WEBVTT - And We're Live!

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says they might

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>be better off. I think the way it seems to

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>me making up their own shows, which might be better

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>than TV. I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>our other regular host, Lauren Boge. Obama is not with

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>us today because she is off. What's she doing. I

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think she is walking on the surface of Jupiter's moon

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Europa today. Yeah, she is unavailable, but she did submit

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>some information that we will be covering in today's episode.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It's really too bad that she's all the way out

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europa because there's no WiFi there and if she,

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if she had WiFi, she could live cast into this

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast and then we'd still have her here. She could

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like periscope from up there. Except to guess, there would

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>probably be a very long delay, A significant delay. Yes,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>so maybe more than twenty minutes. I don't know how

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>long exactly it would be. It would be pretty long,

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and so you wouldn't get your comments answered. It would

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty crappy live stream. Let's be Frank, she

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would be constantly interrupting us with with things that are

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes out of out of alignment with the rest

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of the show. So we're gonna talk today about live

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>casting or live streaming because it's one of those things

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that has become increasingly more popular. Uh, I'd say really

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last year, in particular as it's as it's

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>taken over mobile platforms. Yeah, and you might be able

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to debate why exactly it has become so popular, like

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is this an organic popularity that comes out of people's

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>desire to see live things happening over the internet, or

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is it a sort of top down popularity because it's

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>being promoted by the platforms on which it happened. And

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it may very well be a combination of the two.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You'll just have to listen and to hear what we think.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But I guess we need to define what this is.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And really it's all in the name. It's broadcasting, right,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>live casting or live streaming. Either way, it's about using

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>some service or app or whatever in order to stream

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>live video and audio from a device up to the

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Internet and then down to an audiences group of devices

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and whatever they may be. Yeah, and there are actually

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tools out there to do this today. Now,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we actually have talked about this on the podcast before,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but this is one area where I feel like there

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>has been significant growth since the last time we talked

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about it. Yeah, the episode we did was back in

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>May of My So called Life casting Who came up

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with that title? Always a good question, it's an excellent

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>well it since it's three years ago, I'm not entirely sure. Uh,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's possible it was me, but I don't know. I

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely was aware of my so called life and watched

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Now, why does she go with him?

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean she didn't have to or never mind, I'm

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>just gonna it's the perennial question people have been asking

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>since Little Women. Yeah, that's true, exactly before before MTV. Okay,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, So we talked about some things. We talked

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about Google glass and apparently we talked about the word

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>vlog too much tittering and amusement. Yeah, we talked a

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>lot about stuff that is uh is quaint today just

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>just a mirror three years later. I think the idea

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>back then was we were talking about the question of

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of recording our whole lives well. And we also talked

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about broadcasting, because we talked a little

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>bit about things like justin TV and that sort of stuff,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that the platforms that were out there that allow people

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to kind of turn their lives into a reality television

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>show or the equivalent thereof. But back then, which is

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>weird to say for something that was only three years ago,

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>primarily you did that through a desktop or laptop computer

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that had a webcam and a microphone. Right. You didn't

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>really have a an easy way to do that in

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a mobile application for a couple of different reasons. I mean,

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you had to have the right camera quality, microphone quality,

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you had to have the right U upload bit rate. Yeah,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that was a big one. Was waiting for the cellular

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and WiFi businesses to get to a point where you

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>would have the throughput to upload live video a stream

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of live video, and also to be able to consume

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that live video. But we've gotten to that point now,

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that the mobile approach has has

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:42.559
<v Speaker 1>really pushed this live experience thing um much more into

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the public thought than it had been three years ago. Yeah,

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that, and I would also say

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that if you go with certain models of live casting,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>because we can talk about the different ways the the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>live casters have approached to this. If you go with

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the model that was envisioned by, say, the founder of Periscope,

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the mobile aspect is especially important. Yes, yeah, and uh

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and so, and in fact, there are certain ones like

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Periscope where if you aren't on a mobile platform you

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have a severe disadvantage on the service. Like you can

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>watch a Periscope livestream on a desktop computer, but when

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it comes to things like commenting and that sort of stuff,

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to be on the mobile app in order

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to have that kind of experience. Yeah, now we probably

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need to explain this to you, but just to

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>briefly map the ground on which we stand. It is

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>not a recent thing being able to broadcast video live.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>This is something that goes way back to you know,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>live live news program really goes back to the birth

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of television, because when TV first started, it was cheaper

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to to just broadcast than it was to try and

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>store things on a medium, and so it made way

0:05:55.720 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>more sense that television was just this kind of uh,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ephemeral thing that if you weren't there to if you

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't there to witness it. You missed it her kids,

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's a very slow and awkward puppet show. Yeah, seriously,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a great there's a great sequence of skits on

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and I talked about the show all the time.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But that Mitchell and web look which British sketch show

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>where they they do this whole thing where it's the

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>birth of television and everyone is incredibly awkward, and they say,

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so early now, we aren't even certain if we

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>should be facing you or in profile. So for the

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of this I will be facing to my left

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and he just turns and and then they told us

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we we I know that you can hear us, but

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't yet know if we can hear you. So

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>if you could shout I hear you when I say this,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be very helpful. And he says, hello, oh

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard that. Oh wait, that's just the set in

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the next room. So this whole idea that TV is

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>so new that they don't even know how to use

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it yet. Well, in the way we're kind of in

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that with the lives streaming on the internet. Despite the

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>fact that we've been dealing with live broadcast a video

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time, yeah. But of course, the this

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>goes on into the age where most programs are taped

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time, and even a lot of times you

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have the semi live situations right where something is sort

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of live but on a maybe very brief delay. Seven

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>second delay is the standard you hear bandied about. That's

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that's there in case something unexpected happens, in case one

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of the newscasters gets a little wild, right, or or

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>or something like if it's an anchor who's out there

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.119
<v Speaker 1>on a live report, if something happens in the frame

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that they feel is not something that they want to broadcast,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll interrupted and come back. That kind of thing. It's

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a a protective measure. But let's talk about how the

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>transition over into the digital version of live casting and

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>live streaming, how that's had a big advantage over the

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional media, the television and radio, which you know that

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's set the standard or live broadcast. Well, one obvious

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>advantage is going to be accessibility. You and I do

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>not have the equipment to live broadcast on television because

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we do not have a television station and and antenna

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and all those things we would need. But it turns

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>out these days if you have a smartphone, you can

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>broadcast on the internet. Yeah. Yeah, if you have either

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a computer with that webcam and microphone and an Internet connection,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>or just a smartphone, you can walk around and and

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>carry with you a live broadcast studio. But I must say,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>even even today, wouldn't it be really cool to have

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a television broadcast van. Yeah no, I mean I've seen

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one parked in front of my house a couple of times.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's just an area where they like to

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>report about. Across the street from me, there's a train

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>yard where often they shoot a lot of I know

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're talking about. I walked past that with

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>my dog. Yeah, so that train yard ends up being

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a movie set, movie product and said a lot. So

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I see these and every time I see when, I

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think I'd like I'd like to have one of those.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>But but not having one. But having a smartphone that's

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>capable of broadcasting live video is pretty cool, especially since

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I can reach people I know. And in fact, this

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is another big advantage that live streaming on digital has

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>over traditional media. Traditional media like that that sketch I

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier. It's one way communication. Yeah, you say,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>can you hear me, and they actually can say yes,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we can hear you, because they can comment on the

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>video as you're broadcasting. Yeah, almost every live streaming app

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or service out there has some sort of comment or

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>chat component to it, So you've got this interactive feature

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that is absent in traditional media, and that's a very

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>engaging experience when you are especially if you're a fan

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of somebody and you're watching them live and then you

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to say something to that person and

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they might react to that. That there's a bit of

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a and a rush that comes along with that. And

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that just as just we're not celebrities by

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>any stretch of the imagination, but I've had experiences where

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I've responded to someone mentioning something online and uh in

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>real time and they freak out, which is odd but fun. Yeah. Well,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I would say is that I think

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the commenting back and forth aspect, it introduces an element

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of unpredictability and sort of a wild card variation to

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen live. So imagine somebody here at

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works is doing a live broadcast on something

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they talked about on their podcast that week, and then

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the user says, hey, did you read about this thing

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that's pertinent into what you're talking about? And the host says, oh, no,

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. And then there's actual constructive back and forth

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>going on between content creator and their audience, and they're

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they're learning from one another. It's wonderful. And on the

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you've got maybe trolls who want to come

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in and say, hey, I don't like your face. You know,

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you're whatever, And they both kind of play on the

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>same thing. I mean, obviously one is good and one

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is bad, but both introduce this element of unpredictability. There's

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>something real happening right now. Well, yeah, it's it's more

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>akin to live theater than it is to your traditional

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>television show, right because you've actually got an audience that

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>can impact the course of the live event. Are they

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna laugh? Are they going to clap? Are they gonna heckle? Right?

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh? And that's a lot different than if you're

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just in front of a camera and you know there's

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a crew there that might snicker if you screw up

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>or might they do they do every time, every darn time.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>But generally speaking, you don't have that that uh interaction.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>You could have with a live audience. Hey, I've got

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I've got another thing. What do you know? So, if

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you go on TV and you want to broadcast to people,

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>there are limits on what you're allowed to do without

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>having to pay some hefty fine. Yeah, unless you are

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on like a special cable network. But if you're on

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>regular broadcast television, you have to bow to the whims

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the f c C here in the United States,

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and they set down certain rules and regulations, particularly in

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>regards to obscenity, in decency and profanity, So you are

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to say certain words. I mean, George Carlin

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>had the magnificent comedic routine about the seven words you're

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to say. On television, you can say I'm all.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>On periscope you can. And now there's some platforms out

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there that have specific user agreements that say you will

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>not broadcast like a sexual material, that kind of stuff

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on their platforms. They don't want to turn into a

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>porn hosting right program, And if you you know, if

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you're using that service, it means that you had to

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>agree to their terms of use, which means if you

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>break that, if you go and broadcast something that goes

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>against their terms of use. You could get banned or whatever,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, sanctioned in some way. UM. And it's

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>not the same as the Feds coming in after you,

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>but it it is something that's up to a platform

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>by platform, and it's also contingent upon region of broadcast.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I suppose. Yes, China recently got into the news, and

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>by recently, I mean like the last week when we're

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>recording the week before we're recording this, um, and the

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>news was that the Chinese authorities had decided to ban

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a specific activity being streamed on live video and that

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>activity wild be women eating bananas in a suggestive manner.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>This is I support free speech, but that is kind

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of a weird thing to stream. Yeah it well, I agree,

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a weird thing to stream. It's also a weird

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to really hone in on and say you can't

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>do that in China. There are a lot of different

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>regulations that have been passed recently, UM in regard it's

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to this live streaming service, because it's something that's really

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>taking off in China. The Chinese market, of course, is enormous.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>The smartphone market is huge, so there's a lot of

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity there. But The Chinese authorities, in their efforts to

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>curtail what they see as being um offensive or unsuitable material,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>has gone on to ban not just that, but also

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>things like you aren't allowed to appear on video wearing

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>stockings and suspenders. They say, um, yeah, there's a lot

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of different things that are tends that tend to be

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>identified as being sexually suggestive at least, what I hold on,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>what if you're wearing a Mickey Mouse costume that's got suspenders.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do now? So why are you

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>wearing the stockings? It's stockings and suspenders. I yeah, So

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>see there's your problem. Then they say, well, now you've

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you've made Mickey Mouse wear stockings, and that's where we

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>draw the line. Um, this is not a Mickey Mouse operation,

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as they would say. Well, apart from regulations being imposed

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>from the outside by say government or organizations, there are

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>also plenty of technical limitations on what has been possible

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and to some extent on what is

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>still possible with live casting via digital devices right uh now.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we mentioned earlier is the bit

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>rate problems. I would suggest this is probably much more

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of a problem at the content creators end than the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>consumers end. Right, generally speaking, upload speeds are a tenth

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of what download speeds are, right, and you've got the

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>problem there you have. If you have one viewer with

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad download speed, it just affects the one viewer.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If you have one broadcaster with a bad upload speed,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it affects all viewers. Right. So one way to get

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>around that obviously is coming up with new compression strategies

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for video and audio. Right, So if you can come

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>up with new ways to compress that live video so

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that it can fit in a smaller package data package

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as you send it up, that speeds things up. And

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>then you know, assuming that your audience has the proper

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>means of of decompressing that audio and video, which they

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>would because they'd have whatever app is relevant to what

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you're using. Uh, everything's cool because then all the work

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is being done by the processors for the compression and decompression.

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But that that's just part of it. Obviously. Another big

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>advantage was when we started seeing UH four G and

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>better technologies for transmission for cellular data. WiFi obviously also

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>has improved in its upload and download speeds. So until

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that happened, it was not really feasible to use devices,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly mobile devices, to broadcast live video. You could more

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>easily record a video and then upload it, but obviously

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that would take a lot of time depending on the

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>limitations of whatever technology you were using, and at that

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>point it's not live casting anymore. Yeah, now these days,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like I can use and I have, I've used a

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>live streaming service. I would specifically used Periscope to live

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>cast when I was walking to or from the office,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>just so I could chat with folks, because that's a

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>long walk for me, It's like an hour long walk.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>And occasionally I'll just turn what's your data plan? Oh,

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I have unloaded data, so I don't have to Yeah,

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't have unloaded that's another technical issue, right,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>data caps that really is a big issue both for Actually,

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have a more of a problem at home

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>using my desktop, which has a data cap attached to

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>it because of my home internet service, as opposed to

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>using my phone, which has no data cap attached to it. Yeah,

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a little odd, but data caps are another technical

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not really a technical uh different challenge. Rather that's

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>one that's imposed by It's more kind of like the FCC. Yeah,

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's imposed by I s p s, by Internet service providers,

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but at any rate, Um, I I use this periscope

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>while I'm walking. I'm using it on a cellular network,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are sections on my walk where my cellular

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>service starts to get a little wishy washy, and I'm

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking it must be at a point where there's a

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>handshake happening. Handshake is when it's being passed from one

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>cellular tower to another. And I have often like there's

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>one specific spot on my walk where people are like

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the video has gotten terrible, or I can't hear what

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, or you're cutting in and out, and it's

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>always in the same spot. So so that's where you're

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>walking over the ancient cursed graveyards. Yeah, the Indian burial ground, Uh, obvious.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Weirdly enough, it's actually at the bottom of a hill.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's probably, like I said, right in between two

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>cell towers where the handoff is happening the spirit of

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of prisoners from this former prison colony. Yeah. Yeah.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And and there are other technical challenges to like, for example,

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that if the service you're relying on ends

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>up going down for whatever reason, then you you can

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>no longer life cast. Right, So if Twitch were to

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>crash for some reason, or if the servers that handle

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the traffic for Periscope or Facebook Live or anything like

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that were to suffer some problems, then that would prevent

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you from being able to live stream or live cast.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Um And maybe that all the equipments working fine on

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the broadcaster side and on the audience side, but it's

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the stuff in the middle that's screwed up. So that's

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a possibility to well. So let's say you've got all

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that stuff locked down, you say, okay, we we figured

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>out how to We've got good hardware, we've got good

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>upload and download rates, we can compress videos so that

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes through all right and doesn't use too much data.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But you can still have problems because when you have

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>a service that's supposed to provide live video to people,

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the services more than just streaming the data from one

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>place to another, Right, it's also stuff like how do

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you get the viewers to the place where they're gonna

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>watch it and get them watching something that they want

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to watch. Yeah, there's definite discovery. Discovery is a huge challenge.

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's well and that's gonna get harder. In fact,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna be talking later in this episode

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>about kind of looking forward at live casting, and one

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things I would like to to think about

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is um and is live casting just gonna become similar

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube and that in the early days of YouTube,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if you had a voice, and you had a really

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>distinctive way of delivering your message, you had a really

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>good chance of being discovered. Today, there's so much going

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>up on YouTube, and I mean you know that, they say,

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like more than a hundred hours every minute goes up

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. There's so much stuff going up on YouTube

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that getting discovered is incredibly challenging. I suspect that live

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>casting is going to turn into the same thing, and

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>probably on a much faster ramp up than YouTube did. Well,

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>it's too many content providers, not enough eyeballs. Yeah, I

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, I mean, if you It makes me think

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of some of the streams I've seen where I've commented

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on stuff, and then I start recognizing the other people

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>who are commenting, and I realized we're all content providers

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>commenting on another content provider. Have we just become this

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>insular circular audience where all we're what doing is watching

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what each other is doing. Jonathan, can you even imagine

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the horror of those of you out there right now

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>who just hear us bandying around words like content provider

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>when really we should be saying artists. Yeah, I don't,

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. Okay, there's certain words. There's certain

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>words I don't like using, but I do because it's

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>become the standard, right, content provider being one of them.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>But that is what it's called in the industry. If

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that other people look at on the internet, you're a

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>content provide. Talent is another one I don't. I don't

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>like being called the talent um for multiple reasons. But

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, there are a lot of words in

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the industry that I would prefer to use a synonyms for,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of the standards. Also, we should just

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 1>point out that there's a lot of competition and already

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in this space right there are a lot of different

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>providers offering up services that are similar to one another.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And therein lies another problem because that divides the audience further.

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, not not everyone is going to have every

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>live streaming app. You know, it's just not not something

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that most people are interested in, so your audience, you

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>have to sit there and start making decisions like do

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I want most of my audience, do I think most

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the people that I need to reach, or on

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this platform or this other platform, And you start having

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>to make really tough decisions on that, particularly if you

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>want to try and make a living off of this.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone does if you. If you're just doing it

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for fun, maybe it doesn't matter. But if you're trying

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a living, you might say, well, what percentage

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of my fan base is active on Facebook versus Twitter,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>just as an example, or would it be better for

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>me to go to something like Twitch, which is a

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>more specific live streaming video service. You know, I used

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to think Twitch was just for video games until I

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>heard that some people use Twitch to say, like, here,

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>watch me show you how to weave a basket. Well,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>for a while, Twitch was just about video games, and

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>if your content did not have anything to do about

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>video games, they'd say knock that off or play some games. Uh.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until that they started opening it up to stuff.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That was because I have a friend who used Twitch

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to live stream his his podcast, and his podcast occasionally

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>would talk about video games, but it wasn't a video

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>game oriented podcast, and there were issues that he had

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with Twitch. It was a very popular show, but which

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, it has to be about video games.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And then about a year later that's when they changed

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>their their policy. But at any rate, you also don't

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>know how many of these conflicting services are still going

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to be around in years to come. Right, if one

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>of them n's up being really dominant in the space,

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the others might end up fading way. Well, I think

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at the moment we're recording this, there is a large

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>scuffle going on, right, there's there are multiple scuffles going on.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the scuffles. I mean there's a major uh

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there has been recently and there is still major competition

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for live video us. Yeah, I mean, you know you've

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>got you've got the major players in their Facebook is

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in there, YouTube is in there. Then you've got things

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>like Periscope that that are still in there, and then

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you have former streaming services like mere cat walk about.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it's uh, never once used it, but it has

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a cute name. As a cute name and apparently was

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a very easy user interface by the time I I

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have access to it because it opened up originally

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>to innern iPhone users and I use an Android device.

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, periscope was the same way. It was active

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>first on i iOS and took a while to get

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>over to Android. Irritates me because Android is a far

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more popular platform. But that's a different story. It's a

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>different podcast. Um any rate, I never got a chance

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to use Merecat, and then by the time I really

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>would have taken a look at it, it was no

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>longer supported. It's still a thing, but we'll get into that.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, let's talk about some of these main players,

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the big names that are in the a live streaming field. Okay, well,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Twitch, and should we count video game play

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because obviously that is a form of live streaming some

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>type of content. But when I was first thinking about

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the topic for this episode, I was thinking about people

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of talking to a camera. But but I guess

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have to be that, would it. It doesn't

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be that. And also, you've got a lot

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of Twitch gamers who have a picture within picture presentation,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>so the major picture is the video game they're playing,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and they have a smaller picture, which is a camera

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's on them a reaction camera, and they do tend

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to address the audience live while they play. Not everyone

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>does this, obviously. Some people just play through a game

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're just showing how they play, and maybe that's

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>all you're doing, is just passively watching someone else play

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a game. But a lot of them turn it into

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>something more where they might be commenting on something completely

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>unrelated to the game they're playing. They might be telling

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a story or explaining their personal political philosophy and maybe

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in anything. So I think it's certainly counts. The interesting

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to me is that twitch dot tv started off

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>as a spinoff of justin TV and it became so popular.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that was that a Justin Bieber based service? It

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>was not. It was named after the founder or one

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of the founders, So justin TV was. It was pretty

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>popular as a live streaming service as as far as

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>those go in the early days. I mean, it was

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that wasn't nearly as popular as

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we're talking about today. But it was, uh

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like Justin TV and you Stream were like the two

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>big names in live casting. But dude, I forgot about

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you stream. Oh I didn't. That's what we used to

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>uh live stream how stuff works live. Yeah, we could

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>have upwards of thirty six people watching our show at

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a time, but it was kept online so you could

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>actually watch the old episodes afterwards at any rate. It

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>got so popular that justin TV actually rebranded itself as

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a Twitch Interactive and eventually ended up getting the attention

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of some pretty big players in the space. I was

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>rumored that Google was going to buy Twitch Interactive, but

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that Amazon announced it would acquire Twitch

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for about nine hundred seventy million dollars, so just under

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a billion. That's some amount of dollars. As quite a

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>few dollars, quite a few more than I will ever

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>see in my entire life, which is fine mostly but anyway,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh twitch has more than a million broadcasters and more

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred million monthly visitors to the site, so

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty big business. And you know, I'm sure

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the sort of thing that confounds people in the

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>cable industry, like why are where are these kids just

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>logging in to watch some other kids play video games?

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We want them on our watching our shows and watching

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>our commercials and buying bugging mom and dad to buy

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>our stuff. Um, but that's it's just been wildly popular

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.239
<v Speaker 1>their professional life casters on Twitch, and the way they

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>make their money is through a multitude of ways. They

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>can get sponsorships, they can get ad revenue, they can

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have partnerships with Twitch itself. If they are a partner

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>with Twitch, they can then charge subscribers a certain amount

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of money in order to access uh new features. For example,

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>it may be that if you're on a Twitch performers

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>stream and you're you're in the chat room. You can

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>chat and stuff, but you start seeing like weird UH

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>emojis and things popping up that you don't have access to.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>If you become a paid subscriber, you get access to

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like v I P chat areas and special emoticons, that

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. What happens behind the closed doors of Twitch. Yeah,

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's that exclusivity that ends up being the big selling

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>factor there. Uh. And also it may be that the

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>person playing is paying more attention to the subscriber chat

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>than the general chat that kind of stuff. Um. They

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>also can ask for donations as well. It's not just

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>through through these kind of approaches that it was interesting.

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It looked to me like, UM, I read an article

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about this and in the article, the person who was

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>writing it just made some estimated guesses about how much

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>this one Twitch user was making a year. And we're

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about someone who has nine hundred thousand subscribers and

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and a lot of different ads and things, and

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they estimated that based upon those numbers and not taking

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>into account things like donations or other sponsorships, that they

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>were making two thousand dollars a year playing games. Now,

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, they're also working like sixty hour weeks

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>doing this stuff, So it sounds like, oh wow, First

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that sounds amazing, and then you sit there and think, man,

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that sounds exhausting too, So it's not it's not necessarily

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the coushy job that a lot of people just imagine

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah, But then again, I guess a lot

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of people work sixty hours a week doing stuff that

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is uh yeah, maybe not not as video games and

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>all up. Yeah, but you have to be you have

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 1>to be good at too. Write like I mean, I

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>guess there's some entertainment value and someone who's who's perpetually

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>terrible at video games if their presentation is right. Yeah,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but that sounds like a kind of chemick that might

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not last very long for for more than just a

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>handful of performers out there. Um, but let's talk about

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the other ones. Let's talk about periscope. Well,

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>periscope is one that we're familiar with because a lot

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of us here at the House Stuff Works office have

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>done periscope broadcasts where a lot of times, for example,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast hosts will set up a weekly periscope session where

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they will just talk to their listeners. And so I've

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>done that for my, uh, the other podcasts that I'm

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on here Stuff to Blow your Mind. My co hosts

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and Christian Zeger and I will sometimes get

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on periscope and just talk to people about episodes that

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.239
<v Speaker 1>have come out recently, what's coming up at next, and

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>answer questions. A lot of times people have questions about

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we didn't cover in each of the episodes,

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and and so it can be a lot of fun.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy it. And so the presentation of periscope is

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward. It's just you have a camera. Uh, the

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>camera broadcasts what it sees in real time live, so

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>usually it'll just be us sitting around talking to the camera.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But you can also use it to broadcast I don't

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>know whatever is going on around you if you wanted

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to point it out the window at to somebody who

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is scaling the side of the building you're working in

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with suction cup hands. I don't know why I went

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to that. Then I guess that's just something I expect

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to see someday. Uh, you could periscope that. So it's that.

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But then also people can comment, comments come in, you

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>can interact with them if you want to. I would

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>recommend if you are a periscope uh broadcaster, you probably

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>should interact with the comments because people kind of like

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to have that interactive experience. They want to hear back

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>from you. Otherwise they start suspecting that, hey, this is

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just this isn't live, which is weird for periscope, but

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I get that all the time on Facebook Life. They

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>get mad if you don't interact. Yeah, uh and so,

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's pretty much what it is. So. Periscope was

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>founded by Cavon, Bike Poor and Joe Bernstein, and according

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to the official creation legend, bike Poor was traveling in

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>istanbul In when a bunch of protests broke broke out

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in Tuxim Square in Istanbul and he wasn't at the

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>location of the protest, but he wanted to know what

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>was going on, and so he could check Twitter to

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>see what people were saying about the event, but he

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't see the event for himself. And talking to Business Insider,

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote, it just occurred to me, there were

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>so many smartphones out there, Why wasn't there a way

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for me to ask who else was out there and

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what was happening there? Um and so in the early press,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>periscope was often compared to teleportation. I find that kind

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of a funny metaphor because really the obvious point of

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>comparison to me is just like having a live video

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>camera there. Yeah, I don't really see the teleportation aspect,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think I think it would depend on I

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's the fact that live video, uh, it's it's

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>tough to get live video of brand new, breaking events

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>unless it was something that was scheduled right Like, it's

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea of being someplace when you know

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>something's going to happen, as opposed to the fact that

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>since we all have smartphones these days, and I know

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm making a crazy generalization to say all, but

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>since there's so many smartphones out there that are capable

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of broadcasting. Now, it would be unusual for a public

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>event to occur where there are no smartphones capable of

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting that. So it is more like teleportation because unlike

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing, you know, live video of of the aftermath

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of an event, you can actually see live video of

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of events because the cameras are already everywhere well,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's another way that the interaction is

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>very important. It's a very important element of periscope where

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it's more like teleportation, and that you can't just watch

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. You can comment on it, and you can

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>try to get the person who's holding the phone to

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do something and say like, hey, can you hold about higher.

