1 00:00:01,920 --> 00:00:04,800 Speaker 1: Hi, guys, Welcome to an all new episode of Legally Brunettes. 2 00:00:04,840 --> 00:00:07,920 Speaker 1: I will be your host today, Emily Simpson with Shane. 3 00:00:08,600 --> 00:00:10,800 Speaker 1: With Shane. A lot of you reached out to me 4 00:00:11,039 --> 00:00:14,400 Speaker 1: and you said, have you seen the new documentary on Netflix? 5 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:18,840 Speaker 1: It's about Lucy let Be. She's a nurse, and I 6 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:22,400 Speaker 1: had seen it pop up, And so after several of 7 00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:24,920 Speaker 1: you were dming and asking about it, I decided to 8 00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:27,160 Speaker 1: watch it and kind of take a deep dive into it. 9 00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:30,040 Speaker 1: I will tell you, I still don't know what I 10 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:33,320 Speaker 1: think about Lucy let Bee, whether I think that she's 11 00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:35,080 Speaker 1: guilty or not, but we are going to get into 12 00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: and we're going to discuss it. So, Lucy Leppie was 13 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:41,120 Speaker 1: a neonatal nurse at Countess of Chester Hospital. I also, 14 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:42,879 Speaker 1: can I just comment on how much I love the 15 00:00:42,960 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 1: names of English hospitals. It sounds so proper. Yeah, Like 16 00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:51,720 Speaker 1: here the hospital is called Hogue, right, but this is 17 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:53,400 Speaker 1: called the Countess of. 18 00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 2: Chester Hospital, and isn't there courts the crown. 19 00:00:56,880 --> 00:00:59,840 Speaker 1: Yes, it's all very dignified. It's very very polished, to 20 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:04,959 Speaker 1: dignified and proper. She was convicted of murdering seven infants 21 00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:08,000 Speaker 1: and attempting to kill six others between the years twenty 22 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:13,360 Speaker 1: fifteen and twenty sixteen. Prosecutors argued that a sharp rise 23 00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 1: in unexplained baby deaths and medical collapses in the unit 24 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:21,320 Speaker 1: occurred while she was on duty, alleging that she deliberately 25 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 1: harmed infants. After a lengthy trial that began in twenty 26 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 1: twenty two, I believe her trial was six months. Maybe 27 00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 1: maybe it was nine. It was long. 28 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 2: She was a jury. 29 00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:36,039 Speaker 1: Yes, she was found guilty in twenty twenty three and 30 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,399 Speaker 1: sentenced to a whole life order. See that's another way 31 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:42,640 Speaker 1: that they say it. They say whole life order basically 32 00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 1: like your whole life. 33 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 2: I'm glad this sits well with you. I like it. 34 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 1: I like that, I like the language. A whole life order, 35 00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 1: which is the most severe punishment under British law, with 36 00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 1: no possibility of parole. The case has drawn significant public 37 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:00,880 Speaker 1: and media attention and has remained in the subject of 38 00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 1: appeals and ongoing inquiries. I do know that she currently 39 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:10,119 Speaker 1: is in prison. We do know that she was convicted 40 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:14,080 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty three. Her defense has now working towards 41 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:17,160 Speaker 1: getting her another appeal. I think she's exhausted a couple 42 00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:19,560 Speaker 1: appeals with the Court of Appeals. But then there's a 43 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 1: different route that you can take where you can submit. 44 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:26,240 Speaker 2: Before, which seems like a tough call because there's seven 45 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:31,320 Speaker 2: well there's thirteen convictions. Yeah, so I don't know. I mean, 46 00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:35,799 Speaker 2: you can overturn one or find one to be you know, doubtful, 47 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:38,840 Speaker 2: but then there's others because I think she has a 48 00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 2: whole life sentence for each of those counts. 49 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:43,680 Speaker 1: I believe there's like fifteen sentences. 50 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,560 Speaker 2: So unless you can find something that makes the whole 51 00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 2: like throughout the whole trial, right, you'd have to like 52 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:54,760 Speaker 2: find a way to negate the conviction of fifteen different counts. 53 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:57,800 Speaker 1: Well that's where her defense is at now because they've 54 00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 1: commissioned a whole you know, task force basically of professionals 55 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: and experts that have written these reports. So we'll get 56 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 1: to that. But the case is now being reviewed by 57 00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:13,200 Speaker 1: the CCRC, So that's her kind of last hope. So 58 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:16,519 Speaker 1: all right, let's talk about Lucy's early life. So Lucy 59 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:19,160 Speaker 1: Letby was born and only child to John and Susan 60 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 1: let Be in Hereford, England and January of nineteen ninety. 61 00:03:23,919 --> 00:03:26,360 Speaker 1: Those who knew her describe her as a quiet and 62 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:28,960 Speaker 1: reserved and said it was obvious from early on that 63 00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 1: she would pursue a career as a pediatric nurse. In 64 00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:36,480 Speaker 1: twenty eleven, Lucy let Be began working in the neo 65 00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:40,880 Speaker 1: natal unit at Countess of Chester Hospital in Cheshire, England. 66 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:44,360 Speaker 1: Lucy's close friend that attended nursing school with her claimed 67 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 1: that this hospital was very clicky and that the other 68 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:49,960 Speaker 1: nurses and staff were mean to Lucy because she was 69 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:54,119 Speaker 1: quirky and shy. You know, during the documentary she talks 70 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:57,600 Speaker 1: about this friend. Also, you know what's interesting that they 71 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 1: can do now, do you know? When you watch documentary 72 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:04,320 Speaker 1: previously and they wanted to preserve someone's identity, so they 73 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 1: made them anonymous. They would just make them like a black, 74 00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:10,200 Speaker 1: shadowy figure and then they would change their voice, and 75 00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:12,920 Speaker 1: then they would make it like that probably kind of voice. 76 00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:16,560 Speaker 1: They don't do that. I'm watching this documentary. They enhance 77 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 1: it with AI so they make her look like a 78 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:20,520 Speaker 1: totally different person. 79 00:04:20,520 --> 00:04:23,480 Speaker 2: I guess they try to put a real face on there, 80 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:25,520 Speaker 2: but her real. 81 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 1: Face because she wants anonymity. 