WEBVTT - Tesla Crushing it in China's Car Cap and Trade

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone. On June ninth, BENEF published its annual flagship

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>report on transport, the Long Term Electric Vehicle Outlook, or

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>EVO for short. The report looks at how electrification, shared mobility,

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and autonomous driving will impact road transport from now out,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of weeks will have the head of

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Transport for BENF and evo's lead author Colin mccaracter on

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the show to run us through what they found. But

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>today we've got kind of a preview or trailer for it,

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>or at least an important part of it, which is China.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>In the report, Colin and the authors state that they

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>expect evs to account for passenger vehicle sales in China

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>rising and seventy. Now, this will put about two twenty

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>million e vs on the road in China at that point.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Needless to say, this is going to be a huge

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>chunk of the global market. But how will things get there?

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>How will the market grow to that point? Sure, there'll

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>be a build out of robust charging infrastructure that's needed,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and there are direct purchasing centers for consumers, but those

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are being phased out this weekend the show. We've got

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>me Electric Vehicles analysts for BENF based out of Beijing.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>She's going to tell us about some of the government

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>policies put into place to help accelerate e V adoption.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>See what I did there? Sorry, I couldn't resist. In particular,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>she'll tell us about the New Energy Vehicle or any

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>V targets and corporate average fuel consumption credit systems. Under

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the n e V credit system, automakers are required to

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>generate any V credits from the production of battery, electric,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>plug and hybrid and fuel cell vehicles in order to

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>meet the government assigned any V targets. Manufacturers that do

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not generate enough credits can purchase them from other automakers

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to avoid penalties. It's kind of like cap and trade,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>but for cars. And see he's going to tell us

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all about it. Our discussion is based on a report

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>China's New Energy Vehicle Credit system. Being a user can

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 1>get this report on benef go on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.639
<v Speaker 1>BENIF dot com and the beanof mobile app. As a reminder,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Beanis does not provide investment or strategy advice, and you

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>can hear the full disclaimer at the end of the show.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Mark Taylor, and you're listening to switch on the

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>BENF podcast see thanks for joining today, Thanks for having me.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you start us off just with a very very

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>high level overview of China's emission reduction target. China's presidents

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>EMP actually announced that zero carbon neutrality targets in September.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So the goal is to have China reach the carbon

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>peak by and to reach carbon neutral by. So what

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it translated into the world transport sector is that well,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>although there's no specific targets set for particular sector, paints

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a very direct picture that the country, the central government

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>wants all sectors in the in the country to essentially

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to de carbonized and the passway for different for different

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sectors company as far as a lot. So they want

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to hit their peak of emissions. Would you say, okay, wow,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and then start coming down to zero by so thirty

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>years too to come down the mountain. I guess today

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to focus mostly on e v s or

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles and a policy that's come into play to

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>try to get those sales up and therefore get the

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>emissions down from the transportation sector, can you explain to

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>us just the well, start us off with the name

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of the policy and a bit about its objectives. These

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>policy tools actually called New Energy Vehicle Mandate, So New

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>endin Vehicle is kind of China's definition of the electric vehicle,

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>which include battery, electric, plug in hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So the mandate itself is very similar to California Stereo

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Emission Vehicle or the mandate, and it requires automakers to

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sell electric vehicles in order to produce NAP credit that's

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>going to meet a government assigned target. So essentially the

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>policy tool is designed to push automakers to sell more

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles, which the broader goal of China's push behind

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the autric vehicle is not only to reduce carbon emission,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but also to reduce all the import and to transform

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is industry towards more advance. Okay, so the idea is

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that to reduce emissions by getting more electric vehicles out

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on the road, and they do that by giving in

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a new Energy Vehicle or an any V credit for

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>each electric vehicle sold to the automakers. Is that how

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it works? Yeah, I think the policy itself is kind

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of like just to force automakers, essentially to push automaker

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to sell more evs. I think that's like the one

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I subject for this policy. So the government will sign

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like a target just in proportion to an automaker's domestic

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>production and imports of internal combustion and general ice vehicles.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So the more ice vehicles and automaket selling, the higher

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>target they will face. That means they will need to

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sell more credits in order to meet the target, or

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they have to buy credits from their competitors. I think.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Also the second part of the net credit met or

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the ne credit mandate is that it's linked with China's

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>few economy regulations that some of the automakers can use

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the MAP credit to offset there or two as a

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>compliance tool to help them meet to the stringent few

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>economy regulations. Okay, so the government sets a target. It

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>started I think last year at ten of all sales

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>having to go to e vs. Is that right? And

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>then this year it's yeah, the target set up ten

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>percent for so the new energy vehicle credit policy. Can

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you explain just very basically how that works. China's new

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>editor vehicle credit system is kind of a policy that

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>requires automakers to sell electrical vehicles in order to meet

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>and government assigned the target. And when did it start?

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>It started last year. So the policy was actually is

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>shooting into A seventeen, but it came into effact throughout

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a nineteen national And what does the government target mean?

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>How does that work? So the government target is set

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ten percent in twenty nineteen and twelve percent in and

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll kind of linearly increase to eighteen percent in. So

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the ten percent is proportional to an automaker's dometics, domestic production,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>imports of internal combustion, and general ice vehicle. But this

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that the e V share of their total

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>cells have to be reached ten percent in twenty nineteen. Okay.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm an automaker and I sold a hundred vehicles,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred ice vehicles during I don't know

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>during this year, that means I'm on the hook to

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>produce ten n V credits, is that right? And then

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve in the next year. Ten credits in twenty nineteen.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>First one, you have to have at least like fourteen

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and you BI credits this is fourteen, okay, So how

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>do I get those credits? So there's a few different options, right, Yes,

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the simple as option is that you just

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>produce more evs, which kind of include very large joy

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>plug in hybrid or fuel cell vehicles. I think the

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>second option is that if you cannot have that enough,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>or if you do not have enough e B cells,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you can buy credits from your competitors, or you can

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have some of the credit transfer from like your joid

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>venture set. Okay, so this is kind of like cap

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and trade in power, right, So you you cap the

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>emissions I guess in this this case instead of two

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>commune smokestack, it's from a tailpipe. This is kind of

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like cap and trade for for for power plants, right,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but instead of capping CEO two from the exhaust from smokestack,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's from tailpipe. Is that right? Yes? Okay, you know

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you can either switch you know, to renewables or in

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this case e V s and if you don't have

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the the capability of doing that, you can buy credits

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so you can keep selling internal combustion or ice vehicles.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Yes? So does this result in twelve

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>percent higher e V sales or how does that work?

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So the twelve percent doesn't mean that each other maker

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have twelve percent of your total sales to

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be electric. For each electric vehicle they can generate more

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>than one credit, and for bettery luxury they can generate

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>up to five actually six credits in the period, and

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like around like somewhere like nearly four credits starting

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from this year, and for plugging hybrids is normally just

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like two credits. Oh wow. Okay, so that's pretty cool.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's kind of a sliding skill, and I hate

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep going back to power, but it's kind of like,

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a little bit of credit for gas,

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit fewer emissions, you know, you

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>can equate that to a plug in hybrid, but then

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>going fully electric you get more credits, kind of like

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>going fully renewable in power. I guess you could say

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 1>that's cool. So if I'm a pure play electric vehicle manufacturer,

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm producing all kinds of credits exactly. I think pure

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle manufact are in a really poor position is

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>credit because all they can have or they can generate

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands or hundred tons of thousands of credit without having

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>any liabilities. Okay, so let's let's get into that in

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a second. But before we do, can we go a

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit further with the policy itself. You mentioned it

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>started off at ten percent. Now it's at next year

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's at four percent, and where will it go at

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the end the government sets the target will be fourteen

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>percent for one and will kind of increase to eighteen

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>percent in three and beyond that the government hasn't specified

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of a target. We expect there will be a

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>more exponential increase. That's not really going to be linearly

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>increased anymore. So the idea is to kind of to

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>push automantor will sound more and more evs in by

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>setting a higher target. Okay, so you expect they're using

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a ramping period to where in

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a few years the target to be much higher and

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hopefully they'll just be producing whole bunch of vs at

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that point. Yeah, just stepping back a little bit. We

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>talked in a recent show, I think it was four

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>or five weeks ago about GM and Volkswagen taking on

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Tesla in the US and Europe. But we set an

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>impediment to growth in those markets was a charging network.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that most people would buy e v s,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>myself included, actually if the charging network were better. So

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>how is the charging network in China? Is it an

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>impediment to the NTV program or an enabling feature of it.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think having a bar in order to reach

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>count and ask if you have the option that trying

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to really need a better charging infrastructure network. By that

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean both for for the public chargers that also

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>there there should be chargers available for a home or

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at the workplace. So I think China is still account

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>for accounts on the half of the global public charger installations.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So there has been a quick ramp up of public

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>charging infrastructure, but all that's mostly because the buildings still

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of in China is mostly high high rise buildings

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that limits people's access to the private parking spaces. What

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing where you live and based in Beiging,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So since Veiging in such a like a metropolitan city,

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I see public chargers almost everywhere in the hotels and

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the never office, so every almost everywhere. But I think

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what's been challenging for people living in major cities in

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>China is to have access to home chargers because now

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>all of them can guarantee a a private parking space. Yeah,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the challenge for me here in London as well,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>or access to to charging. Okay, so moving on to

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a different part of the policy, the corporate average fuel

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>consumption target sounds captivating. It's the C a f C.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what that is? So essentially it's a

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it does a few economy regulations for passenger cars. So

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>many countries actually used for economy regulations to reduce the

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>carbon mention as well as the few consumption so the

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>average presenter car fleet. And as we also a way

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to to promote EVS by signing a really low few

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>consumption or few consumption values for evs. So for China's policies,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of the Chinese few economy regulation, it

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>sets a target for the average passenger vehicle car fleet

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to ridge for leaders for a hundred kilometers by twenty

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>which is very stringent, almost on par with that in Europe,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's also more strangent than that team that's in

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>place in Japan and the United States. Okay, so the

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>government is setting a target for fuel economy and you

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>can get there by having really ridiculously efficient ice vehicles,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and I guess in evs which bring down the average

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to make you more efficient or more fuel economic. Is

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that right? Yes? I think the benefits of selling e

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>VS is not only evs are are given basically zero

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 1>few consumption values, but also because there's sometimes it will

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sign a multiplier too, So so producing each electric vehicle

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is counted twice or three times that of the ice car.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the impact of these two policies, So

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the NYV credits and the c a

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>f C there the corporate average fuel consumption target on

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sales and emissions. Can you can? I just walk us

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>through both those for the n e V credit system,

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's just kind of push automakers to sell more

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>e v s unless you lowered your overall ice production,

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>which is something that automate hasn't really wants to lose

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>their market share. I think for the few economy regulation,

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, it's about forcing automakers to either

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have really efficient ice vehicles like hybrid or mildhabber, et cetera,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or you have to sell more evs. So I think

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>combining these two policies, the overall objective is just to

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>accelerate the cells or the adoption of electric vehicles in China,

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and is it working to some extent, It is hard

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that it's working because China also have the

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the some more more direct policy tools in place,

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like the purchase subsidies, which has been very powerful to

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>in promoting the V cells. But I think as China

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>plans to kind of phase out EV subsidies by the

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty two, the country will rely more and

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>more on this sort of the supply side policies like

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the V credit system as well as a few economy

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>or the CFC credit system, so essentially that automakers have

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to fulfill those targets. Okay, So there's kind of a

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>carrot and a stick in place, So you have a

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>subsidy for the purchasers or the buyers of evs, and

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he said in the report that made sales,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you saw an eleven percent increase on evs. Is that right? Well,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say that it's kind of the subsidies

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is the most important factor or driver in EV cells

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, but yeah, I think it's still a very

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>very useful to loosing place. Okay, So you have the

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>carrot and the sticks, and so the carrot is going

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to be phased out so the e V subsidy, but

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the stick is going to be well more more powerful

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know that the targets that will

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>go up for the n e V and the c

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>A f C. Is that right? Yeah, okay, cool, Let's

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the other impacts of the policy.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So what happens to companies in a credit deficit? So

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the penalty if an automaker fills to to

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>meet the government assigned target, So it will kind of

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in a in a deficit of the a V credits.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So to offsete those the credit deficit, they have to

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>either buy or transfer some of the credits from their

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>competitors and joint ventures. And if they still cannot make

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>up the deficit. Right now, China doesn't really have a

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>financial penalties and like those in California or elsewhere, so

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>basically you won't face a like a fine for it.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But but I think on the other side said the

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>government do has a kind of a wet list for

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>models that are can be available to solve. So that

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>means that if you cannot need that that or if

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you if an automaker has a has a credit deficit

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that it cannot be ballanced out. It cannot sell particularly

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>ice vehicles that's not really fuel efficient, So it's just

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of losing market shares, So that's your real risk.

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily a penalty risk, but it's a risk

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of not being able to sell your car, yes, particularly

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like pickups, as you'll be sold those with like more

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>higher fuel consumptions. And this means that EV credits have

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>been sold and traded right, So if companies are in

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a deficit and they want to to get credits to

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>cover their their deficit, they can buy from other manufacturers.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, do we have an indication of either

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>how this works or even the price for buying the credits.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think first is that the price is still where

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the preced is still very limited. First because China doesn't

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>really have like a fine which always kind of serves

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as a price sailing for for the maximum level of

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the credit or the max level of the value per credit.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So that means a lot of automakers right now are

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>actually negotiating the the price of the table, so rather

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>than entering into like a feed or except or an auction.

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>We do think because like back in twenty nineteen, there's

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or in there's has been an over supply of a

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>V credits in the market, which translated into probably lower

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>credits or lower value per per credit. But however, we

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>do see that because there's the supply of the n

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>V credit has been decreasing because of the strandent target,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and that will kind of help drop at the price.

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So some of the report or some of the articles

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>suggested that back in nineteen the price per AV credits

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>around like seventy dollars per credit, but now it had

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an increased to over two hundred dollars, which is still

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>relatively low compared to other markets, etcetera. Relatively low, it

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>seems high to me. Well, we we do expect that

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as the supplies of the credits decreases, the price of

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>per any credit will definitely be going up in the

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>next few years and even probably even double the current level.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>So that could be an expensive prospect for manufacturers that

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>are in a deficit. So once again pushing for more

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>actual evs to be sold in the market. Okay, so

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about what this all means for manufacturers,

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>both for and domestic in China, what this means for

0:18:52.240 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>their sales in that market. Stay with us, Okay, let's

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about who's active in China and who's actually having

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to be concerned about these ny V credits and the

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>c A f C. Can you tell us a bit

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about who the foreign and domestic players are in the

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Chinese auto market. So I think it really has to

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>look down to bost the ice vehicle market, but also

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the EV market. I think for ice vehicle markets that

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the foreign manufacturers are still dominating trying

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to see your market Lexposkwagan General Motors and they sell

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>through their Chinese story adventures. But for EV market it's

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>mostly local brand particularly like b y D or b

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a Isa, etcetera. But there's also an increasing number of

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>either the foreign companies as well as kind of pure

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>e V players like Tessa being actively selling e V

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>s in China for both credits and the few consumption

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>CFC credit positions. So because a lot of the four

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>international automakers, as just say like Bothwaga and they sell

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ice vehicles in China, that means they

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>have a huge credits epicite in terms of both an

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>EV credits but also the CFC credits. So on the

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>other side, small domestic manufacturers like b y D and

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>because they have a large portfolio or evs in their

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>total stills and they get both surplus for an EV

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>credits and CFC credits. Domestic automakers tend to have more

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>an EV credits or the time to have a surplus

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of any credits. So my initial thought on that was that, okay,

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so it sounds like VW might want to rush to

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>get it with I D three or electric vehicle into

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that market to kind of offset its ICE sales. Is

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of what we're seeing happen or are they

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>buying credits from other manufacturers? Yeah, I mean totally. I

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think what's fun is exactly in the position of they

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>have to sell more evast in order to to meet

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the target. But unfortunately for probably the past few years,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's such a huge amount of like ice be

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a coast with sol each year. So I think it's

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>reported that VOT, one of the joint venture, is about

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to buy credits from Tesla in China out of price

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about like four four or four hundred sixty dollars per credit. Overall,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the strategy for companies that Volts Wagening is

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>skilled to ramp up their BB productions in China and

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to increase their EB lineup as like I D three,

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I D four at least six, So essentially they want

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to so increase the evselves by themselves. Wow. Okay, So

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems, going back to guess big picture, that you

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have Chinese peer play EV manufacturers and well, I guess

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and other foreign peer play EV manufacturers that are

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>selling as much as they can in China to bank

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as many of these credits as they can to be

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>able to use them in the future or sell them

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on to companies and deficits. That kind of how it's

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>playing out. I think for for incumbent manufacturers like volt

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Swamen as well as their joint ventures with domestic players

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>like w or I C I S, they're in a

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>rough position this year. But therefore pew EV manufacturers like

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Testa or even domestic ones like Neal or x Poon,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they're in a poll position because all the conset get

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is the pure credits and they can bank them and

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>probably when the price reads of in futures they can

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sell them to or establish modermakers got a new revenue

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>scream somehow, But it seems it seems like a short

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>term game, right, It's short term pain for maybe v

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>W I keep you know, VW is kind of an example,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but it can mean any you know, ice dominant manufacturer.

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess that they're using this time, you know, to

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess pay other manufacturers for the credits while they

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>bring in their evs into the market. Is that right, Yeah,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's that kind of the time they buy into become

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>or when they try to ramp up BV production. Yeah.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And so once I'm just trying to make sure I

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get this is that it would seem that as more

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>evs enter the market, it's a revenue stream for nobody.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>That the the ultimate result of the policy is simply

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there's just more evs in the market

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and nobody's making money from this scheme through selling credits.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that right or no? I think definitely having more

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>evs is like one of the main objections for this policy.

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So if if each of them makers having like a

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of evs ev sales, I think the sort

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of indicative policy is successful. Okay, I'm asking all the

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong questions. No, I mean it's yeah, I think as

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it's so kind of a short term game

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for the STARTUF, but also my personal senses that it

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>depends on if be double can actually sell that many EPs,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's not really up to them, or is more

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>up to consumers whether they want to buy a Tesla

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>or or re double car. Right, well, fair play, Yeah, sure,

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing longer term I guess winners and losers

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in this this scheme. So any automakers whospian batting on

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or increasing their bad on ebs, it's going to be

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a winner in this in this scheme. So I think

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there are automakers of horrible were we're relying more on

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>hybridization or hybrid vehicles as a complise tool like Toyota

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>or Honda. It's kind of make it more challenge for

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>them to meet the target because so the hybrid doesn't

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>really account for the EV credits. So I think that's

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of a trick for or that's challenging for for

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for those automans because for those incombents. Okay, can we

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>go back to the really high level overview and talk

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>about just kind of who's in deficit and who's in

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>surplus after NYV credits and you know, kind of who's

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>winning at this game. Most Chinese automakers are having a

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>surplus of both the EV credit as well as a

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>C physic credit because they're they're high relatively high EV

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>share in their total sales and on the contrares that

0:24:55.240 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>automakers most international automakers of either European or either domicide

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in Europe or in the United States like Volkswaga and

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>General Motors for etcetera. So these automakers tend to have

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge deficit of a UNI credit as well as

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>their CFC credits. I think for Japanese automakers, they used

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to have some surplus of the CFC credit because they

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>sell hybrids, which is good to offer them to to

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>meet the fewer consumption targets. But nowadays because hybrid doesn't

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>really take account towards EV credits, that means that they

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>still have a huge or they still have a deficit

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the EV credits. Are you saying that the Japanese

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers can meet the c A f C with the

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>hybrid but they're they're generating fury n e V s

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>through the scheme. They meant the target in twenty nineteen,

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but not because it's kind of getting it harder to

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>meet from selling hybrid only. I see this is really interesting.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>It seems like we know that the auto manufacturing industry

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>is relatively young. Is that fair to say? Yeah, And

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it seems that the old legacy, you know, manufacturers are

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are in deficit. So you have your GM,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know your American manufacturers, they've been making ice

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>vehicles forever, your European ones, same thing. And then you

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have your Japanese manufacturers that have been doing hybrids for

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and they're the ones that have been

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>in deficit. And your newer ones, your Chinese manufacturers and

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>your Tesla's and your pure players, they're doing really great

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at this. Is that fair to say? Policy is probably

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>just like the government is trying to send a signal

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that if you want Chinese car market, you have to

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on a lot for the vehicles, which is a

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of the domestic governament whose are doing. If they

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>wanted to that onto the Tinnis market, they have to

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>be go for for life for vehicles. Yeah. I think

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the signal is getting pretty clear. That's it's really interesting.

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>A couple of shows ago, we we talked about the

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>EU e t S or the European Emissions Trading scheme,

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and I was kind of surprised, you know, I was like, Oh,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually having an impact, it's has teeth, it's actually

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>doing something. I guess I'm a skeptic most of the

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>time and a lot of these things like this, but

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like this is kind of working too that

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the signal is pretty clear, and then it's driving

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>more EV sales in the market, and it will in

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the future, as you said, the target will ramp up

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>most likely. Can we talk a little bit more about

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>access to the market. So if I'm an American manufacturer

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want access to the market, I have to

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do a joint venture with the Chinese company. Is that right?

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that still how it works? Kind I used to

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have the stowing venture or restrictions for any automakers want

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to enter the domestic market, but the restriction has been lifted.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>So TESTA is the first one the stoptics. I can

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>established Holly owned foreign manufacturing plan in China. And we

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>also see a lot of like BMW, there's either increasing

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>their their shares in their existing joint ventures or they

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>are kind of thinking about maybe setting up like their own,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Holy owned one in the future. Okay, so access

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to the market is going to be much more about

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the technology selling a n V than it is about

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a j V in the future. Yeah, because I don't

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's will be any restriction or probably I didn't

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>really touch but her purpose anyway. So I think there's

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.719
<v Speaker 1>other ways to kind of restrict access to the market

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>when to specify kind of which we are called will

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>receive the credits or receive subsidies, and they may kind

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of discount some of the or take some of the foreigning,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>may vehicles aut of the equation or out of the

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the white list. I think that's also maybe

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a more subtle tool to block for an automakers from

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>entering the Chinese market. I guess the final question from

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>me is did this policy make it into your modeling

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for the upcoming electric vehicle outlook? You know, did it

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>make it into the forecasting for the Chinese market growth?

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean totally. I mean I think particular for the

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>short term forecast, we do factor allotting the policy impact

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in China, like the V credit as well as a

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>few economy credits. These are two very important policies. They're

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going to drive a V adoption in China in the

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>short term. A short term we've been period, so we

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>do increase because of the hard to meet. So for

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the n e V credits, we do see that it's

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively easy to meet for the industry as a whole,

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So it requires around like fift to eleven percent of

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the total sales to be electrics by like in around

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one So that target is easy to meet. But for

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the few consumption targets, for the few CFC targets, that's

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>really challenging, and we we do expect that will help

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>drive up the EV cells. We do expect EV sells

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in China to be around that's a lot and soon

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is that going to be the biggest market? I think, yeah, yeah,

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be the biggest thing. There, you have it.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna be watching for in the Chinese

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>EV market next? Like, what's the thing that you're you're

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>looking out for in your research? Well, I think policy

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is definitely something that we watch a lot in the

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>past because it's such an important driver in EV adoption.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>But as kind of the evy adoptions is now regular

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about five percent, we see consumers moving from the from

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this early adopter to be gradually and enter into the

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to them what a mass adoption faces, that's why we

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>observe a lot more nuanced factors are going to drive

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>ev adoptions such as the charging infrastructure coverage as well

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as maybe the resell values of the lactural vehicles, and

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we do observe all other kind of the more other

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>factors are going to drive or potentially drive drive or

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>become a bottom act to the to the massive adoption

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the in the future. So basically watching for signs

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>at the tipping point or whether that tipping point is

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be blocked somehow. Yeah, wow, cool sounds exciting.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>See thanks for joining, Thanks for having me. Today's episode

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of Switched On was edited by Rex Warner the Great

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Stoke Media. Bloombergin e F is a service provided by

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute,

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>nor should it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations,

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloombergin e F should not be considered as information sufficient

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>upon which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>LP nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>contained in this recording, and any liability as a result

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of this recording is expressly disclaimed.