WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend-December 20, 2020

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio. Hi,

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser. Welcome to the weekend edition of Bloomberg

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Week forty working from home Still for many,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a week with another reality check, as virus cases,

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>hospitalizations and deaths rows to record levels in some places,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and as vaccine distribution began and then hit some snags.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Progress overall, but with a lot of work to be

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>done when it comes to both COVID nineteen and our economy.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>This was all on our mind with our conversations this week,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>including one with Dr Stephen Corwin, President CEO of New

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>York Presbyterian Hospital, who was at the center of New

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>York's coronavirus crisis last spring. He provided some perspective on

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>today's cases. We'll also hear from the Carlisle Group David

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Rubinstein on his conversations with Jeff Bezos, Ruth Bader, Ginsburg,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Oprah and more. It's all in his book How to Lead. Also,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of books, how about the best business books of

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's a hint, they're not all business books. We start, though,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with this week's cover story about the urban exodus. That's

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>happening as a result of working from home, and how

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic migration could reshape the American economy. For more,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quicktake anchor Tim Stanovic and I talked with Noah

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>bu Hire, finance reporter at Bloomberg News and Bloomberg Business

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Week editor Jill Weber. We've been watching this trend um

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just evolved throughout the pandemic, and and it started with people,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically the urban exodus, people leaving cities and

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>going to the suburbs or or the country. And then

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of renting some of those places, people started buying

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and and then you know, the employers started to catch

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>up with with it eventually, and that's really kind of

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the new element. And I think the one that that

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really distinguishes Noah's story has been, you know, the shift

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was at first it was just the real estate implications,

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but now it's about the pay implications. And Noah's reporting

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>actually centers on a store, on a company, Red Fend,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the real estate company, and they actually almost become the

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for the story. So no tell us about this

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>trend and what we've learned through Red Sin. Yeah, Well,

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you really, you really captured it. I mean,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this is uh, this is a trend in HR policy

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. We've we've we've had this massive experiment in

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>working from home, and I think a lot of companies

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.119
<v Speaker 1>have found that it works for people. Um. It's not perfect.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There are for sure some drawbacks. UM, but as as

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through the months, companies, I think, responding to

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what they're hearing from their workforces, have realized that they

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can allow for a much greater uh amount of remote

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>work um when the pandemic is finally over. And that's

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>forced them to really reckon with uh policies and how

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>how you how you actually make this work in a

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>way that's that's fairer and reasonable for your business. And um,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>really it's just opened up a giant can of worms because, uh,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cost of labor and the cost of

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>living just vary so radically across the US that, um,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you could create situations where you know, if someone moved

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Bay Area to Phoenix or Atlanta, they um,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and they carried their salary with them, they just um,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you create a situation where um, you were paying way

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>above market essentially. Okay, So the red fin thing that's

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>so interesting though, is that once people sort of moved out, uh,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and the company had to grapple with us. And they

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>were actually proactive I think and having a plan basically, um.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And they basically realized that in order to implement this,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they needed to have some version of like a localized

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pay policy. Right. So so tell us about how they

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actually went about implementing that. Yeah, so on some levels,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like companies have been doing this for years, right, it's

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just um uh, like they thought about, well, if we

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>open a new office in a new city, what do

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we pay people. What's interesting is that that red Fin

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of other companies you know,

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>had to do this on a mass scale. So what

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Redfin did is they got a bunch of data on

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>cost of labor and cost of living. Um. Their their

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>real estate company. They're in the home brokerage business, so

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>they're they're pretty attuned to this stuff. And I have

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of in house data, but they got external

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>data as well, um to try and craft a policy

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of what's fair and and and you know, the data

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 1>informed their decisions, but there were a lot of judgment

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>calls at the end of the day, and you know,

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they're still tweaking and trying to make sure, um, you know,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>their policy works for their people and that they can

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to recruit and retain the best people because at

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, that's that's really what this

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is about for for companies is you know, there's even

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.679
<v Speaker 1>with unemployment where it is today, there for certain kinds

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of jobs, they're still and insatiable appetite um and demand

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for people and um, you know, as companies compete for talent,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to make sure they're paying the right amount

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in the markets where those people want to be. No,

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>there's there's something you explore in the piece, the economic

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>implications of this. The idea that people are leaving higher

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>cost areas moving to areas than aren't is expensive. And

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>with that, of course, if they're leaving a city or

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a state, with them goes tax base, with them, goes

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>spending in that local economy. What are the long term

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>implications of this migration? Well, I don't think we know,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>ye is the short and short non answer, but um,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it certainly doesn't seem like it's going to be helpful

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for high cost places like New York and San Francisco

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>as they you know, as the whole country tries to

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>uh dig itself out of of of the economic implications

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. I mean, it's not helpful when you

0:05:53.560 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have high earners leave your city, but at the same by,

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the same time, like, we just don't

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>know that at this point how extensive this is going

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. And and there are some real benefits to

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>um living in being near where the action is, where

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>there are other people in your industry, and um, you know,

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that could be a draw for people to come back

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to some of these high cost places. And that was

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>our cover story this week in the magazine that was

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>No Blue Higher Finance reporter at Bloomberg News along with

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business. We get to Joe Weber joining Bloomberg Cricket

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Take anchor Tim Stenovik and me working from home Man,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that is something we have talked so much about this

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>year because of the pandemic. And coming up in the

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>next hour, keep in mind we're going to hear more

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about working from home. It's impact on our lives and

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>our brains. Microsoft is keeping track of that. First up

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>though straight ahead, we're seeing a significant increase in COVID cases.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Another very tough week for the nation. Because of the virus.

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The CEO of New York Presbyterian, home to New York's

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>first confirmed COVID case last spring, share some perspective on today.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Garrol

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Mazer from Bloomberg Radio. This week was another tough one

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in the battle against the coronavirus. We saw the first

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>hiccups in the distribution of a COVID nineteen vaccine in

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the US. The headlines were equally difficult globally. With that

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in mind, Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stanovic and I caught

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>up with Dr Stephen Corwin, president CEO of New York

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Presbyterian Hospital, who The New York Times called in the spring,

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the CEO at the center of New York's coronavirus crisis.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>The first confirmed case in the New York area was

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in one of New York Presbyterians hospitals last spring. Dr

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Corwyn began, though, with what today looks like, we're seeing

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a significant increase in COVID cases. Word about of what

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>our peak was in in the April time frame, and

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we expected quickly to go to the thirty range by

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Christmas time, if not a little bit after, so we're

0:07:55.000 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing a significant uptick. The good news is uh at

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>people are less sick with the virus as we see it.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>During April, we had a mortality rate in the hospital

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of about extraordinary. Now it's down to about five, which

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is still horrific, especially if it's your loved one, but

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but much less than than April. So I would say

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got a rough four to six weeks ahead of us. Uh.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But um, I think that we'll get through it, especially

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>as we start vaccinating people quick follow. Um. Do you

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that we're going to get back to those levels

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of hospitalizations um and cases um where we

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are there, but in terms of hospitalizations that we saw

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the spring, we hope not. Um. You know,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we're clearly mindful of that. Our modeling would show that

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we would peak in the in the middle of January

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>unless we have a really terrible Christmas season in terms

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of people traveling and avoiding, social distancing and man sking.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>We still haven't seen the full peak of of what

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>happened in Thanksgiving, so that that really is a variable

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that that that relates to this directly. So uh, certainly

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to go back to where the city

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>was in April, and we certainly don't. And so again

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>until we get mass vaccination, masking, social distancing, washing your hands,

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all the things you keep hearing about become really critical.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And I empathize with our elected officials in terms of

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>how much of a lockdown do you need to have

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>versus not? I think a lot of it depends on

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>how much virus is circulating. Dr Corwin. Why is the

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>mortality rate gone down so much? Is it because of

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've learned, what you've learned since March, since April?

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it because the hospital is not strained in the

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>same way as it because of therapeutics? Um? I think

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>first the answer to your question is I really don't know.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, I do think that we

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>serve We know how to take care of the patients better.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Um ramdzevie steroids. They may not be game changers, but

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but we know how to use these drugs. UM with

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the masking and social distancing, are people getting less of

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a viral load when they get sick. We've certainly seen

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a shift to a younger demographic who tends to be

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>less sick with the virus um and to your point.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Any system over that gets overwhelmed, it becomes more difficult

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to save lives. So the ability to not get the

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>hospital overwhelmed I think plays into it as well. So

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>all of the above, but it's gonna take us a

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>while to swear it through. This virus becoming less virulent,

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't see that, but that's that's gonna take time

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for us to figure out. One thing that you just

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>said really struck me. People wearing masks that you get

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>less of a viral load. I haven't heard that before.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Well, remember, UH, you know, UH

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>masks aren't totally affect active, but it helps to it

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>helps to filter out particles, and so we use the

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>N ninety five masks when we're caring for patients UH,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>and that clearly prevents UH inhalation of the virus particles.

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>So wearing a surgical mask not only protects UH the

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>person that you would be breathing on, but also helps

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to protect you. And if you get less of a

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>viral load, you may have a milder milder infection that

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if somebody gave you a full viral load, which is

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>clearly what we saw in the beginning of the pandemic. Hey,

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you make Dr Corrin? A new mutation of

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen turned up and I guess more than a

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand infected patients in the UK and was being blamed

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>for more rapid spread of the contagion. Does that make

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you a little nervous? It does? I mean I think

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that this We know that the virus has many, many mutations.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is not the first one. Uh. When

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people went on holiday this summer, they came back with

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a variation from Spain which appeared to be more virulent

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and cause wider spread. So this is not surprising. Viruses,

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like anything else, mutate over time. The fortunate aspect for

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>US VISA via the vaccine is the spike protein is

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the key in terms of inducing immunogenicity, and so knowing

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the spike protein UM and and developing the mRNA towards

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the spike protein. I think we're in pretty good shape

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the variations now in terms of making sure

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that that the vaccination will be very effective, right, because

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what I've heard, that the current vaccines um still

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>will work on these mutations. Is that correct? That's correct

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, Yes, that's correct, and I

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>think that because the spike protein has not changed, so

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not as it's the mutation profile is not what

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we see in influenza uh. And I think that that's encouraging.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And we're very bullish on the m RNA platform and

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. So Dr corn I want to ask you

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're interview at the time, when you were interviewing

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>The Times back in May, you noted that our assumptions

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>around pandemic preparations were flawed. Are there assumptions we are

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>making right now about this wave of the COVID breakout,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this other wave, another wave, and about the distribution of

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine and the impact that will have. Might some

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of those assumptions be flawed as well? We grossly underestimated

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic the amount of protective equipment equipment we would need.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>For personnel protective equipment. We have over ninety days of

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>supply for every major category of that. We had issues

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of do we have an A ventilators? We

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly don't have that issue. Now we know how to

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>create extra I see you beds, and we know how

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to create staffing models that that protect our patients. So

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>from that standpoint, we're much better off. Where I think

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that we can make a mistake as a country is

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to assume that the vaccines here, we can let down

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>our guard. Let's go back to business as usual. It's

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>going to take a while for us to get to

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hurt immunity, and so we've got to do two things simultaneously,

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be really stringent about the guidelines and and separating ourselves

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from each other as tough as that maybe um, and

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>let people get vaccinated and educate the population on the vaccine.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of the population is skeptical of

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. Are populations of color who've been experimented upon

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in the past, their skeptical of the vaccine. So we've

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really got to educate the population as to the safety

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and the efficacy of the vaccine. That skepticism is what

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>worries some about our ability to reach her immunity when

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the virus. That was Dr Stephen Corwin,

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Presidency of New York Presbyterian Hospital, joining Bloomberg Quick Take

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>anchor Tim Stanovic and me. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Week coming up. The pandemic didn't come with a playbook,

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and yet leaders this year drew on many great books

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to find their way. That's next in our Pursuits guide

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Best business books. This is Bloomberg. This is

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Mazer from Bloomberg Radio. This

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>week was another tough one in the battle against the coronavirus.

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>We saw the first hiccups in the distribution of a

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen vaccine in the US. The headlines were equally

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult globally. With that in mind, Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Stanovic and I caught up with Dr Stephen Corwin, president

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO of New York Presbyterian Hospital, who The New York

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Times called in the spring the CEO at the center

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of New York's coronavirus crisis. The first confirmed case in

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the New York area was in one of New York

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Presbyterians hospitals last spring. Dr Corwyn began though with what

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>today looks like we're seeing a significant increase in COVID cases.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Worried about of what our peak was in in the

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>April time frame, and we expected quickly to go to

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirty range by Christmas time, if not a little

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bit after. So we're seeing a significant uptick The good

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>news is that people are less sick with the virus

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>as we see it. During April, we had a mortality

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rate in the hospital of about extraordinary. Now it's down

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to about five, which is still horrific, especially if it's

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>your loved one, but but much less than than April.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So I would say we've got a rough four to

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>six weeks ahead of us. Uh. But UM, I think

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that we'll get through it, especially as we start vaccinating

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>people quick follow. Um. Do you anticipate that we're going

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to get back to those levels in terms of hospitalizations

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>um and cases um what we are there, but in

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of hospitalizations that we saw back in the spring,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we hope not. Um. You know, we're clearly mindful of that.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Our modeling would show that we would peak in the

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of January unless we have a really

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>terrible Christmas season in terms of people traveling and avoiding,

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>social distancing and masking, we still haven't seen the full

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>peak of of what happened and Thanksgiving, so that that

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>really is a variable that that that relates to this directly.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>So UM, certainly no one wants to go back to

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>where the city was in April, and we certainly don't.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And so again, until we get mass vaccination, masking, social distancing,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>washing your hands, all the things you keep hearing about

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>become really critical. And I empathize with our elected officials

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how much of a lockdown do you

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>need to have versus not? I think a lot of

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it depends on how much virus is circulating. Dr Corwin.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Why is the mortality rate gone down so much? Is

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it because of what we've learned, what you've learned since March,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>since April? Is it because the hospital is not strained

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same way as it because of therapeutics? Um?

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think first the answer to your question is, I

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 1>really don't know. To be honest with you, I do

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>think that we certainly know how to take care of

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the patients better, um remdzevie, steroids. They may not be

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>game changers, but but we know how to use these drugs.

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>UM with the masking and social distancing, are people getting

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>less of a viral load when they get sick. We've

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly seen a shift to a younger demographic who tends

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to be less sick with the virus. UM And to

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>your point, any system over that gets overwhelmed, it becomes

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to save lives. So the ability to not

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>get the hospital overwhelmed I think plays into it as well.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So all of the above, but it's gonna take us

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a while to swear through this virus becoming less virulent.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't see that, but that's that's gonna take time

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for us to figure out. One thing that you just

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>said really struck me. People wearing masks that you get

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>less of a viral load. I haven't heard that before.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Well, remember, you know, UH masks

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>aren't totally effective, but it helps to It helps to

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>filter out particles, and so we use the N ninety

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>five masks when we're caring for patients UH, and that

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly prevents UH inhalation of the virus particles. So wearing

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a surgical mask not only protects UH the person that

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you would be breathing on, but also helps to protect you.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you get less of a viral load, you

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>may have a milder, milder infection that if somebody gave

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you a full viral load, which is clearly what we

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>saw in the beginning of the pandemic. Hey, what do

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you make Dr Corrin a new mutation of COVID nineteen

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>turned up and I guess more than a thousand infected

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>patients in the UK and was being blamed for more

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>rapid spread of the contagion. Does that make you a

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>little nervous? It does? I mean I think that this

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>We know that the virus has many, many mutations. I

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>mean this is not the first one. Uh. When people

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>went on holiday this summer, they came back with a

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>variation from Spain which appeared to be more virulent and

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>caused wider spread. So this is not surprising. Viruses, like

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>anything else, mutate over time. The fortunate aspect for US

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>VISA via the vaccine is the spike protein is the

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>key in terms of inducing immunogenicity, and so knowing the

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>spike protein UM and and developing the mRNA towards the

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>spike protein, I think we're in pretty good shape regardless

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of the variations now in terms of making sure that

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that the vaccination will be very effective, right, because that's

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what I've heard that the current vaccines um still will

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>work on these mutations. Is that correct? That's correct as

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, Yes, that's correct. And I think

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that because the spike protein has not changed, So it's

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not as it's the mutation profile is not what we

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>see in influenza uh. And I think that that's encouraging,

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're very bullish on the m RNA platform and

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. So Dr corn, I want to ask you

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>when you're interviewing the Time. When you were interviewing The

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Times back in May, you noted that our assumptions around

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic preparations were flawed. Are there assumptions we are making

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>right now about this wave of the COVID breakout, this

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>other wave, another wave, and about the distribution of the

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and the impact that will have. Might some of

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>those assumptions be flawed as well? We grossly underestimated pre

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic the amount of protective equipment equipment we would need

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for personnel protective equipment. We have over ninety days of

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>supply for every major category of that. We had issues

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of do we have an ventilators? We clearly

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have that issue. Now we know how to create

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>extra I see you beds, and we know how to

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>create staffing models that that protect our patients. So from

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that standpoint, we're much better off where I think that

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we can make a mistake as a country is to

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>assume that the vaccines here, we can let down our

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>guard and let's go back to business as usual. It's

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>going to take a while for us to get to

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hurt immunity, and so we've got to do two things simultaneously.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Be really stringent about the guidelines and separating ourselves from

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>each other as tough as that maybe um, and let

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>people get vaccinated and educate the population on the vaccine.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of the population is skeptical of

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. Are populations of color who've been experimented upon

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the past, their skeptical of the vaccine. So we've

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really got to educate the population as to the safety

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and the efficacy of the vaccine. That skepticism is what

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>worries some about our ability to reach her immunity when

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the virus. That was Dr Stephen Corwin,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Presidency of New York Presbyterian Hospital. Joining Bloomberg Quicktake anchor

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanovic, m me, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>coming up. The pandemic didn't come with a playbook, and

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>yet leaders this year drew on many great books to

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>find their way. That's next in our Pursuits guide to

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the best business books of This is Bloomberg. This is

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Mazer from Bloomberg Radio. In

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>our next half hour, we're going to double down on books,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing from the Carlisle Groups, David Rubinstein on his new book,

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and talking to everyone from Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to Oprah and Yo Yo Ma. In keeping with that,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Business Week's Pursuits team put together list of the best

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>business books this year, and what they ultimately found is

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that some of the best weren't technically business books nor

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>published this year, which just makes this list even that

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>more interesting. Bloomberg Pursuits Deputy editor James Gaddy was behind

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it all and he began with how putting it together

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>involves tapping all corners of our Bloomberg team. And we

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>have the luxury, honestly, of having people all over the

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>world who have contact and resources to talk to some

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of the thought business leaders all over the world. And

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so we reach out to our reporters and bureaus and

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Asia, obviously here in New York and h

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they come back with the list. We had fifty two

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 1>this year actually, and as you mentioned. Uh. Not a

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of them were business books as you normally think

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, or even from this year. You know, one

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of the books that came up with the Great Influenza

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>from way back Ancient History two four written by John Barry,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but of course very relevant today in history of pandemics.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I bought that book this year,

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and partly I think it was also came up on

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates list of like the five books you have

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to read, and that was one of them too, so

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>uh and several people actual he for he's been a

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>guest on our show, the managing director of a travago

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that came up on his list. Yeah. You know. One

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things was the common thread that kind

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of ran through these selections were people trying to find

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>historical analogies to this, you know, to this various prices

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>going on today. And you know, you had people like

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Gray, president chief operating officer for Blackstone Group, and uh,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>into the ninety blitz, the Splendid and the Vial, which

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you know he described as uh, you know, looking at

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Winston Churchill and how he retained this relentless optimism in

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the face of such insurmountable odds allot it a powerful

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lesson for today's challenges. So that was interesting. You know,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we had Roger Ferguson, also President and CEO of t

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I A A who looked to a biography of James A.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Baker the third called the man who ran Washington. And

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said, it's not a timecare not too

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>long ago, but you know you can still see these

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of hyper parers and politics, the feeds of those

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>things being planted during this period. You had, let's see,

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting right to see where leaders go, right, I

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>mean at times of crisis, Like it's not just like okay,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>let me get the leadership one oh one book, especially

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in a year write James that where people said, wait

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute, there is no playbook on this. So it

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating to see where they went. Yeah, we reached

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>out to America goes in the gallaries who art Galaris

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh. He went back and looked at Hollywood. Uh

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh a history of this year that came out

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>called a big goodbye goodbye and called Chinatown in the

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>last year as of Hollywood. And he said, you know,

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>people who work in the business of art like he

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>does Uh, Robert Evans producers that movie. Uh, he found

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>new meaning in this quote that he had, which was

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>always to just bet on talent. And so some you know,

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you have people going back to these uh time periods,

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>which uh. And then one other example was Sam Cobb's

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>CEO Tipping Point Community. He went to a piece of

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>historical fiction called The Cold Millions by Jeff Walters, which

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was very popular books this year. Uh. And it goes

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and looks at the early twentieth century, a little known

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>free speech battle between union organizers and the leaders in

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington State. So yeah, they're they're kind of you know,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the time periods were very different, The protagonists in these

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>books are very very different, and it just kind of

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>shows how people are looking for what we found was

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at least analogous moment. I love like someone like Danielle Blue.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this has been just a devastating year for

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the restaurant industry. And the book that he's

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>reading Dirt Adventures in Leon as a chef in training

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>father and Sleeth looking for the secret of French cooking.

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's just funny to see where, you know, like

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people go Yeah, right, that was really interesting when he said,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a real guts for Bill Buford to

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>go in there and do that, and he knows from

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>first experience. Yeah exactly, I bet right. Yeah. Yeah. You know,

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we did have a few uh, you know, typical sort

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of business books which you know we should call out because, um,

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the year that everyone bench watched Netflix.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, Mark Randolph, the uh, one of the founders

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of Netflix, wrote a book called that Will Never Work.

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The Birth of Netflix from the Amazing Life of an Idea. Well,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>whoever said that was obviously wrong. Thing that I guess

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't surprise me. Um, I guess, Uh, this was more

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:07.959
<v Speaker 1>about me, I guess. But there were a lot of

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>female empowerment books that came up that uh, really interesting.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Untamed Glennon Doyle's No More was also a bestseller this year.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioned by I Believe for different People and

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 1>one of our people, Mary Max from A Little Spargo

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>called it an authentic and empowering kick in the tail.

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So that which that should just be blur cover. I'm

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely all in when it comes to female empowerment and

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>books on that subject, just saying well, it was great

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with Bloomberg Pursuits Deputy editor James Gaddy.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Check out that list on the best books business books

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of It's online in the magazine and on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>From the best business books of some of the best

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>known names in the world on how to lead. It's

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all in a book by the Carlisle Groups David Rubinstein.

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>He's coming up next. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Gerrol Masser from Bloomberg Radio. Safe to say, we didn't

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have a playbook on how to get through the global pandemic,

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and now we just made thanks to a book out

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>by David Rubinstein. He's the co founder and co executive

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the private equity firm the Carlisle Group. David

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is also host of peer to peer conversations on Bloomberg

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Bloomberg TV. His new book, it's entitled How

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to Lead. Wisdom from the World's greatest CEOs, founders and

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>game Changers. He talked about the book and more with

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stenevik and me. We started though

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>with how his interest in leadership, how it all began

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and I was little. I was always interested in learning

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>how other people became prominent and famous, and I used

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to read about him, and I guess I couldn't stop

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>asking people questions. So my mother would say, you know,

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be polite, don't ask people so many questions. But I

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to resist. So dozens of leaders you spoke

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to for this Dr Anthony Fauci, Oprah, Jeff Bezos, Marilyn Howson, um.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there a common thread that runs through all of

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>their journeys that you took away from the conversations. Sure,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>all of them came from I would say middle class,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>lower middle class or blue collar families. None of them

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>were really extremely wealthy. They work their way up. They

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>came from a situation where they typically had some failures

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier in their career. They all tended to have a vision,

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>They were very persistent, they knew they wanted to get

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>something done, They were willing to share the credit with people,

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>highly honest and a lot of integrity, and they rose

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>up in case in situations where there's a lot of crisis.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You could say the word's great leaders overcome crises, And

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 1>many of them overcame crisis and really show their leadership

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>skills during those crisis. So, David, I wonder, if you're

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>not a leader as a kid, or as a teenager

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>or at college, does that necessarily mean you won't be

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a leader later in life? I mean, do you do

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to start showing some trades basically early on.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I wondered if that was also a commonality between some

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of the folks you've talked to. Most of them were

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not leaders when they were very young. In fact, if

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at the last let's say a

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>dozen presidents the United States, maybe only Bill Clinton would

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be somebody who would have been said, as a young person,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this person could be President United States. And the same

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>as true in other areas. I certainly was not a

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>great leader when I was younger, and many people were

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>not famous when they were young for being Rhodes scholars

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>or Supreme Court clerks or Heisman Trophy winners. People who

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>become great leaders later in life basically have a tortoise

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and hair approach. They've worked their way up, they learned

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some skills, and ultimately luck helps them get get forward.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you think of your thank your own high

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>school class, whoever the seat that the senior leader was

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the student body president. What happened to that person? You know,

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.959
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you know you don't know because they didn't become famous.

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I often thought the people in my high school class

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>were going to be conquering the world, and then I've

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>never heard it from some of them. Again, Yeah, mine

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is a pulmonologist in California. He's doing well. Yeah, he's

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>doing okay, he's busy during the COVID pandemic. But um, David,

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it struck me that you said that this common theme

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is that people came from this middle class background. I'm wondering.

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We talked a lot about this idea of a k

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>shape recovery. The middle class has gotten smaller in the

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>United States. Do you think it's still possible for people

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to work their way up? The American dream? I think

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>still lives on. But there's no doubt there's an underclass

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in our country now that, for racial or other reasons,

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>has fallen further and further behind. And I think COVID

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to bring them even further and further behind,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't have technology in the in the

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID era, you're just you're just not able to really survive.

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So think about all the families that don't have high

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>speed internet at home, or cancer ford to have child

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>care for their children, or can't afford to sound the

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>schools right now. So that's a sad situation. So I

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do think that the American dream is becoming more elusive

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for many, many people in this country. But there are,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously are people who still believe in the American dream

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and come from reasonable backgrounds and can work their way up.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And obviously some people from the worst backgrounds can work

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>their way up, but the odds are harder and harder. Well,

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the kind of bigger picture, David,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our economy in the future of it,

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and you watch what's going on in other nations like China,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>who's definitely on a mission to certainly develop some more

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated industries and certainly develop their domestic economy. Do we

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out some new policies and what might

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>those policies be so that the American dream is not

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>more elusive and that it is available to more and

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>more Americans, especially at the lower socioeconomic scale. There's no

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>doubt that our creative activity in this country is the

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>envy of the world. Silicon Valley and all the kind

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of technologies that have been developed there are the envy

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of the world. But we don't have a population base

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that China does, and it's China becomes more and more capitalistic.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually gonna by pay us us in size.

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>In terms of economy, the United States will probably be

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in our lifetime the second largest economy world, not the largest.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>But you can still rise up and have a very

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>great life in the second largest economy in the world.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But we should recognize that China will be a competitor

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>increasingly in the in the economic world, and it's going

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to be difficult for some of us to accept that fact,

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's a reality. If we had one new policy

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that the incoming Biden administration would put into fact, let's

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>say in their first year, that would help some of

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>those Americans that have been left behind. What would you

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you think it should be? No member of

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Congress can get their pay unless we pass bipartisan legislation.

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.479
<v Speaker 1>UH that addresses some of the problems. Obviously that's tongue

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in cheque, but clearly I actually like it. I'm just

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna put it here here, But anyway, go ahead, so

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously that the country doesn't work as well

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as we would like it to work. And we haven't

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>seen bipartisan legislation for a long long time, and we

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>have apparel's appauling, and every time the budget is about

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to expire. So we have to do a better job.

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether the new president can do that

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>or not, but clearly the system isn't working as well

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as the founding fathers intended, that's for sure. I hope

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this interviewed Joe Biden when he uh takes officers. Before

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he takes office, I'd like to talk to him. I've

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>known him for a long time, but I have never

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>interviewed him, so I'm looking forward to that. David, if

0:34:58.239 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>if you'll indulge us, I'd love to go through some

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the names on your list, because it is quite

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a lineup, m and just kind of what comes to

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>mind in terms of their leadership and just talking to them.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos what Jeff is a person who started relatively

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>late when you think about it, the companies, not that

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>he started, but he's now built it into the company

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>which is now one of the best known companies in

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. And he's become the richest person in the world.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But he still has a great deal of humility, I

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>would say, and a pretty good sense of humor. And

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the interview was one of the most interesting

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>ones in the book. Think about it. Many many times

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the richest person in the world over the past half

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>century have been people have been relatively reclusive. Howard Hughes,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody really knew him. J Paul Getty, nobody really knew him.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates and and Jeff Bezos both are pretty accessible,

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can get ahold of him. You can see him,

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you can talk to him. It's not not quite what

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. And I love in your book

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you talk about Jeff Bezos that you had

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity is it right to have a one percent

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>equity stake in the company and you passed? Well, we

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>actually had opportunity of about us on that we did get.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We did get one told that at the I p oh,

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so we thought it was going nowhere. That was our

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest mistake. It happens, it could be worse. What about

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to someone like Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg,

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>who we lost earlier this year. Yeah, she was a

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 1>person who weighed about a hundred pounds when I interviewed

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>at the Street Y in New York. Ninety of those

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>pounds were her brain. Incredibly smart person, but it's very

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult to interview in this sense. Um, when you asked

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody a question interview, you expect an answer within a

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>second or so, but she would pause for twenty seconds

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>or so. When you say, oh, she having a senior moment,

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>did she not hear me? Was an offensive question, but

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>she was actually thinking about what she wanted to say

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and then would say it in paragraph form. So she

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was very, very good. Well, and what about someone like

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Oprah Winfrey, which is just I think for all of

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>us would just I think be so nervous sitting down

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 1>with her. But what was that like? Well, it's hard

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to interview the greatest interview of them all, perhaps, but

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I've known her a little bit and uh so it

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't quite the first time I'd met her, so it

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>was it was okay, and uh, it went well, but

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, she didn't really need an interviewer. I mean,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>she's uh, she was giving a master class and how

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to be interviewed and how to interview. So I was

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>just mostly sitting there watching. But what do you want

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to know as a leader like this, this is all

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>about leadership And what was it that just kind of

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>stood with you about her? Well, she is somebody that

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>came from very, very poor background, and now that she's

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>become very famous and wealthy, she's trying to give back.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.359
<v Speaker 1>She's involved in philanthropy. But she her greatest skill set,

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>she would say, is not being an interviewer, but being

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a listener. And she has empathy with the people she interviews,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what she says is her strength. What about

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>yo Yo Ma, Well, Yo Yo is somebody I've come

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to know pretty well through the Kennedy Center, and he's

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a person that you know chess. He's the best known

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and the best cellis in the world. But that's not

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>what he cares about. At this point in his career.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>He is about sixty five years old. He cares about

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>other things. He wants to perpetuate the idea that the

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>arts make people better, better people that are humans, and

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so he's really interested in in in cutting people to

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>learn more about the arts, not just listening to him play.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So he spends at least half his life now trying

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 1>to get people to become more familiar with the arts

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and appreciate the arts, all kinds of arts. And so

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he's an infectious personality. And he's on the change a

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit because he's a person that doesn't like to

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shake hands. He likes to hug people, and in the

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in the COVID area, it's harder to hug people, so

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you probably have to change his technique there. I have

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, one of the things I like about the

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, David, is the Kennedy Center honors um. I

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 1>still talk about led Zeppelin and Hard doing Stairway to Heaven.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>There's like nothing like it. But I do look forward

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to it, and I think about the importance of arts

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and culture in our community, and I do wonder about

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the hit that it is all taking because of the pandemic,

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>everything being shut down. You know, what are your hopes

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and expectations when we get on the other side of this. Well,

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the performing arts world has been decimated, and I would

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:52.439
<v Speaker 1>say probably ten of performing arts arenas or the state

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>or or venues are not going to probably reopen again. Well, David,

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think the role of the federal

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>government has to be in terms of you know, we

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.399
<v Speaker 1>can go through a list, whether it's cultural institutions, UM,

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>arts and entertainment. I look at the restaurant community, which

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is part of the fabric and culture of

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>our you know, major cities and our society, and they

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 1>are also getting decimated. What's the responsibility of the federal

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>government where it feels like that has really been forgotten. Well, yeah,

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I suppose you work in a food truck. Suppose you

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>work in a restaurant. Uh, you know, you're probably not

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be uh employed that readily right now. And

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough situation. Many of these people are not

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 1>people can readily go get another job so so easily.

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's very tough. I hope the most important thing

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we do in the next week or so has passed

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>some legislation that will actually help with the economy and

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>help these people that need it the most. And we

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>know there are a lot of people out there struggling. David,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, worked as a lawyer in the Senate

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and in the White House during the Carter administration. That

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was David Rubinstein, co founder, co executive chair of the

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle Group, host ap peer to peer conversations on Bloomberg

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Radio and TV. Check out his book How to Lead.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>He was talking with Bloomberg Quick Take anchor Tim Stenovik

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and me. That wraps up the first hour of the

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. From Bloomberg Radio. I'm

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser. More ahead in our next hour, including the

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.720
<v Speaker 1>stats on our virtual working from home world, plus paving

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the way to a more sustainable and regenerative future of fashion,

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and he played with the Rolling Stones, the Almond Brothers

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and Eric Clapton and more. Find out why he's the

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>subject of a new documentary called The tree Man. That's

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>all coming up. I'm Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio. Hi,

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser. Coming up in our second hour of

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. All the crazy

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>statistics on how much we are working from home, the

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>folks over at Microsoft three six, They've got a ton

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of data on what we are all doing. Plus making

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>mushrooms into high end fashion. That's the goal of Michael Works.

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>We check in with one of the co founders and

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the tree Man, the musician who toured with the Rolling Stones,

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Almond Brothers, Eric Clapton and more, and who's now

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>down on the farm. We kick off this hour with

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the story in the magazine about how, in this world

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>of COVID and perhaps more virus and germs to come,

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that if you want to make a building healthier, stop

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sanitizing everything. It's a great story from Projects and Investigations

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>reporter Carolina Winter, who joined me and Bloomberg Quicktake anchor

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovic along with Bloomberg Business We Get It or

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Weber, who kicked it off reminding us of our

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sanitizing craze that's also been covered in the magazine. I

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>love this story, and it's been uh one that I

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was just really looking forward to publishing, in part because,

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Carol, we've had a great Lysol story

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, and it was, you know,

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the theme of that story was like you sanitize everything,

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but lights all over everything. It's so effective at killing COVID.

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 1>And this is like the powder point, I think, which

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is look like when we when we do sanitize things,

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we annihilate everything. And yeah, sure that gets out of COVID,

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But but how much do we really understand about the

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>really small stuff. And that's where Caroline's reporting comes in

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>because there's actually this little mini movement that's that says

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>we're actually doing a lot of harm. And I think

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this makes it really it's especially relevant right now in

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>New York as a snowstorm starts coming down, uh, that

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to be trapped indoors for the next

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. And it's all about indoor environment. So

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so Carolyn take us into the world of science and

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know about what's going on inside of

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>buildings right now. Yeah. Sure, well, so we're we're actually

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:33.439
<v Speaker 1>trapped inside a lot of the times. Just to show

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that in the West, um, humans spend indoors Americans, and

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about that in inside buildings and cars, and there's a

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of research showing that are disconnect from the outdoor

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>world is linked to a huge range of really serious

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>chronic diseases and UM. And of course now we know

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that stars also spreads much more easily indoors, and so

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experts are asking, you know, what, how

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do you make the indoors healthier? And UM, the understandable,

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>understandable tactic has been to just you know, which whip

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about the bleach and just bleach bomb everything. You know,

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>install air sanitizers, get your antimicrobial coatings. And the people

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with, they said, um, you know this, this

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>it makes it makes a lot of sense just from

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>a just you know, we've what we've long wanted to

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>just annihilate any all pathogens. Um, but this may have

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>really serious consequences for our long term health and may

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>also not be helping very much against stars by the way. Yeah, well,

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, Carolyn, I think what's kind of interesting too

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is this whole idea of these indoor microbes. Um. I

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:49.879
<v Speaker 1>just find it fascinating. And you talk about the microbiome

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of the built environment, and I love this. I wrote

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on the story when I was taking notes you which

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>encompasses trillions of microbes, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. I mean,

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there's so much stuff off in these closed spaces that

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we live in and consider a haven a safe haven,

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're not necessarily Yeah, no, it's true. There are

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 1>trillions and trillions of these. There's studies showing that they're

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>actually an equal concentration of viruses as as bacteria in

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>indoor air and what we have to realize is that

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no way we'll ever get rid of all of

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. So no matter how clean you make it,

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the the International Space Stations is filled with microbes,

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>even though they disinfect everything that goes inside of it.

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And so what we're doing potentially by cleaning like crazy,

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is wiping out some of the good bacteria that we

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>actually really need to be healthy and perhaps even creating

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>um more space for pathogens, including antibiotic resistance bacteria potentially,

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which would be a you know, disaster. Let's actually dwell

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on that for a second, because there is actually this

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>ongoing study that you reference that that I think the

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>thrust of it is, like, what if the idea is

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like there's actually benign bacteria that could be all over

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>everything and that actually helps keep the bad stuff at

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>bay just by taking up space. Can you talk more

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>about that research? Yeah? Yeah, this is a really just amazing,

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>amazingly interesting scientists um Jack Gilbert and he's doing he's

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a study right now in an undisclosed hospital in California.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is really that if you sanitize everything

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and wipe off the microbes um and then somebody comes

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in and coughs, there's plenty of space, there's nothing there,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so the virus or whatever, you know, whatever germs they

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have can potentially take up route there and thrive. But

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 1>he he hypothesizes that if you take from this bacteria

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and um and and colonize that that same surface, then

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the person who comes in and coughs on the surface,

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 1>there's there's not as much chance for it to take

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>up residents because it will be out competed for resources

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>by the stuff that's already there. And so um, the

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>results there's there have been previous studies to that extent

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.399
<v Speaker 1>with really encouraging findings, and this one is a little

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more in depth. But but it's actually not that

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 1>far fetched. There are already all sorts of cleaners that

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>people are using that apply this probiotic concept. Um, the

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you're there spring bacteria, and the bacteria goes in and

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>munches away dirt and stuff like that in in the

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>cracks and crevices where you potentially couldn't even get too

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with cleaners. And so it's there's there's there's it's kind

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of a new frontier and and um and an exciting one. Okay,

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so put a bow on it. We only got a

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of seconds left, Like, what's the one thing that

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that I should be doing as somebody who's gonna be

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>trapped inside for for months now? What should we be doing?

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Just got well, you just try and think about aligning

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.399
<v Speaker 1>your buildings with nature as much as you can. Open

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the windows when you can, even if it's cold outside.

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely up for that. Love the outdoors. That's projects

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>an investigations reporter caroly in a winter Bloomberg Business Week

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>editor Joel Weber joining me and Bloomberg Quicktake anchor Tim Stanovic,

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>speaking of spending more time outdoors, Are you wondering how

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>much time you are actually spending online indoors perhaps working,

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and what it's doing to you. We've got that. It's

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up next. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. This

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Garrol Masser

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Last hour, we covered this week's cover story.

