WEBVTT - Legally Brunette: Karen Read

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi guys, welcome to Legally Brunette. I will be your

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>host today Emily Simpson and my co.

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Host Shane Simpson.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, so first of.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>All, we're going to go to just a little bit

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of a brief update on the Menindez case. So, there

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>were two prosecutors, Brock Lunsford and Nancy Theeburg, who filed

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>notices of claim on Monday that they intend to sue

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>DA Hawkman and the Deputy District Attorney John Lewin for retaliation, defamation,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and discrimination. So these two prosecutors said that they made

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a presentation last October arguing that Eric and Lyle Menindez

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>should be re sentenced in their nineteen eighty nine murders

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of their parents, Jose and Kitty because their imprisonment no

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>longer served the interest of justice. Some high ranking La

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>County prosecutors disagreed with the move, including their supervisor. So

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this is according to their notice of claim. Hawkman announced

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>his intention to review the decision after handily defeating Gascon

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>last November. So as we know they have, they have

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a hearing coming up on March twentieth and the twenty first.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So these two das have been big supporters of them

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>being re sentenced, and they're saying that now Hawkman has

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>come in and that they've been demoted.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>So one of them.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Says that he's now been moved to a calendar clerk

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, and then the other one claims

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that she received high regards in her position, but now

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>she's been moved to something else. So they're saying that

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they've been retaliated against because they've been supporting the resentencing

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of the Menendez brothers. Also, what's interesting is they're hearing

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on March twentieth and twenty. First, if you guys have

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>not heard, they will be. They're supposed to be attending

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this hearing in person, which will be the first time

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in thirty years that they've been seen in public, so

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that that will be a media storm.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, And also are you gonna be there?

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I would love to be there if I can get

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>a ticket.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And also I heard that they cannot wear regular clothing.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Like if you remember when Luigi made his first Luigi Mangioni,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he made his appearance, he was like decked in designer.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's gonna wear his prison uniform.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna they're gonna wear a prison.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 4>Well, the reason is because he's already sentenced. He's they're

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>already in jail. So when they have someone on trial

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 4>innocent before proven guilty, right, so they don't Sometimes they

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 4>don't want the jury to prejudge by seeing them in like,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, an orange jumpsuit, right, so they have home

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 4>dress and then come into the court and then change

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 4>back into their jumpsuit or whatever the uniform is, go

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 4>back to prison weather and custody. So I'm guessing this

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 4>time it just doesn't matter because the judge already knows

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 4>they're in jail, and it's just a resentencing hearing. It's

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 4>not a guilty not guilty.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, and just a reminder that it's not the da

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Hawkman who makes the decision for them to be resents.

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>All he does is make a recommendation to the judge

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the judge ultimately decides right.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 4>But important nevertheless, because he's still presenting evidence to the

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 4>judge right and making the case right.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Exactly the case.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Based upon everything that we've heard about Hawkman so far,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>my gut feeling is that he's not going to be

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>very pro recently.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Now. I saw him on TV like a couple months ago,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why because I wasn't following the case

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 4>as close as you. But he he made a good point.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 4>He goes, I'm not just gonna just throw it in

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 4>front of the judge because it's popular and because it's

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 4>all over media. He goes, I'm now in, you know,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 4>in my position where I have to review it. Like

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 4>he's kind of like, okay, now it's it's on my desk.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I got to review it. I gotta like, I can't

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 4>just go off of everyone's word because it's on Netflix.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>And that was true, but you know, only to come

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 4>to this point where it sounds like it's a little

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 4>power trip for him.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Maybe yeah, all right, So we're gonna move on.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And we've already done two podcasts on the Blake Lively

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Justin Baldoni mess.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>That's what I call it. It is a it is

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 3>a p R.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It is a juicy mess. If you haven't listened to

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>our first two podcasts, go back and listen. We go

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>through up until today where we're going to start. First

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of all, the last thing we have not spoken about.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>They did have a hearing. It was a pre trial conference,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and basically what happened was there was a gag order

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that was requested. They really wanted Brian Friedman to shut

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>up and stop talking. Brian Friedman, he's out there a lot,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's out there on TMZ, he's he's doing podcasts, He's

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot. And I find it really ironic that

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>they're telling him that he needs to stop talking, considering

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that when they filed that initial complaint with the California

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Department that they I mean, it looks to me.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Allegedly, it looks like they just colluded with the New

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 3>York Times and the New York City.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Reynolds wants it to continue to be one sided.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>It was very It was very one sided. The article

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was very one sided. It was not a balanced article.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And again, if you recall we've talked about this in

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>our first podcast, they gave Justin Baldoni's side, very very

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>little time to respond. I think they got an email

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the night before basically saying, hey, do you want to.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Respond to this?

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, what happened was and the hearing, the judge

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>basically said, let's just follow the you know, the professional

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>rules of responsibility, which is Rule three point six, which

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>says which basically bars lawyers from making statements publicly that

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>could sway the outcome.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Of the trial.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, to me, that is a very generalized

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>broad statement. I mean clearly, any attorney talking on behalf

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>of their client is going to advocate.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think, I know, I know, but I think

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 4>the ideas because you see them making press conferences all

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the time right from big profile, high profile cases, So

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 4>I think the ideas they can. They're supposed to only

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>go on there and say things like my client's innocent.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 2>We're going to argue.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Zellously blah blah blah, not giving specific facts like they

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 4>can deny things, but you don't want them to come

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>in there and you know, give the you know, taints

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 4>the jury with evidence that may not be admissible in court,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 4>but they're throwing it out there right public.

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But what also is interesting is that Brian Friedman and

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Justin Baldoni's team released the website two days before that

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>pre trial conference where they were going to discuss a

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>gag order. So I call him the FAFO attorney because

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he knew that that was going to be discussed. They

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>want a head and through that website out there. Anyway,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>if you have the chance to look at it, what

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he did was he put the amended complaint on there

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and also the whole text message email chain between him.

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>There's text with him and Ryan Reynolds, there's all the

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>text with him and Blake Lively. I think that was

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just the point they were making, was that they're they're

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the side that's being transparent.

