you know,

0:07:45.124 --> 0:07:50.844
<v Speaker 2>to me, the election overturning January sixth stuff is a

0:07:50.884 --> 0:07:54.204
<v Speaker 2>couple of orders of magnitude, meaning literally hundreds of times

0:07:54.684 --> 0:08:01.564
<v Speaker 2>more serious than anything involving a former porna. But you know, again,

0:08:01.644 --> 0:08:04.004
<v Speaker 2>plans to always kind of match the deal reality. I

0:08:04.044 --> 0:08:09.124
<v Speaker 2>think the more buttoned up prosecutions in the January sixth

0:08:09.164 --> 0:08:12.324
<v Speaker 2>try have taken a long time. But anyway, Trump has

0:08:12.364 --> 0:08:14.924
<v Speaker 2>been convicted on this first set of charges. He will

0:08:15.924 --> 0:08:20.564
<v Speaker 2>almost for sure appeal. I would think the sentencing phase

0:08:20.604 --> 0:08:23.724
<v Speaker 2>will still occur in July, just before the Republican National Convention.

0:08:24.764 --> 0:08:25.684
<v Speaker 2>But that's where we stand.

0:08:26.284 --> 0:08:30.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And obviously I'm not an expert in the polling

0:08:31.204 --> 0:08:33.964
<v Speaker 1>part of this, And so I'm curious because you know,

0:08:34.004 --> 0:08:36.164
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading the news like I'm a good news consumer.

0:08:36.204 --> 0:08:40.404
<v Speaker 1>I've been following the trial. I'm still a little bit

0:08:40.444 --> 0:08:42.964
<v Speaker 1>bummed that it wasn't televised, but it wasn't so I

0:08:43.044 --> 0:08:45.884
<v Speaker 1>was following from Afar and I have read kind of

0:08:45.924 --> 0:08:48.724
<v Speaker 1>takes on both sides that, as you said, you know,

0:08:49.084 --> 0:08:51.404
<v Speaker 1>given that this happened and that we can't control the timing,

0:08:51.444 --> 0:08:54.244
<v Speaker 1>it's great that at least the verdict was guilty. However,

0:08:54.364 --> 0:08:56.284
<v Speaker 1>I have also seen kind of the other side that

0:08:56.324 --> 0:09:01.164
<v Speaker 1>this just strengthens Trump's position among a huge, kind of

0:09:01.244 --> 0:09:05.004
<v Speaker 1>swath of Trump voters and that a lot of people

0:09:05.044 --> 0:09:06.724
<v Speaker 1>see this as kind of part of his brand.

0:09:07.004 --> 0:09:07.204
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:09:07.244 --> 0:09:08.884
<v Speaker 1>This is the guy who said I can stand in

0:09:08.884 --> 0:09:10.684
<v Speaker 1>the middle of fIF if I haven't even shoot someone

0:09:11.204 --> 0:09:14.684
<v Speaker 1>and still be elected. And here he is saying, like, see,

0:09:14.964 --> 0:09:17.844
<v Speaker 1>I don't follow your laws, like I'm you know, I'm

0:09:17.884 --> 0:09:21.044
<v Speaker 1>a renegade. I'm my own man. And they're like, yeah,

0:09:21.284 --> 0:09:23.564
<v Speaker 1>you know, And this this just shows that, you know,

0:09:23.644 --> 0:09:25.484
<v Speaker 1>the judicial system is corrupt. So I guess there are

0:09:25.484 --> 0:09:28.564
<v Speaker 1>two separate questions here. One, do you have a sense

0:09:28.804 --> 0:09:30.684
<v Speaker 1>now or is it a little bit too early to

0:09:30.724 --> 0:09:33.044
<v Speaker 1>figure out how this is going to go down kind

0:09:33.044 --> 0:09:35.604
<v Speaker 1>of in the polls in the Trump base? And two,

0:09:35.724 --> 0:09:37.924
<v Speaker 1>and this is a kind of a separate question, let's

0:09:37.964 --> 0:09:41.444
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit afterwards about the judicial impact of

0:09:41.484 --> 0:09:45.484
<v Speaker 1>this and kind of the delegitimization of the judicial system

0:09:45.564 --> 0:09:47.684
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is trying to push as a story.

0:09:49.684 --> 0:09:53.244
<v Speaker 2>So as gamblers or poker players, we think in terms

0:09:53.284 --> 0:09:57.164
<v Speaker 2>of the marginal effect on something. Right, if you beamed

0:09:57.884 --> 0:10:03.404
<v Speaker 2>to twenty twenty four from ten years ago, you'd be

0:10:03.444 --> 0:10:05.724
<v Speaker 2>shocked by a lot of things. You'd be shocked that

0:10:06.844 --> 0:10:09.804
<v Speaker 2>a a Town Trump had become president. You'd be be

0:10:10.004 --> 0:10:12.324
<v Speaker 2>that Trump had was running for president again and in

0:10:12.364 --> 0:10:16.164
<v Speaker 2>fact was tied her ahead in the polls, despite his

0:10:16.284 --> 0:10:19.044
<v Speaker 2>various criminal charges, and how kind of his first term

0:10:19.764 --> 0:10:24.204
<v Speaker 2>ended with January sixth, and with COVID, you'd be surprised

0:10:24.244 --> 0:10:27.564
<v Speaker 2>that the trial wasn't in some sense a bigger deal.

0:10:27.604 --> 0:10:29.764
<v Speaker 2>I mean, people have been pretty tuned out to this

0:10:29.884 --> 0:10:32.324
<v Speaker 2>until the verdict occurred, in to even people like me,

0:10:32.444 --> 0:10:34.804
<v Speaker 2>I guess, in the news business to some extent. However,

0:10:35.684 --> 0:10:38.724
<v Speaker 2>people in our world, Maria, the poker kind of gambling world,

0:10:38.764 --> 0:10:42.484
<v Speaker 2>think in terms of what's priced in quote unquote to

0:10:42.524 --> 0:10:47.084
<v Speaker 2>the stock. So if you look at betting markets a

0:10:47.164 --> 0:10:49.844
<v Speaker 2>week ago, which was just before when we're taking its

0:10:49.884 --> 0:10:54.244
<v Speaker 2>its Tuesday morning Vegas time, in prodiction markets, Trump had

0:10:54.284 --> 0:10:57.644
<v Speaker 2>a fifty three percent chance of winning the election before

0:10:57.644 --> 0:11:01.244
<v Speaker 2>the verdict. Now that is fifty one percent, So he

0:11:01.324 --> 0:11:04.844
<v Speaker 2>has follown by two percentage points relative to where he

0:11:05.004 --> 0:11:08.484
<v Speaker 2>was pre verdict. And by the way, because people assumed

0:11:09.044 --> 0:11:10.964
<v Speaker 2>before or that he was more likely than not to

0:11:11.004 --> 0:11:13.284
<v Speaker 2>be guilty. If this had come totally on the blue,

0:11:13.284 --> 0:11:15.044
<v Speaker 2>it might have been a bigger shift. But basically, like

0:11:15.964 --> 0:11:18.924
<v Speaker 2>people putting money on the line, follow the conventional wisdom

0:11:18.924 --> 0:11:22.684
<v Speaker 2>that outlined earlier, which is that you know, being a

0:11:22.684 --> 0:11:26.084
<v Speaker 2>convicted felon is probably bad, right, I mean, this is

0:11:26.124 --> 0:11:29.084
<v Speaker 2>kind of where we are probably in politics now. It's

0:11:29.084 --> 0:11:34.764
<v Speaker 2>certainly worse for Trump than being an acquitted, accused felon who,

0:11:34.764 --> 0:11:36.484
<v Speaker 2>even in New York could have been found guilty. I

0:11:36.524 --> 0:11:39.484
<v Speaker 2>mean imagine that, right, That would have been I think

0:11:39.684 --> 0:11:41.964
<v Speaker 2>a big feather in Trump's cap and a big disaster

0:11:42.124 --> 0:11:45.604
<v Speaker 2>for Biden. Now, with that said, for the most part,

0:11:45.644 --> 0:11:50.644
<v Speaker 2>now people are making educated guesses about the impact. There

0:11:50.764 --> 0:11:54.524
<v Speaker 2>is some kind of instant turnaround polling, some of that

0:11:54.564 --> 0:11:58.284
<v Speaker 2>shows Biden gaining a point or two. Net is actually

0:11:58.364 --> 0:12:00.924
<v Speaker 2>one poll from Morning Consult that has Biden actually losing

0:12:01.324 --> 0:12:03.564
<v Speaker 2>a point or so. But we don't have a high

0:12:03.684 --> 0:12:08.284
<v Speaker 2>quality traditional pollster going and doing a proper sample with

0:12:08.324 --> 0:12:11.044
<v Speaker 2>a proper amount of time, asking the right questions to

0:12:11.084 --> 0:12:14.004
<v Speaker 2>a demographically balanced sample, because that just takes a little

0:12:14.044 --> 0:12:17.404
<v Speaker 2>bit of time, and the Polsters apparently didn't necessarily plan

0:12:17.524 --> 0:12:19.684
<v Speaker 2>and advance with this verdict occurring either.

0:12:19.804 --> 0:12:22.404
<v Speaker 1>They're probably at the World Series of Poker with you.

0:12:22.404 --> 0:12:24.364
<v Speaker 2>You never you never know, Maria, I mean, you never

0:12:24.444 --> 0:12:27.724
<v Speaker 2>know who you'll see at the World Series. However, this

0:12:27.844 --> 0:12:31.204
<v Speaker 2>is important because Trip raised one hundred and forty one

0:12:31.284 --> 0:12:35.204
<v Speaker 2>million dollars in May, bolstered in part by this guilty verdict.

0:12:35.404 --> 0:12:38.884
<v Speaker 2>He had a massive amount of four eight hour fundraising.

0:12:39.404 --> 0:12:42.564
<v Speaker 2>I think money's a little bit overrated in presidential campaigns.

0:12:42.644 --> 0:12:46.764
<v Speaker 2>But the point is, yet his base is really enthused,

0:12:46.924 --> 0:12:50.284
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, Biden's base is really enthused too.

0:12:50.284 --> 0:12:53.164
<v Speaker 2>They're tweeting lots of memes about, you know, Donald Trump

0:12:53.204 --> 0:13:00.524
<v Speaker 2>in a prison jumpsuit and things like that. I wouldn't

0:13:00.524 --> 0:13:04.044
<v Speaker 2>have dared to even watch MSNBC. What would have happened

0:13:04.084 --> 0:13:08.524
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday and Friday and all of that right to me, though,

0:13:08.524 --> 0:13:10.804
<v Speaker 2>these are not the voter who matter because their votes

0:13:10.844 --> 0:13:14.124
<v Speaker 2>are already locked in. Instead, it's the kind of casual,

0:13:14.404 --> 0:13:19.124
<v Speaker 2>normy voter who says, no matter what else, Donald Trump

0:13:19.164 --> 0:13:22.684
<v Speaker 2>is a condicted felon, and even the New York Post,

0:13:22.764 --> 0:13:24.244
<v Speaker 2>for example, which I used. The New York Post is

0:13:24.284 --> 0:13:30.924
<v Speaker 2>like a benchmark of conservative but not totally red pilled

0:13:31.004 --> 0:13:33.924
<v Speaker 2>Fox News opinion. They're trying to in a competitive news market.

0:13:33.964 --> 0:13:36.524
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to, you know, they like the actual news.

0:13:36.524 --> 0:13:38.924
<v Speaker 2>And the New York Post had liked the banner headline

0:13:38.924 --> 0:13:40.884
<v Speaker 2>about Trump being guilty. They weren't trying to spin it

0:13:41.284 --> 0:13:44.484
<v Speaker 2>too much. So everybody saw this headline about Trump is

0:13:44.524 --> 0:13:48.724
<v Speaker 2>guilty of thirty six or thirty four. I mean, Trump

0:13:48.804 --> 0:13:49.564
<v Speaker 2>is guilty of thirty four.

0:13:49.604 --> 0:13:52.604
<v Speaker 1>Fallon each Inflation's rail. Inflation's rail.

0:13:53.324 --> 0:13:55.364
<v Speaker 2>Another problem for Bide. But look, but like part of

0:13:55.404 --> 0:13:58.884
<v Speaker 2>it is what are the basic, simple, stylized facts about

0:13:58.924 --> 0:14:01.724
<v Speaker 2>the election? You know, for Biden, the fact is that

0:14:01.804 --> 0:14:05.084
<v Speaker 2>prices are a lot higher than they were four years ago.

0:14:05.204 --> 0:14:09.004
<v Speaker 2>Now you can debate that and say, well, most that

0:14:09.044 --> 0:14:12.404
<v Speaker 2>happened in twenty twenty two, and inflation has slowed down now.

0:14:12.444 --> 0:14:15.844
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, you've had inflation all around the world,

0:14:15.884 --> 0:14:18.724
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of maybe not entirely Biden's fault, and

0:14:19.044 --> 0:14:23.204
<v Speaker 2>and and the jobs market is good. But in politics,

0:14:23.204 --> 0:14:26.364
<v Speaker 2>when you're explaining you're losing, is the is the axiom,

0:14:26.364 --> 0:14:28.844
<v Speaker 2>It's simplar like when Biden is the fact that Biden

0:14:28.924 --> 0:14:31.484
<v Speaker 2>is eighty one years old, and I think often looks

0:14:31.524 --> 0:14:33.324
<v Speaker 2>an acts like it is a simple fact. By the way,

0:14:33.364 --> 0:14:36.484
<v Speaker 2>Trump is seventy seven, will turn seventy eight before too

0:14:36.564 --> 0:14:39.924
<v Speaker 2>much longer. You know, that fact is very hard for

0:14:39.924 --> 0:14:42.404
<v Speaker 2>Biden to overcome. You can spend and say, well, Trump

0:14:42.484 --> 0:14:46.204
<v Speaker 2>is almost as old and Biden Biden is, you know,

0:14:46.284 --> 0:14:48.604
<v Speaker 2>managing the toughest job in the world, and whatever else.

0:14:48.684 --> 0:14:51.364
<v Speaker 2>We have better healthcare, But like the more explaining you're doing,

0:14:51.444 --> 0:14:54.324
<v Speaker 2>you're losing it. In this case, it's Trump and his

0:14:54.444 --> 0:14:57.404
<v Speaker 2>team on their heels, right, They're the ones who are

0:14:57.404 --> 0:15:00.884
<v Speaker 2>saying this prostitution is unfair and how can you expect

0:15:00.884 --> 0:15:03.324
<v Speaker 2>a jury verdict in New York to be fair? And

0:15:03.324 --> 0:15:04.724
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah blah blah blah.

0:15:04.844 --> 0:15:08.444
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, and I'd actually I'd love to just pause

0:15:08.564 --> 0:15:11.844
<v Speaker 1>and just go deep, more deeply on to that point,

0:15:11.924 --> 0:15:15.284
<v Speaker 1>because I think that elections aside, right, since we don't

0:15:15.284 --> 0:15:17.524
<v Speaker 1>have the poll numbers yet, and we probably won't when

0:15:17.524 --> 0:15:20.844
<v Speaker 1>this podcast comes out in a few days, but what

0:15:20.924 --> 0:15:23.884
<v Speaker 1>we are already seeing is kind of what I'd alluded

0:15:23.924 --> 0:15:26.484
<v Speaker 1>to before. The arguments that Trump has been making for

0:15:26.564 --> 0:15:28.884
<v Speaker 1>quite some time about the fact that you can't trust

0:15:28.924 --> 0:15:32.164
<v Speaker 1>our judicial system, right, the judicial system is corrupt, et cetera,

0:15:32.204 --> 0:15:34.724
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. And he's been making this argument

0:15:34.764 --> 0:15:38.044
<v Speaker 1>at every single level of government. And I think that

0:15:38.044 --> 0:15:41.564
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of another a long term consequence that might

0:15:41.804 --> 0:15:46.004
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of last longer than this particular election, this

0:15:46.044 --> 0:15:49.684
<v Speaker 1>particular trial, because what he's doing is undermining one of

0:15:49.684 --> 0:15:53.564
<v Speaker 1>the pillars of democracy and the system that traditionally the

0:15:53.604 --> 0:15:56.444
<v Speaker 1>American public has had the most trust in. And now

0:15:56.444 --> 0:16:00.404
<v Speaker 1>we see that trust eroding because Trump keeps repeating over

0:16:00.444 --> 0:16:03.764
<v Speaker 1>and over and over these statements which are blatant lies.

0:16:03.844 --> 0:16:06.644
<v Speaker 1>But as a psychologist, I can say that it doesn't

0:16:06.644 --> 0:16:09.284
<v Speaker 1>matter because the more someone repeats a lie, it starts

0:16:09.284 --> 0:16:10.444
<v Speaker 1>to feeling like the truth.

0:16:10.964 --> 0:16:15.964
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, trust in almost every major American institution to

0:16:16.004 --> 0:16:19.924
<v Speaker 2>some extent. The military is an exception, but almost every

0:16:19.924 --> 0:16:25.164
<v Speaker 2>major American institution has declined over the past ten twenty

0:16:25.324 --> 0:16:29.444
<v Speaker 2>thirty years. How much Trump is a cause of that

0:16:30.284 --> 0:16:34.204
<v Speaker 2>versus a symptom is a debate I'm sure that academics

0:16:34.524 --> 0:16:37.084
<v Speaker 2>and historians will have for a long time. I mean,

0:16:37.404 --> 0:16:42.884
<v Speaker 2>you know, Trump takes advantage of low trust voters. We're

0:16:42.924 --> 0:16:46.564
<v Speaker 2>in a downward trust spiral in the US. Trump is

0:16:46.564 --> 0:16:52.124
<v Speaker 2>a major kind of cog in that machine, but not

0:16:52.244 --> 0:16:55.244
<v Speaker 2>the only cog. I mean, I don't know, I Maria

0:16:55.444 --> 0:16:57.044
<v Speaker 2>on the show. I want to be able to express

0:16:57.564 --> 0:17:02.044
<v Speaker 2>ambiguous or ambivalent opinions. I have ambivalent feelings about the

0:17:02.044 --> 0:17:05.604
<v Speaker 2>prosecution by Alvin Bragg. If I spent one hundred more

0:17:05.604 --> 0:17:08.124
<v Speaker 2>hours looking at it, I might have stronger feelings one

0:17:08.204 --> 0:17:11.244
<v Speaker 2>way or the other. But you know, I do think

0:17:11.244 --> 0:17:13.324
<v Speaker 2>it's probably right. I think if you kind of surveyed

0:17:14.044 --> 0:17:18.324
<v Speaker 2>most nonpartisan legal experts, they would say that, like to

0:17:18.364 --> 0:17:22.764
<v Speaker 2>turn these into felony charges is not unheard of, but

0:17:23.004 --> 0:17:27.244
<v Speaker 2>is unusual. And in a cistical sense, you would infer

0:17:27.484 --> 0:17:32.084
<v Speaker 2>that Trump's status as a former president kind of as

0:17:32.164 --> 0:17:36.404
<v Speaker 2>part of that. But you know, it's not great for

0:17:36.524 --> 0:17:39.284
<v Speaker 2>the country that you have a active presidential candidate who's

0:17:39.284 --> 0:17:42.124
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty to become president again, and that it

0:17:42.164 --> 0:17:44.124
<v Speaker 2>took so long to bring these charges to trial, that

0:17:44.164 --> 0:17:46.324
<v Speaker 2>the ones that do go to trial are I think,

0:17:46.364 --> 0:17:51.924
<v Speaker 2>by anyone's definition, the weakest charges by in the more

0:17:52.004 --> 0:17:55.644
<v Speaker 2>kind of partisan jurisdiction. It's not it's not ideal.

0:17:56.084 --> 0:17:59.244
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not so, Nate. If I'm going to go

0:17:59.324 --> 0:18:01.564
<v Speaker 1>back through this and try to metabolize all of it,

0:18:02.084 --> 0:18:05.044
<v Speaker 1>what are the key Let's say two things I should

0:18:05.124 --> 0:18:07.364
<v Speaker 1>take away from this analysis from our conversation.

0:18:08.924 --> 0:18:12.364
<v Speaker 2>Look, I say number one, pay more attention to the

0:18:12.404 --> 0:18:16.564
<v Speaker 2>marginal voter, not the cable news punted, but the marginal

0:18:16.644 --> 0:18:19.364
<v Speaker 2>voter who was not paying attention to every detail in

0:18:19.404 --> 0:18:20.844
<v Speaker 2>the white and the race for the White House, but

0:18:21.404 --> 0:18:27.964
<v Speaker 2>who sees big banner headlines Trump convicted, Trump guilty. Number two,

0:18:28.564 --> 0:18:30.844
<v Speaker 2>be patient as you wait for the polls, because these

0:18:30.844 --> 0:18:33.484
<v Speaker 2>marginal voters are hard to reach. The quick and dirty

0:18:33.484 --> 0:18:35.204
<v Speaker 2>polls may not reach them yet, so we're going on

0:18:35.284 --> 0:18:39.644
<v Speaker 2>limited information. And number three, I think separate out the

0:18:39.724 --> 0:18:42.884
<v Speaker 2>question of is this good or bad for the country

0:18:43.124 --> 0:18:46.244
<v Speaker 2>from is this good or bad for Joe Biden and

0:18:46.284 --> 0:18:49.244
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump? Right, I mean, those are different questions. We've

0:18:49.284 --> 0:18:54.244
<v Speaker 2>tried to mainly focus on the electoral impact here and

0:18:54.284 --> 0:19:08.364
<v Speaker 2>not pretend that we're legal scholars.

0:19:10.004 --> 0:19:14.324
<v Speaker 1>Nate, I am so excited for you. Week one of

0:19:14.364 --> 0:19:18.484
<v Speaker 1>the World Series has wrapped. I unfortunately have left Las Vegas,

0:19:18.484 --> 0:19:20.884
<v Speaker 1>so I haven't been able to play after the first

0:19:20.884 --> 0:19:24.884
<v Speaker 1>two events because I have some other commitments. I'll be

0:19:24.924 --> 0:19:28.604
<v Speaker 1>back next week. But you, while I've been traveling the

0:19:28.644 --> 0:19:33.004
<v Speaker 1>world to glamorous New Haven, you've been running up quite

0:19:33.084 --> 0:19:36.964
<v Speaker 1>the trip stack in the fifteen hundred dollars six max event,

0:19:37.164 --> 0:19:40.124
<v Speaker 1>which is incredibly exciting. So you are in the money.

0:19:40.164 --> 0:19:42.244
<v Speaker 1>So for people who don't play poker, that means that

0:19:42.644 --> 0:19:46.444
<v Speaker 1>Nate has already cashed. So every single player eliminated from

0:19:46.444 --> 0:19:49.604
<v Speaker 1>this point on is going to be making money. You

0:19:49.644 --> 0:19:52.684
<v Speaker 1>are about to start day two of the tournament. So

0:19:52.804 --> 0:19:55.484
<v Speaker 1>you found your first bag of the series, which means

0:19:55.524 --> 0:19:58.644
<v Speaker 1>you've bagged up chips. There are over three hundred players left.

0:19:58.684 --> 0:20:00.444
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember how many. I looked this up before

0:20:00.484 --> 0:20:03.004
<v Speaker 1>we started taping, but I don't remember. It's like three

0:20:03.084 --> 0:20:06.124
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty something like that. Does that sound right

0:20:06.164 --> 0:20:06.364
<v Speaker 1>to you?

0:20:07.204 --> 0:20:09.204
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, what those counts are? Delay? It's like,

0:20:09.804 --> 0:20:13.124
<v Speaker 2>all right, so twenty five hundred started, of which about

0:20:13.164 --> 0:20:17.324
<v Speaker 2>I think one to ninety remain, and I'm in fifteenth place.

0:20:17.404 --> 0:20:20.604
<v Speaker 1>Sound yeah, So Nate, you are in fifteenth place, and

0:20:21.484 --> 0:20:24.524
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the three biggest mistakes I've

0:20:24.564 --> 0:20:26.764
<v Speaker 1>been seeing at the tables in the week that I played.

0:20:27.164 --> 0:20:29.364
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like before we get into that, it

0:20:29.364 --> 0:20:32.004
<v Speaker 1>seems like you have probably not been making these mistakes

0:20:32.044 --> 0:20:36.364
<v Speaker 1>because you are now fifteenth in chips. So just you know,

0:20:36.764 --> 0:20:40.604
<v Speaker 1>first of all, congratulations, so well say thank you. We

0:20:40.724 --> 0:20:44.164
<v Speaker 1>are say thank you, we are able to Okay, thank you, Maria. Okay,

0:20:44.284 --> 0:20:47.124
<v Speaker 1>now I won't Okay.

0:20:48.524 --> 0:20:50.284
<v Speaker 2>This is fun because we can put this episode in

0:20:50.284 --> 0:20:52.924
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a time capsule again in the

0:20:52.964 --> 0:20:56.084
<v Speaker 2>realities of the highly produced podcast world. We are taping

0:20:56.124 --> 0:20:59.564
<v Speaker 2>this on early Tuesday morning, Vegas time. It will come

0:20:59.564 --> 0:21:02.164
<v Speaker 2>out in your feeds on Thursday. By the time you

0:21:02.204 --> 0:21:04.404
<v Speaker 2>listen to this, the tournament that I'm playing right now

0:21:04.484 --> 0:21:08.084
<v Speaker 2>will be over. I could have won my first bracelet.

0:21:08.444 --> 0:21:11.204
<v Speaker 2>Much more likely suggests I will been knocked out at

0:21:11.244 --> 0:21:14.404
<v Speaker 2>some point, you know, just after lunch today, and then

0:21:14.444 --> 0:21:17.564
<v Speaker 2>be disappointed about that's about.

0:21:16.884 --> 0:21:19.204
<v Speaker 1>Just after lunch. You're lasting through lunch. That's great.

0:21:20.124 --> 0:21:22.524
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, I do have a lot of chips,

0:21:23.164 --> 0:21:24.924
<v Speaker 2>It's true, a lot of chips. I have a lot

0:21:24.924 --> 0:21:29.924
<v Speaker 2>of short stacks at my table. So but like one

0:21:29.924 --> 0:21:31.524
<v Speaker 2>thing I like to do if I make a Day

0:21:31.524 --> 0:21:34.924
<v Speaker 2>two or Day three is to situate myself in terms

0:21:34.964 --> 0:21:39.764
<v Speaker 2>of rational expectations, right, in this tournament. Last year, only

0:21:39.804 --> 0:21:43.364
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of the field who made Day two made

0:21:43.364 --> 0:21:46.484
<v Speaker 2>the final day Day three. Now I have a well

0:21:46.524 --> 0:21:49.684
<v Speaker 2>above average chip stack, but even knowing that, I know

0:21:49.724 --> 0:21:52.164
<v Speaker 2>that seventy five ish percent of the time, if I'm

0:21:52.164 --> 0:21:55.884
<v Speaker 2>being realistic, my day will end with busting out of

0:21:55.884 --> 0:21:58.844
<v Speaker 2>this tournament and deciding whether to enter a different tournament instead.

0:21:58.964 --> 0:22:02.124
<v Speaker 2>So I think always kind of situating yourself and understand

0:22:02.164 --> 0:22:03.724
<v Speaker 2>that you can have a great Day one and the

0:22:03.764 --> 0:22:05.884
<v Speaker 2>odds are still against you. Just it's a very very

0:22:05.924 --> 0:22:08.324
<v Speaker 2>hard marit to winning tournament or making a final table

0:22:08.364 --> 0:22:10.884
<v Speaker 2>when there are twenty five hundred people. You need to

0:22:10.964 --> 0:22:14.284
<v Speaker 2>kind of keep rolling the dice and having it coming

0:22:14.324 --> 0:22:16.524
<v Speaker 2>up six is like three times in a row, or

0:22:16.564 --> 0:22:18.484
<v Speaker 2>maybe more than that, more than that, right, like yeah,

0:22:18.524 --> 0:22:21.124
<v Speaker 2>four times in a row. Right, It's pretty it's pretty

0:22:21.124 --> 0:22:24.644
<v Speaker 2>hard for that to for that to happen. And having

0:22:24.644 --> 0:22:26.404
<v Speaker 2>the first six and the second six come up six

0:22:26.524 --> 0:22:28.924
<v Speaker 2>is is just kind of the first the first you know,

0:22:29.004 --> 0:22:30.924
<v Speaker 2>halfway through the marathon, so to speak.

0:22:31.204 --> 0:22:33.444
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that that's a very healthy attitude. I

0:22:33.444 --> 0:22:36.244
<v Speaker 1>think too many people get very excited about having lots

0:22:36.244 --> 0:22:39.604
<v Speaker 1>of chips. That said, having lots of chips is better

0:22:39.644 --> 0:22:42.804
<v Speaker 1>than not having lots of chips. And from what I

0:22:42.884 --> 0:22:46.164
<v Speaker 1>know about your playing style, you're an aggressive player who

0:22:46.204 --> 0:22:49.204
<v Speaker 1>knows how to push that advantage, which I think is

0:22:49.244 --> 0:22:52.124
<v Speaker 1>really important. And I think you have a very good

0:22:52.164 --> 0:22:56.004
<v Speaker 1>attitude coming into this. So now let's you know, have

0:22:56.084 --> 0:22:59.404
<v Speaker 1>a positive mindset and say that this is going to

0:22:59.444 --> 0:23:03.164
<v Speaker 1>be your first bracelet or at least a final table.

0:23:04.084 --> 0:23:06.844
<v Speaker 1>And I say that completely selflessly because we have no

0:23:06.924 --> 0:23:10.644
<v Speaker 1>swap in this event, because I have not played it.

0:23:11.604 --> 0:23:14.804
<v Speaker 1>So so this is this is all you, and I

0:23:14.844 --> 0:23:18.284
<v Speaker 1>really I wish you the best, and let me give

0:23:18.324 --> 0:23:21.164
<v Speaker 1>you some advice for the three top things not to

0:23:21.244 --> 0:23:22.844
<v Speaker 1>do that I've seen.

0:23:22.924 --> 0:23:25.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what have you been What have you been seeing that? Uh,

0:23:26.164 --> 0:23:27.404
<v Speaker 2>that players shouldn't be doing?

0:23:27.844 --> 0:23:30.484
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I've been seeing a lot of things

0:23:30.524 --> 0:23:33.884
<v Speaker 1>that players shouldn't be doing. So I played, let's say,

0:23:33.884 --> 0:23:36.324
<v Speaker 1>I played two World Series events this past week, and

0:23:36.364 --> 0:23:39.844
<v Speaker 1>then I played a win event, so the Win eleven

0:23:39.924 --> 0:23:43.044
<v Speaker 1>hundred event as well. So I've seen a few different

0:23:43.044 --> 0:23:46.444
<v Speaker 1>player pools. And this is me generalizing from everything that

0:23:46.484 --> 0:23:49.404
<v Speaker 1>I've been seeing, what are the three most common mistakes?

0:23:49.804 --> 0:23:53.604
<v Speaker 1>By far? Number one that I have seen is what's

0:23:53.604 --> 0:23:57.444
<v Speaker 1>known in psychology as the sunk cost fallacy, and what

0:23:57.524 --> 0:24:00.884
<v Speaker 1>the sunk cost fallacy means is that you make a

0:24:00.884 --> 0:24:05.724
<v Speaker 1>decision and then when the decision environment changes, when the

0:24:05.724 --> 0:24:09.564
<v Speaker 1>information changes, when the data change, and your decision no

0:24:09.604 --> 0:24:13.844
<v Speaker 1>longer makes sense. Instead of walking away, instead of saying, Okay,

0:24:13.884 --> 0:24:15.844
<v Speaker 1>I made the right decision before it's no longer the

0:24:15.884 --> 0:24:19.004
<v Speaker 1>right decision, you stay. You stick with it. You put

0:24:19.164 --> 0:24:21.804
<v Speaker 1>good money after bad, you know, good time after bad.

0:24:22.124 --> 0:24:24.164
<v Speaker 1>You stay in that decision because you say, well, I've

0:24:24.204 --> 0:24:28.604
<v Speaker 1>already invested so much. In poker, there's a concept known

0:24:28.644 --> 0:24:32.204
<v Speaker 1>as pot committed, meaning I've already put so many chips

0:24:32.204 --> 0:24:35.044
<v Speaker 1>in the middle that I am committed to the pot.

0:24:35.164 --> 0:24:36.924
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that is actually one of the

0:24:37.124 --> 0:24:40.364
<v Speaker 1>stupidest concepts in poker. I mean, I just think it's asinine,

0:24:40.684 --> 0:24:43.644
<v Speaker 1>like so so dumb. I cannot I can't even begin

0:24:43.724 --> 0:24:47.724
<v Speaker 1>to say. Because decisions are not made in a vacuum.

0:24:48.004 --> 0:24:51.004
<v Speaker 1>It does not matter how many chips you put in

0:24:51.044 --> 0:24:53.524
<v Speaker 1>one move ago you know, pre flop or on the flop,

0:24:53.964 --> 0:24:56.004
<v Speaker 1>as long as you have chips left. If you now

0:24:56.124 --> 0:24:58.204
<v Speaker 1>know that your beat right, if you now know that

0:24:58.244 --> 0:25:03.884
<v Speaker 1>the decision environment has changed, fold walk away, keep the

0:25:03.964 --> 0:25:06.484
<v Speaker 1>chips that you have. It's a huge lesson for life,

0:25:06.484 --> 0:25:09.804
<v Speaker 1>by the way, being able to walk away, and I

0:25:09.844 --> 0:25:12.364
<v Speaker 1>still have something left, and I should, you know, I

0:25:12.404 --> 0:25:14.844
<v Speaker 1>should be able to use that. I think that's a

0:25:14.884 --> 0:25:17.364
<v Speaker 1>really important life skill. But one of the most important

0:25:17.364 --> 0:25:19.964
<v Speaker 1>that I've learned from poker is kind of that. And

0:25:20.364 --> 0:25:22.284
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you a specific hand where I saw

0:25:22.324 --> 0:25:25.444
<v Speaker 1>this play out that I think is kind of illustrative

0:25:26.324 --> 0:25:30.124
<v Speaker 1>of this idea. So in this hand, I think we're

0:25:30.124 --> 0:25:33.524
<v Speaker 1>playing eight handed, and I raise from under the gun,

0:25:33.804 --> 0:25:36.844
<v Speaker 1>so I'm first to act, and I have pocket kings,

0:25:37.484 --> 0:25:41.364
<v Speaker 1>so I raise, and then another player three bets me,

0:25:41.404 --> 0:25:44.164
<v Speaker 1>so he re raises from the button. So that's, you know,

0:25:44.284 --> 0:25:47.564
<v Speaker 1>very strong position. Obviously he'll always be lost to act.

0:25:47.644 --> 0:25:50.884
<v Speaker 1>The button is yours, your best position. I don't love,

0:25:51.004 --> 0:25:53.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing huge pots out of positions. So I

0:25:53.084 --> 0:25:55.964
<v Speaker 1>four bet, which means I then reraise him. At this point,

0:25:56.004 --> 0:25:59.004
<v Speaker 1>the only hand I lose to is aces, and I'm

0:25:59.044 --> 0:26:01.844
<v Speaker 1>not particularly you know, you can't see monsters under the bed,

0:26:02.124 --> 0:26:04.684
<v Speaker 1>so I reraise and he calls and we go to

0:26:05.124 --> 0:26:07.644
<v Speaker 1>the flop, so it's just the two of us and

0:26:07.724 --> 0:26:10.724
<v Speaker 1>the flop comes Queen High and it's all hearts. I

0:26:10.724 --> 0:26:15.084
<v Speaker 1>think it's six or eight Queen, all hearts. I do

0:26:15.124 --> 0:26:21.084
<v Speaker 1>not have the King of Hearts. I check, and he bets,

0:26:21.124 --> 0:26:24.164
<v Speaker 1>and I call, even though you know, at this point

0:26:24.204 --> 0:26:27.364
<v Speaker 1>I could be drawing dead, right, he could have Ace

0:26:27.444 --> 0:26:29.764
<v Speaker 1>King of Hearts, right, he could have Ace Jack of Hearts.

0:26:30.124 --> 0:26:33.044
<v Speaker 1>He could already have flopped the nuts. And he beats

0:26:33.084 --> 0:26:36.884
<v Speaker 1>pretty big, but I can't fault to one bet and

0:26:36.924 --> 0:26:39.644
<v Speaker 1>then the turn is an off suit king. So at

0:26:39.644 --> 0:26:43.684
<v Speaker 1>this point I now have top set, and so I

0:26:43.844 --> 0:26:47.444
<v Speaker 1>check and he bets again, but he bets really small, right,

0:26:47.604 --> 0:26:50.404
<v Speaker 1>So he bets like a quarter pot, and I was like, okay,

0:26:50.604 --> 0:26:53.044
<v Speaker 1>you do not have a flush right at this point,

0:26:54.004 --> 0:26:55.964
<v Speaker 1>it really just looked like he just did not like

0:26:56.004 --> 0:27:00.524
<v Speaker 1>that king at all. And so I raise because you know,

0:27:00.564 --> 0:27:04.924
<v Speaker 1>that seems like the appropriate thing to do. And he

0:27:05.004 --> 0:27:07.724
<v Speaker 1>does not have that many chips left behind, and you

0:27:07.764 --> 0:27:11.644
<v Speaker 1>can just see him just completely pained, and then just

0:27:11.724 --> 0:27:13.844
<v Speaker 1>like shakes his head and like puts all his chips

0:27:13.844 --> 0:27:17.564
<v Speaker 1>in the middle and he turns over pocket queens and

0:27:17.564 --> 0:27:19.444
<v Speaker 1>he's like, I knew I was be And I was like, well,

0:27:19.564 --> 0:27:22.124
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you don't say that, right, if you

0:27:22.204 --> 0:27:24.444
<v Speaker 1>know your beat just fold. He still had a lot

0:27:24.484 --> 0:27:26.724
<v Speaker 1>of chips behind, but he just couldn't let it go.

0:27:27.204 --> 0:27:30.124
<v Speaker 1>He had flopped, you know, top set. He knew that

0:27:30.164 --> 0:27:33.204
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of ahead of me, and he even

0:27:33.244 --> 0:27:36.324
<v Speaker 1>though the world changed on the turn, he just couldn't

0:27:36.364 --> 0:27:38.324
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge it and he couldn't walk away. And I've seen

0:27:38.324 --> 0:27:39.244
<v Speaker 1>that so many times.

0:27:39.924 --> 0:27:42.484
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, in his defense, he could think that

0:27:42.604 --> 0:27:44.684
<v Speaker 2>you have a flush and he has some outs to

0:27:44.764 --> 0:27:50.204
<v Speaker 2>draw to a full house. But yeah, poker players stick

0:27:50.244 --> 0:27:54.924
<v Speaker 2>their chips in almost as a form of self punishment sometimes,

0:27:55.004 --> 0:27:59.884
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm a fish. And by the one thing,

0:27:59.964 --> 0:28:03.244
<v Speaker 2>as you were speaking, Maria, you know, obviously if there's

0:28:03.284 --> 0:28:06.364
<v Speaker 2>new information, I think also people need to give themselves

0:28:07.204 --> 0:28:11.684
<v Speaker 2>permission to read things, things right, to say, maybe there's

0:28:11.724 --> 0:28:14.524
<v Speaker 2>not new information. But I've had time to think about

0:28:14.564 --> 0:28:16.604
<v Speaker 2>this more, and I just don't think it's plausible that

0:28:16.644 --> 0:28:19.804
<v Speaker 2>my opponent is bluffing very often. Here. I had time

0:28:19.844 --> 0:28:21.644
<v Speaker 2>while the dealer was dealing the cards to think about,

0:28:21.684 --> 0:28:24.044
<v Speaker 2>like what bluff would Maria have in her range? And

0:28:24.044 --> 0:28:26.124
<v Speaker 2>like in this spot, it's hard on these flushboards with

0:28:26.164 --> 0:28:32.044
<v Speaker 2>the king coming, you know, making a life choice belatedly,

0:28:32.124 --> 0:28:36.404
<v Speaker 2>that's a positive life choice is still better than saying

0:28:36.404 --> 0:28:40.564
<v Speaker 2>it's a sunk cost. I can't make any change at all. Okay, Maria,

0:28:40.764 --> 0:28:45.004
<v Speaker 2>let's go into your tip or mistake. Yeah, tips for

0:28:45.084 --> 0:28:47.124
<v Speaker 2>last week. This speaks about mistakes were in the messy

0:28:47.244 --> 0:28:49.644
<v Speaker 2>real world. Now, what's mistake number two you've been seeing

0:28:49.644 --> 0:28:49.964
<v Speaker 2>at the time.

