WEBVTT - Mike Rockefeller on Launching a New Hedge Fund

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with very rid Holds on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Mike Rockefeller of Woodline Partners launched what was one of

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the hottest new hedge funds in a long time twenty nineteen.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 2>He came out of the gate having previously worked at Citadel,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>raising about two billion dollars in the new funds. Since then,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>it's grown to about seven billion dollars. And they are

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>not the typical hedge fund. They run a very specific

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>sector focused type of fund. There are about thirteen different

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>portfolio managers, each focused on a different sub sector. It's

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>beta neutral, market neutral. They run long short across each

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>of these and they've put up some pretty impressive numbers

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>over the past couple of years. It's always interesting to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 2>speak to a fund manager in the midst of one

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>of the craziest macro periods of the markets that we've

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>seen and god knows how long who doesn't factor in

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>macro events or the overall market because their market neutral

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>and hedged, and when they look at a sector, they

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>want to be long the very best stocks at the

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>best valuations they can and short the worst stocks at

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>the worst valuations. It's a fascinating strategy and it's one

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that's been very successful. With no further ado my conversation

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 2>with Woodline Partners, Mike Rockefeller.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Berry, looking forward to the conversation

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>same here.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>In fact, we had a conversation at an Emerging Manager's

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>panel back at Bloomberg invest earlier this year, and I

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>thought you would be great for Masters in Business. So

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>let's dive into your background. How did you get here?

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit about the early days of

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>your career.

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure, so I was a neuroscience major in undergrad so

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I had no intention of being an investment Yeah, it's

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a study of the brain and spinal cord.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Pretty specific, and you know, I just I love biology.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the human body is so complex and will

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>never quite understand it. But I had this really unique

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>experience in between my junior and senior year of college.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I got an internship at a investment fund in Baltimore.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And this was two thousand and two at the time,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>so they were not offering paid internships because the market

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was still recovering from the tech bubble crash. But the

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer offered me an unpaid internship. And he said,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and this is what was interesting, that I could live

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with him and his family for the summer.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>So I.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Know, I know it's a big risk, but I did.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I went down there and I spent the summer. And

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love sports, Barry, and you know, I

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>think they teach you so much about life. I was

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>not good enough to be a pro athlete, but I

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>was amazed how many similarities there were to investing and

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>being an athlete. You know, the competition, the practice, the

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hard work, the score and the occasional randomness. Yes, yeah,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, except in investing, the market is your competitor,

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and your ability to understand businesses and what's priced into

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a stock better than your peers is how you win.

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So what was really amazing about that internship was was

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>actually how Eric, the chief investment officer, practiced. So what

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is that in the morning, he

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>would wake up early, and I saw how he prepared

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for the day. On weekends, I saw how he would

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>prepare for the next week. I remember walking into his

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>living room on Saturday mornings and there'd be newspapers and

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>research reports and articles all over his living room. And

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>he said this is where it happens, you know, the learning.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So I was hooked. I said, this is this is

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>what I want my career to be. And I was

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>fortunate because I was twenty one years old at the time,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and from that moment, every step that I took was

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to get to where I am right now, you know,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting with you Berry and and you know, investing and

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>being a part of a great investment firm.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So you start at the healthcare group as an analyst

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 2>in City in the early two thousands. Obviously the background

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>in neuro had to help.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So after my experience in Baltimore, I wanted to

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pivot to finance and came back to school and applied

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to every major investment bank. That did not go so well.

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>No one called me back. It was late in the process.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Most most of the kids that were going into banking

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>at that time already had their jobs, and I didn't

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have a back around that banks wanted. I had never

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>taken an account in our finance class. But finally City

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>did call me back and invited me to interview, and

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I had four different interviews there and didn't get any

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>of the jobs. And so I went throughout my senior

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>year and didn't know exactly what I was going to do.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And fortunately, at the end of the year a couple

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>spots opened up, one in the healthcare division of the

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>investment bank, and they invited me in. I interview and

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I got the job.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 2>What was a job like?

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, a couple weeks before I joined banking, someone gave

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>me a book called Monkey Business. Have you read that?

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 2>I have not.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So that book is about bankers at DLJ in the nineties,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Premier investment bank, and it talks about how

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>they worked eighteen hour days, slept under their desk, endless

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>pitch books every weekend. And I thought to myself, there's

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>no way it could be like this anymore. That was

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>back then, and I have to tell you, Barry, it

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>was exactly like that. It was brutal. But I was

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so grateful because I knew my life could have been different,

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I was so happy to be there. I

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot of skills, and probably the most important

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>skill that I learned was the basic principle of double

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and triple checking your work and if you ever make

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, don't ever make it again.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Really interesting. So you go from City, eventually to

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Millennium and Morgan Stanley. Tell us about what you did

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>at those shops.

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So in two thousand and four I joined Morgan Stanley

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Equity Research. That was great. They had a star studded

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>cast of research analysts Byron Ween who sadly crossed away

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>recently he had retired, but he was still active, Henry

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>McVay who's now at KKR. He was the US strategist.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Katie Huberty, who's still there now, was a young, up

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and coming tech analyst. And I worked for Jamie Rubin,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>who was a top pharma analyst. And it was great

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>preparation for the buyside, you know, writing research reports, doing

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of work that you would do as

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>an investor, except you're making recommendations instead of on the

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>buy side, you're actually putting those dollars to work and

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>structure in portfolio.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>So now let's talk a little bit about the buy side.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Your next stop is Millennium. What was it like there?

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So in early two thousand and eight, Millennium was looking

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for an analyst at one of their funds out in

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, and I jumped at the opportunity. I had

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>never been to San Francisco.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>You're working in New York.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I was working in New York and I jumped on

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a plane and moved to San Francisco. That was my shot,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, So I was I was in.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Two thousand and eight, the start of the Great Financial Crisis.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>What was it like being at Millennium as everything kind

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of melted down?

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So Millennium employees a market neutral equity strategy long short

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in other words, exactly. And when I joined, I frankly

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't appreciate the power of that type of investing. And

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>then the fall of two thousand and eight came and

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I learned the power of that type of investing. And

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to the credit of the portfolio manager that I was

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>working with, Josh Fisher, we were actually up that year.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's pretty that's pretty impressive. So your next stop

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 2>is Citadel in twenty eleven and you spend six years there.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Citadel also, like Millennium, has a fantastic reputation. What was

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>your Citadel experience like?

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So, during my time at Millennium, as my appreciation for

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>proper portfolio construction started to grow, I had heard that

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Citadel was a pioneer in this type of investing. So

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty ten when they were looking for someone to

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>start their healthcare team in San Francisco, I jumped at

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. Citadel didn't jump as quickly as I did.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That was an eleven month interview process, Yeah, including in

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all day what you would consider FBI like interview where

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they dig through every piece of your background. It was

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>very intense, but fortunately Ken Griffin took a shot on

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>me in what turned out to be a life changing

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to build a business. And by the way, everything

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that I had heard on the outside about the quality

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of people at Citadel and the investment process that they employ,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it was all true. Wow.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So that had to be a fun experience. Had to

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 2>be a tough decision to make to leave a shop

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>like Citadel.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It was. My partners and I were incredibly fortunate to

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>grow up at Citadel. It was there that we learned

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a unique and differentiated approach to portfolio construction and investing

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>where the output was an uncorrelated alpha return stream.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>What made you decide to say, hey, we really need

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to do this as a stands alone outside of a

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>big complex fund like Citadel.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So Woodline was founded by myself, Carl Kraaker our

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>co chief investment officer, Matt Hooker, our chief operating officer,

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and then a group of us who worked together for

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>many years, and we studied the industry leaders of the

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>past twenty years, and we believed that we could iterate

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and improve on those learnings and create a durable investment

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>firm that would thrive in the future. And our vision

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was to create an investment partnership like you'd find with

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a Wellington or a Capital Group, with the risk management

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>expertise of Citadel, wrapped in a specialist structure at Woodline.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>So what was it like when you had to tell Ken, Hey,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>this has been great, but I want to I want

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 2>to hang my own shingle out. How supportive was he?

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>The whole process was exciting, occult, scary, wonderful, all of

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>those things. And leaving a successful career and starting your

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>own business makes no sense on paper. The chance of

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>failure is so high, and it was a bad decision

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>financially initially, So we had to make a choice between

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>comfort and creation. And I remember reading Jeff Bezos's bio

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and it talks about how Jeff was

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>working at d SHAW in the mid nineties, and he

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>had a great job, and he had an idea to

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>start an internet company. So he goes to David Shaw

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and he tells him about his idea. David Shaw says, Jeff,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a great idea for someone who doesn't already

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have a great job. You know, why don't you take

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the weekend to think about it. So Jeff went home

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and he applied what he coined as the regret minimization theory. Basically,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>when he's a eighty years old, what decision is he

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>going to regret less? And he chose out Amazon, which

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 1>worked out very well for him.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Literally threw all the stuff in a car and drove

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>across country that next Monday.

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it was so inspiring. And obviously Amazon is

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a different scale, But I will say I asked myself

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>a similar question, which is, do I want to go

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on this journey even if I never get to where

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going?

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 2>Huh? Really really quite fascinating. What was the most surprising

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 2>thing you learned when you were launching your own firm?

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>What what kind of struck you as Huh? I didn't

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 2>really expect that to happen.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I think how difficult it was to raise money you know,

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a rough first few months.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Didn't you guys launch with a big chunk of cash though,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>like two billion dollars.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>We did, but we had trouble finding investors in the beginning,

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and we had a lot of people on board who

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>left great jobs who were eyeing on us to get

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>funding and pressure there, a little bit of pressure, yeah,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, it's it's it's a different kind

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of pressure when you when you're now responsible for so

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>many people. And so we eventually made the decision to

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fly to the Middle East to meet with a large investor,

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>hoping they would partner with us. And on the flight over,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember waking up in the middle of the night.

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked up. The whole plane was dark except for

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>one light on in the back of coach, and that

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was our COO, Matt Hooker, cranking away. And to say

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we were prepared for that meeting, you know, as an understatement.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So we get all the way over there, they brought

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they brought us into this huge auditorium to present to

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>their team, and you know, we were like, okay, this

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is it, this is our chance. One gentleman comes in,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he sits down. We waited a few minutes. We then

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>asked where everyone else was, and he said he was

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the only one coming. Everyone else was busy so much

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so we ended up presenting to just Tim, and suffice

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, we walked away empty handed. But fortunately, a

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks later, two partners came to the table and

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>anchored our launch, and like that we were in business.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Wow, really really interesting. So let's talk a little bit

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>about your launch in twenty nineteen. You come out of

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.239
<v Speaker 2>the gate pretty fast. Not a lot of emerging managers

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>start with over a billion dollars. You guys were close

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to two billion. You know you have since really ran

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that up in the ensuing four years to over seven

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. Tell us a little bit about how you

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>built the firm and how it's structured.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So we structured Woodline to enable our world class decision

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>makers to operate at their very best. And there's a

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>few key elements to that. One is we have a

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>deep specialist approach, so where our teams are experts in

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the stocks that they cover. We also have a sole

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>coverage model, so that means one person or one team

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is responsible for their group of names, no overlap. Our

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>teams are also small and autonomous such that they can

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>make decisions. Because we believe that people closest to the

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>ground can make the best portfolio management decisions. And since

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Bezos earlier, he has a great quote. He says,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>great teams should be small enough such that you can

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>feed all of them with two pizzas. That's a good concept.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>We believe our senior team should have many years of

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>experience perfecting their craft. There's a gentleman named Anders Ericsson.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>He's done great work on Mastery and he says that

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>expert performance requires intense and deliberate practice for at least

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>ten years. Our pms have eighteen years of experience.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>So you started with about twenty five employees, you have

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>since ramped that up to over seventy five people. What's

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>it like managing all those people and that degree of growth.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We set up a Cocio model to deal with that

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>vario issue so that we could attract the best talent,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>leverage the skills and capabilities of Carl and myself, allowing

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>us to have more time both to invest. And we

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>also set up a management structure of Matt, Carl and

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>myself where every decision is made with a two thirds vote,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and that allows us to really delineate our duties to

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where we see fit and has provided us the ability

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to manage a very complex infrastructure.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>So not ties it takes to you to really move

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a decision forward. Carl is your cocio, Metta is running operations.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>So how much does that free you and Carl up

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>toll becus on the.

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Investing We get that question a lot, and we tell

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>investors that both Carl and I spend more time now

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.719
<v Speaker 1>as cocios of Woodline actually investing in our portfolios than

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we did at Citadel, which is an amazing stat.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 2>And is that because of the structure where you began

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>with someone running operations. It wasn't an afterthought a few

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>years down the road exactly.

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that structure was thought out so that we could

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>focus on investing rather than having to spend all of

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>our days managing people.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about some of those people. You have

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 2>thirteen portfolio managers plus including you and Carl. You've talked

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 2>about a player coach model. Explain what that is.

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's correct. So thirteen pms, including Carl and myself.

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>We also have very seasoned analysts running portfolios, some not

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>These are people truly the best at what they do.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>And what we mean player Coach is that Carl and

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to just take the traditional chief investment

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>officer role of management. We wanted to invest, and so

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Carl and I actually run individual portfolios within Woodline. So

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Carl runs a semi conductor portfolio, myself and my team

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>led by a Niche Kapor and Brian Schmidt, run a

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>bio pharma portfolio, and we spend most of our days

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on those portfolios.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>And then how much time do you devote to managing

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>the other eleven or so pms.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say we spend about seventy five percent of

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>our time on our existing portfolios that we're running, and

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of our time managing others and thinking about

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the business strategically.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about your investment process. You come from

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a biotech background, Carl has a semiconductor background. Tell us

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about a process that has a dozen

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>or so different pms, each with a different focus.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>We each have a different focus, but we all have

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the same bottoms up fundamental research process. The teams spend

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the majority of their time on research and learning about

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the companies that they cover. Each team covers a small

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>group on average of about fifty to seventy names, so

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they can understand them better and they come up with

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>unique insights on those stocks in their universe that may

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>not be appreciated by the market, and then structure portfolios

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 1>around those ideas.

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>So when we think of the typical bottoms up stockpicker,

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>it seems like there's a whole lot of variation, But

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>lots of funds tend to look like other funds. You

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 2>guys seem to look very different than the typical either

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 2>sector focused or bottoms up stockpicking focused fund. What makes

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Woodline a little different, a little more unique.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It really comes down to our portfolio construction. We hedge

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>out not just market beta, but any factors that we

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>can't predict. We focus solely on what is predictable, and

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we construct portfolios around that so that we don't succumb

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to factors that are moving the market on a day

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in and day out basis. That's a key differentiation.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Give us some examples of those factors that you're looking

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 2>to hedge out.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So in addition to beta, you know, there's many

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>factors that are moving stocks outside of what is idiosyncratic

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to a particular company. In fact, you can model these

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>factors and their influence on stocks, so momentum, value, growth,

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>short interest, and like other macro cross currents, we don't

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>have a unique advantage in predicting these factors, so we

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hedge them out.

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Huh. So you describe your key overwriting strategy as market

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>neutral equity focus on the global healthcare sector. Let's break

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that down. Market neutral means most of the time you're

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 2>running long short. Is it long short against the market

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>or long short within the sector?

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We run neutral to the market and to the sub

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>sector that we're in both.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So that's got to be a challenging strategy to

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 2>create for hedging both at the same time.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we have a specialist structure. So we

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>instead of having a healthcare PM or a tech PM,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we have a semiconductors PM, we have a medical device PM.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Just focusing on those fifty to seventy names within those

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sub sectors and then structuring portfolios within those sub sectors.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have to be a specialist to take this approach.

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of funds that have found success seem

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 2>to have run some pretty concentrated portfolios they hit a

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of big winners and it's worked out. You don't

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>take that approach. Woodline has about twelve hundred positions. That

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 2>seems almost like a closet index, but your performance doesn't

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 2>track an index. You guys are absolutely not closet indexers.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Why so many positions?

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The reason why it exists is because of our twenty

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>individually constructed subsector portfolios that feed up into a master

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fund and the end result of that is over one

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand unique positions.

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 2>So less concentrated exposure. What does that big of a

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 2>set of holdings? Due to the funds of volatility and

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>return patterns.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>So we offer investors and uncorrelated diversified return stream. Investors

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>can expect us to be up or down one percent

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a month and our vall is around five percent annually.

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Huh, not too bad. What do you do in terms

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 2>of risk management? How do you stay on top of

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Obviously you don't have a whole lot of concentration risk,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>but just generally speaking, what's the risk management process like?

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So each of the portfolios are running a high idiosyncratic

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ball portfolio on their own, and it all feeds up

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>into the master fund, which creates a great product, but

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we also monitor that from a top level, both Carl

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and Matt and myself. You know, we'll meet weekly and

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>look daily at our exposures and make any adjustments so

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that we continue to make sure that we are completely

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>neutral to any macro factors.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>H quite intriguing. So let's talk about some of those

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>sectors you focus on, tech, healthcare, industrials, energy, and consumer.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Why these sectors they almost seem unrelated.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, the primary driver in deciding where to invest is

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>great talent. That's what we look at first. The secondary

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>component is that we look for sub sectors that have

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the most disruption, innovation, and stock specific idiosyncratic volatility.

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Those sectors that you're focusing on, there's the greatest mispricing

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>versus what the market believes. How do you how do

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>you look at these sub sectors versus the general consensus.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Usually they have the greatest complexity and the greatest disruption,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there's a larger spread between winners and losers.

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's required to have a portfolio where the

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>performance is really driven by our relative stock picking.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Huh. That's interesting. In the past, you've mentioned that Woodline

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 2>established a network of corporate execs and industry relationships. Tell

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 2>us how you're using this network to generate alpha.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're very fortunate to spend our days building relationships

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with some of the world's leading executives. And these executives

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>have a full plate of managing complex businesses, and so

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we're appreciative of the time that they spend with us

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and the members of the Woodline team. We have a

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to create a mutually beneficial engagement, and so we

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>need to be well prepared, ask thoughtful questions and hopefully

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>find ways to add value in terms of what we're

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing across the industry. And then in return, we get

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to have a front row seat of what these companies

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing and where they're going.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Huh interesting. So, in the way you structured the firm,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you Woodline does not have a full pass through. Tell

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit about firms that do have a

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>pass through and why you elected not to go that way.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>That was one of the most important questions to answer

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>when setting up the firm. We believed that establishing a

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>partnership model more akin to what you would find with

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a private equity shop, as the best approach. And we're

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>called Woodline partners for a reason. The partnership structure, coupled

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with our sole coverage model has allowed us to compete

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>effectively for talent.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about that. On a

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>pass through model, if you're a fund manager that's doing

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>well and the firm is doing poorly, you still get

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>full bonuses and everything else. Everybody else takes a hit.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 2>This is more of a all for one and one

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>for all, sort of a three Musketeers approach. Everybody is

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a partner in the firm, not just running their own

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>independent fiefdom.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, and it really aligns incentives with our employees

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and our LPs so that we're all driving for the

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>same goal.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>What does the lack of a pay us through do

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>when you're competing for talent?

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So far, it has not impacted us because the partnership

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>model has been an attractive component to candidates looking at Woodline.

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And also the sole coverage is an important component. When

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you are looking at a platform and you join, you know,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>another multi manager, you're one of two, three, four, six, eight,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty teams covering the same stocks, and it's more of

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a mercenary type of approach. At Woodline, we only have

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>one software PM, that's Elliott Wilson. You know, we only

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have one medical device PM that's Chris Hawkins. They are

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the key people.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 2>So given that, let's talk about some of those sub sectors.

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 2>When you say you cover tech, how many different subsectors

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 2>are under technology?

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>There are four sub sectors currently under technology. There are

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>four sub sectors currently under healthcare, and we break them

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>up biotech services, pharma, semiconductors. We have a Japanese Tech PM,

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a Japanese consumer PM, we have a consumer

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Health and Wellness PM. These are all very specialized sub sectors.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 2>When you say Japanese tech, we're talking about companies in

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Japan that you're buying here. That's right, huh, really interesting.

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 2>So each PM works for a specific fund, it's not

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>part of a whole pulled fund. How does that.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Break down, It's a good question. It's all one fund

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that provides diversified access to all of our subsector portfolios.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Part of the challenge for sector specific funds over the

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>past decade is the higher volatility and lower sharp associated

0:28:58.760 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with that approach.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So one of the sectors you cover is energy. It's

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>been a kind of odd space the past couple of years.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The Russian invasion of Ukraine, oil spikes and by the

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 2>end of the year it's below where it was when

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the invasion starts. Now we have the war in the

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Middle East, oil fools below eighty dollars. How do you

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>contextualize oil? And what other energy subsectors do you do

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>you look at? Do you look at non carbon energy?

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>What else is in that area?

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So energy was one of those sectors that we didn't

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>initially launch with, and the reason why was because there

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of correlation among the companies within energy,

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and with all that's gone on in the world, including

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>clean energy, there's been a lot more dispersion among energy

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>companies and have allowed us to first of all, find

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a great analyst covering those names, also to run a

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>high idiosyncratic portfolio. So that's why we entered the sector.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Hey, it's a really exciting time in healthcare. The mRNA

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 2>drugs have been applied to all sorts of different things

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 2>beyond COVID. The obesity drugs like ozembic and wagovi are

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>finding amazing traction and having great results. This is your space,

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the healthcare sector. What's it like in this area these days?

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredibly exciting time to be a healthcare investor.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Science has gotten to the point where we are understanding

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>biology and how to target areas that we hadn't known

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for decades, and we're seeing some incredible results. You know,

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we've made some breakthroughs in Alzheimer's disease, We've made some

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>breakthroughs in obesity and in diabetes, in cancer, and so

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a healthcare investor right now is probably the

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>best time that I've seen in the last twenty years.

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Huh, really interesting. So you mentioned cancer cell therapeutics looks

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 2>like it's a fascinating area. What's happening in that medical space.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Self therapy is very exciting. You basically take a patient's

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>cells out, you infuse them, and put them back in

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the patient's body to fight the cancer. And we've had

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>remarkable results, particularly in types of blood cancer. But now

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see the promise to work on

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>solid tumors using this approach. And it comes down to

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the industrial complex around these because you have to manufacture

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>these cells for each individual patient.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It has to match their own genetics.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to take the cells out of a person's

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>body and align it just for that individual person and

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>then and put them back in. And so this is

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not something that you can do like a pill where

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you're manufacturing millions of these. This is a one by

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one approach, and so we have to figure out a

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>way to make it more efficient, less costly. But I'm

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>confident we'll do that.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about what's going on

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the hedge fund industry. Eleven thousand hedge

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>funds today, go back twenty five years, there were I

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know a couple of hundred. Are there too many

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 2>hedge funds? Has it gotten too crowded? Tell us about

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>what the space is like.

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>The growth in the number of hedge funds has slowed recently,

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and we think that'll likely continue as the consolidation of

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>talent into the large Platform models appear structural, and like

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>any fast growing business, there will be winners and losers,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but the platforms offer a material value proposition to their

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers and limited partners alike and will likely survive

0:32:58.400 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>various market regimes.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>So define what you mean by platform business models. I

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of people may not be familiar with

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>that term.

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So when I talk about the platforms, some people refer

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to them as the multi managers. The big market leaders

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>are Citadel and Millennium.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And coincidentally, two places you happen to have worked.

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's right, And what the platforms offer is

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>two things. One, from a PM and analyst standpoint, they

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>allow pms and analysts to invest in their portfolios and

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not worry about the operational complexities of running a business.

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>That's huge. And from an LP standpoint, there are lots

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of decision makers, so there are lots of ideas and

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it results in a uncorrelated, diversified alpha return stream and

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>one that an LP can do in a single investment

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>versus the complexity of multiple investments in many funds.

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So when you we were at both Citadel and Millennium,

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you didn't have to deal with any of the operational challenges.

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 2>What has it been like pivoting to running a business,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 2>hiring people, dealing with regulations, managing people, dealing with clients

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and LPs. How different is this experience from what you

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 2>had previously.

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It's complex and it's critically important to have a fully

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>built out infrastructure to support your investment team and manage

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the operations of your business. And we're fortunate to have

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Matt Hooker and his team doing that for us very

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>effectively and allows our investment team to invest even more

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>than we were at Citadel, which is incredible.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 2>So we've talked about a lot of different funds. We

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 2>mentioned d Show, we mentioned Millennium, we mentioned Citadel. Each

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of those have a very specific corporate culture driven by

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the founder. How do you create a corporate culture at

0:34:58.080 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 2>your own fund?

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I just watched an interview where Ray Dalyo was speaking

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to Bill Belichick, the head coach of the Patriots.

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Huh.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Bill had just earned his three hundredth career win, and

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Ray is all about principles, and so he asked Bill

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what his principles as a head coach are and Bill said,

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>put your team first, do your job, and continually focus

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 1>on improvement. And these are the key principles to any

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>successful organization, and they're certainly part of the DNA of Woodline.

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But a football team has a lot in common with

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>a successful investment firm. You know, on a football team,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a little over fifty people who dress for

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the game, plus an entire organization around that, and everyone

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 1>dreams of being the quarterback or the star running back,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but the success of a team is driven by all

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>those people who are doing jobs that may not have

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that same kind of glorified role Woodline. Carl likes to

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>say that people join because they choose to be on

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a great team, rather than being an all star on

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>an OK team. And I think that's true. And I

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like to think of Woodline as an organization of linemen,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>defensive ends, and kickers, where every role is celebrated and

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>every person critical to achieving its goals.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit about return quality. You've discussed

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 2>this previously. How do you define return quality and what

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>do you have to do to deliver it?

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So, ultimately, the goal for all investors across strategies public

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>private is to generate uncorrelated alpha, and it starts with

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>good risk management and optimal portfolio construction. If you look

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>at the average investment fund, it has a risk profile

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of around thirty percent idiosyncratic risk. So let's flip that around.

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>That means the average investment firm has seventy percent of

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>their performance that will be influenced by macro and market factors.

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not high quality, and we think the industry can

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>do better than that.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 2>And you cover North America, Europe and Asia. Are you

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 2>seeing more opportunities in one geography versus another? The world

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 2>really is pretty uncorrelated these days.

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We see opportunities for our strategy in the US, Japan,

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and Europe.

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Japan especially has been a house of fire lately. The

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Nike is up substantially. I don't think we're all that

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 2>far from the prior peaks before their big collapse in

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 2>eighty nine. What is it that's driving Japan despite all

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 2>of their demographic problems and everything else.

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>What's happening over there, Well, what makes a good market

0:37:55.120 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for US is breath of companies, liquidity, and having rules

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 1>based system. And in any of these markets, the market

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.439
<v Speaker 1>being up or down really doesn't matter to us. If

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow you told me the market was going to be

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>up five percent or down five percent, it would likely

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have very little impact on the performance of Woodline. And

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>so we really look at talent and then the types

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>of companies that are within a market that we can

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>structure a diversified portfolio with.

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 2>So, if I say to you, US has been really

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 2>strong economically and Japan has been doing well, but Europe

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 2>has been limping along. They've been rolling recessions from the

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>UK to Germany to France. They can't get out of

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 2>their own way. You don't care about that macro stuff.

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>You want to find the right company at the right price.

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And we want to pick the winners and the losers,

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and we want to structure portfolios around those winners and losers,

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and the market just does not matter.

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Huh. That's really quite fascinating. All right, we only have

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 2>you for a limited amount of time, so I'm going

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to jump to my favorite questions. I ask all of

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 2>my guests starting with what have you been streaming these days?

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what you're either watching or listening to, either

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 2>video or podcasts, or whatever's keeping you entertained.

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Most recently, I've been listening to Founders, where David Cenra

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>summarizes the biographies of path leaders and entrepreneurs.

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Let's talk about your mentors who helped shape your career.

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Well. Ken Griffin is a larger than life figure and

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>teacher that leaves it imprint about how you think about

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>things your entire life. I'd also say that Brandon Haley,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who started Holosecene. He was the first of our group

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at Citadel to launch his own fund and he blazed

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>a path for Woodline and others and was critical in

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>helping all of us get started. Woodline wouldn't be year

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>without him. And then on a personal level level, my

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>father for teaching me the value of loyalty and hard

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>work and consistency. I've been really fortunate, Barry. So I

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>could go on for a while.

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little about books, some of your favorites

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 2>and what you're reading right now. You mentioned Monkey Business.

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 2>What other books are you enjoying.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>One of my all time favorites is Shoe Dog by

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Phil Knight. Have you read that?

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Really interesting?

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's so great. What I love about that is,

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>after a long and sometimes grueling road for him building Nike,

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>he said he could he wished he could go back

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and do it all over again.

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I recall that I thought that was the most bonkers

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 2>thing in the whole book. Ye, after literally selling shoes

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 2>out of the trunk of his car and not knowing

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>if they're gonna have enough money to pay vendors, and

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 2>constantly getting by on the skin of their teeth. The

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>first third of that book is like, I know the outcome,

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and it still feels like they're not going to make it.

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 2>They're just skating by.

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know it's it's amazing and it's inspiring for

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>any entrepreneur.

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Any of the books you want to mention or.

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading Musk right now and that's.

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh Walter Isaacson. Yes, that looks that's that. That looks

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 2>like it's too big to read. It's a giant tone.

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a third of the way through.

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>What I didn't know, Maybe I should have known this

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was that Elon actually started SpaceX before he took over Tesla.

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, He didn't start Tesla, he joined it, didn't start PayPal,

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 2>he joined it, But SpaceX was.

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Basactly Yeah, he was thinking about space travel, you know,

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>from a very early age.

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Quite interesting. Uh. And our final two questions, what

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of advice would you give to a college grad

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 2>interested in a career in investing or hedge funds?

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Place learning and experience over salary entitle.

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 2>No matter what, No matter what, you got to get

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 2>those fundamentals down, the money will take care of itself.

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Later, exactly.

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 2>And our final question, what do you know about the

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 2>world of investing today that you wish you knew when

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 2>you were first starting out fifteen twenty years ago.

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:23.959
<v Speaker 1>So I was fortunate enough to spend time with Will

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I Am from The Black Eyed Peas a couple of

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and I was asking him, Will what was

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it that really made you so successful? And he said

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>that at a very early age, when he was in

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>high school, he started looking forward ten years, twenty years,

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, and then he would envision himself then and

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>then work backward. So I would say, you know, let's

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>all be like Will I Am and look thirty years

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>ahead and envision what the future will look like, so

0:42:58.800 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't miss.

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Out really interesting Mike, Thanks for being so generous with

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 2>your time. We have been speaking with Mike Rockefeller, co

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 2>chief investment officer and co founder of Woodline Partners. If

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you enjoy this conversation, well, be sure and check out

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 2>any of the previous five hundred discussions we've had over

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the past nine years. You can find those at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube,

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 2>wherever you find your favorite podcasts. Sign up from my

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 2>daily reading list at ridults dot com, Follow me on

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Twitter at ridults, follow all of the Bloomberg family of

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 2>podcasts on Twitter at podcast I would be remiss if

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>I did not thank the PRAC team that helps put

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 2>these conversations together each week. Sarah Livesey is my audio engineer.

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Attika Valbrunt is my project manager. Sean Russo is my researcher.

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Anna Luke is my producer. I'm Barry Ridholts. You're listening

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio Back