WEBVTT - White Supremacy Granted a Place at American Political Table, Ricks Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. We thought we could started with the

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>equity markets. We're gonna again have an eclectic show that

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>sporting Douglas cast joins us, who's always interest in interesting

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>because Mr cass Uh follows the markets looking long term

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but also more of a short term perspective, and there

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he has been very uh, very uh cautious. Is I

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>guess how I would put it, Doug, good morning. We'll

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>say the Yankees for the X Blot because I don't

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>want you to hang up the phone on me. If

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at the markets, have you covered your shorts?

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Have you reaffirmed your shorts? Essentially trade around my core

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>short positions almost on a weekly basis. Um that said,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably at my well, probably at my highest net

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>short exposure in two or three years. Why is that dramatic?

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's dramatic. Why is it? Well? I think everything in

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the market gets overdone um um with the S and

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>P and even the fangs, and the SMP price rise

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years has outpaced the prosperity

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on main street. It's time for the markets to fall

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>back in line with what is actually happening in the

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>domestic economy. And how severe the decline will be can

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>be debated, but many, like myself look at most valuation

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>metrics that lie in the decile. We look at the

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>historically wide difference between gap and non gap earnings, with

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gap at eighteen or nineteen times and nine gap non

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>gap in excessive times. We look at the dangerously high

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>equity cap to GDP ratio, which is warm Buffet's favorite evaluation,

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and we say the market is overvalued within that has

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>been a leadership, and that we've had a number of

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>stocks out front, and the bulls would say that frankly,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a real lack of leadership. How do you

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>cut that? Do you want to acquire shares in the

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>laggards or are they a signal of the angst to come.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I tend to look at my both my longs and

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>my shorts on the bottoms up basis um um. You

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>know I'm showing a number of popular stocks like Amazon

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and Disney the ladder, whose growth rate is probably whose

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>secular growth rate is probably under ten percent compared to

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent historically at thirteen and four in consensus on

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the south side of Wall Street. And that's how I

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>do my business. I don't look at and I look

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at I don't look at price targets. I look at probabilities,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and I look at the just generally speaking, I look

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>at the dysfunction that this organization in the White House

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and the animus not only between the Dems and the Republicans,

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but within the GOP itself. And I recognize as a guest,

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a professor at Columbia, in an early segment

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of yours, said, it's highly unlikely that we're going to

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>see the implementation of the administration's tax reform of infrastructure plans,

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so that we're we're probably stuck in barely a two

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>real GDP growth rate for the US as far as

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the eyes can see. How do you respond to the

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>bulls that say we need a recession to really slip

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>into a duncass kind of market. I don't think that's

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>true empirically, um, you know, I think that the market

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>is more governed by uncertainty. And I'll say what I

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>said before on Bloombrook surveillance, I'll say it again. Donald

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to make market volatility and economic uncertainty

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of outcomes great again. So I think that the incremental

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>eight or ten dollars of SNP earnings from the administration's

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 1>initiatives UM is likely in in let's say an SMP

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>earnings terms for next year, is likely a pype train.

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean within this Doug is the idea of being

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>completely short, being not hedged, but saying you can have

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>some enthusiasm. No, I'll get to Twitter in our next section.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But is there any part of a broader, large camp

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>market where you can hide or is it so grim

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can't own utilities? You can't on this well, I,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>as I said, I do a bottom up kind of analysis,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and I have actually a number of long positions, but

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the net basis, I am that short. But these

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>are specific ideas that meet my criteria for investment in

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>very few stocks meet Mike's material investment. But there are

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>some companies like Hartford Financial up in Connecticut, UM, Campbell, Soup, Twitter,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. I'm even long a couple of retail stocks.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Now what would they be? I mean, we we covered J. C.

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Penney on Friday. I meant to your listened to you

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to us? Of course I always do my We're

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>colin up to fourteen listeners. That's just unbelten that's unreal.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>To the game. I can listen to the game list now,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll do that in the next section. You want to

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>come back, I'm gonna beat you to death. But you know, Doug,

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I I look at Amazon as a short. I mean,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you short Jeff Bezos? That's like mom, Dad,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>apple Pie and the rest of it. I'm short Amazon

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Bass And this is clearly a contrarian view, which is

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>typical of many of my popular shorts like Starbucks and Disney,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and in this case, Amazon and I'm short of come

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>based principally on the existential threat that antitrust issues and

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>political viewpoints and initiatives may hold over the company. The

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>company is finally attracting some media and political tension for

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>its business practice. It's disrupting order parts, appliances, and its

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>plans for food retailing through Whole Foods acquisition. It may

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>very well have too many opportunities. Perhaps it's creating a

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>massive smoke screen to mask business problems with profit generation,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but that the core of my concern is whether Amazon

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is growing too big and that the disruptive impact of

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's growth and plans could lead to government restrictions that growth.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's do Twitter right here. We've had a couple of

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>minutes left here, and am I right in that You're

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a long, long, long and Twitter? Is that just a

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>takeout idea on really long Twitter? I think that the

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>market is paying nothing for um takeover option ality, a

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>merger optionality. I think Twitter by this time next year

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>will be part of a much larger company and its

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>basic core businesses is fine despite you know the recent

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>drop in the stock crisis. Well, but you need a

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>lower stock trice stock price to affect a transaction. I

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>think that the stock will probably be taken out in

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the neighbor, let's come back with Doug casts. We've got

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>lots to talk about, including a picture and his family

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Los Angeles Dodgers of a few years ago.

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Mr cass is with Sea Breeze Partners. Doug Cass of

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Sea Breeze Partners will weigh in on the Fed. Now

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to weigh in on the Browns, the Liechtenstein's,

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and the co Faxes. Sanford Brown, who is eighty one

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>years old, Doug, I refuse to believe that Sandy Kofax

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is eighty one years old. We have had a lacious weekend,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>including images from Charlottesville that we're just extraordinary about Jews

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and about a lot of other elements of hatred in

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this country. Take us back to nineteen sixty five. I

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>remember the firestorm of debate when Mr Colfax said, no,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I will not pitch Um. It was actually excuse me, well, Sandy, Um,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know it's I would say that Tom baseball is

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot like investing, you know, as the dude said

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in The Big Lebowski, strikes and gutters, ups and downs.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And Sandy in the mid sixties developed that authortic shoulder.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And I remember sitting with him and my grandmother, Jean Kofax,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in which he said to my grandfather, Harry Kofax, if

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he continued, and this is actually in late sixty five,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>if he continue baseball, he might lose his army. Um,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I don't know if it was a

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>function of medicine, the absence of medical advances at that time.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I suspect he would have had surgery, yeah, Tommy seventeen.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But um, it was. It was kind of catastrophic as

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a Dodger fan and as his cousin. I mean, within

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it is growing up in benson Hurst and you know,

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>on Long Island in that time. It's realm. We moved

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to my hometown, Rockville Center, Long Island on the South Show. Briefly. Yeah,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they were, you know, in Rockville Center, and uh, he

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was essentially folks a walk on at Cincinnati and basketball,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I guess he was a walk on. He

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>had like three tryouts in the majors before branch Rickey

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>decided he could bring the He was a basketball player

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at Lafayette High School and his best friend was Wilpon,

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>who owned New York Mets, and Wilpon was a picture

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to hang out with Fred Wilpon, So

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>he decided to try out for the baseball team and

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>place bas at Lafayette High School. Doug, Within, you you're

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>being part of this family, the greater Cofax family. Do

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>you tec detect the difference in Charlottesville? This weekend versus

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the debates of N sixty six over religion and the

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>importance of yan Kapoor is it? Is it a different

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>discussion now than it was back then. I think that

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the same prejudice is unfortunately existed then um as they

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>do now. And I hate to say that um as

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Bloomberg once said, I'm a New Yorker and I

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>know a con when I see it. And unfortunately the

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>President disavowed the action on Friday, but didn't disavow the actors.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's extremely disappointing, and that was expressed

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>by many of his Republican beyers. We should mention that

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bloomberg, the former mayor, is a principal owner of

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP. And this ation, Doug, we've just got a

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>minute left, which is all you need to describe. Uh,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not the collapse, but the desire I think of everyone

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Yankees to make a go of it, um

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for our global audience. Their relief pitching failed in two

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of three games. What's to do? Mr Cass, Mr Cofax

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can't do it? Right now? I'll tell you who are

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it? To Los Angeles Dodgers. They haven't lost the

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>series since early June. The winning percentage I think is

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're seve. Is it just about money? I mean,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>come on, they bought the team. It's more money. It's

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>more money than thank you. They need you know what

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>they need. They need sandy on the mound and they

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>need this thirteen year old Little League World Series kid

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>um Jace Blaylock plays for Georgia, who hit a three

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy five years old in the trees left. I would

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>suggest I would suggest suggestion Doug. I was just in

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Drysdale to put it under somebody's chin. Doug cast

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, UH this morning on the equity markets.

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Mr Cass's caution on the markets, and also of course

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a snapshot there of Benson Nurst and Rockville Center from

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 1>another time. UH and plays what they did in Washington

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a number of years ago. A great UH financial supporter

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and fundraiser for President Obama was UH Fred hackber And

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and he got his job because he gets up early

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, which is what you do with the

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Small Business Administration and the Export Import Bank as well,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and joining Center studios and well timed. I mean, we

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>could talk I think for at least two hours here

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about your family's heritage, and and you know one of

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>your uncles I believe was killed at Normandy, and you

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>know all the emotion of the weekend that we saw.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>But let me start with business. Is it? Is it?

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You're retired as the head of the Export Import Bank?

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Wrapped up my time? There? I don't consider you're wrapped

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>up your time. Here's the door. What's your hurry? What's

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the state of the Export Import Bank under President Trump? Well,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a little vague, to be honest with you. He

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>has indicated more of late that he's supportive. Uh. He

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>has indicated his nominee for the chairman is someone who's

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been and ultimately opposed to the bank, part of the

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>leadership against the bank. So it's hard to read those

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>tea leaves. But he still has an empty board. They're

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>just two acting members. You need three for a quorum,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's no quorum. Bank has been essentially lapsed for

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>two over two years for any major transactions, and it's

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>hurts our competitiveness and hurts job creation. You have been

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>more than visible in some of the themes that seemed

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to anger the people that were so angry in Charlottesville.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>This weekend. There's any number of ways to take this,

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning with your support for President Obama, your support for

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>LGBT rights, and and critically your support of your family,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the Lillian Vernon people, and and uh the the heritage

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of your family. What was it like for Fred Hackburg

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to see the signs I put out on Twitter direct

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>hatred for Jews? How did you process that and did

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you bring it back to the president. Well, what is

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so shocking? And when you think about terrorism, and many

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have called this domestic terrorism, terrorism is about fear. It's

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about creating a sense of anxiety and people, not just

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>for the people in Charlottesville, but for people throughout the

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. It says, be careful, be watchful. You're not safe,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not in a secure place. And so what's frightening

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think about the weekend is this is about striking

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fear and and putting a damper on people's sense of

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>being an American, being grateful to be here and ask

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in saying you should really be very careful and not

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sure of yourself. And so that was what so was

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>frightening I thought about this weekend. Hi, I just want

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to jump in here and ask a question sort of

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>back to you know, Charlottesville and the issue of, um,

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Export empower Bank. But can you make the best

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>argument to let's call them the global skeptics that um,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, we're behind the Trump movement for

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>why we need the Export Import Bank. Now, I mean

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the argument is that it's kind of a chrony capitalism,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it doesn't really benefit most Americans and so forth.

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the counterpoint to that when you're trying to

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of address those concerns. Well, first of all, if

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you're a global skeptic and you believe in sort of

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>America first, American manufacturing in America economic prowess, then you

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>need to believe in the x in bank. We're not

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to sell overseas and I'm not gonna

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to compete and go hoe to toe with

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, the Koreans, the Germans, if we don't have

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a financial institution just like they do. There are nineties

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>export credit agencies around the world, each one slugging it

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>out to create jobs in their country. So for us

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to try and go into go to that fight with

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one hand tied behind our back is simply crazy. I look,

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I look at this friend and just in the brief

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>time that we we have for you. And as Eli

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>mentions globalists, how did we become a nation of globalists?

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>What does what does globalists mean? That's a great question.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I think we became a nation because

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we're a nation of immigrants. As you mentioned, my family

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>came here uh in the lead up to World War two,

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>where a nation were the most diverse nation in the world.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So people in our country have connections to every country

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world, not so if you're if you're German

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or French or British in the same way. So I

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's a realization that we are five percent of

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the world's cup population is out there. So we want

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a strong economy, creating a lot of jobs,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>having a great simularity. We need to sell to them. Okay,

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you raise money, you raise big money for the president.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg Vllier mentioned this morning, note the disarray of the

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party. Do the Democrats have to migrate away from

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a coastal progressive tone and refine scoop and refined scoop

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's Democrats? Are they out there? Or is that a

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>wasted task? I think the future of the Democratic party

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>is going to be with young people, with millennials, with

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>urban people. Um, we don't want to write anybody off,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but clearly we have to understand who our appeal is.

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the appeals we have to

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>do is for people who don't get a fair shake

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in this society. And that has to do with workers, minorities, women, uh, immigrants,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>and so we can't forget that and that has to

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be front and center as we pursue a policy. Washington,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>first time I've ever asked this question out here. I'm gonna,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm honored to ask it with you. When does President

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama decided to run again? Well, the the constitution will

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>prohibit that, so he can't do they can't do that again.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>To that, Fred Hawkford, thank you so much, greatly appreciated,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>former head of the Export Import Bankers. Well, Eli, you

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta write a column on that. President Obama, even if

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 1>he waits out at Grover Cleveland term can't run again.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the law, right right. Yeah, Well, I

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>mean I know that there are a lot of people.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I feel like he's one of

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.239
<v Speaker 1>those figures right now who's left that can unify us

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and it would be nice of the President Trump would

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of recognize that this is one of those moments

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of crisis where he needs to sort of be bigger

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>than his base, even though I I maintain that this

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is not these these these clansmen are not his base.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are fringe haters. He is the go

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to guy for so many about perspective of our navy

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and where it fits in. He grew up a most

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting life in UH Los Angeles, UH, to say the least,

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and then on to a service for the nation in

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States. UH Navy Admiral Moan UH this morning, Admiral,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>what is your update on the state of our navy

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>off the shores of Korea? Well, and I know it's

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be one of high level of readiness. UM. We

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have for years put our most technically advanced ships UH

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and UH air wing. If you we have an air

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>wing of plus about seventy five airplanes there plus a

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>nuclear aircraft carrier which is homeported in Japan. So they'll

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be not just technically advanced, but UH, they're readiness level.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It will be exceptionally high. I mean it is normally

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and then it will be that much more so. Just

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>because of the recent attentions, I know ELI has got

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions. Let me ask one question. This

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is a question I got at least three times this weekend,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>including from one child as well. Can we shoot Korean

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>missiles out of the air? How do we do that?

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that a secret? Or do people actually know how

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>we do that if they were ever to fire a

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>missile with a dangerous vector. Well, you've seen actually in

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks these missile tests which have gotten uh a

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of publicity. And so the short answer to question is,

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>yes we can. It is the way I've described it

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and others as well. It's hitting a bullet with a bullet.

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The speeds are several mock if you will, coming at

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>each other. Um. But we've developed that technology over many,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>many years, actually decades, so that we have that capability

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as we speak, Admiral Millen thinks so much for for

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>doing this. Let me ask you this, Um. We we

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>learned last week, UM that there is a Defense Intelligence

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Agency estimate that North Korea has the technology or capability

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to miniaturize a nuclear device for a warhead. But um,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I reported in and others have reported,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>this has been kind of floating around, you know, in

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in the intelligence community for a while. How much of

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a shock is that really to the US, uh, you

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>know military at this point? Um, And when do you

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think we really learned that? Is that recent or is

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that is or have we known it for a while?

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the shock the shock is not

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that uh he's either developed or he's very close. I

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think the shock is that he's done it as quickly

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>as he can. While we've talked about it for years.

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing, at least to me very clear, uh

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>watching Kim Jong un, is he is on a very

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rapid pace to develop this system, the missiles, the nuclear technology,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and to make them and have that capability, much more

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so than his father was in many ways. The number

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of tests that he has conducted. UM. And this, to me,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>this is his number one goal. Uh, And he is

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he is significantly outpacing anything that's happened there in the past.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think if there is a shock, is that

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that he's there. If he is so quickly, let me

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>let me follow up with something and that you know,

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for those of us who've watched the North Korea crisis

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>unfold over the years, one thing that we've noticed that

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the North Koreans really do not negotiate in good faith.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the best example of that is during the

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush administration, when we began administration negotiations by

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lifting sanctions and taking them off the state sponsor list.

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were secretly working with the Syrians to

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>develop a nuclear site UM, sending their technicians and so

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>forth over there. What is the formula and the argument

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for how we could negotiate them down, uh in terms

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>of the nuclear program this time when it hasn't worked

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>for nearly twenty five years. Well, I think, and I

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think you make a good point, Eli, and I think

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood should we get into direct negotiations with the

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>North that the behavior in that regard would change is

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>pretty small, So we would we should expect more of

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the same. That said, what what hasn't happened in the past,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and what I believe is the only path now is

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>through Beijing. We've always said that Beijing has always been

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>very reluctant to take the lead UM, and yet I

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>just don't see a peaceful resolution of this crisis without

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Beijing really stepping up. And that doesn't mean alone, because

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we should We should support them. We should do everything

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we can to allay China's concerns about what would happen

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with the United States being very active there, to include

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the instability in the North UH, the the the worry

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that there would be a regime change UH and that

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we'd have unification UH, the financial impact of that to

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly the region and China. So I think we can

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>go a long way to allaying and guaranteeing China that

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>their interests are best served by doing this as well,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>without undermining other things that they worry about, including us

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>back up at the Yalu. So that's the path I

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think that has to that has to be taken now

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>in light of that, and I think most people, I

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>mean agree with you. I think that's a strong argument.

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there an is there a case to

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be made that Trump's UH kind of somewhat reckless rhetoric

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>UH in the last week on North Korea could potentially

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>change the calculation for China to make them realize that

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they need to do this or they need they may

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they may they we may be getting a war from

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the U. S side, and that this is another calculation. Well,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a very high risk path right now. Uh,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a very very tough, complex situation. And UH,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly the President has has made it very clear to

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>China that that he has expectations along these lines. The

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>problem is the rhetoric has been so hot that I

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's left himself that that means the president

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.239
<v Speaker 1>much maneuver room if China doesn't choose to do this.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So it really is high stakes poker right now. And

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes are you know, are possible solution which would

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be terrific. Uh. And then the other side of that,

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>which is exceptionally high risk, is that there would be

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some kind of combat or conflict breakout. Um. And well,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to speak of your wife, Deborah, who's in

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>charge of cultural military policy for the Mulan household. And

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>James Travidis is fabulous the Leader's book Shelf, which is

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>my book of the summer, folks, I can't say enough

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. Admiral Mullen turned to Deborah Mollin and said,

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to read Tom Friedman's From Beirut

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to Jerusalem, and so much of that is about a

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>culture that we miss in America. How does the president

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>bone up on the intricacies of Northern Asia. What what

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Mullen path for anyone and particularly the present

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to become smarter of a smarter about the cultural delicacies here. Well,

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the assumption um that all of us UH

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>should focus on is that we are not very good

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>in cultures other other culture was around the world, and

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that we don't understand them. And I have always tried,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly um in the senior jobs that I had to,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to see the view from the others, the

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>other individual's eyes, or the other individuals country, how they

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>see the world, how is they they see the issue,

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and and you really have to work hard at that.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So there are experts that you can consult with. There

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly are are. There's a rich literature on the culture

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of that region in the world, as there is actually

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>in most regions of the world. And I just couldn't

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>emphasize enough the need two focus on that in terms

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of understanding how the Chinese will react, or the South

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Koreans will react, or the Japanese and the North Koreans specifically,

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>let's come back everyone and with us, of course, the

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he is

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with Eli Lake wash Ington's Studios. We say good morning

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to all of you in Washington and our studios, Eli

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Lake in Washington Studios in Washington. Of course, Mr Lake

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>writing for Bloomberg View often on national security and our

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>most interesting and fractured American politics. And he is joined

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>by UH Mike Mullen. He's the former Admiral of A

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mullan. There

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was a boat, I'm speaking as an amateur, not a ship,

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a boat that wandered through the nineteen fifties, saw significant

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>action in the Western Pacific, and then it was a

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>refitted or something. And in seventy three a lieutenant climbed

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on board the Knox Sube and I guess it was

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>your first command. What was it like the first day

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>when you took over the Nasubi? It was it was awesome. UM.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons that I really loved the Navy

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to stay in was to command ships. And

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that was my first one, and I was all of

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty six years old. My own my own crew deployed

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>twice to the Mediterranean UH in the early seventies. It

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>was an extraordinary experience. And the reason I bring it

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>up is is as if we've talked to James Travitas,

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea here that on a ship things get clarified.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever, when you were in command of ships

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>half the deal with sailors or for that matter, officers

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who had the hatreds that we witnessed in Charlottesville? What

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>do you do when a white nationalist or a white

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>supremacist shows up in uniform? How did Edwald Mullen handle that? Well?

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I can honestly say, I really two thoughts. One is

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a brief answer to your question is no, not not

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that I can ever recall. That said, we in the

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Navy in the sixties and seventies, we went through some

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough times. We had riots on race, riots on

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>ships in ways, just a reflection of what was going

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on in the in the country at the time. And

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>when people ask me about what's going on now, and

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who are very very

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nervous and and and anxious, you know, one of my

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>responses is, we went through some pretty tough times in

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the sixties and seventies, and we got through them. They

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>were they were difficult. I think we're gonna get through this.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>That said, there's absolutely no place for the neo Nazi

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>klu klux Kland. You know, white supremacists in this country,

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, and what happened there in the last couple

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of days is just tragic. It also represents a very

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>visible aspect of the divide in this country, and I

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think leaders across the country at every level, local to national,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out a way to start to unify

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the country and not let this divide continue. Thank you

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>so much. I want to sort of all on those lines.

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about something, UM, I think, uh,

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when historians write about you as the Chairman

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Joint Chiefs, one thing that I think you

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>will really be remembered well for is your role as

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a leader in breaking the taboo on gays in the military.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think President Obama would be able to

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>um repeal don't ask, don't tell if it wasn't for you.

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I say that someone who covered at the time, and

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that brings us to the current moment with the issue

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of transgenders, uh, transgender people in the military. UM, do

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you feel that this is a similar kind of point

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as gays in the military, and it's a question of

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>basic equality or are there sort of special considerations in

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the military that you have to consider, you know, given

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>questions about whether there should be you know, subsidized transitioning

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>surgery and things like that. This this should be uh.

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>This is an issue of equality. It is as it

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was for as in the military. Uh. It is those

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>young men and women who raise their right hand and

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>want to serve our country or are serving our country,

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>who who are transgenders, um, and that we should certainly

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>uh support them. It's very very similar to the gays

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the military issue. That doesn't mean that they're that

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't figure out a way to to uh support

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>them medically. I think it's been widely reported that it's

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really not very much money to do that. The other

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that about the transgender issue is the lack of

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge about what that's really all about. And I think

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that lack of knowledge oftentimes scares people off. UM. I've

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>actually talked to the current chairman, General Joe Dunford about this,

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>who uh similar to the don't ask, don't tell uh

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, his position is everybody who is able ought

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to serve and and our interests shouldn't

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on that aspect of an individual's life. We have

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>run out of time. Edward Mollan, thank you so much

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on the support and Monday greatly appreciate your attendency is

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the former chairman of our Joint Chiefs of Steph. This

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a great conversation made greater because I'm

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna really try to get out of the way. And

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Eli Lake on National security talked to one of our

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>great pros. I'll bring him in. Ask one question and

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Eli tom Rix is all yours. Mr ris Uh, you

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>were very visible this weekend as we all try to

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>digest Charlottesville. And what is so important is it brings

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>us back, as Joshua Rothman of Alabama said to the nineties.

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>You've just written on Churchill and Orwell in the nineteen thirties.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you see similarities between Charlottesville in the nineteen thirties.

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I do, and it worries me. I think Saturday was

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a very bad day for this country. Somebody said it

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was the worst day of the Trump presidency, and I agree.

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing increasing political violence in the streets

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and increasing acceptance of political violence, and both those things

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>worry me. I think that political violence has no place

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in America, that it's getting legitimate, and it worries me

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>when I see both the right and the left kind

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of applauding these attacks. Wow, that is a that's a

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>very good point. But let me push back a little

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bit because I think I disagree with you on the

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>question of whether this is similar to Europe in the

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties. Can you talk about I mean, do you

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>don't you think that one major difference at this point

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>is that in the nineteen twenties and nineteen thirties, fascism

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is an idea was accepted among many eat political, economic,

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and cultural elites as a totally legitimate way to organize societies.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>That is not necessarily the case today. Do you think

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that we really are in danger of a Republican Party

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or an element of American politics to bring back these

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>odious and hateful ideas of white supremacy and so forth

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and so on. I think that we're seeing white supremacy

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>granted a place at the American political table that I

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>had been assumed, as I think many of us did,

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>would no longer be there. Um, I'm not saying that

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>fascism is necessarily the answer. I do think that reactionary

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>politics are um in the middle of the American political mainstream.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we have perhaps the most reactionary president in

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>American history, someone who does not explicitly reject the support

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of fascist, white supremacists and other right wingers. I don't

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>know where this is all going to go, obviously. What

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, though, is the certainty. The political turmoil remind

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>me of the nineteen thirties, especially when we see opinion

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>given privilege over fact, where people say I don't care

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what the facts are, I have my opinions. That reminds

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>me of in the nineteen thirties when people said, well,

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>communism is good, so anything that helps communism is good.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So lying it's good if it helps communism. And this

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is what George Orwell so vigorously opposed when he got

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>up and said, look, I'm a leftist, I'm a dedicated socialist,

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but I will not lie to help my cause. And

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for this he was roundly denounced, as was went in

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Churchill on the right when he got up and said,

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Naziism is wrong. You cannot compromise with it. And all

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you were doing with the policy of appeasement, which was

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the official British policy in nineen thirties. All you do

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is make it more likely that we're going to have

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a big, violent war. What does the president do? What

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>does general this general that, the other eight generals in

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the administration? What do they do with the so called

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>nationalists in the White House? Do they just fester? Is

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that the prescription we all look forward to. Um? I

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>actually have changed my mind about that's. Initially UM, I

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>was a supporter of the idea that it was good

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to have adults in the room. And so when friends

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of mine said to me, Hey, Tom, you know, I

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>think I might go into the administration. I know you're

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump. What do you think My response was looked,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>it's good to have good people in the US government.

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I've changed that to the extent that I think it's

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>bad to have competent people right around Trump. All they

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>do is make him more effective. UM. I want good

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>people and the rest of the government Defense Department, State Department.

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think Trump is so incompetent that we should

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>let that be our is saving grace. Just let the

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>White House be a sinkhole of incompetence. And so I

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think the Master is a competent guy. Have you better

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for him to leave and just have one of Trump's

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>um no, not leave the National Security adviser, thank you

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>so much? On short notice today the author Thomas Rix.

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, he's taken home a few prizes, starting with

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Pete along the way Churchill and orwell the Fight for Freedom?

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it wonderful? Yes, Eli, I read it. It's one

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite books of the years, saying, just a

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just a wonderful window into the thirties. It takes away

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the World War two romance, if you will, of Churchill

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and talks about the realities of where Churchill wasn't then.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Or well, following on, Eli, it's amazing the different emotions

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>or what do you think we will hear? Quickly, Eli like,

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what will you hear from the president of three PM? Well,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I continue what I hope to hear, which is a

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 1>robust and full throated um denunciation of these white supremacists. Um.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I realize I'm in the minority, I guess among the

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>guests who been on the show today. But I don't.

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a difference between people who have um

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of you that I should say I don't agree with

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>On immigration or free trade, which I also don't agree with,

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and then people who are truly interested in I guess

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>restoring uh kind of Jim Crow era America. It's attention,

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene David Gura. Is that David Gura before the podcast?

0:39:46.800 --> 0:40:00.320
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio