WEBVTT - The Silurian Hypothesis

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to be talking about a subject that

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I've actually had on the radar for a while. This

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>is something that was making the rounds on science blogs

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a few years back, and it has been suggested by

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a number of different listeners. So I'm glad we're finally

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>coming around to it. I think I had some hesitation

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>for a while that I want to briefly explain right

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning here. But today we're gonna be talking

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>about an idea known as the Silurian hypothesis. Uh. And

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>just to give you a little bit of background knowledge,

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we spent several minutes before recording today trying to look

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>up how they pronounced Silurian on Doctor Who, because I

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, sure they might use some kind of British

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>English variation where they a Silurian, but but a last

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we could not ever get the doctor to say it right.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I watched I think an entire scene where one of

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the more recent doctors was chatting with us Silurian or

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Silurian out out of your will, and they they it

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was like they were trying not to say it, like

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>if they said it, one would would pop up and

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and crawl out of the screen or something they used

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they referred to another alien race. There wasn't even in

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the scene, and I don't even think was part of

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that episode. And then in all these other terms. But yeah,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they were just trying to mess with me. So this

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is a topic that I have been interested in covering

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while. It's it's been a few years now,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But Rob, when you suggested it, I realized that I'd

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>always been hesitating and not wanting to quite go ahead

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with it. And I think I realized the reason for that,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which is that when I saw people mentioning this paper

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on the internet, it was clear to me that a

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of them were getting exactly the wrong takeaway from it,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Like they were matching onto a very shallow understanding of

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the concept and and running off in a in a

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>very different direction than the authors intended. Not only a

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>different direction than they intend, but a direction they specifically

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>say do not go in, and specifically say that they

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are not trying to to make Yeah. Uh, so to

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to clarify what we're talking about here. The Silurian Hypothesis

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>paper begins with a fascinating question, in the words of

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the author's quote, if an industrial civilization had existed on

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Earth many millions of years prior to our own era,

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what traces would it have left and would they be

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>detectable today? That that's the question at the heart of

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this paper. And obviously this is a tantalizing premise. You know,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>it sets your mind racing with images of impossibly weird organisms,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, like land dwelling octopi and stuff in the

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in their own weird cities, and and what kind of

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>technology would they have? Things that are as alien as

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>anything you could imagine on another planet, except they would

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>have all been from here, native to planet Earth, dating

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>back millions of years into prehistory. But while this is

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>a really attractive imaginative exercise, I think the first order

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of business when talking about this subject is to be

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>clear that the Silurian Hypothesis paper is about coming up

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>with a framework for detecting physical traces of industrial civilizations

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and understanding how long those traces last. So it's about

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, what are the right questions to ask

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>when you're when you're looking at a planet and saying,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>how could we tell if there had been a civilization

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on this planet a long time ago? It is not

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a paper arguing that there was in fact a lost

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>civilization deep in Earth's past. So it's not evidence for

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lizard men, ancient aliens, Graham Hancock, junk Atlantis, or any

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. But I would say in its true form,

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it is a really interesting question. Yeah, And at heart

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode is is not going to be about scientific

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence for lizard men civilizations in the Hollow Earth. So

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for that, this is this is not

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the episode for you. But yeah, what I love about

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it is that it takes this sort of fantastic idea

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and then examines it reasonably, and that examination eliminates some

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>very interesting geologic, climatic, and astrophysical considerations, So you know,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>setting aside pseudoscience and pseudo archaeology here. But on the

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I think if you if you're looking for

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>some sci fi fund this topic in this episode will

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 1>also still engage you. Um, but it is interesting how

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>from a certain perspective you can imagine people being drawn

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>into it by just sort of this sci fi idea,

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea that does lean lend itself well to sort

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy theorist mindsets, and then realizing, actually, this paper

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is about geology and UH and U and the last

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>year of our planet and also, oh, I guess kind

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, in many cases, kind of a downbeat

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>message about the lasting impact of human technology on our planet.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>And on the other hand, too, how forgettable we may

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>be from the standpoint of geological history. Yeah, so if

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>you're on board for all of that, you've come to

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the right place. So real quick, I do want to

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>just discuss the Doctor Who reference here, since since uh,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the authors Schmidt and Frank took the name for the

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis from the Doctor Who species the Silurians, who first

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>popped up in the nineteen seventies series Doctor Who. And

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>these Silurians, I think, now you've got me saying silurians,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I probably probably stuff this way. Well, it gets even

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>worse because so they take the name of the hypothesis

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>from this Doctor Who series where these creatures show up.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But then they say explicitly in the paper, you know,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the range we would really be looking at would actually

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be after the Lurian geologic period, the Silurian period is

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's like a roughly twenty million year period that's

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>more than four hundred million years ago. I don't remember.

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like four hundred and forty something to four hundred

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty something, I think roughly. But if you were

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>seriously looking for evidence of lost civilizations in Earth's ancient past,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably be looking for things like after about four

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years ago, coming you know, forward in time

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Devonian period, when you could have the reasonable

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>biological basis for land dwelling animals that might have evolved

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>complex technological intelligence. Yes, but any rate. In Doctor Who,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>especially in that original nineteen seventy uh appearance, the Silurians

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are these kind of lizard men um. They factor into

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>this plot with the third Doctor played by John part

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Way Who nineteen nine, nine ninety six, and then they

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>subsequently pop up again with the fifth Doctor played by

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Peter Davison and the eleventh Doctor played by Matt Smith,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and then more recently the third teenth Doctor played by

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Jody Whittaker. So this is just the TV show. I

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>can't speak to the various books and audio dramas that

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have come out, and their look has changed throughout the film. Um,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are, in essence, this cold blooded, prehistoric

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>reptile like species with significant technological advancement that they they

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they end up entering various states of suspended

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>animation to avoid uh you know, major changes on Earth,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>changes to the climate, etcetera. Um, and then they re

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>emerge and encounter the Doctor. Um. So yeah, they're They're

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the many interesting alien and otherworldly species that

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pop up. Uh. Though, I guess with the Silurians, one

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of the key things is that they're they're not pure aliens.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They're they're sort of the originals. There are their original terrans,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>original earthlings, uh, that are then encountered by these evolved

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>apes that come much later. I mean to to them,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we are the aliens. Yeah right, we're these weird future creatures. Uh.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The image would tend And I gotta be honest, I'm

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not a hoovoid, so I don't know the lore. But

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the picture you're showing me of the Silurians, they look

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like they look like if the world was all creature

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Black Lagoon and there was a leather face

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the creature from the Black Lagoon civilization. Yeah, I

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they're definitely Doctor Who creatures of this era, which

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which I tend to love these costumes. I know they

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>were working with with with with budget limitations here, but yeah,

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the the aliens and robots of this era really really

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>called me. Now you said you look kind of fish like.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Bear in mind, and I'm sure some Doctor Who listeners

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Who viewers will will will chime in here, But

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe they are related to another species that pops

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>up on the show that live in the water. I

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're like the sea devils or something. Um, but

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys are not aquatic in nature. I think I

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>got that right. The seed of Oh wait, this is

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that like a a bunch of intelligent euryptorids or something

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Yeah, alright, So this is two thousand

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen paper the Silurian hypothesis, Would it be possible to

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>detect an industrial civilization in the Geological Record? This was

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>published in the journal International Journal of Astrobiology. UH. It

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>draws its name from that Doctor Who episode, and the

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>authors here that they point out that they may be

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the first to seriously consider whether a technologically advanced civilization

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>could have evolved prior to Homo sapiens on Earth, though

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the authors due stress that this is a to the

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>best of their knowledge situation, so you know, it's entirely

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>possible somebody was batting around the idea previously, but this

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>may be the first, and certainly this was. This one

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really made a splash when it came out. Okay, So

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the two authors here would be Adam Frank and Givin A.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt right and Frank is a is a physicist and astronomer,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and Schmidt is a climate scientist right right. Schmidt is

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a climatologist, climate model and director of the NASA Gotted

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Institute for Space Studies in New York and co founder

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the award winning climate science blog Real Climate. Frank

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is a physicist, astronomer, and writer whose work has appeared

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in such publications as The New York Times and NPR,

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I believe we've actually referenced his work on the

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast before. Uh. He also has a book. He has

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a few books, including The Constant Fire, The End of

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Beginning, and Light of the Stars. Those are all

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>nonfiction science books, of course, So to be clear, we're

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about two very legitimate scientists and science communicators, not

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a couple of of quacks who were

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>staring into the hollow Earth or anything. So the authors

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>here begin with a very reasonable consideration of the search

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. Uh. And then

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this is something we've we've touched on the show plenty

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of times before. Ours is the only model of life,

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but we generally consider technological advancement to be a hallmark

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of intelligent life. And more to the point, something we

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>can search for signs of, uh concerning other worlds and

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>other star systems. Uh. You know, and anytime you can,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out how to look for signs of

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of advanced and expansive energy harvesting or consumption. Uh. That

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>might be a way for us to tell if there's

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>something else out there that is significantly advanced. Right, and

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it also might be a simple prerequisite for contact, because uh,

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about so that they started off by looking

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>at this as an astrobiology question. You know, you're you're

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for signs of life elsewhere in the universe. And

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, the the search for intelligent life in the

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>universe in practical terms, what's accessible to us really boils

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>down to the search for life capable of Harvard harnessing

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>radio technology within our galaxy. You know, you could probably

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>find maybe chemical biosignatures in in the atmospheres of exoplanets

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that would give you an indication that there's some kind

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of life there, maybe bacterial in nature or whatever. But

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for intelligent life, you're you're probably talking

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about radio of some kind, right, And so the kinds

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of civilizations that develop radio communication technology would fall under

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the classification of industrial civilizations. And these are what author

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the authors define as civilizations that have the ability to

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>harness energy on a global scale. And they bring up

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>how this actually feeds into one of the the recurring

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>characters in in the astrobiology literature, the Drake equation. That's right, Yeah,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they bust out the Drake equation, and of course consider

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>how how some of the takeaways relate to Earth, especially

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the notion that over the course of a planet's existence,

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple industrial civilizations can theoretically arise over the span of

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>time that life exists there. And then we have to

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>factor in questions over you know, how many times life

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>itself may have evolved or started out on Earth before

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>our last universal common ancestors got going. The possibility of

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a shadow biosphere and the idea that species like dolphins

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>may suggest independent evolutions of intelligence on Earth. Um, you know,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so we're left with this idea that, yeah, the radically

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and given the footprint of life on Earth, you could

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>have had multiple intelligences uh evolved and arise during that

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>time period. Because that's certainly what the Drake equation seems

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to allow for concerning other worlds. Well, yeah, and I

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know so I kind of love the Drake equation.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a famous tool that I really enjoy

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about because because it does the job of taking

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a question that seems like we could not possibly answer.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>The question is how many active technological civilizations are there

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Milky Way galaxy? And you know, if you're

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>being honest with yourself, the correct answer to that is

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>how the hell should I know? Like, there's no way

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to answer that question at all. But what the Drake

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>equation does is break that unanswerable question down into a

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>number of other questions that you then multiplied together to

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>get an estimated number. And many of those smaller questions

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves could perhaps be answered, and in fact, some of

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>them have been answered since the Drake equation was first formulated.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, So it decomposes an unsolvable problem of are

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there aliens out there? And if so, how many, into

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a series of smaller problems, at least some of which

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are solvable, maybe all of which are. You know, you

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>could come up with some kind of reasonable gas about.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>And so the classic formulation of the Drake equation is

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to get your number of civilizations in the milky way,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you would multiply a bunch of different terms together. So

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>one is the rate of average the average rate of

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>star formation. You know, how much do you get stars

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>times the fraction of stars that have planets times the

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>average number of planets per star, times the fraction of

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>planets that develop life times the portion of those life

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>systems that gain intelligence, times the portion of those intelligent

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>life systems that develop technological means to communicate times. And

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>then here's a really interesting term, quote the length of

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>time l over which such civilizations released detectable signals. And

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it's this very last term that I think very often

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>gets overlooked by people who are thinking about, you know,

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are there aliens out there? And how could we know?

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we often tend to assume that, well, once

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there are aliens with technological means to communicate. That's just

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, progress only extends from their civilizations

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just continue to get bigger and their capabilities expand and

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they spread out from there. But I don't know that

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>there could be severe limitations on the length of a

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>radio receptive or radio broadcasting civilization. Maybe they only exist

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>for a few hundred years. Because one thing we know

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is that our technological civilization is just a tiny blip

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on the history of planet Earth, even a tiny blip

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>on the history of life on planet Earth. Earth is

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>four point five billion years old. There's been life on

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Earth for most of that time. Uh. The authors here

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>estimate that there has been complex life on Earth to

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>land surface for only about four hundred million years. So

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that's only a fraction of the entire history of Earth.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But that but four hundred million years is still a

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>gargantuan amount of time compared to the length of human civilization.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>They say, industrial civilization, you know, by their metric, has

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>probably existed for only about three hundred years. This is

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>since roughly the beginning of mass production methods for for things,

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and so if humans were wiped out by a global

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>mass extinction, of some kind in the near future. Our

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>industrial civilization would just be this tiny little splinter, this

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>blip of three hundred years on a history of a

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>currently four point five billion year old planet. Yeah, and

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so from there we get into the question, Okay, if

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have an industrial civilization like this, it is

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>just a blip, would we be able to see it?

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And if we could see it, what would we look for?

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is you know, this is pretty much the

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>meat of the paper here analyzing this sort of question,

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>which which is great because it it again it gets

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>into sort of uh, you know, sci fi friendly concepts.

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a useful in considering the evolution of life and

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the existence of intelligent life on other worlds. And it

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>also shines a light on what we're doing now and

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>where we are. And and I think also, uh, you know,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>illustrates nicely illustrates this idea that um that that the

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>technology is not just this um that this this this

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ramp to Star Trek, you know, or this ramp to

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the culture or any of our more optimistic sci fi

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>dreams like there are there are severe challenges. Uh. And

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of course there's there's always the risk of extinction. That's

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And one thing that's funny is we don't

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>know whether the rise of technological civilization should generally be

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>understood as, on average, a linear process where it just

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of goes in one direction and keeps going in

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that direction, or whether it should be understood as on

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>average a sick clickal process where you get a rise

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in technological civilization, then then it disappears for some reason.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine what some of those reasons might be. Um,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and then maybe rises again out of the

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>out of the same biosphere. I mean, either one I

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think is a perfectly plausible model to entertain is like

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>what usually happens in the universe. Uh. And we just

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>don't have the h we don't have the evidence to

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>really have an opinion on that. Yeah, I mean a

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of it just comes back to the fact that, again,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we are the only model of intelligent life, and certainly

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>technologically advanced intelligent life that we have to look at,

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>So we have nothing to compare us to. Yeah, and

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what's going to happen to us in

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the long run. Right. So uh, Well, let's get into

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the I guess the sort of the first part of

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the paper, and I do want to drive home that

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>if you want to just go right to the paper

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>yourself and dive in. Um, you just do a search

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for the title and you can find it hosted on NASA.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They have as has a as a PDF of this

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that's very easily accessible. Uh. You can also read it

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in full on the Cambridge University Press website, which I

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>think is the press behind the journal, the International Journal

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Astrobiology. And yeah, so it's all on their

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>end with the references hyper linked and all that, which

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is nice. Yes, yeah, absolutely so if he hit a paywall,

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't don't give up. It's out there. UM. And I

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>believe Adam Frank also wrote a piece for What the

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic where he nicely summarizes some of the ideas here.

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and he also tells a funny story about

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>how they arrived at writing the paper, because I think

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he says, uh, he showed up in Gevin Schmidt's office

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to to talk about UM, to talk more about astrobiology

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like Drake equation type questions, and he's like, okay, so

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>we we we know we've got one industrial civilization on Earth.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And then Schmidt responded by saying, how do we know

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we're the only one just hitting that early like wall.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like wow, And then that turned into the paper. Yeah,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it's quite a paper. So let's see,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the first part of it, which I

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>think you can loosely think of it's just sort of

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a look at the limits of our vision. So they

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>point out that for the last two point five million years, uh,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there's widespread physical evidence of things like climate change, soil

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>horizons this is where one layer of soil differs from

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>belower above, speaking to changes recorded in the soil, as

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>well as archaeological evidence of non Homo sapiens cultures such

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>as the Neanderthals. And this two point five million year

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>period is known as the Quaternary. Now, going back before

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Quaternary again more than two point five million years ago,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the land evidence is harder to come by. You have

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to depend on drilling, mining, and occasional exposed sections of

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the earth. Even in the ocean, sentiment evidence apparently only

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>goes back to around one seventy million years ago. Yeah,

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think for me this was actually one of

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting parts of the paper because I would say,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>if you just go by standard intuition. A person might think, uh,

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there had been a civilization on Earth,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a two million years ago or something like that. Uh,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>would wouldn't that just be completely obvious, Like we'd see

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence of it all around us? Would there be ruins

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and all that, you know, their their stone hinges, their

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>skyscrapers and everything like that. Actually it's not. It might

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>not be as obvious as you might think. In fact,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of it could be rather scarce. And this

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>runs counter to our sci fi imaginings, right, because you

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>encounter elder civilizations and in other works like there's usually

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a ruin or a vault or some

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of mysterious monolith or something like the idea that

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the elders would just be gone entirely, like just erased,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>not by some sort of a conspiracy or by some

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of a you know, alien shenanigans, but just because

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>things don't last that long. That's uh, it's an alien

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>concept from too many of our again, too many of

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>our creative visions of of what the future. In the past,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe exactly so, we think, well, you know, there are

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>ruins of civilizations from thousands of years ago, but that's

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years ago. That's nothing in geological time. The

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>surface of the I mean, look a look at what

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a map of the land formations on Earth just you know,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty million years ago looked like It's like, you know,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the the surface of the Earth is not fixed and constant.

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a geologically active planet. So would there be

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>ruins all around us? Would evidence of a civilization from

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of years ago just be totally obvious?

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably by the answer that the authors

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>give here, which is that no, it would probably not

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be totally obvious. In fact, it might be incredibly difficult

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to find evidence of at all. Uh. And so one

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of the the interesting points the authors make here is

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that the the exposed land surface of Earth, of course,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is geologically very young on average. They cite evidence from

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a study by ma at mon at All in two

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine that the oldest large patch of land surface

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on Earth is probably in the Negev Desert, and that's

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>only about one point eight million years old. One point

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>eight million years, I mean, compared to the history of

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>civilization is a long time. But that's again, it's like

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing in geological time. It's a tiny fraction of of

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>earth history. So if we wanted to find remnants of

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a civilization from say, hundreds of millions of years ago,

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you probably would not find that on the surface of

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. You'd have to look for it in in

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>exposed geological strata from from previous eras. And even then

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't just count on the fact that you would

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be finding fossils of that civilization all over the place. Yeah, exactly.

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That They that they hit on something we we've discussed

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, which is, of course that the

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>fossil record is inherently incomplete, because fossilization only occurs when

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>conditions are just right. Um. They point out that that

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of all the dinosaurs that ever lived, and there were

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton of you know, uh, you know, they're the

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>era of the dinosaurs taken as as one gigantic, gigantic

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>monolith just dwarfs anything that that that that humanity has

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>ever occupied. Uh. You know, it is a it is

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a cathedral, and and we're we're not even like a

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>child's dollhouse, uh sort of situation here. Um. So uh,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, out of out of all of those dinosaurs

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that ever lived, there are only a few thousand near

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>complete specimens. And so the authors here contend that given

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the rarity of fossilization, a species is short lived, as

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens might not make it into the fossil record

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>at all. And of course, for fossilization to mean anything

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to us, or to you know, anybody who's doing a

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>uh doing you know, some sort of an investigation of

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a planet or our planet, those fossilizations would have to

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>survive and then they would have to be found. Yeah, exactly.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And and so again this might be pushing against your intuition.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You would say, like, wait a minute, there's there's there's

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there's signs of human life all over the surface of Earth.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And and we have, you know, at least a few

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand uh complete dinosaur fossils, enough to have museums of

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>natural history with dinosaur fossils in places all over the world. Uh,

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>surely you'd expect more. But dinosaurs existed for almost two

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years. Human civilization again is like it's a

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>few thousand years at this point. Yeah. So the problem

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>here is like we have trouble comparing the odds because

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not realizing how many millions of times more the

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur bodies got to roll the dice than ours would. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Another thing they touch on is that is the example

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of technology. Uh, and they point out how rarely complex

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>early examples of human technology are ever found. So if

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, well, surely we would find one of these

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>factories or something that was made by one of these

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>factories that a previous civilization might have had, well not necessarily. Yeah,

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>sure surely my rice cooker would be found hundreds of

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>millions of years in the future. But yeah, that they

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned several reasons why that's maybe not as clear as

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you might assume. So they say urbanization that currently represents

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>less than one percent of the Earth's surface, So that's

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a limitation on the deposition side of of creating a

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>fossil record of our current civilization. Only small parts of

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Earth's surface are actually inhabited by humans. That that sounds counterintuitive,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's true. And then they point out that quote

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>exposed sections and drilling sites for pre quaternary surfaces are

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>orders of magnitude less as fractions of the original surface.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>So human civilization currently only feels a small portion of

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Earth's surface right now, and we only access tiny fractions

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of Earth's previous surface through through various kinds of drilling

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, access through exposure to rock strata. So

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>there's just like extreme selection filters on both sides, on

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the deposition and on the excavation side. Yeah, it would

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like even if you you knew somehow,

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with some certainty that there was that that there was

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a technological civilization during this time in the ancient ancient past. Uh, yeah,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you would. You would have to you have to really

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>know exactly where to drill down to hit them. You

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't just expect to randomly do it unless you did

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of drilling and digging and and excavation. Um.

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But but but so what we've been talking about here

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is challenging the the intuition that you would just be

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 1>finding physical fossil remnants and artifacts of this civilization from

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of years ago all over the place.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think they do a very good job of

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>knocking that down. But of course it is not hopeless

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because they say, while our chance of finding the physical

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>remains of a hypothetical Silarian civilization might be very low,

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>there would be other traces of the existence of that

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>civilization that would be preserved in the geologic record, and

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you you would have a very good chance of finding

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>those traces. Yeah, and that's that's what most of the

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the paper deals with. I do want to

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>point out one of the things that they bring up

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in passing that I thought was interesting. They point out

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that that you could certainly make an argument for or

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>against the evolution of intelligent life in a world based

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on the probable evolution of species that are in the

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fossil record, but that they would be focusing on physiochemical

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>tracers for previous industrial civilization. So I hadn't really thought

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, but like the idea of like looking at say,

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur fossils and saying, well, we don't have evidence that

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they evolved in into an intelligent technological species, but if

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we but we can make an argument based on this

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>fossil and this fosil fossil that they were headed in

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that direction. I feel like even that's the kind of

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that probably wouldn't be quite as clear as your

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>intuition might lead you to assign them, because I mean,

0:28:55.760 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like intelligence in mammals arose very rapidly in geologic time. Yeah,

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So again it reached this situation where the fossil record

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>could just be missing that snapshot entirely. So this all

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>leads you the next to the next major question. Given

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the limits of what we can dettacked in the geochemical record,

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>what exactly could we look for on a planet to

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>see if an industrial society ever existed there? And yeah,

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what the bulk of the paper focuses on. So

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Earth, if an organized, intelligent society

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>evolved during the pre Quaternary time but they didn't reach

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the level of an industrial society, there simply would be

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>no record of them as far as this paper is concerned.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Right there, they're looking for the kinds of chemical, material

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and climate type changes that would leave a trace in

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the geologic record, and that would primarily be a function

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of of industry, basically of energy, production of of material

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>working things like metals and plastics, and the uh and

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the methods of harn using energy for industrial use. I

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was reminded of our episodes on fire technology because if

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>listeners may remember, we discussed, well, could something that evolved

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in the water or or on a water world, could

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they ever really get any kind of advanced technology going

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't have access to the surface, and that

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a factor here as well, as they're

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>only looking at the period during which something could have

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>evolved on land. Yeah, so you could maybe have advanced

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence in the water. But it's maybe this is just

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a lack of imagination on our part. You know, you

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>always need to be aware of the limitations of your vision.

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But it does seem hard to imagine advanced technology under

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the water, because like if you don't have fire, you

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can't do metal working, or metal working is very difficult.

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know. It just seems harder to

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine how technology like we understand it could come about

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in the water. But again, you know, limits of our vision. Yeah,

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so they say, quote, the focus is thus on the

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>period between the emergence of complex life on land in

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the Devonian four million years ago in the Paleozoic era

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and the mid appli A scene. Uh, and that's around

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>four million years ago, Yeah, because if it was much

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>more recent, you'd you'd probably get into the area where

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd start to expect to actually see those kinds of

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>remnants and artifacts that that we were talking about. Right,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So they get into the discussion of what we might

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>look for, and they haven't nicely divided up. The first

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>one is, uh, well, they basically have two broad categories

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and then some some details on that category. The first

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>big one though, would be looking at the geological footprint

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of the anthroposcene. So, as we've discussed in the show before,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an argument to be made that the impact of

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 1>human civilization on the environment and the geologic record constitutes

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>its own geologic era, the Anthropocene. So not all the

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>changes would be recognizable millions of years later, but some

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>would be. Right. So, human activity at this point is

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is large scale enough that we are making change is

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to the earth that that are that are widespread or

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you could even say global, And I was gonna say permanent,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not permanent, but extremely long lived. You know, going way

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>into the future, you will be able to find signs

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the rocks and the ice and the setiment, you know,

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the things on Earth that persists over long periods of

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>time that will leave records of what we did to

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the earth in just the past three years or so. Right,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And uh, And as we've probably mentioned before, the anthropasyn

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.959
<v Speaker 1>is not a an official geological era as much as

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>any of these things can be, you know, official if

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like when you're talking about geologic terms, it's

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>even more ridiculous. We can consider such a small part

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of geologic history that we occupy, but there's a lot

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of compelling evidence for it, and you often see it discussed,

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when we're talking about the changes that that humans

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have made to the planet and are still making to

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the planet and how they may show up in the

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.959
<v Speaker 1>geologic record. And just to be super clear, the majority

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>any of the changes we're talking about of this kind

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>would not be changes like physical alterations of the Earth's surface.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about like records of people digging holes

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and building stuff. We're talking about records of like changes

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to the to the level of different carbon isotopes in

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in geological strata and things like that. Right now, they

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>also hit upon something that that I thought was really

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting and in a way almost almost encouraging, uh, the

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sustainability paradox. So the idea here is that of course

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the longer human civilization lasts, especially technological civilization, the greater

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the geologic signal of its impact. Again, that that lasting

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>those lasting signs in the environment, not the faces they

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>carved into the mountains but impacts again on their their

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>geochemical and nature. Um, so that signal increases. But the

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>longer human civilization lasts, the more sustainable it must become

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in order to revive. And this is of course the

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>reality we're living in right now. If a civilization survives

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this test and becomes more sustainable, then that signal grows weaker. Right.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost like the strength of the signal left

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for future people to discover is directly proportional to how

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>suicidal that civilization is, right Like, the more it is

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.439
<v Speaker 1>just burning through fossil fuel resources and the rate of that,

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the stronger the signal will be. And so a civilization

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at some point, they say, well, will naturally tend to

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>attenuate for a couple of reasons. Either it realizes it

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>can't keep going at that rate, or it's going to

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>cause climate damage to itself, so it will naturally switch

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to more sustainable uh energy sources that are harder to

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>detect in the future, or it of course does so

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>much damage to itself that it's signal naturally is reduced,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>right right. So, so basically coming back to what you

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, it's not just that there there's gonna be

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a sign. There's gonna be the signal, uh, this footprint

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of a civilized ation, uh in the in the you know,

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the geochemical record. It's it's also that it may just

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>be very short. It may be a little it's not

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be this. Uh, it's not gonna be a symphony.

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It's going to maybe be a note or two. So basically,

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that that that a real strong, much

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>stronger argument for aliens existing and having some sort of

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>role or some sort of advanced technology having some sort

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of role on Earth in the in the ancient history

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>would not be look at the pyramids, I think aliens

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>did this, or I think, you know, ancient scientists did this.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>It would be pointing at say a blip in uh,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, or an increase in global temperatures during a

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>certain period of time and saying, I think the aliens

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>did this, or I think the advanced technology in question

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>did this. I mean, even then, I think that would

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>be a very speculative and and difficult to prove hypothesis.

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It would be kind of just like unfalsifiable speculation, but

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that that would perhaps be the more likely type of

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>signal you would find if there had been alien intervention,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>then you know specific artifacts than all right, well, let's

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the specifics of the footprint that

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the authors lay out here. The first one is a

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>stable isotope anomalies of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen. And

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the big ones, an estimated point

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>five trillion tons of fossil carbon via the burning of

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels and warming of the planet. Um they quote,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we we expect this temperature rise to be detectable and

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>surface ocean uh carbonates, notably for Manifera. This is a

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>single celled organism with with with a chalky shell. UM.

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Organic biomarkers cave records, such such as stalactites, lake ostracods.

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:56.760
<v Speaker 1>These are minute aquatic crustaceans and high latitude ice cores,

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>though only the first two of these will be a

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>retrievable in the time scales considered here. Right, So this

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>thing about the the isotope anomalies of of carbon and

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>these other elements is very interesting. So they say, you know,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there are natural distributions that you would find records of

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in the different isotopes of carbon that are that are

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>moving around in Earth's atmosphere. But when people suddenly start

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pulling huge amounts of fossil carbon, carbon of a biological

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>origin out of the ground and burning it, you suddenly

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>start throwing those isotopes out of whack, and that will

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be something that will leave records for millions of years

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to come. So you you can look in the geological records,

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the record of of strata from previous eras,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and say, huh, for some reason, in this one period

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 1>deep in history, suddenly the carbon isotopes got way out

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of whack, as if suddenly a bunch of fossil carbon

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like coal or oil or whatever had been burned at

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a at a hideous rate into the atmosphere. Right. And

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, looking at our our time now of

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of of modern human civilization, you know this that we

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>have this fossil fuel consumption, and we have the invention

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the haber Bosch process and the large scale use

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of of nitrogenous fertilizers and agriculture, which will also heavily

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>impact the planet's nitrogen cycling. Yeah, the haber Bosch process. Yeah,

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>as part of the changes in the nitrogen cycle that

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have come about as a result of of industrial civilization

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, they also touched on sediment to logical records.

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The key causes here would be major soil erosion brought

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on by agriculture, but also by agriculture related deforestation. Um. Now,

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>this would be partially mitigated by dams, they point out,

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but erosion is also heightened by climate changes and thawing

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>perma frost. Also sediment content changes due to just industrialization

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in general. Uh. Now, here's a Here's another big one

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think will be pretty obvious. Faunnel radiation and extinctions. Um. Basically,

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>humans have brought about many extinct actions already, and we're

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>living in the midst of an extinction event. Uh. This

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>will likely register in the fossil record. Yeah. Now, of course,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>previous major extinction events have usually been chalked up to

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>two natural things like uh oh, we can track massive

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>vulcanism as as the cause of this one, or say

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a large space impact like the Kti extinction event. But

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there are other extinction events in Earth's history where the

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>cause is not totally clear. You know, there are some speculations,

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know exactly why. Suddenly, it seemed like

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a great reduction in marine biodiversity at this

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>point in history. All right. The next area is non

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>naturally occurring synthetics, so non naturally occurring chemicals generated by

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>industrial activity that persists in the environment. Things persistent organic pollutants,

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>chlorofluoral carbons, in related compounds. And they also point out

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that steroids, leaf waxes, alkanones, and lipids can be preserved

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>in sediment for many millions of years. Now, that one

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>naturally makes me think of King plastic baby. Yeah, yeah,

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the next thing that they mentioned. And

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this one's you know, this one's disheartening but obvious. We've

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>created tons of plastics, tons upon tons upon tons of plastics,

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and they sadly persist not only in heaps and floating masses,

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.959
<v Speaker 1>but inside the bodies of organisms, including ourselves, uh so quote.

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The potential for very long term persistence and detectability is high. Now,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the things they point out about plastic that's

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that plastics may well prove to be a

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>very long term signature of human civilization and the geologic

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>record for you know, millions and millions of years to come.

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>But the development of plastic is also something they would

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>class under the I don't remember the umbrella term they

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>use for this sort of chemical contingencies. A technological civilization

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 1>does not have to use plastics. Plastics are just something

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>that humans happen to use. There are other things that

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>seem probably more universal, like almost any industrial civilization you

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>would expect to burn lots of fossil fuels. But plastics,

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 1>that's more of a question mark. Is that unusual that

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we did it, or is that a very common thing

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that the civilizations would do all right. The next area

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that they highlight transuranic elements. These are elements having a

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>higher atomic number than uranium, which is ninety two. Most

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>radioactive isotopes created via nuclear energy or weaponry have long

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>half lives, but not long enough to be a factor

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on the time scale that they're talking about here. But

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the exceptions are plutonium to forty four and M curium

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>two forty seven, So plutonium has a half life of

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>eight point eight million years, and curium in this case,

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a half life of fifteen million years.

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So in sufficient quantities of disposal, these would these would

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>pop up. And plutonium has no known natural causes outside

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of an actual bernova or something like that. This isotope

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of plutonium. Yes, this particular yea plutonium two forty four

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>so um. So yeah, if you found enough of this

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>uh in the geologic record, that would be a sign

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that something was at work, there was some sort

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of technological atomic uh enterprise that was in place. Now,

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess we've already mentioned earlier that the authors are

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to claim that there was in fact a

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a long lost civilization hundreds of millions of years ago.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>But they do actually look at the geologic record to say,

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>are there anythings that that match these criteria we've been

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at, And they do find some interesting partial matches

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that though of course nothing really comes close to evidence

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that would be conclusive that there actually was a civilization,

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but some of these matches raise interesting questions of their own. Yeah,

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't look at everything, and they point out that

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>things like the KT extinction event, we know that that

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was not an industrial accident or anything, um and uh.

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And and again they're not arguing that these are evidence

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of past pre human industrial civilizations on Earth, but merely

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>point to them as the sources of events we might

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>look at. Yeah, and I would say the biggest one

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that they focus on in the paper is the event

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>known as the Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum or p E

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>t M. Yeah. This is an abrupt spike in carbon

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and oxygen isotopes near the Paleocene Eocene transition uh fifty

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>six million years ago, resulting in a five to eight

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>degree celsius global average temperature rise. This is widely thought

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to be due to well, I think they're there are

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>different theories of One is that it's volcanic activity, um.

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>But there have also been hypotheses put forth that it

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>could have been a common impact. It could be due

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to burning pete methane being released, and a few other candidates. Um.

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's also used as a means of of understanding and

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of like kind of modeling out the effects of

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>climate change during our own era. Yeah. And and one

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons this one gets singled out is, uh

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so it really looks like, Okay, here we're seeing, for example,

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.879
<v Speaker 1>these carbon isotope signature changes that would signal that huge

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>amounts of biogenic carbon carbon that originally came from life forms,

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like the stuff you would find in fossil fuels, is

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.879
<v Speaker 1>being burned and released into the atmosphere. Now, how would

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that happen if if if it wasn't creatures from the

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Black Lagoon with leather face masks digging up a bunch

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of fossil fuels and burning them for their civilization. Well, no,

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't need to jump to that conclusion, because

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there are other solutions on offer, like, for example, there

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>might have somehow been lots of access of volcanic magma

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>two beds of fossil fuels. Maybe certain types of volcanic

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>activity tended to set a light to a lot of

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>natural reserves of fossil fuels and shale beds and things

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. And this almost acted as if the Earth itself,

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we're we're setting off an industrial revolution, but it was

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just volcano interacting with with these reservoirs of carbon in

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Yeah, all you need is geologic upheaval and

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>volcanic activity. And again um our our planet has a

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as a as a very active geological life, so there's

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>plenty of opportunity for this sort of thing to potentially

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have taken place. So it kind of comes back to

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the signal here, the signal you would

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be looking for in the geochemical record, in many cases,

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the very sort of signal we're looking for especially concerning

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>carbon and warming, could have also been caused by these

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>naturally occurring causes, and so strong signals might be coming

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>from something else, and more specific signals that we might

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>look to just might be too weak to to ever

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly observe or to really make much out of. Oh yeah,

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this is an interesting paradox they talk about in their

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of all of the criteria they're able to come

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>up with in this framework for for looking for past

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>industrial civilizations, the stuff that you would expect any industrial

0:45:55.320 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>civilization to do also has other explanations, and so so

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not conclusive that it was an industrial civilization that

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this would be things like, you know, the carbon stuff. Meanwhile,

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that would be really strong evidence of of

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent civilization origin, that stuff that civilizations might not do.

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's more contingent things like plastics and stuff. You know,

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you could have a civilization without plastics. That's not a

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>necessary milestone in the in the progress of energy harnessing,

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's even the sort of thing, uh, an

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>advance civilization would move away from. Coming back to that

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the sustainability paradox, when one could hope, I imagine now

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the authors again they're very clear about just how far

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you should take this hypothesis, stating that quote the Silarian

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis cannot be regarded as likely merely because no other

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>valid idea presents itself. Uh So they admit that this

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing could easily get out of hand

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with folks pointing to any sort of signal in the

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>geochemical record as being possible proof of human technological societies.

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing that, you're you're really taking it and

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>running with in the wrong direction. Yeah, I guess that's

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the frustrating things about about interesting work of

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind is so you can point out a lot

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of the ways that it's difficult to rule out past civilizations.

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But then for a lot of people who just want

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a theory that changes everything, you know, for

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot it's just like it's fun to believe that.

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people just want to believe it.

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to believe, you know, that there was an

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Atlantis mother civilization that birthed everything, or I want to

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>believe that there were aliens on Earth before humans or

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:40.359
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, because that would change everything, and it

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>feels so cool to believe it. Therefore, becomes your default belief,

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and so thus a paper that says, well, it's more

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult to rule out that kind of thing than you

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>might think. Uh, some people can erroneously conclude that that

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is in fact evidence for the thing they want to

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>believe because it feels cool. It's not positive evidence for it, yes, yeah, absolutely,

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 1>um yes, So so you know, they argue that that

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to to further research you know, the likely

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:14.439
<v Speaker 1>signature uh left by our own um Anthropocene era, as

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>well as a deeper exploration of the elemental and um

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>compositional anomalies that we find in extant sediments. Basically, we

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>look at past events mainly with stuff like impacts in mind,

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps the Silarian hypothesis needs to be at least

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 1>on the table as well. Not because again we think

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it is, you know, actually a valid explanation for what

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>has happened. Um, you know, ultimately it's an outside possibility,

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not a conclusion we should jump to, but perhaps it

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>should just be part of sort of the spectrum of

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>possibilities there again, not because we think it happened, but because, uh,

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it gives us a little more of a sort of

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a robust spectrum. And how to interpret these things and

0:48:57.360 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and then moving forward to you know, potentially considering other worlds,

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at other planets like even Mars. Uh. It gives

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>us one more tool, one more UH way to look

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>at the evidence. Yeah, exactly. They're not arguing this because

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they think there was a civilization. It's that we should

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:17.399
<v Speaker 1>consider these possibilities when looking at planets, even including our own,

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and know what we would look for if we wanted

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to consider that possibility, right, Because ultimately this is not

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a supernatural explanation. This is ultimately, you know, a natural hypothesis.

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>But but it is admittedly an outside possibility. Now, of

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>course we're here talking about reasons why you shouldn't just

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>jump to the conclusion of a Salurian civilization. But but

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>there are also some arguments against it in some of

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the specific events that they look at. For example, if

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the best possibility is this interesting event

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in Earth history, the Paleocene Eocene thermal maximum. More suddenly

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>there was there was rapid global warming and UH and

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>these in these chemical changes like with carbon isotopes. They

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>even put some arguments back against considering UH civilization as

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a cause of this global warming in Earth's history. Because

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they say, look, the kind of global warming caused by

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>our civilization is happening in an incredibly rapid fashion over

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.359
<v Speaker 1>just a few hundred years. This actually, though it's it's

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:26.800
<v Speaker 1>relatively rapid in geologic terms. The the p et M

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 1>actually happened probably over hundreds of thousands of years, which

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:35.719
<v Speaker 1>which is incredibly slow if you're imagining that civilization was

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the cause of it, right, if you're if you're comparing

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it to the model of of human industrial advancement, it's

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>incredibly slow. So there's not only the point that you

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't just jump to the conclusion of there was a

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>law civilization because it feels cool, but like in the

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>specific instances they look at, there are some reasons for

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking that's probably not true. I don't know, I guess

0:50:56.400 --> 0:51:00.839
<v Speaker 1>unless those civilizations were like just really lazy. I mean,

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:02.959
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of, you know, pull out your sci

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 1>fi hat and and put it on and come up

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with various ideas of, you know, for why they might

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:09.919
<v Speaker 1>have been this way. Maybe they were super long lived. Yeah,

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>they weren't very ambitious, and they're like this, note, this

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is the right level of industrialization, and we want to, uh,

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to keep going at this rate. I don't know,

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>they didn't reproduce all that much. I don't know. I

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that that's ultimately one of the problems with with imagining, uh,

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, other life forms. It's like it's just you know,

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's you can you can make a case for any

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>number of things, um and and try and make it

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>fit your your hypothesis. And of course that's not really

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the way to go about it, I mean, not in

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from a scientific perspective, from a sci fi dreaming creative perspective, yeah,

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>go for it. Um So, though I guess it does

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of come down to the conundrum two at the

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, like like when does when does

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>mere creativity and um and dream weaving become this kind

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of corrupt of our thought and uh and and a

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>pollution of our ability to understand our place in the

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>world and are where we're going in the future and

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>where we were in the past. Well, you know, I

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like a thread without maybe intending intending to do so,

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've pursued a good bit on this podcast is

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding the ideally the difference between your sort of interest

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and imagination and your epistemology. That like that an idea.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You can like an idea because it's interesting and cool,

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't necessarily mean it's true. You know that,

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like that, your your epistemology is probably best to based

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>on evidence, and you should be skeptical of things that

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to believe because you like them and so forth.

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's still totally valid to like, say, be interested

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in the bicameral mind or whatever because it's a fun idea,

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>even if you know, you probably accepted as you know,

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of evidence for it, right right,

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 1>You can you can alpoly engage in a number of

0:52:56.480 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>these ideas as as more as art than science, and

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>there there's nothing wrong with that. Is when you start

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>arguing that your art is science, that's where you can

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>get into into some trouble. Um. I was reminded in

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this of Carl Sagan's approach to ancient aliens

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and ancient astronauts, particularly in the book that he co

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 1>authored with Joseph Shklovsky Intelligent Life in the Universe. Um.

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The in in this particular book, you know, the the

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.720
<v Speaker 1>examine this idea. They said, okay, here's the speculative idea,

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have evidence that had ever happened, But

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>if it were to have happened, what sorts of specific

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence might we look for? And in this case, we're

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 1>talking about signs that are evident in ancient religions and

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>uh and so forth. Uh. And I thought that was

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a great treatment of that question. Uh and against Sagan's

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 1>treatment reminds me of the treatment given in this paper

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.239
<v Speaker 1>by these authors. But of course Segand had to come

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.760
<v Speaker 1>back and continue to argue with the ancient alien people

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>who were you know, very much going off in their

0:53:57.080 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>own directions, yeah, and pushing pushing art as science, and

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Sagan having to remind them like, no, I love art

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as the next guy. But here's how we

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>approach this from a scientific perspective. Well, I mean, I

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 1>think the important thing about this stuff, like Sagan's work

0:54:12.520 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on that or or or the paper we're looking at here,

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is it's good too when you're when you're exploring it

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 1>like a tantalizing and juicy idea. It's a good idea

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to have criteria for what would be good evidence of

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:29.240
<v Speaker 1>such a thing before you're actually looking at individual evidence

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in cases, because if you look at the evidence first

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you try to come up with criteria. You're

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a tendency to want to fit your criteria

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to whatever evidence you've already got. The cherry picking model

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or what is it the other name of the barn

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>wall fallacy or something like that. Remember, the idea is like,

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody says, you know, I'm a great shot,

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and so they shoot at the side of a barn

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and then they go up, they walk up to their

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:54.880
<v Speaker 1>bullet hole, and then they draw a bull's eye perfectly

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 1>around it. That's that's a great point. That's that's a

0:54:57.320 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>great way of looking at it. All Right, Well, I

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:01.400
<v Speaker 1>guess we're good and go ahead and wrap this episode up.

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But we'd love to hear from everyone out there. I

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from any doctor who fans who have

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:11.280
<v Speaker 1>some additional information they want to share about the Silurians

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and various related um species that have popped up in

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that show. And perhaps you have specific thoughts about about

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, just this this basic you know view uh

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and what it reveals about humanities uh place on Earth

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:32.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, and what technological civilization is doing to the planet,

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and just you know, ultimately what kind of a you know,

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a small blip a week signal we may be in

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the future, as opposed to this kind of lasting thing

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that we sometimes imagine that human civilization is. I'm going

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, I hope that I'll be optimistic, so I

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>hope we do stick around. I hope we attenuate the

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:55.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of geologic signal we leave due to climate change

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and chemical alteration of the atmosphere and all you know,

0:55:58.040 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, uh, and heavy metal pollutions and things,

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and that we the signal of our civilization can always

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>be charted against the geologic record because of the continuance

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Doctor Who Seasons. So when we're on the like,

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, eventually we'll get into the exponential notation of

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the Doctor Who Seasons. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, one day

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ancient U, or rather some sort of

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>far flung future civilization will look back and say, look,

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 1>clearly they knew what they were doing. Uh, they were

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:31.360
<v Speaker 1>able to do you know, some three million years of

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Who. Though maybe at a certain point the doctor

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>will be a robot and the enemies will be will

0:56:36.600 --> 0:56:40.719
<v Speaker 1>be organics, and I don't know, Yeah, I wonder at

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 1>what point do we get a robot doctor? I mean,

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they they're they've only recently really been been been mixing

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:49.920
<v Speaker 1>up the casting on that role. Al right, well, let

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>us know in the meantime if you want to listen

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, we

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays and the Stuff

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind podcast feed. On Monday's we do

0:56:59.120 --> 0:57:02.280
<v Speaker 1>listener Mail, where we hear from from you, the listeners,

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and we read your various listener mails, always a good time.

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:08.879
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesday's we do a short form artifact or monster fact,

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and then on Friday's we do Weird How Cinema. That's

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:14.839
<v Speaker 1>our time to set aside most serious issues and just

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about a weird film. Huge thanks as always to

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 1>our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us with feedback on

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this episode or any other, to suggest a topic for

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the future, or just to say hello, you can email

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 1>us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my Heart radios, the iHeart Radio app,

0:57:44.520 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Props had a chat ba