WEBVTT - 2017 PGA Championship Picks with Paulie

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 2>In a fried egg Friday egg, the dreaded Frida Egg Friday,

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg Egg, Frida Egg Bride Egg Lie, I'm about ready.

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>To run off of the course.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 3>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Frida Egg Podcast. We are here tonight with the legendary

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Polly from Polly's Picks on the website.

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 4>We're going to do a little bit of a.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Breakdown of the players who to expect to play well

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>at this week's PGA.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Polly, welcome on, Thanks Andy for having me.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's been, uh been a good year for you.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 4>You got eight winners this year.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, eight winners.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Almost had number nine in Canada over there. Yeah, hope

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you'll pick them nine this week though.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, hopefully we'll get we'll get some people some good

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>advice on who to pick for their one and done leagues,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 3>their their office pools and DraftKings of course, So.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's get into it. Uh.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Cole hollis the host of this week's PGA, and it's

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>undergone some pretty extensive changes since last year's Wells Fargo.

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Completely new first four holes. First hole.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's like five twenty five uphill, really long

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>haul dirt. Mcgert was complaining today that he hit driver

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>three wood and he was still short on one. New

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 3>grass in the greens, new bunker, sand Uh, PAULI, what

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>do you expect out of the new look?

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's definitely gonna be a little bit

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>different than the years past.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna play very long considering that, I mean, I

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 2>believe it's around par seventy one and about seventy over

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy four hundred yards, so it's definitely gonna be looking

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>towards some of the guys that hit the ball pretty long.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>And then one of the things, as you mentioned, was

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>they went ahead and redid their greens recently. So if

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you all the way back to what they had four

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen, you might remember that they had issues with

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the pros complaining about the conditions of the greens,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and after that they went and changed from bent grass

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 2>over to bermuda, and they had issued those greens the

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 2>last couple years as well, weren't as pure as they

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>would have liked, so about a year ago they went

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>ahead and changed it to grass called Champions Ultra Door Fermuda,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's become very popular last couple of years.

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a genetically modified turf.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 2>And some other tour events have had like TPC Southwind

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>in Memphis, Austin Country Club, TPC San Antonio, the host

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 2>of Leer Texas Open Seminal Golf Club in Florida. That

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>some guys have played at some of the Robert Trent

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Jones courses in Alabama, So it's very prevalent and some

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>of the top players on tour, you know, do put

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 2>better on miss grass than what was previous.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Kind of off course, it's uh, you know, making making

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 3>a couple extra press around can be a big difference.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I've also heard that the rough is.

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, extremely healthy, Like you're saying, like six inches

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>of rough around there, so it could be you know

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more of a premium on finding the fairways.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, definitely.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's gonna be all based upon guys gaining strokes

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>off the tea this week, whether it be by distance

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and accuracy, you know, kind of the guys like you know,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Hoffman a guy who may not necessarily kill it

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>off the tea, but e's it far enough and HiT's

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>it accurate to where you know they're not hitting, you know,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 2>like like McGirt hitting the super long irons or three

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>woods or multiple drivers in the par fours.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>There there has been kind of a factor in the majors,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 3>but maybe not this one. I love Hoffman this week too.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>He's just in such good form. Obviously, third place last week,

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 3>second place at the Canadian Open, and then you know,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>in the majors he's been kind of nails.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 4>He was in the.

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Final group of the Masters, top ten at the US Open,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and another top twenty at the Open Championship.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, definitely.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 5>So as far as weather, you know, when you start,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 5>why don't you walk us through kind of how you

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 5>go about making your picks and what you're thinking about

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 5>this week in terms of the weather and strategy.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I was gonna walk through a little bit.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>So generally I'm on Sunday and Monday before the tournament week,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>I'll go through and just kind of look at pastors

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to the golf course trying to see who has and

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>form at the golf course, and also looked the last

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks to see, hey, who's been playing good?

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, is there anybody that's just writing a heater

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>coming into the tournament here that I'm gonna want in

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>a roster and what it's in draft kings or one

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>and done leagues, And then try to look at the

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 2>prior years events just to try to isolate what stats

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>some of the players succeeded at they were near the top.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So like evidently with Quil Howell.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 2>With it being a long golf horse and with the

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 2>rough being up, we're any guys that can hit it

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.559
<v Speaker 2>long off the tee but still keep it in play.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's gonna be and that's and that's the reason

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>why you've had guys like Roy mcroy's actually killed Quil

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Hollow and the reason why is he's super long off

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>the tee and when he has his driver going, he's

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>almost unbeatable.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that being wrong is such a benefit

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>when that roughs up, too, because if you find trouble

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and you're really long, you've all of a sudden got

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>a short iron in instead of having to hit like

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a four iron out of the rough. And that's where

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>it just kills short hitters like you know, is Zach

