WEBVTT - Rays Keep Rocking in Cleveland

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It's time to raise the roof for our latest regular

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>season episode. Welcome back to the plot everyone, I'm host

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Ax Murphy with me today, my co host Evan Lynch,

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and Gibby's gonna be coming on later, so stay tuned

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>But Evan, how are we doing?

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Man? Good? Good?

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 4>How are you doing?

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Can't complain? The Rays have been way better than I thought.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I am prepared to eat a lot of my words.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 4>I know it's still early in the season, but I

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 4>am prepared to humbly accept that I at this point

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 4>of the season at least wrong, so we can get

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 4>into that a little bit later, which I am pleasantly

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 4>surprised by. But no, yeah, I mean six out of

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 4>seven winning, it's a It was a weird series. It

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 4>was a weird road trip, just a three gamer on

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 4>the road, which is kind of strange. But beeping getting

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 4>that in a little bit, Yeah.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at what the race have

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>done recently, especially you know that series in Cleveland, I

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>do wonder how much the rain did play a factor

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>into it, whether that killed momentum.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 4>For the raz or whatever it might be.

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But to take two out of three there and then

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>coming off a home stand where you were able to

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>take four or six, especially sweeping the sweep, sweep swee

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sweeping the Twins. As you mentioned, the six wins in

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>last seven games overall, that dates back to the last

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>game in the Red Series, of which Nick Martinez pitched

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>an absolute gem. He pitched another gem against Cleveland, which

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's only given up what.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Is he not?

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I said it in just like as an

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>opening to the last spot. He's given up like one

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>run in his last fifteen innings.

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I get now.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much you should actually take into

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>account and affect everything when it comes to training, but

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I do legitimately. I mean, it can't all be legit

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like he had to have been working on stuff because

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>no one, I think expected this kind of success from

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>him after what he did.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Like if he put up like a four.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Era, I would, you know, maybe there was something to it,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>but like a one to seventy RA and one of

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the best pitchers in baseball, I did not expect.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 4>No, he's been. I mean, he's been the sign of

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 4>the offseason. He's been. I mean, you could argue he's

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 4>been our best player. Like he's been unbelievable. I mean

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 4>he went Yeah, like you said, he went eight innings,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>and I mean he probably could have gone nine. He

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 4>could have. I mean he was at like ninety something pitches.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he could have gotten more in the game

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland too. It wasn't like he was out of

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>gas or anything like I think he was only at

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like seventy or eighty pitches. Yeah, he was under I

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>believe eighty five pitches almost guaranteed ninety pitches for sure,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>so he could have gone into the.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Eighth if he wanted to.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, but he's been spectacular, Like, I mean,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 4>he's kind of been the ace of this this rotation

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 4>so far. And like you said, he did not have

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 4>a good spring training, but he did say I mean,

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of cool that he he was like, don't

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>he kind of had that mentality of don't worry about it,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 4>Like I think he's I'm reading the quotes he said,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 4>He's like, a lot of this spring was me trying new,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>trying new things that they were recommending, and a lot

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 4>of it was, yeah, trying to feel out. So yeah,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean when you when that happens and then you

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of back it up with your play in the

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 4>real season. I believe that. And he's been incredible. He's

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 4>what he got paid what twelve thirteen million, which has

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 4>been which is looking like.

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I believe it's thirteen.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It was it was nine, and then there was the

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>mutual like he was gonna end up getting thirteen, but

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it was base salary of nine million this year and

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>then a.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Mutual option whatever it is.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>The buyout was like four mil for next year if

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to resign him again, which I doubt

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that they would considering what the option would be for

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, and he's thirty five, but whatever's that's

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 4>in that's a next season type issue. So I mean,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 4>I mean, his stats are incredible. He's two and one

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 4>with a one to seven ERA and a one even whip,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 4>which is fantastic especially for what he's kind of our

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:21.559
<v Speaker 4>fourth or fifth starter.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, coming into the year, I think he

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>was projected to be what I'm trying to think. I

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think Matts was probably gonna be the five if you

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>think about it, because Matts was kind of at times

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>he was stretched out last year, but in the grand

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things, he was more of a long reliever

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>than he was a starter. So I think if we

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>were going to categorize things, he would probably have been

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the five, the four.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 4>And maybe even three, just because Shane hasn't pitched in

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>two years, so you never so.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Like, at best the three, at worst the four is

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what I would have presumed.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 4>And I guess you could move him up even further

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 4>because Pepio is probably going to be our second so

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 4>and he hasn't pitched an enning the season yet.

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think if you look at the rotation, I

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the expectation was that, of course Papio was

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be healthy, and then who was the Yeah

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it was I mean I thought in my head it

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be Drew was gonna be the one, pap

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be the two, Shamee was gonna end up

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming the three, Martinez was going to be the foreign

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>match was going to be the five.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah that's fair.

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Now like Jesse Schultens is essentially the.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Five, which I mean, he's he's fantastic that he's looked great.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>He didn't heed that Reds game. It was what two

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 4>mondays ago. I think he had the he that definitely

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 4>had some mistakes in the Reds offense is good enough

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 4>to take advantage of that. But whatever that was, that

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 4>was a while ago. But anyway, going back to this

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>the series against the Guardians, it was all I mean

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 4>the Monday game that was a textbook steal. I don't

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 4>know how we won that game, Like that was a

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>game we I don't think we deserve to win. Ryan

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Valaide is incredible.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>He's he has been another guy who I'm eating my

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>words about because yeah, I didn't expect And again when

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the Raids pick up these guys, considering how some of

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>these players have done, and I don't want to put

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the direct comparisons of guys, but if we want

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to do direct comparisons.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, a hundred food should being brought in.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we we've already seen what Alex Jackson did in

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a large, rather large sample size with the Rais and

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>was not successful. So that was a guy that people

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>had concerns about. Valaide. I'm sure people had concerns about

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>him kind of looking like Christopher Morrell to an extent

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of someone who was was good or supposed to be

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.559
<v Speaker 1>good against a certain type of pitcher and then wasn't

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>fully good or I guess not fully good in the

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of Morell not having a good season. But Vlaide

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has been fantastic. He's been a very good bench piece.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I've wanted the Rays to have good bench pieces, like

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I not as much this year, but I use the

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Phillies as what I would consider to be a team

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that has some good bench pieces. So like recently you

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know ed Mundo Sosa, Otto, Kemp West and Wilson, guys

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like that are good pieces to come off the bench

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and do things. And I think that Valaide is fitting

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in that role nicely for the race.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>And I just feel like, I mean, this is based

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 4>on total total field, no statistics whatsoever, So if anybody

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 4>wants to prove me wrong, please do it. But I

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>feel like this team is a heck of a lot

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 4>better than last year's team was against lefties, and maybe,

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 4>and like Vlaid is a huge reason for that. Like

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you look at recent past and ever Ray's

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 4>hitters they were more so power hitters, but like the

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>platoon guys like Hunter Renfro you mentioned Morell, they just

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 4>they didn't come close to what Vlai is doing. Granted,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 4>like I said, it's it's only been half a month

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 4>or what it's been a month of the season, so yeah,

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 4>but I mean it.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Is better that he's done at all, like in his

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>entire career.

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, but he's he's kind of give me the

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Moderizario vibes from what three years ago when he just

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 4>was very good against left handed hitting. And I mean

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Parker Messik, who started that game on Monday for the Guardians,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 4>he has been one of the best pitchers in the game. Like,

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 4>he has a point eight eight whip one point seven

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>to three and the Rays they didn't score a lot

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 4>of against him, but they made him work. I mean,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 4>he went five and two thirds with ninety five pitches.

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 4>He did have nine strikeouts, but they made him throw pitchers.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>He didn't get through six and they were able to

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 4>get to the bullpen. So and Stephen bats also looked

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 4>great too, don't you can't can't he spends that.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 2>He's been strong this year.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that he hit some blips here and there,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but in the general sense, he's been a very strong

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pitcher for the Rays, which I've been very happy about.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 4>He I mean, I wouldn't even say the home run

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 4>that Schneeman hit was a mistake. It was a good

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>pitch and I don't I still don't know how Schneman

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 4>hit that out. But yeah, he went seven innings for

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 4>four hits, two earned, one walk, only two strikeouts, which

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 4>I know he's not a strikeout pitcher, but that's pretty

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 4>insane and ninety five pitches.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>So I was gonna ask you quickly about Mattz.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you like coming in were your expectations of him

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>higher than they were for Martinez? Because mine, for for

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, I felt way more confident in Nats.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Than I did in Martinez.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm the opposite. I don't know, I don't know what.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 4>In spring training. Maybe I think when they signed each player,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go based on that because spring training.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, no, no, that's what I was talking about.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't talking about spring just just signing.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 4>When they signed him, I was definitely more optimistic about Martinez.

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why. Maybe, like it could be a

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>reason just because I had Martinez on my fantasy team

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 4>like a year or two ago and he was awesome,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 4>and I just had that like mentality ingrained in my

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>brain this like, hey, this is a good picture. Thirteen

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 4>mil might have been a lot, But yeah, I don't know.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 4>I didn't think Mattz really stood off the page a

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 4>whole lot, but he's once again, I couldn't have been

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 4>more wrong. Like this is this is an episode of

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 4>me just eating all of my words, and I am

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 4>ready to do so, and I'm happily doing it because

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the Rays are playing really good baseball. Also, Ian Seymour

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 4>is another guy I think we need to talk about

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 4>in this series again.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He's He's had his struggles.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I know he hasn't looked good this year this season,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 4>but he had two really really awesome outings in the

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Monday and Tuesday game where he didn't still didn't look great,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 4>but he was able to get through get an inning.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I think he only went two and a third on

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>the Tuesday game, but he got to He was able

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 4>to get get in there on Monday and got an inning, pitched,

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 4>gave up a walk, but struck out two and got

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 4>through it, got the hold and then Brian Baker locked

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 4>it down. And I don't know he and he I

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>think he was thrown into a pretty crazy situation on

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 4>the Tuesday game and he was able to get through

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>it without giving up a run. So he deserves some

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>full hours for those two performances too.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I will say I've been bit too many times by

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Ray's pitchers not doing well and then go elsewhere, or

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>just having bad seasons after you know, being like like

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kelly pissed me off a lot last year.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 2>He has not.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Been nearly as bad as as he was last year,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which is like that was That's a positive for this

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>team considering how many guys are currently on the IL,

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean on top, like Pepio was moved to the

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>sixty day, who said it was moved to the sixty day.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Clevenger is still working his way back. Those are three

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean Riguez, yeah, yeah, yeah, Man Rod is out.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, on the bullpen side of things, probably your

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>three best relievers, well, depending on how you want to

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>look at Brian Baker, but coming into the season, I'm

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.599
<v Speaker 1>sure how people viewed things. Potentially your three more I

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, because those five, if you include Baker and Jackson,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but your best five relievers in a general sense, were

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>either hurt coming into the year or got hurt earlier

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the year.

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 4>And if you want to throw I mean of comparing

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 4>to last year, you also lost your best reliever to

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 4>free agency. So that's another like you're kind of without

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 4>your six best receive relievers from last year, which is I.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Mean four four of your four of your six best

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>relievers aren't there, and I know that not all of

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>them were that are started the season four of them were.

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So your best four relievers technically to start last season,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you consider Manrod knowing that he was injured,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but when healthy, your four best relievers are.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:33.359
<v Speaker 2>No longer there.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Or are all either not there or hurt, and then

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Baker kind of doing their thing. Still not convinced

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on Jacks by any means. It's a lot of things

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that he needs to work out. I know that like

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>spots start quote unquote, he looked pretty solid in that.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So I do wonder if the Rays are considering trying

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to like stretch him out more turn him potentially into

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a starter if they too, because maybe just the the

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>high leverage thing, it doesn't seem like it seems like

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Baker has more of that like closer type energy that

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the rings want, Like.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 4>He's a psycho. He's a psycho, and and I mean

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 4>then the nicest way possible, he's It's exactly you need

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 4>you need like an insane person to be a closer.

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 4>That the more insane you are on the baseball field

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 4>as a closer, the better you probably are.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>And and I don't know if Jack's quite has what

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Baker has.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 4>He definitely you can tell, I mean he has. He

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 4>was unbelievable for the Twins. He has the talent, maybe

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 4>a centle thing. But you but going back to your

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 4>point about the bullpen, I think it definitely is, Like

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't, I still don't think it's like a top

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 4>ten bullpen in the MLB. It's it's talented, but it's

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 4>it's definitely finding its rhythm a little bit more. I think,

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 4>like you said, they were kind of out of place,

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think Cash necessarily knew how to manage

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>it earlier in the season just because of how many

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 4>moving pieces there were.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's got a lot better job of managing the bullpen.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Right because because I think people, I think they've played

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 4>their ways into their roles.

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, I agree with that.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 4>And Kelly, Kevin Kelly's a guy who and I think

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 4>that's actually Ian Symour and Kevin Kelly are two guys

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 4>who have kind of have maybe it was a mental thing.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know, maybe they had the yips kind

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 4>of earlier this season, but they have definitely found their rhythm.

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Kelly is down to a four to six,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 4>which is unbelievable.

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, considering how horrible he was last year.

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Like he was he was the season, he was unpitchable

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 4>last year and earlier this season, and he's down to

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 4>a four to six, like that's a win. Ian seymore

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 4>down to a six, seven to five. I mean his

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 4>first outing this season, he gives up what seven runs

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 4>in that one in that game against the Cardinals. Yeah,

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 4>that was and Cole Sultzer, I'm going to just go

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 4>and alund the line of the bullpen in the Tuesday game.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 4>He has been on a roll recently. I don't have

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the stats in terms of.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And the not, like you know, these guys are expendable guys,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Rays have needed these guys because of the

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>injuries that have occrued in.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 4>The bullpen, right and he's he I mean he was

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 4>able to give Brian Baker off on Tuesday in that

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 4>one zero win. He got the save, not a one

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 4>two three inning, but sixteen pitches got the got I

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>mean he's a three two four era Like that's I mean,

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 4>he's not gonna be He's not a closer, but still

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 4>not bad for he's probably one of our worst arms

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 4>in our bullpen, and he's been incredible in the last

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks. So it is nice to see the

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 4>bullpen kind of figure out what's going on and the

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Ray's record as the team reflects that.

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a slowly but shirley thing.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>As our other co host gave you joins from is

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it gloomy Ohio?

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Like like, what what's the vibes in Ohio right now?

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh? It's pretty, it's gloomy.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh it's blue sky.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh it doesn't look too bad. Look at Ohio.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 4>It is Ohio, though we can't. It's not that nice.

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're not Columbus right now. I was. I was

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>closer to Cleveland. I guess they weren't.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Too gloomy about the Guardians losing the series, but they

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 5>cared more about, you know, just the weather always being

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 5>like this, but you know it's good when I got

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 5>before I got here, it was like seventy degree weather,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 5>and then when I got here is like stayed at

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 5>fifty found. Yeah, I mean It's great to be here.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, the Rays are playing great.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Well that's the last game in that series, but who cares.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, we went on a little five game winning streak,

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 5>more than I was expecting you from this.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Stand we had ah, but you know, I don't have

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>very much time. Uh, I'd like to pick.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, mine blade's been a badas it's

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 5>very good. Uh Yandi was great this whole series and

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 5>he just continues to prove and be the most underrated

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 5>player in the MLB.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And then Paul Salcer has really turned it around.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 5>I really like what he's been doing. Brian Baker is

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 5>a badass. When you guys are talking about the bullpen earlier,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 5>the pieces they're coming together a little bit better. So

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 5>it's been it's been a pretty good situation going on

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 5>for the Raids. Not what I was expected. You know,

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 5>it was a very quick turnaround. You know, we were

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 5>very mad like the first two weeks, and then you

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 5>know they kind of went back to normal.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Nick Martinez is a badass.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I don't even know when we've had guys,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 5>but we ever had a guy who's pitched two back

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 5>to back, seven eight plus games.

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember the last team that.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Even happened, So yeah, that happens a lot of this team.

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly. So, I mean he's just super effective. He

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 5>munches on innings.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Who else m Jonathan Ronda's been on his comeback?

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 4>I want to in the al in RBI, right, is

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 4>he Is he a home run hitter?

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Like? I because he I mean his average is still

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 4>pretty low, but I mean he's second And like I

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 4>was thinking, it's like, does he did he change his approach?

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 4>And I wanted to get your guys opinions on that,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Like it seems like he's kind of a power hitter guy.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Now, yeah, I mean he's definitely.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 5>I feel like, you know, when you have Yondy who's

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 5>like basically suppose you would think he's a home run

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 5>hitteror but he's not really. I mean he does hit

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 5>home he doesn't hit bombs when he wants to. You know,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 5>he's more of that, uh, just productive, get on base

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 5>kind of guy. And then we have a lot of

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 5>kin get on base guys, you know, like Chandler Simpsons.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 5>So I bet you know there might be a reason

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 5>to that. You know, maybe Kevin Cash told him having

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 5>in the power a little bit more.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Uh, show show it off a little bit more. So, Yeah,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 3>he's been really impressed.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 5>That one game Junior and Aronda hit two home runs.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 5>That was one of the best games I've ever I've watched,

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 5>because you know, you know, I don't even know when

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 5>less than that happened, you know, to two raised.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Hitters hitting two home runs in the same game.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 5>Uh, it's kind of unbelievable for this franchise at least.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I mean Jonathan runs. He was a little

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 5>slump at the beginning of the season, but now he's.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Right back to her.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 5>So I hope he just keeps the climbing and bringing

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 5>back into the MVP conversition like.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 3>He was last year.

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 5>Kind of Uh, but yeah, I got to get back

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 5>to where I was going, So.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, give me where I am.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Give us your give us your players because I know

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have much time. Give us your your

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>keys to the series against the Giants, and then your

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>players are.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 3>The uh Keith Joan hu Lee in the park.

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 5>But you know, he's not been as good as he

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 5>was getting into twenty twenty five, so that doesn't really

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 5>matter too much that I forgot what that one angry

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 5>bulking guy's name was But when you're.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Just like fucking, fucking fucking.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 5>To all the players, and he tried to start a

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 5>fight with.

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Who was of Smith something else.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 4>I have to go back and remember that.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, but but it was that guy's a firebacker.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 5>So let's try not to anger them, so we don't

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 5>get any of our players injured from ball to the

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 5>ridge or something. You know, Let's play ethical baseball, you know,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 5>just for this series. Because the Giants seemed kind of

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 5>hot this year. I've never well I've seen that from

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 5>the Giants. I haven't you know, I haven't seen that

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 5>since like Linsey come left, you know, like that era

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 5>of Giants.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Ah.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, they got they got a little bit of

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 5>fire new So just keep them in the ballpark, you know,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 5>don't bringer the boll pain. Don't get into a sling

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 5>in baseballs match.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>No, no kerfuffles, no kurfuffles.

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 2>So then and then and then who your players for

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the series.

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 4>If you had to pick a cup, guys.

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 5>Oh give me Ryan de Lad because I said that earlier.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean he's just been I've never like usually this

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 5>pinch hit or ship it doesn't really work out you know,

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 5>like we try to bring in a guy like that

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 5>who can't really adjust to the moment out of out

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 5>of the being ice cold, you know, on the bench.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 5>But you know Ryan Vloyd's multiple times and when he

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 5>gets his start, you know, he does good and he's

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 5>just been that has been climbing. You know, he doesn't

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 5>have many patch as the other guys when he's super effective.

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 5>So I mean he's gonna be my hitter. And then

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 5>pitcher Snick Martinez pitching the series?

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>No, because he pitched on Well, he might pitch the

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Sunday game because he No, No, he pitched a Tuesday

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 2>game of this sea, so that means he wouldn't be

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>available for this. He'll put enough money.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Yah, gimme clinster, gimme clanster.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, there we go. I like it. That's a

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>good pick. All right, all right, well we'll leave you

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to it. Enjoy Ohio. Well, Gibby reporting live from uh the.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>How do we describe? Well, I guess he's not in Columbus,

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or is he? I don't I didn't think he said

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>he was in Columbus.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 4>The Buckeye state, right, Yes.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is the Buckeye State that is true.

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's any Raised players who are

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>from Ohio necessarily or went to a school in Ohio.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, Brian Peppy went to Xavier. No, he went

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to Butler. I'm an idiot.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>He went the Butler because because he's an Indiana guy Midwest. No, No,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't count. It doesn't count.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, thanks to Gimby for joining us for a

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>uh but I mean he he brought up a lot

0:22:59.920 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of good points about this team, and points that we've

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>already talked about. I think that there is a lot

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to like about this team. There's also a lot of

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>things to not like about this team in a general sense,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Like there are a lot of holes that still need

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be patched. The bullpen is a major one. The

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>defense has gotten better, but there's still holes in the defense.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Simpson keeps trying to not hit the baseball on

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the ground, which is probably a big reason why his

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>average is dipped as much as it has now. Hitting

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, four hundred is unsustainable at least in this world,

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this era of baseball. But I mean, he keeps trying

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to lift the baseball and he does not have that power.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean he's still batten three to fourteen. The

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 4>OBP is kind of low for an average that high too. Oh,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 4>it's actually really low, three forty nine. He's not walking,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 4>he is striking out a lot more too. Yeah, I

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 4>do not understand. He should be swinging down on the

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 4>baseball every single time. The ball should ait the ground

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 4>every single time he swings the bat, like, no, no offense.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he hits a home run one day, but that's

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 4>not what you're in the lineup for. And Chandler, if

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 4>you bat three above three hundred, you never hit a

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 4>home run. That's cool with me, Like, I'm not I'm

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 4>not expecting you to hit.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>A home run, and like hit the ball, but like

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>line drives, like not try to not not not fly balls,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>like try to hit line drives to the gap, hit

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>line drives down the line. Like that's what he should

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>be focusing his energy towards. And I'm sure that he is.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>But in the in the general sense of he needs

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to like that is his bread and butter, because he

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>is fast and he does not have a lot of power,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So you need to utilize what you have in order

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to make both of those things work.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, And this like like you said about the holes, like, yes,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 4>there are. Like the offense has been a little like

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean the series against the Guardians, the offense was

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 4>not great, but I think I'm gonna give that more

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 4>so credit to the Guardians pitching staff. They had three

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 4>really good starters out of the mound that we had

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 4>to go against, So I'm going to more so blame

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 4>it on that. Just hopefully that doesn't linger too much

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 4>against the Giants. Hopefully the offense can have a breakout

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 4>game or two this weekend against the Giants. But the

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 4>starting pitching has been incredible. I will say the starting pitching,

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 4>I think is how we thought the starting pitching would

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 4>have been last year. I thought last year's was a

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 4>little bit underwhelming, Like I mean, the guys who are

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 4>no longer here, Taj and Shane bos did not kind

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 4>of take that next step that I was expecting. And

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 4>this season the guys we brought in to replace it,

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Like I mean, we've already gone into that, but Matt's

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 4>and Martinez have replaced boj and Bradley and then some

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 4>so their success has helped make this team a lot

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 4>better too. And we're back to kind of winning old

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 4>race game old Raceways the one run low score game.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>So well in the same vein, I think like the

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>middle infield is now a glaring hole with this team.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Like Gavin Luck still hasn't played one game this season

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's been hurt the entire time. Taylor Walls was

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>effective early on and has basically been non existent recently.

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Ben Williamson has been what I would consider good defensively,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think in a general sense good defensively, but

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like the offense still isn't there. Like when you lose

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>someone like Brandon Law and then you really don't have

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone to be able to replace him, it creates an

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>issue because other guys need to produce, and if those

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>guys don't produce, then you know you're in a bet spot.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Johnny DeLuca has been solid this season offensively. Jake

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Fairley in a general sense has been pretty solid, not amazing,

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but pretty solid.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Cedric Mullens has basically been an afterthought.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 4>He's becoming unplayable.

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>He's not good.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 4>He at the point is like it's getting to the

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 4>point where De Lucas should be in regardless of through

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 4>the starting pitching.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yet yeah, I mean has been like he hasn't really

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 1>played as much. Fortes has been the main guy, which

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is what I expect to come in and Fortes has

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>been solid this year, which is good. Like that's someone

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>who I really wanted the Rays to to kind of

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>put their trust in, and they have and that's really good.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with the Luca. The Race and I think

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>are putting more of their trust into Luca and he

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>is producing as people myself included expected him to.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>But like I mean, outside of.

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That, it's just the middle infield is so is such

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a glaring issue and I know, like maybe Gavin lux

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>fixes that problem when he gets back, but he's not

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>back yet. Like maybe Williamson develops more than we expect

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, shows a little bit more power, is more

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch in that aspect, But it's just I wish,

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish that the Rays had a better solution for

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing with the middle infield to an

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>extent only because I'm a Sixers fan. The whole thing

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with them trading Jared McCain and them not finishing, like

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>they basically traded him to try to get pieces to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>get another trade going, and they only completed half of

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it because they weren't able to get the other trade going.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, to an extent, the Rays came into

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the season with ideas on how to replace him and

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>then never fully found the way to replace him. And

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's me thinking that it's the first month of

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the season and nothing's really manifested in terms of players,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but it feels like they had an idea and then

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>never finished the idea.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I think I think Lux might have

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 4>just been the idea and to platoon him with Williamson,

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 4>which I don't hate. I mean, if if Lux can

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 4>around too. Actually, I don't know what is Lux is

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 4>like career batting.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>He's a contact hitter, he's not. He's got kind of

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. He's more of a.

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Contact hitter, that's fine. If he's batten. His career batting

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 4>average is two fifty six. If you can bat like

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 4>what two sixty five and Williamson can kind of be

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>around that same ballpark, I'm fine with that. It's just

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 4>right now. I mean, pulasios Is he's another guy who

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 4>started off the season really hot and he's coming back

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 4>down to earth significantly. I mean, he's been two thirteen now,

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm sorry, Like.

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 3>And and.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I mean the shortstop position as well.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Ben Williamson has been a fantastic fielder. We

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 4>talk a lot about the race defense and a bad

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 4>in a negative light this so far this season, but

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 4>he's been very Surprisingly, He's made a couple of bad throws.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying he's perfect, but that play in Cleveland,

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 4>I think on Monday Night. I mean, that was one

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 4>of the best line drive catchers I've seen in a

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 4>long time. But no, I totally agree what you're saying.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's something that I always said when we

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 4>were thinking about trading Bilao. I mean, my first thought

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 4>was we should just extend, extend him instead of trading him.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 4>I know, he only had one more year year left,

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 4>but we didn't have It's not like we there wasn't

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 4>like a logjam at second base. We didn't have anybody

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 4>to replace him. It's not like it's not like the

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 4>first base position where we have Xavier Isaac and Trade

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Morgan and I mean Yandi obviously Yadi the ages a

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 4>lot now but in Ronda, but second base is wide open,

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Like it's not like we had some stud that was

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 4>ready to like I mean I think the best example

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 4>of that was Adamis in wander Like I mean, Adamis.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we ever really wanted to trade him,

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 4>but we had Wander ready to come up, and so

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 4>we had to trade him. And it's we did the

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 4>same thing with Bilao, except there was nobody else to

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 4>replace him. So I totally get what you're saying there, But.

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Like, the Race have solutions like where they don't necessarily

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.719
<v Speaker 1>have solution the second base, and maybe Williamson just is

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that solution moving forward because he's controllable. The Rays kind

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of have something at shortstop. But again, I just feel

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like coming into the season, I don't want to try

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to dwell on too many things, but you know, someone

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like Jose Cabairo probably would have been a better option

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if they had him and Williamson up the middle.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 2>It would have been a better option overall.

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, like he might have not even mattered in

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the grand seam of things because the Rays want Carson

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Williams to work, and Carson Williams has been better in

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Durham than he was to begin his tenure there last year,

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and I know that the strikeout rate is down, but

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same token, he's not.

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fully convinced yet.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Again, there is progress, but when you look at his

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>small sample size in the big leagues, he hasn't quite

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>adjusted to that. So I don't know if that means

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's not quite adjusted to things on the minor

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>league side and then that's not helping him on the

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>major league side, or if he's fully adjusted on the

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>minor league side and he just hasn't found a way

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that on the major league side.

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 4>No, yeah, I like, I think Williamson has shown some

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 4>some real potential. I I think I like the role

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 4>he has on this team. But yeah, i'd go and

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I I do not understand why we traded Caballero, Like

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I really don't get that at all. Like once again,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 4>we didn't. I mean, I know, I know we have

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Corson coming up, but he's not. I mean, he's.

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Close to be and also was controllable, right and he

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>had like cheap yeah yeah, yeah.

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 4>And we didn't get much for him. I mean the

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 4>guy we got for him with DFAD and he's on

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 4>the White Sox now, Like I didn't.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Prospect for him, but like, who knows what's going to

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>happen with the prospect, but that's going to be years.

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that guy was in I think was in

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>low A or single A, and now he's in high A.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So like it's gonna be a bit before we see

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>him if he even comes.

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Up, right, And I just I never really understood that,

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 4>and he's anyway, that's whatever, that's old news. But I

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 4>agree that that there is a glaring hole in the

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 4>middle lead field. Hopefully Carson can figure out whatever's going

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 4>on and hopefully he can come back soon.

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Because are you are you encouraged by him and Durham, Yeah,

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I need to need to. It hasn't been anything flashy,

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but he's hit some some homers recently. Like I mentioned,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the k rates down from where from where it was before,

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>which is has always been the biggest glaring issue with Carson,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the k rate's way too high. I know

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that on like a defensive side of things, the defense

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was not as advertised in spring training and then at

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the start of the season as people expected him to be.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh So I don't really know what's going to be

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>happening him with that moving forward. I'm sure that he

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>will be fine in the grand scheme of things, but

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, they like everything needs to work out

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in their favor in order to get the whole Carson

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>thing working out, because right now it's not quite at

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that point.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, yeah, two sixty nine with for home

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 4>runs eighteen RBIs three forty one OVP, which still is

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 4>not great either. Yeah, he's he's not ready. I'm still

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm still not losing hope on it. I mean,

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 4>he's twenty two years old. He's still super young, obviously.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 4>It's just it's frustrating because I thought, I think a

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 4>lot of people thought that this would be the year

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 4>where he would make it, not not his debut, but

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 4>he would play his full season with the Rays. He

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 4>maybe he won't be spectacular, but he would be you know,

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 4>you could see glimpses of him becoming that franchise franchise

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 4>short stop, which I think will still happen. It's just

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 4>it's a little bit more delayed than we all expected,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 4>which is frustrating.

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that I agree.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Another minor league guy, Xavier Isaac, if you guys followed

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>everything that happened with him in the offseason, Thank god,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he's just playing baseball. Like the fact that he's healthy,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>playing baseball is the most important thing here, so that's

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible to hear that he's doing as well as he

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>can right now.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 2>And he's been a stud in terms of power for

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Montgomery recently.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>The I guess it's the Rays seem to be finding

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that have strike out issues because he also has

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>strikeout issues.

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 4>But he's except except for the major league team, though,

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 4>we don't strike out much.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, you know, in a general sense, they

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have guys that, like Junior is probably one of the

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>worst offenders of it, but like Aronda doesn't strike out much,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yandi doesn't, or a Ronda doesn't, I would I think

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is below league average or it doesn't strike out a

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy amount. Yanni definitely doesn't, you know, Chandler definitely doesn't.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>So there are guys that do not strike the big

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>leage level. I will agree with you on that.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 4>I think I think we're like second to last in

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 4>strikeout rate per nine innings.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, what I do know is that Xavier Isaac earned

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Week honors. I'm almost positive earned Player

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Week honors because we have like six home

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>runs last week something like that, he hit like five.

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 4>We have the second few with strikeouts on the on

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the hitting side and in the whole league. So yeah, no, that's.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 2>That I'm sure is also a massive and like a massive.

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Reason why they've been doing as well recently is just

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>because they're putting the ball in play, they're they're working

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 1>out walks and they're not striking out.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 4>No, it's a huge, it's it's it shouldn't be a surprise,

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 4>but the things like that it leads to wins.

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but uh yeah, quickly on Isaac, he's just he's

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting home runs at a tour at pace right now.

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully he'll be in Triple A soon and maybe

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll see him in the big leagues at some point

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>later this year. If everything if if he goes absolutely off.

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think targeting that twenty twenty seven debut is

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>probably what's going to happen with him.

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, unless there's I assume that too, unless there's an

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 4>injury or something. Yeah, but yeah, he's i mean, two

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 4>fifty nine six home runs. It's he's he's in bonts

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 4>him a long way too.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Hi everyone, Alex here with a quick word from our

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 6>sponsor Seki sea Gek is your one stop shop for

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 6>tickets for everything from live theater and concerts to sporting

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 6>events like Raise games. Sekk uses a color coded scale

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 6>to show you where the best deals are, with green

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 6>being good and red being bad. If you haven't used

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 6>sea Geek before, we have a special deal just for you.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 6>Use code raise the Roof. That's raised spelled r a

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 6>ys at checkout for twenty dollars off your first purchase

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 6>with sea Geek. Again, that's code Raise the Roof for

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty dollars off your first seat Geek purchase. Thanks so

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 6>much to sea Geek for sponsoring us, and let's get

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 6>back to this latest episode of Raise the Roof.

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Going into this weekend, the Rays are playing the Giants.

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Is some exciting stuff back in the Tampa Bay area.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>If you guys didn't see, the Rays are doing their

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Raise Rush specials throughout the season. Seems like every series

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they got something new going on. For the Giant series,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they had twenty nine dollars tickets in the Matenx sky Deck,

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>which is the all you can eat section up in

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>left field. I guess the three hundred level whatever you

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>would consider it to be. So you know, a lot

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of people have taken advantage of those and for good reason,

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>because that was a really really good price. I think

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:58.959
<v Speaker 1>normal prices on the weekend, specifically, I think Friday's still

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in that like forty dollar or like forty six dollars range,

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the weekend goes up to like seventy eighty

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>ninety bucks depending on the opponent. Whi's just it's at

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>least sixty I think it's at least sixty eight, and

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>then it goes up from there potentially, But yeah, twenty

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.479
<v Speaker 1>nine bucks the entire weekend is pretty freaking good.

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, even seventy eighty ninety dollars is good for

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 4>a ballgame ticket and all you can eat.

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 2>And it also all you can drink except for liquor.

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, sign me up.

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>But I will say for the Blue Jay series coming

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>up next week, if you guys want to take advantage

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of that, they have it was it like nineteen dollars

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>tickets down down the first baseline.

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 2>There's three different sections.

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Those tickets are normally what did I say, like thirty

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>one dollars and up on the weekdays, and like fifty

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars and up on the weekends. It's it's a week

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>day series. But still I mean, that's incredible value. It

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like the Rays are doing it in different parts.

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>It's not like last year where it was just out

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield basically for the twenty hour ticket and

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they eventually included the the Budweiser first based Tarist stuff

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or the all all you can eat stuff at s

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>time Renner. But it seems like the Rays are doing

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>things in different places, which is good.

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 4>So everybody can sit in every section at the most

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 4>beautiful ballpark in this beautiful.

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah America's yeah it is. It is bright, it is

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>very bright, is incredibly bright. And also this weekend is

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the Mini Trap light Up giveaway, so for those that

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>want to go get that, it's a good weekend.

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Ago do they need more reasons?

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. If they do well, what about the

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 2>pitching matches? Maybe if they don't have enough reasons, I mean,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:39.760
<v Speaker 2>we'll convince them otherwise.

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 4>So we are recording this on Thursday. So Tomorrow Friday

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 4>is Robbie Ray versus Shane McClanahan. So what is this

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Shane second? Start back at the TRUP second or third?

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 4>I forget third, and then it is Land and Roup

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 4>versus Jesse Jesse Schulten's on Saturday. Another six to ten

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 4>start on Saturday, which is that? Is that a new

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 4>thing that I missed?

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 2>No, they normally the way that it is is usually

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 2>like a four or five.

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And then like a one forty that's right, yeah o'clock start,

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and then like a one thirty one forty start, and

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>then I think normally the weekdays are well like six

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, six forty maybe seven five, seven ten.

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 4>But this is the second time this season the Saturday

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 4>game has been at six. I remember the Yankees game

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 4>what was that two or three weeks ago, was at

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 4>six o'clock two, And I remember, I mean home games

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 4>on Saturdays are always at four ten, like last week

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 4>it was a four ten game.

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I think that there's a couple to start

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the season out that were like that, but most number

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:43.399
<v Speaker 1>four ten.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 4>It's strange, huh. Anyways, and then Sundays back to that

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 4>one forty time. Tyler Maylee versus Steven Mattz.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Should be pretty I mean, the Saturday matchup might be

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a stinker.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Landon roope is Is is pretty darn good.

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Though, Okay, I'm not well versed enough on my so.

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 4>North Carolina native I only know that because I had

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 4>an injury in my fantasy baseball rotation, so I needed

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 4>a new guy and he was available. And he's he's

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 4>five and one with two five five e and a

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 4>point nine to one whip. So he's having a pretty

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 4>heck of a season.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So then, yeah, I mean it should be three solid

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 2>outings then no stinkers.

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, it's and we're coming off and off day,

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 4>which is extremely helpful. And I think the Giants played

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 4>a double header today which is huge for us. Yeah,

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 4>figure who they played the double header against. They're playing, well,

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 4>they're playing the Phillies. They played they Oh yeah, that's right.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 4>They beat They lost the Phillies in the first game,

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 4>and they're starting the second game.

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Justin Crawford did his second walk off of the year.

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Nice. That in and of itself is huge. I mean

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 4>they're playing a doubleheader and then they have to travel

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 4>down to Tampa and no off day, Like that's a

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 4>expect to win tomorrow just based on that, I think.

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean their bullpen should be shredded.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 4>They'll probably have to call it the guy, but yeah,

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 4>and I mean they're thirteen seventeen like our boy Willie's

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.919
<v Speaker 4>coming home though, Yeah, I mean bring him back.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean Adamas has been back at the drops since

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>he's been traded, right, yeah, I think it's been like

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>six years. There's no way that he hasn't.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he was back with the Brewers, I think.

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but it's it's not It's happened a lot because

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that he's been.

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 3>In the n L.

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 4>Right exactly, I know you're right on it, You're right

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 4>with that. Can we bring him back? We I mean

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 4>that he's not had a good start to the season,

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:42.959
<v Speaker 4>but just for vibes.

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I'm down, even though maybe he'll actually

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to see.

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 2>The roof this time because it's bright.

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Is that a theory?

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean no, no, that was the thing he said it.

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 2>He was like, no, no, no, that was.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 4>That was that? Was that ever thrown around as the

0:43:57.120 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 4>reasoning because you couldn't see because it was.

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>The thing that he said, and a couple of guys

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>said that, like they couldn't see it. But now that

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the the roof is a lot brighter because they had

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>been using i mean literally the same canvas. You have

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to realize that over what it opened up in nineteen ninety,

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>so that over like thirty four years probably had you know,

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>had significant wear to it and also probably got a

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>lot darker over time. So now this one, this new

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>roof being brand new, is a lot brighter to start

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 1>things out, and will probably get I would assume, unless

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a different material, whatever it is, I would assume

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>it'll kind of get weathered in the same way over time.

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think probably not that much in a

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:45.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but yeah, it should be a good series. Giants

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 4>are kind of struggling though they're thirteen seventeen, so I

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 4>think not gonna get confident. But they're two cocky. But

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 4>I think we should take two out of three. I

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 4>think that's fair. I think Saturday is probably with the

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 4>likely loss. I need to know. I'm not sure how

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 4>Robbie Ray's been pretty good. I actually know he's been

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 4>really good so far. I did not know that another

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 4>tough pitching matchup. Same thing with the Guardians early this season.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this week, the Rays have had a lot of

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>good pitching matchups or something, and have also faced a

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of top prospects, including Travis Bazana. Yeah, because you know,

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if that didn't need to persist any further. Just in

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the first freaking month of the year, they had JJ Weatherhole,

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they had Noah Schultz, the pitcher for the White Sox,

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and then they had Bizanna and they faced them in.

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 2>The first month of the year. All three of them

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>are like top forty five prospects in baseball.

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 4>And never never forget when Roman Anthony made his debut against.

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Us, everyone makes the like is it is it me?

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Or does everyone this is this is side thing? But

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to address this. Every fucking top prospect makes

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>their debut against the Rays, like it's not even funny

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>at this point, like every it's it's it's almost like

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they because Treya Savage did it, Christian Scott did it,

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Roman Anthony did That's.

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Three guys last year. Three guys in the first month

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of this year.

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 4>If it's a pitcher, you can you can you can

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 4>chalk that up to a win. Regard I don't care.

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 4>I remember I.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Think six guys.

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Did Noah Cameron for the Royals do that last year too?

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you remember he? Do you remember his performance against

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 4>us last year?

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Did he make his debut against the Rays?

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if it was his debut but he

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 4>went like six, am I going.

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 2>But like, am I going crazy?

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And thinking that, like it is weirdly abnormal that so

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>many top prospects are making their debut against the Rays,

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like like like I'm not just pulling this out of

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>my ass.

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 4>It was against Yeah, no, I was. I was dead

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 4>right on that it was against the Rays. Last WHOA,

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 4>that's actually crazy? Holy shit? What it was a year

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 4>ago today?

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 2>What this anyway?

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Who is this that Noah Cameron made his MLB debut?

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 4>What are the odds on that is insane?

0:46:58.000 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 3>That's weird.

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Look up Noah Cameron because he went he took a

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 4>no hitter into the seven perspect I don't know.

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much I know, you know, he's

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>pitched a decent amount. I don't know where where was

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he at in the road in the in the prospect,

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just remember he had I mean

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he shoved. He took a no hitter into the seventh inning.

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>He went six and a third, hitless and scoreless. Well,

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like I gotta be I mean, there's gotta be something

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with that. That's really weird. Oh Cameron? Is there fifth

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>overall prospect right now? According to MLB pipeline, So like

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>every guy that I've mentioned, for the most part, has

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>been like the guy.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Like it's just so, it's just so weird.

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:46.319
<v Speaker 4>I kind of get it from the pitching side, just

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 4>because the Rays typically do have weaker offenses and better

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.359
<v Speaker 4>pitching steps, but I don't really understand it in terms

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 4>of the hitting side because I'm just confused.

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But like it lines up all the time. I mean,

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we just named how many guys? Was that that we

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>just named seven.

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Guys in the last year?

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like a year and a month.

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 7>Isn't that a little bit weird that that's a little

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.240
<v Speaker 7>bit matulier that it's that that there's been that many.

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 7>And again, none of these guys are like like maybe

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 7>Christian Scott is the only guy that like could be

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 7>perceived as a scrub, but I wouldn't consider him a scrub.

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 4>So they're all good.

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, wasn't there wasn't there a guy on the.

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Was it?

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Didn't didn't George Kirby make his MMB debut against the Rays?

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Am I going crazy and thinking that, Like it's like

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola made his debut against I mean, this was

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like a decade ago. I was there to see it.

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But Aaron Nola made his debut against the Rays completely random.

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think George Kirby did. He went six shutout,

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 4>allowing four heads. I mean, if if, if the.

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>There's I don't know what the stats all on this,

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but there's gotta be something on like how many times

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 1>that a semi decent to elite prospect has made their

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 1>debut against the Rays Because I know Kirby was a

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.839
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, but like, it's just it is

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 1>so uncanny and kind of annoying.

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna lie. It's very.

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Something that I wish wasn't happening as is, but you know,

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't help it at this point. But going back

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 1>to the Giant series, because I don't think that there's

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>any top prospects that the Giants are gonna call up

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>hopefully or hopefully.

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Who do you like?

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling about the series? What do you

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think that the Rays need to do in order to

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:44.439
<v Speaker 1>keep the winning ways going?

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 4>I think I think tomorrow is probably gonna be the

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 4>flip game because I think Saturday is like, in terms

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 4>of the Vegas odds, I'd say Saturday, the Giants are

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 4>gonna be favored and then Sunday we are gonna I'd

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 4>say we are gonna be favored. So just based on

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 4>those odds, I think we're probably gonna win on Sunday

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 4>and then we're probably gonna lose on Saturday. But if

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Shane can give us six quality innings, like I mean,

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 4>it was awesome that he gotta he gotta win. What

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 4>was that two starts a go, I think, And he's

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 4>still his numbers still aren't bad at all, Like he's

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 4>still there's still a lot more in the tank that

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.359
<v Speaker 4>I think he has yet to show us, but he's

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 4>still there, Like there are glimpses of the old Shane,

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the pre injury Shane, and his once again, his numbers

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 4>are still not not bad. And I mean, if you

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 4>asked him, he probably would say they're horrendous and he

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 4>needs to be much better. But I think tomorrow is

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be like like I said, the Flip game,

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 4>if if we can get to Robbie do what we

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 4>did against the Guardians and the Monday and Tuesday game.

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I know we didn't score a lot of who runs,

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 4>but we were able to get those starting pitchers out

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 4>decently early considered. I mean, like we said Biby and

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:58.359
<v Speaker 4>who was blanket on the Cleveland guy's name again, parking mess.

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 4>That's right. Piece of the series. Continue to not strike out.

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I know that's as dumb as that sounds, but just

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 4>continue to make them work and draw walks, especially considering,

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 4>like we said, their bullpen should be pretty depleted after

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 4>playing a doubleheader and no off day and they travel,

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.800
<v Speaker 4>so get to their bullpen. If we can get to

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 4>their bullpen early tomorrow, that'd be huge for the rest

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 4>of the series.

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I definitely agree. I echo all that sentiment. I

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:32.879
<v Speaker 1>know Gibb gave some good stuff earlier. I mean, yeah,

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just capitalize on solid pitching, find ways to have the

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>bullpen continue to be effective, Utilize small ball to the

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:46.840
<v Speaker 1>best of your advantage, like you know, lay down bunts,

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>hit and run, steal that sort of stuff. If the

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>race can continue to do that, and then just you know,

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>strong performances from guys like Junior didn't really do anything

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:58.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy in that series, but like, if Junior can do

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>some big things this weekend, that'll certainly help out. You know,

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some milestones potentially on the horizon. YONDI Diez

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is only five hits away from one thousand in his career,

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be relatively close to or he's getting close

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to a thousand hits as a Ray, which I think

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>he's all time fourth place now, but he'll be I

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>would assume, the fourth player in race history to have

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a thousand hits with them, which is pretty damn impressive.

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's getting close to that. He'll probably, if everything

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>goes well, he'll hit the one k mark with the

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Rays later this season. He'll hit the one k mark

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>here just in his career in the next couple of

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>days if everything works out. Yeah. Yeah, So who are

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>your players for this series?

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 4>It's one more key, I guess, yeah, and more stats

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 4>to throw out there as well. The Giants are the

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 4>last in the league, their offensive struggling. Their average actually

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 4>isn't terrible. Their average is twelfth in the league, but

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 4>they are dead last and home runs RBIs and run scored,

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.919
<v Speaker 4>so that's another thing to keep in mind. I think

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 4>considering if considering our rotation has been really strong, like

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 4>we've already covered, our bullpendance kind of trending in the

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 4>right direction. If we can just scratch across four or

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:16.080
<v Speaker 4>four runs in each of the games, I think that

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.919
<v Speaker 4>should be enough considering the Giants struggles at the plate

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 4>this season.

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean they have.

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Ninety nine runs. The Mets are next close at one

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 4>of six. So yeah, if we can, if we can

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 4>just clow across four or five runs every game, I

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:35.759
<v Speaker 4>think that should be enough for a sweep. But my

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 4>pick a player, you can, well you go.

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 2>First, Yeah, I mean posthumously. He's not dead, but how is?

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:43.799
<v Speaker 3>How is?

0:53:44.320 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but you know, he's always there.

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 4>I haven't I haven't seen his stats in a while.

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so so just you know, just him and spirit.

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 4>He's down to earth. He's Do you want him to

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 4>be good or do you want him to be bad?

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just I don't know. I haven't

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 1>figured that out yet. It's like, do you want him

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to be good just because you love him so much?

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Or do you want him to be bad because I mean,

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point they're not playing the Rays anymore, so

0:54:08.440 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like I could give a shit as to what the

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Pirates do like it.

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 2>As long as he's still successful, then that's all I

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 2>care about.

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 4>He's been two forty five, three thirty six OBP and

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 4>seven home runs, so in nineteen RBIs he came down

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:21.319
<v Speaker 4>to earth a little bit.

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's about what he's done in his career

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in a general sense. I think last year was kind

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of an anomaly of that because he was hitting really

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.720
<v Speaker 1>well average wise, and then came down to earth towards

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year.

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:34.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 4>His career batting average is two forty seven, so two

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 4>points below that. Yeah, you're spot on with that.

0:54:40.120 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah the so.

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 1>But like in all reality, who do I want to

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>go with Chandler? Because I want him to hit line

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>drives and ground balls and not fly balls. So we'll

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>go with Chandler and then we will I don't know

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>how many times Soulcer is going to be used in

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this series, but do where where you were take them?

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Take them?

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably won't pitch tomorrow. He'll probably pitch

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Saturday or Sunday. But considering that the Rays meet him desperately,

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I would love for him to have more good.

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Outings in the bullpen. Nice is it? Who should I

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 4>go with? I'm gonna go with We're facing what two

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 4>righty's and Robbie's a lefty, so I'm not gonna go

0:55:32.480 --> 0:55:33.839
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna go with the valid if we were

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:38.920
<v Speaker 4>facing two lefties, I'm going. I'm going I'll go with

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to go, so I'll go with Richie.

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I go with Richie. Like I said, we're you're facing

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 4>two righties. I assume he'll probably get in the lineup

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 4>at least two or three games. We kind of covered

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 4>that he is falling off the last couple of weeks

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 4>after a really hot start of the season. But I

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 4>don't know. I'm thinking maybe a couple more, maybe not.

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:04.479
<v Speaker 4>A couple of multi hit games might be a little

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 4>bit much, but I don't know. Just he's gonna make

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:09.280
<v Speaker 4>a difference. He's going to be getting big stolen base,

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:12.279
<v Speaker 4>maybe even a pinch run situation where we're down one.

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Maybe in the Saturday game we get on basically in

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 4>the eighth inning, he pinch runs and he steals a

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 4>base and comes around to score or something like along

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:23.960
<v Speaker 4>those lines. And then on the on the pitching side,

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 4>I'll go. I'll go with Shultens. I don't know, like

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:31.399
<v Speaker 4>you covered, you covered him a little bit earlier. He's

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 4>he's been I think a pleasant surprise three twenty year

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 4>or a one point one two whip with nineteen point

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:42.879
<v Speaker 4>two innings like He's been pretty solid, pretty darn good,

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 4>and fill in a hole that is much needed at

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 4>this point in terms of the rotation and or not

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 4>a hole. But he's filled a hole left by injuries,

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 4>not because of talent, I guess. So just continue to

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 4>eat up innings. If you can go out there and

0:56:56.400 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 4>get give five or six strong innings, give up a

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 4>couple runs, that'd be huge. Yeah.

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So the last things that I have are updates on

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 1>other sports. Reuben Bain, Welcome to the Bucks. The Lightning

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>can't beat the Canadians, and I'm really pissed off about

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that because you already know my feelings on the city

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of Montreal and Quebec as a.

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Whole, and we are going head on.

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's all right. The Flyers and Canes are

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 2>going at it.

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 3>We are.

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I am so ready to.

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Be okay, No, I'm just kidding.

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 2>You beat the Penguins and I hate Sydney Crosby. So

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you guys, God, you.

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Guys won the Pennsylvania Civil War. That was That was

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 4>a heck of a series.

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I was, I mean, I was on pins and needles

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>last night, but they won, So that's all that matters.

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 4>That shot was off the pipe is always cool New York.

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 2>And then he throws the stick into the stands.

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah that was I mean, I.

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Mean the crowd pop on that, Like I watched the video.

0:57:56.400 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The crowd pop on that was nuts.

0:57:58.080 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was crazy.

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:01.800
<v Speaker 4>And I mean the Penguins dominated that ot. The entire

0:58:01.840 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 4>ot was in depends lost and then Mark Mark schron

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 4>got that sick look and then like.

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah he had the open net. Then he bottled it.

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:13.600
<v Speaker 4>It was a great save by it was it was.

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't a great shot by him, but it was

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 4>a great save by what Slovas. And then yeah, York

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:23.360
<v Speaker 4>absolutely nuked that from the blue line. So congratulations on

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 4>your series win.

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes I needed that.

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:28.480
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, let's go Bolts because I hate the Canadians.

0:58:29.160 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Please do d away.

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, well, I guess this favors the Bolts.

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 4>What I'm about to say, but go seven. I don't

0:58:36.280 --> 0:58:38.959
<v Speaker 4>care who wins. Just go seven because that those games

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 4>have been awesome. Oh those games have been so odd.

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you mean, I don't care who wins Game six,

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, well, if one team wins Game six

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and that means the series.

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't care who wins the series, but all these

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 4>series are awesome. The Stars Wild is one of the

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 4>best series I think I've ever seen, The Oilers Ducks.

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, can McDavid leave that team back from a

0:58:56.920 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 4>three to one lead like or deficit? Like? Everything has

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 4>been awesome. That Flyers for series was incredible, Hockey is fun,

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:06.320
<v Speaker 4>and Boston's alive again.

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, if you all want to go

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>get tickets to a Bolts game, if they if they

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have a game seven or any of that, like, go

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 1>get yourself, go use our CKE code because you can

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>get yourself some tickets that they'll still be expensive, but

0:59:19.400 --> 0:59:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll be slightly less expensive using our SKI code. But

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 1>with that being said, it's going to include things on

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the slatest eup set of Raise the Roof. We appreciate

0:59:26.320 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys always for your support. Do you guys want

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to follow everything that we have going on? We have

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:33.479
<v Speaker 1>our ten k giveaway still going on that is going

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 1>through the weekend, so be sure to enter that on

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 1>our social or on our Twitter which is Raise the

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Roof TV on you know, Twitter, slash x, Instagram, and

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Blue Sky. We're also going to be doing a giveaway

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>soon on Instagram as well, so be sure to look

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 1>out for that. Our YouTube channel is Raise the Roof.

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to subscribe to us there turn on those

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>postentification so you guys know when new uploads are happening.

0:59:59.440 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 2>And then our podcast. We need to support us as

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 2>you guys have been.

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to like share, leave us a review, hopefully

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a five star review, or like subs fuck that up

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and and our podcast. Be sure to like subscribe, leave

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>us a review, hopefully a five star review, and share

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>this with your family, your friends, anyone to know who's

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a Raised fan or baseball fan. Then one side a

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>podcasts into their podcast feed. We'd love to be part

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. A shout out to our sponsors already mentioned

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>SEEKI in the Clutch, JKS Prince and Homage again Homage

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really really happy to be with them.

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>But for the first.

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Three you could Raise the Roof, ri a y s

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the Roof and I'll have to check out to save

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>us some money help us out in the process. With

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all that being said, thanks so much for listening and

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>as always, Raise up, Raise Up, baby,