82 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:28,600 Speaker 2: I actually looked like you. 83 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know, but it's so bizarre because up 84 00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 1: in the corner it'll say something about like enhanced with 85 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:39,600 Speaker 1: AI or something to preserve anonymity. 86 00:04:39,839 --> 00:04:43,839 Speaker 2: Well, what they do with the voice, they digitally. 87 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:45,560 Speaker 1: Enhance it to make it sound like someone different. And 88 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 1: I guess they took her look she's like a she's 89 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:49,760 Speaker 1: a friend. 90 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 2: Of Lucy Levy. It looks like someone And then they 91 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:53,400 Speaker 2: just accused. 92 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 1: You don't know how you get AI to make it 93 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:58,400 Speaker 1: look like no one else in the world so that 94 00:04:58,440 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 1: you're not defeated someone else. At some point, it's very. 95 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:04,400 Speaker 2: AI for defamation. 96 00:05:04,839 --> 00:05:08,919 Speaker 1: Yeah. At the Countess of Chester Hospital, the infant mortality 97 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:12,680 Speaker 1: rates in the unit were considered statistically in line with 98 00:05:12,800 --> 00:05:17,400 Speaker 1: comparable hospitals. But this was before twenty fifteen. So really 99 00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:20,279 Speaker 1: the focus of this trial and the focus of Lucy 100 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 1: let be and the issue of whether or not she 101 00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:27,240 Speaker 1: is overtly doing things to cause a significant number of 102 00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:30,200 Speaker 1: babies to collapse or die. 103 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:33,240 Speaker 2: Collapse meanings not is that another English term? 104 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,440 Speaker 1: They collapse. They use the word collapse, but that means die. 105 00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:40,040 Speaker 1: Is it's really they focus on the years twenty fifteen 106 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. 107 00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:44,160 Speaker 2: This collapse mean more of a kind of a natural 108 00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 2: medical death as opposed to like a murder. He collapsed her. 109 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:51,120 Speaker 1: Well, I think that's what the term that the hospital 110 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:53,400 Speaker 1: uses is supposed to be, like a nice way of 111 00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:57,080 Speaker 1: saying that the baby didn't survive, so the baby's collapsed. 112 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:01,640 Speaker 1: Prosecutors later argued that seven of the infants, which was 113 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:04,920 Speaker 1: five boys and two girls, were murdered during this period. 114 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:08,239 Speaker 1: So the issue, the main issue of this whole case 115 00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:12,760 Speaker 1: is whether Lucy let Be was overtly doing things when 116 00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:17,960 Speaker 1: she had these babies under her care to induce them 117 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 1: to die, or whether it is just circumstantial as to 118 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:26,400 Speaker 1: the hospital, the babies just weren't well. They would have 119 00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:30,120 Speaker 1: collapsed anyway, And so that's the main issue, and it's 120 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:33,599 Speaker 1: very very divided. And you know what Else's case reminded 121 00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:35,279 Speaker 1: me of when I was watching it and it showed 122 00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 1: a lot of the headlines that had to do with 123 00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:39,880 Speaker 1: Lucy let Be before she went to trial. It reminded 124 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:43,840 Speaker 1: me very much of Amanda Knox, where she had so 125 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:47,560 Speaker 1: much public scrutiny guilty. She was already guilty because remember 126 00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:50,120 Speaker 1: how they would flash all on the inquiry and there's. 127 00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 2: No other suspect, right, she was the only one they 128 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 2: looked into as. 129 00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:57,520 Speaker 1: So Amanda Knox was just her face and her image 130 00:06:57,560 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 1: was splashed all. 131 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:02,960 Speaker 2: Over Here's a crazy lady that murdered her roommate, and 132 00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:05,919 Speaker 2: now is here's a crazy nurse that killed all these babies. 133 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:07,960 Speaker 1: Right, So to me, it was just it looked it 134 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:10,040 Speaker 1: reminded me very much of Amanda Knox, how it was 135 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 1: a public scrutiny trial, how it was just splashing her 136 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:14,920 Speaker 1: face all over the part. 137 00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:16,960 Speaker 2: I've always had a problem with that because it's like, oh, 138 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:21,480 Speaker 2: innocent before guilty, but then show the suspect, not the criminal, 139 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:24,280 Speaker 2: the suspect. So then you show him or her all 140 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:26,640 Speaker 2: over the place, and then let's say they're found not guilty. 141 00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:28,720 Speaker 2: Well the news is done and they're going to move 142 00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:30,840 Speaker 2: on to the next person, and then that person's face 143 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 2: was everywhere. 144 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:32,360 Speaker 1: Well, so it is. 145 00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:34,520 Speaker 2: It is bothersome, I think, right. 146 00:07:34,560 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: And the way they show it is like, you know, 147 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:42,520 Speaker 1: baby killer and you know serial killer, most prolific baby 148 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:45,080 Speaker 1: serial killer of all of history. 149 00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 2: And then her face that was after conviction, that would 150 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 2: make a little bit more sense. 151 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 1: Well, I think it was before and after. I think 152 00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 1: already when she had been arrested and she was being 153 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 1: put on trial for these a legend, you know, collapses 154 00:07:57,360 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 1: of all these children, the media is just splashing her 155 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 1: face every where with like serial killer, baby killer. So 156 00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: it just reminded me very much of a man of knocks. 157 00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 1: How I don't even know if you can get a 158 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 1: fair trial with a jury pool when obviously the media 159 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:13,800 Speaker 1: has convicted her before. And you know, the average person, 160 00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:16,000 Speaker 1: like we talk about, the average person, does not read 161 00:08:16,000 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 1: the article and try to discern thing and look at 162 00:08:18,160 --> 00:08:20,480 Speaker 1: facts and really try to make a decision. They see 163 00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 1: the cover of a magazine, they see her face and 164 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:23,880 Speaker 1: baby killer. That's that's all you need. 165 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 2: So it's good enough for me. 166 00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 1: Right, because you're one of those people. 167 00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:30,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's average. 168 00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:32,839 Speaker 1: It's like when all this I will tell you guys 169 00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:35,959 Speaker 1: out there listening, if you see an article on Facebook 170 00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:40,040 Speaker 1: that has to do with a housewife, chances of it 171 00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 1: being true are slim to none. 172 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:44,320 Speaker 2: I don't even click on anything, even if it's world 173 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:47,240 Speaker 2: news anymore. It's like, well, that sounds pretty bad. If 174 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 2: it's true, then I'll hear about it from multiple sources. 175 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 1: It's just crazy to me how all these articles come 176 00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:55,880 Speaker 1: up now on Facebook. There was one I saw that 177 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,320 Speaker 1: said that you beat me, and then it showed a 178 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:00,520 Speaker 1: photo of me when I had a face because I 179 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:04,320 Speaker 1: had black eyes. So anyway, stay away from Facebook art. 180 00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:07,920 Speaker 2: It's very true to have a new podcast partner. 181 00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:10,920 Speaker 1: Internal concerns were starting to be raised. This is in 182 00:09:10,960 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 1: the twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen timeframe. A senior doctor 183 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 1: testified that he raised concerns to the hospital leadership team 184 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 1: about let Be during twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen. In 185 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:26,120 Speaker 1: one account, he said that he observed her standing by 186 00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:29,720 Speaker 1: an infant whose oxygen levels were dropping and she was 187 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 1: not intervening. Other staff testified about unusual behavior that had 188 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:39,640 Speaker 1: to do with Lucy, allegations that she discouraged coworkers from 189 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:43,720 Speaker 1: assisting during emergencies, and claims that she spent time with 190 00:09:43,840 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 1: babies she was not assigned to. Also testimony that she 191 00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,400 Speaker 1: wrote a sympathy card to parents of a baby she 192 00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:53,920 Speaker 1: was accused of harming. I don't know. You can take 193 00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 1: those things and turn them around into something odd, or 194 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:00,800 Speaker 1: you can turn them around and look at it from 195 00:10:00,840 --> 00:10:02,920 Speaker 1: a different perspective and think that if she wrote a 196 00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:05,559 Speaker 1: sympathy card to someone, maybe it was because she was 197 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 1: sympathetic that somebody lost a baby. And I don't know. 198 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 2: That's what then that's what it should say, because I 199 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:15,800 Speaker 2: always like tell kids like I'm like, okay, say you're sorry, 200 00:10:15,840 --> 00:10:17,320 Speaker 2: and it's like I didn't mean to do it, I know. 201 00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:19,520 Speaker 2: But you can say i'm sorry you got hurt, I'm 202 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 2: sorry it was an accident. So I don't know if 203 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:24,160 Speaker 2: she should have. So it can't go both ways. An 204 00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:26,080 Speaker 2: apology doesn't always mean I did it. It might just 205 00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:27,679 Speaker 2: mean I'm sorry for the circumstances. 206 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: Right, So we get to July of twenty sixteen, Lucy 207 00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:34,760 Speaker 1: was removed from the neonatal unit and transferred to administrative 208 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 1: roles within the hospital's risk and Patient Safety office. Okay, 209 00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:40,440 Speaker 1: that has to put you on notice immediately that something's 210 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 1: coming down the pipeline when you're a nurse and that's 211 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:46,840 Speaker 1: your specialty is dealing with neonatal and dealing with babies, 212 00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:48,720 Speaker 1: and they remove you from that and they're like, that's 213 00:10:48,720 --> 00:10:51,160 Speaker 1: like when you're a police officer and you know, oh. 214 00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:53,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like give me your gun and badge, yeah, hand, 215 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:54,760 Speaker 2: everything's fine. 216 00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:58,440 Speaker 1: Now you're just going to answer the phone and just 217 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:01,440 Speaker 1: some administrative tasks. So obviously she's put on notice that 218 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:03,840 Speaker 1: something's coming down the pipeline and that they're. 219 00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 2: Thinking I don't think that. I never thought that that 220 00:11:06,679 --> 00:11:08,680 Speaker 2: was a secret. I thought like when she was put 221 00:11:08,720 --> 00:11:12,319 Speaker 2: on clinical whatever probation or whatever it's called, I think 222 00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:14,000 Speaker 2: she was aware of the investigation. 223 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 1: She was also sending emails asking for more information because 224 00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:18,960 Speaker 1: she said she had such high anxiety about what was 225 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:19,400 Speaker 1: going on. 226 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:21,439 Speaker 2: She so I had to prepare my defense. 227 00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 1: Tell me what's going on. Lucy remained employed by the 228 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 1: Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in this capacity 229 00:11:30,600 --> 00:11:33,920 Speaker 1: until her first arrest in July of twenty eighteen, at 230 00:11:33,920 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 1: which point she was then suspended. 231 00:11:36,640 --> 00:11:37,560 Speaker 2: Her first arrest. 232 00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:39,840 Speaker 1: The first time she was arrested, I guess they were 233 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:42,840 Speaker 1: unable to keep her because they didn't have enough evidence. 234 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:44,439 Speaker 1: The second time she. 235 00:11:44,360 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 2: Supposed to bail, they didn't learn their lessons. 236 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:47,920 Speaker 1: No, And then the third time, I believe they felt 237 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:51,200 Speaker 1: like they had enough evidence to support the allegation that 238 00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 1: she was overtly doing something. So her trial begins in 239 00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:59,440 Speaker 1: October of twenty twenty two. So now we are and 240 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:01,720 Speaker 1: here we are in October of twenty twenty two. Actually 241 00:12:01,760 --> 00:12:03,440 Speaker 1: they show her being arrested. I believe it's a third 242 00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:05,640 Speaker 1: time in the documentary when they show her being arrested 243 00:12:06,280 --> 00:12:08,480 Speaker 1: and they're so polite when they come in. They come 244 00:12:08,480 --> 00:12:10,559 Speaker 1: in and they're like hello, good. 245 00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:13,440 Speaker 2: They bring crumpets and tea, just like hello, we're here. 246 00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:16,520 Speaker 1: Is Lucy here and the poor. 247 00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 2: Mom helping her pack, and you know they. 248 00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:21,719 Speaker 1: Have the police, uh you know. 249 00:12:21,760 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 3: You're pointing their chests out, you know, the police the 250 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:25,880 Speaker 3: cam body can body cam. 251 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:28,000 Speaker 1: Yes, so they're you know, we get to see it all. 252 00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:30,479 Speaker 1: And they arrive and she's like up in her bedroom. 