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Johnson when he when he misses the fairway and he's

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna miss a fairway, a couple of fairways, he just

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>he's he's hitting a four iron out that are instead

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 3>of a guy like Rory who's hitting a nine iron exactly.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at some of the other courses

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that have had this similar grass in the greens that

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>this champions altraed Door Fermida, it usually ends up being

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 2>really firm and fast. So if we looked at courses

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>like we've had done a T TPC San Antonio for

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Valero Texas Open, a lot of the guys that top

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the leaderboard there are guys that hit the ball long

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>off the tee. Because they're having shorter irons into the greens,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 2>they're able to hold it the same as true in Memphis.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>We've seen guys like Daniel Berger, Tony Fino, Charlie Hoffman,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Brooks Koepka, guys that are able to drive it far

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 2>enough downer to where they're hitting wedges and able to

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>hold that green as opposed to hitting suthern irons in

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the green.

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm expecting the same thing happened this week.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this this week is distance will be huge.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of strategies, I think this is kind

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>of an underrated aspect of fantasy leagues, is you know

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 3>what what should be kind of different strategies for for DraftKings,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 3>whether it be you're in a tournament or like okay,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 3>a fifty to fifty league, and then also for your

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>one and done league, you know, if you're chasing, you

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>know what are you looking for? And if you're kind

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of at the top of your one in dun league,

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 3>what are you you're looking to do? Is the playoffs

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>come around the corner.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I'll try to talk about the one in dun

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>leagues first.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>If you're near the top of your one in Dune

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>league and you still have Roy McRoy available, you should be.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Playing him this week.

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm the reason I'm guessing the reason you kept

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>him all the way through this year is to play

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>him for the PGA because you know he's good.

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>At quill Hollow.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>If you're not near the top of your league, or

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you're maybe fifth sixth place and you want to try

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to leap rogging people out of you, you're obviously gonna

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>want to try to fade Rory and maybe go down

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>to a second tier player that you still have left

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>from the bank. Whoever then may be maybe maybe a

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Berger or maybe even a Phil Mickelson or somebody

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>there who may be very low owned in your league.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe one or two people may have them, and if

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>he wins, you happen to leave rogular players.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the position I find myself in because I

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>haven't been using your picks, have been trying to use

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>my own.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 2>And then in terms of the DraftKings strategy, I mean,

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of broken down into two different two different types.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>So whenever we have people usually refer to them as

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 2>cash games, meaning whether they're double ups or even sometimes

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>triple ups or head to heads kind of where you know,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>roughly a third more than a third of the field

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>gets paid. You know, double ups, it's forty five percent.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Head to heads, you know obviously one out two. When

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 2>when you have those type of tournaments or games, you're

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna want to be a little bit more conservative in

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 2>your picks. You're gonna want guys that are gonna a

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>little more consistent and make cuts versus guys that are

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a little bit more high up side. The

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>easiest way to say that is you're gonna be picking

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the Matt Hoocher's, Adam Scott's, Paul Casey's of the world,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the guys that make a lot of cuts and are

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be getting you a lot of top thirties,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>because in order to win in those events, you're only

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to finish in the top forty five percent

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>for double ups, So if you have six all six

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>guys make the cut, that's almost good to cash ninety

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>percent of the weeks, and maybe some weeks five out

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of six or even four out of six, depending on

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 2>where the ownership falls. Definitely, in those double ups, you

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of people on the same players you

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 2>may see, I believe a couple weeks ago we having

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 2>some guys that were own sixty by seven, sixty or

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent of the rosters had certain players just because

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>there's such such values.

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>So what do you expect a guy like Rory's ownership

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 3>to be this week with everybody all over?

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I expect him to be in terms

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>of double ups, probably in that thirty percent range, only

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>because his salary is so high. That means you're going

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to kind of go a little bit lower, and you

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 2>may not be able to kind of stack your team

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of value plays in that eight thousand

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars range, whereas obviously you have strategy and the other

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 2>end of the spectrum. For tournaments, I would think Rory

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>is going to be roughly around maybe thirty percent known.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 2>It obviously made different for tournaments. For example, this week,

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna see a lot of the players wanting to

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>choose guys maybe like Haidaki Matziyama because he won last week,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and I believe when DraftKings is you know, in the

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>mid ten thousand range, so you're gonna see him be

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 2>highly owned. You're gonna look at you know, people are

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously going to be on Speed based on how he's been,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 2>how he's been playing, you know, trying to get the

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Grand Slam.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>People are obviously on Rory.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 2>So you try to see, is what guy up there

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be as high owned and you

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>may be able to get him at a reduced ownership

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>in a tournament. And that's kind of a way where

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can distinguish yourself and have the ability

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 2>to you know, to win a big if you're in

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 2>a big draftings tournament such as like they have the

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Millionaire Maker this week. So an example of a guy

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 2>you may want to play there may not necessarily be

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the best play. But let's say if you have Jason

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Day at ten four hundred, he's one hundred dollars less

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 2>than Handaki Matziama, you're gonna have twenty to thirty percent

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of people on Matsiyama. You're gonna have eight to ten

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>percent maybe on Day, maybe even less. But we do

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 2>know that Jason Day can win major championships, and he did.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>He did show a little bit.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Last week that hey, he can actually you know, he's

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 2>broken out of his slumpus a little bit. I mean,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously he's still has some lingering injuries. But on a

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>golf course where you have did it long and you know,

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>if a guy that's a hot driver, watch out, that

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>could be Jason Day. And you know, if he happens

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to let's say you have he's only eight percent known,

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and you happen to have him in a lot of

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 2>tournaments in your rosters, you're gonna be looking pretty good

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 2>because you know you've posentially narrowed it down, knocked out

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety two percent of the field because they don't have

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Jason Day, Whereas if you have Hideki and Hideki does good,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 2>you still got to deal with thirty percent of the field.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's definitely a little bit different.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Strategy between between the cash games and double ups versus

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 2>some of the bigger tournaments, especially like the Millionaire Maker.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I think this is good advice too, for you know,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>your office pools and other things like where you know,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>going here a little bit against the grain if they

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 3>do well, If if you're in a forty person pool

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 3>or twenty person pool, you can you can make such

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 3>big headway with just having a player that nobody else has.

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm a I'm in this like Majors draft every

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 3>and it's we've got like thirty guys and every right picks.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a snake draft. And I had the tenth pick

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>or eleventh pick. And then I was sitting there looking

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>at Justin Rose and Jason Day, and I picked Rose,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 3>and my buddy right behind me is like I got

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>picked Day, right. I'm like, yeah, you gotta pick Day

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 3>at twelve because like he's got such upside.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 4>And it's interesting. Rom is another name.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like people are out on Roum just because

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of his attitude, but he's been still playing so well.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, he definitely has the ability there.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just a matter of whether he can stay mentally

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>strong enough, you know, for for four days, especially if

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 2>it gets difficulty out there. He kind of gets hard

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 2>on himself. I mean last week at Firestone, he played

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>good for three rounds. Problem is the second round he

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>shot in the high seventies and that kind of took

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>him out of the tournament after he at least shot

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven the first day.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 3>So, of say the guys that are priced above nine

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 3>thousand in DraftKings, say your bottom tier of this is

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 3>justin Rose and then up to Speef at twelve thousand,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 3>who are kind of your three or four favorite guys

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 3>from in here?

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean so obviously Roy is the best at

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 2>at the top at eleveny eight hundred. But if you're

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 2>learning for guys that probably the upside to win here,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I would be looking at brooks Kopka in ninety two hundred,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and the reason is that is he just performs in majors.

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he won the US Open, but he has a

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>huge streak for the last couple of years to where

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 2>he just performatively almost whole top thirties in his majors.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Last couple of years.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's seventeenth at the Bridge Down six of

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the British, first the US Open, and then eleventh of

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the Masters this year. So he has an ability to

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>perform here. If looking at you know, some courses to

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 2>where you know he might have He's played well in

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the past. He's played well on courses that had this

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>type of champion's ultradorff grass. He's made the you know,

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the Sweet sixteen at Austin this year, was final eight

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 2>there at Austin the year before, has played well at

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the Valero Texas Open, finishing second there this year. At

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the Memphis Saint Jude he's finished second and third and

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 2>two of the last three years there. So he's very

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>familiar and comfortable with this grass. Obviously it's not all

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>dependent on putting. But guys that have you know, had

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>success on similar type tracks, I think you got to

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 2>look a little bit more towards.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Them this week.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Andy, Andy Natchez us that that great driving ability.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>He hits it really long and really.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Straight exactly, So I like Brooks Kopka a lot this week. Also,

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 3>who are you fading in this group? Who do you

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>not like of these top guys?

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the one guy I'm definitely not touching is

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>definitely gonna be Henrik Stenson. So, Hendrik Stenson's record at

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>KORL Holl has been miserable. Believe, his last his last

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>five appearances here have been mis cut fifty eighth, miscut,

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>miss cut, miss cut. Obviously the setup may be a

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit different, but that's enough, you know, bad form

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 2>for a guy at ninety eight hundred to where I'm

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 2>definitely not gonna be on him. With that being said,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think a ton of people will be will

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>be using him in tournaments. So if you want to

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>toss him in a one random lineup because he maybe

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>five percent out, I definitely wouldn't argue against it. I'm

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>just I'm just he's not going to be in my

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>core group of players this week.

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he hasn't really done a lot to inspire enthusiasm

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>and picking him this year. Also, it's been kind of

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a down year for for uh, Henrik moving down and

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 3>this kind of will be interesting to talk about just

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 3>with you know, some sleepers and some maybe outside of

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 3>it isn't really a sleeper if you're in this next

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 3>tier but outside of your big games you get in here.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 4>You've got Justin Thomas at.

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Eighty nine hundred, and we'll kind of go down to

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Thomas Peters at seventy Thomas Peter Charles Schwartzel Louis U

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>says in at seventy five hundred. As the bottom tier.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>You've got a lot of interesting names here, and I

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 3>always think this is kind of the tier of guys

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 3>where where you could get a guy that comes into

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the top five, and this is where you can kind

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>of make your lineup really pop.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely, I see this week, especially if you can.

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>It's me tough to fit two of the top studs

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that we kind of mentioned before in the same lineup,

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>So you're gonna be putting, you know, two or three

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>three of these mid tier players.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>In your lineup.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>And so the guy that I liked the most this

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 2>week is actually Phil Mickelson, which I don't think a

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of people realize.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>How good he's been at Kuil Hollow.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>So in the last his last ten appearances at Kuil Hollow,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>he's gone fourth, fourth, eleventh, third, twenty sixth, ninth, second, fifth,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and twelfth and third. So that's a pretty solid performance

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 2>for the last ten appearances of quil Hollow, which if

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 2>you think about it, you wouldn't expect Phil to play

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>great there on paper because you kind of have to

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>keep it on the planet off the tea box. But

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 2>for some reason off the tee there, he's been absolutely

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 2>amazing the last four or five years there. He's actually

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 2>been near the top of the field and strokes gained

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 2>off the tee at quil Hollow, which is kind of

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>surprising because he doesn't he doesn't necessarily, you know, a

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 2>bomber like Rory, but he's just been hitting fairways every

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 2>time he's been playing at quill Hollow, which if he

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 2>does it again this week, I wouldn't see reason why

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't contend again. And he's another guy that puts

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>good on that champions Bermuda. And so one of the

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>things that should put together this week was looking at

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, stroke stained putting on that type of grass

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>over the last three years versus what their current stats are,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I was able to find, you know,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 2>six golfers that kind of pop there, and you know,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Phil Mickelson over the course of you know, a four

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 2>round tournament, is gaining two and a half shots on

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the green putting on this grass as compared to his

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>normal strokes game putting.

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>On all of the grasses.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 4>That's amazing.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Phil's grass, exactly. Yeah.

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 2>And one other interesting thing is the sand that they

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>just put on the golf course this year is the

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 2>exact type of sand from Augusta Nationals.

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's another thing.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, Phil, you know, if he happen to miss

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the greens, a short game wizard, and we all know

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>how well he plays at Augusta, especially with the short

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>game hitting out of the bunkers. So that's that's just

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of another thing pouring towards Michelson this week.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 4>Man, And this is one hundredth major.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 3>It's ceremonious too, Exactly. I don't know if I could

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 3>deal with Phil winning. I have this thing that Ernie

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Els is a better player than Phil, and I'll just

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll just never hear the end of it.

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 4>If Phil went, so.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We can hope for a Phil victory, then.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I will look like an idiot. I already do look

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 3>like an indiot, though, so that's fine.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 4>So what do you think of you know a name

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 4>in here?

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I kind of likes Tommy Fleetwood. He doesn't have any

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 3>course history, but he drives it so well. I think

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 3>this could be a good fit for him.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is this is honestly a better

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>fit golf course for him than it was at the

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 2>British Open, even though that was kind of a local

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>course for him. He's pretty reasonably price at eight thousand

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars to where for a DraftKings lineup, he'll probably be

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit overlooked because, especially the larger tournaments, you

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of you know, casual DraftKings players that

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily know the European players. So you'll see this

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>every major, the European tour players will be a lot

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 2>less owned just because they don't have the name recognition.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 2>So you know, if let's say, you know Daniel Berger

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>had the same you know, resume as Tommy Fleetwood, you

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 2>put him on paper, they may look fairly similar.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Fleetwood's leading the race to to buy in Europe,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>yet no one knows that.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And you're getting him at eight thousand dollars and he's

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 2>a premier driver of the golf ball on a course

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 2>that needs that. So get fleet with a ten percent

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 2>ownership in a DraftKings lineup, which you know, he's a

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 2>very good, high upside play. He kind of reminds me

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 2>of what Thomas Peters was last week. This one under

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the radar talked about by a few people, you know,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a good course fit, but no one really you know,

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 2>recognized them because you know, he's kind of a European

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 2>tour player, doesn't play much in the States.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>How do you like Thomas Peters for this week? It

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 3>seems like a better good fit. The way he drives it.

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 3>He's a really good approach player, iron player, and he

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and he can get hot with the putter.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, whenever I'm trying to build a lineup

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 2>for a DraftKings tournament, I'm not necessarily just looking at

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 2>how they're gonna play. I'm also looking if my player

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>plays well, how's he gonna how's he gonna get there?

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 2>And so if Thomas Peters plays well, it's because he's making.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of birdies. I kind of do a comparison.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you have some guys that say Louis

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Jus stays in or Zach Johnson, when they play well,

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>they tend to, you know, limit their mistakes and you

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>know they're gonna shoot fifteen under, they're gonna make eighteen

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 2>birdies and three bogies. If Thomas Peter's gonna shoot fifteen under,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna make twenty five birdies and ten bogies usually, right,

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 2>And for DraftKings wise, you're gonna want the guy that's

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>making more birdies because a fifteenth place finish from Peters

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 2>may be just as good as an eighth place finish

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 2>from Zach Johnson, for example.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that makes sense because the whole DraftKings scoring

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>values birdie so highly exactly, So you're high on.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Burger and Hoffman, I know because of the grass, right.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So Charlie Hoffman actually leads that strokes game putting differential.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>He's actually one point or four point four shots better

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>per four rounds on this grass as compared to normal grass,

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>which is which is kind.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Of a little bit astounding.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>But if you look back at the course, he's done

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 2>that on Valera text is open. He plays plays well

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 2>every year and happens the puttwell there. I mean it's

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>only a small sample size of maybe twenty or thirty rounds,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>but it's still a large differential. We really can't ignore.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Andy, and he's hitting the ball great. I mean,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 3>the recent forum is out of this world good. So

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>seems like another good fit for him.

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he hasn't played quil Holli since twenty eleven,

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 2>so I'm not really looking at course history for him.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>But when he goes, you know, thirdy Bridge downs second

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>at the Canadian Open. He's played good in big events.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Twentieth of the British, eighth of the US Open, you know,

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty second of the Masters, thirtieth of the players. Those

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 2>are all big events and he's just he's just always there.

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 4>M M. Yeah.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 3>I always say when he hit the ball well, it's

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 3>it's hard to not be there. And he's hid it

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 3>well all year. So Jamie Holmes is a guy that's

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 3>won here. What are you thinking about him for this week?

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 2>He's another one if you're building let's say, if you're

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 2>building five tournament lineups and draftings, you're probably gonna toss

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 2>him and maybe in one, maybe one or two, just

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 2>because he's another one of those high upside plays to

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 2>where if he happens to have, you know, that week

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>where everything's clicking, he's gonna be a birdie and gets

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>you a top ten, but they're obviously, you know, is

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>the risk of him missing the cut this week. But

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>if you're gonna try to win a tournament on draftings,

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have to play some of these high upside

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 2>plays like homes or repeaters.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is you might want to fade the

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 3>players with Holmes because rumor is he doesn't wear a deodorant.

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 4>It's can be hot and muggy down there.

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, but his playing competitors may also be thirty

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 2>yards behind him off the tee, so they may not

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>smell that.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not in on Patrick Greed this week, are you?

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Nah?

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>He just doesn't necessarily, you know, suit for me. I'd

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>much st to take another guy at seventy three hundred,

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Brennan Steel. You know, Steele just is a really good

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>player off the tee. He has good histories. Last two

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>times at kual Hollow he's gone fourteenth and ninth. And

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>he's also another one of those guys that happens to

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 2>putt well on this grass type. He's got you know,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 2>a posit the strokes game putting of two point eight

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>compared to his normal putting one one putting on the

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>step of grass, you know, not trying to you know,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>not trying to you know, beat the stat to death,

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 2>but you know, it's a big difference when you're getting

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>more than more than two shots over a over a

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>four on tournaments.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Brandon Steele is one of the most

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 3>underappreciated players on tour simply because he's sponsored by Wilson.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, if he was sponsored by like Taylor Made

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 3>or Calaway, he'd be like way more popular because he

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 3>hits it far. His swing's kind of goofy, but you

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 3>know he I just think he gets Wilson doesn't market

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 3>him enough well.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>And the one of the thing is he may go

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit under owned this week actually because he's

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>been consistent the whole year up into the last three,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>last three events, so he did he didn't miss a

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 2>cut all year until they miscut at the Quick Amounts

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 2>miscut at the British Open, and then he shot seventy

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 2>five last week in the first round and then shot

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 2>seventy seventy one and seventy last three, and you know,

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>no one he didn't really get any press coverage. No

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 2>one really knew he's kind of flying under the radar,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and you got a lot of popular plays, you know,

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>similarly priced. If you're looking at on draftings, you got

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 2>you got Caberrabeo, who just did good at at you know,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 2>at last Major at seventy one, you got you know,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>we got Patrick Reid, Bubba Watson, Russell, Henley, JB. Holmes,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Schwartzel Peters, Oust, Hayes, and Hoffman Berger. You have all

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.239
<v Speaker 2>those guys within a couple hundred hours a price. So

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, the ownership is going to have to drop

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>off on a couple of those guys, and it may

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 2>drop off on Steel where you may get him, you know,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>sub ten percent, which you know he could be, you know,

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a guy that you know could make or break your lineup.

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 3>This week, Yeah, speaking of Bubba, your Strokes gained last

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 3>place and Strokes gained mental where.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what do you think about Bubba? This week? We've

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 4>seen some proof of life, but recently from the pescatarian.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Have said seen some proof of life. I mean he

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 2>has had a little bit of glimmer of hope of

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 2>this course. He did finished second back here in two

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>thousand and nine, but since then he you know, he

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>said you said three.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Other appearances and didn't have any top twenties.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not necessarily sure if if it's a great

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>course fit for him, but I wouldn't be playing a

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 2>ton of bubble this week. I mean he he would

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 2>have to be finishing in the know the top ten

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>to get a lot of upside for me, and I

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 2>just don't really see it with his mental game right now.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's uh so, moving down into like the seven

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 3>thousand range and below, I mean there's a lot of

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 3>interesting names.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Tony fen Now obviously is one.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 3>Xander Schoffley, who's been really hot and played well in

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 3>big events is another seven thousand, and then you got

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 3>like Lucas Glover, He's a guy that's always plays well

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 3>here seemingly. Kevin Chappell. I mean there are there's just

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>seems seems like you could create a whole roster with

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>seven thousand dollar guys.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you pretty much could.

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's why you're gonna You're gonna see a

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>lot some of the roster construction where guys will take

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>three guys from this range and then take you know two,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the you know studs in the

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 2>top three of salary and then filling two guys between

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that eight to ninety five hundred range, and that's probably

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a popular construction this week for some of

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the tournaments. But I mean, yeah, definitely a lot of

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 2>those guys you mentioned I love it. I mean Tony

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Fenw has gone twenty eighth and sixteenth his two appearances here.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's been playing great of late fifth of

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the Canadian Open, twenty seventh with the British Open, you know,

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 2>even before that, went seventh at Green Brier. Literally the

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 2>entire last two months, he's he's finished top forty every

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>single event going back to the Byron Nelson in May.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So that just screams consistency right there.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And he's a guy that bombs it off the tee

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and he actually still keeps it in play for as

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 2>far as he hits it. So he's gonna if he

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 2>has a good driving week in terms of keeping on

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the planet, he definitely could have could have a top

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 2>ten of this course. I mean, one of the other

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 2>guys I actually love this week is definitely gonna be

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Chappel.

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>He's just another guy who's just striking the ball well

0:27:59.480 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 2>His last his last two finishes, finished thirteenth at the

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Bridge Dome eighth the Canadian Open. You know, people kind

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 2>of forgot him out because he missed the two cuts

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 2>before that, but it just seems to be a good

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 2>course fit because he's he's another of those guys that's

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of like Charlie Hoffen where he may not

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 2>necessarily hit it the furthest off the tee, but he's

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna hit it three hundred yards and he's gonna find

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fairways, which this week, if you're putting

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>it three hundred yards down the middle of the fairway,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna be in good shape because you know there's

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 2>so many holes that are long here where you're gonna

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 2>be having one to fifty to one eighty in and

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>you just cannot afford to be missing fairways and be

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and be far away. At the same time, you can't

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>be one seventy in the rough. You have to be

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 2>one fifty down there on one forty if you happen

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to miss and be.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 4>In the rough.

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, Chapel has two straight top fifteen finishes at Wells

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Fargo too the last two years at at Quail Howell,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 3>so good course history too totally. Then we get down

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>in the sub seven thousand range. You know, we're starting

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to get into the deep sleepers here. Who are Luke

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Wis played really well last week, he's long. I think

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 3>he's played well at this event before too. You got

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Web Simpson. I had somebody ask me today about Web

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 3>what with the thoughts for the local member Bill hass

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Is another local? Who are your guys in this in

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 3>this bottom tier range going all the way down to

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>say sixty you know, to the bottom.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 2>All the way down to the bottom. Yeah, I mean

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>there's there's a couple of guys. You have some good

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.479
<v Speaker 2>value here. I think you got it, you know at

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven ND I believe is you have. You have

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Gary Woodland, who obviously you know, didn't play great last week,

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>but two weeks ago in Canada played pretty solid, you know,

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 2>finishing fourth and he had He has a prettycent track

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 2>record here. He's gone twenty his last his last three

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>starts here. Quil Holly is going twenty fourth, fourth and eighteenth.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>And you know he's an the guy that he hits

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>long off the tee. I mean he strokes gained off

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the tee when he put in you know Canada finished fourth.

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Was is off the charts because it was just a

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 2>stripe show. It was just three twenty down the middle

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 2>every single hole. And you know he didn't necessily hit

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a grade last week. But if he finds that form

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 2>again this week at sixty seven hundred, there's not many

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 2>guys below seven thousand that have as much upside as

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Gary Woodland just based on some issue based on the

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 2>power alone.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the more depressing things is to look

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 3>at Woodland's tea Degreen stats and then his putting stats

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and you realize if he he putted well at like

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 3>a good level, he would win so many tournaments.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean one.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Of the amazing stats was when he actually played in

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 2>at the RBC Canadian Open, he gained fourteen and a

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>half shots tee to green and lost two and a

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>half shots putting and finished fourth. So it's not often

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 2>you see a guy that lost two and a half

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>shots strokes, gained putting and finished four worth.

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>At an event. Yeah, that just means you're absolutely striping

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>at t the green.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 3>So anybody else down here that you like outside of Woodland, Yeah.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's a couple of players you've had Danny

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Lee here, who's probably you know, a really big flyer

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 2>here down at sixty six hundred. But he's another guy

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>who's had success to this course, and he tends to

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>be a really good long iron player. He's gone ninth

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and thirteenth his last two times at Kuil Hollow. He's

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of been, you know, pretty silent. No one's really

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>heard much from him the last couple of weeks. You know,

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 2>last time he played good. He had a good stretch

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>in late June early July where he went third at

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the Travelers twenty seconds, Wick Loans, and ninth of the Greenbrier,

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and then kind of no one's heard much about it

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 2>last month because he hasn't played great.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he had an elbow injury that he had to

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 3>pull out of the I think the Deer with but he.

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Withdrew for the first round of the Deer. But he

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>did play the Canadian Open.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he finished like thirty second there or

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 2>something like that. So you know, I think he's back

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 2>healthy enough to where I don't mind rostering him at

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>sixty six hundred because he's just you know, he's a

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>guy that wouldn't surprise you. He said, hey, Danny Lee

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>finished fifth at the at the PGA Championship.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, Okay, that's believable.

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there's there's not many guys down here in

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>this range that have as much upside as him. I mean,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>obviously got guys like Jason Duffner or you know, like

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 2>even maybe if Sean o'herry.

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Who's had a good successor in the past.

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>But you don't have a ton of those guys down

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>here that are gonna say, oh, he is top five upside.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>You got a lot of guys that may finish top thirty,

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 2>but a guy that finishes thirtieth probably isn't gonna isn't

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna win you the tournament. You're gonna have to have

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>some you know, longer shot guy down here finished top five.

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, example, like taking a guy like Beef Johnston,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>who nobody knows in America but he's you know, really

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>could try her the golf ball and yeah, he may

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 2>only be one or two percent home Une DraftKings this week,

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and if he happens to play well, there you go.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he did finish twenty seventh of the British

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 2>in the last major, so you know, and for be

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>second at the US Open, so you know, it's definitely

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 2>there for major to where you know he's not necessarily

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>scared of the spotlight.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, beef one at val Darama last year too, which

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 3>was one of the tougher driving courses on the European Tour.

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>So definitely fits him well if you got to drive

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 3>it well, definitely. So any any other guys down here that,

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 3>uh do you have a do you have a club

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 3>pro that you're that you're picking?

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Nah?

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Man, I'm pretty much staying away from all the club pros.

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, you obviously have like Mike Small from

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the University, you know, the University onaway head coach there

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 2>is you know, always a pretty solid play. But realistically

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see maybe one or one or two

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 2>of these guys make the cut this week. But I

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't expect any of them to, you know, really to

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 2>contend this week.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 4>What do you think about Grayson Murray? Uh?

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Can I plead the fifth?

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 4>I kind of think he could have could surprise.

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 3>He's from North Carolina and you know, when he's cooking,

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 3>he drives.

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 4>It really well.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 3>He's long, makes a lot of birdies. But it might

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 3>be it might be too big of.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:09.479
<v Speaker 4>A moment for him.

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's another one where you're gonna have

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to have your mental game together. I mean, obviously the

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 2>PJA Championship of the scoring is usually lower than most

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of their majors, but it's still gonna be a grind

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>fest this week. I mean, I'm expecting, you know, the

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 2>winning score to be somewhere between maybe eight to twelve

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred par and you know, it's gonna play difficult in

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 2>stretches just based upon the way that the course is

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 2>set up, especially if the guys who won in the

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 2>first two rounds and they're teeing off the back side,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have to play the Green Mile, which is

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>what they call quill Hall's last three holes, which are

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, the five hundred and six yard par four,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 2>sixteen sixteen, two hundred and twenty yard seventeenth, part three,

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and ninety yard eighteenth, and they're gonna have

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 2>to go right over to the first t box till

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the hold of McGirt was talking about, you know, five

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 2>five twenty par four, four fifty four and forty eighty

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>par four. So you're going to play those holes in

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 2>a row, and I expect absolute carnage between those six holes.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 2>You may see guys go into that six hole, stretch

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a couple under, and walk out a couple over.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, then it just wears on you for the If

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 3>you have to play six really tough holes in a row,

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 3>it's you need a little break.

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 4>So where are your favorite odds bets this week?

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the best odds on the board

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 2>is that is actually Phil Michelson that I kind of

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>mentioned earlier, So I believe for the week, I think

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>he's plus two fifty for top twenty bet, meaning you know,

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 2>if there's a hundre dollar bet on it, you're getting

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 2>your hundred dollars back plus two hundred fifty dollars back

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 2>for top twenty. Considering you know his history there where

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>he's he's finished inside the top twelve nine of the

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 2>last ten years here, a top twenty bet seems pretty

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty plausible. And he's also five to one for a

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 2>top ten and he's finished you know, top ten six

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of the ten years here. So those are those seemed

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty good odds for you know, a guy who's you know,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>tends to show up in major and you know, really

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>loves his golf course.

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm.

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 3>That's that's good. Do you have any other ones that

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 3>that you're really in on.

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're making it making any bets there,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I would kind of, you know, look at maybe maybe

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 2>towards some head to heads if there's some guys you

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 2>don't like, Like if you're going against maybe a guy

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 2>we talked about Henrik Stenson, if you can find a

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 2>head to head matchup for him against any of the

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 2>other top players, I'm thinking Stenson's got a good chance

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to miss the cut this week, so I would kind

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of choose, you know, the other player, whether maybe you know,

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 2>maybe match up against a Scott or a Casey.

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Or a Sergio or a Rose.

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I like all those guys that you know over Stenson,

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 2>if you can get him in a head to head matchup.

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 4>M yeah, Dessa.

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Rose has good track record here, he's done in the

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 3>best recent form. But I feel like he could be

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a guy that could really play well this week.

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Definitely.

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean he finished third here in twenty sixteen, fifth

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 2>and twenty fourteen, so I mean the forum is definitely there.

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>The only question is is his current form there, because

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 2>obviously we know he plays for he used to play

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 2>or he played well in the pass at Firestone, and

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 2>he didn't necessarily play well last week. But we know

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 2>it's definitely there for majors because you saw what he

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 2>played Augusta. It's just a matter of which Justin really

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 2>shows up for us.

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 4>So h so you're picked to win. Who's is it?

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Rory? It's Rory.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 2>I've been on Ry for a long time and you know,

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>you just cannot pass up what he's done here at

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 2>at at quill Hollow. I mean it just it's been domination.

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, he went fourth in twenty sixteen, one in fifteen,

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 2>eighth and four twenty fourteen, ten to twenty thirteen, second

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twelve. Yeah, obviously missed the cut in eleven,

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and then he won in twenty ten. That's just you know,

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to say, it's almost Tiger like, where the

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>guy his last seven appearances he has you know, six

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 2>top tens.

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>That that's kind of crazy. No, no matter what course.

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 3>That's on, mm hmm, yeah, it's uh, it seems like

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 3>that's where you know, most of the hype is gone.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I since I'm I'm back and down in my fantasy leagues.

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean have to be you know, scrape from the

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:07.800
<v Speaker 4>bottom of the barrel.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know who I'm gonna go with yet, but

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably gonna just take some fire, hope that nobody

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 3>else takes them and pick up some points.

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you just gave me typical control and Andy, we.

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Know it's yeah, well I change my mind every every day,

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:23.479
<v Speaker 3>so I'll uh.

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You'll probably be going with Lee west when it's fine.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 4>So no, no, the last Wood. You know, Westwood does

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 4>have one really good finish here, so I did see

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 4>some glimmer of hope.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 5>But he's been gallivanting in there in in French look, Indiana.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 4>He's not even getting ready down in North Carolina. He's

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 4>been in Indiana. It was disappointed, very disappointed. I might

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 4>pick Thomas Peters.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a viable option. Maybe Fleetwood.

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll probably pick Fleetwood.

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna pick so but uh all right, well, uh

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Les know what you think. We might be doing more

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 3>of these in the future. Paullie, thanks for coming on.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I know you got early morning tomorrow, so no problem.

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, definitely and if you don't follow Paullie, check

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 3>him out. It's at Frida egg Pollie on Twitter, and

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 3>he's he's really good at getting back to you, giving

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 3>and giving you what he thinks about different things.