WEBVTT - Why Stablecoins Matter for Banks and the Dollar

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Stable coins. You've probably heard about them, you may not

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>know what they are, and you should. In June, US

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress passed the Genius Act, creating a regulatory system for

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>these digital assets. And here in Hong Kong, very recently,

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the city began the process of issuing licenses to stable

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>coin companies. These are big steps towards legitimizing the asset

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the global financial system.

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Total circulation of stable coins is also booming. The two

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>largest plays in the market, Circle and Tether, now hold

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>over two hundred and seventy billion dollars in US treasuries.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 2>That's more than what sovereign countries like South Korea, Saudi

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Arabia and Germany hold, and this could have profound implications

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>for interest rates and currencies.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm Kaetidmitriva

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm John Lee, also in Hong Kong. Today we have

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the industry leaders in this space. He is

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yatsu founder of Animoker Brands, a digital assets conglomerate based

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>in Hong Kong with one point eight billion dollars in assets. Yeah,

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the show.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a great pleasure to be here now. Yet there's

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sophisticated crypto investors. There's obviously bitcoin bros.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But for crypto luotites like myself and me, can you

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>explain what exactly is a stable coin?

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Right? Maybe before we even go to what is a

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>stable coin, I think it's important to think about what

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>does tokenization do and what is tokenization. When you tokenize

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>an asset, any asset on chain, what you're really doing

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 3>is you're giving it the qualities of togonization, which is

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 3>enhancing its network effect, and that actually brought about an

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>entirely new industry. Whether this is a stable coin which

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>is essentially expanding the network of the value of the

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>dollar in this case, the sort of a stable coin

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>in itself, or if it's something like a pure network

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 3>asset like bitcoin or ethereum. These are assets that don't

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 3>have necessary something underlying it, but are held up by

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the power of the community and the network effects inherent

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and the builders and developers on top of it. So

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 3>it's really a way for the first time to own

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>a network asset that wasn't really possible for And so

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>what a stable coin is is the marrying of essentially

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 3>the real word asset of the dollar or any currency

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>around the world with that of tokenization, which then essentially

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 3>brings it both the speed and distribution of the Internet.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>And if you think about what the Internet did for information,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>basically stable coins and tokenization is now doing that for

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 3>money and value. And that's why you see this massive expansion.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>The growth that you've seen in stable coins is really

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>what you see when you put something on the Internet,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 3>which is essentially global scale, reach, distribution, and everything else

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that comes with that.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And before we get into how it actually functions and

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>how it's you know, different from a bitcoin, for example,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>where did it come from? Because I feel like just

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in recent months you're suddenly hearing about the US Genius

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Act Hong Kong issuring what's kind of the history of

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>stable coin?

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, stable coins have been around for a while,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 3>and you know, companies like Tether and Circle thereafter, and

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 3>there's actually many other companies there as well, whether it's

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>like you know, for instance, companies like pack Sauce, they

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 3>actually provide services to enable other people to launch their

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>own stable coids, and in principle what they're doing is

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>is they're basically saying I'm buying something that underpins the

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 3>value of the dollar and keeping it stable with a

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>basket of assets and in the case of something like

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>circle treasury bills or maybe just you know, in the

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>case of sort of what the HKMA is mandating it

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>has to be in the currency, so on hundred dollars.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>But also some people have, especially in the early days when

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 3>there was no regulation in no clarity around it, have

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 3>basically put other assets in them, and so controversially in

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the early days, and the reason why teather has had

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 3>a controversial past, according to some is because some of

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 3>those assets consisted of bitcoin. So what they would say is, hey,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 3>we have x amount of bitcoin, and then essentially we

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 3>would mint a certain amount of dollars based on the

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>value of bitcoin which we had in the reserve, and

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the reserve asset essentially creates that way in which we

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of represent the dollars. So if you have a

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred million dollars worth of bitcoin, then I can

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>basically mint on a hundred million dollars worth of dogs,

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>and if the bitcoin goes down, I have to basically

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>buy more. If it goes up, then maybe you so

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>well you can basically create kind of a stable reserve balance.

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 3>This is of course much less controversial when you do

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 3>it with cash or with treasury bills because there's a

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>clear value denomination, But when you start mixing it with

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>digital assets in the past, that was more controversial. Tether

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>has definitely moved further away from that, but in its

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 3>early days it was essentially pegging against that, and it

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>was also an era of sort of experimentation as well.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 3>People were sort of seeing these kind of interesting new

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 3>financial constructs and say, okay, this could be a stable coin.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 3>This is how we do this, And when bitcoin didn't

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>have the legitimacy the head today, using that as an

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 3>underlying asset, it would have been controversial, but that was

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>really the history, and the history was also around how

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 3>do I onboard people into the digital assets world? You know,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>now we talk about it in terms of crypto or

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>with three for instance, and if I tell someone, you

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>know what, you can enter this world by converting your

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>one thousand dollars into one thousand digital dollars. It's a

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 3>much easier way to onboard someone and then they can

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 3>start buying other tokens and on, and really the biggest

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 3>use case for stable coins has been trading and purchasing

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and activities that are on chain or in exchanges, so

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 3>all of the decentralized exchanges where people can trade, all conferences,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the stable coins have a big use case, and of

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>course it's used for remittisances and everything else like that

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Asia Centric is produced by Bloomberg Intelligence, where more than

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 2>five hundred experienced analysts and strategists work around the clock

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>to bring you timely, world class research. Our coverage spans

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>two hundred market industries, currencies, commodities, and industries, as well

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 2>as over two thousand equities and credits. To learn more

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 2>about Bloomberg Intelligence, visit bi go on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>If you like what you're hear, don't forget to subscribe

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 2>and share. I wanted to talk about the recent US

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 2>legislation in particular, you know, the Genius Act. Can you

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>explain why this is so important?

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, is particularly important because when you consider what the

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 3>US stance was on crypto generally including stable coins, up

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 3>until the Trumpe administration, it was quite hostile. So to

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 3>see essentially the US go from very negative to the

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>industry to incredily positive to pass legislation on the stable

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 3>coin is a massive legitimization of the market. And you

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>can see this already not just an impact on prices,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 3>but also people want to build and develop on that.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's one way to look at it just macro

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 3>what it means. But the other thing is that this

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>administration certainly believes, which is maybe diferent what the previous

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>administration believe, that stable coins is a way for the

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>US to continue its dollar hegemony through stable coins. Now,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>when you consider where these stable coins are being used,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>they're used all over the world, but they're growing tremendously

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 3>in places like Nigeria, South America, Southeast Asia, places that

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 3>really couldn't be dollarized in a classical sense because you

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 3>couldn't even have a bank account, and now with a cryptoallet,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I can now have digital dollars, and dollars has always

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>been desired in these markets, that's just no way of

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 3>reaching it. So you could say that in a way,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>they've been assimilated to the dollar at a young age.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>And so therefore, if you talk about these rising nations,

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>which are mostly young populations like prinstance, Mina, Africa, South America,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they're also essentially growing up to the dollar, and that's

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>basically a way which you can create that influence, which

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>is also the reason why other markets are in the

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 3>world are looking at this and say, okay, how do

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>we either counter or deal with that sort of circumstance,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>because that's something that you can really control. Also, the

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>governments themselves have no oversight of it in a classical sense,

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>So if you're a bank, you have to be banked

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>first in order to receive any currency, and the bank

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>itself might restrict you from being able to exchange money

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 3>or maybe to buy dollars. But with a stable coin,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>basically the internet is all you need and wallet and

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>someone or across the world can send it to you

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 3>and you can transact with it, which basically means that

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the digital dollars that were in the form of stable

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>coin becomes the way in which you transact in many

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>of these economies, effectively dollarizing these economies even more. And

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 3>that's actually one of the key areas around why it's

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 3>important for the US because of course a big part

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 3>of the US business model is around essentially using the dollar, right,

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and it's exactly it's a reserve currency of the world.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>How do you make sure that it's the reserve currency

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 3>of the world. You know, basically you sort of enter

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the internet and make it the native currency. And so

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>that's a strategy white so important to the US. And

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 3>what is also interesting is that because of the Genius Act,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>banks before were not allowed to enter into that space.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>So expect that every major bank, maybe even smaller banks,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>are all going to start issuing their own stable coins.

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you even talk about companies like Walmart and

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Amazon and possibly Google and Apple, all of them who

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>have so much dollars in their treasuries, Well, they could

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>issue a stable coin now, and they could basically use

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 3>it for their own commerce and receive transaction fees or

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 3>use them in different forms of commerce. And it also

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 3>enables money to move faster from place to place and

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 3>also brings you more loyalty to the customer because they're

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 3>now attached to your currency as it.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, but wouldn't this cannibalize the business model of banks,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Like that's how they make a lot of money, you know,

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>retail customers they send their money through the swift system,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 2>usually takes like two to three days, sometimes business days,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and they always give you a bad effects, right, but

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>they make big margins. But now if you could do

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>this like seamelessly, wouldn't it be bad The margins would

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 2>be smaller.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, anytime when there's an innovation and

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 3>a change, it necessaries a change in the business model

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 3>and also requires people to become more efficient and more competitive.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Frankly speaking, so I think it's high time, just generally,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>that the industry move away from something like swift and

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>move on to some area where the value doesn't simply

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 3>come from a transaction fee. I mean, just think about.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, what we used to pay for a phone call.

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 3>It's expensive, and what happened when we reduced the call

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 3>or the phone call to something that was essentially deminimus

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the cost. The value basically didn't come

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 3>in terms of making the call. The value came on

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the speed of the connection that we had and the

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>ability for us to conduct business faster and have more interactions.

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I can always reach you all the time. And what happened.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Networks grew faster, business grew faster, Expansions happened because transactions

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 3>were cheaper, faster, better, And that's basically what we have

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>with blockchain. So to me, this is Actually they're positive

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>for society because I'm not able to transfer money across

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the world cheaper, better, faster. I mean, think about all

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 3>the extraction that happens for people who are unbanked, right,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's so so much value that goes away.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Is it isn't it better that instead of paying really

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>large type of transaction fees where it's not just about

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the swift transfer, but about the middleman who basically is

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 3>able to gouge you sometimes ten twenty percent on the transaction,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 3>that it now goes with nine nine percent of their

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 3>value to the actual end user, and then in their

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 3>local communities they get to spend it in local economies.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Now what does it mean though for the banks, Well,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 3>it means that banks are going to be changing the

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>business models around acquiring te bills or maybe looking at

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 3>ways and incentivizing customers to deposit their stable coins that

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 3>they would then generate active yield on, you know, in

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the same way that you would do term deposits for example. Right,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 3>So there's still ways in which you would make money.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the bank is gone because they would

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 3>still have their trading strategies and their yield generitorise they

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 3>just have to be more competitive and ultimately also more transparent,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 3>which I think is just better for the consumer.

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And how much of this relies on the US dollar

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>as the reserve currency relies on US exceptionalism.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very critical at this small one in time,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 3>because the US is the reserve currency of the world.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 3>It is basically the standard. Without the US dollar, the

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 3>legitimacy and the ability to reach the world wouldn't be there.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Because it's not just about, you know, the fact that

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the US is behind it and supporting it. It's also

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the communities around the world desired it.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in basically still when we had an

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>East and West Europe, and I remember my mom used

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to work at the eastern side of Berlin, and so

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>when you cross that border, the dollar was the most

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 3>desired thing. It's like the whole black market around basically

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 3>trading either Deutsch MARKO dollar back in the day. And

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that had to do with because it was stability, it

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>could be used as global trade and that sort of

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>image persists. So the dollar is the desired asset. Also

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>from a branding standpoint, I mean, it's not only about

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the utility, it's also Hollywood, it's movies. It's all that

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff, right, you grow up to like, you know,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 3>whether you do a business deal in the media, you

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>talk about it in dollars, you don't talk about it

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 3>in other current and right, so that all of that

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of matters. And I would say now as a

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>result of that, for deck to get that digital adoption,

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>if it's in the dollar, it just has a much

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>more legitimate framing, and especially if it's now licensable through

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>the Genius Act or maybe also what Hungko was doing

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 3>with their stable coin, it just makes it that much

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 3>more safer and accessible.

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But does that world still exist because we are seeing

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>cracks in it? You know, with President Trump tariffs, shifts

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in global trade policy. There was I think it started

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months ago, but this idea that US

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>exceptionalism might not be so solid going forward, those.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>This D dollarization trend.

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So is there a D dollarization trend? There is a

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 3>D dollarization trend only I think primarily because a dollar

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 3>has been so weaponized in a way. But I would

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 3>say there's a difference between a dollar stable coin and

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 3>the CBDC. So what the industry and especially the Republican

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 3>party was railing so much against was the CBDC. The

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 3>reason why the CBDC is such a negative construct, because

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 3>in some ways they're both digital, is that one the

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 3>government has full control over your money, like they can

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 3>literally take it out of your account right and that

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 3>type of control means is never your money and you

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 3>don't have the freedom to transact because they can also

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>side where the stable coin technically speaking, it's in your wallet,

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the issuer isn't, you know, they have to comply, but

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 3>they're not actually issued by the government per se, and

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 3>it's not controlled by a single entity. They can just

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 3>basically delete your money as it were, takes stuff away

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 3>from you. So I think the construct over it as

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 3>a stable coin, actually I think will reverse that tread

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 3>because now you have the safety and the assumed security

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 3>of owning your assets, which is also the argument where

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 3>people were so into bitcoin, because there's an asset that

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 3>I have self custody over that I control versus I

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 3>put it in the bank. So you know, putting in

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>the bank, the bank can lock you out. You can

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 3>be debanked or unbanked. And then and they're using it

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 3>as well. In some cases you've heard some of these

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>stories and as a result you are excluded from the

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 3>financial world, but all the assets that you have in

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>there you lose as well. Here you have an element

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>in which you can scale self custody. So this is

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>also an important point because you know, in the older generations,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't that on typical to have a lot of cash,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe in your back pocket or like in Japan, underneath

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 3>your bed, you know, that type of stuff. That is

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 3>something which wasn't feasible or practical anymore. But in the

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 3>digital construct you could actually have your money yourself or

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 3>a certain amount and have the freedom around that. So

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a way in the combat sort of

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>this dedoorganization. Having said that, I think US exceptionalism is unique.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>And I know there's some proponents who are like saying, Okay, well,

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>the US is kind of done for and you know,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 3>all that type of stuff. I don't believe that. The

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 3>reason why I don't believe that is because the US

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 3>has probably the only country in the world where it

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>can have this amazing amount of creative destruction. Right It's

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the place where you can blow things up, and somehow

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>it still works because as a culture it celebrates that

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's because it focuses so much on the individual

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 3>versus in other places it's much more focused on the collective,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 3>for instance, diverging a little bit. China's sort of reach

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 3>in AI for instance and other technologies would not be,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 3>in my view, as advanced if it wasn't for the US,

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 3>because it's something to comput against. So the US pushes

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 3>a boundary because they have that exceptionalism, this innovation, and

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>then China reacts to it as its ability to create

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and produce and innovate as well. But if it wasn't

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>for the US, I think China would nearly be as

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 3>competitive or maybe as advanced because it doesn't have to.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's basically the difference between I would say that two,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>both of them being incredibly ingenious in their work. But

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that you need that exceptionalist I think the

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 3>world needs that exceptionalism, and the dollar represents that in

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a way.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>On that point, is there a world in which there's

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a stable coin that's actually backed by Chinese currency, by

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the yuan?

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think there's a lot of question. No,

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>So it's not a dumb question. There's a lot of

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 3>speculation around that. I would say at this moment in time,

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of discussion and people are saying it's possible.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 3>But of course, you know, we for instance, with our

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 3>joint meentor with standard Charter and HKT anchor point. You know,

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 3>we recently submitted our application to have a license here

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 3>from the HKMA to a launch a hundred dollar based

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>table coin. And the difference about the HKMA license is

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>that it does have the ability to do it with

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>different basic currencies. So is it possible it is? Is

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>it in the works? No? Right, I mean, that's obviously

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>something that is being investigated, is being observed. But for

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>sure China is looking at Hong Kong as the test

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 3>bed for that as it always has been, right, Hong

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Kong has always been sort of the experimental financial sandbox

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 3>for what happens in and out of China to learn from.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>And clearly, and this has been already publicly said by

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese government, they are also observing and reacting to

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 3>what the US is doing with the Genius Act and

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>stable coins and blockchain technology because they realize that, you know,

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>neither country wants to be behind in any form of

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>any shape of anything related to technology. It doesn't matter

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>whether there's robotics, whether there's AI, whether it's you know,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 3>compute or where there's blockchain.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about Hong Kong. So, Hong Kong, you

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>know stable coins, the regulations passed on the first of August.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, actually ahead of the US.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Interesting enough, Okay, so Hong Kong's really here, So tell

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>us what's the aims of the Hong Kong government with

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>this new regulation?

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, first, what is Hong Kong. Kong is

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe one of the leading financial centers in the world,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 3>certainly in Asia, if not in the world, you know,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 3>top three, top five, So you have to stay relevant

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 3>in that and how do you stay relevant. You've got

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 3>to go where the future is going. And Hong Kong

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 3>has made it very clear that the future is digital,

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>so that means you have to embrace blockchain technology and

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>digital assets. When you look at the demographics, and especially

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 3>younger demographics in places like South Korea or Turkey or

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, places in the Mid East, it's something like

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 3>sixty to seventy percent of people under the age of

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>thirty in some of these places exclusively old crypto. So

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 3>they don't buy stocks, they only owly tokens. You know

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>they're going to get older, and they don't just suddenly

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>switch and say, oh, you know, I should buy some stocks.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 3>They keep buying crypto, So you have to be ready

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 3>for that market. You can't just say, you know, things

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that used to work ten years ago or twenty years

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 3>ago are the same, which is true for everything. I mean,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 3>change is the only content, sort of famous proverb. So

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 3>I think here Hong Kong recognizes this, but I think

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>there was sso a few catalysts. If you think about

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 3>what happened in Hong Kong before, you know, with the

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>disruptions with protests with COVID, Hong Kong also lost a

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of its financial luster. People left Hong Kong, went

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 3>to Singapore, went to Dubai, went all over the world.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 3>So Hong Kong wants to sort of reclaim that crown

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that is rightfully hers as it were, and digital assets

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 3>is one way to do that. But I think it's

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 3>also around how do you engage the next generation in

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>this area of financial inclusion, because that's a big topic

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>as well, which is that people who understand the stock

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 3>market and understand traditional forms of finance, they're in their

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>particular world but most people don't actually understand finances as all.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 3>They're not financially literate. Hong Kong is a little bit

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of an exception because most people here understand and grow

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>up in money. But think about the rest of the world.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in Europe and we don't talk about

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 3>money at all. And how do you include more people

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>into the space? And again, digital money, digital assets. Tokenization

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 3>democratizes access and also educates people about it because it's

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>now accessible. Think about how inaccessible it is for a

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 3>first person to enter the financial world. It's not a

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 3>bank acout. He has been able by shares, he has

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>a stand about money, He needs to pass certain kind

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 3>of you know, like tests and queries. He has no

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 3>way of experimenting and playing around with it, which basically

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 3>tokenization makes it much easier to do. So it's part

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 3>of that as well. But that's why it's so important

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>for Hong Kong to stay relevant in a financial future

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that is digital. You have to embrace blockchain and neoge assets.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned that China is using Hong Kong as

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 2>almost like a test case. Now for China, could stable

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>coins be used as a means to get away from

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the Swift system.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 3>So first of all, stable coins in general China accepted

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 3>will generally, I think replace Swift And that just makes

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>sense because you know, like take a place like Africa.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 3>So I was just in a meeting with people from

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 3>government and pri certain businesses, and the cross border transaction

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 3>that happens in Africa between their countries basically transactor through

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Swift go to America, and so they paid billions of

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>dollars in transaction fees just to do business with each other.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Stable coin just does as a fraction of a cost,

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 3>and you can still have it with the safety and

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 3>security of knowing that it's a dollar or whatever currency

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 3>that would be. So that value then essentially flows directly

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 3>into the economies that they're building, and so it just

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>makes a lot more sense. Now. What it also means

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 3>for global trade is it makes it much more fluid

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 3>and much more transactable because now I can just do

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 3>it very quickly as opposed to having to deal with

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 3>a bank. Just think about how much money through a

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 3>wire transfer is stuck inside a bank somewhere that even

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 3>one day, but on average sometimes three to five days

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 3>in some cases. People will tell you stories of we

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 3>send a wire transfer, and two weeks later, I'm still

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 3>waiting for it. Well, that's maybe a bit of an exception.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 3>The promise is that that period of time is essentially

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>opportunity lost. And maybe thirty or forty years ago, when

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 3>the world was a little slower, it didn't matter, like

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 3>it's okay if the money arrives a week later, but today,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 3>one day. I mean to think about you being a

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 3>trader or you forge, that opportunity cost is tremendous, right,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not just a matter of it let the money

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 3>come in. Maybe in the laborer construct it's okay, but

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 3>in a capital construct literally seconds can matter, right or

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 3>minutes or certainly hours then, let alone days. So that

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 3>means from a transaction standpoint, it's not just reducing fees,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 3>it's the value of I get the money right away,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>and I can deploy it right away, and I can

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 3>do something with it right away. That is really important.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, ask anyone who sort of trades and assets

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 3>of all sorts the opportunity costs related to that. It

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 3>does disrupt things like credit and lending that will have

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 3>to change as well, but it just has to requires

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 3>them to be more innovative and also offer more value.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 3>As a result of.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>That, the US government has in a way weaponized the

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Swift system. Now they seized Russian assets during the onset

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Russia Ukraine War because they relied on these

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>transfers via Swift. In this tokenized like stable coins world,

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 2>would countries be able to get away from potential US sanctions.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>So first of all, you can really get away from

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 3>sanctions because of the on and off ramp. Even though

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 3>you could own the crypto, if you want to do

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 3>off rampet in the US for dollars, you can trace it.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 3>So if this is tainted money or tainted crypto, you

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 3>would be able to see it because the blockchain tracks everything.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 3>So if someone were to send you money from Russia,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 3>it could be in the form of a bitcoin. Theoretically,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 3>if they're sophisticated enough, which is not very difficult, they

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 3>could say, hey, wait a second, this was send from

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 3>a wallet that comes from a Russian bank or something.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 3>They could basically technically block that, and it's up to

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the basically on and off ramps to do that. So

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 3>it's not the blockchain that does that, it's just basically

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 3>on and off ramps. So it means that the asset

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.479
<v Speaker 3>itself is yours, but for you to utilize it in

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the way you wanted to, there might be some restrictions.

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>And one would argue that's one of the reasons why,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, Russia, for instance, their banks have essentially legalized

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 3>crypto for that reason. But I would also counter this

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>thought as well in terms of sure, the US has sanctioned,

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, using swift, but how effective has it really

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 3>been in the sense that it hasn't really crippled the

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Russian economy. Things seem to be going okay for the

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 3>most part. They're still able to deploy weapons and putin sales,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 3>seems to be able to say the things he wants

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>to say. Generally speaking, I think the age of the

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>sanctions as we see only work when the world is

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>unified in their direction, which they're not so, meaning that

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 3>you've got different alliances around the world. It's no longer

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>a US centric world in the traditional sense of if

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 3>the US wants to Dissuay, everyone follows, because US also

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 3>had a lot of good will which they've lost over time.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, when you look at the alliances. I mean,

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 3>India is a US ally, but they also do business

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 3>with Russia. And China, like, there's many pathways around. So

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the issue of swift is only something

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 3>related to what's happening in the US. It's also the

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 3>alliances that you need to have with different countries around that,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think stable coins and crypto are just visualizing

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 3>what's already happening in the world today. Again, I would

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 3>argue that actually that becomes a more powerful way for

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 3>them to continue that influence, because you know, if you

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 3>want to have influence in a place like Russia and

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 3>they're using stable coins, actually having the Russian economy become

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 3>more dollarized, I would argue, is much more soft power

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 3>and maybe even hard power for America than just be

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 3>able to sort of turn on and off of the

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 3>swift buttons.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, yeah, to Jones's point on the geopolitics of it,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So you basically don't see stable coins or in your words,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of the dollarization of Russia. You know, this goes

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>more wide scale, of course, so you don't see that

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>as having kind of a negative impact for that because

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>from the US perspective, you know, they wouldn't have those

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>on and off switches anymore, right, Well.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 3>They wouldn't have the on and off switches in the

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>way that Swift has it, but they can still block

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the transaction because it's on chain. So if a known

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 3>wallet in let's say, North Korea is a good example

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 3>of that, because North Korea is known to be hacking

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of that crypto, that crypto that's sitting

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 3>in North Korean accounts is frozen effectively because people can

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 3>see its source and origin. So no exchange in the world,

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 3>no intermediary is ever going to touch that money. And

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 3>if that money was transferred from that wallet or you know,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 3>from whatever sort of wallets that they've tracked that they

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 3>know is North Korean, it would immediately be frozen wherever

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 3>it was set. So that's something that's very easy to detect.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So you don't get this animity that supposedly was scriptocurrency.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 3>The anonymity is down to the individual. I don't know

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 3>who owns the wallet, but the assets itself you can

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 3>track all the time, right, And I think there's often

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a misunderstanding around that because of our thinking around identity

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>in the physical world, like when you think, oh, you're

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 3>not anonymous because I know your face, have your passport,

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 3>of your idea, all that kind of stuff. Right, and

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 3>people often think of it as, oh, that's my public

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 3>bank account. I don't want that. Blockchain has the ability

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 3>for you to anonymize the identity of who owns it,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 3>but the transactions themselves is essentially that display of truth.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>And that's actually what makes it work because every time

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I do a transaction, I can verify that this transaction

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 3>is real and the whole world is witness to it.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 3>But I don't need to know that it's your money,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you don't have to be too technical

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 3>about it. But what you can now do with schools

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 3>and blockchain with zero knowledge proofs, is you can now

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 3>also attest, for instance, the value of what you might

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 3>have without ever revealing your wallet. You know, like today,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 3>for instance, when you have to give a credit statement, right,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean you have to literally, outside of a letter,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 3>print out your bank statement, send it over to whoever

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 3>agent is doing it, and say, look, this is proof

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 3>how many assets I have. You know, maybe I cross

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 3>off the bank account, but like, oh, I see it's

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 3>a JP Morgan account, and look you have ten million

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 3>here and I know your name, right, Whereas on blockchain

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't even have to know your name. I can

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 3>just attest because blockchain can say I could verify this

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and this absolute truth because the blockchain can be tempered

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 3>that Okay, he has enough assets, and I just need

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 3>to know that you have enough assets. I don't need

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 3>to see everything. And when you do your tax refund,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 3>how ridiculous is that, here's my passport, so you can

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 3>see everything about me, so I can go buy one

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred dollar thing to get like a you know, three

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 3>dollars discount on tax, and then all of that information

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 3>is in some database that is completely unsecure in some

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>shopping mall. It's crazy, and we think it's normal. It's

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 3>not normal at all because it's just been normalized societally,

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 3>and blockchain solves all of that. So again it's not

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 3>to say that you're anonymous, but you can use it

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 3>as proofs.

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I also like have an example you pull the number

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the hat and the number was ten million.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>We have very different make accounts. I wanted to talk

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>a bit about because you know, we've talked about stable

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>coins being backed by currency. We've talked a little bit

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about tea bills, but there's other assets. And you were

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>involved in a very interesting transaction involving a violin and

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear about that.

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So about a year and a half ago we

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>proceeded together with Galaxy, I purchased a stratavirus violent and

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Antonio Strativaru was probably the most celebrated ruth year in

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the world, a violin maker from the sort of classic

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 3>criminal schools, you know, hundreds of years ago. And that

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 3>strata virus is worth millions of dollars, and all strata

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 3>varrays are expensive. There's maybe six hundred of them around

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the world, give or take. And we tokenized that. We

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 3>tokenized that first as a way to create collateral and

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 3>then later on to essentially offer it for people to buy,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 3>essentially as a kind of quasi fractionalized asset. The vision

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 3>behind that was so I grew up learning classical music.

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 3>My parents are musicians, specifically my mother. She didn't anything

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 3>about money. And by the way, this is not just

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 3>true for artists around the world. It's more even more

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 3>true for artists in Europe, I would say, or just

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 3>generally people in Europe, right, because you know, we don't

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 3>talk about money. It's not like in Hong Kong or

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 3>in Singapore. It's normal to have a you know, in

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 3>dinner you talk about real estate and stock market and prices.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 3>You don't do that in Europe. Like if someone does that,

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 3>you're like, mm, you're kind of weird, you know my

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 3>crowd type of thing, right, it's like it's like, gosh,

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 3>it's like rude to talk about money. So we are

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 3>generally quite financially illiterate, I would say, in those circles.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 3>But that also means in the capitalist world that we

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 3>live in, we get taken advantage of. So you give

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 3>money to an agent, they run it for you and

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 3>they abuse it. And today in the digital construct, that

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 3>entity is called Spotify. There's no musician in the world

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 3>that makes money selling music, right, they have to do gigs,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 3>they have to do other things. Music is advertising, But

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 3>who makes the money off the music? Someone like Spotify

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and Spotify used to be the agent, I mean, was

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 3>personified by an agent or something. But the point is

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 3>that the middleman takes all the value because they understand

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 3>money and they can transact from that. So how do

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 3>we break that cycle? And the idea was the stradivarius

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 3>instrument has always appreciated historically over decades between ten to

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent a year that's also why groups like fifteen

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 3>per year. Yes, and that is also why Nippon Foundation

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 3>and banks around the world, especially Japanese ones literally by

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 3>violence and just vaultam. But that's obviously a little known fact.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Why is that though, sorry, just why is it the

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>specific violin that appreciates that ten to fifteen percent a year?

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>There's only six hundred of them. Sure they're scarcity, but

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>there is there other Yeah, I.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Mean the quality of the fact that the instrument has

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 3>a distinguishable sound tonal quality, the fact that it can

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>never be reproduced. So it's kind of like it has

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 3>that art history element, and you know, in a way

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 3>you could say it it's now created incredible lore where

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 3>there's a marketplace for it. And the marketplace is someone

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 3>will pay more money for this violin over time because

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that they appreciate it and also its

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 3>historical importance. And today the world's most famous violinists or

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 3>play on a strat or del jesu because these are

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 3>the two most valuable instruments and they have the best sound.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of that value construct. The point is that,

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, if I go to a traditional investor and say, hey,

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 3>you should buy a strat because it's a good investment.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Unless he's culturally inclined or he's into music, it doesn't matter,

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's okay. But to me, the opportunity that was

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 3>more exciting was how do I teach people who don't

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 3>know anything about money about the world of money, and

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 3>by tokenizing something they appreciate, which is every musician in

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the world will say a Strata viarus is valuable. They

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 3>know it's worth millions, but they can never afford it.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 3>So they're not going to buy a bitcoin and then

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll got my bonds or tesla because they don't care,

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 3>but they will care about that, and in that process

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 3>they're going to start learning about money because they're going

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to say, Okay, I have an ownership in this strat

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 3>or it goes up in value, I appreciate it, I

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 3>can talk about it, I love it, and at the

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>same time, I can also make money on this, and

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 3>then suddenly I understand what it's all about. So the

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 3>inspiration was, rather than trying to teach people about money

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 3>in let's call it somewhat abstract concepts of stocks or commodities,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 3>copper or gold, o lithium, this is pretty abstract For

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 3>people who don't deal in this kind of world, why

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 3>don't you own assets in you know, the artists that

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>you love. That is a much easier way to teach

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 3>people about value and money because they immediately appreciate the

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 3>constructs themselves because they're passionate about it.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So what's next in terms of tokenized assets?

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Is is it a burken bang? Is it a on

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the peak in Hong Kong solid gold?

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Well, I mean just on the leaboou point. I

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 3>would argue that Laboobu's inspiration very much came from what

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 3>happened in the NFT world in some way of fashion,

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 3>although they don't have digitasties. If you look at what

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 3>happens with board apes or you know today we have

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>it with like Mocha verse or pudgy penguins like these

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>are all NFTs and digital acids that build Oh you

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 3>haven't heard of pudget penguins, I guess, yeah, so, I

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 3>mean pudgie Penguins is basically another NFT kind of like

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 3>a board ape, excepted to keep penguin. And the floor

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 3>price of a pudget penguin is now fourteen eighth to

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>fifteen eath. It's a serious asset, right, and of course

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 3>crypto punks, which are for the og assets that are

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 3>worth hundreds of thousands or some of these millions of dollars.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, the point is that these are cultural artifacts

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>that have meaning. And just quickly, why do these NFTs

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 3>have value? To your point about the birken bag, why

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 3>do people buy birkenback and why do buy rolics? People

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 3>don't buy a rolics to tell the time, and they

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:26.959
<v Speaker 3>don't buy a broken bag to put stuff in it.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 3>The utility is not the reason. It's the status, the

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 3>cultural capital that is associated with it, right, whether I

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>made it, or whether it's the group of people who

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 3>own a rolex that I want to be associated with,

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 3>or that status at success and in the world of

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>digital assets, that's represented by NFTs. And you can see

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>this in every context. When you have a new wealth

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 3>class emergent, this is important to recognize. Crypto is a

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 3>new wealth class for the most part. Yes, sure you

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 3>have Wall Street and institutions getting into it now, but

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the class that got into crypto didn't come from money.

0:32:58.840 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 2>At least most of them.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 3>They made money through crypto, and they had a new

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 3>wealth class and with them, they deliver and bring a

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 3>new form of culture, which is you know, NFTs and

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 3>certain kind of where you know, I've been in the

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>tech industry now for thirty years, and I remember in

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the early days, you weren't taken seriously if you didn't

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 3>have a suitain tie, or if you were drinking you know,

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 3>wine or something like that. But because that was the

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 3>culture of the wealth class of that time, which is

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to be dressed a certain way, and you

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 3>had a certain kind of the chorum in terms of

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 3>what you drink and do and even smoking in the eighties,

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 3>and then you had this new form of wealth, which

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 3>is a Silicon valley and the tech wealth, and these

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 3>guys were all you know about I don't drink, I

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 3>wear hoodies and so on, and suddenly you had billionaires

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>with hoodies, right, and they created a whole new type

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 3>of sort of cultural capital where they're driving electric cars.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 3>And now it's kind of wild to see how these

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of sports where brands are now priced almost like luxury,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.959
<v Speaker 3>where brands in some cases precisely because that audience that

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 3>is that new wealth class, have emerged into that and

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>that's their product category. So the same people who, let's say,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 3>were the Wall Street bankers in the eighties, Maybe that's

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 3>not their cup of tea, But for the Silicon Valley guys,

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 3>that's a cup of tea. And what we're seeing here

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>is with NFTs and digital assists, it's the same. So

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 3>where it's going to go is we're going to see

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 3>this toganization of everything. And the biggest form of current

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 3>form of tokenization, which you see in old coins like

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 3>all these funny meme coins and tokens and other things

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and gaming tokens, what they're really tokenizing is attention. And

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people misunderstand that because I

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 3>think it's like out of thin air. But I would

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 3>argue attention and digital advertising is kind of out of

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 3>thin air as well, because what are you really trading

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 3>or investing in. You're trading the attention of here's a

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 3>biddle board, here's a banner, here's a TV ad. Right arguably,

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 3>broadcast networks like Bloomberg, you make a lot of money

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 3>probably on advertising and sponsorships. That is also a form

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 3>of attention or sort of paying for that attention that

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 3>may be fleeting, but it's still important for generating business

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 3>from that and now through tokenization, you have a way

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 3>of owning that attention. And what was the form of

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>digital attention in the early days of the Internet, It

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 3>was a website. If you remember, back in the nineties,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 3>we had a website, and today we have many websites.

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 3>If you look at your TikTok page, your Instagram page,

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 3>your website, your LinkedIn profile, these are just evolutions of

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 3>websites and all of these are forms of generating attention.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 3>And all of these forms of attention are going to

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 3>be tokenized. Now, that doesn't mean that they're gonna be valuable,

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 3>just like you know, there's someone who has a million

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 3>followers on Instagram is probably a little bit more for

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 3>valuable than someone who has five thousand followers or a

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred followers. But the point is there is a value,

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 3>as small as it might be, and that's now represented

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the toganization and the first wave of all these tokens

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 3>that have come out are that which means, if this

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 3>is true, then we're gonna have billions and billions of

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 3>tokens as we have billions and billions of websites.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, your company animoker, you're the founder of that company

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 2>or coin founder invests in these digital assets. And look,

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll be remiss to not ask you, like you've announced

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 2>that you're in a list or you're going to do

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>an IPO, give us, you know, can you give us

0:35:57.239 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 2>anything like I know, there's a lot of discussion of

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 2>ways you can at least is it going to be

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 2>in the US, is it going to be in Hong Kong?

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, just give us some color?

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Can I say, no comment? So I think the I mean,

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 3>it's not a secret that we want to go public. Again,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 3>we were once a public company in Australia and we

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 3>were small and we had to actually dealist because we

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 3>were dabbling and dealing in crypto at the time because

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the Essex did not like that. That was in twenty nineteen,

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 3>so you know, lifetimes ago. But now, of course the

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>capital markets are ready for it. You know, Hong Kong

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Us are great markets for this. There's a lot of

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 3>attension if you look at all the treasury companies. What's happening,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, between companies accumulating bitcoin, whether it's like a

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>strategy or a DDC or whichever, right, all these companies

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 3>are basically showing the value of digital assets or like

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the circle IPO which was incredibly blockbuster success. All of

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 3>these basically pointing attention to it, so it would be

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 3>remiss for us not to look at that seriously. But

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really at liberty to discuss our specific plans,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 3>but it's definitely clear that we're looking at it. As

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 3>a company. We are very institutionally focused. We do have

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 3>a roster of some of the most sophisticated investors in

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the world. We also have over three thousand shareholders, so

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we're a little bit of a different beast. And I

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 3>would say us, having worked in the space, you know,

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 3>having the revenues that we have, which hasn't been nine

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 3>digital the last four years, has made us very much

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 3>a consistent player in the field. So I think again,

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 3>I think the timing is right, but you know, I'm

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 3>not at liberty to discuss some more specifics other than

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 3>to say that it is very important for us, and

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 3>of course we are here to also deliver value to

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 3>our shareholders and our stakeholders.

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, what an interesting discussion. Thank you so much

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for joining us today.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me.

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Asia Centric from Blooming Intelligence. I'm

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>cut Jamey Treva in Hong Kong.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm John Lee, also in Hong Kong. This podcast was

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 2>produced and edited by Clara Chen and you can listen

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to all our episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or where

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 2>you listen. Thanks for joining