WEBVTT - Big Tech Continues to Push Markets; Bitcoin Weakness Persists

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube Now.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Folks, it's not only the conversation of the day. I

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>think it's sort of the conversation of the week. It's

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>a holiday lengthened work week. It's sort of weird. And

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>then there's after Laurie Kelvicina joins us out of US

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Equity Strategy RBC. She says, to play to when you

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>have to participate, what do markets do after Thanksgiving? We

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 2>used to shut down November fifteenth, we got an M

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and a boom Wall Street's mental What do you foresee

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>to the end of the year in terms of oomph?

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>So question Tom, and I think, as we you know,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 3>we are sitting here this morning, the futures are up

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. We had a good Friday, We had

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 3>a very stream. He did, he did, And look, I

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>mean anecdotally, it sounds like they're a fair number of

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>people who wanted to take some time off this week.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 4>That aren't getting it.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>So I think people are at a minimum, are going

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 3>to be cranky when they get back after December. But

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I think the reality is that there have been a

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of things causing stress in this market, maybe not

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>any single one of them enormous stress, but it all

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of adds up. I think the FED was one

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 3>of those, frankly, because we had seen expectations for cuts

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 3>taken out, and when you've seen that happen in recent years,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, kind of going back to late twenty twenty two,

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>that tends to trip up the stock market, and when

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>we put cuts back in, it tends to help the

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>stock market. So I have no idea what they're going

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>to say. I know that RBC's rate strategist has been

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>in the December skip camp, and then he thinks they

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 3>resume next year. So my guess is the drama is

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>not yet over. But we also know that valuations have

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 3>been a problem since August, and we've seen, you know,

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>f y two valuations sort of bumping up against ceilings.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 3>We're going to cycle into new earnings at some point,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 3>but right now companies don't want to talk a whole

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>lot about twenty twenty six, So I think it's.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Also do you want to talk about until.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so either.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I will say, you know, the consumer companies

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>are coming up. You know, we've got a few more

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>this week. They're kind of trickling in. It was kind

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 3>of hit or missed last week. There were some good ones,

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>there were some not so good ones. You know, it

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 3>does seem like there are certain retailers who are winning

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>with all cohorts of consumers that have more value conscious offerings.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think companies are still managing through pretty well.

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 3>But this feels very unsettled, to be honest, coming back

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>post Thanksgiving.

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 5>So I know you guys at RBC have your twenty

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty six outlook here, what are the themes that you're going

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 5>to be focused on for twenty cox Well, you.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Know, we actually we did sort of an early cut

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>back in September of you know, this is what we're

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>seeing for the second half, you know, kind of a

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 3>second half September type target. We haven't done, you know,

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of here's the big burrimo.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 4>For you know, the one that everyone right at the

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 4>end of.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 3>The year, partially because we had done that early one,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>but we had been saying seventy one hundred for sort

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 3>of a mid to second half twenty twenty six kind

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>of number. And I would say our messaging hasn't changed,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 3>which was that we have thought for quite some time

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>the market was way overdue for kind of a five

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 3>to ten percent garden variety type pullback. We finally crossed

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 3>the five percent threshold on Thursday. That's very good news

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>because I'd rather get this out of the way now

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>than have it overhanging the market early next year. And

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>the way we've put it is, we think stocks can

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 3>do well next year, but we do think we have

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>some stuff to work through to get there. And the

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 3>good news is we finally started working through those things.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 5>But we've got arguably strong earnings environment. Second third quarter

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 5>earnings were very good. We've got presumably a FED that's

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 5>in a easing mode. Are those two things in and

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 5>of themselves enough to move the market hired?

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is the interesting sort of part of the

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>FED conversation from an equity market perspective, right, which is.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, two or three more cuts, right.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's good and that's helpful, but it's not

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 3>like we're at the beginning of something big and long lasting.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>If you look at most forecasts around the street, right,

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of a modest adjustment cutting, you know,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 3>type cycle that most folks are talking about. I do

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>think earning's growth is extremely important. I think that's what's

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>been powering markets.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Can you model it out first Q one twenty twenty six.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 4>In the first quarter?

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I think that, you know, we I think January is

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be sort of a pivotal time, to be honest, Tom,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 3>when companies really kind of unveil the twenty twenty six

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>out looks. And we keep seeing that in commentary, right,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Analysts who dare to ask the question are getting brushed back,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and companies are saying we'll get back to you in

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 3>January or February. I don't think anyone's really going to care,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 3>honestly about four Q results by the time January February

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 3>rolls around.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Interesting at Lori Kelvicina, we continue with the RBC at

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Capital Markets. I went and nerd early in the show.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do it again with the lawyer Paul.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Can we go back to memory John Maloney Tacoma, remember

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 2>telling to Coo, Okay, there was an invention, believe it

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>or not, in the sixth exists didn't exist. Enterprise value

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>to EBITDA. I'm this weekend, I saw essays, essays, essays

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of this ratio of debt cash stock is compared to

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the income statement somewhere any income statement plus depreciation amortization.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a conviction that, in the cacophity we're

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>living now, you can use a modern ratio like EV

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to EBITDA.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 4>So you know, it's funny Tom.

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>A number of years back, I actually surveyed all of

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 3>my analysts about what valuation metrics they thought were appropriate

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 3>for their industries, and I made them give me two.

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 3>And I did find that a lot of the tech

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>related analysts gave me.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 4>EV related metrics.

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 3>That was really where it tended to be limited, to

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 3>be honest, And then the thing that everybody sort of

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>agreed on it may not have been their first indicator.

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>In fact, it usually wasn't their first indicator, but forward pe.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So I tend to still be a forward pe person

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 3>because I think, you know, when you're comparing industries, you're

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 3>comparing sectors, you're comparing size segments, you need something that's

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 3>more universally applicable.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's stay with the earnings theme. Here, are

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 5>the earnings strong enough to support this market and to

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 5>drive it higher?

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you think so?

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's healthy earnings growth embedded in the consensus

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 3>expectations for next year when we've modeled it out. We

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>haven't gotten quite as constructive on as consensus, but we've

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 3>still gott you know, some healthy numbers. I think around

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>like ten percent or so. The reality, though, is that

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>earning sentiment matters just as much as the earnings themselves.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>And the rate of upward revisions for the broader market

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>peaked in August.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 4>We don't have post and video.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, sort of results yet for that particular indicator

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 3>that we look at the rate of upward revisions. So

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>what I need to see in coming weeks is as

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 3>analysts go back and do like all their little modeling,

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, and update all their numbers, do we surpass

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 3>or return to that August peak? And we just don't

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>know the answer to the question yet. But I think

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 3>one thing markets are struggling with is the idea that

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>earning sentiment it's okay, it's just not as good as

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 3>it was.

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Interesting LORI, we don't care. What we care about is

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>how do you do mashed potatoes Thanksgiving?

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna be honest with you, Tom. I don't cook.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I hate I burn everything. I just we we with

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 3>our Thanksgiving. We go to my in laws and we're

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>responsible for old wine, pies and bread.

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 4>So and we buy some very nice pies.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Why do you make old wine? You like? Cook Wednesday night?

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna be on I don't do this either. I

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>run after the children and let my husband do it.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, honest right in front. It's actually a lot like

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 2>laurd Kelvinsy have a wonderful holiday. Thank you for that

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>brief and particularly the CFA worthiness a e v uh.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Apple,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Joining us out Smart and Spain on a Planet. Michael

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>McLoone Bloomberg Intelligence senior, Come out of the Analyst. Tom

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>stopped making fun of bitcoin at thirty thousand. Boom up

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it went gold, Boom up it went what are you

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>focused on A wise one this morning?

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, I like, I want to tilt over to your

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 6>term before Tom of bitdog, I think is becoming bit doog.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 7>The world's changed for cryptocurrencies.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 6>We had this massive pump on the having and the

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.239
<v Speaker 6>ETF pilot and the Trump administration jumping on board and

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 6>very well entrenched into space now and it's peaked. It's

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 6>a classic I think peak bull market peaks on euphoria.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 6>The thing is now it's dragging everything lower with it.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 6>So as of Friday, the Bloomberg Galaxy Crypto index was

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 6>down twenty one percent. On the air was up almost

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 6>a third. Bitcoin is right now down about ten percent year.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 6>The key things where's it go next? The key thing

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 6>I look at is at the same time cryptos are

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 6>going lower, stock market volatile is just buried.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 6>We know the VIX is up, but one hundred and

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 6>twenty day volatile he's still around eleven percent.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 7>That's a very low level. So I think the whole

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 7>space has.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 6>Got more more de risking to go into the end

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 6>of the year, which is probably the primary risk is

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 6>there for bitcoin?

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Does technical analysis work Mike? And if so, was there

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 5>a support number like I don't know. I just kind

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 5>of thought support was one hundred thousand, and we blue

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 5>past that exactly.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 6>That was the key level, certainly psychological, now, Paul, it

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 6>has to work. It doesn't know, so it has to work,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 6>but it has to matter because, as time always points out,

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 6>there's no underlying there's no basis. Like I trade crude

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 6>all futures, I know I'm trading those against crudel, I'll

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 6>trade treasury bond futures.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 7>I know I'm trading those against treasury bonds.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 6>In bitcoin, at cryptos, there's no basis except for crypto dollars.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 6>So the key level now, I think it's around eighty four.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 6>It's been holding eighty four. It's a decent support level.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 6>The key resistance is around ninety four. That'd be unchanged

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 6>on the year and my bias. It's more a greater

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 6>risk of breaking through eighty four and get towards fifty

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 6>than going higher.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 7>And the key thing about.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 6>Fifty is is I love how crypto people say look

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 6>at the chart, but if you look like an annual

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 6>chart going back to twenty twenty twenty one, fifty has

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 6>been a key level for many years.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 7>Wow, fifty all right?

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Gold Gold seems to be holding at that four thousand

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 5>level here pretty solidly.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Mike, is that a good support here?

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 7>It's becoming a part of it.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 6>Gold's been and stare step rally step up to three thousand, hangout,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 6>step out the four thousand hangout.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 7>The problem is now.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 6>It's so extended versus a sixty month moving average. Tom

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 6>would like this. It's about a three standard deviation move.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 6>You have to go back to nineteen eighties. And the

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 6>key thing that's happening about Gold, it's well exactly, it's

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 6>never rallied that this type of velocity with stock market

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and twenty day volatily this low, that's just

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 6>never happened. That's what I'm concerned that that volatili might

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 6>pick up into the year end.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Mike, we don't care. Coral Gables, Florida is the real

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>estate market cracked? I mean, real estate never goes down

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>in Coral Gables, right Well, I'm hearing it everywhere.

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 6>Paul is certainly here recently reduced most buyers, most transactions

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 6>now are reduced prices. And that's what I get from

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 6>my colleague on the journals team, which I sit right next.

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 6>I'm hearing it everywhere. Same with farm land in the Midwest,

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 6>which I'm very close to. Recent reduced prices are all

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 6>trying to dropping. They're just not buying lifting offers anymore.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>One point six million Navari Avenue cozy, two thousand square feet.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a cross the seahouse. It's cozy three three one

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 2>three four, all right. I mean, you know they're.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Living in some high rise Miami thing with all the high.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Then you got to play Miami Vice music exactly.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 5>He's not doing the bungalow thing.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I okay, you know, I may I may have to

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>do a road trip down there.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, span the Michael take care of us.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Michael, put me on the Harley and off we go.

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Michael mcgloone, thank you so much. I'm a wonderful beginning

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to the holiday season. McLoone, smarter than the average bar.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 5>And all the people warming down to South Florida, all

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 5>the snow bunnies and some Mike can't get a reservation

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 5>in his restaurants anymore.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>We're talking to New York City people, and New Wave

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>going down.

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 5>Made all the people coming down for the most time,

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, can't get a parking spot anymore.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>She has been more than patient. Rayan Mittrion is a

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Callen Family Office schedule to be with us a few

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>days ago, and there was this breaking news of that

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 2>breaking news, and we had to say see her right now.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>We celebrate Ryan Mettrion with us. Do you have a

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 2>clear vision Ryan, for Callen Family Office into next year?

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 8>We're relatively optimistic. There's a lot to feel good about.

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, earnings have been incredibly strong, you know, we're

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 8>just wrapping up the fourth Street quarter of double digit earnings.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Growth.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 8>Spending has been strong, especially obviously as related to AI,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 8>and that has been providing a huge tailwind to stocks.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 8>And we have a generally dubbish bed. So all of

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 8>that helps us to think that we should still continue

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 8>to see some upside possibility for equities going into next year.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 2>How does tech lead tech?

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean, tech has been incredibly strong right over the

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 8>last couple of years, and we've seen this since the

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 8>April lows and now we're getting a little bit of volatility,

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 8>which is healthy, but there continues to be a lot

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 8>of strength in that sector. I mean, we see these

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 8>hyperscalers that are spending these incredible amounts of CAPEX to

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 8>build out their AI infrastructure. That's going to have a

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 8>huge demand, and really that's such a big part of

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 8>the market that as long as those companies continue to

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 8>do well and we see that demand held up, it

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 8>should continue to help the tech side, don't you?

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Said Lori Keviscino was the interview of the day. I'm sorry,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Ryan's killing it, Paul. I know because this is a

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>tone I hear from people her in the trenches. Her

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>belief and conviction in the market is a lot of

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>what I hear of people.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, she's a graduate of Vanderbilt, so she's riding high

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 5>a long with Damian Sassar and the football team at Vanderbilt.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 5>But technology ran I'm just looking at your notes, and

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 5>you laid out so clearly. In Vidia's eight percent of

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 5>the S and P five hundred and megacap Tech is

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 5>almost forty percent of the index. So if you're constructive

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 5>on the market, you got to be constructive on tech.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Is that kind of where you guys, are you really do?

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, because if those companies are struggling, the broader

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 8>market is going to struggle. Now that being said, we

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 8>do want to have diversify exposure and we want to have,

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, investments in other areas as well, because these

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 8>can can move the market so quickly, as we've certainly seen.

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 8>But you have to have the exposure or you've been

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 8>missing out.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 5>How else do we think about these equity marketchare ran

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 5>outside of technology? Are there sectors that screenwall for you?

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 5>Are there factors that screenwall for you?

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we want to have we want to.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 8>Have exposure exposure broadly. We've certainly seen tech do well.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 8>We've certainly seen utilities and industrials do well in their

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 8>ties to all this data center spending. We want to

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 8>have exposure to financials is another area. But I mean

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 8>we want to we want to have exposure on the

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 8>value side of things. We want to have small cap exposure,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 8>and we want to have international exposure. I mean international

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 8>has really outperformed us so far this year, mostly due

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 8>to a weeker dollar, but we do want to have

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 8>exposure in all those areas.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh Riyan mitre On with Ush's partnered Hell and Family Office,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious into the you know, with all the success

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>of this bull market at a family and office, do

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you have a pressure to over diversify or is it

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>under diversification. We're the more focus, more bet on a

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>given idea. You know, it really depends.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>We have the ability because we're working with ultra high

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 8>net worth investors that really have a multi generational focus,

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 8>so we can be more aggressive, we can take some

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 8>of those bets because these clients don't necessarily need those

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 8>funds near term because of the level of wealth that

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 8>they have. But we do tend to diversify, and we

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 8>have the ability to get into parts of the market

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 8>that some traditional investors may not be able to get into.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 8>When you're looking at private markets and hedge funds and

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 8>different types of things that allow us to complement our

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 8>traditional portfolios. So that's been, you know, something that we

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 8>can do, but it's I wouldn't say that there's pressure,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 8>but there's certainly a lot of opportunity, and we do

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 8>believe in diversification.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul, chastise me because I haven't brought this

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 2>up today. If you brought in, if you bought in

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>rather to public or private credit, I mean alternative investments

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 2>or do you guys stay a mile wide of that.

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 8>No, we certainly have exposure there. I mean, we do

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 8>have traditional bond allocations. A lot of our investors are

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 8>in high tax brackets, so a lot of it's in

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 8>UNI bonds and UNI high yield, but we do we

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 8>do invest in private credit, and there is a lot

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 8>of hype around there, and you want to make sure

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 8>if you're investing, that you're investing with the right firm

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 8>in the right places because there could be some problems

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 8>going forward in that area. As with any investment, you

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 8>just want to make sure that you're with a high

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 8>quality firm and that because there can be such a

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 8>divergence in returns between the top and bottom quartile funds

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 8>in that type of space.

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 5>Ran your family office clients, what is their appetite for

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 5>alternative investments?

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 8>It varies, right, every investor is different, but our typical

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 8>allocation would include between twenty and twenty five percent in alternatives,

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 8>and that can be a small amount in hedge funds,

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 8>some credit oriented strategies or diversified multistrat funds that give

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 8>us different types of exposures that we can get in

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 8>the traditional markets, and then rounding that out with private equity,

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 8>private credit, private real estate.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 7>Things like that.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean, historically you can get a three to five

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 8>percent premium over traditional equity returns in private equity, and

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 8>we have seen that it's additive to returns over time.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to Vanderbilt, Tennessee?

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, right, I wish I was.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 8>If ever there was a year, this is the year, right.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 7>You have to enjoy it well lasts.

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 8>So it's been a fun season, that's for sure.

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Ran, thank you so much. Don't be a stranger. You

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 2>love to have you back, ryand Mitreon with this Callum

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Family Office, stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming

0:18:55.520 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Coarplay and Android

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty a short visit.

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Right now with enterag Rana, which should be a long visit.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>He is definitive on cloud, definitive on what these companies

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>are doing, and a RAG Over the weekend, the consensus

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>view was Google Gemini three was a home run over

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the Fenway Wall, over the Turnpike, over the cask and

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Flagon helping a home run for Google was Gemini three. Now,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a big deal.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you could see the stock of the acting

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 9>today and one of the things we talk about in

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 9>our notes today is that Apple is actually going to

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 9>use one of their models for CD upcoming release. I

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 9>think that's a very good deal for Apple. They don't

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 9>even have to pay as much. I mean they're going

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 9>to pay probably around a billion dollars a year for it.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 9>And you know that's so it is very clear now

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 9>that it's not going to be Open AI taking everything.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 9>It is going to be spread across multiple models, and

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 9>I think that's I think the big takeaway for all

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 9>of us is this the.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Apple AI play.

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Then Ana raghas is to partner up with existing players

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 5>and say that's it, that's our play.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Paul, we just say, you know.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 9>One of the notes that we published today basically shows

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 9>that Apple's capital expenditures as a percentage of sale is

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 9>merely at three percent, compared to Microsoft at forty percent.

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 9>And what Apple is saying is, you guys, fight it

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 9>out and tell me who has the best model. I'm

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 9>going to just use it in the end and I'll

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 9>pay you, you know, if you're lucky.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 5>All right, So what's the next data point you're looking

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 5>for on this AI play? We had the really good

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 5>numbers out of in Vidia. What's the next when you

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 5>talk to your institutional investor clients, what's the next kind

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 5>of data point milepost for you guys.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 9>I think one of the things we have to do

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 9>is look at the application of AI models across all verticals,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 9>different sectors.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>What are they doing.

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 9>What is the final game for banks, for hospitals, Because

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 9>everybody understands the AI infrastructure play and what's happening over there,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 9>but what is the use case? And that's where I

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 9>think the digestion is going to take some time, whether

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 9>it's all of twenty six or maybe twenty six and

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 9>twenty seven.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 2>So what are you watching for into the end of

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the year, into the first weeks of January and are

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 2>within this AI like, where is the revenue going to

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>come from? Is that a study you're having with your team.

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so the revenue is going to come from enterprise

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 9>applications so big you could say Fortune two thousand companies,

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 9>when they're going to take their applications their core business

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 9>and add more AI capabilities within that. That's you know,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 9>But the thing is, unlike just going out and getting

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 9>a consumer app there is usually going to be a

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 9>a long tail or a while when enterprises add that

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 9>particular capability. Now, I think throughout the year we're going

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 9>to see moderate pickup in those applications. The big question

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 9>right now is what happens to the air infrastructure build

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 9>And one of the things we have been talking about is,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, when it comes to the hyperskale cloud provider,

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 9>whether that's Amazon, Microsoft, or Google, we're really not that

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 9>concerned about them overbuilding. But because even if let's say

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 9>they overbuild and they don't have to do anything for

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 9>the next one or two years, their core business will

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 9>take care of that build of infrastructure. That's not true

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 9>for somebody like an OpenAI me.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 2>No longer visit in RUG around, Thank you so much

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg Intelligence just world class technology analysis.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal