WEBVTT - Could 2023 be worse than 2022? Absolutely

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world's of business and finance,

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well, the new issue of

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week is out now. The cover story Shocks

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to the System. Yes, the global economy is in a

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>fragile state, but here's a practical way to think about

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the risks. It's all about the new economy as well.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We got with us this afternoon Christina Lynn Blatch. She's

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Global Economics editor for Bloomberg Business Week. She's with us

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>right now in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Christina, before

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we get into specific stories, just give us an overview

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of the New Economy issue and you know, of course

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is associated with Bloomberg's New Economy Forum. Um. But what

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>was the goal here in putting this together? Well, one

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things when we started, we were looking at

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of where we were last year when we were

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>putting this together, and we were feeling quite hopeful two

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>years after COVID that the scars were starting to heal.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Was not great, a lot better has been kind of brutal,

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and then well, you know, we were in the grips

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of a crazy virus and then all these other things

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>started happening. More crazy people. They're back on the horizon

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>now on the stage rather um. Yeah. So I think

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the story, one of the stories that we

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>did is is that now geopolitics are back as as

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a risk you know, which we hadn't. You know, we

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>had biological risk for like a year or two write

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>um and that, you know, and it's not like the

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>pandemic has gone away. So it's basically risk on top

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of risk on top of risk, um and um. And

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>then we thought, wow, the world feels so fragile right now.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It does feel fragile, doesn't it talk about recession and well,

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to your point that we've had biological risks. It feels

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like the pandemic has been so all consuming over the

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>past two and a half years. But I like the

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>framing of this story because you bring up Brexit, the

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>U S. China trade war. Haven't thought about that in

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a while, Russia's invasion of Ukraine. To your point that

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the world is very fragile right now, I mean, what's

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what's next helped me. Well, it's actually hard to feel

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>very hopeful right now. By three, I mean, I think

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the best that we can hope for is is that

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's resilience, uh, that countries will get through

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what undoubtedly Europe will soon be in recession. Russia already

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is um. In the US, of course, Bloomberg Economics expects

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>ite um. But I think that in a way, some

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the things we thought were going great, like in

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the last chair, which was the resilience of the labor

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>market in the US, has turned to have a huge

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>downside right in terms of fighting inflation. So it's like

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't even count like you're you know, the your

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you give thanks for some of these things before you

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>realize that, oh no, you know, some of these things

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 1>are actually weaknesses. Well, we learned about how intertwined the

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>world is when it comes to supply chains, specifically when

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to China. I think two has been about

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>our reliance on oil in a different way with Russia's

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine. When we think about the country is that.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say calling the shots in two,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but to look forward to three, what are the countries

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to watch? Um? I think US and China

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are still big protagonists. Of course, they're pulling apart from

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>each other, and that has consequences for many many countries,

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>countries that are going to potentially be forced to choose

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on which side you know they're on, maybe not yet,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but like in subtle ways right, um, Well, Saudi Arabia

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw recently the people you count on as friends

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in the US may not always be there for you

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, what's happening in energy markets.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you think about it now, you know

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>countries have to look at their own well being. What

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia is doing in terms of oil, it's like,

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're talking about a country that has one

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>giant pilot of this commodity and which in twenty years

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>may not be in demand much anymore, right, So they're

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>maximizing their benefits. So in a way, it's like what

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be seeing next year again in our with

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a with a background of our recession, is people are

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking to maximize their own well being

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and countries are right, and so that is going to

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>cause further strains. Um And you have new governments in

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>some places, you know, in the UK and Brazil, um

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and and the new government in the yeah, um you

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>could or you could say though that he probably knows

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>more about the inner working So what's happening in that

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>country right now? Um And, And they're going to be

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>making choices, I mean, domestic politics are going to be

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, foremost, although interestingly in the US there's been

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a tradition that lame duck presidents tend to focus very

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>much on international agenda. So we'll see what we see.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if there's if there's something that Biden he's

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>already duck president, we don't know you heard it here first,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't know your right space. I want to talk

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>more about China though, because the idea that the US

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and China are pulling apart, what falls in the void

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and who you know which countries go along with either side.

