Speaker 1: All right, news roundup and information overload our here's our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. ATS eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: one Sean if you want to join us. So, I
Speaker 1: have a lot of admiration and we've had on radio
Speaker 1: and TV citizen journalist Nick Shirley young Man. He was
Speaker 1: at the heart of exposing all of this Somali fraud
Speaker 1: and daycare centers and so on and so forth in Minnesota.
Speaker 1: And then he went out to California, Gavin Newsom's Marxist utopia,
Speaker 1: and he even found a lot more fraud there than
Speaker 1: he found in Minnesota, which is saying a lot. Now,
Speaker 1: you would think that a state would be happy that
Speaker 1: somebody cared enough to discover the misappropriation of taxpayer dollars,
Speaker 1: but that's not the case at all. Now. Unfortunately, we'll
Speaker 1: ask Nick about this in a second. Unfortunately, I've read
Speaker 1: that his security needs have gone up exponentially, which is frightening,
Speaker 1: especially in a day and age of assassination culture, and
Speaker 1: right after Charlie Kirk and after two assassination attempts against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. It's not a good feeling. I've lived it.
Speaker 1: I've been there. It sucks. And anyway, so he uncovered
Speaker 1: the learning center issue and he's now done the same
Speaker 1: in California. Now here's here's where it gets very interesting.
Speaker 1: Is California right now is trying to pass a bill
Speaker 1: that basically would criminal criminalize investigative journalism and classify it
Speaker 1: as a misdemeanor and whatsoughtrate and by the way, possible
Speaker 1: imprisonment and content takedown forget about freedom of speech and anyway,
Speaker 1: it's Assembly Bill twenty six, twenty four. And this only
Speaker 1: happened after he exposed all this waste, fraud, abuse and
Speaker 1: corruption by immigrant groups, in this case in California and anyway,
Speaker 1: government unfunded entities like the Somali learning daycare centers would
Speaker 1: then be protected from being exposed if they operated inside
Speaker 1: the state of California. Now, the state of California has
Speaker 1: an attorney general. His name is Rob Bonta. Anyway, he
Speaker 1: says the hospice fraud scheming involved fraudster's billing taxpayers when
Speaker 1: they purchased stolen identities out of state on the dark web.
Speaker 1: What does that have to do with what Nick Shirley did,
Speaker 1: which was do his job for him. Listen.
Speaker 2: Operation skip Trace was initially kicked off by a tip
Speaker 2: from California DHCS Department health Care Services of a tip
Speaker 2: of alleged hospice fraud at fourteen companies DOJ's DMFA, the
Speaker 2: Division of Medical Fraud and ELDERBUSE. My team investigated those
Speaker 2: fourteen companies, plus a billing company and eight individuals suspected
Speaker 2: of money laundering. We found that those involved in this fraud,
Speaker 2: in this scheme would purchase personal identifying information for people
Speaker 2: who live outside of California on the dark Web and
Speaker 2: then enroll them into covered California enrolls.
Speaker 1: I've had enough of this. He's acting as though he
Speaker 1: uncovered the fraud. Now, this investigation by citizen journalist Nick
Speaker 1: Shirley happened not that long ago. So as much as
Speaker 1: he's there bragging like they did this phenomenal job, you
Speaker 1: have millions what ultimately will be hundreds of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars in waste, fraud and abuse of taxpayer money thanks
Speaker 1: to the hard work of Nick Shirley. Now here's where
Speaker 1: it gets interesting. According to the Assembly, the California State
Speaker 1: Assembly has advanced the Assembly Build twenty six twenty four,
Speaker 1: which would allow activists and taxpayer funded organizations to demand
Speaker 1: the removal of video evidence. Bill is aimed at boosting
Speaker 1: privacy for immigrant service providers, and according to the assembly
Speaker 1: member Mia Bonta, in other words, the wife of the
Speaker 1: Attorney General that you just heard from, she is the
Speaker 1: one pushing this. Ostensibly, that is not what this does
Speaker 1: at all. This would ostensibly criminalize investigative journalism a citizen
Speaker 1: journalist like Nick Shirley, and he would face potential fines,
Speaker 1: a ten thousand dollars imprisonment, and they would demand that
Speaker 1: he'd take down the content of what he was able
Speaker 1: to discover, the corruption that he would expose. Now, this
Speaker 1: bill was made only after he exposed the mass fraud
Speaker 1: by these groups in California. Anyway, he joins us. Now,
Speaker 1: so I'm calling it to stop. Nick Shirley Act. I
Speaker 1: can't think of a more appropriate name.
Speaker 3: How are you doing great?
Speaker 4: It's a little wild world they're living in right now,
Speaker 4: you know.
Speaker 1: Well, by the way, welcome, this is baptism by fire.
Speaker 1: You're a young man. I'm proud of you. You've done
Speaker 1: you're doing a great job. First of all, let me
Speaker 1: just say to you, as somebody who has lived this
Speaker 1: I read that you had to increase your security. Is
Speaker 1: all that true?
Speaker 4: That is true. Whenever I go out and film now,
Speaker 4: I do bring security with it, because as soon as
Speaker 4: I get to like, for instance, I'll be going to
Speaker 4: California against him. As soon as I get to like
Speaker 4: a hotel, or I get to even like a gas station,
Speaker 4: people start taking photos of me where sometimes you will
Speaker 4: try to doctor the hotel that I'm staying at, So
Speaker 4: now I'm not even staying at hotels.
Speaker 1: Well, the one thing I can tell you is, and
Speaker 1: this is just unsolicited, humble advice for somebody who's been
Speaker 1: in this business for a while is take every threat seriously.
Speaker 1: You're very wise to have security with you. The work
Speaker 1: you're doing is vital, it's very important. It's having a
Speaker 1: deep impact, it's very profound. I admire what you're doing.
Speaker 1: It takes a lot of courage. So I'm sorry that
Speaker 1: you're having to live through this. Unfortunately, it does become
Speaker 1: a part of our industry that nobody really wants to
Speaker 1: talk too much about. I've had a flat while once
Speaker 1: on my head. One day when we're alone, I'll tell
Speaker 1: you that story. It gets pretty interesting. But you know,
Speaker 1: please take every precaution and be safe. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: this bill and what they're proposing here, because it really
Speaker 1: is to stop Nick Shirley Act. The only reason this
Speaker 1: is happening is because of what you exposed exactly.
Speaker 4: And what's so interesting about this bill is it specifically
Speaker 4: says like immigrant locations that receive tax payer dollars and
Speaker 4: what did we know about the fraud that just took
Speaker 4: place in California and in Minnesota. They always use these
Speaker 4: immigrant communities, whether it be Simalians or Arminians, to commit
Speaker 4: all this massive fraud because it deters people from exposing
Speaker 4: it because then they'll be labeled as a racist or
Speaker 4: as Lamophobic. And these people are also funding these exact
Speaker 4: same politicians.
Speaker 1: No, I'll give you one example of how egregious this
Speaker 1: can become. And I think it was doctor Rosa told
Speaker 1: me this, but fully, eighty seven percent of children in
Speaker 1: the Somali community in Minnesota apparently, you know, had some
Speaker 1: type of learning disability. Did you know that, which, by
Speaker 1: the way, is mathematically impossible on top of you know,
Speaker 1: based in comparisons of the general population.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, nothing surprises me anymore. But I mean
Speaker 4: they were saying a lot of their kids had autism too,
Speaker 4: which was completely false.
Speaker 1: Again, all of it's false. How much do you think
Speaker 1: that you've uncovered because you think what you have already
Speaker 1: uncovered in California is far greater than Minnesota. Do you
Speaker 1: have any estimates of the amount of money we're talking about?