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 3>They're just putting it.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 4>All out there, and they're probably arguing two cases, one

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 4>in court and one with the public.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's absolutely and I would say at this point

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>he's winning in the public.

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 3>It's if this is.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>A if this is the court of pr and publicity,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni is on.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Top of this team. Baldoni.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So also in this hearing, Justin Baldoni's attorney, Brian Freeman,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>claims that his client is devastated financially and emotionally, and

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he also wants to depose Blake Lively quickly and get.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Right into discovery.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Then I also saw he did Brian Freeman did a

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast the other day. There's a new podcast called Two

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Angry Men, which is Mark Garregos and Harvey Levin, who

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is the TMZ guy, And on that podcast, Brian Freeman

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was making reference to Justin Baldoni. Basically losing four projects

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>because of these accusations against him. So when people are like, wow,

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million dollars, well, that's because they're going to argue.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>They're going to argue that those are the damages and

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what's been lost. So Lively's attorney claimed during this

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>hearing that they're going to file an amended complaint. The

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>amended complaint was supposed to be filed by February fourteenth,

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So I really thought when we recorded this podcast today

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that we would be able to discuss her amended complaint and.

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Who is Okay Lively is amending her complaints? Do we

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 4>have any idea what she's trying to amend.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, here's my thoughts.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>First of all, if she's amending the content, like I

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have more allegations against him, I find that to be

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>suspect because if you were originally going to file a

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>complaint about someone, you had months and months to prepare it,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you're working with The New York Times on it, you

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>would have thrown everything out there in the beginning.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't have held stuff.

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>So it's not an amendment to add evidence, it's just

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 4>an like cause of action. Well, because evidence is for trial, right,

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 4>So I mean it's probably yeah, you're right, it's probably

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 4>more causes of action.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what those are. I assume they would

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>have been originally. I do think that she's probably going

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to add Jed Wallace. He is the guy that is

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in Texas that he was named in the original complaint

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that Blake Lively filed. Or he has some kind of

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>PR type of business where I don't know he does,

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like astroturfing or bots or something like that. So Blake

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Lively wanted to depose him in Texas. Then he filed

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a seven million dollar lawsuit against her for I think,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for some type of defamation because she named him in

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the complaint. She didn't name him as a defendant. She

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just named him in the complaint and talked about how

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>he was, you know, colluded us.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>On the automation.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 4>When it's in court, you have the immunity quasi immunity,

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 4>which you know, you're allowed to say things in court

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:31.479
<v Speaker 4>make those accusations.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, maybe publicly she also threw it out there or something.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, he's named in this complaint and everybody's

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about all these PR people that are all involved

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in these smear campaigns, and so he got pulled into

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>this smear campaign against.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I want the deposition of Taylor Swift.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, that's interesting you bring that up, because when

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian Friedman did this podcast recently, Harry Harvey said to him,

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you're you're clearly going to depose Taylor Swift, right, And

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, I don't know. We'll figure that

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>out at game time. And Harvey's like, are you kidding me?

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course you're going to depose Taylor Swift. She was.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>She was at their home on that January fourth meeting

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>when supposedly Ryan Reynolds be rated justin Belton the balcony

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>scene or yeah, and apparently you know, she was there

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>when they were having the conversation about this balcony scene

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and they were all, you know, gung ho about Blake's

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and everything.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>You think Taylor's sing. What the heck? Why did I

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>become friends with her?

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I have read some things and this

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is just alleged. I don't know exactly what Taylor Swift

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is thinking, but clearly there's people you know, close to

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Taylor that are saying she's distancing herself from Blake Lively

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and that she doesn't want to be involved in this

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit and she doesn't want to have anything to.

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Tell with it.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Swift should give Blake Lively some advice, and you

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 4>know what that would be, shake it off.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Shake it off.

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>That was a good one, Shane. I didn't even know

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>you knew Taylor Swift song.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I just know that one.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>So there we go.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully when they am in a complaint gets file, we

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>will do another podcast.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 4>We will talk about it.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>We will figure out did she add in new causes

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of action? Did she add in new defendants? What's going

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on there?

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 4>When she amends the complaints, then there can be allowed

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 4>a response to those to the new amended causes of action. Okay,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 4>just to be clear for the listeners.

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So here's some things that have been going

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on in the media with this Blake Lively and Justin

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni situation. First of all, I don't know if you

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>saw this, but Colleen Hoover is back on Instagram. She

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>deactivated her Instagram, I'm sure because she was just getting

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>hit with she went on polse.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes she did.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>She is now back.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, right, So she's back on Instagram.

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>We'll see what happens there.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I did read in an article that she had removed

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>anything that really had to do with Justin or Blake

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or it ends with us. I mean, I'm sure she

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to give people an avenue where they can comment. Now,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>if they want to comment, they have to find, you know,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a picture of Yeah, that would be that would be

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a that would be a series. So Blake Lively right

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>litigates with us.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a good one.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So Blake Lively is now seeking Justin Baldoni's phone records

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to show that there was a smear effort against her.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>This was in a Variety article that came out last night.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Blake Lively's lawyers sent a subpoena on Wednesday, February thirteenth

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for Justin Baldoni's phone records. Lively's attorneys sent subpoenas to

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>three phone carriers, AT and T, Risen and T Mobile

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>seeking phone records. What's his meant, No, that that one

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>has a protective order? Probably kidding, Yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 3>He's like he gets he's like denied. Yeah, I don't

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 3>know who our cell carrier is. That's interesting.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>They're seeking records pertaining to Baldoni, the producer Jamie Heath,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>who is one of the Wayfarer founders, and billionaire Wayfair

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Studios co founder Steve Sorrowitz. The subpoenas also seek the

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>phone records of Abel, she is Wayfarers and Baldoni's publicist.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>She is the one who her phone was confiscated by

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Jones, who is.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Another PR person. There's so much PR people at.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 4>The suppose it and release it.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that subpoena, but anyway, Jennifer Able

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>her phone was confiscated by Stephanie, and then that's how

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they propagated all those text messages that Blake Lively used

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>and her complaint and that The New York Times also used,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and allegedly that's.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Kind of a little sneaky. There was something going on there, right.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, of course, I mean if you in in

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Justin's complaint, he lays out that she went to the

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to work one day and then she got put into

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a room and there was a security guard there and

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they confiscated her phone and they made her sign all

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>these documents and it was her personal cell phone, her

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>personal cell phone number. Then Blake Lively gets a hold

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of all these text messages that she uses in her complaints.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't don't ever give up your cell phone.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>No, race is like that. No, you just throw it.

