WEBVTT - NFL Wild Card Best Bets (Ep. 72)

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everybody. Welcome into the playoff edition of the

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros NFL podcast. I'm your host Dan Harris. With me,

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, is Matt Perrault. Find us on Twitter at

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris Ady and that sports talk Matt, Matt, are

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you ready for the playoffs?

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I am, and I'm really excited to get to

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 2>these games on Saturday Sunday because really it's a three

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>day run of football Saturday, Sunday Monday into the National

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 2>title game for college football. So this is really an

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>interesting week three, three and one to get into. It's

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a great betting stretch. This is kind of the last

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>hurrah of the betting, real betting seriousness we can get into.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>And then we get to the postseason a little bit

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>deeper and we start losing teams in the NFL, so

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 2>college basketball and college in the NBA not great for

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>me on the daily juice, Let's do football. I'm good.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I'm so excited. This is going to

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>be a fantastic weekend with six games. I'm in a

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>great mood today, Matt. Just going to put it out

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>there because my Mets made a huge trade for Francisco

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Lindor and Carlos Carrasco and I'm working right now. If

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you're on YouTube channel, YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got the wireless headphones working, Matt. I finally set

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>them up, so I feel like a brand new man.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So we are going to crush every single bet that

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we got nowt here's the deal. You know, the DraftKings

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>competition as we've been doing all season long. Okay, and

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that's over. As it was last week. We still made

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>our five picks last week, Matt. I don't know about you.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll go through those, by the way, because we did well, Matt.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We went four and one on our pits last week.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we need to come to a consensus.

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we just go through the games, we break

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>them down, we give our sides, we talk about some

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff. I know you said we got some questions

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that some people want answered this week on our discord

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>channel of course, so we can do that. But I

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think we have to like talk. I mean we

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can talk, we'll talk about him, but I don't think

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to reach consensus and reach like the couple

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of bets that want to do or do you think

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we should do that.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we should have a couple of our favorite plays. Sure,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>but I think what's the difference with this week. I

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>think we got to bring in totals too.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I we'll talk about the totals in every game.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, so I think we should talk about that more

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 2>to kind of you know, we normally just do the sides,

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>so now we're going to add a hole. So normally,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, we give out six, this would be six sides. Well,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>now we got six totals stuck out as well. So yeah,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.839
<v Speaker 2>I think the favorite plays should be in there.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll go game by game and sort of do it,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but it'll least I think in the end. You know,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes Matt's on one side of the game, I'm on

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>another side of the game, and sometimes with your trick

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>consensus but we don't. But I've seen I've been following

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you on Twitter this week, Matt, and I know you

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like one team at the very least, which, well, we'll

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about which I'm not sure I'm going

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to back you on, but we'll get there. But very quickly,

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>let's recap last week, because we did make our five

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>picks and it went well. We were correct on these

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Steelers getting nine from the Browns, the Packers laying five

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half to the Bears, Washington laying one and

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Eagles. That was you, by the way,

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>well done on that one. The Rams getting three from

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, which we both really liked. The only one

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we lost on was the Vikings laying six and a

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>half to the Lines. And again to me, I thought

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Chase Daniel was going to start. I did not think

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Stafford was going to be able to suit up for

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that game, but kudos to that guy who's just as

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.839
<v Speaker 1>tough as nails and guts it out. I did also

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hit on the two team teaser that I bet and

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>announced while we were doing that podcast, which was teasing

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers up from minus nine to minus fifteen and

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>teasing the Titans down from minus seven and a half

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to minus one and a half. How is your week seventeen? Otherwise, Matt?

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Other than the picks that we agreed on there.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I missed cashing in the Westgate reboot by half a point. Yeah,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>so that's kind of happen. Went three and two in

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 2>the Westgate Titans killed us. I laid the seven and

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a half with the Titans. Yeah, that killed us. They

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>had it the whole way. The Panthers were a bad

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>pick for us. They got destroyed by the Saints. I

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>thought they'd keep that game close, catching six points from

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the Saints, but you know, three and two. What really

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>hurt us was that Satan's that's that Steelers Ravens game

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>that got postponed to Wednesday. We had it right. If

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 2>we got that right now, other people might have as well.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of tough how it all kind of

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>works out with these contests. But to be a half

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a point out of the money, that definitely stunk in

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the West Gates. So and then we ended up with

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a decent I think we went. We ended up going

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>three and two in the circa too, So it was

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>it was an okay week. It was. It was a

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>decent Daily Juice, went three and one in the Daily

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Juice on Sunday, and then we did really well in

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the props. You you crushed the prop Betsy.

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>We could have we could have easily swept those by

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, right.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I probably should have. Yeah, Mike Evans getting hurt early

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>definitely stung. You had six that went four and two.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 2>I had a two of my own. Uh that that

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the cash that they went two and oh and uh

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the the John Walford at minus one oh five. Yes,

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I bet my I bet two point two five units

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 2>on on these things. So I probably I look back

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>on it and like I knew that was gonna hit

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and hit in the second drive of the whole game

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>that hit.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You were all over that one. By the way, I

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>assume if you listen this podcast, you probably listened to

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Juice podcast was Jesus the podcast at Matt

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>hosts every single day. He'd done it from the hospital room.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>He's done it on Christmas morning, He's done it on

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Day, you know morning, you know into you know, uh,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Year's eve. So it's a great podcast, the Daily Juice.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But one of things Matt does is he bets makes

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>several plays every single day, and one of the things

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that I do is I record them because we want

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to be transparent, of course, and we talk about you know,

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt talks about units and everything like that. So recently

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I totaled up how Matt did for all of his

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>bets by Sport through twenty twenty. And the good thing

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is we're going to be posting an article about that shortly,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt really on Bettingpros dot com. Oh, so we're gonna

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be yeah, we're going to be putting that whole spreadsheet up,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt on bettingpros dot com so that people who follow

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you can look. So now you really want to you,

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we're up in the game for you, my friend.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>This is just non's.

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>People are just gonna be staring at your plays all

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>day long, right, so be careful with it, including it.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It's going to update in real time, by the way,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is whenever I update it, which is I

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>almost always listened to it first thing in the morning.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I like to be the one Matt has offered to

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>update it. I insist on doing it because I listened

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to the juice anyway, so I like to be able

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So, Matt, that's gonna be up. It's

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>probably within a couple days. So you can look for

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>that over at betting Pros dot com and follow all

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of Matt's plays, and you know, he's been pretty successful

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this year. So let's help you keep it up, Matt.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Now that you're gonna get the.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, the future wagers saved my tail. So that was

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of the that was kind of the story of twenty twenty.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I ended up hitting fifty one fifty two percent is

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 2>what we went, which is a little bit less than

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 2>we want for the juice perspective. But we hit on

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of futures six and one on the NFL

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 2>for futures two and zero in Major League Baseball. I

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>was up ten units in Baseball, So.

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I got like, you got the World Series, right, I mean.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tampa and and and the Dodgers, not exactly. I

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 2>didn't go out on a limb too much on the Dodgers,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>but taking Tampa plus one thousand was was really nice.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 2>So hitting those really helped a lot when it came

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>to making money. And so we ended up up over

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 2>eleven units for the year for the first seven months

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of the juice. So not bad, very very good.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's get into this weekend's games again.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be looking at the consensus lines over

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at betting prost. If you have other lines that you're

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>aware of that you're on in Vegas, might be different.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings is not always exactly identical to the consensus lines. Again,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where I can do it. So we'll talk through

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>all of that, and some of them have moved in

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>just this morning, the Bucks Washington game. That's been moving

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>all over the place as far as I can tell,

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Like earlier today it was minus nine. Right now the

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>consensus line is minus eight. I don't even see a

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>minus nine out there.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you know why? You know?

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Why are the Is there any news or it is

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>just that the sharps are hammering it bad?

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Guys are coming in on my side bag. So the Westgate, sorry,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the South Point here in Vegas, they went to eight

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and a half because the public kept on betting on Tampa,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and the second it went to nine, they got annihilated

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>huge amounts of money on Washington at plus nine. So

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>if you want to know where the number is in

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of what's going to fire on the dog, nine's

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the number where the dogs are firing, all right.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So we'll get into that one, but let's go in

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the order that they're going to be played. The Colts

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>are visiting the Bills. The Bills are at minus six

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half. The total is at fifty one on

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the consensus line. There's a couple of fifty one and

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a half's out there, but fifty one for the consensus line.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So Matt, breakdown how you feel about the game, and

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>then I'll talk to my side and then we'll see

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if we're on the same side.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So the public is all over the Buffalo Bills.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>It's it's the number one most bet game in Vegas,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>number one most bet game in New Jersey. At bet MGM,

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>eighty five percent of the money is coming in at

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 2>FanDuel on the Buffalo Bills laying six and a half.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually, by the way, I want to make it clear,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>since I checked before this podcast started, Matt, I've now

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>checked again and it's pretty even. But the consensus line

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually down to minus six because bet MGM is

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>now minus six. FanDuel is minus six and a half,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings minus six and a half, but Fox bet is

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>minus six points Bet is minus six. So just so

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it might be minus six out there when

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>people are listening, But go ahead.

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Take the points. Okay, this is going to be a

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo Bill's victory, all right. But unless there is weather,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 2>real weather to talk about, I think they in the game.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>If there is, if wind shows up, if we're looking

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>at wind in cold and nastiness, I think the Colts

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 2>could win the game outright, But the Buffalo Bills I

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 2>think will win the game. They'll do enough. But I

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 2>think this is a high scoring affair. I like the

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 2>dog and I like the points, and I love the

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 2>same game teaser. How I'm playing that is I am

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>teasing the Colts up. I'm taking the total down or

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the total down and going with the over. So my

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.599
<v Speaker 2>play on that's gonna be Colts plus twelve twelve and

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a half and then go with an over forty five.

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I like, do you like the over at

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty one?

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Ye?

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think that? Okay? So do I. I think

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to be a game with a

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of scoring. I think the Bills defense is really

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of come into their own over the second half

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the season. But still I feel like the Colts

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are humming well enough. On offense, Philip Rivers is playing

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty well despite the toe injury. They're obviously running the

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ball extremely well with Jonathan Taylor, So I would lean

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>towards the over fifty one regardless. I do like the

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>teaser that you've made, but I actually i'll and I

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give it away because I want it

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>when we get to that game. I'll tell you the

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>other leg of the teaser. But I am I do

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>have a two team teaser that I will recommend that

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I've made. My guess is Matt will not like it.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, I have, actually I teased the Bills down

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>No One a half to a half, right.

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I have it. I got twelve points to play with.

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 2>You could have which as you want. With Buffalo, I

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 2>think it's fine.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But to me, no, no, no, I don't think you'll

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>hate that one. I think you'll hate the other leg

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the teaser is what I'm saying that one. I think

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you're fine with it. Yes, because I am extremely confident

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Bills are going to win this game, as

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think most people are. I'm actually surprised that you

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>came out and went there, Matt, given that your usual

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hatred of the Bills, or you're fading of the Bills. Yeah,

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you Bill, Yeah that's true, that's fair. But you've said

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to win. That's that's oh.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean because I think Philip Rivers is going

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to throw a pick at the end to lose the game.

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's fine to me. I think that you know the Colts.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been kind of back and forth on the Colts

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>all year. I really like them. When the season started,

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I was really really high on them. I thought they

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>were undervalued for a long time in the market. And

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>then Philip Rivers, he just looked so terrible to start

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the season that I was like, he's cooked. And I

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>was a kind of a River's believer in the sense

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that I thought last year you could blame on the

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and that this wasn't a Peyton manning like, Okay,

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it's all gone, and it's not. He's showed that he

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>still has at least a little juice left in the tank.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they had a really easy schedule down

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the stretch here when they were playing well, and it's

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>not like they were destroying teams. Jonathan Taylor got going.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll try to run the ball in this game,

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the only part of me that gets a

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>little worried about the over. I'd still lean over, but

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Colts formula and this one

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>probably is Oh goodness, Let's keep the ball out of

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen's hand, Let's try to control the clock as

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>much as we can. Let's keep going with what we

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>can do, and the Bills are a little vulnerable against

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the run. With that said, I think, Matt, I kind

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of have a feeling that the Bills are going to

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>destroy the Cults in this game, which is why I

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>would rather tease it down than tease it. I think

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you're probably safe at twelve and a half, of course,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but I do have a feeling that the Bill, the

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Bills are playing as well as any team in football

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean, they had to both incentive.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I know, but Dan, you're running with the public.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>That's true. It's true. It's very true.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a public play, and I get it. I'm not

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 2>saying you're wrong on that. I just think when you

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>start looking at the liability, as I mentioned, eighty five

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 2>percent of the money coming in here on the Buffalo

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Bills at six and a half at FanDuel, the most

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>popular side in New Jersey and in Nevada for bet

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>MGM are the Bills. I mean, this is just as

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 2>we get to the playoffs, you have to start to

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 2>smell a skunk here because they're upping the limits they're

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>going to allow you to go. I mean like places

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>a circle will allow you to go, like twenty five

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 2>thousand a side, you start seeing a lot more money

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>coming in. They're comfortable because they've got the algorithm, they've

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>got the data that tells them where they need to be.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And I look, you were high on the Colts for

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a while, so I'm surprised you're saying the Colts get

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>blown out.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think here's here's what I think. Okay, I

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>think in watching this Bill's offense right now, I don't

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>know how you stop what they're doing with the way

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that they are humming offensively, with how well you know

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all year, Matt, Because we've talked a lot about the Bills,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>right We talk about them, like, you know, in depth

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>every time because it's always Matt face the Bills. It's

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the joke that we like to make. But Josh Allen,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>I was like, he's a Radick. He'll have his good days.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen a bad game from Josh Allen in

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a really long.

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Since the Raider game. Yeah, it's been a while. I

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 2>mean it's been over a month. I mean he's been

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>on a run right.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, right And and you know, and Stefan Diggs is

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>playing as well as any wide receiver in the league

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. And John Brown is back, which I think

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>also helps them. I just think offensively they're playing extraordinarily well. Defensively,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they've really tightened the screws. They were not a great

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>defensive team early on during the season. I think they

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>are well above average defensive team at this point in

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the season. And so what I think is that the

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Bills are going to have a lead here in this game.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>They're going to jump out to a lead, and when

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that happens, I do not trust Philip Rivers to be

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>able to lead the comeback. I think the way that

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the Colts stay in this game is to be able to,

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, ride Jonathan Taylor, as they basically have done

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for the past several weeks. I just don't think they're

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to do that because I think

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Bills are going to be able to put

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>up points pretty much at will against a solid Colts defense.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think right now, the.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Bill defense, what's that will? What's that will?

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what? All right? So what are they they're

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>favored by six?

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 2>What's your team total?

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Then? All right, well I want to I'm trying to

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>figure out what Vegas hasn't met If they're favored by

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>six it's what twenty nine or six and a half

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>points with a total fifty one? Was that twenty nine,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, twenty eight and a half or something twenty

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two and a half wherever it is that range right

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in that range. I'm sorry. You know, I don't.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Off the top of my head. So let's say, so

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you're saying thirty points for the Bills.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'll give you that.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I can see thirty points of the Bills. The problem

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>is that Buffalo's defense is not that good.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It is good, though it wasn't.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 2>That's not everyone says it is. It's not. It's okay

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>come postseason time against that offensive line, they couldn't stop

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the run when it really mattered. In the end of

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>this year, they've been able to be to be the

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>beneficiary of having leads and having been able to throw

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the ball at will and score fast on defenses that

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 2>haven't been that great. I know, everyone's everyone's in love. Look,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>don't Week seventeen. Just because Buffalo destroyed Miami doesn't mean

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>they're going to destroy the Colts. Different circumstances.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It is, it is, but you know, Matt, the Colts

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>let the Jags hang around Man in Week seventy in

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a game they had to win to get into the playoffs.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Costanzo's out right. I think that's a huge loss to

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line as it has been a shout and again,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny. I don't want to count this

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>too much. They're going to be home. They're gonna be

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>what sixty five hundred fans there those.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>It'll be it'll be juiced. I mean that's I like

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that for the Colts, To be honest with you, I

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 2>think I do. Yeah, I think I think it's better

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to have an environment that feels like a playoff game

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 2>for teams like Philip, for guys like Philip Rivers and whatnot.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Because he's had such difficult times on the road. I mean,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I just I the Patriot game comes to mind really

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>quickly with how badly that that was what his last

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>run with the with with with with the Chargers, and

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots just destroyed them. I I just think this

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Colts team has enough pieces to keep the game relatively close. Again,

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the Bills win the game, and I think

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>being at home could help them in the fourth quarter,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 2>down the stretch, last second drive, kicking a field goal,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot. But I just I see this as like

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>a thirty to twenty seven type of game and a

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 2>three point win for Buffalo.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fine. I don't think we're that far apart. Matt.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the Bill. The biggest point that you've made,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely correct and makes me worried, is the

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's such a public play and that they

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>know it and they don't care, right like that. That's

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing you are all right got bring all the

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>money you want in keeping them on to seven.

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Like with this money going in, you'd be like, why

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 2>aren't you at seven?

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's at six in a lot of places.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>It's right. I get it because respective money is coming

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 2>in on the Colts.

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand. I really do. For me again, and whatever

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the weather is, Matt, this is why. Remember that's why

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bills drafted Josh Allen because he had that arm

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that was going to be able to play in a

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>place that was windy and cold. And he does. And

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I get it. And how well coached they are by

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the way. McDermott. And you know, remember what really always

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>has stuck out to me because you and I were

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Steelers in that game, is how bad they

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>looked against a good Steelers defense in that first half,

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and they came out in the second half and were

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a completely different team. They're well coached, they make adjustments.

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a good team. I just I it's a public play.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna come out and I think they're

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're gonna win handily here. So I would rather

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>tease this down because I'm so confident that they're going

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to win the game the half than tease it up

0:17:58.640 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to twelve and a half. But I think it's fine.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And again your same game teaser, I like that as well.

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think teasing the total down if you can, and

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>then taking the over would be the right play because

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think this is going over fifty one. I

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine I have a couple of plays here, Matt.

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about it, which I lean towards the under,

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I could ever actually play it,

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>because I think that playing an under right now just

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>makes me sick. But all right, so that's the Bills cult.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like we've got pretty much exactly you know,

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>where we're at. We're pretty much in line with that one.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's go the Rams Seahawks. This was the Seahawks laying

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. It's now the consensus line is three.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>There are three and a half's out there, but it's three.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, the total is at forty two

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Go ahead, Matt. What do you think

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>besides actually the consensus line is now forty two. There

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 1>are forty two and a half's out there, but the

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>consensus forty two. Go ahead.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Besides the fact that that we'll get into the next game.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 2>In terms of like my my favorite crazy wild call

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 2>for the week, John Wafford's going to beat the sale Seahawks.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>John Wafford is a enigma, crazy wild. The Seahawks aren't

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna They don't know what's coming with this guy.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>But I can I can I stop you for one

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>second because Goff apparently looked okay in practice and he's

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>questionable for this game.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>They're both gonna play, but I think you're gonna see

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Wofford play the majority.

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So you think they're both playing in this one?

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think they'll go into it and

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 2>they I mean, you're paying Jared Goff a lot of money, Okay, Yeah,

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>but I think if Jared Goff looks at all shaky.

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 2>He's getting pulled, and I think he's gonna be shaky.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I I know that we I've seen injury experts talk

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 2>about the thumb and saying that it's it's you know,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>it's surgery. That's not that significant, and it's more about

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the healing of the wound than it is the actual

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>injury per se. But I think they get more. They

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>can do more with John Wofford. I think they will

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 2>use Jared Goff. I think they may go with both quarterbacks.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 2>But this to me comes to the defense in the

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>fact that Russell Wilson has been playing unlike what we

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>thought Russell Wilson was gonna be this year. We thought

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 2>he was gonna be the MVP candidate, and over the

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 2>last month it's basically you go get DK Metcalf and

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>I think you put obviously Jalen Ray on him, and

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 2>then you let Aaron Donald go to work and they

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 2>can stop the run. And if you stop Seattle running

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the football and you stop DK Metcalf, I know you

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 2>got Tyler Lockett, but he can't beat a team by himself.

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty much garant known. I'm gonna take the three

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>three and a half points with the Rams. But I

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 2>think the Rams win this game outright.

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's crazy. I really don't. At three

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half, I don't. This is not a game

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that I want to go near too much because it

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as the value is on the Rams at

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>three and a half in particular, I think the value

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is certainly on the Rams. So that's out there. I

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>would lean that way.

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>For a teas terrific game. By the way, teaser terrific.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a teaserrific game.

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>So what would you do with it? What would you?

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you same game up?

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 2>No? Would? I would take my teaser on Saturday is

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be I'm taking Washington, and I'm giving Washington

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>for over fourteen and I'm gonna take the I'm gonna

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>take the three and a half and go over and

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 2>go to nine three nine and a half here with

0:20:59.400 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>with the RAM.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny because if I think you the way

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you broke the game down is very almost exactly how

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel about it. Exactly how I feel about it.

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>They're really in a normal environment where I felt okay

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about betting the under. I lean the under on the

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>forty two or the forty two because right so for me,

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>if I'm teasing part of this game, I might tease

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that forty two or forty two and a half up

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and take the other because I don't think there's any

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>way that these teams are gonna, you know, have big

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get And you look at historically how the Seahawks like

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to play, especially in the beginning of the playoffs. They

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>are super conservative. They like to relax and kind of like,

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, go back to running it. And I think

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's what they're gonna and you're right, you stick

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ramsey on DK Metcalf. The Rams defense is

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>very very solid. But the Seahawks defense has played really

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>really well over the last several weeks, and I Walford

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who adds this dimension that it'll be interesting

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>to see how the Seahawks react with. But I do

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>not see a lot of scoring here. I think it's

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be a close game. It strikes me as

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a field goal game one way or the other, which

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is why if you can get three and a half

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Rams, i'd lean that way. I still don't

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>love it, just because the Seahawks sometimes break what I

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think should happen, like you know, because Russell Wilson if

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to, I feel like they could put up

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of points. Maybe not in this game necessarily,

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but generally speaking, I said, if you just said stop

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the run, stop going back to the old thing, just

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>let Russ cook, you'd probably be in better shape. But

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>for this one, it's the third time these teams have

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>met this year, Like, it just does not strike me

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>as something where there's going to be a lot of fireworks.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So I'm probably not making a play on this game.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>At the current numbers, I'd probably lean towards the Rams

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at plus three and a half at three, I'm probably

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>staying away the total. I lean under forty two and

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a half, but I probably wouldn't play it, but I

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>would make it part of a teaser and tease the

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>forty two and a half up to forty eight and

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a half and play the under. So you agree with that,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>at least on the underplay.

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think this is the lowest scoring game.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Very good, All right, let's go on to all right,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this is it, Matt, this is the one bucks at

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team. We're past Tom Brady's bedtime in

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>this one. The consensus line right now, as we just

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about, has dropped to minus eight. I'm looking at

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the lines. There's minus eight and a half out there

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>at bet MGM, there's minus seven and a half out

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>there Fandle, and there's minus eight at Draftking. So it

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>really is the consensus line of eight the total right now,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'll double check it here because again these are

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>moving as as numbers come in. It's dropped to forty

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. It was forty five last time

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I checked. So the bucks minus eight and the total

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>at forty four and a half. Now we already know

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>where you're going, Matt. You want to tease this up

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen? Is that right?

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I really, I mean you're making me a little

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>concerned about the teaser line because I want fourteen. That's

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>really important. So I have a little bit of a

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 2>concern there on the plus eight. So I need eight

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 2>to get to fourteen, So seven and a half would

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>scare me.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, So that's it I'm looking at. That's at two

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>places right now that we've got at FanDuel and at

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Fox bet no oh, and at bet America. So other

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>than that, everything is at eight, and then there's one

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half left out there right now at

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM. So right now it's at eight. Do you

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna drop? I mean you mentioned the Batman.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's going on. I think the public's

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna come in and hammer the Bucks before kickoff.

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I'm not.

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>That concerned about it. There's like a part of me

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>that like, if it doesn't come back, I'd be bummed.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not that concerned because there's no way that

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>line would stay. The public is gonna bet the Bucks

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 2>like crazy. Everyone's on the Bucks. I got buddies of

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 2>mine who are in Iowa or telling me fourteen points

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 2>or more, give me the Bucks. They're betting the alternative

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 2>spread saying Bucks are gonna kill Okay, and that's fine,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>and I get it. There are quarterback concerns, there are

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 2>offensive concerns. There are you know, you're gonna need the

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Washington football team's defense to score or at least set

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 2>up a very short yardage situation for their offense. But

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm banking on that. I'm beking on and Chase Young.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm banking on this defensive front to get after Tom Brady.

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 2>He does not play well at night. He does not

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 2>play well against the NFC East. He does not play

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 2>well when it comes to teams that can make him uncomfortable.

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>And I know that the quote unquote knee is structurally

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 2>sound for Mike Evans, but come on now, he hyper

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>extended that knee and couldn't put any real pressure on it.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 2>So shoot the guy up and have him go play fine,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think he'll be at one hundred percent.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 2>He won't be the same Mike Evans that you would need.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 2>And frankly, the weather's not gonna be horrible, but it's

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>not going to be seventy five and Sonny, Okay, it's

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>still DC in January, so it's still gonna be a

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit cold and not all that fun to go

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and run around out there. As long as mcclaurin plays

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 2>at eighty percent and Logan Thomas can get open in

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the red zone, they're not gonna run the ball. It's

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 2>really hard to run the ball on that Bucks defense.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, you need Gibson just to keep them

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>honest and then don't turn the football over. I mean,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>for my play to be right, it's the under has

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 2>got to come in. It's gotta be an underplay here

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>in this game. But give me the eight points, eight

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 2>and a half points on Washington.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Man, even the money the money line is dropping, Matt

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>like it.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 2>It was taking a plus three fifty, was.

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>It now it's plus three hundred?

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, So people, I don't like it. People are

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 2>starting to buy I don't like it.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not fox bet has it as plus two eighty.

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yu no, no public, no public dogs. I don't like that. No, no, no, no, no.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Stay away from that. That will make me feel like

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks are more live. I people are gonna listen

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 2>to me on this. I don't like that narrative.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>That's like I do. I do have more of a

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>hedge bet. I will say on the plus three fifty

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on on Washington, because there there certainly is a scenario

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>where they managed to win this game. I don't like

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks at minus eight. I'm not. I don't. I

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to.

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, the last two times a team with the

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 2>losing record went to the playoffs, right, you know what happened? Right, Wah?

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 2>They won out right.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember who it was.

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Last two times teams are losing becers have gone to

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, they have won. They won out right. Brady's

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>won in three all time in the playoffs against teams

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 2>from the NFC East. Brady's record in primetime past eight

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 2>o'clock has been brutal. Like you mentioned, past his bedtime.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 2>He goes to bed at eight thirty every night.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a significant thing. I mean, we all

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>know this. When you're in a routine and all of

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 2>a sudden you're out of your routine, sometimes you maybe

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 2>aren't that sharp. Bruce arians loves to throw those fly patterns.

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 2>I get the secondary for Washington's not good. I was

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 2>tucking someone from Pro Football Focus today that they say

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the secondary is so easy for Brady to figure out

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 2>that that's gonna be a big issue because they'll be

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 2>able to move the football as long as he gets

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the ball out. That's the key. Can he get the

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 2>ball out, You're gonna have to blitz him into holy

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 2>heck to get him off his spot.

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know what the problem is is that unlike

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pats who had this game plan, we were like,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, you want to blitz, great, I'll dump it

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>off to James White or whatever. Get out a very

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>quick You know, Brady would be able to get the

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>ball out in three seconds. That's just not what arians does,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's not what he has ever decided that he

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>wants to do. We've all been screaming about it forever.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>They take deep shot after deep shot after deep shot,

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>he holds the ball. You're not gonna be able to

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>do that against Washington. So I actually I don't like it. Minus.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it at eight at all. I don't.

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any side of it because I do

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>think that it's possible if the if the Bucks are able,

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's say they put together a scoring drive in the

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>first drive and it gets you know, they score touchdown

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's seven to nothing. I mean, I'm I'm fifty

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of the way ready to call the game right there,

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>because I find it really difficult to see how Washington

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be able to put up points. They

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>are abysmal, offensively abysmal, and it's not their fault. They

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have the fire power at this point. Alex Smith

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful comeback story, but he's not able to

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>really push assuming that he you know, I'm reading that

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna split snaps with Heineke. I don't know, but

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, if they fall behind, I just don't

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>see how they're on a very strong Bucks defense. That's

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing that you know, they're not going to be

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>able to run. They're gonna know. Okay, we got to

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>take away Terry McLaurin and we got to make watch

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the dumb BoFs to JD. McKissick, and that's gonna be it.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think the Bucks win this game. Now here's

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the part of my teaser, Matt. The other part of

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>my teaser that I did with the uh with the

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bills down to a half, And this was early right,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this is before I dug into it, Matt. This is

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>when I'm like, okay, this is the lines. I sort

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of went with what I like and what I played,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm still fine with it. I'm still completely fine

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with it because I do think and I'm pretty confident

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that the Bucks are gonna win this game. It was

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half when I bet it, and I

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>teased it down to two and a half.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's good. No, I think there were No.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna You're not gonna kill me for it.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>But I know I may put a teaser. I may

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 2>follow on the side of that, I may have a teaser. Look,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna get a little exotic this week because, as

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I said, it's kind of like the last week, right,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>it's our last week, So I'm gonna fire a bit

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 2>more than normal on this. Yeah, but I will kind

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 2>of hedge on my own self here. I'm gonna sprinkle

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 2>on the money line. I'm not going full unit on

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the money line. I mean I'll have a little play

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>on it. Oh yeah, yeah, just a touch, just a touch,

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 2>not nothing serious. But what I will throw full units

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 2>on is if Okay, so I say I'm wrong about

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 2>this and Tampa's gonna blow them out, just tease Tampa

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 2>down and then and then on the other leg, just

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 2>find it another leg that I like. But the Bills,

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I could easily see myself playing your teaser because I

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 2>think Buffalo wins. I love taking that number down. It's

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 2>already crashing anyway, So get it down to a pick. Yeah,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>it would be great. I mean Bill is just on

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>a pick just to beat the Colts.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a point.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's it's win a game there. I like that.

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 2>And then you're gonna take the Bucks under a field goal? Yeah,

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 2>and okay, sure, so you're gonna go ahead, and you know,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the money line on the other side protects you on

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that teaser because it's plus three hundred plus three fifty. So,

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean a lot of times people think that gambling

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>is about predicting who wins, and that's not really what

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>we're doing. We're trying to lay out scenarios in which

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna wind up making money. So I'm all about

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 2>if I'm betting one hundred dollars for a one unit

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 2>bet and I'm betting twenty five dollars on the money

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 2>line at three to one, well you you basically are

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna come out essentially a wash there or you hit

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 2>them both, right, I mean the potential there. So like

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I always talk about, you know, money management and trying

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>to look at what is the most logical thing that's

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen and then betting it and moving the number

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>around to give yourself out in case you're dead wrong,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>because we're often dead wrong on these games. So how

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>do you protect yourself? And that teaser with teasing down?

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>The only thing that blows it up if the Colts

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 2>win the game out right against against But then again,

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>but if you take the Colts plus six though, right,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>if you take the Colts plus six, then you've got

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 2>that one you already in play, so you bet the

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Colts won. You tease the Colts that the Bills down

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>with with UH with Tampa, and then the money line

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>on Washington. You've got yourself covered basically, so you're almost

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed to make money unless something really funky happens proceeds,

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>like a fifty to nothing type of victory that you

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>never saw coming.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Yeah, no, it it's true. This is a

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>game though. It makes me feel I forget about the teaser.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It makes me feel uncomfortable this game with Brady in

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this game. Probably maybe Mike Evans plays, but as you

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>aptly pointed out, he's not one hundred percent, and Tonio

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Brown is playing extremely well at the moment for sure.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's just something where it's really difficult for

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>me to see Washington putting up too many points, which

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm fine with the under at forty five,

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fine with me and it's forty four and

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. You know, I got it at forty five,

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but I would You can also make that part of

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>your teaser to tease it up to fifty one and

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>take the under because I just don't see a ton

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of points being scored in this game.

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but again, I never do more than two leg teasers,

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 2>but I could. I could see myself doing a teaser

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 2>involving two sides and two totals. Yeah, teasing the Bills

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>down and teasing the Washington game up, yep, and taking

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the under in Washington, taking the over in Buffalo. Yeah,

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 2>taking the six points and adding and then you're probably

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna get really decent plus money. I mean, I hear

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 2>in Vegas. I play my two leg teasers in the

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>NFL at Moss one twenty five. But if I added

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>two more legs to that teaser, I'm probably getting close

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 2>to plus one fifty or more on it. So you're

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>into a plus money situation if you go ahead and

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>do things like that.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So I love it.

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Just an idea, Yeah, I like it.

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>All right. Let's get to ooh, the Ravens Sun going

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Titans. Ravens are laying three and a half points,

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and the total is fifty four and a half.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 2>That fne's got to be three.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You sure the consensus is three and a half and

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's been forever. I mean, there are threes

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>out there. There are threes at FanDuel, there are threes

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>at Fox Bet, there are three at points Beture.

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Half painted today when I was looking at it, because

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I like the Ravens minus three three and a half,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't like three.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I like, yeah, so I you know, I said, we

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>did playoff predictions on the Fantasy Bros. Podcast for each round,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and I basically was like, my head says Ravens, but

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>my heart says Titans, Like I don't.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Like the sun.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>No, Where's start due. It's the fact that you know,

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I love the time, I personally like, I like the

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I love Mike Rabel. I really do you? You were

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:13.479
<v Speaker 1>on the Titans like I think I've been.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 2>The regular season. I was all about them, But now

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm done with them, my cash, I've done.

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>What I feel like is I've been rooting for the

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Titans like the whole season because I was for you.

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I have like a very very lengthy, not a not

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a big taste, but a tiny sixty to one on

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>them to win the Super Bowl, which I don't expect.

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, I like the Titans. All right, Yeah, maybe

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>my second.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Has historically bad, Yeah, historically bad down the stretch. Their

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 2>secondary can't stop a nosebleed. I they are in deep,

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>deep trouble if they get down in this game. Yeah,

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 2>if they if they get down in this game the

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 2>entire I was talking to a guy who works in

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 2>sports gamble who lives in Nashville, who covers the Titans

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and he's like, look, He's like, I tell

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>you right now, if the Ravens go down and score

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 2>on their first drive and at seven to nothing, go

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 2>immediately in live bet with whatever number you can get

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>for the Ravens because the Titans are done. It's just

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 2>that quick. The Titans can score, though they can't score,

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 2>but they can't stop anybody, so and they get all

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 2>out of whack when they're not playing with the lead.

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 2>They don't know how because they panic because they want

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 2>to run Henry as much as possible. And when they're down,

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 2>they know they can't just bleed the clock and they're

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna run out because their defense can't stop anybody. And

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 2>they know that's the last weeks Texans.

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I know. And you know we saw what

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>happened against the Packers, which is a terrible game for them.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But I agree, I agree, I completely understand. But the

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think is like where their secondary

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is horrific. Okay, that's not quite as big a deal

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in this game against the Ravens because it's not as

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if they have their best receivers. Marquise Brown, who's, you know,

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>a fine receiver, but he's certainly got the drop seas

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's not somebody who you really feel Mark Andrews

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is very good. But again, that's not really what we're

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And you know what's weird is that the

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Titans don't get pressure, but that almost benefits them this game. Sure,

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson isn't going to scramble and stuff like that,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and they did this last year, and their defense was

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>better last year, of course, but still it just kind

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of strikes me as they might have the formula. Now

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I know they you know, it was kind of fluky,

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but they have won their last two meetings against them.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>It kind of just feels like they might have this

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>figured out. It's not. I don't I don't hate either side.

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 2>The last two times, the steff that I saw was

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the last two times they have played they've turned the

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 2>ball over eight times in the in and around the

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 2>red zone. But I look, you watch freaky right, But

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 2>if you don't do that, it's a blowout. Yes, Like

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 2>if you don't turn the football over. The Ravens that

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 2>moved the ball at will on the Titans up and

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 2>down the field. They just turned the football over and

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 2>kill drives.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it, I get it. You're not wrong. But again,

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that playoff game that you watched last time, Matt, you

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>know that's where they had all those turnovers. Did you

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>really think that the Ravens should have won that game

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs last year?

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, turnovers are bad. Teams turned the football over.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 2>So no, yeah, I mean, I mean that's that's just

0:36:58.440 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>part of football. If you turn it over, you're going

0:36:59.960 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to get beat. But I just think when you look

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 2>at the way that the Ravens defense is playing, I

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>think that's the difference in this football game. I think

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens is good enough.

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't really argue with anything. I I don't, like,

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna be betting on this game either way,

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm really not.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 2>That's probably want to be either. I mean, right, I thought.

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>All I want to watch and enjoy without having action

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on it.

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I may bet the over, though at fifty

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 2>four and a half, I think I'll have action on

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the over there.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 1>If there is a side on this that I want

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to play, it is the over, even at fifty four

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half, because I just think there are going

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to be so many points in this game. I just think,

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which is.

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 2>So funny, right, because you have two running teams points points,

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 2>points because we were expecting huge plays, Derek Henry going

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 2>for sixty and Lamar answering right back for fifty. So

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's the I don't have a great

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>read on who wins the game and what what the

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 2>number will be, but I do think points because I

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 2>both I think both defenses are going to give up points.

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>If I had to go on a side at plus

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, I wouldn't mind the Titans. Otherwise

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying away from it. Otherwise I'm staying away from

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>it completely, and I'm probably not even just to have fun,

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm not gonna bet the total at all, Like

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna stay away from and enjoy it. It

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is a game that I really don't feel like I

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have a good sense of how it's gonna be, because

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you're right, the Titans are playing not good football right now.

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Right to have that game against the Texans where you

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>need to win to to have the division, you know

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that going in and you are a hair's breadth away

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from losing that game. Like that's that.

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw their soul leave their team when they when

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 2>they ran off the field at the end of the

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 2>game against the Packers when they punted the football.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember you said that they didn't need to.

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Punt the football. It was a fourth down play. They

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the Packers would have knelt down anyway, and they punted it,

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and I went, yep, they're done. In that moment, I

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 2>knew they were done.

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You said it, I wrote, I was just like, ah, whatever,

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Like they're just saving their their bullets, Like what's the difference.

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know either way. I think that here

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in this game that they've been here before, they they

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>faced again. A big thing that I always say is

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest things you can do against the

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots when they had Brady, even though it never worked,

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and against the Ravens even last year, is to not

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>be afraid of them, is to not look at them

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in awe and be like, how are we gonna beat

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 1>this team? Because I felt like every time a team

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>played the Patriots because they were the best coach team

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and the best quarterback of all time, that they said,

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>we can't beat these guys, or even if we look

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>like we're gonna win, we're gonna choke it away because

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 1>they're the Patriots. Stuff like that. I think a lot

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of teams are gonna do that right now if they're

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>playing the Ravens because of how they've looked lately. I

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>think the Titans have the advantage of basically being like, no,

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>we've beatn you twice. Call it flukey, call it whatever

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you want. We're comfortable and where we are now. That

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make up for the complete lack of depth in

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>their secondary. I agree with that, but I do kind

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of feel in the end that they're gonna find a

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>way to win this game. Again, not touching the side

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>because I just don't like it, but I do lean

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that way. Let's go to the Bears visiting the Saints.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the consensus line is the Saints minus ten

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and the over under is at forty seven. Any thoughts

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on this one?

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was told today that I am on the

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 2>public saw by liking the points, and I just think that.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Really that's the public side is the points.

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 2>I think so yeah, and I and people were saying

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>at home, the Saints are gonna go and put him

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a big number. I the only thing I can do

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>in this game is tease it down. I can't touch.

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the Bears plus ten is the side. But

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I do think the Saints are going to win this game. Tribitsky,

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 2>I've faded him like crazy, but Pro Football Focus has

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 2>given him the best quarterback grade over the last four games.

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's like it's just.

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Prety schedule alone.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Man who who has been against correct? And this is

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a playoff game. I you know, the only thing I

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>know to do with this is to tease this down

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 2>and to hope that we see the number come to

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 2>nine and I can tease it to three and take

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the Saints minus three and a teaser leg.

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. This is unfortunately, I know it's Sunday because we're

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about Saturday. I'm like, oh, I can get in

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>on this. I like this part. I don't love this

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>game either. I really don't like I think that you

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 1>know Trubisky that he's not gonna be able. He plays

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>well against bad defenses, right, he does not play well

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>against good defenses, and the Saints have a very very

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>good defense. I'm going to assume with the problem. Another

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>problem with this is that we don't really know how

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>healthy the Saints offense is. Because Michael Thomas is coming

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>back great, he was on IR He's coming back finally

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:17.720
<v Speaker 1>from the high ankle spring. But he came back before

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and he was not fully healthy. Is he fully healthy

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>now or is he just like it's the playoffs, I've

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>been rested him coming back now. Alvin Kamara, he had COVID. Matt,

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>you are aware. We've talked about this. Sometimes you come

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>back from COVID and it's like you're totally fine. There

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>is no really negative effect if you were asymptomatic and

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have anything. But sometimes there's a pretty bad

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>effect and it takes you a while to kind of recover.

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to be at one hundred percent? With

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>those questions I play, I mean he's not clear to

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>play yet. Well, he's not clear to play yet, that's true,

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think all everyone is expecting him to play.

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 2>They're doing some weird computer program that's letting practice and

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 2>what do the weak because.

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>He can't he can't return to practice yet, because he's

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>got the ten days it's going to be if they

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>remember this game we're on Saturday, wouldn't be able to play.

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that it's on Sunday is the only

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>chance he has to play. But I am assuming that

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be able to play. If not, you know,

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>then the Bears plus ten becomes a lot more enticing,

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>right for sure. I don't expect this. I don't have

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.399
<v Speaker 1>a u matt. In terms of the scoring. I don't

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>expect the Bears to be able to put up a

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of points at all. And I think that, you know,

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, these are two teams that play pretty slow

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point, like they're not their Their pace of

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>play is not huge. The Saints run the ball a ton,

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so the clock is constantly moving. I don't hate the

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>under forty seven. I don't love it. It's not really

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>enough for me to bet. If I were going to

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>do something with it and it were a part of

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a teaser, I would tease that part up to fifty

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>three and take the under. But you do always have

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the potential even against the good defense like the Bears,

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Saints are just going to go nuts offense.

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 2>That's especially my fear is the Saints haang forty yes.

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And that is one hundred percent on the table because

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>if is healthy, if Kamara is back and feels no

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>after effects, they're in the dome. So you feel like

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.959
<v Speaker 1>this is something where Breeze's arm strength is not really

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna matter. Taysom Hill is gonna come in there and

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>do some crazy stuff. So it is something where I

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>get nervous. So yeah, I'm surprised that the public has

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>taken the ten. I thought I figured the Saints would

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>be kind of the public play here. But I don't

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like it at ten. I don't really love it at

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. If I had to go one way, I

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>would take the under on forty seven. But yeah, that's

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of where we are. Last game, Brown's at the Steelers.

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised this has only moved as much as it

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has Matt, which is to the Steelers minus six. I

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>think it opened at four and a half, so I

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think now it's minus six. The total is forty seven

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and a half. What do you think of this game?

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 2>You know what's interesting? The line opened at three, right,

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you said.

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Was it three? I saw it at four and a half.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>It might have been at three.

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.240
<v Speaker 2>It was three. I was three Steelers mynuch three okay?

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 2>And then it went to six, and then it went

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 2>down to five and a half.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Is it five and a half where you are?

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>It's been five and a half all day in Vegas?

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Was it now?

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>It's six for almost everywhere here?

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's five and a half in Vegas? And so I

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 2>started asking people, can you explain that to me? Please?

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Because they haven't practiced. Their head coaches out, yeah, their

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 2>play caller is out. Yeah, they're missing their starting left

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 2>guard and their quarterback has not thrown a pass to

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 2>their wide receivers since Sunday.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an answer for this?

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 2>No? I no one can. Nobody can figure this out,

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Like why are the This is why I haven't bet

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 2>this game because I am totally perplexed by this, because

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 2>how in the hell are people betting the Browns?

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Like, I don't get it.

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it just because they it's hard to beat somebody

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 2>two weeks in a row and they saw everything Pittsburgh

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do, but the Stars weren't playing for Pittsburgh.

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you know, I mean, is it do we know?

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know this is an oversimplification. Do we

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know the type of money that's coming in on the Browns?

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Is public to move the number? No, I don't know

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.919
<v Speaker 2>what it is. I mean, I'm guessing it's respected money

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:05.280
<v Speaker 2>here on a Thursday for a Sunday. Yeah, I'm guessing

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not the public.

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I could see the in the playoffs. It could be

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the public, I guess. And you could say, like, the

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Browns are like a great story in that right, it's

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time they made the playoffs in twenty years

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever.

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 2>And look maybe, I mean, the NFL network does those

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous predictions that never were correct to those projections that

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 2>they do. But they projected twenty seven to twenty four, sorry,

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three Steelers. So I don't know if that

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 2>people in the people saw that on the NFL network

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and were like, Okay, I'm taking the Browns at plus

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 2>six because they claimed that that's going to be you know,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 2>that's their projection. I don't know if that's why, But

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just think this is another story of

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the Browns, you know, Lucy pulling the football on them.

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 2>In terms of just having way too many problems going

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 2>into their first playoff game in seventeen years.

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pounding the Steelers.

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you.

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm pounding it and I get all that. And I've

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 1>had concerns about why it's still only minus six. You're

0:45:57.920 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>telling me again, I saw it at four and a half.

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>At times Stefanski was declared out. I may be wrong

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>on the timeline at this because you know, I look

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at things and then you know, going back and forth.

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 2>It opened up three in Vegas and then but Tony

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 2>was out and then Stefanski was out.

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>And Buttonio is a huge loss, by the way, like

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>huge loss was.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 2>A gigantic loss. I mean people understanding how people loss

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that is.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing I don't think like people really think about.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's, by the way, something we didn't talk about

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Rams is Whitworth is coming back right for

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams right this week and huge, huge, huge thing.

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even talk about that.

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 2>But yes, and Acres looked pretty good last week. Two.

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's actually also another thing which we didn't get

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to into that. I mean he didn't I wouldn't say

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>he looked. I think he you know, ran twenty one

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>times for thirty four yards, but twenty one carries in

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>your first game back from the high ankle sprands.

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Like one of those were third down pickups though, But.

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I also it's encouraging to me if they're going to

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>give him that workload and you're not going to say okay,

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we don't really have concerns about this.

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We have Malcolm Brown. We're not even letting him touch

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Good. That's good and talented. So that does

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.439
<v Speaker 1>both those we didn't even touch in them Wayne favor

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Rams for me though, I does just the

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the bigger part than Beotonia is the fact that they

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a head coach who calls their plays. You

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can't compare it because they're two very different teams. But

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we saw what the Lions look like in that game

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Bucks. They would have gotten blown out anyway,

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, but you got rid of the coaching staff

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and they look like they might have never been on

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the field before. Now, the Lions aren't that far from

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it necessarily in a good day anyway, So I'm not

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to say that this is what the Browns are.

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and the Browns, by the way. They have

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not been playing well anyway. They barely beat the Mason

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph Like, this is what we talked about when we

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>were talking about that game last week. And then you know,

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolf doesn't kill a team, but he's not a

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a below average NFL quarterback. And they

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 1>they hung around that whole game.

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm with you, No, I think the I

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 2>think the Steelers are the side he's either Steelers are

0:47:57.680 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 2>no play for me.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's Steelers, like this is not one where

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm like it's either this or this. It's Steelers, Like I'm.

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Totally I have no clue on the total for that.

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there because I don't know what the Browns are

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 2>going to score, and they could come out and who knows.

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they could run the ball. The Steelers without

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 2>their linebackers who get lit up by Landry.

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>You know though, man, they get pressure. The one thing

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that they do is they get pressure consistently. And you know,

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Baker is not good under pressure man like that, That's

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>just not what he does. And maybe they'll be able

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to like last week where Chubb broke that you know,

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty yard run and maybe they'll be able to

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. I just don't see it. I just don't

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>see it. And I think that the Steelers are going

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to win and win big in this game. So I

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>have no problem taking the mind of six. I'm not hesitaning,

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but the forty seven and a half, I'm not anywhere

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>close to it. I wouldn't know what to do with

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>it at all because I have no feel for what

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this game is going to be from that side, all right,

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like there are some plays, So what

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want? First of all, do you have questions

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>from discord? I mean, I don't know if we've.

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Got no I mean we've hit more hit on the

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 2>vast cord of them, like we we just looked about

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the COVID issues with the Browns. We hit on that.

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 2>We teaser plays, but they want to know what our

0:48:57.960 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 2>favorite plays are?

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So okay, all right, So you want to start with

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what on on the regular line or are you just

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>more teasing it or whatever you want to do?

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Are straight bets?

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 2>What are what our favorite plays for? Straight bets? What

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 2>are they? All? Right?

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Do we have to agree on them then? Because I

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>don't really.

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Know, No, it's your favorite in my favorite.

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, so my favorite this weekend, I would say,

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll give how about I give one spread

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in one total? Is that right?

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Sure?

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Great? My favorite spread I'm gonna leave York. I feel

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like I know what yours is is going to be

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bills laying six and a half, because I really

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.280
<v Speaker 1>do think that the Bills are going to have a

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>monster game. If it's under a touchdown, that's my pick.

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 1>How about you met against the.

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Spread Stellers miles five and a half?

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Really I thought you were gonna go with the Rams.

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that. I mean it's three and a half.

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's always scary when you're betting against the team

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 2>with a better quarterback. Yeah, I'm not going to stand

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.240
<v Speaker 2>on a desk and pound and say that the Rams

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent. They got two quarterbacks. Jared Goff's is

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 2>youse and and look it's Russell Wilson. I mean, it's

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 2>always very hard to say that. Yep, you know, John

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Wafford is gonna beat Russell Wilson. So I do. I

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 2>think I'm gonna bet it to happen. But it's not

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 2>my favorite play. My favorite play is to go ahead

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 2>and expect the Steelers to annihilate the Browns.

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you care if it's six, by the way, because

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>consensus at six? Does that matter to you? I know

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not going.

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I want to under seven. Get it under seven,

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 2>and and I'm comfortable with with with laying Pittsburgh, you know,

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 2>going pretty.

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Heavy, all right? And how about your favorite total Bills

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>over Bill's over?

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that in the second favorite would be the

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Titans over. But I'll take the fifty one over fifty

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 2>four and a half.

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Bills, I'll give you that one Bill's over fifty one,

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll just come back next week. We'll see

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what we did. Bills over fifty one. I am going

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 1>to do the thing that you really don't want to

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 1>do right now in any NFL game, and that's go

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with an under. But I am going to take the.

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Your favorite, your favorite, boy, Okay.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You better believe it, the Bucks Washington football game under

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>forty five. So that is my actual favorite game, that

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of the over under. If I was going to bet

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a side, because again this is just one Matt, I

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You don't see Washington putting up a ton

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of points, right, Like I can see it against this

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Bucks defense, and we talked about it. This is past

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Brady's bedtime. You're probably not gonna have Mike Evans. There's

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a ton of pressure on him all day long.

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Washington's defense, by the way, has been one of the

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>most underrated defenses all year long. They are legitimate. I

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>know you talked about you talked to you know whoever

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like their corners. I think their corners are good

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>enough to sort of hang with these guys. I think

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be very few points. It's going to

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>make me nervous. I agree, betting me under and all

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is crazy, but I do like that under forty five,

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>so that'll be my pick. So my official plays for

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this one are the Bills laying six and a half

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Bucks. Washington football team under forty five. And Matt,

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you were going with the Steelers laying five and a

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>half to the Browns and the Bills and the Colts

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>over fifty one. Now I will say that what my

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>two team Teazers, and again you can have this now

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that I've already bet is, I'm teasing the Bills down

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to laying a half a point, or it could be

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a pick if you get it at six somewhere because

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's bouncing back and forth. And I have teased the

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bucks down from I had it at minus eight and

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a half and I tease them to minus two and

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a half, but right now to eight, so you can

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>get that. I like it even better. But that's my

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>official two team teaser play, even though again I'll probably

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>making a few total now I'll tweet them out as well. Matt,

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:22.720
<v Speaker 1>do you want you want to wait for your official

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>two team teaser play for the Juice? So you're gonna

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>be making multiple you want to make one here.

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be making multiple, but I got one on

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Sunday one on Saturday. So I'll give you the Saturday

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 2>one now, okay, and then we'll have the Sunday one

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 2>on the Daily Juice. And remember I have two live

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 2>streams coming for our prop bets on Saturday and Sunday

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 2>at eleven Eastern for a half an hour. So we

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 2>got prop bets coming at you guys for all three,

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 2>all six of these games for three.

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And you talk about the games generally on that too, right,

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like any change?

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god? Yes, yeah, yeah, we talk about everything.

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Go lines, We talk about movement and talking about money,

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about injuries, COVID, We'll talk about everything. But my

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 2>Saturday one is going to be I'm gonna follow your

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 2>bills teaser. I like that. I don't have six, though,

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:03.200
<v Speaker 2>so I'm gonna go to bet EMGM and I'm gonna

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 2>tease down to six, from six to six to a pick.

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Bill's at a pick doesn't matter?

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry? Am I missing anything? Does it matter if

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's six or six and a half when you tease

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it down, there's no ties.

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 2>No, it doesn't matter. I mean no, I guess it

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter.

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 1>No, like, actually it doesn't matter, right like.

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:19.839
<v Speaker 2>But it matters to me on the other lag because

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the rams are plus three and a half, I bet mgm.

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, that's fine. So we'll go Bill's minus half

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a point yet, Okay, so we stick together.

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Bill's half a point and I'm going rams plus nine

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And is it in Vegas where you are, Matt? Is

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it plus three and a half right now?

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 2>It is a bet mgm? Yes, okay, Draft Kings on

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the East Coast, it's bet is that betem gym is

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 2>at plus three and a half. I'll here in.

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Draft Kings is also at three and a half

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, but FanDuel is at three, so it's it's

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a little you know, this is where that that half

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a point is a big half a point in a game.

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be close for this one. So okay, that

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is your official These are our official teaser plays and

0:53:57.680 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mine is also Saturday, So Matt, maybe what I'll do

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>is I'll I'll think about it. Maybe I'll give it

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>out to you on the live stream for the Sunday

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:05.319
<v Speaker 1>live stream for my official two team teaser. But mine

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 1>is the Bill's link half a point, teasing them down

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:09.760
<v Speaker 1>from six and a half, and the bucks I'm teasing

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 1>down from I had a eight and a half, you

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:13.280
<v Speaker 1>can get an eight down to two and a half.

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt is also teasing the Bills down to half a point,

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>laying half point, and you're teasing the rams, which I

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>also like a lot, the rams up from getting three

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half to getting nine and a half. I

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like that teaser a lot too, I do. And there

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:28.360
<v Speaker 1>are total teasers that I feel pretty comfortable making in

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 1>this one as well, which we can talk about as well.

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 1>But okay, boy, this got me pumped. Matt, This got

0:54:33.640 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>me pumped for a super wild card weekend. All right again?

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Go on Saturday. What time are you are you doing

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at the usual eleven eleven am Eastern YouTube dot com

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 1>slash betting Pro subscribe while you're there, like his live

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>stream and all that good stuff. Now we'll be doing

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:50.879
<v Speaker 1>two half hour live streams instead of just an hour

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>long on Sunday. We're going to be back doing this

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>all the way through the playoffs. We're still planning out

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to be doing for the Super Bowl,

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>something special. We'll get back to you on that, but

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, enjoy a great weekend of playoff football

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk to you next week.