Speaker 4: Oh, literally billions of dollars because a lot of these estimates,
Speaker 4: for instance, estimates in California, those estimates were only provided
Speaker 4: by the latest data that was available, and that's from
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three, so it's been going on for three
Speaker 4: more years now. So you could just compound at California video,
Speaker 4: where I originally found one hundred and seventy million, you
Speaker 4: could multiply that by three and you'd have nearly six
Speaker 4: hundred million dollars just in the past three years. So,
Speaker 4: in reality, the frauds in the billions.
Speaker 1: Have you ever heard from say Gavin Newsom? Now, I
Speaker 1: know Gavin's very, very busy. He's stalking President Trump, he's
Speaker 1: half stalking me. I don't know what it is about
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, but I kind of live rent free in
Speaker 1: his head. He has the highest income taxes in the country,
Speaker 1: he has the highest gas taxes, highest sales taxes, the
Speaker 1: highest poverty rate, highest homeless rate. People can't even they
Speaker 1: don't even have water in their fire hydrants or in
Speaker 1: their reservoirs for predictable wildfires. With Santa Ana Wins accompanying them,
Speaker 1: people can't get permits to rebuild in the Pacific Palisades.
Speaker 1: And so he's never around. He's either podcasting, or he's
Speaker 1: a world traveler. He's going to Davos, or he's going
Speaker 1: to Munich, or he's stalking Trump, or he's you know,
Speaker 1: a full time ex poster, full time podcaster, now a
Speaker 1: full time author. I'm not sure if he does anything.
Speaker 1: He's like the no show governor. Have you ever ever
Speaker 1: heard from his office?
Speaker 4: Well, I mean they've criticized me a few times. They've maybe,
Speaker 4: let's look out, they've tried to depict me as a
Speaker 4: pervert for exposing fraud, and they've never given me any
Speaker 4: sort of a nick thank you for exposing the fraud
Speaker 4: and entire state. They've instead just tried to make me
Speaker 4: look like the bad man and criticized me.
Speaker 1: You know, I saw that one post that you're referring to,
Speaker 1: you know who, who's this person that would would be
Speaker 1: going to daycare centers to see if they're actual children
Speaker 1: in them, as if there was some type of implication
Speaker 1: to that, And I'm like, how about nobody was there?
Speaker 1: That's the point. These these daycare centers are existent only
Speaker 1: on paper, and we're providing you know, God knows how
Speaker 1: many millions of dollars for daycare that's not being provided
Speaker 1: for children.
Speaker 4: That's the problem, and that the two will want to
Speaker 4: It's so funny because they said that I was there
Speaker 4: was no fraud that I uncovered, and then they try
Speaker 4: to take credit for the fraud, and then they say
Speaker 4: they've been looking at it for over forty years attorney general,
Speaker 4: and then the Attorney general's wife then makes a bill
Speaker 4: to try and make exposing fraud criminal.
Speaker 1: Now, let me ask you this question. I don't know
Speaker 1: if you have any people backing you or supporting you financially.
Speaker 1: You know, at some point here you may need to
Speaker 1: take legal action. Are you prepared to do that?
Speaker 4: It's a good question. I sure hope not, but it
Speaker 4: probably is inevitable, and I do final need to start.
Speaker 1: Oh, Nick, let me just tell you it's inevitable. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't want to get ahead of I don't want
Speaker 1: you to get ahead of yourself. I'm promising you it's inevitable.
Speaker 1: I wish I was wrong, but I know I'm not wrong.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm completely self funded, and I do accept donations
Speaker 4: from people who do want to donate, and they can
Speaker 4: contact men. Just go to Anti Fraud Club dot com
Speaker 4: and there's an email there where we do take an
Speaker 4: incuries of people who do want to help support.
Speaker 1: I mean, I can't believe you've done all of this
Speaker 1: on your own. What got you interested in this in
Speaker 1: the first place.
Speaker 4: Well, I started to see how corrupt the government could
Speaker 4: be when I started going to the border back in
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three and started seeing people literally get human
Speaker 4: trafficked in the United States and then they're getting flown
Speaker 4: to shelters in New York City. And then for the
Speaker 4: past two and a half years, every single week, I've
Speaker 4: been going all across America and across the world, quite frankly,
Speaker 4: to see what's actually happening in our own societies. And
Speaker 4: I got a glimpse of the fraud in Minnesota last June,
Speaker 4: and then this December I went and exposed it all
Speaker 4: after getting all the information on it, and it's just
Speaker 4: kind of unraveled. This huge literally a scandal from the
Speaker 4: government as far as we're our taxes were going. And
Speaker 4: I hate to make it political, but these people were
Speaker 4: the strobs is being committed. I mean, Biden literally lifted
Speaker 4: open the gates so people could commit fraud in so
Speaker 4: in Minnesota, California and these Democrat cities and states, there
Speaker 4: is quite frankly, billions upon billions, it could be in
Speaker 4: the hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud that was
Speaker 4: enabled to take place underneath Biden. And so now we're
Speaker 4: just finding out about it.
Speaker 1: It really is incredible the amount of waste, fraud, and abuse.
Speaker 1: So are you planning to go to the other states.
Speaker 1: One of the states that I think you might find
Speaker 1: a lot of fertile ground would be New York State.
Speaker 1: Have you gone there yet or are you thinking about
Speaker 1: going there?
Speaker 4: Thinking about it? I think I need to go confront
Speaker 4: some people in California first and move by final way
Speaker 4: up there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's really unbelievable. Quick break right back more with
Speaker 1: citizen journalist Nick Shirley on the other side, and then
Speaker 1: your calls coming up. Eight hundred and ninety four one
Speaker 1: seawan our number if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. As we continue.
Speaker 5: Three hours a day of Red, white, and Blue America
Speaker 5: A croud. This is the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1: Right to continue now with Nick's Shirley citizen journalists. They
Speaker 1: have now the Stop Nick Shirley Act. I mean it's
Speaker 1: a real law they're trying to pass in California, if
Speaker 1: you can believe it because the exposed waste fraud and abuse.
Speaker 1: You know, how old are you, Nick?
Speaker 4: I just turned twenty four.
Speaker 1: All right, you're twenty four years old. I think you
Speaker 1: have a very very bright future. You're brave, you're courageous.
Speaker 1: You do a lot of hard work, you do a
Speaker 1: lot of digging, and we wish you the best at
Speaker 1: How can people get in touch with you if they
Speaker 1: want to help out what you're doing?
Speaker 4: Yeah, thank you so much, Sean. And yeah, people would
Speaker 4: like to help, they can go to Antifraud Club dot
Speaker 4: com and there's an email, right, there's an email there
Speaker 4: where people can then go and donate or if they'd
Speaker 4: like to message me about donating, they can help there
Speaker 4: as well.
Speaker 1: Now, and he wanted to give you all the other predictions.
Speaker 1: Now that you've had the security threats, Now that I'm
Speaker 1: telling you you're going to need a lawyer. Do you
Speaker 1: want any more predictions about what your future holds for
Speaker 1: you in terms of what's going to be difficult and hard?
Speaker 4: Yeah? Get me it all please?
Speaker 1: All right. The last thing I'm going to tell you,
Speaker 1: and this is the most important, whatever you do, understand,
Speaker 1: the online world is phony. It is fake, it is fraudulent.
Speaker 1: You are going to have bots that will turn you
Speaker 1: into Satan himself. And if you read it, you know,
Speaker 1: only read it if you really want to feel bad
Speaker 1: about yourself at the highest level, because a lot of
Speaker 1: that is going to be people that just hate your politics,
Speaker 1: hate what you're doing, want you to fail, want you
Speaker 1: to get discouraged. Don't ever listen to comments of these
Speaker 1: keyboard warriors that are naked in mommy and Daddy's basement,
Speaker 1: you know, in their underwear and anonymously putting up the
Speaker 1: most vile, vicious things they could possibly think of. If
Speaker 1: you get those three things down, Pat, I think you'll
Speaker 1: be okay.
Speaker 4: Thank you. Yeah, that is very true, because I mean,
Speaker 4: there are so many critics and there's very few people
Speaker 4: who actually go out and do the doings and so well.
Speaker 1: That's another lesson you've learned already. You're a lot smarter
Speaker 1: than I was at twenty four. I'll tell you that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's a big one.
Speaker 1: Anyway, Nick Shirley, stay safe. God bless you, and we
Speaker 1: appreciate you coming on the program again and sharing all
Speaker 1: of this with us. We appreciate the work you're doing.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Exposing left wing media bias. No stone left unturned.
Speaker 5: The Sean Hannity Show is back on the air.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five till the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one seawn our number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. This
Speaker 1: just keeps getting bigger and bigger by the hour. It
Speaker 1: would seem to me that probably with now criminal investigations
Speaker 1: in New York City and in Los Angeles, as it
Speaker 1: relates to mister Fang Fang Eric Swolwell, that I would
Speaker 1: not at all be surprised if a grand jury convenes
Speaker 1: and that an indictment would be forthcoming. The allegations are
Speaker 1: beyond repulsive. Let me just play a couple of them.
Speaker 1: There are many more, and many more we expect to
Speaker 1: be coming. And for example, this is one accuser, a
Speaker 1: former staffer who alleged that wall Wells sexually assaulted her
Speaker 1: after a night of heavy drinking. Listen to this.
Speaker 6: I went to the bathroom and I don't remember anything
Speaker 6: after that. You don't remember anything. I remember the next day.
Speaker 6: I can see flashes of that evening, of him on
Speaker 6: top of me, me pushing him off, him grabbing me.
Speaker 6: It was a lot more aggressive. It was aggressive.
Speaker 1: Did you say no?
Speaker 7: Yes?
Speaker 6: I said noa I in my flash that I can recall.
Speaker 6: I was pushing him off of me, saying no.
Speaker 7: And what did he do?
Speaker 6: He didn't stop, He didn't stop, And you woke up
Speaker 6: the next morning. I woke up the next morning naked
Speaker 6: alone in his hotel room.
Speaker 1: Now, in that case, okay, the woman claims that they
Speaker 1: had there been a night of heavy drinking. However, she
Speaker 1: has memories of what happened and what she woke up
Speaker 1: to the next day. And here's a woman that said
Speaker 1: he raped her. Listen, I only had one glass of wine.
Speaker 8: We were supposed to go to a political event, and
Speaker 8: he said he needed to get paperwork from his hotel room.
Speaker 8: When I arrived at his hotel room, I was already
Speaker 8: incapacitated and I couldn't move my arms are my body.
Speaker 8: He raped me and he choked me, and while he
Speaker 8: was choking me, I lost consciousness.
Speaker 1: Oh, I mean, it's it is. It is really really disgusting,
Speaker 1: disturbing on every single level. Anyway, here to discuss is
Speaker 1: Anna Paulina Luna is with US, Florida congresswoman who has
Speaker 1: been all over this issue. Also, Ola A. Watma is
Speaker 1: with US, a Republican. She's running for the election in
Speaker 1: the US House to represent the nineteenth congressional district. By
Speaker 1: the way, that's Byron Donald's district. Thank you both of you.
Speaker 1: Thanks to both of you being on the program. Anna,
Speaker 1: we've had you on on this topic. You're actually quoted
Speaker 1: in this morning's paper saying that this may not be
Speaker 1: the end of people that are going to be removed
Speaker 1: from Congress. What did you mean by that?
Speaker 7: Well, look, there's been a number of people currently under
Speaker 7: Congressional ethics investigations that have very serious allegations, but also
Speaker 7: that there is evidence to back. And my opinion and
Speaker 7: position has remained consistent on this. I don't care what
Speaker 7: the party affiliation is of the individuals if they are
Speaker 7: knowingly and maliciously breaking House conduct and our rules as
Speaker 7: well as engaged in illegal activity, and there's proof of that.
Speaker 7: They need to resign, and if they don't resign, I
Speaker 7: will vote to expel them. But that's not the only
Speaker 7: thing I'm hearing. There's a ton that's now coming out
Speaker 7: also too, potentially about a senator associated with Eric Swawall.
Speaker 7: I'm passing that information to John Thune, who I don't
Speaker 7: know if he likes me that much because of my
Speaker 7: position on voter ID and Piza, but nonetheless I do
Speaker 7: think that he needs to look into this.
Speaker 1: Well, I agree with you on voter ID in Pizo,
Speaker 1: so too bad. I mean, we're not always going to agree.
Speaker 1: Are you saying that this individuals from California?
Speaker 7: The senator in question is in Arizona?
Speaker 1: Okay, Well, I think I know who that probably is,
Speaker 1: and you know, we'll wait and see. And I also
Speaker 1: I'm not a person that ever rushes the judgment, but
Speaker 1: I will tell you, listening to all of these women combined,
Speaker 1: they all have a degree of credibility. And I'm just
Speaker 1: looking at this through the prism. Oh I'll bring you
Speaker 1: into this of if I heard these women and I
Speaker 1: was on a jury, and I imagine any other jury
Speaker 1: would hear it the same way. These women have exude
Speaker 1: credibility to me. And when you have one woman after
Speaker 1: another after another, after another, after another after another, and
Speaker 1: they're all describing we're not talking about flirtation, although that
Speaker 1: existed and pictures existed, and all sorts of other bizarre
Speaker 1: behavior with this guy existed. We're talking about rape in
Speaker 1: a couple of these instances. And I don't think any
Speaker 1: jury is going to be sympathetic to mister Fang Fang.
Speaker 3: Yes, it's interesting because there are over a half a
Speaker 3: dozen with sexual misconduct allegations, and I feel like there
Speaker 3: should be disclosure of settlements because I'm not sure what happened.
Speaker 3: Like this is all new, everything's coming up. There are
Speaker 3: other members of Congress that fall into the same category.
Speaker 3: We see Ethics Committee going after them, but then it
Speaker 3: just dies off and we see endorsements come into them
Speaker 3: and they're still in the same seat. There has to
Speaker 3: be accountability. Accountability has to be in place. And I
Speaker 3: love what Annapolina. I mean, we're for the US House
Speaker 3: of Representation. I see her her being the champion of
Speaker 3: this and I get her. I'm proud of you, Anna,
Speaker 3: She's always the leader when it comes to accountability and ethics,
Speaker 3: and especially at a time like this and something like
Speaker 3: this that's so serious, we have to take this serious.
Speaker 3: And it's just disgusting and disturbing.
Speaker 1: Well, I know you spent a large part of your
Speaker 1: life working with young women and helping them develop their
Speaker 1: careers and their self esteem. And that's a big part
Speaker 1: of your platform that you're running on to replace Byron Donealds.
Speaker 1: And we're going to watch this race very very closely.
Speaker 1: But Anna, you know, when I think about all the
Speaker 1: allegations that are being made here, and then I think
Speaker 1: about this, There's been this slush fund that has existed
Speaker 1: in Congress for a long period of time, and I've
Speaker 1: talked about it for many years on this program, where
Speaker 1: these congressmen and these senators, they these allegations are made
Speaker 1: and then campaign funds, federal funds have been used to
Speaker 1: come up with tainments and then non disclosure agreements, and
Speaker 1: the taxpayers have been on the hook for it, or
Speaker 1: donors have been on the hook for it. If they
Speaker 1: want to engage, if they want to go into that agreement,
Speaker 1: I'm perfectly fine if two people want to make any
Speaker 1: business agreement that's up to them. However, you can't make
Speaker 1: taxpayers and donors pay for it. And I think if
Speaker 1: you do do that, or if you've done that, I
Speaker 1: think we should be made aware of it, don't you.
Speaker 7: Oh, most certainly. I was one of the few members
Speaker 7: I think it's three quarters of the House that actually
Speaker 7: voted to basically send the findings on that Congression Slash
Speaker 7: Fund to Ethics, which is basically an off ramp to
Speaker 7: get members to not take the vote, right, I voted
Speaker 7: for the full release. And then we're also able to
Speaker 7: successfully subpoena those files, and we actually had to go
Speaker 7: to I think it's the office house, workplace, something or other.
Speaker 7: But we should be receiving those records within a week
Speaker 7: and then we're going to be releasing them publicly. But
Speaker 7: while will say that Sean I was a member of
Speaker 7: Congress that made the motion to expel Eric Swowell, I
Speaker 7: had emotion to expel Tony Gonzalz as well as soon
Speaker 7: as I saw the evidence come up. So, no matter what,
Speaker 7: aside from the allegations, it is illegal for a member
Speaker 7: of Congress to engage in a sexual relationship with the subordinate,
Speaker 7: of which both men had done. And so that alone
Speaker 7: was grounds for removal from the House of Representatives. But
Speaker 7: then we get into this other issue of you are correct,
Speaker 7: what reforms need to happen with House ethics to where
Speaker 7: a taxpayers shouldn't be on the cut for that right,
Speaker 7: like if you're going to sexually harass and assault your staff,
Speaker 7: you should be personally liable for that. And then the
Speaker 7: other aspect of well ethics also needs to overhaul and
Speaker 7: a reform in the way that it processes, because it
Speaker 7: shouldn't take three years. For example, in a representative Schifflistpcormick's
Speaker 7: case to where if you stole five million dollars of
Speaker 7: FEMA funds, why is she just now being charged with us?
Speaker 7: She's gotten a taxpayer paychecks the whole time.
Speaker 1: What did they find twenty five ethics violations on her?
Speaker 7: Yes, yeah, twenty five out of the twenty seven.
Speaker 1: It was insane, unbelievable. And your commentary on that ola
Speaker 1: and how do we clean up the halls of Congress?
Speaker 1: How have they gotten away for all these decades with
Speaker 1: having a slush fund to pay off people with either
Speaker 1: taxpayer money or donor money, and and and then then
Speaker 1: it gets buried and nobody ever learns about it, and
Speaker 1: then when they vote for transparency, the very people screaming Epstein, Epstein,
Speaker 1: Epstein don't want any transparency all of a sudden, Oh.
Speaker 3: Exactly because it's them. The lack of accountability and transparency
Speaker 3: is definitely needed. I mean that there is no I
Speaker 3: mean you look at Krey Mills for example, and yes,
Speaker 3: I am going to bring up his name, you know,
Speaker 3: as expiled complaints. I know that there were several women
Speaker 3: that came up and then it kind of died off.
Speaker 3: There is no accountability. They need to be as as
Speaker 3: anoplane said, they need to be expelled. I mean, there
Speaker 3: should be responsibility for their actions. They could not continue
Speaker 3: because what happens is we normalize this. It's become a
Speaker 3: normal thing in the halls of Congress, and it's not
Speaker 3: the way it's supposed to be. This isn't how we
Speaker 3: conduct ourselves. We serve the people, and it's not like
Speaker 3: you know, we're paying they're paying taxes for your misconduct.
Speaker 3: Absolutely not.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it really is nauseating to me, the
Speaker 1: whole thing. Hopefully the reforms will now get in place,
Speaker 1: but it seems like, you know, every five or ten years,
Speaker 1: we run through a cycle where this happens a lot.
Speaker 1: We'll give you the last word. Anna.
Speaker 7: Well, look, I'm happy to help lead the way on this.
Speaker 7: I knew the moment I find the emotion to expel Swawall,
Speaker 7: it would start a chain reaction. I went on record
Speaker 7: with that, and as they now say, it's trashed in Washington,
Speaker 7: DC and we're taking out the trash.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we appreciate both of you being one of us. Anna,
Speaker 1: Paulina Luna, thank you. Ola Hawatma is also running for
Speaker 1: the nineteenth district that's Byron Donald's seat in Florida. We
Speaker 1: will follow that race closely. All, thank you for being
Speaker 1: with us. Eight hundred and nine four one. Sean, if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, you know, Linda,
Speaker 1: we this is a topic we've talked a lot about
Speaker 1: over the years. And then then you have this other
Speaker 1: side of it, where you know, false allegations are made
Speaker 1: against the likes of Justice Kavanaugh or Justice Clarence Thomas,
Speaker 1: which is just as horrible. And then you know people
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, they're all worked up, and then
Speaker 1: you find out a lot of the allegations are false
Speaker 1: or politically motivated. I mean, that's why you can't rush
Speaker 1: to judgment.
Speaker 9: The people that protest the much of the most are
Speaker 9: usually the ones that are committing the very the very
Speaker 9: thing they're protesting against.
Speaker 1: You mean, likeswallwell, or if mister Fast exactly like him,
Speaker 1: he's gross. Have you heard the term femos sphere? I haven't, Okay,
Speaker 1: Apparently this is like a big thing on TikTok and
Speaker 1: YouTube and Reddit and anyway. It's there are these femos
Speaker 1: fear communities that are recruiting members and young women and
Speaker 1: I guess it's a women focused answer to the manosphere.
Speaker 1: You've heard the term manosphere before, right, Okay, I guess yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, And this is what I'm reading a description
Speaker 1: of it. Men should always do the chasing. Women should
Speaker 1: seek financial contributions from men. It's appearing online and in
Speaker 1: all of these online spaces. There is a paper published
Speaker 1: in Feminist Media Studies earlier this year, and this professor
Speaker 1: Jillie Kay traced this femosphere online communities back to twenty
Speaker 1: eighteen and reaction to the manosphere and misogynistic communities, and
Speaker 1: they vary in forms of anti feminism to more explicit
Speaker 1: violent rhetoric, et cetera, et cetera. And while the manosphere
Speaker 1: has their influencers, you know, now you've got these this
Speaker 1: new the femosphere influencers. And anyway, this whole dating strategy
Speaker 1: has now spawned a podcast of the same name, which
Speaker 1: claims to be about ruthless advancement of women. And it
Speaker 1: just goes on and I'm like, why is this so manipulative?
Speaker 1: I don't really understand it.
Speaker 9: I am the worst person to ask about this because
Speaker 9: I am the most anti feminist there ever was. I
Speaker 9: can't stand women who talk about being women all the time,
Speaker 9: how hard it is being a woman, how tough it
Speaker 9: is being a woman. I want to be recognized for
Speaker 9: being a woman.
Speaker 7: YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 9: You want to mention it.
Speaker 1: You've made a great achievement, that's awesome. But as soon
Speaker 1: as I started marying from the Irish Daily Mail, you
Speaker 1: actually don't have time.
Speaker 7: You're gonna have to carry it over to tomorrow.
Speaker 1: These are ruthlessen your evaluation of men. Make him invest
Speaker 1: before sex, don't they financially challenge men? Never split the bill,
Speaker 1: you know, these are some of the commandments of the
Speaker 1: female dating strategy. Maybe we should get this woman on
Speaker 1: the show's sle oh, you just made me laugh. That's
Speaker 1: not allowed, not allowed to make me laugh.
Speaker 5: It's bringing you up, people who make the news. This
Speaker 5: this is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: All right, that's gonna wrap things up at today A
Speaker 1: Great Hannity tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
Speaker 1: The blockade is working big time. Will the Iranians decide
Speaker 1: to do it the easy way of the hard way.
Speaker 1: We've got Steven Miller, Dana Perino, Dave asman As oil
Speaker 1: prices now coming down? Are your children being radicalized online?
Speaker 1: An investigation also Clay Travis, Charlie Hurt, Mark Meadows, Set
Speaker 1: you DVR, nine Eastern Tonight Hannity on Fox. Will see
Speaker 1: you then back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the
Speaker 1: show possible.