WEBVTT - MicroStrategy Buys $10M More Bitcoin and the iPhone Turns 15

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Chant, San Francisco, and this is

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, micro Strategy

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>makes another ten million dollar event on bitcoin, even as

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies continue to slide, plus n f T sales getting

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a new low for the year. We will discuss and

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to Snapchat, the social media company announcing a new

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>monthly subscription to premium content. But what does premium content

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>look like on snap and well, customers pay three a month.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Clause Maderna co founder New bar Fa, and we'll join

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>us to talk about the future of the Crown specific

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>boosters and why he's taking on the fight against climate change. Meantime,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sailor is doubling down on bitcoin, micro Strategy buying

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>another four eight coins worth about ten million dollars at

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the height of the crypto market collapse. According to a

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>filing from the SEC, micro Strategy purchased the coins between

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>May three in June for about twenty dollars and eight

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventeen dollars each. Blue Works Katie Gray felt with

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>us now to discuss and not necessarily a surprise given

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>our last interview with Michael, but still now even below

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>it's so fascinating. I mean, the fact that you're getting

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>this big whale buying at a time when no one

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>really else is and Emily, like you said, and you

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>know this very well, he's a true believer Michael Sailors.

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So maybe not surprising in this sense, but it is

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a little interesting if you look into the details. So

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>this was micro Strategy smallest bitcoin by in over a year,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, if you look at their entire ward,

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>micro Strategy owns a hundred twenty nine thousand bitcoin in

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>total at this pert point, the average price for all

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of those purchases it's thirty dollars. So micro Strategy it's

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>well underwater on this bet. But Michael Sailor, I mean

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's known as the biggest corporate advocate of bitcoin, and truly,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean his actions are backing that up. Whether that

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>will pay off for means to be seen. And clearly

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't created as good news in the stock market,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, he does stick to his word. So

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>here's a clip from my interview with Sailor. A couple

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago. First question, any regrets. Take a listen

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to what he had to say. The bottom line is

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin strategy is ten x better than any other alternative,

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and so no, I don't regret it. We've got two

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>point eight billion dollars worth the bitcoin on our balance

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sheet right now, and we feel like we're positioned well

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for when the markets turn around, and our only other

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>choice would be to give all the capital back to

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the shareholders, in which case we would have nothing and

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we would be struggling, uh to get by without any assets.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Ten x better than any other alternative. He's thinking in

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the really, really really long term. But even in the

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>short term, how is bitcoin standing up to alt coins

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and the alternatives out there? Well, if you look across

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the crypto ecosystem, I mean a really crude way to

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think about Bitcoin is sort of the Amazon or the

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>apple of the crypto sphere. I mean, this is sort

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest coin out there. It tends to move

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>less than some of the other coins, and you definitely

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>saw that today. I mean to borrow a phrase from

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlow, I think he said flat as a floppy

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>disk of bitcoin fell just three tents of percent. If

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the old coins, they're more

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>like the speculative tech stocks out there, the high flyers.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You saw ether full almost five per cent, Salona even

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>more than that. And this is why you typically see

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>on the downside and the upside too, when Bitcoin moves higher,

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it the old coins that lead the gains. And as

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we've learned over the past few months, the same is

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>true on the downside. When you do have this big

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>draw down in bitcoin, it tends to be even bigger

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out the risk curve well. And at the same time,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you have the bitcoin believer as you've got the folks

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are never ever going to give up on n f

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>T s, and yet n f T s continuing to fall.

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, would you say we were were

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>past the peak? It's a good question. I mean, just

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at the data, because you're gonna get a thousand

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>different opinions. But if you look at the data on

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>open see that is the biggest n f T marketplace

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out there. This is a really shocking stat In a

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News article today, sales volume has fallen just since

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>ny It's at the lowest level since July. So I

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, perhaps some of the air is coming out

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of that n F T bubble and whatever this is,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, approaching the bottom remains to be seen. But Emily,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>this is what a crypto winter looks like. You tend

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to see a shakeout like this, and you're clearly seeing

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it in n F T S and all coins. It

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is cold. Indeed, Now the deadline for US regulators to

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>rule on gray stales campaign to convert its bitcoin trust

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>into a spot E t F is coming up. What

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>are we expecting there? I am laser focused on this decision.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I cover crypto, I cover E t F s. Now

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we have them coming full circle. So the consensus in

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>both industries is that this is going to be a

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>denial that the SEC isn't going to allow Gray Skill

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to convert it streuss into a physically backed e t F.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That isn't a structure that exists in the U S.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But I crunched the numbers on what that would actually

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>mean for Gray Skill if this fund were to convert

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>into an E t F. Again, not the base case.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Right now, as a trust, it's able to charge two percent,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you times that by the assets under management,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about thirteen billion dollars. That works out to over two

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty million dollars in revenue for gray Skill per

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>year as a trust. But if it converts to an

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>e t F, two percent is very very high for

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>an e t F, You're almost never going to see that.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Feel the most expre one of the most expensions crypto

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>et f s out there, charges a fee of less

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>than one percent, So even if they get a win

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in the next week, I mean, that would mean hundreds

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of millions of dollars lost in revenue. And Emily, we're

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in a crypto winter. All right, Katie, what are you

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching tomorrow? Tomorrow? I mean, I'm right back

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to the fundamentals of the U S economy. I'm looking

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>at core PC figures. But as we've learned, bitcoin tends

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to move along with stocks, and stocks are absolutely moving

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with inflation. Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld, thank you for telling us

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what's on your radar? All right? Coming up, the co

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>founder of maderna new bar off and joins me next

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as a pandemic moves into yet another phase. Plus how

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>the newest ruling from the U. S. Supreme Court could

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>impact climate change and his portfolio. That is all. Next,

0:06:49.000 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. On Thursday, the U s. Supreme Court

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is set to issue another major decision. This one will

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have a big impact on climate change. Specifically, the power

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the US government has to tell companies to reduce

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>their greenhouse gas emissions. As we wait for the decision,

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>many tech companies have been taking it upon themselves to

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>reduce their carbon footprints. Indigo Agriculture is one such company

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>helping fight climate change with carbon removal technologies backed by

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the venture capital firm Flagship Pioneering, which might sound familiar

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to you because the CEO of Flagship New Bar, a Fan,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>has been on our show many times. He is also

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Maderna New Bar. It's great to

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again. I want to talk to you

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about Indigo Agriculture their carbon farming program. What is the

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>dent you expect this or hope? Uh? This will make

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in the climate fight. Emily, thanks for having me. This

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.679
<v Speaker 1>is very exciting day today because it's really the first

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>time that a certified carbon credit has been issued against

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>basically output from farmers. And while today we announced twenty

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand tons of of of certified carbon being captured Uh,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that really can scale and can scale rapidly, we think, uh,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And so it really is a proof point. Um, there's

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's probably several orders of magnitude a hundred of thousandfold

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>more that can be expected from this. And I think

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that agriculture is kind of a very interesting way to

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think about carbon storing, capturing and storing carbon and creating

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>with urns for farmers, which is also a very important, uh,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of part of the circular economy aspect of this.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're bracing for yet another Supreme Court ruling, this

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>one on whether the e p A has the authority

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to tell companies to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. What are

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you bracing for here and how could this impact your

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>new venture? Well, I mean, certainly, I think that that

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that we see a lot of mixed signals as when

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to how consistently we want to to to

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that corporations and and other entities are

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>being responsible for their carbon footprint. Certainly that the momentum

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>has been in favor of more and more responsibility, but

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that regulation aside, the vast majority of companies

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are moving down a path where they're taking it upon themselves.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Today's announcement by Indigo involves eleven major brands that actually

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have stepped up and and and associated with the work

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that the farmers do some forty dollars per ton of carbon,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>which is twice what it was a year ago. And

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we think that these incentives that that will drive the

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>creation these credits will be part of the solution, and

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think corporations might be forced to do it, but

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they also may choose to do it because it's the

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do and it's scalable. Now, regulatory advisors

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just recommended that shots from Maderna and Visor be updated

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to target Oh Macron, what are the next steps from

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a journal here and how will your concoction be different

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>than what Fiser has to offer. Well, the context switch

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is pretty sudden, but I think it's it's memorable for me,

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily because at some level we're talking about the health

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the planet, and then we're also talking about the

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>health of the inhabitants of the planet. So for us,

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really all the same thing from a point of

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>view of the science and the innovation. Uh specifically to

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>your to your question, clearly we've been caught up in

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this battle for two years now between a virus and

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the detect human technology to combat it, and as the

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>virus adapts, we've had to adapt our own vaccine to

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to stay ahead of it and provide the

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of immune protection. We showed yesterday's hearing with the

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>FDA that the data we're generating out of a bi

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>valent that is two different spike protein sequences in our

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>new vaccines are a robust protection package for what we

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>expect to be uh it's coming up in the fall.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So what we need to do is to work with

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the authorities making sure that we we kind of uh

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>put in place that what will be the next vaccine

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be used. Certainly, yesterday's book encouraged a

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>macron to be incorporated into that, and once that's done,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to ramp up production and be ready by

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>early fall to provide the vaccines needed for protection. I

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people, as you know, Emily, are tired.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm tired. Everybody's tired of this, of this pandemic. But

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the bad news is devirus doesn't get tired, and we're

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to stay vigilant. However tired we get, we

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we are tired. I agree, and also you know there

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of folks waiting on these boosters and

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>guidance on boosters. It's it's it's been kind of confusing

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the messaging from the US government. You said early fall,

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the soonest like when do you think O

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>macron specific shots will be going into the arms of Americans?

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Ending working out with the FDA and other authorities the

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>final vaccine composition that we're going with, and there's a

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this that begins to look like early

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>versions of what we've done with seasonal flu, where there's

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>got to be a definition set on what the next

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccine looks like. But once that's done, we think the

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sooner that's done, the sooner we can get on we're

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>poised to manufacture significant quantities. And like we're looking at

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>as early in the fall as we can. You know,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>early September would be great. May well be depending on

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>when the go ahead is given that will affect it.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But but we certainly have planned for in our poise

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to be able to move very very quickly. Now COVID

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are starting to roll out for kids, and I'm

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>curious how you think that campaign is going we've seen

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a slow vaccination campaign under under pediatricians.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>What's it gonna take to make parents less hesitant to

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>get this done? Look, I think that it took a

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>while to get to this point, which is unfortunate because

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>during that time, people were opposed to any any number

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of conflicting points of view, and and everybody uh seems

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to have a view about any number of topics that

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>relate to public health, even though there's public health professionals

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'd say are probably much more uh prepared to

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and and qualified to to guide what it is we're

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>doing as a population. I think it's gonna take a

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit of time for people to get the right information.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The fact is, rigorous testing has been done. The fact

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>is that protecting the youngest kids from getting infected is

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>not only important for their health, but the health of

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the people surrounding them and the people who want to

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be with them. And so I think that overall, just

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like we're vaccinated for lots of other things, we care

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about our kids health and this is a very important

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>next step. The other thing you have to keep in mind, Emily,

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and again this is I think getting lost in the

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>information wars that seem to be going on, is that

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>actually just getting COVID, let alone, getting it over and

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>over again is from a long term health standpoint dangerous

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and I think that we think of this

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 1>as a cold and we go, well, we get it

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>every year, so a big deal. There's no evidence that

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the way this disease plays out. Quite the contrary, there's

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence that in some subset of people, several percent of

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the people, it has long term effects. And I don't

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>see that that's going to be different once enough young

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>kids get this. So we have to be less cavalier

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>about it and do everything we can to prevent it,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at least until we learn more about the disease. We

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just got a new headline that Fiser and bion Tech

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to get an extra three point two billion

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars from the United States for COVID vaccine development. Are

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you expecting more money from Maderna as well? I can't

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>comment on that, alright, So let's talk about the national

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bio defense strategy. I'm so curious if you and Flagship

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have spoken to the by Buying administration about this and

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what the role of Flagship could be there. You know,

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously the hope is that at some point this pandemic abates,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but we will be facing other threats, so emily we

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we have indirect contacts or through a number of channels,

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'd say that I'm happy to see more discussion

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>happening about this whole notion of health security. This is

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>something that we've talked about for three years, in fact,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>preceding the pandemic. We do think that we need to

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>elevate our health to a matter of security, not just care.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not enough that our health kind of is under

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>attack and then we try to then do something about it.

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We have to get ahead of it and health security,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's against pathogen threats or against a lot of

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the slow pandemics that we are attacked by every day,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that's cancer or Alzheimer's, or obesity or any number

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of diseases, all of these are the same kind of

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>threat that can take down our lives, take down our health,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and we need to get ahead of it. Health security,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>by defense. All of that is part of a comprehensive solution.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And I certainly hope and expect that the kind of

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>damage this pandemic is done will be at least converted

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>into some long term lasting value to society. Just like

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>major wars have led to significant kind of after effects

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that have been good for mankind. I expect that to

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>be the case in this case through a more serious

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>effort at preparedness and prevention. All right, well, really appreciate

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>all the work you are doing and your team on

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the front lines to keep us all safe and also

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>now to fight climate change as well. Majorna, co founder,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO Flagship Pioneering New Bar a fan. Good to have

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you back. The iconic iPhone turns fifteen today. Steve Jobs

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>introduced the revolutionary product back in two thousand seven, changing

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the phone and app landscape forever and archuably the world.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>For more on this, I want to bring in Bloomberg's

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, of course covers all things Apple. It is

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to overstate Mark just how much the iPhone has

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>changed a lot of things about this world. How do

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you assess the impact of this one particular product and

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the future impact on the Apple ecosystem. So I think

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone is so much more than just the iPhone,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>even for Apple. If you think about Apple, the company

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that exists today and where they get all of their

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>sales from all the revenue from and all the major

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>elements their business, it all stems from the iPhone. So

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone, you look at that, but what came from

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone? The iPad came from the iPhone? Right, The

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>App Store came from the iPhone. All their services, News

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>plus TV, plus Apple Arcade, iCloud, all those things work

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand with the iPhone. So none of their

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>peripheral products, the Apple Watch, the air pods, the Apple TV,

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>those are all very iPhone reliant. So Apple is the

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>iPhone company because the iPhone not only is their biggest seller,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but it needed to exist for all of their other

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>products to exist. So Apple, you might as well rename

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>them to iPhone in from that standpoint, and obviously you

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>see what it's done for the world. Right. People don't

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to each other in lines anymore, right, People can't

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on screens in a movie theater anymore. Right. Everyone

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is glued to their phone constantly, and people can do

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>anything from their phone, whether it's an iPhone or Samsung.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It all stemmed from the iPhone. So what are the

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>next fifteen years of growth going to come from for Apple?

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna be using phones at all? In fifteen years.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be an a R headset? Is

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it going to be recurring revenue from services? I think

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>there's always gonna be a place for a handheld device

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of product that you keep in your pocket, in your

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>bag or whatnot. I think maybe you'll sleep see people

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>wean off of tablets and laptops more in the iPhone

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>itself becomes sort of a phone, quote desktop computer or

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>your home computer, your laptop, and what was the phone

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of shifts to the wrists for the smart watch

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and for the A R glasses. So I think the

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>iPhone will have a place fifteen years from now still right.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I still think there will be new iPhones in over

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a decade from now, but you'll see that sort of

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to use the Steve Jobs analogy, the iPhone become the truck, right,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and the air glasses in the watch become par So

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's a place for the phone. One

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>term interesting bloom Brooks Mark German, who covers Apple and

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will be hopefully for much, if not all, of those

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>texts fifteen years, Mark, thank you, Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily changing in San Francisco, subscribing to Snapchat. That's right.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Snap is launching a paid version of the widely used

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>social media platform, offering quote exclusive and experimental they say

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>features gloom Skirt Wagner joins us now to discuss. So

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the struggles that like Netflix is having, for example,

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>with its subscription service, why is not moving into this business?

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So you're noticing this both with Snap you recall Twitter

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>did this as well. I think this has to do

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that these are advertising companies. Um, it's

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>been a tough year with everything happening with Apple and

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the tracking changes, and I think these companies that have

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly built an entire business around advertising are realizing that

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not always in their control, it's not always in

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>their hands. It's good to have other forms of revenue,

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even if they're small, to kind of counterbalance that somewhat.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's why you're starting to see

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these social platforms start to, you know, tinker

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>with subscriptions. So what kind of premium content do I

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>get for Yeah, it sounds pretty limited. From what I

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can tell. It sounds like you can, you know, similar

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>things to to Twitter. Again. You can change your app icon,

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you can prioritize certain messages, right, So maybe pin things

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that you use regularly. So I don't think it's the

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that the vast majority of people will

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>want to use. But again, similar to Twitter, if you

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are a power user, if you're someone who does all

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>or most of your communication on Snap, maybe this is,

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, something that's worth a couple of bucks too.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see more strategies like this from

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>other similar company? I think so because of the advertising thing, right,

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're an advertising business, you have to

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sit around and look and say can we control There's

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot that you can't, as we've learned from the pandemic,

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>as we've learned from Apple, and so I think you

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to see the facebooks and others of

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. Maybe it's not subscriptions, but maybe it's commerce

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>or other types of revenue streams beyond advertising paying for

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>certain features. Essentially. Yeah, I mean you heard Mark Zuckerberg

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>last week talk about the metaverse and how he wants

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>people to you know, shop and buy clothes for their avatar.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not advertising in the way we think of

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>with with Meta or Facebook. It's a different kind of revenue,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's all alt. Are people going to

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>be paying for clothes for their avatars? Is that going

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to be? But do you believe UM? I believe that

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>people will pay things. Yes, I believe people will buy

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>things for the avatar. I don't know if UM it

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>will be widely used by people, at least early on.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Right if if suddenly you and I are having this

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>interview in the metaverse someday and I'm working from home

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're going from home, like, I'm probably gonna want

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to wear something a little nicer than what I have here,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I would I would have Bloomberg expensive. That's

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting use case. I'll think about it. Our car Wagner,

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you well. After two years of virtual conferences, hp

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>s annual Edge to Cloud Conference is back in person

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas. More than eight thousand people intended to

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>hear about the latest innovations as the company leans into

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>its everything as a service business strategy. HP CEO Antonio

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Narry joins us now exclusively to bring us the latest

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>from Vegas. Antonio, it's great to have you back with us.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So look that it seems like the everything on people's

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>minds NOW is the economy. What are you hearing from customers,

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>how worried are they and how is this potentially impending

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>recession impacting them? Well, I mean, first of all, thanks

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Is a great day to be here

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>with customers in parliaments. As you said, we have more

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>than eight thousand attendees, and he has been an amazing

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>couple of days where the energy is unbelievable. It shows

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that being together right is unique and one feed by

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a god from customers, this this time around feels totally

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>different and there's a sort of a sense of excitement.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And what we hear from them is that the power

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of digital transformation is accelerated and they need solutions to

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>accelerate inside from the data. Obviously they are all concerned

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about what's happened next, but I think it's more a

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer phenomenal than an enterprise at phenomenal. So how that

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>impacting your outlook? I mean, do you think a recession

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is inevitable? I mean you have to be planning for

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that scenario. Of course, we do based planning scenarios for

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>what comes next. But I have to tell you, Emily,

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the demand that we continue to see the market is

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>incredibly strong, and this event is a catalyst to continue

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with the momentum. We showcase amazing innovation and delivering on

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the vision I shift three years ago. By the way,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>when was the last discovered here in Vegas that we

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>can offer everything as a service from h to cloud.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But as I think about the megatrends right related to

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the need to connect, the need to deliver a cloud

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>experience for all your loads and data, they need to

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>extract insights. You know, I keep saying, you know, we

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have data rich but insight poor and ultimately be able

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to consume it in a more flexible way. That's accelerating.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm more positive about the it T spend

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>than obviously the consumer spend. You've got cloud providers out

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there fighting for industries and companies that haven't yet moved

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>their data to the cloud. Which companies are these and

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>how does HPE win their business? Well, our strategy from

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the get go was to provide a hybrid experience for

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all your loads and data, and that's now very clear.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>When you talk to customers and partners, they tell you

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the world is hybrid. At the same time, digital transformation

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is all about a journey to drive a data first,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>modernization data has gravity and has tremendous value, more value

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>than ever we manage imagine before. So what customers are

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going through is a multi generational, a t journey, but

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately they need the hybrid experience. And so as customers

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>think about compliance issues, regulatory issues obviously cyber issues and cost,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they realize they need a platform to be able to

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>conduct their business across whatever those worlds and data live

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and h speakering leg is the beating heart of our strategy,

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and they realize they can live in a multi cloud world,

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>whatever public cloud environment they use, but also compliment with

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>an amazing set of solutions on prem and more and

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>more of the edge. I think it's fair to recognize,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Emily that seventy of the data is actually outside the

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>public cloud sits at the edge, and more than thirty

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of that data needs to be processed real find and

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the opportunity for of US. HP is one of

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the largest companies that has moved its headquarters from Silicon

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Valley to Texas, and it really looks like we're seeing

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>an inflection point in American social and political history right now.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you have to say to employees who might

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be upset that they've now moved to Texas and they

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>can't access an abortion. Well, first of all, we decided

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to move our headquarters to Texas a couple of years

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>back during the pandemic because I was in the process

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of building a state of the arts site for our

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Houston based employees, and I think about the ability to

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>attractively can talent. I thought the opportunity to create two

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>very amazing sites. One is the San Jose where a

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of a thought leadership takes place, and one is

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in Houston, Texas, where a lot of the operational and

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>back office takes place. But at the same time, you know,

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about this social challenges, listen and I'm

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>an immigrant. They have been living now in the United

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>States or more than twenty three years. And I'll to

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you, I'm incredible disappointed. This is not you know,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>politics is not about a specific state of the other.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But when we saw what we saw last last week,

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we as a company felt compelled to stand up inside

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>by the women choice, meaning given them the choice what

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is right. And ultimately it was a company who offered

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>amazing benefits where we actually pay for all the travels

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and the medical needs that they have if they decide

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the choice. Have you had any reconsiderations about

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>hps own decision in light of the changes to the

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>social and political landscape. Are you hearing anything from employees

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>who made that choice to move and now you know,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>are we considering No? Not. Remember we're a global company, Emily,

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I do business in a hundred seventy two countries. I

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>have sixty thou team members all over the world. Uh

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and we encouraged because work to feedback and obviously we

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>want to hear their voices. But at the same time

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>we tell them go to the book and vote. Vote

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>what you think is the right thing based on your

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>view of the issues. And we understand that sometimes we

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>run into polarized views. But at the same time, we

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot address every individual issues again because whether it's one

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>thing in the United States. You also realize we also

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>do business in the rest of the world. But what

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we stand up is what is called to our purpose

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and value as you recall our purpose to it once

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the way we all live and work, and we need

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a force for good. And that's myself as

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a leader of this company. I guide myself every single day,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>right sure, you also have employees who want to move

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from California to Texas as well. It works both ways,

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>HP CEO Antonio Neary from your users conference in Las Vegas.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for stopping by. Coming up, we

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to get a feel for institutional intimate about

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto and D five. Falcon X CEO ragu Yar Lagatta

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>coming up with me next. This is Bloomberg time now

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for crypto reported losses deep it with popular de fight

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>tokens like Salana and Avalanche, Avalanche following more than sector

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>bellweather Bitcoin. With all this, where does institutional sentiments stand for?

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>More on that I want to bring in ragu Yar Lagatta,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the crypto trading platform falcon X, which focuses

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on institutional investors. So where is sentiment ragu right now?

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Good to be back Emily in terms of institutional interest

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in the space, in the shockdom and liam in definitely

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>there is fear institutions are being verty cautious and by

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that what I mean is they're not taking directional bets.

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>UH insure are focused on market neutral strategies like basis

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>rate without taking directional better. The second point that institutions

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>are feeling is the idiosyncratic risk that is coming from

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the liquidation cascades that we've seen in the space for

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the last two months. That's definitely affecting crypto, and most

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of it I think is flushed through the system, but

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>again for another two to three weeks, we've got to

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be very careful as a segment. Last, but not the least,

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is the the correlation, the high correlation to risk on assets,

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically high road text stalks. So we think that that

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>correlation is also going to continue for the next few

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>quarters at the very least. But overall, if you look

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>at the long term, we have seen the highest number

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of customers on board, highest activity on the platform, and

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that's to say that's bigger than Falconnect, and that's to

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>say that institutional interest for the mid to long term

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>on crypto and more broadly disclasses keeps continues to be strong. Meantime,

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got micro strategy buying more bitcoin. What do you

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>make of them now, aximalist strategy versus other coins, other

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>options out there. Yeah, So for a large part of

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one and continuing into twenty twenty two as well,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of institutions go beyond just bitcoin

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and ethereum um. Early part of twenty twenty and through

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Later part of twenty twenty definitely was all

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>centered around bitcoin, but most institutions diversified beyond bitcoin into

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>ethereum and some of the elements as well. That said,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the micro sanctuaries, you know, buy a ten million dollars.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's symbolic. It is a very strong signal

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>despite the market conditions, that they're willing to double down

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on that, and that is something that a lot of

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>institutions are watching out because that some institutions consider that

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a systemic risk if micro strategy rethinks that decision.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>So that signal is creating very good sentiment in the market.

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>How is global sentiment evolving? For example, how is it

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>different in the US versus Hong Kong versus let's say, Australia.

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The interesting part is we are actually over the last

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>month or two months, Emily, we're seeing a big divergence

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>between different markets. For example, US is definitely trending towards

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a much more cautious side. Asia not as cautious as US,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>which means they're still exploring, you know, all coins but

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, over the last one month, UM institutions are

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not taking directional bets, and that all the price movements

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that we are seen are largely stemming from the retail

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation. So US is in summary, US

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is tending towards the more conservative side. ASIA slightly more

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>aggressive than the US, but holistically as a space, institutions

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>are being very cautious. Now, you recently raised a hundred

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars in a new round of funding, eight

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar valuation, and as I understand it, this funding

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>game together in just a couple of weeks. How don't

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 1>you make is to pull this off in like you know,

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a very dismal market, the market conditions in twenty two

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a very different emily to your point, yes, this is

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a very recent round, as recent as about two or

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>three weeks back. And again the big hypothesis that US

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and some of the highest quality investors for growth stage

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>are seeing right now when we're seeing data to prove

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this hypothesis. The hypothesis is that Crypto, for the first

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>time objectively proved that you can run full stack financial services,

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's trading, banking, credit clearing, all of these services seven,

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>truly globally and truly elastically. No company, no country so

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>far has objectively proved that that can be possible, and

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto has done this at a trillion dollar scale. Now

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that is what we see in terms of the future

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of finance. To be right, I mean a lot of

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>world's value is going to be tokenized. We are actually

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing the data underneath that. As a result, despite the

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>very tough market conditions, Q one we've remain profitable as

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a company. Q one we onboarded the highest number of

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>customers and Q one we have the highest engagement in

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the platform, and that actually is because of the bigger

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thing at play, which is that this class of transformation.

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>We think equities and fixed income markets in the next

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>five or ten years are going to be organized as well,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and institutions want to play in that organized world. I

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have to ask where you stand in this debate. Are

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you a maximalist? Are you more of an ethereum other

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 1>coin kind of guy? I do see you know block

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>chains to be You know, in some business constructs you

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>can compare them to marketplaces, any marketplaces economies of scale

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and network effects. Bitcoin undoubtedly has the biggest network effects,

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, compared to any other you know, cryptocurrency.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, I don't think bitcoin alone will

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>cater to every single use case that's out there. So definitely,

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think the world is bigger than bitcoin, but

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is five thousand bikens either, So

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a head heavy equation with like

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, five then getting the lead in a meaningfully

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>large way. All right, ragu y'allagatas CEO of falcon X,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you for sharing your position with us. Let's get

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the markets on a largely flat day, investors

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and consumers just waiting to see if prices will come

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>down and a recession will be avoided. For more. Now,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Betterman CEO Sarah Levy, and Sarah, I

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.959
<v Speaker 1>know that many of your customers are affluent millennials who've

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>got you know, a little bit of of of money

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in the bank, some assets to move around. How are

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you advising them at this time? So, you know, it's

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting because philosophically, we have always believed in long term diversification,

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, we we attract a client base

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that believes in that philosophy and sort of stays the course.

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So in general, our advices stay the course, and I

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think in some ways we do our best in this

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of economy, um, in this sort of volatle market,

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>because text mark technology is a huge part of the

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>value proposition that we offer. Betterment was actually founded during

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a downturn. What comparisons do you see between then and now? Well,

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, you know, some would say better to be

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lucky than smart, right, so when when Betterment launched, um,

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we it was a downturn, and so we were able

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to put some quick wins on the board for our customers.

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 1>And I think that really holds true now as well. UM.

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know your last segment was on crypto

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and and we're entering the crypto market, and I think

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they're The similarity I would draw is where we are

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto space right now relative to where we

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>were in the overall market, UM a decade ago when

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we were founded. I know you're working on a crypto

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>product for launch later this year. What's your take on

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the broader crypto volatility? And you know Bitcoin at new lows.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, our view is that crypto continues to be

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an asset class to play for the long term, and

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we think about the asset class as a whole rather

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>than thinking about the individual stories. So is it you know,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin or the rest of the coins kind of coming

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>up behind. So our view is long term diversification works

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in the in traditional finance and similarly works in crypto.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And then from an advisory standpoint, you know, we believe

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this is not an all or nothing idea, but we're

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>going to advise our clients to keep less than five

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of their portfolios in crypto as a diversification play.

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We have reported that f t X is Sam Bankman.

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Freed is interested in buying Robin Hood. What's your take

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>on that? How how does that change the game. Well,

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. You know, I think particularly self directed trading

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of excitement, and I think some combination

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of crypto and options and single stocks. You know, folks

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that they were sort of smarter and more informed

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and that they could play the market in a really

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, self directed way, and I think that often

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>ends badly. You know, in that market, we were preaching

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 1>eat your vegetables, while they were preaching you know, here's

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a piece of cake. And I think now you come

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>out on the other side and eat your vegetables feels

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty good and pretty tried and true. So

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think they're they're doing a variant of

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what we are. They're just doing it and self directed,

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, investing, whereas we're doing it in a sort

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of buy and hold advisory capacity. Is a recession inevitable

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in your view? And if so, when does it happen?

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't like to prognosticate particularly on that.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I think the monetary policy right now, um,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that that the government is putting forth is important to

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>cool inflation, and I think that's really the number one objective.

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And and threadning the needle is really the key. Um,

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether or not that needle is going to

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be thread between employment and inflation and and interest rates,

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>um is really gonnaddict. What happens in the markets. How

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do you thread that needle in portfolio invest for basically

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>either scenario? Right? Well, I think again, you know, trying

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not to overreact. I mean, you know, we've, for example, behaviorally,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>don't nudge customers to make too many moves. And so

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>when we think about the savings rate environment right now

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and that rate going up, one of the things we're

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do is we're gonna put more cash and recommend

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>more cash into people's portfolios. But again, these are going

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of modest changes at the margin because

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on average and over time, right dollar cost averaging philosophically

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, um, you know, taking advantage of the text

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>tools that are available to capture some extra beata there. Um.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So we think there's a lot of good in diversification,

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, while we're seeing this market volatility. All right,

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Sorry leaving CEO of Betterment Sarah, thank you for taking

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the time to join us, Thanks for having me. And

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Or

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to be right back here tomorrow. We've got a number

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of great guests, including CLEO Capital, Sarah Kuntz, and the

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Peak to talk about the travel season ahead

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the fourth of July holiday. Don't we get to

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>check out our new podcast meantime. You can find it

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal, Apple, Spotify, I Heart Radio, and anywhere

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco.

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg