WEBVTT - It Just Doesn't Matter! 

0:00:01.540 --> 0:00:05.390
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:05.430 --> 0:00:07.430
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.470 --> 0:00:09.690
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:09.850 --> 0:00:11.170
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:11.390 --> 0:00:25.550
<v Speaker 4>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty. Chinese are extremely sensitive

0:00:26.110 --> 0:00:30.150
<v Speaker 4>about these nuances in diplomacy. They've been at it for

0:00:30.150 --> 0:00:33.729
<v Speaker 4>4,000 years. The Chinese, when they get upset, can do

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 4>things like take over an island here or there or

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 4>tear up an agreement or start threatening or do other

0:00:40.460 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 4>things that could cause a crisis.

0:00:43.940 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 3>So that's interesting. That's Charles Krauthammer, the late Charles Krauthammer,

0:00:48.659 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 3>who we were big fans of back in the day, 2016.

0:00:52.830 --> 0:00:57.590
<v Speaker 3>When I suppose who was Trump got elected in 16.

0:00:57.590 --> 0:01:03.100
<v Speaker 3>So it was at the end of Obama. Anyway, Chinese

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.100
<v Speaker 3>care about these little tiny snubs and that sort of stuff.

0:01:07.140 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>So you have to be very, very careful with the

0:01:09.980 --> 0:01:13.980
<v Speaker 3>diplomacy and the showing up at the airport like Trump

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.819
<v Speaker 3>did last night in the red carpet and having the

0:01:15.860 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>right fork in the right place and all that sort

0:01:18.310 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 3>of stuff, I guess. Whatever. Get over yourselves, is what

0:01:22.940 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I would say. So, President Xi is in Washington, D.C.,

0:01:26.980 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>and they're having their big dinner tonight. And let's get

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.740
<v Speaker 3>a report from Lucas Tomlinson of Fox with what's going on.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.339
<v Speaker 5>The relationship between the United States and China will define

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 5>the 21st century.

0:01:38.260 --> 0:01:41.899
<v Speaker 6>Not everyone is thrilled about Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 6>to the White House after reports surfaced that China was

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.380
<v Speaker 6>supplying satellite imagery to help Iran kill American troops in

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 6>recent months.

0:01:49.620 --> 0:01:50.390
<v Speaker 3>Among the critics.

0:01:50.780 --> 0:01:53.310
<v Speaker 6>the Senate Armed Services Committee's top Republican.

0:01:53.690 --> 0:01:58.130
<v Speaker 7>I would have suggested the president not invite Xi Jinping

0:01:58.170 --> 0:02:01.790
<v Speaker 7>to Washington for such a lavish welcome.

0:02:02.070 --> 0:02:04.950
<v Speaker 6>Secretary Rubio reacting to that suggestion today.

0:02:05.090 --> 0:02:07.830
<v Speaker 5>This is the second largest economy in the world and

0:02:07.850 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 5>a pretty substantial military that's undergoing the most rapid military

0:02:11.190 --> 0:02:12.500
<v Speaker 5>buildup probably in history.

0:02:12.850 --> 0:02:14.940
<v Speaker 3>So I thought that interesting back and forth over the

0:02:14.980 --> 0:02:19.130
<v Speaker 3>last couple of days. was worth noting. I mean, the

0:02:19.270 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 3>chair of the armed services committee is no, uh, is

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 3>not a nobody. And him thinking is a bad idea

0:02:25.620 --> 0:02:29.260
<v Speaker 3>to have G come. Now I saw, uh, whoa, who's

0:02:29.300 --> 0:02:32.180
<v Speaker 3>that democratic Senator who pretended he was a Vietnam war

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>hero and turned out not to be Blumenthal. I can't

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.329
<v Speaker 3>believe that he still gets to be a Senator and

0:02:37.650 --> 0:02:40.750
<v Speaker 3>discuss military matters is a guy who claimed to be

0:02:40.770 --> 0:02:45.390
<v Speaker 3>a big time Vietnam war vet with all these honors

0:02:45.410 --> 0:02:47.510
<v Speaker 3>and everything like that. And he didn't, go at all.

0:02:47.610 --> 0:02:50.850
<v Speaker 3>It just shows you the way politics are. Anyway, I

0:02:50.910 --> 0:02:54.380
<v Speaker 3>couldn't tell if Blumenthal, if this was just partisan, anything

0:02:54.460 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Trump does is wrong, or if he actually thought we

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't invite President Xi. I don't know, and I don't

0:03:00.940 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 3>actually know what is the right answer on this. It

0:03:03.060 --> 0:03:07.620
<v Speaker 3>is pretty weird. President Xi is financing Iran. We're at

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.940
<v Speaker 3>war with Iran. President Xi is daily attacking us. We've

0:03:13.020 --> 0:03:15.419
<v Speaker 3>talked about this for years. The FBI opens up, what,

0:03:15.460 --> 0:03:19.669
<v Speaker 3>like 100 new investigations into Chinese hacks per day or

0:03:19.710 --> 0:03:23.250
<v Speaker 3>something like that? And we get together and have dinner

0:03:23.270 --> 0:03:24.810
<v Speaker 3>and smile at each other and act like we're friends.

0:03:24.870 --> 0:03:27.590
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the point of all that is. Anyway,

0:03:27.889 --> 0:03:28.620
<v Speaker 3>the report rolls on.

0:03:29.190 --> 0:03:32.630
<v Speaker 6>Talks on trade and artificial intelligence are expected to dominate

0:03:32.650 --> 0:03:35.890
<v Speaker 6>the summit in Washington, the leader's first meeting since Xi

0:03:35.970 --> 0:03:39.650
<v Speaker 6>hosted Trump in Beijing in May. President Trump mentioned China

0:03:39.730 --> 0:03:42.910
<v Speaker 6>only one time in his UN address, vowing the US

0:03:43.170 --> 0:03:44.630
<v Speaker 6>must win the AI race.

0:03:44.780 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to stifle growth of something that will.

0:03:47.860 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Be bigger than the Industrial Revolution, and we will be

0:03:50.700 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 4>very careful.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 6>After Trump called on Putin to end his war on

0:03:54.460 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 6>Ukraine at the UN, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky thinks she

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 6>can help make that happen.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.500
<v Speaker 3>He is someone who can influence Russia too, more than

0:04:04.820 --> 0:04:07.820
<v Speaker 3>many others can. Yeah, I'm not optimistic about that either.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm really stuck on this whole UN speeches, fancy meals

0:04:14.300 --> 0:04:18.500
<v Speaker 3>is really close to worthless. The amount of coverage it gets...

0:04:20.110 --> 0:04:23.500
<v Speaker 3>as a ratio to how important it is, is way

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 3>out of, I mean, every television bank I'm looking at

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.289
<v Speaker 3>right now has got some picture of Trump and she,

0:04:29.330 --> 0:04:31.849
<v Speaker 3>and coming on the plane and talking about the speeches

0:04:31.870 --> 0:04:33.980
<v Speaker 3>from yesterday. And I just, I just don't think it

0:04:34.020 --> 0:04:38.190
<v Speaker 3>means anything. Maybe I'm naive, but show me the results

0:04:38.230 --> 0:04:41.370
<v Speaker 3>of previous stuff. A week from now, tell me what

0:04:41.650 --> 0:04:44.909
<v Speaker 3>from these speeches at the UN or this meal we'll

0:04:44.950 --> 0:04:49.270
<v Speaker 3>be talking about as a still ongoing result of this.

0:04:49.790 --> 0:04:54.430
<v Speaker 3>Anything at all? I'm beyond skeptical. I want to hear

0:04:54.470 --> 0:04:57.930
<v Speaker 3>how CBS approached this. Give me 44. This is Nancy Cordes.

0:04:58.330 --> 0:05:02.130
<v Speaker 9>The US and China are at odds over AI, trade,

0:05:02.270 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 9>and most importantly, Iran.

0:05:04.890 --> 0:05:09.260
<v Speaker 3>Trump, stop fawning over strongmen. Stop calling Xi.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 10>A great gentleman.

0:05:10.460 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 9>Lawmakers from both sides urged Trump to dial back the

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:15.100
<v Speaker 9>warm welcome.

0:05:15.430 --> 0:05:20.030
<v Speaker 7>His guest is a brutal, unelected, and oppressive dictator.

0:05:21.150 --> 0:05:25.150
<v Speaker 3>OK, so that from Schumer. Now, that was just partisan politics.