0:28:50.004 --> 0:28:52.844
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the mistake number two is actually probably one of

0:28:52.884 --> 0:28:57.124
<v Speaker 1>the most famous biases in psychology. And so it's always

0:28:57.164 --> 0:28:59.084
<v Speaker 1>so fun to me as a psychologist to see the

0:28:59.124 --> 0:29:02.324
<v Speaker 1>things that you know that theoretically should be very strong,

0:29:02.404 --> 0:29:05.204
<v Speaker 1>see them actually in reality play out this way. And

0:29:05.244 --> 0:29:09.284
<v Speaker 1>that's risk aversion. So this is part of Danny Knnoman

0:29:09.524 --> 0:29:14.164
<v Speaker 1>and Amos Turiski's famous prospect theory right where losses and

0:29:14.284 --> 0:29:17.764
<v Speaker 1>gains are looked at differently, and depending on how you

0:29:17.804 --> 0:29:20.844
<v Speaker 1>frame losses, depending on how you frame gains, people will

0:29:20.924 --> 0:29:24.044
<v Speaker 1>be more or less risk averse. And so what I

0:29:24.124 --> 0:29:29.044
<v Speaker 1>have seen is that people have been too risk averse

0:29:29.164 --> 0:29:31.404
<v Speaker 1>at stages of the tournament where they should be taking

0:29:31.524 --> 0:29:34.044
<v Speaker 1>risks because they value kind of their tournament life too

0:29:34.124 --> 0:29:37.124
<v Speaker 1>much and they don't understand how tournament poker works. So,

0:29:37.444 --> 0:29:39.724
<v Speaker 1>as an example, I saw a hand I was not

0:29:39.844 --> 0:29:44.084
<v Speaker 1>in this hand where someone raised, you know, someone re raised,

0:29:44.524 --> 0:29:47.444
<v Speaker 1>and then this person ended up folding Ace King face up,

0:29:47.484 --> 0:29:50.364
<v Speaker 1>aas King suited, having like thirty big blinds left saying

0:29:50.404 --> 0:29:53.044
<v Speaker 1>you know it's too early, it's too early for me

0:29:53.124 --> 0:29:56.484
<v Speaker 1>to flip, and it was just such a bad mistake.

0:29:56.644 --> 0:29:59.004
<v Speaker 1>Right when I saw that, I was like, what do

0:29:59.044 --> 0:30:01.604
<v Speaker 1>you mean it's too early to flip? You have thirty

0:30:01.604 --> 0:30:04.484
<v Speaker 1>big lines. That's not that you know you should be flipping.

0:30:04.524 --> 0:30:08.404
<v Speaker 1>You have to take those spots. If you're valuing your

0:30:08.524 --> 0:30:12.764
<v Speaker 1>tournament life, valuing not busting so incredibly highly. That means

0:30:12.764 --> 0:30:15.244
<v Speaker 1>that either you're playing too high. You know you're in

0:30:15.284 --> 0:30:18.484
<v Speaker 1>the wrong spot, because that's not the rational decision to make.

0:30:19.084 --> 0:30:23.524
<v Speaker 1>The flip side of this. At EPT Paris back in February,

0:30:24.004 --> 0:30:26.444
<v Speaker 1>which was won by Barney Boatman, who's kind of an

0:30:26.684 --> 0:30:30.764
<v Speaker 1>old school legend, there was a really great televised hand

0:30:31.244 --> 0:30:34.444
<v Speaker 1>where they were at the final table, the final two tables,

0:30:34.644 --> 0:30:36.804
<v Speaker 1>and someone ran kind of a big bluff against him,

0:30:37.444 --> 0:30:39.444
<v Speaker 1>putting him to the test. Right, Barney had to call

0:30:40.324 --> 0:30:41.724
<v Speaker 1>off all of his chips and it was a really

0:30:41.764 --> 0:30:45.284
<v Speaker 1>hard call. Barney finally made it, and when his opponent

0:30:45.364 --> 0:30:48.644
<v Speaker 1>kind of turned over the cards saw what Barney had

0:30:48.644 --> 0:30:51.644
<v Speaker 1>called with he said, how could you call for your

0:30:51.684 --> 0:30:54.204
<v Speaker 1>tournament life here? Like, you can't do that? And Barney

0:30:54.244 --> 0:30:56.244
<v Speaker 1>looks at him and says, it's my tournament life, not

0:30:56.324 --> 0:31:00.604
<v Speaker 1>my actual life. It's just such a great line because

0:31:00.604 --> 0:31:02.924
<v Speaker 1>that's how you have to write. It's fine to be

0:31:02.964 --> 0:31:06.244
<v Speaker 1>too risk averse when it's your actual life. It's when

0:31:06.284 --> 0:31:08.404
<v Speaker 1>you're playing in a tournament. You have to make those

0:31:08.444 --> 0:31:10.844
<v Speaker 1>calculated risks, have to take those slips, you have to

0:31:10.844 --> 0:31:13.924
<v Speaker 1>take those spots, otherwise you ain't ever winning a tournament.

0:31:14.764 --> 0:31:18.124
<v Speaker 2>Ria, I got news for you now that we're into

0:31:18.124 --> 0:31:20.204
<v Speaker 2>the second week of the World Series of Poker that

0:31:20.284 --> 0:31:24.604
<v Speaker 2>like that virginal risk aversion bubble has popped a little bit.

0:31:24.964 --> 0:31:28.524
<v Speaker 2>In the fifteen hundred yesterday, all my chips, or ninety

0:31:28.524 --> 0:31:31.324
<v Speaker 2>five percent of them are from making hands and extracting value.

0:31:31.924 --> 0:31:33.684
<v Speaker 2>The bluss were not working. I lost money on my

0:31:33.684 --> 0:31:35.484
<v Speaker 2>bluff yesterday, and I'm so many people believe it or

0:31:35.484 --> 0:31:39.524
<v Speaker 2>not actually like to fold to Sometimes people were getting

0:31:39.524 --> 0:31:41.604
<v Speaker 2>a little bit rambunctious. I think you kind of get

0:31:41.644 --> 0:31:44.564
<v Speaker 2>into this point in the tournament where maybe you have

0:31:44.724 --> 0:31:47.724
<v Speaker 2>fired four or five or six entries. People are getting

0:31:47.764 --> 0:31:52.204
<v Speaker 2>though a little bit friskier, I think, with kind of

0:31:52.244 --> 0:31:56.124
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these smaller events. And the Mystery Millions

0:31:56.124 --> 0:31:58.924
<v Speaker 2>is a tournament where you can enter like literally eight

0:31:59.004 --> 0:32:01.724
<v Speaker 2>times if you want the first event after that. See

0:32:01.764 --> 0:32:04.484
<v Speaker 2>people who are a little bit on tilt from you know,

0:32:04.524 --> 0:32:07.044
<v Speaker 2>literally as we're playing, by the way, people are drawing

0:32:07.164 --> 0:32:10.764
<v Speaker 2>prizes from this bounty pool winning a million bucks where

0:32:10.764 --> 0:32:12.884
<v Speaker 2>two and fifty thousand bucks, right, and here you are

0:32:13.364 --> 0:32:16.284
<v Speaker 2>plotting along your fifteen hundred dollars tournament. That was encouraging

0:32:16.284 --> 0:32:18.484
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot more risk taking. So so this

0:32:18.604 --> 0:32:20.644
<v Speaker 2>is self corrects a little bit. But I agree in

0:32:20.724 --> 0:32:23.884
<v Speaker 2>CHERYLD that as a default, as a default, even in

0:32:23.924 --> 0:32:28.204
<v Speaker 2>the poker world, as default, people are usually too risk averse.

0:32:29.364 --> 0:32:31.244
<v Speaker 2>For the Barney Boatmen reason that it's just a fucking

0:32:31.244 --> 0:32:34.364
<v Speaker 2>poker tournament, right, I understand that you make day two,

0:32:34.484 --> 0:32:36.524
<v Speaker 2>day three, the money can be significant. It's just a

0:32:36.524 --> 0:32:37.404
<v Speaker 2>fucking poker tournament.

0:32:37.564 --> 0:32:38.924
<v Speaker 1>That's that's very true.

0:32:38.964 --> 0:32:40.804
<v Speaker 2>If you're putting your life on your line to enter

0:32:40.844 --> 0:32:43.084
<v Speaker 2>the tournament, then you've made a bad decision in the

0:32:43.084 --> 0:32:46.324
<v Speaker 2>first place. So I can't really guide you. But but

0:32:46.644 --> 0:32:48.924
<v Speaker 2>this is kind of a laboratory where you can repeat

0:32:48.964 --> 0:32:51.764
<v Speaker 2>the experiment and enter a different tournament, especially the World Series.

0:32:51.804 --> 0:32:54.604
<v Speaker 2>And so don't be a knit is one of our

0:32:54.644 --> 0:32:59.364
<v Speaker 2>favorite things to say, and it means a neurotic risk averse,

0:33:00.124 --> 0:33:03.484
<v Speaker 2>you know, turn in the punch bowl basically, Maria.

0:33:03.564 --> 0:33:07.364
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, So that's you know, that's number two. But I'm

0:33:07.404 --> 0:33:09.724
<v Speaker 1>glad that you're saying that it's been self correcting because

0:33:09.764 --> 0:33:12.844
<v Speaker 1>that actually goes to mistake number three that I've been seeing,

0:33:13.164 --> 0:33:18.404
<v Speaker 1>which is people becoming too emotional and making decisions based

0:33:18.444 --> 0:33:21.444
<v Speaker 1>on how they're feeling and what just happened, as opposed

0:33:21.484 --> 0:33:25.084
<v Speaker 1>to based on data and based on kind of what

0:33:25.124 --> 0:33:28.484
<v Speaker 1>they should be using in their logical rational decision making.

0:33:29.044 --> 0:33:34.284
<v Speaker 1>So they're going on tilt and basically making just really

0:33:34.284 --> 0:33:37.844
<v Speaker 1>egregious errors. So once again, you know, I think it's

0:33:37.844 --> 0:33:42.164
<v Speaker 1>always good to have an example. I was playing this

0:33:42.444 --> 0:33:44.524
<v Speaker 1>was I think it might have even been during the

0:33:44.564 --> 0:33:46.724
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars event. No, it was a five hundred

0:33:46.724 --> 0:33:49.924
<v Speaker 1>dollars event, so the second event, slightly smaller event. It

0:33:50.004 --> 0:33:52.004
<v Speaker 1>was a freeze out, which is important, which means people

0:33:52.044 --> 0:33:54.844
<v Speaker 1>can't read buy this is not the mystery bounty. And

0:33:55.004 --> 0:33:58.164
<v Speaker 1>I had a gentleman to my left who'd been, you know,

0:33:58.564 --> 0:34:01.524
<v Speaker 1>playing fairly. Well I didn't know him, but I think

0:34:01.644 --> 0:34:04.324
<v Speaker 1>he played a lot of poker, and then he got

0:34:04.364 --> 0:34:08.644
<v Speaker 1>into a spot against someone else where he was you know,

0:34:08.844 --> 0:34:11.324
<v Speaker 1>on the river and facing a huge bet and he

0:34:11.404 --> 0:34:13.324
<v Speaker 1>needed to decide whether or not he was going to call,

0:34:13.684 --> 0:34:16.564
<v Speaker 1>and he just tanked. And it's a pretty turbo structure, right.

0:34:16.564 --> 0:34:19.284
<v Speaker 1>The levels are thirty minutes long.

0:34:19.644 --> 0:34:21.924
<v Speaker 2>Meaning that you're a chip count dwindles and real or

0:34:21.964 --> 0:34:23.204
<v Speaker 2>in absolute terms.

0:34:23.084 --> 0:34:25.404
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so very quickly, so you need to act quickly.

0:34:25.444 --> 0:34:27.524
<v Speaker 1>So here's this guy and he's been thinking for two minutes,

0:34:27.804 --> 0:34:32.684
<v Speaker 1>so I very I think nicely, and the tables agreed, said,

0:34:33.444 --> 0:34:35.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know you're in a tough spot, but

0:34:35.364 --> 0:34:36.964
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, I'm going to call the clock

0:34:38.004 --> 0:34:41.484
<v Speaker 1>in one minute, because you know, taking two minutes if

0:34:41.524 --> 0:34:43.044
<v Speaker 1>you think about it. I said, I was going to

0:34:43.124 --> 0:34:45.644
<v Speaker 1>call it at three minutes, right, so you're ten percent,

0:34:46.124 --> 0:34:47.764
<v Speaker 1>which is ten percent of the time. And I gave

0:34:47.844 --> 0:34:50.764
<v Speaker 1>him that warning and then he just like he you know,

0:34:51.004 --> 0:34:53.684
<v Speaker 1>puts in the call and it's the wrong call and

0:34:53.724 --> 0:34:56.004
<v Speaker 1>he loses the pot. And then he turns to me

0:34:56.044 --> 0:34:58.644
<v Speaker 1>and he says, well, it's only it's only a turbo.

0:34:58.684 --> 0:35:02.284
<v Speaker 1>If you're used to playing bullshit live events, this is

0:35:02.324 --> 0:35:04.524
<v Speaker 1>not a turbo structure. I was like, well, empirically it

0:35:04.604 --> 0:35:07.044
<v Speaker 1>is anyway, very next hand, I'm on the button and

0:35:07.084 --> 0:35:10.644
<v Speaker 1>he's in the small blind and I raise and he

0:35:10.724 --> 0:35:12.644
<v Speaker 1>just looks at me, and he goes, well, I'm all in,

0:35:12.764 --> 0:35:15.404
<v Speaker 1>and he just shoves and rips it, and then the

0:35:15.444 --> 0:35:18.244
<v Speaker 1>big blind folds and I have a six of spades,

0:35:18.244 --> 0:35:20.124
<v Speaker 1>which is a good hand, but not a great hand.

0:35:20.164 --> 0:35:22.724
<v Speaker 1>But given what just happened, I was like, I'm gonna call,

0:35:22.964 --> 0:35:25.804
<v Speaker 1>so I did. He had Queen five offsuit. Luckily he

0:35:25.844 --> 0:35:29.724
<v Speaker 1>didn't hit and I knocked him out. Don't be that guy.

0:35:30.164 --> 0:35:32.604
<v Speaker 1>It does not matter if you just made a bad decision.

0:35:32.924 --> 0:35:35.804
<v Speaker 1>Do not make another bad decision because of that. If

0:35:35.844 --> 0:35:38.244
<v Speaker 1>someone calls the clock on you. You know I didn't

0:35:38.244 --> 0:35:40.804
<v Speaker 1>even call the clock on him, right, Like, just do

0:35:41.004 --> 0:35:44.964
<v Speaker 1>not be that guy. Make rational decisions. Do not punt

0:35:45.004 --> 0:35:47.764
<v Speaker 1>with queen five offsuit, even though you still have a

0:35:47.804 --> 0:35:51.044
<v Speaker 1>ton of chips, just because you're pissed off and you

0:35:51.084 --> 0:35:52.964
<v Speaker 1>think that you know that someone's picking on you.

0:35:53.844 --> 0:35:55.804
<v Speaker 2>I think the guy thing like not to be too

0:35:56.004 --> 0:35:59.364
<v Speaker 2>like woke here or anything. The guy thing is important though,

0:35:59.404 --> 0:36:04.524
<v Speaker 2>because like men with other men don't want to lose face,

0:36:04.644 --> 0:36:07.204
<v Speaker 2>and that can like manifest itself in different ways. But like,

0:36:07.604 --> 0:36:11.724
<v Speaker 2>I haven't been quite in that spot as often as

0:36:11.964 --> 0:36:14.644
<v Speaker 2>people seem to react to you that way, even though

0:36:14.644 --> 0:36:16.484
<v Speaker 2>I would have been probably more aggressive about just calling

0:36:16.524 --> 0:36:18.564
<v Speaker 2>the clock and not giving him like a warning. I

0:36:18.564 --> 0:36:21.324
<v Speaker 2>do think that, like, you know, men who feel like

0:36:21.364 --> 0:36:24.324
<v Speaker 2>they're embarrassed by women. I mean, this is not like

0:36:24.964 --> 0:36:28.844
<v Speaker 2>some deep breakthrough here, right, but like you know, men

0:36:28.884 --> 0:36:30.924
<v Speaker 2>who feel like they're embarrassed by women can kind of

0:36:30.964 --> 0:36:33.404
<v Speaker 2>go on tilts in different ways, and they might if

0:36:33.404 --> 0:36:35.204
<v Speaker 2>they're embarrassed by another guy.

0:36:35.764 --> 0:36:37.884
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I think that's very true. And I actually

0:36:38.124 --> 0:36:41.084
<v Speaker 1>wrote an entire piece about sexism and poker on my

0:36:41.124 --> 0:36:44.924
<v Speaker 1>substack this week, and some a guy also going on

0:36:44.964 --> 0:36:48.444
<v Speaker 1>tilt to a female gave me a ten ten thousand

0:36:48.484 --> 0:36:50.764
<v Speaker 1>dollars main events seat, so I'm very grateful for that.

0:36:51.364 --> 0:36:54.324
<v Speaker 1>So everyone, do not make this mistake unless you're a

0:36:54.324 --> 0:36:57.204
<v Speaker 1>bounty with ten thousand dollars on your head, in which case,

0:36:57.244 --> 0:36:59.684
<v Speaker 1>you know, please do emotionally tilt and give me your chips.

0:37:00.404 --> 0:37:03.564
<v Speaker 1>But Nate, I think that that is a you know,

0:37:03.724 --> 0:37:06.764
<v Speaker 1>great place to wrap it up, and to say again,

0:37:07.644 --> 0:37:10.044
<v Speaker 1>I trust that you will not make any of these

0:37:10.084 --> 0:37:13.804
<v Speaker 1>mistakes today. I hope you play well and may the

0:37:14.004 --> 0:37:16.204
<v Speaker 1>may the cards be with you, because that's you know,

0:37:16.244 --> 0:37:31.764
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing that you can't control. So Nay

0:37:31.884 --> 0:37:34.764
<v Speaker 1>Risky business is still a young show. You know, we're

0:37:34.804 --> 0:37:38.564
<v Speaker 1>we're a month old, and I have already learned more

0:37:38.884 --> 0:37:42.524
<v Speaker 1>about basketball than I have learned during my entire life,

0:37:43.044 --> 0:37:47.004
<v Speaker 1>and here we are doing yet another basketball segment. Last week,

0:37:47.164 --> 0:37:48.964
<v Speaker 1>I when I told you that I was ready to

0:37:49.004 --> 0:37:51.324
<v Speaker 1>go to a next game, you informed me that unfortunately

0:37:51.364 --> 0:37:54.124
<v Speaker 1>they were already out, so you know, so that that

0:37:54.244 --> 0:37:56.404
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that wasn't great timing, So we'll have to go

0:37:56.524 --> 0:38:00.764
<v Speaker 1>next season. But you've also informed me, and I didn't

0:38:00.804 --> 0:38:05.044
<v Speaker 1>know that we're now starting the NBA Finals, which sounds really,

0:38:05.084 --> 0:38:07.804
<v Speaker 1>really exciting, and I'm gonna I'm gonna get some real

0:38:07.844 --> 0:38:10.404
<v Speaker 1>excitement going once I finally go to an NBA game.

0:38:10.604 --> 0:38:12.444
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you will teach me to love it. But

0:38:12.524 --> 0:38:16.124
<v Speaker 1>for now, let me ask you who's playing in the

0:38:16.164 --> 0:38:17.724
<v Speaker 1>finals and why do we care?

0:38:17.964 --> 0:38:20.924
<v Speaker 2>Mario? Are you? Are you anti sports and you want

0:38:20.924 --> 0:38:22.884
<v Speaker 2>to read The New Yorker? Are you one of those

0:38:23.204 --> 0:38:25.444
<v Speaker 2>call us at sports ball and things like that. I'm,

0:38:26.044 --> 0:38:30.244
<v Speaker 2>by the way, your hometown team, the Boston Celtics, is

0:38:30.324 --> 0:38:32.804
<v Speaker 2>one of the two teams involved in the NBA.

0:38:34.964 --> 0:38:35.684
<v Speaker 1>That's exciting.

0:38:36.524 --> 0:38:41.004
<v Speaker 2>I did. The other team is a Dallas Mavericks. Who

0:38:41.044 --> 0:38:43.044
<v Speaker 2>are I guess I was gonna say younger. They're not

0:38:43.164 --> 0:38:47.164
<v Speaker 2>that young, but they kind of overachieved expectations this year.

0:38:47.444 --> 0:38:50.444
<v Speaker 2>You know, I did a kind of preseason preview for

0:38:50.524 --> 0:38:53.684
<v Speaker 2>my newsletter subscribers at Silver Bulletin. Talked about every team.

0:38:53.764 --> 0:38:57.204
<v Speaker 2>Although I was very bullish in the Celtics. I was

0:38:57.284 --> 0:39:00.164
<v Speaker 2>kept on the Dallas Mavericks would even make the playoffs,

0:39:00.804 --> 0:39:03.644
<v Speaker 2>and here they are in the NBA finals. So what

0:39:03.684 --> 0:39:04.884
<v Speaker 2>the fuck do I know?

0:39:05.044 --> 0:39:08.404
<v Speaker 1>I suppose so I didn't know who'd be in the finals,

0:39:08.444 --> 0:39:10.444
<v Speaker 1>and Nate, you don't know who would be in the

0:39:10.444 --> 0:39:11.764
<v Speaker 1>finals for either for.

0:39:11.964 --> 0:39:14.484
<v Speaker 2>Different reasons, I would say, But at the point is

0:39:14.564 --> 0:39:15.524
<v Speaker 2>the point is well taken?

0:39:16.684 --> 0:39:18.724
<v Speaker 1>No, for the record, let the record show I am

0:39:18.764 --> 0:39:23.164
<v Speaker 1>not anti sport, and I'm very excited about getting excited

0:39:23.284 --> 0:39:25.284
<v Speaker 1>about sports once i know more about them.

0:39:26.004 --> 0:39:30.004
<v Speaker 2>Anti sport are you British? They call it like sport

0:39:30.364 --> 0:39:31.324
<v Speaker 2>singular instead of.

0:39:31.324 --> 0:39:37.324
<v Speaker 1>Playing anti sports sport. I just all right, fine, fine,

0:39:37.404 --> 0:39:41.324
<v Speaker 1>my fake English accent friend, I am not anti athletics

0:39:41.844 --> 0:39:42.684
<v Speaker 1>sports teams.

0:39:42.804 --> 0:39:45.284
<v Speaker 2>Okay, after you're not. You're not helping yourself here, I

0:39:45.324 --> 0:39:48.884
<v Speaker 2>don't think. Here's what I want to discuss though, and

0:39:48.924 --> 0:39:52.484
<v Speaker 2>we'll be short with this segment. There is a gap

0:39:52.524 --> 0:39:55.324
<v Speaker 2>here between kind of what the stats would say and

0:39:56.524 --> 0:39:59.204
<v Speaker 2>what the betting markets say. So, the Celtics in the

0:39:59.244 --> 0:40:04.404
<v Speaker 2>regular season went sixty four and eighteen, winning sixty four

0:40:04.444 --> 0:40:07.724
<v Speaker 2>games is a very very very good record. Dallas, by contrast,

0:40:07.764 --> 0:40:12.244
<v Speaker 2>went fifty five, zero and thirty two. They were a

0:40:12.324 --> 0:40:14.764
<v Speaker 2>number five seed. The Celtics were a number one seed.

0:40:15.204 --> 0:40:19.524
<v Speaker 2>The Celtics are twelve and two so far in the playoffs.

0:40:19.564 --> 0:40:23.684
<v Speaker 2>They have virtually swept every series. The Celtics have an

0:40:23.724 --> 0:40:28.524
<v Speaker 2>average victory margin of more than ten point eight points

0:40:28.564 --> 0:40:30.364
<v Speaker 2>per game or more than ten points per game, which

0:40:30.364 --> 0:40:33.204
<v Speaker 2>is one of the best in NBA history this year.

0:40:34.564 --> 0:40:36.484
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at this system like, I'm gonna

0:40:36.484 --> 0:40:40.644
<v Speaker 2>promote a system called EPM, which is by at the

0:40:40.684 --> 0:40:44.444
<v Speaker 2>site Dunks and Threes. It's a good, very good basketball

0:40:44.484 --> 0:40:47.404
<v Speaker 2>analysis site that rates individual players and has team projections.

0:40:48.164 --> 0:40:51.084
<v Speaker 2>Their projections have the Celtics with an eighty six percent chance.

0:40:51.164 --> 0:40:53.724
<v Speaker 2>Eighty six percent of the Celtics, who, by the way,

0:40:53.764 --> 0:40:56.364
<v Speaker 2>are have a home court in Boston's a good home

0:40:56.404 --> 0:41:00.524
<v Speaker 2>court advantage an eighty six percent chance of winning the finals.

0:41:00.764 --> 0:41:02.924
<v Speaker 1>Now, if I go down there, pretty high chance.

0:41:04.364 --> 0:41:06.684
<v Speaker 2>It's a pretty high chance. But the NBA is a

0:41:06.724 --> 0:41:12.164
<v Speaker 2>game where a game of dominant compare, for example, a

0:41:12.204 --> 0:41:16.204
<v Speaker 2>basketball game to a football game. In the NBA, each

0:41:16.244 --> 0:41:18.604
<v Speaker 2>team has over one hundred posessions, maybe even one hundred

0:41:18.644 --> 0:41:21.924
<v Speaker 2>and ten or one hundred and twenty, given how fast

0:41:22.084 --> 0:41:25.724
<v Speaker 2>paced the game is nowadays. Right in the NFL, a

0:41:25.804 --> 0:41:29.084
<v Speaker 2>team might have what is it like, you know, twelve

0:41:29.124 --> 0:41:33.404
<v Speaker 2>or thirteen possessions in a game, so roughly one tenth

0:41:33.484 --> 0:41:37.244
<v Speaker 2>as much. If you roll a dice one hundred and

0:41:37.284 --> 0:41:41.044
<v Speaker 2>ten times versus twelve times, then you match the kind

0:41:41.044 --> 0:41:44.484
<v Speaker 2>of long run statistical distribution much more closely with a

0:41:44.524 --> 0:41:49.604
<v Speaker 2>larger sample size. So in the NBA, small edges shooting

0:41:49.724 --> 0:41:52.844
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine percent from three point range instead of thirty

0:41:52.844 --> 0:41:56.204
<v Speaker 2>six percent. That plays out when you're taking all these

0:41:56.204 --> 0:41:59.604
<v Speaker 2>shots per game, so that the better team usually wins

0:41:59.644 --> 0:42:02.404
<v Speaker 2>in the NBA, like almost no other sport, right Michael

0:42:02.484 --> 0:42:05.724
<v Speaker 2>Jordan's Bulls when he was on the team won six championships.

0:42:06.724 --> 0:42:09.404
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors won whatever it was three and four years.

0:42:09.844 --> 0:42:14.364
<v Speaker 2>So again, my favorite basketball stat site, dunksan threes dot

0:42:14.364 --> 0:42:17.804
<v Speaker 2>com gives Boston an eighty six point four percent chance

0:42:17.844 --> 0:42:20.844
<v Speaker 2>of winning. If I believe that number, I can go

0:42:20.924 --> 0:42:23.124
<v Speaker 2>down to the sportsbook here I'm staying at the Cosmo,

0:42:23.204 --> 0:42:26.164
<v Speaker 2>I guess, or anywhere in Vegas and make what, in

0:42:26.244 --> 0:42:29.164
<v Speaker 2>theory is a very very profitable bet. That bet implies

0:42:29.244 --> 0:42:31.924
<v Speaker 2>they only have to win seventy percent of the time.

0:42:32.004 --> 0:42:35.844
<v Speaker 2>Seven zero eighty six is a lot higher than seventy

0:42:35.444 --> 0:42:39.284
<v Speaker 2>to a gambler or a poker player. And yet, Maria,

0:42:39.364 --> 0:42:41.724
<v Speaker 2>I have not I have not made that bet yet,

0:42:41.804 --> 0:42:44.004
<v Speaker 2>despite having been in Vegas all week?

0:42:44.724 --> 0:42:46.204
<v Speaker 1>Why haven't you made that bet? Nate?

0:42:48.684 --> 0:42:52.164
<v Speaker 2>Partly because I should say, full disclosure, I probably will

0:42:52.764 --> 0:42:54.884
<v Speaker 2>by the time you listen to this. Have made some

0:42:55.044 --> 0:42:59.724
<v Speaker 2>amount of bets somewhere on the Celtics. But like, look,

0:43:01.924 --> 0:43:04.044
<v Speaker 2>one reason, a couple reasons why. Number one is that

0:43:04.124 --> 0:43:09.964
<v Speaker 2>I have repeatedly been low on the Mavericks throughout the season, right,

0:43:10.364 --> 0:43:12.044
<v Speaker 2>which may mean that there is just something that I

0:43:12.084 --> 0:43:15.164
<v Speaker 2>don't understand and I have to, like concede that the

0:43:15.204 --> 0:43:17.924
<v Speaker 2>public betting public, which is very sharp and the aggregate

0:43:18.604 --> 0:43:20.604
<v Speaker 2>knows something or not noticing that that I don't, but

0:43:20.764 --> 0:43:25.804
<v Speaker 2>like has a better read on the situation. Now, look,

0:43:26.884 --> 0:43:29.644
<v Speaker 2>the NBA Finals is such a big public event that

0:43:29.724 --> 0:43:32.924
<v Speaker 2>you have a lot of how should we say, a

0:43:32.924 --> 0:43:37.644
<v Speaker 2>lot of dumb money on the series. Sometimes one belief

0:43:37.644 --> 0:43:39.324
<v Speaker 2>of that I think maybe is not dumb is that

0:43:39.804 --> 0:43:42.484
<v Speaker 2>Luka Doncic is a Dallas Maverick superstar. I don't what

0:43:42.564 --> 0:43:44.404
<v Speaker 2>you want to call him. He's kind of like plays

0:43:44.444 --> 0:43:47.124
<v Speaker 2>point bar guard, but kind of like a small forward

0:43:47.164 --> 0:43:51.644
<v Speaker 2>slash unicorn bowling ball in his own way. He is

0:43:51.684 --> 0:43:54.404
<v Speaker 2>pretty clearly the best player in the series. I think

0:43:54.404 --> 0:43:56.404
<v Speaker 2>people are now calling him maybe the best player, at

0:43:56.444 --> 0:43:59.284
<v Speaker 2>least the best offensive player in the NBA, probably not

0:43:59.324 --> 0:44:00.244
<v Speaker 2>the best all around self.

0:44:00.404 --> 0:44:02.844
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying is he's the Caitlyn Clark of

0:44:02.924 --> 0:44:04.044
<v Speaker 1>the team.

0:44:04.764 --> 0:44:06.804
<v Speaker 2>Caitlyn Clark is off to a little bit of a

0:44:06.884 --> 0:44:11.524
<v Speaker 2>rocky start here, actually, Maria, Yeah, no, yeah, I don't

0:44:11.564 --> 0:44:14.364
<v Speaker 2>think he would be flattered by the Caitlin Clark comparison.

0:44:14.604 --> 0:44:17.724
<v Speaker 2>No he is. I'm not sure how you what's the

0:44:17.844 --> 0:44:21.004
<v Speaker 2>right compare. I mean, he's not super athletic, So I'm

0:44:21.044 --> 0:44:23.284
<v Speaker 2>not like, oh, he's the Michael Jordan or Lebron James,

0:44:23.324 --> 0:44:26.084
<v Speaker 2>because those guys are like much better athletes. We get

0:44:26.084 --> 0:44:30.084
<v Speaker 2>into like a little bit of like racial profiling. I mean,

0:44:30.244 --> 0:44:34.964
<v Speaker 2>Larry Bird is not the worst comparable for Luca necessarily

0:44:35.044 --> 0:44:38.604
<v Speaker 2>where he shoots, he rebounds. Larryberd was a better defensive

0:44:38.604 --> 0:44:42.404
<v Speaker 2>player than Luca most likely, but Luca's more dominant. He

0:44:42.444 --> 0:44:44.764
<v Speaker 2>can take over a game. We're talking about dominance here

0:44:44.764 --> 0:44:48.244
<v Speaker 2>and in general, when you have the best player in

0:44:48.364 --> 0:44:51.444
<v Speaker 2>the in the game, then your team wins, especially in

0:44:51.484 --> 0:44:56.764
<v Speaker 2>the finals where everyone's playing maximum minutes, maximum effort, so

0:44:56.804 --> 0:45:01.284
<v Speaker 2>it's a best player versus best team thing. I think

0:45:01.324 --> 0:45:03.764
<v Speaker 2>the kind of public believes heavily in the best player.

0:45:04.324 --> 0:45:06.644
<v Speaker 2>They kind of also think the Celtics are chokers. They've

0:45:06.644 --> 0:45:09.244
<v Speaker 2>been in the finals before, they've made deep playoff runs

0:45:09.564 --> 0:45:12.964
<v Speaker 2>ended badly. That's probably just like it's look, I think

0:45:13.004 --> 0:45:16.604
<v Speaker 2>you're bad. Is probably halfway between the stats and the public,

0:45:16.604 --> 0:45:19.324
<v Speaker 2>which means I should go and make some type of

0:45:19.364 --> 0:45:24.404
<v Speaker 2>bet on Boston. Maybe emotional because Boston has burned them before,

0:45:24.644 --> 0:45:28.484
<v Speaker 2>but you know, by the numbers they are a fantastic

0:45:29.044 --> 0:45:33.084
<v Speaker 2>basketball team, they're at home. They're very deep. They do

0:45:33.124 --> 0:45:35.204
<v Speaker 2>have very good players. I mean, Jason Tatum might be

0:45:35.244 --> 0:45:39.084
<v Speaker 2>the sixth best player in the league, Jalen Brown might

0:45:39.124 --> 0:45:42.404
<v Speaker 2>be the you know, thirtieth best player, Derek White might

0:45:42.404 --> 0:45:44.324
<v Speaker 2>be the twenty eighth best player or something. Right, they're

0:45:44.404 --> 0:45:47.884
<v Speaker 2>very deep, and I think you know, you hear people

0:45:47.884 --> 0:45:49.444
<v Speaker 2>at the poker tables being like, well, well, I don't know,

0:45:49.484 --> 0:45:51.844
<v Speaker 2>the Celtic are jokers, Like it's actually a reason to

0:45:51.924 --> 0:45:56.004
<v Speaker 2>bet on the Celtics when like generic poker players are like,

0:45:56.204 --> 0:45:57.764
<v Speaker 2>who don't know that much about basketball?

0:45:58.124 --> 0:45:58.284
<v Speaker 1>Are?

0:45:58.964 --> 0:46:00.764
<v Speaker 2>That's you know, they're the ones who are like helping

0:46:00.764 --> 0:46:03.244
<v Speaker 2>to set the market line. I think their rationales are

0:46:03.284 --> 0:46:06.884
<v Speaker 2>not that compelling. But at the same time, I'm not

0:46:06.884 --> 0:46:08.804
<v Speaker 2>sure I want to bet that much against against Luca.

0:46:09.204 --> 0:46:11.884
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think that that's a really that's a

0:46:11.924 --> 0:46:15.364
<v Speaker 1>really great point about how betting works in general. Right,

0:46:15.764 --> 0:46:21.764
<v Speaker 1>you do need to have some sort of idea about

0:46:22.124 --> 0:46:24.604
<v Speaker 1>where you are relative to the public, but also how

0:46:24.644 --> 0:46:28.764
<v Speaker 1>much you personally are willing to risk, right, Like, can

0:46:28.804 --> 0:46:32.804
<v Speaker 1>you risk ruin with with these odds or not? And

0:46:32.844 --> 0:46:36.324
<v Speaker 1>I think usually, especially from what I understand of sports betting,

0:46:37.204 --> 0:46:41.404
<v Speaker 1>the answer usually is no, Please don't right that there

0:46:41.524 --> 0:46:45.684
<v Speaker 1>is uncertainty and emotions do get into it on every

0:46:45.724 --> 0:46:49.044
<v Speaker 1>single line, and as accurate as a market might be,

0:46:49.084 --> 0:46:51.284
<v Speaker 1>as accurate as a line might be, there will be

0:46:51.364 --> 0:46:54.844
<v Speaker 1>kind of emotional betting and shit happens, right Like, this

0:46:54.884 --> 0:46:56.924
<v Speaker 1>is a game of individuals, And I think that that's

0:46:57.004 --> 0:46:59.244
<v Speaker 1>kind of the other point you're making. Someone might be

0:46:59.244 --> 0:47:01.564
<v Speaker 1>having a great day, somebody might be having an off day,

0:47:01.604 --> 0:47:04.684
<v Speaker 1>somebody might be a superstar, someone might choke you. Just

0:47:05.124 --> 0:47:07.604
<v Speaker 1>you can't account for all of those variables, and I

0:47:07.644 --> 0:47:09.804
<v Speaker 1>think that that's important in a game like that basketball.

0:47:14.724 --> 0:47:18.564
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going back to the beautiful Paris Horseshow Casino

0:47:18.844 --> 0:47:21.724
<v Speaker 2>in just about two and a half hours. Maria, When

0:47:21.724 --> 0:47:22.524
<v Speaker 2>are you back in town?

0:47:23.084 --> 0:47:27.724
<v Speaker 1>So it is now Tuesday. I will be doing a

0:47:27.844 --> 0:47:31.964
<v Speaker 1>multi country tour between now and then. So from New Haven,

0:47:32.004 --> 0:47:34.364
<v Speaker 1>I'm going back to New York and from there I

0:47:34.404 --> 0:47:39.124
<v Speaker 1>am going to Ireland and then on Saturday evening, so

0:47:39.604 --> 0:47:42.044
<v Speaker 1>late on Saturday, I will be back in Las Vegas

0:47:42.204 --> 0:47:45.884
<v Speaker 1>ready to play on Sunday. Now, this depends on how

0:47:45.924 --> 0:47:49.964
<v Speaker 1>well I've slept, how rested I am. But assuming everything

0:47:50.004 --> 0:47:52.964
<v Speaker 1>goes smoothly and I'm well rested. I'm actually going to

0:47:53.004 --> 0:47:55.164
<v Speaker 1>be playing my biggest buying event of the summer, the

0:47:55.284 --> 0:48:00.884
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thousand dollars eight handed event on Sunday, and.

0:48:00.924 --> 0:48:03.964
<v Speaker 2>Well I will be away. I'll be in California briefly

0:48:04.004 --> 0:48:05.804
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday and then back in New York. So we're

0:48:05.804 --> 0:48:08.724
<v Speaker 2>not doing a very good job of coordinating our schedules.

0:48:08.724 --> 0:48:11.284
<v Speaker 1>Maria, you know we're not. But this just means that

0:48:11.364 --> 0:48:13.524
<v Speaker 1>you and I don't have to compete for bracelets. We

0:48:13.564 --> 0:48:21.124
<v Speaker 1>can both win bracelets in separate events. Perfect Risky Business

0:48:21.204 --> 0:48:23.604
<v Speaker 1>is hosted by me Maria Kanikova.

0:48:23.364 --> 0:48:24.564
<v Speaker 2>And me Nate Silver.

0:48:25.044 --> 0:48:28.444
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:48:28.884 --> 0:48:32.924
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer

0:48:33.004 --> 0:48:36.684
<v Speaker 1>is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:48:36.724 --> 0:48:38.764
<v Speaker 2>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:48:38.764 --> 0:48:40.964
<v Speaker 2>so other people can find us more easily. And if

0:48:40.964 --> 0:48:43.284
<v Speaker 2>you want to listen to an AD free version, sener

0:48:43.364 --> 0:48:45.284
<v Speaker 2>for Pushkin Plus. For six D nine a month you

0:48:45.284 --> 0:48:47.924
<v Speaker 2>get access to ad free listening. Thanks for tuning in.