WEBVTT - Stream Wars: Bots & Beef - Lab 088

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm TT and I'm Zakiah and this is Dope Labs.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Dope Labs, a weekly podcast that mixes hardcore

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>science with pop culture and a healthy dose of friendship. Now,

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>there's no debate that Kendrick won the rap Beep with Drake.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, hands down. TKO called the Sandman lights out.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Drake is a corpse, okay, and we can't ignore that.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a real sucker move to.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Issue a lawsuit as soon as you rise up from

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the dead.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But maybe, just maybe those allegations deserve a closer look.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they do.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So this week we're diving into the state of streaming.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>So what do we know?

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like if you've been paying attention to anything,

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or if you just remembered downloading songs that say aol

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>music at the beginning of them, you know, the streaming

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>services were at one point seen as the saving grace

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the music industry.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I saw where b York. You remember her mm hmm,

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>singer song.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember what she looked like in those outfits.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, so she's like a Swan, she's very edgy.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, she just said streaming is one of the

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>worst things to ever happen to musicians. The tides have changed, okay,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and so now it's time for us to kind of

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>change how we're looking at things. So we're putting those

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>streaming services like the one you know y'all might be

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>using to listen to us right now, we're putting those

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>under the microscope. Okay, So what do we want to know? Well,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know for sure, I'm like, what's going on?

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Are the streaming platform is good for the artists or not?

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Drake was the king of pop and R and B

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and whatever other you know genre he chose, you know,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the genre reggae, the hispanic, oh gosh, everything, all of it,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and so he was dominating Spotify and Apple Music and

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>now y'all are mad at him.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>What's going on?

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So, like, you know, my main question is is some

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of this just sourenness from public humiliation by Kendrick or

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is there actually some merit to his claims. Drake is

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>really seeming like a poor sport. But maybe he's just

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>saying the quiet part out loud.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 2>That's fair. I think that's fair.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And if everyone is getting so many streams and we're

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>all listening to their music, why is everybody so grouchy.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Is being number two that much worse than being number one?

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Or is the key to actually making it as an

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>artist having your own masters? Because you know, Maggie Stallion

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was talking about that, yup, and some other people have

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>been too, so like, is that why everybody's a grumpy?

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And what lies ahead for streaming? When we consider AI

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and bots? I mean, ai've been taken over so many things,

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and I mean including Drake.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>We heard that Ai, Drake m h ay y'all.

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Taking off everything except the dishes in my sink. Hello, Okay,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody's doing this laundry. The laundry just pile up on

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the bed. I'm sleeping on top of it. Okay, who's

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna fold these clothes?

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're using it in the wrong areas. But

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of questions, and I'm not ashamed of

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>those squestions. I don't know a lot about all of

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this me either, But that's fine because that's just what

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Dope Labs is for. Let's jump into the dissection. This week,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to Professor Eric A.

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Drott.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a professor of music at the University of Texas,

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin and author of streaming music streaming capital. His work

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>dives into the political economy of music streaming and exploring

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>how digital music platforms have reshaped the way music is produced, distributed,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and consumed. We'll start with some streaming platforms like Spotify

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and Apple Music. They really have revolutionized how we listen

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to music. When I look back, it seems like these

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>services crept up and they were the music industry's way

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to recapture a lot of the market after LimeWire and Napster,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>which I am guilty of and I think, you know, yes,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody is my desktop was smoking with all of my loads.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So when we see how they brought the music industry back,

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's great to see, but at what cost to artists.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's important to recognize that there are

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 3>a lot of positives about the advent of streaming.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, definitely on the consumer side.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>And if you told me when I was fifteen twenty

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>years old that you know, in a few years time

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 3>you'll be able to just like click a button get

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>access to anything I have, you know, just been in

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 3>heaven at the very thought of it.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 4>So that's great from the perspective of artists. Creates a

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 4>global marketplace.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 3>So if you blow up, you blow up at a

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>global level, right, I would.

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Think that blowing up at a global level is a

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>good thing. You know, more people, more streams. When I

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was checking the stats, it said that there are over

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and forty million monthly active users on Spotify,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and that Spotify captures the majority of the market, but

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple is only a couple percent points right behind. That's

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people listening. And if I'm an artist,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I like those odds. I'm not really seeing

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the problem yet.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 4>There are several problems of from the perspective of artists.

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>One, there is this phenomenon. It's not new to screaming.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>It's known as winner take all markets.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>A good example of the sort of dynamic is something

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 3>like a sporting event where we're talking about fractions of

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>a second, and so like fractions of a second from

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 3>you being the world champion to you not even being

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 3>on the podium. And so one of the things about

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>winner take all markets is that you get this dynamic

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>where these tiny, tiny differences in absolute terms lead to

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>these massive disparities and relative terms.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you see in the world of.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Music very vividly, where you know the top artist you

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 3>know is going to make basically two times probably like

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 3>the next top artists, and then you know it will

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>go down kind of exponentially from there.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so this is kind of like when Ricky Bobby

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was intelligent to Night saying, if you're not first, your last.

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that movie had economics in it.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>The more you know, Yep, the Beyonces, the Taylor Swift's,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>these are the global superstars who were like doing very

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>well by the current system. But it drops off Pray radically,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 3>very quickly.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like now Drake's complaints are making a lot

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more sense. If you're not number one, your pockets are

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>being affected. If this is a winner takes all market.

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yeah.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>So I mean basically, several months after Not Like Us,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>which was kind of the last word in the beef,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>It's very hard to see how Drake could come back

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>after that.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 4>After that was released, he filed a couple of lawsuits.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean the first couple they were like pre litigation.

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a lawyer, so I don't.

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Really understand some of the nuances here. They weren't really lawsuits,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>but they're like pre litigation, there's something like that.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But Drake dropped those pre litigation submissions and really honed

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in on Universal Music Group. That was strange because that's

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>his label. What's he saying about them?

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 3>It's basically accusing Universal of a few things, one of

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 3>which is that they engaged in a defamation against him.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Since you know, essentially Kendrick is.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Calling pedophile, right, and you're saying, that's affirmation that because

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Universal agreed to release this right, because they gave the

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>green light for the supubilis that they are a party

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>to that defamation.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 4>So that's part of it.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>But then another part of is that, you know, he's

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 3>saying that they did certain things that were either questionable

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>legality or just playing illegal. I'm not sure, but you know,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 3>definitely dubious.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is a legal side from Drake to Universal

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Music Group or UMG about Kendrick saying he's a pedophile

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and likes young girls. And I mean, T T I

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>get that, because if that's not true, this SE's and

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>desist or whatever, you know, stop it, Okay.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Stop that.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>You can tell we're not lawyers, but seriously, separate from

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the defamation. What's wrong with UMG? Promoting a song like

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they have a vested interest in it doing well.

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So one thing he says, which I think is one

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 3>of the most interesting things, He says that you know, UMG,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 3>whitelisted the song, which means that basically, UMG, they have

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 3>the right to exclude other people from using it unless

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>you pay the money, right, And so, like, if I

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>were a TikToker or a YouTuber, Instagram reals person, I

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>want to put like this song up there, you know,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>basically Universe will come in and block it, right, flag

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 3>it saying this has an unauthorized recording here, Okay, But

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 3>basically whitelisting is Universal saying no, We're just gonna withdraw

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 3>all those copyright protections temporarily because you know, basically one

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>of the things that the lawsuit sites is all these

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 3>reaction videos to the song, right, and basically those would

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>have been subject to copyright claims from Universal. But you know,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Drake is saying, or Drake's lawyers are saying, like Universal

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 3>wanted you know, this to generate buzz, generate like discourse,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and what better medium to do that than like reaction

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 3>videos for people, which it's like, you know, oh shit,

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 3>what does this guy.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Saying, so put that thing up. You know how on

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube sometimes it'll say this head is a copyright claim

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>or there's music in this that can't be used. Drake

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>is saying, why didn't y'all put that up for Kendrick

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Lamar song exactly?

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>And then the other thing he says again like this

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>is actually technically illegal, you know, he basically says that

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 3>they engage in payola, which there have been controversies for

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean decades, the concern record labels paying. Back in

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the day, it was radio stations. Now it's streaming platforms,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and there's actually laws against that. So basically you started

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>saying that that this is what Universal did in or

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to sort of give the song a boost out of

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the gates right by sort of artificially inflaming number of streams,

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 3>either by using bots or by using click farms or

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 3>paying people to stream it, you know, which some.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Of the stuff is outright illegal. All that is like

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 4>very questionable.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>If this is illegal, why didn't it blow up even bigger?

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't other artists outraged that UMG is doing this

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and that it hurts their streams? Aren't the other labels

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of UMG? Upset I would be right, or were

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>people just fixated on the actual beef. Hmm, that's a

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>good question.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I Mean the thing is is that, like this is

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of an open secret that this happens, right, and

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 3>it happens with the major labels, right, I mean yes,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of of you know, young up and coming

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 3>artists will try to use bots or paid streams in

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 3>order to give their stuff a boost and get a

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>bit of traction, bit of visibility.

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the hardest things about streaming platforms is like

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>getting heard because there's just so much music. I mean,

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>this is going back to like, what are the problems

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>streaming platforms? That's a big one, right, because it's just

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 3>so hard to break through. But you know, even though

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 3>for the past few years, you know, all the major

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>labels and a bunch of other stakeholders have been you know,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 3>making a hue and cry about you know, the problem

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>streaming fraud and how there has to be a crackdowns

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 3>about this, you know, there's anecdotal evidence. I mean I've

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>heard from pretty reliable sources who have worked for major

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 3>labels that this is something that they have at least

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 3>engaged in the past. I won't be surprised if they

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 3>still engage in it in some way, shape or form.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So Drake is kind of onto something and highlighting a

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>problem that you're saying is kind of systemic. It's not

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>just a personal thing, it's it's something that has been

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>going on for a long time that does cause issues.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So do you think that these actions, the lawsuits and

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the refilings and everything like that, are ultimately going to

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>do more harm to his reputation than good for the

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>music industry?

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, definitely. I mean it looks bad. I mean,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, like it just like, I'm no expert in rappies,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>so this is like to me, this looks pathetic, right,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean it looks sad. But you know, I you know,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Kendrick just to play the Super Bowls, right like,

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like, you know, I don't know how much

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>more attention like can be drought to this song. But

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, well, okay, fine, you know you're accusing UMG

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 3>of using these questionable methods, methods of questionable legality.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>To boost Kendrick. You're also a universal heart, right.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean we can put to you know, you

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>may have benefit from this in the past.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 4>You probably have benefit from this in the.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>When he was beefing with Meek Mill, probably yeah.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Or or just for any song that he's released, right,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and there have been cases like I remember, oh,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember which album it was, but like they

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>had the entire Drake takeover of Spot five's homepage, where

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 3>like every playlist had his picture on it, and wow,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, like so it's like I want to listen to,

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 3>oh no, like Beethoven and so like a picture of

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Drake's on it, you know.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>A minute, Yeah, what's happening?

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 2>Is Beethoven black?

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 4>That's also a debate.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll bring you back again for that one.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 3>The thing to remember, right is that these platforms are

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 3>really dependent upon the major mabel's catalogs in many ways, right,

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 3>And it's not just like the current catalog like what's

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>popular right now, which obviously they dominate, but also the

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>massive back catalogs.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't really make sense to call like Universal Record

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>label because what it is is like kind of a

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 3>holding company for all these smaller.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Labels that it's acquired over the years.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>So jazz labels like VERV, labels like Island Records, which

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>really s all the like Bob Marley recordings in the

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventies, Interscope right, big hip hop label, and the

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 3>list goes on. You know, platforms really rely on all

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 3>that music. You know that these major labels have managed

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>to gobble up over the decades, and so that means

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>that they will basically do things in order to appease

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the labels.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You're helping us really understand, because I think too often

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about the streaming platforms as being the

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>big dogs here, but really the record labels with these

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>extensive catalogs, like, somebody's got to populate your platform, so

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they have the ball and if you want them to

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>stay in, you want them to keep playing. And so

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like this kind of tug of war

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of power or the recording each other to keep music

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>streaming as we know it. Yeah, and that also makes

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>me think about how some artists own their own masters.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So Steve Stout has been a vocal advocate for artists

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>owning their own masters. Artists like Jay z Rihanna, Frank

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>ocean U two, they own their own masters. And then

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we see stories like Taylor Swift where she comes out

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with Taylor's version because Scooter Braun owns her masters, and

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Jojo also came up put her album from back in

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the day so that she could own those masters. Can

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit about that and is this

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a realistic solution for most artists or does it only

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit those at the top?

