WEBVTT - Huge, Huge Ridiculous Boobs!

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty arm Strong and get Katie

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and he Armstrong and Getty and I'm going you're going

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>to go.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I do believe because I have listened to this argument

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 3>for so long. And this is not about Chinese billionaires

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 3>or billionaires from other countries who all of a sudden

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 3>have seventy five children, or fifty nine children in one case,

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 3>or ten children becoming American citizens. This was about slaves.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Talking about the birthright citizenship Supreme Court case. The oral

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>arguments are today and Trump has a riven.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>He is there.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you fancy I'm looking at the cable news channels.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>He's there at the sup Supreme Court. First time ever

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a sitting president has gone to take in the oral arguments.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>What the President was talking about in the and that

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting and we'll talk about about it. But what

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about in that clip we played was

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth Amendment. It was not about Chinese billionaires popping

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>out surrogate kids to have US citizens, probably as a

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>spy army. It was about the children of slaves. When

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth amendment was passed. More on that no moment,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>there's Brooks Schaffer from The News Nation explaining that not

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>everybody agrees with.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 4>The potus this order, though it has faced a lot

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 4>of criticism, particularly among Democrats and immigration advocates. They warned

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 4>that if upheld, it could impact millions of immigrants already

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 4>living here and hundreds of thousands born each year. This

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 4>order so check of the neighbor impeatedly blocked by lower

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 4>courts across the country. Some legal experts believe the Supreme

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Court will do the same.

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand the way the left works looks at

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. That will affect a whole bunch of people. Yeah,

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so what it's either the right policy or not the

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>right policy at the end, however many people it affects

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>now or in the future is irrelevant.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>It's either right or wrong.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 5>I think you've quite skillfully highlighted one of the main

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 5>features of leftist thinking. It's not about principle, it's about

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 5>outcome anyway. So here's what we're arguing about, essentially, and

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 5>the administration its lawyers agree that, yeah, we're asking for

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 5>a change in the interpretation from the way it's gone,

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 5>but The reasoning behind the way it's been interpreted for

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 5>a long time is very very thin.

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>To wit. The fourteenth Amendment was.

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Ratified right after Civil War, well ratified in eighteen sixty eight.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 5>It begins quote, all persons born or naturalized in the

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 5>United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 5>of the United States.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 2>The question is, does this.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Language confer us citizenship on babies who whose parents are

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 5>in the country illegally or very temporarily, and that was

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 5>traditional understanding is yes. Trump says no, But that was to.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Make sure sure that you know, in the most racist

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>states Alabama or Mississippi, hey, those people are citizens. Whether

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you like it or not. They are right and they

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>get all children the rights.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 5>But that just because they're slave parents weren't quote unquote citizens,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 5>doesn't mean the kids ain't. That's the whole reason for it. Now,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm shooting from the hip here. I've not read deeply

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 5>on this, But if the intention was that, and you're

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 5>an originalist, I would think you'd go back to their

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 5>original thinking and think, Okay, everybody who could conceivably be

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 5>the child of a slave was gone by I don't

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 5>know whatevery.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Year nineteen twenty.

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean unless you live to be one hundred and fifty,

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so it no longer applies period.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've gotten way ahead of me, but you're one

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent right. Yeah.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 5>So the constitutional provision has come before the Supreme Court before.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 5>In a case called Wong kim Ark in eighteen ninety eight,

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 5>the justices recognized the citizenship of a man born to

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Chinese parents in San Francisco. The majority said, and I

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 5>quote the fourteenth and affirms the ancient and fundamental rule

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 5>of citizenship by birth within the territory. All children here

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 5>born of resident aliens. Now, the few exceptions, and this

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 5>is where it gets interesting, because they absolutely recognized that

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 5>there are exceptions. They included children of foreign diplomats because

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 5>you are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 5>You have diplomatic immunity enemies during hostile occupations. You can't

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 5>have Poncho vin as boys invade the US have a

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 5>bunch of kids and say they're US citizens, and particularly

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Native American tribal nations which were considered self governing, their

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 5>children are not automatic US citizens under that you know

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 5>at that time. But the Trump administration is arguing that

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 5>the Court has not answered the question the current question

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 5>not directly. Congress did not pass the first modern immigration

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 5>law until eighteen seventy five, so for much of our history,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 5>migrants could free enter the United States and take up

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 5>permanent residence. The government points out, and Wong kim ark

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 5>concerned children of aliens with a lawful domicile in the

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 5>United States, not children of temporarily present aliens or illegal aliens,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 5>a concept that was practically unknown until you know closer

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 5>to the modern era. So the crux of the dispute

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 5>is what does it mean to be subject to US jurisdiction.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 5>The opponents of the Trump administration say this simply refers

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 5>to people who are under the government's authority, including illegal aliens.

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 5>If you murder somebody's an illegal alien, well not in

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Chicago or or La or New York, but you get

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 5>arrested and tried and punished, so clearly you're under the

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 5>jurisdiction of the United States government. But people on our

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 5>side of it argue that birthright citizenship covers only people

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 5>completely subject to US political jurisdiction, meaning those who will

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 5>direct an immediately allegiance to the nation may claim its

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 5>protection Its rating excludes babies born to temporary viaseholders, as

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 5>well as illegal migrants who lacked the legal capacity to

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 5>form a lawful domicile, not to mention birth tourists for

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 5>goodness sakes.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So there are thirty three countries, according to Claude, that

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>grant unconditional birthright citizenship, many of them in the Americas.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But these are go way back for a variety of

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons that they did. That people have been getting rid

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of this over recent decades. I didn't know this. Notable

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>examples of countries that ended unrestricted birthright citizenship in recent

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>decades include the UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, India. In Ireland,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they ended it in two thousand and four,

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with eighty percent of voters backing a constitutional amendment in

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the modern world for all the modern reasons. You don't

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>want to do this, so you're not some sort of

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump racist and you think, unless you think all the

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Irish are racists or Great Britain or whatever, you don't

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>have to be some sort of Trump races to want

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to end birthright citizenship.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>It's a, to me, a stupid way to run your country.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>I would agree, Yeah, especially if you're not here lawfully

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and especially cuckoo. Not especially if you have a welfare

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>state the way modern countries do and you allow chain migration. Yeah,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the era of wide open immigration had no welfare stake. No,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so you came, you would work harder, you'd starve. Yeah,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>either came here and made your way, or you went

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>back home, or you starved to death.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Those are your options.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 5>Or leaned on your family, who would soon tell you

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 5>go back to the old country, you suck. I want

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 5>to quote a Randy Barnett, who's the director of the

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Georgetown Center for the Constitution, co author of a book

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 5>entitled The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, It's Letter

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 5>and Spirit, which is pretty authoritative. His piece is entitled

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Trump is right on birthright Citizenship. The Fourteenth Amendment authors

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 5>would exclude illegal and visiting aliens from US quote unquote jurisdiction.

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 5>And he agrees that dispute is over the meaning of

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 5>the subject of jurisdiction that phrase in each of the categories.

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 5>He mentions children of diplomats, soldiers from an invading army,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 5>American Indians maintaining tribal relations. In each of these categories,

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the status of the child depended on the status of

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 5>the parent, and then he gets into the temporary or

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 5>unlawfully thing.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Before Trump's executive order, what.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Originalist scholarship existed on the original meaning of subject to

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 5>the jurisdiction?

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.239
<v Speaker 2>That keyphrase was sporadic and lightly tested, if at all.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 5>This past year has produced an explosion of originalist scholarship

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 5>on both sides. This is where Jack preciently got a

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 5>couple of minutes ago. The justices are now in a

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 5>good position to decide which side has presented the stronger

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 5>originalist case. Kurt Lash University of Richmond has examined the

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 5>congressional debates over the Fourteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Act of eighteen sixty six. By the way, the Fourteenth

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 5>Amendment was like to constitutionalize the Civil Rights Act of

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 5>eighteen sixty six, it was to say, hey, this is

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>not a law that can come and go.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>This is permanent. Please.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 5>And that act declared what we said already about to