0:05:26.100 --> 0:05:30.220
<v Speaker 3>Barack Obama welcomed President Xi also. And at that time,

0:05:30.260 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>we we already knew President Xi was an evil communist

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 3>dictator who had slaves and was hacking into everything he

0:05:37.260 --> 0:05:39.060
<v Speaker 3>could hack in and stealing our technology and all the

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.380
<v Speaker 3>bad things he was doing back then. And he welcomed him.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>So let's God, I wish we didn't have to play

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:48.370
<v Speaker 3>these partisan games all the time. Something a little more concrete,

0:05:48.510 --> 0:05:52.500
<v Speaker 3>Scott Bessent, he is the Secretary of the Treasury, was

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:57.420
<v Speaker 3>interviewed yesterday talking about how many meetings they might have.

0:05:58.140 --> 0:06:00.780
<v Speaker 11>This is our second in-person meeting. There's a chance they

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.420
<v Speaker 11>may have a historic four meetings this year, four meetings

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 11>between the most powerful country in the world and the

0:06:08.620 --> 0:06:10.349
<v Speaker 11>second largest economy in the world.

0:06:10.370 --> 0:06:15.070
<v Speaker 3>A visit in Beijing, this visit, a visit to Shenzhen.

0:06:16.220 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 11>They have for a conference in November and then President

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.990
<v Speaker 11>Xi coming for the G20 in Doral.

0:06:22.950 --> 0:06:29.070
<v Speaker 3>By the way, that G20 meeting in Florida, Trump invited

0:06:29.150 --> 0:06:34.070
<v Speaker 3>Vladimir Putin to that. Now, that one I definitely don't

0:06:34.130 --> 0:06:36.659
<v Speaker 3>think is cool that you have Putin come to the

0:06:36.700 --> 0:06:40.590
<v Speaker 3>United States and eat dinner there. with you and treated

0:06:40.650 --> 0:06:43.610
<v Speaker 3>like an equal on the world stage, like a, like

0:06:43.810 --> 0:06:46.980
<v Speaker 3>any sort of normal actor on the world stage. That

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 3>is just completely out of bounds. I don't know if

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.979
<v Speaker 3>Trump just invited him knowing he won't come or the

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 3>security would not allow it to come or for all

0:06:55.500 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the different reasons that it shouldn't happen. It won't happen.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.580
<v Speaker 3>And so he just invited him for, I don't know

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.390
<v Speaker 3>the way Trump works people, but the idea of Vladimir

0:07:04.430 --> 0:07:08.430
<v Speaker 3>Putin having dinner at the golf club in Florida and

0:07:08.870 --> 0:07:16.270
<v Speaker 3>while he's bombing children's hospitals in Ukraine. That's just appalling. Anyway,

0:07:16.290 --> 0:07:21.010
<v Speaker 3>this is the News Nation take on the whole AI

0:07:21.170 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>angle on the summit between Trump and Xi today.

0:07:24.530 --> 0:07:26.830
<v Speaker 1>Say the AI race is one of their top priorities

0:07:26.870 --> 0:07:30.830
<v Speaker 1>for this US-China relationship. Do you think this should be

0:07:30.850 --> 0:07:34.210
<v Speaker 1>a focus headed into today, just taking that into consideration?

0:07:34.570 --> 0:07:36.470
<v Speaker 12>Whether or not it should be a focus, it simply

0:07:36.610 --> 0:07:40.950
<v Speaker 12>is a focus. Americans may not associate it directly with

0:07:40.970 --> 0:07:43.530
<v Speaker 12>the China relationship, but of course, it affects all of

0:07:43.610 --> 0:07:45.540
<v Speaker 12>our lives. I have a colleague who likes to say,

0:07:45.630 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 12>it's like electricity. You don't think about it, but it's

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 12>part of absolutely everything. So of course, it's going into

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.340
<v Speaker 12>this summit, it's going into our daily lives.

0:07:53.860 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not optimistic that China has any interest in

0:07:58.140 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 3>playing ball on this whole AI thing. I was going

0:08:00.140 --> 0:08:01.660
<v Speaker 3>to throw out a question to those of you... I

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 3>got two questions. So, executive producer Hanson came up with

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:13.110
<v Speaker 3>a good idea today. We need an AI Tim Beloyer.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.070
<v Speaker 3>If you've been fans of this show for years... we

0:08:17.130 --> 0:08:19.150
<v Speaker 3>used to talk about legal stuff and this guy named

0:08:19.210 --> 0:08:21.090
<v Speaker 3>Tim who happened to be a lawyer would call into

0:08:21.110 --> 0:08:23.370
<v Speaker 3>the show and say, Hey, good point about this, or

0:08:23.410 --> 0:08:25.740
<v Speaker 3>you're wrong about this, or here's something you might want

0:08:25.770 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to know about this thing you were talking about. And

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.900
<v Speaker 3>over time, Tim became a regular guest and they know

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>he's fabulously successful and writes books that get national attention

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.359
<v Speaker 3>and all that sort of stuff. But we'd love to

0:08:36.420 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>have an AI, Tim, the lawyer we know because we're

0:08:38.980 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>on in Silicon Valley, we've been on in San Francisco

0:08:41.780 --> 0:08:48.380
<v Speaker 3>for 23 years now. Wow. Um, And all over the

0:08:48.420 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Bay Area, all over California, around the country. If you

0:08:52.059 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 3>are some sort of expert around AI and you would

0:08:58.140 --> 0:09:00.699
<v Speaker 3>like to either email us or call in on a

0:09:00.750 --> 0:09:02.390
<v Speaker 3>regular basis or we could just have you as a

0:09:02.420 --> 0:09:05.170
<v Speaker 3>guest whenever we need to, that would be fantastic. And

0:09:05.190 --> 0:09:09.089
<v Speaker 3>here's one of the questions I would ask. People keep

0:09:09.130 --> 0:09:12.670
<v Speaker 3>portraying this race that we've got going on between us

0:09:12.730 --> 0:09:15.890
<v Speaker 3>and China. Well, we can't slow down on AI or

0:09:16.030 --> 0:09:19.150
<v Speaker 3>China will win the race. They'll get ahead of us.

0:09:19.650 --> 0:09:22.570
<v Speaker 3>I've heard multiple reports that China is basically six months

0:09:22.610 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>behind us. Does that framework work? Does that make any sense?

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.140
<v Speaker 3>Is there a getting to the end, like getting there,

0:09:33.940 --> 0:09:39.309
<v Speaker 3>that will give us an advantage of any consequence over... China,

0:09:39.429 --> 0:09:42.569
<v Speaker 3>if they get there, whatever there means, if they get

0:09:42.610 --> 0:09:46.250
<v Speaker 3>there six months later, I'm thinking of the whole nuclear race. Now,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.740
<v Speaker 3>it was important for us getting nuclear weapons before Hitler did. Very,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.179
<v Speaker 3>very important for obvious reasons to end World War Two

0:09:53.220 --> 0:09:56.570
<v Speaker 3>or before Japan wasn't really working on a nuclear weapon

0:09:56.590 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>or anywhere close. But Germany was and. the Soviet Union

0:10:01.260 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 3>got one quickly. But, well, I guess that's part of

0:10:03.460 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 3>my point. So we get there to AGI, Artificial General Intelligence,

0:10:08.740 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 3>where computers are programming themselves and everything like that. If

0:10:11.780 --> 0:10:15.710
<v Speaker 3>China gets there six months later, have we done anything,

0:10:15.730 --> 0:10:19.990
<v Speaker 3>won anything? Is that part of the whole thing? Conversation

0:10:20.030 --> 0:10:22.510
<v Speaker 3>is important as it's portrayed all the time. We need

0:10:22.530 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 3>to stay ahead of China. Or what happens would be

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the question I'd ask to whatever AI expert we have

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>out there. You can text us 415-295-KFTC or email or,

0:10:34.910 --> 0:10:37.170
<v Speaker 3>you know, we'll set up a phone call. Love to

0:10:37.210 --> 0:10:41.370
<v Speaker 3>talk to you about that. Need to talk to you

0:10:41.390 --> 0:10:45.420
<v Speaker 3>about this. A couple of years ago, I had reason

0:10:45.460 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 3>to do a little research on somebody and I had

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.380
<v Speaker 3>their phone number. And I thought, I wonder what I

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 3>can find out about somebody based on their phone number.

0:10:53.179 --> 0:10:55.660
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea this. I was shocked. I mean,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm naive. I didn't know there are all these websites

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.900
<v Speaker 3>where you can pay like five dollars a month and

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.020
<v Speaker 3>you put in somebody's phone number and you get all

0:11:03.059 --> 0:11:05.540
<v Speaker 3>this information. And there are tons of websites like that.

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:06.860
<v Speaker 13>Um.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>We got this story. Authorities say a Kentucky officer ran

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.620
<v Speaker 3>the same two license plates 2,000 times. They belong to

0:11:14.660 --> 0:11:17.630
<v Speaker 3>the mother of his child. She had an order of

0:11:17.670 --> 0:11:20.150
<v Speaker 3>protection against him. He didn't hack anything. He just typed

0:11:20.190 --> 0:11:24.130
<v Speaker 3>in the plate. One of 120,000 cameras. The Washington Post

0:11:24.170 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 3>found at least 50 more. Most were watching women. So

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 3>here is what is happening. You've got logs of your

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.740
<v Speaker 3>license plate and your locations and everything out there. You've

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 3>got all the information that you can get from a

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.550
<v Speaker 3>phone number that I mentioned. It's all out there. They're

0:11:39.590 --> 0:11:43.210
<v Speaker 3>data brokers. They sell this stuff, home addresses, phone numbers, relatives,

0:11:43.690 --> 0:11:48.110
<v Speaker 3>everywhere you've lived. Your habits, you don't want that stuff

0:11:48.170 --> 0:11:50.270
<v Speaker 3>out there for all kinds of safety reasons, all kinds

0:11:50.309 --> 0:11:53.610
<v Speaker 3>of marketing reasons. That's why we use Incogni, I use Incogni.

0:11:53.630 --> 0:11:56.410
<v Speaker 3>It sends removal requests to more than 420 data broker

0:11:56.690 --> 0:11:59.089
<v Speaker 3>and people search sites, then follows up so that you

0:11:59.190 --> 0:12:04.060
<v Speaker 3>don't get relisted. Go to incogni.com slash Armstrong to get 60% off.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.179
<v Speaker 3>That's incogni.com slash Armstrong. They can't harm you if they

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.340
<v Speaker 3>can't find you. I'm a big fan of that. As

0:12:09.380 --> 0:12:11.660
<v Speaker 3>we move into this weird world where all your information

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.900
<v Speaker 3>is floating around there on the web, and pretty soon AI,

0:12:14.100 --> 0:12:15.500
<v Speaker 3>you'll be able to tell, I bet I could do

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.900
<v Speaker 3>this right now. Hey, AI, here's a phone number. Tell

0:12:18.940 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>me everything you can about this person and then do that.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Does AI go out there and scrub all those websites

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:29.510
<v Speaker 3>and try to get all the information? Horrifying. So Heather Myers,

0:12:29.650 --> 0:12:32.069
<v Speaker 3>who's filling in for Katie Green doing news today, told

0:12:32.110 --> 0:12:34.150
<v Speaker 3>us a story that she's been following a little bit

0:12:34.230 --> 0:12:36.790
<v Speaker 3>earlier about, for the first time ever, a high school

0:12:36.809 --> 0:12:39.770
<v Speaker 3>degree isn't really worth that much less than a college degree.

0:12:39.790 --> 0:12:41.420
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get the details on that coming up.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 3>That's a big story. Stay tuned.

0:12:44.540 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:12:50.580 --> 0:12:52.940
<v Speaker 3>We did get a text about that Lizzie Borden series

0:12:53.020 --> 0:12:56.590
<v Speaker 3>on Netflix. They said it's really good, but very graphic,

0:12:56.650 --> 0:13:00.300
<v Speaker 3>so beware. Okay, so. If you're the sort of person

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.570
<v Speaker 3>that wants to see a hatcheting, maybe don't watch that.

0:13:03.870 --> 0:13:06.130
<v Speaker 3>Heather Myers is nice enough to fill in for Katie

0:13:06.170 --> 0:13:08.189
<v Speaker 3>Green for a couple of days while Katie is doing

0:13:08.250 --> 0:13:13.310
<v Speaker 3>her anniversary trip. Heather is a longtime TV host and

0:13:13.390 --> 0:13:15.910
<v Speaker 3>a correspondent for Newsmax right now. And what is the

0:13:15.929 --> 0:13:17.870
<v Speaker 3>story you covered the other day that caught my attention?

0:13:18.530 --> 0:13:21.540
<v Speaker 1>This caught my attention too, Jack, because I have a

0:13:21.580 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>high school-aged son.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 14>I believe you do too.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So for decades, young Americans have been told that that

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.420
<v Speaker 1>four-year college degree is the immediate ticket to a good job.

0:13:31.940 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>But there's brand new data coming out about our labor

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>market that shows that those with a recent college degree,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.260
<v Speaker 1>so a recent college grad, I'm talking between the ages

0:13:40.300 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of 22 and 26, are having one of the toughest

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:48.690
<v Speaker 1>times ever finding a job. At the same time, those

0:13:48.870 --> 0:13:52.550
<v Speaker 1>without a bachelor's degree and maybe with just a high

0:13:52.590 --> 0:13:55.589
<v Speaker 1>school diploma or partial college education are having one of

0:13:55.630 --> 0:13:58.830
<v Speaker 1>the best job markets that they've experienced in the past

0:13:58.830 --> 0:13:59.449
<v Speaker 1>20 years.

0:14:00.450 --> 0:14:03.790
<v Speaker 3>I knew this was coming. Whenever I would talk about

0:14:03.830 --> 0:14:05.730
<v Speaker 3>the fact like I'm not pushing my kids to go

0:14:05.750 --> 0:14:07.530
<v Speaker 3>to college, I have one that probably won't, one that

0:14:07.550 --> 0:14:10.939
<v Speaker 3>probably will, but I'm definitely not pushing it. Whenever I

0:14:10.980 --> 0:14:13.620
<v Speaker 3>have mentioned that, people have said to me, well, statistically,

0:14:13.700 --> 0:14:16.100
<v Speaker 3>over time, people who graduate college make this much more money.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.780
<v Speaker 3>That has been true always. I don't believe it's going

0:14:18.820 --> 0:14:22.500
<v Speaker 3>to be true anymore. I knew at some point the

0:14:22.540 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 3>data would catch up to that, and I'm sure that's

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.260
<v Speaker 3>roughly starting now and going forward. There's all kinds of

0:14:28.350 --> 0:14:30.650
<v Speaker 3>reasons for that. I've got a thing from a college

0:14:30.690 --> 0:14:32.230
<v Speaker 3>professor I'm going to read a little bit later in

0:14:32.270 --> 0:14:35.530
<v Speaker 3>the show. Him talking about current students who know nothing,

0:14:35.990 --> 0:14:39.470
<v Speaker 3>learn nothing, come out of college no more qualified than

0:14:39.510 --> 0:14:42.110
<v Speaker 3>when they went in, only poorer. And then you've got

0:14:42.150 --> 0:14:44.490
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing. If I bring on a college graduate,

0:14:44.730 --> 0:14:49.410
<v Speaker 3>what crazy crap do they believe about the employer-employee relationship

0:14:49.830 --> 0:14:53.870
<v Speaker 3>and suing me for this and that? Yeah, who wants that?

0:14:55.190 --> 0:14:57.540
<v Speaker 1>Right, and so this is interesting because the study touched

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on exactly what you just mentioned. A few of the

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.660
<v Speaker 1>other reasons of why we're seeing this trend is that

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.710
<v Speaker 1>AI has largely taken over entry-level white-collar jobs. So those

0:15:08.750 --> 0:15:11.230
<v Speaker 1>recent college grads are coming out, and usually you'd start

0:15:11.250 --> 0:15:13.470
<v Speaker 1>kind of at the bottom of the ladder job. Those

0:15:13.510 --> 0:15:15.770
<v Speaker 1>are now being done by AI for a lot of

0:15:15.810 --> 0:15:16.390
<v Speaker 1>these companies.

0:15:16.430 --> 0:15:19.110
<v Speaker 3>Those weren't jobs you needed a college degree for anyway.

0:15:19.130 --> 0:15:19.270
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:15:19.590 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 3>They're hiring college graduates to do college graduates are doing

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.340
<v Speaker 3>them because it was all I could find. But that's

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.540
<v Speaker 3>not no, that's not what got them the job.

0:15:27.300 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.180
<v Speaker 1>Another reason, simple supply and demand. So older workers in

0:15:31.260 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>skilled trades are starting to retire. So that's creating demand

0:15:33.950 --> 0:15:37.550
<v Speaker 1>for people who can do jobs that require hands-on skills.

0:15:37.610 --> 0:15:41.170
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about your air conditioning repair person, your plumber,

0:15:41.210 --> 0:15:42.130
<v Speaker 1>your electrician.

0:15:42.490 --> 0:15:44.090
<v Speaker 14>Those trade jobs are still.

0:15:44.470 --> 0:15:45.990
<v Speaker 1>You know, they need to fill a lot of spots

0:15:46.050 --> 0:15:46.410
<v Speaker 1>in those.

0:15:47.580 --> 0:15:49.100
<v Speaker 14>There was something else here.

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:49.700
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So You know when you're talking about something in front

0:15:51.900 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of your phone and then sooner than later you get

0:15:54.180 --> 0:15:56.100
<v Speaker 1>a video about this exact topic?

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, we were discussing this just the other day, yeah.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I'm talking about this subject matter with my

0:16:02.020 --> 0:16:03.780
<v Speaker 1>husband and all of a sudden I get this video

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for a company called Degree Free. And basically what this

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.380
<v Speaker 1>woman and I believe her husband have done is they

0:16:10.420 --> 0:16:14.530
<v Speaker 1>have figured out how to reverse engineer your way into

0:16:14.570 --> 0:16:17.370
<v Speaker 1>the career that you want to go into without getting

0:16:17.410 --> 0:16:21.530
<v Speaker 1>a college degree. So I interviewed her for the same story.

0:16:21.650 --> 0:16:25.790
<v Speaker 1>And she basically said that the most important thing that

0:16:25.850 --> 0:16:29.530
<v Speaker 1>employers are looking for is no longer a bachelor's degree.

0:16:29.630 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 14>It's work experience.

0:16:31.540 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't have any work experience, and it

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could be something as like being a high school waiter

0:16:36.940 --> 0:16:39.220
<v Speaker 1>or waitress at a restaurant or a lifeguard, any of

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.380
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of jobs, employers want that more than anything

0:16:43.450 --> 0:16:44.070
<v Speaker 1>else right now.

0:16:44.990 --> 0:16:50.140
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't surprise me a bit. Uh, It's very easy

0:16:50.220 --> 0:16:53.570
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of young people now to, and part

0:16:53.590 --> 0:16:55.550
<v Speaker 3>of it is we've crafted a society where it's very

0:16:55.570 --> 0:16:57.370
<v Speaker 3>hard to get a job as a teenager now. There's

0:16:57.390 --> 0:16:59.410
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of things that I did that you're not

0:16:59.430 --> 0:17:02.390
<v Speaker 3>allowed to do anymore and Anyway, so you could graduate

0:17:02.430 --> 0:17:05.909
<v Speaker 3>from college with a worthless degree. You're out there. You're 22,

0:17:05.910 --> 0:17:09.270
<v Speaker 3>23 years old. You've never worked a day in your life.

0:17:09.670 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 3>You've never had a boss. You've never been given a

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.540
<v Speaker 3>task that you had to perform or anything ever. Yeah,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.140
<v Speaker 3>there's a big difference between that person and you hire

0:17:18.180 --> 0:17:19.830
<v Speaker 3>somebody who's had a couple of jobs. And who cares

0:17:19.850 --> 0:17:21.970
<v Speaker 3>about the degree? Because we all know in most cases.

0:17:22.740 --> 0:17:24.940
<v Speaker 10>They're worthless. Yeah.

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:25.859
<v Speaker 14>So that was her point.

0:17:25.940 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>She said that for a lot of these employers, these

0:17:28.940 --> 0:17:31.939
<v Speaker 1>recent college grads are coming in with zero work experience

0:17:32.290 --> 0:17:34.659
<v Speaker 1>and then asking for a salary similar to what the

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.940
<v Speaker 1>owner of the company is bringing home every week.

0:17:37.140 --> 0:17:38.810
<v Speaker 3>And it's not the kid's fault. I don't want to

0:17:38.830 --> 0:17:41.730
<v Speaker 3>make it sound like that. It's horrible that we sold

0:17:41.790 --> 0:17:44.950
<v Speaker 3>this line of crap to college kids and parents about

0:17:44.990 --> 0:17:48.409
<v Speaker 3>this for years. All these different kind of gender study

0:17:48.450 --> 0:17:50.570
<v Speaker 3>degrees and everything like that that aren't going to do

0:17:50.970 --> 0:17:53.390
<v Speaker 3>anything for you. Oh, that's horrible.

0:17:53.410 --> 0:17:56.050
<v Speaker 14>Expensive piece of paper. And they have all this debt.

0:17:56.490 --> 0:17:57.949
<v Speaker 1>And then they have to go back and get the

0:17:57.990 --> 0:18:00.490
<v Speaker 1>waiter waitressing job or that entry level job that they

0:18:00.510 --> 0:18:01.790
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten at 18.

0:18:01.790 --> 0:18:02.030
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:18:02.970 --> 0:18:05.810
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for that story, Heather. Really appreciate that. We'll talk

0:18:05.830 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to you a little bit later. That is not surprising.

0:18:09.580 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 3>The data has caught up to what we all thought

0:18:12.100 --> 0:18:14.580
<v Speaker 3>was going to happen anyway. Stay tuned for more.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.020
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:17.850 --> 0:18:20.190
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to continue this conversation we were just having

0:18:20.210 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>with Gary Dietrich, who joins the Armstrong and Getty Show

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.659
<v Speaker 3>right now. CBS television and iHeartRadio political analyst Gary Dietrich.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:27.340
<v Speaker 3>How are you today, Gary?

0:18:28.140 --> 0:18:29.060
<v Speaker 10>Hey, I'm doing great, Jack.

0:18:29.100 --> 0:18:31.980
<v Speaker 8>And by the way, I just heard a rumor recently

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 8>that you've been taking some flack for cream in your coffee, buddy.

0:18:35.060 --> 0:18:37.179
<v Speaker 10>But I want you to know, I want you to know.

0:18:37.300 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 8>Dairy farmers nationwide, 110% behind the little teaspoon or two

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 8>that you use every day. So don't push back on.

0:18:45.940 --> 0:18:46.790
<v Speaker 10>That, Jack. Come on.

0:18:48.410 --> 0:18:48.630
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:18:48.910 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel less of a man because I put cream

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.340
<v Speaker 3>in my coffee. So we're just having this conversation about

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:55.970
<v Speaker 3>and then we'll get into politics. But we're just having

0:18:55.990 --> 0:18:58.390
<v Speaker 3>this conversation about for the first time ever, the job

0:18:58.430 --> 0:19:02.460
<v Speaker 3>market is a better. for young people with a high

0:19:02.500 --> 0:19:05.420
<v Speaker 3>school degree than with a college degree for a variety

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>of reasons, including the whole everybody's caught on to the

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.700
<v Speaker 3>fact that a lot of these college degrees, you didn't

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.140
<v Speaker 3>learn a single thing. And maybe what you learned was

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 3>to be in a pain in the ass employee who's

0:19:17.980 --> 0:19:20.780
<v Speaker 3>going to sue me over something crazy. But anyway, over

0:19:20.820 --> 0:19:22.740
<v Speaker 3>the years, I've given you we've made a lot of

0:19:22.790 --> 0:19:24.830
<v Speaker 3>fun of you going to Harvard, which I'm actually very

0:19:24.869 --> 0:19:27.090
<v Speaker 3>impressed with because you went to Harvard back in the

0:19:27.130 --> 0:19:31.090
<v Speaker 3>day when that meant something. But do you have any

0:19:31.930 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 3>opinions on this, what college is worth now versus the

0:19:35.060 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 3>old days? Like, for instance, your alma mater, Harvard, up

0:19:38.980 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 3>until recently when they tried to change this, the whole

0:19:42.500 --> 0:19:44.419
<v Speaker 3>how many A's they gave out thing that got so

0:19:44.460 --> 0:19:50.139
<v Speaker 3>much attention, if you include A-, minus, 84% of the

0:19:50.220 --> 0:19:53.630
<v Speaker 3>grades given out at Harvard were A's. A's are A minuses.

0:19:53.630 --> 0:19:53.670
<v Speaker 8>84%.

0:19:53.670 --> 0:19:54.310
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's insane.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.900
<v Speaker 8>Well, given the fact that I got all Ds when

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.740
<v Speaker 8>I got out of there, it does probably speak well,

0:20:03.780 --> 0:20:06.380
<v Speaker 8>just joking. Here's the thing, Jack, it's funny we're having

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.959
<v Speaker 8>this conversation today. Literally, Jack, two days ago, they had

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.070
<v Speaker 8>an online conversation with Harvard's president, who I sat through

0:20:14.090 --> 0:20:16.510
<v Speaker 8>the entire hour of this Zoom call, whatever, just to

0:20:16.530 --> 0:20:17.910
<v Speaker 8>see what he had to say about it. Of course,

0:20:17.950 --> 0:20:20.970
<v Speaker 8>he dealt with federal lawsuits and all, but great inflation,

0:20:21.010 --> 0:20:23.010
<v Speaker 8>believe it or not, was the first topic discussed.

0:20:23.330 --> 0:20:25.370
<v Speaker 10>He addressed. Now, I wanna say one caveat.

0:20:25.450 --> 0:20:27.350
<v Speaker 8>I went to one of the Harvard professional schools, the

0:20:27.369 --> 0:20:29.710
<v Speaker 8>Kennedy School, got my master's degree there. So I can't

0:20:29.770 --> 0:20:33.550
<v Speaker 8>speak to Harvard College as they call the undergrad. But

0:20:33.850 --> 0:20:38.070
<v Speaker 8>more broadly, what's really interesting is that places super expensive

0:20:38.090 --> 0:20:41.470
<v Speaker 8>like Harvard, people are talking about regularly now, Jack, going

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 8>to three-year college degrees rather than four, partially just because

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 8>of what you said. The return on investment, the cost

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.490
<v Speaker 8>of going to any college these days versus the return.

0:20:52.830 --> 0:20:56.190
<v Speaker 8>And it's somewhat sad to say for people who are

0:20:56.230 --> 0:20:58.689
<v Speaker 8>behind the humanities and Phi Beta Kappa and all these

0:20:58.730 --> 0:21:02.150
<v Speaker 8>sort of Renaissance man approach. But to your point, Jack,

0:21:02.619 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 8>vocationally focused education seems to be the wave of the

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.580
<v Speaker 8>future as opposed to more general ed, you know, the

0:21:09.619 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 8>kinds of things people thought was important in the past

0:21:12.619 --> 0:21:15.449
<v Speaker 8>in terms of having a so-called well-rounded education.

0:21:15.890 --> 0:21:20.629
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you're a parent like me. The goal

0:21:20.690 --> 0:21:22.649
<v Speaker 3>for your kids is for them to be able to

0:21:22.710 --> 0:21:26.709
<v Speaker 3>support themselves. I'd love them to be well-rounded, but the

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.419
<v Speaker 3>real goal is for them to be able to get

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:29.740
<v Speaker 3>out in the world and support themselves.

0:21:30.810 --> 0:21:32.330
<v Speaker 10>Well, there is all that.

0:21:32.650 --> 0:21:35.709
<v Speaker 8>The vocational ed part of it is really interesting because

0:21:36.090 --> 0:21:38.970
<v Speaker 8>even in California, there's now been all of a sudden

0:21:38.990 --> 0:21:42.020
<v Speaker 8>for the first time, the ability for our junior colleges,

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.459
<v Speaker 8>over 100 of them in California. And for folks who

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.700
<v Speaker 8>aren't familiar, that's the two-year college system to actually grant

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.340
<v Speaker 8>bachelor's degrees themselves for the first time, not just UC

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.380
<v Speaker 8>and CSU's. The important thing there, Jack, is these bachelor

0:21:54.420 --> 0:21:58.460
<v Speaker 8>degrees are very vocationally focused, many of them very technical

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.330
<v Speaker 8>or in medical fields, et cetera, where the perception is

0:22:01.740 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 8>jobs are plentiful.

0:22:02.740 --> 0:22:05.290
<v Speaker 3>Well, with an actual skill, so many of these degrees,

0:22:05.369 --> 0:22:08.909
<v Speaker 3>what the hell would you do with that? It's so nuts. Anyway,

0:22:10.710 --> 0:22:12.649
<v Speaker 3>we're here to talk politics with you, which kind of

0:22:12.670 --> 0:22:16.470
<v Speaker 3>fits in with this because. A lot of your college

0:22:16.670 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 3>crowd is behind this big socialist movement we got going

0:22:21.380 --> 0:22:23.900
<v Speaker 3>on right now, what they call the downwardly mobile. These

0:22:23.940 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>are people that spend a lot of money to get

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 3>a degree or going out into the world and can't

0:22:26.940 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>make a living. And their thought isn't, well, that degree

0:22:30.580 --> 0:22:33.740
<v Speaker 3>is pointless. There's no job market for people. It's got

0:22:33.770 --> 0:22:36.810
<v Speaker 3>to be capitalism. It's got to be the system. It's

0:22:36.850 --> 0:22:38.470
<v Speaker 3>got to be the patriarchy. It's got to be white people.

0:22:38.490 --> 0:22:40.450
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be something. And so they're leaning toward

0:22:40.470 --> 0:22:44.330
<v Speaker 3>these socialists. And this poll that came out, That rocked

0:22:44.390 --> 0:22:47.830
<v Speaker 3>the L.A. mayor race in which the DSA politician is

0:22:47.890 --> 0:22:49.550
<v Speaker 3>now in the lead. Tell us that story.

0:22:50.130 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this, Jack, is, this has gotten buried because of

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 8>Xi's visit to the White House and all kinds of things.

0:22:56.740 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 10>The U.N., all things happened this week.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:03.140
<v Speaker 8>But this new poll that shows Karen Bass's opponent, Karen Bass,

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 8>for those who don't know, the incumbent mayor, much embattled,

0:23:05.980 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 8>especially after the L.A.

0:23:07.460 --> 0:23:08.699
<v Speaker 10>Fires and homelessness, etc.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:14.390
<v Speaker 8>But her Democratic Socialist opponent, I mean, avowed Democratic Socialist,

0:23:14.890 --> 0:23:18.330
<v Speaker 8>is in the lead by over 10 points. And we're only, Jack,

0:23:18.530 --> 0:23:21.369
<v Speaker 8>six weeks away from election day. This is rocking the

0:23:21.410 --> 0:23:23.490
<v Speaker 8>political world because just envision.

0:23:23.070 --> 0:23:24.619
<v Speaker 10>This, Jack.

0:23:24.980 --> 0:23:27.939
<v Speaker 8>You could have in six weeks the two largest cities

0:23:28.020 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 8>in the United States, New York and Los Angeles, the bi-coastal,

0:23:31.859 --> 0:23:37.230
<v Speaker 8>some would say, epicenters of politics. Run by people, closely aligned,

0:23:37.330 --> 0:23:40.770
<v Speaker 8>endorsed by the Democratic Socialist America. You don't think that's

0:23:40.790 --> 0:23:44.030
<v Speaker 8>gonna rock the Democratic Party in the midterms and going

0:23:44.190 --> 0:23:47.020
<v Speaker 8>into 28? I'll tell you, the pressure is on from

0:23:47.060 --> 0:23:49.580
<v Speaker 8>that wing of the Democratic Party. And it's not really

0:23:49.619 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 8>a wing per se, because they sort of very loosely

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 8>associate themselves currently. And of course, have a lot of

0:23:54.820 --> 0:23:58.869
<v Speaker 8>anathema for the formal Democratic Party. But it's sending shockwaves, Jack,

0:23:58.880 --> 0:23:59.750
<v Speaker 8>I'll guarantee you that.

0:23:59.970 --> 0:24:03.190
<v Speaker 3>Well, we could have a senator or two that are

0:24:03.590 --> 0:24:06.669
<v Speaker 3>socialists or aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America, which is,

0:24:07.390 --> 0:24:08.990
<v Speaker 3>you know, and we've talked about a lot. I mean,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.100
<v Speaker 3>if you look at their website, it's some crazy stuff.

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.260
<v Speaker 3>It's get rid of the Constitution. It's, you know, it's

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of interesting, really interesting stuff. Aren't these candidates crazy?

0:24:17.619 --> 0:24:19.070
<v Speaker 3>I've been saying this for a while. I don't feel

0:24:19.109 --> 0:24:22.330
<v Speaker 3>like it gets said. I don't hear it enough in

0:24:22.430 --> 0:24:26.890
<v Speaker 3>mainstream news. Aren't these the most radical candidates we've ever

0:24:26.950 --> 0:24:30.250
<v Speaker 3>had in the major parties for office in our lifetimes?

0:24:30.910 --> 0:24:33.510
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, the thing about it is, you know, Jack,

0:24:33.530 --> 0:24:35.370
<v Speaker 8>I'm quite the student of this kind of stuff.

0:24:35.670 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 10>Some could say that, for example.

0:24:37.750 --> 0:24:40.730
<v Speaker 8>When Governor Wallace in the South ran for the presidency,

0:24:42.010 --> 0:24:45.230
<v Speaker 8>people who've been around a while or studied political history

0:24:45.250 --> 0:24:48.290
<v Speaker 8>knows some could say he was radical in the other direction.

0:24:48.590 --> 0:24:50.609
<v Speaker 10>Some could say there's been Republicans, i.e.

0:24:50.650 --> 0:24:53.530
<v Speaker 8>Barry Goldwater in the Republican Party, others who've been very

0:24:53.609 --> 0:24:57.770
<v Speaker 8>radical in a conservative direction. But in sort of recent politics,

0:24:57.790 --> 0:25:00.669
<v Speaker 8>certainly in the century, this is sending shockwaves. I mean,

0:25:00.690 --> 0:25:02.290
<v Speaker 8>the only thing people have been able to sort of

0:25:02.850 --> 0:25:05.740
<v Speaker 8>try to draw some parallels to, is Newt Gingrich and

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 8>the things that happened when the conservatives in the House

0:25:09.260 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 8>really began to flex their muscle. And of course, that

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.750
<v Speaker 8>was accelerated through the so called MAGA movement. But in

0:25:14.770 --> 0:25:17.590
<v Speaker 8>the Democratic Party, we haven't seen anything like this in

0:25:17.609 --> 0:25:20.270
<v Speaker 8>terms of upheaval, Jack, since the 1960s.

0:25:20.470 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's no doubt about that.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 8>That's when sort of so-called liberal progressive politics, the 68th

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.939
<v Speaker 8>Democratic Convention was really a clash between the moderate, the

0:25:29.980 --> 0:25:33.100
<v Speaker 8>sort of established wing of the Democratic Party and the

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:34.109
<v Speaker 8>new young liberals.

0:25:34.180 --> 0:25:35.330
<v Speaker 10>And that's what we're seeing now.

0:25:35.670 --> 0:25:39.109
<v Speaker 8>You know, the energy, as they say, inside the Democratic

0:25:39.150 --> 0:25:41.290
<v Speaker 8>Party is with the D.S.A.

0:25:42.060 --> 0:25:44.460
<v Speaker 10>Some say movement. Let's just call it that for today.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.220
<v Speaker 8>And that's going to be very interesting to see how

0:25:47.270 --> 0:25:49.530
<v Speaker 8>it plays out, both in this election and in 28.

0:25:49.530 --> 0:25:51.710
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you've got both Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris

0:25:52.070 --> 0:25:55.510
<v Speaker 8>who have been polling at the top for the Democrats

0:25:55.570 --> 0:25:57.950
<v Speaker 8>in terms of the presidential race in just two years,

0:25:58.350 --> 0:26:03.420
<v Speaker 8>have both gone and campaigned for the aforementioned Democratic Socialists Aligned,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.899
<v Speaker 8>to some degree, candidate in Michigan, as you know. And

0:26:07.020 --> 0:26:10.379
<v Speaker 8>so there's a sense in which, what do you do

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.150
<v Speaker 8>with this? I mean, it's creating a schism inside the party.

0:26:13.470 --> 0:26:16.950
<v Speaker 8>Some are saying if Hakeem Jeffries becomes the speaker, he's

0:26:16.970 --> 0:26:19.350
<v Speaker 8>gonna have a really difficult time, for example, keeping his

0:26:19.410 --> 0:26:20.330
<v Speaker 8>own caucus together.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'd say so. So, as you know, the presidential

0:26:24.740 --> 0:26:28.830
<v Speaker 3>election starts the day after the midterms on November 4th.

0:26:28.890 --> 0:26:32.209
<v Speaker 3>It'll be all 2028 talk, and some people are going

0:26:32.230 --> 0:26:34.750
<v Speaker 3>to jump into the race in November and December, according

0:26:34.790 --> 0:26:37.540
<v Speaker 3>to most people who are following this closely. We had

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.300
<v Speaker 3>Lonnie Chen on yesterday. He said, don't be surprised if

0:26:40.380 --> 0:26:42.619
<v Speaker 3>AOC is the nominee for the Democratic Party. How do

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:43.300
<v Speaker 3>you react to that?

0:26:43.940 --> 0:26:44.540
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know.

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.580
<v Speaker 8>Early, Jack, I remember you and I having conversations way,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 8>way back when people thought it was gonna be Rudy

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 8>Giuliani as the, remember, nominee for the Republican Party back then.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.410
<v Speaker 8>So it's way too early to talk about with any

0:27:00.490 --> 0:27:03.670
<v Speaker 8>certainty about this. But I would say this, You could

0:27:03.710 --> 0:27:06.170
<v Speaker 8>take a deck of cards right now, right? There's probably

0:27:06.170 --> 0:27:09.450
<v Speaker 8>15 or 20 Democratic names, throw them up in the air,

0:27:09.730 --> 0:27:11.350
<v Speaker 8>pick one out that lands.

0:27:11.430 --> 0:27:12.510
<v Speaker 10>They might be the nominee.

0:27:12.530 --> 0:27:15.820
<v Speaker 8>And I don't say that facetiously because things are so

0:27:15.859 --> 0:27:19.100
<v Speaker 8>topsy turvy, so turbulent right now. Is it gonna be,

0:27:19.140 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 8>for example, is it gonna be a more conservative or

0:27:21.660 --> 0:27:26.419
<v Speaker 8>let's just not say conservative, more moderate, established candidate, say Shapiro,

0:27:26.460 --> 0:27:30.940
<v Speaker 8>governor of Pennsylvania, or Beshear, governor of Kentucky. Is that

0:27:31.020 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 8>going to be a Democratic nominee? Or is it going

0:27:34.290 --> 0:27:37.030
<v Speaker 8>to be somebody like an AOC who, as you know,

0:27:37.070 --> 0:27:40.790
<v Speaker 8>has been leading the charge for the DSA in many ways,

0:27:40.830 --> 0:27:43.970
<v Speaker 8>certainly behind them, as has Bernie Sanders. She's the heir

0:27:44.030 --> 0:27:48.930
<v Speaker 8>apparent Bernie Sanders wing effort within that party. And let's

0:27:48.950 --> 0:27:53.530
<v Speaker 8>not forget, Bernie Sanders came very close to toppling Hillary

0:27:53.630 --> 0:27:55.550
<v Speaker 8>Clinton for that party's nomination.

0:27:55.590 --> 0:27:58.129
<v Speaker 3>If his own party hadn't jumped in and fixed it

0:27:58.190 --> 0:27:59.889
<v Speaker 3>to make sure he wasn't, he was going to be

0:27:59.910 --> 0:28:03.649
<v Speaker 3>the nominee. So that's my point. Unless the Democrats are

0:28:03.670 --> 0:28:06.390
<v Speaker 3>going to do that again, figure out a way To

0:28:06.820 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 3>stop one of these people, you're going to have one

0:28:09.980 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 3>of these whack jobs be the nominee, which might be good.

0:28:13.020 --> 0:28:15.340
<v Speaker 3>Let him go through this little thing that you're not

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.220
<v Speaker 3>going to get elected president as a DSA member.

0:28:18.300 --> 0:28:20.420
<v Speaker 8>Well, and the question is gonna become, I mean, there's

0:28:20.460 --> 0:28:22.500
<v Speaker 8>a lot of assumptions being made on both sides here.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.030
<v Speaker 8>But let's just say because he's pulling so far ahead

0:28:25.170 --> 0:28:27.870
<v Speaker 8>within his own party, that JD Vance is the nominee.

0:28:28.450 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 8>The history is not great for vice presidents succeeding their

0:28:33.660 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 8>boss and moving into the White House. Frankly, it's a

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.300
<v Speaker 8>pretty dicey proposition, just historically speaking. And if you're in

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 8>many people's minds, let's see where we are 18 months

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.420
<v Speaker 8>from now. But if you have the country, really, I mean,

0:28:47.660 --> 0:28:51.250
<v Speaker 8>Trump's numbers at a historic low for his own approval

0:28:51.310 --> 0:28:54.170
<v Speaker 8>ratings right now. Everybody knows that, both in terms of

0:28:54.230 --> 0:28:56.410
<v Speaker 8>the economy, Iran, you just go down the list.

0:28:56.770 --> 0:28:57.510
<v Speaker 10>Even AI.

0:28:57.770 --> 0:28:59.990
<v Speaker 8>People say he's on the quote unquote wrong side of

0:29:00.030 --> 0:29:02.490
<v Speaker 8>that issue in terms of the populace.

0:29:02.910 --> 0:29:03.670
<v Speaker 10>It could be tough.

0:29:04.470 --> 0:29:06.630
<v Speaker 8>I think we have to be careful about making an

0:29:06.690 --> 0:29:11.010
<v Speaker 8>assumption that XYZ candidate couldn't succeed.

0:29:11.390 --> 0:29:12.250
<v Speaker 10>Jack, I will say this.

0:29:12.530 --> 0:29:15.910
<v Speaker 8>The current political environment, you have to say, is more,

0:29:15.950 --> 0:29:19.220
<v Speaker 8>some would say more volatile, certainly more flexible than it's

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.500
<v Speaker 8>been in a long, long time and with both parties'

0:29:22.540 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 8>nominations without an incumbent. It's been a while since we've

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.540
<v Speaker 8>not had an incumbent running for the presidency, either Republican

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.350
<v Speaker 8>or Democrat. I mean, again, take the deck of cards, throw.

0:29:34.210 --> 0:29:34.670
<v Speaker 3>Them in the air.

0:29:34.690 --> 0:29:36.330
<v Speaker 10>Let's see where we are in 12 to 18 months.

0:29:37.290 --> 0:29:39.490
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to ask you some yes, no questions

0:29:39.510 --> 0:29:41.380
<v Speaker 3>that I've put to several people over the last couple

0:29:41.420 --> 0:29:44.340
<v Speaker 3>of days. If you could just go, uh, yes, no. Um,

0:29:44.780 --> 0:29:45.860
<v Speaker 3>is Kamala Harris going to run?

0:29:46.590 --> 0:29:48.310
<v Speaker 10>Let me first say, yes, I do take cream in

0:29:48.350 --> 0:29:49.510
<v Speaker 10>my coffee. That's a yes.

0:29:49.590 --> 0:29:50.650
<v Speaker 3>Wow, you do? Okay, well.

0:29:50.910 --> 0:29:52.830
<v Speaker 8>Okay, well, so put me in that category. All the

0:29:52.850 --> 0:29:54.530
<v Speaker 8>rest of you people send the hate mail to A &amp; G,

0:29:54.550 --> 0:29:58.230
<v Speaker 8>not my place. Okay, so is Kamala Harris gonna run? Jack,

0:29:58.730 --> 0:30:00.630
<v Speaker 8>I think this has to be a huge maybe.

0:30:00.670 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 10>Let me tell you why. Because she's out there campaigning.

0:30:03.540 --> 0:30:05.740
<v Speaker 8>But I'll tell you, a recent poll just came out

0:30:05.780 --> 0:30:10.820
<v Speaker 8>this week of California Democrats not enthusiastic about her running.

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, over half of them said she should not run.

0:30:14.020 --> 0:30:16.959
<v Speaker 8>And six out of ten said I mean, excuse me,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 8>six times more said they think that Gavin Newsom has

0:30:20.740 --> 0:30:22.980
<v Speaker 8>a better chance of winning the White House than she does.

0:30:23.300 --> 0:30:25.850
<v Speaker 8>So if you ask insiders in the party, they don't

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:26.870
<v Speaker 8>think she should run.

0:30:27.210 --> 0:30:29.270
<v Speaker 10>Will she? You have to go inside of her own

0:30:29.290 --> 0:30:30.209
<v Speaker 10>brain to figure that out.

0:30:30.370 --> 0:30:31.570
<v Speaker 3>So you don't have a yes or no on that?

0:30:32.140 --> 0:30:34.860
<v Speaker 8>Well, I, I, because you can't, I can't say yes

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.969
<v Speaker 8>or no. I think it's going to be, I think it's,

0:30:37.050 --> 0:30:37.690
<v Speaker 8>we don't know yet.

0:30:37.770 --> 0:30:38.810
<v Speaker 3>Is Gavin Newsom going to run?

0:30:39.510 --> 0:30:43.690
<v Speaker 10>Oh, he already has been running. That's 110%. Despite of what?

0:30:43.710 --> 0:30:44.470
<v Speaker 3>That's a clear yes.

0:30:44.970 --> 0:30:45.190
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:30:45.210 --> 0:30:47.570
<v Speaker 3>A hundred percent on that one. Is JD Vance going

0:30:47.590 --> 0:30:48.710
<v Speaker 3>to run? Oh yeah.

0:30:48.750 --> 0:30:49.390
<v Speaker 10>That's a, that's 193%.

0:30:49.390 --> 0:30:49.650
<v Speaker 13>Okay.

0:30:49.670 --> 0:30:53.970
<v Speaker 3>And then, so does Marco Rubio hold to his pledge

0:30:54.010 --> 0:30:55.170
<v Speaker 3>of JD runs? I won't run.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:56.700
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think he doesn't.

0:30:57.140 --> 0:30:59.990
<v Speaker 8>Now, he says he's not interested in the VP slot,

0:31:00.250 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 8>but could he be talked into that? I mean, look,

0:31:02.620 --> 0:31:06.010
<v Speaker 8>those have been the two biggest issues shall we say,

0:31:06.130 --> 0:31:09.150
<v Speaker 8>front men for this administration, there's no doubt there's a

0:31:09.310 --> 0:31:11.330
<v Speaker 8>lot of affection. If you look at the polls inside

0:31:11.350 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 8>the party, Vance doubles up Rubio. But Rubio is even

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 8>pulling at around 20% and at 40-something percent for Vance

0:31:19.980 --> 0:31:22.660
<v Speaker 8>amongst people in his own party. So clearly very popular.

0:31:22.700 --> 0:31:25.700
<v Speaker 8>His stock's really been rising. I would not be surprised

0:31:25.740 --> 0:31:27.420
<v Speaker 8>if he ends up in the VP slot.

0:31:27.500 --> 0:31:29.820
<v Speaker 3>Man, my dream matchup's not going to happen. I think

0:31:29.860 --> 0:31:33.230
<v Speaker 3>we'd have two grown-ups having real substantive conversations like the

0:31:33.290 --> 0:31:35.890
<v Speaker 3>old days if it was Rubio versus Rahm Emanuel. That's

0:31:35.910 --> 0:31:38.550
<v Speaker 3>what I would like to see. I think we'd go

0:31:38.590 --> 0:31:40.620
<v Speaker 3>back to normal conversations about things.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.220
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, people say that the same might be true

0:31:43.260 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 8>if you had a Bashir or a Shapiro or others

0:31:46.020 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 8>with Rubio.

0:31:46.700 --> 0:31:47.420
<v Speaker 10>Rubio's sharp.

0:31:47.620 --> 0:31:50.660
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he knows foreign policy like, frankly, almost nobody

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 8>else inside the Beltway.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 10>That's obvious.

0:31:53.180 --> 0:31:56.270
<v Speaker 8>And given all the foreign entanglements right now and all

0:31:56.310 --> 0:32:01.330
<v Speaker 8>the issues geopolitically, witness what's happening in the UN this week,

0:32:02.110 --> 0:32:05.970
<v Speaker 8>Rubio would certainly add a lot of gravitas to a

0:32:06.010 --> 0:32:06.970
<v Speaker 8>ticket for the Republicans.

0:32:07.810 --> 0:32:09.650
<v Speaker 3>Gary Dietrich, thanks for your time today. Appreciate it.

0:32:10.260 --> 0:32:11.340
<v Speaker 10>Okay, buddy. Talk to you soon.

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.350
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Gary wears loafers, though. So the fact that he

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.390
<v Speaker 3>puts cream in his coffee, I don't think that helps

0:32:16.430 --> 0:32:21.610
<v Speaker 3>my cause. I like SimpliSafe so much that I've been

0:32:21.690 --> 0:32:23.470
<v Speaker 3>using it for years and years. Am I locked into

0:32:23.490 --> 0:32:26.350
<v Speaker 3>a contract? No, neither will you be if you call

0:32:26.390 --> 0:32:29.430
<v Speaker 3>up SimpliSafe or go on their website and customize the

0:32:29.550 --> 0:32:32.190
<v Speaker 3>system for your home for home security. And you can

0:32:32.230 --> 0:32:34.790
<v Speaker 3>set it up yourself. That's part of the Simpli and SimpliSafe.

0:32:34.890 --> 0:32:38.580
<v Speaker 3>Setting it up yourself, ordering it, using it. A lot

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 3>of security systems back in the day were so complicated

0:32:41.180 --> 0:32:42.980
<v Speaker 3>that people didn't use them because setting them up every

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 3>night was like, I'm too tired. SimpliSafe is not like that.

0:32:46.140 --> 0:32:50.490
<v Speaker 3>They've got AI-powered cameras that detect suspicious activity at the

0:32:50.530 --> 0:32:53.590
<v Speaker 3>perimeter and alert live US-based agents before someone breaks in.

0:32:53.930 --> 0:32:55.890
<v Speaker 3>Learn more about that at the website. Right now, you

0:32:55.910 --> 0:32:58.330
<v Speaker 3>can get 50% off a new SimpliSafe system. Just go

0:32:58.370 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 3>to simplisafe.com slash Armstrong. That's simplisafe.com slash Armstrong for 50% off.

0:33:03.060 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 3>And when you order, please write in Armstrong and Getty

0:33:06.060 --> 0:33:07.620
<v Speaker 3>show and the whole, how did you hear about us?

0:33:07.660 --> 0:33:09.980
<v Speaker 3>We'd appreciate that. They do a little survey at the end.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.300
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget. There's no safe, like simply say there are

0:33:12.340 --> 0:33:14.630
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, Joe's like this and Gary's like this.

0:33:14.670 --> 0:33:16.570
<v Speaker 3>Some people like this. I'm not like this. When I

0:33:16.670 --> 0:33:20.750
<v Speaker 3>ask a yes or no hypothetical will not answer. Um,

0:33:20.990 --> 0:33:23.450
<v Speaker 3>because I don't, I don't know. I just, I've, I've

0:33:23.470 --> 0:33:25.610
<v Speaker 3>never had any problem, uh, right here, right now. What

0:33:25.630 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 3>do I think of these two things? I think Kamala

0:33:28.620 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>doesn't run. I think Gavin does run. I think JD

0:33:30.940 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 3>does run. So Marco won't run. I think that's almost

0:33:33.900 --> 0:33:35.340
<v Speaker 3>certainly going to be the case. And some of them

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:36.740
<v Speaker 3>are going to jump in here in just a couple

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.260
<v Speaker 3>of weeks. That's enough politics. Something different next.

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:45.370
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:33:46.650 --> 0:33:50.310
<v Speaker 13>I miss being young. Your 20s are great. You're down

0:33:50.370 --> 0:33:53.570
<v Speaker 13>for whatever. Your friends call you. They're like, do you

0:33:53.590 --> 0:33:54.050
<v Speaker 13>want to go?

0:33:54.190 --> 0:33:54.890
<v Speaker 3>You're like, I'll go.

0:33:55.330 --> 0:33:59.010
<v Speaker 13>You don't even know where you're going. You're like, I'll move, dude.

0:33:59.170 --> 0:34:01.150
<v Speaker 13>I'll set my apartment on fire. What do you want

0:34:01.170 --> 0:34:08.779
<v Speaker 13>to do? Your 30s come and you're like, where are

0:34:08.820 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 13>we going? How late are they open?

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:13.020
<v Speaker 3>Is it loud?

0:34:16.900 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 10>I am going to drive separate.

0:34:29.670 --> 0:34:36.430
<v Speaker 13>Your 40s, I'm not going. I'm mad that you thought

0:34:36.489 --> 0:34:37.029
<v Speaker 13>I would go.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.779
<v Speaker 3>Nate Bargatze, who's one of the funniest people ever? That's right,

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>your 40s, I'm not going. I can't believe you even

0:34:46.780 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 3>asked me. It's a little maddening that you even thought

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.500
<v Speaker 3>I would consider. Like, every once in a while that happens.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a... a band playing somewhere. That's a

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.170
<v Speaker 3>45 minute drive on a Tuesday night. Are you kidding?

0:35:01.190 --> 0:35:05.089
<v Speaker 3>Are you kidding? No, there's not a chance. Of course,

0:35:05.130 --> 0:35:07.109
<v Speaker 3>part of that is a lot of people, my age,

0:35:07.150 --> 0:35:08.850
<v Speaker 3>their kids are grown up and gone. And so they're

0:35:08.870 --> 0:35:11.750
<v Speaker 3>kind of going back to doing that sort of lifestyle. My,

0:35:11.830 --> 0:35:13.310
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've still got kids at home, so no,

0:35:13.390 --> 0:35:16.660
<v Speaker 3>I'm not doing anything most nights and certainly not anything

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 3>ever on a weeknight. Trump just put out a truth.

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:27.500
<v Speaker 3>Social social post. That's worth remarking upon. I met President

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:32.939
<v Speaker 3>Xi at the plane in parentheses airport with an exclamation mark.

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.620
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why airports in parentheses or why it's

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.500
<v Speaker 3>got an exclamation mark. Anyway, I met President Xi at

0:35:40.540 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 3>the plane airport yesterday. He looks strong, vibrant, and fit

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 3>better than ever. Madam Xi, of course, beautiful, all caps,

0:35:48.860 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 3>President DJT. There you go. Buttering up the commies. Well,

0:35:52.900 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 3>maybe it'll get us something. I doubt it. Couldn't hurt,

0:35:55.420 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 3>I suppose. Hanson first turned us on to this documentary

0:36:00.300 --> 0:36:04.660
<v Speaker 3>that's coming out and showed us the trailer. This is

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 3>the one about Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos. It's called You

0:36:09.820 --> 0:36:12.739
<v Speaker 3>Can See Everything. Have you seen any of these trailers?

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.739
<v Speaker 3>They're weird. The thing that, so the trailer was weird

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 3>and I thought, okay, this is maybe got a bit

0:36:19.580 --> 0:36:22.690
<v Speaker 3>of a reality show thing going here where it's all

0:36:22.730 --> 0:36:24.730
<v Speaker 3>about the editing and the angles to make it look

0:36:24.750 --> 0:36:28.090
<v Speaker 3>crazier than it is, but According to some of the

0:36:28.130 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 3>reviews I've read, it is really gripping on how weird

0:36:34.020 --> 0:36:36.939
<v Speaker 3>Elizabeth Holmes is, who apparently thinks she can hypnotize people

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.410
<v Speaker 3>with her eyeballs, if you've seen the trailers. She thinks

0:36:40.469 --> 0:36:42.969
<v Speaker 3>that if she stares into your eyes with her big

0:36:43.050 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty eyes really wide open, That she can hypnotize you

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.350
<v Speaker 3>into believing things. Which may be how she pulled that off.

0:36:49.410 --> 0:36:52.890
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Getting billions of dollars invested. But I

0:36:52.989 --> 0:36:56.310
<v Speaker 3>am looking forward to seeing that. It comes out on

0:36:56.469 --> 0:37:00.969
<v Speaker 3>October 16th. You can see everything. And the reviews are

0:37:02.750 --> 0:37:06.450
<v Speaker 3>really good. People say it's dang interesting. And I look

0:37:06.469 --> 0:37:08.549
<v Speaker 3>forward to telling you more about that later. We're going

0:37:08.570 --> 0:37:11.189
<v Speaker 3>to have a guest. Third hour. His name is Joe Getty.

0:37:12.450 --> 0:37:13.859
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know what we're going to talk about, but,

0:37:13.900 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, you paid for Armstrong and Getty, and you're

0:37:17.100 --> 0:37:18.700
<v Speaker 3>being ripped off right now. So you'll get the whole

0:37:18.739 --> 0:37:20.410
<v Speaker 3>thing coming up. If you missed a segment, get the

0:37:20.430 --> 0:37:22.170
<v Speaker 3>podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:26.020
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.