WEBVTT - What Was the First Killer Robot?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works, Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Bogelbaum here. The date is January nine nine. Robert Williams,

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a year old factory worker in a Ford Motor Company

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>casting plant in Flat Rock, Michigan, is asked to scale

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a massive shelving unit to manually count the parts there.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The five story machine used to retrieve the castings is

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>giving false readings, and it's William's task to go up

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and find out how many there actually are. While Williams

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is up there doing the job, a robot arm, also

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>tasked with parts retrieval, goes about its work. In doing so,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>their paths accidentally cross, and the robotic arm catches the

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>young man, striking him in the head and killing him instantly,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And thus, on this wintry day, Williams becomes the first

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>human in history to be killed by a robot. The death,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, was completely unintentional. There simply weren't safeguards in

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>place to protect Williams. No alarms notified him of the

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>approaching arm, and there was no technology in place to

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>alter the robot's behavior in the presence of a human person.

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>As of nineteen seventy nine, the artificial intelligence involved wasn't

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated enough to do anything to prevent such a death.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Jury agreed that not enough care had been put into

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the design of the robot. William's family wanted ten million

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar lawsuit for his wrongful death from the Unit Handling Systems,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a division of Litton Industries, the manufacturer that designed the robot.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>In the ensuing years, roboticists, computer scientists, and artificial intelligence

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>experts have continued to struggle with the issue of how

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 1>robots can safely interact with humans without causing them harm.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Decades later, reports of human deaths caused by robots or

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligences feel more commonplace. Uber and Tesla have made

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the news with reports of their partially autonomous cars getting

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>into accidents and killing passengers or striking pedestrians. Though many

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>safeguards now are in place, the problem still hasn't been solved. However,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>none of these deaths are caused by the will of

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the robot. These programmed machines don't to have a will,

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>just a set of operating conditions. But there's a worry

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>fanned by the flames of science fiction stories like The

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Terminator or the Matrix, that artificial intelligences could develop a

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>will of their own, and in that development, the desire

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to harm a human. We spoke with Shaman Whitson, Associate

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of Oxford and chief scientist and co founder of Morphy's Labs.

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>He calls this concern the anthropomorphic fallacy. This, he said,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is the assumption that a system with human like intelligence

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>must also have humanlike desires e g. To survive, be free,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have dignity, et cetera. There's absolutely no reason why this

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>would be the case, as such a system will only

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have whatever desires we give it. Value misalignment, he argues,

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>is the greater existential threat, where a gap exists between

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what a programmer tells a machine to do and what

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the programmer really meant to happen. Whitson explained, how do

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you communicate your values to an intelligent system such that

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the actions it takes fulfill your true intentions. The discrepancy

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>between the two becomes more consequential as the computer becomes

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>more intelligent and autonomous. Whiteston tells us that the even

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>greater threat, however, is scientists purposefully designing robots that can

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>kill human targets without human intervention for military purposes. The

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Guardian reports that three d and eighty one partly autonomous

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>weapon and military robotics systems have been deployed or are

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>under development in a dozen countries, including China, France, Israel,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the UK and the US. In AI and robotics researchers

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world published an open letter calling for a

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>worldwide ban on such technology, and it's currently endorsed by

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>almost four thousand researchers in the field and over twenty

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand other concerned humans, including folks like Stephen Hawking

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and Noam Chomsky, and the United Nations is meeting again

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in to discuss if and how to regulate so called

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>killer robots. Today's episode was written by Brian Young and

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>produced by Tyler Klang. For more in this and lots

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of other all two human topics, visit our home planet,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>TAW staff works dot com.