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 5>not subject to any foreign power, blah blah blah. The

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Fourteenth Amendment, Oh, I already said that. But the drafters

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 5>of the Fourteenth Amendment saw need for constitutional language that

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 5>more clearly excluded the children of tribal Indians. Lyman Trumble

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 5>of Illinois managed the citizenship clause in the upper chamber

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>in the Senate explained that subject subject to the jurisdiction

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 5>meant not owing allegiance to anyone else, whether to a

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 5>tribe or foreign power. This is the guy who managed

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 5>that clause in the fourteenth Amendment. John Bingham, a Congressman

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 5>from Ohio, the moving force behind the fourteenth Amendment. He

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 5>was a Republican, of course, used the same framework, referring

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 5>after ratification to persons born in the US quote and

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 5>not owing allegiance to any foreign power. These statements and

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 5>others mister lash identified demonstrated how leading Republicans explained the concept.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 5>The text was meant to capture birth plus full political membership.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 5>And I could go more into detail on some of

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 5>the precedents that have come and gone, but they only

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 5>scratched the surface of the key question.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>This is an old.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 5>Interpretation of the fourteenth Amendment based on virtually no serious thought.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 5>It again, it was like drive by interpretations that addressed

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 5>a specific question at a specific point in history, but

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 5>did not take on the bigger question. It's practically been unexamined, so.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is going to happen if you

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>watch I don't know about mainstream media, but certainly lefty

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>leaning media, which is mainstream media they're presenting. It is

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>just an incredibly unconstitutional overreach by Trump too.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>It's very clear in the Constitution what is supposed to happen.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not true at all. What do you think is

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>going to occur? I'm gonna find out till June. By

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the way, the arguments are today and Trump is there

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to listen to them, but they probably won't release their

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>decision until June.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 5>Well, Jack is gonna cuss me for this, folks, But

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it's something close to a coin flip.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Really, I don't know.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 5>It's it would definitely be a c change in the

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 5>interpretation of the fourteenth Amendment, and to my mind, a

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 5>completely appropriate one.

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a great case of I just I mean,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a lawyer, and you know I can't. I

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>can't look at it this through the lens of the

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>way you argue this in the Supreme Court. But just

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on the face of it it at the surface level,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it just seems so insane to continue to use something

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>meant for a and now it applies only to B,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to keep it around because it was

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there originally.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 5>What right right, Well, it's it's a perfect example, as

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 5>I started to say, of how sometimes the constitution of

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 5>the amendments are a bit vague because the people people

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 5>who whether frame the Constitution and the bill rights, etc.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Or came along later, like the fourteenth Amendment, the world

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 5>they existed in was very, very different in terms of immigration, population,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 5>that sort of thing than the world exists that exists today,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 5>and so their wording was absolutely adequate to the situation

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 5>of the time. But now the situation has changed so completely.

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 5>You've got to dig and this is what the MSNBC's

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 5>The World are not doing. You've got to dig behind

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 5>the vague wording and look at the reasoning behind it.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 5>Be an originalist. What did they mean? What were they

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 5>trying to get to? And you answer that question and

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 5>if then you decide, well that's wholly inadequate to the

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 5>modern world, well that's when Congress steps up and you

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 5>clarify it, or you amend the amendment or whatever, which

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 5>you can absolutely do. We need to do this though

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 5>right now. A word from our friends that simply save

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 5>home security. This is such a great deal, such a

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 5>great system. I think we've all a lot of us

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 5>have had like old time security systems with all the

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 5>wires and stuff, and they didn't work right, and they

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 5>were incredibly expensive and you had to sign a three

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 5>year contract. Simply Safe is none of those things. It's

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 5>super advanced AI technology, live monitoring agents, no locked in contracts.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I have it myself. I got to sign in front

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of my house. That reminds me as much as anybody else.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, as I'm pulling away from my house right now,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I got to simply Safe setup with the sensors and

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>the cameras and all the different sort of stuff. And

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's also the fact that I'm not locked into

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing it just because I signed a couple

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of year contract and I got no choice.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 2>No, they earn your business.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>All the time by being good, and lots and lots

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of people, five million people like me trust simply Safe

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>every day.

