WEBVTT - why is the government fighting with claude?

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Yo, what's going on? It's Texter. So technology does not

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>slow down for anybody. And sometimes I wish that I

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>could just talk to y'all live about what's happening right now.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But then we were talking about it, we realized, wait

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a second, we can talk to you live. So we're

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna try something new here. Every once in a while,

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about something that's happening right now and

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>let people jump into the audience to ask questions, and

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll bring a guest along. And so what you're about

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to listen to is our first episode that we live

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>streamed on Wednesday, March third. So if you want to

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>catch the next one as we're recording it and maybe

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>even ask some questions, you can subscribe to our YouTube

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>page and you can catch the links to that in

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the description. So everyone, this is we're doing something different here.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.319
<v Speaker 1>We're doing the first live episode of kill Switch. We're

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably try to do these maybe once a month,

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just to give people opportunity to actually jump into the

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>chat and talk about stuff that is happening right now.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for bearing with us while we experiment a

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But today what I'd like to talk about

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is what is happening with Anthropic, what's going on with

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, what's going on with the US government. To

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about it today, our guest is Will Knight, who's

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a senior writer at Wired. He's been writing about AI

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for a while. He's got a weekly AI newsletter called

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>AI Lab. Will Welcome to kill Switch.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in, Thank you for having me. I'm wanting to

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>be on the first experimental live stream.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hey, look, we'll see. Everything's in experiment at this point,

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for better or for worse. Sure, So I want to

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>start this off with a timeline, Okay. On the twenty seventh,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump gets on truth Social and says that Claude

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is a radical left woke company. Okay, yeah, out of nowhere,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>People like, what why is he saying this? Pete heg

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Saith gets on Twitter and says that Claude Anthropic, the

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>company that makes Claude, is a supply chain risk, which

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>most people have never thought about what that even means.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The next day, Open Ai, who makes chat GPT, announces

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're working with the Department of War, and then

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump announces that we're bombing Iran. As I say

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that that sounds like a completely unhinged sequence of events.

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Please tell me where I'm wrong, because I must be

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>missing something.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think I think there's a lot that's

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 2>that's right in there and a lot that's unhinged. But

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean to sort of set the scene a little bit,

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 2>you know. So this goes back. So the use of

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Claude in classified military systems has its origins last year,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 2>last summer, Anthropic was the first to get involved in

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 2>working with the military. You know, they've pursued a very

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 2>business focus, and I think that sort of led them

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>to focus on the d D, which is like one

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest businesses in the US. So they ended

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>up supplying Claude their model, a version of that which

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>runs on the Pentagon's own systems for military use on

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 2>classified systems. In many ways, this is totally remarkable because

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>just a few years ago, everybody in the AI industry

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>was saying, one thing we don't want to do is

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 2>work with the military, and people were staging, you know,

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>walkouts over this, right, So it shows you how the

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>tech world has really pivoted to that. What happened more

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>recently was that its themes and you know, this is

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>somewhat disputed but there's been reports that when President Maduro

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>was captured, Claude was used, and somebody at Anthropic may

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>have raised questions about that. This seems like it snowballed.

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And one of the carve outs in the original contract

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>signed last year there were two. One was against mass

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>surveillance of US citizen and the others was that the

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>model shouldn't be used to build fully autonomous weapons. And

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the DoD or W said that they wanted to change

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the contract essentially, which is an unusual thing to do,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>but they wanted to allow all your lawful use. And

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to some degree, this dispute seems like it's a little

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>bit like people, you know, each side talking past each

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>other to some degree. And I think that the DOW

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the Department of War became very concerned about a tech

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>company saying how it could and couldn't use the technology.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 2>And to be fair, that is quite an unusual idea, right.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like somebody selling a missile or a jet fighter

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>to the Pentagon and then later on saying we don't

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>want you to use it in this way or that way.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>But then again, ai is is a really different technology,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>is very new, it's very experimental and I believe anthropic,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 2>especially among AI companies, it's very focused on safety and

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>they have concerns just about how it could end up

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>being used.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, so let's jump into this so anthropic you know,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a statement that is put on anthropic dot com.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is their own, you know, pr statement here

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and the title is statement from Daria Ama Day on

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>our discussions with the Department of War, and it starts

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>out the first line, I believe deeply in the existential

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>importance of using AI to defend the United States and

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>other democracies and to defeat our autocratic adversaries. So already

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate, that's kind of an interesting thing

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for again a company in Silicon Valley to be saying,

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>even just in the past couple of years, really, but

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the two big points of contention here,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there's two. He says, using these systems for mass domestic

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. So spying out other people,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we're okay with that. Spying on people in the US,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not okay with that. Right, And then the next

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is, quote frontier AI systems are simply not reliable

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to power fully autonomous weapons both of those sound

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>totally okay and reasonable. Not only do they sound okay

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and reasonable, but I mean, look, I've spent a whole

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of time around people on the pretty far rate

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, for work, right, and they will tell

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you I don't want no government spying on me, and

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust these computers. Right, where's the beef? What's

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem here?

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. You know. I've spent a lot

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 2>of time talking to people in the Pentagon and military

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>defense companies, and nobody believes that those frontier models are

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 2>ready were even remotely near ready being used in autonomous weapons,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>And consistently the government said we have no desire to

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 2>do either of those things. I think the way what

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>it really came down to was that they didn't just

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, take a knee and agree to change the

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>terms of their contract. And as you say, you know,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it culminated in Trump and Hegxeth and others putting out

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>these very very you know, as often happens, they were

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of classifying them all of a sudden as the

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 2>radical left, which is it's pretty incredible for company supplying

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 2>technology that's working on classified US systems.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, So this is the post that Donald Trump made

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>on his social media network Truth Social and this I'm

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>reading from the top, and I'm reading verbatim. The United

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>States of America will never allow a radical left woke

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>company to dictate how a great military fights and wins wars.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That decision belongs to your commander in chief and the

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tremendous leaders I appoint to run are military. And then

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>he finally gets to what he's talking about. He says,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the left wing nut jobs Anthropic have made a disastrous

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>mistake trying to strong arm the Department of War and

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>force them to obey their terms of service instead of

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>our constitution.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like a lot of that doesn't really even

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>make sense. I think Anthropic is not a radical left

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>organization by a stretch. It's since come out that that

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>should The DoD was negotiating with that for they were

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to get this war odding kind of massalage into

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a format that everybody was happy with. And it doesn't

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>seem like that would have been impossible. It feels like

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>some people within the administration lost patients, And I think

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it came down to just power and

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the Department of Defense and the leadership not being able

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>to handle being denied that by a tech company that

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>they could very easily see as as you know, part

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of this sort of you know, coastal elite and in

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the case of Anthropic, woke and liberal. I mean, it's

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 2>another reflection of how AI is just is it sort

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of also a cultural lightning rod, right, it becomes suddenly

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 2>it becomes this kind of left versus right. So, I mean,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 2>you know that that post kind of does unfortunately sum

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>up the entire situation, which is slightly bewildering if you

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>know that now they've they've taken the action to try

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and to classify, as you said, Anthropic a supply chain risk,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>which is something that's only ever been to foreign nations.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 2>And we're doing this to one of the foremost AI

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>companies in the United States, one of them I supposedly,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, should be our national champions. It it doesn't

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 2>sound like to me they're really promoting American technology. If

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you if you're too keen to do that, I think

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you don't. You know, it's a real danger you're going

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 2>to harm some of you know, this this nascent, very

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 2>important American company also maybe dissuade other companies from working

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>with the government or the Pentagon if they feel that

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 2>that's going to happen.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, So the supply chain risk thing again that

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the language that Pete Hegseth used. What does it

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>mean to call anthropic a supply chain risk? What does

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that even mean? Yeah?

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, well, the first thing is to

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>say that this supply chain risk designation is incredibly unusual, extraordinary,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and just the kind of thing that I think the

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of left field thinking that we're become accustomed to

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 2>with the administration because it's usually applied to, you know,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>a company that you want to remove from the US

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 2>supply chain because you're worried that their software or their

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>hardware might contain backdoors, might be a threat to national

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>security because it could be used by an adversary. So

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 2>this is the very sort of all or nothing. You

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 2>either agree with everything we say, or you are the enemy.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the kind of tenor which sounds familiar

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to me generally. Often the most extreme version of that designation,

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and we haven't seen the full details of it because

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>they haven't produced it yet, but would mean that any

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>company who's working with the d id couldn't use your technology,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>which is a vast I mean, Amazon, which has invested

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>billions in Anthropy, has massive contracts with the DoD so

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>it's an enormous thing to designate them. It's also doesn't

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>really make sense because you know, they were also saying

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 2>we may invoke the Defense Production Act, which has been

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>used in wartimes or in actually also during the Cold

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 2>War to force companies to prioritize production and supply because

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>what they were making is so important. So it's it's wait,

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I think this may be what, Yeah, this may be

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>a legal problem that the d ID has, and I

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 2>think you know Anthropic is going to as a signal

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>that's going to take some legal action, So you can't

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>it's difficult to argue. On one hand, it's so vital

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>we may invoke the Defense Production Act, but then we

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>may also designate you a supply chain risk.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like you're too dangerous for us to use, but

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you're so useful that we want to use your product.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>But we want to force you to supply it big one.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like nobody can have it, but we want it. Okay,

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing here? So basically the next day

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>open Ai signs something with the government. How does that

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sequence of events? Like, what kind of sense are you

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>able to make of that?

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is very interesting that anthropics chief rival. And

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 2>quick reminder that Anthropic was founded by people who left

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 2>OpenAI because they said that company was not developing AI

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>with enough focus on safety. And they're really really bitter rivals.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And as it was going on, Sam al Mun was

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>working through an alternative deal. The deal that they signed

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>seems extremely similar to the one that Anthropic we're trying

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to hash out, has similar carve outs, so it's sort

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>of doesn't actually carve them out, but it specifies that

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>those things that massurbillance is unlawful and that nobody wants

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to build autonomous weapons.

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So are the details or the terms of the contract

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that OpenAI signed with the Department of War, are they

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>materially different from what Anthropic did? Because this is from CNBC,

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Altman said, and I want to read this here quote.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>I believe that we will hopefully have the best models

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that were encouraged the government to be willing to work

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>with us, even if our safety stack annoys them. But

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>there will be at least one other actor, which I

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>assume will be x Ai, which effectively will say, will

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>do whatever you want. So the vibe here seems to

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be like, okay, well listen, at least worthy adults in

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the room. They're gonna let Grop do whatever Groc wants

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to do, whatever, whatever Trump wants to do. They're just

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna let it do it, drop bombs wherever. At least

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be some adults in the room. But

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is Opening Eye doing something fundamentally different. Did they seed

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>more grounded than Anthropic did or is it the same thing?

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, Yeah, there's a lot going on there. I

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>think that they they did see slightly more ground in

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that they basically agreed to a contract that specified all

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>lawful use. They changed the contractors make Oh but you know,

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to be clear, here's what's what is lawful and what

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the deity doesn't want to do. But I think there

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't a huge amount of difference. I mean, I think

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>what you're seeing with that that internal statement was really,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, Sam open Ai willing to take a bit

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of flat because it's just incredibly important to get a

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>win over Anthropic, to be seen to be very on

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 2>board with the US government because you want more and

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>more involvement, more and more contracts and they've since you know,

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>open a I since got quite a lot of blowback.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's talk about the blowback here. I mean

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this is on tech crunch us app. Uninstalls of chat

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>gbt's mobile app went up almost three hundred per so

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>people were uninstalling chat gbt and started installing Claude Anthropics Claude.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a weird way in which there's this

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and I really hesitate to call this a game, but

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a weird, really weird way in which there's

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this game being played over who gets to be the

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>contractor for the Department of War. But then also we're

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>still fighting for consumers here.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Definitely, And it is interesting. It's the sort of perception

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of who's the good guy and you had, you know,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Katie Perry was subscribing to claud pro and posting about

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>it and this, you know, the sort of interesting cultural moment.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think the thing that was that struck me

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>was like, the people really know how Claude is being

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>used by the military, Do they know what Anthropic was

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>willing to do? I think it's gotten a little oversimplified

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>to my mind, and I think that one of the

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>risks there is that we ought to be rather necessarily

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 2>uninstalling something or posting about who you think is best,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>really pushing for more of an explanation about how the

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>technology is being used and developed and tested, like what

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>is it mean that it's used on classified systems? There

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 2>should be more accountability there. And the fact of the

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 2>matter is there is nothing legally to putting the issue

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>of the bonus to once nothing prohibiting the development of

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 2>autonomous weapons, and there isn't really a legal framework around

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that sort. If they, you know, civilians were affected by

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>fully autonomous weapons, you suddenly have a situation where nobody

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>is legally accountable. And so these are things that really

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>need to be figured out. And that doesn't mean a

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>fully autonomous web that could be your automated part of

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the so called kill chain and so decisions were kind

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of automated away. I think that is really important to

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>have more focus on this and to have more discussion

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of it. And you know, one of the reasons, honestly,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>as someone who's looked at the DoD and the work

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>going on around autonomy, is that unfortunately it is the

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>case that we're just going to have more and more autonomy,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and most analysts expect that they're going to be swarms

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 2>of drones attacking systems, and the truth is you just

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>won't be able to have humans in the loop always.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>So this is going to become a really big issue.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And it's not necessarily about anthropics models in those situations,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>but the question of who's accountable, how do we know

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 2>that the systems are reliable? That is going to become

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>more and more important. So I think it's good that

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the situation is getting some attention. I do think that

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the positive thing is that it is important for people

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>who understand this technology really really well. Do you maybe

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 2>have a role in at least influencing how it's used.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And that doesn't mean, you know, like you get to

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>say yes or no to a mission. It just means

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 2>perhaps that you say, have some input on how you

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>ought to try and deploy it within the Pentagon I.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Think, I mean, how does that functionally work? Though maybe

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the question here, That is the question, Yeah, can

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a contract with the government and tell them no,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't do this? And I'm asking that partially because

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly there is a lot of talk that will wait

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a second, The iron Strake. Was Claude used there.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. To answer the first question, I think that is

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 2>a really good question. How do companies, how does the

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 2>public understand how things are developed, what the rules are

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 2>around them. And there are specified rules around autonomous weapons,

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>around surveillance, but this is also a technology that's different,

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that can misbehave in surprising ways and can be kind

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>vulnerable in surprising ways. So I mean that it needs

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit more scrutiny. The Washington Posters has reported. I

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's that it seems very likely true that Claude

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely used in the Iran operation as part of

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>this system called Maize and which was built by Palanteer,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>which includes a bunch of things, not just a language model.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 2>It can do you know, analyzed maps and images and

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>mission plan and so on. But yeah, as part of that.

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>And so now, one of the things that was kind

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>of crazy with Trump's initial statement was that he said,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm ordering everybody to stop working with Anthropic because they're

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>all these terrible people. But there'll be a six month

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>period of what we carry on doing. Right, it can't

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 2>be that bad, and we're going to use We're about

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to use them in this you know, incredible operation in

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean we're laughing. It's terrible. I mean

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous and also terrible. I suppose it can be

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>two things at the same time. And because we're doing

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this live, I wanted to take a few questions. And

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions that I got actually previously I

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>posted on Instagram does anybody have any questions? And somebody posted,

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think they were kind of joking, but they said, hey,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can we just make all the country's Ais fight against

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>each other? Can we just have them fight instead of

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the real war. But it's kind of funny that they

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>say that because there's I don't know if you've seen

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this article in the New Scientist, but basically different AIS,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and the headline here kind of says it, all AIS

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>can't stop recommending nuclear strikes in wargames simulations, and the

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>subhead leading AIS from Open Ai, Anthropic and Google opted

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to use nuclear weapons in simulated wargames in ninety five

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of cases.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, So I read that paper. It's important to

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>know that this person was just trying to understand what

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the kind of behavior of models would be. Well, I'm

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 2>not advocating to do that, and I don't think anybody.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I think actually this is one of the like not

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 2>letting AI have a role in nuclear weapon decision making

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 2>is one thing that the US and China have actually

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 2>agreed on, which is extremely unusual these days.

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So, but it's unsurprising to me that if you have

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 2>a model trade on the entire Internet, it's going to

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 2>tend toward escalation and not be very very expert in

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 2>how to avoid you know, it's not going to be

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>someone who spent their life worrying about that sort of thing.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 2>And on the question of whether ais could fight each other,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>the truth is, like you are already seeing in certain conflicts,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, autonomous systems, semi autonomous systems are remotely operated

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 2>fighting other semi autonomous systems.

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And some people may argue that that would remove people

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 2>from harm's way. That is not the reality of a conflict.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 2>There's going to be plenty of people in harm's way.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 2>And the question is, you know, how do you do

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 2>that in ways that are reliable and don't make mistakes.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>And there has been talking in recent years of these

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 2>sort of things like existential risks, but long before that,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of systemic dangers of using this technology

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>in any critical system. So you know, just as you

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 2>have hallucinations if you're using a chat, or just as

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>it gets simple reasoning wrong in a very convincing way,

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that is what we should be worried about. I think

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 2>in how this and other models language models are used

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>by the military, by the Pentagon.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You know what.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I once talked to the excuse and naval officer in

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the US Navy whose job it was to, you know,

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 2>be in command of these nuclear submarines, and he said

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the first things he did when he got

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the job was get permission to go and talk to

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 2>his counterpart in China, go meet him and spend time there.

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>The reason being because if something went wrong, if one

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of the systems went wrong with some a person made

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 2>a mistake, you know, or say there's a collision between

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 2>two vessels, and you know, you've a risk of escalation.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>He wants to be able to pick up the phone

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and talk to someone he knows. He doesn't want that

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 2>to be the first time he's spoken to them, and

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 2>so that sort of shows the importance of the human element.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's not something that those we talk about

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>a g I and intelligence being sold. But that is

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 2>a very human thing that no language want to really,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>they don't have that kind of human human intelligence, right.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, chat GBT can't take groc out for coffee.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah No, well no not yet. I mean, that's a

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 2>frightening thought, it is. I don't think anybody would want

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to take rock count.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's a question also here in the chat that

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to, so b masters asking saying

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they read some sources that say that Anthropic was actually

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>willing to give in to the Department of Wars demands,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but the communication broke down. The CEO just doubled down

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on the ethical argument, just as a pr move. I mean,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what your reporting have you? Have you seen anything that

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>would substantiate that.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't tell you definitively if they were about to

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>cave to the d d's terms. I have heard that

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 2>they were very close to reaching an agreement which seemed

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>like sounded to me like a compromise between the two

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and it wasn't very far off. I think it's gonna

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be too easy to get caught up in

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the drama of these companies in there and missed the

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 2>bigger picture. Which is we'll hang on. Maybe we should

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>have more of a discussion about how those things are

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 2>you what are the benefits, what are the It's important

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to say that I don't think you should not use

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>AI in defense. It's all about how reliably you can

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 2>do it, What are the limits? What accountability is that?

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 2>How how does citizens sort of know how that's being

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>used in their name?

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 2>And it you know, Trump wrote in that that message

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 2>that he decides how wars are fought, and in some way,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 2>right he decides when we invadeer on, but he doesn't

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 2>decide the terms of war, like you know, what is

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>a war crime? That is decided by society at large.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's the sort of a bigger thing that we

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>to be asking these questions when it comes to the

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>new capabilities that the AI is going to give governments,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>which is they would be able to do new kinds

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 2>of massurveilance you could never you know, never imagine before. Right,

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>you can be able to find patterns you couldn't think

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of it, or you'll be able to sort of automate

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 2>that much more so, I think, yeah, that's the bigger

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 2>thing for me, and I think I should remember that

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, real life, real human beings at stake here

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 2>and that war as hell, and it is something you

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>want to try and avoid.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, you were talking about the bigger picture, and

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>also you mentioned palents here, which, as it happens, I

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit ago talk to mechanic Kelly, your

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 1>colleague about talents here, and we actually have an episode

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>about tech drop in next week. But this kind of

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to be part of a larger trend, like you said,

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies who were very interested in working with

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the government, but specifically working with the government in military capacities,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>which feels new and in some ways it's not. Of course,

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in some ways it's not. Some of the origins of

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>things like the Internet, you know, does come from the military.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the way that we think about

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the culture of Silicon Valley, I think this turn has

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit unsettling but also surprising for a

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. But it does to be a trend

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. Where do you see this going, say, even

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>over the next year or so.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's a great question. That is a really

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting question. It's hard to imagine ALI companies becoming disentangled

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>because they are is so strategically important, and the incentive

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 2>for working with the government is enormous. Right, The amount

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 2>of data, the amount of compute, the amount of money

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>that the government has to throw out those companies is

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 2>so huge that it would be surprising to me if

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody said, our conscience is not clear, so we're going

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 2>to rein that in So if you imagine that we're

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>going to have more and more tension, more more conflict,

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 2>there will be pressures on them too, for everybody to

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 2>use that AI and new ways that might be concerning,

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 2>besides the use in military situations, which I think we

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>should have try and have transparency on. I think it

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>is really telling that Anthropic had this concern about mass

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 2>surveillance because I think language models are preternaturally brilliant at

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 2>passing large amounts of text and audio and making sense

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of it, finding patterns and making predictions like we haven't

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>done anything like that, and that's exactly what you might

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>want to do with in surveillance. So the temptation is

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be huge, and yeah, I think it will.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it will be very interesting to see if

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>this turns into more of a pushback if more people.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 2>One thing is that tech workers have a ridiculous I

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>mean especially AI engineers, right has an incredible amount of

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 2>cloud these days because they're so valuable. And I think

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 2>this is you know, one reason why Sam Alman and

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>others are going to extraordinary lengths to try and explain

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and to a piece their their staff and maybe change

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>even change tax because of that.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, there were there were a bunch of workers,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean hundreds of workers from open Ai and Google

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>who signed an open letter basically supporting anthropic. There is

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>something of a little bit of pushback, if I can

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>call it that, from inside of these companies, and even

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the consumer angle, people uninstalling chat ubt

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and installing Claude. The question, though, becomes, are both of

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>those things enough? Is the pushback from inside the company?

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Enough is a bunch of people deciding that, Hey, I'm

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna uninstall open Ai and use the woke claud which

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we've established is is maybe not that maybe

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not as woke as some people might have be given

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it credit for. What does that do? Does that anything

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>move the needle?

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it does at this stage. I think

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the question is does it go from hundreds of workers

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to thousands and does the pushback from the public, which

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>already seems to be fading somewhat, does that turn into

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 2>something maybe with further incidents that has a meaningful impact

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>on bottom line, you know. And it is sort of

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 2>hard these days, right for people. It's harder for people

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 2>to push back and draw lines when it comes to

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 2>the government. It seems like everybody's a bit more curtailed

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 2>and scared, right, But at some point that you know,

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 2>as we've seen with some of the protests, that there

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>is a sort of breaking point, and I think it

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>needs to be a bigger pushback. But I think it

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 2>also we probably should have more nuance around what that

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 2>pushback here it really is, you know, just saying anthropic

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>is better. It's actually maybe like maybe everybody should get

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 2>together and say all these companies should be saying, hey,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 2>we're not totally sure this stuff is ready even for

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 2>half the use cases whatever it might be like, and

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 2>then have the government explain to people how it's being mean.

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the things that America can do, you know,

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 2>is pushes political leaders in theory to do that. So

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I would rewind hope.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>For well, thank you so much for coming through and

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. It's heavy stuff, but we got to

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Thank you for real.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>You're very welcome, ye, thanks for having me.

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening to another episode of

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>kill Switch. You can email us if you want to

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>talk at kill Switch at Kaleidoscope dot NYC or on

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Instagram or at kill switch Pod, and if you like

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're hearing, maybe leave us a review. It helps

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>other people find the show, which helps us keep doing

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>our thing. And as I said at the beginning of

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the show, kill Switch is on YouTube, so if you

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>want to catch the next one live, the link for

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that and everything else is in the show notes. Kill

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Switch is hosted by Me Dexter Thomas. It's produced by

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Sena Ozaki, Darluck Potts, and Julia Nutter. Our theme song

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is by me and Kyle Murdoch from Kaleidoscope. Our executive

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>producers are Ozma Lashin, mungesh Hati Kadur, and Kate Osborne

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>from iHeart. Our executive producers are Katrina Norvil and Nikki Ecord.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Catch on the

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Next one, Goodbye,