1 00:00:01,480 --> 00:00:06,440 Speaker 1: The volume td Tuddy taking it to the house in 2 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:09,559 Speaker 1: for six. Whatever you call a touchdown, one thing's for sure, 3 00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:13,560 Speaker 1: touchdowns matter more at Draft Kings Sportsbook, an official sportsbook 4 00:00:13,600 --> 00:00:16,400 Speaker 1: partner of the NFL. On the ground, in the air, 5 00:00:16,840 --> 00:00:19,600 Speaker 1: from the special teams or defense, we don't care how 6 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: they score them. We want to bet on touchdowns, and 7 00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:25,400 Speaker 1: Draft Kings Sportsbook is delivering. Ready to place your first bet. 8 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 1: Try betting on something simple like picking a player to 9 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:31,840 Speaker 1: score a touchdown or how many tds will be in 10 00:00:31,960 --> 00:00:35,000 Speaker 1: a game. Go to DraftKings Sportsbook app and make your pick. 11 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 1: The game I have in my eye on this week 12 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,800 Speaker 1: is Ravens Cowboys. I think both teams need that game badly. 13 00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,519 Speaker 1: I'm a Cowboys fan. To very predictable start to the 14 00:00:43,560 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 1: season for the Cowboys, but I'm really really excited for 15 00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,360 Speaker 1: this weekend. Ready to do a touchdown dance of your own. 16 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:52,680 Speaker 1: New DraftKings customers bet five dollars to get two hundred 17 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:56,920 Speaker 1: dollars in bonus bets. Instantly score big with Draft Kings Sportsbook, 18 00:00:56,920 --> 00:01:00,560 Speaker 1: the number one place to bet touchdowns. Download the DraftKings 19 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:04,920 Speaker 1: Sportsbook app and use code hoops. That's h oops, that's 20 00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:07,680 Speaker 1: code Hoops for new customers to get two hundred dollars 21 00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:10,480 Speaker 1: in bonus bets when you bet just five bucks only 22 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:14,360 Speaker 1: on DraftKings. The crown is yours. Gambling problem called one 23 00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:17,280 Speaker 1: eight hundred gambler In New York call eight seven seven 24 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 1: eight hope en why, or text hope n why to 25 00:01:21,160 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help is 26 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight seven eight 27 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. 28 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 1: Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort 29 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:39,039 Speaker 1: in Kansas twenty one plus. Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction. 30 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:42,959 Speaker 1: Void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty 31 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:47,200 Speaker 1: eight hours after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, 32 00:01:47,480 --> 00:02:04,360 Speaker 1: see DKNNG dot co slash ft ball. All right, welcome 33 00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:06,480 Speaker 1: to Hoops tonight. You're at the volume. Happy Friday, everybody. 34 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 1: I hope all of you guys had a great week. 35 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:10,079 Speaker 1: Got a jam packed show for you today. Got a 36 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: little bit of NBA news today. Joel Embiid has signed 37 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:17,720 Speaker 1: a three year, one hundred and ninety three million dollars 38 00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:21,640 Speaker 1: maximum extension, so he's now locked up for the next 39 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 1: five years at an average annual salary of sixty million dollars. 40 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: So we're gonna talk about that a little bit off 41 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:29,079 Speaker 1: the top. And then we're continuing with our power rankings 42 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:32,959 Speaker 1: today with number fourteen through number twelve season preview style, 43 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 1: so we'll be doing season previews on the New Orleans Pelicans, 44 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:40,360 Speaker 1: the Golden State Warriors, and the Indiana Pacers. You guys 45 00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:42,120 Speaker 1: have the drope before we get started. Subscribe to the 46 00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 1: Hoops Tonight YouTube channel so you don't miss any more 47 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:47,120 Speaker 1: of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at underscore Jason Lts. 48 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:49,359 Speaker 1: You guys, don't miss show announcements. Don't forget about a 49 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:52,400 Speaker 1: podcast feed wherever you get your podcasts under Hoops Tonight. 50 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 1: Don't forget it's also helpful if you leave a rating 51 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:56,359 Speaker 1: and a review on that front. And then, last but 52 00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:58,560 Speaker 1: not least, keep dropping mail bag questions in the YouTube 53 00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:01,800 Speaker 1: comments so we can keep hitting them throughout the remainder 54 00:03:01,919 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 1: of this year. All right, let's talk some basketball. So 55 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 1: the Joel Embiid extension three years, one hundred and ninety 56 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,280 Speaker 1: three million, locked up for five years at an average 57 00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:13,480 Speaker 1: annual salary of sixty million, and there's a couple of 58 00:03:13,480 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 1: different angles to look at this from. I understand why 59 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 1: Daryl Morey and the Sixers did this. The Sixers have 60 00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 1: been a disappointing team, right. They haven't achieved as much 61 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:27,960 Speaker 1: as certainly people in Philly have hoped for over the 62 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:31,320 Speaker 1: course of this last few years. Right. And it got 63 00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:34,160 Speaker 1: a little weird last year, right, Like we had Joel 64 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:37,640 Speaker 1: Embiid showing up with Paul George to a playoff broadcast 65 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:41,839 Speaker 1: before that deal was done, which is like a legitimate, 66 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:44,640 Speaker 1: like kind of passive aggressive type of pressure move to 67 00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 1: be like we need more firepower. Right, And it's been 68 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 1: a weird saga over the course of the Embiid experience, right, 69 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:52,800 Speaker 1: Like we had to hold Ben Simmons thing and how 70 00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:55,880 Speaker 1: that went south. Obviously, Joel Embiid was very fond of 71 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,480 Speaker 1: Jimmy Butler and wanted him, and then he ended up 72 00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:04,040 Speaker 1: getting a Tobias Harris ended up getting preferred over Jimmy 73 00:04:04,080 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 1: Butler over the course of that summer, which ended up 74 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 1: being something that Joel Embiid did some passive aggressive stuff 75 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:13,880 Speaker 1: kind of surrounding that move. Right. So you're basically it 76 00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:17,760 Speaker 1: seems as though you're one trade and record like one 77 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:22,839 Speaker 1: bad season away from potentially a trade demand. Right. So 78 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:25,839 Speaker 1: locking up Joel Embiid helps that in two ways. One, 79 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 1: it's a gesture of good faith. Right, You're offering an 80 00:04:29,320 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 1: enormous amount of money to Joel Embiid after the specific 81 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:37,800 Speaker 1: season where most of your concerns about Embiid's floor came 82 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:41,240 Speaker 1: to the surface, right between him not even playing half 83 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 1: the season and not being able to get his team 84 00:04:44,160 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 1: out of the first round and looking like he was 85 00:04:46,200 --> 00:04:48,800 Speaker 1: wearing down at the end of those Knicks games. Right, 86 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:52,279 Speaker 1: So it's an act of good faith after a season 87 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,840 Speaker 1: like that to offer him such a massive guarantee that 88 00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 1: builds cachet in that relationship. Right. And then the second 89 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:03,160 Speaker 1: piece of it is it makes his contract borderline untradeable 90 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:05,720 Speaker 1: in the sense that even where if Embiid were to 91 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,800 Speaker 1: request a trade it would be difficult to find willing 92 00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:12,800 Speaker 1: trade partners at that point, which almost kind of further 93 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 1: anchors Joel Embiid in Philly. Right. But I also understand 94 00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:21,480 Speaker 1: the NBA fan base at large and how they would 95 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 1: look at this and be like, what the hell are 96 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:27,719 Speaker 1: you guys doing, Because now you have, on average for 97 00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:31,159 Speaker 1: the next four years, over one hundred and ten million 98 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:36,040 Speaker 1: dollars guaranteed tied up in Paul George and Joel Embiid, 99 00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:39,280 Speaker 1: two players who are notoriously hurt all the time. I 100 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: pulled this thatt this morning. In the last five years 101 00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:45,960 Speaker 1: combined for those two guys, so ten total seasons, they've 102 00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:49,640 Speaker 1: reached sixty games three times. Between the two of them 103 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:53,880 Speaker 1: combined over the last five years. They're notoriously unavailable, and 104 00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:57,719 Speaker 1: with exception of little short bursts, both of them notoriously 105 00:05:58,120 --> 00:06:01,200 Speaker 1: seem to go down a signific level in terms of 106 00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 1: their winning impact when they get to the postseason. Right. So, like, 107 00:06:05,839 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 1: I think that's fair criticism, and I understand how people 108 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:11,360 Speaker 1: from the outside looking in would say that. But this 109 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 1: is where we have to be honest about the reality 110 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:17,280 Speaker 1: of this situation. The Sixers are in the Joe l. 111 00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:21,440 Speaker 1: Embiid business. There's really no version of that business that 112 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:26,160 Speaker 1: doesn't carry an enormous amount of risk. There's just as 113 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:28,800 Speaker 1: much risk in not extending him, because then what if 114 00:06:28,839 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 1: he does end up requesting a trade, what if he 115 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 1: does end up testing free agency. There's risk there as 116 00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:39,120 Speaker 1: as well as well, even if you were to offer 117 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:42,760 Speaker 1: him a lower extension like hey, like, hey, we want 118 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:45,039 Speaker 1: to lock you up for five years, but you know 119 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:46,920 Speaker 1: we're not going to come in at that super max number. 120 00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:49,240 Speaker 1: Let's see if we can come in somewhere lower. That 121 00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:51,240 Speaker 1: could just insult the guy. And now you're in the 122 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:56,039 Speaker 1: same boat. Right. There was risk in not going after 123 00:06:56,080 --> 00:06:59,080 Speaker 1: Paul George this summer. It's very possible that if you 124 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:01,720 Speaker 1: do nothing this summer, you end up in the same 125 00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 1: type of situation where Joel Embiid is unhappy and potentially 126 00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:08,600 Speaker 1: requests to trade. I'm sure if you injected truth serum 127 00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:12,640 Speaker 1: into Daryl Moury and asked him, like, would you prefer 128 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:17,160 Speaker 1: to build around a star who always plays seventy five 129 00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:21,720 Speaker 1: games and consistently goes up a level in the postseason, 130 00:07:22,360 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 1: I'm sure he would. But that's not the deck of 131 00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:29,440 Speaker 1: cards that Darryl Moury has been dealt. He took over 132 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:31,800 Speaker 1: as general manager of a team that is built around 133 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:36,320 Speaker 1: Joel Embiid. When you're building around Joel Embiid, there is 134 00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 1: inherent risk there. And as soon as you go out 135 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 1: of the Joel Embiid business. Let's say you traded him 136 00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 1: this summer before you extended him when he's more tradable, 137 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 1: then you immediately lose all relevance. I like Tyre's Maxy, 138 00:07:52,880 --> 00:07:56,360 Speaker 1: good young player, but you're not getting Paul George without 139 00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:59,880 Speaker 1: Joel Embiid. And without Paul George or Joel Embiid, you're 140 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:04,720 Speaker 1: a basement of the Eastern Conference type of team. So like, 141 00:08:05,240 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 1: I get it, how from the outside looking in, we 142 00:08:07,600 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 1: might look at it and go man one hundred and 143 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:13,040 Speaker 1: ten million guaranteed for the next four years on average 144 00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 1: annually tied up in two players that routinely miss like 145 00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:19,880 Speaker 1: at least a third of the season and both struggle 146 00:08:19,880 --> 00:08:21,920 Speaker 1: in the playoffs. I get why from the outside looking 147 00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:25,520 Speaker 1: in that looks tricky, But if I was GM of 148 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:28,680 Speaker 1: the seventy six ers, I think I'd probably do the 149 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:33,120 Speaker 1: same thing, because as soon as you've decided we're building 150 00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 1: around Joel Embiid. This is kind of the reality of 151 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:40,199 Speaker 1: how this works. So to put it simply, Darryl Moury 152 00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:43,240 Speaker 1: has made an extremely risky series of moves this summer, 153 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:46,679 Speaker 1: but his franchise is built around the riskiest star in 154 00:08:46,720 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 1: the league. So it's kind of just the reality of 155 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:53,040 Speaker 1: the way you have to do business when you're building 156 00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 1: around Joel. And there's another side to this, coin that 157 00:08:56,679 --> 00:08:59,760 Speaker 1: you have to factor in when you're having this conversation. 158 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:04,560 Speaker 1: As of right now on DraftKings, the Sixers have the 159 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 1: third best odds to win the title. Now I don't 160 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:12,199 Speaker 1: have them quite that high, but I have them very high, 161 00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:15,600 Speaker 1: and I have consistently said that Joel Embiid is one 162 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:19,440 Speaker 1: of the small handful of players in the NBA who 163 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,800 Speaker 1: is capable of legitimately going on a wrecking ball tour 164 00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:27,439 Speaker 1: and just kicking everybody's ass and getting the trophy. Most 165 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:31,800 Speaker 1: gms aren't building around stars that have that type of upside, 166 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:37,480 Speaker 1: So maybe those gms can be more risk averse, but 167 00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:42,840 Speaker 1: they're not winning the trophy anytime soon, right and beat 168 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:46,720 Speaker 1: is thirty years old. He has this short window here, 169 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 1: probably in that thirty to thirty three age where maybe 170 00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:54,840 Speaker 1: if everything goes right, you can win the title. After 171 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,840 Speaker 1: that you're fucked anyway. He's been hurt way too many times, 172 00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:01,600 Speaker 1: the wear and tear in every on his body. He's 173 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:03,160 Speaker 1: not the kind of guy that's gonna be good at 174 00:10:03,160 --> 00:10:06,480 Speaker 1: thirty seven, thirty eight years old, So you like you're 175 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:10,600 Speaker 1: there is no long term window here anyway. This is 176 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:13,640 Speaker 1: very much a short get it while you can type 177 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 1: of window, so you might as well put all the 178 00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:19,440 Speaker 1: support you possibly can behind him and see if you 179 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,439 Speaker 1: can get it done. The last example I would use 180 00:10:23,480 --> 00:10:27,559 Speaker 1: for this is remember the Kauhi trade to Toronto, and again, 181 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:32,120 Speaker 1: like it's not exactly the same type of comparison, but 182 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:36,320 Speaker 1: it has some similarities in the sense that everyone around 183 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:38,679 Speaker 1: the league knew Kauhi wanted to go to Los Angeles. 184 00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:42,960 Speaker 1: Everyone around the league knew if you traded for Kawhi 185 00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 1: that year and you weren't one of the LA teams, 186 00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:49,120 Speaker 1: that it was a one year rental. There was like 187 00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:51,640 Speaker 1: that tiny little crack of hope like maybe if you 188 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:56,080 Speaker 1: just wow him he might stay. But you can't do 189 00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:58,320 Speaker 1: any better than Toronto did that summer anyway, and he 190 00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:07,120 Speaker 1: still left. But here's the thing, Toronto made the trade. 191 00:11:07,520 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 1: Kawhi did leave, and Toronto's been bad ever since, but 192 00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 1: they have the Larry O'Brian Trophy and that shit is forever. 193 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:19,960 Speaker 1: So like, if I'm Daryl Moray, you know how we 194 00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:22,240 Speaker 1: all know how Daryl Mourray does business too. He's got 195 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:25,200 Speaker 1: his algorithm where he basically calculates a percentage chance that 196 00:11:25,240 --> 00:11:26,960 Speaker 1: he thinks his team has to win the title and 197 00:11:27,040 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 1: most of his decision making his geared towards trying to 198 00:11:29,240 --> 00:11:34,640 Speaker 1: increase that percentage. There's a lot of potential bad outcomes 199 00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 1: for the Sixers this year. We all know that maybe 200 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 1: Paul George plays fifty games and NB plays forty five 201 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:43,920 Speaker 1: games and they end up in the fifth or sixth 202 00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: seed and they lose a first round series. Maybe that's 203 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:50,400 Speaker 1: what happens, but there's also like a legitimate pathway here 204 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:54,080 Speaker 1: that ends in them holding the trophy. They're a lot 205 00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:56,840 Speaker 1: closer to the trophy than most of the teams in 206 00:11:56,840 --> 00:12:02,440 Speaker 1: the league, So once we acknowledge that they're in the 207 00:12:02,679 --> 00:12:06,400 Speaker 1: high risk, high reward business, I think these moves make 208 00:12:06,400 --> 00:12:10,080 Speaker 1: a lot of sense. You needed to substantially improve and 209 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:13,319 Speaker 1: beat supporting cast this summer. Going after Paul George was 210 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,800 Speaker 1: the only real way to do that. You need to 211 00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:21,600 Speaker 1: cement Joel Embiid in Philly to make it so that 212 00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:23,840 Speaker 1: you have multiple years to try to make this work. 213 00:12:24,160 --> 00:12:27,440 Speaker 1: Extending him was the best chance to do that. And 214 00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:28,960 Speaker 1: if I was gm of the six Ers, I would 215 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:34,200 Speaker 1: have done the same thing. So I think like it's 216 00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:36,920 Speaker 1: easy to look at other situations around the league and 217 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:40,400 Speaker 1: to be like that situation's better, that situation's better, and 218 00:12:40,440 --> 00:12:43,160 Speaker 1: you might be right, But Daryl Morey doesn't have the 219 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:46,000 Speaker 1: luxury of just cherry picking which situation he wants to 220 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:48,959 Speaker 1: be in. He's in Philly. He's got to deal with 221 00:12:49,280 --> 00:12:52,079 Speaker 1: Philly's hand of cards, and I think these are the 222 00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:55,640 Speaker 1: right moves within that context. All right, Let's get into 223 00:12:55,840 --> 00:13:00,000 Speaker 1: our season previews, starting with number fourteen. The New Orleans Pelicans. 224 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 1: A lot of turnover for them this summer. They lose 225 00:13:04,400 --> 00:13:10,679 Speaker 1: Dyson Daniels, Najie Marshall, Larry Nants Junior, Jonas Valanciunas, and 226 00:13:10,760 --> 00:13:13,480 Speaker 1: Cody Zeller. They had Javonte Green, an athletic wing who 227 00:13:13,520 --> 00:13:18,600 Speaker 1: played for Chicago last year, Daniel Tice. They drafted Eves 228 00:13:18,640 --> 00:13:21,720 Speaker 1: Missy in the late first round. He's like an athletic 229 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:23,880 Speaker 1: center prospect. And then the major move this summer, they 230 00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 1: traded for Jontey Murray, obviously giving up in that deal 231 00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:29,319 Speaker 1: Dyson Daniels and Larry Ant Junior, as well as some 232 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:31,880 Speaker 1: draft compensation. He's one of my favorite players in the 233 00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:35,319 Speaker 1: league and a guy that I desperately wanted the Lakers 234 00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 1: to get and a guy that I think Pelicans fans 235 00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:40,040 Speaker 1: will love. So when we're talking about next season, Let's 236 00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:44,280 Speaker 1: start with Dejonte. Dejontay brings an element to the Pelicans 237 00:13:44,280 --> 00:13:48,360 Speaker 1: backcourt that they didn't have. Zion obviously brings like real 238 00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:51,800 Speaker 1: downhill force to his game, but Brandon Ingram and c 239 00:13:51,920 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 1: Jim McCollum didn't or don't, I should say they're still 240 00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:58,760 Speaker 1: in the roster. They are finesse pull up shooters. They 241 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:00,920 Speaker 1: can get to the rim. Brandon got to the rim 242 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:05,160 Speaker 1: plenty mostly as part of screening actions. When the coverage 243 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:07,760 Speaker 1: has the ability for them to get by their defender 244 00:14:07,800 --> 00:14:10,480 Speaker 1: and get into the basket area. Those guys can take 245 00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:15,040 Speaker 1: advantage of that. But they're not like, face up with 246 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:18,600 Speaker 1: really good perimeter defenders and get dribble penetration type of guys. 247 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:21,680 Speaker 1: That's not what Brandon and CJ do. Dejonte's really good 248 00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:25,680 Speaker 1: at that. De Jonte can beat good perimeter defenders off 249 00:14:25,720 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 1: the dribble straight up. But he also has the same 250 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,040 Speaker 1: type of counter in pull up jump shooting situations that 251 00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:36,480 Speaker 1: Brandon and CJ had. Brandon CJ both shot forty five 252 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:38,880 Speaker 1: percent on pull up jump shots last year. De Jonte 253 00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:42,160 Speaker 1: Murray shot forty five percent on pull up jump shots 254 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: last year. There were sixteen players in the NBA that 255 00:14:46,520 --> 00:14:48,840 Speaker 1: attempted at least five hundred pu up jump shots last year. 256 00:14:48,880 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 1: Dejonte's one point zero three points per possession ranked eighth 257 00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:56,360 Speaker 1: on that list. He was a good, efficient, high volume 258 00:14:56,760 --> 00:14:58,840 Speaker 1: pull up jump shooter. He was more efficient on pull 259 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:03,320 Speaker 1: up jump shots than Damian Lillard was last year. So like, 260 00:15:03,360 --> 00:15:07,040 Speaker 1: there's a real drive and kick kind of element with 261 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:09,760 Speaker 1: Dejonte that you can get in terms of beating people 262 00:15:09,760 --> 00:15:12,720 Speaker 1: off the dribble and getting people into rotation while also 263 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:15,600 Speaker 1: bringing that over the top shot making that has become 264 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:17,600 Speaker 1: a staple of what has made the Pelicans good over 265 00:15:17,640 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 1: the years. Right, he made the fifth most clutch shots 266 00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:24,880 Speaker 1: in the entire NBA last year because of his ability 267 00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:26,960 Speaker 1: to knock down shots over the top. He's also a 268 00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 1: good passer. He averaged six assists per game playing next 269 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 1: to Trey Young his last season in San Antonio before 270 00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:36,000 Speaker 1: he came over to Atlanta, he averaged nine point two 271 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:40,880 Speaker 1: assists with just two point six turnovers. That's awesome, and 272 00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 1: more importantly, he just had the best off ball season 273 00:15:44,800 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 1: of his career. He converted spot ups at one point 274 00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:49,960 Speaker 1: one five points per possession. That's in the seventy ninth 275 00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 1: percentile out of the thirty seven players in the league 276 00:15:52,960 --> 00:15:55,280 Speaker 1: to log at least three hundred spot up possessions, he 277 00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:59,520 Speaker 1: ranked eleventh. That's really really good, and that's something that 278 00:15:59,640 --> 00:16:02,000 Speaker 1: used to be weakness of his. Now I know there's 279 00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:04,560 Speaker 1: some hesitancy surrounding him on the defensive end of the floor, 280 00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:07,040 Speaker 1: and there's some reality there, like he was in all 281 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:10,760 Speaker 1: defense caliber guard when he was in San Antonio. Wasn't 282 00:16:10,800 --> 00:16:13,160 Speaker 1: like that in Atlanta. But I'm a big believer in 283 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:16,880 Speaker 1: basketball culture, and Atlanta did not have a defensive minded culture. 284 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:21,840 Speaker 1: And so this is a Pelicans team that was top 285 00:16:21,880 --> 00:16:24,640 Speaker 1: ten in defense last year. It's part of the identity 286 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 1: organizationally from the top down if you get buy in again. 287 00:16:29,360 --> 00:16:31,680 Speaker 1: And then there's also just the sheer amount of offensive 288 00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:34,880 Speaker 1: talent on this team when you have Trey Murphy, Zion Williamson, 289 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:38,680 Speaker 1: Brandon Ingram CJ. McCollum. There's just a lot more ball 290 00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 1: handling and playmaking ability on this team than Atlanta had, 291 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:46,280 Speaker 1: which was a traditional four out, one in your turn, 292 00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:50,680 Speaker 1: my turn type of offense between two guys. There's gonna 293 00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 1: be more resources that Dejonte can devote to that end. 294 00:16:53,080 --> 00:16:54,840 Speaker 1: Of the floor. But yeah, like, if you're asking me, 295 00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:57,840 Speaker 1: what are some of the swing factors around this deal 296 00:16:57,880 --> 00:17:00,320 Speaker 1: as to whether or not it'll work extremely well or 297 00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:03,040 Speaker 1: not as well, one of those major swing factors is 298 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:05,200 Speaker 1: going to be does Dejonte defend the way that he's 299 00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:09,199 Speaker 1: capable of? And that's totally fair to bring up. But 300 00:17:09,320 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 1: I do think that New Orleans is more set up 301 00:17:12,520 --> 00:17:15,919 Speaker 1: to accentuate that part of Dejonte's game. I think New 302 00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:18,320 Speaker 1: Orleans has a chance to be a devastating drive and 303 00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:22,199 Speaker 1: kick team if they utilize Zion at the beginning of 304 00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:25,560 Speaker 1: possessions to pressure the rim and make kickout passes. And 305 00:17:25,560 --> 00:17:27,360 Speaker 1: by the way, Dejonte can do the same thing. There's 306 00:17:27,400 --> 00:17:32,000 Speaker 1: now two layers to that. They have incredible spot up talent. 307 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:35,000 Speaker 1: De Jontay Murray one point one to five points per 308 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:38,640 Speaker 1: spot up possession. That's insanely good. CJ. McCollum one point 309 00:17:38,720 --> 00:17:41,280 Speaker 1: three to two points for spot up possession. That was 310 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 1: one of the best marks in the league last year. 311 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:46,040 Speaker 1: Trey Murphy one point one eight, Brandon Ingram one point 312 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:48,960 Speaker 1: oh eight. That's solid. Herb Jones one point oh nine. 313 00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:52,760 Speaker 1: That's solid. The Pelicans as a team last year we're 314 00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:55,879 Speaker 1: second in spot up efficiency in the entire league, and 315 00:17:55,920 --> 00:17:59,240 Speaker 1: you just added another guy who can both capitalize on 316 00:17:59,240 --> 00:18:03,120 Speaker 1: spot up situation and pressure the rim consistently. I think 317 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:06,919 Speaker 1: it's a legitimate offensive upgrade. Now where it gets weird 318 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:10,400 Speaker 1: is how does this all fit together? Right? Where does 319 00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:14,240 Speaker 1: brandon Ingram fit into this? How do you start constructing lineups? 320 00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:17,159 Speaker 1: There's a lot of talk because Daniel Tye is the 321 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:20,159 Speaker 1: only proven NBA center on the roster right now, and 322 00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:23,120 Speaker 1: he's basically a backup. Right, there's a lot of talk 323 00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:26,280 Speaker 1: of Zion starting at center. If they start Zion at center, 324 00:18:26,320 --> 00:18:30,000 Speaker 1: your lineup is Cee, Jim McCollum, de Jontay Murray, Herb Jones, 325 00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:34,720 Speaker 1: Brandon Ingram, and Zion Williamson. Like, that's a ton of 326 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:39,000 Speaker 1: offensive skill, obviously coming with some downsides, right, very small 327 00:18:39,080 --> 00:18:42,479 Speaker 1: and weak defensively on that front line with the with 328 00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 1: your forwards, But on the other end of the floor, 329 00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:48,560 Speaker 1: you're going to be very fast and borderline impossible to 330 00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:52,040 Speaker 1: guard in space. There's a given a take, right, So, Like, 331 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:55,000 Speaker 1: I think it's worth trying throw it out there for 332 00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:57,080 Speaker 1: twenty thirty games. See what happens if it ends up 333 00:18:57,119 --> 00:18:59,960 Speaker 1: being an absolute disaster and your defense is not good 334 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 1: enough and the offense isn't enough to make up for 335 00:19:03,080 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 1: that gap, then you can get more aggressive about trying 336 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:08,960 Speaker 1: to make some sort of consolidation trade and try to 337 00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:12,880 Speaker 1: turn one of these guys like cj Orbi into somebody 338 00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:15,280 Speaker 1: that you can use on that frontline to anchor those units. 339 00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:18,840 Speaker 1: But I think it's worth giving a try, and I 340 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:21,080 Speaker 1: think there's enough talent there that even if you dropped 341 00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:24,800 Speaker 1: some games, like if you lost to Denver or you 342 00:19:24,880 --> 00:19:28,480 Speaker 1: lost to like another big physical frontline like the Lakers, 343 00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:31,480 Speaker 1: because you just don't have that size on the front line, 344 00:19:31,560 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 1: but you're still, you know, fifteen and seven because your 345 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:37,600 Speaker 1: offense is incredible and you beat the shit out of 346 00:19:37,640 --> 00:19:42,280 Speaker 1: everyone else. Like that's fine, You're floating along. That's a 347 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,440 Speaker 1: decision that you can make and deal with in February. 348 00:19:46,560 --> 00:19:48,119 Speaker 1: I mean, the Knicks are in the same boat with 349 00:19:48,160 --> 00:19:50,360 Speaker 1: this Julius Randall thing. It's like, yeah, it's a little clunky, 350 00:19:50,720 --> 00:19:52,600 Speaker 1: don't know how he fits in the grand scheme of things, 351 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:55,200 Speaker 1: but like what's the rush. Send them all out there, 352 00:19:55,280 --> 00:19:58,840 Speaker 1: let him hoop, see what happens. Basketball's more art than science. 353 00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:00,719 Speaker 1: I talk about this all the time. Like sometimes you 354 00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:02,560 Speaker 1: just put a bunch of guys together and it just 355 00:20:02,720 --> 00:20:05,440 Speaker 1: magically comes together, and all of a sudden, it's like, 356 00:20:05,480 --> 00:20:10,840 Speaker 1: holy shit, what are we watching? And when you've got 357 00:20:10,840 --> 00:20:13,320 Speaker 1: this kind of talent, it's at least worth throwing these 358 00:20:13,320 --> 00:20:15,640 Speaker 1: guys out there and just seeing what happens. Now. On 359 00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:18,760 Speaker 1: the defensive end, it is hard to build any sort 360 00:20:18,800 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 1: of traditional look without a real defensive anchor, a guy 361 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:23,800 Speaker 1: that can defend in ball screens in some way, whether 362 00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:25,600 Speaker 1: it's a high drop or a deep drop or whatever 363 00:20:25,640 --> 00:20:28,800 Speaker 1: it is that you want to do, and then that 364 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:31,800 Speaker 1: can also help control the defensive glass. It's challenging to 365 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:34,720 Speaker 1: do without a real center, but there is talent there. 366 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:36,240 Speaker 1: You have a lot of length, you have a lot 367 00:20:36,280 --> 00:20:38,560 Speaker 1: of speed, especially on the perimeter right. You got a 368 00:20:38,600 --> 00:20:41,479 Speaker 1: lot of guys that can guard at the point of attack. 369 00:20:42,920 --> 00:20:46,160 Speaker 1: So like, if you don't have a giant guy underneath 370 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:50,879 Speaker 1: the basket that can drop in ball screens and defend 371 00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,119 Speaker 1: a grab defensive rebounds, then as a team you have 372 00:20:55,200 --> 00:20:58,439 Speaker 1: to positionally be ready to protect the paint. What that 373 00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:01,359 Speaker 1: means is one, you got to can the basketball and 374 00:21:01,520 --> 00:21:05,240 Speaker 1: control dribble penetration. Another way, you could do that too. 375 00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:08,560 Speaker 1: By switching ball screens, you can shut off dribble penetration. 376 00:21:10,320 --> 00:21:12,280 Speaker 1: But it's going to be so much more important on 377 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 1: the backside for guys to make their rotations quickly, because 378 00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:19,240 Speaker 1: if you're going to protect the rim, it's not going 379 00:21:19,280 --> 00:21:22,919 Speaker 1: to be vertically because you don't have real interior size. 380 00:21:23,119 --> 00:21:26,359 Speaker 1: It's got to be positionally, meaning it's about guys on 381 00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: the backside. When people do get beat off the dribble, 382 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:31,800 Speaker 1: those guys have to be quick and precise in their 383 00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:35,720 Speaker 1: rotations and positionally put themselves between the ball handler and 384 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:38,040 Speaker 1: the rim where they can either take a charge or 385 00:21:38,080 --> 00:21:40,159 Speaker 1: at least force that guy to veer off into a 386 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,160 Speaker 1: different direction. Right, So it's going to be a really 387 00:21:43,160 --> 00:21:47,240 Speaker 1: difficult job. And then on the defensive glass, everyone's got 388 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:50,399 Speaker 1: to fly around, everyone's got to box out, everyone's got 389 00:21:50,440 --> 00:21:54,240 Speaker 1: to crack down from the wings. And then the last 390 00:21:54,240 --> 00:21:57,120 Speaker 1: piece of it is when you have opportunities to use 391 00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 1: that speed against interior size, you have to take advance 392 00:22:00,320 --> 00:22:03,280 Speaker 1: of it. That's spreading teams out and driving kicking them 393 00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:05,639 Speaker 1: to death. And then when you see opportunities to get 394 00:22:05,680 --> 00:22:07,720 Speaker 1: out and transition and beat slow foot and bigs up 395 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:12,800 Speaker 1: the floor, again, like we always talk about styles make fights, 396 00:22:13,560 --> 00:22:17,440 Speaker 1: but it's usually which style wins the fight. If there's 397 00:22:17,480 --> 00:22:20,560 Speaker 1: a big team playing against a small team, if the 398 00:22:20,600 --> 00:22:24,040 Speaker 1: big team is better at doing big guys stuff then 399 00:22:24,080 --> 00:22:26,880 Speaker 1: the small team is at doing small guys stuff, then 400 00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:28,880 Speaker 1: the big team will win and everyone will be like, man, 401 00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:33,960 Speaker 1: they're just too small to guard us. But if the 402 00:22:34,880 --> 00:22:38,800 Speaker 1: small team does more small guy stuff and does it 403 00:22:38,840 --> 00:22:42,399 Speaker 1: more impactfully than the big team does, then you'll come 404 00:22:42,440 --> 00:22:43,600 Speaker 1: out of that game and you'll be like, man, they're 405 00:22:43,640 --> 00:22:46,960 Speaker 1: just too slow for us. Those are the pushes and 406 00:22:47,000 --> 00:22:50,679 Speaker 1: pulls that you have to win. That said, like, this 407 00:22:50,840 --> 00:22:52,399 Speaker 1: was a team last year that was top ten in 408 00:22:52,440 --> 00:22:56,119 Speaker 1: defense and top ten and rebounding. I'm not sure if 409 00:22:56,119 --> 00:22:58,040 Speaker 1: they can get there without a real starting center in 410 00:22:58,080 --> 00:23:02,359 Speaker 1: the fold. So it feels like this inevitably ends with 411 00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:05,760 Speaker 1: Brandon Ingram being traded for front court depth. But it's 412 00:23:05,760 --> 00:23:09,960 Speaker 1: just really hard to find willing trade partners there. So 413 00:23:10,040 --> 00:23:13,960 Speaker 1: this is like a really funky team that's around a 414 00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:17,720 Speaker 1: built around a very funky traditional or non traditional i 415 00:23:17,720 --> 00:23:21,960 Speaker 1: should say, foundational star in Zion. So it's really hard 416 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:23,919 Speaker 1: to predict what the Pelicans are going to look like 417 00:23:23,960 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 1: this year. Right now, I'm going to say a playing team, 418 00:23:28,160 --> 00:23:30,400 Speaker 1: but this team has a very wide range of outcomes 419 00:23:30,400 --> 00:23:32,399 Speaker 1: for the season, and I think the Pelicans are on 420 00:23:32,440 --> 00:23:33,919 Speaker 1: the short list of teams that I think we're going 421 00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:36,919 Speaker 1: to learn the most about in the first month or 422 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:51,359 Speaker 1: so of the season. All right, next number thirteen, the 423 00:23:51,400 --> 00:23:54,040 Speaker 1: Golden State Warriors little bit of roster turnover. They lost 424 00:23:54,080 --> 00:23:57,280 Speaker 1: Chris Paul Dariosarch and Klay Thompson. They added Kyle Anderson, 425 00:23:57,359 --> 00:24:01,200 Speaker 1: Buddy Healed, and Anthony Melton. Offseason for the Warriors actually 426 00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:03,520 Speaker 1: reminds me a lot of the twenty twenty two offseason 427 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:08,280 Speaker 1: in that you're finding discounted role players, but not necessarily 428 00:24:08,320 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 1: that are more talented than what you have, but just 429 00:24:10,880 --> 00:24:17,360 Speaker 1: fit Warriors basketball better, Right, Like that twenty twenty one 430 00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:21,640 Speaker 1: team that was like Kelly Ubray and Kent Bazemore and 431 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: Brad Wannamaker. It's like, it's not like those guys are 432 00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:31,040 Speaker 1: demonstrably better than Otto Porter, right or Na Manna Bielitsa. 433 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:35,000 Speaker 1: It's more just that those guys fit better into what 434 00:24:35,040 --> 00:24:38,320 Speaker 1: Golden State was trying to do, right. That's what I 435 00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: like about these three guys. Kyle Anderson very good defensive forward. 436 00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:43,679 Speaker 1: You can play both on and off the ball. Of 437 00:24:43,800 --> 00:24:46,800 Speaker 1: all of the guys that Minnesota tried on Luka Doncic 438 00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:49,200 Speaker 1: in the Conference finals, I thought Kyle was by far 439 00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:53,600 Speaker 1: their best option. He's particularly good at bigger forwards that 440 00:24:53,760 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 1: like to use size and strength to get to spots, 441 00:24:55,920 --> 00:24:57,920 Speaker 1: but he's also a good off ball player. He's got 442 00:24:57,920 --> 00:25:01,040 Speaker 1: great length, He's a very smart defender, and then on 443 00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:04,000 Speaker 1: the offensive end. I think he'll thrive as a playmaker 444 00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:07,680 Speaker 1: and Golden State system, he had four point two assists 445 00:25:07,680 --> 00:25:10,280 Speaker 1: to just one point two turnovers last year. He was 446 00:25:10,359 --> 00:25:13,800 Speaker 1: one of only fourteen players in the entire NBA to 447 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:16,520 Speaker 1: play at least twenty minutes per game but to log 448 00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:18,960 Speaker 1: and assist a turnover ratio of at least three point 449 00:25:19,040 --> 00:25:22,960 Speaker 1: five to one. He's an efficient playmaker, and as we know, 450 00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:25,800 Speaker 1: in Golden State system, they usually have two dribble handoff 451 00:25:25,840 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 1: folcrums that are non shooters. When they're flowing from side 452 00:25:28,880 --> 00:25:33,080 Speaker 1: to side with action right Dreymonald dribble over into a 453 00:25:33,160 --> 00:25:37,200 Speaker 1: dribble handoff with Padjemskik or Steph coming off one side, 454 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:38,880 Speaker 1: and then that guy comes off and throws a swing 455 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:42,320 Speaker 1: pass to the second guy usually Loony or Trace Jackson 456 00:25:42,359 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 1: Davis or something like that, and it's like that guy 457 00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:47,679 Speaker 1: turns and he runs the next dribble handoff, and usually 458 00:25:47,720 --> 00:25:51,480 Speaker 1: one of those guys ends up drawing their screen defender 459 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:54,639 Speaker 1: out onto the ball handler of Steph or Pods or 460 00:25:54,680 --> 00:25:57,000 Speaker 1: Clay whoever it was last year, and then there's a 461 00:25:57,040 --> 00:25:59,760 Speaker 1: slip opportunity there, and then that guy needs to make plays. 462 00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:04,040 Speaker 1: Or if Kyle Anderson in this case, is dribbling at 463 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:08,879 Speaker 1: that second side action and the defender's top locking, meaning 464 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:11,600 Speaker 1: that defender is not allowing the use of the screen, 465 00:26:12,080 --> 00:26:15,000 Speaker 1: he's forcing a backcut. You need a guy that can 466 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:18,880 Speaker 1: consistently make those backcut passes. I mean, Kyle Anderson's gonna 467 00:26:18,880 --> 00:26:22,080 Speaker 1: do that really, really well. He scored well on the 468 00:26:22,160 --> 00:26:24,160 Speaker 1: role last year. He got one point twenty seven points 469 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,840 Speaker 1: per possession on rollman possessions. That's very good. And he's 470 00:26:27,880 --> 00:26:30,960 Speaker 1: also just a good ball handler in general. I'm actually 471 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:33,320 Speaker 1: gonna be really curious to see if the Warriors run 472 00:26:33,359 --> 00:26:36,920 Speaker 1: more inverted ball screens with Steph as the screener. They 473 00:26:36,920 --> 00:26:38,560 Speaker 1: did a little bit of this over the last few 474 00:26:38,600 --> 00:26:42,600 Speaker 1: years with Andrew Wiggins, but Anderson is a better decision 475 00:26:42,640 --> 00:26:45,240 Speaker 1: maker and a better ball handler in that spot. And 476 00:26:45,280 --> 00:26:47,000 Speaker 1: so I'm actually really curious to see if we get 477 00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:49,680 Speaker 1: a lot of that where it's like Kyle Anderson dribbling 478 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:52,880 Speaker 1: the ball while Steph just screens for him. Because Steph's 479 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:57,320 Speaker 1: man is not going to help on a Kyle Anderson 480 00:26:57,400 --> 00:27:01,880 Speaker 1: drive and so so if he does, Steph's gonna get 481 00:27:01,880 --> 00:27:04,919 Speaker 1: wide open on the slip, and if he doesn't, Kyle's 482 00:27:04,920 --> 00:27:06,800 Speaker 1: going to turn the corner and get right downhill to 483 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:09,000 Speaker 1: the rim. As soon as Kyle gets right downhill to 484 00:27:09,040 --> 00:27:11,439 Speaker 1: the rim, because the guy set in the screens not 485 00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:15,040 Speaker 1: helping Kyle's defender, He's gonna get downhill and be able 486 00:27:15,040 --> 00:27:17,159 Speaker 1: to wreck havoc. As a playmaker at that point, I 487 00:27:17,160 --> 00:27:20,520 Speaker 1: think it's going to be a really useful player on 488 00:27:20,560 --> 00:27:25,960 Speaker 1: a discounted deal. Buddy healed Klay Thompson last year gave 489 00:27:25,960 --> 00:27:28,600 Speaker 1: you eighteen points, three rebounds, and two assists on fifty 490 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:32,240 Speaker 1: eight percent true shooting, and he had his worst defensive 491 00:27:32,240 --> 00:27:34,400 Speaker 1: season in a long time, and he wasn't very impactful 492 00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:38,159 Speaker 1: in the glass. Buddy healed twelve points, three rebounds, three 493 00:27:38,200 --> 00:27:40,359 Speaker 1: assists on fifty eight percent true shooting, but he played 494 00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:43,000 Speaker 1: fewer minutes. If you extrapolate both players out to per 495 00:27:43,080 --> 00:27:45,800 Speaker 1: thirty six, Clay was about twenty two points per thirty 496 00:27:45,800 --> 00:27:48,720 Speaker 1: six minutes, Buddy was at about seventeen, so not quite 497 00:27:48,760 --> 00:27:52,199 Speaker 1: the amount of scoring production. Here's a couple more key 498 00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:55,320 Speaker 1: numbers for you guys, Klay Thompson one point one zero 499 00:27:55,440 --> 00:27:59,200 Speaker 1: points per possession in off screen situations, one point zero 500 00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:02,639 Speaker 1: nine points per possession in spot up situations, one point 501 00:28:02,640 --> 00:28:06,720 Speaker 1: one one points per jump shot. Buddy healed zero point 502 00:28:06,760 --> 00:28:09,280 Speaker 1: eighty seven points per possession off screen, so not as efficient, 503 00:28:09,320 --> 00:28:12,600 Speaker 1: but he was much much lower volume. He was doing 504 00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:15,160 Speaker 1: a lot of like ghost screens for Tyrese Haliburton, which 505 00:28:15,160 --> 00:28:20,320 Speaker 1: register actually has Rollman possessions on Synergy. But that was 506 00:28:20,359 --> 00:28:23,320 Speaker 1: like one of Indiana's most impactful actions last year, and 507 00:28:23,320 --> 00:28:26,480 Speaker 1: it still functions essentially as like a movement shot in 508 00:28:26,520 --> 00:28:30,639 Speaker 1: his screening action. And then one point zero one points 509 00:28:30,640 --> 00:28:33,639 Speaker 1: per possession and spot up situations. That's pretty mediocre, but 510 00:28:33,680 --> 00:28:35,240 Speaker 1: he did shoot the ball well one point one to 511 00:28:35,240 --> 00:28:38,040 Speaker 1: one points per jump shot. So here's the thing. Buddy. 512 00:28:38,400 --> 00:28:43,280 Speaker 1: Buddy's smaller, and he's overall a less impactful movement shooter 513 00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:46,800 Speaker 1: than Clay is, but Buddy Yield is three years younger 514 00:28:47,160 --> 00:28:51,160 Speaker 1: and costs about half as much in guaranteed money. Also, 515 00:28:51,280 --> 00:28:54,200 Speaker 1: Klay Thompson is very clearly on the downslope and had 516 00:28:54,240 --> 00:28:56,880 Speaker 1: his first big drop off last year. It was his 517 00:28:56,920 --> 00:28:59,120 Speaker 1: first time failing to hit twenty points per game since 518 00:28:59,120 --> 00:29:02,800 Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, it was his worst defensive rebounding season since 519 00:29:02,800 --> 00:29:06,400 Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, and overall I thought he struggled defensively last year. 520 00:29:06,800 --> 00:29:10,480 Speaker 1: So essentially, you got a player who can roughly approximate 521 00:29:10,480 --> 00:29:13,760 Speaker 1: what Klay Thompson does with about half as much guaranteed 522 00:29:13,800 --> 00:29:18,840 Speaker 1: money and less risk of age related decline. The other 523 00:29:18,880 --> 00:29:20,480 Speaker 1: part of it, too, is I think he's more willing 524 00:29:20,600 --> 00:29:23,800 Speaker 1: to accept a smaller bench role right like Clay, Even 525 00:29:24,080 --> 00:29:27,600 Speaker 1: in his bench games, still played about twenty nine minutes 526 00:29:27,640 --> 00:29:30,760 Speaker 1: per game. There were only three times all season last 527 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:33,920 Speaker 1: year that Klay Thompson did not play twenty minutes. The 528 00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:35,920 Speaker 1: last day of the regular season against the Jazz in 529 00:29:35,960 --> 00:29:39,200 Speaker 1: a game they didn't need him, the fifty two point 530 00:29:39,240 --> 00:29:42,360 Speaker 1: loss against Boston because everyone was sitting the bench in 531 00:29:42,360 --> 00:29:45,040 Speaker 1: the second half, and then the Minnesota game where he 532 00:29:45,080 --> 00:29:47,120 Speaker 1: got ejected in the first couple of minutes. That's it. 533 00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:51,400 Speaker 1: Because Clay was like under the expectation that he needed 534 00:29:51,400 --> 00:29:53,840 Speaker 1: to play a lot, and there would have been issues 535 00:29:54,080 --> 00:29:56,280 Speaker 1: if Steve Kirk cut his minutes way down and they 536 00:29:56,320 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 1: needed him to play for what it's worth. But like 537 00:29:59,000 --> 00:30:02,680 Speaker 1: if there was a reason to play someone else, Kerr 538 00:30:02,720 --> 00:30:07,239 Speaker 1: wasn't going that route, not in any sort of like 539 00:30:07,360 --> 00:30:10,880 Speaker 1: substantial sample size. That is, now you'll be able to 540 00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 1: get away with like heavily oscillating buddy, heals minutes from 541 00:30:14,680 --> 00:30:17,640 Speaker 1: high to low based on the matchup without having to 542 00:30:17,680 --> 00:30:21,240 Speaker 1: worry about fallout in team chemistry. I think that's an advantage. 543 00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:24,200 Speaker 1: So like, obviously you don't want to lose Clay, but 544 00:30:24,320 --> 00:30:27,000 Speaker 1: if you're going to, you did pretty well to try 545 00:30:27,000 --> 00:30:29,760 Speaker 1: to replace that archetype. And there's another element to that. 546 00:30:30,400 --> 00:30:33,320 Speaker 1: D Anthony Melton another guy who plays a similar position, 547 00:30:33,840 --> 00:30:37,920 Speaker 1: a rock solid starting caliber guard when he's healthy. Going 548 00:30:37,960 --> 00:30:39,840 Speaker 1: back to his twenty twenty three season, that was the 549 00:30:39,920 --> 00:30:43,280 Speaker 1: last time he was healthy, he played seventy seven games. 550 00:30:43,320 --> 00:30:45,120 Speaker 1: He actually played seventy plus games in each of the 551 00:30:45,160 --> 00:30:47,280 Speaker 1: two seasons before last year, So if you're looking for 552 00:30:47,320 --> 00:30:50,480 Speaker 1: optimism around Anthony Melton's health, you could hope that last 553 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:54,240 Speaker 1: year was an outlier in recent years, but d Anthony 554 00:30:54,240 --> 00:30:56,600 Speaker 1: Meltain in twenty twenty three one point one to two 555 00:30:56,640 --> 00:30:59,120 Speaker 1: points per spot up possession. That's really good. He was 556 00:30:59,160 --> 00:31:01,840 Speaker 1: an efficient on ball creator. He ran two hundred and 557 00:31:01,880 --> 00:31:03,560 Speaker 1: forty eight pick and rolls for two hundred and fifty 558 00:31:03,640 --> 00:31:05,800 Speaker 1: nine points. That's one point zero four points per possession 559 00:31:05,800 --> 00:31:09,040 Speaker 1: including passes. That's really good. He's a high level jump shooter. 560 00:31:09,080 --> 00:31:11,240 Speaker 1: He shot thirty nine percent from three on five attempts 561 00:31:11,240 --> 00:31:15,280 Speaker 1: per game, one point one to three points per possession overall. 562 00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:18,720 Speaker 1: On jump shots, he shot forty one percent on catch 563 00:31:18,720 --> 00:31:21,360 Speaker 1: and shoot jump shots in that twenty twenty three year. 564 00:31:22,200 --> 00:31:23,960 Speaker 1: And he can knock down jump shots off the dribble. 565 00:31:23,960 --> 00:31:26,080 Speaker 1: He hit like forty or fifty I can't remember exactly 566 00:31:26,080 --> 00:31:27,400 Speaker 1: off the top of my head, but he hit a 567 00:31:27,440 --> 00:31:29,160 Speaker 1: bunch of pull up jump shots that year as well. 568 00:31:29,320 --> 00:31:31,280 Speaker 1: I've talked about this a lot, but I view him 569 00:31:31,280 --> 00:31:35,600 Speaker 1: as like a like a like a slightly poor man's 570 00:31:35,680 --> 00:31:39,000 Speaker 1: version of Contavious Callwell Pope, but with more off the 571 00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:41,880 Speaker 1: dribble pop. And that's like the main difference. Kcp's more 572 00:31:41,920 --> 00:31:44,360 Speaker 1: of like a movement shooter. D Anthony Melton is a 573 00:31:44,400 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 1: guy that can actually like put the ball on the 574 00:31:45,720 --> 00:31:47,600 Speaker 1: floor and make plays. I think he's a guy that's 575 00:31:47,600 --> 00:31:50,760 Speaker 1: actually gonna have some success running action coming off of 576 00:31:50,800 --> 00:31:54,520 Speaker 1: screens in Golden State system. He rebounds well for guard, 577 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:56,560 Speaker 1: He's a good point of attack defender. I think he's 578 00:31:56,560 --> 00:31:59,320 Speaker 1: just a rock solid player provided that he's healthy. So 579 00:31:59,360 --> 00:32:01,840 Speaker 1: as long as he has healthy, that's that to me 580 00:32:01,920 --> 00:32:05,320 Speaker 1: is a big get. So you got three quality rotation players, 581 00:32:05,360 --> 00:32:09,000 Speaker 1: all for about thirty million dollars annually combined, all uneasily 582 00:32:09,080 --> 00:32:13,720 Speaker 1: tradable contracts. So like, given the lack of options that 583 00:32:13,760 --> 00:32:15,840 Speaker 1: were available to Golden State this summer, I actually thought 584 00:32:15,840 --> 00:32:18,480 Speaker 1: they did about as well as you possibly can while 585 00:32:18,520 --> 00:32:22,320 Speaker 1: maintaining their ability to make a move during the season. Now, 586 00:32:22,680 --> 00:32:25,959 Speaker 1: looking at last year's team, I actually thought the Warriors 587 00:32:26,000 --> 00:32:28,920 Speaker 1: performed well relative to the talent they had on the roster. 588 00:32:29,880 --> 00:32:34,400 Speaker 1: They won forty six games. They finished ninth in offensive rating. 589 00:32:34,440 --> 00:32:37,960 Speaker 1: That is a testament to Steph Curry's greatness because given 590 00:32:38,000 --> 00:32:39,840 Speaker 1: the talent on that roster for them to finish top 591 00:32:39,880 --> 00:32:43,200 Speaker 1: ten in offense, even during Steph's slump to end the 592 00:32:43,280 --> 00:32:46,120 Speaker 1: year his final twenty five games in that span, they 593 00:32:46,120 --> 00:32:49,880 Speaker 1: were eighth in offense, which just goes to show you 594 00:32:50,280 --> 00:32:53,280 Speaker 1: how impactful Steph is offensively, just when he's running around, 595 00:32:53,320 --> 00:32:56,959 Speaker 1: even when he's not making shots. He can fuel an 596 00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:00,880 Speaker 1: above average offense with below average talent even without making shots. 597 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:05,520 Speaker 1: That's incredible. But it was abundantly clear throughout the year 598 00:33:05,600 --> 00:33:08,080 Speaker 1: last year that the Warriors were not as good as 599 00:33:08,120 --> 00:33:11,200 Speaker 1: their record ship like. They were twenty four and five 600 00:33:11,240 --> 00:33:14,560 Speaker 1: against teams that were below five hundred. That's the same 601 00:33:14,640 --> 00:33:17,800 Speaker 1: record that Oklahoma City had against teams that were five 602 00:33:17,880 --> 00:33:20,040 Speaker 1: hundred or below or below five hundred, I should say, 603 00:33:20,360 --> 00:33:22,560 Speaker 1: so they took care of business against the bad teams, 604 00:33:23,200 --> 00:33:26,920 Speaker 1: but they were just nine and twenty one against teams 605 00:33:26,920 --> 00:33:29,240 Speaker 1: that were in the top ten in point differential. According 606 00:33:29,280 --> 00:33:32,440 Speaker 1: to Cleaning the Glass, they had a minus two point 607 00:33:32,560 --> 00:33:34,640 Speaker 1: seven net ratings, so they got outscored by two point 608 00:33:34,680 --> 00:33:37,320 Speaker 1: seven points per one hundred possessions in those matchups that 609 00:33:37,400 --> 00:33:47,040 Speaker 1: ranked twenty second in the NBA. Charlotte, Memphis, San Antonio, Portland, Utah, Detroit, Atlanta, 610 00:33:47,080 --> 00:33:52,040 Speaker 1: and Chicago all had better net ratings against teams in 611 00:33:52,080 --> 00:33:54,400 Speaker 1: the top ten in point differential last year than Golden 612 00:33:54,400 --> 00:33:58,320 Speaker 1: State did. So that screams to me, this team doesn't 613 00:33:58,360 --> 00:34:04,880 Speaker 1: have enough talent, but has excellent leadership because anytime a 614 00:34:04,920 --> 00:34:08,919 Speaker 1: win was realistically achievable, those guys got the job done 615 00:34:09,800 --> 00:34:14,520 Speaker 1: through excellent coaching and leadership from Steph Kurr. But when 616 00:34:14,520 --> 00:34:18,520 Speaker 1: they ran into teams with real firepower, they got exposed 617 00:34:19,280 --> 00:34:22,960 Speaker 1: for being a roster with severe limitations. So that to 618 00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:26,520 Speaker 1: me is like a special shout out to Steve Kerr 619 00:34:26,600 --> 00:34:30,120 Speaker 1: and Steph Curry last year because given the circumstances, given 620 00:34:30,160 --> 00:34:32,319 Speaker 1: the Draymond suspension, given the amount of talent they had 621 00:34:32,360 --> 00:34:35,479 Speaker 1: around them, that looks like a thirty five win team 622 00:34:35,520 --> 00:34:39,239 Speaker 1: to me, and they got forty six wins. So like 623 00:34:39,320 --> 00:34:41,799 Speaker 1: I thought, they squeezed that sponge for everything it was 624 00:34:41,800 --> 00:34:45,480 Speaker 1: worth last year. And that's why it's so dumb every 625 00:34:45,520 --> 00:34:47,120 Speaker 1: single time we do the whole like, oh, they missed 626 00:34:47,120 --> 00:34:49,640 Speaker 1: the playoffs thing, it's like, usually there's reasons for that, 627 00:34:51,960 --> 00:34:53,960 Speaker 1: and like, look, Steph didn't play very well down the 628 00:34:53,960 --> 00:34:55,799 Speaker 1: tail end of the season, but it wasn't for lack 629 00:34:55,840 --> 00:34:58,040 Speaker 1: of trying. He was leaving it out there every single night. 630 00:34:58,680 --> 00:35:02,560 Speaker 1: This wasn't like you know, UCA and last year, the 631 00:35:02,640 --> 00:35:04,799 Speaker 1: year before the final run, where at the tail end 632 00:35:04,800 --> 00:35:06,279 Speaker 1: of the year, every time he watched him on TV. 633 00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:09,600 Speaker 1: It was an I sore like they were trying like 634 00:35:09,680 --> 00:35:11,279 Speaker 1: hell to get in. They just didn't have the talent 635 00:35:11,320 --> 00:35:14,799 Speaker 1: to get it done. So we talked about the three 636 00:35:14,800 --> 00:35:17,319 Speaker 1: new free agent signings the summer. Let's talk about what 637 00:35:17,480 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: needs to happen in the house for the Warriors to 638 00:35:21,200 --> 00:35:25,200 Speaker 1: return to the middle tier of the Western Conference, to 639 00:35:25,280 --> 00:35:27,560 Speaker 1: get back in with those groups, that group that has 640 00:35:27,600 --> 00:35:31,160 Speaker 1: like Dallas and Minnesota and the Lakers and Memphis and 641 00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:33,279 Speaker 1: all those teams in the middle of the West. How 642 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:38,080 Speaker 1: do they get back into that group. I have three things. One, 643 00:35:38,280 --> 00:35:41,040 Speaker 1: Brandon Pajemski needs to take the next leap as a 644 00:35:41,080 --> 00:35:45,200 Speaker 1: shot creator. He had an awesome rookie season, finished fifth 645 00:35:45,239 --> 00:35:47,319 Speaker 1: in Rookie of the Year voting. He shot the ball well. 646 00:35:47,680 --> 00:35:50,600 Speaker 1: He was Golden State's second best on off guy in 647 00:35:50,680 --> 00:35:54,080 Speaker 1: terms of differential behind Draymond. They were six point two 648 00:35:54,600 --> 00:35:57,799 Speaker 1: points per one hundred possessions better with Pademski on the 649 00:35:57,800 --> 00:36:00,759 Speaker 1: floor versus off the floor. He was excellent fit in 650 00:36:00,800 --> 00:36:03,759 Speaker 1: their five out offensive attack. He made good decisions consistently, 651 00:36:04,000 --> 00:36:07,000 Speaker 1: he kept the ball moving, and he's already a solid 652 00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:12,280 Speaker 1: defensive player at the guard position. But Golden State needs 653 00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:15,880 Speaker 1: more offensive production out of that off guard spot in 654 00:36:15,960 --> 00:36:21,040 Speaker 1: supportive steph. POD's got over fifteen points in a game 655 00:36:21,120 --> 00:36:24,520 Speaker 1: just nine times last season, and it really comes down 656 00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:26,200 Speaker 1: to just being more aggressive. And I get it. For 657 00:36:26,239 --> 00:36:29,040 Speaker 1: the record, I get it in his circumstance why he 658 00:36:29,080 --> 00:36:32,120 Speaker 1: didn't come in as a rookie into the Golden State 659 00:36:32,200 --> 00:36:35,680 Speaker 1: Damn Warriors and just start jacking up shots, I get it. 660 00:36:35,800 --> 00:36:38,520 Speaker 1: I'm not blaming him for last year. I'm talking about 661 00:36:38,520 --> 00:36:41,200 Speaker 1: what he needs to do moving forward. He shot over 662 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:43,200 Speaker 1: forty percent on one hundred and two pull up jump 663 00:36:43,200 --> 00:36:45,480 Speaker 1: shots last year, and a bunch of them were threes, 664 00:36:45,960 --> 00:36:48,040 Speaker 1: so he was at one point one to two points 665 00:36:48,080 --> 00:36:49,839 Speaker 1: per pull up jump shot. That's insane. As a matter 666 00:36:49,880 --> 00:36:51,279 Speaker 1: of fact, out of the one hundred and thirty five 667 00:36:51,280 --> 00:36:53,440 Speaker 1: players to attempt at least a hundred pull up jump shots, 668 00:36:53,719 --> 00:36:56,479 Speaker 1: Pods ranked eighth eight out of one hundred and thirty 669 00:36:56,480 --> 00:37:00,680 Speaker 1: five guys inefficiency. I actually view that is a bad 670 00:37:00,719 --> 00:37:02,520 Speaker 1: stat and the main reason why is it means he's 671 00:37:02,520 --> 00:37:06,120 Speaker 1: being too picky. He needs to take more of them. 672 00:37:06,280 --> 00:37:08,000 Speaker 1: He needs to take more pull up jump shots and 673 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:10,319 Speaker 1: he needs to take more floaters. Those are the two 674 00:37:10,320 --> 00:37:12,320 Speaker 1: shots that I think when he's getting downhill on screens 675 00:37:12,320 --> 00:37:14,120 Speaker 1: and he sees opportunities to get to that floater, he 676 00:37:14,160 --> 00:37:17,040 Speaker 1: needs to take it more and more and just every 677 00:37:17,040 --> 00:37:18,480 Speaker 1: time he gets a little bit of separation and he 678 00:37:18,480 --> 00:37:23,000 Speaker 1: needs to let that thing fly off the dribble. Brandon 679 00:37:23,000 --> 00:37:26,000 Speaker 1: pe Zemski averaged twenty points per game at Santa Clara. 680 00:37:26,160 --> 00:37:29,360 Speaker 1: He's got real scoring chops, and I think that this 681 00:37:29,400 --> 00:37:33,399 Speaker 1: team actually needs him to unleash them. When I talk 682 00:37:33,440 --> 00:37:36,879 Speaker 1: to Warriors guys that cover the league, there's a lot 683 00:37:36,920 --> 00:37:40,959 Speaker 1: of buzz. There's some disagreement about Pazemski. There's some guys 684 00:37:40,960 --> 00:37:42,400 Speaker 1: that aren't very high on him, but the people that 685 00:37:42,440 --> 00:37:44,120 Speaker 1: I trust are actually very high on the The people 686 00:37:44,160 --> 00:37:46,480 Speaker 1: that watch him every day think he has legitimate all 687 00:37:46,480 --> 00:37:49,400 Speaker 1: star upside, and I just want to see how much 688 00:37:49,440 --> 00:37:53,240 Speaker 1: closer you can get to that in this season two. 689 00:37:53,600 --> 00:37:57,239 Speaker 1: Jonathan Kamina needs to learn how to channel his abilities 690 00:37:58,040 --> 00:38:03,040 Speaker 1: more consistently in a winning text. Kamika showed real scoring 691 00:38:03,120 --> 00:38:06,120 Speaker 1: upside last year. He had twenty three twenty point games, 692 00:38:06,719 --> 00:38:09,600 Speaker 1: did a lot of damage and transition, and in those 693 00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:12,120 Speaker 1: baseline cuts out of that classic Golden State tic tac 694 00:38:12,160 --> 00:38:15,560 Speaker 1: toe or Steph draws two short roll man baseline, defender 695 00:38:15,600 --> 00:38:18,239 Speaker 1: steps over, Kaminka cuts out of the baseline, he gets dunk. 696 00:38:18,280 --> 00:38:20,320 Speaker 1: A lot of stuff like that. But he also showed 697 00:38:20,320 --> 00:38:23,120 Speaker 1: real upside as a post scorer. He was consistently getting 698 00:38:23,160 --> 00:38:25,680 Speaker 1: around his defender or just going through his defender. He's 699 00:38:25,680 --> 00:38:27,719 Speaker 1: getting to the foul line a bunch. Really. The main 700 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:30,759 Speaker 1: thing that nuked his efficiency in the post was turnovers. 701 00:38:30,760 --> 00:38:32,520 Speaker 1: He turned the ball over on thirteen percent of his 702 00:38:32,560 --> 00:38:35,120 Speaker 1: post ups, which was to be expected start the year. 703 00:38:35,120 --> 00:38:37,400 Speaker 1: He's getting a lot of single coverage. He was cooking everybody. 704 00:38:37,760 --> 00:38:39,720 Speaker 1: Second part of the year. They started bringing that second 705 00:38:39,719 --> 00:38:42,120 Speaker 1: defender to his left hand side, and he just wasn't 706 00:38:42,120 --> 00:38:45,480 Speaker 1: reading that defender really well. That comes obviously with repetition. 707 00:38:46,000 --> 00:38:50,160 Speaker 1: But his impact didn't match up with his production Compared 708 00:38:50,160 --> 00:38:53,399 Speaker 1: to his actual counting stats. He wasn't as good. Wasn't 709 00:38:53,400 --> 00:38:57,200 Speaker 1: as good in the plus minus categories. Zero point ninety 710 00:38:57,280 --> 00:38:59,360 Speaker 1: nine points per spot up possession because he kind of 711 00:38:59,360 --> 00:39:01,880 Speaker 1: struggled to space the floor when he was off ball. 712 00:39:02,239 --> 00:39:04,960 Speaker 1: Zero point ninety seven points per catch and shoot jump shots, 713 00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:06,920 Speaker 1: So those numbers aren't good enough. He's a bit of 714 00:39:06,920 --> 00:39:09,040 Speaker 1: a ball stopper, a little bit of a clunky fit 715 00:39:09,080 --> 00:39:11,400 Speaker 1: on offense and then on defense. A lot of really 716 00:39:11,440 --> 00:39:13,200 Speaker 1: good moments, a lot of really bad moments, typical for 717 00:39:13,239 --> 00:39:14,960 Speaker 1: young players. Like I talk about this all the time 718 00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:20,319 Speaker 1: with young players when it comes to replicating successes and 719 00:39:20,800 --> 00:39:24,960 Speaker 1: diminishing mistakes, meaning like, oh, I fucked up, let's try 720 00:39:25,000 --> 00:39:28,040 Speaker 1: to not do that again, or oh this is working, 721 00:39:28,840 --> 00:39:31,680 Speaker 1: let's keep doing it. Like a lot of times, young 722 00:39:31,719 --> 00:39:36,160 Speaker 1: players will do something easy for a basket because of 723 00:39:36,200 --> 00:39:39,319 Speaker 1: a simple basketball read, and instead of going back to it, 724 00:39:39,360 --> 00:39:43,960 Speaker 1: they'll do something random on the next possession. Like veteran players, 725 00:39:44,239 --> 00:39:48,960 Speaker 1: they'll spam something until it stops working. They know, if 726 00:39:49,000 --> 00:39:51,120 Speaker 1: I run this lane, if I set the screen and 727 00:39:51,120 --> 00:39:52,520 Speaker 1: I slip out of it like this, if I do 728 00:39:52,880 --> 00:39:54,680 Speaker 1: if I move the ball quickly, it'll get its way 729 00:39:54,719 --> 00:39:57,120 Speaker 1: back to me. Like all these like little details about 730 00:39:57,600 --> 00:40:03,320 Speaker 1: how to replicate successes in minimize failures, they take time. 731 00:40:04,200 --> 00:40:07,840 Speaker 1: That is a classic young basketball player issue. So the 732 00:40:07,920 --> 00:40:12,560 Speaker 1: question is how fast will Jonathan Caminga make those progressions 733 00:40:12,840 --> 00:40:15,000 Speaker 1: into being more of a winning basketball player. I'm not 734 00:40:15,040 --> 00:40:18,560 Speaker 1: worried about his production. I think he averaged something like 735 00:40:18,560 --> 00:40:20,960 Speaker 1: sixteen points a game last year. If you average sixteen 736 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:23,839 Speaker 1: points a game this year that'd be great within the 737 00:40:23,840 --> 00:40:27,560 Speaker 1: context of doing all of those little things more consistently 738 00:40:27,640 --> 00:40:32,920 Speaker 1: and minimizing mistakes. And then, lastly, can Steph return to 739 00:40:33,000 --> 00:40:35,600 Speaker 1: four last twenty five games last year? Those of you 740 00:40:35,600 --> 00:40:38,000 Speaker 1: guys who've been following the show, I've read these stats 741 00:40:38,000 --> 00:40:40,840 Speaker 1: a million times, But last twenty five games last year 742 00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:43,520 Speaker 1: twenty two point eight points per game, forty two percent 743 00:40:43,600 --> 00:40:46,040 Speaker 1: from the field, thirty eight percent from three. That's just 744 00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:50,560 Speaker 1: not superstar production anymore out of Steph Curry, and it 745 00:40:50,600 --> 00:40:52,400 Speaker 1: was part of the reason why they struggled against the 746 00:40:52,400 --> 00:40:55,000 Speaker 1: top teams. The example I always use is that twenty 747 00:40:55,000 --> 00:40:58,560 Speaker 1: twenty one team that was an equally limited funky roster, 748 00:40:59,719 --> 00:41:03,319 Speaker 1: but they went ten to fifteen against the top ten 749 00:41:03,480 --> 00:41:09,600 Speaker 1: point differential teams. That's a forty percent win percentage, whereas 750 00:41:09,719 --> 00:41:12,960 Speaker 1: last year they had a thirty percent win percentage against 751 00:41:12,960 --> 00:41:16,280 Speaker 1: the top ten teams. So Steph was able to lift 752 00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:19,279 Speaker 1: them over the top for a ten percent increase in 753 00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:22,919 Speaker 1: win percentage based on his super duper star level of play. 754 00:41:22,920 --> 00:41:24,520 Speaker 1: He was playing like the best player in the world 755 00:41:24,600 --> 00:41:28,160 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one, So how close can he get 756 00:41:28,200 --> 00:41:30,200 Speaker 1: back to that form is going to be one of 757 00:41:30,200 --> 00:41:33,280 Speaker 1: the major swing factors of this season. For the record, 758 00:41:33,719 --> 00:41:36,000 Speaker 1: I believe he will. I think we're going to get 759 00:41:36,000 --> 00:41:39,160 Speaker 1: a major bounce back season from Steph. I think he's 760 00:41:39,160 --> 00:41:41,319 Speaker 1: too competitive. I think he knows his team needs him, 761 00:41:41,320 --> 00:41:44,200 Speaker 1: and I think he knows what it takes. I have 762 00:41:44,200 --> 00:41:46,920 Speaker 1: a feeling that when we get through ten games or 763 00:41:46,920 --> 00:41:49,000 Speaker 1: so of the year, Steph's going to be back up 764 00:41:49,040 --> 00:41:52,160 Speaker 1: around twenty seven points per game on roughly forty five 765 00:41:52,160 --> 00:41:54,480 Speaker 1: percent from the field and forty percent from three. That's 766 00:41:54,480 --> 00:41:57,680 Speaker 1: what I think we're going to get. And just like that, 767 00:41:58,080 --> 00:42:01,960 Speaker 1: just that, just that goes a long way towards returning 768 00:42:02,000 --> 00:42:05,120 Speaker 1: this team to the middle of the Western Conference. So, 769 00:42:05,200 --> 00:42:07,360 Speaker 1: in summary, I think Golden State is firmly in the 770 00:42:07,360 --> 00:42:09,960 Speaker 1: play in picture again this year, but in a different 771 00:42:10,000 --> 00:42:12,960 Speaker 1: way than last year. Last year, I thought they outkicked 772 00:42:13,000 --> 00:42:16,719 Speaker 1: their coverage to barely scrape into the plane. I think 773 00:42:16,760 --> 00:42:18,799 Speaker 1: this is a better roster. I think they have more 774 00:42:18,880 --> 00:42:21,040 Speaker 1: veteran role players that fit the scheme better on both 775 00:42:21,120 --> 00:42:23,920 Speaker 1: ends of the floor, and I think Steph's going to 776 00:42:23,960 --> 00:42:27,120 Speaker 1: be better. But I also think they're well positioned to 777 00:42:27,120 --> 00:42:30,080 Speaker 1: make an aggressive move should the opportunity arise at some 778 00:42:30,120 --> 00:42:33,080 Speaker 1: point this year. So for right now they're playing team, 779 00:42:33,080 --> 00:42:34,759 Speaker 1: but they have some real upside if they can get 780 00:42:34,840 --> 00:42:52,640 Speaker 1: a deal done at some point this year. Our last 781 00:42:52,680 --> 00:42:55,800 Speaker 1: team for the day at number twelve, the Indiana Pacers. 782 00:42:57,040 --> 00:43:00,200 Speaker 1: Not too much roster turnover. They lost Doug McDermott, lost 783 00:43:00,280 --> 00:43:03,800 Speaker 1: Jalen Smith, brought in Cole Swider and James Wiseman, so 784 00:43:03,840 --> 00:43:06,759 Speaker 1: basically trading out of bench wing that won't play and 785 00:43:07,080 --> 00:43:09,640 Speaker 1: their third string center is basically all they did. So 786 00:43:09,640 --> 00:43:11,200 Speaker 1: they're more or less running it back with the same 787 00:43:11,280 --> 00:43:14,120 Speaker 1: roster as last year. But let's take a quick look 788 00:43:14,120 --> 00:43:16,440 Speaker 1: back at last year because it's a confusing team in 789 00:43:16,440 --> 00:43:19,359 Speaker 1: the sense that they have these really impressive metrics that 790 00:43:19,480 --> 00:43:22,080 Speaker 1: also just didn't seem to really amount to anything when 791 00:43:22,200 --> 00:43:26,240 Speaker 1: it was nut crunching time. So in the regular season, 792 00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:29,200 Speaker 1: the five man lineup of Tyrese Haliburt n Anger, Nemhard 793 00:43:29,200 --> 00:43:32,719 Speaker 1: Aeronnie Smith, Pascal Siakim and Miles Turner their starters, they 794 00:43:32,719 --> 00:43:35,360 Speaker 1: had nine hundred and twenty two possessions according to Cleaning 795 00:43:35,400 --> 00:43:39,160 Speaker 1: the Glass plus seven point five net rating. That's really good. 796 00:43:39,560 --> 00:43:41,440 Speaker 1: They were actually very good defensively. They had a one 797 00:43:41,440 --> 00:43:44,080 Speaker 1: to oh eight defensive rating. And they rebounded really well. 798 00:43:44,080 --> 00:43:46,879 Speaker 1: They grabbed seventy five percent of their opponent's missus. That's 799 00:43:46,880 --> 00:43:50,799 Speaker 1: a really good number. In the playoffs, two hundred and 800 00:43:50,840 --> 00:43:54,560 Speaker 1: eighty eight minutes played between those five guys plus fourteen 801 00:43:54,719 --> 00:43:59,840 Speaker 1: point one net rating a one twenty nine offensive rating. 802 00:44:00,239 --> 00:44:04,360 Speaker 1: Those are insane numbers in the large sample. But a 803 00:44:04,400 --> 00:44:07,960 Speaker 1: couple of concerns popped up. One. Their rebounding didn't hold. 804 00:44:08,000 --> 00:44:10,440 Speaker 1: They gave up an offensive rebound on thirty one point 805 00:44:10,440 --> 00:44:13,800 Speaker 1: two percent of opponents misses in the playoffs. That is bad. 806 00:44:14,719 --> 00:44:18,560 Speaker 1: And then the big one, they got absolutely annihilated in 807 00:44:18,600 --> 00:44:23,520 Speaker 1: clutch situations. They went two and five. Overall. Their offense 808 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:25,560 Speaker 1: got strangled. They went down to a one to oh 809 00:44:25,600 --> 00:44:29,080 Speaker 1: one offensive rating when the game was within five points 810 00:44:29,120 --> 00:44:31,000 Speaker 1: with at least five minutes left or with less than 811 00:44:31,040 --> 00:44:34,200 Speaker 1: five minutes left one oh one. Think about that. Their 812 00:44:34,239 --> 00:44:37,000 Speaker 1: offensive rating, i said earlier, was one twenty nine with 813 00:44:37,040 --> 00:44:39,480 Speaker 1: those five guys in the postseason in the large sample. 814 00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:43,360 Speaker 1: So they were like really good until it got to 815 00:44:43,360 --> 00:44:45,120 Speaker 1: the end of games, and then they could not score. 816 00:44:46,719 --> 00:44:48,920 Speaker 1: And then their defense got thrashed too. For as good 817 00:44:48,920 --> 00:44:51,680 Speaker 1: as their defense was in the large sample in the 818 00:44:51,680 --> 00:44:54,440 Speaker 1: regular season, they had a one to twenty one defensive 819 00:44:54,480 --> 00:44:57,399 Speaker 1: rating and clutch situations in the postseason, And that's really 820 00:44:57,440 --> 00:44:59,520 Speaker 1: the main reason why I'm lower on the Pacers than 821 00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:02,839 Speaker 1: most people. I think their regular season engine is real 822 00:45:03,400 --> 00:45:06,560 Speaker 1: Tyres Halliburton is one of the best large sample offensive 823 00:45:06,560 --> 00:45:09,759 Speaker 1: engines in the league. Does everything that I want in 824 00:45:09,800 --> 00:45:13,240 Speaker 1: an offensive engine. Consistently throws kick ahead passes in transition. 825 00:45:13,320 --> 00:45:16,520 Speaker 1: Anytime somebody's open up the floor, he's throwing those kickhead passes. 826 00:45:16,680 --> 00:45:21,080 Speaker 1: They're so valuable because defensive transition is always geared looking 827 00:45:21,160 --> 00:45:24,839 Speaker 1: up the floor, looking back towards the ball handler. When 828 00:45:24,840 --> 00:45:27,400 Speaker 1: you throw it over their head, they all turn to 829 00:45:27,480 --> 00:45:29,920 Speaker 1: go identify where the ball is, and that opens up 830 00:45:29,920 --> 00:45:33,760 Speaker 1: opportunities for trailers. It's also opportunities to attack and slash 831 00:45:33,840 --> 00:45:36,200 Speaker 1: or get wide open threes before the defense is set. 832 00:45:36,560 --> 00:45:38,239 Speaker 1: So like those kickhead passes are great. And then when 833 00:45:38,280 --> 00:45:40,920 Speaker 1: he gets into the half court, he's just like an 834 00:45:40,960 --> 00:45:45,239 Speaker 1: incredible playmaker out of ball screens. If you die on 835 00:45:45,280 --> 00:45:48,279 Speaker 1: the pick or you duck underneath, he's a deadly pull 836 00:45:48,320 --> 00:45:51,160 Speaker 1: up jump shooter. If you die on the pick, but 837 00:45:51,239 --> 00:45:55,520 Speaker 1: he gets downhill, he's a deadly floater shooter. If you 838 00:45:55,600 --> 00:46:00,000 Speaker 1: switch the screen. He routinely toasted bigs in ISOs last year, 839 00:46:01,360 --> 00:46:04,399 Speaker 1: and then he's one of the best passers in those 840 00:46:04,400 --> 00:46:08,440 Speaker 1: situations that you'll meet with the early phases, when it 841 00:46:08,480 --> 00:46:12,040 Speaker 1: was Buddy Healed and Miles Turner just picking and popping 842 00:46:13,120 --> 00:46:15,439 Speaker 1: all season long, and him just routinely hitting that guy 843 00:46:15,480 --> 00:46:17,839 Speaker 1: wide open for three or when it was a lot, 844 00:46:18,200 --> 00:46:21,560 Speaker 1: a lot more like traditional ball screens post deadline, he's 845 00:46:21,600 --> 00:46:24,359 Speaker 1: reading Obi Toppin or Pascal Siakam out of the weak 846 00:46:24,440 --> 00:46:27,960 Speaker 1: side corner. Whenever his man steps over to tag the roller. 847 00:46:28,200 --> 00:46:31,160 Speaker 1: He just routinely made the right read every single time. 848 00:46:31,400 --> 00:46:36,000 Speaker 1: It generated all these high efficiency shots for all of 849 00:46:36,040 --> 00:46:38,279 Speaker 1: these players that, like a lot of these players were 850 00:46:38,320 --> 00:46:41,720 Speaker 1: mediocre players elsewhere in the league. Boston didn't want Aaron E. Smith, 851 00:46:42,600 --> 00:46:45,920 Speaker 1: the Knicks had no use for Obi Toppin. These are 852 00:46:45,920 --> 00:46:52,680 Speaker 1: guys that turned into like legitimate large role contributors for Indiana, 853 00:46:52,800 --> 00:46:56,240 Speaker 1: like Tyres is the master at just getting defenses into 854 00:46:56,360 --> 00:47:00,880 Speaker 1: rotation so that guys can capitalize on it. Dockham was 855 00:47:00,920 --> 00:47:03,160 Speaker 1: a really nice fit that juiced him up on both 856 00:47:03,239 --> 00:47:05,960 Speaker 1: ends of the floor. A lot of upside there. But 857 00:47:06,280 --> 00:47:09,280 Speaker 1: when things slow down and get stuck in the half court, 858 00:47:10,160 --> 00:47:13,840 Speaker 1: and defenses are more attentive to detail and more physical 859 00:47:13,840 --> 00:47:17,000 Speaker 1: on the ball and fly around in rotation better they 860 00:47:17,040 --> 00:47:21,800 Speaker 1: can struggle. Tyres Halliburton shot three for fifteen in clutch 861 00:47:21,840 --> 00:47:26,480 Speaker 1: situations in the playoffs and had seven turnovers to his 862 00:47:26,520 --> 00:47:31,080 Speaker 1: eight assists. Now, one thing I'll say is I thought 863 00:47:31,080 --> 00:47:34,800 Speaker 1: that Tyres, before he heard his hamstring, had more athletic 864 00:47:34,920 --> 00:47:38,920 Speaker 1: juice to get separation from elite defenders. And that's the case, right, 865 00:47:39,400 --> 00:47:41,920 Speaker 1: Tyres was so good in the clutch before he hurt 866 00:47:41,920 --> 00:47:46,480 Speaker 1: his hammy, So like, maybe that translates better at the postseason, 867 00:47:48,600 --> 00:47:51,120 Speaker 1: but there is a certain amount of that, Like, it 868 00:47:51,239 --> 00:47:54,120 Speaker 1: really looked like they ran into a brick wall when 869 00:47:54,120 --> 00:47:57,400 Speaker 1: they got into some intense playoff situations. Now, but Jason, 870 00:47:57,400 --> 00:47:59,560 Speaker 1: they made it to the Eastern Conference finals last year. 871 00:48:00,560 --> 00:48:02,720 Speaker 1: I think a healthy Knicks team beats them in five, 872 00:48:03,440 --> 00:48:05,399 Speaker 1: and I think a healthy Bucks team beats them in six. 873 00:48:05,440 --> 00:48:08,359 Speaker 1: The Bucks were a tough matchup for the Pacers were 874 00:48:08,360 --> 00:48:10,080 Speaker 1: a tough matchup for the Bucks, and they gave them 875 00:48:10,080 --> 00:48:11,880 Speaker 1: a lot of issues. But I think if Giannis and 876 00:48:11,960 --> 00:48:14,440 Speaker 1: Dame are one hundred percent healthy in full, go for 877 00:48:14,480 --> 00:48:16,520 Speaker 1: a playoff series I think the Bucks probably get the 878 00:48:16,600 --> 00:48:19,719 Speaker 1: job done, so like, yeah, they made the conference finals, 879 00:48:20,200 --> 00:48:24,160 Speaker 1: but they were extremely fortunate in getting here. So the 880 00:48:24,239 --> 00:48:27,040 Speaker 1: question is, how can the Pacers enter into that next 881 00:48:27,080 --> 00:48:29,239 Speaker 1: tier of teams? How can they get into that tier 882 00:48:29,239 --> 00:48:32,080 Speaker 1: because like starting on Monday, I'm covering teams that legitimately 883 00:48:32,080 --> 00:48:34,600 Speaker 1: have a championship ceiling if things go right. I don't 884 00:48:34,600 --> 00:48:37,520 Speaker 1: think this Pacers team does. So how do they get there? 885 00:48:38,120 --> 00:48:39,680 Speaker 1: I think they need an upgrade at the two or 886 00:48:39,719 --> 00:48:43,120 Speaker 1: the three. Aaron Ne Smith and Adrian m Hardn are 887 00:48:43,120 --> 00:48:46,719 Speaker 1: two really solid basketball players, and I think they are 888 00:48:46,920 --> 00:48:51,279 Speaker 1: definitely championship level rotation players, but ideally they should be 889 00:48:51,320 --> 00:48:55,479 Speaker 1: coming off the bench. For you, you need more high level 890 00:48:55,560 --> 00:48:58,880 Speaker 1: closeout attacking out of those spots, and you need better 891 00:48:59,000 --> 00:49:01,719 Speaker 1: contested rebound. This was a team that did not rebound 892 00:49:01,760 --> 00:49:05,680 Speaker 1: well in the postseason. If you can basically imagine aaron 893 00:49:05,760 --> 00:49:08,279 Speaker 1: Ne Smith but like a six ' eight version of 894 00:49:08,360 --> 00:49:10,360 Speaker 1: him with a little bit more off the dribble pop, 895 00:49:10,880 --> 00:49:13,480 Speaker 1: I think just that if you did a substantial upgrade 896 00:49:13,560 --> 00:49:16,560 Speaker 1: to one of those two spots, I think that goes 897 00:49:16,600 --> 00:49:20,840 Speaker 1: a long way, like kind of like with the Knicks 898 00:49:20,840 --> 00:49:24,600 Speaker 1: did bringing in Michale bridges as an upgrade at the 899 00:49:24,640 --> 00:49:29,160 Speaker 1: three dramatically increases their ceiling. A player of that type 900 00:49:29,160 --> 00:49:32,480 Speaker 1: of caliber at the two or the three, I think 901 00:49:32,640 --> 00:49:36,000 Speaker 1: moves the Pacers into those discussions. And they have the 902 00:49:36,000 --> 00:49:37,600 Speaker 1: means to make that type of deal. They have a 903 00:49:37,640 --> 00:49:39,680 Speaker 1: young player that doesn't seem to fit their long term 904 00:49:39,760 --> 00:49:42,680 Speaker 1: vision and Ben Matherin. They have draft picks to spend, 905 00:49:42,880 --> 00:49:44,920 Speaker 1: they have lots of mid level salaries that can be 906 00:49:44,960 --> 00:49:49,319 Speaker 1: combined to get to a higher level player. And then 907 00:49:49,360 --> 00:49:51,200 Speaker 1: the last piece of it is just Tyree solving that 908 00:49:51,200 --> 00:49:53,520 Speaker 1: playoff puzzle. He was a little bit weird in this 909 00:49:53,560 --> 00:49:55,560 Speaker 1: playoff run. A lot of high highs, but a lot 910 00:49:55,600 --> 00:49:57,959 Speaker 1: of low lows. He had seven games where he didn't 911 00:49:57,960 --> 00:50:00,840 Speaker 1: even take fifteen shots. He had four games where he 912 00:50:00,880 --> 00:50:04,600 Speaker 1: didn't even take ten shots. There was like a little 913 00:50:04,600 --> 00:50:06,799 Speaker 1: bit of like a he either hazard or he does 914 00:50:06,840 --> 00:50:09,359 Speaker 1: in on this particular night kind of thing. And that's 915 00:50:09,400 --> 00:50:11,439 Speaker 1: just part of the puzzle of the playoffs. You get 916 00:50:11,440 --> 00:50:14,000 Speaker 1: attacked on the defensive end a lot, and on offense 917 00:50:14,040 --> 00:50:17,120 Speaker 1: everything gets way harder and you have to maintain that 918 00:50:17,200 --> 00:50:22,560 Speaker 1: consistency throughout that four round setup. Now, to be clear, 919 00:50:22,680 --> 00:50:25,160 Speaker 1: the Pacers to me feel like the next great Eastern 920 00:50:25,200 --> 00:50:30,040 Speaker 1: Conference Titan. Remember how like Milwaukee, Miami, and Boston kind 921 00:50:30,040 --> 00:50:33,560 Speaker 1: of ran the East over the previous half decade. I 922 00:50:33,560 --> 00:50:35,120 Speaker 1: feel like the Pacers are going to be in that 923 00:50:35,200 --> 00:50:38,160 Speaker 1: type of group for the future. But I feel like 924 00:50:38,200 --> 00:50:41,759 Speaker 1: they're one more roster shakeup, in a little bit more 925 00:50:41,840 --> 00:50:45,880 Speaker 1: player development away from actually making that a reality. So 926 00:50:46,000 --> 00:50:47,840 Speaker 1: for this season, I just have them as the best 927 00:50:47,880 --> 00:50:51,239 Speaker 1: team that doesn't have a real chance to win the 928 00:50:51,280 --> 00:50:53,920 Speaker 1: title this year at number twelve. All right, guys, that 929 00:50:54,000 --> 00:50:55,720 Speaker 1: is all I have for today. As always, I sincerely 930 00:50:55,719 --> 00:50:57,680 Speaker 1: ap pursuit you guys for suporting me and supporting the show. 931 00:50:58,040 --> 00:51:01,360 Speaker 1: We'll be back on Monday, getting in to number eleven 932 00:51:01,760 --> 00:51:05,360 Speaker 1: in our next tier of teams that can win the championship. 933 00:51:05,400 --> 00:51:07,000 Speaker 1: If things go right, I will see you guys then 934 00:51:09,200 --> 00:51:12,360 Speaker 1: the volume. What's up guys? As always, I appreciate you 935 00:51:12,440 --> 00:51:15,400 Speaker 1: for listening to and supporting OOPS tonight. It would actually 936 00:51:15,400 --> 00:51:17,319 Speaker 1: be really helpful for us if you guys would take 937 00:51:17,320 --> 00:51:20,440 Speaker 1: a second and leave a rating and a review. As always, 938 00:51:20,440 --> 00:51:22,160 Speaker 1: I appreciate you guys supporting us, but if you could 939 00:51:22,160 --> 00:51:24,640 Speaker 1: take a minute to do that, I'd really appreciate it.