WEBVTT - The Podcast Patent Problem

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer at

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works in love all things tech, and we're

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>going to tackle a very special topic to me today.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So for several years, there was a dark cloud looming

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>over the podcast landscape, and the shadow of this cloud

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>was affecting many podcasters in different ways, including the podcasts

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from How Stuff Works. So today we're going to explore

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the story of Personal Audio l l C, the patents

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>that were at the heart of the issue, and what

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>happened as a result. And I've been asked about this

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>story many times, and until the matter was actually put

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to rest earlier in two thousand eighteen, I couldn't really

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. I'll mention more about being put to

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>rest in a little bit, but I didn't feel comfortable

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>covering the story on my show because How Stuff Works

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of the parties specifically named by Personal Audio

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>LLC and its complaints, and as an employee of How

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works, it would at the very least be unwise

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>to comment officially on the matter. I might be seen

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as a real voice of the company, like I was

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>representing the company as a whole, and I wouldn't necessarily

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that I would just be trying to cover the story.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I am not the official voice of the company. I

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>am given an awful lot of control over my podcast,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>and I do appreciate that. But as we understand, with

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>great power comes great something something. As my fictional uncle

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Ben used to tell me before, I would hustle off

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to shoot pictures for the local paper. But now the

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>whole matter is closed and I feel I can at

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>least give an account of what happened and why it

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>took so long to resolve, and I'll try to be

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as objective as possible. So please remember, this was a

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>case that had the potential to really affect my career,

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so I am a bit close to it, but I'm

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and be unbiased. That's also challenging because a

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the outlets that reported on this had a

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>very specific perspective on the matter. So let's begin this

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>discussion by talking about what patents are, because that's at

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the very heart of the matter. A patent is at

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>least a patent like the kind of talking about in

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this episode is essentially a license or similar authorized document

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>issued by a government to an applicant for the right

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to make, use, sell, or license out and invention. You

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>cannot patent an idea, but you can patent the implementation

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.399
<v Speaker 1>of an idea as long as it meets certain criteria.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've come up with a really cool

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>invention that's going to automatically coordinate all your outfits so

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>that not only are you fashionable, but you also never

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about wearing the exact same outfit twice

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because it will keep a track record of everything you've done,

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>so it will pair different pieces together to consistently keep

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>your look fresh from day to day and fashionable. It's

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>not gonna pair two mismatched pieces of clothing together. And

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you feel this invention has real value and you want

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to protect your idea from people who might steal it,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so you have a couple of different options ahead of you.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>One of those options is you keep your mouth shut

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>about how you invented it. You don't explain how it works,

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You create a product, and you go to market. The

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>danger of this method is that you don't really have

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>any protection for your idea if someone goes out and

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>buys your product and then says, I'm going to break

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this down and figure out how this this person did this.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They reverse engineer your process and they figure out how

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you did it. They could conceivably create a competing product

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of their own and undercut you, and you don't have

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>any protection in that case. Or you could apply for

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a patent for your invention. Now, this involves drafting a

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>patent application to the respective authority in the United States,

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the Patent and Trademark Office. The Patent Office reviews

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>your application and assuming your patent appears to be valid

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and presents at least a partly new invention that is

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>not obvious, they will most likely approve it. Now, that

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>creates a very interesting trade off because, on the one hand,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your patent is public information. Anyone can pull up your

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>patent and read it and see how your invention works

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>from a very high level. Most patents use fairly vague

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>language so that the intricate details are not on display.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>They give the general process of how an invention works.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, you can go to and do

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>patent searches online and pull up patents for all sorts

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of stuff and see how it works. It's actually really

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>really useful if you're trying to, I don't know, do

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a podcast where you're explaining how tech works. But the

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>patent also grants protection. If you find someone using your

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>invention and they don't have your permission to do so,

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you can sue them for infringing on your patent. And

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can prove that they are using your approach,

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the one that's detailed in your patent, and they don't

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have your permission, you can put a stop to it.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Even if it turns out that other people have come

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>up with the same approach independently after you came up

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>with it. If they say, look, we never ever encountered

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>your design, you could argue, well, that doesn't matter, because

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I have the patent, and that patent pre dates your

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>version of my invention. I own that approach to the invention. Effectively,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you can choose to license your approach to other people

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if they want to do the same thing, but they

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>can't do it without your permission. Now. Current lee in

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States patents have a term of twenty years

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>from the earliest filing date of the patent application. You

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>also have to pay occasional fees to maintain the patent.

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>In the United States, like in some countries, it's an

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>annual fee, but in the US it's not. In the US,

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay a fee at three and a

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>half years, seven and a half years, and eleven and

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a half years after the patent has been issued, and

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the patent fee increases each time. If the patent holder

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fails to pay the fee, the patent is abandoned and

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the invention is no longer under patent protection. Patent holders

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>will often abandon a patent on purpose if the maintenance

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>fees exceed the value of the patent itself. If you're saying, well,

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be paying x amount, but this is

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>worth less than X, it doesn't make sense to keep

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.799
<v Speaker 1>maintaining the patent, you might abandon it. The Patent office

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>can take a couple of years to grant patents from

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the moment that they've been applied for. After the HERMA

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>protection is up, anyone is free to create inventions based

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>off the information in those patents. So twenty years passes

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>after the filing of a patent or the rather the

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>application for a patent, then anyone can make something and

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you you have no legal recourse to suthe them for

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>using your approach because the patent has expired. The general

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>logic about this is that you don't stifle innovation. This way.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Other people can take your idea and they can work

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>with it. They can change it up, they can make

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>tweaks to it. But the protection gives you two decades

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of a head start, so you have a nice solid

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>ground to to start from. Now. Patent holders can make

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>money or exploit their inventions in several ways. And when

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we say exploit, and it's not like it's being it's

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not a negative thing. Exploiting in this sense means you're

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>just making use of the invention in a way in

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>order to profit from it. So patent holders can make

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>their inventions and sell them to customers. They could go

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>into manufacturing and production. They might license their inventions to

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>other parties, which then can go on to exploit those

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>inventions and sell them or otherwise profit from them. So

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Let's say you're a small time inventor

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and you've come up with a brilliant invention, but you

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>don't really have the capital to start up a whole

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing system. You might take your idea and license it

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to a different company that does do manufacturing. And that's

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>why you can. You can profit from your idea, but

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to sink in the massive investment to

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>go into the actual production. You could even sell your

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>patent rights to another party entirely. You just sell them

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the patent and they become the patent holder. It's it's

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like a transference of property, which means the company might

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>then go into production, or maybe they just sit on

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the patents and wait and watch, and if anyone else

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>tries to make anything that infringes upon that patented invention,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the patent holder can threaten legal action. They can attempt

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to take the other party to court, often as a

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>means to leverage a large settlement from the infringing party. Now,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>many people call this last group of patent holders a

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>patent troll, and the argument for doing that, to call

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>them a patentrol goes kind of like this. The holder

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the patent is not actually doing anything useful with

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the invention that the patent covers. Instead, what they're doing

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is effectively acting as a gatekeeper. The patent holder is

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>not protecting their inventions so much as they are lying

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in wait to spring a trap. They want other parties

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to use that invention implementation so that they can jump

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in with threats of litigation, so you could argue their

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>stifling innovation rather than encouraging it. For many people, it

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>seems unfair that a company or inventor could patent a

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>really cool invention and then refuse to actually do anything

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>productive with it, while preventing anyone else from doing the

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>same unless they pay an exorbitant fee. Some folks would

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>go so far as to throw the patent holders who

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>license their patents to others in that category. I think

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going too far. I think there are plenty of

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>cases where it's totally legitimate to license out a patent

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to other companies if you are incapable of producing it yourself.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's totally legit. I think the patent holders

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>should get compensation for his or her idea. But I

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>do get a little uneasy about companies that hold lots

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of patents but they never do anything with them apart

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>from threatened litigation. That does rub me the wrong way.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I find it rather trollish. Next, I'm going to talk

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>about Personal Audio LLC and why many people refer to

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that company as a patent troll. But first, let's take

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to thank our sponsor. Now, before I

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>get too far into this section, let me be clear.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I am not definitively saying that Personal Audio ll C

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is a patentrol. Lots of other people have done that.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>If you do any research at all on the various

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>news outlets that have covered this story, patentrol tends to

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be the phrase most used to describe Personal Audio LLC.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>But I am going to try and step back from that.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I just want to explain the story as it unfolded

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and let you guys draw your own conclusions, because I

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>actually really do think the story is more complicated than

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>how it's frequently portrayed. There are critics who said that

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what Personal Audio LLC did was an extortion racket, and

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually a little more nuanced than that.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's not being entirely fair. So let's dial

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this back all the way to nineteen nine six, which,

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.599
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was years before the word podcast was

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing. And I can say that authoritatively because podcast

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>comes from the word iPod, and the Apple iPod didn't

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.479
<v Speaker 1>hit the market until two thousand one. So this company's

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>beginnings pre date the word podcast, if not the general concept.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>More on that in a minute. In nine a guy

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>named James Logan got involved in this and made this

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>enormous investment to start up a company. Now, Logan had

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>previously founded a company called Microtouch Incorporated. He was the

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO of that company. He had amassed a you know,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>good fortune. He would remain the CEO of Microtouch until

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand. At that point, another company, three M, would

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>acquire micro Touch. Fun side note, by the way, the

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>U S Securities and Exchange Commissi or SEC would actually

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>file a suit against James Logan alleging charges of insider

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>trading back in two thousand three. UH. The charges stated

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that Logan had directed a trust for the benefit of

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>his minor children to acquire Microtouch stock, knowing that Microtouch

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>was engaged in negotiations with both Tycho International Limited and

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing also known as three M, and

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that he was benefiting directly from this where specifically his

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>children were. Logan would end up settling this matter out

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of court for more than half a million dollars without

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>having to admit or deny the charges anyway. In the

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties, James Logan says he invested more than a

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>million and a half dollars in a new company with

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of co founders, and the company's goal was

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring to market a product that would download and

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>play customized audio tracks, and as part of the company's

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of this goal, it filed patent applications regarding the

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>business strategy. But in this process, the company concluded there

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>would be too difficult and expensive to move forward, and

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they abandoned the plan to make the product, but they

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>still held the patents. This would lead Logan to form

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio LLC in two thousand nine. It served as

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a holding company and its only purpose was to hold

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>onto those patents that were created back in the ninety nineties.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The company itself is based in Texas, which has led

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>many critics to suggest this was a calculated decision because

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas courts have a reputation for favoring patent holders. A

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>judge in Texas had established some really strict rules to

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>keep these patent trials short and to the point, creating

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what was casually known as the rocket docket, and juries

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tended in Texas to side with patent holders more than others,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so it became such a big issue that in two

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, a court case caused great upheaval because the

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>courts ruled that patent holders would no longer be allowed

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to seek out a friendly court to hear their litigation.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That this was in the wake of discovering that Eastern

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Texas would hear Thousands of patent infringement cases per year

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>were brought to courts by what was called nonpracticing entities.

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That means companies that did not actually produce anything. They

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>owned a lot of patents, but that's all they did,

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>In other words, patent trolls. According to some critics, one

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the patents that Personal Audio LLC. Was concerned with

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was titled Audio Program Player Including a Dynamic Program Selection Controller,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and the abstract for that patent describes the invention like this,

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is a long quote, but stick with me.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>An audio program and message distribution system and which a

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>host system organizes and transmits program segments to clients subscriber locations.

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The host organizes the program segments by subject matter and

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>creates scheduled programming in accordance with preferences associated with each subscriber.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Program segments are associated with descriptive subject matter segments, and

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter segments may be used to generate both

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>text and audio cataloging presentations. To enable the user to

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>more easily identify and select desirable programming, a playback unit

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>at the subscriber location reproduces the program segments received from

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the host and includes mechanisms for interactively navigating among the

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>program segments. A usage log is compiled to record the

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>subscriber's use of the provided program materials, to return data

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to the host for billing, to adaptively modify the subscribers

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>preferences based on actual usage, and to send subscriber generated

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>comments and requests to the host for processing. Voice input

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and control mechanisms included in the player allow the user

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to perform hands free navigation of the program materials and

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to dictate comments and messages, which are returned to the

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>host for retransmission to other subscribers. The program segments sent

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to each subscriber may include advertising materials which the user

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>can selectively play to obtain credits against the subscriber fee.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Parallel audio and text transcript files for at least selected

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>programming enable subject matters searching and synchronization of the audio

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and text files. Speech synthesis may be used to convert

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>transcript files into audio format. Image files may also be

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>transmitted from the server for synchronized playback with the audio programming.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a long summary, but that particular thing would

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>come into play in two thousand nine when Personal Audio LLC.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Would bring a lawsuit against Apple for patent infringement. Personal

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Audio would win eight million dollars that effort. Other lawsuits

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>against other manufacturers would follow, and you could certainly argue

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that the iPod and playlists and structure that Apple had

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>created resembled the proposal in the patent, and that other

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>companies that had produced MP three players in their own

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>filing systems and organization systems also kind of fell into

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that category. But the patent the company would use to

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>go after podcasters was not exactly that same patent. It

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was slightly different. And one of the things about patents

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is that you can actually apply to modify them as

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>technology advances. So you could create an invention that depends,

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say, on a specific type of media. For example,

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say that your invention UH concerns cassette tapes. But

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then later on, as technology advances and you get compact

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>discs or you get digital media. You want to update

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>your invention. It's following the same sort of invention process,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>but now it's dependent upon a new form of media.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You can do that. It's subject to the Patent Offices approval,

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but you can win a new patent that covers the

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>same approach, but now with a new element, like a

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>new in this case new medium. But on the media

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>distribution side, this patent was was not focused on a

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>model that would resemble subscribing to downloading and listening to

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a podcast with that Apple one and for that the

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>patent Personal Audio LLC would use against podcasters and which

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>would later get challenged was u S Patent eight million,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>five hundred four, also known as System for Disseminating Media

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Content Representing Episodes in a serialized sequence. Now that patent

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>included claims that would more closely tie to podcasting in general.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>These sections focused on the host side of the invention,

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>as in the servers on the Internet that would host

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the audio files that listeners would connect to and download

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to listen to their shows. This patent was

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>granted in two thousand twelve, and as the site i

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 1>P Watchdog would put it, The patent quote claimed a

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>media player for acquiring and reproducing media programming files which

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>represent episodes in a series of episodes as those episodes

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>become available. The media player includes a digital memory at

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>communication sport coupled to the Internet for transmitting data requests,

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and an output unit for reproducing the media files that

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>would essentially be speakers or headphones. The resulting invention addressed

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a need among Internet radio sources for a more practical

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>system of delivering content too interested users on request, rather

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>than searching for the radio source via web browser, a

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>difficulty which is exacerbated further when while an interested user

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is driving end quote. That would be the patent that

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>would be the focus of all the fuss. What fuss?

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain more in just a moment, but first let's

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break to thank our sponsor. In two

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen, Personal Audio began to issue warnings to several

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>different podcasting organizations, including the Corolla Digital Network, home of

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Adam Corolla Show. The warnings were all about this

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so called podcasting patent that Personal Audio had received. In

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>February twelve, Corolla's company was hit with a lawsuit for

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>patent infringement, and he decided to fight the lawsuit rather

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>than just settle out of court directly, and he argued

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that the claims in the patent were overly broad and

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the suit was without merit. Around this time, podcasters were

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that the notifications sent by a Personal Audio were

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in the realm of extortion because they didn't include the

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>demand for a licensing agreement or even a firm amount

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that the company wanted. Those who received the messages said

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it felt more like an implied threat that Personal Audio

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>held these patents and was ready to bring them to

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>bear in courts, and the podcasters said it felt like

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 1>they were the recipient of a shakedown. On the Personal

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Audio side, the company said that wasn't the case at all.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>They were just trying to protect the rights that they held,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and people like Logan had invested real money into this

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>company and they were eager to get that investment back.

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't produce the product that they wanted to produce,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but they still had the invention patented and they wanted

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to make profit off their idea. But no one was

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>really sure at the time how much money was actually

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>in podcasting. It could be hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It could be very little at all. This was the

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>time of the wild West in podcasting, and you could

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>argue we're still there right now, but podcasting was hardly

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>an established medium at this point. Even years later, it's

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>still a big question as to how profitable the form

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can be, as different podcasters test out different revenue models.

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But the backlash against Personal Audio LLC was quick, and

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>since the targets happened to be podcasters, it was really public.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>The podcasters happen to have audiences that they could talk

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to and did talk to on a regular basis, so

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the court of public opinion, personal audio had already lost.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Dave Weiner, a software developer, was instrumental in modifying the

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>RSS standard to include a new feature called enclosure, and

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>closure would allow an RSS aggregator to grab the address

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of a media file and this is the heart of

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the subscription process. He did this back in two thousand one,

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and he questioned, how could this patent, which was granted

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve possibly apply to a methodology that

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>was more than a decade older. Adam Carolla launched a

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>crowdfunding campaign to fight the lawsuit and raised more than

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>half a million dollars in the process. However, ultimately he

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>decided to settle with Personal Audio out of court for

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>undisclosed terms. In fact, the terms were word it in

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>such a way that Corolla had a non disclosure agreement.

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>He could not share what those terms were or else

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it would invalidate the negotiations on his part. The settlement

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at the time probably made the most sense for Corolla,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as these lawsuits can be incredibly expensive. Defending against a

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>patent infringement suit could cost a couple of million dollars easy.

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Even with the half million he had already raised for

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>legal fees, he was still way behind. And in Texas,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>where the lawsuits were filed, patent holders, as I said,

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>had a long record of winds juries tended to favor

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>them over others. However, by settling, this meant that Personal

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Audio would have the ability to sue others for that

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>same sort of infringement, and that included companies like how

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works, the one I work for, and at the

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>time we were part of Discovery Communications. The Corolla case

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>was just one of seven district court cases filed in

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen that centered on this particular patent. One

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of those cases was again CBS, in which Personal Audio

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>argued that quote Several shows podcasted by CBS, including sixty Minutes,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Tech Talk and Face the Nation, use servers, data storage,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and other Internet hardware which directly infringe claims of the patent.

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio also alleged that CBS is distribution of episodic

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>video media for shows such as c s I Crime

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Scene Investigation either literally infringed the band or constituted infringement

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>under the doctrine of equivalence. End quote. This quote, by

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, is coming again from the website i P Watchdog.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Then the Electronic Frontier Foundation stepped in or e f F,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about the e f F and other podcasts.

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a group dedicated to preserving individual rights and freedoms

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, and it frequently wages courtroom battles against

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>corporations that sees as encroaching on those ideals, as well

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>as government agencies. Does that with those two. Now, since

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Corrol this case did not go to an in court decision,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there was no precedent set, so the e f F

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>filed an Interpartists review or i p R on the

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasting patent. This is a way for someone to petition

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the Patent and Trademark Office to re evaluate an already

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>issued patent. With a strong enough argument, it is possible

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to have the Patent office decision reversed even after they've

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>granted a patent. It's an expedited process that can lead

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to the office invalidating part or all of a patent,

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>causing the patent to enter abandoned status. The e f

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>F filed this petition on October or in October two

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen, and just to be clear, this effort focused

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>on a different argument than the one CBS attempted to

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>make in its defense against the earlier lawsuits. CBS would

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.239
<v Speaker 1>lose its lawsuit. The e f F was looking at

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a different part of the patent and arguing that it

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>was invalid. They argued that the personal audios patent was

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>invalid because there were already pre existing examples of what

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the patent was claiming from UH that that existed from

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>other people already by the time the patent had been filed.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>This is what we call prior art. Prior art is

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>evidence that the invention in question is already known. That's

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>an invalidating quality of an invention. So to get a patent,

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the invention has to be new prior art doesn't have

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to exist physically or commercially. There just has to be

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>proof evidence that the idea pre exists the filing of

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the patent, and that was the tactic the e f

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>F employed in their case, and specifically they pointed at

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>how CNN had made news clips available online and how

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the radio broadcast company CBC had done a similar thing

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>with radio programs, and these instances pre dated the nine

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>patent application. It wasn't good enough to predate the two

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve patent, because the two thousand twelve patent was

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>built on top of the patent. They needed to go

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>back further than that and say, here's examples of stuff

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that existed before even this idea was put forth. Now,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>these are not the only sources for media that resembled

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>what Personal Audio laid out in its patent application. Way

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>back in a guy named Carl Malamud launched a show

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>called Internet Talk Radio, and he would interview various computer

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>experts and offer up the files for downloading later, and

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>someone eventually would call it a synchronous radio. We might

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think of it as radio on demand, because you didn't

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have to tune in a specific time to catch the broadcast.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 1>You could download and listen to it whenever you wanted to.

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>This happened three years before Logan had even invested money

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in that initial venture. The e f F successfully argued

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that the claims in the patent were not valid. The

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Patent Trial and Appeal Board decided in two thousand fifteen

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that all the patent claims that the e f had

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>challenged were in fact invalid. Personal Audio would appeal this decision,

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and the case ended up going to the federal circuit courts.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It took two years, but on August seven, two thousand seventeen,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this appeals court ruled that the previous ruling by the

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Patent Trial and Appeals Board was correct, meaning the patent

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>would remain invalid. Specifically, the Federal Circuit found that CNN

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and CBC both had implementations of the technology before the

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>filing of the patent, meaning they had in fact established

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>prior art, and that, in addition, the claimed invention was

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>deemed too obvious. That's another metric you have to meet

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>when you patent something not only has doesn't have to

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be new, it cannot be obvious. You also, by the way,

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can't patent stuff like natural phenomena, though that gets kind

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of tricky when you get into stuff like DNA and

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and genetics and stuff like that, but that's a topic

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for another time. Personal Audio then filed a petition to

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have this case heard by the Supreme Court, and on

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>May fourteen, two thousand eighteen, the Supreme Court officially denied

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that petition, which meant the Federal Circuit decision would remain final,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it would stand, it would be the official decision on

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the matter, and it was laid to rest. Now what

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this means is that the claims in that patent that

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>relates specifically to the distribution of material in a way

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that we call podcasting no longer have any real meaning.

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>There's no validity to them anymore from a legal standpoint

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So podcasters do not have to

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>pay a royalty or licensing fee to Personal Audio in

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>order to maintain operations. For a lot of people in

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the business, this was a huge relief because for many people,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasting is not exactly profitable. Uh, you might be breaking even,

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you might be losing money on it. And if you

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a loyal royalty fee or a licensing

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>fee on top of that. Then you would lose significantly

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>more money, so it would be prohibitive for a lot

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of people if that or the case. And like I said,

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't feel comfortable talking about it at all because

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works was a named uh entity in this

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>whole process. But now that it's all over, I figured

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I could finish the story. So I hope you guys

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that peek back into the history of podcasting and

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the the dispute that could have dramatically changed the way

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasting unraveled. It would probably mean that I have a

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>totally different career now if in fact it had gone

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>another way. So very interesting stuff for me personally. If

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys have suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a technology, a person, a company, whatever it

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>may be, send me an email and let me know.

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The address is tech stuff at how stuff works dot

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>com or drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>The handle of both of those is text stuff H

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>s W. Don't forget to pop on over to T

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>public dot com slash tech stuff. That's t e E

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>public dot com slash tech stuff. That's where all our

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>merchandise is you can make yourself lousy with tech stuff

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>merch and every purchase you make goes to help the show,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so we greatly appreciate it. Also, don't forget to follow

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram and I'll talk to you again really

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 1>soon for more on this and thousands of other topics

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>because it how stuff works dot com