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>If anything, they'd start to go for you throw it

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>out in the past, so you don't have.

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>To give them the cast code.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>The subpoenas seek the phone records Amable and publicist Melissa Nathan.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Melissa Nathan is the publicist who is the crisis PR

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>publicist that Justin Baldoni hired. You know when the movie

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>came out. He's hearing that he's been referred to as

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a sexual predator. He hires the same PR crisis management

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>team that represented Johnny Depp. So not so he has

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a regular publicist and then he hired this crisis management team.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>So there are so many PR people.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 4>I know that's the way it's deviating. But do you

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 4>know how much money is being made off of everyone

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 4>outside of this, all the like social media stuff, articles written,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, TV shows or whatever, news casting. Then you

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 4>have all these PR crisis people that are hired. Who

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>knows how many therapists are hired. The lawyers are hired, right,

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 4>tons of investigators.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>It creates so much like money.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but but these.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>PR people are all being sued and they're all suing

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>each other, so they also have to.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 3>They're also PR people are hiring PR people, They're hiring.

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorneys to defend them. I mean, they're all suing each other.

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's a mess.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Send them all to an island.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 3>So where are we at?

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Lively's lawyers also sent subpoenas to two internet providers, cloud

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Fare and Aol, as well as to Jed Wallace, who

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier. He's the crisis consultant who is

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>accused of launching a digital army against Lively on Baldoni's behalf.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I anticipate that when she files her when Blakely, Blakely,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Blake Lively, see, I have to say her name so

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>many times. I just made it Blakely. When Blake Lively

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>files her amendic complaint, she's probably going to add Jed

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Wallace in as a as a new defendant. Brian Friedman,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni's attorney, said that Lively is seeking calls, texts, and

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>location data stretching back more than two years, and he

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>calls it a massive fishing expedition, and it demonstrates that

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they are desperately seeking any factual basis for their provably

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>false claims and that they will find none. And I

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>know he is working on a platform. We're talking about

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Friedman, we're talking about Justin's attorney. He is working

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>on a platform of transparency.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's been their thing the whole.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 4>That's my means, I got nothing to hide. Let's get

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 4>it all out there on the table.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, And that was the whole point of their website

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was to say, look, our hands are clean. Here's everything.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We're not hiding anything. Here's all the messages to.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 4>The other end, here's all the crap that Blake is doing,

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 4>so have at it.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>So Justin Baldoni, there was a recent podcast he was

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>actually the podcast was actually taped before the Blake Lively

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>court filing. It was taped back in November. I don't

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>know why they held onto it so long, but it

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just got released a couple days ago, so I'm not sure.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they recorded it and they always

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>had the intent of holding onto it this long, or

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it just worked out that way. But anyway, he appeared

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>on an episode of the Gents Talk podcast. It was

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>released on Monday, February tenth. The installment was filmed back

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in November of twenty twenty four, which is a month

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>before or Lively filed a lawsuit against her ends with

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>US co star and director. He says, quote, this morning,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I sent a text message to my best friend Jamie.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Jamie's involved in way Ferirr. He was a producer on

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the movie, and the president of my company, Tara, and

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I told them that I wasn't in the best place,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni said on the podcast. I told him that I

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>was exhausted and that I haven't given myself time to

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>recover or time to heal. Clearly, on this podcast, he

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go into any details about what's going on in

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>his life, and at that time, I'm sure the interviewer.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't know to ask more.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Questions because they don't know exactly what he's making reference too.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>But now we know, I'm sure he's making reference to

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the year and a half of hell that he had

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to deal with.

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's talk about the regular stuff. Have they been

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 3>in court yet together? They haven't any. No, they haven't

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>made an appearance.

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Together when they both have to go.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, here's my thought on stuff like that. And you

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 4>know what the Amber heard Johnny Depp stuff.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's going to get that far.

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 4>It may not, but you think it's it'll settle. I

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 4>think someone will drop it.

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to settle. Because do you think

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that Blake Lively wants to be deposed by Brian Friedman?

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 4>I know she doesn't want to take two parties, so

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 4>she can offer all she wants. He'd have to accept.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 4>And I'm I'm speculating.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 4>I would think that he might be like, hell with this, No,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 4>we're going to court like Johnny Depp did. Johnny Depp

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 4>wasn't trying to get two million bucks or whatever. He

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>was trying to say, I'm clean, she's nasty, she pooped

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 4>on my pillow and I was making a movie, right

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 4>or whatever?

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>He does right right.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know that's interesting because they also in that

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast that Brian Friedman just did, they said, you know,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>would you be would you be willing to settle?

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Wow?

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 3>And he doesn't say yes or no. He's very smart

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 3>in his wording.

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Of course, but he says, look, this is about a

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>man's reputation. He's been referred to as a sexual predator.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And does the settlement mean hey, let's just figure this

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all out and let's back out. But does it also

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mean are you going to publicly say right?

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Because if they settle and the terms are kept private,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 4>then everyone's gonna think, oh, everyone's dirty or whatever. No

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 4>one wants anything exposed, like Johnny Depp. But if he

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 4>says no, let's go to court and let's expose it all, let's.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Clear my name.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Plus, if his reputation and his business is suffering, then

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 4>he may need the money to offset his losses. And

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>if he's suing for four hundred or whatever, you think

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 4>they're going to cough up anywhere near that.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's suing the New York Times too for defamation,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So I.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Mean he's he's.

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Asking for a lot of money out there. He's suing

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>up Blake or a set.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 4>I always included a written statement too, yeah, which I

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 4>don't know if that's enough.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Does a written statement? Is that enough to cure the

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 3>fact that.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Someone provided facts, like you know, clarification of them? But no,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 4>So I hope he takes it all the way because

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 4>I want some good court TV.

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well you want to see well, it's in federal court,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know do they film. I know state courts.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they if it's going to end

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>up on television. Like Johnny Depteck was a state court.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a different.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Are they all federal courts all all these cases?

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're all in they've all been. They're all in

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 3>New York now.

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So he dismissed his action against The New York Times

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in California. That's why he amended the complaint. And now

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in the New York filing, he added New York Times

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>into that amended complaint.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's all in the same court. Now.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 4>On another thing, I want to bring up, which I'm

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 4>probably throwing you off, that video that came out where

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 4>she says she just does whatever to get the job

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 4>and she acts like an actor. That's then I get

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 4>in and I infiltrate. Yes, that's oh my gosh. She

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 4>is terrible, she is nasty. She's an idiot for saying

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 4>that she is an idiot. What year was that?

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 3>That was in twenty twenty two, so that was idio.

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Prior to her, she thought she was so smart, like,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 4>she's clever like and then I get in and I

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>just do.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Whatever I want. Well, let me get into that and anything.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I could finish that video, all right, and here that's

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>next on my In a resurface interview from the twenty

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty two Forbes Power Our Women's Summit, Lively said just

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>following direction as an actress was not fulfilling for her,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and that.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 4>She's received to be nasty on top of it that

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 4>filling for me, and that.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>She has received backlash for stepping in and trying to

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be a part of costume design, writing and other aspects

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>of a project.

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 2>How would you want to do that?

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I get paid twenty million dollars to act. I'm not

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 4>going to go above and beyond.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to act because at that point, it's

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>an ego. It's not about actually doing your job and

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>staying within the scope of your employee.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 4>I want to be bigger in Hollywood, right, you want

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 4>to be like, I'm a big executive producer on this

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>that now I'm going to do another movie?

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>She said she has had writers, producers, and directors welcome

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that and invite that, but she's also had others who

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>resented her for stepping on toes. She also said she

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't always been upfront with her plans to step into

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>other parts of a project where she has where she

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was just hired as the actress, and that she wouldn't

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>reveal that I actually need to have authorship in order

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>to feel for filled. Sometimes that might have felt like

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a rug being pulled out from under, you know. And

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>she admits that, she says, I'll I'll just pretend like

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look cute, and I'll just stand here on

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>this mark because I'm the actress and I'm just doing that.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>But really her intent is she wants to be involved

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in the writing and she wants to be involved in

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the costume And all I could think about when I

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>watched that video was that is exactly what she did

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with this movie. Her first step was she took over costumes,

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>which was not a great step. That is where they

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>should have immediately been like, you don't know what you're

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>doing with this movie. You need to get your hands

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the cookie jar. This wardrobe is a disaster.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>No one reading this book pictured this woman dressing like

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>this or looking like this, and that's really where she

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>should have been roped back in. But you know what,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>people from this whole scenario from beginning to end, and

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>all the text messages and all the complaints and everything

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I've read, it tells a story. And the story is

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>this is a woman and along with Ryan Reynolds, and

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I've said this before or they are surrounded by yes people,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is the problem with them.

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 3>There is no one like You're a no person, right,

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 3>you are?

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I would say when people are like, oh, you've

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>been on TV for a long time, but you really

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't changed.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I have. I can't because my husband tells.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Me every day that I am not a star, that

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I am not famous, that I am not special, that

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I am a mom.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 3>I need to go make some chicken nuggets in the kitchen.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You're a civilian. I am a civil person. I am

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a regular person. He tells me that daily, and I

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have remained humble.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm the star.

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I know, you are the star. I got it.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 3>But the problem with Blake Lively.

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And Ryan Reynolds is that everyone walks on eggshells around them,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and everyone is a yes person around them.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Her attorneys are yes people.

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 4>Her attorneys are like oh yeah, yeah, yeah, well we

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 4>got this, we got this, Okay, you know, give us

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 4>a blank check. Right, and then when those attorneys go

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 4>in public and they do the little uh you know,

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 4>press conference, and they say, we will fight this to

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the end. No, we will fight this so long as

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 4>she keeps us and the until they those checks stop coming,

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 4>then we will not.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Fight it anymore. And that's all that. That means.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 3>They don't really whether she's guilty or not. I mean

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>they should if she hires them, they should defend her obviously,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>but there it's all about the money.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, they're getting paid regardless of whether she has

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>a great case or whether she has a crappy case.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it makes no different exactly. You know how

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 3>much her bills are because you know they call all

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 3>like Lively and Reynolds are like constantly like here's another email,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 3>here's this now I wanted to mend it.

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>When can we do this?

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 4>And you know they're just taking it's going to be

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 4>seven figures like big time.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah absolutely. But here's the thing.

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she wants to go to trials. So

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>how do they get out of this?

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, if if you say she has this ego, she

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 4>may not settle, but.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>She's already I have read and I'm sure it's true,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but allegedly she does not want Brian Friedman to depose her.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>She wants if she has to be deposed, she wants

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>someone else. It doesn't work like that. Brian Friedman is

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>going to depose.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Her, and let's talk about depositions really quickly.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 4>But her ego is going to be the death of

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 4>her if it's as you say, and as Kenny Rogers says,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 4>he had no one to fold them, and he got

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 4>no one to hold them. Yeah, and she's got a fold.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 4>But when your ego is there, you hold out maybe

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>just maybe maybe maybe I'll win, Maybe I'll win, and

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 4>then you don't.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I just want to talk about just quickly, like depositions.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>She does not want to be deposed.