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to see what's going on here, look around

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the corner of that kind of stuff. Yeah, uh, And

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so that that that went on for a while. Twitter

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>bought periscope in January. For what was the number you

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>saw on that? I saw around a hundred million, But

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.919
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of guesses all over the place.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it really First of all, I keep it pretty quiet.

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>But secondly, because periscope still wasn't really a thing when

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter bought them, like it hadn't really made a big splash.

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Um it was what the what happened in the aftermath

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter buying Periscope made more news than the fact

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter brought periscope. Uh yeah, and so in August periscope

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>claimed it had ten million users. More on that number

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and a bit yeah. And also, uh, the other thing

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought was really fun about periscope and I'm glad

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that they fixed it so it no longer becomes like

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>a a means of one upsmanship between between various periscopers

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is that if you like what you're watching, you can

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 1>tap your screen. It sends little hearts to show up

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:03.879
<v Speaker 1>in the video. It's so nice seeing all those little

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>hearts floating. It was very sweet. It's very reaffirming. Uh.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And for a while periscope took count of all those hearts,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>which ended up becoming like almost like bragging rights for

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>various um uh parascopers out there. Like it was this

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that by having this most liked video, it's gonna

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>jump up the charts and be easily discovered. Right, I know, Jonathan,

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>tell the truth. It just steamed your biscuits that you

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the most hearts. It's not so much that,

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but rather that the system was easily gained. Yeah, Like

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it was very easy to just watch your own thing

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and just keep hitting hearts, hearts, hearts, hearts, hearts, and

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you could just tell your viewers like, hey, hammer on

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>those hearts for us, We've done it before. It's funny, yeah,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and then so do it. They're they're like little automata.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>They just right well, and on the flip side, so

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are we because they asked us to do things, and

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>occasionally we do them to prove that it's live, and

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>then it all just turns out that we're the ones

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>being puppeteered. But at any rate, the that no longer

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>holds that much water, Like it's not it's not something

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that really boosts a video's performance in any meaningful way.

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just a nice feedback mechanism. So it's not like

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a has any meaningful impact at this point. The other

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>service we wanted to talk about that was very similar

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to Periscope would be mere Cat. Mere Cat and Periscope

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>when they first came out, they were very very similar.

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Um mere Cat was released in February, just ahead of

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>South By Southwest, and it was very much a favorite

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at that at that. Yeah. Yeah, and this is something

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>we see all the time where we'll see apps get

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>launched either just before or at south By Southwest in

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to generate a lot of bus because that's

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 1>where you've got a ton of people south By Southwest

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>interactive as a lot of folks who are influential in

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the text space. And if you can get a lot

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of people using your app, generally speaking, it tends to

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>turn out pretty well for you. And uh, it got

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of widespread attention at south By Southwest, but

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it also relied on Twitter to allow live casters a

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>chance to reach an audience. It tapped into Twitter's social

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>graph in other words. And then Twitter in March cut

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>off mere Cat's ability to use the Twitter log in

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>after Twitter bought Periscope, Yeah by a couple of months. Yeah,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>so when Baroscope came out using Twitter's a p I, uh,

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>mere Cat mysteriously no longer had access to it. And

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that ended up causing a lot of conversation in the

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 1>space about how Twitter was allowed to do this because

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>their private company and they bought this other tool, and

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they said, look, our policy says that if you try

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and replicate something that we have we can kick you off.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And we bought this company back in January, and you

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>launched your service in February, and so, uh, it was

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of a little ugly, but Merecat soldiered on for

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about a year. Uh. In August of twenty fifteen, it

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was already clear that the service was on the downward slope,

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and by March twenty sixteen, CEO Ben Reuben made the

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>decision to change the company's focus too and always live

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>social network. I don't know what that really means yet either, Yeah,

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>because as far as I know, Merecat hasn't actually launched

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>anything new, but they did say they were essentially pulling

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 1>all their resources off of live video. Not that the

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>tool is gone, but there's no more development in that

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>space for Meercat there, So no, it's that's a lost

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>cause for us um and so it doesn't look great

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>for live video from Meercat anymore. Well. Yeah, and I

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>found an article on recode that had a part of

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>an email from the Mercat CEO, Ben Reuben to investors

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>from February. I thought this was interesting. So he was

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to explain what had gone on with

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the bad year, and in what he said was quote,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>mobile broadcast video hasn't quite exploded as quickly as we'd hoped.

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>The distribution advantages of Twitter, Periscope, and Facebook Live drew

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>more early users to them away from us, and we

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>were not able to grow as quickly alongside as we

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>had planned. So that's talking about one thing. There is

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just like who has access to people using the internet

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, who can steer them, you know, sort of

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>funnel them in the live broadcast direction that that they want.

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And then also I thought that was interesting that he

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>said that broadcast video hasn't quite exploded as quickly as

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we'd hoped, because I mean, if you read everything else,

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh man, this is the way of the future.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's got to get on live broadcasts. Well again, I mean,

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>is is that just him spinning it the you know,

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that makes his company look better, or I

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's more Again back to that

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>problem of so many different competitors in the space. That

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fractures the audience, right the market share gets divvied up.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So some people may be like, listen, I don't want

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>to use Facebook. I just use Twitter, So I want

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you to be on periscope. I've got some people who

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have said that to me. When I do, I I'll

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>put out a blast on Twitter saying hey, I'm going

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>live on Facebook Live at three o'clock so you can

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>tune in at how stuff works is Facebook page and

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>watch me and I I often will get a message

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of saying, hey, I don't use Facebook anymore? Could you?

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever thought about going back to periscope and

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>just a little peek behind the curtain. The reason why

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I tend to use Facebook Live more than baroscope is that,

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 1>at least based upon the metrics, more people watch. So

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>those metrics are also kind of interesting. We'll talk about

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>talking and it may very well be that there's a

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>particular thing Facebook does that is uh misleading me into

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking that. But at at any rate, um, you know,

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>mircat now looks like it's heading more towards using are

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>developing a tool that's kind similar to like skype Ree,

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Google hang Out, something that's meant for a video messaging

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>service that would be more like a closed group as

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>opposed to one person broadcasting to a lot of people.

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So it could be like if we wanted to do

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a little video chat among the writers one day that

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>might be a tool we would use. I don't really

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know why they would go into that space, seeing is

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>how it's already represented by some pretty hefty companies like

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Skype and Google. But that's that's at least some of

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the speculation around this. Uh, We've got other examples their Snapchat,

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>although that's really almost live. It's not really a live

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>video streaming service. You can record very short video snippets

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and people can then watch them. The big attraction to

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat is that it only lives on the servers for

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours. Usedly, yeah, at least it's only accessible

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>by by viewers for twenty four hours. But there of

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>course I have vague memories of us having talked about

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this on the show before there being some big aster

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>risk to that. Yeah, it's I don't recall with enough

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 1>detail to say now there there's some there's some definite, uh,

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>questionable things going on, not questionable in the sense of

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the content may still very well live on a server.

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You can actually save stuff to your snaps too. You

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>can save your own snaps. Also, there are a lot

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of tools out there for people to save stuff, um

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that they see on Snapchat, like little add ons that

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>weren't intended originally by the service but have obviously popped up.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's only kind of semi live. But then we

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>get to the big one we were talking about before

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Live. This one was a relative latecomer, launched in

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>August of two fifteen, and it was a controlled launch, Like,

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't rolled out to Facebook users at large. It

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was rolled out to specific movers and shakers in the

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>entertainment industry, for example, who already had really large followings

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to kind of um boot this idea early

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>in the stage of of launch. Right, So, um, some

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>big pages that had lots of followers, or entertainers personalities

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that had a lot of followers, they were the ones

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>who got access to this tool first um and eventually

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>expanded to all Apple Mobile users in January and then

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody else by February. So uh, it was a controlled rollout,

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense. You can actually see how it's performing

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and start making tweaks before you give everyone access to it. Um.

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you haven't noticed, Facebook wants you to be

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>watching Facebook, Uh, you really should be watching it. Yeah.

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There have been a lot of high profile live events

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that have used Facebook Live which are all in partnership

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook. It's not just that they coincidentally decided to

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>use Facebook Live. These are very obviously partnerships and there's

0:43:56.040 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with that necessarily, especially if it's transparent. But

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's also interesting that UM Apparently the notifications on Facebook

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Live events have recently changed. It used to be that

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>if every time we would go live on How Stuff Works,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone who followed How Stuff worksoul get a little notification

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on that, and people would go and respond to it.

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>They'd like, what's this and they'd see a video and

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>some of them would get irritated because they get this notification. Uh,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you could turn those off. I think now. I did

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>housetopp Works live podcast or broadcast last week, and uh,

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and Sherry, who is the person who kind of oversees

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that at our office, came in and said, Yeah, we're

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing fewer numbers or lower numbers now, but we think

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that might be because Facebook might be tweaking the notification

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>system so that it's not blasting everybody the way it

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.760
<v Speaker 1>had been, but perhaps they were getting some negative feedback

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on that. So it's still influx um now. According to

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>their chief product officer Chris Cox, Facebook has more than

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a hundred people working on Facebook Live and part of

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>what they're working on are some updates that will soon

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 1>be rolling out and may very well some of them

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>may be in place by the time you listen to

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. They were announced back on April UM and

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we're recording in early May. So one of those features

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is the ability to feed to filter your live streams

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to only certain people on your friends list, so that

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>way you could broadcast straight to the people that you

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to and and it doesn't go out

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.479
<v Speaker 1>to everybody else. That could be useful if you're doing

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>something like doing a just a quick update to folks,

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or you need to pass on some important news to

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>your friends that kind of stuff, um, or just you know,

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you just want to show off to the jerks and accounting.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there's a lot of different possible opportunities there,

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Or if you're just doing your own unboxing video,

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:00.280
<v Speaker 1>nice serial unboxing video. That's my idea I've been thinking

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 1>we should do is Cereal on boxing. We're gonna we're

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna do some statistical analysis my lucky charms. Oh it's

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>full of tricks. Wow, what's the percentage that a green

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>clover will come out next. Um. They're also including some

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>other filters that were present on Snapchat as well, the

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to apply visual filters to live video and scribble

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on the screen while you're broadcasting, which is not again

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>that different from what we've seen with Snapchat where they

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have all these different filters and overlays. You can do

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that on Periscope. Now you can draw on the screen.

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, the the Snapchat one has some problematic filters,

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 1>ones that I think they really need to rethink before

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>implementing again. For example, they have like they have like

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the face swapping stuff, which is fine where you can

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 1>swap your face with some other face and then they

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>they'll actually animate the face with your facial motions, which

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is kind of creepy and interesting. But they've also done

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>one like they had one that was a Bob Marley

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>filter which put Bob Marley's face onto the Snapchat users

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 1>face and some people said, this is getting uncomfortably close

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to black face. Yeah, so there's some things that that

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people said, like maybe we need to maybe someone needs

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to rethink that. That actually made a big fuss on Twitter.

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, when that went life, Um,

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that was on April by the way, when that that happened. So, um, anyway,

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they're also going to give the broadcaster emoji reactions that

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>could pop up on screen, um, and a dedicated app

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>tab just for video, and a world map that will

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>let you find broadcasts happening around the globe, so you

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can actually search for live broadcasts more easily that way. Um. So,

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>So what I guess the question is why did Facebook

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get into this live broadcasting game when you've

0:47:56.600 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>already got these players out there like like Twitter, Chin,

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Periscope and you know, all these other ones we've already

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Why is it that Facebook says now we've

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 1>got to be the ones? Well, Facebook, Facebook's a publicly

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>trade company, right and they want to own the world.

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>They want to own the world. You can only grow

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so much when one in seven people on the planet

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:24.319
<v Speaker 1>has a Facebook account, right. So it's one of the

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>things they have to do is find new ways to

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>engage users to make sure that they stay loyal to Facebook.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>They don't go anywhere, they don't give up on the platform.

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Look at Facebook all day. And by creating this Facebook

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Live platform, they give more reason for people to go

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook. They give more reason for people to create

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff on Facebook where it lives on Facebook. It's not

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a link that you've dumped into Facebook. It lives there.

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And now you've seen other versions of this with things

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook articles, where now instead of sharing an article

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>to link out to an external site to read something

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about the news, you can just click through to a

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Facebook news page that has an article embedded. The same

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>thing with Facebook video, right, instead of embedding a link

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to like a YouTube video, you can upload directly into

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and have it lived there. Clearly that benefits Facebook, right,

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's the same sort of thing. It benefits

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the company, and it creates more more Facebook in your Facebook,

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can Facebook all the time, right. And you know,

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you could be cynical and just say like this is

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>just a way to to leverage the users and make

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 1>more money, and to some extent that is absolutely true.

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But it also creates more uh more features that users

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>can actually use and enjoy and get some benefit out of.

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's it's not like it's just corporate evil. Well no,

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're trying to make money. I guess it

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>depends on do you do you want to say that

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>in a harsh tone of voice or not. Yeah, I

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem with companies trying to make money.

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the purpose for companies to exist. The problem, of course,

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is that if they do so without any checks or balances,

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because companies also by nature, are a moral uh. Despite

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that in the United States we can talk

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about corporations as if they are people, they do not

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>have any moral or ethical core to themselves. It's all

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>about the people who steer the company, right. Oh, I

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe Wayne Enterprises, you know, yeah, Stark Industries.

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So um. At any rate, the those are the big players.

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of other ones that are in

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the space too. There are tons of apps and online

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>services like Google Hangouts being another one that we mentioned earlier.

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You can do a Google hangout and broadcast to the public,

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and it houses that broadcast on YouTube where you can

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 1>watch live and it will stay there. It can watch

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it afterward too. So so we've got this trend now,

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and we've got all these people competing to be the

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 1>biggest players, uh in the live live casting business. That

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people out there working in the tech

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>industry have it in their head that the next big

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is everybody watching other people do stuff live on

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Is that true? Uh So one of the

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>things we can look at is how popular is this

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>right now? So there are some numbers I was looking

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at for Periscope. Periscope, of course is is periscope. It's

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not the entire profile of what people are doing in

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of live video on the Internet, but it's one

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the big names. So, as I said earlier in August,

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:31.879
<v Speaker 1>periscope claimed it had ten million users, which oh, yeah,

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not bad. But what that meant was that

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ten million people had registered accounts. It was about two

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:43.720
<v Speaker 1>million people who used the app every day at that time. Also,

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, users were watching a combined forty

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.879
<v Speaker 1>one year's worth of video every single day. According to

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:53.720
<v Speaker 1>an article I found on Recode from March, that number

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>has gone up and now the Periscope users are supposedly

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>watching a hundred and ten years worth of video every

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:02.839
<v Speaker 1>single day. Isn't it great? These metrics we have? Yeah? Yeah,

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because you sit there and like, how is that possible?

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Like well, matters of scale, right, you know, you just

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the number of people and then you say, well, holmeut,

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>how much time is the average person viewing. Multiply that

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>by the number of people who are on average using

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>baroscope on a day. That's where you get that number. Um,

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Uh. And there are other metrics we can

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about, Like we mentioned the Twitch one, right, the

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>one the more than a million Twitch broadcasters, and there

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 1>are a hundred million monthly visitors and that was I

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>think back in too, so those numbers have changed obviously

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>since then. But what about Facebook. Yeah, well, they don't

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>really share their numbers as far as I could tell.

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I dug around and could not find anything. So I

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>imagine they're they're keeping that protected. I maybe we'll hear

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 1>more when they do like a shareholders meeting. They might

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have some some statistics that they'll share, but at the

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>moment we're largely in the dark. But we do know

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they were orderly have something like one point five billion

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 1>users around the world. Uh. And from our experience, every

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 1>time somebody goes live, Facebook tries to show that video

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to every one of those viewers. Yeah, that se but

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think they, like I said, I think

0:53:14.040 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they've scaled back on that in the in the relatively

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>recent past, but there was definitely it still happens every

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>time we do a live video. Yeah, there's aggressive in

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>app promotion. They're trying to get people watching this stuff, right,

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.439
<v Speaker 1>and you will get comments like what is this? Who

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>are you? Why am I seeing this? Yeah, and we're like,

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're just trying to go about your business.

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 1>You can, you don't have to watch this. Please, please

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>don't be mad at me. I didn't make the algorithm. Yeah.

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So they obviously have a strong desire to put users

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>eyes on live streaming video. And I can speak from

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:57.320
<v Speaker 1>personal experience and say that when you broadcast live on Facebook, uh,

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the number of views you reportedly get

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>do not seem exactly to match up with the number

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of viewers actively engaging through comments and liking and stuff. Now,

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you'd expect all the people engaging through comments and liking

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to to be some small subset of the total number

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of viewers. So I'm not thinking that every viewer would

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:20.720
<v Speaker 1>be interacting, But it seems like it's actually a very

0:54:20.760 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>small subset compared to the number they're saying, watch to

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:28.280
<v Speaker 1>your live video. And so I'm wondering how they quantify

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what counts as a viewer of a live video for

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook video. Well, I can tell you that. In fact,

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>i'll tell you that right now because I have this

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>later on in our notes, but it's pertinent to this conversation. Uh.

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It takes three seconds of viewing the video before Facebook

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>counts it as a viewer. Yeah, so if you have

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a video playing for three seconds or longer than you

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:51.839
<v Speaker 1>are a viewer of that video. Here's the other part

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of that. You may have noticed that when you pull

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 1>up Facebook, videos will start to auto play, not necessarily

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with sound, but they'll start automatically play. And if an

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>auto plays, for if you're on that screen for three seconds, congratulations,

0:55:06.360 --> 0:55:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you've just become a Facebook viewer. So the viewer numbers

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can be high because it could just be that people

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>were scrolling through their Facebook they came across the video,

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it started to auto play, and before they scrolled off

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of that screen, three seconds had passed. And then you

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 1>have this rather inflated number of the viewers for your

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:30.439
<v Speaker 1>content and it looks great. You start feeling really proud

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.360
<v Speaker 1>about yourself. Right. Did they end up coming up with

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>these numbers that make some media providers on the internet

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just kind of salivate over this? How do they get

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that many million views on their live broadcast, like the

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 1>big one being the BuzzFeed broadcast of the Watermelon and

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rubber bands. Are you familiar with this? Oh, I

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what you're talking about. I didn't watch it,

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but I know I saw people talking about how many

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:58.359
<v Speaker 1>views it got. It was like forty seven minute long

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>video or something like that. But I also saw a

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>breakdown afterwards that said, you know, this does not mean

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>all these people watched the whole video. Most of them

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:08.319
<v Speaker 1>watched a few seconds of it. Right, It might have

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:10.239
<v Speaker 1>been that at its peak, I think there was like

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:12.800
<v Speaker 1>more than eight hundred thousand. I think at its peak

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:18.239
<v Speaker 1>more than people are watching it but simultaneously. But then

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>when you factor in this these different uh components, the

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>idea that it's pre rolling as soon as you go by,

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of stuff, it could give a very

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:34.479
<v Speaker 1>false positive of how many people were engaged watching your material. Yeah.

0:56:35.040 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah. So it's problematic with and this is not

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>just we don't mean to just signal out Facebook. This

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:47.479
<v Speaker 1>is something that is a largely unanswered question in live

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>video on the Internet in general. Well, I mean it

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:54.080
<v Speaker 1>brings it brings to mind the main question for me

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which is is personal live video streaming here to stay

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as like a new may eager thing on what data

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be flying back and forth on the

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on the web going into the future. Or is the

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>current popularity more of a an inorganic industry fad that

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the platforms are trying to push this and people are

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of consuming it somewhat, but it's not going to

0:57:20.680 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>stay at this level forever, or it's not going to

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>get much bigger. I think. I think there are certain

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:32.440
<v Speaker 1>audiences that love the live video and they will continue

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to love the live video. Whether that audience is broad

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 1>enough for it to support the massive amount of investment

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we have seen from major companies and startups alike, that's

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 1>another question. Um, it's one that I'm a little skeptical about.

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there have been some people who have said

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that it may very well be that this ends up

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 1>being a a very popular but transitory kind of fad,

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Like it's something where after after it has lived out

0:58:01.760 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 1>its initial burst onto the scene, and we may be

0:58:05.200 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>getting close to it. I mean, we're a year in

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with the mobile stuff, Um, that it'll kind of fade

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>into something more like Yeah, it's like Twitter. Everyone knows

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter. A lot of people use Twitter, but it's

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not something people are necessarily buzzing about anymore. Yeah, well,

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I certainly think that now that we're mostly

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>past the hardware problems, you know, now that we you

0:58:29.840 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>can broadcast without real bandwidth issues and stuff like that,

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there are always going to be some people doing this.

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But the question for me is just how popular is

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it going to be? Do people really want to keep

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>watching the standard kind of video where somebody's just say, hey,

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 1>here's my day. I'm talking into my phone. For all

0:58:50.880 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>my peeps out there who enjoy watching me talking too

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.920
<v Speaker 1>my phone. There's a lot of that going on, And

0:58:56.960 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I can also still see the continuing appeal for what

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the founder of periscope is actually talking about, meaning sort

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know what you call it, citizen journalism,

0:59:07.960 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are in a place where something interesting is

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 1>going on, and thus it's more situational that they're broadcasting

0:59:16.280 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than that they are a standard content provider through

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>these services. So it's more more of of an event

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 1>based thing and not a personality based thing in that case. Yeah,

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the personality based stuff clearly has a place

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, simply because the interactive factor, right, if you

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:36.560
<v Speaker 1>are giving an audience the chance to interact with someone

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they admire for whatever reason, someone they find entertaining or

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>informative or whatever, then that's a very powerful experience, much

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 1>more so that, I would argue than watching a static video.

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean static video is probably the wrong term, but

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a prerecorded video where you know, yes, you can watch

0:59:57.000 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a horror movie and say don't go in there, but

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know that they can hear you. But if you're

1:00:01.360 --> 1:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>doing a live video, like I think a live video

1:00:03.560 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>walk through a haunted house for someone's you like, don't

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>go in there, and like, you know what, that's a

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>great idea, I'm going to turn around and go the

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>other way, you know, the ruin it. Yeah, I imagine

1:00:10.920 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if you could interact with the horror movie, you'd ruin it.

1:00:13.360 --> 1:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You'd say don't go in there, they'd say okay, and

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>then they'd leave, and then it would be boring. No, no, no,

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you you always you always have to have a backup

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>zombie in the yard. You know, you gotta have, you

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta have, you gotta have your backup monsters so that

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, you're gonna encounter a dangerous situation. But

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but no, the interactivity does I think add a lot

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of value to this experience, and if they, if the

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>various providers out there continue to find interesting ways to

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>boost interactivity, I think we could see this sticking around

1:00:44.520 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for a good long while. It maybe that we have

1:00:48.320 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>m another period, like I said, kind of like YouTube,

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>where we see a huge rush of of broadcasters out

1:00:56.080 --> 1:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there and it may shake out where they're are a handful,

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe a hundred really well known broadcasters, and

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>then there's everyone else and discovery becomes incredibly challenging. I

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna be the like we said at the

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>top of the show, I think it's gonna be the

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest hurdle for live casting. But I think live casting

1:01:18.080 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is definitely here to stay, and especially as we get

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>even more sophisticated UM streaming opportunities. It's gonna be built

1:01:25.360 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>into everything, just like cameras were built into lots of stuff,

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Just like you know, voice activation has been built into

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff. We're gonna see more and more

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of these being incorporated directly into products, like like the

1:01:39.400 --> 1:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fact when when the PlayStation four came out and there's

1:01:42.680 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a button on the controller for you to start broadcasting

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitch. That's a huge message that live casting is

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely a big deal. So, uh yeah, I expect that

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see more of this, at least in the

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>near future. Um, it will be really interesting if it

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>continues to be largely unregulated, you know. That's the other

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>question is will there come a point where the government

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the United States decides to step in and pass

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>some regulations? Can't wait? I mean that it's already happening

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of the world, So the question is

1:02:15.800 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>will it happen in the US and and you know,

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and that kind of thing. And there are

1:02:20.480 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different things to consider, Like when I

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do my walk where I'm periscoping. As I walk around,

1:02:26.800 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I try very hard to not show off too much

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of the neighborhoods I'm in out of the concern for

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the privacy of the people who live there. But that's

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>me trying to be thoughtful. There's nothing to guard against

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that if I were to, If I wanted to, I

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>could just walk up to a house periscope live there

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, right, the jerk, the jerk who lives here,

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>their dog poops on my yard. So here's their address, everybody.

1:02:51.680 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could do that, and that would be

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really crappy of the for them. Yeah, that would be

1:02:58.440 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the nice way of of of of harassing that person.

1:03:03.120 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, in the innocent day, yes. Uh So I'm

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>hopeful that that largely the communities will be self regulating

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and self policing because, uh, otherwise, you're gonna have to

1:03:16.200 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have government agencies come into this and start to make rules,

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to make the whole thing harder to access,

1:03:24.480 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>um and and that that would be a shame. But

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I definitely would be concerned about

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the privacy and safety of people who had not consented

1:03:33.120 --> 1:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in a live video and they're not in

1:03:35.760 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a public space. Um. If they're in a public space,

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing, but if they're in like in their

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>own yard, that's something else. Entirely. At any rate, this

1:03:45.320 --> 1:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting conversation, and obviously it's still developing. We're

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>really gonna have to pay attention and see if we

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>end up going down a m a pathway where everyone

1:03:55.680 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is having this awesome communication and we have more access

1:03:58.520 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>than ever to all these amazing events, some some awesome

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and some awful around the world, or if he'll turn

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>into like a black mirror situation and we'll be regretting

1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we ever developed the transistor in the

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>first place. UM, I'm curious about it, and I want

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to know what you guys think too, Like, what what

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are your views on this whole live casting thing are you?

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you a fan? Do you create stuff? Do you

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>watch stuff? Do you watch our stuff? If you don't,

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you should, uh and let us know. Send that's a message.

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Our email addresses f W Thinking at how Stuff Works

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or you can drop us a line on

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or Facebook and Twitter we are f W Thinking.

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>On Facebook, you can just search fw thinking in that

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>little search bar will pop right up and you can

1:04:41.840 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message and we will talk to you

1:04:43.840 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. For more on this topic in the

1:04:53.160 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>future of technology, visit forward Thinking dot com, brought to

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you by Toyota. Let's go Places,