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>If the U S And China are pulling apart, is

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that inherently inflationary? That's a good question, thank you. Um,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>because you think about bobalization, I mean, the thing you

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>always hear is that it's been deflationary. You've gotten lower

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>prices as technology and trade just continues to flow. So

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, is the is the complete opposite of

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that a globalization? Is that that? I don't know, what

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>does the logic follow that that's inflationary? Well, I mean,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we are seeing some manufacturing coming

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>back to the US isn't because you know, American policymakers

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>have been standing on the shores, you know, calling companies

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to come back. Uh, it's because shipping costs got to

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be so high, you know, and and supply chains headaches,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. So some companies believe they can actually manufacture

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>closer to their main market at at a low cost.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So if that is the case, then it shouldn't necessarily

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>be inflationary that these you know, that these countries are

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>pulling apart. The thing about this what we're seeing right now, though,

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is there's so many different factors also involved. In those calculations, right,

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>because the strength of the dollar. You know, people have said, oh,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the US is exporting inflation to other countries through that conduit.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about, for example, the fact that

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>global commodities tend to be prized in dollars, what it

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is like for a country that is a net import

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or of oil uh to be having to you know,

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to to to pay for that commodity now in like

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and which is much more expensive, then

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you can understand that we've seen all sorts of traditional

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of that that that that those calculus is not

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a good word, are constantly shifting, and they've been shifting

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last year. UM. I mean from a from

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a business perspective. UM. I think people companies have seen

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the downside of of how heavily they came to rely

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on one country for manufacturing uh. And I think that,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the margin, when a company thinks, now,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe not where am I going to move that plant

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>out of China, but where am I going to with

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the second or third plant? Uh? And those are good

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>conversations to be having. Okay, twenty seconds left. There are

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stories in here that I want to

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get to we have time for one more birth control

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in developing countries. Um, why do we need to focus

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on sort of an old school method? Twenty seconds? Well,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Africa in particular, because there's this thing

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>called the demographic transition, and if you mismanage it, you

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>get poorer before you know, you miss out on prosperity.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Christina Lyndblad, Global Economics editor for Bloomberg Business Week,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Check out

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week. It's online, It's

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on newsstands now and of course it's also on the

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. It's the new Economy issue of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Very pleased right

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>now to be joined by Dr Tom Inglesby, Director for

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Health Security, the JOHNS Hopkins Bloomberg School

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health. It is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Doctor Inglesby

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>joined us on the phone from Baltimore. Dr good to

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. As I mentioned just a

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>few moments ago, Katie and I both moderated panels from

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Growth Summit Bloomberg Live event here, and I

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, it feels like we are back to

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>totally normal, pre pandemic uh activities, full full room, a

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of masks, but you know, not by the majority

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or anything. And you know there was you were able

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to join virtually, but there are people here in person.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh are we out of this pandemic? Well, Hi, Tim

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and Katie, thanks so much for having me. We are

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>not out of the pandemic. Uh that things are obviously

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>much better than they were a year ago or even

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>six months ago. But if you look at the numbers

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>every day, there still are fifty people on average dying

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>from COVID every day in the United States. And you

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>know that this the majority of people who are getting

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>serious CODED infection are unvaccinated or have some kind of

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.119
<v Speaker 1>underlying immune suppression. But there are people who are vaccinated

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and are still getting very serious COVID infections, And so

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's importable to know. It's it's far far better than

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it was, but it's fairly steady. We are still in

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty steady state of people having a fatal infection

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>from COVID every day. If you look at the the

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>stats across the country, it's still for adults something like

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the sixth or seventh leading cause of death in the

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>United States. So it's nothing to be kind of trifled with.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>It's still a very serious illness. And so I mean,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is that just going to be sort of the new

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>normal going forward? And to your point that they're still

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>unvaccinated people in this country at this point, is it

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>safe to say if you haven't gotten a vaccine by now,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not going to go get the job. Well,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope that's not the case. I think, you know,

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the more that we learn about the vaccine and more

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>than information is published about it, the more the doctors

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and nurses who take care of people and communities keep

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about the value of vaccine. I am hopeful that

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>more people will get vaccinated. You're right, only only about

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the country or have gotten the first

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>two shots of vaccine, and so the other third of

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the country is walking around pretty vulnerable, were very vulnerable

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to a COVID infection and maybe a very serious one

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or even a fatal one. So hopefully with time, as

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>people see that the vaccine has been really well tolerated,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that major side effects have not occurred, that more people

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>will decide to get vaccinated. It is not too late.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Some people may think I've missed the window. You haven't

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>missed the window. You could get vaccinated today. It's free,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>uh in places around the country. And so I really

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>would encourage people to do that. Okay, So in the

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>last minute and a half that we have with you,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Dr Englesby, give us, give us some lessons that we've

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>learned over the past two and a half years that

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>could help us deal with future viral outbreaks. And I

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>got to tell you there are the virus I mean,

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, my son had RSV last week. We know

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>kids in the hospital with RSV. There's ten foot mouth

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>going around at daycare, like there are other viruses out there. Oh,

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. I think we're entering a wintertime where

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have continued covid infection. We're gonna have a

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>probably pretty serious flu season and a lot of RSB

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like like your son. I think, you know, one of

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the lessons is that we have tools to fight these viruses.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>For many of them, I think rs V. Unfortunately, we

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>don't have the same tools we have for flu and

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for COVID, but research and development in America matters a lot.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We can actually still make a lot of progress against

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>these viruses. Wearing a mask makes a big difference. That

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>lowers your chance of getting infected. So if you're if

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you're vulnerable to one of these infections, then then that

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of intervention or UM that that kind of like

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>removing yourself from infection is important. And um getting tested

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>also is really useful because it then leads to the

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>potential for treatment. So we have now rapid tests available

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>around the country for COVID, really easy to get flu

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>tests as well, and getting those tests helps make a

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>diagnosis and then can lead to rapid treatment and that

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>can make a big difference for people. Dr Tom Angles,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>director of the Center Frail Security at the Johns Hopkins

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health. Dr Engels, be good to

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have you with us here on a Bloomberg Business Week Radio.

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>hotel search platform Tree Vago reported earnings earlier this week.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Revenue for the third quarter beat, but it was a

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>miss when it came to the bottom line. The company

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>reported a lost per share of nineteen euro cents versus

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>an estimate of actually an earnings of four euro cents.

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get more right now with Axel Heafer, he's

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Tree Vago. He joins his via zoom

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>right now from Dusseldorf, Germany. Axel, good to have you

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>back with us. How are you. I'm very well. How

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are you? We're doing well? Thanks? Hey, um, let's start

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 1>with earnings and then I want to get to what

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing when it comes to travel demand in Europe

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and around the world. What happened when it came to

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line just expenses rose, No, not at all.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we had the highest adjustity but of all times,

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>so I record. What happened is that we have have

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of goodwill on our balance sheet, which

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is coming from an acquisition ideal years back, and with

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a rising interest rate environment, you basically need to do

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>impairment tests every quarter, and the impairment has basically brought

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>down the net income and what was there any impact

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>at all from the strong dollar. I feel like when

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you look over the third quarter earnings reporting season so far,

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been a consistent theme. Was that a factor

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for Triviago as well? Not really. I mean, we are

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a global business, so we operated pretty much everywhere other

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>than in China, and so um currencies have an impact,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but but not a material impact on our numbers. Okay, well,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>let's move out and talk about broader travel environment right now,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as I've been talking about this throughout the program. Today

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I did a panel for Bloomberg Live at the Bloomberg

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Growth Summit. Katie did as well, and I started off.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I asked the CMO in chief Digital officer of Virgin Atlantic,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the airliner based in the UK part of Virgin Group

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>also ready nine percent owned by Delta, about demanding what

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>she's seeing, Chavonne pitz Fitzpatrick, and she told me that

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they are still seeing robust demand. They're not seeing any

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of slow down when it comes to what people

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>want to purchase in terms of flights and traveling. And

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it kind of runs counter to what we've been hearing

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about concerns about a recession globally. ACXL. What are you

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing on your platform. Yes, so the if you just

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the third quarter, the summer was very very

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>strong for sure. Um, if you now look look at

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter and really at an automate winter, the

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the demand is very strong. So and what But on

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, what we are seeing is that they

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are very very first signs, tiny signs of changing consumer

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>behavior in Europe, and we believe that Europe will be

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>actually hit harder than than the US. What are those tines?

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>What are those tiny signs? So what we are seeing,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what what you would expect in in in

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a more difficult time that people will try to mitigate

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the increase in in prices by somehow trading down. And

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there are three ways how you can trade down. One

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is you just reduce the length of your trip, and

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some very early signs of a reduction in

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the length of stay in Europe. The second one is

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that you are taking a cheaper destination. And the destination

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>can be cheaper either because it's cheaper to get there

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you can drive there rather and have to fly there,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>or the destination is as such cheaper, and again we've

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>seen some very early signs there in Europe and the

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>third one is that you just compare more, which is

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously for US great because that's what we offer. We

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>help users to compare hotel prices. So so actually just

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>sticking with this because this is really interesting, interesting data

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that you guys have. Are you talking about this just

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for European customers or is this globally? We can't see

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it in America's yet. And and that that also makes

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>sense because the impact of the current crisis is much

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>more severe in in Europe. Inflation obviously has hit the

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Western world everywhere, but in Europe you have you have

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot more visibility and you have real shortage. So

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>there there is concerned that you will run out of

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>certain basic goods over winter because they are supply shortages.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And in addition you have rapidly increasing prices. So the

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is much worse than than in the US. And

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that's why I would also expect for next year the

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>recession or the cool down of the economy to be

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>worse in Europe versus the US. Actually you mentioned that

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, what you're seeing is that people are not

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>staying for as long. Uh, their stays have been shortening up.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting, I mean comparing and contrasting that with

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>what we heard from Airbnb, who reported earlier this week

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. They give a week forecast. There was weakness

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.239
<v Speaker 1>in high end rentals, maybe people not using rentals as

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a place to work from home. Is it a similar

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>read and what's going on in Europe with people shortening

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>their stays. I think it's very different. I mean, the

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the mix of all the travel companies is obviously very different,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and geographic makes Europe versus the US, but also the

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>business makes and I think Whateverbnb is referring to is

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really this this remote working which is um in a way,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>an upper class phenomenon, and so we we don't have

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the same exposure, not as strong asposure as they have.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But that that again makes sense because they you have

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more and more companies that moved to a hybrid model

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>or some even returned fully to the office. So that's

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not a surprise to me that that you have a

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>less demand for fully flexible housing. A lot of people

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think about Triviago as a hotel search platform, but what

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of visibility do you have when it comes to

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>flights and when it comes to car rentals? Zero it's it,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but you can book those services on Trivago. No, not really.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean so, so we've run some tests where we

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>have actually used wide labeled solutions of other partners. But

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>but we we are ourselves. We only operate as an

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>accommodation search class. It's interesting and find what I'm seeing

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem what we see here see here in the

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>US must be a white label version because we can

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and book those here in the US. We

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>were talking earlier about the signs of trouble that you're

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to see in Europe. You said you're not seeing

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it here in the US yet. But what do you

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>expect to see as a as a person running a

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>company that operates in what pretty much every country except

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for China, How are you planning for? So we think

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that actually the absolute spend on travel will be up

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>next year, and and why is that the prices will

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to rise. You have inflation on pretty much everything

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Western world, and we do think that that

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>will continue um, but consumers will and that's to a

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>different degree in Europe and the US will try to

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>counter that that increase in prices. But that that we

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>do expect that the overall spending will be up in

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>absolute terms. Well, Okay, overall spending, you expect to see

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it up. But tell us about how inflation is impacting

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the business now and pacting travelers. Now, do you see

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>an effect? I mean that right now, you see very

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>little effect, to be perfectly honest, and in a way

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with that's that's more or less what we've expected. I mean,

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we expected the very very strong summer as we've seen

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the last two years as well, even during the pandemic,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because in summer is really the time to travel where

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you really want to get a break, um, and where

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you want to see friends and family, et cetera. And

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that to a very very strong degree. The

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>other thing that helped the summer is obviously that the

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>savings rate has been very high and in a lot

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of countries, in most countries actually through the pandemic, So

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>people have saved money that they could spend on expensive

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>travel this year. Um and uh. And they were just

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of things that were promised

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that were they were pushed out, that that you needed

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to needed to do. I don't know, Disneyland was one

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>of our top destinations and you can really imagine how

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>many kids were promised that they would they would be

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>taken to Disneyland in the last two years, and at

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>some point in time you need to honor your promise. Um. So,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's why you can't really see it right now

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>other than the very first signs of it. But if

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the world around us and the world

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we are currently living on, everything is getting very expensive

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and the the real wages in a lot of our

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>core markets are under pressure, which means that people have

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to save. Um. And so I don't think it's it's

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>prudent to assume that, um, that the market will will

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just go up with inflation. Um. We believe that that

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>consumers will will save and and and encounter some of

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the inflationary pressure on travel costs. So how are you

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with this internally right now? At the end of

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, you had what about eight hundred employees Actel

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about what you're doing inside the company

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to potentially plan for some sort of downturn. Yeah, I

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>mean we we actually took a decision that was quite

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>tough in summer, and then in summerre he said, Okay,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it's very clear that we were entering more turbulent times

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or we were in more turbulent times already in summer

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and being based in Europe, obviously we're in the middle

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of it. And we said what it was quite clear

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that inflation will be around us for the foreseeable future,

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and that will saving money and comparing prices for pretty

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>much everything from milk to t shirts to hotels will

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be on top of everybody's mind. So we decided to

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on our core value proposition and we've shut down

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>some of our more adjacent products, which which basically allows

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>us to to really focus on our core and to

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>serve our customers with the product that we think is

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>most suitable. On the other hand, it also helped us

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to reduce our costs and because of that, we do

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>believe that will be able to reduce our cost twenty

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>two to twenty three, even though inflation will will push

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>up our expenses. And actually we have a little less

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>than a minute left with you. But of the regions

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that you have visibility on, which is the closest to

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic times, I would say pretty much all of

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the West, so western Europe and northern America's um in

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>this summer, people were traveling like crazy. Um So, yeah,

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it was it goes as as good as it could

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>go for a travel company. Alright, Axel Hea for for

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO at Trivago, joining us via zoom from Dusseldorf, Germany.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Always going to chat with you. Excellent. Get an idea

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for what's happening when it comes to the world of

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>travel and specifically hotels and lodging room a journal. Yeah,

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, please,

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the right gravels. I want to drive. It's

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>good question. This is good Drive to the clothes on

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Bluebird Radio. It's that time already less than ten minutes

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>ago in until the bells here for our drive to

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the clothes. We are very pleased to be joined by

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Mona Mahajan, a senior investment strategist at Edward Jones. She

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>joins us this afternoon via zoom from Warren, New Jersey. Mona,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us. How are you great?

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me? Great to be here on a

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>beautiful day, beautiful day maybe outside, beautiful day here at

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the office. But you take a look at the markets

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's not a lot of beauty to see. Um,

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you explain it? Yeah? Look, it was a

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>big week in markets, and the FED was probably the

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>culprit of what's causing not only yesterday's volatility, but some

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of the follow through we're seeing today. Um, you know,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we went into yesterday hopeful that the FED would move

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>at a more moderate pace going forward. Well we got

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that message loud and clear from Joe Powell, but we

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>also got the messages that, um, not only would they

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps be moving at a more gradual page, but they

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>would be doing so for potentially longer, moving rates higher

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>than what they had outlined in the September meeting. And interestingly,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a notable that Jerome Powell outlined

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that the risk he sees at least is to ease

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, pause too soon rather than overtighten and

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>then have the ability to cut rates a later. So

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly his bias and perhaps out of the f O

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>m C, is to keep moving forward, of course, until

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we start to see that infamous inflation CPI print start

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to move more lower at a more consistent and clear pace.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>And so Mona, can I tell you how wrong I was?

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I had been, you know, hearing and seeing chatter about

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>peak hawkishness for example, maybe that you know, Jerome Powell

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would somehow make some sort of non to that pivot trade,

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe that they would dial back the pace of rate highs.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we almost got that in the statement

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that quickly went away as soon as he started talking.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But I WinCE your time inline for when maybe we

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>do start to discuss peak hawkishness in the rear view mirror. Yeah,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, Look, I think the bottom line is we're

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly closer to the end than we are at the beginning.

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good news for investors. You know, keep

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>in mind, the Feds already done four basis points in

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the span of probably about eight months. You know, that's

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty unprecedented in terms of pace of tightening UM. But

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of course inflation has remained sticky. It's broadened out to

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>some extent. But keep in mind, and the Fed did

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge this that there are lag impacts not only from

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>their rate hikes, but also the CPI prints that we're

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>getting don't quite reflect some of the underlying fundamentals that

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. You know, certainly areas like housing, parts of

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>even the rental markets are starting to show signs of

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>softening weakening UM. Some forlooking indicators of inflation are starting

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to roll over. We're seeing it in you know, I

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>S M prices paid in manufacturing at least certainly in

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>supply chain pressure indices. Even areas like inflation expectations are

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>moderating and so, you know, good signal leading indicators. We

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>would love to see them show up in the CPI

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>prints ultimately. Um. But I think we're, you know, probably

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in the next couple of quarters, close to that

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>peak hawkishness. Okay, So give us an idea of what

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about when it comes to the terminal rate

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and how long the Fed will keep interest rates there. Yeah.

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think interestingly, the market didn't really move

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>much in terms of the terminal rate between let's say

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Monday and Tuesday of this week. Um, and then you know,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>after the FED meeting on Wednesday, we're still at about

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that five five and a quarter percent terminal rate for

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the FED funds. And how we get there could be interesting,

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, two fifties and twenty five or

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>seventy five and you know, a couple of but I

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>do think that we're probably headed towards that five percent,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's five and five and a quarter percent

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>level UM, just so you know, the CPI giving some

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>time for the CPI inflation prints to to catch up, UM,

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully also for that supply picture to fully you know,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>get back into shape as and so I do think

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we're heading towards that direction. But UM, keep in mind, historically,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we do hit peak FED funds rate

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>where whenever that may be, whether it's March or in

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>sometime in mid three, historically the twelve months after we

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hit the terminal FED funds rate has been very good

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for markets. In fact, SMP is up on average about

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>fift in that twelve month period following that peak rate.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're heading towards you know, that type of backdrop,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in the months ahead. So what do you do

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime? Where do you position your portfolio and

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of hang out a little bit? Yeah? Absolutely, you know,

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost of course, for longer term investors, trying

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to time yourself in and out of the market UM

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is much tougher than you know, probably time in the market.

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind when you do try to go

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in and out, you have to make two decisions. You

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have to decide the best time to leave in the

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>best time to re enter. And you know, timing markets,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, is notoriously difficult. But what we

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would say for both equity and bond investors there are

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting opportunities forming. You know, in equities there has been

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this concentration um and probably relative outperformance and the value

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and defensive parts of the market, uh, certainly energy, but

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>also areas like healthcare, staples, utilities. Over time, we would

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think that as you know, yields peak, that funds peak

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>um and start to stabilize and potentially roll over, that's

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a better environment for growth, and we would say quality growth.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So start maybe thinking about the opportunities forming to complement

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe not wholesale shift out of your your

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>value and defensive. Similarly, in bonds, you know a lot

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of concentration in that shorter end CDs one to two

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>year bonds, which have been providing very interesting value. But

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>as we get closer to peak rates, there could be

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>value in that longer duration trade as well, especially in

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the investment great space. Okay, start thinking, start thinking about

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunities forming in the equity market. At what point do

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you start to deploy that capital? Yeah? Absolutely, you know, look,

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably get bouts of volatility between you know, call

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it now and your end now and peak fed funds UM,

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and those are the opportunities that you have to look

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for to deploy. And we do think as people as

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>investors are starting to plan for a year ahead, that

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>tends to be a time where money flows into the

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>markets and we tend to get and we hear Santa

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Claus Rally various terms for this, but that's really when

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>people start to think about their three portfolios UM, and

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps you start thinking about it UM in the

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks ahead of the new year as well. But also

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind we have midterm elections coming up next

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>next week as well, and and historically that's been a

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>good time the twelve months post midterm elections, and this

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>year it may coincide with hopefully UM a peak and

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed funds rate and also a potential rollover in inflation

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>more meaningfully at least mona twenty seconds. What is the

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pain trade right now? You know, I think people are

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>still positioned for volatility, and so maybe a move higher

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or at least straight higher would be more painful for

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors, especially after yesterday. I think a

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of bets were, or at least more bets were

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on a FED moving more in a more devish direction

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>than they got the hawk ish tilt. So keep in

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>mind volatility probably not going away anytime soon, but that's

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity, all right. Monamahajan, Senior investment strategist at Edward

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Jones Running spas um from Warren New Jersey. Checker out

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Mona Mahajan view on Twitter. Thanks for listening

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com. And you can also listen to

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News