WEBVTT - Thar She Blows, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 2>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part two

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 3>in our series on that most charismatic anatomical feature of whales,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 3>the blowhole, also known as the spiracle or the spout.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 3>If you are just joining us and you haven't heard

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 3>part one, you might want to hop back in the

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 3>timeline and listen to that one first. That's where we

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>go over a lot of the basic science of the blowhole.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>But as I mentioned last time, this is a subject

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that I was tempted to look into because there is

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>a whole chapter about the spout in the classic nineteenth

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 3>century American novel Moby Dick by Herman Melville. Now, if

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>you've ever read Moby Dick, you'll probably recall that it

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>is not all high speed whale chases and heroics by

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Queek Wegg and mad sermons of vengeance by Captain Ahab An.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Awful lot of the book is made up of chapters

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.919
<v Speaker 3>that could be considered strange, thoughtful little essays on objects

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>both technological and biological. Technological subjects like various pieces of

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 3>whaling equipment and things on ships, and biological subjects like

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the various parts of a sperm whale's body. And one

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>of the latter chapters is called the Fountain. It concerns

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 3>the blowhole, and I thought this this would make an

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 3>interesting subject for us, in particular because the chapter raises

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a number of practical controversies about the biology of whale spouts,

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>as well as some tantalizing but questionable claims about sprays

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 3>of blubbery venom from the whole. Now, among the primary

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>controversies that concern the narrator Ishmael in this chapter is

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the question what is it exactly that shoots out of

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the whale's spout? What are the plumes that whaling ships

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>used to locate these animals out on the high seat?

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 3>And of course these are still you know, people looking

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 3>for the whale blow is still what like whale watchers

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 3>today would use to look for these animals? Is it

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a towering jet of water blasting as if from a

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 3>fire hose, as it is often depicted, I'd say most

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>often depicted, or is it nothing more than gas, vapor

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 3>or misst And to get as started here, I want

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>to read from this chapter in Moby Dick articulating this

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>first question, Are you all right if I read this? Rob,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 3>go for it? Okay, okay, this is what Ishmael says.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 3>You have seen him spout, then declare what the spout is?

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 3>Can you not tell water from air? My dear sir,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>In this world it is not so easy to settle

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 3>these plain things. I have ever found your plane things

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the nattiest of all. And as for this whale spout,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 3>you might almost stand in it and yet be on

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>decided as to what it is. Precisely the central body

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 3>of it is hidden in the snowy, sparkling mist enveloping it.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>And how can you certainly tell whether any water falls

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 3>from it? When always, when you are close enough to

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>a whale to get a close view of his spout,

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>he is in a prodigious commotion, the water cascading all

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 3>around him. And if at such times you should think

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 3>that you really perceived drops of moisture in the spout,

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 3>how do you know that they are not merely condensed

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 3>from its vapor? Or how do you know that they

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>are not those identical drops superficially lodged in the spout

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 3>whole fissure which is countersunk into the summit of the

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>whale's head. For even when tranquility swimming through the midday

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 3>sea in a calm with his elevated hump sun dried

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 3>as a dromedaries in the desert, even then, the whale

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>always carries a small basin of water on his head.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>As under a blazing sun, you will sometimes see a

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 3>cavity in a rock filled up with rain.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Whoa who this kind of went off the rails. Yeah,

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and here what.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>You do not agree that whales always have a pool

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of water on top of them, like a rock filled

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 3>up with rain.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, or that they keep their elevated humps sun dried

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>as a camel's in the desert.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is a good quase. I don't know if

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>there's anything to that claim or not, Like, would a

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>whale ever keep a part of its body consistently exposed

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 3>over the surface or do they? I mean, what I

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 3>feel like I've seen most of the time is repeatedly

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 3>going under and then coming back up to breathe, and

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>then returning correct.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think there'll be a hint of

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>this in one of the sources I refer to in

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit concerning depictions and iconography of whales, which very

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>often still do picture the whale as having a large

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>portion of its head above the water, as if that's

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>just how it rides around.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now, we already discussed discussed this question to some

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>extent in the last episode, and the consensus of spurts,

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>marine biologists, and just whale watchers that we were reading

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 3>last time seem to be that what comes out of

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 3>the whale's blowhole is not primarily water. It is not

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 3>a jet like from a fire hose, but it is

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the explosive exhalation of gas from the whale's lungs, and

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 3>to be clear, that can be quite explosive, because when

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>a whale breathes out, especially after it has been under

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, it nearly totally collapses its lungs.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 3>It is like a blast of breath, and that exhalation

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 3>can create a very watery looking blow for several reasons.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 3>First of all, the exhaled breath contains vapor, which condenses

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 3>into mist and droplets when it leaves the warmer environment

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>of the whale's lungs and airways and enters the colder

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 3>environment of the atmosphere above, similar to how you can

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 3>see your own breath on a cold day. Then, of

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>course there's also some droplet content in the whale breath

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that is just mucus being exhaled, kind of like when

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 3>we sneeze. And then there's probably also some splashing of

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>sea water, which may happen if the exhalation begins before

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the blowhole breaks the surface of the water, so some

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 3>water is just getting sort of splashed up by the blast,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>or if there was some amount of seawater trapped in

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>the airways robbed, Is that about the gist of it,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>you think?

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, And, like I say, from my family's tripped

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>down to Mexico to observe the gray whales and their lagoons,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 2>very much the case with those exhalations that occur below

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the surface of the water. Those can be quite explosive

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and create what feels like a fountain next to you

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>in the water.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 3>But that does not mean the whale spout is shooting

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>a jet. It is breathing out and that breath is gas,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 3>though it contains probably some mucus droplets and bits of water.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, of note, I've run across various descriptions both in

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 2>literature and in just you know, the discussions of whale behavior.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Of the of the spout with a rainbow within it.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, the spout mist goes up into the air

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and you can see the reflection, the refraction and the

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>and the dispersion of light in the water droplets. I

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have much to say about that other than it

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>is neat to see, and you've certainly seen it. See

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that it has captured people's imaginations over the years, and

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you can find various photos of this today from whale watchers.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Rob When you mentioned this, did you know that this

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>actually connects to the final paragraph of this chapter in

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Moby Dick.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Moby Dick was coming up in my searches, and I've

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>never actually read Moby Dick. I've I've only seen the

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>film adaptations, but I did suspect that Melville also touched

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 2>on this.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I actually he writes about it quite beautifully, so if

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>you don't mind it. In the last paragraph, he says,

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>and how nobly it raises our conceit of the mighty

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>misty monster to behold solemnly sailing through a calm, tropical sea,

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 3>his vast mild head overhung by a canopy of vapor

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>engendered by his incommunicable contemplations, and that vapor, as you

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>will sometimes see it, glorified by a rainbow, as if

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Heaven itself put its seal upon his thoughts. For do

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 3>you see rainbows do not visit the clear air, They

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 3>only irradiate vapor. Thrue science fact. And so through all

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 3>the thick mists of the dim doubts in my mind,

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>divine intuitions now and then shoot in kindling my fog

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>with a heavenly ray.

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 2>That's beautiful. Yeah, and really, I mean, this is what

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>it's like to be in the company of whales, Like

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the idea that Heaven is glorifying them with a rainbow.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 2>It does not feel hyperbolic to me having been in

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>their presence, like being in the presence of a whale

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 2>invites hyperbole because it's just such an overwhelming experience.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Haven't had the experience myself, but I can't disagree it

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 3>is quite true to most observers who write of it.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>But I want to come back to this misconception, the

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 3>idea that the whale spout shoots a jet of water

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 3>like from a fire hose. Do we have any idea

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>like where does this misconception come from? How far back

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>does it go? And like why were people saying this?

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting to try and tease this apart getting

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>into these older descriptions of whales and older understandings of

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 2>whale behavior and biology. You know, there's a lot we're

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>still unraveling about wales today. But historically there was a

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>great deal that wasn't known about these creatures, and they

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>were frequently the subject of myth, legend and folklore, and

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 2>even people who are trying to, you know, skeptically understand

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>them were often having to depend on the word of

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 2>sailors and second and third hand accounts of what they do.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And then you throw whalers into the mix, and of

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 2>course you know that also skews things in different directions.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 2>But they were, you know, generally they were often interpreted

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>as fish, as monsters, as gods, as shape shifters, and more. Now,

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>concerning whale blow or whale spout in particular, there are

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>a few main myths and misconceptions. Yeah, to discuss, uh,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, first hitting on this one about the about

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the spout being a jet of water. Again, this is

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 2>something that not only do you find in old besty

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 2>areas and woodcuts some of those old maps. You see

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 2>these fabulous like beat twails with two you know, almost

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>like Martian old school Martian style blowholes on the top

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of their head that are depicted just spouting big jets

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of water like their fire engines.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>They have almost horns made of water or like antinnae.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes and then just poking around. If you if you

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>have your your smartphone with you and you pull up,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>pull up somebody in there, do a you know, a text,

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>and if you go into throwing some whale emojis, chances are,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, if your phone's like mine, you'll have

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>two to choose from. One is a more thankfully scientifically

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 2>accurate whale, but the other is what we've seen a

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>million times and emojis and clip art. It is a

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>cartoon whale spouting a fountain out of its single blowhole

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>on the top of its head.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 3>The same way it is most often drawn, with the

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 3>fountains splitting in a kind of fork two ways.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which, as we discussed in the previous episode, you know,

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the spout has different shapes and different intensities depending on

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the species of the whale. Some do kind of squirt

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>off in two directions. But it's the way you see

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 2>it in clip art and these simple plaistic cartoon illustrations. Yeah,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it tends to look just like a fountain. Now. In

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 2>trying to in getting into this ended up, I kept

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>pulling up older sources. But one of the more interesting

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>older sources on this is an eighteen eighty four book

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 2>by naturalist Henry Lee titled See Fables Explained, and it

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 2>took on this misconception about whale spout more than a

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>century eco.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Now a brief note on Henry Lee. He was a

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>nineteenth century English naturalist who specialized in marine organisms, and

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 3>for a time he was the director of the Brighton

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Aquarium in England.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 2>But he is.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Notable for writing measured skeptical investigations of cryptozoological legends, and

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>in this latter capacity he has actually come up on

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the show before, I think, on some episodes that we

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 3>just recently did for Vaults on Saturdays. So Lee was

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the author of the eighteen eighty seven monograph called the

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Vegetable Lamb of Tartary, a curious fable of the cotton plant.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>We discussed this at length in those episodes on the

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>vegetable lamb, which of course was a legendary organism with

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 3>accounts going back to ancient times, usually described as a

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 3>basically a mammal that grew from a plant, a furry,

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>flesh and blood mammal that had meat and bones and

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>blood that came out of a stalk that was attached

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>to the ground roots and grew somewhere in Central Asia.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 3>While there have been multiple skeptical attempts to make sense

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 3>of these legends going back hundreds of years, Lee offered an,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 3>I think, in both of our views, an extremely persuasive

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 3>argument that these accounts actually go back to observations and

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>misunderstandings of the cotton plant. So by the standards I

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 3>would normally apply to a I don't know, a multidisciplinary

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 3>skeptical treatise involving literary, historical, and biological knowledge from the

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>eighteen eighties, I recall being extremely impressed with the last

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 3>work of Lee's that we looked at.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh. Absolutely yeah, And I feel like this book. What

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I read from it, which is basically the chapter on

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>whale spout, I thought thought it was a very level

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and in any ways ahead of its time. So in

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 2>this chapter he cites an example of this whale spout

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 2>misunderstanding in the work of the second century Greco Roman

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 2>poet Opian And this is the quote uncouth the site

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>when they, in dreadful play discharge their nostrils and refund

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to see while noisy finfish let their fountains fly and

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>spout the curling torrent to the sky. So beautiful, you know,

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in translation obviously, but yeah, this idea of refunding the sea,

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 2>letting the fountain fly a curling torrent up to the sky,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>it's at least a landsman's idea of what whale spout

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>consisted of.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Based on what I've read, it seems like the most

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>common understanding was that whales were shooting jets of water

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>out of their blowholes because they like swallowed a lot

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 3>of water through their mouths while eating, and then they

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>would have to squirt it back out, but couldn't do

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 3>that through their mouths for some reason.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, which I think it's one of those things

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that certainly by this point naturalists knew that this is

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>not how an organism worked, and certainly not how to

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 2>how whale works. And so Lee, Yeah, he basically lays

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 2>out that this had been already been refuted time and

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>time again by naturalist but that the image was just

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>too entrenched in the popular imagination and popular imagery of

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 2>whales to be fully dismissed. And also more people are

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 2>casually taking these images in than they are actually listening

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 2>to the naturalists. And we have to, I guess we

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>also have to bear in mind like today so many

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of us have access, whether we're actively watching them or not,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 2>to fabulous documentaries about the biology and behavior of whales,

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>so many opportunities to see for yourself what the whale

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>spout looks like. And this of course was not always the.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Case, right, So back then there might have been more

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 3>correct knowledge about whales and their mammalian biology in books.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>But that it really hits home more when you just

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 3>like see some video of them moving and swimming and spouting.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, So he rails against quote sensational pictures in

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>which whales are presented with their heads above the surface

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and throwing up from their nostrils column of water like

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the fountains in Trafalgar Square. Now he cites another erroneous

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:12.239
<v Speaker 2>description from a sixteenth century map by map master Olaus Magnus.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 2>This is somebody we've talked about on the show before

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 2>and concerning old maps and sea monsters. Right.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I think he came up extensively in my interview with

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>chet van Duzer on the history of monsters on maps,

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>but I think he's come up in other capacities as well.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 3>This is a recurring guest here.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Lee writes the following, quoting Magnus quote four to

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the danger of seamen, he will sometimes raise himself above

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the saal yards and cause such floods of water above

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>his head which he had sucked in that with a

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>cloud of them, he will often sink the strongest ships

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>or expose the mariners to extreme danger. This beast hath

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 2>also a large round mouth like a lamprey, whereby he

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 2>sucks in his meat or water and buy his weight

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 2>casts upon the flour or or hinder deck. He sinks

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and drowns a ship hinder deck, hinder deck, hinder deck.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't know anyway, you get the idea like,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 2>here's this big monster and there and he fears. Some

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 2>woodcut illustrations to this article, and you can you can

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 2>easily find these as well, depicting the same sort of

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>like you know, beaked monstrosity we just described with these

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>creatures like coming up to a ship and spitting out that,

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, using their their strange blowholes to just flood

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>a ship and make it sink.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Brutal, not real though.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah no, and Lee continues to rail against this. He

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>shares that after previously trying to set the record straight

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 2>on this in a publication, he received letters stating that, Okay, sure,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>while lesser whales might not spout water like this, the

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 2>great whales are doing it. They're totally doing it. You're wrong.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>So he goes on to discuss the basics of blowhole

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 2>anatomy and function, driving home that there's no way this

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 2>system could be the system that you find in a

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>whale's head, great or small. There's no way that this

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>system could be used to squirt jets of pure water.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just not how their bodies work. Right.

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 3>So, as we said before, in certain cases, there might

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of splashing from a whale's explosive exhalation,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 3>but it's exhaling gas and that maybe some splash is

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>getting caught up in that exhalation, but it is not

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 3>squirting water. What's coming out is from its lungs.

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, and he lays all this out and discusses everything

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 2>we've just mentioned before that yeah, it's not water coming out,

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 2>but if the exhalation comes below the surface of the water,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it's liable to carry up a lot of water and

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 2>have this explosive watery appearance.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, given all this, I did want to be fair.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to come back and add that to the

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>partial credit of Ishmael, the narrator of Moby Dick. He

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>does come down on what we now know to be

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>the correct side of the water jet versus mist or

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>vapor debate. So he says it is missed, but he

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 3>gives a fairly hilarious reason for thinking it is missed.

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>His explanation is as follows.

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 3>I account him meaning the sperm whale, no common shallow being,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>inasmuch as it is an undisputed fact that he has

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 3>never found on soundings or near shores all other whales

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 3>sometimes are. He is both ponderous and profound. And I

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 3>am convinced that from the heads of all ponderous profound

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 3>beings such as Plato, Piro, the Devil, Jupiter, Dante, and

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 3>so on, there always goes up a certain semi visible steam.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>While in the act of thinking deep thoughts while composing

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 3>a little treatise on eternity. I had the curiosity to

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>place a mirror before me, and ere long saw reflected

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 3>there a curious involved worming and undulation in the atmosphere

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 3>over my head, the invariable moisture of my hair while

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>plunged in deep thought after six cups of hot tea

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 3>in my thin shingled attic of an August noon. This

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 3>seems an additional argument for the above supposition is so good,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I get sweaty one time too.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these are some some wonderful mental gymnastics which again

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>land him in the right spot, but some unnecessary twists

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and turns. Now. It's worth noting, for the most part,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 2>this misunderstanding of whale anatomy is victimless, right. I mean,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it's like, okay, if worst case scenario you think that

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>a whale shoots water out of its blowhole, I mean,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 2>what's it? Or if you encounter a whale you'll be

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>set right on this. But it's worth noting that the

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>myth of whale spouts and water can even prove actually

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 2>dangerous to whales. This, according to Dan Jarvis of the

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 2>British Diver's Marine Life Rescue organization is quoted in a

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one Melissa Hobson article on Nationalgeographic dot Cota UK.

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Apparently there have been cases where people who are not

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>familiar with the anatomy of whales, who still have this

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 2>idea of the whale fountain in their mind. They have

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>happened upon a stranded whale on the beach and thinking

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 2>that this great fish needs water to start pouring water

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 2>into its blowhole, which can drown the whale. Oh no, yeah,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 2>So you know there are cases where not knowing what's

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>going on, even is a non biologist, it can lead

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to something like this. So don't go pouring water into blowholes.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Certainly not but okay, I think we can mostly close

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the book on the idea of the water jet. It's

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 3>not a water jet. But returning to c fables explained

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>by Henry Lee, Lee also briefly addresses a strange claim

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.239
<v Speaker 3>in the same chapter of Moby Dick that caught our

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 3>attention and we wanted to investigate further and to refresh you.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 3>We mentioned that in the last episode. But this is

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the allegation made by Ishmael that the whale spout is poisonous,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 3>a claim that seemed prima fasse unlikely to both of us.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 3>But to read again from Mobi Dick so you'll know

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 3>what he's saying. He says that for even when coming

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>into slight contact with the outer vapory shreds of the jet,

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 3>which will often happen, your skin will feverishly smart from

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the acridness of the thing, so touching it. And I

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 3>know one who coming into still closer contact with the spout,

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 3>whether with some scientific object in view or otherwise, I

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>cannot say, the skin peeled off from his cheek and arm. Wherefore,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 3>among whalemen the spout is deemed poisonous. They try to

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 3>evade it. Another thing I have heard it said, and

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I do not much doubt it, that if the jet

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 3>is fairly spouted into your eyes it will blind you.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 3>The wisest thing the investigator can do, then, it seems

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to me, is to let this deadly spout alone. So

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 3>that's a number of strange claims, he says. Okay, I've

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>got a friend who got some whale blow on him

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and that made his skin peel off. Whaleman generally say

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 3>that the blow that comes out of the spout is

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 3>poisonous and if you get it in your eyes it

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 3>will make you blind.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>So Lee doesn't spend a lot of time with this.

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 2>He mentions it he doesn't really have much to add,

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 2>but he kind of dismisses it out of hand, and

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 2>also throws in there that Herman Melville is quote not

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a naturalist, and he doesn't seem to have much to

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 2>add beyond that, aside from mentioning an account from a

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 2>steamship whaler. He writes, quote, he believes that the blast

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>was strong enough to blow a man off the spiracle

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 2>if he were seated on it. Now, I don't know. Okay,

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>that also feels kind of like a tall tail, but

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe a more believable. It's not saying that it will

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 2>blow your skin off and blind you, but he's just saying, well,

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty explosive. If you were re seated right on it,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 2>I bet it would blast you into the air. I

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>think it definitely would make you move, So just on,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 2>just strong enough to blow a man off the spiracle.

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe you would not remain on the spiracle if

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you were somehow balanced there for the spout.

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Right, So it might knock you off, but it would

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 3>not as often depicted in cartoons and illustrations. Create a

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 3>jet that then leaves you floating in the air above it.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. And the idea of it being used as

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 2>an offensive blast against ships, yeah, that's pure fantasy. Now.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>One thing I did find interestingly doesn't go into this,

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 2>but he mentions that this being an account from a

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 2>steamship whaler, and I can't help but wonder about, during

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the age of steam power, if there's like not some

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 2>level of technological comparison going on in one's mind where

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>steam comes out of the top of a ship. Steam,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>of course, is very hot and can damage you and

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 2>burn the skin off your body, things like that, And

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 2>so if there's some sort of like comparison that gets

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>made between the ship and the whale, which of course

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>is large, travels in the water and also emits these

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 2>blasts that don't look unlike steam like, maybe it's the

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing where there's just kind of like a

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 2>sub conscious comparison being made.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. I never thought about that, but that does

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 3>seem plausible. So I did my own digging around for

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 3>answers on the question of the supposedly poisonous whale spout

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 3>and like you, Rob, I found no support whatsoever for

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the claim that the blow from the blowhole is poisonous,

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 3>meaning that it contains a chemical toxin or venom with

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 3>directly injurious effects on nearby mammals through either topical contact

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 3>or ingestion. I found nothing on that. In fact, I

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 3>didn't even find that many references to this passage in

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 3>moby Dick, which I was surprised by. I thought I

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 3>would come across more. I don't know scientific sources referencing it,

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 3>even if only to contradict it or maybe try to

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>get at the source of this belief. But it just

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem like this this idea gets a lot of stick.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 3>One example of the kind of reference I found was

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 3>in not even really a scientific book, just a sort

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 3>of book on grey whales called Grey Whales Wandering Giants

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 3>by Robert Bush from nineteen ninety eight, which mentions the

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 3>claim in Moby Dick that the spout is poisonous, only

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 3>to say that it's not poisonous at all, but that

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it does have a very powerful smell, and the

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 3>author quotes John Steinbeck from a work called The Log

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 3>from the Sea of Cortes. In Steinbeck wrote, a whale's

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 3>breath is frightfully sickening. It smells of complete decay. The

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 3>author here Bush says, I don't know, it's never really

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 3>smelled that way to me.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was in a position to smell a lot

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of grey whale breath and I don't know. I mean,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>there is a breathiness to it, I guess at times,

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, I wouldn't say it stinks. Now. One thing

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to keep in mind, though, is like these are organisms.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>The blowhole is, you know, a breathing orifice. So I

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 2>have read that you do have situations where you can

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 2>have a sick whale, so that could impact what you're smelling.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 2>I suppose that.

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Bush says the same thing. Maybe it's breath

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 3>smells worse when it is diseased or wounded or something.

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>So beyond this, I was just I was like, Okay,

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to expand my circle of interest here. I

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 3>was looking to find any evidence of any mammal or

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 3>any animal for that matter, that is believed to have

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 3>poisonous or venomous breath, and I really could not find

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 3>anything that fits the description. Despite the popularity of creatures

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>with toxic breath in Dungeons and Dragons in video games.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 3>It's a good area of effect type attack. But I

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 3>couldn't find really any evidence of this in reality. Maybe

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 3>there is such a thing and I just wasn't searching

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the right way. But the closest stuff I could find

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>is what we're all more familiar with animals that might

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 3>spit venom or something, but not having toxic breath.

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the only thing that really comes to my

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 2>mind is vultures, say vomiting, which there are a few

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>different interpretations of that behavior, but it's not quite a

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Dungeons of Dragon's area of a fact attack.

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 3>And still that would be vomit from the digestive system,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 3>not toxic breath.

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Right right, not toxic gas emitted from the mouth.

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 3>So is this claim in mobe to just completely made up?

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.479
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Melville just made it up to make, you know,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 3>just for interesting fictional effect. Or maybe it was something

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>he heard he heard from people that was an actual

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>belief among whalers, but they just made it up. Well maybe,

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>but then again maybe not. While I think it's clear

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that the exhalation of whales is not poisonous or venomous,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I think this could be a misunderstanding of something that

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>does seem true, which is that I found evidence that sometimes,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 3>after certain times types of contact with marine mammals, including whales,

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 3>people do report reactions. In fact, this is a great

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 3>bit of listener mail we heard from a listener after

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 3>part one of this series who has a bit of

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 3>relevant personal experience. So Rob, I'm gonna read Tabitha's email here,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.239
<v Speaker 3>all right. Tabitha says, Dear Robert and Joe, regarding the

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 3>consequences of getting a face full of blowhole ejecta. I

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 3>have a family experience. As a child, I went on

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 3>a dolphin watching boat trip. When dolphins started swimming alongside

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the boat and playing in the bow waves, my sister

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>and I were allowed to lie on the deck and

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 3>stick our heads out under the railing to watch them.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 3>It was the nineties. One dolphin surfaced and exhaled directly

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 3>into my sister's face from close range. Initially she was fine,

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 3>if a bit slimy and embarrassed. Later that day, however,

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 3>her eyes turned red, weepy and swelled almost shut. I

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 3>don't really remember the aftermath except for thinking it was hilarious,

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 3>But as far as I recall, it got better in

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a day or so, suggesting an allergic reaction rather than

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 3>bacterial infection. So maybe a certain number of people are

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 3>just really allergic to cetaceans. Maybe a lot of people,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>but we don't have the opportunity to find out very often.

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I can imagine a whaling crew having one case of

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 3>whalesnot face rash, and the story spreading until it reaches

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the flesh dissolving, eye melting, tall tail stage. Love the

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 3>show as always, Tabitha, well fascinating and thank you so

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 3>much for sharing this, Tabitha. So I totally agree that

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 3>it is not hard to imagine some nineteenth century whalers

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>could observe experiences like this and conclude incorrectly from it

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>that the whale spout is toxic, is venomous or poisonous,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 3>like the venom of a spitting cobra or something. But

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 3>I was wondering more about the mechanism, what is actually

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 3>going on here now? I honestly could not find much

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of anything documenting what we're directly classified as allergic reactions

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>to cetace blow. But I did find a very interesting

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 3>source documenting similar reactions in the context of human zoonotic

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 3>diseases from marine mammal vectors. Now, this is something I

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 3>really had never thought about before we did this series.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Of course, when you think about zoonotic diseases, you think

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 3>about bats, You think about livestock animals, you know, maybe pigs, birds,

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 3>and so forth. I had never thought of the idea

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 3>that humans could catch diseases from whales, seals, dolphins, and

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 3>so forth.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean neither.

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>But now allow me to introduce you to the paper

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Health Risks for Marine Mammal Workers published in the journal

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Diseases of Aquatic Organisms the year two thousand and eight

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 3>by Tanya Hunt at All. This is a paper where

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the authors say there have been isolated, documented cases of

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>humans acquiring zoonotic diseases from marine mammals. There are certain

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 3>diseases that are well known and even have interesting little names,

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>such as seal finger. If you want to be grossed out,

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 3>you can look up images of seal finger. But they

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 3>wanted to design a survey to get a broader range

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>of responses. So they wanted to survey professionals and volunteers

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 3>who regularly work directly with marine mammals to see how

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 3>common various types of injuries and work related illnesses were

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in people who have contact with these animals. So what

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 3>did they find to read from their abstract? First of all,

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>they characterized the people who responded to the survey. Most

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 3>respondents eighty eight percent were researchers and rehabilitators. And then

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 3>they say, quote of all respondents, fifty percent reported suffering

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 3>an injury caused by a marine mammal and twenty three

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:07.479
<v Speaker 3>percent reported having a skin rash or reaction. Marine mammal.

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Work related illnesses commonly included seal finger, which is now

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 3>known to be traceable to a bacterium called mycoplasma, conjunctivitis.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 3>That's very interesting because that conjunctivitis is irritation and swelling

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 3>of the eyes. That of course connects to Tabitha's story,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 3>but also connects to the idea that getting whale blow

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 3>in your face could make you blind. But to go on,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 3>viral dermatitis, bacterial dermatitis, and non specific contact dermatitis. This

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 3>is rash or irritation of the skin, although specific diagnoses

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 3>could not be confirmed by a physician. Through the study,

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 3>severe illnesses were reported and included tuberculosis, leptospirosis, brucillosis, and

0:33:55.320 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 3>serious sequli to seal finger. Risk factors associated within increased

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 3>odds of injury and illness included prolonged and frequent exposure

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 3>to marine mammals, direct contact with live marine mammals, and

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 3>contact with tissue, blood and excretions. And I was looking

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 3>at another paper tracking marine mammals Zunocees in humans. This

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 3>was by waltzik at All in Zunoceason Public Health from

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twelve, and it also tried to collect all of

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the literature on zoonotic infections from marine mammals and humans,

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 3>and it concluded that the most common type of zoonotic

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 3>reaction to marine mammals was localized skin infections in humans,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 3>which again makes you think about the discussion about like

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 3>peeling skin and skin reactions that Melville mentions. So those

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 3>are human diseases that have been tentatively linked at least

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 3>circumstantially to contact with marine mammals. But we need to

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 3>introduce some caveats Number one. This includes a wide range

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 3>of different marine mammals, so not just whales, but all

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 3>kinds of marine mammals, and a wide range of different

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>types of contact including touching of skin, bites, contact with

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 3>blood and inner organs, et cetera, not just exposure to say,

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 3>mucus and droplets from the blowhole of whales. So what

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 3>if we were to come at this question from the

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 3>other direction and ask what is in whalesnot specifically when

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 3>a whale breathes out, there's got to be plenty of

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>bacteria and stuff in there. Has anybody ever documented what

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>microbes are present in the blow of a whale and

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 3>whether that list contains anything that could cause skin or

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 3>eye infections or otherwise create the impression, even the false

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 3>impression that the spout is poisonous or venomous. Yes, there

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 3>have in fact been investigations microbiological investigations of whale blow.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 3>The first one I wanted to mention was a paper

0:35:55.520 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 3>from twenty seventeen. This was published in m sistems Too,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 3>which is an American Society for Microbiology journal. It's by

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Amy April at All and it's called Extensive Core Microbiome

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 3>in Drone Captured Whale Blow supports a framework for health monitoring.

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 3>This study was interesting because it used a drone to

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 3>fly above the water surface and collect blow from two

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 3>populations of healthy humpback whales, one Pacific group off of

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Vancouver Island and an Atlantic group off of Cape Cod

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 3>and I was thinking, wow, that's a good use for drones. Yeah,

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 3>So they took these samples, but then they compared the

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 3>microbes present in them to what was present in just

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 3>samples of straight seawater from around because obviously some seawater

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 3>gets in with the blow, so you're looking to see

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 3>what's in the blow that's not just in the seawater.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 3>And the author's right quote. The blow microbiomes were distinct

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 3>from the seawater microbiomes and included twenty five phylogenetically diverse

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 3>bacteria common to all sampled whales. This core assemblage comprised

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 3>on average thirty six percent of the microbiome, making it

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the more consistent animal microbiomes studied to date.

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 3>The closest phylogenetic relatives of twenty of these core microbes

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 3>were previously detected in marine mammals, suggesting that this core

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>microbiome assemblage is specialized for marine mammals and may indicate

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a healthy, non infected pulmonary system. So that's interesting. These

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 3>two geographically distinct populations of healthy humpback whales from different

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 3>oceans share a common baseline of non pathogenic bacterial species.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Of course, the fact that a bacterium is not pathogenic

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 3>in its normal whale host doesn't necessarily tell you how

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 3>it will behave when sprayed onto the skin or into

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the eyes of a human being. But then, the other

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 3>study I wanted to mention is one that was published

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 3>in Nature Scientific Reports by Raverty at All in twenty

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 3>seventeen called Respiratory Microbiome of Endangered Southern resident killer Whales

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 3>and Microbiome of surrounding Sea surface micro layer in the

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Eastern North Pacific. So, to summarize from a news report

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 3>on this article, I was reading from the University of

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 3>British Columbia. Stephen Raverty, he was the lead author on

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 3>the study, is a professor or an adjunct professor at

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 3>University of British Columbia's Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries.

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 3>And this study was looking at the microbiome of endangered

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 3>Southern resident killer whales in what's known as the Salish Sea.

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 3>It's the sea around I think, the sort of the

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 3>inside of Vancouver Island. It's the sea around that stretch

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 3>throughout British Columbia and Washington State. And this study was

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 3>focused on the health of orcas, not on humans, so

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>this was not studying human diseases. But it did find

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that the breath of these killer whales, when sampled droplets

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>from that blow, contained all kinds of bacteria and fungi

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 3>that are known to cause disease in humans, so bacteria

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 3>like salmonella, like Staphylococcus aureus, and then fungi like penicillium

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 3>and foma. And it's not clear that these common bacteria

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 3>that could also cause disease in humans would be present

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 3>in the breath of all whales. It's also not clear

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>that they have always been present, even in these killer whales,

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 3>because there's a possibility that these are sort of recently

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>introduced microbia loads that are a result of human activity.

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 3>We don't know, but it's a possibility. Giving a quote

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 3>to this news article, the lead author, Raverty says, quote,

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>We're not sure if these microbes naturally occur in the

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 3>marine environment or if they may be terrestrially sourced. These

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>animals are long ranging as they migrate along the coast,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 3>and they are exposed to agricultural runoff and urban discharge,

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 3>which may introduce a variety of microbes into the water.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 3>So ultimately, in this case, we don't know for sure,

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Like we can't take a sample of what whalers might

0:39:57.640 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 3>have been getting blown in their faces from sperm whale

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 3>or whales in general in the nineteenth century. But here

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 3>at least there are cases today of whales that are

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 3>ejecting breath from their lungs that contains droplets of mucus

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 3>with bacteria that we know do cause disease in humans.

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Whether that is sort of a recent loading onto these

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 3>whales or whether that would have been present a long

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 3>time ago, we can't say for sure. But if you

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 3>combine this with the other observations that people, you know,

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 3>people who work directly with marine mammals, report a lot

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 3>of sort of skin infections conjunctividis and things like that,

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 3>it does not seem implausible to me that this story

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 3>about the whale blow being poisonous could emerge from different

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 3>types of infections people get after getting whale mucus or

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 3>other types of whale body fluids on their skin or

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 3>in their eyes.

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are a number of additional considerations to make

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 2>based on this information, because, on one hand, just by

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.919
<v Speaker 2>the nature of tall and sailor lore. How many times

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 2>would it need to happen really for the stories to generate,

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, just one incident of somebody really swelling up

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 2>after being exposed to whale blow might be enough. At

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.720
<v Speaker 2>On top of that, if there are myths and legends

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 2>pre existing that to tie into some of this, those

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 2>could add to the energy of these tales and could

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 2>even in their origin be partially inspired by such experiences.

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And then I think the other thing to keep in

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 2>mind is that the whalers we were just talking about

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 2>all the different things that one might have reactions to

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 2>have exposed to, including like blood and organs, Like the

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 2>whaler was not just out there to see the whale,

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 2>not just out there to experience the whale. They were

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 2>out there to kill and butcher the whales. So it

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 2>seems entirely likely that, yeah, if you're going to have

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>an allergic reaction to one aspect of the whales anatomy,

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 2>there are going to be multiple additional opportunities to be

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 2>infected by blood, viscera, et cetera.

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely agree with all that. So yeah, I can't

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>say for sure, but my best guess is if this

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 3>is not just a made up story. If there are

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 3>if there were actually folk tales among whalers that the

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 3>spout was poisonous, it probably came from people getting some

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of infection after being around whales.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Now I have a few other little things first to

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 2>take into this first one kind of ties into several

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 2>different things we've discussed, because it definitely concerns whaling. It

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 2>concerns the idea of a liquid spout, and it also

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 2>concerns exposure of the whaler to various parts of the

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 2>whales anatomy. So this concerns the red spout. In the

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 2>book Red Leviat and the Secret History of Soviet Whaling,

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 2>author and previous guest on the show, Ryan Tucker Jones

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 2>discusses the destruction wrought by the Soviet industrial whaling industry,

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and in this one particular case, the Soviet industrial whaling harpoons.

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.800
<v Speaker 2>So these were not like the harpoons of the classical

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 2>age of whaling as depicted in Moby Dick. We're talking

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>about things that are fired, and in this case a

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.720
<v Speaker 2>grenade tipped so that they explode upon hitting the whale

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and impacting the whale. He points out that the ideal

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 2>first hit ideal for the whalers, of course, not the whale.

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Would be for one of these to go off near

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the whale's vital organs. Wherever it hit, blood would pour

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 2>into the cavity and the brain would eventually succumb. But

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 2>if the lungs were punctured quote, blood would soon fountain

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 2>out the blowhole. This was termed by the Soviet whalers

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 2>a red spout, and the whale would drown in its

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 2>own fluids. And he goes into a great deal more

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 2>detail about all of this, but suffice to say like

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.320
<v Speaker 2>two to six harpoons were often required to kill the whale.

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.280
<v Speaker 2>So worth keeping this in mind, I think and thinking

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 2>about all of this, and also it brings to mind

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>an account that I was reading regarding a mythic monstrous whale.

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 2>So we have the word cetacean, you know, referring to

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 2>our whales. This I've read is connected to the name

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of the of the sea monster in Greek mythology Ketos

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 2>or CTOs, and it is believed by some, at least

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 2>in some tellings, to be based on or interpreted as

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a whale. In Manilius is Monster by K. M. Coleman

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 2>from nineteen eighty three, the author points to whale like

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:49.280
<v Speaker 2>qualities of spouting in the writings of first century Roman

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 2>poet Manilius. Ovid, however, doesn't write of spouting with these

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 2>with this creature, but of vomiting bloody water. So the

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 2>there of this paper, Coleman contends that Manilius was possibly

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 2>incorporating observational or even for the time natural insight into

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 2>his treatment of the myth. But I also think this

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 2>depiction of that Ovid gives the spouting of bloody water.

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 2>This also brings to mind, I mean this, I can't

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 2>help but compare to this idea of the red spout

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and wonder if it might be connected to some you know,

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 2>ancient world older accounts of harpooning a whale piercing the

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>lung and observing this reaction.

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Wow, but now I'm picturing this. So the key toss

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 3>or the sea monster that is here being interpreted as

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 3>a whale I think was the monster in the Perseus

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:45.919
<v Speaker 3>and Andromeda story. So like when Cassiopeia offers up Andromeda

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 3>as a sacrifice to the sea monster, we should maybe

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 3>picture at not like a big scaly man thing coming

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 3>out of the water track see and clash of the Titans,

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 3>but instead a whale vomiting bloody water.

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, and you know this idea of the vomiting whale,

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 2>he goes. There's some other accounts of this as well,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 2>because I was poking around looking for just any other

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:14.399
<v Speaker 2>interesting like whale spout myths that connected into what we're

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about here. And there are various myths about whales

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.359
<v Speaker 2>being you know, monsters or gods and so forth, but

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 2>not all of them are necessarily insightful concerning the spout

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 2>or the blowhole. But I happened to cross something in

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Irish traditions that I can't help but wonder if this

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 2>is something that ended up helping inform sailor's lore, especially

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 2>as discussed in Moby Dick. I found this initially in

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 2>an eighteen ninety nine publication Notes and Folklore from the

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Renez Copy of the Dencentchez by TJ. Westrop, published in

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland.

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 2>The Dencentchez. This is the tales of the Tales of

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 2>the Duns, the Lore of Places. It's a class of

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 2>texts from early Irish literature, and these were apparently added

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 2>to by various writers up until the eleventh or twelfth centuries.

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So here's a quote from this particular author quote. A

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 2>very dangerous monster, the ros Sualt is also described, which

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 2>spouts at Muhrisk in Mayo, and a pestilence en sieus.

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 2>This is stated of the whale in other ancient works.

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 2>When the whale spouts upwards, flying creatures die, when downwards

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 2>it kills the fish, and when at the land, a

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 2>plague ensieus. Whoa. So this is the idea of a

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 2>whale shooting birds out of the air with its poisonous spout,

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 2>and occasionally, you know, coming close to the shore and

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 2>being a bringer of plagues, vomiting up plague upon the

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 2>shore and letting that plague or roll across the countryside

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 2>as a vapor, a bringer of miasma.

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I was confused about the timeline for a second.

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 3>But okay, so this is an eighteen ninety nine publication,

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 3>but it is discussing these earlier like medieval Irish texts.

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Yes, and for there's a little background. Mrisk is

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 2>in fact a village in County Mayo in Ireland, and

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 2>also according to a different text in eighteen ninety two

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 2>text I was looking at this ross salt, and I

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 2>apologize that I'm butchering. This was sometimes understood as a

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.879
<v Speaker 2>sea animal, and I think sometimes translated as a walrus.

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Not that we should necessarily think of it as a walrus,

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 2>but you know, sometimes there's a shift in what these

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 2>terms are referring to over time. So since we had

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 2>a sea monster here, especially one of European origin, I turned,

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 2>as I always do, to the books of Carol Rose.

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>He has these wonderful pair of encyclopedias, one dealing with

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 2>monsters and giants and other other one dealing with fairies

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and leprechauns. And there's some crossover between the books, but

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 2>they're both great. So I looked it up. And Rose

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 2>has a little more insight on the resalt, which she

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 2>says is an alternate name for the moorisk, a monster

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 2>fish of Irish tradition. She writes that it was said

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to inhabit the region of crow og Patrick, and it

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 2>was super poisonous. If it vomited in the water, all

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 2>the sea life around it would die. The fumes from

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 2>its mouth would cause dead birds to fall out of

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.720
<v Speaker 2>the sky, and it could breathe on a coastal region

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:24.720
<v Speaker 2>and bring disease.

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that sort of matches what we were reading a

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 3>minute ago, right, right, yeah, yeah, And at the coast

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 3>it brings the pestilens. It kills the birds if it

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.439
<v Speaker 3>shoots up, and it kills the fish if it shoots down.

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Right. And I also found another source referring to this.

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 2>This is from P. W. Joyce in nineteen oh six

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 2>is a smaller social History of Ancient Ireland, and this

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 2>author added basically says the same thing, but added that

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.320
<v Speaker 2>it was quote able to vomit in three different ways

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 2>three years in succession. He adds that the vomiting into

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the water also wrecked ships, and when it vomited towards

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the land in the third year, the whale caused quote

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a pestilential vapor to creep over the country that killed

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 2>men and four footed animals.

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 3>No, not the four footed animals.

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 2>The four footed animals are just at the forefront of

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 2>strange death. I mean, this is how many times are

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 2>we gonna in this year and last have we talked

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 2>about strange reasons that four legged animals are dying? And

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 2>in the British Isles.

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 3>We never considered this as an explanation for the cattle

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 3>mutilation panic. What if it was actually a risk?

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, what if a whale vomited? So this is

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 2>this is all interesting Again, I don't think that. I

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 2>think potentially one has to, you know, take into account

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 2>these these myths and legends about poisonous vomit coming out

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 2>of these whales or whale like creatures, these also first

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 2>hand accounts of potentially getting some sort of an infection

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:02.280
<v Speaker 2>after contact with a whale spout or whale blood, et cetera.

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.760
<v Speaker 2>But I also can't help but wonder if there's some connection,

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 2>particularly between this story and perhaps encounters with beached and

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 2>dead whales, where there's of course decomposition going on, and

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 2>therefore there's going to be a very strong, awful odor,

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the kind of odor that we would, you know, we

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 2>would associate with with illness. Perhaps, so I wonder, I

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:27.760
<v Speaker 2>wonder if there's any connective tissue there as well.

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Well. Rob, I think this has been a mighty fun

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and interesting exploration. Even though we didn't get a definitive

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 3>answer on the poisonous whales thing, I think what we

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 3>did find out has been enlightening, and as Melville would say,

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 3>through all the thick mists and the dim doubts, you know,

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the divine intuitions now and then shoot, so our fog

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 3>has been enkindled with a heavenly ray.

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Very nice. All right, We're gonna gohead and close it

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 2>out then, but yeah, we'd love to hear from everyone

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.760
<v Speaker 2>out there. If you have additional insight, experience, et cetera,

0:51:57.880 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>just general thoughts and what we've talked about in this

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.240
<v Speaker 2>pair of episodes or our previous episodes on Gray Whales

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 2>in particular, write in we'd love to hear from you.

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Just a reminder that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 2>primarily a science podcast, with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 2>but on Mondays we do listener mail. On Wednesdays we

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>do a short form artifact or monster fact episode, and

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 2>then on Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 2>just talk about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks to our audio producer JJ Posway. If you

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:29.240
<v Speaker 3>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:31.720
<v Speaker 3>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 3>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 3>email us at contact Stuff to Blow Your Mind dot com.

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Nations, Westrator