WEBVTT - How Chile's Unrest is Affecting the Economy

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you now. People have different associations with

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the South American country of Chile. For older listeners, it

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>make under our images of the dictator Augusto Pinochet. For others,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's probably Chilean merlot or maybe the odd copper mine.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But one thing almost everyone knows is that Chile and

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>its economy are stable in a region full of countries

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that are not. The violent protests in Chile since October

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have turned that reputation on its head. Demonstrators demanding a

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>more equal society have clashed with police, and the unrest

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>has sometimes tipped over into looting and vandalism that more

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>than twenty people have died, hundreds have been wounded, and

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>thousands thrown into jail, and there have been plenty of

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>accusations of human rights abuses. So the billionaire president Sebastian

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Pinera was caught off guard at the beginning and fumbled

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>his response. He said that Chile was at war, which

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>enraged the protesters. Then he backtracked and has now promised

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>lots of social projects to bring the demonstrators around. In

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a minute, I'm going to ask one of Bloomberg's Latin

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>American economist, Philippi Hernandez, whether the protests have put Chile's

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>long term stability at risk and whether they shed light

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on the challenges facing new governments in Argentina and Brazil.

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to catch up with our trades are

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Brenda Murray on the latest truce in the US China

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>trade war. But first, here's Bloomberg Santiago Bureau chief Eduardo

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Thompson on the roots of the economics and social crisis

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in Chile and where the country goes from here. Understand

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Chile need to know about Plas Italia, a wide roundabout

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that marks the dividing line between the upscale neighborhood of

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Providencia in the district of Santiago Center, the home of

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>government offices. Every time the national soccer team wins, crowds

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>gather there to sing and celebrate. It's also a magnet

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for political protests. In a way, it's a local version

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of Washington's National Mall, with wide avenues and parks along

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the border of the Mapucha River. It's also an invisible

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>boundary the Place Italia Barria or on up from Place

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Italia is where the wealthy live in Santiago's northeastern districts.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Nail Italia. We're never gone down. Best place Italia means

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who has never seen the real world, and by

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>real world we mean in downtown, where most of the

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>people that feel left behind from Chile's economic progress live.

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Las Italia is the ground zero of the Protestant Chile

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that started in October. Layers and layers of graffiti now

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>cover the statues honoring past wars, while metal or ward

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>barriers surround the area's stores. A few brave shopkeepers have

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>put ups paper signs saying they're still open. Many have

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>closed for good. On a sunny and hot Monday, I

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>met with a twenty four year old woman named Tad Flories.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>All around, college age men their faces covered behind masks,

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>directed traffic and set off fire extinguishers. Women near the

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>main statues were doing a topless feminist performance against sexual violence.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Police were nowhere to be seen ever since they started

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>be coming here to protest. But I get out of it,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>turns to violet and there's police repression and protest him

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>because of the bad quality of public health and pensions.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Pensions are just too like the addition, know about this,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>she works at a private clinic that attends to the

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rich those that live uptown from Plas Italia. This invisible

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>boundary in Plas Italia also inspired David Vargas to protest.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Every Friday. After the thirty eight year old technician completes

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>his shift working in the back office of a credit

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>card company in the swanky neighborhood of Nova Las Condes,

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>he heads out here to join the protests. I came

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to work one day at Glas Conges after it all began,

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is what angered me the most. The place

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was packed with soldiers. They were guarding everything when absolutely

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing had happened. But if it went downtown or rather

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>places in Santiago, it was pure chaos. They just guarded

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from Plas Italia to the rich neighborhoods. Very That's how

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it was, and you can still see that today and

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>David are part of chillis rising middle class. Both have

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>professional degrees. David, for example, comes from a poor family.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>His father, a former factory worker, collects a monthly disability

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>pension equivalent to about hundred dollars. David's mother worked her

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.239
<v Speaker 1>whole life cleaning houses to put food on the table

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for him and his family. I'm protesting mostly because of

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the pensions, and to emphasize because right now I have

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>privileges that many don't have. I know what it is

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to live in a poor neighbor. I know what it

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>is to wait for eight hours at public hospitals for service.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I know what it means that the elderly received extremely

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>low pensions and don't have enough to leave or to

0:05:52.720 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>buy food. A few blocks down from plass Italian is

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>where the whole mess started. In a subway station called Chile.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Early in October, students began to plot massive ticket evasions,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>first in New York City Chile and then in other stations,

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>sparked by a fair increase of thirty vessels or four cents.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Things got nasty fast. Police special forces clashed with the protesters.

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Acts of vandalism started and culminated on the night of

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>October eighteen, when unidentified groups set stations on fire. Protests

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>continued and morphed into the biggest social unrest since the

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet. The message was clear. The neglected

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>lower and middle class in South America's richest country was mad,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>very mad. Outside of the iconic station in downtown Santiago.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I met with Claudiaquentis, a professor of political science from

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the New Year City, Diego Portalis. He has been following

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>social protests for a long time, but the violence of

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the protests took him by surprise. The people are very,

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>very upset against political parties, against the business community abusing powers.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is at two sides, a conflict related to

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>social demands and the abuse of power of the lead.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Although at the time of this recording, the intensity of

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the protests seems to have subsided, the damage to the

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>social fabric of Chile and it's once growing economy is undeniable.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>The Central Bank has warned that if the economy doesn't

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>get back on track, unemployment can jump to more than

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ten pc. The bisto has had the worst performance of

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>any emergent market currency in the period. Getting out of

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this will require lot of spending and a lot of

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>soul searching around what led the country there. I think

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that also makes it extremely difficult to handle that this

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is domestically created. Most of the crisis that we have

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>had Asian crisis, the global finance crisis were extended crisis

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that is dean of the New Yar City, Chile School

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of Economics and former governor of Chile Central Bank during

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. He says that though income inequality figures

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have improved and poverty has fallen, it hasn't been enough.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>All they the munity developments and poor people housing was

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>down in the In the baphory of the of the

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>city we create not get as well, but the extremely

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dissegregated city, so you are very high inca where if

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you have middle or low income living different helps. Getting

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>out of this crisis won't be easy for President Pineta.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>He has promised the five point five billion package of

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>social measures, and the country will issue more dead and

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>spend part of its savings. There's also a promise of

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a new constitution vote next April, but political parties have

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>stalled discussing the details of the process, and for people

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>such as David Vargas, it isn't the solution. He wants

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to see the video. I meant anything. The most important

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>measure is that the president should resign because he has

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>shown that he won't bring peace. Neither will political parties.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>They set up a show and say we've signed a

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>peace agreement, but they don't see that people are protesting

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>because they don't believe in competitions that may be seen

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as too extreme. But political scientists Cloudy Afuentes says that

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a major change is long overdue, need to change forever,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because the previous let's say CONSENSUV and its stabilty was artificial.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>It was like a time em bomb in which where

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pressuring force certain issues. And I think that if we

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>don't change the way society is set up, we might

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have another explosion in thirty years, in twenty years. It's

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a lesson that other Latin American countries are paying careful

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>attention to. When similar protests began in Colombia, the government

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of Van Duke quickly set up talks with unions and

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>social groups to diffuse the tention, While the government of

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Jai Bolsonado in Brazil has taken the foot off the

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>gas of its markets reform agenda. It remains to be

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>seen if the reforms in Chile or elsewhere will be

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>enough to avoid another flare up of the violence. For

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, I'm Edward or Thompson. So I'm I'm joined

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>now by Phelipp Fernandez in New York, who covers Mexico, Chile,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of other countries in Latin America for

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economics. Philippe, thanks for coming on Stephonomics. Thank you

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for inviting me, Stephanie. We just listened to that piece

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>from Eduardo, and you know, I guess the question is

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>does this does this unrest actually put Chile's really long

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>reputation for economic and political stability at risk? I mean,

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is this is that the Chilean economic model, such as

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it is, is it is it fundamentally under threat now?

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Or are these protests something that are likely to fade.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The short answer to your question is that yes, indeed,

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all of these unrest has raised some risks for the

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Chilean economy and the view, the consensus view

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of a sterile Chile. What the policymakers have to understand

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is that in terms of what changes are REQUI fired,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they must keep in mind or try to make sure

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that what has been working well for Chile is maintained.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Some good examples of this is that they you now

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have a very credible and independent central bank, which has

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>helped to keep a low and stable inflation, responsible and

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>sustainable fiscal policy and the overall conditions that have allowed

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Chile to enjoy relatively stable and positive economic growth. Now,

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there were some things that were not working in Chile.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the different indicators, you find that

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>despite all of these things that I mentioned before, there's

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a still high income inequality in Chile. There were limited

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>redistribution policies and low social mobility in part due to

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>limited taxes to high quality education. And any new arrangement

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that comes out as a result of the of these

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>changes must be sustainable in the long term, and by

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this I mean at any any fiscal policy measures that

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>result in higher public cector expenditure will have to be

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:10.239
<v Speaker 1>upset by the government finding news sources of of revenues,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and for the economy as a whole, of course, this

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>probably will imply higher taxes. Any decisions in terms of

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>increasing wages or pensions that could result in higher costs

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for the for the productive sector will all have to

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be carefully weighted against the negative impact that this could

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>have on the competitiveness of Chile, especially when considering that

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Chile is a very highly opened economy and that it

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is it's a competitiveness relative to the world, to the

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world is a key component of the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>positive growth in the economy. It's not just Chile. I mean,

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>if you look around the region, there's protests bursting out

0:13:54.000 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>all over. We've seen in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador. Venezuela obviously

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>has been in meltdown for quite a while. And I

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>noticed that you you took a look um with Adriana Jupiter,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>who's our Argentina and Brazil economists at the regional picture

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on protests and how to think about how one might

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>assess the risk in different countries of protests breaking out

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Can you can you tell us a

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about that? Sure? So there were in different countries

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>different reasons for the protests, but what we saw is

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that they share a lot of the same problems. So

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in equality, it's not a problem only in Chile, it's

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>also a problem in the rest of the region. The

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>need for fiscal titaning measures. It's not just something that

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is now at the center of the debate in equal or.

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's also part of the debate economic debating the rest

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of the region, and the political noise in both Bolivia

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and Colombia. I think this is just evidence of the

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>problems regarding governance that we continue to see again not

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>only in these two fries, but in most of Latin America,

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>which basically helps to explain why you have these UH

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>these episodes of unrest and and the protest breaking up

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at the same time everywhere. Now, all of

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>these problems that I mentioned before, they are really not new,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but have recently become more note noticeable. The main reason

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for this is that for almost fifteen years between two

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two thousand fifteen, you had very strong growth

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in the region, and that very strong growth in the

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>region helped to achieve or deliver some progress in terms

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of social indicators. That very strong economic growth but was

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>written mainly by very favorable external conditions, bolstered by strong

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>growth from China, high commodity prices, and a steady decline

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in global monetary policy interest rates sarvice. Alt of these

0:15:55.320 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>favorable environment and strong economic growth, governments during these period

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>had a significant amount of resources to expand government programs

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to aid the lower and middle income classes. We saw

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>very successful and the programs of cash transfers from the

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>public sector to to to these UH minorities, and we

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>did saw a red significant reduction in the levels of

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>poverty and in some countries some improvement in inequality measures. However,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, the external environment has been

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>less favorable. That has had a negative impact on economic

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>growth in the region. And what we have seen is

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the last five years, this progress in social

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>indicators has pretty much stalled, and in some cases we

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have seen some deterioration. So the people in these countries,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>after fifteen years of progress, they are seeing no progress.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, they are losing some of the progress made.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And now that you have a bigger middle income class,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this is uh people that are getting used to make

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>more demands and want better services and and but there

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>better attention from from the government and under governors. And

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>when people talk about South America and particularly people and

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the economic side of things, they tend to

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>focus on Argentina, Brazil and Brazil. You know they face

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>they face some of the same problems. They have both

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>relatively recently had elections. Do you think there's a risk

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in either of those countries that even these quite new

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>governments will face the kind of unrest we've seen, particularly

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe in Argentina. Ah, the answer is yes, there's definitely

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a risk for it for Argentina, Brazil, and I will

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>also say Mexico as well to be included, and we

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot rule out that they could eventually see some some

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of this unrest as well. The main reason is that,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned before, they pretty much share most of

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the problems that triggered the protests in Chile. They also

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are facing decelerating economic growth. Actually Mexico now in recession.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that we looked into in the

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>piece that we wrote with Adriana, is that what why

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have we not seen protests in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And the main reason, at least one of the explanation

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that we could came up with, is that we recently

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>saw elections in all of these In these three countries,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the presidents that were elected or the results of these

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>elections provided a significant political change from the from the

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>previous government. And in the case of Mexico and Brazil,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the current presidents have been sitting in office for less

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>than a year, so they are relatively new and they

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are still like in like a honeymoon period. That reduces

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the amount of pressure, that of political or popular pressure

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that they can under. So people think they've successfully voted

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for something different, and now they're going to wait and

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>see if they get it. Reminds me of somewhere else,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not a million miles away from from where I am now.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Philip Bernandez, thanks very much for joining us. Thank you

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for invading. So we just have time for the very

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>latest on the trade wars to keep you happy as

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you go into the holiday season. Or is there still

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a trade war? Is it over? You could take a

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>number of views on that on the basis of President

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's tweets in the last week. Brendan Murray, our

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>long suffering trades are is here? Brendan, what's going on? Well,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say the trade wars are over, but let's

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just say both sides called a time out and agreed

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to go back to their corners and carry on, both

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sides being US and China exactly. So, what the US

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>announced just a couple of days ago was was a

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>deal in principle with China that consists of a couple

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of things. The Beijing has promised to purchase some two

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars worth of American products over the next

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. A lot of that agriculture and and

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>President Trump conceded that he would roll back some tariffs.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>So we've got both sides kind of giving in but

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>agreeing basically to put off the really tough issues where

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't come together for a later round, a phase two.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>They're calling this one phase one, and the next step

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>where they would address some of the more the deeper

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>structural issues with Chinese economy down the road. Now, that

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>could be a year from now, could be two years

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from now, who knows, but it's it's a pretty safe

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>bet that the that the trade wars are going to

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of drag on for months, if night years. Well,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say that I would miss talking

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to you about the trade wars, but I don't think

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I have to worry about that anytime soon. I mean,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we should say about the timing of this, that the

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>announcement of the deal came just a couple of days

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>before you would have had that imposition of the next

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>round of of tariffs on China, which actually our economists

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>had pointed out would be much much more damaging and

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>affect a lot more US companies than the previous tariffs.

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So I guess there was a reason for Donald Trump

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to come up with something um. But just to be clear,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>there's still going to be a lot of tariffs in

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>place for the foreseeable future. There what are the other

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>question marks about this phase one deal before we even

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>get to the Phase two. Absolutely, there's there still remains

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>tariff on two hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Chinese products and and teariffs on another hundred and thirty

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>billion or so. So we're still looking at, you know,

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the US ex imposing a fair amount of leverage on China. UM.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>The big question then is whether the threat of those

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>tariffs is wielded over China going into at the end

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>of Phase one and inter phase two. Is this is

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it a threat that just could keep coming up over

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and over again as they try to work through those

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>tougher issues. So the tariffs that are currently in play

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>aren't going anywhere for the foreseeable future, and you know,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that will continue to put economic pressure on China to

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, to come back to the table again and again.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>As if the US it continues to press press these issues.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the economic prism that we're looking through. The political

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>prism is Trump heading into his election next November, you know,

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to deliver the goods for the for the farmers

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Midwest to you know, many of them who

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>will vote for him, And so there there are economic

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>costs and benefits and political costs and benefits here. And

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we've we've talked about in the past that it probably

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>if your president Trump, your ideal is something that you

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can say is more than any other president would have achieved,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>but not so much that you have to stop complaining

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>about China and you can still bang the drum. So

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess in that sense it's kind of perfect for him.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm hearing is that we're not going to

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>get a Phase two anytime soon. It's really unlikely, at

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>least the experts that we talked to to see, uh,

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, these bigger issues that they need to deal

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>with um being hashed out in an election year. Being

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>tough on China is does sell well with the American public,

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>both Democrats and Republicans, But the Chinese understand the political

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>timetable as well, and so their their strategy has largely

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>been to kind of stall, drag their feet and see,

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>if you know, the political pressure outweighs the economic costs

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and and leaves Donald Trump trying to focus on these

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>other issues we are speaking today when when he's the

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>House is taking up his impeachment. Uh, quite a distraction.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And we have before you even think about that, we

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do have this other issue and that has been resolved.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we should say, if you like the other

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the other side of trade wars that was opened up

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>when President Trump came in, which was the renegotiation of NAFTA.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>UM that has gone through in the in the same

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>week or at least we've got agreement with the Democrats

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on that new deal. You know, I guess the obvious

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>question is if we've got if if the President would

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>say that NAPA to the North American trade with Canada

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and Mexico that he complained about has been sorted and

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>there's at least a truce on the situation with China.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Is Europe next? According to the U S Trade Representative

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Bob Lighthouser, he's setting his sights on that big trade

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>imbalance with with the European Union next year. It's you

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>know something that um. You know, the President Trumps has

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>complained about a lot. He he calls Europe even worse

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>than China when it comes to dealing with on with

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the trading relationship, and there are threats of tarrass on

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>auto imports which would hit Germany very hard, France and

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the UK to a large extent as well. So the

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the ever present threat of tariffs pointed at China to

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>date is you know, going to be pointed in the

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>direction of Europe next coming to shows now you well,

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. I'm sure we will be talking

0:24:51.680 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>about that in the new year. Brenda mind thanks for

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to Stephanomics. We'll be back next week with an

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>extra special Christmas episode featuring yet another Nobel Prize winner

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in conversation and a particular take on the holiday season

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>from Vietnam. In the meantime, you can find us on

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal website, app or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>and we'd love it if you took the time to

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>rate and review our show. For more news and analysis

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Economics, follow at Economics on Twitter. You can

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>also find me on at my Stephanomics. The story in

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this episode was written and reported by Eduardo Thompson with

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>assistance from Maria Jose Campagnion. It was edited by Bruce

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Douglas and produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Special thanks to Philippe Hernandez,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Murray, Rodrigo Ramirez, and Solida Saldalla. Scott Lamman is

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>the executive producer of Stephanomics and the head of Bloomberg

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Podcast is Francesca Levi.