1 00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:18,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. 3 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:25,680 Speaker 2: I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisenthal. 4 00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:26,720 Speaker 3: Joe, do you. 5 00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:29,680 Speaker 2: Ever feel like the investment gods are punishing you? 6 00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:33,199 Speaker 4: Oh? My god. I think about this all the time. Like, 7 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:36,960 Speaker 4: you know, when I first started investing my money, I'm like, 8 00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:40,360 Speaker 4: I'm going to be a very prudent diversifier, and I'm 9 00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:43,080 Speaker 4: going to buy some bond funds. 10 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 2: Some hard assets, some star funds. 11 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:48,960 Speaker 4: I'm going to invest internationally. I'm going to invest a 12 00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:52,200 Speaker 4: little bit in emerging markets. I'm going to buy some 13 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:56,120 Speaker 4: ETF so I get a little income. Yes, I thought 14 00:00:56,160 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 4: I was being very smart for that, but all it 15 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:02,480 Speaker 4: turns out is I should have just bought QQQ or 16 00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:07,640 Speaker 4: you know, the big tech stocks how to inspire die? Yeah, yes, 17 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,280 Speaker 4: or over time I've become a little bit more aspired. 18 00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 5: Dye. H. 19 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,679 Speaker 4: You capitulated, Yeah, it capitulated probably means it's the top. 20 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:18,080 Speaker 2: Now I have the same thing. So obviously we're journalists 21 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:21,039 Speaker 2: and we can't really invest. We don't trade, right, we 22 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 2: don't trade. H But for instance, we have retirement options yeah, right, 23 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:27,680 Speaker 2: And there are retirement options that are like, oh, an 24 00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 2: ex Us dividend fund or something like that. And I 25 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:35,039 Speaker 2: remember in the sort of mid twenty tens people talked 26 00:01:35,080 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 2: a lot about international equity. Yeah, and like, don't just 27 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:41,479 Speaker 2: put all your eggs in the America basket. Make sure 28 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:46,200 Speaker 2: you have exposure to emerging markets in China and like Europe, 29 00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 2: even coming out of the Eurozone crisis. And it turns 30 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 2: out that was a bad idea totally. 31 00:01:52,720 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 4: You really should have just bought us big caps. 32 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:55,440 Speaker 5: You know. 33 00:01:55,520 --> 00:01:57,520 Speaker 4: You mentioned like retirement like in our like four to 34 00:01:57,560 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 4: one K options. I think I have money and some 35 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:02,680 Speaker 4: sort of target date funds. Yeah, which is a cool 36 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 4: idea because as you get older and one right, I 37 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:08,960 Speaker 4: think so, you know, and like in theory, as you 38 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:12,080 Speaker 4: get older you're supposed to take on less risk and 39 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 4: stuff like that, and so great, it seems like a 40 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:17,520 Speaker 4: good idea to want to like think about it too much. 41 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 4: So it'd be nice if we're just sort of automatic. 42 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 4: But man, all of this diversification is killing me. What 43 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 4: a mistake. 44 00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 2: All right, Well, today we need to talk a little 45 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 2: bit about why diversification for the past ten years or 46 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 2: so at least, has turned out to kind of be 47 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:36,600 Speaker 2: a bad idea. You would have made a lot more 48 00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:39,920 Speaker 2: money just putting stuff in the S and P five hundred. 49 00:02:40,200 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 2: You certainly would have made a lot more money if 50 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:44,680 Speaker 2: you just, I don't know, bought Apple. 51 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 4: Or QQQ, Yeah, just big cap tech. 52 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:51,800 Speaker 2: So why is that we need to talk about why 53 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 2: we're being collectively punished for being prudent. We have the 54 00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 2: perfect guests to talk about this. We're going to be 55 00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:01,520 Speaker 2: speaking with someone who I actually can not believe hasn't 56 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 2: been on the show before. I feel like he has, 57 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:06,440 Speaker 2: but then I realized that, like he's sort of like 58 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,120 Speaker 2: the Rocky Mountains in the sense that he's just always 59 00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:10,840 Speaker 2: kind of been there, but you kind of take him 60 00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 2: for granted. He's like out there, you know him, you 61 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:16,600 Speaker 2: read all his stuff, maybe listen to a show, see 62 00:03:16,639 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 2: him on Twitter, certainly, and yet we've never had him 63 00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:21,239 Speaker 2: on the show. We've just taken him for granted. 64 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:24,640 Speaker 4: Or outrageous oversight that we must now rectify. 65 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 2: Yes, Okay, so I'm very excited to say we are 66 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:29,400 Speaker 2: going to be speaking with Med Faber. He is, of course, 67 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 2: the co founder and CIO of Cambria Investment Management and 68 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 2: also the host of the Med Faber Show the podcast, 69 00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 2: So meb thank you so much for coming on all blots. 70 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 2: I feel so bad that you haven't been on before. 71 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:42,320 Speaker 2: I can't believe it. 72 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:44,720 Speaker 3: It's great to be here y'all. As a Colorado native. 73 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 3: Maybe the Mountain analogies spot on. 74 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 4: Oh that was better than you real. By the way, 75 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 4: we're still out even though it's long past. We are 76 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 4: recording this at the future Proof conference in Huntington Beach, California. 77 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:58,040 Speaker 4: Maybe you live like an hour away. 78 00:03:58,120 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 5: Huh. 79 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:00,720 Speaker 3: Yes, Sadly we invited Joe and Tracy come surfing. They 80 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:03,640 Speaker 3: skipped out again for our surf lessons. But beautiful day, 81 00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 3: glad y'all are here. 82 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 2: I'm not good with cold water, so I'm just gonna 83 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:10,119 Speaker 2: be like one hundred percent honest. It's like sixty five 84 00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 2: degrees at the moment in Huntington Beach. I could not 85 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:16,800 Speaker 2: fathom going willingly going into the water in this temperature. 86 00:04:16,880 --> 00:04:19,960 Speaker 3: Who just talked about surfing, Actually, Joe mentioned that he 87 00:04:20,040 --> 00:04:22,440 Speaker 3: likes getting punished in the market. Surfing will be perfect, right, 88 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 3: It's the ultimate humility. You get out there and just 89 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:26,760 Speaker 3: get tossed. 90 00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 2: Pounded by the waves of bad decisions over and over again. Yeah, 91 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:32,640 Speaker 2: that sounds about right. Okay, Wait, so I mentioned that 92 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,520 Speaker 2: you've sort of always been out there, and certainly for 93 00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:39,320 Speaker 2: as long as I can remember, in financial journalism, you 94 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:41,840 Speaker 2: were always there. Cambrio was always there, and so I 95 00:04:41,960 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 2: never really stopped to think about what it is that 96 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:45,599 Speaker 2: you actually do. But what does Cambria do? 97 00:04:45,880 --> 00:04:48,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, So we like to think of ourselves as the 98 00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:50,640 Speaker 3: odd lots of ETFs. 99 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:50,039 Speaker 5: You know. 100 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:55,080 Speaker 3: See, But I'm being serious, you know. We fast forward 101 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:59,000 Speaker 3: from getting started pre GFC the company launched its first 102 00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:02,120 Speaker 3: ETF and twenty thirteen, so over a decade old now, 103 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:04,320 Speaker 3: and we often tell people the best compliment you can 104 00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 3: give anyone in investing, but also in the asset management 105 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:12,479 Speaker 3: and entrepreneurship is just surviving. So Alpha all that extra wonderful, 106 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 3: but just surviving is a big compliment. So we're near 107 00:05:16,640 --> 00:05:20,160 Speaker 3: three billion in assets, sixteen ETFs now, but we often 108 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:22,640 Speaker 3: say it's the best time ever to be an investor. 109 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:26,000 Speaker 3: The choices are limitless. You can invest in ETFs for 110 00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:32,040 Speaker 3: near zero fee, thousands of choices. But in that world, 111 00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:34,360 Speaker 3: if you're going to charge more, you better be doing 112 00:05:34,400 --> 00:05:37,720 Speaker 3: something weird. We're concentrated in different and so we try 113 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:40,680 Speaker 3: to only launch funds that don't exist in in a 114 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,360 Speaker 3: world of ten thousand plus funds, that seems like a 115 00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:47,280 Speaker 3: hard goal, or that are sufficiently we think we can 116 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:50,440 Speaker 3: do cheaper or quote better and better off is a 117 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:52,360 Speaker 3: lofty goal too, But it has to be something I 118 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:54,039 Speaker 3: want to put my own money into. It has to 119 00:05:54,040 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 3: be something that's backed by academic and practitioner research, and 120 00:05:57,560 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 3: so that versus a lot of the industry. And I 121 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:02,719 Speaker 3: love our friends here that throw as much spaghetti against 122 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 3: the wall and see what sticks. We want products that 123 00:06:04,920 --> 00:06:06,720 Speaker 3: we want to invest in that don't exist. 124 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 4: Speaking of academic research, didn't you write some like it 125 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:15,560 Speaker 4: was one of the most downloaded papers ever on SSRN 126 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:16,920 Speaker 4: about market timing? 127 00:06:17,200 --> 00:06:19,599 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, it's funny you mentioned market timing. The original 128 00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:22,680 Speaker 3: title was a better Approach to market timing, and no 129 00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:24,960 Speaker 3: one would read it. I got a lot of really 130 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 3: nasty responses from probably some prior a lot guests, but 131 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,800 Speaker 3: a lot of famous investors and a lot of really 132 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:33,520 Speaker 3: wonderful thought for responses too, and I changed the title 133 00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:37,840 Speaker 3: to Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation. Oh more, sounds 134 00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:41,320 Speaker 3: way more like consultant speak. But it also there's a 135 00:06:41,320 --> 00:06:44,040 Speaker 3: lot of luck. It came out pre financial crisis. Is 136 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:47,080 Speaker 3: a very simple trend following methodology, and trend falling goes 137 00:06:47,080 --> 00:06:49,680 Speaker 3: back one hundred years, so nothing particularly new, but it 138 00:06:49,680 --> 00:06:51,720 Speaker 3: would have worked great as trend falling tends to do 139 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 3: during crisis and big bear markets, which we haven't had 140 00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:57,200 Speaker 3: in a long time, and so it became very popular. Clearly, 141 00:06:57,240 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 3: if I published in twenty ten, probably have zero downloads 142 00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 3: as well. 143 00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 2: It did better under the second title than it did 144 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:07,599 Speaker 2: under the market timing title. That's kind of crazy from 145 00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:08,720 Speaker 2: a headline perspective. 146 00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:12,160 Speaker 4: Well, tactical, I think is a great word to have, 147 00:07:12,280 --> 00:07:12,560 Speaker 4: all right. 148 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 2: The headline of this episode is going to be like 149 00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:19,200 Speaker 2: med Faber on tactical allocation. Yeah, all right, okay, Well, 150 00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:21,600 Speaker 2: so you mentioned in the beginning that if you are 151 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:26,400 Speaker 2: charging clients more, you better be doing something interesting and worthwhile. 152 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:29,760 Speaker 2: Convince me why I shouldn't just put all my money 153 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:30,400 Speaker 2: in spy. 154 00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 5: Long dramatic pause. So a couple of things. 155 00:07:35,880 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 3: We always say the global market portfolio is the best 156 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 3: starting point. And what is the global market portfolio's If 157 00:07:41,080 --> 00:07:43,360 Speaker 3: you buy everything in the world, all the public assets, 158 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:47,560 Speaker 3: and that is roughly half stocks, half bonds, half US 159 00:07:47,560 --> 00:07:51,680 Speaker 3: half foreign roughly speaking, and that's actually a really really. 160 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:52,920 Speaker 5: Hard portfolio to beat over time. 161 00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:54,520 Speaker 3: But if you were to go back one hundred years, 162 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:56,440 Speaker 3: one hundred and twenty years, we were doing odd lots 163 00:07:56,440 --> 00:08:00,240 Speaker 3: in London, sipping on some tea, drinking some champagne in 164 00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 3: eighteen ninety nine and trying to project what would be 165 00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 3: the successful country. You know, maybe we pick the US, 166 00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 3: Maybe we pick Argentina, you know, maybe we pick other 167 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 3: countries and areas and stock markets. And my favorite investing book, 168 00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:17,640 Speaker 3: Tryumph for the optimists, you know, outlines the historical returns 169 00:08:17,640 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 3: of stocks, bonds, bills and all these countries. People always 170 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:22,360 Speaker 3: think the US is the best. It hasn't been. I 171 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,440 Speaker 3: think Australia and South Africa had better returns. But the 172 00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:29,240 Speaker 3: US has darned near over two thirds of the world 173 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:32,360 Speaker 3: market cap today. So even if you invest in the 174 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:34,680 Speaker 3: global portfolio, you're putting ten times as much in the 175 00:08:34,720 --> 00:08:37,440 Speaker 3: US stock market as any other country. And let's be honest, 176 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,320 Speaker 3: US has been on a roll. You guys know. I 177 00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:42,360 Speaker 3: love to do my polls on Twitter. We did a 178 00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 3: poll the other day and listeners, you got to answer 179 00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:46,560 Speaker 3: this before I give the answer up, I said, what 180 00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,600 Speaker 3: do you think US stocks have done since two thousand 181 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 3: and nine? And the multiple choices were do you think 182 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:55,760 Speaker 3: they've doubled, do you think they've tripled? Do you think 183 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:59,160 Speaker 3: they've quadrupled? And the fourth answer, which I had to 184 00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:04,080 Speaker 3: google was non you polled, which is nine times, and 185 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:07,120 Speaker 3: then deck you polled, which is ten times. So listeners, 186 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 3: think about what do you think stocks had done? The 187 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:12,199 Speaker 3: answers is almost a ten bagger. So one hundred grand 188 00:09:12,200 --> 00:09:14,480 Speaker 3: in stocks in two thousand and nine, if you didn't sell, 189 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:16,439 Speaker 3: or you held, or you bought in March, you now 190 00:09:16,440 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 3: have a million bucks million bucks. You got ten million 191 00:09:18,160 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 3: bucks amazing fifteen percent returns. So you should have invested 192 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 3: in spy right like you crushed everything in the world. 193 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 3: But historically that concentration has not been rewarded. If you 194 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:32,520 Speaker 3: look at the other forty five countries and you talk 195 00:09:32,600 --> 00:09:36,680 Speaker 3: to someone in Greece or Japan, or China or the UK, 196 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:39,240 Speaker 3: they would tell you that investing all their money and 197 00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:43,640 Speaker 3: their home country was a terrible idea. But diversifying globally, 198 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:46,560 Speaker 3: particularly into the US, has saved their bacon for the 199 00:09:46,559 --> 00:09:47,680 Speaker 3: past ten fifteen years. 200 00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 4: So Tracy mentioned that much to our regret we've never 201 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:54,679 Speaker 4: had you on the podcast before. I have interviewed you, however, 202 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:58,439 Speaker 4: once maybe twice on TV, and you're talking about some 203 00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 4: of these similar themes about international diversification, and I think 204 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:06,520 Speaker 4: if I recall, he was talking a little bit also 205 00:10:06,559 --> 00:10:09,280 Speaker 4: about like sort of international extension of some of the 206 00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:12,680 Speaker 4: ideas that Robert Schiller has talked about, and the idea 207 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:16,440 Speaker 4: of Schiller cape ratios, looking at market valuation from that 208 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:22,840 Speaker 4: point and opportunities to essentially invest in cheap markets overseas, 209 00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:24,840 Speaker 4: and this idea that if it works in one country, 210 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:28,640 Speaker 4: maybe it works internationally. What's the basic idea behind that? 211 00:10:29,240 --> 00:10:31,440 Speaker 4: And then you know, you mentioned, okay, the US has 212 00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:34,680 Speaker 4: just like totally clobbered everyone else. Give us the rundown 213 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:36,199 Speaker 4: of like, I don't know, it was probably ten years 214 00:10:36,200 --> 00:10:38,439 Speaker 4: ago or maybe eight years ago, what's happened over the 215 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:39,839 Speaker 4: last eight years internationally? 216 00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:43,520 Speaker 3: So if you rewind the clock and look at these 217 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:46,840 Speaker 3: various regimes, and everyone wants to focus on what's the 218 00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 3: FED doing, what are earning? Is going to be what's 219 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:51,560 Speaker 3: going to happen this month, the election next month? A 220 00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 3: lot of these regimes play out over not. 221 00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:55,079 Speaker 5: Just years, but decades. 222 00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:58,079 Speaker 3: Right If you look at not that long ago, from 223 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,480 Speaker 3: two thousand to the financial crisis, the US stock market 224 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:03,200 Speaker 3: got creamed by everything. 225 00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:03,559 Speaker 5: Else in the world. 226 00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 3: Reads, gold, foreign stocks, merging market stocks, and so you 227 00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:10,040 Speaker 3: go through these periods where various assets have their time 228 00:11:10,120 --> 00:11:11,680 Speaker 3: in the sun and day in the shade. If you 229 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 3: look at the US market, say nineteen eighty super cheap, right, 230 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:18,880 Speaker 3: the US has been a long term KP ratio of 231 00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:21,839 Speaker 3: five before, it's been as high as forty five at 232 00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:23,880 Speaker 3: the peak of my favorite bubble ninety nine. 233 00:11:24,520 --> 00:11:24,959 Speaker 4: Mine too. 234 00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:27,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a great time in the nineties, but if 235 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:30,120 Speaker 3: you look on average, it's usually like in the low 236 00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:33,360 Speaker 3: twenties if inflation is chill. But you have all these 237 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:36,079 Speaker 3: countries and other examples. The classic we always talk about 238 00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:38,600 Speaker 3: is Japan. You know, Japan was darn near one hundred 239 00:11:38,679 --> 00:11:42,480 Speaker 3: in the nineteen eighties and then went nowhere for multiple decades. 240 00:11:42,520 --> 00:11:45,880 Speaker 3: Now it looks great today after an entire generation has 241 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:49,280 Speaker 3: made no money in the Japanese stock market. But that's 242 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:51,440 Speaker 3: how long it often plays out in Japan's not some 243 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:53,920 Speaker 3: tiny economy, you know, this is a top three world 244 00:11:53,960 --> 00:11:56,960 Speaker 3: economy in stock market, and what's the biggest stock market 245 00:11:56,960 --> 00:11:59,320 Speaker 3: in the world at that time where the US is today, 246 00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:02,040 Speaker 3: and the US isn't expensive today, it's in the mid thirties. 247 00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:05,320 Speaker 3: It's not a bubble, but it tends to be a weight, right. 248 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 3: It tends to be a headwind over time, because you're 249 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:08,520 Speaker 3: buying all the. 250 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:09,480 Speaker 5: Future cash flows. 251 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 3: The good news is most of the rest of the 252 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:14,079 Speaker 3: countries around the world are reasonably priced to really cheap. 253 00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:15,800 Speaker 5: The really deep. 254 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:19,600 Speaker 3: Value like GMO and others talk about, is exceptionally interesting 255 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:22,600 Speaker 3: right now, So we manage these shareholders yield ETFs, and 256 00:12:22,640 --> 00:12:25,520 Speaker 3: so the market cap in the US, the Achilles Heel 257 00:12:25,559 --> 00:12:28,760 Speaker 3: of market cap indexing is there is no tethered to 258 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:33,240 Speaker 3: value whatsoever. It's the stock price times shares outstanding. And 259 00:12:33,280 --> 00:12:35,440 Speaker 3: that's good most of the time because you're guaranteed to 260 00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 3: own the winners. But it's bad in the sense when 261 00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:40,840 Speaker 3: things go crazy, they're really expensive, and everyone's talking about this, 262 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 3: right the bag seven everything else, the really expensive stuff 263 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:48,199 Speaker 3: gets the highest weights, and so much like late nineties, 264 00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:52,280 Speaker 3: a lot of the cheap companies high quality look exceptional 265 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:55,320 Speaker 3: not just within the US but in foreign developed and 266 00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:59,160 Speaker 3: emerging as well. But everyone's forgotten about foreign stocks. Emerging 267 00:12:59,160 --> 00:13:02,240 Speaker 3: market stocks wants any but that sets the stage for 268 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:04,080 Speaker 3: the next next outperformance as well. 269 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,600 Speaker 2: Wait, talk more about the role of the benchmark indices 270 00:13:08,679 --> 00:13:10,400 Speaker 2: in all of this, because this is one thing that 271 00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:14,000 Speaker 2: I've been really interested in in recent years. This idea, 272 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:17,040 Speaker 2: I mean, this is where the flows before pros kind 273 00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:19,120 Speaker 2: of comes from. This idea that like, if you want 274 00:13:19,120 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 2: to pick a winner, maybe rather than looking at the 275 00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:24,680 Speaker 2: fundamentals or trying to see if something is underpriced or whatever, 276 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:26,360 Speaker 2: you want to look at where the flows are going. 277 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:29,400 Speaker 2: And a lot of those flows nowadays are dictated by 278 00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:34,160 Speaker 2: index construction. And so how big a role does that 279 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:39,240 Speaker 2: indexing actually play in I guess the outperformance of concentration 280 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 2: or US versus diversification and rest of the world. 281 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 3: We always say flows drive performance, and you know in 282 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:51,680 Speaker 3: a particular small asset class or a concentrated strategy has 283 00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:55,360 Speaker 3: a much larger impact. You've seen some active funds, some 284 00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:59,200 Speaker 3: very famous fund managers over the past ten or so years, 285 00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:02,679 Speaker 3: where the flows a dramatic impact on the way up 286 00:14:02,840 --> 00:14:04,520 Speaker 3: and also on the way down. But this could also 287 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:08,160 Speaker 3: be if you're buying Brazilian small cap tech stocks, right, 288 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:10,360 Speaker 3: you can move those around with a lot less money 289 00:14:10,400 --> 00:14:12,559 Speaker 3: than you could the SMP. But look, you go back 290 00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:16,600 Speaker 3: fifty years, the concept of the market cap index set 291 00:14:16,640 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 3: off just this neutron bomb across the industry. But it 292 00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:24,040 Speaker 3: actually wasn't the index. That was the innovation, you know, 293 00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:27,880 Speaker 3: John Bogo, Wells Fargos and others. It was what indexing enabled, 294 00:14:27,920 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 3: which is low cost investing because you don't do anything 295 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 3: and you're guaranteed to own the winners. So quote passive 296 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 3: investing was an amazing invention. But here we are in 297 00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:41,320 Speaker 3: twenty twenty four and you don't have to do market 298 00:14:41,320 --> 00:14:45,240 Speaker 3: cap indexing to deliver the low cost right. We always 299 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 3: say ETFs are eating the asset management industry. So you 300 00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 3: have all this historical very expensive mutual funds with conflicts 301 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:55,320 Speaker 3: of interest and front end loans and twelvey one fees 302 00:14:55,960 --> 00:15:00,920 Speaker 3: that maybe index funds. But the index is not the innovation. 303 00:15:01,360 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 3: It's the low fees, which is what John Bogo used 304 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:06,280 Speaker 3: to say. You know, it's not about index active passive. 305 00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:08,280 Speaker 3: He's like, the debate is really high fee, low fee, 306 00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:11,360 Speaker 3: and so now you can deliver these much more interesting 307 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,760 Speaker 3: exposures instead of just passive market cap waiting. 308 00:15:16,040 --> 00:15:17,400 Speaker 5: That should do much better over time. 309 00:15:33,560 --> 00:15:35,200 Speaker 4: You know, one of the things that really strikes me. 310 00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:37,560 Speaker 4: And I think this is an important point that you've 311 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:40,760 Speaker 4: already touched on a couple of times, that the beauty 312 00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:44,800 Speaker 4: of like the sort of modern ETF world is it 313 00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:49,520 Speaker 4: used to not be trivial right to have substantial foreign exposure. 314 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 4: And you know, especially thinking like before mutual funds proliferated, 315 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:55,360 Speaker 4: you might say, like, I've like Brazil, but when you like, 316 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:57,480 Speaker 4: go out and have a broker make a buye order 317 00:15:57,520 --> 00:16:00,960 Speaker 4: for every individual stock, Like that's a cost process and 318 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:03,840 Speaker 4: now that's not costly anymore. And I think that's a 319 00:16:03,920 --> 00:16:09,280 Speaker 4: really underappreciated fact about investing. But just sitting aside the 320 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:14,400 Speaker 4: US outperformance, what's going on in international markets so that 321 00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:19,040 Speaker 4: investors haven't loved them, Like, yeah, why you talk about 322 00:16:19,160 --> 00:16:23,520 Speaker 4: there must be great Latin American companies, Latin American tech companies, 323 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:27,080 Speaker 4: Latin American tire companies and beverage distributors and everything they have. 324 00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:29,560 Speaker 4: Why haven't investors liked these companies? 325 00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 3: The US has certainly had great earnings growth, yeah, for 326 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:37,640 Speaker 3: the past ten to fifteen years, right, so it's led 327 00:16:37,680 --> 00:16:38,120 Speaker 3: the charge. 328 00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:39,120 Speaker 5: It's done really well. 329 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:41,440 Speaker 3: But if you look around the rest of the world, 330 00:16:41,960 --> 00:16:43,960 Speaker 3: you know, and we manage my largest look, by the way, 331 00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:47,640 Speaker 3: my largest fun long only US stock fund. So talking 332 00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:50,440 Speaker 3: my book here, But looking at the foreign and emerging 333 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 3: you see great companies, and so here's an example. You know, 334 00:16:54,960 --> 00:16:58,240 Speaker 3: we run a value quality strategy. US shareholder yield doesn't 335 00:16:58,280 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 3: have much tech exposure. Okay, surprising because tech stocks in 336 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 3: the US on average are pretty expensive, but they also 337 00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:09,160 Speaker 3: do a bunch of share issuance based on stock based compensation, right, 338 00:17:09,240 --> 00:17:12,679 Speaker 3: so they have a negative buyback yield because they're issuing 339 00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 3: and issuing a ton of shares. But if you look 340 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,480 Speaker 3: at foreign, developed, and emerging, our emerging market fund, tech 341 00:17:18,600 --> 00:17:22,080 Speaker 3: is the largest sector allocation, which is surprising to many 342 00:17:22,080 --> 00:17:23,639 Speaker 3: people because it's a value strategy. 343 00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:25,000 Speaker 5: But we always say. 344 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:28,000 Speaker 3: There's opportunities, people just aren't necessarily focused on them. As 345 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:32,080 Speaker 3: an example, our largest holding was a better performer than Nvidia, 346 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:34,760 Speaker 3: and it's a semiconductor stock, but nobody knows about it. 347 00:17:34,760 --> 00:17:37,159 Speaker 3: Nobody talks about it because nobody cares about emerging markets. 348 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:39,640 Speaker 4: But used to be clear, setting aside what people care 349 00:17:39,720 --> 00:17:44,200 Speaker 4: about at a given time, earnings growth in the US 350 00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:46,480 Speaker 4: since two thousand and nine or really at any point 351 00:17:46,680 --> 00:17:49,919 Speaker 4: has been extraordinary and over time. It just there are 352 00:17:49,920 --> 00:17:53,919 Speaker 4: companies that buy and large are just continue to grow earnings. 353 00:17:54,320 --> 00:17:56,240 Speaker 4: Has that not been the case internationally? 354 00:17:56,440 --> 00:17:58,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, you haven't had the same earnings growth. But also 355 00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 3: within the US, you have had this tailwind of multiple expansion. 356 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:05,720 Speaker 3: Our buddy Cliff was talking about, He's like, the percentage 357 00:18:06,240 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 3: of the returns that are attributal to multiple expansion is 358 00:18:10,080 --> 00:18:12,440 Speaker 3: pretty high. Right, So you've had the US So back 359 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:14,639 Speaker 3: in two thousand and nine, right, we're hanging out in 360 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 3: March somewhere at a pub in New York City, drowning 361 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:21,359 Speaker 3: our woes about the world going crazy. The US stock 362 00:18:21,400 --> 00:18:23,879 Speaker 3: market talking about back to the Shuler cap ratio was 363 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:27,080 Speaker 3: low teens, but so was foreign developed and emerging. So 364 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:29,240 Speaker 3: the US has gone from twelve to let's call it 365 00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:32,200 Speaker 3: thirty six today, whereas the rest of the world hasn't. 366 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:34,840 Speaker 3: It hasn't had that multiple expansion, and so that can 367 00:18:34,880 --> 00:18:38,520 Speaker 3: be a massive tailwind and headwind over the course of 368 00:18:38,560 --> 00:18:41,440 Speaker 3: a decade of like three, four, five seven percent per year, 369 00:18:41,960 --> 00:18:45,560 Speaker 3: depending on what people are willing to pay for those stocks. 370 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:48,520 Speaker 2: So just on this point, one of the criticisms that 371 00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:53,399 Speaker 2: is sometimes leveled against diversification or strategies that are focused 372 00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:57,840 Speaker 2: on diversification is the idea that well, your purposefully kind 373 00:18:57,880 --> 00:19:01,440 Speaker 2: of adding losers to your port, Like you're not really 374 00:19:01,520 --> 00:19:04,320 Speaker 2: trying to choose winners, You're trying to distribute your risk 375 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 2: among a bunch of different entities. And the analogy that 376 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:12,119 Speaker 2: I sometimes use, which probably will not resonate for either 377 00:19:12,160 --> 00:19:14,359 Speaker 2: of you or like most of our listeners, but I 378 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:16,959 Speaker 2: sometimes think it's kind of like trying to find a 379 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:21,040 Speaker 2: single guy over forty in New York City, Like there's 380 00:19:21,080 --> 00:19:24,960 Speaker 2: a reason they're desirable to single women. But on the 381 00:19:25,040 --> 00:19:27,879 Speaker 2: other hand, like, there's probably a reason that they're single 382 00:19:28,040 --> 00:19:31,399 Speaker 2: over forty. There's probably something wrong with them, right, and 383 00:19:31,440 --> 00:19:34,199 Speaker 2: that's why this is good, That's why they're single. So 384 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:38,239 Speaker 2: I sometimes think about diversification or like value investing in 385 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:42,120 Speaker 2: those terms, why should you seek out things that are 386 00:19:42,359 --> 00:19:45,199 Speaker 2: probably going to be losers at least for you know, 387 00:19:45,600 --> 00:19:46,800 Speaker 2: the short to medium term. 388 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:49,760 Speaker 3: There's the late Peter Bernstein had a great quote which 389 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:52,280 Speaker 3: I'll get directionally correct, which was he's like, look, acid 390 00:19:52,320 --> 00:19:55,960 Speaker 3: allocation is a defensive strategy, but it's also an aggressive 391 00:19:55,960 --> 00:19:59,119 Speaker 3: strategy because you never know where the next windfall is 392 00:19:59,160 --> 00:19:59,879 Speaker 3: going to come from. 393 00:20:00,119 --> 00:20:00,679 Speaker 5: Look around the. 394 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:03,600 Speaker 3: World, today gold all time highs. Nobody's talking about it, 395 00:20:03,600 --> 00:20:05,919 Speaker 3: at least at this conference that I'm chatting with. But 396 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:09,040 Speaker 3: you never know if you look at various assets, whether 397 00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:12,720 Speaker 3: it's coffee, whether it's the yen, whether it's foreign stocks, 398 00:20:12,840 --> 00:20:17,720 Speaker 3: merging markets, reads, bonds, even US stocks value right quality, 399 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:21,000 Speaker 3: you never know the exact timing of it. And that's hard, 400 00:20:21,080 --> 00:20:23,680 Speaker 3: you know, And we have a lot of non consensus 401 00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:26,120 Speaker 3: views when it comes to acid allocation. I actually don't 402 00:20:26,119 --> 00:20:28,920 Speaker 3: think if you're doing buy and hold, your allocation matters 403 00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 3: much at all, which I think it's like my mom 404 00:20:31,640 --> 00:20:34,040 Speaker 3: is a Southern cook and you know, you make She 405 00:20:34,119 --> 00:20:37,960 Speaker 3: makes chocolate chip cookies with just by by a feel right, 406 00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:40,639 Speaker 3: She tastes some. But as long as you have the wheat, 407 00:20:40,680 --> 00:20:43,600 Speaker 3: the flour, the butter, the chocolate chips, like it's going 408 00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:46,119 Speaker 3: to end up okay, you totally omit one thing and 409 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:48,080 Speaker 3: it's probably going to be suboptimal. And that's the way 410 00:20:48,080 --> 00:20:51,320 Speaker 3: with this ass allocation. You have some global stocks, some 411 00:20:51,359 --> 00:20:54,200 Speaker 3: global bonds, and some real assets, meaning like tips reads, 412 00:20:54,440 --> 00:20:55,959 Speaker 3: the allocation percentage doesn't much. 413 00:20:56,000 --> 00:20:57,200 Speaker 5: And when we wrote this book, this. 414 00:20:57,280 --> 00:21:00,879 Speaker 3: Acid Allocation book a decade ago, which were updated, we 415 00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:04,040 Speaker 3: actually found that if you look at overtime the last 416 00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:06,920 Speaker 3: fifty the last one hundred years, and compare the best 417 00:21:06,920 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 3: performing strategy relative to the worst. And we looked at 418 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:12,960 Speaker 3: all of them en DOWNMNT permanent portfolios sixty forty, on 419 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:15,920 Speaker 3: and on, we found the spread was actually pretty tight. 420 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:18,520 Speaker 3: They all returned about within a percent or two percent 421 00:21:18,560 --> 00:21:20,720 Speaker 3: of each other. And the crazy part is if you 422 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:23,200 Speaker 3: took the best one, you say, all right, Joe Tracy, 423 00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:26,160 Speaker 3: I'm gonna give you crystal ball. We'll hop in the Dolorean, 424 00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:28,520 Speaker 3: go back fifty hundred years. I'm going to tell you 425 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:31,159 Speaker 3: which asset out case and strategy was best. How much 426 00:21:31,160 --> 00:21:32,919 Speaker 3: would you pay me that? You know, PIMCO probably give 427 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:34,800 Speaker 3: me a billion dollars for that knowledge. But I said, 428 00:21:34,800 --> 00:21:38,199 Speaker 3: hold on the genie. There's one rule. You have to 429 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:41,119 Speaker 3: implement it with the average mutual fun feed of today, 430 00:21:41,200 --> 00:21:44,359 Speaker 3: not back then one point two five percent today that 431 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:46,920 Speaker 3: takes the best performing allocation makes it almost as bad 432 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:47,480 Speaker 3: as the worst. 433 00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:47,960 Speaker 5: Wow. 434 00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:49,919 Speaker 3: So all this time we spend on the FED, on 435 00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 3: gold or whatever. And this is for buy and hold, 436 00:21:51,960 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 3: just market cap indexing. We're not talking about all the 437 00:21:54,640 --> 00:21:57,280 Speaker 3: good stuff that we do. Trend following value, YadA YadA, 438 00:21:57,520 --> 00:21:59,680 Speaker 3: just the basics. And so we often say, you're acid, 439 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:02,800 Speaker 3: alt care doesn't matter that much, but what does matter 440 00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:06,480 Speaker 3: is expenses, costs and taxes. 441 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:10,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I remember seeing I think, well, it might 442 00:22:10,640 --> 00:22:12,639 Speaker 4: have been like the bulgel Head Forum is back in 443 00:22:12,680 --> 00:22:14,639 Speaker 4: the day, and it is so much about like the 444 00:22:14,640 --> 00:22:17,879 Speaker 4: cost matter is hypothesis as being a more powerful idea 445 00:22:17,880 --> 00:22:22,960 Speaker 4: than the efficient market hypothesis for this exact reason. So, 446 00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:25,240 Speaker 4: you know, we've been talking about Okay, since two thousand 447 00:22:25,240 --> 00:22:27,960 Speaker 4: and nine, we know US stocks have clobber the rest 448 00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:30,040 Speaker 4: of the world. When was the last time, Actually that 449 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:30,720 Speaker 4: wasn't the case. 450 00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:32,680 Speaker 3: Well, so we wrote this piece. It's called the bear 451 00:22:32,720 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 3: market and diversfication. Yeah right, and so since two thousand 452 00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:38,400 Speaker 3: and nine, US stocks again, listeners, think in your head 453 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 3: fifteen percent per year. Yeah, that's only happened on a 454 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:44,479 Speaker 3: ten year rolling basis four times in history. And they 455 00:22:44,520 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 3: all have names. Roaring Twenties, in fifty fifty, the Internet bubble, 456 00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:51,960 Speaker 3: and then whatever we're calling this COVID meme sonk Ai 457 00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:55,320 Speaker 3: era right now, you don't know how long it's going 458 00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:55,760 Speaker 3: to last. 459 00:22:55,760 --> 00:22:56,480 Speaker 5: And on the. 460 00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:59,439 Speaker 3: Backside, they also all have names, the Great Depression, the 461 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:04,680 Speaker 3: inflation seventies period, the dot com bubble burst in GFC 462 00:23:04,800 --> 00:23:06,480 Speaker 3: echo and whatever comes next. 463 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:06,800 Speaker 5: Who knows. 464 00:23:06,800 --> 00:23:08,040 Speaker 3: It doesn't mean so during. 465 00:23:07,800 --> 00:23:12,480 Speaker 4: Those periods that we don't have good names for, international 466 00:23:12,480 --> 00:23:14,600 Speaker 4: diversification has paid off. 467 00:23:14,440 --> 00:23:17,679 Speaker 3: If you look at this period has arguably been the 468 00:23:17,960 --> 00:23:22,080 Speaker 3: worst period ever for an acid allocation portfolio. And we'll 469 00:23:22,080 --> 00:23:26,840 Speaker 3: just use the Global market portfolio versus the SMP. The 470 00:23:26,880 --> 00:23:29,600 Speaker 3: only comparable period is post World War two. And this 471 00:23:29,720 --> 00:23:31,440 Speaker 3: is not just in terms And first of all, didn't 472 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:33,840 Speaker 3: do bad, did like seven percent a year? Totally fine, 473 00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:36,399 Speaker 3: Joe's four to one k seven percent a year not bad. 474 00:23:36,800 --> 00:23:40,080 Speaker 3: But if you look at in terms of underperforming your neighbor, 475 00:23:40,200 --> 00:23:43,040 Speaker 3: so an absolute underperformance versus the sb But the worst 476 00:23:43,040 --> 00:23:46,159 Speaker 3: part is not the absolute poortance, it's the years in 477 00:23:46,200 --> 00:23:50,640 Speaker 3: a row. It is something like thirteen of fifteen years. 478 00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:54,240 Speaker 3: It's funder perform the SMP. So it's just bodyblow after 479 00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 3: body blow of looking less smart than your dope neighbor 480 00:23:58,880 --> 00:23:59,680 Speaker 3: who bought the cues. 481 00:23:59,760 --> 00:24:03,760 Speaker 4: And that's upsetting. Yeah, I know it's not fair. 482 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:09,240 Speaker 2: I'm trying to process this because it bothers me so much. No, okay, well, 483 00:24:09,840 --> 00:24:13,760 Speaker 2: since you brought up taxes and the cost base as 484 00:24:13,800 --> 00:24:19,280 Speaker 2: such a big factor to investment success or outperformance. Talk 485 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,360 Speaker 2: to us about what you're seeing there in terms of 486 00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:25,720 Speaker 2: I guess innovation, because we often talk in the investment 487 00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:28,760 Speaker 2: space in ETF certainly about the race to the bottom 488 00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:31,400 Speaker 2: in terms of costs. And to me, I look around 489 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:34,239 Speaker 2: at some of the tax yields on these things, it 490 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:37,040 Speaker 2: feels like you can't get that much lower, but maybe 491 00:24:37,080 --> 00:24:37,400 Speaker 2: you can. 492 00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:40,960 Speaker 3: There's a lot about ETFs that I think that people 493 00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 3: don't know. First of all, a lot of public funds 494 00:24:45,359 --> 00:24:48,480 Speaker 3: will do short landing and return that revenue to the consumers. 495 00:24:48,560 --> 00:24:51,359 Speaker 3: So on top of the fee you have, let's say 496 00:24:51,520 --> 00:24:54,679 Speaker 3: like we charge half or percent well the short landing revenue, 497 00:24:54,680 --> 00:24:57,040 Speaker 3: and some funds at may be ten basis points, at 498 00:24:57,040 --> 00:24:59,600 Speaker 3: maybe twenty. In some cases it could be very material 499 00:24:59,640 --> 00:25:02,479 Speaker 3: fifty over one hundred basis points. So there are plenty 500 00:25:02,520 --> 00:25:06,600 Speaker 3: of ETFs out there that actually already have a negative 501 00:25:06,600 --> 00:25:09,640 Speaker 3: expense ratio. So let that sink in. You're getting paid 502 00:25:09,680 --> 00:25:12,080 Speaker 3: to own this fund. That's pretty cool, right. Second is 503 00:25:12,119 --> 00:25:16,920 Speaker 3: the ETF expense ratio is also tax deductible. Right, It's 504 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:19,000 Speaker 3: coming out of the income. So if you're comparing that 505 00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:22,160 Speaker 3: to a traditional separate account, which is not deductible. That's 506 00:25:22,160 --> 00:25:26,440 Speaker 3: an additional essentially benefit of the ETF over these traditional structures. 507 00:25:26,880 --> 00:25:30,479 Speaker 3: But here's the challenge. If you've been participating, you're one 508 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:32,240 Speaker 3: of the lucky ones. You bought a bunch of stocks, 509 00:25:32,280 --> 00:25:35,280 Speaker 3: you own a bunch of Nvidia since two thousand and nine. 510 00:25:35,480 --> 00:25:38,320 Speaker 3: You're sitting on a ten bagger gain. And if you 511 00:25:38,400 --> 00:25:42,240 Speaker 3: talk to older generation, if you look at Buffett, you 512 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:44,479 Speaker 3: know all these decisions that he has to make on 513 00:25:44,560 --> 00:25:47,080 Speaker 3: Apple where he has to eventually pay the taxes. Right, 514 00:25:47,080 --> 00:25:48,399 Speaker 3: you talk to the order gender and say, well, I 515 00:25:48,440 --> 00:25:52,040 Speaker 3: just can't sell my Microsoft or GE or IBM because 516 00:25:52,080 --> 00:25:55,560 Speaker 3: the taxman would kill me. We had Hank Bessenbinder on 517 00:25:55,560 --> 00:25:58,439 Speaker 3: the show recently, who did the famous paper to stocks 518 00:25:58,480 --> 00:26:01,120 Speaker 3: outperformed T bills. We had Hank run for the past 519 00:26:01,119 --> 00:26:03,280 Speaker 3: one hundred years. I said, hey, what's the best forming 520 00:26:03,280 --> 00:26:06,200 Speaker 3: stock of all time? And listeners, you have to guess 521 00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:06,560 Speaker 3: this too. 522 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:07,280 Speaker 5: You may get it. 523 00:26:07,320 --> 00:26:09,200 Speaker 3: Of the top five, the top three, I don't think 524 00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:11,360 Speaker 3: I could guess two or three ever heard of them, 525 00:26:11,560 --> 00:26:13,920 Speaker 3: but Vulcan Materials I think two. 526 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:15,600 Speaker 5: Kansas City was. 527 00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 3: Third and number one was railrud Yeah, okay, and this 528 00:26:19,840 --> 00:26:24,000 Speaker 3: is just you are optimizing on length of compound. 529 00:26:24,080 --> 00:26:25,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, so one hundred years. 530 00:26:25,359 --> 00:26:27,760 Speaker 3: But Altria you put It's like you put one thousand 531 00:26:27,760 --> 00:26:29,320 Speaker 3: dollars in al three hundred years ago, you now have 532 00:26:29,320 --> 00:26:33,640 Speaker 3: two billion. Anyway, the point being is that if you invest, 533 00:26:33,880 --> 00:26:37,080 Speaker 3: you eventually have a bunch of capital gains. Great good 534 00:26:37,119 --> 00:26:39,280 Speaker 3: problem to have, right if you're in a taxable investor, 535 00:26:39,800 --> 00:26:41,920 Speaker 3: and if you have been invested in the US stocks 536 00:26:41,920 --> 00:26:45,159 Speaker 3: in two thousand and nine, you have ten x capital 537 00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:48,800 Speaker 3: gains on average. Right, So that's a problem for investors, right, 538 00:26:48,800 --> 00:26:50,359 Speaker 3: because you got to make a decision. Am I just 539 00:26:50,359 --> 00:26:52,399 Speaker 3: going to bite the bullet? Sell this, pay the taxes 540 00:26:52,440 --> 00:26:56,879 Speaker 3: and move on. Because these power laws dominate everything we 541 00:26:56,920 --> 00:26:59,560 Speaker 3: do in investing. It's in VC, it's true in public 542 00:26:59,600 --> 00:27:02,480 Speaker 3: markets where the best performers, it's like five percent of 543 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:04,480 Speaker 3: stocks generate all the return. So if you end up 544 00:27:04,520 --> 00:27:07,480 Speaker 3: with one of these, your whole portfolio is now this 545 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:11,520 Speaker 3: appreciated stock or portfolio. What I'm getting at is what 546 00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:14,199 Speaker 3: do you do well. There's actually been something that's been 547 00:27:14,200 --> 00:27:16,760 Speaker 3: around for one hundred years called the exchange fund. It 548 00:27:16,800 --> 00:27:19,560 Speaker 3: was popularized really in the nineteen seventies by eat Advance 549 00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:23,800 Speaker 3: by now Morgan Stanley Goldman does it. And it's like 550 00:27:23,840 --> 00:27:25,120 Speaker 3: a ten thirty one exchange. 551 00:27:25,119 --> 00:27:26,760 Speaker 5: If you have a portfolio, this is it. 552 00:27:26,800 --> 00:27:28,720 Speaker 4: The ten thirty one is that how real estate investors 553 00:27:28,800 --> 00:27:29,600 Speaker 4: never have to pay ten. 554 00:27:29,680 --> 00:27:31,840 Speaker 2: That's like when you buy a house, if you buy 555 00:27:31,880 --> 00:27:33,800 Speaker 2: an if you sell it and then buy another. 556 00:27:33,600 --> 00:27:36,760 Speaker 3: One commercial you buy it, you buy a hotel, you 557 00:27:36,760 --> 00:27:37,320 Speaker 3: buy some farm. 558 00:27:37,320 --> 00:27:40,119 Speaker 4: Commercial real estate. People love this. This is like the essence, 559 00:27:40,320 --> 00:27:40,520 Speaker 4: what's it? 560 00:27:40,800 --> 00:27:44,600 Speaker 3: Indefinite tax referral. And it builds generational wealth. And it's 561 00:27:44,600 --> 00:27:46,720 Speaker 3: why you see so many people that you know, they 562 00:27:47,119 --> 00:27:50,880 Speaker 3: they talk, well, my grandmother bought this property at ten 563 00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:53,560 Speaker 3: thousand dollars and now it's ten million. You know, So 564 00:27:53,600 --> 00:27:58,199 Speaker 3: it's great. It's a huge wealth compounder over time. But 565 00:27:58,280 --> 00:28:00,600 Speaker 3: so with stocks, you eventually have to pay the pipers. 566 00:28:00,640 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 3: So there's this thing that's been around forever called exchange funds. 567 00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:05,600 Speaker 3: And the way they work is if you have highly 568 00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:09,000 Speaker 3: appreciated positions, you get a bunch of other people, you 569 00:28:09,080 --> 00:28:11,320 Speaker 3: contribute them to a portfolio, and there's some rules. You've 570 00:28:11,320 --> 00:28:13,840 Speaker 3: got to be accredited or qualified. You've got to hold 571 00:28:13,880 --> 00:28:15,960 Speaker 3: it for seven years and at the end of seven years, 572 00:28:15,960 --> 00:28:19,080 Speaker 3: you get back at diversified portfolio, so you you eliminate 573 00:28:19,080 --> 00:28:21,840 Speaker 3: your concentration risk. But the problem of the course is 574 00:28:21,880 --> 00:28:25,159 Speaker 3: it's run by the traditional asset managers who love to 575 00:28:25,240 --> 00:28:27,679 Speaker 3: charge exceptionally high fees. They're going to ding you probably 576 00:28:27,720 --> 00:28:29,679 Speaker 3: a percent or two just to get in, and then 577 00:28:29,680 --> 00:28:31,720 Speaker 3: they're going to ding you a percent or two every 578 00:28:31,800 --> 00:28:34,200 Speaker 3: year for seven years for the privilege of having this 579 00:28:34,560 --> 00:28:37,200 Speaker 3: exchange fund. So there's others trying to do this. There's 580 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:39,880 Speaker 3: a company called cash that's doing this, trying to disrupt this. 581 00:28:40,480 --> 00:28:44,360 Speaker 3: But if you think of the ETF structure, which is 582 00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:48,479 Speaker 3: a massive innovation where you're having actively managed portfolio at 583 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:52,760 Speaker 3: index portfolio, you're only paying taxes when you sell that fund, 584 00:28:52,840 --> 00:28:55,120 Speaker 3: so the turnover doesn't matter. I think that's well understood 585 00:28:55,160 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 3: by most investors today, hopefully. But if you look back 586 00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:00,120 Speaker 3: at Spy, if you bought it in ninety seven, I've 587 00:29:00,120 --> 00:29:02,240 Speaker 3: paid no capital gains at all, despite the fact that 588 00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:05,720 Speaker 3: trades consistently. That's not a feature of mutual funds or 589 00:29:05,760 --> 00:29:08,000 Speaker 3: hedge funds, and that's why ETFs are eating asset management. 590 00:29:08,160 --> 00:29:11,640 Speaker 3: They're vastly more tax efficient, which on average is probably 591 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:15,480 Speaker 3: about a seventy basis point after tax benefit relative to 592 00:29:15,520 --> 00:29:20,640 Speaker 3: mutual funds. Monster number probably more important than the expens ratio. However, 593 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:22,440 Speaker 3: what if you've got a bunch of stocks have gone 594 00:29:22,520 --> 00:29:24,000 Speaker 3: up a ton, so you could go to this exchange 595 00:29:24,000 --> 00:29:25,560 Speaker 3: fund route, you're stuck. 596 00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:26,080 Speaker 5: You could sell it. 597 00:29:26,680 --> 00:29:29,760 Speaker 3: But what you've started to see over the past five years, 598 00:29:30,640 --> 00:29:32,840 Speaker 3: you've seen the riding on the wall, and the traditional 599 00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:35,240 Speaker 3: mutual fund industry is doing one of two things. They're 600 00:29:35,280 --> 00:29:37,840 Speaker 3: going Ostrich style head and sand I'm just going to 601 00:29:37,920 --> 00:29:41,160 Speaker 3: ride this till I retire and we'll just deal with 602 00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:44,840 Speaker 3: the outflows and someone else's problem. Or their shops like DFA, 603 00:29:44,920 --> 00:29:45,240 Speaker 3: they say. 604 00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:46,200 Speaker 5: You know what, we're going to convert. 605 00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:49,520 Speaker 3: We're going to They do fifty billion of mutual funds 606 00:29:49,560 --> 00:29:53,880 Speaker 3: to ETFs. And then you see some innovation going on 607 00:29:54,080 --> 00:29:56,760 Speaker 3: where a group we're partnering with Wes Gray and his 608 00:29:56,800 --> 00:30:00,680 Speaker 3: team at Alpha Architect ETF Architect, they we're able to 609 00:30:00,680 --> 00:30:04,360 Speaker 3: go to an asset manager and say, okay, well. 610 00:30:03,520 --> 00:30:04,960 Speaker 5: Let's convert your clients. 611 00:30:05,480 --> 00:30:08,520 Speaker 3: So they had five thousand clients from separate accounts to 612 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:11,720 Speaker 3: an ETF and it's not a taxable transaction. And so 613 00:30:12,120 --> 00:30:13,440 Speaker 3: I started to think about this. It's called a three 614 00:30:13,560 --> 00:30:15,920 Speaker 3: fifty one exchange again, been around for one hundred years, 615 00:30:16,520 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 3: and you start the brain working in an odd lot's 616 00:30:20,320 --> 00:30:22,800 Speaker 3: way and taking this to its logical conclusion. I say, 617 00:30:22,840 --> 00:30:26,120 Speaker 3: this is a really cool idea, and to my knowledge, 618 00:30:26,160 --> 00:30:27,920 Speaker 3: we're going to be the first to do this. And 619 00:30:27,960 --> 00:30:30,160 Speaker 3: so I said, why can't we open this to everyone? 620 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:33,600 Speaker 3: Why can't we make this so that it's disrupting the 621 00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:36,560 Speaker 3: entire industry. You make it democratize it where you don't 622 00:30:36,600 --> 00:30:38,960 Speaker 3: have to be a qualified investor. You can just be 623 00:30:39,040 --> 00:30:41,280 Speaker 3: any investor that's sitting on capital gains. 624 00:30:41,760 --> 00:30:43,000 Speaker 5: And so the way that works. 625 00:30:42,800 --> 00:30:45,959 Speaker 3: Is you can contribute a portfolio of stocks ETFs whatever, 626 00:30:46,040 --> 00:30:48,120 Speaker 3: and there's some rules like one position can't be over 627 00:30:48,160 --> 00:30:51,000 Speaker 3: twenty five percent, the top five can't be over fifty. 628 00:30:51,760 --> 00:30:55,520 Speaker 3: You contribute a basket of stocks, you get an ETF 629 00:30:55,520 --> 00:30:59,120 Speaker 3: in return, and you get essentially a tax deferral diversified 630 00:30:59,120 --> 00:31:02,800 Speaker 3: portfolio that now has a diversified strategy. It could be 631 00:31:02,800 --> 00:31:05,400 Speaker 3: whatever strategy. The first one we're doing is actually a 632 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:09,400 Speaker 3: riff on an old paper we wrote which demonstrated that 633 00:31:09,400 --> 00:31:11,280 Speaker 3: if you're a high tax investment in it plays like 634 00:31:11,320 --> 00:31:13,960 Speaker 3: California or New York. The last thing you want is 635 00:31:13,960 --> 00:31:16,680 Speaker 3: dividends or high dividends. So we demonstrated that if you 636 00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:20,360 Speaker 3: had a value strategy that targeted stocks that paid load 637 00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:23,400 Speaker 3: to no dividends your act after tax, you do much 638 00:31:23,400 --> 00:31:28,200 Speaker 3: better than the SMP or high divinut strategy. So this 639 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:31,280 Speaker 3: takeaway of this idea is that you can contribute a 640 00:31:31,360 --> 00:31:34,120 Speaker 3: basket of stocks end up with a great ETF and 641 00:31:34,920 --> 00:31:37,240 Speaker 3: you could launch a series of these every year, every 642 00:31:37,280 --> 00:31:40,000 Speaker 3: three months, every six months, and let people opt in. 643 00:31:40,600 --> 00:31:42,080 Speaker 5: What do you think, great? 644 00:31:42,240 --> 00:31:45,000 Speaker 4: This sounds good. I wish I had some gigantic capital 645 00:31:45,040 --> 00:31:48,440 Speaker 4: gains that I needed to solve for, but a loss 646 00:31:48,520 --> 00:31:51,200 Speaker 4: that's not my problem. But let's just talk a little 647 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:55,320 Speaker 4: bit more mechanics. So let's say ten years ago, I'd 648 00:31:55,320 --> 00:31:58,440 Speaker 4: bought a bunch of Apple and Nvideo and Microsoft and 649 00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:02,520 Speaker 4: whatever else, JP Morgan, a bunch of names that have 650 00:32:02,560 --> 00:32:05,280 Speaker 4: done well. Okay, So I have these and now I'm thinking, Oh, 651 00:32:05,320 --> 00:32:08,920 Speaker 4: the market's kind of expensive these days, I'm nervous, et cetera. 652 00:32:09,520 --> 00:32:11,720 Speaker 4: I'm thinking about I want to sell them, but I 653 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:15,200 Speaker 4: don't want to like write a huge check come next April. Okay, 654 00:32:15,360 --> 00:32:18,760 Speaker 4: so that's my problem. Talk to me the specific mechanics. 655 00:32:18,920 --> 00:32:22,960 Speaker 4: Now your fund suddenly, your new ETF suddenly exists. Walk 656 00:32:23,040 --> 00:32:25,720 Speaker 4: me through the specific mechanics of what I have to 657 00:32:25,760 --> 00:32:27,800 Speaker 4: do to swap them. 658 00:32:27,960 --> 00:32:29,760 Speaker 2: I don't understand how you like deliver it. 659 00:32:29,960 --> 00:32:33,120 Speaker 4: Yeah, so I swapped that into this thing so that 660 00:32:33,280 --> 00:32:36,239 Speaker 4: now I'm in a diversified portfolio that's a little bit 661 00:32:36,320 --> 00:32:40,280 Speaker 4: de risked. Thanks to diversification, I don't have my concentration problem, 662 00:32:40,360 --> 00:32:42,200 Speaker 4: but I didn't have to pay the taxes. Talk to 663 00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:42,880 Speaker 4: me about exactly. 664 00:32:42,920 --> 00:32:44,960 Speaker 3: This is why we're partnering with our friends ETF architect 665 00:32:45,000 --> 00:32:47,600 Speaker 3: like you have things like ten thirty one, have very established, 666 00:32:47,600 --> 00:32:49,200 Speaker 3: templated rules how to do it. 667 00:32:49,200 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 5: And this is the first time we going through it. 668 00:32:50,800 --> 00:32:53,320 Speaker 3: So I'm sure it's not going to be one hundred 669 00:32:53,320 --> 00:32:57,800 Speaker 3: percent without headaches and hiccups. But the first thing you inquire, right, 670 00:32:57,920 --> 00:33:01,080 Speaker 3: So we set up camera investments dot com, forward slash tax. 671 00:33:01,400 --> 00:33:04,280 Speaker 3: Put in your name, your info. I got this portfolio. 672 00:33:04,400 --> 00:33:07,640 Speaker 3: Joe's got a portfolio. Swab Yeah, it's I literally do have. 673 00:33:08,720 --> 00:33:11,640 Speaker 3: So you know, here's I'm interested. Send me more information. 674 00:33:11,680 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 3: I'm sure we'll do a webinar, we'll educate everyone and 675 00:33:14,360 --> 00:33:16,600 Speaker 3: we'll say here's the menu, here's the process of what's 676 00:33:16,600 --> 00:33:20,760 Speaker 3: going to happen on I'm just making up this date December. First, 677 00:33:21,200 --> 00:33:24,120 Speaker 3: your portfolio will contribute to the ETF. 678 00:33:24,200 --> 00:33:25,480 Speaker 4: Everybody, How does that work? 679 00:33:25,640 --> 00:33:26,040 Speaker 5: Magic? 680 00:33:26,160 --> 00:33:29,160 Speaker 3: Hopefully you know the plumbing and the pipes of it. 681 00:33:29,440 --> 00:33:31,000 Speaker 3: We'll have to get Wes on the show and get 682 00:33:31,080 --> 00:33:33,160 Speaker 3: him to get really deep on it. But they just 683 00:33:33,160 --> 00:33:34,800 Speaker 3: did it with a five thousand account. 684 00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:38,360 Speaker 4: But like Schwab or whatever, like, they have mechanisms for. 685 00:33:39,240 --> 00:33:40,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I'm sure, like I don't know whether 686 00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:43,520 Speaker 3: it's going to be you know, acadding and whether it's 687 00:33:43,560 --> 00:33:45,400 Speaker 3: going to be just electronic transfer. 688 00:33:45,520 --> 00:33:48,680 Speaker 4: Okay, but you can do that with shares, yeah, okay, Okay. 689 00:33:49,440 --> 00:33:52,360 Speaker 3: So we wrangle up a bunch of people with all 690 00:33:52,400 --> 00:33:56,240 Speaker 3: sorts of different securities and they all contribute them, and 691 00:33:56,280 --> 00:33:58,240 Speaker 3: then the next morning they have an ETF in their 692 00:33:58,240 --> 00:33:58,960 Speaker 3: swap account. 693 00:33:59,040 --> 00:33:59,680 Speaker 5: It's beautiful. 694 00:33:59,720 --> 00:34:02,400 Speaker 3: And then there you know they have a diversified portfolio. 695 00:34:02,520 --> 00:34:04,640 Speaker 3: And we have a few different ones lined up. We 696 00:34:04,680 --> 00:34:07,560 Speaker 3: have an endowment style. You guys probably seen me pick 697 00:34:07,560 --> 00:34:08,880 Speaker 3: my fights with cowpers. 698 00:34:08,480 --> 00:34:09,000 Speaker 5: Over the years. 699 00:34:09,040 --> 00:34:11,520 Speaker 3: We have a global shareholder yield style. So the menu 700 00:34:11,640 --> 00:34:14,520 Speaker 3: will be different for people that may want different ideas, 701 00:34:14,560 --> 00:34:17,920 Speaker 3: but the first one, at least, we're doing US stock exposure. 702 00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:22,240 Speaker 2: So once you're in the diversified portfolio the ETF, presumably 703 00:34:22,280 --> 00:34:24,600 Speaker 2: if you sold that you would still have to pay 704 00:34:24,719 --> 00:34:28,120 Speaker 2: capital gains, but the benefit is that you're getting out 705 00:34:28,120 --> 00:34:31,000 Speaker 2: of that like big concentrated position and going into something 706 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:31,879 Speaker 2: more diversified. 707 00:34:31,960 --> 00:34:32,600 Speaker 5: That's the hope. 708 00:34:32,760 --> 00:34:34,960 Speaker 2: Okay, that sounds interesting. 709 00:34:35,200 --> 00:34:37,319 Speaker 4: It sounds very interesting. Can I ask a question? You 710 00:34:37,440 --> 00:34:42,359 Speaker 4: mentioned Wes's company, Wes Gray. You mentioned Wes's company is 711 00:34:42,400 --> 00:34:46,960 Speaker 4: called Alpha Architect. Since you've been in the ETF game 712 00:34:47,200 --> 00:34:49,680 Speaker 4: for a long time, can you talk a little bit 713 00:34:49,719 --> 00:34:53,239 Speaker 4: about how, you know, if Tracy and I have an 714 00:34:53,239 --> 00:34:56,439 Speaker 4: idea for an ETF, some strategy that we think could 715 00:34:56,480 --> 00:35:00,760 Speaker 4: be interesting, how much easier is it today in twenty 716 00:35:00,800 --> 00:35:04,400 Speaker 4: twenty four to build What is the process of Like, okay, 717 00:35:04,400 --> 00:35:07,200 Speaker 4: we want to build an ETF around this versus say 718 00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:10,080 Speaker 4: twenty fourteen or two thousand and four. 719 00:35:10,239 --> 00:35:10,960 Speaker 5: It's night and day. 720 00:35:11,239 --> 00:35:12,920 Speaker 4: So what's the what's it like? 721 00:35:13,000 --> 00:35:15,880 Speaker 3: You know, we originally were gonna sub advise on a 722 00:35:15,880 --> 00:35:18,680 Speaker 3: couple of funds. The Forbes family was gonna move into ETFs. 723 00:35:18,800 --> 00:35:20,960 Speaker 3: It's a fun fact they didn't because it was two 724 00:35:20,960 --> 00:35:24,160 Speaker 3: thousand and nine. So we eventually sub advised on a 725 00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:28,160 Speaker 3: fund with advisor shares. Because back then it costs half 726 00:35:28,200 --> 00:35:30,759 Speaker 3: a million a million bucks a year just to get 727 00:35:30,800 --> 00:35:33,919 Speaker 3: the trust permission to launch ETF, so a huge pain. 728 00:35:33,960 --> 00:35:37,320 Speaker 3: We eventually bit the bullet starting launching funds in twenty thirteen. 729 00:35:37,920 --> 00:35:41,120 Speaker 3: Fast forward a decade in the ETF rule which was 730 00:35:41,160 --> 00:35:44,360 Speaker 3: passed a few years ago that really streamlined everything, changed 731 00:35:44,400 --> 00:35:47,520 Speaker 3: it all. And so the two main companies, so ETF 732 00:35:47,640 --> 00:35:50,279 Speaker 3: architect and then Title, which are both groups that do 733 00:35:50,400 --> 00:35:53,279 Speaker 3: this white label ETF business. You could go to them 734 00:35:53,320 --> 00:35:56,880 Speaker 3: now and say, Joe's got his idea for this ETF. 735 00:35:57,000 --> 00:35:59,800 Speaker 3: It's only going to invest in companies in North Carolina. 736 00:36:00,120 --> 00:36:01,840 Speaker 3: The letter M like, whatever it may be. You know, 737 00:36:01,880 --> 00:36:04,200 Speaker 3: who knows. Three months from now you could have a 738 00:36:04,200 --> 00:36:06,560 Speaker 3: fund out. Wow, it's going to cost you, I don't know, 739 00:36:06,640 --> 00:36:09,600 Speaker 3: fifty grand and startup fees. But the big problem, and 740 00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:11,920 Speaker 3: you know everyone sees the gold at the end of 741 00:36:11,920 --> 00:36:14,040 Speaker 3: the rainbow, but you really need to be able to 742 00:36:14,080 --> 00:36:17,319 Speaker 3: get to twenty thirty forty million. So a lot of 743 00:36:17,320 --> 00:36:18,720 Speaker 3: people sit at zero. 744 00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:21,200 Speaker 2: Is that just to make the economics of actually like 745 00:36:21,400 --> 00:36:23,319 Speaker 2: managing and trading the ETF actually work well. 746 00:36:23,320 --> 00:36:24,719 Speaker 3: If it sits at zero, you're on the hook for 747 00:36:24,719 --> 00:36:27,920 Speaker 3: probably quarter million expenses per year two hundred and fifty grand. 748 00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:29,680 Speaker 3: But that's if it sits at zero, and so then 749 00:36:29,719 --> 00:36:32,759 Speaker 3: you're subsizing. You know, writing twenty k checks per month 750 00:36:32,800 --> 00:36:34,040 Speaker 3: adds up over time. 751 00:36:50,440 --> 00:36:53,759 Speaker 2: Here's something I always wanted to write about or talk 752 00:36:53,800 --> 00:36:58,440 Speaker 2: about reverse inquiries in ETFs. I think this is sometimes 753 00:36:58,480 --> 00:37:02,480 Speaker 2: like an underappreciated perspect of how ETFs come into being. 754 00:37:02,680 --> 00:37:05,279 Speaker 2: But I have heard that, like a hedge fund or 755 00:37:05,360 --> 00:37:08,080 Speaker 2: an investor will go out and say, we want the 756 00:37:08,120 --> 00:37:11,520 Speaker 2: opposite exposure to this particular thing. We want to take 757 00:37:11,560 --> 00:37:13,799 Speaker 2: the other side of the bet. Will you create an 758 00:37:13,800 --> 00:37:16,359 Speaker 2: ETF that allows me to do this? 759 00:37:16,920 --> 00:37:18,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, you see that more at a lot of the 760 00:37:19,040 --> 00:37:24,080 Speaker 3: trade specific shops and firms that want those thematic exposures. 761 00:37:24,120 --> 00:37:26,319 Speaker 3: You know, we tend to focus on ideas I want 762 00:37:26,320 --> 00:37:28,799 Speaker 3: to put money into. You know, the average mutual fund 763 00:37:28,800 --> 00:37:32,200 Speaker 3: manager has zero dollars invested in their own fund, which 764 00:37:32,239 --> 00:37:35,800 Speaker 3: is an astonishing statistic. And half of all public funds 765 00:37:36,360 --> 00:37:39,120 Speaker 3: close over the course of ten years, so there's a 766 00:37:39,160 --> 00:37:41,759 Speaker 3: massive amount of turnover and people that don't have skin 767 00:37:41,840 --> 00:37:43,719 Speaker 3: in the game, and so a lot of these ideas. 768 00:37:44,440 --> 00:37:45,880 Speaker 3: You know, I want nothing to do with a lot 769 00:37:45,960 --> 00:37:49,040 Speaker 3: of these tradeable thematics, right, but if people build them, 770 00:37:49,080 --> 00:37:50,680 Speaker 3: they want to invest them, God bless them. 771 00:37:50,719 --> 00:37:51,000 Speaker 5: Right. 772 00:37:51,080 --> 00:37:53,160 Speaker 3: But we we air on the side of things that 773 00:37:53,200 --> 00:37:56,319 Speaker 3: we think make a material impact to investors, you know, 774 00:37:56,560 --> 00:37:59,040 Speaker 3: future returns and portfolios and. 775 00:37:59,080 --> 00:38:00,720 Speaker 5: A lot of out there. 776 00:38:01,280 --> 00:38:03,080 Speaker 3: You know, I wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole, 777 00:38:03,200 --> 00:38:05,200 Speaker 3: but some of them raise a billion, ten billion dollars 778 00:38:05,239 --> 00:38:05,799 Speaker 3: or what do I know. 779 00:38:06,920 --> 00:38:11,760 Speaker 4: It's interesting hearing you describe how much easier ETF creation 780 00:38:11,960 --> 00:38:16,359 Speaker 4: has gotten, because it strikes me that it's like the 781 00:38:16,400 --> 00:38:21,360 Speaker 4: ETF physation of the ETF industry, because ETFs, of course 782 00:38:21,520 --> 00:38:25,360 Speaker 4: make investing in a country or a theme much easier 783 00:38:25,360 --> 00:38:26,840 Speaker 4: than if you had to do it by hand and 784 00:38:26,920 --> 00:38:30,840 Speaker 4: buy a bunch of stocks. And this is essentially taking 785 00:38:30,880 --> 00:38:34,560 Speaker 4: that same idea except applying it to the creation of ETFs, 786 00:38:34,600 --> 00:38:37,240 Speaker 4: where you have all these white label things. The infrastructure 787 00:38:37,320 --> 00:38:39,480 Speaker 4: is already there, so all you have to do is 788 00:38:39,640 --> 00:38:42,200 Speaker 4: supply the idea. This gives me just something I've always 789 00:38:42,280 --> 00:38:44,800 Speaker 4: just sort of been wondering about what happens when in 790 00:38:44,880 --> 00:38:47,960 Speaker 4: the ETF dies. So Tracy and I launch our fund 791 00:38:48,000 --> 00:38:50,719 Speaker 4: where we only invest in North Carolina stocks where the 792 00:38:50,760 --> 00:38:54,960 Speaker 4: ticker has the letter eminem and then, for whatever reason, 793 00:38:55,719 --> 00:39:00,360 Speaker 4: in two years we have five hundred thousand dollars under management, 794 00:39:00,400 --> 00:39:03,480 Speaker 4: which is probably high, but clearly not enough to build 795 00:39:03,520 --> 00:39:05,399 Speaker 4: a business on. You're like, you know what, we don't 796 00:39:05,400 --> 00:39:06,719 Speaker 4: want to do this. We don't want to write the 797 00:39:06,800 --> 00:39:10,439 Speaker 4: twenty thousand dollars checks a month to support this. When 798 00:39:10,600 --> 00:39:13,080 Speaker 4: we decide to wind it down, what happens. 799 00:39:13,239 --> 00:39:16,080 Speaker 3: They go to the ETF ticker in the sky graveyard, 800 00:39:16,320 --> 00:39:18,640 Speaker 3: you know. I mean it's a pretty orderly process. There's 801 00:39:18,719 --> 00:39:21,480 Speaker 3: a lot of prior arity, of course, you know, I 802 00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:24,440 Speaker 3: think on very very rare cases. 803 00:39:24,200 --> 00:39:27,000 Speaker 4: The investors get distributed the stock or do they get 804 00:39:27,040 --> 00:39:28,080 Speaker 4: distributed the cash. 805 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:29,280 Speaker 5: It's usually cash. 806 00:39:29,320 --> 00:39:32,480 Speaker 3: But the correct answer for the vast majority of investors 807 00:39:32,520 --> 00:39:34,480 Speaker 3: just sell it before close it down, you know, you 808 00:39:34,840 --> 00:39:36,560 Speaker 3: sell it on the secondary market. Yeah, like, hey, we're 809 00:39:36,560 --> 00:39:37,759 Speaker 3: going to close this into the year. We'll just sell 810 00:39:37,800 --> 00:39:39,719 Speaker 3: it now and just be done with it. But you know, 811 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:42,640 Speaker 3: I think a lot of people take a negative view 812 00:39:42,680 --> 00:39:45,120 Speaker 3: of the amount of products out there. You often hear 813 00:39:45,160 --> 00:39:48,200 Speaker 3: people say there's more ETFs than stocks, right, and say, well, 814 00:39:48,239 --> 00:39:50,839 Speaker 3: there's more words than letters like that, that doesn't ye like. 815 00:39:50,800 --> 00:39:52,719 Speaker 4: It doesn't more sentences than words, but. 816 00:39:52,880 --> 00:39:55,880 Speaker 3: You have sort of the ability to have this limitless 817 00:39:56,000 --> 00:39:58,960 Speaker 3: grocery choice. There's a lot of areas that I think 818 00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:02,040 Speaker 3: haven't developed the way that they will eventually in One 819 00:40:02,040 --> 00:40:04,960 Speaker 3: example is the all in one acid allocation ETF. We 820 00:40:05,000 --> 00:40:07,000 Speaker 3: have three of these, but if you look at the 821 00:40:07,080 --> 00:40:12,520 Speaker 3: traditional mutual fund asset allocation industry, it is multiple, is 822 00:40:12,560 --> 00:40:16,279 Speaker 3: more expensive and tax inefficient compared to the ETFs, and 823 00:40:16,360 --> 00:40:18,560 Speaker 3: yet they still have about a trillion in assets. And 824 00:40:19,000 --> 00:40:21,719 Speaker 3: you know those type of assets, it's usually death or 825 00:40:21,760 --> 00:40:24,680 Speaker 3: divorce or bear markets where they all come out all 826 00:40:24,719 --> 00:40:26,359 Speaker 3: the money at some point, but they never go back 827 00:40:26,400 --> 00:40:29,080 Speaker 3: to paying two percent. And so I think you'll see 828 00:40:29,160 --> 00:40:31,280 Speaker 3: over the next ten to twenty years a big shift 829 00:40:31,320 --> 00:40:35,239 Speaker 3: and assets and structures, but eventually it all leads to 830 00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:36,040 Speaker 3: the ETF. 831 00:40:36,360 --> 00:40:40,279 Speaker 4: You know, you mentioned the sort of global market portfolio, 832 00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:44,680 Speaker 4: and we can never own the global market portfolio truly, 833 00:40:44,760 --> 00:40:47,200 Speaker 4: so you only are like trying to get close, right, 834 00:40:47,239 --> 00:40:50,920 Speaker 4: because the global market portfolio also includes all real estate 835 00:40:51,520 --> 00:40:53,839 Speaker 4: in the world and just a number of things like 836 00:40:54,160 --> 00:40:57,200 Speaker 4: you can approach it maybe asymptotically, but you'll never truly 837 00:40:57,239 --> 00:41:00,000 Speaker 4: own the global market portfolio. But the old academic Reais 838 00:41:00,040 --> 00:41:03,080 Speaker 4: search says, like to own the global market portfolio every 839 00:41:03,560 --> 00:41:06,840 Speaker 4: asset in the world. How close do you get in 840 00:41:06,880 --> 00:41:09,480 Speaker 4: one of these funds? Are you like ninety five percent 841 00:41:09,520 --> 00:41:10,160 Speaker 4: of the way there? 842 00:41:10,200 --> 00:41:12,960 Speaker 3: I'd say it's closer to like ninety nine, you know. 843 00:41:13,040 --> 00:41:15,720 Speaker 3: The if you look at one of my favorite examples 844 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:18,239 Speaker 3: we always joke on these assy action from portfolios. We 845 00:41:18,239 --> 00:41:20,880 Speaker 3: have one called the Talmud portfolio, which is based on 846 00:41:21,280 --> 00:41:22,799 Speaker 3: there's a piece of advice where it was like, let 847 00:41:22,840 --> 00:41:26,320 Speaker 3: every man invest a third in business, a third in land, 848 00:41:26,400 --> 00:41:28,680 Speaker 3: and a third keep in reserve, which we interpret is 849 00:41:29,080 --> 00:41:31,440 Speaker 3: a third in stocks, a third and real assets, and 850 00:41:31,440 --> 00:41:34,919 Speaker 3: the third and bonds. That portfolio is almost impossible to beat. 851 00:41:35,040 --> 00:41:37,560 Speaker 3: And if you look at a lot of like Cowper's Bridgewater, 852 00:41:37,640 --> 00:41:39,480 Speaker 3: and we do all these articles and say should these 853 00:41:39,480 --> 00:41:42,920 Speaker 3: big institutions just be managed by a robot? And they, 854 00:41:43,120 --> 00:41:46,640 Speaker 3: for the most part, usually can't beat these basic asset 855 00:41:46,680 --> 00:41:49,320 Speaker 3: allocation benchmarks. It's really hard for them. Some you include 856 00:41:49,320 --> 00:41:51,040 Speaker 3: a little leverage because they have a lot of private 857 00:41:51,080 --> 00:41:54,480 Speaker 3: equity and leverage vehicles, but these basic portfolios are a 858 00:41:54,520 --> 00:41:55,480 Speaker 3: heart high. 859 00:41:55,320 --> 00:41:56,600 Speaker 4: Bar that's funny. 860 00:41:56,640 --> 00:42:00,719 Speaker 2: I hadn't considered talmudic investment philosophy for the wind, but 861 00:42:01,160 --> 00:42:04,040 Speaker 2: I guess it works. Okay. So this whole conversation has 862 00:42:04,080 --> 00:42:06,600 Speaker 2: reminded me that I am old enough to remember when 863 00:42:06,719 --> 00:42:11,040 Speaker 2: active ETFs were first becoming a thing and they were 864 00:42:11,080 --> 00:42:15,879 Speaker 2: going through like regulatory approval process. Obviously they've become much 865 00:42:15,920 --> 00:42:19,320 Speaker 2: more of a thing since then, and we've seen mutual 866 00:42:19,360 --> 00:42:22,960 Speaker 2: funds convert into ETFs. As you mentioned, what's the next 867 00:42:23,000 --> 00:42:27,400 Speaker 2: big thing in the etfification of the market. 868 00:42:27,680 --> 00:42:30,520 Speaker 3: Now, there's a few areas we're always interested in. And 869 00:42:30,840 --> 00:42:33,080 Speaker 3: when we look at the Vinn diagram or you make 870 00:42:33,120 --> 00:42:37,120 Speaker 3: the columns of things that are totally fine, Okay, good, 871 00:42:37,520 --> 00:42:38,719 Speaker 3: there's plenty, right. 872 00:42:38,920 --> 00:42:39,080 Speaker 5: You know. 873 00:42:39,120 --> 00:42:40,879 Speaker 3: I was chatting with someone last night and he's like, look, 874 00:42:40,880 --> 00:42:43,120 Speaker 3: I used DFA, Why should I use your funds? I'm like, don't. 875 00:42:43,239 --> 00:42:46,640 Speaker 3: DFA is fine, you know, but the bad news is like, 876 00:42:46,680 --> 00:42:51,280 Speaker 3: there's a whole universe of absolutely awful, god awful, terrible. 877 00:42:51,640 --> 00:42:54,319 Speaker 3: I have a Twitter thread that's just instant. I made 878 00:42:54,360 --> 00:42:59,799 Speaker 3: the mistake of bookmarking a spammy, sleazy Instagram ad for 879 00:43:00,239 --> 00:43:03,120 Speaker 3: private real estate. It's always private real estate, right, fifty 880 00:43:03,160 --> 00:43:04,000 Speaker 3: percent per year. 881 00:43:04,760 --> 00:43:05,360 Speaker 5: You know, they're. 882 00:43:05,160 --> 00:43:07,919 Speaker 4: Claiming those guys got closed. There's twenty See. 883 00:43:07,960 --> 00:43:09,880 Speaker 2: Some of the videos are like, if you just commit 884 00:43:10,040 --> 00:43:12,799 Speaker 2: investment and tax fraud, you can make like a two 885 00:43:12,920 --> 00:43:15,000 Speaker 2: hundred percent return in six months. 886 00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:18,200 Speaker 3: So all my all my ads are now these scams. Right, 887 00:43:18,239 --> 00:43:20,400 Speaker 3: I just get delivered because they I bookmarked it, so 888 00:43:20,480 --> 00:43:22,880 Speaker 3: I get all these So just avoiding and doing the 889 00:43:22,920 --> 00:43:26,600 Speaker 3: really dumb stuff is the key to almost all of this. 890 00:43:26,840 --> 00:43:27,000 Speaker 5: Right. 891 00:43:27,239 --> 00:43:29,840 Speaker 3: We did an old article about the food pyramid. You 892 00:43:29,840 --> 00:43:30,840 Speaker 3: remember the food pyramidal? 893 00:43:31,360 --> 00:43:31,799 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know. 894 00:43:31,840 --> 00:43:33,440 Speaker 3: The base of that when we were kids was eat 895 00:43:33,440 --> 00:43:35,920 Speaker 3: a bunch of cereal and bread and pasta, you know, 896 00:43:36,040 --> 00:43:38,719 Speaker 3: and it's kind of inverted now where thinking about it. 897 00:43:38,719 --> 00:43:40,800 Speaker 3: But the same thing with investing is like the basics. 898 00:43:40,840 --> 00:43:44,040 Speaker 3: Get the basics right, payloa fees, payload taxes, get your 899 00:43:44,080 --> 00:43:48,120 Speaker 3: money invested. That's the number one piece of advice of 900 00:43:48,160 --> 00:43:50,879 Speaker 3: all this is get to work, let it compound, right, 901 00:43:51,280 --> 00:43:53,080 Speaker 3: and then the other things take care of themselves. So, 902 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:55,640 Speaker 3: but because this is the Wonky Show and we get 903 00:43:55,640 --> 00:43:57,800 Speaker 3: into this, I think the things like the three fifty 904 00:43:57,800 --> 00:43:59,560 Speaker 3: one exchange idea we're talking about are going to be 905 00:44:00,000 --> 00:44:01,800 Speaker 3: extremely material when we're talking about. 906 00:44:01,600 --> 00:44:02,279 Speaker 5: This in a year or two. 907 00:44:02,560 --> 00:44:04,719 Speaker 3: I've seen some other companies and we don't do this, 908 00:44:04,840 --> 00:44:08,160 Speaker 3: But I love the idea of taxable target date ETFs. 909 00:44:08,440 --> 00:44:11,800 Speaker 3: We see people behave better in target date style funds. 910 00:44:12,200 --> 00:44:16,560 Speaker 3: I think there's some ideas and concepts around building personal 911 00:44:16,719 --> 00:44:20,000 Speaker 3: pensions where people are locked into their investments and get 912 00:44:20,000 --> 00:44:22,600 Speaker 3: them to behave in a good way where you know, 913 00:44:22,680 --> 00:44:26,000 Speaker 3: these fiduciaries, you're kind of forced to hold investments and 914 00:44:26,120 --> 00:44:28,600 Speaker 3: let the compounding do its work. There's a lot of 915 00:44:28,640 --> 00:44:31,160 Speaker 3: innovation in some of those ideas. But if you go back, 916 00:44:31,200 --> 00:44:32,600 Speaker 3: I have a joke, I'm like, so many of the 917 00:44:32,760 --> 00:44:36,919 Speaker 3: fintech ideas are just vanguard with a shiny coat of paint, right, 918 00:44:37,000 --> 00:44:40,120 Speaker 3: Like you already have pretty great out there. But there's 919 00:44:40,160 --> 00:44:41,520 Speaker 3: there's some more ideas we're working on too. 920 00:44:42,200 --> 00:44:44,360 Speaker 4: I love the idea of like a sort of like 921 00:44:44,480 --> 00:44:49,200 Speaker 4: forced pension because it intuitively it seems like a most 922 00:44:49,239 --> 00:44:52,000 Speaker 4: people make mistakes when they're like left on their own, 923 00:44:52,040 --> 00:44:53,359 Speaker 4: so you just sort of want to lock it up, 924 00:44:53,480 --> 00:44:56,680 Speaker 4: would be. It also seems like there's probably excess returns 925 00:44:56,719 --> 00:44:59,239 Speaker 4: for like that commitment where if like you trade off 926 00:44:59,280 --> 00:45:03,920 Speaker 4: the liquidity profile, then you get paid more anyway, med favor. 927 00:45:04,440 --> 00:45:06,759 Speaker 4: It's so great to finally have the show. Great to 928 00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:09,720 Speaker 4: catch up with you in your natural environment at. 929 00:45:09,560 --> 00:45:10,520 Speaker 2: The surfing on a beach. 930 00:45:10,800 --> 00:45:13,359 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's like okay, like, yeah, we didn't have MeV 931 00:45:13,480 --> 00:45:15,120 Speaker 4: on for a long time, but if we when we 932 00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:17,759 Speaker 4: did finally have it, we're like literally on the beach 933 00:45:17,880 --> 00:45:19,440 Speaker 4: right now, listeners. 934 00:45:18,960 --> 00:45:19,560 Speaker 5: You heard it here. 935 00:45:19,600 --> 00:45:22,080 Speaker 3: They're committed to us serving with this future. 936 00:45:22,160 --> 00:45:22,480 Speaker 4: I don't know. 937 00:45:22,600 --> 00:45:25,320 Speaker 2: Only I said only if the temperature is above eighty 938 00:45:25,360 --> 00:45:27,600 Speaker 2: degrees or someone like loans me a what you. 939 00:45:27,800 --> 00:45:29,160 Speaker 4: Just it's freezing. 940 00:45:29,520 --> 00:45:30,600 Speaker 3: I'm really cool care of it. 941 00:45:30,680 --> 00:45:32,040 Speaker 2: I've been cold for two days. 942 00:45:32,360 --> 00:45:35,000 Speaker 4: It all right, thanks so much, man, take. 943 00:45:34,880 --> 00:45:35,319 Speaker 5: Great, y'all. 944 00:45:48,200 --> 00:45:50,120 Speaker 2: Well, I'm glad we were finally able to do that, Joe, 945 00:45:50,160 --> 00:45:54,040 Speaker 2: as you say, in Meb's natural environment. One thing I 946 00:45:54,160 --> 00:45:57,319 Speaker 2: was thinking was just about that new fund and the 947 00:45:57,360 --> 00:46:00,440 Speaker 2: sort of tax focus of it. It is in interesting 948 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,719 Speaker 2: because you know, our whole conversation was about how over 949 00:46:03,760 --> 00:46:07,400 Speaker 2: the past ten years or so, those big concentrated yeah 950 00:46:07,520 --> 00:46:11,400 Speaker 2: investments are what have paid off the most, and I 951 00:46:11,400 --> 00:46:13,799 Speaker 2: guess people are now trying to think through how they 952 00:46:13,880 --> 00:46:18,480 Speaker 2: actually crystallize those wins and so it's interesting to see 953 00:46:19,000 --> 00:46:21,880 Speaker 2: the market trying to come up with a solution to 954 00:46:21,960 --> 00:46:23,120 Speaker 2: that problem. 955 00:46:22,800 --> 00:46:25,160 Speaker 4: The solution of the problem of people having to pay 956 00:46:25,320 --> 00:46:28,520 Speaker 4: tax and people having to eventually pay taxes. You know 957 00:46:28,560 --> 00:46:32,040 Speaker 4: what I think is interesting to me to going back 958 00:46:32,080 --> 00:46:36,319 Speaker 4: to the sort of diversification story and getting punished for 959 00:46:36,400 --> 00:46:41,160 Speaker 4: diversification where we started. I like the idea that one day, 960 00:46:41,440 --> 00:46:44,000 Speaker 4: like the sort of I'm still kind of diversified, you 961 00:46:44,040 --> 00:46:48,000 Speaker 4: know that, like my prudent approach is going to pay off. 962 00:46:48,360 --> 00:46:51,080 Speaker 4: But it's also interesting that like the periods that were 963 00:46:51,239 --> 00:46:54,640 Speaker 4: paid off are like not great periods. So it's like, Okay, 964 00:46:54,680 --> 00:46:55,279 Speaker 4: I want my. 965 00:46:55,280 --> 00:46:57,759 Speaker 2: Diversification yocer and forgettable. 966 00:46:57,600 --> 00:47:00,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, or like the aftermath of a craft and so 967 00:47:00,760 --> 00:47:03,200 Speaker 4: like I want my diversification to pay off, but I 968 00:47:03,200 --> 00:47:04,080 Speaker 4: don't want to crash. 969 00:47:04,239 --> 00:47:07,560 Speaker 2: This is exactly what I was thinking. The trigger for 970 00:47:07,800 --> 00:47:12,239 Speaker 2: diversification coming back would be something very bad happening that's 971 00:47:12,320 --> 00:47:14,920 Speaker 2: right in the US. Yeah, And as people who live 972 00:47:14,920 --> 00:47:17,320 Speaker 2: in the US were de facto over levered. 973 00:47:17,360 --> 00:47:19,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, we're always going to be levered to the US. 974 00:47:19,120 --> 00:47:21,640 Speaker 4: I mean, our jobs are levered to the US economy, right, 975 00:47:22,000 --> 00:47:25,280 Speaker 4: So I think about this a lot, which is like Okay, 976 00:47:25,840 --> 00:47:29,680 Speaker 4: it makes me uncomfortable as not just someone with money 977 00:47:29,800 --> 00:47:31,759 Speaker 4: in the market, but it makes me uncomfortable as a 978 00:47:31,800 --> 00:47:34,760 Speaker 4: press of the world that, like, we have this market 979 00:47:34,800 --> 00:47:38,759 Speaker 4: that is just so heavily concentrated and so levered to 980 00:47:38,840 --> 00:47:42,560 Speaker 4: the success of Meta and Nvidia and Amazon, and I 981 00:47:42,560 --> 00:47:44,919 Speaker 4: don't really like that. It rubs me the wrong way. 982 00:47:45,000 --> 00:47:47,640 Speaker 4: It doesn't sit right with me as something. But on 983 00:47:47,680 --> 00:47:51,640 Speaker 4: the other hand, if I think about what would change that, 984 00:47:52,239 --> 00:47:54,839 Speaker 4: it's nothing good. Yeah, there doesn't seem to be like 985 00:47:54,920 --> 00:47:58,440 Speaker 4: a positive version. Now I would see the one exception 986 00:47:58,560 --> 00:48:01,600 Speaker 4: where maybe this doesn't have to be the case would 987 00:48:01,680 --> 00:48:06,920 Speaker 4: be kind of like a market in which the investments 988 00:48:06,960 --> 00:48:10,400 Speaker 4: that are being made in things like the Inflationial Reduction 989 00:48:10,480 --> 00:48:12,560 Speaker 4: Act and the chipsy Act, where there's like this industrial 990 00:48:12,600 --> 00:48:15,880 Speaker 4: renaissance in the US and that really started taking off, 991 00:48:16,400 --> 00:48:19,960 Speaker 4: or where you have such above trend growth and productivity 992 00:48:20,239 --> 00:48:22,400 Speaker 4: that a lot of the so called like real economy 993 00:48:22,560 --> 00:48:25,520 Speaker 4: stocks really start to do well, et cetera. So there 994 00:48:25,719 --> 00:48:27,560 Speaker 4: is like that sort of golden. 995 00:48:27,239 --> 00:48:31,480 Speaker 2: Scenario where more winners come in this right right, and 996 00:48:31,600 --> 00:48:35,200 Speaker 2: so like having more exposure to potential winners that pays off. 997 00:48:35,239 --> 00:48:38,080 Speaker 2: But on the other hand, it feels like the downside scenario, 998 00:48:38,120 --> 00:48:40,640 Speaker 2: where like the current winners just get just. 999 00:48:40,840 --> 00:48:43,719 Speaker 4: Are no longer the winners and everyone loses, and then 1000 00:48:43,760 --> 00:48:48,000 Speaker 4: seems more probable. It seems more probable, and so it's hard. Yeah, 1001 00:48:48,080 --> 00:48:52,160 Speaker 4: it feels like when the regime shifts, which will happen 1002 00:48:52,280 --> 00:48:55,799 Speaker 4: because regimes shift, and maybe it'll be one hundred years 1003 00:48:55,840 --> 00:48:58,200 Speaker 4: from now and it will be dead and whatever. But 1004 00:48:58,280 --> 00:49:01,319 Speaker 4: it seems most likely that when the regime shifts, it 1005 00:49:01,360 --> 00:49:03,600 Speaker 4: will not be because things are good. 1006 00:49:03,960 --> 00:49:09,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, nothing last forever shed dramatic tear, including our time 1007 00:49:09,080 --> 00:49:11,879 Speaker 2: at Futureproof on the beach. So shall we leave it there? 1008 00:49:11,920 --> 00:49:12,680 Speaker 4: Let's leave it there. 1009 00:49:12,960 --> 00:49:15,759 Speaker 2: This has been another episode of the oud Lots podcast. 1010 00:49:15,880 --> 00:49:18,760 Speaker 2: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. 1011 00:49:19,040 --> 00:49:21,560 Speaker 4: And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart. 1012 00:49:21,800 --> 00:49:25,200 Speaker 4: Follow our guest meb Fabor. He's at meb Faber. Follow 1013 00:49:25,239 --> 00:49:29,400 Speaker 4: our producer Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman ermann Dashil Bennett at Dashbod, 1014 00:49:29,480 --> 00:49:33,240 Speaker 4: and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. Thank you to our producer Moses Ondam. 1015 00:49:33,440 --> 00:49:35,799 Speaker 4: From our odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot com 1016 00:49:35,800 --> 00:49:39,040 Speaker 4: slash od Lots where transcripts, a blog, and a newsletter, 1017 00:49:39,239 --> 00:49:41,640 Speaker 4: and you can chat about all of these topics twenty 1018 00:49:41,640 --> 00:49:43,640 Speaker 4: four to seven in our discord, where we have a 1019 00:49:43,680 --> 00:49:46,400 Speaker 4: markets channel and people talk about stocks and debate the 1020 00:49:46,400 --> 00:49:49,560 Speaker 4: market discord dot gg slash odd Lots. 1021 00:49:49,640 --> 00:49:52,239 Speaker 2: And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it 1022 00:49:52,280 --> 00:49:55,640 Speaker 2: when we talk about the pain of being a diversified investor, 1023 00:49:55,719 --> 00:49:58,480 Speaker 2: then please leave us a positive review on your favorite 1024 00:49:58,520 --> 00:50:02,480 Speaker 2: podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, 1025 00:50:02,560 --> 00:50:05,600 Speaker 2: you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. 1026 00:50:05,960 --> 00:50:08,560 Speaker 2: All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel 1027 00:50:08,560 --> 00:50:12,400 Speaker 2: on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.