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 5>And they prevent break ins. They don't just go off

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 5>after the breakings occurred. It's great and right now you

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 5>good people can get fifty percent off your new simply

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Safe system. It's simply Safe dot com slash or I'm

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 5>strong fifty percent off simply safe dot com slash or

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm strong there's no safe like simply safe.

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The giant headline on the front of the New York

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Post what a boob. We all learned a word yesterday.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Bimbofication is a kink and Christy Nomes husband has it.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that and other story is on the way. I

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I saw any news coverage yesterday of

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Christy Nomes husband bimbification story. Apparently we still have

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>some decorum and standards where we just don't get into

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that on the serious shows, because I didn't

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>see it anywhere, did you.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it's of any great significance other than

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 5>being interesting from sexual kink perspectives.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of stuff that makes the news of no

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>great significance, like most of oh my gosh, yeah, almost

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Yeah, so I just was surprised nobody

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>did it. So apparently the meme is going around the

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio finding out meme that has been going for

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>quite some time. Marco Ribio finding out he's now the

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback of the you know, the Green Bay Packers in New.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 2>York Jasey sitting on the couch in his uniform.

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not finding out he's the new Shaw of Iran

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio finding out he's now Christy Noms's husband. But

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a picture of him in pink spandex looking at

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a giant bra Confused.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 5>I've seen a couple of different versions of that.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, uh, bimbofication.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So Christy Nome, who was the Department of Homeland Security

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>secretary up until a couple of weeks ago, Ice Barbie,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and there are all the rumors, which seem to be

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty fact based, that she was having an affair with

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Corey Lewandowski, which was Trump's original campaign manager that got him.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Elected way back in twenty sixteen.

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Any who, and then you had the weird thing and

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Christy Nome being grilled by Congress and her husband sitting

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>right behind her as Congress asked her about the affair. Well,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>she he had left at that point to catch a

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>plane to probably a bimboification conference.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>More on that stay with us.

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we know anything about Christy Nome's husband

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>really is that he was sitting behind her at that grilling.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>She's awkward all the way around, anyway, story breaks yesterday,

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not Christy Nomme knew about it herself,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm still skeptical. She's claiming the family had no idea.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>They were completely blindsided when all these pictures came out

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of him dressed in really tight tops with giant, giant

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>balloons or something under his shirt to look like enormous

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>boobs and his tiny little shorts. And it's some sort

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of kink called bimblification, which I don't know that I'd

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ever heard of. And he corresponded hundreds and hundreds of

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>messages with adult performers with massively augmented breasts to achieve

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a Barbie dial like appearance. No, it's Barbie dial like it.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't begin to describe it now. And he didn't

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>try to hide who he was at all, And he

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of claimed he coveted huge, huge, ridiculous boobs, that's

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a quote. He was willing to share these pictures with

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>his face well lit and very clear who he was

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>with all kinds of random people who are into bimbification.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Jack.

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 5>His face is fully visible in several of the photos,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 5>one with a completely straight visage and others making a

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 5>flirtatious kissy face with purse limps back to you.

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the tiny little pink shorts are more

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>offensive than the giant bazoombas guy's successful insurance executive.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 5>He sent some of these performers over twenty five thousand

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 5>dollars via cash app and PayPal as tips as they

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 5>would do whatever he bid or engage in whatever conversation.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>He and Kirstyd been married for thirty four years, like

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>high school sweetheart sort of couple. He traded selfies with

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one woman he pledged to worship like a goddess, telling

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>her quote, you turned me into a girl, before asking

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>if he should put on leggings.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 2>He's wished. He's straight as far as we can tell.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It doesn't matter.

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Really a straight guy thing to do.

