WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 5 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Check it down, Man Down Man, Thursday morning, October seven,

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Beating the book podcast megapod live from the d Skill Alexander,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, Staples of the show from our home here

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>at the day, the vice president Operations and Circuit Sports,

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Derek Steven's conciliary and man all about town, Mike Paul,

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, Mikey? Great? Great big week for Circule huh.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>We were named the North American Property of the Year

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>G two. We first Nevada Casino would ever win the award? Really, yes,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you beat out Dotties. We beat out in Choctaw in Oklahoma,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>finished second. I by the minor upset. I had Choctaw

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>over us, but we got there. And so congratulations to

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Derreck Stevens and everybody to put the property together. Mazle

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to thank you as my mother would say, thank you.

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And then just thirty minutes ago we launched circuits Sports

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa. We went lives Yeah another you know. I

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was on Tuesday with Ken Miller and Trent Condon on

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>k x N O and des Moines and that they

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>interviewed about the launch and at the end Trent Condon said,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to speak for many many megapod listeners, Mike,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if you could please ask Todd Wishes just to shut

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>up and let you in the guests talk Todd your

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. I'm not even going to respond to that nonsense.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>People in Iowa obviously are not the wow taking out

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole state. That's Todd Wish. That from his mom's

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>cork attic in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, bulletin boards all over the

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>cork behind it. Are you doing, Toddy good? I'm doing

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all right. Ladies and gentlemen, are are rotating guests today

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to join us on the podcast. I don't

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>believe he was on the podcast last year, but he's

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>been on the pod years ago, two years ago, many

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>times before. Professional better half of the Massy Peabody analytics team,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>co founder of unabated, which you can tell us about

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. Rufous Peabody, How you do it, man? I'm

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>doing well, Gil. I'm excited to actually get some NFL

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>knowledge for from some people that actually know how to

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>beat the NFL, because I certainly don't. This year. You're

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>having a rough time of it. Yeah, I've I've made

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>money every Saturday and lost money every Sunday, which is

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not normal for you, right, that's not like a normal thing. Well,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, I mean, NFL has gotten harder and

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>harder to beat. I bet, and honestly, I bet nfls

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on in college on Monday. Um, actually I got college

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>later in the week as well, but but I don't

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bet it on Monday for NFL and probably not betting it.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So you grab, you you're basically doing the numbers grab

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>early in the week, and the COVID era of information

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>coming down to the wire. Not interested, not interesting to

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you in terms of making bets waiting late into the week, right,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like there's so many people with

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>such good data analyzing the NFL out there that you know, myself,

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 1>with you know, only devoting a little bit of time

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to it. It's just not enough. What are you devoting?

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>How about in game? Um? You know, I haven't even

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bet second half this year. That's something I always bet.

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing second half for college football, but my

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>server isn't working properly for NFL second half, and I've

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of just been like, Okay, I'll get to it

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>next week. It's never been the highest thing on my

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>list of priorities for some reason you do college football

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>second half though. Yeah. I have been witnessed to Rufus

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on a college football Saturday sitting in front of his

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>computer back in the day making multiple college football bets

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>too much success. That was always a treat. So tell

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>us about Unabated. For those who are unfamiliar with Unabated,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>what you do with the Commissioner Sports Betting Captain Jack

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>andrews weird. Yeah, I like that title for him, it

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly fits. So Unabated is a venture between with myself,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Captain Jack and um well, Dan fer Grizio and Matthew Snyder.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Who are We're all out here for G two E

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>actually in Vegas. UM, and it is we provide betting

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>tools and education for better is. Basically, we want people

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to quantify their opinions, and we have

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>products that make you a better better UM alternate line

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>pricing tools, UM. We have a season long NFL simulator

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that you can customize with your own power ratings or

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>use a bunch of grading systems out there. UM. I

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's as specific as quarterback injury probabilities and backup

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback penalty UM. And recently, while we're launching prop tools

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that allow you to come in with your projections for

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a player, like receiving yards receptions and see what that

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>distribution looks like. You know, what's the probability of this

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>guy gets a hundred yards? What's shila under seventy seven

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half minus one forty or you know under

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy three and a half minus one ten? Interesting, so so,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>and it's all free at unabated dot com for now,

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for now, unfree, free and unabated. But just an example,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if if Team A is favorite over Team B by

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seven points, alternate line seven a half eight, eight and a

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a half nine, so on and so forth, it will

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>allow you to sort of determine what the best bet

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bunches is that one possible application. Yeah, there's

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a compare line school you put in okay, you put

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in two lines, and tells you which one is better.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But there's and there's different things, so people will gravitate

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>towards what sort of resonates with them. There's different ways

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to use on a beta. It's really interesting. Um. And

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I was saying when you and Captain Jack were on

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game yesterday on Visa, I was saying,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's tons of betters out here. We're listening

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the megapon right now. Who hear that and say

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this sounds awesome. I really want to be a better better,

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like it might be too complicated for

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>me to them. You would say what I would say? Well,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>first off, um, is it complicated to put two lines

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in and see which one is better? And it will

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you which one is better? Now, I mean if

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you so, I think, regardless of how sophisticated you are

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or want to be, if you want to save money, um,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you can save. We have tools that basically will help

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you execute that a better prices and save money that way. Um.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But what we want to do Captain Jack loves this

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>term aspirational sharp and I think it's fantastic too. But

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's who were catering to. And we want

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to sort of help, um, help better, sort of move

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>up that ladder. And and we we don't want to teach.

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to give him man of fish. We

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>want to teach a man to fish. Or I've heard

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>person wish Yeah, yeah, I like it. Aspirational betters, aspirational

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>sharps exactly aspirational do you have anything but the acid aspirational.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything for aspirational radio hosts? Because there's

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>a man to your left who is aspirational. He's a

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of mediocre. He'd like to get that. Well, all

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to say is I'm here for you if

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you were not here, you know. I was like, I

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>was going to tell Gil no, but then he said,

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Todd wishnup. I was like, yeah, I'm in. I mean

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Todd wish to that have aspirational sharp Todd, you are

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast stenographer, and uh I am the one falling

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>further and further behind. What do you got, Killy the

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ice man with a nice delicious one and two? You

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta like it, just keep fading. The gil Meister he

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>was now last week I was I told him he

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was fortunate, and when he was unfortunate on one of

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>his wins, let's give him, uh, you know, some kind

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of compensatory, you know, clapping or something, because his Lions

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pick did not deserve to lose. They were inside the

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>five yard line a hundred and fifty times and could

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not score. Mikey also lost on that, So you guys

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>got unfortunate after being fortunate the week before. But Anyways,

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Guilt falls to four and eight with his one and two,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but his teasers continue to roll on at four and oh,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which is really the only important thing because anybody who

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>would bet the spreads pre game is an idiot, so

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, four no teasers. Great job, Gilly. Mikey with

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a strong two in one week um with the Packers

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and Browns two winners. He moves to seven and five,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>although he lost his teaser with the Tight Titans because

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Titans too, I had a four team teaser and

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the loser. So Mikey falls to two and

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>two the teasers, and then the great One himself has

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a bad one in two weeks, but still stays tied

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for first at seven and five and also four no

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and teasers. That's me seven and five and four no

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and teasers, and we move on. How did how did

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>our guest spot do? Yet? Last week our guest spot

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was Matt Brown. He had the Ravens a winner, the

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Browns a winner, and Dallas a winner. Clean and you

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>also had the teaser correct with the Chiefs in the bus.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brown clean sheet co host Time Action MSG plus

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that I do uh week nights with Kelly Bidlin as well. Okay,

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so then Mikey Circuit Million, Circus Survivor, Circus Survivor. People

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>continue not to put in their entries. All time record

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen people didn't put in their entry. How do weeks?

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>What is that? Somebody needs to invest some money like

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Rupus has in his website and do a thirty for

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty on this and go to all these people that

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't over the years put in these picks. It gets

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more ludicrous. What if I told you? What

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>if I told you? It's so now three straight weeks

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the largest knockout is the ones that didn't put one in, right,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we we we lost four oh nine with the Saints,

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one fifty one with the Titans, nineteen the Medals, four Dolphins,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one Vikings. We we lost exactly twenty percent of the

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>remaining entrance went from seventeen to thirty three. So it

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>should be it should be noted, and it was great

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Giants and Jets both with the upsets over

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Saints and the Titans respectively in overtime, but it

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>should be noted that there with all those eliminations, there

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>are still more people alive in Survivor right now, this

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>year than there were in the entire survivor pool. Last

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>year there were nine. There's a thousand more. Yeah, so

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>how many people relatives exactly started and now are left?

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So after four, after four weeks, you know we've knocked

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>out last year last year lower last year because everyone

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>lost the Colts and we want thirty three lost. A

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>third of the people had the coltson Week one last

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>year was down quick. I want to know if anybody, like,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>did anybody pick the Texans last week? I mean, what's

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the dumbest Oh, we've seen some ridiculous ones, like people

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking that they're some of this is to wait. They

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>use opposite sides of the same game to advance the

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pick of two teams they think they'll never use again.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's called the double option that Derek promotes. I'm not

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>too sure. No, no, somebody did it. Somebody used their

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>six entries and did three Browns and three Texans in

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>week two. Yeah. Wow, if you think the Texans are

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna went to stay away from the game and let

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody get slaughtered with the Browns, this is this again,

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 1>this again. I keep trying to say this to to

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>people know who listen. Anything beyond one entry. It is

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not proportional to your advantage. No, everyone is. If you

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have six entries, you do not have six times the

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>chance because people do not play anything but that remaining

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>one optimally. I have a stand on this gill though,

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>because one of our friends asked about this, because he's

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in this group. Three and eleven people bought six entries

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this year. Okay, of those three eleven, sixty of those

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>still have six entries alive, which our friend does. All

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>our friend does, he asked about. But and here's the thing.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>He thinks that somehow he is that it doesn't matter.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>By the time we get to Thanksgiving, Let's see how

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>many entries they all have left. That's what I'm saying.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>If if you do have six left, then I mean

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in a great spot. And his argument is you

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>need those six to get through Thanksgiving and Christmas? You do,

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>or to give you some back? Did you understand my point?

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>He's not playing them all the same way by definition.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>By definition, that means you are not playing it the

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>same way you would play with one. And so it

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a face givings too far out

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for this to matter, is what I'm saying. Some people

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately get there with two entries left. Right, Christmas is

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>really far out to the people that are saving for Christmas.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Last year, remember when Dr Dmyer's power were ranked at

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the end and I was third. There was like two

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>different people with two entries left. Those are the people

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that have an advantage at the end. But right now

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with yeah? Well multiple yes, at the end.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I started looking at the grid because this week is

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, um and it starts getting really really dice

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>even uh in the next couple of weeks, I agree

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>of like who's available and who you could take. I mean,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going to be forced to take either

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings this week or maybe even the Carolina Panthers,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>because you know, like I, I know I want Dallas

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for Thanksgiving, so I have to save those guys. And

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's other teams you have to save if you

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the grid, because there are some weeks there

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is nothing. And let me tell you something, thanks Giving,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday of Thanksgiving is gonna be insane because if

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at the games, everyone's thinking you gotta get

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>through Thanksgiving. You also have to get through the Sunday,

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't have as many games, and all those games

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>are tough as hell. Andy, who's like gritting it out

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and mapping it at this point? I said it before

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the season. I was like, you're kidding yourself if you're

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>doing it at this point, because you don't know you

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Todd are both alive with your one entry, correct, Todd, Todd,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>who'd you have last week? Last week? I survived with

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs, and that's right, I had Cincinnati.

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Todd was sad Cincinnati rally to nine people knocked out.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We're all rooting against each other and the circle million three.

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Just because the quarter ended the first four weeks with

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a quarter, now it's a five week quarter. Five people

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>tied at eighteen and two going into Monday night. There

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was one guy that had a shot. He had the Raiders.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>He could have been nineteen and one and one hundred

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and seventy one thousand. But as it ends up, the

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>guy that was fifteen and I went three and two,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and four other people end up eighteen and two. They

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>split first, second, and third. They each got forty nine thousand,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>three fifty and on the bottom end, two entries went

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>three and seventeen. They split the five each new quarter begins,

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>new quarter begins. Now the extra is the final quarter,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the extra week. There's two extra weeks, right, so it's

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the second and fourth quarters are five weeks long. Okay,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>good to know, Todd, you're thirteen and seven. Yes, seven,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I am tied like place all the way to nine.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It's impressive. Good luck, good luck. That's all value these days.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Uh, let's do best bets. No before we

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do that Thursday night. I don't know if it's anybody's

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>best bet, but tonight there is a game rams uh

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Seahawks Rams on the road favored by two

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half against Superman Russell Wilson and the Seahawks. Rufus,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>did you have any thoughts on this game at all?

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know if I have intelligent thoughts,

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but my numbers actually made the Seahawks a small favorite,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>although again it depends what are you using for home field?

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Depends on home field advantage right now, because I think

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are a slightly better team, but you know,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>mark like less than a point better. Um, I'm using

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>two points for this game. That's but this is this

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the art of betting in a way.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>This is not necessarily science, like this is regress zero. UM.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I was who was I talking with um earlier this

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>week about home field advantage? I think it was Chris

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>List on the Serious X Down Fantasy UM radio spot,

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And there was no home field advantage in two thousand nineteen.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this, like he he said he had

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>heard the right two thousand nineteen, there was no home

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>field advantage I and I like literally quickly pulled up

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>data set. I was like regression of score differential on

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>dummy variables for team and opponent and whether the teams

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at home. And certainly it was a very small negative number. UM.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we always say home field has been decreasing

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>over time, but it kind of like fell off a

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>cliff in two thousand nineteen and then two there no

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fans and it was you know, point one five points

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, and then this year it's basically

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>been nothing too. What is your theorist why it fell

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff? Then? I don't know. I mean, what

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>my theory to why college football team start with the

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>letter oh? Covered a clip over fifteen years with six

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>d observations like but but that is truly ridiculous that

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>what what There's got to be something to this, right Well,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean I think there was last year,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean, you and I root for a

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>team that clearly has had no home field advantage in

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a decade, right like we could see that with our

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>own eyes because of a curse. You and I actually

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>had it to give a famous exchange on this show

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>about Seattle crowd years ago. I don't know if you

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>remember it where I said, oh, rufus, it's a huge

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage. I went to a game. I couldn't

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hear the guy next to me, and you said to me, Gil,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>really you went to one game and you've decided that

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a massive home field advantage. But that is a

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>stadium Seattle where it is sort of conventional wisdom that

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's this massive home field advantage. And yet you're even

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>saying there, you're giving it a nod of two points.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So so it's a greater home that advantage than most.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And the big reason for me is because of the

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>geographical location at Seattle that travel to travel, it's longer travel.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, not the crowd noise, not travel to travel.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And although I'll say being a divisional game less home

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for the advantage, like historically that's been the case a

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>divisional games because there's more familiarity this. You know, the

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams go there once a year. They're used to you know,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>players are used to that routine of coming into that stadium.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not there. Yeah, So with would that trigger a

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>bet on Seattle? Though? For you your your your projection, Well,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this line opened it a pick and so it's kind

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of moved up and we moved towards the Rams, like

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, two points are worth the time. Um, And

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it's not Monday, so I'm probably not

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going about it. If you know, if it gets to three,

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I might just just for you know, yeah, um, or

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>if I see a good like alt price or something

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. Um, that's kind of where I would where

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I would go. Or if I had to like to

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tease it with, I guess. So yeah, it is a question.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that a good Seattle teaser? Like I mean that

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that feels kind of teaser? Is shi now at this point?

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know I read somewhere that Russell Wilson is

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>nine in one on Thursday Night Football. Historically, he said

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>he prides himself and how he prepares in a short week.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything to that? He says, He prides himself urface,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But I want to ask you guys all and that

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>includes dot over you know, Yonder in Pittsburgh. What what? What?

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>What do you make home field advantage this year for

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an average team? One point of seven? Is the word?

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Is the number that gets thrown around? Yeah, I think

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's too to what Chris Andrews say. He only gives

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>two teams the full three on your show, Yeah, Seattle

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and Green Bay. He gives three two? Was three what

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he used to give for every every problem for everybody.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what year is that? Well, it could be

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from dinner the late eighties on? Right? Isn't it

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>also matter where the where the line would be prior

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to the giving for the home So for instance, if

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were five and a half points better than

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a team and now you're getting one and a half

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>for the home now you get to go over seven,

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like that has to be part of

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the equation, like getting near the key numbers on the

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>home field, You know what I mean, That's why we

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>said average. I hear you, okay, fair enough. Top refuses

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to answer the question I see I who knows, I

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>mean this NFL nonsense. You've got to just played in game.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. Yeah, but I sit here. I used to

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sit here on a Sunday and be able to pick

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 1>off six or eight end game betside like I sit here.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The last two weeks, I made exactly two bets. It's

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>just too hard. It's just too hard to find that

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>where you think there's value in these game props that

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are are are fun. Not here. If you were in

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Nevada though, you're in the you're in the you're in

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the dark age, but you can you know, there are

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>places where you can bet the running backs, you know,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not the you know under and over on that passing

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff as the game's going on. It's incredible.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is a lot of those props are

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really bets on the game in a sense because you have,

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>like if you're gonna bet the running back under it

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because you think that the other team is gonna have

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to throw because they're a hind. All that other stuff

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is really coming into the proper handicapped as well. By

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the way, this has nothing to do with anything, but

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>did you say, did you hear that Brandon Stanley minute

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and change that why you need to run the football

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that I thought brilliant, brilliant. Give him coach of the year.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Now if you, by the way, you send that back

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to the seventies and eighties the pants what what? What

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>number in terms of a game do you give the

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Chargers this year having him as the coach as opposed

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to Anthony Lynn last year. I mean, dude, it's already

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one at least, I think Anthony Lynn got a rod deal.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you I think Anthony Lynn was a better coach

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>than people give him credit for a better head coach? Yeah,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we see the in game stuff, yes,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and we say he couldn't manage in game. You know,

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know who else people said that about for years

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid, And people don't think Andy reads a boat,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I think he still can't manage in

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>game Andy Reid. I think he's batter, I think. But

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we see the in game decision making, the

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth down stuff, and we said, like, it's what we

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>can observe directly. We don't indirectly observe what happened. We

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't directly observe what happens in the locker room in

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the motivation and how he you know, leads these men,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>um we and so we judge based on these two probabilities.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So a numbers game this morning, I lead with this.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>That game. That baseball game last night was National Nation

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>League wild card game. The most significant moment of that

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>game most people didn't even notice or comment on right

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're not analytics people. When they didn't pull waynewright,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>when Schilt didn't put Joe Pete had a great tweet

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>about this when they didn't put pull waynewright after I

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>think it was beat got HBP hit by pitch, so

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there was two out better at first at the top

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>of the sixth, and Waynewright's position came up and it

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was one to one. Yes, No, I think this was

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the wasn't this earlier in the game? Top of the

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>six Yes, top of the top of the six one

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to one, two out beaters at first, pain rights position,

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>game and Silt lead him into bad out of the inning.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 1>By the way Wayne writes out after the next two

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>batters anyway, in the bottom of the sixth and the

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>point that Rufus was just making, when we somewhat justifiably

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but not always justifiably bitch about some of these fourth

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>down decisions. I'm as guilty as of it as anybody.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>The win probability difference in those fourth down decisions that

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.479
<v Speaker 1>are that are made poorly, it's about a two percent

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>win probability difference. That thing with with Wayne Right not

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>being pulled yesterday, if they go up two to one,

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a twenty percent win probability difference, and no one

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>mentions it or ever says anything about it. He made

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the last out in the fourth too, in that same

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>situation where he came up with two outs in a runner,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but that was the fourth I thought the key pointing

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole game and not from a decision making though,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was this O'Neill not advancing the runners first and second,

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>nobody out top of the fifth and child batting O'Neil

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and fred Ronado and not doing anything all night is

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>probably the difference in that game. It's uh. But Anthony

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>len five double digit leads last year. Five, he's handing off,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he's running, he's he's running. A draw play in Tampa

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay up seventeen and a rainstorm with fifty seconds left,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay only had one time out and they fumble

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and now they're only up ten. And I mean, this

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>goes on and on for years with them about this

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff's terrible. But he's good at like I mean, I

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's actually good at getting these guys to play.

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think he's a good In Detroit, he

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>got he like you can't ignore the fact that he

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>got them those double digit leads. He turned around and

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>then he took We took a team that went four

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and twelve and five, five and eleven before he took over,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>they went what nine and seven and then twelve and

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>four and uh lost to the um Patriots in the

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was the divisional round. I guess with Philip Rivers, who yes,

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. Also he has the least clutch quarter He

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>had the least clutch quarterback of all time in Philip

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Rivers and a non sneaking quarterback as well. But there's

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>other things though about the charges, they can't be quantified.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And people like you who are lifelong Charges fans will

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you this. They were always they they would never

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they never play hurt. Also, there were key guys that

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>would get dinged and on the charges. The culture of

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that team under Anthony Lynn, they'd be like well we're out.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm out. There was never guys that played through ship.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>They just were out, and so there's there's stuff like

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that that aren't in the numbers. I'll say this, I know,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I know someone who works for the Chargers, and basically

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody in that organization has so much respect for Anthony Lynn,

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think he was a great leader,

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and I think he got that team to play like

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like Rufus, I agree with Rufus, I

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think Mike Tomlin is similar in

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a in a situation, he's a very good at certain

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>parts of the game and the time management and the

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>going for it on fourth down. Stuff like that he's

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>not good at. But because he's good at the other stuff,

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he's able to Now Anthony Lynn, I agree with you.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he was a pretty good coach in certain

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>but because he had this huge blind spot on certain things,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone just blows it up out of proportion. But the

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>fact is it still did cost them zillions. Well that's

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Maybe let's rephrase that. Maybe what we're really

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>saying is that the skill of being an in game

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>on the fly coach is actually much more important than

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>preparation pro preflop. Well, I don't know. They think it's

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>what we observed though, so we think it's more important. Oh,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it is more important though, because again, let's

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>take let's take the God of All and I know

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a drinking game with me. Joseph Jackson Gibbs the

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>greatest coach of all time, rufus. I think you've known that, right,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So he would have great game plans if if Washington

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was getting crushed at the half, whether on offense or defense,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Petty Bone or Gibbs, Joe Gibbs and Riggie Pettybone had

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the ability to say, our game plan sucks. Where XS

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and O's geniuses. Here's what we're doing. Bang bang bang

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bang bang, and they'd be a different team in the

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>second half. That's what a good coaches with all these

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>other guys. Marty Schottenheimer, I know how to do this.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You play my way, never made a super Bowl. Steve Spurrier,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>We're just gonna pitch and catch. I know what I'm doing. No,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't, jackass, right Urban What about Tony Dungey. What

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>about a Tony Dunge type. I'm not saying it's the

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>only way you can wear. What I'm saying is it's

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the single most important thing. Yeah, you can't. What's that saying?

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Shot him drive in a fumble and went fourteen and

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>two and thirteen and three and never and missed and

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't get out of theirs. I'm not sure why

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't use it. That's my point. People think he's

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>a good coach. He was. I think you're I mean,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you're being fooled by randomness a little bit. Oh, I

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think think about how many regular season games we

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have to observe relative to the the playoff games. All right, well,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>let's get let's get back to an lit let's get

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the subject. Forget throw a Shotenheimer. I'll stick

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>by it. But whatever, there's no way to me that

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the in game portion is less important than what happens

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>before the game. But you're talking about in games XS

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and os and being able to adapt a game plan

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to about clock management, I'm talking about situational football. He

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>had no concept of that. Decisions a head coaches make

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>during a game, and you talk so so I guess

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing is like these four down I mean, we'll

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>think about like David not going like but you know,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but I mean that that was a great

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>in general, Like people are looking, you know a lot

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of these are like, well, you know, it's posting a

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>team like you know, one and a half to win

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>probability and those are kind of the pretty bad not

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>go for decisions. Yeah no, that's what I was trying

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to say before, Like we and I raised my hand

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a guilty, But who makes up the probabilities that give

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me a break? Some of them are not? Here? We go? Here,

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we go with this. Some of them are not that's

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some of them are huge Todd Wish note, can we

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>see your model model is called it's called the Google

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>loss model route and the other thing that it doesn't

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>see here's the big problem with all the modeling. Buru.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>There we go. Okay, maybe not you mr. This is

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>why I'm here, Like, but the you know, if you

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>watch the games a teams, here's and I wanted to

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>bring this up anyway, So I'm glad that this came

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>up today. You know, I watched games and you watch

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>for instance, like in a college game, right a team

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>will hit an eighty six yard pass and then do

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing for like five five series is in a row

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and their stats don't look that bad because they have

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the eighty six yard pass are awful. Would you say

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>their play success rate is awful, right, exactly, But I'm

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>saying their yards per play doesn't look as bad and

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. And also, if you're watching the game,

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times you see how difficult it is

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or how easy it is by how open people are.

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one thing that just does not

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>come across in modeling. Not to change the subject out

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of this, but um, you know, I think it's one

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>problem with with modeling that And and this goes to

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're saying, oh, it's only a one

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>or two percent probability. You know, that's all based on

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody deciding what the probabilities are, So it's not really

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a model. It's a person deciding, well, it is a model,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>someone modeling what those probabilities are for an average team

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>against an average opponent. Then you could say, well, you

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, you know, this team is has a higher

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>percentage chance of getting the sport down than an average team,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>although you know a bad team has the worst chance,

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but a bad team also will have a worst chance,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, of getting yards later on too. So let

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>me say, let me say, let me say it a

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>different way, Todd, And I don't know if you'll agree

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with this or not. I have always found that win

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>probabilities in baseball, because of the mechanical nature of baseball,

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>with three bases, three outs, and innings and nine innings,

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that probabilities historically on historical data data are much more

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>precise than that in football because there are so many

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more variables in football, Like there's like play calls, right

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like if you know you have a particular playball like

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>think about think about the Eagles and the super Bowl, Philly,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Special Place or something, right like, they're like, we we

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>have the special player. We think that this is gonna work.

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe on average this scenario would only be

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a sixty percent conversion. We think this is gonna be

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like eighty percent or something, and maybe it is, and

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so that should affect the decision making. We could go on,

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but Mikey has this is if you seriously, if you

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really want to get into it, like for real. But

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Gil, you're making a good point

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that the baseball Todd on average, has a bigger average numbers.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean that every football decision is only

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a two percent decision. That's no, of course they're not

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>all two percent. But I'm I'm saying we, I think,

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>analyze these sort of things that don't have that have

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a fairly marginal impact on It's not like it's not

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like Anthony Lynn is costing his team like six points

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a game out there with you know, worth down decision. Maybe,

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think we're arguing that. Yeah, well, Gil's

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>arguing that. He said at one point, I didn't say

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that said it's the most important thing. Oh, I think.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think in the end that in game coaching,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>situational decision making, ultimately in those higher leverage situations, is

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>more important than what happens before a game starts. Yes,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you must think, you must think Andy Reid is not

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a very good touch that. No, I think he's good.

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's very good. I think he has all

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the talent in the world right and I think he

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>was a the talent was able to overcome any of

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy reads and he read the real knock on Andy

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Reid was not situational except it was just clock management

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of games. That was his bugaboo with

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn. We I mean, there's too many of them.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>We've forgotten half. How about when they threw the hail

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Mary and they needed two scores and they lined up

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and run the ball and didn't get in and then

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they only had one play left there. It's just insane.

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>There's so many things he did in Buffalo when they

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were There's just so many things he did throughout the

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>course of the year that were ludicrous. I mean, to me,

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you should just have someone in there like that, says,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>do you know a consultant sends his resume out to teams,

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>He does about his background covering sports, betting and all

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and offers to be the person on the field making

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions for them. It's the old Bill Simmons thing, where

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid should they should have gone to the bullpen

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at the two minute warning. Everything like calling somebody to

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the game. But the thing is it

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>has to be marbleized into the offensive coordinator and everything else.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not as simple as just saying, okay, this is

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy in charge. Because let's say you're at the

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the half and there's a minute ago and

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you really want this to be the last. That means

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>all the play calling has to be geared towards that.

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It can't just be one guy. It has to be

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a guy mixed into the entire organization because that offensive

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter needs to make play calls that are going to

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be as successful as possible with also thinking, this is

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the last drive of the half marbalized if you will,

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>marbleized marbalization. That's right, marbleization. Big fan of over marbleization.

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It gives it all the flavor. Rufus and I are

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>aligned on on Amo. It is superior and even two berries, right,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's only two percent. It's only two at best

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>than any other steakhouse at the most. All right, we

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have to Mikey has a deadline because he does a

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>show called odds On not to be confused with the

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Nuts or not to be confused with odds on Lombardi,

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the website that he does with them all shot. Alright,

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So three best bets if we can get to three, Rufus,

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>what's your first? My first? Um? Well, unfortunately this well

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the line I bet is not available, but so that's

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not an excuse. But I'm gonna you know, I want

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to give people what you know. I want them to

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be aligned with me. So Um, the Saints. The Saints

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is a home well because of that great home field

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>advantage in Washington, right is a road dog. I think

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that line what are we? It opened somehow took one two.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I did not understand that line there. I mean,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the Saints are much better team than they

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and people give them credit for. I think Winston was

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>never got the chance. I mean you want to talk

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>about like coaching in the second half, like screwing a

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>team over Sean Payton's like really conservative play call and

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking the defense would just close out the Giants. And

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Saints do have a very good defense.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>They were I had them as the best basically the

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>best defensive football last year in terms of the predictive metrics. Um,

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they have not been quite as good. Um this year

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they have not been good passing the ball, but um,

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>actually no, their defense still has been really good percentile

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>against the rush against the past, scoring a ficiency and

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>eight in play success. So, UM, I just think that there.

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I don't think that Washington is anywhere

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the same tier, um in terms of of you know, ratings.

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So Saints pick number one, I think, and I mean

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>on a neutral field I have that is a is

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown spread? Do you really? Wow? I'm not saying

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm right. I haven't been right so far this year,

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but so there is that. But I betted it minus one.

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 1>So College Place, you're doing well, College very college Place.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll call up the spreadsheets when Duke's losing seventeen and

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the half to Kansas. Take the

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Duke team total over. I don't care what it is

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and ben a billion dollars which book and will give

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>me the billion? And the circa limits are pretty good.

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>But okay, they don't even do it. Mikey what year?

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I have really square plays this week? But

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this is this is I don't get the Packers number

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and Cincinnati three, I mean, that makes no sense to me.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It should be like one right the other way, I

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think it should be five and a half. It's you know,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I will never Let's not forget for a half. Cincinnati

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>should have been down seventeen to nothing to Jacksonville on

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night and let's well, no, I don't think he

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>should have went There were three possessions for each team

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first half. Why wouldn't you go up three possessions.

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>So there were exactly three possessions for each team. You

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be up three Urban he's thinking about,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to the bar in Columbus. But so

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this is how I led the numbers game the next

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>morning to he very nice visual so he it was

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the curse. And again this is something that the mainstream

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>announcers never mentioned, right, the curse of having third and

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>goal at the eight with one left and half of fourteen. Nothing.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Anything that happens. You either are kicking a field goal,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>if it's a loss, no gain or very short gain,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>or it's a touchdown, you twenty one and nothing. The

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing that can't happen is if you gain seven

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>yards right, six and a half or seven yards, because

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>then it tweaks your brain into thinking, oh now, which

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they did and they got stuffed that. So everybody says

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>all the fourth down plays the key play of the game.

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>They stuff to know it's the third down play. Was

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it such a quirk of foot? You're Kevin Stefanski only

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta get four yards because he's going forth and from

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the fourth. No matter what that was. That was all

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>my notes of the games last week. I just took

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>random fourth down plays that they called. I didn't mind

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina fourth down when they were down twelve points

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter in their own territory. But the

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Colts one at the end of the first half, when

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they were up seven to three, fourth down at their

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>own and they went for it. I was like, Okay,

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're getting a little too crazy. I mean, you

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>liked it. I'm never gonna fault the team for going

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>forward on fourth down at their own twenty eight up

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seven to three. Well, how fourth and what fourth too?

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>They're going against their going against an average team. And

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>when I say an average team, I mean a team

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that could never score in the history of football. How

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about what Taylor went fourth in one with three minutes

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>left in the third quarter against the Vikings in Week one,

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>up by fourteen from his own thirty I mean, you're

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to get that fourth and one. You're supposed to,

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't, you put a team right back

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Vikings only had one drive of more

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>than eight plays the whole game, and you're up fourteen.

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It was fourth and one. I like, okay, yeah, there

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't three sounds probably probably not the right four. I

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>took the Packers, I can. I will not forget them.

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 1>They should have been down seventeen. Nothing. I will not forget.

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>How did the Packers get blown up by the Saints

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in Week one? I mean, that's a very strange game.

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Though the Saints had five touchdowns in twelve yards at

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>one point. I mean, it was like it was ridiculous.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Were we were fooled into thinking that the Saints offense

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was better than it was in that first week? Many

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of us, it's really not it's a bad offense with

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a great defense or a very good defense. It is

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good defensive team. Yeah. Anyhow, I'll never

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>forget in Chicago in Week two how he got sacked

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>nine times and through three interceptions and just totally outmatch.

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 1>It was only fields coming in the game and throwing

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>interceptions that made that game close. I don't think Cincinnati's

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that good of a team. I still think they're tied

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>with Pittsburgh is the worst team in that division, And

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe you give a nod to Pittsburgh, but I don't

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's close. I think the Packers are appreciably better

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>if this game was in Lamb, But wouldn't it be

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>six the Packers. I would think anyhow, I'll take the

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers minus three. Pittsburgh. Is Pittsburgh better off a big

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>better Mason, Rudolph Mason, Rudolph Mason, Rudolph doesn't Mason. It

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't better for for all of time, I think it's

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>may think it's still. I mean, my numbers say that

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're not like but yeah, you know, at this point,

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's it feels like nobody can be

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>worse than big Ben. But he's probably better than Bason.

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what about Nathan Peterman if he was on

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the you know, Dwayne Haskins not mentioned in this conversation.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben's taking one. By the way, I'm not a

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben apologist. Big Ben is not as bad as

0:38:55.719 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody's saying. He's in Pittsburgh. Should we listen to are

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a total Big Ben apologist. By the way, I am

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not that. I'm not a Pittsburg Steelers offensive line is

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible and the receivers get no separation whatsoever. So it's

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not all big beness, but they do. They have the

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>kid from Notre Dame Reiver. You know what, Steelers are overrated.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>The the receivers are overrated. We're going back to the

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>time because Antonio Brown was there. First of all, Juju

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Smith Schuster was never a number one. He was never

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a number one. They made him up better than than

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>he was. What about his USC I thought he was

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at USC all. I'm saying is if you watch the

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Steeler games, you see the receivers are never open. That's

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because Matt Canada. We're in Barking Canada. Is uh, you know,

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like no motion, no like I mean, I'm not nextus

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>nose guy. But I've you know, I've read I've read

0:39:55.239 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter Big Ben third and fourth down lays. This year,

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth down, there's been fifty two of them.

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four of those fifty two. He's throwing the ball

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>short of the sticks. Think about that. Yeah, it was

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty offensive. Fine, is an absolute horrendous unit. You if

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't win a football game with no offensive line,

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I give you that. But if you're twenty four of

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty two are short of the sticks, there is an

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>element of braindeadedness. Okay, I'm not saying he's you have

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to take risks, you do, I mean okay, And I'm

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>not saying that's like someone's throwing away on fourth down.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>That's why would you do that? It's cart he just

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>want to take It's like it's like roof, Like what

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you said about Anthony Lynn. I kind of agree with

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you about Anthony Lynn. I don't think as an overall

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>football coach, I don't think he's as bad as everyone

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>makes it. Okay, as an offensive coordinator, Todd, I think

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>he's doing a fine job with the Lions. Well, I

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think think about this like, Okay, are you the same

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 1>person you were five years ago? Absolutely not? Okay. People

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>change and grow and learn, and I don't know if

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn has that mind or I mean maybe some people.

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>But wait, wise they certainly do. All right, Todd, Todd,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>what's your first pick? Wait? Wait? So so because you

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>know on the game one pick, but the other one

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I took, I took Cincinnati actually plus three and a half.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>But I don't we're just going around the horn on

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the pick. But I wanna, I wanna, I want to

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rebut please in my rebut I think you'll appreciate this, Gil.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just going to be one name. Joe Barry's is

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a Washington band. You understand, like, why would any team

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>hire that guy's defensive coordinator. It's brutal, Like I don't

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>understand how they think that's a step up from Mike

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the team. Yeah, but you had the teen was so

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bad in the championship game. In one game, he was

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>really bad. They never I mean, the Sea should have

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten the Seahawk, should have gotten rid of Russell Wilson

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>after that Super Bowl. He cost them the Super Bowl,

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>right the second Super Bowl. I think he cost them

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the second super Bowl making a point. I don't think so.

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Daryl Bevel costs him second Super You know,

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. Step out gifts as a as adjuster.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And I thought Pete Carroll at USC was the best

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>college at halftime of changing a game plan that I've

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. Just to throw that, I don't know. His

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>second half numbers were amazing. If you met the second

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>half in USC when they had that run with Reggie Bush.

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I every week I used to win on that. It

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>was like literally like fifteen and two at some point,

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter whether they were behind or head or I

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>mean they were probably always ahead. They usually weren't ahead

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>by that much, or they were behind at halftime, and

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>then they would just blow the doors off people in

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the second I remember that isn't because they're deeper and

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they're like you know, later on in the game when

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you know you're bringing in the backups and stuff, their

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>backups are just going to crush the other teams back.

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That could be a factor. Yes, I hope Pete Carroll

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>watched that Brandon Staley Running Back Running Game dissertation. But

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>did you have more than just the two words Joe Barry?

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Not really? I mean I basically I think that the

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>green Bay defense thinks. Do you believe Cincinnati will win

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>this game? No? Is that your second pick? But he

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>took three and a half. I took three. Let's be fair.

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean I make it. I make it. I make

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the line basically a little less than one one yea.

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's you take. So you're saying Cincinnati is the

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of the best team in the NFC North. I

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think Cincinnati's point seven points worse than an average team,

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and so Green Bay's an average team. Do you know

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>there're two point four points better than an average team,

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but three one and then you give them two points

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in this game? It all it all comes down to

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage here, basically, So would you take him

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at current line three, Like what, I actually bet them myself. No,

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I would not bet them myself, but being honest and

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>half on Monday, I'm not going to bed. Yeah, we

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta go. Okay, my number one pick is going to

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be the Jacksonville Jaguars plus four and a half. What

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what was that I said? I heard it audible? Uh? Okay,

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. This is not so much a pick

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for Jacksonville. It's a pick against the Tennessee Titans. Um.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't really like betting against the team

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and just got embarrassed by the Jets. But I just

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Tennessee Titans defense is not ready for prime time,

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Jacksonville Jaguars are not as bad as everyone

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>thinks they are. On offense. Against Cincinnati, they moved the football.

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They did move the football against Cincinnati with not a

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble. I think everyone will move the football

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Tennessee defense. I just think it's a terrible defense.

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you're getting four and a half

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>points at home in a National Football League game, you

0:44:57.200 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to if you're gonna cover four

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half, you have to be able to do

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>something on defense, and this team does not want to

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>do anything on defense, So you've got to be ahead

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>by more than ten at the end. Otherwise the backdoors

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>wide open. I'm taking Jacksonville plus four and a half

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 1>because I just don't think Tennessee with that defense should

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be favored, you know, that much against anybody. They just

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>can't play defense. God, do you discount the distraction of

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Urban Buyer? The players saying they don't. They think he's

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a clown, he's a joke. The owner has no faith

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in him. I'm O, yes, I know, And I like

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 1>when that's in there because now everyone's going to talk

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>about that all week. Oh my god, Urban Meyer got

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a half lap dance. And was it a real lap

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>dance or a full lap dance or a half a

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 1>lap dance. I don't know what really happened with Urban Meyer.

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, now we can't do the X and

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>nose because Urban got a lap dance. And now you know,

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>my career as wide receiver is totally ruined because of

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Urban's lap dance. You know what, Guys still want to

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>make catches. Guys don't want to run the football, Guys

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make that Because I still want to

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>play in the National Football League, So all this ESPN

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hubbub is for me. It helps me. I'll take the

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 1>extra half a point I'm getting for the hubbub plus

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. I loved tendency on guessing lines

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and minus four. I will lay the minus four and

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a half because of Urban Meyer. That's my that's my

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>second play. That's your second. By the way, if you

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>could just shut up one second time and let me speak,

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I really would appreciate it. Um. The the thing about

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I love the Orlando Sentinel describing that

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as someone dancing close to his lap. I love that description. UM.

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought guessing lines Tennessee was was a quick reaction

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for me. I thought that line was too low. Tennessee

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 1>has the get out of jail free card, even without

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>when they didn't have their wide receivers last year. By

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just tucking it under Derrick Henry's stomach and just getting

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>out of dodge, they should have been killed in that

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets game seven different times. They somehow managed to make

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it all the way. They did lose in the end.

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I get it. In overtime, I think the Titans they

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.439
<v Speaker 1>will have at least one of the two wide receivers back.

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:01.439
<v Speaker 1>That's huge for that offense. And I actually do think

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that the urban Meyer thing matters, and I'll tell you why.

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Normally I wouldn't, but if you're listening to what those

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>players are saying, that ship is corrosive. They are not

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>feeling this, dude whatsoever. I actually don't think that all

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of their heads are in this game. So I'm taking Tennessee.

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's well far beyond this lapdown. He had him

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>hitting in O T A s which was illegal. He says,

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we made the cuts on COVID decasy. I mean, everything

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he's done has had a false ring to it, thank you.

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Was all that true in the first half against Cincinnati

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>when they should have been up seventeen nothing were they

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:37.760
<v Speaker 1>corrossedst They were corrossed by the fourth decision at the gone.

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where they lost the faith. They're still professionals, and

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they still want to play football. I mean, come on,

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't, I know, but look, there's obviously something to

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:48.919
<v Speaker 1>what you guys are saying. And I don't think urban

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Meyer is a good coach at all. But that's already

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the line. All right, We'll just play it out

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. What's your second pick? My second

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>one is on the New York Jets. What's the Jetropolitans?

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Spread right here? New York Jets are I have him

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>as plus three minus one plus three. I liked them

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>better at three and a half obviously when guessing lines came,

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'll stick to the plus three. I just don't

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.439
<v Speaker 1>believe the Atlanta Falcons. Certainly they shouldn't have had the hook.

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They shouldn't be a three and a half point favorite.

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a game is in London, by the way,

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:24.760
<v Speaker 1>over anybody, Um, I just you watched the Falcons play football.

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Maddie Ice just doesn't appear to have the the decision

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>making or the time to make the proper decisions whatever

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it is. Washington's defense wasn't really didn't really crush him,

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and he still had issues. There was, by the way,

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>there was a play where Chase Young got called for

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 1>a roughing that really could have made that game a

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>lot easier for Washington. H he got Yeah, he got

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>nailed for hands to the face. Washington had to win

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 1>it sort of dramatic fashion. But they can't stop anybody. Um,

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Jets coming off that win, are

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.800
<v Speaker 1>buoyed by it. I think you're giving me the points

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Jets again. I would love the three and

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a half more, but I'll take the three in London

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and be pretty happy about it. Fading the Falcons pause.

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know that you're getting three touchdowns

0:49:07.239 --> 0:49:09.879
<v Speaker 1>from Corduall anymore. And I think the Jets, if they're

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>if their defense and their and their defense has been

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 1>playing well, they'll key on who can beat them, and uh,

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Atlanta has multiple players that can. So

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Jets plus three, Rufus number two, number three,

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever we're on with Rufe, he'd be three for Rufus.

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I already gave. It's gonna be Todd your

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>second that your second was your second pick the Bengals

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are No, Yes, well I didn't think. I guess it

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>is he wanted a big stage. Yes, it has to

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be a second pick. Yeah, I don't have anything. I mean,

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't have anything better than that. Honestly, I show

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>very little value on the board this week's second us.

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>None of us do. But we're having a podcast anything,

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We're having a podcast. All right, Todd, what's number two. Now,

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>now you're supposed to talk Todd talk when you're supposed

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to go okay, So I'm putting Rufus down for Bengals.

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Plus three is his second pick. Um, My second pick

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be the Las Vegas Raid as I will

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>take the Las Vegas Raid as minus the five and

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. And the reason I want the Raid is,

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I love the fact that they lost

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>on on Monday night. And because now people will be like,

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>oh wait, maybe the Raiders aren't an't that good? This

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is really because the Bears aren't good on offense. Because

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bears went down and scored some points against the

0:50:33.920 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Lions doesn't mean anything to me, because I don't think

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the Lions can stop anyone. I think Field is gonna

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have trouble even if they bring in dal And I

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>don't care what they're doing. They're not good on offense,

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're certainly not good on offense. And allowed stadium,

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 1>even if there's only point seven of a home field advantage,

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that Las Vegas stadium is probably pretty wild and and

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and rowdy. And now you're gonna ask just justin Fields

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to go into a rowdy stadium and hang with the

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Raiders and the Bears. The Bears defense is not this

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>vaunted defense that it used to be. The Lions were

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>inside the ten yard line like literally a hundred times

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>when Gil and Mikey were both unfortunate as was I

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>had the over in the d game because the Lions

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 1>couldn't score inside the ten yard line against the Bears.

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>But the Bear they were moving the football. Don't tell

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>me the Raiders can't move the football against the Bears.

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they can move the football against the Bears.

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the Raiders are above average offense. I'm not

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>saying they're amazing, but they're above average offense, and I

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think they will move the ball against the Bears. And

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this is just gonna come down to the fact, I

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see how the Bears are gonna stay inside five

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half points because I don't think they can

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 1>score enough point. So if they get to seventeen and

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are twenty four, you still cover. Give me

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders minus five and a half Detroit last week,

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 1>just a Butcher's your point first in gold Down seven

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and nothing at the eight, premature shotgun staff hits golf

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Gonads Ricochet's over the offensive line and do

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to a bellow Nichols hands uh that goes down as

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a fumble by the center. Fourth and goal at the

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>five left in the second quarter, down fourteen and nothing.

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>They go for it, Jared, if there's a horrific pass

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to the out to the outside receiver. Third and goal

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Chicago three, three or nine left in the

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, strip sec and then at the end Teasers

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>blew it right because they they had a chance crushed

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>by getting a third down play within a yard of conversion.

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Same thing we talked about with the Bengals. They of

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 1>all things that could have happened. You don't want to

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, right, just kick the field goal. Teasers will win.

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Instead one yard short they go for it and they

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>blow it again, or he has to kick the field

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>goal there to make it at one position. I don't.

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Matt Naggy thing. All of a sudden,

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>he's told us up a five thousand times that Andy

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Dalton's gonna be the quarterback of his handy Dalton. Do

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you think Ryan Pace Finally like whispered in his ear,

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody somebody did playing. Somebody didn't had to be Maybe

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Virginia MCCASKI, who knows, maybe George Allison somebody did h

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:47.240
<v Speaker 1>rufus number three? If you have them, I guess who's

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>number two? Jesus Christ, Jesus, you know, I'm o you,

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I've got two Tennessee tighter of that sounds like me

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on the golf course with Jeff trying to figure out

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the handicap, like and what like, like what do I need?

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>What do I need to make here? Jeff? Jeff gets

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad at you. So Mike second k is officially

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee minus four and a half. That's correct, Okay, no problem,

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, number three. If I have to take a third,

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take Seattle then, oh all right, Seattle. Tonight's

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Seattle plus two and a half. His numbers say otherwise

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a teaser, like for make for sure? I think

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>most wait do we know? Is uh? What's what's bridgewater

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>situation in the concussion protocol? I don't know yet. I

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't decided yet. Yeah, yeah, I mean I might not

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like I'm assuming actually assuming that what goes? I mean,

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I like pittsburtty there, but but you know, I don't know.

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>If Bridgewater goes, it's no play. If i'd let me

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>see what's my number two points? Actually, I probably actually

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>know what. We're gonna take away Seattle. There we're gonna

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>say Pittsburgh. Sorry, We're gonna go to Pittsburgh because I

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>still think. I still think I like Pittsburgh. Even if

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Locke is the quarterback. What about if Rudolph is the quarterback?

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, what about if it's Rudolph Bridgewater. This

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is my head's about to explode because that's that was

0:54:07.600 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>how was minus one and a half before that. I'm

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:14.360
<v Speaker 1>taking Pittsburgh. It's my third, not Seattle. Seattle is probably

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna win, right. I take the Enzers against Drew lack

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in that because Drew Lawk stinks. But if it's Steady

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewaters don't want to go against that guy. That guy

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>don't make no mistakes in that, We're not gonna be

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 1>able to put the ball on the ends on So

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me, it's all about the Denver quarterback

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 1>in that. Thank you God, thank you. The rule is

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the rule. I'll take the Carolina Panthers and lay the

0:54:38.760 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>three points against these Eagles. I was gonna do that.

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't bet this. This Eagle's team refuses to run

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball at all. I don't see to your point

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about Brandon Steely and how you have to run the

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>ball just to get established the physicale. They don't. They

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:58.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely don't run the ball at all. Zero zero running

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the tips. I don't think Carolina play well in the

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 1>second half against that. Look at Dallas, gonna move the

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ball in anybody. They'll move the ball in the Saints.

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:06.879
<v Speaker 1>That's a good offensive team. They came back, they made

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that game competitive. I think Matt Rule is building a

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>good team in that spot in Carolina, and I think

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a bad spot for Philadelphia coming off the

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 1>home lass to have to go on the road here.

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought this line would be four, it's three. I'll

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lay it, okay, Mikey, Why is it coming down? That

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was almost my third pick was Carolina. Why is it

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>coming down? I don't know. I asked somebody in sports

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>media dot number three. My number third pick was gonna

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:32.359
<v Speaker 1>be Panthers. The only reason I'm not taking the Panther.

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely taking the Panthers in my circle millions, because

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to get five picks, you have to come up with something.

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm definitely taking the Panthers. There. But I just

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that scares me is it's it's a

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 1>one in three team against the three and one team

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and spreads. And I know in the NFL that's always

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous thing to do because they all revert to

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the mean, almost all of them. So that's why I'm

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna go with Panthers is my number three pick here.

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 1>But what I will take is my number three pick

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is the Ravens under forty six. And um the reason

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I like the Ravens under forty six is because, um wait,

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 1>who I have Ravens against Indiana Cults, right, Ravens under

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>forty six against the Colts. I I am not a

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>believer in the Colts. I don't believe the fact you

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can go down to Miami and beat a team that

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely no offense whatsoever means anything at all. I

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 1>am not a believer in the Colts. I still don't

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.840
<v Speaker 1>believe in Carson Wentz. And I think the Ravens defense

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is starting to come around. They really put the clamps

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:35.439
<v Speaker 1>on Denver last week. And I mean the other games

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:37.400
<v Speaker 1>where they didn't play as well defensively were against the

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs and against the Raiders. I gotta kind of throw

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>those out as those are above average offensive teams. I

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think Indianapolis is above average offensive team. And I

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna be one of those old school

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Ravens games where they run the ball a lot, play

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:53.839
<v Speaker 1>real good defense and win seven or something. So I'm

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna go under forty six and uh, I hope that

0:56:57.280 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I can get there in my third pid Alright, any

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.359
<v Speaker 1>square than I've already been. What's the New England line?

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:08.359
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots? Are I have him at night nine? Okay? Um,

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this was the other one on guessing lines. I'll just

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>go with my guessing lines instincts. I listen, I'm not

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>like Chris Collinsworth and now Michael's ready to like put

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones in the Hall of Fame. That was a

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>little ridiculous on Sunday night. But this Houston team, as

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>long as Davis Mills is the quarterback, and he will

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be the quarterback this week. Still no Trod Taylor yet.

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>This Houston team might be one of the worst teams

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we've ever seen in modern history. They are really bereft

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of any talent, with the exception of Brandon Cooks New England.

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bill Belichick versus David Culley. It's a whole

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of points to give away on the road. But

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't like anything else better. So

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking New England minus the nine and hoping that

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick will figure out a way to blow this

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>team out. Are you gonna use New England and survivor? Girl,

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about it. The problem is they have two

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen. Now, there covid situation. I don't even think

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Texans are the worst defense in football? Really, who

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think the worst defenses? And then Jacksonville and

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Texans aren't that bad on defense. They're bad on

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>offense right exactly, They're just like abysmal unoffensive right now?

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>That is what I was referring. Now, how about you, Todd,

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do? You gonna use Minnesota this week? Well?

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I started like looking at the next couple of weeks,

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, I mean, I'd like to use the I'd

0:58:27.080 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like to use the Cowboys really to be honest, but

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't use the Cowboys because I need them for Thanksgiving.

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to use the Cowboys. And I

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to use Tampa Bay here against Miami because

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I need Tampa Bay for later as well. So it

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 1>really comes down to Minnesota against the Lions, which scares

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>me because I hate betting on Kirk Cousins and and

0:58:46.200 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Panthers. I mean, I don't know. There's a

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of options this week and none making feel good

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>A great I know you have confidence in yeah, okay,

0:58:54.080 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you do now? To Casey and the Browns

0:58:57.640 --> 0:59:00.400
<v Speaker 1>up to eight? I think this is gonna be a

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tremendous game and we'll see really where both teams are.

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>This Brown's defense is nasty. I said, you know, Mac

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown and I both like this as our top play

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>last week. I saw his second play. I said, Cousins

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:13.080
<v Speaker 1>had never faced this kind of pressure. After the first drive,

0:59:13.120 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they never got in the red zone. Again. That Minnesota offense,

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield didn't do anything, not paint enough, zero, couldn't

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.439
<v Speaker 1>hit anybody, couldn't hit anybody running open anywhere. You said

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you got a torn labor in his non throwing shoulder.

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 1>They say no. I was like, we're using that as

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:26.960
<v Speaker 1>an excuse. I'll take the Browns up to eight and

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys down to one. Todd, That's what I'm doing.

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the same one I'm doing, Rufus. I'm doing

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 1>because I don't see I don't see the Cowboys losing

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants. The Cowboys have a have a nice

0:59:37.000 --> 0:59:40.160
<v Speaker 1>looking offense. I mean, this is becoming a juggernaut offense.

0:59:40.240 --> 0:59:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And I just don't see the Giants, you know, hanging

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Also, the Giants kind of they shot

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>their load last week with their ridiculous winner down with

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half minutes to go, and somehow they

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 1>win that game. I don't even know how they won

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the game. But I'll take Browns plus eight. I think

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the Browns will hang with the Chargers and Cowboys. If

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you're in a draft, King's juristiction or anybody. NFL comeback

1:00:00.760 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year Dak Prescott is only in quotes

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:07.479
<v Speaker 1>minus one. You almost have to bet that for whatever

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll let you bet. Who's the second choice? Joe Burrow?

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>What's he coming back from? And in five games they

1:00:13.360 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>don't give comeback Player of the Year for five games.

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like a it's like a lifetime achievement thing. Rufus,

1:00:19.040 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you're too I'm gonna tease the Browns and then with

1:00:23.360 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Seattle as the Pilots. I'm gonna tease the uh the

1:00:28.440 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Browns with the New England Patriots down against Houston Brown's

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Patriots for me Seattle plus Seattle plus eight and a

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>half in Browns plus eight for Rufus and you are gilt.

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Who do you have? Gil Oh? We have nine on

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots down to three. I'll still do it. So

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going Pats Pats minus three. And what was the

1:00:46.640 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>other one? Brown's Browns plus eight? No, Stanford Loong. Well

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they're on the road anyway, so it would have been

1:00:53.240 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wong ish um. Okay, So final two questions, big favorite,

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:01.919
<v Speaker 1>most likely to who's out right? My computer just went down,

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so Bucks, you can read them out for Bucks minus

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ten over the Dolphins, Vikings minus nine over the Lions,

1:01:09.120 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Patriots minus nine over the Texans, Cowboys minus seven over

1:01:14.800 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, Ravens minus seven over the Colts, seen eight

1:01:18.920 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half on the Patriots. Hair. First of all,

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you gotta cut that out because I'm looking here at

1:01:26.600 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the board. It's not just Circus Circus not the only casino.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And I made the goddamn rules on this podcast, Todd,

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're doing. Jesus mother. I mean,

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>unless we're gonna be talking about incarnate word tomorrow plus

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the true dads. All right, So who's the most likely

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to lose outright? Of those rufus Vikings Vikings, Vikings. I

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think that the Lions offense did move the ball, as

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you all said, and then weird things happened to the

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>ball hitting off Dolf shoulders. That was that was weird.

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>That was weird. That was the weirdest thing. That was

1:01:57.760 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a weird way. Um yeah, I think, yeah, visional matchup,

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not as much on bit advantage, etcetera, etcetera. I agree

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they can, they can and take the Vikings, So I

1:02:09.920 --> 1:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>can't answer the Vikings is the most likely to lose.

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go against you, Jo and say the Patriots,

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you've got an offensive lineman out a

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback. I just think it offensive. I think is

1:02:22.800 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>big because it's to your point, none of these picks

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>make you feel calmed of them feel good, Todd. You

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm with you, Mikey. I don't trust the Pats.

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>There's just too many passes the Hunter Henry for six yards.

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go eight hundred players to get down the field.

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean not Mac mac Jones. You know, come on, man,

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not that great. And the answer is clearly the

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings, clearly because I can see Jared Golf doing

1:02:48.840 --> 1:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden that that offense is feisty enough

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on Detroit. They shouldn't have lost that game last week. Oh,

1:02:55.200 --> 1:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I hate Kirk Cousins. I'm with you. I hate Kirk

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>just I want to I want to shot of you

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with a Minnesota survivor play when Kirk Cousins is jacking

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it up for you, I'm probably gonna need a sixty

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>six yard field goal on the last play of the

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>game to beat the Lions again. Okay, last question, because Mike,

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:14.479
<v Speaker 1>he's got a run bizarro world. You must pick a side.

1:03:14.520 --> 1:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You must bet a side in every single one of

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>these games, except for one one that you're like, you

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'll bet these fifteen but this one, man,

1:03:24.040 --> 1:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>forget it. I'm not betting it with your money. What

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is that game? Rufus Tennessee, Jacksonville, Tennessee, Jacksonville Chief, hear

1:03:31.920 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>your opinions, heard, you know, everybody's opinion here on the

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Urban Meyer situation. I don't know. He's right, Yeah, We

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know either, chief spills, chief spills, rufus, rufus. You

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the urban Mier. But do you have

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a definitive answer on whether it was a half or

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a full lap dance? Oh? Three quarters, Mike, Yeah, I'm

1:03:52.360 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with you. Chiefs Bills, Chiefs Bills, any outcomes possible. Yeah,

1:03:56.640 --> 1:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't even teach the Bills update. And because they

1:03:58.640 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>could get blown out in this game as well as

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they can win it, Todd, game you want to part them?

1:04:03.120 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to pick the Packers Bengals game

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think the Bengals are feisty, and I don't

1:04:09.280 --> 1:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>know the Packers either. You know that Aaron Rodgers every

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like once in a while, he just throws a duty

1:04:14.880 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in there, you know, like against the New Orleans Saints.

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't really try or something. You never know what

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>those Packers, I don't trust them. We're getting to the

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>point in the NFL where that question should be rephrased

1:04:24.640 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the only game you want a part of? Yeah, but

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a podcast. If you could erase fifteen of

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>these but only play one, which Todd before we go, Todd,

1:04:34.320 --> 1:04:37.439
<v Speaker 1>It's we're beginning to baseball playoffs in mass today after

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the two wild card games. Do you have an opinion

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on either league or World Series champion? Well, I I've

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>been horrendous in baseball this year, so don't listen to me.

1:04:49.040 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But I guess if I had to say, like a

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>sleeper pick, maybe I maybe think about the Braves as

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a sleeper pick, just because some of their starters are

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>not bad. They do hit the ball, and nobody's really

1:05:01.160 --> 1:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>given him any credits, so you probably get a decent price. Um,

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know. I have a ticket free

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>ticket that I got on from DraftKings on on Baseball Champion,

1:05:10.960 --> 1:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and I took Houston plus twenty one, so I'll be

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>rooting for Houston. You, Mikey, I think it's so wide

1:05:16.320 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>open this year. I don't know what to make of anything. Definitively,

1:05:19.480 --> 1:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I got Giants and Rays meeting in the World Series.

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the Rays are the best team. Does that

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>mean they'll get there? I don't know. What do you

1:05:26.920 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>think about Larus's decision to start Lynn off an injury. Yeah,

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have started Ron, but I mean to go righty, lefty, righty.

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I played the Astros today, but I

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you really any concern about the Giants not

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>having a bunch of real top line starters. Does that

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>concern you, I'll tell you why, because that's that has

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>always been the thing, right with baseball playoffs. Hey, the

1:05:48.600 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Giants in this particular case aren't built like the Brewers

1:05:51.640 --> 1:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and say the Dodgers are with front line starting. But really,

1:05:54.800 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if you think about what has won for baseball teams

1:05:57.280 --> 1:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in recent history, and I'm talking about like the last

1:05:59.800 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two three years, it's just having a whole bunch of

1:06:02.520 --> 1:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>great pictures and mixing and matching. Whether it was the

1:06:05.960 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Royals when they did the seven eight nine thing. The

1:06:08.200 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Rays are the greatest example this, the Rays that figured

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out they've sort of hacked baseball with this. They get

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't need those three guys. Everyone's like, how

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>amazing is this? They lost Morton, they lost uh Glass

1:06:19.480 --> 1:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>now to the Tommy John two and snow and the

1:06:22.440 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Rays have figured out that's not what That's not the

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>only way to win at baseball. And so I don't

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think I think the Giants have lots of really good pictures,

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are underestimating them, even in the postseason.

1:06:33.360 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, and americanly, only the White Sox, if healthy,

1:06:37.480 --> 1:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have a great starting rotation. All the teams are mixed

1:06:40.240 --> 1:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and match type of deal in the man and then

1:06:42.560 --> 1:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>actually gets much different because you have the Dodgers and

1:06:44.760 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the and the Brewers. Literally, though, you're right, any one

1:06:48.080 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of these anyone could. I would not be surprised if

1:06:50.280 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>any one of these teams won the World Series? Should

1:06:52.720 --> 1:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be fun, rufus. Any thoughts on baseball? You you've retired

1:06:56.240 --> 1:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>from the baseball games, rufus? Do do? College used to

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>control our lives? I did? They all not talked about

1:07:04.200 --> 1:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this at breakfast yet? Yeah, I used to control our

1:07:06.240 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>lives like it's I took the year off during the pandemic,

1:07:08.880 --> 1:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and I've just realized how I didn't miss it at all,

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and I have enough going like I I My problem

1:07:14.400 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is not having time to fill. I used to sit

1:07:17.600 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at the hard Rock Mikey watching baseball, and I used

1:07:20.120 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to question my existence on there if I'm like, why

1:07:22.000 --> 1:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I am? How am I gonna care about this? On

1:07:24.560 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>my deathbed, I spent so much time handicapping and watching baseball.

1:07:28.600 --> 1:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, no, I can't do this anymore. Rufus,

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>how come you don't do college basketball, there's some unbelievable opportunities.

1:07:35.560 --> 1:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you not like college matter? Are you busy with

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>something else? I just have enough? Like you can't do everything? Well,

1:07:40.520 --> 1:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. Yes, you know, my golf is what

1:07:43.440 --> 1:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I make most of my money on, and that's you know,

1:07:47.760 --> 1:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I have unabated. I have some other stuff going on too.

1:07:50.240 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just not enough hours in a day.

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That sounds for me in mental bandwidth. It's how it

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is for me with tennis and doing all the shows

1:07:57.320 --> 1:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I do. I just I can't like people like, oh,

1:07:59.760 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you're sucking at football. Hey man, something had to go.

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, everyone's sucking. Everyone's gonna suck at football,

1:08:06.480 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>even if they're great. As as Roxy Roxborough said to

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>me at Piero's years ago, Gil no one wins at

1:08:14.440 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the NFL long term, No one never forget. I would

1:08:18.320 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 1>say the end game is not true though yeah this

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is before acast though not true. In a podcast, that's

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>right for rufus people. Thank you, Rufus, appreciate it. Man

1:08:27.080 --> 1:08:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Double Duty from yesterday, Todd Wished Ever from his mom's

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>cork addic in Pittsburgh. Pia and Mike Palm, co host

1:08:32.680 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of odds on with a mall show at Visa and

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of course Derrick Stephen's Conciliary and Tim Lawson for hanging

1:08:38.160 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>out on the back. Thank you for listening to the megapod.

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with your week five picks in the Nation

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Football League.