WEBVTT - Stocks Bounce on Trump’s Iran Peace Push

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, folks, what we're going to talk about you. We're

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 2>not gonna talk dsge. We're not going to talk intercals

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 2>within intericals or derivatives the mathiveness that Richard Clarett has

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 2>acclaimed for the former vice chairman of the FED. I

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>don't want to know when the Fed's going to cut

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>rates or all that. We're going to talk about what

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 2>you did at Columbia. Okay, Richard Claret of folks went

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 2>into Columbia with some massive hires in retention of one

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>of the best faculties in the planet. It goes back

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to Luvin in Belgium, it goes back to some of

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the way back work in Germany, and of course the

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>combine out of England is well, you retained a laureate Stiglitz. Yeah,

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you dealt with Jeff Sachs with all of his ability.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>In that you have ned Phelps with this massive eclectic

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>view over time. Colombia owns the social analysis. Good morning Chicago,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 2>and mister Becker, you own the social analysis of this

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>K shaped economy. Jeff Sacks wrote a book twenty years ago.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say it was way out front on

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>this how case shaped are we? When you talk to

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 2>your friends and Romans and countrymen in Colombia, how K

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>shaped are we now? Doctor Claardon.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, and also you left out Bob Mandell, Chili a

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>giant and international monetary economics. So it certainly been a

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>treat to be at Columbia all these years. We're definitely

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>in a K shape economy. I think we've been moving

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>in that direction for thirty years. Not in a straight line,

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 3>but the trend has definitely been in that direction. I

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>think the events with the pandemic, the policy response, and

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the like amplified some of those trends. You know, in America,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>if you own your home, as sixty percent of people do,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 3>and if you own stock, you've had a very good run.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 4>But that means there's.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 3>A substantial fraction of the country that has not been participating.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Maybe if I can just parachute a bit in on this.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, at the FED. When the economy slows, you

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>cut rates, and I certainly did that at my time

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>at the FED.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 4>And the FED.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Understands that when it lowers rates, it's going to support

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>the labor market, which is good and for a lot

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of people that is their stake in the economy.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Is their job.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>But low rates also lead to higher acid valuations and

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 3>also leads to some of the trends that you've mentioned

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 3>in the case shape economy. And so I think central

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 3>bankers understand that, but their toolkit is really pretty limited.

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's how we end up with this dynamic.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 6>How does it fit a reserve? Any central bank deal

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 6>with a black swan like, oh, I don't know, a

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 6>war and rent that came out of nowhere. I mean,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 6>how does a FED typically look at those types of events.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 3>It's difficult to predict back swanp black swans almost by definition.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So what you try to do is you try to

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 3>do analysis. You try to look back at history. You know,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>history doesn't repeat, but it rhymes as the saying goes.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm sure at the FED they're looking at

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 3>past oil shocks, past Middle East conflicts, but they'll also

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>have to fix factor in Paul that it's a different

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>US economy than you know back in my college years

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen seventies. In particular of the US is

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>a net energy export. Important, however, is in the FEDS

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>models it's still the case that when energy prices go up,

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>the economy slows, and I think the main reason for

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>that is that roads real incomes for a lot of workers.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Also the fact that the US imports a lot of

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>goods that have a high energy content, and so yes,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>you'd better be an exporter than an importer. But the

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>US is not insulated from this shop.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Karl Marx comes from the giant Thomas soul Out at Hoover. Yeah,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and also from my great mentor in London, Megduan to Saia,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>who we lost last year, Carl Marx said in the

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 2>British Museum reading room and wrote a treatise on the

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>end of capitalism, and the bottom line is by definition

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>we become ever more k shaped, evermore divided, and there's

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>corrective solutions. Do you worry that within all of the

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>institutions of you, as you've represented, that we're getting to

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 2>stress points where it falls apart.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm not sure of that, but certainly.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>The trends, as I mentioned, since twenty twenty have definitely

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 3>moved more in that direction. I would point out, though,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 3>that we have had periods not all that long ago,

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, certainly in the last part of Obama and

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 3>during the first Trump term, before the before the pandemic,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you actually had some of those K shaped trends reversing

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>and lower desk. And I can certainly tell you that

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>during my time at the FED, it was one of

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 3>my focuses. That's one reason why the FED got a

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 3>lot of criticism for cutting rates in twenty nineteen, because

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the unemployment rate was below four percent, and some models

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>were saying, oh, you can't operate the economy below four

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 3>percent unemployment. And our attitude, well, let's see how the

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 3>economy operates. And I think that was a positive development.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>And so I think policymakers do need when they are

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>in healthy economy to allow the economy to reach its potential.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, one could argue, I mean the war. Notwithstanding the

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 6>economy is generally performing well in terms of growth, the

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 6>unemployment still looks like at our near full employment. Sure,

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 6>I guess that's a recipe for the FED to say,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 6>all right, we're doing our job and maybe we can

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 6>just sit down, stand down a little bit. Is that

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 6>what you expect the FED to do over the next

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 6>several meetings?

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 5>I do.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that they've pretty much signaled that the existing

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 3>FED before Kevin Warsh arrives, it is happy right now

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 3>to step back see how the economy evolves with its

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>energy shock. It is interesting, though, that they did indicate

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>that most of the members of the committee still see

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 3>at least one cut this year and next year as appropriate,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and so I would think that over time Kevin Warsh

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 3>will be able to get the Committee to cut rates

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 3>at least a couple more times, but it may not

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>happen for for a while.

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Richard Clarina with this folks of Columbia, of course of

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>PIMCO as well, global economic advisor in the former chair

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Federal former vice chair, It's going to give

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you a promotion Therey formervice chair the Federal system as well. Okay,

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I've got to get you in trouble. Myrone was and

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Governor Myron was in with John Farrell. John I thought

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 2>was great. Good, there's a FED reacting after the fact, folks,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 2>John Tucker told me the Latin is ex post, and

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>then there's this whole dream of getting out front and

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>fixing it before it screws up, called ex ANTI. I

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>would suggest Governor Myron is not nearly ex post. Is

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>his brethren at the FED. He genuinely wants to get

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>x anti. Is there any evidence of a successful central

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 2>bank trying to get out front of the model?

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, you have to look pretty long and hard to

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 4>find that.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>New testament.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, models are tools, but they're backward looking,

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 3>and in particular, I think oftentimes the argument that Governor

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Myron has made is he.

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 4>He has a personal individual belief that the.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Neutral interest rate in the US is well below the

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>current level and well below where the committee believes. You know,

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>he could be right, but I don't think that is

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the view on the committee, So I think he'll continue

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 3>to be a minority view on that.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned mister Walsh taking the FED chair seat later

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 6>this year.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 5>In several months time.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure we've got a path for that to happen.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 6>How concerned are you about some of the noise surrounding

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 6>that whole.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's pretty clear now that in order

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 3>to become a FED chair you've got to be confirmed

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>by the Senate, and to be confirmed by the Senate,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to have an affirmative.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Vote in the Banking Committee.

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>And right now, Senator till Us has indicated he will

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>not support any FED nominee, including Warsh, who he thinks

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 3>would be a good choice, until the current situation with

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>the Justice Department subpoenas and the FED is resolved. And

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Power more or less said that himself that he's not

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>going anywhere until it's resolved. We do think it will

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 3>be resolved. We do think eventually Warsh becomes chair. The

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>timing of that is uncertain. Whether or not it happens

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 3>in time for the June meeting is too soon to tell.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>But we do a thing eventually that it will get resolved.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 2>The first thing I did with AI, yeah, Tom Sekunda

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>was our founders grabbed me by the cheese its rack

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in the food court, so that we need a briefing.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>And is mister Secunda's leadership. Folks on AI is noted

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 2>across a ten state area. Richard Clarita, he said, here's AI.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Get up to speed on it. Richard Clarita is up

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to speed on AI right now? Is it a job

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 2>creator or is it a job loser?

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, right now doesn't appear to be either in the data.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think there is as many opinions on this

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>as there are people that you talk to. Myself, I am.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm skeptical that in the next year or so we're

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>going to see a dramatic change in the labor market

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>because of AI. The models are impressive, but the analogy

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I like to use is even their developers admit right

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>they hallucinate.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Hallucination is a feature, not a bug.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know about you, a Bloomber, but I

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 3>can tell you at PIMCO, we don't hire a lot

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>of employees who say part of my job description is

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to hallucinate, And so I think until they

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 3>figure that out, it may not have as much an

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 3>effect on the labor market as people think.

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>You and I used a Kueful and Asker slide rule. Okay,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the only way you can learn logs is a slide rule.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Remember when the Hewlett Packard cat or the rich kids

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 2>had the Helett Packard.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 4>What was it called reverse polish reverse polish notation.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I got one on my phone here, But to me,

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>it's the same shift where the professors are going mental

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>and clash and use your calculator and all that, and

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 2>we're just gonna get We're gonna deal with it.

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 5>I think we're gonna deal.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>With it, and remember that near term, in order to

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 3>get the nirvana of AI benefits, there has to be

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of capital spending, data centers, power generation, and

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>so that the interesting thing about AI right now is

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 3>that it's really a driver of a lot of the

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 3>old traditional bricks and mortar economy.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>One final question, Yes, sir own Powell. Yeah, you've been

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a staunch defender of him. He's had a pretty good

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 2>ten days week here. Yeah. And so the governor as well,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>under duress, what's his value add to the American people

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to serve out all of his different tenures.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's important.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 5>I think I think J.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Powell recognizes that, you know, the first sentence and eventually,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 3>whenever his New York Times obituary is written, is he

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 3>wants to make sure that it says something along the

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 3>lines as chair Powell Report, restore price stability and maintained

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the Fed's independence.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 4>And I think that he is going to achieve that.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Richard Claire to coming. Was this

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 2>okay that we didn't do monetary parlor game?

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Can I also say it must be opening day because

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 3>mister Kean's wearing a tomorrow probably mister Sweeney, of course,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>My god, where's the duke?

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 6>I know, are you going to the game? Not going

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 6>to the game, But it'll be a great game.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid to ask. How's your bracket?

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, I'm a loyal alam of the University of

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Illinois and I picked them.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 4>At least on that part of the bracket.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing pretty well, although I got to tell you,

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 3>what's this playing a tournament game on a home court

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>for the number two?

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Do they have a bracket pool at the FED? Oh yeah,

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 2>PhDs all the stuff? I think so ringer there, you know,

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>like Vince Ryanair years ago was reading three years in

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a row.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, go line on.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Richard Claire, thank you so much, greatly, greatly appreciated.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg business app or

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Tina Fordham is a force on LinkedIn and research effort

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>at Fordham Global Foresight is world class. Where thrilled we

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 2>could get a briefing this morning, Tina. And all the

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>years I've done this, I have never ever seen a

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>morning like this, a cacophony of news sources, headlines, different

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 2>cross currents this way that I'm completely relying on the

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>acclaimed t live of Bloomberg with its translation abilities. Give

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>us your update on the veracity of a fifteen point

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>piece plan.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 7>No one knows Tom.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 8>The idea of coordinating with Pakistan on this is interesting.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 8>It is something that we heard through our sources over

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 8>the last couple of days. What I think is really,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, fascinating and so important for kind of gaming

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 8>out the power balance here is that Iran, having been

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 8>presumed to be a weak military force, actually finds itself

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 8>with more leverage than anybody thought right now and is

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 8>issuing some pretty robust statements about its commitment to defending

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 8>its land even as the eighty second Airborne is on

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 8>the way.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Does President Trump and whomver of America have an identified

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Iranian leadership they can speak to.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 8>Well there's some suggestion about who they might be speaking to.

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 8>But one of our problems, you know, and I put

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 8>both of us in the same boat here is the

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 8>presence of so many unreliable narrators, including the President of

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 8>the United States. Now he is clearly looking for an interlocutor,

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 8>as he said himself.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 7>So many of them have been killed.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 8>They've been assassinated by Israel, who have eliminated that whole

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 8>kind of middle.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 7>Cadre of possible successors.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 8>I know that the Iranian succession is for leaders deep,

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 8>but you've got to have somebody to talk to to

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 8>make a deal, and you have to have a counterparty

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 8>that wants to accept that.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 7>Right now, Iran is signaling strength.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 6>So Tina, I have to ask, where's the US State

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 6>Department in all of this? Don't we have like a

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 6>whole section of government that does this kind of stuff,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 6>negotiates with the countries, really thinks about how to craft

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 6>these agreements. Is that is there any a sense that

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 6>there's involvement here?

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, we haven't seen much from the Secretary of State.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 8>And not only that at the kind of you know,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 8>the line levels, so many of the embassy's US embassies

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 8>in the Middle East are without a US ambassador, so

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 8>everything's concentrated in the president who values surprise, it confuses

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 8>that Jesus out of market participants among others. I've been

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 8>talking to corporates, including in the Middle least, who are

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, bewildered about all of this. The geopolitical butterfly effect,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 8>as I call it, the kind of knock on effects

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 8>are manifold, but one of the ones that's caught my

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 8>attention is a reminder that after the nineteen seventy three

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 8>oil price shock, no incumbents in major countries were re elected.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 7>So this is going to be sending a cool, you know,

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 7>chill win.

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 8>Not just the inflation shock, but the political outlook from

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 8>all of this is not going to endear the United

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 8>States to anybody.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Across the United States around the world. This morning, Tina

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Fordham where it's a Ford and Global Foresight, Paul Sweeney

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and Tom Keene with a news flow this morning extraordinary,

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 2>there's an upfield to it. With a fifteen point piece

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>plan futures up sixty down, futures up four forty six,

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>The vixen well over a stick, but oil now under

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight ninety seven point seventy one on Brent Crude.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Your acclaim is a cultural synthesis of your study a

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 2>foreign policy of international relations. Now we have a presence

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 2>talking to Tim O'Brien of Bloomberg Opinion. Yesterday you go

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>up to the food court. I'm having a bag of

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>apricots and Tim O'Brien's having a full English. Sure up there,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>you know the whole thing, And Tina, I'm talking to

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Tim O'Brien, who owns the understanding of Trump. We've got

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a guy who's deal transaction based in that Culturally, how

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 2>is that Trumpian deal transaction process greeted by the Arab

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and separately by the Persian world.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 7>How is it created by Well?

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean he is somebody who values making a deal

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 8>above all, but also winning above all. And what I

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 8>think is very concerning is that it's hard to imagine

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 8>an easy win here. As we get further in, you

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 8>start to you know, hear references to that Q word

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 8>from the Vietnam era quagmire.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 7>Now, the President probably won't want to allow that to happen.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 8>But you know, thinking about your previous guest and what

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 8>others like Mohammed a Larian are saying.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 7>The impact of this oil price shock.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 8>Even if it's stopped tomorrow, it will you know, continue

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 8>for some months.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 7>We're already in this shock.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 8>So calling that a win, I mean most market participants

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 8>I speak to say, well, the president can kind of.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, he can quit any time. He can quit

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 7>this war and call it a victory anytime.

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 8>Maybe, But we still come back to first principles, which

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 8>is who's going to lead the country. And this notion

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 8>of the world's most unusual joint venture proposition with the Ayatola,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 8>as President Trump put it, and himself, you know, kind

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 8>of co owning the Strait of Hormuz. It's hard to

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 8>think about how you execute that kind of arrangement, isn't.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 4>It It is?

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 6>It's odd, And I think what it comes down to

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 6>for a lot of us that are just ramping up

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 6>our knowledge of this part of the world once again,

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 6>is it all comes down to the Strait of horror

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 6>moves and I just declaring victory and walking away. That

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 6>does nothing to really secure that part of the world.

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Is reasonable, take it.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Away from Iran, It doesn't take Iran controls a major

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 8>economic choke hold. If you know, among the many pretexts

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 8>given for this war. One one that has appeared is

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 8>kind of eliminating Iran's leverage there. You know, there's some

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 8>reason to imagine that President Trump thinks about the Strait

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 8>of Hormuz, which he's been talking about for forty years,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 8>by the way, and carg Island in the same way

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 8>that he thinks about the Panama Canal something that it

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 8>is like a toll road for global trade that it

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 8>is unacceptable for anyone to have control of without United

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 8>States as a as a kind of majority shareholder in

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 8>that arrangement.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Tina, thank you so much. I can't say enough, folks

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 2>about the LinkedIn effort of Fordham Global Foresight. As we

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>had way Lee of Blackrock on yesterday. It's just a

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 2>font of brilliance from Tina Fordham and her team out

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 2>at LinkedIn. Tina Fordham, thank you. Stay with us. More

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 2>from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Brian Belski with us with Humillus investment strategies, and the

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>wonderment of his eight page note densely written, like damn,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>I've got to read every word. Is he this is

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the courage, this is the thinking to stay in the market.

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Is the mood out there? A panic our people quote

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>unquote going to cash.

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 9>I think a lot of institutional accounts are kind of

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 9>waiting to see to happen. You know, the majority of

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 9>who we've talked to recently, obviously are a great wealth

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 9>management clients and they've been waiting for an opportunity. In Canada,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 9>they're still a little bit worried with respect to what's

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 9>happening in the US, and they kind of see this.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 5>As a replay of last year, so they're.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 10>A little more emotional.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 5>But in the US, we're ready to put money to work.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot of people.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 9>Kind of redid their portfolios and re kind of configured

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 9>at the end of the year time, and there's been

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 9>a lot of talk with respect to some tax gains

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 9>taken at the end of the year, So I think

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 9>there's some cash on the sidelines that are ready to go.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Is Microsoft at a pea twenty two forward like a

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 2>new Microsoft?

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 9>You know what's interesting about Microsoft is that last year

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 9>it was kind of the darling in terms of the

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 9>war chest of cash and in terms of how we

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 9>look at Microsoft and kind of core and large cap portfolios.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 9>It was tough to continue to be overweight that stock.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 9>So we're more neutral in that stock where I think

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 9>that the Apples and the Amazons, which actually underperformed the

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 9>Max seven last year, are better. But I think Microsoft

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 9>Oracle Palenteer from a software perspective, We're gonna kind of

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 9>get through this malaise. Let's say, the thing that you

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 9>have to understand is you don't have to own everything, guys.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 9>You don't have to own everything. And I think sometimes

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 9>the market has been trying to outsmart themselves by trying

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 9>to pick the bottom in some of these SaaS names.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>It's a really important insight there. It goes back to

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Munger where you don't have to look at it. Can

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you hear me buttoning and unbuttoning my Red Sox jacket? Absolutely,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>this is Don's the only one that fit me was

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Don Zimmer's check exactly way back. I'm going to Scott

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 2>for those of you on radio, I'm wisconstant Red Sox

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>today and drawing it down for Giants Yankees Paul Sweeney

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 2>in his Yankees jacket with Brian Belts.

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, Hey, Brian, what we saw a little bit before

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 6>Iran started was a little bit of rotation in this

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 6>world out of some of the higher multiple tech names

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 6>maybe into some more cyclical name to being small and

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 6>mid cap. Is that a short term tray? Is that

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 6>something that place out in twenty six as well?

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the real trade.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 9>When we wrote our year ahead piece in first week

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 9>in January for both the United States and Canada, especially

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 9>in the US, we talked about a broadening out of

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 9>the market. Finally, we also talked about and defined what

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 9>an earnings driven market looks like. Typically and historically the

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 9>beginning stages of cyclical bulls which we saw in twenty three,

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 9>twenty four to twenty five was this momentum multiple driven market.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 9>We've transitioned to more earnings driven market. Think about the

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 9>earnings growth is really good. So when that happens is

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 9>you see dispersion increasing, meaning stocks trade at different levels

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 9>in different technical type performance. But more importantly, the earning

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 9>side really tried to drive things. So I think investors

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 9>have a hard time dealing with that. And traditionally that's

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 9>the more volatile market. So if you look at an

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 9>earnings driven market relative to a multiple driven market, the

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 9>upside is roughly half. Let's just keep the math simple.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 9>But it benefits names that have been underperforming, like small cap,

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 9>like financials, like some industrials, and I think that's where

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 9>we want to be longer term. Again, I've said this

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 9>for a while now, and we've been a little early,

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 9>but I think we're right. Ten years from now, we're

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 9>gonna be kicking ourselves if we don't own more small cap.

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 6>Okay, how about the AI trade? And I'm trying to

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 6>think about what's been going on in the market outside

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 6>of Iran, and of course AI trade is evolved. It

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 6>used to be just buy everything you know, and who's

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 6>ever spending more money? That's where you want to be Now.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 6>The market's trying to be a little bit discerning winners

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 6>and losers. And you mentioned the SaaS stocks took it

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 6>on the chin earlier this year.

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 5>I think about that.

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 9>I think discerning is the great way to think about it.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 9>So let's use a couple of terms, demand, supply, expenses

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 9>and revenue. I think what's happening is we're trying to

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 9>match what's happened in expenses and revenues or spending spending,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 9>spending spending, So how much revenue can we derive from that?

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 9>And then in terms of the supply demand, who are

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 9>going to be the winner? So there's been so much

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 9>rhetoric in terms of what platform is going to be

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 9>the best. I still think that you just got to

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 9>kind of keep it simple and think about think about

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 9>here's an Apple, Here's the core of AI is an Apple,

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 9>and the core is in Vidia, So then what else

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 9>do you want to own and be around that? And

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 9>tour three in terms of every kind of theme, whether

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 9>or not software is cybersecurity, but especially with respect to

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 9>how you're the electrification of that, which would be the

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 9>sum how.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Many you quickly hear how many stocks is a minimum

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 2>portfolio for Brian Belski.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 9>For us to fill a minimum portfolio to be properly

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 9>diversified in large scap money. We believe, and we've done

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 9>a lot of back testing on this, fifty stocks five

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 9>zero five zero because you can get a highway.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Of fun fidelity fifty.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 9>Six five seven percent on the top end in terms

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 9>of a position one percent on the lowan for our

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 9>small MidCap money that we run a humorless it's anywhere

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 9>between sixty and seventy five. And I think going into

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 9>as we progress through this broadening out, you want to

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 9>own more names.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 5>So you have the opportunity to make all your bets.

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Brian Belski is all over the country folks in

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this industry of investing away from what we do here.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a fan of this, but we're going to

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 2>get his knowledge base. James Diamond on the cover of

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Barons this week. Mary Erda's front and center for JP

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Morgan and they've had huge success with their hedgedat whatever

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 2>it is JPMI, whatever the code is. Brian Belski on

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 2>the modern rage of only SMP hedge it for a

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>more stable income and give away the upside. Your thoughts

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>on this what we see out there right now?

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, and Jamie, we trust one of my great friends

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 9>in the business, Hamilton Render, does a lot of these

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 9>things that worked. That was a great client of mine

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 9>when I was on the institutional side. I think those

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 9>products are important. What we like to think is that

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 9>the passive market has peaked. Active investing own stocks, keep

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 9>it simple, nineteen ninety added the ability to meet Charles Schwab,

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 9>Peter Lynch, and Warren Buffett in the first six months

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 9>of the business at will Ammonio okay, and Warren Buffett said,

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 9>don't buy anyth unless you can reach out and touch it.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 9>Keep it simple. And I think sometimes we try to

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 9>outsmart ourselves. That's why we got in trouble. I think

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 9>at private equity, Tommy, this time around, we're how.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Big is the upset in private credit? We run out

0:26:59.440 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of time?

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 9>Think we see an unwinding there that was ultimately not

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 9>gonna It's not systemic. We've already I think we've already

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 9>established that. But ultimate, that ultimate unwinding is actually gonna

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 9>be positive for publicly traded securities, especially small midcast.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Is the Twins just a funding place for baseball teams

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>before they go to the Dodgers, the Giants in the Yankees?

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 9>The answer is yes, so your socks right, they've been

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 9>after Joe Ryan. They should just take him out of

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 9>his misery to I mean, the Twins are gonna win

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 9>seventy games, they.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Beat the Socks. The Twins beat the Socks. Yesterday's safeteen

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 5>to six.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Qui animies it's a beautiful ball part twenty six years, Tommy, twenty.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Six straight years of season tickets. What did they get me?

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 5>Here's your here's your code to blog into your tickets. Nothing.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a great divide.

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 5>It's a beautiful ballpark.

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 9>But you know, even the you know the Yankees. You

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 9>dont remember Don Zimmer ended his career with the Yankees.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 9>So the Jack, you know the Jack.

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 2>It was a great trade. Like Babe, Ruth, you know, Okay,

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 2>this is a problem. Sarah emails, and it is time.

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>There's not enough Orioles talk. I was talking to Mindy

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Ripkin yesterday up in the flute for she can't even concentrate.

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 5>She's so pumped. Tomorrow tomorrow, Oh.

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Really must watch. You know they're our favorite team.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 5>I know, I know they're going to get choice. Give

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 5>me like a twelfth of two game.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Mister Bloomberg's got a bag of Jesus is in an

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 2>handgoing time. I don't hear enough Orioles talk.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, Brian, thank you so much.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>This is milst thing going.

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay for it, it's going amazing. Thank you so much.

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Look and rested.

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 5>Well it's it's Naples.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 9>This is my this is my lunchtime Walker Tine and

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 9>I process and I listened.

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 5>I listened to Bloomberg Radio on my wah.

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Are you doing? It was a very nice like that

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot, I mean, are you squeezing? Like a seventy

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 2>hour work weekended eighty hour?

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 9>You know when you're the chief bottle washer, the chief

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 9>compliance officer, the chief of staff and picking stock kill

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 9>a lot.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Courage to stay in the market. He owns a high

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>ground on that. Brian Belski Stay with us. More from

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Celebrate Franzos to Han just wonderful with his work over

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the decades. Now Chief Investment Strategists Pimo at Capital Markets.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Did you fly in from the Carolina game last night?

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Were you in the loge bmo.

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 10>As they call it, No, but I did. I did

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 10>watch it. I thank you for remembering.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Can they can they keep going? I'm watching every game

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and show I'm.

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 10>Love Yeah, this is this is their year. I mean,

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 10>it's a talking because for the rest of the world

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 10>got in Montreal, Canadians.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 2>The Rangers had nine shots last night. It's magical up

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>in Montreal right now, isn't it. Yeah.

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean for a team that's been in rebuild mode

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 10>for so long, Yeah, to finally feel like we're getting there.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Are we rebuilding? With AI? You walked in the studio

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>and you said, I want to talk about AI. Your

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 2>synthesis is so odd and wonderful about the way you

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 2>bring economics, finance, investment in synthesize AI out. When the

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Canadians win the Stanley Cup.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, AI, you know, it's a big pushback on our thesis,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 10>and so you know what I've been was easier by

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 10>the way to pitch this a month ago, to be

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 10>perfectly honest. But you know, if you look at the

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 10>overall thesis, there's a lot of stimulus in the pipeline,

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 10>the type of stimulus that you see when you have

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 10>a recession. The issues We never had a recession, and

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 10>so we don't have a lot of excess capacity in

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 10>the economy. To see this kind of stimulus with a

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 10>fore handle on the unemployment rate, is a recipe for

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 10>inflation that comes back more quickly than we've been accustomed to.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 10>So I don't think this time around we get goldilocks

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 10>for very long. So the pushback Tom is people say,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 10>all right, we can't have non inflationary growth because we

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 10>don't have access capacity. Why can't AI play that role

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:14.719
<v Speaker 10>with productivity? And that sounds logical when you think about it,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 10>when you dig into the data, you realize that it's

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 10>not feasible in twenty twenty six and so, and the

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 10>reason for this is that AI is really for now

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 10>a phenomenon of the very large companies. Small business America

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 10>has not really embraced it, and small business America creates

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 10>three quarters of jobs in the US. And so until

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 10>you know this is adopted broadly, I don't think we're

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 10>going to see the employment phenomenon that a lot of

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 10>people are looking for.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 6>So are you calling for higher inflation here and then

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 6>your intiate term?

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 10>And this is before you know the events in the

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 10>Middle East?

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 6>So how does that impact kind of where you want

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 6>to allocate capital here? What are the conversations you're having

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 6>with your quinity?

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So it's not easy because to me, it is

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 10>a pretty constructive backdrop. But really for cyclical assets, the

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 10>issue is that there's not a whole lot of that

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 10>left in the S and P nowadays. You know, the

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 10>S and P is now a growthier benchmark. You know,

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 10>on growth stocks are kind of allergic to higher inflation,

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 10>and so when you have this amount of stimulus, you know,

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 10>it is the tie that lifts all boats for earnings.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 10>But I think when it comes to growth, their pees

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 10>are going to be you know, they're going to see

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 10>a bit of a headwind in the form of higher

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 10>inflation later.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>In the year.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't sound like you're very constructive on the equity.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 10>Markets I am. I mean, if you gave me the

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 10>S and p's version of twenty years ago, would be

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 10>jumping up and down right, you know, because that was

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 10>seventy nine percent of your earnings came from cyclicals. When

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 10>you're going into the GFC that was a very pro

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 10>cyclical index. It's just a different story nowadays. And so

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 10>I would say my comments, I have more enthusiasm for

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 10>the Russell two thousand index or the S and P

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 10>six hundred, you know, the smaller indices that just have

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 10>more cyclicals in them.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 2>From late twenty twenty five may be Autumnal twenty twenty five.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft's enjoying a draw down of thirty two percent Max

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>seven in particularly these selected hyper scale it's whatever you

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>want to call them. Is that enough of a pullback

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 2>for transport? How to load the boat?

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 6>Uh?

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 10>Not yet? I think you know the issue is that

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 10>And this is part of the problem in pitching this story,

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 10>is that there's a real love affair with the MAC

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 10>seven because it's been so profitable for so long, and

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 10>so when you're telling people there's a lot of opportunities

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 10>in the marketplace, it's just in an unusual spot that

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 10>you haven't looked at in a while. And so to me, Tom,

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 10>the ideal time to load up on big growth stocks

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 10>like that is when we're going to be at the

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 10>top of the cycle. And I don't think that's the

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 10>story of twenty twenty six.

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 6>We saw a rotation beginning, I guess late last year

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 6>out of some of these tech names growth your names,

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 6>hire multiple names into Maybe it's more cyclical.

0:33:58.560 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 6>Is that a investible trend in the next twelve to

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 6>eighteen months or is that a trade Because we saw

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of a pulling back on that as

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 6>we kind of got.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 10>No, I think it's the beginning. It's the early innings

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 10>of a recovery. You know, if you didn't know about

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.479
<v Speaker 10>all the craziness going on in the world and you're

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 10>only looking at the market's behavior, you know, you've seen

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 10>the FED cut rates. Then we had fiscal stimulus and

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 10>leading indicators started to pick up, and alongside that we

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 10>saw change in leadership towards the more pro cyclical segments.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 10>I want to say that starts like late summer, early fall,

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 10>pretty normal stuff, and so you know, you tell me

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 10>when the cycle tops out, and then we can talk

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 10>about when it will be time to revisit the growth

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 10>stock story again.

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Franspha turn with us with the Bank of Montreal. I'm sorry,

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm old fashion. It will always be the bank. It's

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.959
<v Speaker 2>so spiritual where their offices are across from this most

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 2>beautiful church in North America. Early in the Western atmosphere,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 2>just extraordinary female capital markets in you guys own with

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>your acquisitions to Minneapolis, the study of the Great Lakes. Paul,

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>when did we last mention tariffs? Yeah, exactly, I mean

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it was yes, expos were going down. Frank Trahan.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Here a tariff update in the impact on the Canadian

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Great Lakes, the Gordon Lightfoot territory.

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 10>You want to know what the impact is on the

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 10>See impact.

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 2>From the Bank of Montreal on tariffs. We haven't talked

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 2>about it in three months.

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 10>Of tariffs on inflation more broadly, and.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Inflation more broadly, windsor ow you know, autos and you

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 2>know the going over the two bridges which cars are

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 2>doing with Trump about.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 10>And so it's uh, look, it's uh. I think uh

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 10>prime mister Carney sees it as it's intended. This is

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 10>a structural change in how we do business, and so

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 10>you know, I don't think it's unusual to think that

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 10>there's going to be a little friction in negotiations. To

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 10>be honest. You know, economists of my generation aren't fans

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 10>of tariffs because they're inflationary. And the reality is our

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 10>economy is consumption based. Nowadays, sixty eight percent of our

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 10>GDP comes from consumption, and inflation is like a variable

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 10>tax rate, if you will, And so you know, but

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 10>it is the policy we're dealing with.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 6>One of the themes in twenty twenty five that worked out

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 6>very well is as well as a US equity markets

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 6>did the rest of the world. A lot of parts

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 6>of the resta world did really well, and part due

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 6>to the falling dollar, but other drivers as well. How

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 6>do you think about the US or North America vice

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 6>to be the rest of the world here.

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so.

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've had very US centric comments here. But

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 10>the reality is the story I just told you is

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 10>the story of the world. Eighty nine percent of the

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 10>world's GDP is in countries that have monetary stimulus in

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 10>the pipeline. There's only a few large economies that have

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 10>raised rates, so it really is a global story. Up

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 10>until the events in Iran, most equity markets are outpacing

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 10>US equity, which is what you see in a global

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 10>in a global recovery. US equities have been really resilient

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 10>in the last month because we're a large oil producer

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 10>that insulates us to a certain extent, unlike the countries

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 10>that import, you know, much of their energy needs. We

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 10>have a lot of stimulus in the pipeline right that

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 10>also helps insulate us. Our earnings were growing before all

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 10>of this, and our stock market, our main benchmark, the

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 10>S and P five hundred, is very growthy and those

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 10>are stocks that tend to do well when the economic

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 10>outlook gets all murkier.

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 2>If you will, what's the energy component of the standard

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and oh it's a single dish.

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 10>Oh yeah, single digits at least like six percent?

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Should is an enormative basis. Does that expand over a decade?

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 10>I think it will.

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's shrunk dramatically largely. You know, it's been

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 10>squeezed out by what's taking place in technology.

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 2>There's so and I've got a distraction here. We're gonna

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 2>have to go to in a moment here off of

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Dubai's the Bloomberg desk in Dubai. But first of Johan,

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the earning season is upon us. Can you even model

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 2>double digit earnings growth? I guess before the war that's

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 2>what we're going to see.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Before the war.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think you can absolutely Again, when you have

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 10>the amount of stimulus that you get typically when you

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 10>have a recessionary backdrop, without one, our earnings were still growing.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 10>I think you can get the double digit earnings territory.

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 6>How much credit risk are you taking in the fixing

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 6>come market these days?

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 10>I want to say that I'm a little bit less

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 10>concerned than the headlines when it comes to that. You know,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.720
<v Speaker 10>we're in this we're in this transition period right where

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 10>we have stimulus. We're starting to see it in leading

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 10>indicators of the economy. You know, all the pmis basically

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 10>have these smile patterns that start late last year, as

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 10>you pointed out a little earlier, but we haven't seen

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 10>it in the economic data itself, in retail sales, industrial production,

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 10>that sort of stuff, and that's usually when the earnings

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 10>really kick in the gear. So it's really rare that

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 10>something breaks when you're in recovery mode. You know, recovery

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 10>tends to patch a lot of things, if you will.

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 10>It's more on the other side of this that I

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 10>think you'll want to be concerned, meaning once we have

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 10>tightening and we have a slowdown in the pipeline, which

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:22.959
<v Speaker 10>is probably a couple of years away.

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 2>TRANSPA, thank you so much. Congratulations on the new effort

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 2>at Female Capital.

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch US live every weekday on YouTube

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal