WEBVTT - DirecTV and Dish To Merge, Beijing Wants to Ditch Nvidia Chips

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>The Heart where innovation, money and power. Collie in Silicon

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Valley and beyond.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Loved Love.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Live.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 3>This is Broomberg Technology.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 5>Now we get to direct TV in the dish, become

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 5>the PTV provider in the United States. Plus, Beijing steps

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 5>up pressure on domestic companies to ditch in video chips,

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 5>and California Governor gab Newson Brooks proposed AI safety bill

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Center West the bill. But first, let's check in on

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 5>these markets at the moment, because as I battle perhaps

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 5>some technical issues with my microphone will crently seeing the

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Nasdaq one hundred off by a quarter of a percent

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 5>at the moment that we're all awaiting fedshare Pal what

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 5>he will be saying regarding the economy post of course

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 5>those FED cuts. We're looking at the Dragon, Golden Dragon Inecks.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 5>Over in China though, up another four percent. Tech stocks

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 5>on fire amid the stimulus and of course a feeling

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 5>of fomo continuing to perpetuate in the market. We are

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 5>the highest on these Chinese related names in more than

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 5>a year. Look at some individual movers though, because We

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 5>have got a merging Monday on our hands, and a

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 5>lot of stocks are being impacted. AT and T for one,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 5>only up about a tenth of a percent. But this

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 5>has been long in the making, DirecTV and Dish combining

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 5>to create the biggest PATV provider in the United States.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 5>AT and T is part of the deal while it's

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 5>selling its seventy percent stake in Direct Tv to TPG. Meanwhile,

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 5>that earns seven point six billion dollars Echo Star, as

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 5>you'll see, under pressure, the owner of Dish and Sling

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 5>especially dodging bankruptcy here according to BlueBag Intelligence, by offloading

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 5>the debt associated with PayTV assets, and is set to

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 5>sell more shares itself.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's discuss all of this.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Shell Davis, who throughout has been following this deal. You

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 5>take a victory lap because you're ahead of the curve

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 5>on this. This is why AT and T isn't moving

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 5>that much, because we'd anticipated it's offloading of Direct TV.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 5>But just remind us what they're creating here by merging

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 5>the two companies.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 6>So, as you just said, you know, this deal has

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 6>been a long time coming, and there's a lot happening here.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>The news all came out this morning.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 6>Through a series of five six press releases filings, and

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 6>what's happening is that Dish and direct TV are going

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 6>to combine. Direct TV is acquiring Dish to form if

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 6>it gets approved, the biggest paid TV provider in the US,

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 6>and the way they're doing that is Direct TV is

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 6>paying one dollar in equity and then assuming ten billion

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 6>dollars of Dish debt in order to acquire the business.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 6>As part of that, though, Dish or Direct TV has

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 6>to get Dish bondholders to agree to take a haircut

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 6>on some of their debts.

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 3>So if this goes through, it.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Will mean a stronger balance sheet, you know, behind those

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 6>lenders that are agreeing to this, But the bondholders have

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 6>to agree to take that haircut.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>And that is why some of these bond prices are

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 5>significantly under pressure today. It's not just a stock of

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Echo style. For example, EchoStar meanwhile is going more into

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 5>the infrastructure side, into the five G side, and into

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 5>selling about five billion dollars worth of stock. That's why

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 5>it shares full on the day. There are some of

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 5>the outstanding debt that's involved in this dead exchange. But

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 5>why then at and T exit it's holding of DirecTV,

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 5>does it not see the future potential of a bigger deal.

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 3>So this is all.

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Part of a bigger theme that we're seeing in M

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 6>and A and in corporate America, where companies are increasingly

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 6>looking to simplify their businesses. AT and T has done

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 6>a bit of.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>A three sixty years ago, they.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Got into the content game, and you'll remember a couple

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 6>of years ago they spun out and sold Warner Brothers

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 6>to Discovery. Now with DirecTV, you know, they're looking to

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 6>exit that and they say that this is all about

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 6>them wanting to focus on what their core is, which

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 6>is wireless broadband. They don't see you know, value in

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 6>content the way that they had before.

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>And under TPG.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 6>With this this TV that they have, DirecTV has done

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 6>really well because TPG has been able to cut costs

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 6>and so the thought is maybe it's better in their

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 6>hands than a split you know deal.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>I like the fact that you're saying this is all

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 5>part of a trend to simplify, because you're also on

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 5>the byline for Verizon's story today where we're seeing a

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 5>three point three billion dollar deal to basically sale and

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 5>then lease back access to its towers.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Why do that for a Verizon?

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 6>So it's a way for a Verizon to get some cash.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 6>They announced a deal themselves a couple a couple of

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 6>weeks ago to buy Frontier, which is a big broadband

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 6>internet player. And we're seeing just a big theme of

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 6>the wireless players tapping out on kind of you know,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 6>cell phone and seeing we need to find ways to

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 6>get more customers and the way to do that is

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 6>by offering internet access. So this is a way for

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 6>them to pay for that without you know, boosting their

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 6>average as much. It gives them a little bit of cash.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 5>Michelle, which has been busy, we appreciate it. Meanwhile, let's

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 5>talk about this in the broader market context. Empower's chief

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 5>investment strategist, Martin Norton is here for more and Marta, look,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 5>we do have a feeling of m and a Monday

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 5>on our hands. Are we going to see more deals

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 5>go through as we see rates get lower?

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I mean we have seen some pickup in

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>deals this year, and I think one of the challenges

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>has been higher rates. And so the expectation that you know,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as if FED enters a definitive cutting cycle, we're going

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to see some shifts broadly, and that can impact the

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>M and A environment as well. There's also the regulatory

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>angle and of course getting deals through and that's been

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>harder in recent years, and so that remains something that

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, is something that investors and companies are going

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to have to continue to contend with. But certainly lower

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>rates are a bit of a tailwind.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 5>What's interesting is when you felt perhaps M and A

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 5>and indeed IPOs there, we say it are all going

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 5>to be held back until post the political anxiety that

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 5>is the US election, That doesn't seem to be holding

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 5>it back right now. Is that your view?

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Marta?

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I do think that regulatory impact has

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>been felt. That doesn't mean that companies aren't going to

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>engage in deals when it makes strategic sense. I think

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're seeing with the Dish Direct TV deal.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that there's potentially been less activity

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>than there otherwise would be, and so I think that

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as we turn the elective corner and start to have

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>some clarity on what that looks like, we may start

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to see a pickup in activity on the M and

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>A front.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 5>What about activity and ownership of big tech right now?

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 5>Because we're down on the day on the NASDAC. There

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 5>is talk that hedge funds are selling out of technology

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 5>names to get into lumberhold Chinese companies. How are we

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 5>seeing that play out in terms of people's desire to

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 5>stay committed to the Magnificent seven?

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's such an interesting question because a lot

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of times when we're talking about the environment that we're in,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there's really been two drivers of returns in twenty two.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>For of course, there's been the AI theme, and of

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>course that's really benefited the big tech space. And there's

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>also been this soft landing theme, and now we're adding

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the cunning cycle to the mix. So I think that's

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>really within the US broadening out the trade, not necessarily

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning that folks need to abandon big tech. I mean,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>lower rates aren't necessarily bad for big tech, but it

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly brings other areas, like the small cap area into

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the front of investors' minds. Now what's happening in China

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is so fascinating because this has been an area that

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>has been under pressure, it's had multiple false dawns, and now,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>as Bloomberg has recorded, so clearly there's the monetary and

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal side coming together to push these stocks higher,

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's giving a lot of investor

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm to assets that have been really depressed. You can

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>find some very healthy, big tech names in China, but

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the overhang there has just been made it very difficult

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>for investors to want to get involved.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 5>We've already seen the Faumo kick in the rallying of

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 5>the names we can only have on the screen the

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 5>Ali Baba's, the JD dot COM's, the by Dos. Is

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 5>there still juice to go hair or do you wait

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 5>to see how bigger impact the stimulus actually has.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>From a fundamental perspective.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue that the valuations are still there. I mean

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>when you take a look at something like Crane shares

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>etf that's shocking the China market, and you look at

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>where it peaked in February twenty twenty one, it was

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>around one hundred and thirty and it's come down all

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the way down to about eighteen at one point now

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in the thirties. It potentially won't go all the way

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>back up to something like one thirty, but you can

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit room left on the valuation side

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because the sentiment has been so bleak. I mean, there's

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>been numerous seal side research pieces out over the past

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>several years saying that this is a no go space.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And so now that you have kind of the support

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for the demand side, I'm not saying there aren't still issues.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of issues left, but I think that's

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>take at least some of the concerns away from investors' minds.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 5>And we have had such a US is the only

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 5>game in town for technology trade?

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that still the case?

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's hard to find similar opportunities from kind of

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a financial resilience or health or dominance perspective in what

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you have in Silicon Valley. There is a lot of

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>uniqueness to those types of names. But the closest corollary

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>that I see really is in China, where you have

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these similar types of companies with really healthy

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. So I think that this is the competitive trade.

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>But of course they have, you know, concerns around the

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment, there are geopolitical risks, there are a number

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of other things that kind of spoil the apple cart

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit there. But from an asset perspective, they're

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty competitive.

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 5>I just want to double click on that in terms

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 5>of regulatory concerns, because they're actually geopolitical regulatory concerns as well.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 5>With China pushing back against the video chips, that's benefited

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 5>Chinese chip makers today. We've got to talk about it

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 5>much more in a moment, Marta. But how much are

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 5>you factoring in for your investors the idea that China

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 5>US tensions will continue.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that is one of the kind

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of exaginous events that's out there and affects a course tech,

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but it also affects the broader market. And you know,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we have talks of tariffs and the like as well,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of questions around kind of the

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>cooperation of different countries and how they'll play well. And

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>then something like AI and thinking about kind of the

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>security risk how that factors into things. So I think

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there is you know, something of a when folks are

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these assets to think about the valuation and

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's accounting for that type of risk. And as

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we're taking a look at big tech today, even post

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>summer storm, I'd argue that valuations are a bit high

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're not really taking into account some of these

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>outside events that could be problematic for.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Some of these companies.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 5>Empower's chief investment strategist Martin Norton. Great to get your take.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Now let's turn our attention to US and China. Now,

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg has learned that Beijing is stepping up pressure on

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 5>domestic companies to ditch in Vidia processes for lo called

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 5>alternatives that are cent shares of China chip maker camanicn

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 5>technology is absolutely soaring today. Let's discuss more with bluemg's

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 5>Mackenzie Hawkins, who help break this story on Friday evening

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 5>around the pushback against Nvidia. This is today's market reaction.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Mackenzie just remind us as to why they are trying

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 5>to curtail these not the most powerful chips from video,

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 5>that's for sure.

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 4>So Beijing for years has been aiming for self sufficiency

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 4>in semi conductors, which are the critical electronic building blocks

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 4>of every advanced technology, including artificial intelligence, and Chinese chip

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 4>makers have been trying to make strides against their foreign

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 4>rivals but have struggled to keep up. And videos chips

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 4>are still the gold standard, even the slightly less powerful

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 4>ones that the company is allowed to sell to China

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>under US restrictions. So Beijing, on the one hand, wants

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 4>to prop up these domestic companies and encourage Chinese AI

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 4>developers to use Chinese chips. On the other hand, they

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 4>don't want to handicap these Chinese AI startups, so they're

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 4>not fully banning them from buying the best chips on

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the market, which are in Vidias, but saying if you

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 4>can please buy local.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 5>Interestingly, I think a quote on camera was Jensen Hwang

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 5>on Friday as well in Washington. He's doing all he can,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 5>he says, to support sales in China.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 4>China is an incredibly important market market for Nvidia and

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 4>pretty much every other chip maker. The US restricted sales

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 4>of advanced ships made with any type of American technology

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 4>to China in twenty twenty two and has been increasingly

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 4>cracking down on those sales over the past couple of years.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 4>But in Nvidia and other companies responded by trying to

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 4>design new chips for the Chinese market, which the US

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Commerce Department then cracked down on those, and Nvidia designed

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 4>even less powerful chips. And this is still a huge

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 4>electronics market. Obviously, an enormous amount of manufacturing happens there,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 4>and companies are trying to bide buy restrictions from Washington

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>while maintaining access to a critical customer base.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Mackenzie Hawkins, thanks so much.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, sticking with China manufacturers, there selling the fewest electric

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 5>cars in eighteen months to customers across Europe, registration is

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 5>actually falling by nearly half in August from a year earlier.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Pett the most credudel here for us from London. This

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 5>is a continuing theme, Craig.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 7>I think this is a case where we still have

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 7>yet to see tariffs come into place and actually be implemented.

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's been a provisional additional charge put on vehicles,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 7>but it won't actually be charged until November, so you know,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 7>this is maybe a little bit of an early taste

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 7>of the impact that these additional tariffs could have on

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 7>Chinese manufacturers and you know, international car companies like Tesla

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 7>that are facing you know, additional tariffs as a result

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 7>of the fact that the EU is concerned about you know,

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 7>just how much lower costs are in China and how

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 7>much you know, companies exporting out of China maybe have

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 7>a leg up over local manufacturers.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 5>MG and Brown that had a lot of success that's

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 5>feeling the heat byd as well. We're currently looking at

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 5>some American auto companies as well, though, because all of

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 5>this comes in the context Craig of a very tough

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 5>environment for automakers.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Still Antos the latest.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 7>Today, Yeah, that's right, and stillentis. The profit warning today

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 7>was really dramatic. They went from seeing a more than

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 7>ten percent profit margin for the year to five to

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 7>seven and a half percent margin for them to lower

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 7>that and also really dramatically reduce their expectation for free

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 7>cash flow. Initially they were seeing that to be positive.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 7>Now they're saying a negative five billion to negative ten billion.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 7>That is really something that has caught the market off guard.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 7>I think it was well understood that this company was

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 7>having some real issues and particularly with their inventory getting

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 7>a bit out of whack in North America. They've been

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 7>making way more cars than they have man for. But

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 7>for them to come out and really have this sort

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 7>of clearing event and you know, worn in a very

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 7>dramatic way, I think has really alarmed investors and analysts

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 7>today the context.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 5>Thank you from Craig Rudell. Meanwhile, coming up, we're going

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 5>to be joined by orchestro CEO Neil Lustig for his

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 5>insights on the potential East Coast port strikes, what the

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 5>impact is likely to be on the supply chain. More broadly,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 5>we'll bring you that next. This is buly Meg Technology.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 8>I urge us MX and the ILA to come in

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 8>an agreement. It respects workers, that ensures the flow of

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 8>commerce through our ports, and the stake are very high.

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>The potential for disruption is significant.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 5>New York Governor Kathy Hokeel earlier this hour union workers

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 5>along the East Coast and Gulf Coast ports threatening strike

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow over a new contract. Bloomberg's Danny Berger joins us

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 5>now from right outside Newark Shipping Port and New Jersey

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 5>on the latest, And Danny, we're hearing actually in a

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Facebook post from the ISLA that USMX continues to block

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 5>the path forward to a settlement.

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>They currently are saying, and this.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Coming from the International Longshoreman's Association, it feels like a

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 5>deal is not near done.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 9>No, they are still a long ways away. And given

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 9>that post, it seems like the strike will likely be

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 9>on twelve am, one minute past midnight on Tuesday is

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 9>when the contract expires and when a strike will happen.