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I think obviously it's better to own the masters than

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 3>not to own the masters. And this is obviously one

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of the main ways at the record labels. Why have

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 3>they become so powerful, right, is because the additions of

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 3>getting access to a the funding that you know, record

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>label usually provides in the form of an advance and

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 3>be then the marketing and the promotion that you know,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 3>especially major labels are able to provide. The sort of

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 3>cost of all that is that you usually have to

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>sign away your rights. This isn't just restricted to the

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 3>music industry. I don't own the rights to either of

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>the books I've written. Doesn't really matter since they're not

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 3>making any money anyways. That's part for the course for

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>academic books. But you know, it does become very consequential

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>when we're talking about valuable music rights.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a tricky trade off though, because how can you

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>see into the future, Like I got my masters, but

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe I needed that marketing and promotion.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, it's in a lot of cases, for

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the overwhelming majority of artists, you may own your rights,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 3>but they may not be worth very much because you

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't break through, right, And this gets back to that

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 3>question the winner take all kind of nature of music

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>economies in general.

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I want to rewind is something you mentioned earlier

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because you briefly mentioned this FBI case where this guy

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he uses AI to make music. Then he gets all

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>these bots to stream this music that he's making with AI,

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and he makes well, he should have made like millions

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. Yes, yes, and so considering this case, but

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>also considering this technology in a winner takes all market

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he carved out a pretty good spot

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for himself. I mean, aside from jail that might need ahead,

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not a good spot. How do you see AI and

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>technology kind of shaping the music industry even further? You know,

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>especially as we think about these metrics, and one of

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the known or unknown knowns is that like all these

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>streaming numbers, this stuff is not as reliable as it seems.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>So people are bragging about being number one, but that

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>might not even be real platform to platform.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we don't even get much visibility.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So what do you think this means? What do

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you think is next? What do you think we're gonna see.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 2>More of this?

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the things that at least right

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 3>now is a comfort probably for a lot of artists

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 3>is that even the most sophisticated AI generators and music

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 3>that produce is still pretty right, and so you know,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's much competition, and like people listen

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 3>to music for all kinds of reasons. Just as important,

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>i'd say in a lot of cases is like a

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 3>sense of connection with the artists, right, So.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 4>You don't have that with like AI generating music. Right.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the idea that this is going

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 3>to like displace artists is you know premature. Let's say,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who knows what's going to happen ten twenty

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>years from now, but I think right now, I think

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 3>I think one thing also to bear in minds, like

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about AI, we can be referencing all

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 3>kinds some different things. I think a lot of times

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 3>people think about you know, AI generate songs, it could

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>also mean things like the sort of vocal clones.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, So there's the Fake.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Drake song that came out almost two years ago now

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Hard on my Sleeve, which was kind of the big

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 3>wake up call for the industry that this technology had

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 3>reached a certain point where you could have somebody basically,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, create a track and use one of these

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 3>vocal masks in order to like emulate the sound and

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 3>style of like a major artist. You know, I think

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 3>it's telling there that we haven't had any other kind

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 3>of big breakout moments since then, right, And it's not

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>like the technology's bad, it's it's like it's kind of gimmicky.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I Saebob sing Luther Vandra style, and I was like,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced that SpongeBob Patrick.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Patrick, I think there are two main concerned So

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 5>that one is that already when you look at the

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 5>catalogs or the databases of these major platforms, you know,

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 5>the number of tracks.

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 3>That they have is absolutely eye watering, right, Like, I

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 3>mean Spotify has over one hundred million tracks. And you know,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>we were talking before about how hard it is to

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 3>get heard, right, and if people are uploading forty thousand

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 3>tracks a day, right, it just makes it all the

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 3>more difficult to break through. And you know, maybe some

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 3>portion of those are AI generated block but it doesn't matter.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 3>It's just adding to the noise that you have to

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 3>get past. So that's one problem. I think the other

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 3>problem is, like it's a little more indirect. So about

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>two years ago, the head of UMG Loosing Range, comes

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 3>out with like a letter that he publishes just this

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of state of the union for the music industry,

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and he said streaming has been great, helping the record

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 3>industry get back on his feet, but the revenue sharing

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 3>model is broken. And he cited the fact that you know,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 3>there's just so much garbage now populating streaming platforms. You know,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 3>all the white noise playlists to help you sleep, you know.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Which, Yes I'm playing this, yeah, yeah, I mean.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm a fan.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 3>But he cited AI generated music right, AI slop right.

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 3>And so basically what UMG started pushing is what they

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 3>call artists centric model, where it's basically, in order to

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 3>get any kind of payment from a streaming platform, you'd

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>have to pass a certain kind of threshold of monthly listeners, right,

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and a certain number of listeners listening to your music, right,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and so like if you only get nine hundred and

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine streams one month. Right, you're not a real

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.719
<v Speaker 3>artist acquarding to this, right, which you know, like there

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of like musicians working in more obscure yeah,

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>genres that you know, they're not pulling in huge numbers,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 3>but they may be super talented musicians.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 4>So you know, AI in this case is being.

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Used as a kind of pretext in order to like

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 3>restructure the way in which streaming economies work.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't like that though.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, the music industry, in the podcast industry

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is not sounded so different. I don't know who wrote

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the letter for podcasting this year, but take away some

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of the microphones. Not ours, but some other people. We've

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot from you to think about, and it's

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>really got our brains going.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 2>We are lovers of music, like.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Zakia, and our friendship has introduced me to a lot

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of music. Now I'm trying to think of somebody you

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>put me onto I can think as a win and

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it's actually relevant right now too. Our homegirl, Rachel Lizzy.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>She just got roasted on the internet for not liking

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Anita Baker. But you know, when I first met you,

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know the difference between Nita Baker and Josephine Baker.

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, do you want to hear some Anita Baker?

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And she said, is that the lady with the bananas?

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And I almost lost it. But as soon as I

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>realized who Anita Baker was, I am now I'm a fan.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I love her. Bake me up, I love it. She

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>is just chefs kissed.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>She is on every playlist that I have that to

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>get me in the right mood.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm very grateful to z A Kia for that.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're very thankful to you, Professor Drot, for explaining

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>all of this because t T we really didn't know

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. No, we just knew that we

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>were team Kendrick and that was but now we know

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that it might be a little bit deeper than rap.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's good to know.

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>All this talk about music is making me think about

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>my favorite songs right now, tit. You know, I always

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>want to know what you're listening to, go ahead and

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>give it to me what you're feeling right now? Okay,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So honestly, it's the entire Chromacopeia album by Tyler the creator.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 2>H Lyrically, it's just perfect.

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the way that Tyler raps and the

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>things that he raps about speaks directly to me. There's

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so many good one liners. I feel like I quote

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>him on a daily basis. So, Yes, that is the

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>music that makes me happy currently. I like it. I

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like it and pretty much everything by boss Man Dilo.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what about j Zee? What are you liking right now?

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I think right now I am in I'm definitely in

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>my love Girl era. Okay, So I've been listening to

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>all the R and B and I liked this artist

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a while back. When we were in New Orleans for Suspith,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw Ombre and there's a song Ambre has that's

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>called Superstitious. I just saw her live recently at City

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Wannery and she sang it in like it's been my jam.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>So Superstitious and all kinds of other stuff, and bre

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Conrad Fabo Destin Conrad, a sleeper, Oh my goodness.

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Super sleeper.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Also Leon Thomas, Leon Thomas. There's more than just mut

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I know y'all are using this Instagram. There's more than

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>being used a lot. There's more than mud. Yes is

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a very good song though. Okay, so we've talked about

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>our favorite music, but we want to know y'all's favorite music.

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you send us a message, a comment, a

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>DM letting us know what you're listening to right now

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and make it good because we love a good playlist. Yes,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on X and Instagram at Dope

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Labs podcast, tt is on X and Instagram at d

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>R Underscore T s h O, and you can find

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Zakiya at Z said So. Dope Labs is a production

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 1>of Lamanada Media. Our senior supervising producer is Kristin Lapour

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and our associate producer is Usara Savez. Dope Labs is

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>sound designed, edited and mixed by James Farber. Limanada Media's

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Vice President of Partnerships and Production is Jackie Danziger. Executive

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>producer from iHeart podcast is Katrina Norvil. Marketing lead is

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Alison Canter. Original music composed and produced by Takayasuzawa and

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Alex sugi Ura, with additional music by Elijah Harvey. Dope

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Labs is executive produced by us T T Show Dia

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and Zakia Wattley.