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, explain what a deposition is, the basic structure of it.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, so basic structure would be Brian Friedman. He

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to do Discovery. This man is like chomping

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at the bank. He wants to do Discovery right now,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and he wants to He wants to depose everyone and

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone that's on set that has anything to say. The actors,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift, Ryan Reynolds.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this guy's chalking the.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Deposition, they sit down and they get to do Q

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and A.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 4>They get asked all kinds of questions, right, and the

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 4>questions can be they don't have to just be about

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 4>direct evidence, because it could be a question that my

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 4>lead to evidence. So they can ask all kinds of

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 4>questions about her relationship with Taylor Swift. And then if

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 4>she says the wrong thing, then like she starts to

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 4>open up the door to certain text messages, then they

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 4>might be able to subpoena Taylor Swift's cell phone carriers

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 4>and blah blah blah. So it can get really bad.

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 4>And then in work comp when we do depositions, sometimes

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 4>like they'll claim like erectile dysfunction, right, And then you're

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 4>like that's good because now in the deposition I get

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 4>asked them about all their sex life. And then usually

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 4>people are like, I don't want to talk about this

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 4>really because you made a complaint, you filed and said

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 4>you had ed so I got to figure out, you know,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 4>what gets you off and what doesn't and why it's

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.239
<v Speaker 4>not happening. And I'm telling you I've seen people they

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 4>ask them really deep because then the person's like, forget it.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Forget it, forget it, and they'll either drop it or

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 3>be quick to settle. Right.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And also in a deposition there isn't a judge there

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>where your side can object. The only thing really that

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you can object to is anything has to do with privilege.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, you can object, you can you can object to

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 4>hear say and all the regular ones, but they still

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 4>have to answer the question. So you object in a

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 4>deposition to preserve it for when it goes to court

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 4>to be inadmissible. But so a lot of times when

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 4>we've done depositions, like their attorney will be like objection

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 4>and then the person's like thinking, oh, I don't have

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 4>to answer the question. Their attorney looks a him and goes, no,

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 4>you still got to answer the question. They're like what

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 4>They're like, no, that's just preserving my objection for court. Right,

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 4>So you can get really deep.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I would want to be a fly on the wall

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if Brian Friedman has the opportunity.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 4>And they might try to video it.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 3>That is true.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It would be on camera, yes, absolutely, And I don't

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>know about media rules with depositions and recording it, but

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>knowing Brian Friedman and his concept of transparency, ye, it'll

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be like live stream.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 3>On the website.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to move on and we're going to

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about a new case because this is a very

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting case. A lot of people have been invested in this.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It is the Karen Reid case. Now Karen Reid is

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>going to go on trial again on April first, so

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do a quick just synopsis background. Her

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>first trial was a hung jury, so she is now

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>being retried and she goes a trial on April first.

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So I know that there's going to be a media

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>storm around this trial and everybody's going to be invested

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 1>in it. So I wanted to take this time that

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we can do kind of a background into the case,

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the facts, where we're at, so we can all be

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on the same page, so that when it start, the

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>trial starts April first, and we can follow it all.

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, So what are the charges? It's criminal, right, Yeah.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So John O'Keefe had been an officer with the Boston

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Police Department for sixteen years when he died January twenty ninth.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>On twenty twenty two, he had been dating Reid. This

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is Karen Reid, and she was an equity analysis at

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity Investments for two years. According to the Norfolk County

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Assistant District Attorney Adam Lawley, troubles in the couple's relationship

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>appeared to intensify in the months before O'Keeffe's death, which

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>included during a New Year's trip to Aruba. Apparently, there's

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>text messages and voicemails that start to show that they

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that their relationship was deteriorating.

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Who are these people? Are they regular people?

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>They're just regular people. But he's a he's a police officer.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is his girlfriend, Karen Reid. And I'll tell

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you this case is. People are very invested in this case.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you why this. Let me go through

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it in the way.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 2>What's the crime.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting there.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Just start with the crime.

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm just giving you a background of who the people are.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>He's an officer, this is the girlfriend. On January twenty

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>eighth and twenty twenty two, Reed's defense lawyer, David Yanetti

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>claims that the couple seem fine while they were out

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>at a bar in a Boston suburb. They're at out

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at a bar with other current and former law enforcement officers.

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>After leaving the bar, Read later told first responders that

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>she had argued with O'Keeffe before dropping him off at

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>an after party at the home of Brian Albert, who

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is a now retired Boston sergeant who had also been

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at the bar. The next morning, Reed's lawyers have said

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that she went out looking for her boyfriend.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 3>She couldn't find him. She wakes up at like four

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>in the morning, and she realizes he's not home.

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>So he spent the night I know.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 3>No, he did not spend the night. He got dropped

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 3>off at a party. This is what she claims.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, she.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Claims that she dropped him off at a party. They

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>went to a bar. They're inebriated, they're drinking, she drops

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>him off, she's driving. Clearly, she's drove him to a house.

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm already not believing this story. They went to a

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 4>party or a bar or whatever. Yes, I had a

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 4>bunch of drinks, her girlfriend and boyfriend, and then she

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 4>drops him off somewhere. They don't go home together, They

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 4>don't spend more time together.

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>No, Apparently she drops him off at a home that

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was having an after party and the home is owned

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>by a former police officer.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and she doesn't go to the party no.

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>She leaves and goes home, sure and passes out or whatever.

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Then she wakes up at like four in the morning.

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 4>He's already not believable.

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, why can I tell what hydern I even got

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>through the facts the case?

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Yelty, Okay, go ahead, sorry.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, she wakes up, she realizes that she can't find him.

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>He never came home that morning. She she has some

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>friend that goes with her. They drive around, they go

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>back to the house, and she spots his body outside

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the home on the morning of January twenty ninth,

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and then one of the women dialed nine to one

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to one.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Keith, this is.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I know I got to ask these questions though,

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 4>So she gets her friends says, let's go look for

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 4>my boyfriend.

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Why is she suspicious the boyfriend's missing because she text

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 4>him and he doesn't respond because he never came home,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 4>so he didn't fall through whatever his routine was, and

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 4>he's missing.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 3>He's missing, so he's not there. So she gets up.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 3>It's early in the morning.

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 4>They drive I need to go get an alibi. So

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 4>she's like, hey, come with me to find my boyfriend.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 4>He's on this lawn over there. Sorry, this is pretty obvious. Okay,

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 4>keep going. I don't know why I was ungury Okay,

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 4>go ahead, sorry you.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Are okay, go ahead, Karen read.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, So you got me all confused.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 2>She went and found him on the lawn or something.

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, at like six am, they called nine to one

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.719
<v Speaker 1>one the police calm, he's pronounced dead. They take him

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to the hospital. He's pronounced dead at seven fifty am.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.719
<v Speaker 1>At the hospital, the medical examiner attributed his cause of

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>death to blunt force trauma to the head. Blunt force

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>trauma to.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>The head, trauma to the rest.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the head, Yes, it could be to like your

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>your chest, your Yeah.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 2>If she wants to kill him, she's gonna hit him

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>in the head.

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, in hypothermia. So, Reid was charged with manslaughter, motor

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicle homicide, and leaving the scene of a deadly crash.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution alleges that Reid backed her Lexus SUV into

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>O'Keefe outside of the home, causing a skull fracture and

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>brain bleed, and that she left him there to die.

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as a prosecution, right, that's a different story.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Basically, they got into a fight and she's aee breed

0:33:58.000 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's a nee breed, and she's in the car

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and she's pissed off and she backs over him and

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>then leaves him there. Okay, story, that's the prosecution story.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Even though Reid said she dropped O'Keefe off at Albert home,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the assistant DA said that no one at the after

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>party recalled seeing O'Keeffe inside.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 3>See.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>That was interesting to me because she claims that she

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>dropped him off at this house.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 3>There's all these people at a party.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 4>That was one of my first questions, except he kept

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 4>telling me not to ask questions. Was she drops off?

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 4>She claims to drop him off at a party where

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 4>there's all these witnesses. Ridiculous.

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 2>She was an idiot.

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 4>She should have said I dropped him off, like on

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the corner where he wanted to walk or something.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But there's no witnesses.

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>So this is where it gets moundy for me, because

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why if he went inside the house,

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>there's witnesses that can't confirm that he's ever inside this house.

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 2>But of course he didn't go inside the house.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't think he ever went sie?

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, newsflash, No, No, she dumped him on the lawn

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 4>at what time, I don't know, after she ran him over.

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 4>Whatever she did, she puts him on the lawn at

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the party. The party's probably over by now, or she

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 4>put them on the lawn hoping someone from the party

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 4>would see him. They clearly didn't. And then she grabbed

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 4>her friend as a witness so the friend could testify like, oh,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, we were driving around, we found them,

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 4>she didn't touch them.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's get back to the facts.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I like, how you figure this, figured this whole case

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out before you could.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Get through it, and I need to be on the jury.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they was, Yeah, okay, they claim. So people in

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this home claim that they saw the suv pull up

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to the house then leave, and they assumed no one

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>from the vehicle was joining them. But vehicle data from

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Reed's suv showed that at twelve forty five am, while

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>outside of Albert this is the other police officer at home,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the Lexus Trevel traveled backward for sixty feet at twenty

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>four miles per hour.

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 3>This is what the prosecution played.

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 4>Don't realize your car documents a lot. It's called an

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 4>OBD two sensor. It's not surprised her that you know,

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 4>regulated and all cars have them.

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Does my car know how many times I've been through

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's drive through? That's what I want to know.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it senses the egg mcmuffins and it reports it

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 4>to me. I have an app, no really, that has

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 4>an OBD two sensor and it documents. So if you

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 4>hard breaks air bags and a miles per hour, it

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 4>can I don't think GPS so much. That might be some,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 4>but that's not required.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me go on with the prosecution side, and

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>then we'll get into the defense. The SUV's tail light

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was broken, and pieces of the light from the tail

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>light were later found outside of Albert's home.

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 4>And tail lights can be very distinctive, like sometimes they

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 4>have veins on them and stuff, so they can really

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 4>know which tail light, like which car goes to.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, again, this is just the prosecution, so we're going

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>to get to the defense. The forensic testing showed that

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>O'Keefe's hair was found on the vehicle's bumper and his

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>DNA was found on the tail light. Investigators also found

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the remnants of a cocktail that appears to have been

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>build on the bumper.

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 3>The prosecutor said.

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 2>She's built her cocktail. Oh or it probably is, huh.

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>O'Keefe was captured on video leaving the bar with a

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>cocktail in his hand, and bits of what the prosecutor

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>described as a drinking glass were found in the SUV's bumper.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get to the defense. The defense. Yes,

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 3>there's always a defense. There was a hung jury. There's

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 3>clearly a defense.

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Reed's lawyers developed a theory that Karen Reid did drop

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>off O'Keefe at the party, after which O'Keefe got into

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a fight with someone at the party and was attacked

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>by the family dog. Because apparently there were scratches all

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>over his arms that aren't consistent with someone running over him.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Reed's defense brought in experts to say that O'Keefe's wounds

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>were consistent with a dog bite from a dog the

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>size of the one that lived at that home, who

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>had a history of biting people. And even if the

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>police didn't engage in a cover up, that's what they claimed.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>They claimed because these people at this home were all

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them were officers. It was at an

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>officer's home that this was a police cover up, that

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe he got inside the house, he was there. Everybody's drunk.

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>He's drunk, he gets in a fight. He has blunt

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>forced trauma to the head because he got in a

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>fight with somebody.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Theory as someone else beat him up and killed them.

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Their theory.

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and they all wanted to cover up because they're men.

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:19.439
<v Speaker 1>They're all conspiring because they're protecting each other. And that's

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>her theory.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that on this phone doesn't have a ring camera

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 4>or something. Man, that would solve a lot of problems.

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Right at the house. Yeah, aren't there neighbors that have

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a ring camera?

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Like someone's got we've got cameras on this house, Like

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>someone's got to have cameras somewhere these days. So this

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. So the lead investigator in this case texted

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate comments about Karen Reid to others, to like his

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>high school friends, his sister. Three different prosecution witnesses testified

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that at crucial times, including the night of the killing,

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>their calls back and forth to each other were inadvertent

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>butt dials. So basically, there's these calls between these officers

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the night that this happens. But they're saying, oh, these

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>were just accidental calls, like They weren't conspiring. They weren't saying,

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, we've got to come up with this

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>story to say that you know, she ran over him.

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 3>They don't have the content of the call. They just

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 3>have phone logs.

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>They just have phone logs, and like one calls a

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>couple seconds, the other one's like twenty two seconds. So

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the defense saying that they're the.

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 4>Calls are probably did you hear that car crash? It's

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 4>sound like she ran over someone. What's that tail light

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 4>over there?

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So the lead investigator in this case, he's state Trooper

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Michael Proctor. He's a Massachusetts State police trooper that led

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the investigation in this car case. No, his name's Proctor,

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Proctor. He's the lead investigator. Oh okay, he's a trooper,

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>a police State police trooper. Karen Reid's lawyers said that

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Proctor's investigation was biased, and they accused him of failing

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to pursue other potential suspects and not disclosing his relationship

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>with the family, the Albert family, which is where this occurred.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So he has a relationship with the guy that owns right,

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he's the lead investigator.

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a fair that's a fair concern. Right.

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>So the defense is saying, look, not only is he's

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>sending inappropriate you know text that have to do with

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this case. He called her a like a whack job,

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and he said he texted.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Like sure, he called her all kinds of things.

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And he also said like when he was.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Going through a killer called her that.

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, he called her a whack job.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>He also made reference to like going through her phone

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and saying, oh, I couldn't find any news.

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, I agree with the arguments biased and

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 4>it's a conflict of interests that doesn't negate my findings.

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 4>She's guilty.

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 3>You're so convinced she's.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 4>Gold, right, they definitely you definitely need someone more neutral, right,

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 4>And that's a shame, Okay.

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So in her first trial, So during this is Michael

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Proctor again.

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Wait when was the first trial?

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 3>So this trial, her.

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>First trial took place in twenty twenty four, So Michael

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Proctor again, he is the lead investigator. And during his

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>testimony during the trial, Proctor read through a text conversation

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that he had with a group of friends he'd known

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>since childhood on the evening of January twenty ninth, which

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is the day O'Keefe died. After some discussion, a friend

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote back, in this text, this group text, I'm sure

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the owner of the house will receive some shit. Proctor responded, Nope,

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the homeowner is a Boston cop too, So he's saying

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in this text message, this guy doesn't anything to worry

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.439
<v Speaker 1>about because he's a Boston cop, basically implying that he's

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be protected.

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So this came out during the trial.

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>He also told his friend that read waffled O'Keefe waffled.

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess that means just is that like literal? Like

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it looked like a waffle.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what mean.

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what he said.

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Verb it is now waffle is a verb? He waffled,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 3>or she waffled.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>O'Keefe's body, who was banged up and he saw it

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at the hospital. When a friend asked, is she hot?

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>At least, Proctor replied, from all accounts, he didn't do

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>anything wrong. She's a whack job.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Then spelled out a vulgar word for a woman, which

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 3>we can all guess what that vulgar word is. It

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 3>starts with the sea, ends in a cat. Yes, cat,

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 3>I love that your micros.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Read's attorney objected and said, these are your words, and

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>then the judge said, these are your words, Trooper Proctor,

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and he had him say the C word out loud,

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>which it's not cat, it's the cun t word. Proctor continued,

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>She's a babe weird fall River accent, though then added

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a disparaging comment about her rear. So clearly this is

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the lead investigator. He's making He's there's these text messages

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where he's completely inappropriate. He's talking about how because the

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who owned the house where this where this death occurred,

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that he won't be in any trouble because he's a

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Boston police officer. So basically that's enough for it. Now

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy has to go to these disciplinary hearings. Yeah,

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's removed from the case. He's been to two

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>disciplinary hearings. He has another hearing on March thirteenth, so

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happened.

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 4>A quick question, so, as a hung jury, do we

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 4>know how many voted or how they casted theirs?

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, But what came out later was that

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the jury was unanimous on two of the counts, but

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that was not made public, and I don't think the

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>judge do that. So what what her defense is trying

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to do now currently is to get those two charges

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>dismissed because during that original trial, he's saying, throw those

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>two charges out because the jury was unanimous that she

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't guilty on those two charges.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 4>When they have a second trial, because there's a little

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 4>bit of tainting on this investigation, I do agree that

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 4>it's unfortunately biased. Whether it affected the investigation or not,

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 4>it's still not a good look. Do they have a

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 4>new investigator, do they do anything different or do they

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 4>present the same evidence?

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but that is a very good question,

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:08.479
<v Speaker 1>and that is something that we'll have to talk about

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>again when this trial starts April first.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:11.919
<v Speaker 3>How they're going to proceed for.

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 4>I always think I don't I don't have the experience,

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 4>but I certainly a second trial after Hungary is always

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 4>a little weird because they do it's a different delivery. Yeah, well,

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 4>when you almost should just get a new jury and

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 4>just have them watch the trial the original trials. They've

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 4>the can come up with a different response. I don't know,

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 4>because sometimes it happens. I've read in cases they can't

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 4>recall the top of my head. But the second case, well,

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.839
<v Speaker 4>the second trial will not have this evidence. Oh it

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 4>was the Menendez one.

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 4>It was like, I G that was you that I

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 4>was talking about that I was trying to say.

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, yes, the second trial and Mendez was

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>completely different.

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 3>It's terrible, it's completely different.

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they didn't allow like ninety percent of the evidence

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or the testimony to add to do with the alleged

0:44:57.719 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>abuse and all that.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Well that's one reason why.

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, that's the risk you take with the jury.

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 4>But with a judge, you'll never have a.

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Hung jury, hung judge, no, you won't. Not to be

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 3>taken out of context, right exactly, Okay, all right.

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So on June twenty eighth, twenty twenty four, this is

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>during her first trial, juror sent a note to Judge

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Canoni telling her that they are deadlocked. The judge responded

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that she did not believe that they had deliberated long

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>enough and asked them to continue trying to reach a verdict. Then,

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.320
<v Speaker 1>on July first, twenty twenty four, the jury sent another

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>note to the judge for a second time, telling her

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that they are unable to reach an unanimous verdict. The

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.479
<v Speaker 1>jury said they are deeply divided, and the judge asked

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:41.240
<v Speaker 1>them to return for one final round of deliberations. Later

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the day, a mistrial was declared due to the

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>hung jury. Hours after the mistrial was declared, Massachusetts State

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Police announced that Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator in

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the case, has been relieved of duty.

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 3>So he's removed.

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now we're going to.

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Get to the retrials.

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So the state's top court ruled that Karen Reid can

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be retried on all the same charges and the death

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of her Boston Police officer boyfriend. Prosecutors have sought to

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>retry Read this year on charges of second degree murder, manslaughter,

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and leaving the scene of a crime. So Karen Reid's attorney,

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Martin Weinberg, argued that five jurors later said that they

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>were deadlocked only on the manslaughter count and that they

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>had unanimously agreed in the jury room that she was

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>not guilty of the charges of second degree murder and

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>leaving the scene, but they had they had never divulged

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that to the judge.

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't have the experience, but the whole hung jury

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.359
<v Speaker 4>and a second trial, second jury, it just never sat right.

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 4>With me, it's like and then when the judges and

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 4>I get that they they're not doing the wrong thing.

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 4>But when they're like, no, go back in there and

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 4>figure it out, because it's kind of like, oh, you're honor.

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Six of us, you know, think he's guilty and the

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 4>other six don't. Oh well, go back in there until

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 4>you change your minds. I mean, it's it's just and

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:57.399
<v Speaker 4>then you get a second jury. And then in this case,

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 4>I get the argument which is like, look, you know,

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 4>a jury of his peers, her peers has found out

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 4>that she's not guilty on these two things, so they

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't be retried. I totally get that, But then you're

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 4>can have a different jury talking about different It's just

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:12.879
<v Speaker 4>so flippant, and I.

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't like that. But I know that, you know, I

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the answer would be.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So so Weinberg argued and the appeal that trying her

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>again would amount to double jeopardy and urge the court

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to allow on evidentiary hearing where jurors could be asked

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>whether they had reached final not guilty verdicts on any.

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Of the charges.

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 4>That's right, double jeopardy because if they're found if a

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 4>jury found them not guilty, found her not guilty on

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 4>two things, and they say, okay, yeah, but we're gonna

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 4>go have a net. We're going to charge you again, right,

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 4>We're going to prosecute you again, right on the same

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 4>because double jeopardy is on the same set of facts

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 4>and the same crime, not just the same crime, the

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 4>same set of facts. And in this case there are

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 4>no new real facts as to the alleged crime.

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So she's going to go back to trial again on ape. Well, first,

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've determined whether she's going to be

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>retried on all three charges or just on the one.

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is still the one being aslaughter,

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the one being manslaughter.

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 4>I find out in due time. Yes, how old is

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Karen read by the way, how old are these people?

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Well? Do you want to know if she's hot and what?

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 4>But I also I just want to know what they're like, like,

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 4>do they have kids? How loo they've been together?

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Is this a crime of passion?

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:26.919
<v Speaker 1>It is? Right, Well, it's a crime of alcohol too. Well,

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens when everybody.

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if it's crime passion, but it was

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 4>between two lovers, two lovers.

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Okay, so she's going to go back to trial

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>April first. But the judges ruled that she's going to

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>go back and they're going to deliberate all three charges,

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>even though there was evidence that jurors came forward and

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>said that there was a unanimous.

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Argument that double jeopardy was overridden by the judge. Yeah, so,

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 4>which is interesting. That's interesting. So what we learn, we

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 4>think we learn is it's all or nothing. If we're

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 4>going to retry the case, We're going to try it all.

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 4>But it would go the other way around too. They

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 4>found her guilty on certain charges and not guilty and

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 4>hung on other charges. Again, they would throw it all

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 4>out and have to start all over.

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>The problem is is that I don't think the jury

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that might get appealed.

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 3>The jury did not.

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess the jury wasn't forthcoming and what they were

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:21.439
<v Speaker 1>unanimous on. They just basically were like, we just can't

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.479
<v Speaker 1>come to a decision on all three. And then later

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it was determined that they did actually come to a

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>decision on two. But I guess at this point in time,

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't retroactively apply, and she has to be retried

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>on all three counts again starting April first, which we

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>will follow, So make sure that you continue to listen

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast because we're going to follow the Karen

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Reid trial, which I think will be really interesting.

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Question.

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, during all this time, is she in custody or

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 4>is she out on bail?

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 2>That's what I want to know.

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So she's out.

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 4>On bail, okay.

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And they were dating for two years and she is

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>forty four, So those are your and you can google

0:49:57.520 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>an image of her so that you can see what

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>she looks like. All right, So there you go. That's

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>a little brief. I know that if a lot of

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you followed the care and read trial, I know that

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot more involved. There were like seventy

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>witnesses or something.

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I just looked her up guilty, Okay.

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So I understand that there's a lot more details. However,

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to do a brief overview just so that

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we could all kind of be on the same page,

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that we all have a basic understanding of what happened

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and where we're at, so that we can follow this

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>starting on April first. So again, thank you guys so

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 1>much for all the amazing feedback. So many of you

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have reached out and said that you enjoy listening. Also,

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you find Shane funny. I appreciate that Shane appreciates that

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I do all the work and Shane is the sidekick

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that asked the questions. But a lot of you say

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>that you enjoy it because he asked the questions that

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you are thinking. So we appreciate the positive feedback. And

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>just to let you know, we're going to release episodes

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>every two weeks, so that is the plan going forward.

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So again, thank you so much for listening and we

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>will see you next time.

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Thank you bye people.

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>A