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Those little pink shorts don't seem very straight, but I

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>don't I might not fully understand bimblification, if you know.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Texas Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 7>Finally, some potential good news here for oil markets, for

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 7>stock markets, and really for the American consumer that's been

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 7>hit by this impact to oil, you know, trickling down

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 7>to prices at the pump. We've actually seen over the

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 7>last twenty four hours, the oil futures move as low

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 7>as four percent just around one hundred hours of bell orrow,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 7>just falling under that threshold. We are starting to head

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 7>in the right direction, and there's more optimism that this

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 7>could be a sustained pullback for the oil markets, as

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 7>the President, of course has signaled that the end of

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 7>this conflict could be near within the next.

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Couple of weeks.

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I just wanted to play that to make

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the point. This determining on a twenty four hour by

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour period whether policy these are good or

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>bad based on tiny movements in various commodities is not.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 5>I was going to ask, is that nice lady familiar

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 5>with roller coasters and how they work?

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Whyes?

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We today we went up, look ahead, just ahead, See

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that twisty thing. Both sides do it though all the time,

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and quit making your argument for anything based on one

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>day of movements and markets.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a verrazy song. Everything is click pait. It's very

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 2>very complex.

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>There's all kinds of reasons things can go up and

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>down for one day.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, people who want good news for reasons political

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 5>or financial will click like crazy on those headlines. Those

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 5>who despise Trump and are convinced this war was about

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 5>our idea will click like fiends on anything that's negative.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 2>So I want to mention this.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this out yesterday afternoon, and it's kind of

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>interested to see what the responses would be.

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 2>Got quite a few responses.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Partially because I've lived in California for so long now

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know what the rest of America does

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and how much has changed along with California or as

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>different California. Anyway, this is what I tweeted out. I

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>had to take my son to the doctor for his physical.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He was due for his tea DAP also booster, which

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>used to be for me anyway, just all about the

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.239
<v Speaker 1>tetanus and then you know that other stuff that they

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>throw in there. Well, since I had the p in

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the tea DAP whooping cough last year, and you don't

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>want to get whooping cough. But anyway, he had to

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>get that shot and just regular physical and I tweeted out,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anything makes me angrier at the doctor's

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>office than being asked to step out of the room

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so they can talk to my kid alone. And some

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of the responses I thought were interesting from people who

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>said move here. They don't make us do that here. WTF?

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>So I even and it does. It makes me insanely angry,

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and I try to control my boiling rage. I don't

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>know how good a job I did it. I made

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it clear to the nice young woman who is a

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>assistant of some sort who asked me to leave the room,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>how angry it makes me. And I made it clear

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's not your fault. I realize you don't make

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the policy. I'm just registering how outrageous I think this is.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And I do think it's outrageous. And then, well, first

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, do you have any concepts of how common

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it is around the country for this? Is this the

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing they do mostly in California, you know, Taxachusetts,

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and not in Oklahoma and.

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska, or I don't actually know.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't I would like to dig into that. It's

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 5>an interesting question.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I know it didn't happen when I was a kid,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>and the physician's assistant she said, you know, I actually

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>underst I'm not sure if I had a kid, I

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>would like that either. But the idea that I said,

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is it the does the government make you do this?

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it the hospital and she said, it's kind of bopen.

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>The idea that I, as the parent of a kid,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>who have sole responsibility for everything in that kid's life,

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm asked to leave though now I'm asked, well, that's

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to get to. I'm asked to leave

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the room so that some other entity can come between

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>me and that kid, because we're making the assumption here

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that whatever conversation they're gonna have with my kid is

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>at a higher plane than what I'm gonna do.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 2>That it is the authority.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the let us check in to see if we

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think what's going on in this household is right or wrong.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Because we know what's right or wrong, he might not.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>We're just checking.

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 5>In important clarification, not as a backstop if something's gone

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 5>terribly long wrong like abuse or neglect, No, but as

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 5>an on going higher authority for that child's life and

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 5>well being.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Right, you're making the statement that we the state, or

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we this institution at the behest of the state, know

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what's best. We're just checking to make sure you're following

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>our rules. And what indication do you have that their

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>rules have been very good throughout history?

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I will tell you this, and this is the

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 5>bedrock of all of it.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I've told this story in.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 5>Various forms many times, but I encountered a professor in

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 5>college who was a Marxist, and I was at that

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 5>point completely unfamiliar with some of the sociological aspects of

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Marxist thinking. And her point was that the nuclear family

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 5>is an organization, an institution of oppression, and that the

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 5>state should raise children. She actually espoused this in class,

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 5>and I'm sitting there like, wait what. And that was

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 5>my introduction to that Marxist belief that the state should

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 5>raise the child, because that way you can indoctrinate them

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 5>into becoming a good little Marxist or just you know,

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 5>automaton or what have you. And it's right there in

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 5>the It takes a village philosophy, and it's absolutely the

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 5>unholy bloom of that weed right now is hey, Yeah,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 5>I'd be happy to call you Jenny Johnny.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 2>And let's not tell mom and dad.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 5>They don't need to know because they're probably going to

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 5>abuse you or whatever. The teachers, radicalizing the children and

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 5>getting between the parent and the child, it's all the

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 5>same thing. And yes, it's leached its way into medicine.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Some of our medical schools, like UCLA Medical School. It's

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 5>one of the most woke institutions in America.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 2>It's horrible.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Some of the questions they asked too, How did this

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>become part of a physical Why are you asking about

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff for physical Yeah.

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 2>My kids both know that that. We don't answer the

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>gun question. None of your effing business.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Why are you freaking asking me if I've got a

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>gun in my house at the doctor's office.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a big yes. Oh yeah, no kidding, right what?

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 2>And so I it's interesting.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the responses on Twitter to that were

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that when people saying I don't, I just say no,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>which I left the room because I don't want to

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>embarrass my kid. I mean, if it's me, I'm willing

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to get into all kinds of an uproar. I don't

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>care if they have to bring in guards because they're

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>worried I'm about to twist off. I'm perfectly fine with

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>bringing that upon la Vie, but I don't want to

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>put my kid in awkward position. And we talked about

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it later and he said, I'm fine with you doing that.

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>So from now on, I'm just gonna say no, just no.

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not leaving the room anything. You got to ask

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>me and ask them for me. Of course, in the so,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I bring this up to some people and they look

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at me like, why would that be a problem?

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>What sort of crazy? What are you hiding?

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>What awful thing are you doing to your child that

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>you want to hide that you no, no.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>No, no no no. Do you not understand?

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>They're declaring that they know what's best and you don't.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the statement they're making.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 5>And there's a presumption that they they are justified in

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 5>coming between you and your child and say, all right,

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 5>what's what's the deal with him?

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 2>What's going on? Right?

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember it, and this one was tough and

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>it blindsided me. And you know, Katie's trying to stay calm.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Oh go ahead, Katy, Oh boy, I'm just thinking, you know,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 6>I've got a kid on the way, and I would

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 6>blow a gasket.

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Where is that? What to happen?

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're gonna be doing dealing with it really soon,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>probably because the first time it hit me was when

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Sam was born and I was asked to leave the

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>room so they can talk to mom without me there,

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Like what.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 6>See, that's when I'm going to demand no, Drew is staying,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 6>you can talk to both of us.

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't under this is bizarre, feel free, They can't.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they do if you say that,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but they probably just make a note on a form.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Probably it's an unholy confluence.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 5>I think of what I was describing, and like insurance

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 5>companies and liability, and maybe greater awareness of certain issues,

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 5>like every time I register to go to my usual

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 5>let's try not to have a stroke appointment with my doctor,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 5>I've got to fill out the pre thing, the pre

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 5>form which includes do you ever feel like life is

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 5>pointless and you take no joy in the things you do?

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 5>And I want to fill in only when I'm filling

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 5>out this form.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, actually, you know what.

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 6>I've had to fill out two of those a week

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 6>for the last.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Month, and I'm gonna have to do it again today.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 6>I will be writing that only when you guys ask

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 6>me this question, oh, I and over again.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate the greater awareness of mental illness issues, but

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 5>is there anybody who's so completely unaware of depression and

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 5>what it is and where you might get help that

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 5>they'll fill out that form and the doctor will say,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 5>say Jim, It sounds like depression to me, and they'll

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 5>be like, what doc, the fact that I'm hopeless all

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 5>the time and take no joy in anything, and that

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 5>will be the pipeline, that will be the connection that's

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 5>leave them.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 2>It just strikes me as I don't know, dopey.

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Michael, there are so many people out there though,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 5>that actually think they do know best and they will

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 5>follow right along.

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they think that the authorities no best. Absolutely. What's

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 2>your indication of that, COVID? I hate to bring it up, but.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm talking to people who believe that the the

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the the the government's view or an institution's view of

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>how to raise your kids is better than yours.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 2>What what's your your your data that led you to that?

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 5>Excuse me, Jack, while I interview this sheep and ask

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 5>it why it runs with the herd.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>That's just the nature of that sort of beast.

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And I live in a state where it's certainly on

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the table for somebody to say to your kid behind

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>closed doors, do you ever feel like a girl or

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a boy?

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Except except the activists are much more insidious. They'll say,

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 5>do you ever feel like you know, being a tough

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 5>guy is not who you really are right, They'll find

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 5>some universal like that and then shove that wedge and

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 5>that's what they do.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it happen.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the questions were at least half like

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>social sciences as opposed to all medical stuff like blood pressure, weight,

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, all those sorts of things. Do you do

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it a physical get the right vaccinations? Ok, it's just

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The modern world is not for me.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh that makes me insanely angry though, I mean just

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like I can't hardly control.

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Myself angry right right, because you understand the greater symbolism

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 5>of it and the intent behind it.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, And as a full time single parent, the responsibility

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I have of raising kids and how much work it is.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And now you've just stepped in to say we're really

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones in charge here.

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh oh my god. Yeah.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 5>I know them intimately and love them on a level

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 5>that the greatest greatest poets couldn't even describe. But you,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 5>having just walked into the room, are going to take control.

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, right, That's exactly it. You put it better than me.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the feeling I hear all day today, for instance,

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>doing nothing but trying to make sure his life is okay.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And now you're going to put me out of the

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>room because you're the wheel.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're gonna take the wheel. Yeah, Oh my god.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 5>Next time they ask you about the guns in the home,

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 5>say yes, six. I mean they're not in the home.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 5>They're on my person right now. Take out six of them.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 5>One in my left sock, one in the back of

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 5>my pants. I guess two one here and mag gotta

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 5>be careful with that one.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Am I wrong?

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Of course both of my holsters on either hip and

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 5>then the one tucked in my back in case you know,

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 5>things get really hairy.

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 2>On each side like you use somebody. Sam. Oh, I've

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>got one of those drop down machetes too. Do you

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 2>need to know about that?

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's in my sleeve here, Ah boy, got a barrel

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of antracks in the garage. I'm just let me go

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>through the listener, any thoughts on any of this? Being

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>asked to leave the room? Text line four one five

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>two nine five KFTC.

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, man skied across an asphalt parking lot at sixty

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 5>nine miles an hour, not intentionally. He'd just been clipped

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 5>by Tiger Woods this suv.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got to get to Tiger Wood's statement yesterday

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in which I found bad news for Tiger. Actually, so,

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking about how angry it makes me

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>when they say at the doctor's office, I'm there for

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>my kid's physical. Can you step out of the room now?

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We need to talk to him alone. And I just

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can't restate what I just said. If you missed it,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>get the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand. But what's

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the message it sends to the kid? This twenty two

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>year old woman is the authority, not your parent, right.

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I hate everything about that. I'm never

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it again. I'm never doing it again. You hold

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>me off in cuffs if you want to. I will

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>never leave the room again. And I'm just gonna see

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened. We got this text, Katie, you like this

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>since you were with child Jack and oh I just

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>had a kid. In the state of California, if you

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>go to a baby checkup as the husband when she

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is pregnant, they will tell you in the lobby that

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they have to talk to her first before you're allowed

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to come into the baby checkup, the prenatal baby checkub.

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>They bring her back there and ask her if everything

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is okay in the home life. Then the nurse comes

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out and grabs you in the lobby.

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 5>What in the hell did we decide this was okay,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 5>that the intrusion into the coherence of the family, the

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 5>cohesion of the family is justified by the interests of

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 5>the state and protecting women or something.

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 2>When did the trade office work?

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We are sheep well that we allowed it to even

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>get going, that we all just sided it, that the

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>first time it ever happened. We all just thought, well,

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I suppose i'd better because they asked me to. But

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's freaking outrageous anywhile, let you react gate.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, and so what if you say no, what

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 2>do they.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, actually, and I suppose I doubt they

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>can say, well, then you can't have a baby here.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 6>I doubt they do that, because I mean, that's got

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 6>to be some kind of protocol that they're following.

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but I mean we are She and I are

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>grown ups, adult citizens of this country. We willingly decided

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to get married and have a kid together.

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>All you need to know, right, your job as a.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Medical professional is to facilitate this birth in the healthiest

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>way possible.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, check on my baby. Not my marriage. I'm fine.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, there's I always harp on the Marxist

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 5>thing that the postmodernist way lefties, but there's a lot

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 5>of paternalism and nanny statism among the left and center

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 5>left too, that they just think the government is here

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 5>to solve all problems, and they don't. They don't see

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 5>it as a trade off. They see it as an

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 5>unmitigated good.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no.

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 5>All the husband has to do is leave the room

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 5>for like a minute or two. We make sure the

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 5>wife's not being abused or the girlfriend or the partner

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 5>or whatever, and then the man comes in. What's There's

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 5>no cost there other They just don't see the world

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 5>the way we do.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you're not making that argument for yourself, but

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no cost other than an infentele makes us all infants.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 2>In that way, you know, completely.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>We need to be taken care of by again, the

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty three year old the doctor's office, because we're not

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as adults capable of, you know, handling our own lives.

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Right here, they come to the rescue. Yeah, exactly, exactly. Anyway, well,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>that twenty three year old is an agent of the state.

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 5>Literally, They and I a bureaucrat to whom you must answer.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say it again because I know this will

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>get back. It always does. I realize you're doing your job.

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 1>You're just doing your job. You're doing what you're told

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to do. You're making your living. Not a problem with you,

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the policy, not you.

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right here here.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 5>As most of you may have heard by now, Judy

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.959
<v Speaker 5>and I lost our buddy Baxter the dog this last

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 5>week Backsi taxi, codependent boyfriend, mister underfoot. He went by

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 5>many names. There's been another loss in the world of dogs.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 5>This Sugar the Surfing Dog, the first canine inducted into

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 5>the Surfer's Hall of Fame. You may have seen a surfer,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 5>Sugar the Surfing Dog, who hung out at hunting And Beach,

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 5>California and was a very very famous surfing dog. Sixteen

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 5>year old rescue dog from Huntington Beach, five time dog

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 5>surfing World Champion, passed away. When Sugar was not surfing,

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:25.479
<v Speaker 5>she was a what's the proper term, A counseling dog,

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 5>a comfort dog for veterans. This is a Dog Hall

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 5>of Famer, Sugar the Dog, and just reminds us it's

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 5>funny how much good will a dog brings in a room,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 5>hospital with kids or whatever. Man are our canine companions.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:42.479
<v Speaker 5>They have a special, special role.

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 2>She was sixteen sixteen.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 6>Wow, she's like a kind of a lab Ish. That's

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 6>pretty old for that kind of a dog. A therapy

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 6>dog was the term I was looking for. Yeah, sixteen

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 6>year old lab mix, I believe. And how recently was

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 6>the dog surfing?

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Till toward the end she.

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Had like the equivalent of like an eighty five year

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>old human out there surfing.

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 5>That's pretty impressive winning championships. In twenty twenty four, her

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 5>paw Prince joined the hand and footprints of many other

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 5>renowned surfers immortalized at the Surfing Hall of Fame.

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>That's sweet, that's awesome.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we do a lot of stuff, been wide ranging.

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>If you ever miss anything, want to catch it, get

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe Armstrong and Getty