1 00:00:01,680 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: Cool Media. Hello sixteenth minute listeners. It's Jamie just saying 2 00:00:08,600 --> 00:00:11,479 Speaker 1: really quick at the top that a show that is 3 00:00:11,520 --> 00:00:14,680 Speaker 1: my honor to produce on the iHeartRadio network. We the 4 00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:19,080 Speaker 1: Unhoused has been nominated for a webby and we need 5 00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: your help. If you haven't listened to the show before, 6 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:24,760 Speaker 1: first of all, I highly recommend you do. But it 7 00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:29,000 Speaker 1: is a show that began in twenty nineteen. It's created, hosted, 8 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:32,720 Speaker 1: and reported by the wonderful Theo Henderson. He began the 9 00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:36,920 Speaker 1: podcast while living on the streets of LA and it's 10 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:40,960 Speaker 1: grown significantly during that time, but remains the only podcast 11 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 1: that tells stories that affect the unhoused and tells the 12 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 1: stories of the unhoused while continuing to center their own 13 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 1: perspectives and experiences. We've been nominated in a web category 14 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 1: and we need your help. If you click the link 15 00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:00,240 Speaker 1: in the description, it goes directly to our category. It's 16 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 1: literally two clicks. It's a tight race, so I would 17 00:01:04,240 --> 00:01:07,040 Speaker 1: really appreciate it if you both gave us a vote 18 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 1: and also checked out the show. You can do both 19 00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:13,480 Speaker 1: at the link and the description and Inhale deeply Baby. 20 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:20,080 Speaker 1: Here is our doctor Ali Luke's episode if you were 21 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:23,399 Speaker 1: to give up any of your five senses, which would 22 00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:28,920 Speaker 1: it be, statistically one in two of you just decided 23 00:01:29,319 --> 00:01:32,399 Speaker 1: probably my sense of smell. And I am honestly with 24 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 1: you there. I think I had a roommate once who 25 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 1: truly did not have a sense of smell, or a 26 00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:40,840 Speaker 1: very dull sense of smell. Maybe he was lying now 27 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:43,240 Speaker 1: that I'm saying it out loud. Either way, the place 28 00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:46,680 Speaker 1: smelled terrible and it made my life a living nightmare. 29 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 1: And it turns out that a lot of the reason 30 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,560 Speaker 1: why you might have been so quick to forfeit your 31 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: sense of smell might have something to do with an 32 00:01:55,600 --> 00:02:00,680 Speaker 1: extremely powerful myth that humans have a very sense of 33 00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 1: smell compared to other mammals. And to be clear, what 34 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 1: may be clear, this is a myth that I believed 35 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 1: until like six days ago, but that is not actually true. 36 00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:15,399 Speaker 1: According to a twenty seven research paper from Rutgers University 37 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:19,200 Speaker 1: professor John McGann, as, it turns out, humans have a 38 00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:22,919 Speaker 1: sense of smell that is arguably as acute as mammals 39 00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:24,840 Speaker 1: that we think have a keener sense of smell than 40 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 1: we do. And while his numbers are generally thought to 41 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 1: be overstated, McGann published in twenty seventeen that we can 42 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:36,560 Speaker 1: identify close to one trillion separate sense as opposed to 43 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:40,800 Speaker 1: the ten thousand that's commonly cited, and to introduce a 44 00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:44,480 Speaker 1: returning villain from our last series. Part of the reason 45 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:48,120 Speaker 1: that this misconception around smell has become ingrained in our 46 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:54,240 Speaker 1: consciousness is because of one Sigmund Freud. Professor McGann said 47 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:56,239 Speaker 1: back in twenty seventeen. 48 00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:59,240 Speaker 2: It has been a long cultural belief that in order 49 00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:02,639 Speaker 2: to be a reasonable or rational person, you could not 50 00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:06,799 Speaker 2: be dominated by a sense of smell. Smell was linked 51 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:10,440 Speaker 2: to earthly animalistic tendencies, and. 52 00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:13,240 Speaker 1: Since twenty seventeen it has been debunked that we can 53 00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:17,440 Speaker 1: discern a trillion smells. But this is just another piece 54 00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:22,560 Speaker 1: of evidence that this area of humankind is wildly under explored. 55 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:26,160 Speaker 1: There have since been numerous attempts to identify with more 56 00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:31,880 Speaker 1: specificity where exactly humans stand in the mammal smelling hierarchy. 57 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 1: But as more time and funding has been put into 58 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: this line of study, it's become clear that our species 59 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:43,080 Speaker 1: reputation as bad smellers is definitely false and possibly a 60 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 1: misguided way to make us feel better than the other 61 00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 1: mammalian girls. Basically, a de emphasis on smell seems to 62 00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: be part of how humans have been propped up to 63 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 1: be better than other species. In reality, that's not just 64 00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:01,119 Speaker 1: far from the truth, but we rely on our sense 65 00:04:01,160 --> 00:04:05,120 Speaker 1: of smell far more than we seem to realize. For 66 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 1: the last week or so, I've been reading a book 67 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 1: called Smells, A Cultural History of odors in Early modern 68 00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:16,200 Speaker 1: Times by French writer Robert Mushambled. Definitely got that wrong, 69 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 1: and with all due respect to the author, most of 70 00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,800 Speaker 1: this book PARPs on the history of people being obsessed 71 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:25,680 Speaker 1: with the smell of their own parts and whether they 72 00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:29,840 Speaker 1: or their spouse's pussy is stinky or not. And if 73 00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 1: this is something you think about a lot, I guess 74 00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:36,000 Speaker 1: I recommend the book. But within this book I genuinely 75 00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 1: learned a lot about the fundamentals of smell that I 76 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:43,359 Speaker 1: had completely misunderstood or have been miseducated on. Heard the 77 00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:47,159 Speaker 1: author smell is just as much, if not more, connected 78 00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:51,040 Speaker 1: to learned experience as it is to natural instinct, and 79 00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:53,839 Speaker 1: he argues it's the only one of our senses to 80 00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:57,520 Speaker 1: be truly learned. It's also been speculated that our sense 81 00:04:57,560 --> 00:05:01,640 Speaker 1: of taste heavily relies on our sense of smell that 82 00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:05,000 Speaker 1: influences the smells that we're drawn to or gain pleasure by, 83 00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:08,080 Speaker 1: and has a hand in explaining why the smells we 84 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:11,400 Speaker 1: find pleasant can be so different, and whether you believe 85 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:15,200 Speaker 1: in horny pheromone sense or not, it influences the smells 86 00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:18,479 Speaker 1: that we're repulsed by as well. That is to say, 87 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 1: with enough convincing, your nose can and is trained to 88 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:27,599 Speaker 1: distrust someone else by their smell. And while some of 89 00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 1: you are shaking your heads until they fall off your neck, 90 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 1: there is an argument that there is really no such 91 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:37,800 Speaker 1: thing as a bad smell. There are instead smells we 92 00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 1: learn through experience to interpret as bad, whether this is 93 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:47,600 Speaker 1: for social or survival purposes, and this can lead to 94 00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:53,160 Speaker 1: encouraging or helping to form any number of societally induced discriminations. 95 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:57,120 Speaker 1: Linked to our sense of smell is a strong tradition 96 00:05:57,360 --> 00:06:01,400 Speaker 1: of classism, as well as racism and xenophobia. But for 97 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:03,920 Speaker 1: the purposes of our guest today, I'm going to zone 98 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:08,040 Speaker 1: in on one particular aspect of the socialized learning of smell, 99 00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,840 Speaker 1: how your nose can tell you to hate women, and 100 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:15,839 Speaker 1: to be clear, the way that most texts about how 101 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:19,240 Speaker 1: misogyny and the sense of smell are intertwined, and there's 102 00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:24,720 Speaker 1: not many define what a woman is is extremely myopic, 103 00:06:25,200 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 1: and by that I mean these texts generally define women 104 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:31,479 Speaker 1: as people with wombs. I hope you don't need me 105 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:33,960 Speaker 1: to tell you that a person with a womb does 106 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 1: not a woman make And if I do have to 107 00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:39,280 Speaker 1: explain that to you, how did you find my podcast 108 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:43,880 Speaker 1: JK Rowling? Please turn it off? But in Mutchambled's work 109 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,640 Speaker 1: in particular, we are trained to see women or as 110 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:51,599 Speaker 1: the case may be, people with wombs, historically subjugated in 111 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:56,839 Speaker 1: a few distinct ways by encouraging disgust or even inventing 112 00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 1: smells around menstruation and a specifically. 113 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:05,680 Speaker 2: I read somewhere that their periods attract bears. The bears 114 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:07,040 Speaker 2: can smell the menstruation. 115 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:09,480 Speaker 3: Hear the head bears. 116 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:11,240 Speaker 2: Now you put in the whole station in. 117 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:15,960 Speaker 1: Jeopardy basically in a heteronormative structure. Give me a horn 118 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:19,840 Speaker 1: for the term heteronormative women that men were trained to 119 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: view as disgusting when it came to fucking or making 120 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:26,440 Speaker 1: them wives. You know the deal. But interestingly, even the 121 00:07:26,480 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 1: quality is that men are conditioned to find desirable were 122 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:34,640 Speaker 1: also sometimes dismissed based on their smell. Throughout time, there 123 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: have been associations with excess perfume in the West, categorized 124 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:43,280 Speaker 1: as smelling slutty, and there's also been writings of rich 125 00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: women's farts smelling better question mark and please don't get 126 00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:49,480 Speaker 1: me started, because I do not want to get into it. 127 00:07:49,800 --> 00:07:54,160 Speaker 1: But yes, there is a huge amount of weird poetry 128 00:07:54,280 --> 00:07:57,760 Speaker 1: going back five hundred years or more about how pussy 129 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:02,640 Speaker 1: is stinky, but I like it. Shut up, I'm kidding. 130 00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:04,720 Speaker 1: If you listen to the end of the episode, I 131 00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:06,400 Speaker 1: will share one of these disgusting poems. 132 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 3: Now. 133 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 1: Part of the reason we know so little about smell 134 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:13,800 Speaker 1: at the Earth's advanced age, the author argues, is because 135 00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 1: there is very little encouragement under capitalism to learn more 136 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 1: about smell. That is, there's not much money in this 137 00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 1: line of study unless you're trying to identify what is 138 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:29,280 Speaker 1: going to sell deodorant and candles, and so to this day, 139 00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:33,520 Speaker 1: getting funding for anything outside of what smells can sell 140 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:38,120 Speaker 1: can be a real challenge in the modern age. Muchumbled 141 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 1: argues that our pushing smell aside as a powerful sense 142 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:43,240 Speaker 1: is very intentional. 143 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:47,680 Speaker 2: He writes, our deodorized world now offers a kind of 144 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 2: antidote to existential anguish as olfactory silence has developed in 145 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 2: parallel with the silence surrounding disease and death dating from 146 00:08:57,559 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 2: around the same time. 147 00:08:59,400 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 1: But there's no such thing as a deodorized society, whether 148 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 1: we're afraid of death or not. So much of the 149 00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:09,760 Speaker 1: way people have interpreted smell over time has been subjective, 150 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:13,520 Speaker 1: depending on the way that they were encouraged to see, interpret, 151 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 1: and experience shitting and death mainly, among other things. And 152 00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:21,360 Speaker 1: the further back you go from modern medicine and plumbing, 153 00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:26,520 Speaker 1: the more crucial these lived connections become. Because while social 154 00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:30,040 Speaker 1: norms dictate the way that one interprets the scent of 155 00:09:30,080 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 1: a woman out a cheating. 156 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:35,120 Speaker 2: Scent of a woman. 157 00:09:35,040 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 1: Should make you feel one way or another, it's had 158 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 1: varying results while remaining an intense fixation and subject of discussion. 159 00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:47,880 Speaker 1: Bliny the Elder, Yes, we're going back that far. Bliney 160 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:51,360 Speaker 1: the Elder said that the scent of menstruating people just 161 00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:59,880 Speaker 1: their existence caused horses to have abortions. Really think about that, then. Paradoxically, 162 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:04,720 Speaker 1: sixteenth century writer Marguerite de Navarre implied that infertile women's 163 00:10:04,720 --> 00:10:08,640 Speaker 1: butts smell better than fertile women. This type of speculation 164 00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:13,200 Speaker 1: spread misogyny and xenophobia at once, with a different author 165 00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 1: from this same era saying, quote, the arsful of an 166 00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: Italian woman could only be a sewer unquote, and I 167 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:24,240 Speaker 1: took that personally. Menstruation has long been encouraged to be 168 00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:28,520 Speaker 1: seen as a site of terror and evil, Its connection 169 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:31,800 Speaker 1: to implied life or deathmongered as a way to scare 170 00:10:31,880 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 1: dumbasses for centuries and counting, particularly in centuries where Western 171 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:43,120 Speaker 1: religion reigned. This is from sixteenth century writer Lavinous Laminius. 172 00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:49,000 Speaker 2: Since women abound with excrement and emit ill smells because 173 00:10:49,040 --> 00:10:53,440 Speaker 2: of their periods, they make all things worse and spoil 174 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 2: than natural forces and innate qualities. 175 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:01,559 Speaker 1: But don't worry, if you go through menopause, you still 176 00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:06,000 Speaker 1: smell fucking gross, and also you're old. From Erasmus is 177 00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:08,640 Speaker 1: fifteen eleven work in praise of folly. 178 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:12,760 Speaker 2: Better sports tale is to see those decrepit old women. 179 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:16,200 Speaker 2: That old age seems long since to have cut off 180 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:21,120 Speaker 2: from the number of the living, those strolling corpses, those 181 00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:27,760 Speaker 2: stinking carcasses, which everywhere exhale a sepulchral odor, and yet 182 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 2: who cry at every moment. Nothing is sweeter than life. 183 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:36,440 Speaker 1: So, if you're keeping score, if you menstruated, you stank 184 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:40,360 Speaker 1: of the devil, but once you didn't menstruate, you stank 185 00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:44,280 Speaker 1: of a corpse. And this smell was directly connected in 186 00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:49,880 Speaker 1: both cases with Satan himself, whose period is gnarly, I'm sure. 187 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:53,280 Speaker 1: And while there are countless examples that draw smell as 188 00:11:53,280 --> 00:11:56,640 Speaker 1: an indicator of character of where one should stand in 189 00:11:56,679 --> 00:12:01,200 Speaker 1: an enforced hierarchy, there's been shockingly little recognition that that's 190 00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:05,960 Speaker 1: what we're either doing, being subjected to, or both. But 191 00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:08,400 Speaker 1: if the last week of my life has been any indication, 192 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 1: it's the kind of thing you can't unsmell once you've 193 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:15,200 Speaker 1: noticed it. We're subtly signaled on how to feel about 194 00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: a character in media, written or otherwise all the time 195 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:23,680 Speaker 1: based on how they smell. And I'm typing this while 196 00:12:23,679 --> 00:12:27,160 Speaker 1: I frantically apply perfume to my wrists out of self consciousness. 197 00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:31,560 Speaker 1: I'm not saying let's stop showering. I'm saying that we 198 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:34,880 Speaker 1: lead by our noses more than we think, and it's 199 00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:38,000 Speaker 1: something that it's going to take years to fully understand, 200 00:12:38,640 --> 00:12:41,960 Speaker 1: because not only is the present history of smell important 201 00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:45,240 Speaker 1: to our daily lives, there's a few crucial people in 202 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:49,640 Speaker 1: this field arguing that it's just as crucial to the future. 203 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:53,520 Speaker 1: And that brings us to today, a day where there is, 204 00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:56,640 Speaker 1: from what I can tell, more being written about the 205 00:12:56,640 --> 00:13:00,199 Speaker 1: cultural history of smell than ever, and they're there is 206 00:13:00,280 --> 00:13:05,280 Speaker 1: less public encouragement, particularly online, to engage with the humanities 207 00:13:05,320 --> 00:13:09,000 Speaker 1: in this way than in years prior. So keep your 208 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:11,560 Speaker 1: nose down if you know this one already. But what 209 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:15,960 Speaker 1: happens when a young woman celebrates her PhD on how 210 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:20,880 Speaker 1: smell has been portrayed in literature to distinguish racial class 211 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: and gender prejudice a young queer woman at that on 212 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:30,080 Speaker 1: the absolute cesspool once known as Twitter dot com. It 213 00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:34,199 Speaker 1: went really well, Doctor Allie Luke's aka the student who 214 00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:37,640 Speaker 1: went viral for her thesis paper on smell being too woke. 215 00:13:38,320 --> 00:14:33,200 Speaker 1: Your sixteenth minute starts now join Welcome back to sixteenth Minute, 216 00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 1: the podcast where we talk to the Internet's main characters 217 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:39,280 Speaker 1: see how their moment in the spotlight affected them and 218 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:43,200 Speaker 1: what that says about us and the Internet. And this 219 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:46,960 Speaker 1: week we are visiting a pretty recent story. One you 220 00:14:47,040 --> 00:14:50,240 Speaker 1: might have heard of the tale of doctor Ali Lukes, 221 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 1: who ended up on the wrong side of the Twitter 222 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:56,960 Speaker 1: algorithm after committing the heinous crime of completing over a 223 00:14:57,040 --> 00:15:02,000 Speaker 1: decade's worth of higher education studying an underappreciated but critically 224 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:07,040 Speaker 1: necessary intersection of science and the humanities. How dare she? 225 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 4: What? 226 00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: An asshole? In all seriousness, I was very lucky to 227 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:14,200 Speaker 1: get to speak with doctor Ali Lukes. She is wonderful 228 00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:18,040 Speaker 1: and this story in particular, I think has a lot 229 00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 1: to say about where our relationship with the internet is 230 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:25,720 Speaker 1: right now. So let's get into it. Come with me 231 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:33,560 Speaker 1: if you dare to. November twenty twenty four. Very recent story, 232 00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:36,880 Speaker 1: to be sure, but in a world this completely dystopian, 233 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:41,280 Speaker 1: it is worth putting ourselves in a moment online down 234 00:15:41,360 --> 00:15:45,000 Speaker 1: to the finest detail, because if you haven't noticed, it's 235 00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:49,160 Speaker 1: an exceptionally difficult time to be a student. The example 236 00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 1: we're talking about today is Allie's one that is centered 237 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:57,520 Speaker 1: on cyber attacks fueled by anti intellectualism, misogyny, and very 238 00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:01,520 Speaker 1: likely bots. But it's far from the only uphill battle 239 00:16:01,720 --> 00:16:05,800 Speaker 1: that students are facing right now. And while anti intellectualism 240 00:16:05,880 --> 00:16:09,120 Speaker 1: has taken many forms, on college campuses in the last 241 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 1: ten years, it makes the most sense to focus on 242 00:16:12,440 --> 00:16:17,120 Speaker 1: student advocacy for a free Palestine and student groups pushing 243 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:22,920 Speaker 1: for university divestment from Israel. This mission expanded beyond Palestine 244 00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 1: for many groups in the last year and a half, 245 00:16:25,600 --> 00:16:29,800 Speaker 1: and lists of demands put forward by students establishing encampments 246 00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:34,080 Speaker 1: to both protest and push back on their university. Empowering 247 00:16:34,120 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 1: other settler states has been critical. These groups also have 248 00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:41,080 Speaker 1: sought to protect the student and staff's rights of any 249 00:16:41,200 --> 00:16:44,920 Speaker 1: university to protest instead of This is. 250 00:16:44,880 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 4: The moment Tuff's University graduate student Rumesa Oster was arrested 251 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:53,720 Speaker 4: and taken into federal custody. Doorbell camera footage obtained by 252 00:16:53,800 --> 00:16:57,440 Speaker 4: NBC News shows two plain clothes officers approaching the thirty 253 00:16:57,520 --> 00:17:00,640 Speaker 4: year old in Somerville outside of Boston. Os Turk at 254 00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:03,880 Speaker 4: first appears to back away before more agents approach. 255 00:17:04,600 --> 00:17:08,600 Speaker 1: This also comes with, to no one's surprise, a tremendous 256 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:12,920 Speaker 1: amount of xenophobia and racism by the students who are 257 00:17:13,000 --> 00:17:17,520 Speaker 1: working within these spaces. There are countless examples of student 258 00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:23,120 Speaker 1: protesters being profiled by race, particularly Palestinian, other Middle Eastern 259 00:17:23,400 --> 00:17:28,040 Speaker 1: or black students. These students were and are characterized not 260 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:32,359 Speaker 1: as anti genocide but as anti Semitic, even with the 261 00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:36,320 Speaker 1: large portion of student organizers being composed of young anti 262 00:17:36,440 --> 00:17:39,679 Speaker 1: Zionist Jewish students and groups. And you don't need me 263 00:17:39,720 --> 00:17:43,040 Speaker 1: to tell you that this profiling, censorship, and state violence 264 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:47,159 Speaker 1: has only escalated since Trump re entered the White House. 265 00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:52,760 Speaker 1: But I digress. November twenty seventh, twenty twenty four, It's 266 00:17:52,800 --> 00:17:55,040 Speaker 1: been less than a month since Donald Trump was re 267 00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:58,119 Speaker 1: elected by America, this time without having to cheat his 268 00:17:58,160 --> 00:18:03,760 Speaker 1: way into it and promising any number of horrifying policies 269 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:08,000 Speaker 1: before re entering office. As Joe Biden does his last 270 00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:11,400 Speaker 1: few laps in the Olympic sized pool of lukewarm ice 271 00:18:11,440 --> 00:18:14,240 Speaker 1: cream that he floated around in instead of doing anything. 272 00:18:14,840 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 1: It's one day before Hailey Welch aka the Hawk Tua 273 00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:22,080 Speaker 1: Girl will release what she does not yet know is 274 00:18:22,119 --> 00:18:26,400 Speaker 1: the final episode of Talk To for over six months 275 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:29,400 Speaker 1: before the crypto scam she's become the face of is busted. 276 00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:34,160 Speaker 1: And it's a week before internet boyfriend Luigi Mangioni will 277 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:38,320 Speaker 1: assassinate a healthcare executive after being the poat producer of 278 00:18:38,359 --> 00:18:41,840 Speaker 1: this very show. Robert Evans radicalized by pain. 279 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:44,880 Speaker 5: This past week, legacy media and Lonely Cat owning true 280 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 5: crime podcast fans were obsessed with the mysterious man Dan 281 00:18:48,080 --> 00:18:50,800 Speaker 5: Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare, even though there 282 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:53,200 Speaker 5: was only just fuzzy surveillance footage, thirsty men and women 283 00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:55,560 Speaker 5: calling him things like socialist Daddy, putting him on a 284 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:57,879 Speaker 5: pedalstal for literally a stranger in the back and then 285 00:18:57,920 --> 00:18:59,200 Speaker 5: running away from the authorities. 286 00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 1: You tell, Ben. And even though it sounds counterintuitive that 287 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:07,359 Speaker 1: with all this going on, with the rights of immigrants, 288 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:10,160 Speaker 1: of trans people, of anyone who could need an abortion 289 00:19:10,400 --> 00:19:14,520 Speaker 1: on the chopping block again or still, the Internet found 290 00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:17,440 Speaker 1: some time and energy to bully a doctoral student for 291 00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 1: finishing her thesis because woke while Ali Lukes, and that's 292 00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:27,880 Speaker 1: doctor Ali Lukes to you, was about twenty seven when 293 00:19:27,920 --> 00:19:30,680 Speaker 1: all of this happened, and could barely remember a time 294 00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:34,920 Speaker 1: before the Internet. She was not particularly logged in and 295 00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:38,640 Speaker 1: didn't really want to be like a lot of PhD students. 296 00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:42,800 Speaker 1: She's a book forward person, but she lives in a 297 00:19:42,840 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 1: society and did have social media accounts that she used 298 00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:49,520 Speaker 1: sparingly in order to keep in touch with friends and family, 299 00:19:49,920 --> 00:19:52,600 Speaker 1: as well as to make professional connections in a field 300 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:58,119 Speaker 1: of study that was and is extremely specific and so. 301 00:19:58,640 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 1: On November twenty seventh, she posted to her Twitter slash 302 00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:05,480 Speaker 1: x account with the selfie of Ali and her now 303 00:20:05,600 --> 00:20:10,840 Speaker 1: professionally bound thesis. She wears a simple red sweater and smiles, 304 00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:12,600 Speaker 1: captioning the photo. 305 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:15,679 Speaker 3: Thrilled to say, I passed my VIVA with no corrections 306 00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:17,880 Speaker 3: and an officially pH done. 307 00:20:17,880 --> 00:20:20,680 Speaker 1: Grad student LINGO don't worry about it, but what gets 308 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:25,600 Speaker 1: people stirred up and through some opaque, algorithmically driven nightmare 309 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:29,080 Speaker 1: pushed into the feeds of hundreds of thousands of blue 310 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:34,320 Speaker 1: check AI Cryptonihilist Freaks is the title of the paper 311 00:20:34,440 --> 00:20:38,000 Speaker 1: she's written, an embossed gold text on the red leather cover. 312 00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:42,200 Speaker 1: Doctor Ali Lukes wrote her Cambridge University thesis on. 313 00:20:42,680 --> 00:20:45,040 Speaker 3: O factory ethics, the politics of smell and modern and 314 00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:46,320 Speaker 3: contemporary prose. 315 00:20:49,160 --> 00:20:54,280 Speaker 1: Smell and not just smell, but how smell has been 316 00:20:54,400 --> 00:21:00,040 Speaker 1: characterized in literature an obscure topic. Sure, social function not 317 00:21:00,440 --> 00:21:05,560 Speaker 1: immediately obvious. Fair Even Ali gets why the function of 318 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:09,200 Speaker 1: her thesis paper might not be immediately obvious to those 319 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:12,240 Speaker 1: out of the know, as she will explain in our interview. 320 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: But keep in mind she's not trying to get this 321 00:21:15,880 --> 00:21:18,600 Speaker 1: out to a general public. She only has a couple 322 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:22,679 Speaker 1: hundred X followers at this time. Her last posts on 323 00:21:22,720 --> 00:21:26,919 Speaker 1: the platform before this were months apart. One was a 324 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: photo of the Cambridge campus that. 325 00:21:29,000 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 3: Read extremely fortunate that I get to teach in a 326 00:21:32,280 --> 00:21:33,720 Speaker 3: place as beautiful as this. 327 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:36,280 Speaker 1: And the other was a photo of her on campus 328 00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:39,320 Speaker 1: from June of twenty twenty four, reading. 329 00:21:39,880 --> 00:21:42,000 Speaker 3: I submitted my PhD thesis today. 330 00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:46,000 Speaker 1: This was an account for her peers, professional and personal 331 00:21:46,600 --> 00:21:50,160 Speaker 1: people who would most likely understand the function of her 332 00:21:50,200 --> 00:21:54,320 Speaker 1: thesis paper because they were academics too. I'm reminded quite 333 00:21:54,320 --> 00:21:57,000 Speaker 1: a bit of the Coffee in the Garden with my 334 00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 1: husband Saga when it comes to this story. It was 335 00:22:00,800 --> 00:22:03,359 Speaker 1: actually one of the first episode topics that we covered 336 00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:06,800 Speaker 1: on sixteenth Minute all the way last spring, in that 337 00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:11,240 Speaker 1: doctor Alli was definitely not trying to get this pieceis 338 00:22:11,280 --> 00:22:15,080 Speaker 1: announcement out to a larger audience. The only thing that 339 00:22:15,119 --> 00:22:17,919 Speaker 1: made it possible for it to go viral anyways, was 340 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:22,120 Speaker 1: the fact that her account was a public one. Think 341 00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:25,000 Speaker 1: of the conventional ways that we would try to court 342 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,959 Speaker 1: attention on social media if we wanted a post to 343 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:33,040 Speaker 1: get outside of our followers. It's generally a game of 344 00:22:33,160 --> 00:22:36,520 Speaker 1: tagging right, add a hashtag tag the account of a 345 00:22:36,600 --> 00:22:40,120 Speaker 1: larger institution or another account in the hopes that they 346 00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:44,679 Speaker 1: will either engage with or repost it, And nothing like 347 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:49,439 Speaker 1: that is happening here. What's happening is the twenty twenty 348 00:22:49,480 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 1: four Twitter slash x algorithm, one that, as we discussed 349 00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:57,639 Speaker 1: in our Hailey Welch Talk TUA series, is conditioned to 350 00:22:57,800 --> 00:23:03,159 Speaker 1: boost emotionally driven content and most importantly, elevate the replies 351 00:23:03,359 --> 00:23:07,480 Speaker 1: of paying subscribers. So the blue check freaks I was 352 00:23:07,520 --> 00:23:11,879 Speaker 1: referring to, and through this pay to play increasingly fascistic 353 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:16,159 Speaker 1: platform that longtime users had been departing in the millions 354 00:23:16,280 --> 00:23:22,160 Speaker 1: and continue to now. Doctor Allie's inoffensive, celebratory post got 355 00:23:22,160 --> 00:23:25,359 Speaker 1: sucked into this algorithm and pulled in some of the 356 00:23:25,480 --> 00:23:30,520 Speaker 1: gnarliest Blue check comments ever generated by either a dumb 357 00:23:30,560 --> 00:23:33,560 Speaker 1: man or AI trained on a dumb man. It's hard 358 00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:35,880 Speaker 1: to tell. Sometimes. Buckle in. 359 00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:42,520 Speaker 2: For those wondering her PhD thesis per abstract is basically 360 00:23:42,560 --> 00:23:46,040 Speaker 2: on why it's racist and or classicist to not like 361 00:23:46,080 --> 00:23:50,159 Speaker 2: it when people exhibit body odors consistent with poor hygiene. 362 00:23:50,960 --> 00:23:54,680 Speaker 2: You would have spent your years better by getting married 363 00:23:54,880 --> 00:23:59,400 Speaker 2: and having children. Oh look, another woman getting a useless 364 00:23:59,440 --> 00:24:02,879 Speaker 2: degree that does nothing for the furtherance of society. Women 365 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:07,080 Speaker 2: would rather spend years pursuing stupid degrees that won't fulfill 366 00:24:07,119 --> 00:24:11,160 Speaker 2: them over a family that actually will enjoy the debt, 367 00:24:11,560 --> 00:24:13,960 Speaker 2: since nothing you learned or produced will ever be of 368 00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:18,399 Speaker 2: any benefit to society. Adorable, but what can you do 369 00:24:18,520 --> 00:24:19,960 Speaker 2: with this? pH dick? 370 00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:26,560 Speaker 1: Okay, well done, boys. While the algorithm is the original 371 00:24:26,600 --> 00:24:30,560 Speaker 1: offender for driving harassment towards doctor Allie, her post was 372 00:24:30,680 --> 00:24:35,280 Speaker 1: further boosted in the algorithm when influential blue check accounts 373 00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:40,120 Speaker 1: began to quote tweet the post with random misogynist criticisms 374 00:24:40,119 --> 00:24:43,560 Speaker 1: of her. And while it took a few days, the 375 00:24:43,640 --> 00:24:46,840 Speaker 1: story does go viral in a way that crosses into 376 00:24:46,840 --> 00:24:51,000 Speaker 1: the mainstream press, which, as we've discussed, is pretty rare 377 00:24:51,080 --> 00:24:54,159 Speaker 1: these days, and doctor Allie is, for the most part 378 00:24:54,600 --> 00:24:58,199 Speaker 1: game to engage with the story going viral, and the 379 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:01,560 Speaker 1: benefit here, it seems, for her, is that she knows 380 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:04,960 Speaker 1: that what she does is niche, and she rightfully isn't 381 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: taking the horrific bad faith criticism around it very seriously. 382 00:25:10,600 --> 00:25:12,040 Speaker 1: Some headlines from the days that. 383 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:16,399 Speaker 2: Followed why this Cambridge Grads PhD thesis on smelly people 384 00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:19,720 Speaker 2: is dividing the internet olfactory oppression. 385 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:23,920 Speaker 1: They attacked her PhD. Now this smell expert is making 386 00:25:24,119 --> 00:25:25,600 Speaker 1: x her classroom. 387 00:25:25,520 --> 00:25:28,719 Speaker 2: In defense of writing a quirky thesis on the politics 388 00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:30,359 Speaker 2: of smell in modern literature. 389 00:25:30,920 --> 00:25:34,399 Speaker 1: The tone of most of this coverage is nothing really surprising, 390 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:38,159 Speaker 1: and by that I mean so tremendously half cooked that 391 00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:40,480 Speaker 1: it makes you want to rip your head off. Here 392 00:25:40,560 --> 00:25:41,840 Speaker 1: is something from the New York Post. 393 00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:46,879 Speaker 2: The thesis states that olfactory discussed can result in a 394 00:25:46,960 --> 00:25:51,800 Speaker 2: person's rejection. Online critics needed smelling salts after reading what 395 00:25:51,840 --> 00:25:55,320 Speaker 2: they deemed to be woke sounding, academic gobbledygook. 396 00:25:55,720 --> 00:25:59,520 Speaker 1: And while very little of this coverage is outright hostile, 397 00:26:00,040 --> 00:26:03,520 Speaker 1: who doctor Ali Luke's very few I was able to 398 00:26:03,560 --> 00:26:06,960 Speaker 1: find seem to take the time to understand what her 399 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:11,239 Speaker 1: thesis was actually about, which we will get into the 400 00:26:11,240 --> 00:26:13,840 Speaker 1: tone of So much of this criticism framed the topic 401 00:26:14,040 --> 00:26:18,359 Speaker 1: as Ali applying a system of ethics to how marginalized 402 00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:22,520 Speaker 1: people smell. But if you look at her abstract, which 403 00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:25,960 Speaker 1: she shares, she makes it clear that it is not 404 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:29,880 Speaker 1: this simple. Instead, her paper is a look at how 405 00:26:30,000 --> 00:26:33,680 Speaker 1: smell has been presented in literature over time in order 406 00:26:33,760 --> 00:26:37,840 Speaker 1: to make a definitive statement about a marginalized person, and 407 00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:41,959 Speaker 1: what that definitive statement says about the author, the place, 408 00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:44,639 Speaker 1: and the social mores of the time in which it 409 00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:48,240 Speaker 1: was written. You can hate the premise if you want, 410 00:26:48,680 --> 00:26:52,080 Speaker 1: but taking a few seconds makes it clear that the 411 00:26:52,119 --> 00:26:55,399 Speaker 1: point of her paper is to build out a cultural 412 00:26:55,640 --> 00:26:59,480 Speaker 1: history of smell, the one sense that is still widely 413 00:26:59,640 --> 00:27:05,000 Speaker 1: under estimated and misunderstood. There is value to this, so 414 00:27:05,119 --> 00:27:09,040 Speaker 1: why can people not take it seriously? Here I want 415 00:27:09,040 --> 00:27:11,439 Speaker 1: to again bring up the twenty twenty two case of 416 00:27:11,680 --> 00:27:14,919 Speaker 1: the drinking coffee in the garden with my husband post 417 00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:19,080 Speaker 1: because their similarities and differences I think are pretty instructive 418 00:27:19,119 --> 00:27:22,920 Speaker 1: here as a refresher. If you haven't listened to this episode, 419 00:27:23,119 --> 00:27:27,760 Speaker 1: and you should. User Daisy Miller posted this simple statement 420 00:27:28,160 --> 00:27:31,679 Speaker 1: to her ten thousand or so followers on Twitter. My 421 00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:32,679 Speaker 1: husband and I wake. 422 00:27:32,600 --> 00:27:34,359 Speaker 3: Up every morning and bring our coffee out to our 423 00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:36,760 Speaker 3: garden and sit and talk for hours every morning and 424 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:38,960 Speaker 3: never get sold, and we never run out of things 425 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 3: to talk to. Love him so much. 426 00:27:41,640 --> 00:27:45,520 Speaker 1: And as we unpacked in that episode, she got completely 427 00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 1: demolished in the replies. With a few rounds of discourse 428 00:27:49,359 --> 00:27:54,160 Speaker 1: taking place, the tweet very quickly escaped its relatively small 429 00:27:54,240 --> 00:27:58,720 Speaker 1: intended audience of twenty something cottage core fans and made 430 00:27:58,760 --> 00:28:02,800 Speaker 1: its way into the uneneral cesspool, the most popular critique 431 00:28:02,800 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 1: at the time being that Daisy was bragging or being 432 00:28:07,200 --> 00:28:11,159 Speaker 1: insensitive to class by posting this. The first round of 433 00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:15,359 Speaker 1: discourse was backlash to Daisy herself. The second round of 434 00:28:15,400 --> 00:28:20,000 Speaker 1: discourse was backlash to the backlash, where thousands came to 435 00:28:20,040 --> 00:28:23,760 Speaker 1: Daisy's defense saying that this was an innocuous statement. And 436 00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:27,320 Speaker 1: finally there was some light coverage from places like BuzzFeed 437 00:28:27,400 --> 00:28:30,680 Speaker 1: and Page six before the whole story kind of petered out. 438 00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:35,200 Speaker 1: Daisy did interact with the story at first, but only 439 00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:38,560 Speaker 1: for a short amount of time. She stayed positive, but 440 00:28:39,080 --> 00:28:45,320 Speaker 1: ultimately and rightfully seemed overwhelmed by the attention and migrated platforms. 441 00:28:45,800 --> 00:28:48,400 Speaker 1: This was in the fall of twenty twenty two, about 442 00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 1: six months after Elon Musk bought Twitter as a joke 443 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:54,400 Speaker 1: and then tried to save face by turning it into 444 00:28:54,480 --> 00:28:57,880 Speaker 1: a hub for fascist thought, and so a big similarity 445 00:28:58,040 --> 00:29:01,880 Speaker 1: between Daisy's story and doctor Ali Luke's story is that 446 00:29:01,920 --> 00:29:06,440 Speaker 1: these were posts made by women for a very specific audience, 447 00:29:07,120 --> 00:29:10,160 Speaker 1: but the criticism that they received was a result of 448 00:29:10,200 --> 00:29:14,080 Speaker 1: the algorithm pushing these posts into the feed of people 449 00:29:14,320 --> 00:29:19,080 Speaker 1: who would probably hate it, ostensibly because these people would 450 00:29:19,120 --> 00:29:23,360 Speaker 1: engage with it. And to be clear, this is requiring 451 00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:27,120 Speaker 1: some guesswork on my part because of all the secret 452 00:29:27,200 --> 00:29:30,840 Speaker 1: policy that Twitter has managed to accidentally leak over the 453 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:34,800 Speaker 1: last couple of years, big scary algorithm changes do not 454 00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:37,560 Speaker 1: tend to be one of them. But on its face, 455 00:29:38,040 --> 00:29:42,240 Speaker 1: both of these examples are Elon era Twitter harassment stories, 456 00:29:42,600 --> 00:29:46,440 Speaker 1: where the machine has been calibrated to get women harassed 457 00:29:46,720 --> 00:29:51,560 Speaker 1: over nothing through no fault of their own. But there 458 00:29:51,600 --> 00:29:56,240 Speaker 1: are a few differences between these stories. In doctor Alli's case, 459 00:29:56,680 --> 00:29:59,840 Speaker 1: twenty twenty four gave the Internet and Twitter too full 460 00:30:00,120 --> 00:30:04,880 Speaker 1: years to descend further into anti intellectualism, and in a 461 00:30:04,920 --> 00:30:08,240 Speaker 1: more concrete sense, the replies that got the most boost 462 00:30:08,240 --> 00:30:12,200 Speaker 1: in the algorithm were different from Daisy's experience, and that 463 00:30:12,440 --> 00:30:15,560 Speaker 1: is because of a very cursed program that was rolled 464 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:18,640 Speaker 1: out in the month after Coffee in the Garden with 465 00:30:18,720 --> 00:30:24,080 Speaker 1: my husband in November twenty twenty two x premium formerly 466 00:30:24,160 --> 00:30:28,280 Speaker 1: known as Twitter Blue, where in previous years a blue 467 00:30:28,360 --> 00:30:31,520 Speaker 1: check beside your Twitter user name was free and the 468 00:30:31,560 --> 00:30:34,880 Speaker 1: result of being verified as a prominent person or brand 469 00:30:35,040 --> 00:30:38,720 Speaker 1: on the app. This new program allowed for as low 470 00:30:38,760 --> 00:30:42,120 Speaker 1: as eight bucks a month to receive this blue check 471 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:46,760 Speaker 1: as a veneer of distinction, as well as ensuring that 472 00:30:46,880 --> 00:30:50,000 Speaker 1: if you replied to a tweet that your reply would 473 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:53,440 Speaker 1: be boosted in the algorithm to show up before most 474 00:30:53,600 --> 00:30:59,240 Speaker 1: unpaid users, regardless of how popular your reply was. There 475 00:30:59,280 --> 00:31:02,120 Speaker 1: was a lot of contray over this program and continues 476 00:31:02,120 --> 00:31:04,640 Speaker 1: to be, but most of the Blue checks that I 477 00:31:04,760 --> 00:31:07,800 Speaker 1: followed back in the day on Twitter really just responded 478 00:31:07,840 --> 00:31:11,080 Speaker 1: by ceasing to use their account or just deleting it altogether. 479 00:31:11,720 --> 00:31:15,520 Speaker 1: And in this first round of discourse, attacks on doctor 480 00:31:15,520 --> 00:31:20,320 Speaker 1: Ali Luke's mainly came from this type of account, many 481 00:31:20,360 --> 00:31:24,480 Speaker 1: of which are speculated to be bots, and their responses 482 00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:27,080 Speaker 1: were amplified in the way that they couldn't have been 483 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:31,360 Speaker 1: during Daisy Miller's moment of virality with Coffee in the Garden. 484 00:31:32,120 --> 00:31:35,000 Speaker 1: But the second round of engagement in these cases are 485 00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:39,160 Speaker 1: the same. Once Ali's tweet had gotten enough engagement, there 486 00:31:39,280 --> 00:31:43,400 Speaker 1: was an equally strong second round of discourse in support 487 00:31:43,800 --> 00:31:46,960 Speaker 1: of her thesis on smell, with many accounts replying with 488 00:31:47,160 --> 00:31:51,760 Speaker 1: encouragement and asking when her thesis would be available to read, which, 489 00:31:51,920 --> 00:31:55,640 Speaker 1: if you're curious, is unfortunately available still nowhere at the 490 00:31:55,640 --> 00:31:58,320 Speaker 1: time of this writing. But that didn't stop doctor Ali 491 00:31:58,400 --> 00:32:02,120 Speaker 1: from wanting people to un understand where she was coming 492 00:32:02,160 --> 00:32:05,760 Speaker 1: from while replying to as many people as she could, 493 00:32:06,200 --> 00:32:09,920 Speaker 1: which is no small task or a relatively offline person 494 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:14,240 Speaker 1: who was suddenly exposed to millions of accounts. Ali replied 495 00:32:14,280 --> 00:32:19,320 Speaker 1: to the original, now wildly viral post with clarification on 496 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:21,800 Speaker 1: what her thesis was actually about. 497 00:32:22,560 --> 00:32:25,800 Speaker 3: She writes, to be clear, this apptect was written for 498 00:32:25,840 --> 00:32:28,360 Speaker 3: experts within my discipline and field. It was not written 499 00:32:28,400 --> 00:32:30,080 Speaker 3: for a lay audience, and this is not how I 500 00:32:30,080 --> 00:32:33,080 Speaker 3: would communicate my ideas to the average person. Since there's 501 00:32:33,120 --> 00:32:35,160 Speaker 3: some confusion about the nature of my research, here is 502 00:32:35,200 --> 00:32:37,920 Speaker 3: the abstract from my PhD thesis, which I hope provide 503 00:32:37,960 --> 00:32:40,560 Speaker 3: more contexts for anyone interested in learning about my work. 504 00:32:41,000 --> 00:32:43,920 Speaker 1: She then posts, per abstract. 505 00:32:43,920 --> 00:32:47,240 Speaker 3: This thesis studies how literature registers the importance of olfactory discourse, 506 00:32:47,320 --> 00:32:49,880 Speaker 3: the language of smell and the olfactory imagination it creates 507 00:32:49,880 --> 00:32:52,200 Speaker 3: and structuring our social world. The broad aim of this 508 00:32:52,280 --> 00:32:55,000 Speaker 3: thesis is to offer an intersectional and wide ranging study 509 00:32:55,000 --> 00:32:58,360 Speaker 3: of olfactory oppression by establishing the underlying logistics that facilitate 510 00:32:58,440 --> 00:33:02,280 Speaker 3: Smell's application and creating subverting gender, class, sexual, racial, and 511 00:33:02,320 --> 00:33:06,200 Speaker 3: species power structures. I focus largely on pros fiction from 512 00:33:06,200 --> 00:33:09,040 Speaker 3: the modern contemporary periods so as to trace the legacy 513 00:33:09,080 --> 00:33:12,080 Speaker 3: of olfactory prejudice in today and situate its contemporary relevance. 514 00:33:12,600 --> 00:33:14,880 Speaker 1: It goes on from there. I've linked it in the description, 515 00:33:15,600 --> 00:33:20,120 Speaker 1: and to be fair, this kind of paper is extremely 516 00:33:20,200 --> 00:33:23,880 Speaker 1: my shit, and I'm so glad that doctor ally has 517 00:33:23,960 --> 00:33:27,360 Speaker 1: cornered the market on talking about it. As I hope 518 00:33:27,400 --> 00:33:30,560 Speaker 1: I've established at this point, I think there is tremendous 519 00:33:30,640 --> 00:33:35,080 Speaker 1: value in seeing how something as both universal and understudied 520 00:33:35,120 --> 00:33:40,080 Speaker 1: as smell, something almost everybody deals with, has been represented 521 00:33:40,160 --> 00:33:42,640 Speaker 1: in the arts as a way of framing how we've 522 00:33:42,720 --> 00:33:46,160 Speaker 1: interpreted our relationship to it over a course of centuries. 523 00:33:47,160 --> 00:33:50,560 Speaker 1: But this would not be an opinion shared in a 524 00:33:50,680 --> 00:33:55,400 Speaker 1: void of anti intellectualism. As the humanities continue to be 525 00:33:55,600 --> 00:33:59,080 Speaker 1: de emphasized in the West, the idea that literary work 526 00:33:59,120 --> 00:34:03,240 Speaker 1: could be anything but a pastime and not contain actual 527 00:34:03,480 --> 00:34:07,920 Speaker 1: historical value or insight. Is not as commonly shared an 528 00:34:07,920 --> 00:34:11,759 Speaker 1: opinion as it once was. But another aspect that I 529 00:34:11,800 --> 00:34:15,279 Speaker 1: find interesting about how doctor Alli in twenty twenty four 530 00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:19,560 Speaker 1: and Daisy Miller in twenty twenty two respond to this 531 00:34:19,840 --> 00:34:24,520 Speaker 1: absolute torrential downpour of hate in the comments is how 532 00:34:24,520 --> 00:34:29,840 Speaker 1: they respond as individuals, because, unlike Daisy, doctor Ali engages 533 00:34:29,880 --> 00:34:34,480 Speaker 1: with her haters with a relatively and I think incredibly 534 00:34:34,640 --> 00:34:39,840 Speaker 1: even keel for weeks. Here's an example of her thoughtfully 535 00:34:39,880 --> 00:34:43,880 Speaker 1: engaging with an absolute shode as long as said chode 536 00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:48,799 Speaker 1: was expressing a thought that wasn't just outright misogyny. The 537 00:34:48,840 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 1: commenter writes. 538 00:34:50,280 --> 00:34:54,160 Speaker 2: We need a new prefix for people with academic PhDs. 539 00:34:54,360 --> 00:34:56,280 Speaker 2: Doctor should mean something. 540 00:34:56,719 --> 00:35:00,319 Speaker 3: Doctor Ali replies, you know what, I don't disagree with this. 541 00:35:00,840 --> 00:35:02,800 Speaker 3: I certainly won't be putting up my hand if someone 542 00:35:02,920 --> 00:35:04,760 Speaker 3: asks is there a doctor in here on a plane. 543 00:35:05,320 --> 00:35:08,320 Speaker 1: The amount of times that doctor Alli Luke's shows genuine 544 00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:12,719 Speaker 1: patients with clearly bad faith commenters like this blew my 545 00:35:12,840 --> 00:35:16,440 Speaker 1: mind and made me so glad that she's a teacher, 546 00:35:16,560 --> 00:35:19,960 Speaker 1: because that kind of superhuman patience does not come easily 547 00:35:20,440 --> 00:35:23,279 Speaker 1: and she clearly had some practice with it, but that 548 00:35:23,320 --> 00:35:27,760 Speaker 1: doesn't mean that these bad faith comments and even threats 549 00:35:28,360 --> 00:35:33,920 Speaker 1: didn't or couldn't affect her. It was a deeply stressful factor, 550 00:35:34,680 --> 00:35:37,480 Speaker 1: and I think the most extreme example she's shared is 551 00:35:37,640 --> 00:35:40,480 Speaker 1: this tweet about the fact that she needed to report 552 00:35:40,520 --> 00:35:43,919 Speaker 1: a threat to the authorities on December one, twenty twenty four. 553 00:35:44,600 --> 00:35:46,319 Speaker 1: Alie writes, to be. 554 00:35:46,360 --> 00:35:48,239 Speaker 3: Clear, this is where I draw the line. This is 555 00:35:48,239 --> 00:35:50,040 Speaker 3: abhorred and illegal, and no one should ever have to 556 00:35:50,080 --> 00:35:50,560 Speaker 3: deal with this. 557 00:35:51,200 --> 00:35:54,880 Speaker 1: Attached is a screenshot of an email she received on 558 00:35:55,000 --> 00:36:00,799 Speaker 1: her academic email earlier that day, which reads and trigger warning. 559 00:36:01,200 --> 00:36:05,040 Speaker 2: You are the dumbest fucking bitch I have ever seen 560 00:36:05,120 --> 00:36:08,680 Speaker 2: on the Internet and the perfect example of literally everything 561 00:36:08,760 --> 00:36:14,920 Speaker 2: wrong with modern society. Imagine thinking you deserve taxpayer money 562 00:36:14,960 --> 00:36:19,720 Speaker 2: for writing up that useless piece of shit thesis nobody 563 00:36:19,800 --> 00:36:25,880 Speaker 2: will ever read vegan, feminist, and queer. Your dues to 564 00:36:26,000 --> 00:36:30,400 Speaker 2: society are many, and me and the boys will rape 565 00:36:30,400 --> 00:36:31,000 Speaker 2: them out of you. 566 00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:34,320 Speaker 1: When we read this. In our script meeting for this episode, 567 00:36:34,800 --> 00:36:37,439 Speaker 1: our producer ian said that this was one of the 568 00:36:37,480 --> 00:36:43,000 Speaker 1: worst screeds he'd heard directed to anyone online. Ever, I 569 00:36:43,040 --> 00:36:45,400 Speaker 1: don't think you need me to remind you that this 570 00:36:45,560 --> 00:36:50,640 Speaker 1: was in response to an unpublished paper about smell in books. 571 00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:53,400 Speaker 1: There is no world where this is a rational response 572 00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:56,719 Speaker 1: to anything, but it's egregious here. This was not in 573 00:36:56,760 --> 00:37:00,680 Speaker 1: response to a hot take. Virtually all of the harassment 574 00:37:00,880 --> 00:37:05,040 Speaker 1: doctor Ali was receiving was a result of violent projection 575 00:37:05,880 --> 00:37:09,880 Speaker 1: on a platform where hate speech and threats are increasingly 576 00:37:09,920 --> 00:37:15,239 Speaker 1: tolerated and inflammatory statements are boosted and even monetized. And 577 00:37:15,480 --> 00:37:19,400 Speaker 1: all doctor Ali had done is commit the cardinal contemporary 578 00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:25,640 Speaker 1: sin of being too woke. It's truly disgusting, and this 579 00:37:25,719 --> 00:37:29,080 Speaker 1: is how a person who kept her personal life offline 580 00:37:29,440 --> 00:37:33,880 Speaker 1: and posted almost never at all suddenly became an optimal 581 00:37:33,920 --> 00:37:39,920 Speaker 1: target for gendered and homophobic harassment. To her attackers, Ali 582 00:37:40,040 --> 00:37:45,120 Speaker 1: represented the exact kind of highly educated feminist intellectual that 583 00:37:45,200 --> 00:37:48,359 Speaker 1: the right has delighted in threatening on social media and 584 00:37:48,440 --> 00:37:51,719 Speaker 1: in real life at increasing rates for the last decade 585 00:37:51,840 --> 00:37:55,600 Speaker 1: and then some. And while doctor Ali doesn't draw much 586 00:37:55,600 --> 00:37:59,520 Speaker 1: attention to this in subsequent press appearances, this is just 587 00:37:59,520 --> 00:38:02,040 Speaker 1: as good as time as any to discuss the state 588 00:38:02,400 --> 00:38:06,719 Speaker 1: of online harassment, particularly because this story is such a 589 00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:11,000 Speaker 1: recent one. Because in one sense, yes, the old chestnuts 590 00:38:11,080 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 1: of online misogyny ring true here right. Being a woman online, 591 00:38:15,280 --> 00:38:19,040 Speaker 1: being non white online, being trans online can and often 592 00:38:19,320 --> 00:38:23,960 Speaker 1: is a fucking nightmare, particularly when you get pushed into 593 00:38:24,040 --> 00:38:27,320 Speaker 1: the wrong side of the algorithm. But if you've also 594 00:38:27,440 --> 00:38:30,520 Speaker 1: had the creeping feeling that this type of harassment has 595 00:38:30,520 --> 00:38:33,640 Speaker 1: been getting worse in the last few years, you're far 596 00:38:33,680 --> 00:38:37,920 Speaker 1: from alone, and you're probably right. In recent years, there 597 00:38:38,000 --> 00:38:41,000 Speaker 1: has been a number of studies on how safe people 598 00:38:41,480 --> 00:38:45,960 Speaker 1: and marginalized people specifically felt online after reports of online 599 00:38:46,000 --> 00:38:51,080 Speaker 1: harassment had scaled up significantly. Sixteen percent of respondents told 600 00:38:51,120 --> 00:38:53,720 Speaker 1: the Pew Research Center that they had been harassed online 601 00:38:53,800 --> 00:38:57,799 Speaker 1: in twenty fourteen, a number that increased to twenty eight 602 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:02,600 Speaker 1: percent by twenty twenty one. These numbers then increased dramatically 603 00:39:02,840 --> 00:39:06,520 Speaker 1: when narrowed to just speaking to women. The Worldwide Web 604 00:39:06,600 --> 00:39:10,040 Speaker 1: Foundation's twenty twenty study said that over half of women 605 00:39:10,120 --> 00:39:13,759 Speaker 1: and girl respondents had been harassed online before, and that 606 00:39:13,880 --> 00:39:17,480 Speaker 1: eighty seven percent felt the problem was getting worse. This 607 00:39:17,640 --> 00:39:22,040 Speaker 1: was before Elon bought Twitter, and this also scales up 608 00:39:22,160 --> 00:39:25,719 Speaker 1: with a number of suicides among marginalized young people as 609 00:39:25,719 --> 00:39:30,280 Speaker 1: a result of cyberbullying in that same timeframe. So why 610 00:39:30,400 --> 00:39:33,360 Speaker 1: is it getting worse? To say that the world is 611 00:39:33,520 --> 00:39:38,319 Speaker 1: full of idiot bigots is true, but too simple to 612 00:39:38,400 --> 00:39:41,520 Speaker 1: be a full answer. It doesn't explain why, as time 613 00:39:41,560 --> 00:39:45,640 Speaker 1: goes on we see people online being attacked over less 614 00:39:45,920 --> 00:39:49,280 Speaker 1: and less. To say that that's because of Trump's reelection 615 00:39:49,400 --> 00:39:51,560 Speaker 1: would also be to miss the forest for the trees, 616 00:39:52,120 --> 00:39:55,959 Speaker 1: because yes, his being in power does endorse and even 617 00:39:56,160 --> 00:40:00,360 Speaker 1: encourage more subjugation that is empowered by the government. But 618 00:40:00,440 --> 00:40:03,520 Speaker 1: all of these numbers I just cited of increasing anxiety 619 00:40:03,640 --> 00:40:08,919 Speaker 1: around online harassment were conducted during the Biden administration, as 620 00:40:09,040 --> 00:40:13,320 Speaker 1: is the example of coffee in the garden with my husband. Okay, 621 00:40:13,560 --> 00:40:17,839 Speaker 1: so maybe it's not entirely that. Like so many things 622 00:40:17,920 --> 00:40:21,040 Speaker 1: about the contemporary Internet, I think a lot of this 623 00:40:21,120 --> 00:40:26,320 Speaker 1: can be traced to algorithm driven timelines instead of the linear, 624 00:40:26,800 --> 00:40:31,200 Speaker 1: personally curated ones that first made apps like Twitter, Facebook, 625 00:40:31,360 --> 00:40:35,800 Speaker 1: and on and on so successful today, where the famously 626 00:40:35,880 --> 00:40:40,200 Speaker 1: algorithm driven TikTok remains king among young users. This is 627 00:40:40,280 --> 00:40:45,320 Speaker 1: true almost nowhere, meaning that as in both doctor Ali 628 00:40:45,440 --> 00:40:49,319 Speaker 1: and Daisy's cases, their harassment was the result of an 629 00:40:49,320 --> 00:40:53,600 Speaker 1: algorithm recognizing that pushing their post out to users who 630 00:40:53,640 --> 00:40:59,120 Speaker 1: either genuinely hated women academia or both, or were willing 631 00:40:59,160 --> 00:41:03,440 Speaker 1: to perform hating women and academia for cloud and personal 632 00:41:03,480 --> 00:41:07,680 Speaker 1: profit and pushing their content there. It's a kind of 633 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:10,680 Speaker 1: harassment that wouldn't have been possible ten years ago, and 634 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:13,560 Speaker 1: one that makes the Internet a far less safe place 635 00:41:13,640 --> 00:41:18,560 Speaker 1: for everyone while making it more profitable for very few. 636 00:41:18,600 --> 00:41:23,400 Speaker 1: Are we sensing a familiar pattern here? No, Okay, my 637 00:41:23,640 --> 00:41:27,839 Speaker 1: soapbox just collapsed beneath my feet, but be serious. What's 638 00:41:27,880 --> 00:41:31,160 Speaker 1: happened here is that places like Twitter slash x have 639 00:41:31,280 --> 00:41:34,839 Speaker 1: put a new, easy to use style of harassment in 640 00:41:34,880 --> 00:41:40,040 Speaker 1: front of its worst users and literally monetized it. Doctor 641 00:41:40,080 --> 00:41:43,279 Speaker 1: Ali Luke's getting messages like the one we read is 642 00:41:43,320 --> 00:41:47,240 Speaker 1: completely horrifying and I hate how normal they've come to feel. 643 00:41:48,080 --> 00:41:50,720 Speaker 1: And sure, reporting it is one of the very few 644 00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:54,440 Speaker 1: options victims of this type of harassment have at their disposal, 645 00:41:54,880 --> 00:41:58,920 Speaker 1: But like anything regarding threats of violence against women, police 646 00:41:59,280 --> 00:42:04,880 Speaker 1: are his store and expectedly dog shit at dealing with them. 647 00:42:05,520 --> 00:42:09,319 Speaker 1: Doctor Alli did discuss how this harassment affected her in 648 00:42:09,440 --> 00:42:12,680 Speaker 1: a couple interviews. Again, in a moment that we come 649 00:42:12,719 --> 00:42:15,920 Speaker 1: to see for all main characters, she had to decide 650 00:42:15,960 --> 00:42:18,200 Speaker 1: whether she was going to let this story go away 651 00:42:18,239 --> 00:42:21,560 Speaker 1: on its own by not engaging with it, or potentially 652 00:42:21,719 --> 00:42:25,400 Speaker 1: extend the moment by participating, and she decides to go 653 00:42:25,480 --> 00:42:28,640 Speaker 1: for it, but in a very specific way that still 654 00:42:28,680 --> 00:42:34,120 Speaker 1: prioritizes her privacy. I think it's pretty cool. This is 655 00:42:34,120 --> 00:42:37,200 Speaker 1: why it's nice to add in sounds on the podcast. 656 00:42:37,480 --> 00:42:40,440 Speaker 1: I can tell you what's funny, and if you disagree, 657 00:42:40,920 --> 00:42:43,800 Speaker 1: you hate women, she recently told Rolling Stone. 658 00:42:44,080 --> 00:42:45,520 Speaker 3: I didn't know that this was going to get out 659 00:42:45,520 --> 00:42:47,719 Speaker 3: of hand until probably forty eight hours in, when I 660 00:42:47,719 --> 00:42:50,719 Speaker 3: started to see a couple of quite vicious comments. I thought, 661 00:42:50,760 --> 00:42:53,200 Speaker 3: oh no, it's moving over to the wrong side of 662 00:42:53,239 --> 00:42:55,600 Speaker 3: the platform, and so it did. 663 00:42:55,719 --> 00:43:01,240 Speaker 1: So in the front facing media sense sense, doctor Allie 664 00:43:01,239 --> 00:43:04,520 Speaker 1: sticks to her guns, never apologizing to any of the 665 00:43:04,600 --> 00:43:08,160 Speaker 1: assholes who came after her, while still not sharing much 666 00:43:08,200 --> 00:43:12,400 Speaker 1: about herself, as is her right. And this approach, she 667 00:43:12,480 --> 00:43:15,759 Speaker 1: seems to quickly figure out, is a chance to make 668 00:43:16,080 --> 00:43:20,279 Speaker 1: a very niche subject that she studies accessible to a 669 00:43:20,480 --> 00:43:25,319 Speaker 1: suddenly captive and supportive audience. Because after the rounds of 670 00:43:25,360 --> 00:43:28,200 Speaker 1: Twitter discourse died down and the blue checks moved on 671 00:43:28,320 --> 00:43:32,320 Speaker 1: to harass the next person, Doctor Allie began posting regularly 672 00:43:32,440 --> 00:43:36,239 Speaker 1: about smell in an attempt to answer good faith questions 673 00:43:36,600 --> 00:43:39,960 Speaker 1: and share more about what she was actually studying, and 674 00:43:40,120 --> 00:43:43,799 Speaker 1: her audience, presumably as under educated about smell as I 675 00:43:44,000 --> 00:43:49,000 Speaker 1: was and still am, stayed and were really interested in 676 00:43:49,040 --> 00:43:51,840 Speaker 1: what she had to say. Here are a few posts 677 00:43:51,880 --> 00:43:53,400 Speaker 1: she made in the months that followed. 678 00:43:54,200 --> 00:43:55,640 Speaker 3: I just know I'm going to be the talk of 679 00:43:55,640 --> 00:43:58,840 Speaker 3: the English faculty this week. Hi all, I couldn't be 680 00:43:58,840 --> 00:44:01,160 Speaker 3: more delighted that so many people pople have showed enthusiasm 681 00:44:01,200 --> 00:44:03,160 Speaker 3: towards my work, and I'd love to share more with 682 00:44:03,239 --> 00:44:05,160 Speaker 3: you as soon as I'm able, But right now my 683 00:44:05,239 --> 00:44:08,319 Speaker 3: first priority is my students. But still term time here, 684 00:44:08,360 --> 00:44:11,480 Speaker 3: and they deserve my time and attention in the context 685 00:44:11,560 --> 00:44:14,080 Speaker 3: of my thesis. Yes, in order to understand how authors 686 00:44:14,120 --> 00:44:16,799 Speaker 3: useful factory messaging, we must recognize that smells linked to 687 00:44:16,800 --> 00:44:21,080 Speaker 3: different identity characteristics, for example, class race, in different ways, 688 00:44:21,120 --> 00:44:24,040 Speaker 3: and that sometimes these characteristics overlap. Treating complexity. 689 00:44:24,360 --> 00:44:28,080 Speaker 1: She began to do and is still doing, maybe the 690 00:44:28,080 --> 00:44:31,160 Speaker 1: most subversive thing you could do on Twitter right now, 691 00:44:31,920 --> 00:44:36,600 Speaker 1: something fucking useful, and it's worked. As of this writing, 692 00:44:36,800 --> 00:44:40,680 Speaker 1: her online audience has grown to over two hundred thousand 693 00:44:40,760 --> 00:44:46,000 Speaker 1: followers on Twitter, where she still bravely posts, ordinarily in 694 00:44:46,000 --> 00:44:49,640 Speaker 1: response to stories people send her regarding Smell and how 695 00:44:49,640 --> 00:44:54,680 Speaker 1: it's framed in contemporary media. By her account, the harassment 696 00:44:54,760 --> 00:44:58,360 Speaker 1: died down as soon as the blue checks moved on 697 00:44:58,440 --> 00:45:02,760 Speaker 1: to their next victim, very likely when the algorithm stopped 698 00:45:02,800 --> 00:45:05,879 Speaker 1: piping out her content to people who hated it once 699 00:45:05,920 --> 00:45:11,320 Speaker 1: it started to produce diminishing returns. And while absolutely nothing 700 00:45:11,880 --> 00:45:15,440 Speaker 1: justifies the fear of receiving the kinds of threats that 701 00:45:15,480 --> 00:45:20,279 Speaker 1: she did, Doctor Allie has decided to make lemonade. She's 702 00:45:20,320 --> 00:45:23,719 Speaker 1: got literary agents and with any luck, a book on 703 00:45:23,760 --> 00:45:27,399 Speaker 1: the way soon. Fingers crossed, and when we come back, 704 00:45:27,800 --> 00:45:30,880 Speaker 1: doctor Ali Lukes tells us what the whole experience was 705 00:45:31,000 --> 00:45:49,239 Speaker 1: like from her side of the keyboard. Welcome back to 706 00:45:49,280 --> 00:45:51,840 Speaker 1: sixteenth minute. I got pretty burnt out in the middle 707 00:45:51,840 --> 00:45:54,000 Speaker 1: of reading that book about Smell, and so I took 708 00:45:54,000 --> 00:45:58,200 Speaker 1: a break to watch Scream six and this actor named 709 00:45:58,320 --> 00:46:01,359 Speaker 1: Dermott mulroney is in it. And I know that he's 710 00:46:01,400 --> 00:46:04,120 Speaker 1: a person who has been famous for a while, but 711 00:46:04,200 --> 00:46:08,960 Speaker 1: I'm never not completely taken aback when I see the 712 00:46:09,040 --> 00:46:14,640 Speaker 1: name Dermott mulroney. Like, your name is Dermott mulroney, I'm Dermott. 713 00:46:14,800 --> 00:46:18,000 Speaker 1: No it's not. And here is my interview with the 714 00:46:18,000 --> 00:46:19,520 Speaker 1: wonderful doctor Ali Lukex. 715 00:46:20,080 --> 00:46:24,440 Speaker 6: I'm doctor Ali Lukex. I'm currently a supervisor in English 716 00:46:24,480 --> 00:46:27,800 Speaker 6: Literature at the University of Cambridge and I work on smell. 717 00:46:27,920 --> 00:46:30,840 Speaker 1: I've learned so much from you, but at what cost? 718 00:46:30,960 --> 00:46:33,799 Speaker 1: And that's what we're here to discuss today. Were you 719 00:46:33,920 --> 00:46:36,600 Speaker 1: always into olfactory studies? How did you get there? 720 00:46:37,000 --> 00:46:39,880 Speaker 6: I was not always into ol factory studies. I arrived 721 00:46:39,880 --> 00:46:43,120 Speaker 6: at olfactory studies during my undergrad degree. I did my 722 00:46:43,200 --> 00:46:49,400 Speaker 6: undergraduate degree at the University of Exeter, which was fantastic. 723 00:46:49,520 --> 00:46:52,760 Speaker 6: It gave me all of the things that I needed 724 00:46:52,760 --> 00:46:53,400 Speaker 6: to get going. 725 00:46:53,760 --> 00:46:55,600 Speaker 1: What were you studying at English Literature? 726 00:46:55,680 --> 00:47:00,640 Speaker 6: So I did English literature undergrad English Issue in Modern 727 00:47:00,680 --> 00:47:05,439 Speaker 6: Culture at UCL for my master's degree, and everyone called 728 00:47:05,520 --> 00:47:09,279 Speaker 6: us the Issues students, which I felt was not very complementary. 729 00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:14,600 Speaker 6: My work even at Exeter was relatively into disciplinary in 730 00:47:14,640 --> 00:47:17,520 Speaker 6: that I was kind of given free reign to draw 731 00:47:17,600 --> 00:47:20,360 Speaker 6: on philosophy and sociology. 732 00:47:19,719 --> 00:47:20,320 Speaker 1: In my work. 733 00:47:20,400 --> 00:47:23,279 Speaker 6: But my master's degree was really my kind of first 734 00:47:23,280 --> 00:47:26,440 Speaker 6: forra and cultural studies. By the time I was in 735 00:47:26,440 --> 00:47:31,000 Speaker 6: my second year of undergrad, I already had become infatuated 736 00:47:31,080 --> 00:47:33,480 Speaker 6: with smell studies, although I didn't even really know that 737 00:47:33,520 --> 00:47:35,279 Speaker 6: it was called smell studies back then. 738 00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:36,680 Speaker 1: I just knew that. 739 00:47:37,120 --> 00:47:40,799 Speaker 6: I had noticed this really interesting thing about literature, which 740 00:47:40,880 --> 00:47:45,400 Speaker 6: was that in so many canonical texts, the texts that 741 00:47:45,640 --> 00:47:48,719 Speaker 6: were just set on our reading lists, smell was a 742 00:47:48,800 --> 00:47:54,759 Speaker 6: really fundamental part of how the authors were characterizing the 743 00:47:54,800 --> 00:47:58,720 Speaker 6: figures in their books, both in positive and negative ways, 744 00:47:59,000 --> 00:48:01,920 Speaker 6: that smell was used as a kind of political agent 745 00:48:02,400 --> 00:48:03,240 Speaker 6: in those books. 746 00:48:03,440 --> 00:48:05,719 Speaker 1: You know better than anyone, I feel like, probably the 747 00:48:06,160 --> 00:48:10,359 Speaker 1: least examined sense, or at least considered sense, it's always 748 00:48:10,400 --> 00:48:11,880 Speaker 1: the one that I say I would give up. 749 00:48:12,239 --> 00:48:15,920 Speaker 6: And you're not alone. I very often, I very often 750 00:48:16,120 --> 00:48:18,919 Speaker 6: do this thing with my students where I asked them 751 00:48:18,920 --> 00:48:22,799 Speaker 6: to rank their senses according to their perceived value, and 752 00:48:22,880 --> 00:48:28,279 Speaker 6: smell is like almost universally ranked at the bottom and 753 00:48:28,320 --> 00:48:30,640 Speaker 6: sight at the top. And then we inevitably end up 754 00:48:30,640 --> 00:48:32,960 Speaker 6: talking about smell because I can't stop talking about it, 755 00:48:33,000 --> 00:48:35,200 Speaker 6: and then everyone else gets interested in it and they 756 00:48:35,200 --> 00:48:37,560 Speaker 6: start reevaluating their biases. 757 00:48:38,640 --> 00:48:41,200 Speaker 1: Taste suddenly found dead in a ditch. I mean, and 758 00:48:41,800 --> 00:48:45,919 Speaker 1: so you, over the course of higher education, you become 759 00:48:46,040 --> 00:48:49,560 Speaker 1: drawn to this very particular area of study. What existed 760 00:48:49,719 --> 00:48:52,640 Speaker 1: around this area of study, I honestly have no idea. 761 00:48:53,000 --> 00:48:55,880 Speaker 6: When I was an undergraduate, smell Studies really had not 762 00:48:56,280 --> 00:49:00,720 Speaker 6: cohered into a stable field of study. I was drawing 763 00:49:00,760 --> 00:49:03,919 Speaker 6: on simply what was out there and what I had 764 00:49:04,000 --> 00:49:06,799 Speaker 6: access to, which was not everything. As it turned out, 765 00:49:06,920 --> 00:49:10,319 Speaker 6: I only realized that I'd been missing out on some 766 00:49:10,719 --> 00:49:15,279 Speaker 6: texts online when I got to Cambridge and suddenly had 767 00:49:15,320 --> 00:49:21,200 Speaker 6: access to basically everything. The first Smell Studies academic article 768 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:27,359 Speaker 6: I found was this article called What's This Smell? By 769 00:49:28,040 --> 00:49:33,200 Speaker 6: Hands Rendersbacker, and I thought that it was perhaps the 770 00:49:33,239 --> 00:49:37,040 Speaker 6: most unique and interesting piece of criticism I'd ever read, 771 00:49:37,760 --> 00:49:40,840 Speaker 6: And I think that was really what got me hooked. 772 00:49:41,400 --> 00:49:44,200 Speaker 6: And it was kind of just freely available on academia 773 00:49:44,200 --> 00:49:48,240 Speaker 6: dot edu, so that was great. I'm really a champion 774 00:49:48,480 --> 00:49:53,359 Speaker 6: for free public access to resources. You know. I do 775 00:49:53,400 --> 00:49:56,040 Speaker 6: feel that it's a shame that my thesis is embargoed, 776 00:49:56,080 --> 00:49:59,840 Speaker 6: but it's also a necessity for now just to like 777 00:50:00,280 --> 00:50:03,919 Speaker 6: protect my intellectual property until I can publish it. I'm 778 00:50:03,960 --> 00:50:07,279 Speaker 6: really invested in making sure that academic work can be 779 00:50:07,360 --> 00:50:10,640 Speaker 6: translated for public audiences and is available to public audiences. 780 00:50:10,680 --> 00:50:12,879 Speaker 6: So I thought that it was really cool that he'd 781 00:50:12,880 --> 00:50:15,759 Speaker 6: put it up on this public website for everyone to 782 00:50:15,800 --> 00:50:16,680 Speaker 6: be able to access. 783 00:50:16,880 --> 00:50:19,359 Speaker 1: What is your relationship with the internet like growing up 784 00:50:19,440 --> 00:50:24,000 Speaker 1: and into college sort of alongside your journey towards smell studies. 785 00:50:24,239 --> 00:50:30,160 Speaker 6: I have always been very bookish. Since I could read. Basically, 786 00:50:30,360 --> 00:50:32,560 Speaker 6: I have been bookish. So I spend a lot more 787 00:50:32,560 --> 00:50:35,560 Speaker 6: time reading than I do on the internet. Even now 788 00:50:35,960 --> 00:50:39,120 Speaker 6: that i'm you know that I've been spending so much 789 00:50:39,160 --> 00:50:42,760 Speaker 6: time on the internet, I still read more than I 790 00:50:42,840 --> 00:50:46,040 Speaker 6: look at my social media. I was born ninety seven, 791 00:50:46,239 --> 00:50:51,200 Speaker 6: so okay, I'm on the cusp of remembering a time 792 00:50:51,320 --> 00:50:55,200 Speaker 6: before we had, you know, an enormous computer in the house. 793 00:50:55,480 --> 00:51:00,359 Speaker 6: I was never really interested. I was just I would 794 00:51:00,440 --> 00:51:03,640 Speaker 6: rather read books, Like I grew up with audio books. 795 00:51:04,000 --> 00:51:06,359 Speaker 6: On the daily. You could find me painting or drawing 796 00:51:06,360 --> 00:51:09,280 Speaker 6: whilst listening to an audiobook. That is how I wanted 797 00:51:09,280 --> 00:51:10,839 Speaker 6: to spend my time, and it's how I still want 798 00:51:10,880 --> 00:51:12,400 Speaker 6: to spend my time. Nothing has changed. 799 00:51:12,520 --> 00:51:14,520 Speaker 1: How long did it take to write this thesis? What 800 00:51:14,600 --> 00:51:18,000 Speaker 1: was the process of researching it because I really want 801 00:51:18,000 --> 00:51:21,680 Speaker 1: to hit on what exactly this thesis is about, especially 802 00:51:21,719 --> 00:51:26,439 Speaker 1: to emphasize how wildly, bizarrely out of context it's taken. 803 00:51:26,520 --> 00:51:29,600 Speaker 6: Later for me, it took three and a half years. 804 00:51:29,800 --> 00:51:33,160 Speaker 6: That's pretty typical, I think for a British PhD, most 805 00:51:33,160 --> 00:51:35,719 Speaker 6: people take about four years. It's possible to get it 806 00:51:35,760 --> 00:51:37,960 Speaker 6: done in three, but not many people do it. So 807 00:51:38,360 --> 00:51:40,200 Speaker 6: I'm kind of smack bang in the middle of those 808 00:51:40,239 --> 00:51:45,880 Speaker 6: two polls. I had already developed this base of knowledge 809 00:51:45,920 --> 00:51:48,840 Speaker 6: and smell studies over kind of over years of studying 810 00:51:48,880 --> 00:51:52,080 Speaker 6: it during my undergrad and my masters, but I was 811 00:51:52,160 --> 00:51:57,040 Speaker 6: studying it in usually historical contexts, so I kind of 812 00:51:57,160 --> 00:52:02,600 Speaker 6: purposefully left a gap the PhD where I would finally 813 00:52:02,680 --> 00:52:06,600 Speaker 6: get to talk about modern and contemporary literature. It turned 814 00:52:06,600 --> 00:52:11,800 Speaker 6: out that like hardly anyone was doing that work. Certainly 815 00:52:11,840 --> 00:52:13,200 Speaker 6: no one was doing it in the way that I 816 00:52:13,280 --> 00:52:16,440 Speaker 6: wanted to do it. So I really had free reign, 817 00:52:16,480 --> 00:52:21,040 Speaker 6: which was great, so exciting. Honestly, welcome to my world. 818 00:52:21,360 --> 00:52:26,000 Speaker 6: It has been the most amazing seven or eight years 819 00:52:26,120 --> 00:52:30,120 Speaker 6: of studying this thing. Almost everything I say is a 820 00:52:30,200 --> 00:52:35,320 Speaker 6: relatively new thing to people. It's so hard to happen 821 00:52:35,400 --> 00:52:38,000 Speaker 6: upon that kind of thing in academia. So the process 822 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:42,520 Speaker 6: of writing the thesis, I knew the structure going into it. 823 00:52:42,680 --> 00:52:45,719 Speaker 6: I knew that I wanted to structure it around identity 824 00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:50,719 Speaker 6: categories because I had noticed in my reading Smell related 825 00:52:50,840 --> 00:52:57,640 Speaker 6: to individual identity categories in quite distinct ways, but that 826 00:52:58,040 --> 00:53:03,799 Speaker 6: all of those identity categories were related, and that there 827 00:53:03,840 --> 00:53:11,120 Speaker 6: was this kind of collapsing and interesting overlaying of different 828 00:53:11,600 --> 00:53:15,640 Speaker 6: social meanings that Smell could take on in relation to 829 00:53:15,760 --> 00:53:21,160 Speaker 6: different identity categories. I wanted to write a thesis that 830 00:53:21,360 --> 00:53:25,879 Speaker 6: really took each identity category seriously, but in which each 831 00:53:25,920 --> 00:53:28,680 Speaker 6: of the chapters spoke to one another, and then I 832 00:53:28,760 --> 00:53:30,640 Speaker 6: just read voraciously. 833 00:53:31,080 --> 00:53:34,680 Speaker 1: So you complete your thesis? When do you complete your thesis? 834 00:53:35,080 --> 00:53:39,719 Speaker 6: I completed my thesis in June twenty twenty four. I 835 00:53:39,719 --> 00:53:44,400 Speaker 6: think some people feel very ambivalently towards their PhD thesis 836 00:53:44,440 --> 00:53:48,799 Speaker 6: and the process of writing a PhD. I am very 837 00:53:48,840 --> 00:53:53,400 Speaker 6: grateful that I never lost my enthusiasm for my subject 838 00:53:54,239 --> 00:53:58,480 Speaker 6: or for the study of literature. I feel just as 839 00:53:58,640 --> 00:54:03,400 Speaker 6: enthused as when I started, if not more actually, because 840 00:54:03,480 --> 00:54:08,040 Speaker 6: the more you learn about smell, the more fascinating it is. 841 00:54:08,440 --> 00:54:13,799 Speaker 1: Honestly, you have this beautiful, like bound version of your 842 00:54:13,840 --> 00:54:18,960 Speaker 1: thesis and you log on to formerly Twitter dot com. 843 00:54:19,120 --> 00:54:20,960 Speaker 1: How after when were you posting on this platform? What 844 00:54:21,040 --> 00:54:25,880 Speaker 1: was your like standing relationship with this platform on the day. 845 00:54:26,080 --> 00:54:28,960 Speaker 6: For a couple of years, I think a couple of 846 00:54:29,080 --> 00:54:33,040 Speaker 6: years preceding the incident, I think I posted once every 847 00:54:33,120 --> 00:54:37,600 Speaker 6: six months. I spent so little time on it that 848 00:54:37,880 --> 00:54:42,399 Speaker 6: I had completely forgotten about the Musk takeover. I had 849 00:54:42,440 --> 00:54:45,359 Speaker 6: no idea what it had become. It's never really been 850 00:54:45,440 --> 00:54:48,319 Speaker 6: part of my personality. I don't think to be on 851 00:54:48,400 --> 00:54:51,760 Speaker 6: social media very much, and I think Twitter is the same. 852 00:54:52,280 --> 00:54:55,319 Speaker 6: It's the same story on Twitter. And the reason that 853 00:54:55,360 --> 00:54:58,400 Speaker 6: I posted the photograph in the first place was because 854 00:54:58,440 --> 00:55:01,799 Speaker 6: I kind of thought again, because I didn't realize that 855 00:55:02,560 --> 00:55:06,520 Speaker 6: the platform had changed and people had left, mostly that 856 00:55:07,080 --> 00:55:10,799 Speaker 6: my smell studies people and my literary studies people were 857 00:55:10,840 --> 00:55:13,759 Speaker 6: still there and they might want to know that I'm 858 00:55:13,800 --> 00:55:17,640 Speaker 6: done because they might have like potential post top projects 859 00:55:17,680 --> 00:55:21,400 Speaker 6: that I could join. I did it for a reason. 860 00:55:21,680 --> 00:55:25,280 Speaker 6: I didn't expect it to be met by an audience 861 00:55:25,320 --> 00:55:28,319 Speaker 6: outside of the three hundred or so people that I 862 00:55:28,400 --> 00:55:29,680 Speaker 6: followed on Twitter. 863 00:55:29,640 --> 00:55:33,000 Speaker 1: Which is normal, but you're not in a normal place. 864 00:55:33,360 --> 00:55:37,920 Speaker 1: So walk me through this day, this series of days, 865 00:55:38,520 --> 00:55:42,200 Speaker 1: what pace did things start taking off? And how are 866 00:55:42,239 --> 00:55:43,560 Speaker 1: you feeling as that's happening. 867 00:55:44,200 --> 00:55:49,080 Speaker 6: So the post gained traction immediately, but initially it was 868 00:55:49,239 --> 00:55:52,839 Speaker 6: among lots of kind people who were just offering their 869 00:55:52,840 --> 00:55:57,279 Speaker 6: congratulations on my accomplishment. So that fact, even though I 870 00:55:57,320 --> 00:56:05,480 Speaker 6: was uncomfortable about the attention, felt fine, right. But then 871 00:56:05,760 --> 00:56:10,280 Speaker 6: after about forty eight hours, I would say, I started 872 00:56:10,320 --> 00:56:16,520 Speaker 6: to notice some odd replies coming in, and then it 873 00:56:16,560 --> 00:56:20,600 Speaker 6: was reposted by a couple of right wing accounts with 874 00:56:21,000 --> 00:56:25,920 Speaker 6: big followings, and at that point the comments started to 875 00:56:25,960 --> 00:56:30,719 Speaker 6: become extremely hostile, and those comments started gaining traction. So 876 00:56:30,760 --> 00:56:34,720 Speaker 6: it wasn't just that it was the odd strange comment 877 00:56:34,760 --> 00:56:39,520 Speaker 6: that you could kind of report and ignore these comments 878 00:56:39,920 --> 00:56:44,600 Speaker 6: whilst it was bouncing around that hostile part of the platform. 879 00:56:44,840 --> 00:56:49,040 Speaker 6: Those comments started shooting up to the top of the 880 00:56:49,160 --> 00:56:51,920 Speaker 6: kind of comments. They were gaining the most likes and 881 00:56:51,960 --> 00:56:56,520 Speaker 6: completely They weren't by any means outweighing all of the 882 00:56:56,560 --> 00:57:01,840 Speaker 6: positive congratulatory comments, but they were the first that anyone 883 00:57:01,840 --> 00:57:04,359 Speaker 6: would see when they looked at the post because they 884 00:57:04,360 --> 00:57:05,120 Speaker 6: had the most. 885 00:57:05,040 --> 00:57:10,520 Speaker 1: Likes, prior to if you could remember the massive amplification 886 00:57:10,640 --> 00:57:13,560 Speaker 1: through the right wing accounts, what were the weirder responses 887 00:57:13,600 --> 00:57:17,640 Speaker 1: you were getting and what were proportionally positive to negative 888 00:57:17,880 --> 00:57:20,440 Speaker 1: before these big accounts latched onto it. 889 00:57:20,800 --> 00:57:23,160 Speaker 6: I do think that it was such a whirlwind that, 890 00:57:24,000 --> 00:57:25,880 Speaker 6: even though in general I have quite a good memory 891 00:57:25,880 --> 00:57:33,120 Speaker 6: from my own experiences, I would struggle the most outlandish 892 00:57:33,520 --> 00:57:35,960 Speaker 6: comments coming in, you know, the kind of the really 893 00:57:36,000 --> 00:57:42,280 Speaker 6: long ones where someone's basically written an essay. And there 894 00:57:42,360 --> 00:57:46,680 Speaker 6: was one where someone was like, your ancestors were fighting 895 00:57:46,960 --> 00:57:55,200 Speaker 6: mountain lions and you are disgracing them. I was like, 896 00:57:55,480 --> 00:57:57,160 Speaker 6: where do you Who. 897 00:57:57,000 --> 00:57:58,640 Speaker 1: Do you think I am? And where do you think 898 00:57:58,680 --> 00:57:59,120 Speaker 1: I live? 899 00:58:00,480 --> 00:58:02,080 Speaker 6: As British as it. 900 00:58:02,040 --> 00:58:06,720 Speaker 1: Gets, Yeah, that is I found a pretty common anti 901 00:58:06,760 --> 00:58:10,800 Speaker 1: intellectual reply to almost anything. It's like your ancestors did 902 00:58:10,840 --> 00:58:13,120 Speaker 1: something that matters and I hate you, and it's like, well, 903 00:58:13,120 --> 00:58:17,760 Speaker 1: what are you doing? How did you manage that? And 904 00:58:17,880 --> 00:58:21,160 Speaker 1: how did it translate to your normal life? 905 00:58:22,760 --> 00:58:27,480 Speaker 6: Yeah, it was pretty all consuming for the first week, 906 00:58:28,240 --> 00:58:32,640 Speaker 6: if not longer. The replies were coming in way faster 907 00:58:32,760 --> 00:58:35,320 Speaker 6: than I could read them, which was stressful because I 908 00:58:35,440 --> 00:58:38,480 Speaker 6: like to have the full picture, so I was not 909 00:58:38,640 --> 00:58:41,160 Speaker 6: sleeping in an attempt to keep up with the conversation. 910 00:58:41,960 --> 00:58:45,280 Speaker 6: I probably got about three hours of sleep every night 911 00:58:45,360 --> 00:58:49,080 Speaker 6: for about nine days, constantly refreshing the other thing is. 912 00:58:49,120 --> 00:58:53,840 Speaker 6: And this really reveals how kind of illiterate I am 913 00:58:54,320 --> 00:58:58,400 Speaker 6: on that platform. I didn't realize that you could check 914 00:58:58,800 --> 00:59:03,520 Speaker 6: quote tweets, so I would stumble upon quote tweets of 915 00:59:03,800 --> 00:59:09,520 Speaker 6: that original tweet with like millions and millions of impressions. 916 00:59:09,840 --> 00:59:11,720 Speaker 6: Even as I thought I was doing quite a good 917 00:59:11,800 --> 00:59:14,080 Speaker 6: job of keeping up with the replies, I was still 918 00:59:14,120 --> 00:59:19,439 Speaker 6: missing them thousands and thousands of quote tweets. It wasn't 919 00:59:19,480 --> 00:59:21,760 Speaker 6: that I was losing. It wasn't like it was keeping 920 00:59:21,800 --> 00:59:24,640 Speaker 6: me up at night. I think mentally, I was really 921 00:59:24,760 --> 00:59:28,800 Speaker 6: unscathed by this. I'm quite a difficult person to phase. 922 00:59:29,360 --> 00:59:35,640 Speaker 6: Partly that's because the critiques were so ludicrous in so 923 00:59:35,760 --> 00:59:39,040 Speaker 6: many instances, and there was some valid skepticism. Don't get 924 00:59:39,040 --> 00:59:42,400 Speaker 6: me wrong. I don't expect everyone to read the title 925 00:59:42,440 --> 00:59:44,720 Speaker 6: The Politics of Smell and think, oh, yeah, of course, 926 00:59:44,760 --> 00:59:48,120 Speaker 6: that's a really useful thing that we need in society. 927 00:59:48,320 --> 00:59:52,280 Speaker 6: But I felt confident that provided I was given the 928 00:59:52,320 --> 00:59:55,160 Speaker 6: time and space, I would be able to win over 929 00:59:55,320 --> 00:59:57,680 Speaker 6: at least some of the people who were skeptical about 930 00:59:57,720 --> 01:00:00,560 Speaker 6: the value of the thesis. I didn't worry about critiques 931 01:00:00,560 --> 01:00:03,760 Speaker 6: of my work because you know, ultimately they only had 932 01:00:03,920 --> 01:00:06,520 Speaker 6: the title of my thesis and the abstract, which was 933 01:00:06,800 --> 01:00:11,480 Speaker 6: written and intended for an academic audience, and so I 934 01:00:11,560 --> 01:00:15,080 Speaker 6: understood why some people were saying that it was kind 935 01:00:15,120 --> 01:00:20,200 Speaker 6: of obfuscating or it was inaccessible. I think that's a 936 01:00:20,200 --> 01:00:25,160 Speaker 6: fair critique of an academic abstract, almost any academic abstract, 937 01:00:25,400 --> 01:00:27,800 Speaker 6: and it's not the way that I would convey my 938 01:00:27,880 --> 01:00:31,600 Speaker 6: ideas to a general public. So nobody really had anything 939 01:00:31,880 --> 01:00:36,080 Speaker 6: else to say about the work. The work, you know what. 940 01:00:36,320 --> 01:00:38,720 Speaker 6: They were making assumptions about the work, but those assumptions 941 01:00:38,720 --> 01:00:39,200 Speaker 6: were false. 942 01:00:39,360 --> 01:00:47,720 Speaker 1: So we'll be right back with more from doctor Alli. 943 01:00:57,640 --> 01:01:01,120 Speaker 1: Welcome back to sixteenth Minute. I bring lost an AMBI 944 01:01:01,240 --> 01:01:04,520 Speaker 1: podcast Award in Chicago last night. But the good news 945 01:01:05,040 --> 01:01:07,560 Speaker 1: is that I lost to a great show. I've been 946 01:01:07,560 --> 01:01:11,560 Speaker 1: listening to it all today. It's called Inheriting from LAist 947 01:01:11,760 --> 01:01:14,480 Speaker 1: and I think you'll really like it. It's linked in 948 01:01:14,560 --> 01:01:19,440 Speaker 1: the description and if you still respect my loser ass 949 01:01:19,920 --> 01:01:23,240 Speaker 1: here's the rest of my interview with doctor Ali Lukes. 950 01:01:23,680 --> 01:01:27,960 Speaker 1: You engaged with people, even if they were, you know, 951 01:01:28,680 --> 01:01:33,320 Speaker 1: very clearly willfully misinterpreting what you're saying. You replied to 952 01:01:33,440 --> 01:01:38,160 Speaker 1: a lot of people thoughtfully and patiently. What motivated you 953 01:01:38,240 --> 01:01:38,560 Speaker 1: to do that? 954 01:01:38,880 --> 01:01:43,720 Speaker 6: I think fundamentally, I have no interest in arguing with 955 01:01:43,800 --> 01:01:46,240 Speaker 6: people on the internet. It's not a good use of 956 01:01:46,280 --> 01:01:50,320 Speaker 6: my time. Did, however, always intend to share my work 957 01:01:50,360 --> 01:01:53,440 Speaker 6: with a public audience. I always wanted to write a 958 01:01:53,480 --> 01:01:57,240 Speaker 6: trade book. I always wanted to disseminate my ideas in 959 01:01:57,280 --> 01:02:01,120 Speaker 6: a way that would be accessible to people, and I 960 01:02:01,240 --> 01:02:05,280 Speaker 6: had been given an opportunity to do that in an 961 01:02:05,400 --> 01:02:09,120 Speaker 6: unconventional way. Sure, but it was nevertheless an opportunity to 962 01:02:09,200 --> 01:02:12,880 Speaker 6: reach people and to kind of cut my teeth in 963 01:02:13,040 --> 01:02:16,240 Speaker 6: the world of public discourse. Because I do think there's 964 01:02:16,520 --> 01:02:20,880 Speaker 6: something to be said about the insulation of academia, the 965 01:02:20,920 --> 01:02:23,000 Speaker 6: way that you know, we all talk to each other 966 01:02:23,120 --> 01:02:26,200 Speaker 6: and we're all kind of interested in our in our 967 01:02:26,320 --> 01:02:29,480 Speaker 6: own niche little aspects of whatever it is that we're 968 01:02:29,520 --> 01:02:33,000 Speaker 6: working on. It is easy, I think, in academia to 969 01:02:33,080 --> 01:02:37,600 Speaker 6: feel slightly separated from the real world in a way 970 01:02:37,640 --> 01:02:42,280 Speaker 6: that is I think distinct from the criticism of academia 971 01:02:42,280 --> 01:02:45,240 Speaker 6: that we're all kind of in ivory towers, and that 972 01:02:45,320 --> 01:02:48,600 Speaker 6: we don't have any understanding of the real world in 973 01:02:48,680 --> 01:02:51,640 Speaker 6: terms of privilege. I think it's not sensible to make 974 01:02:51,840 --> 01:02:56,480 Speaker 6: assumptions about people online whether they're in academia or not. 975 01:02:56,840 --> 01:02:58,920 Speaker 6: We still have a long ways to go in terms 976 01:02:58,960 --> 01:03:02,800 Speaker 6: of making academia equitable, in making sure that you know 977 01:03:03,080 --> 01:03:06,480 Speaker 6: everybody has access to those resources. But it's not possible 978 01:03:06,520 --> 01:03:09,440 Speaker 6: to tell based on a picture of someone right what 979 01:03:09,520 --> 01:03:11,960 Speaker 6: their background is. My friends have told me since the 980 01:03:12,040 --> 01:03:17,000 Speaker 6: dawn of time that I'm quite a naive person and 981 01:03:17,480 --> 01:03:21,720 Speaker 6: that I'm probably too earnest for my own good, and 982 01:03:21,760 --> 01:03:24,600 Speaker 6: I think I probably bring that to my social media 983 01:03:24,640 --> 01:03:27,439 Speaker 6: presence because I don't know how else to be. I've 984 01:03:27,480 --> 01:03:31,840 Speaker 6: experienced people coming in with hostility or writing something that 985 01:03:32,080 --> 01:03:36,480 Speaker 6: is clearly quite combative, and provided you don't kind of 986 01:03:37,000 --> 01:03:40,480 Speaker 6: stoop to their level, sometimes people will turn around. I 987 01:03:40,480 --> 01:03:45,080 Speaker 6: think the problem is online we forget that people are 988 01:03:45,200 --> 01:03:49,160 Speaker 6: real people. I think when I engage with people online, 989 01:03:49,240 --> 01:03:53,120 Speaker 6: I assume that everyone that I'm talking to is a 990 01:03:53,160 --> 01:03:56,440 Speaker 6: real person, probably even when they're a bot. The post 991 01:03:56,440 --> 01:03:59,320 Speaker 6: went viral towards the end of term, so I think 992 01:03:59,360 --> 01:04:03,640 Speaker 6: I had a out a week of teaching left before 993 01:04:03,680 --> 01:04:09,240 Speaker 6: the end of term. Most of my students mentioned it. 994 01:04:09,320 --> 01:04:15,160 Speaker 6: But honestly, that generation, they're implacable. They are so difficult 995 01:04:15,160 --> 01:04:17,800 Speaker 6: to phase. They were just like, oh, I saw that 996 01:04:17,840 --> 01:04:21,480 Speaker 6: you were on BBC News. What's that about? Yeah, And 997 01:04:21,520 --> 01:04:23,760 Speaker 6: a couple of them, a couple of them were, you know, 998 01:04:24,160 --> 01:04:27,680 Speaker 6: really worried. And one of them brought me a plant, 999 01:04:28,160 --> 01:04:31,680 Speaker 6: which is over there on my desk. Oh, that's so sweet, 1000 01:04:31,960 --> 01:04:34,520 Speaker 6: and it was yeah. I mean, I love my students. 1001 01:04:34,520 --> 01:04:38,280 Speaker 6: I think they're wonderful, but they they truly do not care. 1002 01:04:38,440 --> 01:04:41,440 Speaker 6: They don't care at all about my personal life or 1003 01:04:41,480 --> 01:04:44,880 Speaker 6: what I'm doing outside of teaching them. And that's great. 1004 01:04:44,920 --> 01:04:45,320 Speaker 6: I love that. 1005 01:04:45,480 --> 01:04:47,280 Speaker 1: Were you happy with the way that your story was 1006 01:04:47,320 --> 01:04:51,680 Speaker 1: being framed in the media? How were you wanting to engage? 1007 01:04:52,440 --> 01:04:58,480 Speaker 6: This was probably the most chaotic period of my entire life, 1008 01:04:58,800 --> 01:05:02,760 Speaker 6: the sort of three or four days once the media 1009 01:05:02,880 --> 01:05:07,240 Speaker 6: had caught wind of it and everybody wanted to have 1010 01:05:07,320 --> 01:05:11,640 Speaker 6: an interview, everybody wanted to comment, and trying to sift 1011 01:05:11,880 --> 01:05:16,360 Speaker 6: through like hundreds of emails every day. I was happy 1012 01:05:16,360 --> 01:05:21,240 Speaker 6: with the way that the media decided to report on this. 1013 01:05:21,760 --> 01:05:25,680 Speaker 6: The first British publication to report on it was the 1014 01:05:25,800 --> 01:05:30,000 Speaker 6: Daily Mail. And the Daily Mail they're known for being 1015 01:05:30,160 --> 01:05:37,360 Speaker 6: quite right wing. Their assessment of the situation was remarkably charitable. 1016 01:05:38,480 --> 01:05:41,880 Speaker 6: That they've done a couple of articles now and they've 1017 01:05:42,000 --> 01:05:45,640 Speaker 6: they've been really kind of glowing, and I'm still unsure 1018 01:05:45,640 --> 01:05:47,680 Speaker 6: as to how I've pulled that off. 1019 01:05:47,960 --> 01:05:51,000 Speaker 1: Did you feel pressure to be more online after this happened? 1020 01:05:51,680 --> 01:05:56,440 Speaker 6: I did feel pressure, but I also resisted the pressure. 1021 01:05:57,160 --> 01:06:02,560 Speaker 6: So I decided that I would only do it as 1022 01:06:02,600 --> 01:06:06,480 Speaker 6: long as I was having fun and as long as 1023 01:06:07,360 --> 01:06:11,840 Speaker 6: people were feeding back that they were learning something. I 1024 01:06:11,880 --> 01:06:14,240 Speaker 6: didn't want it. I didn't want it to just become 1025 01:06:14,320 --> 01:06:16,640 Speaker 6: like a running joke. I wanted it actually to be 1026 01:06:16,800 --> 01:06:22,400 Speaker 6: at least to some degree educational, because I think that's important. 1027 01:06:22,520 --> 01:06:25,240 Speaker 6: I also, you know, didn't want to let it kind 1028 01:06:25,240 --> 01:06:30,160 Speaker 6: of overshadow the things that I really want to invest 1029 01:06:30,280 --> 01:06:34,960 Speaker 6: my time in, which is teaching my students and writing. 1030 01:06:35,560 --> 01:06:38,080 Speaker 6: I think I've found a nice balance. I don't spend 1031 01:06:38,200 --> 01:06:40,479 Speaker 6: very much time on there at all. 1032 01:06:40,840 --> 01:06:44,120 Speaker 1: What would you like to do with this new audience, 1033 01:06:44,160 --> 01:06:46,080 Speaker 1: I mean, what would you like to sort of do 1034 01:06:46,520 --> 01:06:49,360 Speaker 1: moving forward? I am like I would love to read 1035 01:06:49,880 --> 01:06:55,200 Speaker 1: a book about smell theory from you. Oh well, I'm. 1036 01:06:55,080 --> 01:06:57,400 Speaker 6: Very pleased to hear that this is what it's all 1037 01:06:57,440 --> 01:07:01,440 Speaker 6: been leading up to for me, because although I really 1038 01:07:01,520 --> 01:07:06,320 Speaker 6: enjoy explaining smell stuff to people on Twitter in a 1039 01:07:06,360 --> 01:07:09,160 Speaker 6: limited amount of characters, it's quite good for me actually 1040 01:07:09,240 --> 01:07:15,400 Speaker 6: to practice being really concise. I am a writer, and 1041 01:07:15,440 --> 01:07:18,880 Speaker 6: I do think that my ideas are probably best conveyed 1042 01:07:18,960 --> 01:07:22,360 Speaker 6: in the form of like long form prose. So I 1043 01:07:22,400 --> 01:07:26,080 Speaker 6: think if people are interested in the ideas, then they're 1044 01:07:26,120 --> 01:07:27,920 Speaker 6: going to love the trade book. 1045 01:07:28,200 --> 01:07:34,439 Speaker 1: But now that there's sort of massive unexpected thing has happened. Yeah, 1046 01:07:34,440 --> 01:07:40,160 Speaker 1: what is your takeaway? Ben From having survived the main 1047 01:07:40,240 --> 01:07:44,360 Speaker 1: character experience and been able to return to your normal life, I. 1048 01:07:45,320 --> 01:07:47,240 Speaker 6: Have not returned to my normal life. 1049 01:07:47,480 --> 01:07:48,680 Speaker 1: Okay, say more about that. 1050 01:07:50,640 --> 01:07:54,880 Speaker 6: I that my normal life has been and gone, but 1051 01:07:55,000 --> 01:07:57,240 Speaker 6: not in a bad way. Not in a bad way, 1052 01:07:57,280 --> 01:08:00,480 Speaker 6: I mean, in many ways, this experience hasn't changed me. 1053 01:08:00,880 --> 01:08:05,640 Speaker 6: It hasn't changed my personality, It hasn't changed my perspective. 1054 01:08:05,880 --> 01:08:10,240 Speaker 6: It hasn't changed my perspective on the work or on 1055 01:08:10,440 --> 01:08:12,840 Speaker 6: what I want to do with it. It has slightly 1056 01:08:12,880 --> 01:08:19,400 Speaker 6: changed my perspective on some people who are wild. I 1057 01:08:19,439 --> 01:08:21,920 Speaker 6: didn't know that it was. I think I truly, I mean, 1058 01:08:22,040 --> 01:08:25,160 Speaker 6: I guess intellectually, I knew that it was possible for 1059 01:08:25,200 --> 01:08:31,360 Speaker 6: people to be so hostile and so combative towards something 1060 01:08:31,439 --> 01:08:36,679 Speaker 6: they don't understand. But it's a different thing knowing something 1061 01:08:36,960 --> 01:08:40,799 Speaker 6: is possible and experiencing it yourself. I do think, though, 1062 01:08:41,680 --> 01:08:44,559 Speaker 6: that perhaps some of that has to do with the 1063 01:08:44,560 --> 01:08:48,120 Speaker 6: fact that almost all of us have a sense of smell, 1064 01:08:48,960 --> 01:08:51,280 Speaker 6: and almost all of us have a whole lifetime of 1065 01:08:51,360 --> 01:08:54,320 Speaker 6: experiences to draw on when we're talking about smell, and 1066 01:08:54,360 --> 01:08:56,400 Speaker 6: so we all kind of feel like we're experts in 1067 01:08:56,439 --> 01:08:59,759 Speaker 6: our own experience of smell. I can see why people 1068 01:09:00,280 --> 01:09:04,040 Speaker 6: feel maybe concerned about the idea that their sense of 1069 01:09:04,080 --> 01:09:06,640 Speaker 6: smell could be doing something that they're not aware of. 1070 01:09:06,720 --> 01:09:10,640 Speaker 6: I think I think that's maybe a little it's suspicious, 1071 01:09:10,840 --> 01:09:15,400 Speaker 6: and I can see why people would be worried about it. 1072 01:09:16,240 --> 01:09:18,519 Speaker 6: I don't I don't really see why people would react 1073 01:09:19,200 --> 01:09:21,600 Speaker 6: with quite the amount of vitriol that they did. But 1074 01:09:21,760 --> 01:09:25,439 Speaker 6: then again, I'm I'm not them, and I'm kind of 1075 01:09:25,439 --> 01:09:28,840 Speaker 6: happy with I'm certainly happy with that. I'm happy to 1076 01:09:28,920 --> 01:09:32,519 Speaker 6: accept that a whole variety of people exist in the world, 1077 01:09:34,560 --> 01:09:36,559 Speaker 6: and that has nothing to do with me or my work. 1078 01:09:36,920 --> 01:09:39,240 Speaker 1: What is next for this field of study? What would 1079 01:09:39,280 --> 01:09:40,879 Speaker 1: you like to see happen moving forward? 1080 01:09:41,280 --> 01:09:43,160 Speaker 6: Oh, this is I mean, this is a personal bias 1081 01:09:43,200 --> 01:09:45,960 Speaker 6: because this is what I want to do next. Please, yeah, 1082 01:09:46,120 --> 01:09:47,720 Speaker 6: because I want to do it. That is That is 1083 01:09:47,760 --> 01:09:51,200 Speaker 6: how I feel. I mean, I mean, I'm already in 1084 01:09:51,200 --> 01:09:54,240 Speaker 6: the process of this. I'm developing a post doctoral project 1085 01:09:54,320 --> 01:09:58,200 Speaker 6: that would study the effects of smell disorders. I think 1086 01:09:58,680 --> 01:10:03,040 Speaker 6: this is like you know post well, we say post COVID, 1087 01:10:03,080 --> 01:10:06,080 Speaker 6: but that is a really contentious thing, especially in the 1088 01:10:06,200 --> 01:10:10,680 Speaker 6: US in comparison to the UK. But it's estimated that 1089 01:10:10,760 --> 01:10:15,320 Speaker 6: something like twenty seven million people still have long lasting 1090 01:10:15,479 --> 01:10:19,280 Speaker 6: damage to their sense of smell and their sense of 1091 01:10:19,280 --> 01:10:21,439 Speaker 6: taste because the sense of smell is up to ninety 1092 01:10:21,479 --> 01:10:26,120 Speaker 6: five percent. Well, it's flavor taste is separable. I'm going 1093 01:10:26,200 --> 01:10:31,880 Speaker 6: to get into a whole thing. It doesn't even matter. 1094 01:10:31,960 --> 01:10:34,240 Speaker 1: Really, don't get her start it, don't give her startled. 1095 01:10:37,280 --> 01:10:41,640 Speaker 6: But there are globally so many people have been affected 1096 01:10:41,800 --> 01:10:47,280 Speaker 6: by smell disorders, and they are dramatically understudied. But the 1097 01:10:47,320 --> 01:10:54,840 Speaker 6: studies that we do have show that depression, anxiety, suicidality, 1098 01:10:56,360 --> 01:10:59,400 Speaker 6: weight loss, all of these things come in the wake 1099 01:10:59,439 --> 01:11:03,519 Speaker 6: of losing sense of smell. So I think a project 1100 01:11:03,560 --> 01:11:07,599 Speaker 6: that studies the effects of smell disorders would really help 1101 01:11:08,560 --> 01:11:13,519 Speaker 6: to completely re evaluate the way that we think about 1102 01:11:13,600 --> 01:11:16,680 Speaker 6: smell and the way it contributes to our lives and 1103 01:11:16,760 --> 01:11:21,920 Speaker 6: our well being. Actually, so that's something that I hope 1104 01:11:21,960 --> 01:11:26,000 Speaker 6: is cooking. The other reason that studying smell disorders is 1105 01:11:26,040 --> 01:11:32,080 Speaker 6: really important is because evidence, recent evidence starting in about 1106 01:11:32,200 --> 01:11:36,639 Speaker 6: twenty twenty three, suggests that we're all losing our sense 1107 01:11:36,680 --> 01:11:40,920 Speaker 6: of smell, that the effects of pollution are causing us 1108 01:11:41,080 --> 01:11:44,280 Speaker 6: all to have a diminished sense of smell, and that 1109 01:11:44,800 --> 01:11:52,640 Speaker 6: is disproportionately affecting people from low income backgrounds and racialized communities, 1110 01:11:52,840 --> 01:11:56,160 Speaker 6: because those are the kinds of people who typically are 1111 01:11:56,240 --> 01:12:01,479 Speaker 6: situated around heavily polluting industrial where houses because they're cheap. 1112 01:12:02,520 --> 01:12:06,280 Speaker 6: Those houses are cheap, and that is a serious problem. 1113 01:12:06,439 --> 01:12:09,599 Speaker 6: It's a serious problem that really is own we're only 1114 01:12:09,880 --> 01:12:12,880 Speaker 6: just starting to talk about in the smell studies community, 1115 01:12:13,040 --> 01:12:17,000 Speaker 6: let alone in the kind of broader public discourse. 1116 01:12:17,360 --> 01:12:19,840 Speaker 1: And I'm sure people have asked you this before. What 1117 01:12:20,160 --> 01:12:24,000 Speaker 1: is your favorite smell? What is the best smell to you? 1118 01:12:26,760 --> 01:12:29,640 Speaker 6: My go to answer now because people have asked me 1119 01:12:29,680 --> 01:12:30,320 Speaker 6: this and I've been. 1120 01:12:30,240 --> 01:12:31,559 Speaker 1: I don't have to imagine. 1121 01:12:31,600 --> 01:12:38,720 Speaker 6: Yeah, is fresh garden sage like garden sage when you 1122 01:12:38,760 --> 01:12:42,840 Speaker 6: like tear up a leaf that smell is my favorite. 1123 01:12:43,200 --> 01:12:46,280 Speaker 1: Wow, you're literally out there touching grass, doing the thing 1124 01:12:46,439 --> 01:12:49,759 Speaker 1: that everyone's telling each other to do in the internet. 1125 01:12:50,160 --> 01:12:53,800 Speaker 6: I am obsessed with smell. There's this It's on. It's 1126 01:12:53,880 --> 01:12:59,080 Speaker 6: indubitable that I am obsessed with smell. I can't imagine 1127 01:12:59,320 --> 01:13:04,559 Speaker 6: that obsession waning, actually, partly because there's so much work 1128 01:13:04,560 --> 01:13:09,360 Speaker 6: to be done. Yeah, and it has been like notoriously 1129 01:13:09,400 --> 01:13:13,599 Speaker 6: difficult to get funding to do work on smell because 1130 01:13:13,600 --> 01:13:17,680 Speaker 6: it's not valued. And now that the tables are turning 1131 01:13:17,920 --> 01:13:22,360 Speaker 6: slightly and we're seeing more interest in sensory studies broadly 1132 01:13:22,840 --> 01:13:26,200 Speaker 6: in the academy, I do think that we're just going 1133 01:13:26,280 --> 01:13:29,760 Speaker 6: to keep seeing more and more interesting work about smell. So, 1134 01:13:30,280 --> 01:13:33,320 Speaker 6: you know, I would love to keep talking about smell, 1135 01:13:33,400 --> 01:13:37,320 Speaker 6: commentating on smell, bringing that work to public audiences. But 1136 01:13:38,040 --> 01:13:41,960 Speaker 6: I also think that there's work to be done in 1137 01:13:43,080 --> 01:13:48,160 Speaker 6: just advocating for and championing the value of the humanities 1138 01:13:49,560 --> 01:13:52,800 Speaker 6: and trying to get away from this idea that the 1139 01:13:52,920 --> 01:13:58,559 Speaker 6: humanities and the sciences are in competition, because I think 1140 01:13:58,880 --> 01:14:06,120 Speaker 6: my work certainly suggests that literally studies specifically, it's kind 1141 01:14:06,160 --> 01:14:11,120 Speaker 6: of open to reinvention in the process of new interdisciplinary 1142 01:14:11,200 --> 01:14:13,720 Speaker 6: encounters that I would I would love to be a 1143 01:14:13,760 --> 01:14:18,280 Speaker 6: small part of the story of trying to make the 1144 01:14:18,400 --> 01:14:23,680 Speaker 6: humanities cool again. I'm so grateful for my audience of 1145 01:14:23,720 --> 01:14:29,240 Speaker 6: people who are curious and interested in learning about things 1146 01:14:29,280 --> 01:14:32,839 Speaker 6: that they might not have encountered before. I don't think 1147 01:14:33,400 --> 01:14:39,200 Speaker 6: that people actually think the humanities are uncool. I mean 1148 01:14:39,320 --> 01:14:44,400 Speaker 6: some people do. I don't think that it's this kind 1149 01:14:44,439 --> 01:14:47,360 Speaker 6: of like received understanding of the value of the humanities. 1150 01:14:47,400 --> 01:14:50,880 Speaker 6: I don't think it's that pervasive in the US. I'm 1151 01:14:50,880 --> 01:14:53,360 Speaker 6: sure it's this. It's it's the same as in the UK. 1152 01:14:53,479 --> 01:14:59,000 Speaker 6: People are increasingly worried that they're not going to be 1153 01:14:59,080 --> 01:15:01,680 Speaker 6: able to get a job that will give them a 1154 01:15:01,800 --> 01:15:06,599 Speaker 6: life that is livable, and there's this kind of fear 1155 01:15:06,680 --> 01:15:11,080 Speaker 6: mongering surround surrounding the humanities that suggests that if people 1156 01:15:11,439 --> 01:15:14,360 Speaker 6: pursue degrees in the humanities, then that's not going to 1157 01:15:14,520 --> 01:15:18,000 Speaker 6: offer them employability at the end of it. And I 1158 01:15:18,040 --> 01:15:25,360 Speaker 6: actually think that that's statistically not true. I've looked at 1159 01:15:25,400 --> 01:15:28,880 Speaker 6: some of the reports about employability and it turns out 1160 01:15:29,320 --> 01:15:34,040 Speaker 6: that certainly in many sectors, English is more employable than 1161 01:15:34,120 --> 01:15:38,000 Speaker 6: something like physics. The way that we talk about things 1162 01:15:38,400 --> 01:15:44,519 Speaker 6: online really really matters. It can seriously obscure the reality 1163 01:15:44,560 --> 01:15:49,400 Speaker 6: of a situation. We kind of need people who are 1164 01:15:49,520 --> 01:15:55,280 Speaker 6: willing to go to bat for the humanities when they're 1165 01:15:55,840 --> 01:15:59,840 Speaker 6: in this kind of pressure cooker situation of being defunded 1166 01:16:00,520 --> 01:16:05,439 Speaker 6: and push to one side people who just simply don't 1167 01:16:05,479 --> 01:16:08,479 Speaker 6: understand the value of them control the conversation, and that 1168 01:16:08,520 --> 01:16:14,320 Speaker 6: in some ways does more damage than anything else because 1169 01:16:14,320 --> 01:16:16,719 Speaker 6: it puts people off. It puts people off even trying 1170 01:16:17,640 --> 01:16:22,400 Speaker 6: right right, You have teenagers thinking, oh, well, I absolutely 1171 01:16:22,479 --> 01:16:26,240 Speaker 6: love literature, but I don't think I can go and 1172 01:16:26,280 --> 01:16:29,240 Speaker 6: study it because you know, what's the point at the 1173 01:16:29,320 --> 01:16:30,600 Speaker 6: end of it, How is it going to get me 1174 01:16:30,640 --> 01:16:33,760 Speaker 6: a job? And I I like, realistically, I don't think 1175 01:16:33,800 --> 01:16:37,559 Speaker 6: that's a problem any more than it is for certain 1176 01:16:37,760 --> 01:16:41,400 Speaker 6: other disciplines that are outside of the humanities. And it's 1177 01:16:41,400 --> 01:16:43,719 Speaker 6: just stopping people from engaging in what they really would 1178 01:16:43,720 --> 01:16:45,600 Speaker 6: love to do, and that's problematic. 1179 01:16:46,240 --> 01:16:49,080 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for making time for this. I 1180 01:16:49,120 --> 01:16:50,120 Speaker 1: really appreciate it. 1181 01:16:50,120 --> 01:16:52,600 Speaker 6: It's an absolute pleasure. Thank you for asking me. 1182 01:16:53,040 --> 01:16:55,800 Speaker 1: Thanks so much to doctor Ali Lukes, who you can 1183 01:16:55,880 --> 01:16:58,680 Speaker 1: follow at the links in the description for when she 1184 01:16:58,880 --> 01:17:02,760 Speaker 1: has time to share her brilliance with you. I am 1185 01:17:03,000 --> 01:17:08,000 Speaker 1: so inspired by Ali's even headedness and commitment to her 1186 01:17:08,080 --> 01:17:12,720 Speaker 1: line of study, in particular her care in noting that 1187 01:17:12,800 --> 01:17:16,240 Speaker 1: a diminished sense of smell due to long COVID could 1188 01:17:16,280 --> 01:17:19,280 Speaker 1: stand to hurt a lot of people down the line, 1189 01:17:19,360 --> 01:17:24,400 Speaker 1: particularly those who live in frontline climate communities. I don't 1190 01:17:24,400 --> 01:17:27,519 Speaker 1: know about you, but that had certainly not occurred to me, 1191 01:17:28,120 --> 01:17:31,240 Speaker 1: but it makes a lot of sense. And as with 1192 01:17:31,400 --> 01:17:36,680 Speaker 1: so many marginalized people doing important, undervalued work, it is 1193 01:17:36,880 --> 01:17:42,280 Speaker 1: so frustrating that academics like Ali Luke's are always the 1194 01:17:42,360 --> 01:17:47,320 Speaker 1: first to absorb this absurd amount of vitriol from the 1195 01:17:47,360 --> 01:17:52,200 Speaker 1: worst faith people on the planet with Internet connections, and so, 1196 01:17:53,000 --> 01:17:57,200 Speaker 1: dear listener, I am hanging in for a book from Ali. 1197 01:17:57,439 --> 01:18:00,720 Speaker 1: I have a good feeling because whether those chodes on 1198 01:18:01,040 --> 01:18:04,679 Speaker 1: X believe it or not work like hers can really 1199 01:18:04,800 --> 01:18:10,599 Speaker 1: make a huge difference. Doctor Ali Lukes, Your sixteenth minute 1200 01:18:11,080 --> 01:18:15,879 Speaker 1: ends now. 1201 01:18:16,400 --> 01:18:19,080 Speaker 7: Sixteenth Minute is a production of Cool Zone Media and 1202 01:18:19,160 --> 01:18:22,800 Speaker 7: iHeart Radio. It is written, hosted, and produced by me 1203 01:18:23,040 --> 01:18:27,120 Speaker 7: Jamie Loftus. Our executive producers are Sophia Lechterman and Robert Evans. 1204 01:18:27,320 --> 01:18:31,439 Speaker 7: The amazing Ian Johnson is our supervising producer and our editor. 1205 01:18:32,000 --> 01:18:35,840 Speaker 1: Our theme song is by Sad thirteen. Voice acting is 1206 01:18:35,880 --> 01:18:38,920 Speaker 1: from Brandt Crater and pet shout outs to our dog 1207 01:18:38,920 --> 01:18:42,479 Speaker 1: producer Anderson, my kat's flea Casper, and my pet rock Bird, 1208 01:18:42,600 --> 01:18:44,639 Speaker 1: who will outlive us all Bye.