WEBVTT - Would You Shoot Greenlanders In The Legs?!

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Arm Strong and Getty and he.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty jump ahead a day. I just saw

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Senator Marco Rubio.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Whose confermation hearing is tomorrow for Secretary of State. We'll

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 4>say in his opening remarks that China has lied and

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 4>cheated its way to superpower status at the expense of

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 4>the United States, according to.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>The syllable truth.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely man, I love a secretary of state coming in that.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 4>That's his opening point of view. That's freaking awesome.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Time to call a spade a spade and a communist

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>a communist.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>But for today, makeup America, grow up, stand up, get up.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 4>For today it pull your socks up. As John Lennon right,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Pete heggsth is trying to be confirmed as Trump's choice

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 4>for Secretary of Defense. And in cases they don't follow

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 4>this sort of stuff very closely, it's worth knowing that

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of the media and the politicians themselves.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 3>It's just yar side or boo our side.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 4>They just want to shoot down whoever the other side

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 4>nominates with some sort of feeling that if they have

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 4>to go to their second choice, you've won something. Though

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen that displayed in my life on any

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 4>level that it really has any lasting impact. But so

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 4>they would feel like MSNBC and the Democrat senators would

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 4>feel like they won something if they could stop Hezeth

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 4>from being nominated. Okay, fine, just more than I think

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 4>than the particular issues of the person that they're growing,

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 4>don't you think.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, absolutely, it's just posting a win for our side,

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>even if, as you indicate, the wind doesn't do you

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>any good.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just go to a different choice.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>And and and they and they are playing out the

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 4>president's policy anyway as secretary of State or sect deef

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>or whatever. If they didn't, they get fired by their boss. Right,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>So where should we start on some of that? They're

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 4>in the third hour of the Hegxeth hearings. That would

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>be a grueling day, man, And I I don't know

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 4>how you not lose your temper. That'd be the main

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 4>thing I'd be saying there, don't get angry, don't get angry,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 4>don't get angry. That's I'd be saying to myself. Stay cool,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>stay cool, stay cool. As they call you all kinds

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 4>of names and try to drag you into not into

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 4>losing your cool.

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>That's one of their goals, right, yeah, although it depends.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, some some can get that boil at just

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>the right level. But it's a it's a dangerous game

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>to play. You don't me.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 4>I'd go with you, you pizza half, you mother plag

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 4>and try to climb over the table, and then people

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 4>have to hold me back. That's why I said some

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 4>too specific.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 3>He Hanson, where do we want to start in these?

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay, here we go, Here we go, Pete exit being

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 4>questioned by somebody.

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 5>So what we're talking about here specifically is women in

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 5>ground combat roles in jobs like infantrymen or artillerymen or

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 5>special forces. Until about ten years ago, that wasn't the case.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 5>Under Secretary of Panetta, those roles were opened up to

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 5>women to serve in. As President Trump indicated all that

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 5>he plans to rescind or alter that guidance.

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 6>You're correct to point out, Senator, that these are the

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 6>decisions that the commander in chief will have the prerogative

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 6>to make. He has not indicated me to me that

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 6>he has plans to change whether or not women.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Would have access to these roles.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 6>However, I would point out ensuring that standards are equal

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 6>and high is of importance to him and great importance

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 6>to me, because in those ground combat roles, what is

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 6>true is that the weight of the ruck on your

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 6>back doesn't change, the weight of the one to five

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 6>to five round that you have to carry doesn't change,

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 6>the weight of the two forty provo machine gun you

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 6>might have to carry doesn't change. And so whether it's

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 6>a man or a woman, they have to meet the

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 6>same high standards, and Senator, in any place where those

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 6>things have been eroded or in courses, criteria have been

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 6>changed in order to meet quotas, racial quotas, or gender quotas.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 6>That is putting a focus on something other than readiness, standards, meritocracy,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 6>and lethality. So that's the kind of review I'm talking about,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 6>not whether women have access to ground combat.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>R So, what percentage of America would agree with what

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>he just said?

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 2>There huge, huge, huge.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Absolute majority, without a doubt. I'm looking at Byron.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 2>York from the Washington If you were to poll people

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 2>who served in combat and therefore really know what they're

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 2>talking about, it would be unanimous Byron York.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Washington Examiner says that Kristen's Jilibrand as her attempts failed.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 4>She's the demoocratic senator from New York. Let's hear a

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>little of her.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 7>Everything you've said in these public statements is politics. I

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 7>don't want women.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't want moms. What's wrong with a mom?

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 7>By the way, once you have babies, you therefore are

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 7>no longer able to be lethal. I mean, you're basically

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 7>saying women after they have children can't ever serve in

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 7>the military in a combat role. It's a silly thing

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 7>to say. It's a silly thing to say. Beneath the

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 7>position that you are aspiring to to denigrate LGBTQ service

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 7>members is a mistake. If you are a sharpshooter, you're

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 7>as lethal regardless of what your gender identity is, regardless

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 7>of who you love.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 6>Senator, as the President has stated, I don't disagree with

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 6>the overturn of Donuts Hotel Great.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 7>Because I don't want you thinking can't serve if your

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 7>mom can't serve your LGBTQ.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>He's like, who are you yelling at? And why?

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, okay, then all right, So I would just say, hey,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Democrats keep thinking that that Twitter worldview is the winning argument.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Do it go, take it to the mat.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Just keep pushing it, cycle after cycle. That's all about

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 4>LGBTQ and identity, politics and everything.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Keep doing it. I'm all for you. I'm on your side.

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Kirsten Gillibrand is the classic mid wit. I think that's

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the term we're supposed to use these days. Hl Menkin

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>would have called her a mediocrity. Whichever term searchs you

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 2>suits you the best.

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I think that's probably true. I remember when she

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 4>ran for president and I wasn't impressed. But she's also

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 4>trying to get re elected in New York where a

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of her constituents agree with what she just said,

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's her job.

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 3>So staying in office is her job.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Again, to your point, her job is not to figure

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 2>out who would be the best second f right. She

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 2>probably didn't even consider that.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 4>So here he is, how do you say the name

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Herno Rono Herono? But this is where they start getting

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 4>into his personal life and questioning him on haven't heard this.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 8>Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 8>unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 8>physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature. No, Senator,

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 8>have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 8>relating to this kind of conduct.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 6>Senator, I was falsely accused in October of twenty seventeen.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 6>It was fully investigated, and I was completely cleared.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 8>I don't think how completely cleared is accurate, but the.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Fact is that.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Your own lawyer said that you entered into an NDA

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 8>paid a person who accused you of raping her some

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 8>of money to make sure that she did not file

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 8>a complaint. Moving on, as secretary, you will be in

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 8>charge of maintaining good order and discipline by enforcing the

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 8>Uniform Code of Military Justice you see in addition to

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 8>the sexual assault allegations. And by the way, the answer

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 8>to my second question should have been yes. I have

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 8>read multiple reports of your regularly being drunk at work,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 8>including by people who worked with your Fox News.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you know that being drunk.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 8>At work is prohibited for service members under the UCMJ.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Senator, those are multiple false, anonymous reports pedaled by NBCD.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 6>You know that directly to the dozens of men and women.

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 8>I worry I'm not hearing that.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>My question.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 4>I like the question, do you know you're not supposed

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 4>to be drunk at work. Yeah, yeah, I know.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Mazy Herono is a seventy seven year old progressive crank.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 4>So I just I've just looked ahead on this. This

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 4>gets into whether or not he'd shoot protesters in the legs,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 4>So I want to hear this.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 3>The next one.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 8>In June of twenty twenty, then President Trump directed former

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 8>Secretary of Defense Mark Esper to shoot protesters in the

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 8>legs in downtown d C.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>An order.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 8>Secretary Esper refused to comply with would you carry out

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 8>such an order from President Trump?

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 6>Senator I was in the Washington DC National Guard unit

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 6>that was in Lafayette Square during those would you carry.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 8>Out shoe protest in the legs?

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 6>I saw as the service agents to get injured, b

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 6>rids trying to jump over the fence, se church on fire,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 6>and destruyer.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 8>That sounds to me that you will comply with such

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 8>an order, you will shoot protesters in the leg moved on.

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Hawaii. I've been to Hawaii. I've enjoyed Hawaii. I've talked

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 2>to Hawaiians. You can do better than that half wit

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 2>elect somebody who's got like two thirds of a wit

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 2>looking up at Senator Warren. Elizabeth Warren, I've been looking

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>waiting for her today. She says, I want to pick

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 2>up on the questioning of Senator Herono. So that's exciting.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>So hey, take this further down the road. Well, we

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>have more Mazie Herono, who I'm actually enjoying in a

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>perverse sort of way. Uh seventy six. I think it's

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>clear what she's talking about, but this is this is great.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 8>President Luck has attacked our allies in recent weeks, refusing

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.479
<v Speaker 8>to rule out using military force to take over Greenland

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 8>and the Panama Canal, and they threatening to take to

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 8>make Canada the fifty first state. Would you carry out

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 8>an order from President Trump to seize Greenland, a territory

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 8>of our NATO ally Denmark, by force? Or how would

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 8>you comply with an order to take over the Panama Canal?

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Senator.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 6>I will emphasize that President Trump received seventy seven million

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 6>votes to be the lawful commander.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 8>Talking about the election, my question is would you use

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 8>our military to take over Greenland or an ally of Denmark?

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Senator.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 6>One of the things that President Trump is so good

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 6>at is never strategically tipping his hand and so I

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 6>would never in this public forum give one way or

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 6>another direct orders the president in any context.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 8>That sounds to me that you would contemplate carrying out

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 8>such an order to basically invade Greenland.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Mister he says, was you shoot Greenlanders in the legs

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>if you invaded and they protest? Senator, that's a ridiculous

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 2>I can only assume you would shoot Greenlanders in their legs.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 3>You know what's against the law to be drunk in Greenland.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>But you, having shot a Greenlander in the legs, get

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 2>drunk and come on to her.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Would you secu pass a drunk Greenlander who was limping

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 4>along having been shot in the leg.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Have you in the past answer the question?

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I just love how she borderline sounds drunk and goes

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 4>you understand it against the rule to be drunk. I

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 4>realize that's the way she talks. But yeah, she did

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 4>something a little drunk. You know you're not supposed to

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 4>drink the work, right, She got a just a nit

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 4>wit at age seventy seven. Now we're taking ridiculous grand

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 4>standing questions. What do we where's the greatest superpower on Earth?

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Act like it?

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Ninety nine percent of hearings are our grand standing performative

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 4>bs for talk radio to mock one side or the other.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I do want to hear the Tim Kaine stuff. It's

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of long.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 4>He's the senator from wherever he was Hitlar Glint's running mate.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 4>You might remember him.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Nobody cares Virginia maybe.

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Or remember they featured him on Saturday Night Live a

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks ago. It was hilarious. Nobody remembered who

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 3>he was. That was the whole point.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, he really gets into Hegzeth's personal life.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to play that for you.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Come up.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>The bit on SNL real quickly is they had a

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 4>game show and they played a show to tweet from

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 4>one of the contestants that said, this is the most

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 4>important election of our lifetime.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Who's with me?

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Back in twenty sixteen for a Democrat who was voting

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 4>for Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine, And then they marched

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 4>out Tim Kine, the real Tim Kaine. Ones announce said

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 4>who is this? And they had no idea. I had

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 4>no idea as a political junkie. That's how quickly you

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 4>forget the most important election of our lifetime participants. Anyway,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 4>Tim Kaine, who's still a senator apparently was questioning Pete

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Hegseeth about his personal life and trying to make this

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 4>a reason not to have him be Secretary of Defense.

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, mister hegg Seth.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 9>I'm looking forward to this opportunity to talk. I want

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 9>to return to the incident that you referenced a minute ago,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 9>that he in Monterey, California, in October twenty seventeen. At

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 9>that time, you were still married to your second wife, correct,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 9>I believe so, And you had just fathered a child

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 9>by a woman who would later become your.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Third wife, correct, Senator.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 6>I was falsely charged, fully investigated, and completely cleared.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 9>So you think you are completely cleared because you committed

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 9>no crime, that's your definition of cleared. You had just

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 9>fathered a child two months before by a woman that

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 9>was not your wife. I am shocked that you would

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 9>stand here and say you are completely cleared. Can you

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 9>so casually cheat on a second wife and sheet on

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 9>the mother of a child who had been born two

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 9>months before, and you tell us you are completely cleared?

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 6>So how was that a complete clear Senator? Her child's

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 6>name is Gwendolen Hope hag Seth, and she's a child

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 6>of God, and she's seven years old, and you cheated

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 6>on the mother of that child less than two months

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 6>after that daughter was born, didn't you?

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Those were false charges?

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, no, fully investigated, and I was completely cleared.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 3>And I am so useful in the marriage. I have

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>to decide.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 9>You've admitted that you had sex at that hotel in

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 9>October twenty seventeen. You said it was consensual. Isn't that

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 9>correct anything. You've admitted that it was consensual and you

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 9>were still married and you.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Just had a child by another.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow, again, how do.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 6>You explain your completely false charges against me? You fully

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 6>investigated and.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I was completely clear.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 9>You have admitted that you had sex while you were

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 9>married to wife two, after you just had fathered a

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 9>child by wife three.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>You've admitted that.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 9>Now, if it had been a sexual assault, that would

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 9>be disqualifying to be secretary defense, wouldn't it?

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>It was a false claim?

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.119
<v Speaker 3>Then in a false claim.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 9>Now, if it had been a sexual assault, that would

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 9>be disqualifying to be a secretary of defense, wouldn't it?

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 6>That was a false claim.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 3>So you're talking about a hypothetical.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 9>So you can't tell me whether someone who is committed

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 9>a sexual assault is disqualified from being a Secretary of Defense.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Senator.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 6>I know, in my instance, and I'm talking about my

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 6>instance only, it was a false claim, but you acknowledge it.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 9>But you acknowledge that you cheated on your wife, and

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 9>that you cheated on the woman by whom you had

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 9>just fathered a child.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>You have ad met at that. I will allow your

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>words to speak for them.

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 9>You're not retracting that today.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>That's good.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Wow oof wow.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>So he's got a very ugly don't approve of it

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 4>personal life obviously.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, that's been pretty well conceited by all he

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 2>ran around.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>This isn't new information.

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 4>But he could have responded with, so are you arguing

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Bill Clinton should have never have been president? Or I

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>know you went to Harvard John F. Kennedy's School of Government.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Should his name be taken off that building? I mean,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>my lifestyle is not much different than their lifestyle. I

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 4>know you wouldn't say that, but it's true.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Or yeah and absolutely throw in And I regret the

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 2>way I acted. I was more interested in my desires

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 2>than my responsibilities as the young men. I've changed completely.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>That's some ugly stuff there.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 4>That his wife's business, but it's current wife didn't really

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 4>dig hearing it either. We had a little more of

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 4>this and other stuff on the way Liz.

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Warren Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 6>I love my country, Senator, and I've dedicated.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>My life to the war fighters.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 6>People see me as someone who hosts a morning show

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 6>on television, but people that really know me know where

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 6>my heart's at. It's with the guys in this audience

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 6>who've had my back and I've had theirs. We've been

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 6>in some of the darkest and most difficult places you

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 6>can ever be in. You come back a different person,

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 6>and only by the grace of God am I.

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Here before you today.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing this job for them, thank all of them.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 2>And I'm getting drilled and insulted by a bunch of

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>rich halfwits who the most difficult thing they ever done

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>is accepted their phony master's degree.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Mark Levin tweeted out, is herono part of an S

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 4>and L skit agreed, We played that a little bit earlier.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 4>If you missed it, get the podcast.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I wish there had been more of her.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>She was so funny. Unintentionally speaking. Speaking of unintentionally funny,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>you've got the beer swinging fake Indian from Massachusetts or

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>wherever she's from. Elizabeth Warren. She's a Havid academic. She

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>is in favor of all things progressive. She has a

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 2>problem with the actual fighting man. Pete Hagsith. I like

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 2>this conversation, though, I'm glad it's taking place. Seventy nine Michael,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>page fourty eight of.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Your book, you claim that women should not be in

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>combat roles meant because men are distracted by women. And

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>then ten weeks ago you appeared on the Sean Ryan

0:18:56.240 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Show and said, I'm straight up just saying should not

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have women in combat rules. Now, I presume you recall

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>making all these statements.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 6>Senator, I'm not familiar with arcle you're pointing to in

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 6>twenty thirteen, but it underscores my argument completely. It is

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 6>in that twenty thirteen argument I was talking about standard.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 3>I stand up there.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>What it's always been about, you have the same fight

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>has always.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Been about, So did you directly.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got the video. We're happy to show it. But

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear here. For twelve years you

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>were quite open about your views, and your views were

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>consistently the same. Women are inferiors, soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and guardians. And in case anyone missed the point, and

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>these are your words from ten weeks ago. Women absolutely,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>straight up should not be permitted to serve in combat.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 3>And I notice on each.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Of these quotes those are said without qualification. It's not

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>by how much you can lift or how fast you

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>can run. They don't belong in combat, period, or your

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>words straight up. And then on November ninth, twenty twenty four,

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>just thirty two days after your last public comment saying

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>that women absolutely should not be in comment, you declared

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that quote, some of our greatest warriors are women, and

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you support having them serve in combat. Now, that is

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a very very big about face in a very very

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>short period of time. So help me understand, mister hag said,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what extraordinary event happened in that thirty two day period

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that made you change the core values you had expressed

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for the preceding twelve years.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 6>Senator again, I very much appreciate you bringing up my

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 6>comment from twenty thirteen, because for me, this issue has

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 6>always been about standards. And unfortunately, because of some of

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 6>the people that have been in four years, stop have driven.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Seen you so and I have the answer. Actually, he

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 4>Pete's not going to give it. The reason why he

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>change his opinion was Jony Ernst, the female senator from Iowa,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 4>who is a Republican, who was very unhappy with those

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 4>things that I think he actually believes, and he needs

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 4>fifty Republican votes to get confirmed, and he is.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Trying to get hers.

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I think he believes that women in combat are a

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 4>distraction and make it more difficult to have an effective

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 4>fighting for us. I don't have any way to speak

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 4>to that. I think it makes perfectly good sense his theory,

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 4>but I don't know that's true or not. I've never

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 4>experienced it myself well and honestly.

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's at once a lazy argument an incredibly

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 2>good argument, Senator. For all of human history, mankind has

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>not put women into combat except in very, very rare circumstances.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the numbers are tiny historically speaking, for a

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>number of reasons, including standards, but also because women are

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>too valuable to the society. If you want ten babies

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Had this Handmaid's tale, okay, here we go.

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 2>If you want ten babies this year, you need ten women.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>You need a dude.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 4>By the way, that's the part that made me grown

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 4>out loud. At Gladiator two, they're opening scene they had

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 4>to have a chick warrior who was kicking ass.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Like, come don it, you're trying too hardier.

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh goodness sakes pre historic.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Back in the Roman days, that wasn't happening.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 4>It's not hard to imagine it as possibly being true

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 4>that to have one woman in a group of fifteen

0:22:56.320 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 4>guys presents more obstacles than it's worth. It's not difficult

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 4>for me to understand even if she's.

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Qualified, like physically can do the job right, it's just

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 2>and this is the difference in orientation between Liz Warren

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>and her type and more ours and Pete Hexas's is

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that matters. Well, okay, let me rephrase it.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>The first question must be effectiveness. It must be the

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>result period before we discuss anything else. We discuss the

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 2>result of having that woman in a combat unit, because

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>it's not always going to be disruptive necessarily, but you've

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 2>got to discuss in terms of combat readiness and effectiveness.

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 2>How does it affect it. Now, if you say it

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>affects it significantly, well then that's the end of the discussion.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Even if it's it affects it significantly a smallish percentage

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>of the time we're done talking here. From my point

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of view, Now, if it's a very minor difference in effectiveness,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 2>then okay, I'm willing to say, all right, what do

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 2>we gain by doing that?

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, you gain by in ferry you would double the

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 4>pool of people you can choose warriors from. It's probably

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 4>not double because the percentage of women that can physically

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 4>do it would not be as high as men, but

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 4>you greatly enhance the pool of potential great warriors if

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 4>you allow women.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would suggest not to quibble, but if you

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>kept the same standards as Pete is advocating, you would

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 2>increase the pool slightly.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't know that the current standards Tom Cotton

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 4>was talking about aren't very strict.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Running at two miles and twenty two minutes, for instance.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Can you get off a couch and walk swiftly? Yes? Ah? Yeah, yeah. Well,

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 2>putting aside the fact that a lot of this questioning

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>is is blatantly unfair or irrelevant, and not all of it,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 2>but they got to figure out who this guy is

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and what sort of character he hasn't and there are

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna be some embarrassing and tough questions. I'm not gonna

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 2>go full on, you know, one sided partisan on this one,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>but I just.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Feel like you did a bit ago where we got

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 4>to keep the women back to have ten babies each.

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 3>Whatever. Whatever you're talking about, it's just been discussed that roughly.

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 2>That's roughly correct. Yeah. No, I'm glad these discussions are

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>being had. Anytime they can be had publicly and have

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>America's attention drawn to them, I think that's a good thing.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise China is gonna whoop our ass.

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, do you agree with me?

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 4>I think Pete believes women shouldn't be in combat roles

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 4>because it doesn't it's more of a negative than a positive.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 4>But he has he feels like he had to abandon

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 4>that position for whatever reason, for Jony Ernst at least.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think there could be some clarification.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if a woman's like a fabulous drone pilot,

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>is that quote unquote in combat?

0:25:59.080 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Good question.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>You're killed, folks, you're in combat. I would think, so,

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>how about a fighter pilot because Joni was a pilot?

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Correct or am I misremembering? I might be thinking of

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>somebody else. I apologize. But fighter pilot, okay with that.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 2>It's when you get into infantry and you know our

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 2>artillery groups, squads, you know that I have problems with

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 2>whish we get again, but again I will leave. I

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 2>will happily leave that to the experts and not just

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>civilians spouting off opinions based on their beliefs about you know,

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 2>pie in the sky ideals for society. The military is

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>not a social experiment, right.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 4>It's amazing that we still can't have these conversations without

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 4>just getting to the that group of twenty humans over there,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 4>are they going to be a more lethal fighting force

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 4>with a woman or two or without the end? And

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 4>then somebody honestly answered that question, and then whichever gonna

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 4>make it the most lethal, Let's do that. If making

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 4>it all women makes it more lethal, let's do that.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't care. I just wanted to beat the Chinese

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>when the US HiT's the fan, right.

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm reminded of that piece I read earlier, and we

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 2>were talking about about Tanashi Coats and how the romantic

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>point of view is just about your feelings and the

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 2>facts and figures and effectiveness. Why are you denying my truth?

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I know I'm right, and I don't care what your

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 2>facts are. We can't have that sort of person running

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>our military. That please, the grown ups are required.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 3>How about that team kine stuff.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Another thing I'm surprised we haven't worked out by twenty

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty five where we've just decided we're not gonna care

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 4>if guys cheat on their wives and that sort of

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 4>stuff that doesn't have anything to do with the job.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 4>Or do we care? I mean, why can't we just

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 4>figure that out once and for all.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we have. If it's the other guys, it matters completely,

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.959
<v Speaker 2>it's incredibly important. If it's our guy, it's irrelevant.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 4>Seventy seven million people just dond voted for Donald Trump

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 4>knowing exactly what kind of guy is when it comes

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 4>to women.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the difference there is it's a binary choice. Probably, sure, sure, yeah, yeah,

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely see your point. At the same time, it

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>feels kind of case by case ish to me. Okay,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not a sin to have an unhappy

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 2>marriage and before the paperwork's done, maybe you've got a

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>girlfriend or a boyfriend. Well, according to some people, it

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 2>is a sin. But you know, in my world, I

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>get that it's fine. If you're like abusive and you know,

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't love If I found out a friend of

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 2>mine had, for instance, produced a child with soon to

0:28:54.760 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>be wife number three while still married to wife number two,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.959
<v Speaker 2>and was stopping strangers in hotels.

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Who was also married. The that woman was married and

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 4>her husband was upstairs with the kids, that's a horrible story.

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 2>You almost need a chart, like we're doing a murder podcast.

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, story with her kids upstairs and her husband's

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.959
<v Speaker 2>in the host yeah, same hotel room. Yeah, but anyway. Uh,

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 2>if I found that that about a person, I would

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>definitely think, oh boy, Okay, I know what sort of

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>fell I'm dealing with here, right, case by case basis,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't like his chances at all for a variety

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>of reasons. Okay, but I respect Pete hegseeth, and I

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>value his voice. Well, I think, just having looked at

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the various like modern Republican senators in which way they're leaning,

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't like his chances.

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 4>I think Fetterman hinted he's a yes. So then you

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 4>only need to get to forty nine Republican senators right

0:29:56.280 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 4>if yes, but there are according to Mark Alprin, yeah, yesterday,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 4>a dozen pretty close to hard nos among the Republicans,

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 4>which is way more than would doomi, which includes Mitch

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 4>McConnell and a variety of other people whoever replaced Mitt Romney.

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 2>You know who doesn't have a chance. I'll tell you

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 2>next Okay.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll finish strong next day.

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 10>Here, it's looking like the Supreme Court is going to

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 10>uphold the ban on TikTok starting this weekend. If the

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 10>band goes into effect, Americans can still see tiktoks, but

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 10>the apple will stop working due to a lack of updates.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty much what happened to President Biden. Yeah, I

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't know that till yesterday.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 4>The TikTok app, it doesn't like disappear from your phone

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 4>or whatever, and you can still get it. It's just

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to be able to update it or anything.

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 4>And over time it will work, it'll get bugs, and

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 4>your new phone won't be.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Able to use it, so it'll kind of phase out.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Interesting again, as Jimmy Fallon said, they're starting this weekend,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 4>but it's not a hard cut off all of a sudden,

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>TikTok dis beers this weekend.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>No, you just can't download the app. You could still

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>access it online theoretically. I don't know how that differs

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the experience from having the actual app. I guess people,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to a technical explanation of the how

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 2>it develops bugs and win and then eventually it doesn't

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 2>work at all. Stuff. But it was just it was

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a very dry and be over my head.

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm guessing there'll be a lot of reporting next week

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 4>about how well it is or isn't still working on

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 4>people's phones.

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how about your youngsters. You get your homework done,

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 2>learn to read and write.

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 3>To go on a date, Oh my god.

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, go have a couple of beers by the overpass.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Don't drive, just go live life. Oh my god. So

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you gave a great it's so cool, it really is.

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's you gave a great tease.

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 3>And I don't remember what it was.

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh it was. Which nominee for the cabinet is absolutely

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 2>not going to make it? And that would be, uh,

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the perhaps highest profile guy, Robert F. Kennedy Junior. I'm

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at a pretty good list of you know how

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>many yes's and no's and maybe's probably there are in

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:16.959
<v Speaker 2>the Senate, and he has a whole lot of people

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 2>who are barely even able to say, yeah, we'll give

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 2>him a good look. A lot of a lot of Republicans,

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>modern Republicans are very hesitant or very skeptical about him.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 3>So you're predicting he goes down.

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I am. I am indeed, so how I'm not rooting

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 2>for it, per se. It'll be interesting to see. And again,

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 2>he is a very bright guy. So how the hearings

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 2>go nobody knows, but I don't love his chance.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 3>How will Maha react to that?

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Make America healthy? And yeah, they will react badly and angrily.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Practically everybody I know who's into that, the sort of

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 4>thing has Maga and Maha in their.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 3>In their feeds.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Thought. I'm strong, I'm strong.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Get ready with Katie Green and.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Strong.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>crew to wrap things up for the day. Let's begin

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 2>with our technical director, Michaelangelo. Michael, what's your final thought?

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you guys. Young people, if you're listening, go.

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 9>Find that cute girl, take her out for ice cream,

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 9>Go to a square dance, Get out.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 3>There, Get out there.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Katie Greener esteemed Newswoman. As a final thought, Katie.

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 6>I just came across an interesting fact.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 4>They've now arrested forty people that were looting these fires

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 4>in LA not one of them from the area.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 3>They all traveled there for the looting.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow, they hang horse thieves or they used to just

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 2>say stand story. Yeah yeah, indeed, My god, there can't

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:00.959
<v Speaker 2>be a sanctions severe enough Jackie.

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Final thought, This might be all you need to know

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 4>about politics. One of the Democratic senators who's already announced

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 4>he's a no vote, Senator Richard Blumenthal, for decades lied

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 4>about being a Vietnam vet, then we all found out

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't, and he's still a US senator and gets

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 4>to grill the potential sect deaf.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Are you kidding me?

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>My final thought. I'm looking at the handicapping from the

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 2>various nominees, including Christy Nome, and the first thing they

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>mentioned is that she fatally shot her dog. Credit cricket.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Tell you what you need to shoot your dog, Go

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 2>ahead and shoot it, but don't put it in your

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 2>buck armstrong.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's wrapping up another grueling four hour workday.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll see it tomorrow.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 4>God bless America.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm strong and Getty. He has to stop like the

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 2>day before yesterday. Yep, absolutely, are you sure? Oh dead shure.

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 2>I've been thinking that we really all need a trendous hug.

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Get the hell out of here. Do you think it's

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 3>a little ot?

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's one hundred on the crazy meter? Are you shuting?

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 2>So let's go with a bang. I think our generation

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>is very aware, like a lot of us are activists,

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think that awareness influences our drinking habits. On

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that high note, bye bye Armstrong and Getty.