WEBVTT - Thursday night kickoff preview, Inside Injuries with Dr. A, Week 1 picks, and more...

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever. H Yeah, this is the Fantasy

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>alongside Frankie Stample. I am Greg Sausman. Bragga, go on, man,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Greggy football is back, my man, are you ready? I'm ready? Man,

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm I said, are you ready? Yea ready, I'm ready

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to rock. Things are good. It's awesome, man, it's I

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>can't believe it. I kind of did. I kind of

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>can't because we've been working really hard on it. Um.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>It's been a grueling off season. It's been a grueling

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>last season in particular, in particularly a grueling week for sure. Um,

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like we're just not stop doing stuff,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. And what's even cool about that is

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just just NonStop news breaking. That's the crazy part to me.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There's NonStop news breaking all week long. And and really

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it starts and kind of ends with Lavi on Bell.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>I read the tweet on the air yesterday. We we

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't sure if it was real, but people are believing

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's not coming back in the next ten games.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>His offensive line called him out and said, listen, you

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>run behind us. We do your job before you and

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a lot of shock waves next can the shock

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wave is be resolved that he shows up today? For instance,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I happen to think, so you've been our record, and

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and on Twitter certainly saying, hey, I think he's played

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>his last game in his Steelers uniform. You don't know

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that he can come back from this is Levy on

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Bell situations on the crazier ones. We've never seen advantage coupall. Yeah,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's two years in a row now right where

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a polarizing situation involving a big name running back.

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Last year it was Ezekiel Elliott really threw us for

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a loop. We didn't know where to draft him because

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>of that. Was he gonna get suspended six games? Was

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it going to be the start of the season. Was

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it going to be the end of the season. It

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>ended up being the middle of the year for Ezekiel Elliott.

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And and now we have this Levian Bell situation, And

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I tweeted it out yesterday. I don't think

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he plays another game with the Pittsburgh Steelers. I just

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>think this has gone completely awry. I mean, his offensive

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>line calling him out now. I mean, maybe I'm just

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>reading too much into it, maybe maybe I'm a sensitive Greg,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But if these guys can find a way to just

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>sweep it under the rug and Levian Bell comes back,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if this team gets off to a slow

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>start and they're like, look, we take back what we said.

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>We need Levian Bell, and maybe they make amends rather quickly.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But I just think it's gone. It's gone so south.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>From the front office, the gm uh, Mike tomlin Um,

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the offensive lineman even calling him out Big Bend, it

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>just seems like everyone has turned their back on Levy

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>on bell Um, It's it's it's just crazy to say,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like the verbage right, Like the way it sounds like

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they're turning their back on him, It's like taking sides.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Did Levyan Bell turn his back on them. Uh, it's

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's tough. It's a tough situation. And it's like if

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if there were stillse drafts happening, which there are, there's

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>some like big high stakes drafts that were going on.

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Like what do you do, Yeah, drafting tonighttand I we

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>have auctions tonight going on. There's snake drafts still going on.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to do. Like you were mentioning before,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>both on the air and off the air about James

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Conner and like how we've gone to the other side

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>with James Conner treating in like Levy on Bell seeing

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this crazy crazy offers of of Aaron Rodgers for James

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Conner and the like, I mean, one of the craziest

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>offers you've seen. I've seen a Green involved in some

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>trades for James Conner. I think yesterday someone in the

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>chat asses they were all for Tyreek Hill. I've seen

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Dog Baldwin thrown out there. So this guy is James

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Conner is being valued as a near second third round

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>value right now, especially for the Levian Bell owner. It's

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy. So you know it's interesting because like I

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>get it right, Like we've seen it with the Steelers.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>That's really the difference in that we have seen it

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>with the Steelers in that they are a workhorse running

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>back team. When levy On Bell has been hurt or suspended,

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they give the ball to D'Angelo Williams five hundred times.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Like we've seen that, and I think people have that

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in their minds of James Connor. What I can't tell you,

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and I read you the stat this morning, I'm gonna

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>do it again. If you're an Antonio Brown owner, you

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>should feel pretty awesome right now because in the last

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games without Levan Bell, Antonio Brown has played has

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>posted a re line of it is the sixteen games,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so basically a full season one hundred six receptions, two

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred targets, thousand and eighty yards, or thirteen touchdowns. That

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is good for four hundred and thirty five p p

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>R points. This comes from Anthony Stags on Twitter. Brown

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has also played in thirteen games over the last three

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>seasons without levy On Bell. If you want to extrapolate

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that to the sixteen games only, you know, three games extrapolation,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it would lead to a hundred and fifty five receptions

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on nineteen targets over yards, fourteen touchdowns, and fifty five

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>PPR points. In theory, whenever Levian medals in play, Antonio

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Brown goes off. Yeah, while James Conner or whoever fills

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>in for Levion Bell, we assume it's James Conner, He's

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be the workhorse for this team. I don't

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>know that he's going to catch the ball as much

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>as Levian Bell would have. Right, like Levian Bell sees

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at least, you know, six seven targets a game. He's

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>around that, you know, five receptions of game pace, um,

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, consistently seventy receptions plus per year. I'm not

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like James Conner is going to be the workhorse for

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this team, But I'm with you, especially with Antonio Brown stats.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are numbers to back it up. James

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Connor will catch the ball still, Yes, probably not as

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>much as Levian Bell would have. And for that reason,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>those extra targets that are left behind are gonna go

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to Antonio Brown, They're gonna go to Jujus Smith schuster Um.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately, like James Connor isn't probably isn't going to

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>be as dynamic as Levian Bell. So it just opens

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>up the more more opportunity for Antonio Brown. So I

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with you on that front. Remember last time in

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen, Levion Bell played from week three

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>through eight week nine on D'Angelo Williams. This is carries

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>total week nine seven, Week ten, seventeen, Week eleven, by

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>week twelve eight carries, Week thirteen, twenty six, Week fourteen,

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, Week fifteen, fourteen, Week sixteen, seventeen carries. So

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean there were three games in that stretch where

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>he had twenty three plus carries. That was D'Angelo Williams,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and at that point he was general thirty three years old.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Three James Connor is much younger than that, and he

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>has looked very sprite in the preseason. So I look,

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>I just hope that if you are a Levan Bell owner,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you have James Conner. Um. You know there's a league

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that I that I have Greg where I lost Jack

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>McKinnon and now I lost Levian Bell and I don't

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have James Conner. So this will be the ultimate test

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to see if I can in my fourth picks. Right

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>after me, I took Girly, he took Bell, you took

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.679
<v Speaker 1>McKinnon and I took Royce Spreeman and things are going well. Yeah,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome, Greg. Things are things going very very well. Um,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy, this Levy on Bell thing. Like we knew

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the for instance, last year, the Ezekiel Elliott suspense, it

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was hanging over us. When players are suspended, it's hanging

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>over Guys are always going to be injured. It happens

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>every year. But this is the one year where we

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of ignored Leavian Bell being holding out. We saw

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it last year. We figured he'd just show up and

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe he will. Like that's the craziest thing. Do you

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have a draft to night you see Levy on Bell

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just dropping and you're like, all right, at what point

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do I just do this? And you have it in

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>your hand, I'll just take James Connor early. And in

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>my league, Levyan Bell went to Overall. This this draft

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is on Tuesday night before the report broke yesterday, he

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>went to Overall and they took James Conner in the

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>eighth round. And it ultimately it doesn't matter when you

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>have to take James Connor. You just have to make

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sure you do it. And I was seeing Chris McCarroll

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>tweet like I have a he has the tenth pick

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tonight because I don't. I don't. I don't know what

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. If Levian Mills staring at me at fick ten,

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>what do I do? And I don't know the answer.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody can. If you were drafting tonight, Greg,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at what points you're like, what name do you need

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to see next to Levian Bell in the running back tab?

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And be like, this is the time that I take

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Levia right at the time take Well, that's that's that's

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the question I is um from my draft rank purposes,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>I've moved him behind Christian McCaffrey, and obviously is he

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>behind Leonard? For that? For you, yes, okay, so he's

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>behind in front of Davante Freeman and Jordan Howard. That

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>means that's exactly where I've pushed them to. I think

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at that point, yeah, you you can take that risk,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you get the next question you ask yourself

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is when do I take James Conner, which you know

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>people were asking me yesterday. I know Truck tweeted at

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>me and said he saw him go in the sixth

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>round of a draft. So you pull the trigger in

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the fifth the sixth round. You have to dedicate your

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe your late first early second round pick on Levian

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Bell and then your fifth or your sixth round pick

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on James Connor. Brutal. And you have to because if

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you into week one without your first second round pick

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>and you know everybody and you know everybody in that

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>draft is gonna be ten today jameson Connor throughout the draft. Yeah,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you might go in the fourth round. You might go

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier than that, probably, I don't know how many. We

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to get to today. Obviously, great, we're

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna talk to h inside injuries about week

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one injury updates. We're gonna give you a prediction for

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>tonight um start and sit for tonight's game. The Eagles first,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons obviously, and we're gonna go through predictions as well.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you have any crazy James con I want

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear it trades or Levy on Bell, trades or

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>situations that you need to call in a four four eight, four, three,

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>six eight seven nine. I want to hear what some

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff that's going on out there right now. I

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't I just don't know what to do. I

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy it's absolutely crazy. Oh my goodness, leaving on

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Bell News is just wild. Um. I don't blame I

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>don't blame him at all. He could afford this is

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my opinion on it. He could afford to lose the

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>money he's need a lot of money. Is a hip

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>hop career as well, He's going to make a lot

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of money wherever he signs. I always take the side

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of the player, and this is no different. Like I

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>get your teammates are a peo to you, and this

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is this is the weird thing, right Whenever you have

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>these players disputes, normally the players all back to you

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>every single time. This is what's weird. Do you wonder

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>if he like lied to them, if he's just like, yeah,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back after labor dad. That's probably what it

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is though, because all along his agent was saying Levian

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Bell is bound for the best season of his career.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And there was a tweet that resurfaced yesterday that Levian

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Bell tweeted out back and I think it was May

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and he put the date like nine slash nine slash eighteen,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like that's week one date or whatever, saying pretty much

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>indicating like I'm gonna be there right, so you that

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think they're met there. They take that

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>they take most to heart is that he misled them.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>If he would have came out during May and he's like,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>look holding out, I'm not playing until week ten, and

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think or if he said I'm not paying until

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I get paid, whatever, it's different. I think it's different.

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair. I think that's fair. Man crazy,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it was not even playing tonight. We have

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>another couple of days. That's great. Tonight Eagles and Falcons

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>kick us off. No Carson went which we speculated it

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on back in November, right when this team went started

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this run. When he gets hurt tears z cl in

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Rams, and we speculated on it

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>when he won the Super Bowl and I sat here,

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank talking to you, and I'm like, when Nick Foles

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>starts week one and there's no by the way, guarantee

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or indication Carson Wentz is back in week two, that

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>like he hasn't started practicing with contact yet, so there's

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee he's back next week. If Foles goes on

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this run again, it's gonna be our dimension. It's going

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to be our dimension. I said it back in November.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Y'all laughed at me, And I get how Nick Foles

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>look in the preseason, like he looked terrible, But what

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did you say to me before we came up here?

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>People are writing off the Eagles tonight. People are writing

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>off Nick Foles like they always do. You see all

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the money going towards It was a trap game when

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they played Atlanta in the Divisional round last year. I

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think I think had opened at like four and a half.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a trap game when they played Minnesota at

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>home last year. It was a trap game in the

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl last year, and once again they're at home.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It would not surprise me if all of a sudden,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>this is pick him in this in the Super Contest,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a pick him game. It not surprised me if

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it gets there later. Tonight is game. It's down to

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>one point. It opened at four and a half grade.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a trap, written all, and I understand Frank

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Reik's not there, and I understand that this is the

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>guy that won the Super Bowl, But I'm telling you,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this is such a trap. How about this Greg the

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Falcons money line or now it's now minus one time

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>let's pick on that. Let's pick them. It's it's crazy, yeah,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>but it does have trap game written all over it. Um, Yeah,

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried. I don't think. I don't think there's a

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of points scored in this game either. If I'm

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the over under at forty four and a half.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually looked at this last night a week one. The

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>past three Thursday night games in Week one, three out

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of four of them have gone over barely. Last year,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it was crazy how high scoring it was, and that

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was a huge shot Kansas City beating New England last year.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>But even even following that trend, I think I think

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we see more defense tonight than anything. I don't think

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that is very good. Michael Benn will play um that

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>no idea. The Falcon's defense has improved too, so maybe

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a little low, so maybe we are going lower in there. Well,

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the under. Interesting, crazy, absolutely crazy. What's going

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on in the NFL right now? Eight four four eight

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>four three six eight seven nine eight four four eight

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>four three six eight seven nine that's the number to

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>join in? Um tonight, Frankie, Uh, I know j G

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I is not your guy, but do you think he's

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a major workhorse tonight without Carson Wentz, given that he

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be healthy, do you think he's a

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>major workhorse or do we get a glimpse of what

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you were shared about all season, all off season long,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with a GI with a mix of Corpy, Cummand and

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>went will smaller and so on and so forth. Yeah,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly it. I still have a GI

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>ranked as a low end RB two right now, just

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>based on the rest of the matchups. I don't think

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this is great for him. Yes, the Falcons give up

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of receptions and receiving yards two opposing running backs,

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but they only allowed six rushing touchdowns two running backs

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, so they actually don't allow out running backs

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to score all that much on the ground. I actually

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think this is a better game, a better matchup for

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>guys like Corey Clement and Darren Sprowls. So I could

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>see see all three of these guys getting mixed in. Again,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a low end RB two. I don't really want

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to have to trust him um and and plus he

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was nursing a foot injury which he just got cleared

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to play, so I'm not sure that he's on a

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>full snap count either, He's probably in that twelve to

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen touch range, so I think that makes him like

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a low n RB two, high end RB three. But

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I will say in a full PPR, I would start

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Darren Sprowls and Corey Coleman over to Tevin Colton tonight.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you tonight? Just how potent the Eagles rushing

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>defense was last year. They were either number one or

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>number two in the least amount of points allowed against

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs last year. I know the Vikings were up

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>there as well, and all they did was make that

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>defensive line better. They go out and get Michael Bennett,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that it's gonna be hard to

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>come by. I don't even love DeVonta Freeman. I still

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have him as like a solid to high end RB two.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not a top twelve running back from me this week, um,

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to start Tevin Coleman if I

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>could get away from him, if I could start one

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of those other guys instead, I could give you a

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of other names that I have ranked just ahead

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of him in a standard league. How about this, Greg,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I would startle Garrett Blunt over Tevin Coleman. I think

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he has a chance to score against the Jets this week.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Would you start Theorytic over Tevin Colan in the PPR League,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I would? Would you start Mike Gillisly over Tann Coleman.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>That's where That's where it becomes Harriet, I'd probably start

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman, started Jordan Wilkins over Tarren Coleman. I would,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I would start Jordan Wilkins. I think he I think

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wilkins he's the starter in that game. I think

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he probably gives you untill Christian Michael's starting. Probably, but

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we get like twelve plus touches out of

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wilkinson that game, and at the touches tonight for

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman, and just overall terrible Terraman over under three

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half catches with Calvin Ridley tonight and his

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>debut over over nice can't kid for Calver Realley. Then

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I have him as a of like low end wide

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>sea of four. It's like right around eight for me.

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So okay, enough, let's take a break. When we come back,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we joint by dr a inside injuries. That happens next

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com optimize that in minutes, building optimized line

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and turneys learned from the game's

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot Com. Is this

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>directed waiting dr A for inside injuries and is normal

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Thursday spot for us. We have a ton of injuries

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we obviously want to get to today, and not just

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>skill position players We've been talking a lot about Um,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but also some of these offensive linement and defensive linemen

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that could affect who you were starting in sitting tomorrow,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>no doubt all your calls start to sit on the

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>show straight out on a Friday. Obviously that comes your

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>way tomorrow. But as we wait Dr A, we will

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>work to get him on. I want to go over

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the headlines and players that are practicing that

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna get a chance to ask Dr A

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about Frank Um, and I want to start in Seattle

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with Doug Baldin, who is practicing in full. It's been

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>an up and down ride For those that have drafted

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Doug Balbin this summer where you drafted him early. Great,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you have this borderline wide receiver one. Then he gets hurt,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>so you drop him a little bit. As all the

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>optimism starts to rise for Doug Baldwin, he jumps back up.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, cool, He comes out and has press conferences

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>like listen, I'm not going to be a hundred percent

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all season long. I'm gonna be like eight. And back

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>down he goes, And then things kind of settled where

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>he rose again. Doug bald is practicing in full. We're

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a glimpse of what Doug Baldwin is this week. However,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>very tough matchup against Detroit. I'm sorry. He gets Denver

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and a very good cornerback and Chris Harris who will

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>be all over the field with Doug Baldwin. How do

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel about starting him this week? First of all,

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm encouraged that he's practicing in full, so that's a

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>good sign for a week one of the season. But

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>going up against Denver, like you mentioned, it is a

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>tougher matchup, but you know they do move Doug Ballwin

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>around a lot. He doesn't just play on the outside.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't just play on the inside. You know, they

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>get pretty creative with him and they find ways to

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>move him all over the field. I'm not sure that

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Harris necessarily follows him inside the slot or whether

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Bradley Roby. They still do have talented corners there.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Don't just think that because they lost a keep to

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>leave that the secondary really, you know, they take a

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>huge step back. I still think that this could be

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a very very strong defense. I think he's a solid

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too. I'm encouraged that he's practicing in full

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>for week one. Great. Yeah, I think it's obviously a

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>very encouraging cybery Doug Baldwin that he's a normal, normal

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>work week for him, even if he gets these maintenance

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>days on Wednesday. Going forward, all good, Let's see what

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>he can do obviously on Sunday against Denver. Right, for

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, um, they have they have the Atto

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>coverage matrix on the Pro Football Focus. It's that they

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have right and they show you every single week that

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a cornerback shadowed a player of an opposing team. Denver

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>did not use one of their top corners as a

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>shadow cover corner in any single game last year. Now,

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that might be because they had to keep Steve and

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>they had Chris Harris, so they just figured, all right,

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>no matter who you put on the outside of wide receiver,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have strong corners to play against you. They

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>probably still feel that way though, because Bradley Roby is

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>very talented as well. Definitely, I'm not sure that they

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just put Chris Harris on Doug Baldwin in this game.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I still kind of like him. I think he's a

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sneaky play, all right, Speaking of a wide receivers that

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>were hurt all offseason. Then you get to Richard Matthews,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>who very mysterious injury which kind of lead to I

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>believe it's r meniscus is what what the injury was for.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Richard Matthews gets a one year contract extension, like not really,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing guaranteed, and he negotiated it. Not an agent.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't do that because it's a it's a lose money.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately Richard Matthews practicing UH in full this week,

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>which is great, but says may be on a snap

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>count because like the rookies have looked good, the young guys.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The Corey Davis is the Taiwan Taylor's of the world,

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know Delaney Walker is going to play and

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll get his compliment of snaps before we get the

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>dr Ray Frank, would you be hesitant start Richard Matthews

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this week? Yeah, there's no chance to have him in

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>my starting lineup. I do think he's a sneaky stash

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right now because we know the report that he has

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>with Marcus Mariotta. But I think we can see a very,

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>very big Week one out of Corey Davis and Delaney Walker.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins struggled mightily against the tight end last year,

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so with Richard Matthews on a pitch count, whether they're

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>rolling Taiwan Taylor out there or throwing more to Dion Lewis,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be, I think we see a lot

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of Corey Davis and Delaney Walker in Week one, right there?

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You going with that? We have a lot more injured

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>guys to talk about, so we're gonna do it with

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a good doctor here on a Thursday before the first

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>NFL game of the season. It's dr Ay from Inside Injuries.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Good morning doctor, Good morning guys. How are you guys

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>doing today. We're doing great. Thank you so much for

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us. And the big story over the weekend was

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Jered McKinnon tearing his e c L. I know we've

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about the forty Niners throughout the off

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>season when it comes to McKinnon and Brita and George Kittle,

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>including last week with Virginia, but it takes a bigger

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>precedence now without Jack McKinnon on the field all season long,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>people are going to rely on Matt Breeda. He battled

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>his own shoulder injury this summer. How much is he

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>ready to go this weekend? So? Um, it's a Grade

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>two shoulder sprain, which is you know, very very good

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in regards to uh not escalating to a grade three.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like it's just a sprain, probably a

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>rotator cuff sprain. Um, the optimal covery time for that

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>was two weeks, so he should that should have been

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>set for August twenty one. He should have healed from that.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no structural damage, which means translation, there's no actual tear.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So our our prediction on grade two was likely correct.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now, he's at low injury risk and peak health

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and so he should be ready to go to start

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the injury standpoint. Very good news from Matt Breed. He's

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ready to rock in Week one San Francisco. Top matchup

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>though against Minnesota. Would you start breeding this week? I

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>have him ranked. Him and Alfred Moore is both ranked

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of my top thirty six, so they're not even

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the flex discussion For me, I want to take

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a wait and see approach. Plus, it's just an absolute

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>brutal matchup for the reasons I mentioned. I didn't like

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Keevin Coleman against the Eagles. Again, if Brita and Alfred

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Morris are taking away from each other, plus they're going

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>up against the Vikings defense, I really don't like that.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Doc? I wanted to ask you about

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Austin Sinfari and Jenkins, a very popular streaming tight end

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>for Week one because he's going up against the New

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>York Giants. We've consistently said, Greg, if you would have

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>just played every tight end one against the Giants last year,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have ended up with the number five overall

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>tight end one year ago. So we like a s

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>J as a Week one stream but now he's dealing

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with a core muscle injury. He miss practiced yesterday, and

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Doug Marron said, quote, we're just going to be smart

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. I feel like he'll play, but you never know.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound too good. What do you have about

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Austin's Farrian Jenkins this week? Yeah, that's translation for uh,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a grade one core muscle injury, which is the

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>lowest grade other than just a minimal superficial tweak. And

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>so uh, you know, the optimal recovery time is two

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks for that. And so even though the coach says that, um,

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, any core muscle injury in any football player,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it definitely at a grade one level needs at least

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a week and a half to two weeks to heal completely.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at week three, September eighteen at the

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>time where he should come back. If he does play

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in this game, he will be an elevated injury risk

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of that's pretty high, meaning it's not it's not but

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not nine percent, and so is uh is a

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit too high. I don't think he should play

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in this game. If he does, he's you know, he's

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>out that injury watch basically because um, and he may

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>play significantly limited slash snaps because you know, if he

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look good in that first couple of snaps, they

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>may not then they may not keep him in for

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the game, which kills any fantasy roster anyway.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So not a great report they ever as Farren Jenkins,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in a fantastic matchup against the Giants. Yeah, so

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>other streaming tight ends who are kind of right in

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>that range that you know I'll boost ahead of him now,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Eifer for sure, Ricky Steals Jones, where the Washington

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Redskins struggled mightily against the tight end one year ago.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>And then I think Ben Watson and the Tampa Bay

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers are also, you know, right ahead of him. Now.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We love the matchup for a s J but based

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>on that report, um, you know, it sounds like he

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can easily re injure himself where he's not gonna be

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on a full snap count. I wouldn't trust it all.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Since the Farion Jenkins a week one, Greg, let me

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>stick with the tight ends here, Doc from a moment

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and ask you about a couple of more and in

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>particular to two tight ends that are simply always injured,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Eiffert and Jordan Reid. Both are not even on

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the injury report this week, which is shocking because they're

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>always on injury report. We talked about them from a

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>draft perspective, and you almost laughed at us when we

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>said we would consider drafting Tyler Eiffert and or Jordan Reid.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I have now drafted Jordan Reid, Frank has drafted Jordan

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>reading the league, um, and we're hoping that you just

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy at least for the going What do you think,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>doc this week about Judian Reid and Tyler Eiffort. Well,

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>so here's the good news. I seem you want the

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>good news, but before the bad news first, right, kind

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of bad news first? Well, the bad news is these

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>uh tyler efforts at elevate injury risks, he's not going

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to get any better than that. That is his best

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>number that he's gonna get. But his HPF is at peak.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>So what that tells us is that he's recovered from

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>his injuries. So no existing injury is going to impact

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>his play. But he has a one in five chance

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of getting injured right now. And uh so that means

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he's got when you multiply that by sixteen games, you

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>know a fifth of the season right now, he's gonna

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>miss no matter. I can tell you right now that

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of him missing a fifth of the season

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is very high. So um Jordan Read varies these two

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage points better than Tyler Effort at elevated injury risk

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and again he's at peak health. He's at the same

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>exact number eight two percent. So these are elevated high

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>reward type guys. You cannot rely on them as like

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the one or two. You gotta go down to three,

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>four five for these guys. Look, these guys are healthy

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>if they're dominant. But the issue again is that they've

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>been you know, they they've they've been very cautionary with

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>them in the in the off season precincts. You haven't

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>heard about any injuries in that cent But once that

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>first game hits, do not be surprised if one or

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys are coming off the field due

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to an injury. And that's why I'm saying take them because, uh,

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, from that peak in peak HPF. But they're

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>high risk, high reward type guys. And this is the

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>fact that we all know this about Tyler Eiffort and

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reads that when they're healthy, they're dominant. Dr A

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>just said, especially in the reserve with Tyler Eiffort, and

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really all across the board with Jordan read Um. Alex

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Smith has always utilized his head end from Burning Davis

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>backing in San Francisco, certainly to Travis Kelsey in Kansas City.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reid is good to go. Jake Gruden said yesterday

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that yeah, that works some other guys in but Jordan

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>reads healthy. And he said both guys, of course, saying

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this as healthy as they felt in years. We'll see

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if they can they can be managed. I took your advice, Frank.

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I picked up Vernon Davis, John Alex Smith Um, and

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm handcuffing him. I'm crazy. I'm handcuffing my tight end

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and my wide receiver in Jonimo Allison Um and Vernon Davis. Now,

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have a I don't think

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a choice, um, but I'm banking on Tyler,

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on Tyler Eifert and Jordan read here this Sunday. Yeah.

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I liked about Jordan Reid and Tyler

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Effort this draft season is that you finally got them

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at that discounted price. Right, Jordan read the customer. I

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>mean the past couple of years, four fifth, sixth round pick.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you're getting him in the nine round. Sometimes Tyler

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Eiffort even later than that. I mean, you could have

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>got him with one of your last picks of the draft.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to talk to three. I think you

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you play these guys while they're healthy. I think undoubtedly

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they're going to misstime at some point, but especially early

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on in the year, while these guys are healthy, not

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report, I go ahead and get them

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in my lineup. I think there's a lot of similarities

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>between and cuffing their backup too, because Andy Dalton likes

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to throw the tight end a lot. Absolutely, something happens

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to effort. I think Tyler Craft steps in and he

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>will be Fantasy viable as well. Yeah, what one thing

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to look out Jordan read five plus concussions first game out.

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You know he's on concussion Watch. So just that's a

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>tidbit there. Yeah. Absolutely, anytime you know he takes a

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>big hit, you're gonna be holding your breath. Is he

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave that game? I mean, that is what you

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about. Being a Jordan read owner. Frankly,

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I've never owned him before because he never had that

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>discount baked into his price, but this year he did,

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so that's why I was willing to take that risk. Doctor,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about a defensive player actually,

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>which is something we don't normally do, but he has

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that much of an impact for fantasy. That's Xavier Rhodes.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You've heard of Rhodes closed. He's dealing with a hamstring injury.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He was limited and practice yesterday. He's questionable for Week one.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The reason why we need to know about this is

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because if he plays, it seems more than likely he's

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>going to shadow Mark. He's goodwin in their matchup against

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty niners, and we know that that's

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not a good thing. So what do you have on

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Roads and his availability for Week one? So the

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>compliment to wide receiver for hamstring injuries is a cornerback

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for hamstring injuries. It is their achilles heel. And when

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw this, I said, oh, this is not good.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Um grade one hamstring injury even though it's grade one

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>for cornerback. That that is uh. You know, you'll see

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about our big offensive tackle. But you know,

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for for cornerbacks and wide receivers, this is an impactful injury,

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>even at grade one. Right now, I'm telling you, right now,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't play until week three. He does play. If

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he does play in this game, um, look out because

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>right now he's at thirty one percention injury risk to

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to tweak it, to worsen it um if it's truly

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a Grade one hamstring, which is what we're showing. So

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, September eighteen is when he should he should

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>rest that because then he can be good to go

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season if he reactivates it,

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean re injuries it this game and maybe he

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>may be out for half a year. And this is serious.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>This is serious, guys. This is hamstring injuries for wide

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>receivers and corner backs. Is the most important thing from

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>an injury perspective, especially for a team that has Super

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl aspirations in the Minnesota Vikings. Doctor, I just wanted

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask you if they risk Xavier Rhods playing this

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>week based on the health the health risk factors that

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you have there, what percentage do you think he would

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be at if he's playing this week? Is it is

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like six sevent what would you say, thirty nine percent

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>right now? Um, probably at game time if he has

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in the next uh three days to uh probably Hell,

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe it'll go up to forty six seven percent. I

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think even he won't get to feel better about

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>playing Mark. He's good. I was gonna say, because the

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 1>player that he's going to guard is a burner, right

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to make him test that over and

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Definitely feel a little bit better

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about starting Mark. He's good Win this weekend. Yeah, and

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo for that matter, and Jimmy Garoppolo, no doubt

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Although with quarterbacks is you probably have better option?

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I would think, Yeah, any Dalton that stream Murphy's available,

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you're still starting him over Jimmy g I'm

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna actually stick at the tight end where I was

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>before because in Arizona we we've seen he will take

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>shots on Ricky Seals Jones with the with the thought

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>process being he's going to improve in in year two

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as a recognizable name. All that thought process was if

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Jermaine Gresham remained hurt. Gresham came off the publist at

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the end of training camp because the team didn't think

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that he would miss six games. Well that was practicing

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this week. Is Jermaine Gresham ready to go? And could

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he play on Sunday? No, and he shouldn't play on

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Sunday right now. Our HTR shows in October fifteenth, which

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is week six basically, so I think he's off the

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>publist because he will be utilizing all of that time.

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think week six is the one where he

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>should optimally come back. If he does come back before

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, you're taking a risk. He's that's still

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he's still high and he's at the borderline of elevated

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and high injury risk. And he's had a below average

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>poor designation right now mainly because he's still US five

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to six weeks left to recover completely torn achilles on

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a tight end or any football player, I mean, so

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like a forty week recovery basically. Okay, So nothing

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to worry about essentially, if you have Ricky Seels Jones,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like you get a good matchup this week, play him

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>over all since Verian Jane clearly now you're debating between

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>those two. Yeah, and so in regards to another injury

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>with that has to do other players as well. Sonny

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Michelle is back practicing for New England and we've heard

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Rex Brokehead could be eased in the action for New England,

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and the same goes to Sonny Michelle. Is he going

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to play UF Sunday? He shouldn't. Um his HTR is

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of week two somewhere, so he should

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.239
<v Speaker 1>not play in this first game. He shouldn't, even though

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people want want to see him, Um,

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just he's he's been injured a lot

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of Georgia and you know, I know a lot about

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>him because he's in my hometown basically. But uh but yeah, no,

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a week two is kind of what we're looking at.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>His His numbers have improved as he's been rehabbing to

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>sixteen percent injury risk. It was at eight percent only

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, so he's improved to sixteen percent and

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>he's gone from port or below average, so now he's

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>escalating up to above average. So you know, just give

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>it time. Week two he should be very close to

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>low injury risk and back up to above average peak health.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>And I wouldn't be surprised one bit if they sit

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>him this week. They have enough other options out there

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>between Rex Burkhead, Jeremy hill Um, and James White, So

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they have options. I think it would be

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>smart for them to sit him as well. Doct Just

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one more question here. I asked you about Xavier Rhodes.

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to ask you about Anthony Costanzo, left

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>tackle for the Indianapolis Colt, who's covering the blindside for

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck who you know is recovering from the shoulder.

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>He needs all the protection he can get. We only

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have one minute left, uh Cassanto dealing with the hamstring injury?

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Does he play this week? And if not, how does

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that affect Andrew? Look So hamstring injuries to cornerbacks and

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers I told you are algorithms, uh point on

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that offensive tackles not so much so, you know, great

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to hamstring injury. He had it, then it then it reaggravated.

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Um and right now though he's still at low injury

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>risk at nine percent peak help at this is not

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>going to affect him too much. It's not a significant

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>stabilis and muscle, his quadri steps and all these other

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>muscles and hips, loteral rotations, those are. These are the

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>things that are will stabilize an offensive tackle. So he

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>should be good to go. He I mean, he will

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>experience some pain probably in it, but he's not at

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>super high injury risk. You know, he should be good

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to go. That good news for Andrew Luck. There you go,

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Doc inside Injuries the Expert. It's Dr A rid of

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>your Falcons tonight. Doc. Oh yeah, ready to go. I'm

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>riting from to screw the Eagles. There we go. Football

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is back. Dr will be with us every Thursday going

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>forward throughout the NFL season. When we come back, Frank

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and I make our season long picks and we answer

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>your calls eight four four, eight four, three six and

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>seven nives. Stick with us. It's your fantasy best friends forever.

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Like a great pass rusher, the Roto Experts will help

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you sack your fantasy football competition. When you register for

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>their exclusive Edge Fantasy package, you get a cheat cheat generator,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>plus a player database with sortable projections and rankings from

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the best in the business, and you can join the

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy conversation in slack chat channel. Visit Roto Experts dot

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>com to register for the Exclusive Edge Fantasy Package and

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>enter the promo code F and T S Y and

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you get a temper said discount. That's the Rotal Experts

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com Exclusive Edge Fantasy Football package. Promo code F

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>N T s Y Fantasy Factors Free entry million dollar

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL Survivor cott. This is now open. Sign up today

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>play for a chance to win one million dollars. Fantasy

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Factor dot Com. That's Fantasy Factor dot Com. Uh, did

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you jump in yet? I have jumped in and entered

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>my Survivor team. Me too. I'm going with the Baltimore Ravens. Yeah,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>pounded Ravens. So Ravens go flying like Ravens tonight. Whatever

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that means. Whatever that means. We also want to remind

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you that bet d s I is celebrating twenty years

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as the industry's biggest and safings betting site. They have

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>great customer service and fast easy payment of winnings. You

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can play virtually every sport at bet d s I

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with hundreds of wagering options, including live in game wagering

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>on all major sporting events where you can play at

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>any time. Listen, there's more here. Using promo code FN

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>T S Why bet d s i is offering up

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to a million dollar bonus or thousand dollars not a

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. That's a fantasy factors for for contest using

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>promo code F and T s Y. Bet d s

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I is offering up to a thousand dollar bonus on

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>your first deposit. Use promo code F and T s

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Y and try bet d SI dot com. That's bet

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>d SI dot com. The promo code is F and

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>T s Y. Head on over and start winning today.

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it? Yes, all right? What a be doing first? Gregor,

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>were preview in the Thursday night game? Are we doing

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>our season long previews? We'll take some calls. I feel

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like we got to do a little bit of rapid

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fire everything. We'll take some calls. Eight four four eight

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>four three six seven nine's get to Pete in Florida

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>started us off. What's up? Pete? Hey, what's up? Guys?

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Love the show? Awesome, appreciate it man, thank you for

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sticking with it. What's going on? Yeah? I got a

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>question a lot with this Bell drama trade question. He

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>wants he wants Rex Rex burkehead from me and he'll

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>be given me. I got leave Bell and he'll be

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>given me. Connor and Duke Johnson and can I tell

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you my line up quick? Yes? My all my running backs,

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little thin. I got leave Bell, Birkhead, Marshawn Lynch, Penny,

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, and Latavious Murray. But my wide receivers are stacked.

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I got a j Adams and Baldwin stack. Yeah, you

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>know what Greg actually think. I don't. I don't think

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the running back situation is all that bad, honest. Same uh,

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>And I would do this trade. I would do this trade.

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I would do it as well. I think

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you're actually a really good position to do it. I

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>make the move. Yeah, you get James Connor, your parent

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with Levian Bell. You played Connor until presumably Levian Bell returned.

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>You have him in Marshall Lynches your RB one and two,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a few stats candidates, guys that

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>could pop off later on in the year, in Rashad

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Penny and Aaron Jones. So I actually don't mind this.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Let's go back to the phones at eight

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>four four, eight four or three six seven nine to

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Joshua in Colorado. What's up, Joshua, what's so grad? How

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you guys doing? We're doing great? Man, what's happening? Great? So, um,

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a three part question here. I have Jordan

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Howard and Carlos Hide. But I guess my guru on

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>UM NFL Fantasy, what I play Jordan Howard over Carlos Hide.

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>What are you guys thinking there? I think it makes

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. I'm going Jordan Howard over Carlos Hide.

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I like Carlos Hide a lot this week, but I'm

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>still gonna keep Jordan Jordan Howard in the lineup Bears

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Um. I think he's gonna have an opportunity

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to I think he's gonna get more touches overall in

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this game. But it's tough because they do look like

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>all those hide a lot as well. Alrighty. In my

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>second book question I would say here it would be

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>so I have take In and Rashown Matthews. There's saying

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to star roshown Matthews they had to take in, but

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the take In has a higher more projection. What do

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys stay there? Do you have anybody else he's

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from between those two guys, Well, let's see here John

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Ross Um, John Ross, Jeronimo Allison Um. But the rest

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of my two I have Antonio and Brandon Marque is

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>good when already already starting, as well as Chris Hogan.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because I like I think I like Ross

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and Alison both better than the two choices that you have.

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I would take the shot on John Ross. Match up

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>against the Cold Sect doesn't get any better. Yea, with

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>those the wide receivers he already has in his lineup.

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I agree, we'll we'll both take the shot on John

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Ross there. Before we get to our season long picks, Frank,

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to pick tonight's game Atlanta and the Philadelphia Eagles.

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>The line is at one? Is that correct line is

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>at one? Philly is a one point favorite the defending

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl champions at all move the Falcons are minus one?

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>What the Falcons are minus one in this game? You

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm looking at? That's unbelievable. Yeah, I want

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to check the We're Gonna Fandue sports book here because

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm looking at. Oh, do chan our graphic

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>now that we made? Probably? Okay, actually we can't because

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we already talked about what the line was previously in

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the video, so we will not be changing the graphic.

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Um wow, Okay, So the updated line is the Falcons

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are a one point favorite in this one against Eagles.

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely unbelievable. I'm taking the Eagles. Screw it, man, I

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Falcons win. But now I'm getting a point

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to not that you can I can push, so like that,

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Eagles. It's gone too far. This seems

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like a trap game. I'm gonna continue to choose the Falcons,

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:11.439
<v Speaker 1>but the more and more it goes the other way again,

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I feel like it could be a

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>trap break. So if if I'm taking a bet tonight,

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the under at forty four and a half.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I could see this game seventeen twenty. The question is

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>do you think it gets to because that's the cut

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>off that is right there at forty five forty four

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I think this game goes under. They

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>know it's crazy. Man. Nick Foles looks so bad, Like

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>remember in practice last year, before we started in practice,

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>he looks so terrible. There were rumors are gonna starting

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Ate Sudfeld, like we're gonna stick with Nick Foles. Anyone

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I would win a Super Bowl? Yeah, I want to

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>go to the Eagles. Look, this game was fifteen to

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ten last year in the playoffs. You could argue both

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive got better. Totally, so totally if I'm taking a bet,

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tough conditions though in Philly that day, very very cold out.

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it will be beautiful today, very very hot actually

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia. I think I need agrees today. If I

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have to choose a winner, I'll take the Falcon, but

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the other, all right, I'll take the Eagles

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as my pick in this one. Speaking of picks, let's

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>go through our picks, Frankie, all season long. Um, we're

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>not all season long, all year long. We want to

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>give you. We need picks every Friday. Of course, our

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 1>our top five plays of the day. But we want

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to make our season long picks. Divisions, wild Cards, playoffs, champions,

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah blah. Let's start off in the

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Eagles division. Let's start off in the FC East. I

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>will take the Eagles. But you know, I actually struggled

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with this a little bit last night. They were thirteen

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and three. Last year. I think they I think they

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:32.919
<v Speaker 1>bounce back. I think they fall come back to earth

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more so this year. I could see

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 1>them at about ten and six, but it wouldn't be

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>surprised that the Giants or Cowboys make a run here.

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I could see the either the Giants at nine wins

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 1>or the Cowboys surprising some people at eight or nine wins.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I think that the one of those teams

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>are going to be right on the Eagles this year,

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Foles and the uncertainty of Carson Wentz health

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Super Bowl hangover, I see the team at

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ten and six. They still win a division, but it's

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot closer than last year. I'll see the Giants.

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a homer, really, yeah, you know what the Giants

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>can time I talked to your like, the Giants are

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>last eight games this year, Now you're picking them to

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>win the division. Well, let's remember when I did the

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>rookie when I knew the pace picks previously, I picked

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Luis Savarino. I picked Labor torres. Um. You know, actually

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the world actually chose Jacob Degram to win. You did,

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It's right, you guys laughed at me, Yeah, because you

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know my LMP. But didn't you wait? Did you do

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you like to grow more than because we were doing

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy rankings, you didn't have to grow. Did you

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>have the ground that next. Okay, I had him like

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the highest of that. I chose, I chose, I chose

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Arnados n l Freddy Freeman. Who's your almv P? Rry Sanxious?

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>There's an l v P and actually is Garry Absolutely,

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 1>who's my m v P. Oh, it was Aaron Josh,

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which could have been based on the way that the

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Yankees are playing right now. He might be the most

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>notable player. You should win, all right? NFC North, Uh, Frankie,

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Green Bay Packers here. I

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>think Aaron Rodgers will stay healthy and I think this

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>team will be I think the Vikings regressed just a

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit, so I'll say the Packers win the NFC North.

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I will also say the Packers. I think it's very

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>close between them and the Vikings. Um, but all the

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Packers really needed that offensive line to stay healthy. They've

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>made a ton of additions to that secondary to try

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and show it up. In the off season. They bring

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>back Tormon William who had a fine season in Arizona

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>last year, and then they draft arguably two of the

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>top three cornerbacks in the draft and Jaire Alexander and

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jackson. So I can actually see the Green Bay

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers defense taking a New Orleans Saints kind of um,

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, transition from last year where we've never seen

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Saints defense be good or adequate. I can see

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the Packers doing that this year. In the NFC West,

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are your defending champions, had a fantastic year,

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>but this could be a very very competitive division with

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the Rams and the Niners obviously looking up. I think

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals will be a lot better, um, and we'll

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>see what the Seahawks bring to me out of it.

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>The Rams here, I just I just don't know if

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody else has enough off. As I said, I think

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the fort Nighters can be good. I like the Cardinals too,

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love the Cardinals over We spoke about

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that on our Under show like a week's back. So

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the Rams to win this division. Like I

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of parody in this division outside

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Los Angeles Rams. I think the Rams dominate

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in this division. I can see them at eleven or

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve wins. They do have a very very tough scheduled,

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>very but in terms of balance, I don't know that

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a more well balanced team in the NFL. Right

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:27.399
<v Speaker 1>now from the elite players that they added to their defense. Again,

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:29.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of personalities on that defense, so Sean

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh is gonna have his hands full. But just in

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of their offensive line, the running back, the improving

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play, and and their overall coaching. I like the

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Rams a lot this year. I take them to win

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the division. I do think that the Cardinals, Seahawks, and

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners are all kind of close within like seven

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to nine wins. NFC South traditionally one of the toughest

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>divisions to pick, with all four teams usually being pretty good.

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>This year, the books look to be the worst, but

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see how it obviously turns out when

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston gets back from suspension. Saints were the wild

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>card team last year despite winning eleven games. Carolina won

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this division and Atlanta just two years ago when the

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>NFC representatives in the Super Bowl, Who do you got

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in this one? Yeah? So I have the New Orleans Saints.

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna they're gonna come out hot this

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>year after what happened in the miracle in Minneapolis last season,

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>where you know they you know, what's what's left to

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>be said about that. Um so yeah, I think the

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Saints win this division. But again, I think there's there's

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parody. I think it's close between them

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Falcons. Before we sign off, YouTube will give

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you give me your wild cards in the NFC. I

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>will take the Vikings, almost taking the Saints, by the ways,

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when I didn't, I didn't go further. I'm thinking the

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Saints as well. I'm taking the Vikings and the Falcons

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and the wild cards. Vikings and the Falcons. In the

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wild card, I am taking the Vikings as one of

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>my wild cards. The second wild card. It's tough, man.

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Um my second wild card. You took the Giants. I know,

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking. I'm looking at that. The Eagles are still

0:47:55.760 --> 0:48:00.080
<v Speaker 1>out there. They are the Eagles are Eagles are are

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>still out there. For my second wild card, I'm gonna

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>go with the Arizona Cardinals. I like the Cardinals this year.

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably all right, let's go over the board.

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>You know some of these teams expressed alright, Oh man,

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I like the Panthers too. Where are the Cardinals? Went on?

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Who You're second wild card? Would you say it wasn't

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 1>get Falcons. Okay to alright, Uh, we'll sign off YouTube now.

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll get the a f C picks on radio and

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast only. We'll make our Super Bowl predictions there as well,

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you want those, you gotta listen to our

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast or turn on the f T s Y radio

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:31.919
<v Speaker 1>app right now my heart. Of course that will work

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. We appreciate you watching the fantasy football frenzy

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>comes your way. Next, it's gonna be a f C

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>East here, Frankie. Um in the a f C East, well,

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll take the Patriots. We'll take I don't want to

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>waste I don't want to waste time doing it. Um

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Ac North, the a f C North, it lose LEVI

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bell, but I still think this is the Pittsburgh

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Steler's division to lose. I agree. You also will take

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers there in the a f C West, Who

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 1>do you got there? I think this will be our

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 1>first differing choice, and I will take the Los Angeles Chargers.

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Is very, very bullish on the Charges. It wasn't the first.

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I took the Giants. You do the Eagles. Yes, you're

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>taking the Chargers. You're bullish on him. Everybody's bullish on

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers this year, and I'm gonna tell you what,

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Charges let you down every year. He's just not here.

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Give me Andy Reid. Give me the Chiefs. I know

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone who thinks their defense about letting you down every year,

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but in the playoffs, but that offense is going to

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>be fun. Give me the Chiefs. Yeah, I think they

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>get washed in Week one by the Chargers. We'll see

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a FC South the Jaguars, the defending champions. They made

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it all the way to the ANFC Championship game. Do

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you like him to repeat? Do not have the It's

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>a very risky It's a high risk, high reward play here.

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But if their defense stays healthy, if the Shawn Watson

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>stays healthy, Houston Texans will win this division. Greg, I

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>love Houston Texans, but I have them as a wild

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>card in the a f C. I think Texans can

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>really do damage. I think they can make the Super

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Bowl in all honest day. But I think the Jaguars

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>defense and their offense is improving. Also, we talked about

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>well balanced team, um I think that the Rams are

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely the most balanced team potentially in the NFC. I

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think you can make a case the Jaguars are the

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>most balanced team in the a f C. So I'm

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna make the Jaguars my division winner, with the Texans

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.879
<v Speaker 1>being one of my wild card teams. The other wild

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>card team is the team that's just They're always there.

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>They always find a way to fight and get very

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>very close under the Ravens was my second wild card team, Ravens.

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. So I actually have three teams making the

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 1>playoffs of the a f C South. I have the

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Texans winning the division, and then I have the Titans

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Jacksonville Jaguars. I could see all three teams

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>at nine and seven, or maybe the Texans at ten

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and six, but the other two there nine and ten.

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I think one of these. Um. It's interesting because the

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Colts are another competitive team that Andrew lux so I

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think this would be a very competitive division in the

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:46.879
<v Speaker 1>a f C South. Give me your super Bowl please.

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So you would have thought Michael Florio made these predictions

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>after moving to l A. But I have the Rams

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:58.320
<v Speaker 1>over the Chargers. I have the Battle of l A,

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and I not always tossing and turning in last night,

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I was actually thinking about this. I think the NFC

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is wide open I think there's a good chance that

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots get knocked off this year in the a

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>f C. And if it does happen, it's from the Chargers.

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Love that defense, love that pass rush. They made improvements

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to the offensive line, they have Philip Rivers, they have

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:15.879
<v Speaker 1>a great running back in Melvin Gordon. I just think

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of balance on that Chargers team. And

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:20.800
<v Speaker 1>then for the Rams, once again, what it said balance

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that they have a ton of stars in that defense.

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I struggled between them and the Saints. I really it

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:27.839
<v Speaker 1>was the Rams of the Saints for me. But I'll

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:29.400
<v Speaker 1>do the battle of l A. The Rams winning all

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's amazing because I also have the Rams

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of my Super Bowl champion, because they are so well balanced.

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.399
<v Speaker 1>As to me, um, I'm between two teams of who

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think will win it, but you know what, the

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:42.800
<v Speaker 1>best team also, I'll go with the Rams over the

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs in the Super Bowl, all right, I'll go to

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are the Chiefs. I was really considering putting

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Texans in there because I think they're balanced as well,

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but like the Jaguars too, and I think they'll cancel

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>each other out. I'm gonna go with the Rams over

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs in the Super Bowl. Who is your NFL

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>m v P this year, Frank, the NFL m v P.

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 1>If I had to choose one, who probably like a

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady or whatever. You have to choose one. If

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>if I was thrown down, bets, I would throw it

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>down on either Philip Rivers or Todd Gurley. What's your pick?

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta put it in here. I'll say Philip Rivers.

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Say Philip Rivers, that's a mistake. He'll never win the MVP. Okay,

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if the Charges go twelve and four and

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 1>he throws thirty touchdowns, he'll be the m v P. Rick, No,

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he won't be. You're good, Okay, that's Philips. Trading him

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>away was the best thing that your franchise are. He's

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a loser. You eat your words this here, Greg, we'll

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 1>find out my my NFL m v P. Um to

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>me Aaron Rodgers. Come on, he's the favorite of plus

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:41.600
<v Speaker 1>four hundred. It's so boring, Greg, Yeah, I understand. Who

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is your NFL rookie over the year. My take, Barkley,

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an offensive been a defensive offensive. I have sa Kwan,

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think a sneaky bet if some kind of

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>injury injury were to strike the say Kwan, my Homer

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>picked Sam Darden. Oh, you just need to get the

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>jets in there somewhere. You have a defensive over giy

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>in the year, you don't. I think Bradley Chubb. I

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>think Bradley Chubb has a good chance of when a

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive Rookie of the Year playing opposite of von Miller.

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be lots of opportunities from this year. I

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really know any defensive rookies, So Ben's award, Bradley Chubb,

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>either of the Peckers, neither of those guys. Now, I

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't I'll let you know what right now. I'll let

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you know right now the Rookie of the Year I haven't, haven't.

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't found him yet. Anything else you want to

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pick um, No, that's pretty much it. I think you

0:53:26.000 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>know Philip Rivers and Todd Girl. If you're just throwing

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit for the MVP, plus the Rams

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and Chargers I believe are both plus twenty two hundreds,

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So you just throw it down a little bit on

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:41.359
<v Speaker 1>either one of those the chiefs that I can pull

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it up really quickly. Wait, show's not anything right, huh.

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Sprinkle Baby, Sprinkle Fantasy Football Frenzy with Corey Parson, Jim Day,

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Chris Vner coming your way next. But Frankie Stample, I'm

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg sum will do it all again on a Football

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday tomorrow, we hope,