WEBVTT - What Records Could Be Broken During The 2021 Season? | Bucs Insider

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Bucks fans. Happy Wednesday. It's time for Buccaneers

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Inside or Live, presented by a Miller light Casey Phillips.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Here was senior writer and editor Scott Smith, and this

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is where we answer all of your questions. So if

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you are not already watching this on the Buccaneers Facebook page,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you can head on over there. Leave all your thoughts, comments,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>questions in the comment section. And this is such a

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>great time of year to do this because there's not

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really anything going on in terms of on the field,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>so this is the great time to just talk about

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever those burning questions you guys have are about the team,

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about the roster, training camp, stuff coming up, So any

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff, leave it in the comments section underneath

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>our Facebook live video while we give people a chance

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to do that. We did talk a little bit last

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>week about the potential new helmet rule, and it had

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not officially been decided at that point, and now we

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>know that it has, so tell everybody a little bit

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about that and what that's going to mean for the

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Bucks moving forward. Yeah, last week we were asked about it,

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think the answer was, well, we know they're

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, so that's a good thing. But we

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>hadn't seen an answer yet. We have an answer now,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>or at least part of an answer. And for anybody

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.919
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't quite know what we're talking about, the Buccaneers,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>uh did throwback games to the orange jersey starting in

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine and did it for four years, one

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>time a year, and it was very popular. Uh you know,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not only just the the uniforms, but at the

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>stadium they decked it out and all the orange and

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>really made a whole throwback day out of it. That

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was very popular. But the Buccaneers had stopped doing it

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand thirteen because the NFL started with this

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>rule that every team could only have one set of

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>helmets for an entire season. A player would get fitted

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>with the specific helmet and he had to wear that

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>helmet the entire year. And it was for safety reasons,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of course. And I meant the Bucks really couldn't do

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>their throwbacks anymore because our our helmets are pewter and

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't have another helmet. You needed a white helmet

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to do the throwbacks, and you couldn't have that. And

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so the Buccaneers, uh, you know, there's franchise and it

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been happy about this for years now because it

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to go back and start doing throwback games again,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and and the owners have repeatedly said straightforward, we would

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>definitely want to do throwback games if we're working with

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL to try to change this rule. And finally,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL has said teams can now fit their players

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>during trading camp with two helmets, so now we can

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have a white helmet and we can do throwback jerseys.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I would say the answer isn't completely set yet though,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 1>because we know we couldn't do it until next year,

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and then there's some reports that you would have had

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to already decide by now if doing any alternate jerseys

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for the two season. That deadline has already passed technically,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder though, given the change in the policy, if

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they might make an exception there. Uh, We're still waiting

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to hear the news. So I would be certain that

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>throwback games are coming. I hope they're coming in two

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for sure that they are until Yeah,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be interesting to see. And even if there

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>were exceptions, if the team would even be able to

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>get everything together, I mean, it would be such undertaking,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not only to get the team part ready of their

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, helmets and jerseys and equipment, and then like

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, trying you know what you do in stadium

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, having to announce to all the

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 1>other teams ahead of time what color you're gonna wear.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that also people don't understand sometimes how

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>much goes into planning game themes. You know that there's

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much to this that is normally planned

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>out very far in advance. So it may not have

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>anything to do I'm sure it won't have anything to

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>do with whether or not the team wants to do it, um,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure they also are gonna want to do

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it right and there may not be time to to

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>do all of the the brewjaja that they will want

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to go with it, um, Yeah, and how quickly I

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>can can put together jerseys you know, right, maybe they'll

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be like maybe it'll be like the last game in December.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Give us all the time that we can, Okay, are

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We had a question from Raphael asking are there any

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>injuries that we should be worried about from the start

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Actually, no, that the Bucks are in

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good shape in that regard, there were only six

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>guys that weren't practicing UH during when the rookie and

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the mandatory minicamp started. Another player, safety named Curtis Riley,

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>did suffer an achilles injury, and at the time coach

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Arean said he wasn't sure if I was gonna require surgery.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I I don't like to speculate about injuries, but I

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>have not often heard of minor achilles injuries, So I

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I would think that Curtis Riley could be a

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>question mark. That's the safety that we added who has

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>some NFL experience. We added him in in May. Otherwise,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>there were six guys. I don't know if I'll be

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>able to come up with all of them off the

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. O. J Howard um Uh, Jordan Whitehead.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>They were all not practicing when during the O T

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>A s but coach said at the end that all

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of them were looking good. Jordan white it was probably

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the farthest way, but that only been a few weeks.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He had shoulder surgery after the season, and coach said

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't think any of them were going to

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be an issue for the starter training camp, So you

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have that very often, to be quite honest with

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>do you you, um, usually have one or two guys that

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you think might not be ready to go, might have

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to put somebody on pup, and of course things can change.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And never take any answer about a player's injury with absolutes,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>because you know you never know what's gonna happen with

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the human body. But um, it looks really good. The

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>picture looks really good in terms of the team's health

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>heading into training camp. Okay, and David asked, do you

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think that we will have a running back hit a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand yards this year? Well, on one hand, I would

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>say it seems less likely because it just seems more

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>likely that Leonard Fournett will get a bigger share of

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the carries than he did last year, making it a

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more even between him and Ronald Jones. Last year

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>during the regular season, even with Ronald Jones missing a

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of time in December, the the carries. By the

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, we're almost two to one in

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>favor of Ronald Jones. Now, Ronald Jones I think ended

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>up with nine hundred six yards something like that, and

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>with about three games to go, you look like a

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>dead lock to make it to a thousand, and then

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he had the uh, let's see, he had he had

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a hand injury, I believe, and then he he was

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list and they had a quad injury,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>and so he didn't get a chance. He only really

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>needed to play like one more game and he would

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>have got to a thousand. So you can you can

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>look at this and go, well, Ronald Jones basically had

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it last year, so it seems obvious he could get

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it this year. But I wonder if the carriers are

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little more even making it hard

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for either of those guys is to get to a thousand,

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you still got a factory on what they

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>want to do with Keyshawn Vaughan, how much Geo Bernard plays. Um,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't look like a situation where the Bucks

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>have a lead back that goes for over a thousand.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I do think that coach arians will

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>go with the hot hand idea. So if either Leonard

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Fournette round Jones is just killing early on, they might

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>take over the lead role. And in that case, my

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>answer changed, but at the moment I would bet no. Okay,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence asked, what do you think the dynamics are gonna

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>look like in terms of long passing game, shorter passing game,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and just what what the offense might look like in

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of that area is compared to last year. We

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>do have so many of the same guys back, but

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you do add a Jalen Darden and um,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, are are there any differences in terms of

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>now and having O. J. Howard in the mix more often?

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, how how does that change maybe some of

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the long verse short passes and what the offense could

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>look like. Well, I don't think that Bruce Arian's philosophy,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>an approach to offense and and buy with which by extension,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to change a lot. So this is still

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a team that's going to try to push the ball downfield.

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, think about the fact that you

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have Antonio Brown now for seventeen games instead of just

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>half the season. And it took a little while last

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>year before Brown really started getting downfield targets. We used

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>them a lot early on with short passes, but later

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in the year and in the place he got some

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>downfield targets. I think he could be more of a

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>weapon downfield than he was last year. And uh, you know,

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line is intact, so tom Brady and did

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty well last year and could be even better this year.

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So tom Brady should have time to throw downfield. I

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>understand you have the addition of Jalen Darden, so you

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think maybe more underneath throws, But I don't know how

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>much the rookie is going to get right off the

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>bat um. You know, the offense. If you remember how

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the Downfiel passing went last year, it was it was

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty good early on, and then for a good stretch

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the field, they sort of lost

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it and the downfield shots were not working at all

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for a good I don't know, three or four or

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>five weeks. But then at the end they got it

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>back and the offense was really clicking and just about

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>every way. So you know, you can hope that with

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that year under the belt and Tom Brady now fully

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in charge of this offense. It took him a while,

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>as we're now finding to really have full command of

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the offense last year. Wasn't still well into the second half,

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>should be from the start now, and uh, you know,

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody back all the same pieces, the same philosophy on offense.

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I think they're still going to try to push the

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>ball downfield more than the average NFL team does. And

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>um Jarvis asked, do you think that Mike Evans hits

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>his thousand yards this year? Yeah? I would bet on it.

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Every time we're gonna talk about a statistical milestone, we're

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have people are gonna get tired of here and

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to say this. But they're seventeen games now, so uh

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes it a lot more. Uh. I mean, think

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>about Mike Evans last year, for various reasons. He went

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>into the last game needing about I think fifty yards

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 1>forty six yards something like that, and he got it

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on the you know, on those first three catches and

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>he was there, and then he got to throw to

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>him in the end zone and took a weird step

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on the slide and looked like he suffered really bad.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>We were all very worried that he started a really

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>bad knee injury. And that was game sixteen. As it

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>turned out, he was able to play the next week

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. Had there been a seventeenth regular season game,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>presumably he would have been ready to play for that.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And if he had not made it two a thousand,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>he would have one more shot. So given that Mike

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Evans numbers tend to come in large, you know, like

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>there were at least three or four or five games

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>last year we had two yards or ten yards. But

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>then they're always every year he has four or five

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>games where he has like hund a hundred fifty yards,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>so he tends to get a lot of them in bunches.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So give him one more chance, you know, that makes

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it much more likely. I know we have Antonio Brown

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for the whole year, but Mike Evans numbers actually were

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit better in the eight games that Antonio

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown played, so I don't think that takes anything away

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from him. You know, we have so many targets, and

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I would call Mike and Chris when he's healthy at

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>problem staying healthy last year one A and one B.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But still Mike Evins is probably one A. And if

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you're on an offense with Tom Brady getting passing yards,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very good chance that your one

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>A is going to get a house. Yeah. I'm so

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>glad that Mike broke the record last year, so that

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he has the record without that asterisk, and now no

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one will be able to break that record in the

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>same amount of games that he did, and I love

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like he will forever have the record in terms of

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>when they were sixteen game seasons. So I think that's

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool, um, you know, and it's a hard

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>record to break anyway, just because most of the guys

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that you would think at a shot at, like Randy Moss,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>aj Green, Um, Julio Jones, guys like that, either they

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a huge rookie season or they just had

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>one season where they missed too many games due to injury.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things about Mike is he hit

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the ground running, was awesome as a rookie. And even

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>though he's battled through some injuries, if you look at

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>his career numbers, he usually plays fifteen or sixteen games.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>He just had battle some through some injuries. He's never

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>had that season where he misses like nine games. So

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>availability is one of the big abilities in the NFL.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's very true, Um, Richard asked, and I love this. Uh,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had a choice, which team would you like

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks to wear the creamsicles against? Well, so you're

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>looking for a good uh combination here, I guess right,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So you wouldn't want to wear it against a team

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that had some orange and already, like the Browns or

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. But we don't those teams. But we're talking

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about next year or beyond, right, Yeah uh uh, I mean,

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this in the asked. The very first

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>game we did against was Green Bay and that was

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. That was a pretty cool combination of uniforms,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>um and teams that were a long time previous rivals.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And then each of the next three games was against

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>division opponents. So let's cut out the three division opponents

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>because we've already done that. Um, something green Bay would

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>be cool? Um, what about the Patriots tom Brady still

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>our quarterback? That Yeah, that would be I mean, that

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>game is already so epic if you add that on there,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's just crazy. Um yeah, but it

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>would be that it would be at least the second

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>time that Tom Brady's played him, because he's going to

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>get the first one this year. Yeah, that's true. That's true. Um. Yeah,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a part of me that just that wants to

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>say the Saints just because it's the Saints, that like,

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to do something that's going to get people

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>even extra fired up. Whenever you play against them, like

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just that kind of a rivalry idea, Um, that would

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be pretty incredible. Yeah, I kind of wonder how how

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>good is Are we sure New Orleans is gonna be

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>good in Oh, yeah, we're not sure at all, but

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just based on like who they have been and how

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that even if they aren't, we're still

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>going to enjoy winning that that's that's not going to

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>take away from how much you want to beat a

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>division team and one that you have had some history

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>with and all of that. So, yeah, it is gonna

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>be very different, But I feel like that's one I

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>would pick. One that I think just aesthetically that would

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>look cool is against the Rams because now that they

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have their colors that very much resemble their throwback stuff,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that it would just overall kind of look like a fun,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>giant throwback game for everybody. True good idea. Vikings might

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be good. Orange and purple together could be pretty cool.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>That Yeah, that would be a lot there there would

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that be would be a lot happening. Um, all right.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So Richard also asked, are there any other records that

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can be broken by a Bucks player this upcoming season

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or any other records that we should be on the

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>lookout for. Yeah, and to me, the big one is

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I know Mike Evans already has virtually all the

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>receiving records, so you wouldn't think there's much more that

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he can break. But there is a big one on

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. Mike all Stot is the Bucks all time

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowner with seventy one, I believe, and that record for

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time looked unassailable. I didn't think anybody's gonna

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere close to that UM But Mike Evans is

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>up to I believe sixty two something like that UM

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>so or sixty somewhere he's he's within striking distance. I

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's about nine back. And we know Mike can

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>get nine in a I think he needs tend to

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>break it. We know Mike can get nine or ten

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in a season. He just got thirteen. I believe he's

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>had ten or more three or four times, and he's

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>also had eight on a couple of other occasions. Touchdowns

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit of a fickle stat for just

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>about any position. But I didn't come up with this

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>on my own, but I was just watching something yesterday

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and they were showing Mike Evans, and it was like

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>something about last season and he had said he was

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the most targeted player in the end zone over the

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>last few years. So he even in those games like

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans game, uh, last year, even he only

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>caught one pass, but it was a one year touchdown pass,

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and I remember which game was recently he caught two passes.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>They were both one year of touchdown passes. So even

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>when the defense makes a point of taking Mike Evans

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the game by just doubling him the whole time,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and it opens up opportunities for somebody else when you

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get down there near the goal line, there are still

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>ways to get him involve no matter what the defenses

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. So, um, that's the big one to me,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that the touchdown record. There's a bunch of them that

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>could fall, Like like Ryan Suckop broke our our season

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>scoring record last year, and there's no reason why this

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>offense won't be scoring a lot of points again. And

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a very accurate kicker, and we had one more games,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so he could break it against year as an example. Okay,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and we'll close it this. Michael wanted to know how

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is Kyle Trask looking well. I think we add certain

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the same question last week, and you know, we were

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about a very small sample size so far. I

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna learn a lot more in training camp

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>when he should get a ton of reps, especially if

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>coach continues to break the full full team sessions into

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>two groups, so you've got two quarterbacks each getting eleven

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on eleven action on. You know, in each group, you

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>know you'd have Blaine Gabbert and Tom Brady on one

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>side and Ryan Griffin and Kyle Trask on the other.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're getting a lot of reps and I think

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a lot more than All I can say

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is the coaches are pleased with what he's done so far.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>They saved him, and the coaches are taking a very

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>methodical approach because there's no expectation that Kyle Trast is

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to play during the regular season anytime soon,

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're taking a slow, methodical approach. And he's he's

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a good learner in that regard. Otherwise, I just think

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that that he is what they thought he was. He's

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a big, strong guy, um, you know, who can make

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the throws that this offense requires. All Right, well that's

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it for us on this edition of Buccaneers

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Inside a Live presented by Miller Lte. Thanks as always

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for being with us and for those great questions. We

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are off next week. This is the week that everything

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of goes dark in the in the buccaneer

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>world before the chaos of the season begins. So we're

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>off then, but we will be back in a couple

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of weeks to get you guys ready for all things

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>training camp, So we'll see you then. M