253 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:35,720 Speaker 1: The mom her mom is wailing in the background, just wailing. 254 00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:36,719 Speaker 2: The third arrest, right, I. 255 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:38,040 Speaker 1: Believe this is the third arrest that they show in 256 00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:38,280 Speaker 1: the dark. 257 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,360 Speaker 2: At some point I would be a little common. I'm like, yeah, okay, 258 00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 2: you tried this before. You don't have any evidence. 259 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:44,800 Speaker 1: Well, she's actually very calm for someone that's been arrested 260 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 1: three times. I mean, she's just kind of sitting in 261 00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:48,480 Speaker 1: her bedroom under the covers, and they just they like 262 00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:50,720 Speaker 1: knock on her bedroom door and they're like, hello, Lucy, 263 00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 1: you know, do you want to get dressed? Let's go, 264 00:12:52,640 --> 00:13:02,959 Speaker 1: We're going to be on our way. October of twenty 265 00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:06,840 Speaker 1: twenty two, Lucy's child began at the Manchester Crown Court. 266 00:13:06,960 --> 00:13:10,520 Speaker 1: She pleaded not guilty to twenty two charges. These charges 267 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:15,160 Speaker 1: included seven murders and multiple attempted murders. There were notable 268 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,960 Speaker 1: cases that were referenced by the prosecution in court. You know, 269 00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:21,280 Speaker 1: they named all the children. They were all kind of 270 00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:26,560 Speaker 1: named by letters. So there were two triplets. 271 00:13:26,080 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 2: Mean for purposes of the prosecution. 272 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:32,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, Child O and Child P that had died, 273 00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:37,480 Speaker 1: and a third triplet, Child H, had allegedly survived two 274 00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:42,840 Speaker 1: attempts and recovered after being transferred. Child G survived three 275 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:47,000 Speaker 1: alleged attacks but later suffered severe and permanent brain injury. 276 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:51,559 Speaker 1: Child B experienced rapid deterioration after her twin brother had 277 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 1: already died, and Child EA's mother testified that she found 278 00:13:55,120 --> 00:14:00,280 Speaker 1: her baby bleeding and distressed. Concerns were allegedly dismissed at 279 00:14:00,280 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 1: the time, so. 280 00:14:01,280 --> 00:14:03,280 Speaker 2: They weren't consistent causes of death. 281 00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:07,440 Speaker 1: No, and prosecutors stated that at least seventeen collapses were 282 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 1: not medically explainable. So really, I had to I read 283 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:17,920 Speaker 1: several articles about this because SIDS, Yeah, a sudden infinite 284 00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:20,400 Speaker 1: death syndrome. Yeah, so I was trying. 285 00:14:20,160 --> 00:14:23,600 Speaker 2: To break down which is unexplainable, inexplainable. 286 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:28,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's actually you've met Alan before with the Innocence Center. 287 00:14:29,320 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: He was convicted many many years ago and spent many 288 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:35,720 Speaker 1: years in jail for ACIDS type of situation and it 289 00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:39,280 Speaker 1: ended up being proven later after the fact that he 290 00:14:39,360 --> 00:14:40,360 Speaker 1: had nothing to do. 291 00:14:40,440 --> 00:14:42,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think he's not the only one. I 292 00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:46,000 Speaker 2: think that's yeah. They've come to learn that sometimes. Yeah. 293 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:49,080 Speaker 2: And then they find consistencies in these SIDS cases, like 294 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 2: certain patterns of kind of how they are in their nursery, 295 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:55,600 Speaker 2: in their home, which is not negligence, it's just there's 296 00:14:55,640 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 2: a consistency there. 297 00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:01,880 Speaker 1: Colleagues testified that sudden infant de interiory were happening while 298 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 1: Lucy was on duty. The prosecution presented a chart that 299 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,400 Speaker 1: showed Lucy Leppie was at the hospital during every infant fatality. 300 00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:13,040 Speaker 1: So her new defense team claims that she was present 301 00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:15,240 Speaker 1: not only because she worked more, but also because she 302 00:15:15,320 --> 00:15:17,240 Speaker 1: was more qualified than the other nurses, or she had 303 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:21,720 Speaker 1: like specified education and she was more experienced. But then 304 00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:24,680 Speaker 1: you know, the prosecution comes back and says that though 305 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: she had taken extra courses, she was still labeled what's 306 00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:30,120 Speaker 1: called a Band five nurse, which in the UK is 307 00:15:30,160 --> 00:15:33,640 Speaker 1: the entry level grade for newly qualified registered nurses, and 308 00:15:33,680 --> 00:15:35,960 Speaker 1: that there were other nurses in the neonatal ward that 309 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:38,800 Speaker 1: were banned six and banned seven, meaning that they were 310 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:44,040 Speaker 1: more qualified than Lucy. So again, lots of arguments on 311 00:15:44,120 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 1: both sides. 312 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:48,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, again, there's no going back to the beginning when 313 00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:52,240 Speaker 2: you said you're uncertain, and then you asked my prediction 314 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:57,480 Speaker 2: what your judgment would be. It fucking makes sense to that. 315 00:15:57,560 --> 00:16:01,120 Speaker 2: But then it's like, if you're on, then that's the answer. 316 00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:04,520 Speaker 2: You're uncertain and there's enough doubt and she shouldn't be convicted. 317 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:07,360 Speaker 1: I know, But sometimes I feel like once we go 318 00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:07,800 Speaker 1: through this, and. 319 00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:10,080 Speaker 2: I know I was just saying, like I was just 320 00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:12,320 Speaker 2: pointing out that there's a significant amount of doubt that 321 00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 2: you have. 322 00:16:13,320 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 1: However, some Stetisians find the prosecution's chart to be very skewed, 323 00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:20,040 Speaker 1: as it seemed to pick and choose which staff was added. 324 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:22,520 Speaker 1: There were other doctors and staff that were not included 325 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:25,120 Speaker 1: in the chart. Why were they not included? That's the question. 326 00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:30,400 Speaker 1: Expert witnesses stated. Some overfeeding incidents could not have been accidental. 327 00:16:30,760 --> 00:16:36,400 Speaker 1: You know, the prosecution was alleging that she was overfeeding babies, 328 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:41,120 Speaker 1: which I guess would like overfeeding them with milk, but. 329 00:16:41,080 --> 00:16:43,360 Speaker 2: Not for purposes of killing, right, just like she was 330 00:16:43,400 --> 00:16:44,600 Speaker 2: improperly No. 331 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:47,400 Speaker 1: I think with purposes of harming them. If you overfeed 332 00:16:47,440 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 1: someone with milk, think about you know, the people that 333 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:51,320 Speaker 1: have died because they drink too much water. You remember 334 00:16:51,360 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 1: there was a case where someone didn't they. 335 00:16:53,160 --> 00:16:55,120 Speaker 2: Run or something a number of cases. Yeah, yeah, So. 336 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:56,720 Speaker 1: I'm just saying, if you pump a baby full, if 337 00:16:56,720 --> 00:17:00,400 Speaker 1: you're feeding, if you're overfeeding a baby milk that's tiny 338 00:17:00,440 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: and just born and mighty, be having some issues that 339 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:03,840 Speaker 1: could lead to death. 340 00:17:04,280 --> 00:17:06,560 Speaker 2: So that was a plus. That should be a minimal 341 00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:09,120 Speaker 2: skill that a nurse is aware of, right, how much 342 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:09,960 Speaker 2: they should be fed. 343 00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:14,960 Speaker 1: Prosecutors argued that air embolism was also used in multiple cases. 344 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:16,000 Speaker 1: This was with baby O. 345 00:17:16,080 --> 00:17:19,160 Speaker 2: I actually injecting air into their blood stream or something. 346 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:22,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, so they really if you look really at baby Oh, 347 00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:26,400 Speaker 1: the prosecution accuses her of injecting air into the blood 348 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:29,480 Speaker 1: of baby Oh, which that type of blockage is called 349 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:33,639 Speaker 1: an air embolism. So that's what the prosecution was saying. 350 00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:36,840 Speaker 1: Then you know, and I guess a trait of air 351 00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:39,919 Speaker 1: embolism is that the baby's skin becomes discolored, and I 352 00:17:39,920 --> 00:17:43,639 Speaker 1: think there were several babies that had skin discoloration. So 353 00:17:43,640 --> 00:17:45,760 Speaker 1: that's what they were saying, that someone had to overtly 354 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:46,440 Speaker 1: inject air. 355 00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:50,320 Speaker 2: But I'm going to guess the skin discoloration doesn't isn't 356 00:17:50,400 --> 00:17:53,720 Speaker 2: conclusive that that was the cause of death. It's just 357 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:56,639 Speaker 2: that's a symptom, but it's probably also a symptom that 358 00:17:56,760 --> 00:17:58,680 Speaker 2: arises from other causes of death. 359 00:17:58,800 --> 00:18:02,720 Speaker 1: Right, So, Dowie Evans, who is the main expert witness 360 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:05,640 Speaker 1: used by the prosecution, has been accused of being an 361 00:18:05,720 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: unreliable expert witness. Doctor Evans claimed that many of these 362 00:18:09,880 --> 00:18:14,320 Speaker 1: newborns died by air embolism, citing so he used so 363 00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:18,560 Speaker 1: this doctor that was an expert for the prosecution used 364 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:22,159 Speaker 1: a research paper written by doctor Shu Lee back in 365 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:26,560 Speaker 1: nineteen eighty nine. So that's where he claims that it 366 00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:28,879 Speaker 1: was the embolism. It was air embolism. The air was 367 00:18:28,920 --> 00:18:32,159 Speaker 1: directly I guess, inserted into a vein or something, and 368 00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:34,560 Speaker 1: then the baby's. 369 00:18:33,640 --> 00:18:35,600 Speaker 2: I've always heard that if you have a syringe that's 370 00:18:35,640 --> 00:18:37,520 Speaker 2: empty instous air and you pump it into someone, it 371 00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:38,560 Speaker 2: could result in death. 372 00:18:38,680 --> 00:18:41,600 Speaker 1: Yeah. Here's my other question though, and this is I 373 00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 1: don't really understand. I understand that this hospital was small 374 00:18:45,359 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 1: and understaffed. I don't think it was medically up to date. 375 00:18:48,080 --> 00:18:50,879 Speaker 1: It probably needed new equipment and things like that. But 376 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:52,440 Speaker 1: why did they not have cameras? 377 00:18:54,920 --> 00:18:57,320 Speaker 2: Do hospital? Where do you want the cameras in. 378 00:18:57,280 --> 00:18:58,359 Speaker 1: The neonatal unit. 379 00:18:58,400 --> 00:18:59,280 Speaker 2: You've got babies. 380 00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:02,040 Speaker 1: There's always issh with babies being kidnapped. Why are there 381 00:19:02,040 --> 00:19:04,760 Speaker 1: not security cameras and all of this? And it's a 382 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:05,600 Speaker 1: very small. 383 00:19:06,880 --> 00:19:08,479 Speaker 2: Do we know that there were on cameras or are 384 00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:09,359 Speaker 2: you just assuming there was? 385 00:19:09,600 --> 00:19:11,400 Speaker 1: I'm assuming there's no cameras because. 386 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,480 Speaker 2: A camera show that she fed the baby too many ounces. 387 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, they also they also alleged that she injected 388 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:21,560 Speaker 1: them with insulin. So I'm saying, if she's doing these 389 00:19:21,600 --> 00:19:26,200 Speaker 1: things like injecting a baby with insulin or overfeeding or 390 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:31,520 Speaker 1: injecting error into their veins for then wouldn't there be 391 00:19:31,560 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 1: something on a camera. I don't know, or it would 392 00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:37,080 Speaker 1: deter her from doing that. I mean, I just don't 393 00:19:37,119 --> 00:19:39,560 Speaker 1: understand where there's no security cameras in this hospital where 394 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:41,440 Speaker 1: it's a neonatal unit where you have babies. 395 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,840 Speaker 2: That's on the assumption that all hospitals have cameras in 396 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 2: this one doesn't. We don't know what if that's not 397 00:19:48,080 --> 00:19:49,320 Speaker 2: what if it's a private s thing. I don't know. 398 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,959 Speaker 1: Doctor Dowie Evans claimed many of these newborns died by 399 00:19:53,000 --> 00:19:58,000 Speaker 1: air embolism, citing doctor Shoeley's research on the subject. However, 400 00:19:58,160 --> 00:20:01,840 Speaker 1: doctor Shoeley, the man that wrote this this paper, was 401 00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:05,680 Speaker 1: then contacted by the defense and then he went through 402 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 1: each case by himself, each case of the babies dying, 403 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:16,520 Speaker 1: along with fourteen other neonatal experts, and they determined that 404 00:20:16,560 --> 00:20:19,479 Speaker 1: none of the infants died from air embolism. However, this 405 00:20:19,560 --> 00:20:21,480 Speaker 1: is after the fact that I believe this was after 406 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:25,120 Speaker 1: she was convicted. So this is her defense preparing. 407 00:20:25,240 --> 00:20:27,840 Speaker 2: To challenge to challenge it right. 408 00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:32,000 Speaker 1: Also, handwritten notes found by Lucy Letby and her home 409 00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:36,919 Speaker 1: were presented. Some contain self critical statements and references to 410 00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:40,399 Speaker 1: harming babies, like I did this. I am evil. You know, 411 00:20:40,440 --> 00:20:41,679 Speaker 1: I don't know how I did. 412 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:43,200 Speaker 2: You just say, where was that said? 413 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:47,359 Speaker 1: So when they searched her home, she liked to journal, 414 00:20:48,119 --> 00:20:49,840 Speaker 1: so she wrote a lot and I guess they found 415 00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:53,439 Speaker 1: a lot of journals and scribbles and she wrote, I 416 00:20:53,600 --> 00:20:55,400 Speaker 1: did this, I am evil. 417 00:20:57,640 --> 00:21:01,000 Speaker 2: Self incriminating, probably don't want to be right in that others. 418 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:04,160 Speaker 1: But she also wrote things like, you know, she also 419 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:08,600 Speaker 1: questioned why she was being accused, like writing, I am innocent. 420 00:21:08,760 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 1: Why are they doing this to me? I don't know 421 00:21:12,200 --> 00:21:17,760 Speaker 1: how how profound that is. If someone's just journaling a 422 00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:21,080 Speaker 1: stream of consciousness or whatever in their writing. 423 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 2: It's not like it's a detailed account of what took place. Yeah, 424 00:21:26,280 --> 00:21:29,240 Speaker 2: I am evil. Doesn't mean I did everything that you're 425 00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:30,000 Speaker 2: accusing me of. 426 00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:32,159 Speaker 1: But she said, I am evil, I did this. But 427 00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:34,679 Speaker 1: then I don't know what this is, what this is. 428 00:21:34,800 --> 00:21:37,800 Speaker 1: Maybe it's something else. Maybe she's just saying it because 429 00:21:37,800 --> 00:21:40,400 Speaker 1: of all the news headlines. 430 00:21:40,119 --> 00:21:42,600 Speaker 2: Or I did this means like I was negligent in 431 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:44,560 Speaker 2: the way I cared for them, and now I've caused 432 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:46,520 Speaker 2: all this. I mean, we don't know what it means. 433 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: So jurors were shown the diary entries with initials of 434 00:21:50,080 --> 00:21:53,679 Speaker 1: infants that have passed under her care. Text messages were 435 00:21:53,720 --> 00:21:57,320 Speaker 1: also presented in which she referenced emotional distress at work. 436 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,359 Speaker 1: You know, I don't know if text messages were She's, 437 00:22:00,520 --> 00:22:04,600 Speaker 1: you know, distressed at work, show culpability. I feel like 438 00:22:04,720 --> 00:22:08,200 Speaker 1: all of us have text messages where we're distressed at work, 439 00:22:08,359 --> 00:22:11,600 Speaker 1: so or the marriage or that. In May of twenty 440 00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:14,399 Speaker 1: twenty three, she testified in her own defense, stating she 441 00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:19,560 Speaker 1: intended no harm. She suggested environmental issues, including plumbing problems, 442 00:22:19,560 --> 00:22:23,800 Speaker 1: could have contributed to infections or complications. In June of 443 00:22:23,800 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, prosecutors delivered closing arguments alleging deliberate and 444 00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:30,040 Speaker 1: repeated harm. 445 00:22:31,040 --> 00:22:31,119 Speaker 2: So. 446 00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:33,720 Speaker 1: Then in August of twenty twenty three, this is August 447 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:36,600 Speaker 1: eighteenth of twenty twenty three, Lucy Leppie was found guilty 448 00:22:36,720 --> 00:22:39,800 Speaker 1: following a ten month trial. She was convicted in the 449 00:22:39,880 --> 00:22:43,720 Speaker 1: murders of seven infants and the attempted murders of six others. 450 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:51,560 Speaker 2: Obviously, the children that died collapsed right clearly, Like there's 451 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:54,439 Speaker 2: evidence that there's a death, but the attempted murders you 452 00:22:54,520 --> 00:22:56,399 Speaker 2: just said, there's no cameras and things of it. Like 453 00:22:56,440 --> 00:23:00,480 Speaker 2: how did they attribute attempted? Like where's the records to 454 00:23:00,640 --> 00:23:03,359 Speaker 2: show that there was an attempted murder on these six? 455 00:23:04,200 --> 00:23:05,879 Speaker 1: I don't know other than they have records of the 456 00:23:05,880 --> 00:23:11,159 Speaker 1: baby maybe being on on colapsing but collapsing, But I 457 00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:14,320 Speaker 1: get to me, maybe collapsing isn'tdying. Maybe it's just like decline. 458 00:23:13,920 --> 00:23:17,880 Speaker 2: Like some illness or some urgency that was addressed, and. 459 00:23:17,760 --> 00:23:21,439 Speaker 1: Now they'reuscitated, I think because those babies were able to 460 00:23:21,440 --> 00:23:24,680 Speaker 1: be resuscitated. And then but they're accusing. 461 00:23:24,800 --> 00:23:27,919 Speaker 2: How why Okay, if they were resuscitated, why do they 462 00:23:27,960 --> 00:23:30,560 Speaker 2: need to be like, what, what are the details of 463 00:23:30,600 --> 00:23:32,959 Speaker 2: what happened to get to that point? And then now 464 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:35,560 Speaker 2: they're going to say, oh, this baby that almost died 465 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:38,440 Speaker 2: was because of you. I don't know what's the evidence. 466 00:23:38,280 --> 00:23:41,439 Speaker 1: Because I would assume that those attempted murders had the 467 00:23:41,480 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 1: same type of facts surrounding them, like. 468 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:46,600 Speaker 2: She was on the clock, that she was there, none. 469 00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 1: Of that, you know, I don't know that they the 470 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:51,480 Speaker 1: skin was discolored, so they're going to attribute it to, 471 00:23:51,960 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 1: you know, an air embolism. 472 00:23:53,359 --> 00:23:56,240 Speaker 2: She's going to get whole life sentence for that, or 473 00:23:56,280 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 2: she would. 474 00:23:56,560 --> 00:23:58,600 Speaker 1: Have gotten a whole life sentence for the six that 475 00:23:58,640 --> 00:24:01,240 Speaker 1: they deemed that she actually did murder. 476 00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:04,400 Speaker 2: I know, but then now attempted murder is the same. 477 00:24:04,440 --> 00:24:07,359 Speaker 2: I'm just saying, this evidence doesn't look very strong to 478 00:24:07,400 --> 00:24:09,480 Speaker 2: you get fifteen life sentences. 479 00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:12,919 Speaker 1: The judge stated that the severity of the offenses warranted 480 00:24:13,040 --> 00:24:17,119 Speaker 1: lifelong imprisonment. Then in July of twenty twenty four, this 481 00:24:17,200 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 1: is following a four week retrial, she was convicted on 482 00:24:20,440 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: an additional count of attempted murder in relation to another victim. 483 00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:28,080 Speaker 1: This was child k after the jury was previously hung 484 00:24:28,200 --> 00:24:32,680 Speaker 1: on that specific incident. This resulted in an additional life sentence. 485 00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:36,560 Speaker 1: So she's serving total. She's serving a total of fifteen 486 00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:39,800 Speaker 1: whole life sentences, appeals and the aftermath. So now we'll 487 00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:42,840 Speaker 1: get to twenty twenty three to twenty twenty six. She 488 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:50,120 Speaker 1: has unsuccessfully appealed her convictions twice. They even I think 489 00:24:50,119 --> 00:24:54,480 Speaker 1: there was even the appeals court said, even if because 490 00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:57,360 Speaker 1: she because I believe her defense attorney has that new 491 00:24:57,560 --> 00:25:00,200 Speaker 1: has that panel of experts now that have all come forward. 492 00:25:00,280 --> 00:25:02,520 Speaker 1: Doctor Sue is one of them that wrote the original 493 00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:06,440 Speaker 1: paper on air embolism and infants, and they've all gone 494 00:25:06,480 --> 00:25:08,959 Speaker 1: through each case case by a case, and then they 495 00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:14,080 Speaker 1: all deemed kind of unanimously that that theyse weren't murders. 496 00:25:14,119 --> 00:25:18,840 Speaker 1: And so I think that evidence is now I guess 497 00:25:18,920 --> 00:25:21,760 Speaker 1: was used somewhat in the appeals. But then I believe 498 00:25:21,800 --> 00:25:24,399 Speaker 1: the appeals court said, even if it even if that 499 00:25:24,520 --> 00:25:26,960 Speaker 1: were true, there were other instances that had to do 500 00:25:27,040 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 1: with insulin and other things. So too much feeding. 501 00:25:30,680 --> 00:25:34,560 Speaker 2: And I know because it's it's very mysterious, Right, you 502 00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:36,080 Speaker 2: have a baby that dies, well. 503 00:25:35,960 --> 00:25:38,440 Speaker 1: We have multiple, you have lots of babies, and it's 504 00:25:38,480 --> 00:25:41,040 Speaker 1: not like there was a pattern. There was also another 505 00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 1: baby that collapse, died whatever you want to say that 506 00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:49,440 Speaker 1: they deemed had some type of liver issue, but a failure. 507 00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:52,239 Speaker 1: But they said the liver failure was because of like 508 00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:55,679 Speaker 1: posts or because of like blunt horse trauma or something 509 00:25:56,080 --> 00:25:59,560 Speaker 1: like she had abused the baby or something. So then 510 00:25:59,560 --> 00:26:01,359 Speaker 1: that's a good point that you made, because I feel 511 00:26:01,359 --> 00:26:04,800 Speaker 1: like if someone were a serial killer, we've learned that 512 00:26:04,840 --> 00:26:07,560 Speaker 1: the definition of a serial killer is because someone has 513 00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:11,400 Speaker 1: a pattern of behavior, they do the same things. 514 00:26:11,320 --> 00:26:13,520 Speaker 2: And she wants them dead. Why would she like, why 515 00:26:13,520 --> 00:26:15,720 Speaker 2: would she use like the idea of methods. 516 00:26:15,400 --> 00:26:18,760 Speaker 1: Right, like an air embolism here, too much insulin here, feeding, 517 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:23,080 Speaker 1: too much, a liver issue here. It's it is kind 518 00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:25,560 Speaker 1: of all over the board, not just like a systematic, 519 00:26:26,119 --> 00:26:28,080 Speaker 1: same type of thing every single time. 520 00:26:28,440 --> 00:26:30,199 Speaker 2: And the babies are all different too, right, There was 521 00:26:30,240 --> 00:26:33,520 Speaker 2: premature ones and there was you know, normal and the 522 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:34,480 Speaker 2: weighted one, and. 523 00:26:34,480 --> 00:26:36,240 Speaker 1: It had issues like as soon as they were born, 524 00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:39,120 Speaker 1: you know, that were already vulnerable at that point. 525 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:42,040 Speaker 2: You know, I do know that from looking over this 526 00:26:42,080 --> 00:26:45,919 Speaker 2: a little bit. That another thing, and it's circumstantial. But 527 00:26:45,960 --> 00:26:50,359 Speaker 2: another thing is the amount of babies dying in such 528 00:26:50,400 --> 00:26:53,879 Speaker 2: a short period of time that the hospital that's like 529 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:58,680 Speaker 2: not normal, like results, not normal statistics. And then when 530 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:01,280 Speaker 2: they she was put as a medical nurse or whatever hurt, 531 00:27:01,359 --> 00:27:05,119 Speaker 2: she was demoted or taken off of basically there it 532 00:27:05,240 --> 00:27:09,440 Speaker 2: dropped significantly. And I read that up to today or 533 00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:12,680 Speaker 2: at least recently, they've had twenty five hundred like babies 534 00:27:12,720 --> 00:27:16,080 Speaker 2: come through the hospital and they've had one death. 535 00:27:16,760 --> 00:27:20,199 Speaker 1: Well you know, but also did have they cleaned up 536 00:27:20,200 --> 00:27:22,960 Speaker 1: the hospital and have they put new do they have 537 00:27:23,040 --> 00:27:25,840 Speaker 1: new staff? Do they have you know. 538 00:27:26,080 --> 00:27:30,439 Speaker 2: They I know they also the hospital stopped taking in premies. 539 00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:34,840 Speaker 1: Well see that that's why when you have a conclusion, 540 00:27:34,920 --> 00:27:38,479 Speaker 1: like a very conclusive statistic where it's like, okay, well 541 00:27:38,480 --> 00:27:41,239 Speaker 1: ever since Lucy let me left right now, there's been 542 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:43,600 Speaker 1: no deaths, But then you don't explain it further. Well, 543 00:27:43,600 --> 00:27:47,359 Speaker 1: maybe there's no death because the staff is different. Maybe 544 00:27:47,359 --> 00:27:50,760 Speaker 1: they've upgraded their medical equipment, maybe. 545 00:27:50,600 --> 00:27:54,480 Speaker 2: They stopped taking in babies, maybe they stopped taking right. 546 00:27:54,800 --> 00:27:56,000 Speaker 1: Maybe it's not there anymore. 547 00:27:57,040 --> 00:28:00,760 Speaker 3: So you know, those are things that maybe someone else 548 00:28:00,840 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 3: is not there also that they are fired some doctor 549 00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:11,240 Speaker 3: right who knows? 550 00:28:12,800 --> 00:28:15,960 Speaker 1: She unsuccessfully appealed her convictions twice We talked about that, 551 00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 1: and then in February twenty twenty six, at coroner formally 552 00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:23,320 Speaker 1: open inquests into several of the infant deaths. Well, you 553 00:28:23,359 --> 00:28:25,000 Speaker 1: know what my other question is, the whole time I 554 00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:26,800 Speaker 1: was watching this documentary and the whole time I was 555 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:29,720 Speaker 1: reading these articles, why are people still giving birth in 556 00:28:29,800 --> 00:28:30,520 Speaker 1: this hospital? 557 00:28:31,600 --> 00:28:34,080 Speaker 2: Well? Do they know these? Oh you mean after it's 558 00:28:34,119 --> 00:28:36,080 Speaker 2: like publicly, I'm just saying I wouldn't. 559 00:28:36,200 --> 00:28:40,080 Speaker 1: I mean, the hospital can that neonatal unit still exists 560 00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:41,680 Speaker 1: and babies are still being born there? 561 00:28:41,720 --> 00:28:41,880 Speaker 2: What? 562 00:28:42,360 --> 00:28:42,520 Speaker 3: Well? 563 00:28:42,920 --> 00:28:44,360 Speaker 2: Because I don't know they got rid of her. 564 00:28:44,480 --> 00:28:46,760 Speaker 1: I'm just telling you, if I was brave, I'd be like, 565 00:28:46,760 --> 00:28:48,000 Speaker 1: don't we. 566 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:50,280 Speaker 2: Should look up the reviews on the hospital. 567 00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:52,880 Speaker 1: And I don't care if we have to reral and 568 00:28:52,920 --> 00:28:55,040 Speaker 1: we have to like go a longer distance, I'm not 569 00:28:55,080 --> 00:28:57,440 Speaker 1: going to that, or we have it in the bathtub 570 00:28:58,080 --> 00:29:02,480 Speaker 1: or something. Right, the case attracted widespread media attention, with 571 00:29:02,560 --> 00:29:04,560 Speaker 1: many debating if let Be is actually one of the 572 00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:08,320 Speaker 1: most prolific child serial killers in history, or if the 573 00:29:08,360 --> 00:29:11,200 Speaker 1: hospital is using her as a scapegoat. 574 00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:13,480 Speaker 2: For that too, they have bad practice. If they have 575 00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:16,880 Speaker 2: bad practices and they want to blame something other than themselves, 576 00:29:17,720 --> 00:29:19,520 Speaker 2: then they might say, Hey, this lady works a lot, 577 00:29:19,560 --> 00:29:20,400 Speaker 2: let's excuse her. 578 00:29:20,640 --> 00:29:23,120 Speaker 1: Right. So, as we were talking about. In February of 579 00:29:23,120 --> 00:29:26,480 Speaker 1: twenty twenty six, a Netflix documentary titled The Investigation of 580 00:29:26,560 --> 00:29:30,560 Speaker 1: Lucy let Be premiered, featuring arrest footage and interviews disputing 581 00:29:30,640 --> 00:29:33,680 Speaker 1: aspects of the prosecution's case. All right, I will tell 582 00:29:33,680 --> 00:29:35,040 Speaker 1: you I did as much as I could. I did 583 00:29:35,080 --> 00:29:37,160 Speaker 1: as much research as I could. I read as many 584 00:29:37,240 --> 00:29:40,360 Speaker 1: articles as I could, even got on Reddit and read 585 00:29:40,400 --> 00:29:42,800 Speaker 1: all the things that I could find on Lucy Leppie. 586 00:29:42,880 --> 00:29:44,560 Speaker 1: And it comes down to, you know what, if I'm 587 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:46,360 Speaker 1: going to have to pick a side, I'm going to 588 00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:48,480 Speaker 1: go with the safe side, where I don't think we 589 00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:50,840 Speaker 1: should give a thirty three year old woman a life 590 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:54,160 Speaker 1: sentence for the rest of her life when there isn't 591 00:29:54,160 --> 00:29:57,320 Speaker 1: a smoking gun. There's no smoking gun, and I'm sorry, 592 00:29:57,360 --> 00:29:59,000 Speaker 1: but in order to put someone in prison for the 593 00:29:59,040 --> 00:30:01,240 Speaker 1: rest of their life. I need to smoking gun. I 594 00:30:01,280 --> 00:30:04,600 Speaker 1: need video camera footage. I need her to I need 595 00:30:04,640 --> 00:30:08,160 Speaker 1: someone to show me that this woman is killing these 596 00:30:08,160 --> 00:30:12,120 Speaker 1: babies on purpose because she's sick and demented and she 597 00:30:12,240 --> 00:30:14,400 Speaker 1: deserves to stay in prison the rest of her life. 598 00:30:14,480 --> 00:30:15,200 Speaker 1: That's what I need. 599 00:30:15,320 --> 00:30:18,400 Speaker 2: You have, what's better an innocent person in jail or 600 00:30:18,800 --> 00:30:21,240 Speaker 2: you know, someone that's guilty on the streets. 601 00:30:21,680 --> 00:30:24,800 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm going to err on. I would feel 602 00:30:24,800 --> 00:30:27,280 Speaker 1: more comfortable with her on the streets, just not working 603 00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:30,240 Speaker 1: with babies, Like maybe she needs a different or elderly 604 00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:35,080 Speaker 1: career path, something away from healthcare. But until there is 605 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:37,680 Speaker 1: something that proves to me there is some type of 606 00:30:37,720 --> 00:30:40,680 Speaker 1: smoking gun that says that I'm like convinced. 607 00:30:40,240 --> 00:30:43,040 Speaker 2: That she did think about the letter, the notes or 608 00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:46,040 Speaker 2: diaries that she wrote where I'm not good enough, I'll 609 00:30:46,040 --> 00:30:49,200 Speaker 2: never marry, I'll never have children. Always did it? I mean, well, yeah, 610 00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:52,040 Speaker 2: all those things. Well, let's assume she's not guilty for 611 00:30:52,120 --> 00:30:55,560 Speaker 2: purposes of my points. Okay, so she's writing in her journal, 612 00:30:55,760 --> 00:30:59,600 Speaker 2: I you know, I'm she's depressed, right, I'll never marry, 613 00:30:59,600 --> 00:31:01,440 Speaker 2: I'm not going to have children, I'm not good enough 614 00:31:01,520 --> 00:31:03,920 Speaker 2: all these things, and then she gets thrown in jail 615 00:31:03,960 --> 00:31:06,920 Speaker 2: for life. Now, what do you think she thinks? She 616 00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:10,200 Speaker 2: thinks this is my life, like I'm worthless, I'm no good, 617 00:31:10,920 --> 00:31:13,440 Speaker 2: and then she thinks I'm just destined to kind of 618 00:31:13,440 --> 00:31:15,880 Speaker 2: have a miserable life. And it's an awful thing to think. 619 00:31:16,120 --> 00:31:18,320 Speaker 2: And I think a lot of even guilty people think 620 00:31:18,360 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 2: that because I watch sometimes a lot of court sentencing 621 00:31:20,840 --> 00:31:23,960 Speaker 2: and things like that on TV, and I always feel 622 00:31:23,960 --> 00:31:28,160 Speaker 2: that these usually kids or young people, think, well, that's 623 00:31:28,160 --> 00:31:30,120 Speaker 2: just kind of my life. I grew up in an 624 00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:34,360 Speaker 2: unfortunate situation. I have crappy parents or whatever, and whatever, 625 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:36,000 Speaker 2: I'll just go to jail and they kind of just 626 00:31:36,040 --> 00:31:38,160 Speaker 2: throw their arms in the air. And anyway, that's the 627 00:31:38,160 --> 00:31:40,160 Speaker 2: part of me that feels really bad for people sometimes. 628 00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:42,760 Speaker 1: But are you saying that you think her ramblings were 629 00:31:42,760 --> 00:31:46,400 Speaker 1: more just a stream of like just questioning, like she 630 00:31:46,560 --> 00:31:47,880 Speaker 1: was just depressed and she's just no. 631 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:52,960 Speaker 2: I was only going on the possibility if she were 632 00:31:53,160 --> 00:31:55,000 Speaker 2: to be not guilty, and she truly was just a 633 00:31:55,080 --> 00:31:57,760 Speaker 2: nurse that just couldn't save these kids and these babies 634 00:31:58,280 --> 00:32:01,000 Speaker 2: or just had bad luck with care for them. And 635 00:32:01,040 --> 00:32:03,560 Speaker 2: then She's already depressed about herself and now she gets 636 00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:08,719 Speaker 2: thrown in jail and blamed. I mean, that's that's heartbreaking. 637 00:32:08,800 --> 00:32:12,480 Speaker 1: Yeah. So let's where she's at now. So her case 638 00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:15,760 Speaker 1: is now being reviewed by the CCRC, which stands for 639 00:32:15,800 --> 00:32:19,360 Speaker 1: the Criminal Cases Review Commission, and they have the task 640 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:22,080 Speaker 1: of reviewing the expert reports that we talked about how 641 00:32:22,080 --> 00:32:27,320 Speaker 1: her defense had compiled the fourteen I believe experts, and 642 00:32:27,360 --> 00:32:30,680 Speaker 1: they drafted a report which has been submitted by her 643 00:32:30,720 --> 00:32:34,280 Speaker 1: defense team to the CCRC. So now there, I don't 644 00:32:34,280 --> 00:32:36,040 Speaker 1: know if there's a timeframe on that or I don't 645 00:32:36,040 --> 00:32:37,920 Speaker 1: know if it's like the Supreme Court where you can 646 00:32:38,280 --> 00:32:39,960 Speaker 1: they can just take all the time in the world 647 00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:41,800 Speaker 1: to decide whether they're going to pick something up and 648 00:32:41,840 --> 00:32:45,440 Speaker 1: read it and adjudicate it. But that's where her case 649 00:32:45,520 --> 00:32:49,440 Speaker 1: is now. For purposes of our discussion, I would hope 650 00:32:49,800 --> 00:32:54,320 Speaker 1: that they read it and that they give her whatever happens, 651 00:32:54,320 --> 00:32:58,560 Speaker 1: whatever the the you know, judiciary is with this. I 652 00:32:58,560 --> 00:33:00,160 Speaker 1: don't know if I think it kicks it back to 653 00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 1: the appeals court, like I think if they read it 654 00:33:02,600 --> 00:33:04,680 Speaker 1: and think, okay, this is substantive and it would make 655 00:33:04,720 --> 00:33:07,440 Speaker 1: a difference, let's kick it back to the appeals court. 656 00:33:07,480 --> 00:33:09,520 Speaker 1: Then I hope that happens because I feel like she 657 00:33:09,560 --> 00:33:11,720 Speaker 1: should have another day in court. 658 00:33:12,520 --> 00:33:16,280 Speaker 2: Ah, yeah, I don't. I everything I've looked at, which 659 00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:18,360 Speaker 2: probably wasn't as much as you, I don't see any 660 00:33:18,400 --> 00:33:23,200 Speaker 2: reason to give her all those sentencings. I don't think 661 00:33:23,240 --> 00:33:26,120 Speaker 2: she's not guilty. No excuse me. I don't think she's innocent. 662 00:33:27,520 --> 00:33:30,080 Speaker 2: I don't know that she's innocent, but I say she's 663 00:33:30,080 --> 00:33:31,320 Speaker 2: not guilty by a matter of law. 664 00:33:31,440 --> 00:33:33,160 Speaker 1: No, I agree with what you're saying. I'm not saying 665 00:33:33,360 --> 00:33:35,600 Speaker 1: that either. I'm not saying I'm convinced she's innocent. I'm 666 00:33:35,640 --> 00:33:38,040 Speaker 1: just not convinced that she's guilty and should spend the 667 00:33:38,080 --> 00:33:41,080 Speaker 1: rest of her life in prison. So that's where we're 668 00:33:41,120 --> 00:33:43,560 Speaker 1: at on Lucy let Be. I would love to know 669 00:33:43,600 --> 00:33:46,200 Speaker 1: you guys's thoughts. If you've seen the documentary on Netflix, 670 00:33:46,240 --> 00:33:48,400 Speaker 1: what are your thoughts on Lucy let Be, or if 671 00:33:48,400 --> 00:33:50,440 Speaker 1: you've read more things on the case, or if you've 672 00:33:50,440 --> 00:33:52,800 Speaker 1: been invested in it and you have more details, or if. 673 00:33:52,720 --> 00:33:55,360 Speaker 2: There's any other hospital staff members out there that kind 674 00:33:55,360 --> 00:33:58,600 Speaker 2: of have come across, like you know, situations where it's 675 00:33:58,600 --> 00:34:03,320 Speaker 2: sketchy but it's also just unfortunate medical standards and lack 676 00:34:03,360 --> 00:34:05,640 Speaker 2: of care or just mishaps, right. 677 00:34:05,480 --> 00:34:07,520 Speaker 1: So we would love to hear your thoughts, so you 678 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:10,799 Speaker 1: can let me know on Instagram. Also, guys, please be 679 00:34:10,840 --> 00:34:12,799 Speaker 1: sure to follow us at Legally Brunette and you can 680 00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:16,080 Speaker 1: listen to us anywhere you listen to podcasts, and also 681 00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:18,360 Speaker 1: be sure to tell your friends and family. We appreciate 682 00:34:18,400 --> 00:34:20,720 Speaker 1: that very much, so thank you so much for listening. 683 00:34:20,960 --> 00:34:21,279 Speaker 2: Thank you