WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Lamont, Rattner & Summers

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>corporate government? So the deficit is a real issue. The

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>US economy continues to send mixed signals, the financial stories

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that cheap our world fed action to con concerns over

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity and encouraging China data the five hundred wealthiest

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. Through the eyes of the most

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>influential voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, START CEO,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. A cold dose of

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>reality from the experts and equities appear to pay attention.

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. Welcome back.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn to the state of Connecticut. Now it has

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>had more than thirty thousand COVID cases so far and

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>very sadly were the three thousand deaths. But at the

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>same time, hospitalizations are coming down as it looks toward

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a possible deadline for maybe some relief from some of

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions coming up on May twenty were welcome now

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive interview the governor of the state of Connecticut.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>He is ned Lamont and Mr Governor, thank you so

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>much for joining said giving a sense, your sense of

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>where the disease is in your state and what do

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to see between now and May twenty to

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>relieve at least some of those restrictions. Well, Connecticut got

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard. We were right next to a New York

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>city which was many ways the wuhan province of the

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pandemic here in the United States. And but now it's

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, six weeks later, all those curves are

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>bending in the right direction. We have extra hospitalization capacity there,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>which was a key metric. We're finally getting the PP

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>We delivered it ourselves, brought it from China, complicated process,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I might say, we got track and trace and testing

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>ready to go, and these are the key metrics we

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to give people confidence we could begin to reopen

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on May. Governor, can you give us any sense of

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the distribution across the state, And I mean, I guess

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>both socio economic but also geographic. We see some differences

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in some states. In fact, of course New York is

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a larger geographic state. There's gonna be differences in the reopening.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to apply in Connecticut? Well, first, of all, UM,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we were hit in different ways in different regions. You know,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Fairfield County, which is closest to New York City, was

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>hit the hardest, hit the earliest, went right down Metro

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>North and up through a Bridgeport New Haven, Hartford. That

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was the area that probably got hit the hardest because

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the proximity to New York. And now we've got

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>eastern Connecticut, which is the New London area, and maybe

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Boston is coming down that way

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. But we're a pretty small states. So our

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>anticipation is we're gonna open on a statewide basis, uh,

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on a very thoughtful way, and on some things, we

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>want to do it in the association with our neighboring governors.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't do me any good to UM close down

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bars and restaurants if Andrew Cuomo opens them up in

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Westchester County, So we're doing some things in conjunction. Yeah,

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>govern As you mentioned, there's so much integration between Connecticut

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and particularly New York City and the New York City area.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>What about those commuter trains, well, that posed a particularly

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge for you because we have a lot of people

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth between Connecticut and New York every

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>single on those trains. Uh there were a lot of

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 1>people going back and forth, and we thought about that,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but within a few weeks ridership was down. So I

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>think people have voted with their feet, so to speak.

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>They started staying at home and they started telecommuting, or

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>they drove if they had to, which was a good thing.

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>So um governor call and I thought about what we

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>should do with sayt Metro North the rail system decided

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it was probably first responders and people that really had

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>no other way to get to work. So we did

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>keep it open on a limited basis. But as you reopen,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as as we reopened, will we'll be looking at certain curtailment,

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, a capacity of the seating arrangement, things like that.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>In the commuter trains, we're certainly going to be very

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>strict about um uh de sanitizing and making sure everything

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is clean on a real basis, probably gonna discourage people

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>from going in the train for the near term, Probably

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna strongly recommended everybody used mass in the train for

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the near term. But I think even bigger, I think

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find that um the old idea of the

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>commuter going into New York City five days a week.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe an idea of this behind us. I think we

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>found at the end of this COVID session UM that

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we're realizing the telecommunity in many cases work. So maybe

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a great job that seems to be a

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>geographically located New York City you can do with two

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the time from you're a home in Stanford.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>As you look towards possible reopening, Uh, what is your

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>situation this stick to testing sort of tracing and hospital capacity.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You said you have the hospital capacity you need right now,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but in case there's a flare up, how much capacity

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>do you have to deal with it? Well, we have

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>capacity now, and I think that's a pretty good benchmark.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>If there's a flare up, I would rethink things if

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>we got the eighty or nine capacity. Obviously we have

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>capacity now. In fact, they're going back and doing some

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the so called electors, many of which were important

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>operations that were put off and should be taking place now.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>The testing, UM, we've ramped that up. We're doubled it

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>from last week. We'll double it again next week. So

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll be doing about forty two thousand tests a week

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>starting next week. Governor. You mentioned that PPE, that personal

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>protective equipment that you bought from China, a fair amount

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. Now, have you had any issues with the

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>quality of that, because there have been some other places

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world and even around the country who bought

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>things from China and it turns out it didn't work

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>so well. Whether it's testing kits or whether it's PPE.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>We had to be very careful and how you vet this,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a good question. And let's face it, you know,

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a month or so ago when people were really scrambling

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the globe, but everybody had a friend who had a

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>cousin in Ukraine who did some work with Rhody Giuliani,

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't know where you were getting this stuff from.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We didn't do any of that, but we found this.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>We vetted it very carefully, working closely with the government

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>of China, working with some strong relationships we had here

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with the business people in Connecticut. So I have it

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>on high confidence this is the right stuff going forward.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And you've been coordinating with Governor Cuomo, Governor Murphy down

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey and things like that. Do you envision

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a world in which those three states and maybe more

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>really get together in the manufacturing and purchasing a ppe

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and stockpiling. Yeah, I think that makes all the sense

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>in the world. You know, we've got a buying consortium now,

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's not little Connecticut going all the way to

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>China to buy this product. But even more importantly, we

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ought to figure out who is good at manufacturing what.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>We've got a facility here in this state that makes vents.

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Gina Romando up in Rhode Island has a growth that's

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>making a mass in a significant way. Phil Murphy. They've

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>got some of the best pharma in the country and

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are doing the saliva tests. So I think there are

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways we can mix and match. That

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>was Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont coming up looking for green shoots.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Could the auto industry point the way toward a rebound?

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>We talked with Wall Street veteran and architect of the

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>auto industry recovery, Steve Rattner. That's next on Wall Street

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Week on Bloombergo. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>David weston bloom Bird Radio. Whether driven by electricity or

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engines, autobiles have long been an important indicator

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of the overall economy. And they may be showing some

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>slight signs of a rebound. Steve Ratner is a veteran

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street who also headed up Prisoner Obama's efforts

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to save the auto industry, and we asked him whether

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he could see some indications of a rebound overall economy

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>from what we're seeing from autobiles. David, I think we

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have to be careful not to be misled by early

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>signs of what may seem like spring we are going

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to see. And there's already a little bit of a

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>tiny little bit of evidence of a pick up in

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>car sales from obviously an abysmally low level in the

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>month of a month of April. But this is this

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is all going to be relatively small potatoes compared to

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the distance we have to go to get back to

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>where we were before all this started. And I am

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty pessimistic about our ability to get back to that

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>point at any time in the immediate or imaginable future. Well,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we heard some of the pessismism, or at least realism

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps from the Fed chair J. Powey and his remarks

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>where he really warned about things like mass bankruptcy and unemployment.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>If we don't do even more in the financial financial,

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal and the monetary side. Is there more that

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Cannon should be done to try to bring that recovery sooner? Yes, absolutely,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I I am completely in agreement with Chairman Powell, not

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that he needs my support for his for his thoughts. Look,

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>as I said, I think I think the notion that

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we are facing a V shaped recovery where it's all

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going to bounce back. Car sales are gonna go back

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen million, people are going to travel and spend

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and go to Disney World and all those kinds of

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>things is frankly a fantasy. Uh. This has been an

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>enormous shock to the economic system. There's been much permanent

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>job loss. Factories that are never going to reopen, restaurants

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that are never going to reopen, companies that are never

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>going to rehire back or at least not in the

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future, all the people that they have laid off.

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we do need to do more. But I

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think it needs to be not just providing income support

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to Americans who have lost their jobs and businesses that

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are in danger of failing, but also we need to

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>really rebuild America. We need to finally do something on infrastructure.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>We need to do something about retraining and finding jobs

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for the people who are not going back to their

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>old jobs, because this whole economy is going to shift

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>into a somewhat different focus. And so yeah, there's an

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of Congress can do. The question is whether

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they have the will to do it. In the meantime,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we have a big investors trying to decide what to do.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We heard Stanley Duckomer and on temperate thing. They're very

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>concerned with the equity markets, being overallly optimistic about the future.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>As an investor, what do you do in that environment

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>where equities actually a bounced back a long way from

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the trial frankly, and they may not be justified by

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the economic data. I think many of us have been

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>scratching our heads about the resurgence of the equity market,

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and we can debate the reasons for it. Uh. I

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think the most important reason is probably all the liquidity

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED has pumped into the system. But nonetheless, I

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think what Stanley Druck and Miller and David Tepper and

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>others have been saying makes a lot of sense in

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of being concerned about the level of the equity market.

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you hedge it? Well, the simplest thing to

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>do is simply sell. Uh. There are then if you

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if you for whatever reason want something more esoteric, you

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>can do things with options. You can do things with

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>tail risk. There are more sophisticated ways. But at the

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is either if you don't have a positive

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>view about the equity market, you simply need to reduce

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>your exposure to the equity market, give up the possible upside,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and protect yourself again against the downside. We still are

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in a world of quite efficient markets and are no

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>silver bullets or magic ways to take out the downside

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but keep the upside. So I guess it was Margaret

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Thatchrick to talk about Tina that there is no alternative.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Is there an alternative? I mean you have to put

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>your money somewhere. Is it better off under the mattress

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or there are other asset classes that offer at least

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>some solace. I don't think there are any. Again, there's

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>no magic bullets or simple solutions. Part of again, why

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets have been so robust is because people

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>look around and see relatively interest rates relatively near zero

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and decide that's not a particularly attractive place to put

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>their money. And you can make two or three percent

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just on the dividend yield on the S and T,

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>so that seems pretty interesting. But then you're taking all

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this risk on your actual capital value. UM. So no,

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>there are no there are again, there are unfortunately no

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>secret places you can put your money. I don't think

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>any of us feel that corporate credit, corporate bonds, things

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like that are particularly attractive at these levels either, and

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think the best advice I would give would

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be a mix of some equity exposure so that if

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in fact it turns out these levels of the stock

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>market makes some sense, you can participate in it with

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>good companies, combined with maintaining a very low leverage level

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of leverage if any at all, and a high on

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a high amount of a cash balance on which you

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>should not expect to earn any interest, but you're not

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose any money. And what about cross border exposure.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of talk now that the supply chains

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>may never be the same. Certainly there's a lot of

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on China right now, with the President really certainly

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rattling a saber about China. Does that indicate that you're

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>better off with more domestic exposure and not as exposed

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to globalization. We have to see how that unfolds. There's

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of talk by the President, but frankly,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>with the president is mostly talked. There's some talk among

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>c e O s and that we should pay close

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>attention to. I think we've all learned a lesson here

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>about long supply chains. But as we look around the

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>world as investors, we find Europe exceedingly uninteresting. UH. They

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>have huge structural problems. Their companies are not the companies

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that are most likely to do well, and in post

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID environment, a lot of old economy industrial companies. China

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>has done and is continuing to do amazingly well, both

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of keeping the virus under troll but in

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>getting people back to work and in UH and in

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>getting their economy going again. And the biggest risk in

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>China is the one that you identified, which is essentially

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>will they have customers either because the economies elsewhere not

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in great shape or because the supply lines are too long.

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see how that infolds. But we have

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>been before all this and continue to be as an

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.479
<v Speaker 1>economic matter, not as a political matter, not as a

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>any other matter of that sort, but as a purely

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>economic matter. We continue to find China very interesting as

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>investors and are disproportionately invested. There is the big issue

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>right now for the United States and maybe for the

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>globe demand. I mean we hear about things like demand

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>destruction or or a doom loop. Is that what you

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>believe Sherman Power was talking about and he said there

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>could be really long term, maybe even permanent damage the economy.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we in danger of permanently destroying demand? I think

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a problem on both the supply and the

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>demand side. We clearly have a problem on the demand

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>side when you have what is effectively when you make

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the right adjustments and things, probably of Americans out of

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>work getting their unemployment insurance but not their their real wages,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and with huge uncertainty since the unemployment insurance does expire

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the extra six dollars after eight weeks, obviously people are

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going to spend less. And of course when they're essentially

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>trapped in their houses, they're going to spend less. And

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you see that in the consumer spending data that was

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Rattner, Chairman and CEO of Will and Advisers, which

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>invests the private and filmthropic funds of Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the founder of our parent company, Coming Up. Oil has

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>added to the concern over the economy overall. We talk

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with Dan Boreyette, Secretary of the Department of Energy, about

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the prospects for oil. That's next on Wall Street Week

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Oil has been one of the

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>darkest corners a gloomy economic picture, but with Saudi Arabia

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this week announcing unilateral production cuts, things may be looking up.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what Secretary of Energy Dan Briette says, anything that

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>applies to both the supply and the demand side. Yes,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it is starting to look really good. Has the President

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>has been saying for quite some time now. We're on

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the verge of a transition to greatness and we're starting

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to see it. We now have states that are opening,

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there are local economies that represents roughly the gasoline demand

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. We're starting to see oil prices stabilize.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very important to note that, um, you know,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this increase is good for consumers in the sense of

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>jobs are protected all across the economy, and we see

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>no dramatic impact on gasoline prices across the country, which

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is very important as well. So Mr Secretary,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>take us behind the scenes a little bit, if you can.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>We know the President Trump has a very good relationship

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Crown Princess Saudi Arabia, Mohammad ben Sell Mine

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>was that cut at all something that the President helped

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>encourage or even arrange. The Presidents have been personally engaged

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation for the last few weeks. Um. You know,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about in the past, OPEC began its

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>conversations around the March time frame, early March time frame,

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and Saudi Arabia and Russia got themselves into a bit

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of a dispute over their production numbers. And when the

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Saudi's decided to take some actions right at the beginning

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic that led to both increased production and

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a reduction in the pricing of oil across the world.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>That impacted the U S producers very dramatically. And the

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>President saw that early. He engaged with the head of

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>state in both countries, both Russia. He's talked to President

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Putin several times, and he's also engaged personally with the

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>King of Saudi Arabia. The point of those conversations is

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring stability to the marketplace and stability to the

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>producing community, and that's really our goal here. Is there

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>any risk that actually the US Prussian may come back

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>too far, too fast? I mean, I just read there's

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>energy transfer LP came out and said that at least

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the premium basin that actually shales coming about quite fast.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>US that went down about eight percent, and now a

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>full quarter that is back online. Are you at all

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>concerned that that might undermine some of the efforts here

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize the price. No, I don't think so, David.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're gonna see here very shortly, If

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're familiar with our Energy Information Administration what we

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>referred to as e i A. They just put out

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a report. It talks about the economic boom that I

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're just on the verge of seeing. So the

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth quarters in twenty and certainly into twenty

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>one are going to be very very robust. So the

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>production will come back online as this economy begins to

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>take off. And if you look at those numbers, I

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think you'll see that that that what the President has

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>referred to as a V shaped recovery looks very clear

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in the charts right now, so you'll see the production

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>tend to match that V shaped curve. So Mr. Sextually,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that long ago we were talking about what

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of accommodations you need to make. The President designated you,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>along with Secretary Manution, to really help out the US

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>oil industry, and you're talking about certain things like lending facilities.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>We also have the Fed now doing that well, changing

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>their rules. Do we need that support anymore? Is that

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>taken care of pretty much? Well, too loorally to tell,

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and it various company by company. But what the Secretary

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>directed both Secretary Manuchin and myself to do was to

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>evaluate the programs that were passed by the Congress and

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ensure but there is access for these energy industries to

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>those programs. And that's what we've done. Secretary Manuchin worked

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>very closely with the Federal Reserve. We adjusted the program,

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the main Street lending program, and made that program available

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to what we refer to as MidCap sized companies. You know,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there are companies in America that are investment grade, Um,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they perhaps do not need the same level of economic

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>help that others do in the marketplace, and they have

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>access to capital and access to liquidity perhaps others don't have.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are many companies out there that simply didn't

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have that option. So making available this program that was

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>passed by Converse was very, very important, and I applaud

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Manuchi in the Federal Reserve and others from moving

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>so aggressively to do exactly that. So, Mr Secretary, when

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you implement a program like that, how do you deal

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>with what a lot of people call moral hazard? As

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, the investigrade companies don't really need it so much.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Others do because they're not nearly as good shape. But

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that's because they, let's be frank, borrowed too much.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>This tends to be a bit of a boom and

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>bust business as I understand it in the oil patch.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>How do you make sure that we're not encouraging almost

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>reckless behavior when it comes to financing. That's absolutely corrective.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no question that moral hazard exists. That

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>exists in every form of the banking industry. So you know,

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>when we apply these types of UM you know, or

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we create these types of programs, we apply very strict

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lending standards to them. And what Secretary Manichul and I

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>did was to identify those companies that really were impacted

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>by COVID, I mean, but for the COVID pandemic, they

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>would be strong ongoing concerns, and we looked at those

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>companies for potentially UM making loans available to them. We

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're very very clear and very strict about this.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>There are some companies that were on the verge of

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>insolvency and they were highly leveraged, and we're perhaps not

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>going to make it under any circumstance. Those companies are

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be excluded from these types of programs, and

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think rightfully so. That was Secretary of Energy Dan

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Briet coming up. We wrap up the week with our

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>special contributor Larry Summers. This is Wall Street Week on Bloomber.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Social distancing slows the spread of coronavirus, So stay a

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>minimum of six ft away from others and stay home

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can. More info at Coronavirus dot gov. Let's

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all do our part because we're all hashtag alone together.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the ad Council. This is Bloomberg

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. The

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>experts spoke this week, and for once, investors seemed to

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>take heed. Dr Anthony Fauci warned that opening the economy

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>who soon could lead not only to illness and even death,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but also it could do more harm than good for

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy. And President Trump he would have none of it.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Luck he wants to play all sides of the equation.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to have a tremendous fourth quarter.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>And then FED Chair J. Powell warned of potential mass

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcies and unemployment. He said that we may need more

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>fiscal and monetary stimulus, and once again, President Trump, he disagreed.

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with him on one thing now, and that's

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>negative rates. But Wall Street heavyweights like Stan drucken Miller

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and David Tepper sided with the experts, saying the talk

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of a V shaped recovery was really just a fantasy

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and the equities are more overvalued than in any time since.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a week of cheer leading from the administration,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>even as those on the front lines, from governors to investors,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>talked of caution and of worry. And one of those

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.239
<v Speaker 1>who has been expressing ashton and even war has been

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>our very on Wall Street Week contributor Larry Summers. From

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, he's been talking about some of the

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>problems we have in store. This is someone what he

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>said in the past on this program. The first plank

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in that UH right economic strategy is an aggressive health strategy.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the market's reflecting a sense that there's a

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>wall of money okay, and we're delighted to have with

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>us now Wall Street were contributor from Harvard Form Prijory

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Lauren Summers. So, Larry, give us a sense

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>why is it so difficult for us as a people

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to really follow the science, follow the facts, because it

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like the more we see it, the less we

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. I wish I knew, and I wish I

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>fully understood. We're not getting presidential leadership. That's emphasizing what

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the scientific community UH mostly believes. We all want to

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>believe that problems aren't there and that we can go

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>out uh with uh equanimity. So there's always a desire

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to grab onto UH good news, and we're not being

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>given a solid plan beyond grabbing at flailing attempts that

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>could possibly UH work. The reality is that viruses like

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>this UH go into remission just like cases of cancer do,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's always a very great risk that they'll come back,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have to manage that risk very aggressively if

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you want to succeed. And my great threat fear is

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're not managing that risk aggressively. We're letting everything

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>back into the open before any of the criteria that

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at Spurts have laid out have been fully uh met,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and we may not pay for it, but I think

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the best guess has to be that whether it's soon

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of months or whether it's deferred

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>towards fall and winter, we will pay a price for

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>that in more cases, more fear and apprehension, ultimately less

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>economy UM, more job loss, more reductions in income. So

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not very comfortable with the path UH that we're on,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which seems to me to be translating hope UH into

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>a strategy. I could conceive it we turned out to

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>be wrong, but it's not a prudent bet UH that

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we're making. It's not a prudent bet that so many

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>people are not wearing masks. It's not a prudent bet

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that we're engaged in so little testing and so little

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing. It's not a prudent bet that we haven't

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>made more substantial efforts to separate and target aging and

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable UH populations. Our strategy seems to be we're just

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tired of this and we're gonna let it all go.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And it might work, but it's not something I think

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>we can count on. Well. Where as you say you

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>may be wrong, and we hope you're wrong, but thus

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>far you've been pretty close to right in all of

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>your caution. Look Out now over the next month or

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>two months, what might be maybe on the radar stream

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but not in the center of it, that you think

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>may well end up in the center of it. I

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's a risk that they're going to be big

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>increases in the number of cases in at least some

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the places that have opened up, and that we're

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have more hotspots that may not be as

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>bad as New York, but are going to be in

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the direction of what happened in New York, and that

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to freak people out. I think there's a

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>risk UH that the law is gonna let up, but

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>people are going to realize that they're actually pretty scared

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to stores, and they're pretty scared to sit

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in restaurants, and people are going to realize that life

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be more or less like this until

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a vaccine, and that that's gonna be a while,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and that that's gonna lead to some reassessment that there's

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 1>more uncertainty and lower incomes ahead and that that's hardly

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a positive factor UH for UH for markets.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a risk that we're gonna understand that

0:26:55.480 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>there's much more financial strain ahead as people can start

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>running out of the short cash reserves they had and

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not paying rent, not making UH mortgage payments, not making

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>credit card payments, and I think there's an associated risk

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that landing is going to decline and that that's going

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to create something of an adverse uh financial uh spiral.

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a risk and Larry, Larry, if I

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>could just interrupt on that point, and that specifically we've

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>heard from I'm sorry for we heard from fetch heare

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>j Pal this week saying if this goes on very

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>long as be trouble and then at the very end

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the week, the ft itself came out and ward

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>about potentially significant asset price declines if in fact, this

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic lasts too much longer, if this crisis last went

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>too much longer. At the same time, we have a

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>debate between the Democrats and Republicans by and large in

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress about how fast we need to have the next

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>reflief package. How much time do we have. Every week

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we delay committee to supporting the incomes of unemployed Americans,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>supporting new investments, in testing, in contact tracing, in addressing

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>this virus. Every week we delay supporting state and local

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>governments is a week that we are weakening the foundation

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, prolonging UH the downturn, reducing the speed

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of UH the upturn. We should be making the necessary

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>commitment to keep supporting UH the economy within the next

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, and it looks less likely now that we're

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going to do it. Does Nancy Pelosi have exactly the

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>right formula? I think she's got many of the right

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>elements health investments, state and local government, unemployment insurance UH

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in particular. But we need to be getting UH somewhere,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and UH I hope that we can find in the

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>face of this most extraordinary of emergencies, some capacity for

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan cooperation. Is the best way to help the workers

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>directly to the workers, or is it go through the

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>states through block grants or to the companies. I think

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we I think we need to have generous unemployment insurance

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and we need it needs to be there for gig workers.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be there, whether your job ends, it

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>needs to be there, whether you're on temporary, I owe, whatever.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Exactly the circumstances that people have lost their ability to work,

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to be supporting their incomes and those are

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>their families. We've got municipalities who do vital work. They

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>fight the fires, they keep the streets UH safe. They

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>will have to educate the children, perhaps in uh new

0:29:55.680 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>ways UH given uh this challenge. This is no time

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for them to be cutting their budgets because of balanced

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>budget amendments and reduced tax collections. This is no time

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for hospitals to be closing. This is no time for

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>doctors and nurses to be furloughed. And if we're going

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to avoid that, we need to be supporting state and

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>local governments and we need to get off of defense.

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>We need to start playing offense and start using a

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>moment when commodities are cheap, when there's all kinds of

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>unemployed people to do the work, whether it's renewing the

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>country's infrastructure, whether it's building a caring economy, to do

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the work that's always been essential um for us as

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a UH country. Yeah, yeah, it's it's fascinating. A lot

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of work to be done, not to speak of infrastructure,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>which is something you've talked about more than one occasional

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>renew the infrastructure, and that's what we need to be

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>moved forward with, not debating about having a state bankruptcy code,

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the proposal that McConnell put forth some time ago. Okay,

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Larry. It's always a great treat

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. As in Larry Summer's former

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>treasures are great now at harbor and he also is,

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm an important contribute to Wall Street Week.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>This has been another edition of Wall Street Week, See

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you next week. To protect her home and family in

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, Karen was willing to wade through water, mud,

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and insurance paperwork. Yeah, I can do this. You go,

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Karen By simply understanding and updating what her insurance covers

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't cover. Now she'll be better prepared no matter

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>when disaster strikes. Learn other simple ways to protect your

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>home and family before a natural disaster at ready dot gov.

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>That's ready dot gov. A mess. It's from Female and

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the ad Council.