WEBVTT - the smell doctor who was 'too woke': dr. ally louks

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Cool Media. Hello sixteenth minute listeners. It's Jamie just saying

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>really quick at the top that a show that is

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>my honor to produce on the iHeartRadio network. We the

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Unhoused has been nominated for a webby and we need

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>your help. If you haven't listened to the show before,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I highly recommend you do. But it

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is a show that began in twenty nineteen. It's created, hosted,

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and reported by the wonderful Theo Henderson. He began the

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast while living on the streets of LA and it's

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>grown significantly during that time, but remains the only podcast

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that tells stories that affect the unhoused and tells the

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>stories of the unhoused while continuing to center their own

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>perspectives and experiences. We've been nominated in a web category

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and we need your help. If you click the link

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in the description, it goes directly to our category. It's

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>literally two clicks. It's a tight race, so I would

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it if you both gave us a vote

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and also checked out the show. You can do both

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at the link and the description and Inhale deeply Baby.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Here is our doctor Ali Luke's episode if you were

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to give up any of your five senses, which would

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it be, statistically one in two of you just decided

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>probably my sense of smell. And I am honestly with

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you there. I think I had a roommate once who

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>truly did not have a sense of smell, or a

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>very dull sense of smell. Maybe he was lying now

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm saying it out loud. Either way, the place

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>smelled terrible and it made my life a living nightmare.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that a lot of the reason

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>why you might have been so quick to forfeit your

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sense of smell might have something to do with an

0:01:55.600 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>extremely powerful myth that humans have a very sense of

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>smell compared to other mammals. And to be clear, what

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>may be clear, this is a myth that I believed

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>until like six days ago, but that is not actually true.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>According to a twenty seven research paper from Rutgers University

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>professor John McGann, as, it turns out, humans have a

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>sense of smell that is arguably as acute as mammals

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that we think have a keener sense of smell than

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we do. And while his numbers are generally thought to

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be overstated, McGann published in twenty seventeen that we can

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>identify close to one trillion separate sense as opposed to

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the ten thousand that's commonly cited, and to introduce a

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>returning villain from our last series. Part of the reason

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that this misconception around smell has become ingrained in our

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is because of one Sigmund Freud. Professor McGann said

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty seventeen.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 2>It has been a long cultural belief that in order

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>to be a reasonable or rational person, you could not

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 2>be dominated by a sense of smell. Smell was linked

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to earthly animalistic tendencies, and.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Since twenty seventeen it has been debunked that we can

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>discern a trillion smells. But this is just another piece

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of evidence that this area of humankind is wildly under explored.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>There have since been numerous attempts to identify with more

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>specificity where exactly humans stand in the mammal smelling hierarchy.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But as more time and funding has been put into

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this line of study, it's become clear that our species

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>reputation as bad smellers is definitely false and possibly a

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>misguided way to make us feel better than the other

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>mammalian girls. Basically, a de emphasis on smell seems to

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>be part of how humans have been propped up to

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be better than other species. In reality, that's not just

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 1>far from the truth, but we rely on our sense

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of smell far more than we seem to realize. For

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the last week or so, I've been reading a book

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>called Smells, A Cultural History of odors in Early modern

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Times by French writer Robert Mushambled. Definitely got that wrong,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and with all due respect to the author, most of

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this book PARPs on the history of people being obsessed

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with the smell of their own parts and whether they

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or their spouse's pussy is stinky or not. And if

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this is something you think about a lot, I guess

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I recommend the book. But within this book I genuinely

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot about the fundamentals of smell that I

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>had completely misunderstood or have been miseducated on. Heard the

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>author smell is just as much, if not more, connected

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to learned experience as it is to natural instinct, and

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>he argues it's the only one of our senses to

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be truly learned. It's also been speculated that our sense

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of taste heavily relies on our sense of smell that

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>influences the smells that we're drawn to or gain pleasure by,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and has a hand in explaining why the smells we

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>find pleasant can be so different, and whether you believe

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in horny pheromone sense or not, it influences the smells

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that we're repulsed by as well. That is to say,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with enough convincing, your nose can and is trained to

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>distrust someone else by their smell. And while some of

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you are shaking your heads until they fall off your neck,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>there is an argument that there is really no such

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>thing as a bad smell. There are instead smells we

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>learn through experience to interpret as bad, whether this is

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for social or survival purposes, and this can lead to

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>encouraging or helping to form any number of societally induced discriminations.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Linked to our sense of smell is a strong tradition

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of classism, as well as racism and xenophobia. But for

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of our guest today, I'm going to zone

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in on one particular aspect of the socialized learning of smell,

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>how your nose can tell you to hate women, and

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, the way that most texts about how

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>misogyny and the sense of smell are intertwined, and there's

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>not many define what a woman is is extremely myopic,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and by that I mean these texts generally define women

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>as people with wombs. I hope you don't need me

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that a person with a womb does

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not a woman make And if I do have to

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>explain that to you, how did you find my podcast

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>JK Rowling? Please turn it off? But in Mutchambled's work

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in particular, we are trained to see women or as

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the case may be, people with wombs, historically subjugated in

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>a few distinct ways by encouraging disgust or even inventing

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>smells around menstruation and a specifically.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I read somewhere that their periods attract bears. The bears

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>can smell the menstruation.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Hear the head bears.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Now you put in the whole station in.

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeopardy basically in a heteronormative structure. Give me a horn

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for the term heteronormative women that men were trained to

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>view as disgusting when it came to fucking or making

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>them wives. You know the deal. But interestingly, even the

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>quality is that men are conditioned to find desirable were

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>also sometimes dismissed based on their smell. Throughout time, there

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have been associations with excess perfume in the West, categorized

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as smelling slutty, and there's also been writings of rich

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>women's farts smelling better question mark and please don't get

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>me started, because I do not want to get into it.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But yes, there is a huge amount of weird poetry

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>going back five hundred years or more about how pussy

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is stinky, but I like it. Shut up, I'm kidding.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to the end of the episode, I

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>will share one of these disgusting poems.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason we know so little about smell

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Earth's advanced age, the author argues, is because

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there is very little encouragement under capitalism to learn more

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about smell. That is, there's not much money in this

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>line of study unless you're trying to identify what is

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>going to sell deodorant and candles, and so to this day,

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>getting funding for anything outside of what smells can sell

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can be a real challenge in the modern age. Muchumbled

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>argues that our pushing smell aside as a powerful sense

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is very intentional.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 2>He writes, our deodorized world now offers a kind of

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>antidote to existential anguish as olfactory silence has developed in

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>parallel with the silence surrounding disease and death dating from

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>around the same time.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's no such thing as a deodorized society, whether

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we're afraid of death or not. So much of the

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>way people have interpreted smell over time has been subjective,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>depending on the way that they were encouraged to see, interpret,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and experience shitting and death mainly, among other things. And

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the further back you go from modern medicine and plumbing,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the more crucial these lived connections become. Because while social

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>norms dictate the way that one interprets the scent of

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a woman out a cheating.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Scent of a woman.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Should make you feel one way or another, it's had

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>varying results while remaining an intense fixation and subject of discussion.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Bliny the Elder, Yes, we're going back that far. Bliney

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the Elder said that the scent of menstruating people just

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>their existence caused horses to have abortions. Really think about that, then. Paradoxically,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth century writer Marguerite de Navarre implied that infertile women's

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>butts smell better than fertile women. This type of speculation

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>spread misogyny and xenophobia at once, with a different author

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>from this same era saying, quote, the arsful of an

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Italian woman could only be a sewer unquote, and I

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>took that personally. Menstruation has long been encouraged to be

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>seen as a site of terror and evil, Its connection

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to implied life or deathmongered as a way to scare

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>dumbasses for centuries and counting, particularly in centuries where Western

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>religion reigned. This is from sixteenth century writer Lavinous Laminius.

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Since women abound with excrement and emit ill smells because

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 2>of their periods, they make all things worse and spoil

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>than natural forces and innate qualities.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>But don't worry, if you go through menopause, you still

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>smell fucking gross, and also you're old. From Erasmus is

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen eleven work in praise of folly.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Better sports tale is to see those decrepit old women.

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>That old age seems long since to have cut off

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>from the number of the living, those strolling corpses, those

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>stinking carcasses, which everywhere exhale a sepulchral odor, and yet

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>who cry at every moment. Nothing is sweeter than life.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So, if you're keeping score, if you menstruated, you stank

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the devil, but once you didn't menstruate, you stank

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of a corpse. And this smell was directly connected in

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>both cases with Satan himself, whose period is gnarly, I'm sure.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And while there are countless examples that draw smell as

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>an indicator of character of where one should stand in

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>an enforced hierarchy, there's been shockingly little recognition that that's

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're either doing, being subjected to, or both. But

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>if the last week of my life has been any indication,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the kind of thing you can't unsmell once you've

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>noticed it. We're subtly signaled on how to feel about

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a character in media, written or otherwise all the time

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>based on how they smell. And I'm typing this while

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I frantically apply perfume to my wrists out of self consciousness.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying let's stop showering. I'm saying that we

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>lead by our noses more than we think, and it's

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>something that it's going to take years to fully understand,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because not only is the present history of smell important

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to our daily lives, there's a few crucial people in

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>this field arguing that it's just as crucial to the future.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And that brings us to today, a day where there is,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>from what I can tell, more being written about the

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>cultural history of smell than ever, and they're there is

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>less public encouragement, particularly online, to engage with the humanities

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in this way than in years prior. So keep your

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>nose down if you know this one already. But what

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>happens when a young woman celebrates her PhD on how

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>smell has been portrayed in literature to distinguish racial class

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and gender prejudice a young queer woman at that on

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the absolute cesspool once known as Twitter dot com. It

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>went really well, Doctor Allie Luke's aka the student who

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>went viral for her thesis paper on smell being too woke.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Your sixteenth minute starts now join Welcome back to sixteenth Minute,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast where we talk to the Internet's main characters

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>see how their moment in the spotlight affected them and

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what that says about us and the Internet. And this

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>week we are visiting a pretty recent story. One you

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>might have heard of the tale of doctor Ali Lukes,

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>who ended up on the wrong side of the Twitter

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>algorithm after committing the heinous crime of completing over a

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>decade's worth of higher education studying an underappreciated but critically

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>necessary intersection of science and the humanities. How dare she?

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 4>What?

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>An asshole? In all seriousness, I was very lucky to

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>get to speak with doctor Ali Lukes. She is wonderful

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and this story in particular, I think has a lot

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to say about where our relationship with the internet is

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. So let's get into it. Come with me

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>if you dare to. November twenty twenty four. Very recent story,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to be sure, but in a world this completely dystopian,

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it is worth putting ourselves in a moment online down

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to the finest detail, because if you haven't noticed, it's

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>an exceptionally difficult time to be a student. The example

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about today is Allie's one that is centered

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on cyber attacks fueled by anti intellectualism, misogyny, and very

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>likely bots. But it's far from the only uphill battle

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that students are facing right now. And while anti intellectualism

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>has taken many forms, on college campuses in the last

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years, it makes the most sense to focus on

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>student advocacy for a free Palestine and student groups pushing

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for university divestment from Israel. This mission expanded beyond Palestine

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for many groups in the last year and a half,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and lists of demands put forward by students establishing encampments

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to both protest and push back on their university. Empowering

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other settler states has been critical. These groups also have

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>sought to protect the student and staff's rights of any

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>university to protest instead of This is.

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 4>The moment Tuff's University graduate student Rumesa Oster was arrested

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 4>and taken into federal custody. Doorbell camera footage obtained by

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 4>NBC News shows two plain clothes officers approaching the thirty

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 4>year old in Somerville outside of Boston. Os Turk at

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 4>first appears to back away before more agents approach.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>This also comes with, to no one's surprise, a tremendous

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of xenophobia and racism by the students who are

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>working within these spaces. There are countless examples of student

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>protesters being profiled by race, particularly Palestinian, other Middle Eastern

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>or black students. These students were and are characterized not

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>as anti genocide but as anti Semitic, even with the

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>large portion of student organizers being composed of young anti

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Zionist Jewish students and groups. And you don't need me

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that this profiling, censorship, and state violence

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>has only escalated since Trump re entered the White House.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But I digress. November twenty seventh, twenty twenty four, It's

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>been less than a month since Donald Trump was re

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>elected by America, this time without having to cheat his

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>way into it and promising any number of horrifying policies

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>before re entering office. As Joe Biden does his last

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>few laps in the Olympic sized pool of lukewarm ice

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>cream that he floated around in instead of doing anything.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one day before Hailey Welch aka the Hawk Tua

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Girl will release what she does not yet know is

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the final episode of Talk To for over six months

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>before the crypto scam she's become the face of is busted.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's a week before internet boyfriend Luigi Mangioni will

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>assassinate a healthcare executive after being the poat producer of

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>this very show. Robert Evans radicalized by pain.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 5>This past week, legacy media and Lonely Cat owning true

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 5>crime podcast fans were obsessed with the mysterious man Dan

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 5>Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare, even though there

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 5>was only just fuzzy surveillance footage, thirsty men and women

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 5>calling him things like socialist Daddy, putting him on a

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 5>pedalstal for literally a stranger in the back and then

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 5>running away from the authorities.

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You tell, Ben. And even though it sounds counterintuitive that

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>with all this going on, with the rights of immigrants,

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of trans people, of anyone who could need an abortion

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on the chopping block again or still, the Internet found

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>some time and energy to bully a doctoral student for

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>finishing her thesis because woke while Ali Lukes, and that's

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>doctor Ali Lukes to you, was about twenty seven when

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this happened, and could barely remember a time

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>before the Internet. She was not particularly logged in and

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't really want to be like a lot of PhD students.

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>She's a book forward person, but she lives in a

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>society and did have social media accounts that she used

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>sparingly in order to keep in touch with friends and family,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as to make professional connections in a field

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>of study that was and is extremely specific and so.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>On November twenty seventh, she posted to her Twitter slash

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>x account with the selfie of Ali and her now

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>professionally bound thesis. She wears a simple red sweater and smiles,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>captioning the photo.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Thrilled to say, I passed my VIVA with no corrections

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 3>and an officially pH done.

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Grad student LINGO don't worry about it, but what gets

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>people stirred up and through some opaque, algorithmically driven nightmare

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pushed into the feeds of hundreds of thousands of blue

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>check AI Cryptonihilist Freaks is the title of the paper

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>she's written, an embossed gold text on the red leather cover.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Ali Lukes wrote her Cambridge University thesis on.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 3>O factory ethics, the politics of smell and modern and

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>contemporary prose.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Smell and not just smell, but how smell has been

0:20:54.400 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>characterized in literature an obscure topic. Sure, social function not

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately obvious. Fair Even Ali gets why the function of

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>her thesis paper might not be immediately obvious to those

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the know, as she will explain in our interview.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind she's not trying to get this

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out to a general public. She only has a couple

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred X followers at this time. Her last posts on

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the platform before this were months apart. One was a

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>photo of the Cambridge campus that.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Read extremely fortunate that I get to teach in a

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>place as beautiful as this.

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And the other was a photo of her on campus

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>from June of twenty twenty four, reading.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I submitted my PhD thesis today.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>This was an account for her peers, professional and personal

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>people who would most likely understand the function of her

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>thesis paper because they were academics too. I'm reminded quite

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit of the Coffee in the Garden with my

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>husband Saga when it comes to this story. It was

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>actually one of the first episode topics that we covered

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on sixteenth Minute all the way last spring, in that

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>doctor Alli was definitely not trying to get this pieceis

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>announcement out to a larger audience. The only thing that

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>made it possible for it to go viral anyways, was

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that her account was a public one. Think

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of the conventional ways that we would try to court

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 1>attention on social media if we wanted a post to

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get outside of our followers. It's generally a game of

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>tagging right, add a hashtag tag the account of a

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>larger institution or another account in the hopes that they

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>will either engage with or repost it, And nothing like

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that is happening here. What's happening is the twenty twenty

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>four Twitter slash x algorithm, one that, as we discussed

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>in our Hailey Welch Talk TUA series, is conditioned to

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>boost emotionally driven content and most importantly, elevate the replies

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of paying subscribers. So the blue check freaks I was

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>referring to, and through this pay to play increasingly fascistic

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>platform that longtime users had been departing in the millions

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and continue to now. Doctor Allie's inoffensive, celebratory post got

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>sucked into this algorithm and pulled in some of the

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>gnarliest Blue check comments ever generated by either a dumb

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>man or AI trained on a dumb man. It's hard

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell. Sometimes. Buckle in.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>For those wondering her PhD thesis per abstract is basically

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>on why it's racist and or classicist to not like

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 2>it when people exhibit body odors consistent with poor hygiene.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 2>You would have spent your years better by getting married

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and having children. Oh look, another woman getting a useless

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 2>degree that does nothing for the furtherance of society. Women

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 2>would rather spend years pursuing stupid degrees that won't fulfill

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 2>them over a family that actually will enjoy the debt,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>since nothing you learned or produced will ever be of

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>any benefit to society. Adorable, but what can you do

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>with this? pH dick?

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well done, boys. While the algorithm is the original

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>offender for driving harassment towards doctor Allie, her post was

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>further boosted in the algorithm when influential blue check accounts

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>began to quote tweet the post with random misogynist criticisms

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of her. And while it took a few days, the

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>story does go viral in a way that crosses into

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream press, which, as we've discussed, is pretty rare

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>these days, and doctor Allie is, for the most part

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>game to engage with the story going viral, and the

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>benefit here, it seems, for her, is that she knows

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that what she does is niche, and she rightfully isn't

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>taking the horrific bad faith criticism around it very seriously.

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Some headlines from the days that.

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Followed why this Cambridge Grads PhD thesis on smelly people

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>is dividing the internet olfactory oppression.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They attacked her PhD. Now this smell expert is making

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>x her classroom.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 2>In defense of writing a quirky thesis on the politics

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>of smell in modern literature.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>The tone of most of this coverage is nothing really surprising,

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and by that I mean so tremendously half cooked that

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it makes you want to rip your head off. Here

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is something from the New York Post.

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 2>The thesis states that olfactory discussed can result in a

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>person's rejection. Online critics needed smelling salts after reading what

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 2>they deemed to be woke sounding, academic gobbledygook.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And while very little of this coverage is outright hostile,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>who doctor Ali Luke's very few I was able to

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>find seem to take the time to understand what her

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 1>thesis was actually about, which we will get into the

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>tone of So much of this criticism framed the topic

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>as Ali applying a system of ethics to how marginalized

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people smell. But if you look at her abstract, which

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>she shares, she makes it clear that it is not

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this simple. Instead, her paper is a look at how

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>smell has been presented in literature over time in order

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a definitive statement about a marginalized person, and

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 1>what that definitive statement says about the author, the place,

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and the social mores of the time in which it

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>was written. You can hate the premise if you want,

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but taking a few seconds makes it clear that the

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>point of her paper is to build out a cultural

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>history of smell, the one sense that is still widely

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>under estimated and misunderstood. There is value to this, so

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>why can people not take it seriously? Here I want

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to again bring up the twenty twenty two case of

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the drinking coffee in the garden with my husband post

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because their similarities and differences I think are pretty instructive

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>here as a refresher. If you haven't listened to this episode,

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and you should. User Daisy Miller posted this simple statement

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to her ten thousand or so followers on Twitter. My

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>husband and I wake.

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Up every morning and bring our coffee out to our

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 3>garden and sit and talk for hours every morning and

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 3>never get sold, and we never run out of things

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>to talk to. Love him so much.

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And as we unpacked in that episode, she got completely

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>demolished in the replies. With a few rounds of discourse

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>taking place, the tweet very quickly escaped its relatively small

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>intended audience of twenty something cottage core fans and made

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>its way into the uneneral cesspool, the most popular critique

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time being that Daisy was bragging or being

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>insensitive to class by posting this. The first round of

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>discourse was backlash to Daisy herself. The second round of

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>discourse was backlash to the backlash, where thousands came to

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Daisy's defense saying that this was an innocuous statement. And

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>finally there was some light coverage from places like BuzzFeed

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and Page six before the whole story kind of petered out.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Daisy did interact with the story at first, but only

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for a short amount of time. She stayed positive, but

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately and rightfully seemed overwhelmed by the attention and migrated platforms.

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>This was in the fall of twenty twenty two, about

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>six months after Elon Musk bought Twitter as a joke

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and then tried to save face by turning it into

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a hub for fascist thought, and so a big similarity

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>between Daisy's story and doctor Ali Luke's story is that

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>these were posts made by women for a very specific audience,

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but the criticism that they received was a result of

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm pushing these posts into the feed of people

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who would probably hate it, ostensibly because these people would

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>engage with it. And to be clear, this is requiring

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>some guesswork on my part because of all the secret

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>policy that Twitter has managed to accidentally leak over the

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, big scary algorithm changes do not

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to be one of them. But on its face,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>both of these examples are Elon era Twitter harassment stories,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>where the machine has been calibrated to get women harassed

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>over nothing through no fault of their own. But there

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are a few differences between these stories. In doctor Alli's case,

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four gave the Internet and Twitter too full

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>years to descend further into anti intellectualism, and in a

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>more concrete sense, the replies that got the most boost

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the algorithm were different from Daisy's experience, and that

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is because of a very cursed program that was rolled

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>out in the month after Coffee in the Garden with

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>my husband in November twenty twenty two x premium formerly

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>known as Twitter Blue, where in previous years a blue

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>check beside your Twitter user name was free and the

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>result of being verified as a prominent person or brand

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>on the app. This new program allowed for as low

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>as eight bucks a month to receive this blue check

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as a veneer of distinction, as well as ensuring that

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if you replied to a tweet that your reply would

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be boosted in the algorithm to show up before most

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>unpaid users, regardless of how popular your reply was. There

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of contray over this program and continues

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to be, but most of the Blue checks that I

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>followed back in the day on Twitter really just responded

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>by ceasing to use their account or just deleting it altogether.

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And in this first round of discourse, attacks on doctor

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Ali Luke's mainly came from this type of account, many

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of which are speculated to be bots, and their responses

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>were amplified in the way that they couldn't have been

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>during Daisy Miller's moment of virality with Coffee in the Garden.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But the second round of engagement in these cases are

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the same. Once Ali's tweet had gotten enough engagement, there

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was an equally strong second round of discourse in support

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of her thesis on smell, with many accounts replying with

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>encouragement and asking when her thesis would be available to read, which,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're curious, is unfortunately available still nowhere at the

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>time of this writing. But that didn't stop doctor Ali

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>from wanting people to un understand where she was coming

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>from while replying to as many people as she could,

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>which is no small task or a relatively offline person

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>who was suddenly exposed to millions of accounts. Ali replied

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to the original, now wildly viral post with clarification on

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what her thesis was actually about.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>She writes, to be clear, this apptect was written for

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 3>experts within my discipline and field. It was not written

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 3>for a lay audience, and this is not how I

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 3>would communicate my ideas to the average person. Since there's

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 3>some confusion about the nature of my research, here is

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the abstract from my PhD thesis, which I hope provide

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 3>more contexts for anyone interested in learning about my work.

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>She then posts, per abstract.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>This thesis studies how literature registers the importance of olfactory discourse,

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the language of smell and the olfactory imagination it creates

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 3>and structuring our social world. The broad aim of this

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 3>thesis is to offer an intersectional and wide ranging study

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 3>of olfactory oppression by establishing the underlying logistics that facilitate

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Smell's application and creating subverting gender, class, sexual, racial, and

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 3>species power structures. I focus largely on pros fiction from

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the modern contemporary periods so as to trace the legacy

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 3>of olfactory prejudice in today and situate its contemporary relevance.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It goes on from there. I've linked it in the description,

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair, this kind of paper is extremely

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>my shit, and I'm so glad that doctor ally has

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>cornered the market on talking about it. As I hope

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I've established at this point, I think there is tremendous

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>value in seeing how something as both universal and understudied

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as smell, something almost everybody deals with, has been represented

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in the arts as a way of framing how we've

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>interpreted our relationship to it over a course of centuries.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But this would not be an opinion shared in a

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>void of anti intellectualism. As the humanities continue to be

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>de emphasized in the West, the idea that literary work

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>could be anything but a pastime and not contain actual

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>historical value or insight. Is not as commonly shared an

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>opinion as it once was. But another aspect that I

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>find interesting about how doctor Alli in twenty twenty four

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Daisy Miller in twenty twenty two respond to this

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>absolute torrential downpour of hate in the comments is how

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they respond as individuals, because, unlike Daisy, doctor Ali engages

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with her haters with a relatively and I think incredibly

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>even keel for weeks. Here's an example of her thoughtfully

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>engaging with an absolute shode as long as said chode

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>was expressing a thought that wasn't just outright misogyny. The

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>commenter writes.

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 2>We need a new prefix for people with academic PhDs.

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Doctor should mean something.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Ali replies, you know what, I don't disagree with this.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I certainly won't be putting up my hand if someone

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 3>asks is there a doctor in here on a plane.

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>The amount of times that doctor Alli Luke's shows genuine

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>patients with clearly bad faith commenters like this blew my

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>mind and made me so glad that she's a teacher,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of superhuman patience does not come easily

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and she clearly had some practice with it, but that

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:27.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that these bad faith comments and even threats

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't or couldn't affect her. It was a deeply stressful factor,

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think the most extreme example she's shared is

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this tweet about the fact that she needed to report

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.919
<v Speaker 1>a threat to the authorities on December one, twenty twenty four.

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Alie writes, to be.

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>Clear, this is where I draw the line. This is

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 3>abhorred and illegal, and no one should ever have to

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 3>deal with this.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Attached is a screenshot of an email she received on

0:35:55.000 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>her academic email earlier that day, which reads and trigger warning.

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>You are the dumbest fucking bitch I have ever seen

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 2>on the Internet and the perfect example of literally everything

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 2>wrong with modern society. Imagine thinking you deserve taxpayer money

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:19.720
<v Speaker 2>for writing up that useless piece of shit thesis nobody

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 2>will ever read vegan, feminist, and queer. Your dues to

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>society are many, and me and the boys will rape

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>them out of you.

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>When we read this. In our script meeting for this episode,

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 1>our producer ian said that this was one of the

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>worst screeds he'd heard directed to anyone online. Ever, I

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think you need me to remind you that this

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>was in response to an unpublished paper about smell in books.

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>There is no world where this is a rational response

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to anything, but it's egregious here. This was not in

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>response to a hot take. Virtually all of the harassment

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor Ali was receiving was a result of violent projection

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on a platform where hate speech and threats are increasingly

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>tolerated and inflammatory statements are boosted and even monetized. And

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>all doctor Ali had done is commit the cardinal contemporary

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>sin of being too woke. It's truly disgusting, and this

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is how a person who kept her personal life offline

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and posted almost never at all suddenly became an optimal

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>target for gendered and homophobic harassment. To her attackers, Ali

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>represented the exact kind of highly educated feminist intellectual that

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the right has delighted in threatening on social media and

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>in real life at increasing rates for the last decade

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and then some. And while doctor Ali doesn't draw much

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>attention to this in subsequent press appearances, this is just

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as good as time as any to discuss the state

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of online harassment, particularly because this story is such a

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>recent one. Because in one sense, yes, the old chestnuts

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of online misogyny ring true here right. Being a woman online,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>being non white online, being trans online can and often

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is a fucking nightmare, particularly when you get pushed into

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the wrong side of the algorithm. But if you've also

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>had the creeping feeling that this type of harassment has

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>been getting worse in the last few years, you're far

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>from alone, and you're probably right. In recent years, there

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has been a number of studies on how safe people

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and marginalized people specifically felt online after reports of online

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>harassment had scaled up significantly. Sixteen percent of respondents told

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pew Research Center that they had been harassed online

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fourteen, a number that increased to twenty eight

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>percent by twenty twenty one. These numbers then increased dramatically

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>when narrowed to just speaking to women. The Worldwide Web

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Foundation's twenty twenty study said that over half of women

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and girl respondents had been harassed online before, and that

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven percent felt the problem was getting worse. This

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was before Elon bought Twitter, and this also scales up

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>with a number of suicides among marginalized young people as

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a result of cyberbullying in that same timeframe. So why

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is it getting worse? To say that the world is

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>full of idiot bigots is true, but too simple to

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be a full answer. It doesn't explain why, as time

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>goes on we see people online being attacked over less

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and less. To say that that's because of Trump's reelection

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>would also be to miss the forest for the trees,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.959
<v Speaker 1>because yes, his being in power does endorse and even

0:39:56.160 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>encourage more subjugation that is empowered by the government. But

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>all of these numbers I just cited of increasing anxiety

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:08.919
<v Speaker 1>around online harassment were conducted during the Biden administration, as

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is the example of coffee in the garden with my husband. Okay,

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 1>so maybe it's not entirely that. Like so many things

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>about the contemporary Internet, I think a lot of this

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can be traced to algorithm driven timelines instead of the linear,

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>personally curated ones that first made apps like Twitter, Facebook,

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and on and on so successful today, where the famously

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>algorithm driven TikTok remains king among young users. This is

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>true almost nowhere, meaning that as in both doctor Ali

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and Daisy's cases, their harassment was the result of an

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>algorithm recognizing that pushing their post out to users who

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>either genuinely hated women academia or both, or were willing

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to perform hating women and academia for cloud and personal

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>profit and pushing their content there. It's a kind of

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>harassment that wouldn't have been possible ten years ago, and

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one that makes the Internet a far less safe place

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for everyone while making it more profitable for very few.

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we sensing a familiar pattern here? No, Okay, my

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>soapbox just collapsed beneath my feet, but be serious. What's

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>happened here is that places like Twitter slash x have

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>put a new, easy to use style of harassment in

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>front of its worst users and literally monetized it. Doctor

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Ali Luke's getting messages like the one we read is

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>completely horrifying and I hate how normal they've come to feel.

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And sure, reporting it is one of the very few

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>options victims of this type of harassment have at their disposal,

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But like anything regarding threats of violence against women, police

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are his store and expectedly dog shit at dealing with them.

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Alli did discuss how this harassment affected her in

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple interviews. Again, in a moment that we come

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to see for all main characters, she had to decide

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>whether she was going to let this story go away

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on its own by not engaging with it, or potentially

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>extend the moment by participating, and she decides to go

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for it, but in a very specific way that still

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>prioritizes her privacy. I think it's pretty cool. This is

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>why it's nice to add in sounds on the podcast.

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you what's funny, and if you disagree,

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you hate women, she recently told Rolling Stone.

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know that this was going to get out

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 3>of hand until probably forty eight hours in, when I

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 3>started to see a couple of quite vicious comments. I thought,

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 3>oh no, it's moving over to the wrong side of

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the platform, and so it did.

0:42:55.719 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So in the front facing media sense sense, doctor Allie

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sticks to her guns, never apologizing to any of the

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>assholes who came after her, while still not sharing much

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about herself, as is her right. And this approach, she

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>seems to quickly figure out, is a chance to make

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a very niche subject that she studies accessible to a

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>suddenly captive and supportive audience. Because after the rounds of

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter discourse died down and the blue checks moved on

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to harass the next person, Doctor Allie began posting regularly

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>about smell in an attempt to answer good faith questions

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and share more about what she was actually studying, and

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 1>her audience, presumably as under educated about smell as I

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was and still am, stayed and were really interested in

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>what she had to say. Here are a few posts

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>she made in the months that followed.

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I just know I'm going to be the talk of

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 3>the English faculty this week. Hi all, I couldn't be

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 3>more delighted that so many people pople have showed enthusiasm

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 3>towards my work, and I'd love to share more with

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 3>you as soon as I'm able, But right now my

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 3>first priority is my students. But still term time here,

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 3>and they deserve my time and attention in the context

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 3>of my thesis. Yes, in order to understand how authors

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 3>useful factory messaging, we must recognize that smells linked to

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 3>different identity characteristics, for example, class race, in different ways,

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 3>and that sometimes these characteristics overlap. Treating complexity.

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>She began to do and is still doing, maybe the

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>most subversive thing you could do on Twitter right now,

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>something fucking useful, and it's worked. As of this writing,

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>her online audience has grown to over two hundred thousand

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>followers on Twitter, where she still bravely posts, ordinarily in

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>response to stories people send her regarding Smell and how

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's framed in contemporary media. By her account, the harassment

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>died down as soon as the blue checks moved on

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to their next victim, very likely when the algorithm stopped

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.879
<v Speaker 1>piping out her content to people who hated it once

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it started to produce diminishing returns. And while absolutely nothing

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 1>justifies the fear of receiving the kinds of threats that

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>she did, Doctor Allie has decided to make lemonade. She's

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>got literary agents and with any luck, a book on

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the way soon. Fingers crossed, and when we come back,

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>doctor Ali Lukes tells us what the whole experience was

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>like from her side of the keyboard. Welcome back to

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth minute. I got pretty burnt out in the middle

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of reading that book about Smell, and so I took

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a break to watch Scream six and this actor named

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Dermott mulroney is in it. And I know that he's

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a person who has been famous for a while, but

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm never not completely taken aback when I see the

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>name Dermott mulroney. Like, your name is Dermott mulroney, I'm Dermott.

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>No it's not. And here is my interview with the

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>wonderful doctor Ali Lukex.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 6>I'm doctor Ali Lukex. I'm currently a supervisor in English

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 6>Literature at the University of Cambridge and I work on smell.

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I've learned so much from you, but at what cost?

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're here to discuss today. Were you

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>always into olfactory studies? How did you get there?

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 6>I was not always into ol factory studies. I arrived

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 6>at olfactory studies during my undergrad degree. I did my

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 6>undergraduate degree at the University of Exeter, which was fantastic.

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.760
<v Speaker 6>It gave me all of the things that I needed

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 6>to get going.

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>What were you studying at English Literature?

0:46:55.680 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 6>So I did English literature undergrad English Issue in Modern

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:05.439
<v Speaker 6>Culture at UCL for my master's degree, and everyone called

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 6>us the Issues students, which I felt was not very complementary.

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 6>My work even at Exeter was relatively into disciplinary in

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 6>that I was kind of given free reign to draw

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 6>on philosophy and sociology.

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:20.320
<v Speaker 1>In my work.

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 6>But my master's degree was really my kind of first

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 6>forra and cultural studies. By the time I was in

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 6>my second year of undergrad, I already had become infatuated

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 6>with smell studies, although I didn't even really know that

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 6>it was called smell studies back then.

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I just knew that.

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 6>I had noticed this really interesting thing about literature, which

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 6>was that in so many canonical texts, the texts that

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 6>were just set on our reading lists, smell was a

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 6>really fundamental part of how the authors were characterizing the

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:58.720
<v Speaker 6>figures in their books, both in positive and negative ways,

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 6>that smell was used as a kind of political agent

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:03.240
<v Speaker 6>in those books.

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>You know better than anyone, I feel like, probably the

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 1>least examined sense, or at least considered sense, it's always

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the one that I say I would give up.

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 6>And you're not alone. I very often, I very often

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.919
<v Speaker 6>do this thing with my students where I asked them

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 6>to rank their senses according to their perceived value, and

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 6>smell is like almost universally ranked at the bottom and

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 6>sight at the top. And then we inevitably end up

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 6>talking about smell because I can't stop talking about it,

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 6>and then everyone else gets interested in it and they

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 6>start reevaluating their biases.

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Taste suddenly found dead in a ditch. I mean, and

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.919
<v Speaker 1>so you, over the course of higher education, you become

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>drawn to this very particular area of study. What existed

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>around this area of study, I honestly have no idea.

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 6>When I was an undergraduate, smell Studies really had not

0:48:56.280 --> 0:49:00.720
<v Speaker 6>cohered into a stable field of study. I was drawing

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.919
<v Speaker 6>on simply what was out there and what I had

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 6>access to, which was not everything. As it turned out,

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 6>I only realized that I'd been missing out on some

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 6>texts online when I got to Cambridge and suddenly had

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 6>access to basically everything. The first Smell Studies academic article

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 6>I found was this article called What's This Smell? By

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Hands Rendersbacker, and I thought that it was perhaps the

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 6>most unique and interesting piece of criticism I'd ever read,

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 6>And I think that was really what got me hooked.

0:49:41.400 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 6>And it was kind of just freely available on academia

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:48.240
<v Speaker 6>dot edu, so that was great. I'm really a champion

0:49:48.480 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 6>for free public access to resources. You know. I do

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 6>feel that it's a shame that my thesis is embargoed,

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:59.840
<v Speaker 6>but it's also a necessity for now just to like

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.919
<v Speaker 6>protect my intellectual property until I can publish it. I'm

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 6>really invested in making sure that academic work can be

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 6>translated for public audiences and is available to public audiences.

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 6>So I thought that it was really cool that he'd

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 6>put it up on this public website for everyone to

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 6>be able to access.

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>What is your relationship with the internet like growing up

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and into college sort of alongside your journey towards smell studies.

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 6>I have always been very bookish. Since I could read. Basically,

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 6>I have been bookish. So I spend a lot more

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 6>time reading than I do on the internet. Even now

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 6>that i'm you know that I've been spending so much

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:42.760
<v Speaker 6>time on the internet, I still read more than I

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 6>look at my social media. I was born ninety seven,

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 6>so okay, I'm on the cusp of remembering a time

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 6>before we had, you know, an enormous computer in the house.

0:50:55.480 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 6>I was never really interested. I was just I would

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 6>rather read books, Like I grew up with audio books.

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 6>On the daily. You could find me painting or drawing

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:09.280
<v Speaker 6>whilst listening to an audiobook. That is how I wanted

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 6>to spend my time, and it's how I still want

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 6>to spend my time. Nothing has changed.

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take to write this thesis? What

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was the process of researching it because I really want

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to hit on what exactly this thesis is about, especially

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:26.439
<v Speaker 1>to emphasize how wildly, bizarrely out of context it's taken.

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 6>Later for me, it took three and a half years.

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 6>That's pretty typical, I think for a British PhD, most

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 6>people take about four years. It's possible to get it

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 6>done in three, but not many people do it. So

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm kind of smack bang in the middle of those

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 6>two polls. I had already developed this base of knowledge

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 6>and smell studies over kind of over years of studying

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:52.080
<v Speaker 6>it during my undergrad and my masters, but I was

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 6>studying it in usually historical contexts, so I kind of

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 6>purposefully left a gap the PhD where I would finally

0:52:02.680 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 6>get to talk about modern and contemporary literature. It turned

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:11.800
<v Speaker 6>out that like hardly anyone was doing that work. Certainly

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 6>no one was doing it in the way that I

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 6>wanted to do it. So I really had free reign,

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 6>which was great, so exciting. Honestly, welcome to my world.

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 6>It has been the most amazing seven or eight years

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 6>of studying this thing. Almost everything I say is a

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 6>relatively new thing to people. It's so hard to happen

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 6>upon that kind of thing in academia. So the process

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 6>of writing the thesis, I knew the structure going into it.

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 6>I knew that I wanted to structure it around identity

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 6>categories because I had noticed in my reading Smell related

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 6>to individual identity categories in quite distinct ways, but that

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:03.799
<v Speaker 6>all of those identity categories were related, and that there

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 6>was this kind of collapsing and interesting overlaying of different

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 6>social meanings that Smell could take on in relation to

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 6>different identity categories. I wanted to write a thesis that

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:25.879
<v Speaker 6>really took each identity category seriously, but in which each

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 6>of the chapters spoke to one another, and then I

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 6>just read voraciously.

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So you complete your thesis? When do you complete your thesis?

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 6>I completed my thesis in June twenty twenty four. I

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 6>think some people feel very ambivalently towards their PhD thesis

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 6>and the process of writing a PhD. I am very

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:53.400
<v Speaker 6>grateful that I never lost my enthusiasm for my subject

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 6>or for the study of literature. I feel just as

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 6>enthused as when I started, if not more actually, because

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 6>the more you learn about smell, the more fascinating it is.

0:54:08.440 --> 0:54:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, you have this beautiful, like bound version of your

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thesis and you log on to formerly Twitter dot com.

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>How after when were you posting on this platform? What

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was your like standing relationship with this platform on the day.

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 6>For a couple of years, I think a couple of

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 6>years preceding the incident, I think I posted once every

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 6>six months. I spent so little time on it that

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:42.399
<v Speaker 6>I had completely forgotten about the Musk takeover. I had

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:45.359
<v Speaker 6>no idea what it had become. It's never really been

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:48.319
<v Speaker 6>part of my personality. I don't think to be on

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:51.760
<v Speaker 6>social media very much, and I think Twitter is the same.

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:55.319
<v Speaker 6>It's the same story on Twitter. And the reason that

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 6>I posted the photograph in the first place was because

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 6>I kind of thought again, because I didn't realize that

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 6>the platform had changed and people had left, mostly that

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:10.799
<v Speaker 6>my smell studies people and my literary studies people were

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.759
<v Speaker 6>still there and they might want to know that I'm

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 6>done because they might have like potential post top projects

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 6>that I could join. I did it for a reason.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I didn't expect it to be met by an audience

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 6>outside of the three hundred or so people that I

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 6>followed on Twitter.

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Which is normal, but you're not in a normal place.

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So walk me through this day, this series of days,

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what pace did things start taking off? And how are

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you feeling as that's happening.

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 6>So the post gained traction immediately, but initially it was

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:52.839
<v Speaker 6>among lots of kind people who were just offering their

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 6>congratulations on my accomplishment. So that fact, even though I

0:55:57.320 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 6>was uncomfortable about the attention, felt fine, right. But then

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:10.280
<v Speaker 6>after about forty eight hours, I would say, I started

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 6>to notice some odd replies coming in, and then it

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 6>was reposted by a couple of right wing accounts with

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 6>big followings, and at that point the comments started to

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 6>become extremely hostile, and those comments started gaining traction. So

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:34.720
<v Speaker 6>it wasn't just that it was the odd strange comment

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 6>that you could kind of report and ignore these comments

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 6>whilst it was bouncing around that hostile part of the platform.

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Those comments started shooting up to the top of the

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 6>kind of comments. They were gaining the most likes and

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 6>completely They weren't by any means outweighing all of the

0:56:56.560 --> 0:57:01.840
<v Speaker 6>positive congratulatory comments, but they were the first that anyone

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.359
<v Speaker 6>would see when they looked at the post because they

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 6>had the most.

0:57:05.040 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Likes, prior to if you could remember the massive amplification

0:57:10.640 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>through the right wing accounts, what were the weirder responses

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you were getting and what were proportionally positive to negative

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>before these big accounts latched onto it.

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 6>I do think that it was such a whirlwind that,

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 6>even though in general I have quite a good memory

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 6>from my own experiences, I would struggle the most outlandish

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 6>comments coming in, you know, the kind of the really

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 6>long ones where someone's basically written an essay. And there

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 6>was one where someone was like, your ancestors were fighting

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 6>mountain lions and you are disgracing them. I was like,

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 6>where do you Who.

0:57:57.000 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think I am? And where do you think

0:57:58.680 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I live?

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 6>As British as it.

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Gets, Yeah, that is I found a pretty common anti

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>intellectual reply to almost anything. It's like your ancestors did

0:58:10.840 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 1>something that matters and I hate you, and it's like, well,

0:58:13.120 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? How did you manage that? And

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 1>how did it translate to your normal life?

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it was pretty all consuming for the first week,

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:32.640
<v Speaker 6>if not longer. The replies were coming in way faster

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 6>than I could read them, which was stressful because I

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 6>like to have the full picture, so I was not

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 6>sleeping in an attempt to keep up with the conversation.

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 6>I probably got about three hours of sleep every night

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 6>for about nine days, constantly refreshing the other thing is.

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 6>And this really reveals how kind of illiterate I am

0:58:54.320 --> 0:58:58.400
<v Speaker 6>on that platform. I didn't realize that you could check

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:03.520
<v Speaker 6>quote tweets, so I would stumble upon quote tweets of

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:09.520
<v Speaker 6>that original tweet with like millions and millions of impressions.

0:59:09.840 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 6>Even as I thought I was doing quite a good

0:59:11.800 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 6>job of keeping up with the replies, I was still

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:19.439
<v Speaker 6>missing them thousands and thousands of quote tweets. It wasn't

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 6>that I was losing. It wasn't like it was keeping

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 6>me up at night. I think mentally, I was really

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 6>unscathed by this. I'm quite a difficult person to phase.

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Partly that's because the critiques were so ludicrous in so

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 6>many instances, and there was some valid skepticism. Don't get

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 6>me wrong. I don't expect everyone to read the title

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 6>The Politics of Smell and think, oh, yeah, of course,

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 6>that's a really useful thing that we need in society.

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 6>But I felt confident that provided I was given the

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 6>time and space, I would be able to win over

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 6>at least some of the people who were skeptical about

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 6>the value of the thesis. I didn't worry about critiques

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:03.760
<v Speaker 6>of my work because you know, ultimately they only had

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 6>the title of my thesis and the abstract, which was

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 6>written and intended for an academic audience, and so I

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 6>understood why some people were saying that it was kind

1:00:15.120 --> 1:00:20.200
<v Speaker 6>of obfuscating or it was inaccessible. I think that's a

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:25.160
<v Speaker 6>fair critique of an academic abstract, almost any academic abstract,

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:27.800
<v Speaker 6>and it's not the way that I would convey my

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:31.600
<v Speaker 6>ideas to a general public. So nobody really had anything

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 6>else to say about the work. The work, you know what.

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:38.720
<v Speaker 6>They were making assumptions about the work, but those assumptions

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 6>were false.

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be right back with more from doctor Alli.

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to sixteenth Minute. I bring lost an AMBI

1:01:01.240 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast Award in Chicago last night. But the good news

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is that I lost to a great show. I've been

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to it all today. It's called Inheriting from LAist

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think you'll really like it. It's linked in

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the description and if you still respect my loser ass

1:01:19.920 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>here's the rest of my interview with doctor Ali Lukes.

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You engaged with people, even if they were, you know,

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>very clearly willfully misinterpreting what you're saying. You replied to

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people thoughtfully and patiently. What motivated you

1:01:38.240 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that?

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 6>I think fundamentally, I have no interest in arguing with

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 6>people on the internet. It's not a good use of

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 6>my time. Did, however, always intend to share my work

1:01:50.360 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 6>with a public audience. I always wanted to write a

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 6>trade book. I always wanted to disseminate my ideas in

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:01.120
<v Speaker 6>a way that would be accessible to people, and I

1:02:01.240 --> 1:02:05.280
<v Speaker 6>had been given an opportunity to do that in an

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 6>unconventional way. Sure, but it was nevertheless an opportunity to

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:12.880
<v Speaker 6>reach people and to kind of cut my teeth in

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 6>the world of public discourse. Because I do think there's

1:02:16.520 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 6>something to be said about the insulation of academia, the

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:23.000
<v Speaker 6>way that you know, we all talk to each other

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 6>and we're all kind of interested in our in our

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 6>own niche little aspects of whatever it is that we're

1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 6>working on. It is easy, I think, in academia to

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 6>feel slightly separated from the real world in a way

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 6>that is I think distinct from the criticism of academia

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 6>that we're all kind of in ivory towers, and that

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 6>we don't have any understanding of the real world in

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 6>terms of privilege. I think it's not sensible to make

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 6>assumptions about people online whether they're in academia or not.

1:02:56.840 --> 1:02:58.920
<v Speaker 6>We still have a long ways to go in terms

1:02:58.960 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 6>of making academia equitable, in making sure that you know

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:06.480
<v Speaker 6>everybody has access to those resources. But it's not possible

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:09.440
<v Speaker 6>to tell based on a picture of someone right what

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 6>their background is. My friends have told me since the

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 6>dawn of time that I'm quite a naive person and

1:03:17.480 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 6>that I'm probably too earnest for my own good, and

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:24.600
<v Speaker 6>I think I probably bring that to my social media

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:27.439
<v Speaker 6>presence because I don't know how else to be. I've

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 6>experienced people coming in with hostility or writing something that

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 6>is clearly quite combative, and provided you don't kind of

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 6>stoop to their level, sometimes people will turn around. I

1:03:40.480 --> 1:03:45.080
<v Speaker 6>think the problem is online we forget that people are

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 6>real people. I think when I engage with people online,

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 6>I assume that everyone that I'm talking to is a

1:03:53.160 --> 1:03:56.440
<v Speaker 6>real person, probably even when they're a bot. The post

1:03:56.440 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 6>went viral towards the end of term, so I think

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:03.640
<v Speaker 6>I had a out a week of teaching left before

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 6>the end of term. Most of my students mentioned it.

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 6>But honestly, that generation, they're implacable. They are so difficult

1:04:15.160 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 6>to phase. They were just like, oh, I saw that

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:21.480
<v Speaker 6>you were on BBC News. What's that about? Yeah, And

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:23.760
<v Speaker 6>a couple of them, a couple of them were, you know,

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 6>really worried. And one of them brought me a plant,

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 6>which is over there on my desk. Oh, that's so sweet,

1:04:31.960 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 6>and it was yeah. I mean, I love my students.

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 6>I think they're wonderful, but they they truly do not care.

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 6>They don't care at all about my personal life or

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 6>what I'm doing outside of teaching them. And that's great.

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:45.320
<v Speaker 6>I love that.

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Were you happy with the way that your story was

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>being framed in the media? How were you wanting to engage?

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:58.480
<v Speaker 6>This was probably the most chaotic period of my entire life,

1:04:58.800 --> 1:05:02.760
<v Speaker 6>the sort of three or four days once the media

1:05:02.880 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 6>had caught wind of it and everybody wanted to have

1:05:07.320 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 6>an interview, everybody wanted to comment, and trying to sift

1:05:11.880 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 6>through like hundreds of emails every day. I was happy

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:21.240
<v Speaker 6>with the way that the media decided to report on this.

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:25.680
<v Speaker 6>The first British publication to report on it was the

1:05:25.800 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 6>Daily Mail. And the Daily Mail they're known for being

1:05:30.160 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 6>quite right wing. Their assessment of the situation was remarkably charitable.

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 6>That they've done a couple of articles now and they've

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 6>they've been really kind of glowing, and I'm still unsure

1:05:45.640 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 6>as to how I've pulled that off.

1:05:47.960 --> 1:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you feel pressure to be more online after this happened?

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:56.440
<v Speaker 6>I did feel pressure, but I also resisted the pressure.

1:05:57.160 --> 1:06:02.560
<v Speaker 6>So I decided that I would only do it as

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:06.480
<v Speaker 6>long as I was having fun and as long as

1:06:07.360 --> 1:06:11.840
<v Speaker 6>people were feeding back that they were learning something. I

1:06:11.880 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 6>didn't want it. I didn't want it to just become

1:06:14.320 --> 1:06:16.640
<v Speaker 6>like a running joke. I wanted it actually to be

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 6>at least to some degree educational, because I think that's important.

1:06:22.520 --> 1:06:25.240
<v Speaker 6>I also, you know, didn't want to let it kind

1:06:25.240 --> 1:06:30.160
<v Speaker 6>of overshadow the things that I really want to invest

1:06:30.280 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 6>my time in, which is teaching my students and writing.

1:06:35.560 --> 1:06:38.080
<v Speaker 6>I think I've found a nice balance. I don't spend

1:06:38.200 --> 1:06:40.479
<v Speaker 6>very much time on there at all.

1:06:40.840 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>What would you like to do with this new audience,

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what would you like to sort of do

1:06:46.520 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>moving forward? I am like I would love to read

1:06:49.880 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a book about smell theory from you. Oh well, I'm.

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 6>Very pleased to hear that this is what it's all

1:06:57.440 --> 1:07:01.440
<v Speaker 6>been leading up to for me, because although I really

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:06.320
<v Speaker 6>enjoy explaining smell stuff to people on Twitter in a

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 6>limited amount of characters, it's quite good for me actually

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 6>to practice being really concise. I am a writer, and

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 6>I do think that my ideas are probably best conveyed

1:07:18.960 --> 1:07:22.360
<v Speaker 6>in the form of like long form prose. So I

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 6>think if people are interested in the ideas, then they're

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:27.920
<v Speaker 6>going to love the trade book.

1:07:28.200 --> 1:07:34.439
<v Speaker 1>But now that there's sort of massive unexpected thing has happened. Yeah,

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>what is your takeaway? Ben From having survived the main

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>character experience and been able to return to your normal life, I.

1:07:45.320 --> 1:07:47.240
<v Speaker 6>Have not returned to my normal life.

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, say more about that.

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:54.880
<v Speaker 6>I that my normal life has been and gone, but

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:57.240
<v Speaker 6>not in a bad way. Not in a bad way,

1:07:57.280 --> 1:08:00.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, in many ways, this experience hasn't changed me.

1:08:00.880 --> 1:08:05.640
<v Speaker 6>It hasn't changed my personality, It hasn't changed my perspective.

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 6>It hasn't changed my perspective on the work or on

1:08:10.440 --> 1:08:12.840
<v Speaker 6>what I want to do with it. It has slightly

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 6>changed my perspective on some people who are wild. I

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:21.920
<v Speaker 6>didn't know that it was. I think I truly, I mean,

1:08:22.040 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 6>I guess intellectually, I knew that it was possible for

1:08:25.200 --> 1:08:31.360
<v Speaker 6>people to be so hostile and so combative towards something

1:08:31.439 --> 1:08:36.679
<v Speaker 6>they don't understand. But it's a different thing knowing something

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:40.799
<v Speaker 6>is possible and experiencing it yourself. I do think, though,

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:44.559
<v Speaker 6>that perhaps some of that has to do with the

1:08:44.560 --> 1:08:48.120
<v Speaker 6>fact that almost all of us have a sense of smell,

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:51.280
<v Speaker 6>and almost all of us have a whole lifetime of

1:08:51.360 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 6>experiences to draw on when we're talking about smell, and

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:56.400
<v Speaker 6>so we all kind of feel like we're experts in

1:08:56.439 --> 1:08:59.759
<v Speaker 6>our own experience of smell. I can see why people

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 6>feel maybe concerned about the idea that their sense of

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:06.640
<v Speaker 6>smell could be doing something that they're not aware of.

1:09:06.720 --> 1:09:10.640
<v Speaker 6>I think I think that's maybe a little it's suspicious,

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:15.400
<v Speaker 6>and I can see why people would be worried about it.

1:09:16.240 --> 1:09:18.519
<v Speaker 6>I don't I don't really see why people would react

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:21.600
<v Speaker 6>with quite the amount of vitriol that they did. But

1:09:21.760 --> 1:09:25.439
<v Speaker 6>then again, I'm I'm not them, and I'm kind of

1:09:25.439 --> 1:09:28.840
<v Speaker 6>happy with I'm certainly happy with that. I'm happy to

1:09:28.920 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 6>accept that a whole variety of people exist in the world,

1:09:34.560 --> 1:09:36.559
<v Speaker 6>and that has nothing to do with me or my work.

1:09:36.920 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>What is next for this field of study? What would

1:09:39.280 --> 1:09:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you like to see happen moving forward?

1:09:41.280 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 6>Oh, this is I mean, this is a personal bias

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:45.960
<v Speaker 6>because this is what I want to do next. Please, yeah,

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:47.720
<v Speaker 6>because I want to do it. That is That is

1:09:47.760 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 6>how I feel. I mean, I mean, I'm already in

1:09:51.200 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 6>the process of this. I'm developing a post doctoral project

1:09:54.320 --> 1:09:58.200
<v Speaker 6>that would study the effects of smell disorders. I think

1:09:58.680 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 6>this is like you know post well, we say post COVID,

1:10:03.080 --> 1:10:06.080
<v Speaker 6>but that is a really contentious thing, especially in the

1:10:06.200 --> 1:10:10.680
<v Speaker 6>US in comparison to the UK. But it's estimated that

1:10:10.760 --> 1:10:15.320
<v Speaker 6>something like twenty seven million people still have long lasting

1:10:15.479 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 6>damage to their sense of smell and their sense of

1:10:19.280 --> 1:10:21.439
<v Speaker 6>taste because the sense of smell is up to ninety

1:10:21.479 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 6>five percent. Well, it's flavor taste is separable. I'm going

1:10:26.200 --> 1:10:31.880
<v Speaker 6>to get into a whole thing. It doesn't even matter.

1:10:31.960 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Really, don't get her start it, don't give her startled.

1:10:37.280 --> 1:10:41.640
<v Speaker 6>But there are globally so many people have been affected

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 6>by smell disorders, and they are dramatically understudied. But the

1:10:47.320 --> 1:10:54.840
<v Speaker 6>studies that we do have show that depression, anxiety, suicidality,

1:10:56.360 --> 1:10:59.400
<v Speaker 6>weight loss, all of these things come in the wake

1:10:59.439 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 6>of losing sense of smell. So I think a project

1:11:03.560 --> 1:11:07.599
<v Speaker 6>that studies the effects of smell disorders would really help

1:11:08.560 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 6>to completely re evaluate the way that we think about

1:11:13.600 --> 1:11:16.680
<v Speaker 6>smell and the way it contributes to our lives and

1:11:16.760 --> 1:11:21.920
<v Speaker 6>our well being. Actually, so that's something that I hope

1:11:21.960 --> 1:11:26.000
<v Speaker 6>is cooking. The other reason that studying smell disorders is

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:32.080
<v Speaker 6>really important is because evidence, recent evidence starting in about

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:36.639
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty three, suggests that we're all losing our sense

1:11:36.680 --> 1:11:40.920
<v Speaker 6>of smell, that the effects of pollution are causing us

1:11:41.080 --> 1:11:44.280
<v Speaker 6>all to have a diminished sense of smell, and that

1:11:44.800 --> 1:11:52.640
<v Speaker 6>is disproportionately affecting people from low income backgrounds and racialized communities,

1:11:52.840 --> 1:11:56.160
<v Speaker 6>because those are the kinds of people who typically are

1:11:56.240 --> 1:12:01.479
<v Speaker 6>situated around heavily polluting industrial where houses because they're cheap.

1:12:02.520 --> 1:12:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Those houses are cheap, and that is a serious problem.

1:12:06.439 --> 1:12:09.599
<v Speaker 6>It's a serious problem that really is own we're only

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:12.880
<v Speaker 6>just starting to talk about in the smell studies community,

1:12:13.040 --> 1:12:17.000
<v Speaker 6>let alone in the kind of broader public discourse.

1:12:17.360 --> 1:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure people have asked you this before. What

1:12:20.160 --> 1:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is your favorite smell? What is the best smell to you?

1:12:26.760 --> 1:12:29.640
<v Speaker 6>My go to answer now because people have asked me

1:12:29.680 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 6>this and I've been.

1:12:30.240 --> 1:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to imagine.

1:12:31.600 --> 1:12:38.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, is fresh garden sage like garden sage when you

1:12:38.760 --> 1:12:42.840
<v Speaker 6>like tear up a leaf that smell is my favorite.

1:12:43.200 --> 1:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you're literally out there touching grass, doing the thing

1:12:46.439 --> 1:12:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's telling each other to do in the internet.

1:12:50.160 --> 1:12:53.800
<v Speaker 6>I am obsessed with smell. There's this It's on. It's

1:12:53.880 --> 1:12:59.080
<v Speaker 6>indubitable that I am obsessed with smell. I can't imagine

1:12:59.320 --> 1:13:04.559
<v Speaker 6>that obsession waning, actually, partly because there's so much work

1:13:04.560 --> 1:13:09.360
<v Speaker 6>to be done. Yeah, and it has been like notoriously

1:13:09.400 --> 1:13:13.599
<v Speaker 6>difficult to get funding to do work on smell because

1:13:13.600 --> 1:13:17.680
<v Speaker 6>it's not valued. And now that the tables are turning

1:13:17.920 --> 1:13:22.360
<v Speaker 6>slightly and we're seeing more interest in sensory studies broadly

1:13:22.840 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 6>in the academy, I do think that we're just going

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:29.760
<v Speaker 6>to keep seeing more and more interesting work about smell. So,

1:13:30.280 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, I would love to keep talking about smell,

1:13:33.400 --> 1:13:37.320
<v Speaker 6>commentating on smell, bringing that work to public audiences. But

1:13:38.040 --> 1:13:41.960
<v Speaker 6>I also think that there's work to be done in

1:13:43.080 --> 1:13:48.160
<v Speaker 6>just advocating for and championing the value of the humanities

1:13:49.560 --> 1:13:52.800
<v Speaker 6>and trying to get away from this idea that the

1:13:52.920 --> 1:13:58.559
<v Speaker 6>humanities and the sciences are in competition, because I think

1:13:58.880 --> 1:14:06.120
<v Speaker 6>my work certainly suggests that literally studies specifically, it's kind

1:14:06.160 --> 1:14:11.120
<v Speaker 6>of open to reinvention in the process of new interdisciplinary

1:14:11.200 --> 1:14:13.720
<v Speaker 6>encounters that I would I would love to be a

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:18.280
<v Speaker 6>small part of the story of trying to make the

1:14:18.400 --> 1:14:23.680
<v Speaker 6>humanities cool again. I'm so grateful for my audience of

1:14:23.720 --> 1:14:29.240
<v Speaker 6>people who are curious and interested in learning about things

1:14:29.280 --> 1:14:32.839
<v Speaker 6>that they might not have encountered before. I don't think

1:14:33.400 --> 1:14:39.200
<v Speaker 6>that people actually think the humanities are uncool. I mean

1:14:39.320 --> 1:14:44.400
<v Speaker 6>some people do. I don't think that it's this kind

1:14:44.439 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 6>of like received understanding of the value of the humanities.

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:50.880
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's that pervasive in the US. I'm

1:14:50.880 --> 1:14:53.360
<v Speaker 6>sure it's this. It's it's the same as in the UK.

1:14:53.479 --> 1:14:59.000
<v Speaker 6>People are increasingly worried that they're not going to be

1:14:59.080 --> 1:15:01.680
<v Speaker 6>able to get a job that will give them a

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:06.599
<v Speaker 6>life that is livable, and there's this kind of fear

1:15:06.680 --> 1:15:11.080
<v Speaker 6>mongering surround surrounding the humanities that suggests that if people

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 6>pursue degrees in the humanities, then that's not going to

1:15:14.520 --> 1:15:18.000
<v Speaker 6>offer them employability at the end of it. And I

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:25.360
<v Speaker 6>actually think that that's statistically not true. I've looked at

1:15:25.400 --> 1:15:28.880
<v Speaker 6>some of the reports about employability and it turns out

1:15:29.320 --> 1:15:34.040
<v Speaker 6>that certainly in many sectors, English is more employable than

1:15:34.120 --> 1:15:38.000
<v Speaker 6>something like physics. The way that we talk about things

1:15:38.400 --> 1:15:44.519
<v Speaker 6>online really really matters. It can seriously obscure the reality

1:15:44.560 --> 1:15:49.400
<v Speaker 6>of a situation. We kind of need people who are

1:15:49.520 --> 1:15:55.280
<v Speaker 6>willing to go to bat for the humanities when they're

1:15:55.840 --> 1:15:59.840
<v Speaker 6>in this kind of pressure cooker situation of being defunded

1:16:00.520 --> 1:16:05.439
<v Speaker 6>and push to one side people who just simply don't

1:16:05.479 --> 1:16:08.479
<v Speaker 6>understand the value of them control the conversation, and that

1:16:08.520 --> 1:16:14.320
<v Speaker 6>in some ways does more damage than anything else because

1:16:14.320 --> 1:16:16.719
<v Speaker 6>it puts people off. It puts people off even trying

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:22.400
<v Speaker 6>right right, You have teenagers thinking, oh, well, I absolutely

1:16:22.479 --> 1:16:26.240
<v Speaker 6>love literature, but I don't think I can go and

1:16:26.280 --> 1:16:29.240
<v Speaker 6>study it because you know, what's the point at the

1:16:29.320 --> 1:16:30.600
<v Speaker 6>end of it, How is it going to get me

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:33.760
<v Speaker 6>a job? And I I like, realistically, I don't think

1:16:33.800 --> 1:16:37.559
<v Speaker 6>that's a problem any more than it is for certain

1:16:37.760 --> 1:16:41.400
<v Speaker 6>other disciplines that are outside of the humanities. And it's

1:16:41.400 --> 1:16:43.719
<v Speaker 6>just stopping people from engaging in what they really would

1:16:43.720 --> 1:16:45.600
<v Speaker 6>love to do, and that's problematic.

1:16:46.240 --> 1:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for making time for this. I

1:16:49.120 --> 1:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it.

1:16:50.120 --> 1:16:52.600
<v Speaker 6>It's an absolute pleasure. Thank you for asking me.

1:16:53.040 --> 1:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much to doctor Ali Lukes, who you can

1:16:55.880 --> 1:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>follow at the links in the description for when she

1:16:58.880 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>has time to share her brilliance with you. I am

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so inspired by Ali's even headedness and commitment to her

1:17:08.080 --> 1:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>line of study, in particular her care in noting that

1:17:12.800 --> 1:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a diminished sense of smell due to long COVID could

1:17:16.280 --> 1:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>stand to hurt a lot of people down the line,

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly those who live in frontline climate communities. I don't

1:17:24.400 --> 1:17:27.519
<v Speaker 1>know about you, but that had certainly not occurred to me,

1:17:28.120 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but it makes a lot of sense. And as with

1:17:31.400 --> 1:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so many marginalized people doing important, undervalued work, it is

1:17:36.880 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating that academics like Ali Luke's are always the

1:17:42.360 --> 1:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>first to absorb this absurd amount of vitriol from the

1:17:47.360 --> 1:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>worst faith people on the planet with Internet connections, and so,

1:17:53.000 --> 1:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>dear listener, I am hanging in for a book from Ali.

1:17:57.439 --> 1:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a good feeling because whether those chodes on

1:18:01.040 --> 1:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>X believe it or not work like hers can really

1:18:04.800 --> 1:18:10.599
<v Speaker 1>make a huge difference. Doctor Ali Lukes, Your sixteenth minute

1:18:11.080 --> 1:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>ends now.

1:18:16.400 --> 1:18:19.080
<v Speaker 7>Sixteenth Minute is a production of Cool Zone Media and

1:18:19.160 --> 1:18:22.800
<v Speaker 7>iHeart Radio. It is written, hosted, and produced by me

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:27.120
<v Speaker 7>Jamie Loftus. Our executive producers are Sophia Lechterman and Robert Evans.

1:18:27.320 --> 1:18:31.439
<v Speaker 7>The amazing Ian Johnson is our supervising producer and our editor.

1:18:32.000 --> 1:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Our theme song is by Sad thirteen. Voice acting is

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>from Brandt Crater and pet shout outs to our dog

1:18:38.920 --> 1:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>producer Anderson, my kat's flea Casper, and my pet rock Bird,

1:18:42.600 --> 1:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>who will outlive us all Bye.