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 9>Forty five thousand members to this union. That is some

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 9>thirty six ports. It's about half of the goods imported

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 9>into the US. The sticking points are two very big ones. Caroline,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 9>it is one pay. They want a some eighty percent

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 9>pay rise over the next six years. Say the current

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 9>offer that they are being given is quote stingy. They

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 9>also want language drafted into the contract that prevents more

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 9>automation on these sports. Automation I should say that is

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 9>very prevalent elsewhere. It is in Asia, it is in

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 9>places like Amsterdam. But they don't want that over fear

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 9>of losing their job. So the head of the Longshoremen's Association,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 9>the union representing them, saying that come Tuesday morning, they

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 9>are ready to in his words, awaken a sleeping giant.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 5>And we saw that awakened on the West coast, but

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 5>a year or so ago, Danny, and a lot of

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 5>that came down to technology, to innovation, as we say,

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 5>alliance and container Carries, direct Employers and Port Association basically

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 5>the United States Maritime Alliances who they're up against anything

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 5>from that side in terms of their talks with the ISLA.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean this is a problem that we've heard

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 9>from many unions. I mean, you can even refer to

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 9>what's happening, what happened in the Hollywood strike over fear

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 9>of technology. And when it comes to the West Coast,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 9>it is a separate union, so these talks are different.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 9>Now you could look at the West Coast and say

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 9>if this is a model for how talks can go

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 9>and even abroad of how talks can go to incorporate automation. Essentially,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 9>they want guarantees put in that workers will be protected.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 9>That's the kind of language they want it. More automation

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 9>does come. Now, there has been some hope that maybe

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.479
<v Speaker 9>if goods can't come through the East Coast, they can

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 9>come through. The West Coast is still open. Unfortunately, the

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 9>capacity there is not enough, and the head of the

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 9>unions on the East Coast has said that there's been

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 9>solidarity and that some of the workers there won't accept

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 9>the shipments coming in. So, yes, it is that sticking

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 9>point of technology. But many people say, look, this is

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 9>a tide that cannot be stopped. It is automation that

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 9>is necessary. It makes a job easier, quicker, and yes

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 9>some jobs will be lost, but it's not reskilling. That's

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 9>really necessary to make sure that that doesn't happen and

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 9>people stay employed even if there is automation.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Dotty Baga live from York. We thank you.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, let's talk more ultimation technology helping us in this

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 5>current supply chain issue.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Neil Lusting joins us. He's the CEO of kestro so predict.

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Procurement platform powered by AI gain theory, which helps companies

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 5>proactively reroot those shipments and secure alternative supplies before well,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 5>perhaps these disruptions are.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Going to be felt.

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 5>I have a feeling you're getting a few calls.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 10>It's a tough time to be a supply chain executive

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 10>this week, and I think most of our customers right

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 10>now are focused on alternatives. Right there where you find

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 10>new routes, how we're going to move things through air.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 10>This is something they would have been focused on for

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 10>a few days already at this point. If you haven't

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 10>figured this out, you're a bit late, and longer term,

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 10>your job is to figure out how to make yourself

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 10>more resilient. Software like Orchestro can't predict black swan events

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 10>like this, but they can't help you become more adaptable

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 10>respond much faster. So our customers can reach out to

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 10>hundreds and thousands of contractors suppliers in order of magnitude faster,

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 10>And really, this is what this is about, is from

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 10>our customer's perspective, is adapting to the issue. Our customers

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 10>aren't going to be involved in the labor discussions. But

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 10>how do you adapt and adjust quicker than you did

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 10>in the past, and more importantly, quicker than your competitors.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Will they likely though, be feeling money lost. We're expecting

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 5>a big economic impact from this.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, there's no question this is going to be damaging

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 10>to everyone. There is enough alternative There are enough alternative

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 10>suppliers or alternative channels. This is not the capacity. So

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 10>this makes it twice as important for you to be

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 10>the first one to move. Yes, and if you move,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 10>as I said, this is kind of like the joke

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 10>with the bear in the woods. You don't have to

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 10>outrun the bear, you have to run your buddy. And

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 10>if you can adapt faster than your competitors, you can

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 10>find those alternative roots. You can arrange airshipping for critical imports.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 10>It's a short term bit, but speed matters.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's talk about the speed and how machine learning

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 5>or how game theory are raging your client puts them

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 5>able to front run hand right.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 10>So AI is good at a few things in the

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 10>enterprise market. AI is good at sifting through large amounts

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 10>of data. And AI is good at automating things that

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 10>otherwise a human being would have had to do, like

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 10>reaching out and managing a code process for finding an

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 10>alternative ship or finding alternative supplier, and so being able

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 10>to take that and shrink that time to twenty percent

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 10>of what it was before means you can now do

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 10>this just more five times as much as you could before.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 10>Our customers are finding For example, we had a customer

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 10>who a few months ago went out to the entire

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 10>North American trucking market at once four thousand lanes, three

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 10>hundred and fifty carriers. A job that would have taken

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 10>nine months and a dozen people was collapsed into three

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 10>people three weeks.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>And so this is the.

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 10>Kind of nimbleness that AI gets you broadly, and what

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 10>our customers delivering for our customers in supply.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 5>Chain, how do you respond to a sudden wave of

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 5>demand on your end? Does anything get stressed or stretched?

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you have to think about investing in your own platform?

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 10>So We're lucky. We use a set of cloud based

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 10>platforms that do it's called auto scaling, so our infrastructure

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.719
<v Speaker 10>is able to expand and contract dynamically. So for us,

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 10>this is actually not a crisis. It's an opportunity.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 5>This is what you're built for. Orchestra Ceo, Nil Lastig.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Great to have you here on a very busy day. Meanwhile,

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 5>coming up, we're going to be joined by California Senator

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 5>Scott Wiener to weigh in on the AI Safety Bill,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 5>which was just vetoed by California Governor Gavin Newsom.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Blue Big Technology.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 11>This is an AIPC, a new generation of personal computer

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 11>with specialized processors for AI tasks. It also has an

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 11>AI assistant software that's pre installed. We tried out Adell

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 11>XPS thirteen and a Microsoft Surface Pro. They both run

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 11>Windows eleven on Quodcom chips, a combination of CPU, GPU

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 11>and NPU or neural processing unit. That's the new bit.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 11>There's also a button or key specifically for Microsoft's Copilot

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 11>Tap and boop upcomes the AI assistant. Copilot acts like

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 11>a chatbot, fielding questions, it creates images, and it can

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 11>quickly draft schedules or summarize dense text in web browsers.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 11>Copilot answers questions about web page or summarizes news articles.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 11>The AI tech still has a lot of limitations, but

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 11>battery life that was great in both PCs three or

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 11>four days on a full charge, chatting with copilot, rendering

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 11>images even if you push the limits with gaming. In

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 11>the Dell's case, that's thanks to Snapdragon's MPU, it can

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 11>run forty five trillion operations per second, so multiple AI

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 11>apps simultaneously without a hit to performance or battery life.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 11>Like pieces of old, there's gremlins, but on the whole

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 11>it does what you'd want from a PC. There's still

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 11>a question, how do aipcs change how we work and.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Play more on AI?

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 5>Because California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed what would have

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 5>become one of the most comprehensive policies governing the safety

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 5>of AI in the United States. The bill, which would

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 5>have held AI developers accountable for any severe harm caused

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 5>by their technologies. It drew strong criticism from the likes

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 5>of Open Ai, VC firm and Recent Horowitz and many more,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 5>who warned it could stall innovation in the States.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Democratic California Senator.

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 5>Scott Wiener, who introduced the bill, called Newsom's veto a

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 5>setback and a missed opportunity. In a statement on X, says, quote,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 5>we are all less safe as a result.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 3>He joins US now for more.

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Along with Bloomberg Showene Gafari and Senator I start you

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 5>you'll reaction disappointment, But why less safe?

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 12>Sure?

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 13>Yes, the governor's veto was very disappointing. This was a

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 13>very thoughtful, focused piece of legislation that would have addressed

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 13>catastrophic risk from only the largest, most powerful models, and

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 13>what it did was very basic. It would require the

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 13>largest AI companies, the largest HEAD companies, to perform safety

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 13>evaluations on massive powerful models before they release them, and

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 13>also to be able to shut down those models if

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 13>something goes awry. They've all committed to perform these safety evaluations.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 13>But instead of just trust us, we want to put

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 13>it in statute. So there was nothing extreme or unreasonable

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 13>about this, and the veto unfortunately sends a very bad

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 13>message about the future of AI safety.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 12>And Senator what do you make of Governor Newsom's rationale

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 12>for vetoing this bill? He said that he's worried it

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 12>would provide a false sense of security that smaller models

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 12>could be exempt. We also saw Nancy Pelosi put out

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 12>a statement about how she's happy to beat bill has

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 12>been meted to what do you make of their rationales?

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 13>Well, respectfully to the governor, I'm first of at least

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 13>the governor acknowledged that these risks are real, because some

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 13>of the opposition throughout we're saying, oh, this is just

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 13>science fiction. It's not science fiction. These are very, very real,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 13>tangible risks that these models could help facilitate. So the

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 13>governor did acknowledge that, which is good. I didn't fully

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 13>understand the governor's VETO message. It said, well, the bill

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 13>is too broad, but the bill is also too narrow,

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 13>So the veto message, it's unclear what the governor actually wants,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 13>and we'll see with this working group that he's setting

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 13>up what comes out of that. But I and many

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 13>others are committed to really moving forward to support AI

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 13>innovation because AI can make the world a better place,

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 13>but trying to get ahead of the risks posed by

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 13>this very powerful technology.

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 12>Right and talking about that working group, So the governor

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 12>has said that he's consulting with outside experts, including Faith

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 12>A Lee and some others, to potentially come up with guardrails,

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 12>maybe even new legislation. It sounds like in a future session,

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 12>what do you make of that? Do you think those

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 12>are the right people for this group? Some people have

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 12>brought up that Faith A Lee does have funding for

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 12>a startup from Interries and Horowitz, the VC firm, which

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 12>has been very vocal against a SB ten forty seven.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 12>What do you make of that group? Are they the

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 12>right people to be addressing this well?

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 13>They also he put a Tino Quaar on there, who's

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 13>a former California Supreme Court justice who I admire greatly,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 13>and I have a lot of respect for Faith A.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Lee.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 13>She's an incredibly smart, talented person. And it's also important

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 13>that folks who technologists who so ported the bill also

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 13>be involved because we had some of the greatest minds

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 13>in AI who were supporting the bill. I hope that

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 13>they are included as well.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 5>Right, Senator, What of the influence though, of those that

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 5>were against?

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 3>What of the lobbying did it make an impact?

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 13>Well, it did not have significant impact in the legislative process.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 13>The legislature with very strong votes in both the Senate

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 13>and the Assembly passed this. So Democrats overwhelmingly supported this

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 13>legislation despite the intense lobbying by large tech companies and

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 13>by large venture capital firms. You know, the governor went

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 13>through his own process, and I am confident was hearing

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 13>a lot both support and opposition and ultimately made his decision.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 13>I strongly disagree with the governor's decision, but again, at

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 13>least he acknowledged that these risks are real and that

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 13>they're not made up.

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 5>When you reintroduce SP ten forty seven in the next session.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 13>We're going to evaluate next steps. We certainly want to

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 13>engage with the Governor and with others. This issue is

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 13>not going away. It's important. Congress has shown no signs

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 13>of acting. Congress could not even get it together to

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 13>pass an election deep fakes bill before this election. So California,

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 13>as the heartland of tech and AI innovation, has a

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 13>responsibility to lead on AI safety.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 12>So, Senator, while this bill didn't pass, it did spark

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 12>a national even international conversation about AI legislation. What do

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 12>you think the impact has been, As it surprised you

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 12>how big this is. The debate over this bill became

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 12>and how much a divided the tech community.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I knew this bill would be controversial, any tech

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 13>regulation bill is. I did not anticipate the scale of

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 13>the conversation. But I have to say it's always disappointing

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 13>when a bill fails or gets vetoed, But sometimes you

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 13>have to introduce a big, controversial bill to spark a

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 13>long overdue conversation. I've seen that happen in some of

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 13>the housing work that we've done, where you pass, you

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 13>introduced a huge bill, it doesn't pass, but it moves

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 13>the conversation forward, and I think the same is true here.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 13>The fact that the governor issued a very, very lengthy

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 13>and detailed veto message, the fact that he acknowledged that

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 13>the risks were real, and the fact that he committed

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 13>to forming not just forming a working group, but saying

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 13>specifically who's going to be on it and what it's

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 13>going to focus on. That's a big step forward. And so, yes,

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 13>it's disappointing that this veto happened, but this issue isn't

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 13>going away, and we're going to get the job done.

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 5>California Senator Scott Reena, we thank you, Amblubos Sharene Gafari

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 5>I think Gaines is expanding its anti trust fight with Google.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Now the gaming john is accusing the Android with conspiring

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 5>with some Sung go this to block rival apps on

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 5>its marketplace by default globally.

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 3>For more, multi Nac is here with it.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 5>And this is yet further anti trust fight with Alphabet,

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 5>the parent company of Google. And of course the Android

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 5>offering's a stake here for Epic.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 14>So this is very interesting because you know, the fight

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 14>is coming after last year's trial where Epic fought against

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 14>Google's app store policies, challenged them, and then one jury

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 14>trial where you know, the jurors found that Google Play policies.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Were anti competitive.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 14>So now we have this new move, the latest move

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 14>where Google says sorry.

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Epic says that while.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 14>Google, a judge in the Google case, is figuring out

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 14>remedies on how to fix Google Play policies, it wants

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:57.479
<v Speaker 14>Google wants Samsung to sort of block gamers from finding

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 14>their games easily. So it's sort of an interesting sort

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 14>of a new effort, you know, that's happening while a

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 14>judge is actually about a rule anytime on how to

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 14>change Google Play policies to make them, you know, less

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 14>of a monopoly. Which which was which is what a

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 14>jury found. Ury jury found last year that that the

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 14>Google Play Store was a.

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 5>Monopoly multi Samsung in July said all of its phones

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 5>will have this default setting.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 3>They say it's basically.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 5>To prevent what malware, but ultimately it blocks downloads of

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 5>Android apps that compete with the Google Play Store. So

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 5>what is Samsung saying that it's actually doing here? What

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 5>does Google say that it's actually doing here? Not constraining competition?

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Sure, so the lawsuit was.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 14>Just file this morning, and Samsung says this auto blocker

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 14>feature that Epic says is now blocking gamers from downloading

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 14>Epic games and Epic products is actually something that Samsung says.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Users have an option to turn it on or turn

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>it off. It's up to them.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 14>But according to Epic, in July, Samsung turned this feature

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 14>into a default. There was a default setting after an

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 14>update where now every time you know, you turn on

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 14>your phone, auto blocker is automatic, automatically on, So it's

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 14>not up to the user anymore.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.719
<v Speaker 2>And that's what Epic says is anti competitive.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 14>So Samsung says, hey, you know, our users can still

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 14>turn off this feature if they want, and we haven't

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 14>heard from Google. Yet the lawsuits file just this morning,

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 14>so waiting to hear their response. It shouldn't be interesting

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 14>because you know, this is sort of the next fight

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 14>after a fight that is already ongoing, so it'll sort

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 14>of be interesting to see what happens.

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Representative from Google decline to comment, and we plan to

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 5>vigorously contest if it gains basis claims, so says Samsung

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Malty Nayak. Thank you so much for bringing us the

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 5>latest in the antitrust fight. Meanwhile, how does it for

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 5>this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Do not forget to check out our podcast.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 5>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 5>online on Apple, Spotify, and high Heart.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 3>From New York, this is Bloomberg Technology.