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's about the urban exodus as a result of working

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>from home and the impact that may have on the

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>American economy. Well, as we watch the pandemic potentially impacting

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>American migration. The virus we know affecting how we work,

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>tracking how we are working from home. Is Jared Spitaro,

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>his corporate vice president of Microsoft three sixty five, who

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>came armed with tons of data a surge of COVID

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's changed the outside environment quite a bit. Um

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>We have really tried, as I indicated them, to just

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be students of the moment and try and take in

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 1>data from as many sources as we can and then

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>piece together a mosaic a little bit of what's going

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>on and where do we think it'll it'll go. Some

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers for me are really pretty astounding. I'll

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>give you a couple thinking of one of our products

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 1>called Microsoft Teams. This is a product that brings together,

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for instance, meetings and chat and team workspaces. Teams users

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have had more meetings and calls per week now than

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:33.839
<v Speaker 1>they did pre pandemic. In addition the work they span

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and teams. So that's the time between the first and

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the last active log in is up by over an

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>hour in many countries in the world. In some countries

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like Australian Singapore, it's up by over two hours, and

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>then that's even bleeding over into the weekends. Teams, chats

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:52.280
<v Speaker 1>on the weekend have spike, so none of that's really changed.

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those trend lines have stayed pretty consistent. They have. Um,

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw some countries starting to add back, as an example,

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Unity to Western Europe. There was this hope that we

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>could kind of get back. But during the spikes that

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we have seen in both places here in the winter, UM,

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we've just continued to see people, you know, moving backwards

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of in their progression, deciding we need to stay

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>remote for a while. So those trends just continue for us.

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder and I don't know if you guys are

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.359
<v Speaker 1>measuring this, measuring this, so forgive me if I'm going

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:21.919
<v Speaker 1>to place that you guys aren't. But I wonder about

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>productivity because there is such a debate about you know,

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>people working from home, are they as productive? I mean

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I felt like I was really productive at home, and

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>there were certain areas that I never were able to

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really make inroads on that I did at home and

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>vice verse. So I just wonder what people are seeing.

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. There was a really good article in the

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Well Street Journal today that I picked up on and

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought one of the conclusions there is worth repeating

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe it says that the research essentially says, you know,

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>productivity for a lot of people is up for all

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that you say, but it's coming at a cost.

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Again to data points that give us some sense. When

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we recently went out and around the world hold workers

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 1>just across different countries, we found it over thirty percent

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of workers. And that was been a pool of six

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>thousand people we ask so thirty percent of them said

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that the pandemic can increase their sense of burnout at work.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that almost a third of people saying I feel

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>more burned out. And then a third of remote workers

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:17.760
<v Speaker 1>say that the lack of separation between work and life

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so roughly about the same as negatively impacting what they

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>would call their well being just overall. Well, and I wonder,

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, since you guys talk this stuff, how much

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of it do you think? It was interesting? I was

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>just talking with Ken Swig Swig Equities, who is very

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 1>involved in the commercial real estate market um in New

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>York and elsewhere on the country, and just this whole

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>concept of working from home. You know how much of

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it sticks ultimately going forward? And I'm just curious. Microsoft

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>is a company right that has said, you guys want

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to work from home, you can continue doing that, you

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>know after the pandemic. How much of some of the

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>trends that we're seeing, uh, you know, after hours, weekend,

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 1>how much of it do you think ultimately sticks? When

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we look at what people are learning during this pandemic,

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they are learning that in many instances, they can use

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>digital connections to more easily, more conveniently connect with other

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>people when they previously have relied on physically being present,

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, right with someone. And so then if we

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of translate that into what are they saying about

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>work post pandemic, we found that umi, excuse me, two

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of managers expect to have more flexible work from

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>home policies post pandemic. So over eight percent of managers saying, yeah,

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we expect that we will give people the option to

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>work from home. Seventy one percent of employees want to

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to work from home at least part time, and

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>part time in many ways. As we're seeing the data

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>come in, is at least two days a week. So

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty big change from pre pandemic. I think

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 1>almost everyone felt like they needed to show up at work.

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>If you imagine your workforce where just across the week,

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people who choose two of those days not to be there.

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>We think even if just that sticks, it will dramatically

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>change into dynamic of how people are getting their work

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>done and when you guys are checking out, you know,

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when people you're doing your research and gathering the data.

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're talking about impise companies from all different

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>types of industries. Correct, that's correct. Yeah, we go across

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all different types of industries and we try to be

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>broad based. At one survey I decided the moment ago,

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for instance, with six thousand workers across the world, so

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>across different nations, in all different industries. So we're not

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just looking at one We're trying to get a really

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>nice broadly segment size so that we can make sure

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we see the trend well. And I wonder if you can,

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, give me some insight into you know,

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>with that promise of a vaccine here and on the

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>horizon for for most workers, how quickly do you think

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 1>we see employees kind of you know, get workers back

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the office. Sure, we we think that it's going

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to take time for the vaccine to roll out, and

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see that kind of rollout over time. We

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>love the fact that we're seeing the vaccine go to

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>those that need it most, perhaps healthcare workers and others.

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So we think that you look at one and it

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>won't be all of a sudden. We think that there

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>will be a long time being in this hybrid state.

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Our announcement has been that people won't have to come

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>back to work, but we won't even be opened back

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to work until the summer, so July of one is

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what we've talked about this year. Hearing a lot of

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that too here on the East Coast. Jared. One of

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the stats when we did the panel together that stuck

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out for me is you guys, actually are there some

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>research and I think you guys were involved in it

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or let it on brain waves and what happens when

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 1>we're in a video meeting. Can you share some of

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that with our audience? You bet. I think all of

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 1>us who have been involved in kind of these virtual

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>meetings have selpt a sense of fatigue, and so we

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>were pretty curious about that early on, wondering, you know,

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>was it was it just made up or were we

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>actually feeling something. So we went into the lab and

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>actually put these sensors on people allowed them to both

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>interact in person and interact in virtual meetings. What we

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>found wasn't surprising if you were in online meetings, but

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>there was science now behind it. It turns out that

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.279
<v Speaker 1>these online meetings really do tax our brain more. They

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 1>make it more difficult for us to concentrate, They make

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it more difficult for us to stay in the meetings

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and be productive, So that was really interesting. From there,

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>we decided that we there probably some innovation that was

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be necessary, and so we did create some

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of product features that were and to address that

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and teams. The things that we found that are making

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a big difference UM consists somewhat of technology and somewhat

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of just us learning new ways of doing things. So

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you one that was surprising to me.

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the pieces of research that we did that

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>now has made its way into the product is the

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of a virtual commute. Awesome not to be able

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to not to have to jump into a car and

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>or a subway and commute into work, But what we

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 1>found was that people were having a really high hard

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:28.839
<v Speaker 1>time creating boundaries between their work and life, and so

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we've actually introduced a bot into the team's environment that

0:54:32.920 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>allows people to kind of ramp up into their work day,

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>have it just a little bit of a buffer, and

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then to ramp down out of the work day to

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 1>really process what happened. Yeah, just a reminder of how

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 1>our physical commutes to and from work we're really a

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>necessary process of winding up and winding down our days,

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and now how it's being done virtually. That's jared's Pitaro,

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Corporate vice president of Microsoft three. The pandemic we know,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we say it's so much impacting so much of our

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 1>world in fluting an interest in sustainability. One company has

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>taken that to heart and is creating a new material

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>out of mushrooms to be used in high end fashion.

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up next. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 1>MS is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Garrol

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Mazer from Bloomberg Radio. We're bringing you some of this

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>week's highlights on our daily radio show and podcast. And

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you might recall we recently had a conversation about sustainability

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with the head of Patagonia, Jenna Johnson. Sustainability and making

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 1>clothes and products that they sell Overall, the global ethical

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fashion market size reached about six point thirty five billion

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 1>last year and it's expected to grow to eight and

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a quarter billion in three Sophia Wang is co founder

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Work. She knows about that She is combining

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't science to create sustainable fashion materials. She tells us

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how they're doing it. What we are doing is developing

0:55:54.560 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>advanced bio materials from a natural material called my celium.

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So matium refers to the fine networks of threads that

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>form the vegetative part of the organism that most people

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with as a mushroom. So as a visual

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine the mushrooms you see above ground and

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>my celium as the rooting structure that extends below ground.

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So we've developed a advanced materials platform called fine mycelium

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and it amplifies my soul's natural capacity to bind to

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:30.840
<v Speaker 1>itself and other materials, creating strong, interwoven three dimensional networks

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that enable strength and durability in our materials. And our

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 1>first product is called Raci. It's a new class of

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 1>biomaterial that is a sustainable option for fine leather that

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is non animal, non plastic, and we are introducing it

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:47.880
<v Speaker 1>via the luxury fashion and footwear market. And are you

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 1>just is it just starting to go out to people

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>who actually make products, because that's it. You're you're providing

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:56.799
<v Speaker 1>this material, right, and then it's up to the retail world,

0:56:56.840 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the fashion world, to then shape it into products. Correct. Correct, Yes,

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 1>our partners are brands, and we've actually been sharing material

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>with and working with them collaboratively for several years now,

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 1>very closely. Um iterating on product prototypes will give me

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>an idea. Are they brands that we all know about? Oh? Yes,

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they're really exciting household name brands, some of the most

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 1>elite and respected brands in the world. And I am

0:57:26.040 --> 0:57:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so excited to soon be able to share who they are,

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which we will be able to do in the coming months. Okay, interesting, So,

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so they've been have they actually been making products and

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>selling products? Are just kind of experimenting with it, So

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they have been in the prototyping and testing phase and

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and so, um, we have not yet launched for sale,

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but that is coming soon. That's really fascinating. What's okay? So,

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one thing I wanted to ask you is, you know,

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the sustainable process is taxing on the environment. And

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder about this. I've talked about this with

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>folks who are involved in sustainable farming or hydroponic farming,

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of electricity involved, So that goes

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of counter to being good for the environment. The

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>process itself. Is it taxing on the environment? Is it

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>neutral or carbon neutral on the environment? What do we

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 1>know about that? So we've been measuring UM the carbon

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>impact of our product and process since actually two thousand

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and six UM that's when we first started doing preliminary

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>l c A S lifecycle analyses on our product and process.

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And so what I can tell you is that you know,

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we're starting with my clium, which is one of the

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Earth's most powerful and abundant agents of regeneration and carbon sequestration. UM.

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 1>My felium plays an important and symbiotic role in the

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 1>health and regeneration of many of our ecosystems. Adding to that,

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>my cilium grows on very widely available plants and wood

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 1>based biomass, so you can think of that as by

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>byproducts from other agricultural and lumber based industries. So we're

0:58:57.640 --> 0:59:01.440
<v Speaker 1>starting with UM a process of the essentially recycling and

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>adding value to existing plant biomass and bringing in a

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 1>powerful carbon sequestering agent. And so you know, we just

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>died another cycle of a lc A screening and we're

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>really excited to be able to bring UM that data

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>forward in the near future. Um. All the data that

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we have right now supports the potential impact that we

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have to bring a very beneficial, sustainable material to market.

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like, Um, Sophie, you guys have been obviously

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:31.080
<v Speaker 1>working on this for a long time, kind of perfecting it.

0:59:31.360 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You're working with brands who are testing out you know,

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:38.320
<v Speaker 1>making fashion if you will, and you know from from

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>your from the product from Rachie. Am I saying it correctly, Racie,

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:46.520
<v Speaker 1>forgive me? And so no, but I just do wonder

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So how are you guys like funding this and supporting it? Did?

0:59:49.240 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Was it VC money? Was it Angel money? Were you bootstrapping? Oh? Yeah,

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the first few years it was bootstrapped, and then

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we got some seed money through a biotech accelerator based

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ser Francisco in d Bio, and we closed our Series

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>A back in and we've just announced the closing of

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>our Series by million in financing. Wow. So so okay,

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just thinking as consumers. When is it that

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're all like talking about RACI or understanding like miss elium,

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like that platform. When will it become kind of you think,

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>part of the norm. I mean, it's obviously your hopes

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and expectations for it, but I mean, realistically, when does

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it really start to have an impact. I think that

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I've already seen the impact, of course from my perspective

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>being at the forefront of developing this, but in the

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's say seven to ten years i've been

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, I've seen widespread growth and people knowing

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what my celium is, and also UM inspiring other companies

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to develop their own my celium based materials. So I

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>think UM, with our launches, launches WHI are planned for

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the near future, we're going to make a huge impact

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and visibility of the material and the new technology. I'm

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to hearing more on the partnerships and brands

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that they are working with to make that impact. That

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was Sophia Wayne, co founder of Michael Works. Up next

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>mixing rock and roll legacy was sustainable tree farming. We'll

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>hear from the musician who played with rock icons make

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Eric and Dwayne straight Ahead on Bloomberg Business Week. This

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. That's Chuck Leavel playing with Eric Clapton.

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you're looking for something to watch this weekend,

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>how about a new documentary. It chronicles the musician singer

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>songwriter Chuck Lavell, who has spent half a century going

1:01:45.760 --> 1:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>around the world with the Rolling Stones, touring with the

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Almond Brothers, Eric Clapton and more. Chuck is also an

1:01:51.000 --> 1:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>environmentalist and tree farmer, and his friends with the acclaimed director,

1:01:54.800 --> 1:01:58.919
<v Speaker 1>filmmaker and photographer Alan Forrest, who directed this new documentary.

1:01:59.080 --> 1:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>That friendship to the making of The Tree Man. Alan

1:02:02.480 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and I had known each other for a number of

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>years because he had asked me to play on a

1:02:09.480 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>guitar player um session that he was managing and promoting,

1:02:15.120 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I went up to Ohao for the session.

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Everything went fine. Then there was this long gap where

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really talk to Alan, and we had this

1:02:24.880 --> 1:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>concept to do a documentary and we were in Las

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Vegas to do a show with the Rolling Stones, which

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately got canceled because Met got laryngitis and Allan happened,

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just happened to be in in um Las Vegas and

1:02:40.960 --> 1:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the blue call me up. So we talked

1:02:43.640 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. He convinced me that he really, really wanted it.

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad that we got together and did this

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and we shot over three and a half years, and

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he just did a masterful job not only of shooting

1:02:55.240 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>during all that time, but of weaving the stories together.

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So very very pleased. Well, let's talk about that, Alan,

1:03:02.200 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>because you know right at the stop at the top,

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are the three storylines of Chuck's life,

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>his musical life, his life as an environmentalist, but also

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you wove in his personal life and his love for

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>his wife. How did you think about weaving those stories together?

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Because it's really cool. You go from kind of making

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>bacon to talking about the Almond brothers. You go from

1:03:20.640 --> 1:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>talking rolling stones and seeing Mick, Keith and Ronnie and

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>then talking about setting burns and forests. It's really wonderful

1:03:26.760 --> 1:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>how it's all woven together. Alan. Oh, thank you, Carol Um,

1:03:30.880 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having a song. Yeah, you know, I think

1:03:33.360 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's story I knew from the outside just when he

1:03:37.040 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was wanting to do this, and I really wanted to

1:03:39.720 --> 1:03:41.479
<v Speaker 1>do it. You know, I knew he had a great

1:03:41.560 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>story uh to tell, and it was just kind of

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it just needed to come out, you know, and uh,

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this this opportunity I wanted to take and make this

1:03:51.960 --> 1:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>film as unique as as he is, you know. And

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he is a salt of the earth kind of guy. Uh.

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He never take more than what he he needs. Um,

1:04:02.800 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but he gives back way more uh than the common guy.

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, and not only musically, but also with his

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>forest life. And also his marriage is kind of works

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the same way. I mean, it's it's a real testament

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to be in the rock and roll business and have

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a marriage at forty seven years uh, you know what

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean. But he also met her in a very

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>unique way at Capricorn Records, so um, you know, Rose

1:04:29.240 --> 1:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Lane worked there right when you walked in the doors,

1:04:31.560 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and he met her at such a young age and

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they they fall in love and they've been together ever since.

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>As the movie says, you know, yeah, it actually you know,

1:04:40.920 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>sets goals for all of us in a relationship. It's

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>really it's really lovely, Chuck, I mean, what did you

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think about I mean three three and a half years,

1:04:48.480 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>As you said, the process of it. What what was

1:04:50.720 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it that you hoped ultimately was shown as you worked

1:04:53.560 --> 1:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>with Alan on this. You know, my main motivation, Carol,

1:04:58.200 --> 1:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was to wind up with a document for my family,

1:05:01.640 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>for grandchildren, for future grandchildren, great grandchildren up the road,

1:05:07.960 --> 1:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and not only of my life or you know, myself

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and my wife Rose Lane, but also for the times.

1:05:15.520 --> 1:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, to to have a document of what the

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>touring was like with the Stones at this particular point

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in time. Uh, talk about some of the things we

1:05:24.720 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>did in the past with the Almond Brothers band and

1:05:27.800 --> 1:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the other musicians and artists that

1:05:31.360 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I've just been so privileged to work with. I imagine

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that there had to be some serious logistical issues during filming.

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you travel the world recorded interviews

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with I think some eight people touring a lockdown? Well

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it was we we kind of finished right before

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Lockdown happened. But but you know, for for those three years, yeah,

1:05:51.360 --> 1:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right, we went you know, Europe like seven eight

1:05:53.440 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>times and back and forth, and you know, one day

1:05:55.920 --> 1:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you're with Clapton, the next day you're with Gilmore. I mean,

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it was like living Chuck's life on warp speed going,

1:06:02.720 --> 1:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, back with all the people he had played with,

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which which you were trying to bring that into the story,

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it's it's always a challenge when you're

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're traveling with three thousand pounds of gear on

1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a smaller crew to try to save money because you know,

1:06:17.720 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we knew we were going to interview well, we could

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have potentially interviewed eighty people, um, and we really got

1:06:24.040 --> 1:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>them all, you know, So it just we had to

1:06:26.520 --> 1:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of stretch the budget out to make it happen.

1:06:29.200 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But that that's kind of how we did it. So check.

1:06:31.280 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta ask you because as we talked about earlier,

1:06:34.480 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>woven through the film, is your love of the environment? Uh?

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And you talk about it a lot. Where did that

1:06:39.640 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all come from it? And I know you talk about

1:06:41.360 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in the film when your wife inherited a farm. Um,

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>but just talk to us a little bit about this

1:06:45.960 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and what you're hoping the message you're hoping to get

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>out to people. Yes, well, it is definitely all my

1:06:53.400 --> 1:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>wife's fault because you guys always blame us, that's always

1:06:56.960 --> 1:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens. But you know the fact is that Rose

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Lanes family has been connected to the land literally for

1:07:05.200 --> 1:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>generations as farmers tending cattle and livestock, attending forest land

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and road cropping. And you know, when we first got together,

1:07:15.400 --> 1:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and as we pointed out earlier, it's been forty seven

1:07:18.200 --> 1:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>years now, uh, I began to get a field for

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the passion to love, the dedication of the land that

1:07:24.840 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this family had. And in nine she inherited some land

1:07:30.160 --> 1:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>from her grandmother, and it became our responsibility to carry

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on what I saw is a heritage of stewardship. And

1:07:37.640 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>so I went on a little, you know journey, educational journey,

1:07:42.400 --> 1:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>going to library, checking out books on land use and

1:07:45.160 --> 1:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so forth. And the short up it is that I

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>had kind of an aha moment when I realized, well,

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>where does that thing that has given me so much

1:07:53.560 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>joy in such a great career come from? The piano?

1:07:56.840 --> 1:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course, had comes largely from the resource of wood,

1:07:59.800 --> 1:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and as does most other musical instruments, so I have

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>personal connection. And I really wanted to study forestry and

1:08:08.040 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>learn more about, you know, long term sustainable forestry. It's

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly something very near and dear tall of us. And

1:08:14.240 --> 1:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this year of dealing with the pandemic, dealing

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with inequities but also you know, seeing the environment, um,

1:08:22.560 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happens when the economy shuts down and

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the skies are blue again and you can see mountain ranges.

1:08:28.360 --> 1:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But also watching those terrible fires in California. I mean, Alan,

1:08:32.240 --> 1:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like in so many ways this film is

1:08:34.880 --> 1:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just spot on. Yeah, you know, four years ago and

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we started it. We we didn't really know that the

1:08:41.800 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>California fires were going to take off and be so

1:08:45.080 --> 1:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>much in the news in the last year. And I

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think some of those practices that Chuck talks about with

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>firebreaks and some of that stuff, um, you know, I think,

1:08:56.160 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're hoping that environmentalists can take a um,

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe step back and look at some of

1:09:02.439 --> 1:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>those practices and you know, you might have to give

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a little to keep a lot, you know sometimes. And

1:09:07.680 --> 1:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of the message of of the film.

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:13.519
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think if your listeners want to

1:09:13.600 --> 1:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>check it out, you know, they can. They can find

1:09:15.439 --> 1:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>it on v O D now, which would put them

1:09:17.640 --> 1:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>into like iTunes, Apple iTunes or Amazon and they can

1:09:21.200 --> 1:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just search the tree Man. But I think ce and

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's story, um and watching what he brings to the

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>table with the environment. Um, it's just a big piece

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the movie that you don't really see coming. You know,

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>you you know, he has this uh, just giant body

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of work that he's done, not only on um, you know,

1:09:42.960 --> 1:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>hits and helping other bands, but then these other, you know,

1:09:46.360 --> 1:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>humongous bands. He's been touring with them, playing with from

1:09:49.840 --> 1:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Almond Brothers to The Stones. It's just incredible because

1:09:53.479 --> 1:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if if you had just one of those in your career,

1:09:56.680 --> 1:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it would have been a monumental career. But he's done this.

1:10:00.000 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm in time again. A quick kind of word association

1:10:03.240 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with you, Chuck. If I can just briefly, if I

1:10:05.240 --> 1:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>say Rolling Stones, what comes to mind? Fun? I bet

1:10:10.600 --> 1:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>there are stories? Well, can I tell you? A colleague

1:10:13.360 --> 1:10:15.639
<v Speaker 1>said to me that they once heard that Ronnie would

1:10:15.640 --> 1:10:19.759
<v Speaker 1>start his day with four Guinnesses. Is that true? Oh no, listen,

1:10:20.080 --> 1:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie has been clean and sober for a long time now,

1:10:22.760 --> 1:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's got a wonderful wife, Sally, and they have

1:10:26.080 --> 1:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to two beautiful twin daughters that are just adorable. And

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie has got it together. I mean, it's amazing. And

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>don't forget he's probably the most popular contemporary visual artist

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in the in the world today. Yeah, that's act. That's

1:10:41.760 --> 1:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a really good point as well. Um Allman Brothers.

1:10:45.320 --> 1:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>What comes to mind? Oh and southern rock, um, you know,

1:10:52.120 --> 1:10:55.519
<v Speaker 1>paving the way for a new kind of music. Clapton,

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, impatible, Uh, gentlewoman, Um, generous and awesome. Southern

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:13.599
<v Speaker 1>yellow Pine. Southern yellow Pine is everything to me. It's

1:11:14.080 --> 1:11:16.479
<v Speaker 1>where I am. That's who I am, It's where I live.

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And Rose Lane Love, love and more love. He's a rocker,

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>he's an environmentalist and as you can tell, a romantic musician.

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Leavell along with the director and filmmaker Alan Forst

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on their new documentary The tree Man. That complete conversation

1:11:32.600 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>can be found on our podcast feed. And that wraps

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>up the weekend edition to Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

1:11:38.160 --> 1:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. I'm Carol Masser. Be

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to tune in daily to Bloomberg Business Week Monday

1:11:43.040 --> 1:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>through Friday starting at two pm Wall Street Time on

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. You can also hear more of our Bloomberg

1:11:48.160 --> 1:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Week conversations download theb at Bloomberg dot com, Apple podcast,

1:11:52.439 --> 1:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. You can also watch

1:11:55.080 --> 1:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg Global News and be

1:11:58.080 --> 1:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out our Bloomberg Business Week at Extra podcast.

1:12:00.800 --> 1:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>This week with Prince Emmanuel Philiberto di Savoya, who did

1:12:04.720 --> 1:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the unthinkable opening his first brick and mortar restaurant in

1:12:07.800 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the l A neighborhood of Westwood, all during the pandemic.

1:12:11.240 --> 1:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week It's available on news stands, now, online,

1:12:14.280 --> 1:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg. Have a safe weekend everyone,

1:12:17.479 --> 1:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg