Speaker 1: All right, so what is a few days among friends?
Speaker 1: GLADU with US eight hundred and ninety four one sean
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program? I mean,
Speaker 1: what is it three weeks now we get this whole
Speaker 1: twenty twenty crazy madness Iowa Caucus, Bernie Rising according to
Speaker 1: many others, and I guess Particus is now out. He's
Speaker 1: suspended his campaign. There is now a lot of infighting
Speaker 1: emerging among the Democrats. You got Bernie Sanders. Now volunteers
Speaker 1: are being told to zero in on the weaknesses of
Speaker 1: fellow socialist Elizabeth Warren. My personal opinion is there's not
Speaker 1: really a dime's worth of difference between the two of them.
Speaker 1: They're both radical, extreme left wing socialists that want medicare
Speaker 1: for all and would want the Green New Deal. That
Speaker 1: those are unsustainable promises. It's unsustainable for the country financially.
Speaker 1: It's something that can never ever happen. And we're having
Speaker 1: discussions as if it's a serious, you know, possibility. You
Speaker 1: don't take in ninety four trillion dollars in ten years.
Speaker 1: You don't take in fifty four trillion dollars in ten years.
Speaker 1: Those are just two programs, and so we don't have
Speaker 1: the money, and these are just you know, pie in
Speaker 1: the sky socialist promises. We have James O'Keefe today, Wow,
Speaker 1: what he did. He's got some exclusive inside the Bernie
Speaker 1: campaign field organizer talking about and he's gonna play the
Speaker 1: tapes exclusively here stating Bernie Sanders campaign, effing cities, burn
Speaker 1: will burn if Donald Trump is reelected on tape. He's
Speaker 1: got video too, stating that effing states that Stalin had
Speaker 1: reason to use gulogs, claiming the gulogs are a heck
Speaker 1: of a lot better than what the CIA has told
Speaker 1: us that they were. Oh really, I will send you
Speaker 1: to one of the gulogs. How many murdered under stal Wow?
Speaker 1: The lack of history. The greatest way to break a
Speaker 1: effing billionaire of their like privilege and their idea that
Speaker 1: they are superior. Smack, go out and break rocks for
Speaker 1: twelve hours a day. You're now a working class person.
Speaker 1: So if you're successful, they're going to send you to
Speaker 1: re education camps. They talk about that too. So I
Speaker 1: guess if you have money, they'll legalize stealing it to
Speaker 1: give it to somebody else, and then they'll send you
Speaker 1: to break up rocks all day. They had to teach
Speaker 1: you a lesson for getting rich, to teach you a
Speaker 1: lesson for being successful. How do you get successful? How
Speaker 1: do you get rich? You usually produce goods and services
Speaker 1: that people want, need and desire. If you do, unless
Speaker 1: you have family money of some kind, which is good
Speaker 1: for you. I didn't have that growing up, but good
Speaker 1: for you if you do. Makes life a little bit easier.
Speaker 1: Money equals freedom, nothing more. What is the freedom freedom
Speaker 1: to make other choices? Maybe I want to go back
Speaker 1: to school and pursue a passion over a career, and
Speaker 1: you have the money to afford it, go do it.
Speaker 1: Tax the rich, Tax the rich, tax the rich. We did,
Speaker 1: we did? Now I forbid the rich leave. They're leaving.
Speaker 1: Number one state where population is left, New York State
Speaker 1: now nearly two hundred thousand and one year alone. That's
Speaker 1: a lot of people leaving over the course of a decade.
Speaker 1: Looks like they're gonna lose congressional seats as a result
Speaker 1: of this. Uh, free speech has repercussions. There are consequences
Speaker 1: for your effing actions. You should expect a violent reaction,
Speaker 1: and you deserve a violent reaction. Is Bernie Sanders campaign
Speaker 1: I thought they were peaceful socialist I guess not the
Speaker 1: angry old man at the top of the ticket. I
Speaker 1: guess these are his supporters anyway, So they do. Is
Speaker 1: a Bernie Sanders supporting right now? I literally amna abul. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it wasn't a good day. I hope she's okay anyway.
Speaker 1: So Sanders volunteers are being told to zero win on
Speaker 1: the weaknesses of Warren, but they're basically one and the same.
Speaker 1: Also Biden and Buddha Judge. Now it's Spartacus bailing out
Speaker 1: of the race. The Iowa poll released Friday at Sanders
Speaker 1: in first place at twenty percent, Warren now trailing narrowly
Speaker 1: behind in second place seventeen percent. We were told never
Speaker 1: to go negative or contrast with other candidates. A person
Speaker 1: close to Sanders campaign told Politico Bernie would let us know,
Speaker 1: and it was okay. So if that's happening, he's aware.
Speaker 1: At a campaign appearance on Sunday, Warren responded that she
Speaker 1: was disappointed to hear that Bernie is sending his volunteers
Speaker 1: out to trash me. We all saw the impact of
Speaker 1: the factionalism in twenty sixteen. We can't have a repeat
Speaker 1: of that. I hope Bernie reconsiders and turns his campaign
Speaker 1: in a different direction. Listen, everybody could sit here and
Speaker 1: act all nice and sank them onius, but when they're
Speaker 1: in politics, let me tell you what starts to happen
Speaker 1: when it starts getting real. We're not going to run
Speaker 1: a negative campaign. Yeah, okay, when you're when it's now
Speaker 1: game time, you're gonna run a negative campaign. Why the people?
Speaker 1: Every time people are pulled, we don't like negative ads.
Speaker 1: The problem is negative ads work. That's why you get
Speaker 1: them every election season. If they didn't work, you wouldn't
Speaker 1: see them. So they're gonna run a negative and listen,
Speaker 1: even George Bush and John McCain. I don't think McCaine
Speaker 1: ever got over South Carolina in two thousand. When I
Speaker 1: mean they the Bush campaign went hard, and it's fascinating.
Speaker 1: I know some some Bush supporters or angry at Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Get a mirror, guys, because it wasn't that long ago
Speaker 1: when you needed to go there. You went there pretty
Speaker 1: in a pretty harsh way, and guess what they won.
Speaker 1: That's the way. Unfortunately, the sport, the blood sport of
Speaker 1: politics is often played. You got another thing that is
Speaker 1: emerging here is Democrats who believe Sanders is having a
Speaker 1: negative influence in twenty sixteen against Donald Trump. They're increasingly
Speaker 1: expressing worry's going to hurt the party again this time,
Speaker 1: and Democrats complaining about Sanders, some of whom have histories
Speaker 1: with Hillary Clinton's campaign, argue the rhetoric that he's using
Speaker 1: in some cases goes too far and damaging his rivals,
Speaker 1: and they say it's going to make it harder for
Speaker 1: the party to unify around a nominee. And they're particularly
Speaker 1: worried that supporters of Sanders won't back any nominee who
Speaker 1: isn't the favorite kendidate. He needs to stop set a
Speaker 1: Democratic strategist. Oh look at this crazy Martin she and
Speaker 1: his back and policy. He's now endorsed Elizabeth Warren. What's
Speaker 1: not the like? She's a beautiful lady. Sanders camp released
Speaker 1: an archive video of Joe Biden praising the Bold Leader
Speaker 1: George Bush nine months ago. I voted with Mike colleagues
Speaker 1: to give the President of the United States of America
Speaker 1: the authority to use force, and I would vote that
Speaker 1: way again today. It was a right vote then and
Speaker 1: to be a correct vote today. Whoops, because he's been
Speaker 1: out there saying he didn't support that vote at that time.
Speaker 1: Miranda Divine has a piece in the New York Post
Speaker 1: today Bernie Sanders seems to be winning the battle for
Speaker 1: progressive hearts and minds. Elizabeth Warren sinking like a stone again.
Speaker 1: It's twenty seventeen there, and the great moderate Hope who's
Speaker 1: not moderates Joe quid pro quote Joe is only a
Speaker 1: fifteen percent. So nothing else happening there. Our friend Peter Schweitzer,
Speaker 1: I have learned, has his new book coming out one
Speaker 1: week from tomorrow. He will launch it, I guess one
Speaker 1: week from today on this show. And it's Profiles in
Speaker 1: Corruption on the cover, it's got all of the Democratic candidates,
Speaker 1: and it hit number one on Amazon ten days before
Speaker 1: the release. You know why, Look how ahead of the
Speaker 1: curve he was on so many other occasions. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of really good work. He was the
Speaker 1: first one to discover the Clinton Foundation, Barissma Holdings, etc.
Speaker 1: Trump has now taken notice of the crazy Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: rising in the polls. He tweeted out, Wow, crazy Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders surging in the polls, looking very good against his opponents,
Speaker 1: and to do Nothing party. So what does it all mean?
Speaker 1: Stay tuned? Ill to stay tuned me all that means,
Speaker 1: stay tuned and we'll find out. Obama's campaign manager, Jim
Speaker 1: Messina remember him, he managed Obama's twenty twelve campaign, revealed
Speaker 1: in an interview over the weekend that Sanders winning the
Speaker 1: Democratic nomination would be welcome news for Donald Trump. Michael
Speaker 1: Bloomberg is apparently a Breitbart article. He's willing to spend
Speaker 1: all of his money to get rid of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Every cent that he has is going towards ousting President Trump.
Speaker 1: So they're gonna try and buy his way into the
Speaker 1: White House. Number one priorities to get rid of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm spending all my money to get rid of Trump.
Speaker 1: You want me to spend more or less? End of story.
Speaker 1: One of the reasons I'm confident I could beat Trump.
Speaker 1: I would be an acceptable moderate. He's not a moderate,
Speaker 1: He's a hardcore left winger. Hillary Clinton senior age Jen
Speaker 1: pell Mary congratulated Bernie Sanders on momentous lead and gold
Speaker 1: standard Iowa Pole. Bloomberg admitting his strategy strategy of screwing
Speaker 1: Democrats while trying to beat Trump. He's got himself I
Speaker 1: guess I meet too problem with his company because I
Speaker 1: guess they paid out all those money to individuals and
Speaker 1: he doesn't want to release them from the non disclosure agreements.
Speaker 1: But on the other hand, if you make a deal,
Speaker 1: here's money, but you keep it competent, that's kind of
Speaker 1: rock solid deal. I know everyone wants those to go away,
Speaker 1: but if you sign it, you take the money. I
Speaker 1: guess you can give the money back or make a
Speaker 1: new deal. That would be one way. And we have
Speaker 1: a comedian promising oral sex to anyone who votes for
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders. I thought that'd be called bribery. Thought that
Speaker 1: was illegal in the United States. Apparently not, you know,
Speaker 1: but it's Look, it doesn't matter because at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, look at where we are as a country.
Speaker 1: I saw that the Council of Economic Advisors put out
Speaker 1: an impact of the Trump labor market on historically disadvantaged Americans.
Speaker 1: Why is the president doing now so well with African
Speaker 1: Americans thirty four and a half percent in one poll,
Speaker 1: thirty four percent, another thirty three, and another twenty eight
Speaker 1: and another. He only at eight percent back in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: But if you look at they actually have the numbers,
Speaker 1: and they're comparing it with Trump over Obama in terms
Speaker 1: of the percentage, especially people workers, they're doing better than managers,
Speaker 1: no bachelor's degree, people that are doing blue collar work.
Speaker 1: In terms of percentage growth and earnings, they are doing better.
Speaker 1: If you look at the bottom ten percent, they're doing
Speaker 1: better than the top ten percent by a significant amount
Speaker 1: under Trump policies versus Obama. If you look at demographic breakdowns,
Speaker 1: African Americans are doing almost twice as good. Say, then
Speaker 1: you look at the change in real net worth in
Speaker 1: the first eleven quarters of the Trump years, and what
Speaker 1: do you see. You see that, You know, the change
Speaker 1: in real net worth. The people that are doing the
Speaker 1: best are doing better under Trump, not Obama, because under
Speaker 1: Obama they were down sixty four percent. The bottom fifty
Speaker 1: percent they're now up forty seven percent, and the top
Speaker 1: one percent are only up thirteen percent. If you look
Speaker 1: at the yearly growth and net worth of bottom half
Speaker 1: without recessions, under Trump, it's a whopping fifteen percent, up
Speaker 1: seventy six percent of the increases due to housing. If
Speaker 1: you look under the Obama the top one percent, you
Speaker 1: know it barely showed up. It was a negative number
Speaker 1: under the Obama Biden plan. If you look at change
Speaker 1: in the share of net worth, well, okay, if you
Speaker 1: look at the top one percent, it actually went down
Speaker 1: under Trump, but the bottom fifty percent of wage earners
Speaker 1: went up almost point four percent under Donald Trump. You
Speaker 1: look at contraction versus expansion of the working of the
Speaker 1: age force. You look at predicted versus actual new jobs.
Speaker 1: They only predicted one point nine in terms of millions.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump gave us seven point one million new jobs.
Speaker 1: Self sufficiency is rising over government dependence. We lost more
Speaker 1: people millions now out of off of food stamps, out
Speaker 1: of poverty. You look at enhancing self sufficiency over government dependence.
Speaker 1: That's all happening as well. About eleven percent of Americans
Speaker 1: living an opportunity zone home values of risomort and opportunity
Speaker 1: zones than elsewhere, generating twenty five million. I mean, these
Speaker 1: are real people, real lives, real benefit, real change, real success.
Speaker 1: There's one article today. All those impeachment fantasy is not
Speaker 1: going to happen either. Very unusually, the Leader of the Senate,
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell, has signed on to a resolution to dismiss
Speaker 1: the case. To dismiss the case that in his view,
Speaker 1: may be committed to having the presentations first. Now I'm
Speaker 1: telling you that he signed on on Thursday to a
Speaker 1: resolution to dismiss the case. The dismiss dismissing is a
Speaker 1: cover up. Dismissing is a cover up. If they want
Speaker 1: to go that route again, the senators who are thinking
Speaker 1: now about voting for witnesses or not, they will have
Speaker 1: to be accountable for not having a fair Trump. They're
Speaker 1: gonna have the fair trial. The only people that have
Speaker 1: been unfair those whole time has been her. The compromise
Speaker 1: congenital liar, Adam Schiff, and Gerald Nadler, people that didn't
Speaker 1: adopt the same procedures used during the Clinton years was them.
Speaker 1: Now Democrats in the Senate and elsewhere, even in the House,
Speaker 1: they just fed up with it. They know it's dead
Speaker 1: on arrival, but we'll go through. They'll send them, They'll
Speaker 1: send their stupid impeachment articles over. They'll send their dumb
Speaker 1: managers over. I guess the compromise congenital liar will probably
Speaker 1: lead the way. I'm not sure. I agree with Steve
Speaker 1: Bannon telling Maria bart Romo that maybe the president should
Speaker 1: delay the State of the Union address. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: He's gonna get acquitted, probably pretty expeditiously. Anyway, what's the point?
Speaker 1: We have so much to follow up, by the way,
Speaker 1: on the part of a rand that we will get in.
Speaker 1: One other thing I didn't get to on Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: is it's starting to get ugly between Sanders and Warren
Speaker 1: because Sanders now is out there denying a CNN report
Speaker 1: that allegedly he told Elizabeth Warren that a woman can't
Speaker 1: win the White House anyway. They reported today The remark
Speaker 1: came during a meeting in Warren's apartment in late twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: during which the candidates discussed their presidential ambitions and Warren
Speaker 1: told Sanders she would make a robust argument about the
Speaker 1: economy and earned broad support from female voters. Sanders responded
Speaker 1: he didn't believe a woman could win the presidency. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure if I believe this or not. Why did
Speaker 1: it just come out now? That was twenty eighteen. Oh,
Speaker 1: Nicholas Sandman's attorney is announced that they got a big
Speaker 1: dollars settlement recently now they've announced another lawsuit against well
Speaker 1: a CNN host by nine, tell you next who it is?
Speaker 1: All right? So fake News CNN and twenty five to
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. They ended up paying a
Speaker 1: it's an undisclosed amount. They were sued per two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty million dollars. Lynn Wood main attorney now after
Speaker 1: nearly a year former CNN host Rasa Aslan that person
Speaker 1: was involved in some other controversies anyway, how to tweet
Speaker 1: up the whole time referring to Nicholas Sandman's punchable face
Speaker 1: doesn't mean the team is willing to let bygones be bygones,
Speaker 1: his attorney. Sandman's attorney said Monday that mister Aslon is
Speaker 1: now is a top target of the team's legal team,
Speaker 1: which is already filed defamation lawsuits against NBC Universal, the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. They reached their first settlement last week with
Speaker 1: Baked News CNN. All I can say is Nicholas Sandman
Speaker 1: has not yet initiated legal action against this particular host,
Speaker 1: and he's one of our top individual non corporate targets.
Speaker 1: According to the email of the attorney, it is likely
Speaker 1: we will bring suit in time. Sam Man's attorney total
Speaker 1: federal judge last week they planned to file lawsuits against
Speaker 1: as many as a dozen potential defendants in the next
Speaker 1: thirty to sixty days anyway. So the CNN host of Believer,
Speaker 1: a series that was canceled, tweeted January Worry nineteenth, twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: honest question, have you ever seen a more punchable face
Speaker 1: than this kid's? Kids? Sixteen years old? Really? Kids sixteen?
Speaker 1: It's not like Hunter Biden's forty nine. Who is the father? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's not the same thing. The tweet showed a picture
Speaker 1: of the standoff with Nicholas and this Native American activist,
Speaker 1: Nathan Phillips. They finally removed it last week. I guess
Speaker 1: they heard they were being sued. Maybe we should take
Speaker 1: down that tweet. I would love to know how much
Speaker 1: fake news CNN paid, I think, and I have no knowledge.
Speaker 1: There's a total guess guarantee you it's over a hundred
Speaker 1: guaranteed because they were dead, they were done. They went
Speaker 1: so deep, so heavy into smearing this kid. I just
Speaker 1: I think there's no way. What about the people that
Speaker 1: threatened physical harm? You know, you could say that's a
Speaker 1: terroristic threat. I mean there are you can't say, pretty
Speaker 1: pretty harsh, disgusting language from a grown adult against a child.
Speaker 1: Where is the action against her? Where is it. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I mean, I don't. I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: understand why there is. I guess their hatred is such
Speaker 1: that they just feel justified in doing this. I don't know.
Speaker 1: By the way, a Bloomberg rally plans to buy the
Speaker 1: temoc right at the nomination, but he can't. I guess
Speaker 1: by supporters only had forty five people turn out for
Speaker 1: a rally over the weekend with Judge Judy. Judge Judy.
Speaker 1: I don't know why. Why is Judge Judy? There must
Speaker 1: be friends, I don't know in Texas, Unlike everyone else
Speaker 1: in this race, I think what's important is beating Donald Trump. Okay,
Speaker 1: there's your whole campaign. Beat Donald Trump. Uh no, thanks,
Speaker 1: you got a red hot labor market benefiting American workers
Speaker 1: use six unemployment rate all time low. The president now
Speaker 1: scoring big with another ruling as terms of the moneys
Speaker 1: for the wall, the reallocated funds from the Defense Department
Speaker 1: are now his. And so we begin the economy off
Speaker 1: not only one hundred and forty five thousand new jobs,
Speaker 1: seven million fewer Americans on food stamps, nearly eight million
Speaker 1: new jobs created, and just the time he has been president.
Speaker 1: But this is the lowest rate ever recorded in history,
Speaker 1: the use sixth number. And then you have record low
Speaker 1: unemployment for every demographic group. And then you get who's
Speaker 1: getting the better part of the raises well by curbing
Speaker 1: illegal immigration. That would be a lot of blue collar
Speaker 1: people are seeing the best economy they've ever seen in
Speaker 1: their life. You know, seven nearly eight million new jobs
Speaker 1: since the president's elected. You got now the lowest use
Speaker 1: sixth rate ever, the lowest unemployment level in fifty years.
Speaker 1: The booming economy just defying everyone's produce fiction a doom
Speaker 1: and gloom. Prior to the twenty sixteen election, the CBO
Speaker 1: had projected the unemployment rate at this time would be
Speaker 1: a point and a half higher. American workers now coming
Speaker 1: off the sidelines, and they're coming back and they're lifting
Speaker 1: up all Americans. Wage growth for workers now outpaces wage
Speaker 1: growth for managers. Wage growth for those who have a
Speaker 1: four year degree now outpaces wage growth for those with
Speaker 1: a four year degree. While workers in the tenth percentile
Speaker 1: of income distribution are now seeing faster wage growth than
Speaker 1: individuals in the ninety percentile, the ninetieth percentile, average wages
Speaker 1: growth for African Americans now outpace that for white Americans.
Speaker 1: If you're looking demographically. December's job report, the trend continues.
Speaker 1: The seventeenth consecutive month workers have seen wage growth at
Speaker 1: three percent or higher. It's great for the American people.
Speaker 1: Bad news for the Democrats of the media mob, but
Speaker 1: great news for the American people. And it's just unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Give you a quick outline on the impeachment. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: they know their impeachment articles are so weak. They're looking
Speaker 1: for new impeachment articles before they even hand over the
Speaker 1: first impeachment articles because we apparently now the House Intel
Speaker 1: is considering subpoena, and he putting out a subpoena for
Speaker 1: John Bolton. They never never thought that John Bolton's not
Speaker 1: gonna say what they're assuming that they think that he
Speaker 1: might say. Anyone ever think that now? I always liked
Speaker 1: John Bolton. I wanted him to get that job. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Apparently conflicts with individuals. I know nothing about it.
Speaker 1: But so Pelosi loses gives upholding articles of impeachment. Democrats
Speaker 1: are now privately complaining that this was a total disaster
Speaker 1: and a failed strategy. That was in the Daily Caller.
Speaker 1: They have one Washington post Congressional reporter Rachel bad saying
Speaker 1: that Democrats are privately saying the Nancy Pelosi's decision was
Speaker 1: a failed strategy. Not sending over the impeachment articles. Now
Speaker 1: what they're going to start a whole new level of
Speaker 1: impeachment now to stop twenty four hour a day impeachment.
Speaker 1: We'll have an impeachment channel on the air by the
Speaker 1: time this is all said and done. I mean, she
Speaker 1: claimed that there would be no impeachment without bipartisan public support.
Speaker 1: That didn't happen. You know, the fact is, if there's
Speaker 1: grounds for impeachment of Trump, and I'm not seeking those grounds,
Speaker 1: she said that would have to be so clearly bipartisan.
Speaker 1: That's what she originally told us. Blosie began the impeachment.
Speaker 1: Remember she announced it before even hearing about the transcript.
Speaker 1: I guess she had a conversation with Schiff because now
Speaker 1: we know he's compromised and his office is compromised with
Speaker 1: the non whistle blower here say whistle blower. Anyway, she
Speaker 1: announced the beginning of the impeachment process at a press
Speaker 1: conference before the transcript with Zelinski and the President ever
Speaker 1: went out. There's only one fact witness in this case.
Speaker 1: I keep going back to u US senators don't do
Speaker 1: the job of the House. Constitutionally, they have the sole
Speaker 1: power to impeach. They've impeached. Now, let them bring their
Speaker 1: articles over and their little cherrywood box and lay it
Speaker 1: before the almighty Senate and Chief Justice John Roberts presiding,
Speaker 1: and let them make their case, because we know there's
Speaker 1: only one fact witness that they had. Now the fact
Speaker 1: that they decided not to call witnesses, maybe they didn't
Speaker 1: think they needed other witnesses. It's not your job to
Speaker 1: do the job of impeaching the president and making a
Speaker 1: better case if you think one can be made. Your
Speaker 1: job is to sit there and you're the jurors, and
Speaker 1: then listen to the case that they're going to present
Speaker 1: to you, and then when they're done, call the role
Speaker 1: and this madness for this period of time ends. I'm
Speaker 1: sure there'll be more conspiracies, more lies, more attempts to
Speaker 1: undo an election. God only knows what we will have seeing.
Speaker 1: You know, as we get you ten days before the election,
Speaker 1: we're two ninety five days away. I wonder if it's
Speaker 1: five days away, tune them for the news that day.
Speaker 1: I assume something big and huge and breaking, and it's
Speaker 1: gonna happen if your electim is we're going to impeach
Speaker 1: him tomorrow. I mean, it's all you need to know.
Speaker 1: It's been it's been one failure after another, and it's
Speaker 1: just been based on an irrational hatred of all things
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. It is. There's nothing here. There never has
Speaker 1: been anything here. It was they thought they had it
Speaker 1: with Trump Russia collusion, and then four separate investigations found nothing,
Speaker 1: including the Mulla Report. And to get to where they are,
Speaker 1: they have to accept that there was Russian interference in
Speaker 1: our election when Hillary paid for a dirty Russian dassier.
Speaker 1: They never once wanted to look into that. They never
Speaker 1: once cared that the illegal server was hacked by numerous
Speaker 1: other countries that didn't seem to bother them at all.
Speaker 1: They care so much about Ukraine and quid and pros
Speaker 1: and quote, but they just act like Biden bragging, you're
Speaker 1: not getting a billion unless you fired the prosecutor that's
Speaker 1: investigating my zero experience son as being paid millions. You
Speaker 1: have to have zero common sense, intellectual honesty reason to
Speaker 1: find yourself in that position. But that's where they take us.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing with you know, look at what
Speaker 1: has happened with Iran. Now, we had some very interesting
Speaker 1: developments over the weekend, and look, I'm for a regime
Speaker 1: change in Iran, but not us doing it. If people,
Speaker 1: the people of irand if they want regime change, which
Speaker 1: would be in their best interest, they're gonna have to
Speaker 1: be the ones that do it at some point, if
Speaker 1: we can help them with because it's kind of hard
Speaker 1: to win a revolution with a slingshot or Molotov cocktail
Speaker 1: or whatever. You know, what else can you use a rock?
Speaker 1: I mean, I watch all these protest You're not gonna
Speaker 1: win a revolution with that. So at some point might
Speaker 1: be good nations of the world that would assist a
Speaker 1: serious resistance within Iran. But we're not putting boots on
Speaker 1: the ground. We're not about regime change. That's up to
Speaker 1: the people of Iran. We're just not going to allow
Speaker 1: the Iranians to get nuclear weapons because with their sick, ugly, twisted,
Speaker 1: evil ideology, that then puts the entire world in jeopardy.
Speaker 1: So Pelosi and the Democrats, they didn't have one good
Speaker 1: thing to say about all the protests out there this weekend.
Speaker 1: And every major Iranian city. Hundreds of protesters in Iran
Speaker 1: refusing to trample US and Isralli flags, denouncing anyone who did,
Speaker 1: as rallies were continuing against the regime for the doubting
Speaker 1: of the Ukrainian passenger flight that killed one hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy six souls on board. You have videos and reports
Speaker 1: emerging all over the place showing the crowds deliberately walking
Speaker 1: around the edges of flags painted on the pavement of
Speaker 1: University of Tehran. Those who did walk across the stars
Speaker 1: and stripes and star at David were immediately pointed at
Speaker 1: and booed the crowd chanting shame on you, and many
Speaker 1: of the protesters shouted our enemy is Iran, not America.
Speaker 1: All these democrats that hated Trump for doing for showing
Speaker 1: enormous restraint after drones were taken down and tankers were
Speaker 1: taken hostage and the Saudis were being hitting to disrupt
Speaker 1: the free flow of oil at market prices, You're killing American.
Speaker 1: The line in the sand was drawn, and the Iranians
Speaker 1: looks like either they're really bad shots or missed on purpose.
Speaker 1: I don't know what they were thinking, but no American
Speaker 1: was killed. The President gives them an off ramp. They
Speaker 1: appear to be taking it forty eight hours. You know,
Speaker 1: Democrats livid the Trump had led us to the brink
Speaker 1: of World War three with the taking out of their
Speaker 1: top general. Well, where's the outrage over the shooting down
Speaker 1: of the Ukrainian Airlines flight Solomani is dead? Is a
Speaker 1: good thing. Can't find anybody but Joe Lieberman willing to
Speaker 1: say it. That's pretty pathetic. And the president's approval rating,
Speaker 1: by the way, has gone through the roof as a
Speaker 1: result of him taking the sissive action and keeping to
Speaker 1: his promise not to go about protracted, long conflicts showing
Speaker 1: enormous patients. Donald Trump was justified. It's a good thing
Speaker 1: they did it. How do you ignore all the Iranian
Speaker 1: protesting that's going on there now? I don't know did
Speaker 1: anyone pay attention that you have Iran? They only have
Speaker 1: one female Olympic medalist, and she got a bronze medal
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, first medal ever for a woman out
Speaker 1: of Iran. She's now defected out of the country anyway.
Speaker 1: She's a taekwondo champion and she won a bronze medal
Speaker 1: in the Real Olympics in twenty sixteen, attacked the hypocrisy
Speaker 1: lies an injustice of her homeland as she revealed she's
Speaker 1: fled to Europe on one of the millions of oppressed
Speaker 1: women in Iran, whom they've been playing for years, she
Speaker 1: wrote in an Instagram post, accusing Iranian officials of sexism
Speaker 1: and other mystery. What we've been telling you about this forever.
Speaker 1: Women can't drive, women are told can only leave the
Speaker 1: country with permission of a mail. You know, you see
Speaker 1: women stone to death, You see gaze and lesbians thrown
Speaker 1: off roofs and killed and murdered just for being who
Speaker 1: they are. And God forbid you say anything against the
Speaker 1: mullas you're done. That's not gonna work good for you either.
Speaker 1: Now covering for Iran, now what do we have. We
Speaker 1: have the Democratic Party, the liberal elite media. You would
Speaker 1: think that that would be a big enough story, I
Speaker 1: guess apparently not for them. You got, you know, so
Speaker 1: much happening in the world, and this is where their
Speaker 1: minds rit. So what's gonna probably happen this week? What
Speaker 1: we're gonna see is the Democrats eventually are gonna vote.
Speaker 1: They're gonna send the articles over, and I think the
Speaker 1: Senate trial begins immediately, and I think they're going to
Speaker 1: adopt the same rules they had for the Clinton impeachment,
Speaker 1: and that is house managers make their case if there's
Speaker 1: a need for clarification. I guess of the witnesses they had,
Speaker 1: they'll bring them in and then it will be there'll
Speaker 1: be an acquittal. It's really going to be that simple,
Speaker 1: really simple. Eight hundred ninety four one shown. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program purified, and
Speaker 1: I quote here, the story that we have millions or
Speaker 1: hundreds of millions of dossiers on people is completely false.
Speaker 1: The reason I'm asking the question is, having served on
Speaker 1: the committee now for a dozen years, I don't really
Speaker 1: know what a dossier is in this context. So what
Speaker 1: I wanted to see is if you could give me
Speaker 1: a yes or no answer to the question, does the
Speaker 1: NSA collect any type of data at all on millions
Speaker 1: or hundreds of millions of Americans? No, sir, it does not,
Speaker 1: not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect,
Speaker 1: but not wittingly. The way we operate in the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice, if we're going to accuse somebody of wrongdoing.
Speaker 1: We have to have admissible evidence and credible witnesses. We
Speaker 1: need prepared to prove our case in court, and we
Speaker 1: have to fix our signature to the charging document. That's
Speaker 1: something that not everybody appreciates. Now, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: talk about FISA applications, and many people that I see
Speaker 1: talking about it seem not to recognize what a FIES applicat.
Speaker 1: FIES application is actually a warrant, just like a search warrant.
Speaker 1: In order to get a FISA search warrant, you need
Speaker 1: an affidavit signed by a career federal law enforcement officer
Speaker 1: who swears that the information in the affidavit is true
Speaker 1: and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Speaker 1: And that's the way we operate. And if it's wrong
Speaker 1: sometimes it is. If you find out there's anything incorrect
Speaker 1: in there, that person is going to face consequences, all right,
Speaker 1: So whereas the consequences, one must asked, shouldn't we anyway?
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine four one Shawnee want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Clapper testifying to Ron Widen
Speaker 1: that NSA is not collecting data on millions of Americans wittingly, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't believe that either, saying there are cases where
Speaker 1: it could happen inadvertently on purpose. Anyway, Now we have
Speaker 1: this new case. It has been brought by Cheryl Atkins,
Speaker 1: an author of two New York Times bestsellers, formerly of
Speaker 1: CBS News The Smear, How Shady Political Operatives, fake news
Speaker 1: controls what you see, what you think, and how you're
Speaker 1: going to vote, and Stonewald. She's the host of her
Speaker 1: own investigative reporting show on Sunday mornings on. It's a
Speaker 1: national program. It's called The Full Measure with Cheryl Atkinson,
Speaker 1: and it focus is on the investigative and accountability of reporting.
Speaker 1: You know, one thing I could tell you, Cheryl, and
Speaker 1: it's not like a point of bragging. It's frankly pathetic.
Speaker 1: You know, for three plus years now, the media's lied
Speaker 1: to the American people over and over again. They spew lie,
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories, and they show no little critical thinking. If
Speaker 1: any ever knee jerk hate Trump, whatever one person reports,
Speaker 1: we won't confirm it. We'll just go with it anyway.
Speaker 1: And with this failure now they double down with the
Speaker 1: greatest hypocrisy over Ukraine, because if they really cared about
Speaker 1: Ukraine and quit and pros and quoes. Then they'd care
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden bragging on tape that he withheld a
Speaker 1: billion US tax dollars unless they fired the prosecutor investigating
Speaker 1: his zero experience son. It was being paid millions. So
Speaker 1: there's no greater double standard, is there. I completely agree
Speaker 1: with you on that. I think you've laid its fourth
Speaker 1: very well, and I think that's what shows the power
Speaker 1: of the narrative. Things that are on narratives A lot
Speaker 1: of times reporters in the media will jump on it
Speaker 1: and spend it and twist it. But things that are
Speaker 1: true but often narrative, become buried or hidden or not
Speaker 1: discussed at all. So you have this lawsuit out now,
Speaker 1: and it's Cheryl Thompson Atkinson, James Howard Atkinson, Sarah Juda's
Speaker 1: Star Atkinson plaintiffs against Rod Rosenstein and including the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice. And then you go on versus a number
Speaker 1: of other people that you mentioned. Tell it. We know,
Speaker 1: for example, former government agent admits that they illegally spied
Speaker 1: on you. Correct. Yes, So we now have an addition
Speaker 1: to the irrefutable forensic evidence which we've had for five
Speaker 1: plus years, we also have someone confessing to the crime,
Speaker 1: and of course the hard part. I hate to sound cynical,
Speaker 1: but I used to think all you needed was truth,
Speaker 1: the government intruded on you, and someone would be held accountable.
Speaker 1: Will we quickly learn that's not the case when it's
Speaker 1: the government who decides what to do and they've chosen
Speaker 1: to do nothing about this. Now we even have someone
Speaker 1: practically in handcuffs presenting themselves saying I did it. And
Speaker 1: the question is if Department of Justice still does want
Speaker 1: to hear it or won't do anything about holding its
Speaker 1: sound accountable. It still just sits out there, you know.
Speaker 1: I look at this, for example, and I'm reading the
Speaker 1: complaint and I'm looking at item six. Shortly thereafter, in
Speaker 1: January twenty thirteen, I met miss Atkinson for the purpose
Speaker 1: of returning her computer and discussing the findings of the
Speaker 1: confidential analysis. I personally advised Miss Atkinson at the time
Speaker 1: that I and my associates involved were quite shocked at
Speaker 1: what we found and that we felt what was transpiring
Speaker 1: and had transpired was outrageous. I personally could not imagine
Speaker 1: that something like this could ever happen in the United
Speaker 1: States of America, so I advised Miss Atkinson point seven,
Speaker 1: and during the course of the conversation, I advised Miss
Speaker 1: Atkinson that the internal investigation and analysis of her computer
Speaker 1: yielded clear evidence that the computer was infiltrated by a
Speaker 1: sophisticated person or entity that used commercial, non attributable spyware
Speaker 1: that was proprietary to only government agencies including the CIA, FBI, NSA,
Speaker 1: and the particular intrusion entered the computer silently was attached
Speaker 1: to an otherwise innocuous the email that Miss Atkinson likely
Speaker 1: received and opened sometime in February of twenty twelve, and
Speaker 1: the analysis likewise revealed that the intrusion was redone in
Speaker 1: July of twenty twelve through a satellite terminal, and the
Speaker 1: intrusion was refreshed at a later time using a Wi
Speaker 1: Fi or ritz Carlton and the uninvited programs were running
Speaker 1: constantly on the laptop and including a keystroke program that
Speaker 1: monitored every single thing typed on the computer, visited online,
Speaker 1: viewed on the screen. When the intruder had full access
Speaker 1: to email, including Miss Atkinson's CBS work account, the intruder
Speaker 1: was likewise able to access Miss Atkinson and her family's
Speaker 1: passwords and all their financial accounts and information. I informed
Speaker 1: Miss Atkinson that she should assume that her smartphones are
Speaker 1: also impacted, and the analysis also revealed that the intruder
Speaker 1: access miss Atkinson's Skype account, stole the password, activated the audio,
Speaker 1: and made very heavy use of both, presumably listening tool when,
Speaker 1: according to the evidence, the intrusion stopped abruptly about the
Speaker 1: time that Miss Atkinson noted that our computers stopped self
Speaker 1: starting at night. That sounds to me like your government
Speaker 1: spied pretty heavily on you. Why and how did they
Speaker 1: all get away with it? Well, let me point out
Speaker 1: quickly that affidavit that you read, it's from an attorney
Speaker 1: and a former unit chief for the SBI. That's what's
Speaker 1: so important about it. Who was the first one to
Speaker 1: reveal and identify this as a government intrusion, No doubt
Speaker 1: about that. That was years ago. We hadn't submitted the
Speaker 1: affidavit attached to a complaint until now. But you know,
Speaker 1: we know from information we've gotten since then, that they
Speaker 1: first became interested in me over the fast and furious reporting.
Speaker 1: But it wasn't just Nichean. I mean, we've keeped saying this,
Speaker 1: We talk about it I'm the least of the person
Speaker 1: that this happened to. This happened to hundreds of people
Speaker 1: out of this Baltimore unit. According to our information, led
Speaker 1: by then US Attorney Rod Rosenstein, they were allegedly surveiling
Speaker 1: not just me and other innocent US citizens and journalists
Speaker 1: and ATS agents. They were surveiling all kinds of people.
Speaker 1: So I think that's what makes it so important. It's
Speaker 1: not like they picked me and only me to do
Speaker 1: this too, because I was reporting on that. That was
Speaker 1: one reason. But I'm just one person, and I think
Speaker 1: the failure to pay due attention to this and demand
Speaker 1: accountability back then is part of the reason that opened
Speaker 1: the door for this to happen again in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: And if we continue to let the government just sweep
Speaker 1: to some of the rug, it's going to happen again.
Speaker 1: How does a judge get to release my private personal
Speaker 1: emails with an individual when I'm doing nothing wrong, which
Speaker 1: happened recently seventeen hundred of them. Well, I've learned that
Speaker 1: judges have a great deal of latitude. You know, we'd
Speaker 1: like to think you go into court, you present your
Speaker 1: evidence both sides in common sense, and the judge's wisdom determines,
Speaker 1: you know, with a jury the outcome. But what I've
Speaker 1: learned is I can't even get the proof before a jury.
Speaker 1: I can't even enter the proof to the judge. It
Speaker 1: can't get that far because Department of Justice is obstructing,
Speaker 1: and so far the court doesn't seem to want this
Speaker 1: case to go forward, so we'll never get to the
Speaker 1: proof stage. If you know, it's the judge's discretion that
Speaker 1: the case shouldn't go forward. It is amazing. Now we
Speaker 1: know what Durham and bar seem to be working at,
Speaker 1: and that would be more in the intelligence at side
Speaker 1: of Operation Crossfire Hurricane. But you know, it's my strong
Speaker 1: belief that the evidence will show. And I think if
Speaker 1: you wanted a great Hannity and My television show and
Speaker 1: the radio show and whether we were right about FAISA
Speaker 1: and everybody else was wrong about Russia Russia collusion collusion,
Speaker 1: I think we'd get pretty high grades. And I think
Speaker 1: your standards are pretty high. Is that a fair assessment? Yes,
Speaker 1: I would. I would have to say that in retrospect
Speaker 1: what you have reported and commented on as well as
Speaker 1: what I've reported, that I have nearly as many listeners
Speaker 1: and viewers as you do. But I've also had informants
Speaker 1: and I've been writing on this as well, that all
Speaker 1: has borne out is true versus all the other series,
Speaker 1: and you know, things that were supposedly happening, none of
Speaker 1: which were. So yes, I think you have a strong
Speaker 1: track record on that. Well, it's not our first rodeo
Speaker 1: we have. You know, I learned a long time ago.
Speaker 1: You know this new movie Richard Jewel is out. I
Speaker 1: haven't seen it yet, but I was. Yeah, I was
Speaker 1: in Atlanta when the story broke by the AJC that oh,
Speaker 1: he fits the full profile of the lone bomber. The
Speaker 1: security guard is not a hero. He he lives with
Speaker 1: his mother and father. And I was on the air
Speaker 1: at the time. I had no idea that Richard Jewel
Speaker 1: was listening to me. At that moment, I said, just
Speaker 1: because he lives at home doesn't mean a thing. This
Speaker 1: is the dumbest analysis. And as time went on, none
Speaker 1: of it made sense. But the media just slammed this guy.
Speaker 1: It was a huge payout to Nicolas Sandman, you know,
Speaker 1: the kid from Covington High School by fake New CNN.
Speaker 1: But one of the things I learned Richard Jeweler to
Speaker 1: serve me well, because we didn't rush the judgment with
Speaker 1: the Cambridge police or Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman or
Speaker 1: Ferguson Missouri or UVA or Duke Lacrosse or Baltimore, Maryland
Speaker 1: and Freddie Gray, and we actually vetted Obama when nobody
Speaker 1: else would in the same Now with the deep state,
Speaker 1: it's a very simple formula, as you dig for the
Speaker 1: truth and you don't rush out there with a conspiracy theory. Agreed,
Speaker 1: and I will bring up one other one. This taught
Speaker 1: me a lot as a new person in Washington at
Speaker 1: the time. I broke the story of Chinese spying on us,
Speaker 1: this W eighty eight nuclear warhead design plan and everybody
Speaker 1: else once the government leaked that Win Holy, a Chinese scientist,
Speaker 1: was a suspect, and I knew from my sources he
Speaker 1: was not. And I broke the story that the FBI
Speaker 1: lied about his polygraph, framed him, said he failed when
Speaker 1: he passed. Ultimately, after being held in solitary confinement, he
Speaker 1: was released. The judge spanked the FBI for all kinds
Speaker 1: of misconduct, but to my knowledge, nobody in the FBI
Speaker 1: got punished when Holie suit. Everybody accepts us at CBS
Speaker 1: because we had reported the facts correctly. How is it
Speaker 1: major settlements. I'm going to be talking to the brother
Speaker 1: of General Flynn, who's expected to get sentenced soon at
Speaker 1: the bottom of this half. How are how is it
Speaker 1: that we now know from the Inspector General report that
Speaker 1: James call me Lyne the lack of candor say it
Speaker 1: anyway you want. Lack of candor means you're not telling
Speaker 1: the truth. Same with McCabe. How do they lie? And
Speaker 1: we never see charges brought up against them? And Collmey
Speaker 1: was referred for criminal charges over the mishandling of the
Speaker 1: stuff he did in his anti Trump effort of government
Speaker 1: documents that the Department of Justice took a pass. Nay,
Speaker 1: they didn't think he meant any harm. And I read
Speaker 1: somewhere where in sort of an ancient Asian societal society
Speaker 1: that believes at once the society no longer believes that
Speaker 1: the powerful people are held to the same account and
Speaker 1: treated the same in the government as the least among us.
Speaker 1: The society breaks down, and I think we're getting to
Speaker 1: that point, all right. Cheryl Atkinson, thanks so much for
Speaker 1: being one of those congrats on your Sunday show. We
Speaker 1: always love you, and we're going to watch this lawsuit
Speaker 1: in this case move forward hopefully in very quick order.
Speaker 1: Let's get to our phones. Our friend Don Lake wrong
Speaker 1: Conkoma on the Sean Hannity Show. Only two hundred ninety
Speaker 1: five days, Don, what's going on? My friend? Hey? How
Speaker 1: you doing? My friends? Great to talk to you again.
Speaker 1: I guess it's still not too late to say a
Speaker 1: happy New Year to you? And happy New Year? Yep, nope,
Speaker 1: it's only January thirteenth. Do you get till January fourteenth?
Speaker 1: And then we cut it off. No more happy New
Speaker 1: Years after January fourteenth. It's great to talk to you again.
Speaker 1: Listen last winds. When Trump spoke to the nation, he was,
Speaker 1: He spoke to the Iranian people, the protesters, and the
Speaker 1: leaders there, and he told them that they have a future,
Speaker 1: a great future that they deserved, one of prosperity at home.
Speaker 1: And I was wondering at the time, how is he
Speaker 1: ever going to get that? How would they ever get
Speaker 1: that message? Being such a close society, and since for
Speaker 1: any real change to happen, it has to happen from within.
Speaker 1: I mean, how do you get the word of President
Speaker 1: Trump's support to the Iranian people who are they're sick
Speaker 1: of the twisted mindset of the Ayatot and his minions.
Speaker 1: And how do you let the Iranian government, protesters and
Speaker 1: freedom fighters know that they're on the right side. How
Speaker 1: is it possible? You got the Iranian people protesting turning
Speaker 1: pro American in huge numbers, and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: all the hate Trump, Democrats and the mob they go
Speaker 1: silent as they are now turning against the Mulas. Now, look,
Speaker 1: you never win a revolution with a sling shot or
Speaker 1: with a rock or a Molotov cocktail. It's not going
Speaker 1: to happen that way. That's right. You know. The only
Speaker 1: way that they were able to get rid of Morsey
Speaker 1: after the Arabs spring and supported by Obama. By the way,
Speaker 1: this guy once said referred to the Israelis as descendants
Speaker 1: of apes and pigs. Anyway, is you had General l
Speaker 1: CSI used the full force of the military to get
Speaker 1: rid of Morsey, and he's been in power and control
Speaker 1: ever since. And thank god he got that position. But
Speaker 1: I'll tell you I feel for the American people. We
Speaker 1: can't do a boots on the ground effort that is
Speaker 1: going to have to come from within. And when I
Speaker 1: see this, I feel for the people that don't have
Speaker 1: and are looking to get that which we take for granted,
Speaker 1: and that is liberty and freedom. And that's what's unfolding.
Speaker 1: And how happy that Solomoni's dead. The only ones that
Speaker 1: seemed to be unhappy the Democrats because oh it's it's
Speaker 1: another Trump's success. That's not good. Can't be good anyway,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one sewn. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, quick break will come back.
Speaker 1: James O'Keefe. He's done it again. We'll explain and continue
Speaker 1: on the other side in the future. When you look
Speaker 1: up the word dirty cop, if you have a fair
Speaker 1: internet and free internet, you will see the pictures of
Speaker 1: Komey and McCabe there. This is these guys make Hoover
Speaker 1: look like a saint. That I had actually never seen
Speaker 1: that clip that you displayed, But it is absolutely despicable
Speaker 1: that the head of the FBI would think it's funny
Speaker 1: and cute to send over these FBI agents to go
Speaker 1: and interview the National Security Advisor for the President of
Speaker 1: the United States, and then they walk out of there
Speaker 1: and say, look, we don't think the guy's lying, but instead,
Speaker 1: what do you do it? Doubled down? You look at
Speaker 1: this White House now, and it's hard to imagine two
Speaker 1: FBI agents sending up in the same room. How did
Speaker 1: that happen? I sent them something I probably wouldn't have
Speaker 1: done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized
Speaker 1: investigation and more organized administration in the George W. Bush administration,
Speaker 1: for example, or the Obama administration. The protocol two men
Speaker 1: that all of us have perhaps increased appreciation for over
Speaker 1: the last two years. And in both of those administrations,
Speaker 1: there was process, and so if the FBI wanted to
Speaker 1: send agents into the White House itself to interview a
Speaker 1: senior official, you would work through the White House Council
Speaker 1: and there be discussions and approvals and who would be there.
Speaker 1: And I thought, it's early enough, let's just send a
Speaker 1: couple of guys over. Yeah, let's just let's get rid
Speaker 1: of all due process. And this happened. He's bragging about
Speaker 1: doing something. That's called me bragging about doing something I'd
Speaker 1: never do, nor would I ever dare get away with
Speaker 1: in any of the other administrations, the Obama administration, the
Speaker 1: Bush administration. Now what's he bragging about doing. He's bragging
Speaker 1: about sending over his agents to interrogate General Flynn. Now
Speaker 1: where even gets worse than that they send the agents in.
Speaker 1: Flynn calls over to the deputy FBI Director McCabe and says, well,
Speaker 1: do I need my own lawyer? Is this something that
Speaker 1: I need a lawyer for? Oh? No, No, you don't
Speaker 1: need a lawyer, not at all. And then it gets
Speaker 1: worse for General Flynt. General Flynn then gets these trumped
Speaker 1: up charges and what do we find out down the
Speaker 1: road he's admitting to lying to FBI agents. The FBI
Speaker 1: agents themselves never thought he was lying. And I think
Speaker 1: we've gleaned a lot of details now from General Flynn's
Speaker 1: new attorney, Sydney Powell was saying, yeah, that's because they
Speaker 1: were threatening to put his own son in jail and
Speaker 1: go after his family. So I guess, like a good soldier,
Speaker 1: let me see, do I just take the hit from
Speaker 1: my family or and admit to something I didn't do,
Speaker 1: or do I, you know, take the hit this way
Speaker 1: get them out of any kind of jeopardy. Well, I
Speaker 1: guess the thirty three year war veteran, I guess that's
Speaker 1: what we how we brag about treating him. Joe Flynn
Speaker 1: is with us. He is the brother of General Michael Flynn,
Speaker 1: here to discuss the case for expecting. I guess any
Speaker 1: day now we're gonna have a sentencing in this case.
Speaker 1: Originally there was gonna be no sentence recommended. Now we've
Speaker 1: got zero to six months and after thirty three years
Speaker 1: serving your country to literally have your Miranda rights ripped
Speaker 1: away from you and get taken advantage of by the
Speaker 1: top two people in the FBI. And even still they'd
Speaker 1: never thought you were lying, but you have to redo
Speaker 1: a lying charge that they didn't think you did. It's
Speaker 1: pretty awful. It's a pretty horrible way to treat our military. First,
Speaker 1: Joe Flynn, welcome to the program. How's your brother doing, Sean,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for having me. You know, we're
Speaker 1: facing an upfhill battle here, Sean. We're pretty disgusted by
Speaker 1: the by the system and how it's railroaded, and particularly
Speaker 1: the vindictive prosecutors and the fact that Sydney, as you know,
Speaker 1: has asked for has really been trying to play by
Speaker 1: the by the rule book, asking for exculpatory information so
Speaker 1: that she can demonstrate that this was basically a setup
Speaker 1: and that the General was railroaded into Well, you're talking
Speaker 1: about Brady material, the words information that the government would
Speaker 1: have that they had not handed over to the defense,
Speaker 1: which by law Brady, they had to turn over. The
Speaker 1: judge in the case is saying there wasn't any Is
Speaker 1: that true? That's that's the judge was saying that that
Speaker 1: the stuff that Sydney has been asking for, which is
Speaker 1: which is very irrelevant. He basically called it irrelevant or
Speaker 1: elements of it irrelevant to this particular case, and which
Speaker 1: which you know, nothing could be further from the truth.
Speaker 1: And we were quite surprised by that. That's why we
Speaker 1: feel now we're in a situation that we have an
Speaker 1: uphill battle, and the govern and the prosecutors have become
Speaker 1: very vindictive in their recent sentencing memo asking for zero
Speaker 1: to six months when before they said no jail time.
Speaker 1: And here's a guy that that pled guilty, you know,
Speaker 1: spent ninety hours of excruciating testimony where they got nothing
Speaker 1: from him because they had nothing to get from him,
Speaker 1: but he played by their rule books, and then they
Speaker 1: still basically are screwing him, saying that's too bad. We're
Speaker 1: still going to recommend zero to six months. Did nothing.
Speaker 1: Didn't your brother have to sell his house because he
Speaker 1: ran out of money? He did? He did? He did?
Speaker 1: He had to sell his house and did it? Did he? Am?
Speaker 1: I right? Am? I analysis that the only reason he
Speaker 1: admitted the line to the FBI, because they didn't think
Speaker 1: he lied, was because they the prosecutors, were threatening to
Speaker 1: go after his son and his family, and that was
Speaker 1: definitely the main element of the reasons why. But guilty
Speaker 1: is particularly his son, because his son was in business
Speaker 1: with him when they went after him. I think he
Speaker 1: had I mean, I'll say this straight up. I think
Speaker 1: he had terrible legal counsel leading into that plea deal.
Speaker 1: I think that he could have had better counsel. And
Speaker 1: you know, you never know when you get involved with
Speaker 1: these things where you're going to get somebody, You get
Speaker 1: recommended people who are supposed to be experts, and they
Speaker 1: turned out to giving the wrong advice, and then you
Speaker 1: get into an even more difficult situation. And I would
Speaker 1: say that was the case with General Flynn. We've been
Speaker 1: very happy with Sydney Sidney, He's been fighting hard for
Speaker 1: this and I think Sean over the next couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: You should expect, everybody should expect that Sydney and Michael
Speaker 1: and General Flynn are going to fight even harder. But
Speaker 1: we're faced with an uphill battle and we don't know.
Speaker 1: Is there an opportunity where your brother can withdraw his plea.
Speaker 1: I think there is that opportunity. I'm not privy as
Speaker 1: to exactly whether that's going to happen. I'll have to
Speaker 1: leave that to Sydney, but certainly those kinds of things
Speaker 1: are options on the table. Whether whether or not it's
Speaker 1: successful or not, you know, remains to be seen. But
Speaker 1: I think you're going to see a fight. You're going
Speaker 1: to see putting everything we can on the on the
Speaker 1: line here and Sean if that doesn't happen, And you know,
Speaker 1: as as a family member, I mean I've been very personally,
Speaker 1: very involved in this for the last three years, as
Speaker 1: you know, you know, with the Legal Defense Fund, and
Speaker 1: I want to thank you and all your supporters for
Speaker 1: the support you've given us for the Legal Defense one,
Speaker 1: which we're going to continue to need. But um, what
Speaker 1: is what is the date now scheduled on whole of this?
Speaker 1: What's the time frame from here on? Yeah? So we
Speaker 1: have a sentence in date on the twenty eighth of January,
Speaker 1: Tuesday to twenty eighth at eleven o'clock and at the
Speaker 1: District Court in Washington, and again if we if we
Speaker 1: head in there and again all else fails, I'll be
Speaker 1: straightened say the family would this is this way to end?
Speaker 1: This would be a pardon from the president. Assuming we
Speaker 1: can't get we can't use the justice system to see justice,
Speaker 1: then we're going to have to go to the president
Speaker 1: and ask for pardon. I mean, one second of jail
Speaker 1: time for General Flynn is an absolute egregious disgusting. Has
Speaker 1: anybody ever reached out to the president? I would assume
Speaker 1: that probably would not be something that would happen until
Speaker 1: after it's adjudicated, correct, Yeah, And we we haven't reached
Speaker 1: out formally to the president on it. Um, but you know,
Speaker 1: the President obviously is very well aware of what's happening
Speaker 1: with this case. Um. You know, I think I can't
Speaker 1: speak for the president we have we haven't done anything
Speaker 1: official in that right, but if we have to sean
Speaker 1: myself as Michael's brother, I would absolutely do it. Well,
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people are praying for you,
Speaker 1: and your family, and I wish you all the best.
Speaker 1: I know it's been a very difficult, long, arduous battle.
Speaker 1: It's just shocking to the conscience. This is how we
Speaker 1: treat thirty three year veterans to our country. Unbelievable. Well, well,
Speaker 1: you know, Sean, I want to thank again, thank you
Speaker 1: for everything. I just want to if I can. We're
Speaker 1: still going to need support, so I'm going to let
Speaker 1: everybody know our Legal Descent Fund website, which is the
Speaker 1: Mike Flynn Defense Fund dot org. That's Mike Flynn Defense
Speaker 1: Fund dot org. We're gonna need this now more than ever. Well,
Speaker 1: I appreciate you coming on. Our many prayers are thoughts
Speaker 1: to your brother and your whole family. I know it's
Speaker 1: been very difficult for all of you, and I'm hoping
Speaker 1: the worst case scenario is they just dismissed this thing
Speaker 1: and make this nightmare go away for your family. Anyway,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean, if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, back to our phones,
Speaker 1: the swing state of Florida. Two ninety five days till
Speaker 1: election day, Doc and Florida, what's going on? Doc? How
Speaker 1: are you glad you called Sean? Hannity, you are the
Speaker 1: voice of the Republic. Man. I just wanted to thank
Speaker 1: you for what you're doing. Thank you, my friend, Amy.
Speaker 1: I am Trump's biggest African American supporter, and I convert
Speaker 1: black black folks to Trump by simply walking them past
Speaker 1: their emotions. For instance, when they talk about the booming economy,
Speaker 1: they try to give credit to Obama. I say, come,
Speaker 1: let's think about this. You remember when Obamacare kicked off,
Speaker 1: how companies had to downside employees and be like oh yeah,
Speaker 1: oh yeah yeah. And I say, think about this if
Speaker 1: you know how bad Chicago is and they're like, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's bad. The Democrats destroy Chicago, but worse, they want
Speaker 1: America to be like Camdom, New Jersey. And then I
Speaker 1: show them what Camdom, New Jersey is, how poor it is.
Speaker 1: I say, the Democrats did that to Chicago and tandem,
Speaker 1: and you want this for where you live. I walked
Speaker 1: them through, step by step, and I show them the
Speaker 1: verifiable fact to what Trump has did versus what Obama said.
Speaker 1: Because they love what Obama said until they see what
Speaker 1: Trump did and it starts making sense. I win black
Speaker 1: black voters. I'm winning them over. I'm winning them over. Sean,
Speaker 1: and I appreciate you being the voice. Let me tell
Speaker 1: you something. You know why I think the president is
Speaker 1: doing so well on the polls. They're no longer outliers.
Speaker 1: There real numbers. Eight poles president as high as thirty
Speaker 1: four and a half percent support among the African Americans.
Speaker 1: When you break things down demographically, another pole had him
Speaker 1: at thirty four, Another pole had him at thirty three,
Speaker 1: the lowest at sixteen. He only had eight percent of
Speaker 1: the African American vote in twenty sixteen. And I think
Speaker 1: one of the reasons is that the African American community
Speaker 1: was disproportionally negatively impacted by the failed policies of Obama Biden.
Speaker 1: And I think now the President has turned it around
Speaker 1: and things have moved in a positive direction. Millions of
Speaker 1: jobs created, millions off of food stamps, millions out of wealth,
Speaker 1: out of poverty. It's great. You are so ripe. And
Speaker 1: the beautiful thing is when I asked him this one question,
Speaker 1: it shocks them. I say, give me one campaign promise
Speaker 1: Obama made and kept. That shuts the whole showdown right there.
Speaker 1: And I want to say one more thing. You have
Speaker 1: the best hair in radio and TV besides coach Jimmy Johnson.
Speaker 1: I love it. Brother, You're awesome. Well, I gotta tell
Speaker 1: you something. You're a good man. When what do you
Speaker 1: do for a living. I'm just curious. I work in
Speaker 1: home healthcare, and eventually I wanted to do a Trump
Speaker 1: store because that would be my passion in life, to
Speaker 1: do a Trump store because Trump. I'll just get going.
Speaker 1: Where are you what? Tany eleven, Jacksonville, Florida. Oh, get going,
Speaker 1: Just build it up, build a mail business. Maybe we'll
Speaker 1: link to it. Sean, You're awesome. Thank you. God bless you,
Speaker 1: my friend. God bless you, my friend. Keep up the
Speaker 1: good work. Eight hundred ninety four one, Sean, our number,
Speaker 1: two hundred ninety five days. We'll be watching Michigan very closely.
Speaker 1: Linda in Michigan. We'll get to you in a second.
Speaker 1: Let's get back to our busy telephones. All right, the
Speaker 1: swing state. Two hundred and ninety five days. We will
Speaker 1: be watching the great state of Michigan closely. Linda. You're
Speaker 1: in charge of pulling out all the Trump vote for us. There.
Speaker 1: How are you? I'm good, Sean, how are you? I'm good?
Speaker 1: Thank you. I just want to say I'm such a
Speaker 1: fan and thinks to my brother from Traverse City. He
Speaker 1: introduced me to you, and we love your show. And
Speaker 1: I'm from Iraq and I'm Christian and my husband's from Iran.
Speaker 1: But he did convert to Christianity, he became Christian. We
Speaker 1: just want to say we support Trump. God bless him.
Speaker 1: God bless our military, our CIA, everything, God bless him.
Speaker 1: God bless our police officers. They're doing everything to protect us.
Speaker 1: And what he did in Iraq was the best thing
Speaker 1: ever for the whole world, not just the United States,
Speaker 1: but for the whole world. And instead of people standing
Speaker 1: up giving him, standing ovation and clapping for him, we
Speaker 1: are just sabotaging him and the real enemy Sean, it's
Speaker 1: really the Democrats in our media. That's my point. Well,
Speaker 1: they've got an agenda. I mean, they are the propaganda
Speaker 1: arm of the you know, the Democratic Party. This is
Speaker 1: state run TV. Now, there's no ambiguity, there's no doubt,
Speaker 1: there is no debate. They do all things advanced that
Speaker 1: they are one team. You got every media outlet with
Speaker 1: a few exceptions. You got talk radio exceptions. You got
Speaker 1: a few of us on Fox as exceptions to that rule.
Speaker 1: The rest of them, they are compromised, and they are corrupt,
Speaker 1: and they are agenda driven. We're not, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: stay focused on the truth for two hundred ninety five
Speaker 1: days that you won't get elsewhere. They want to impeach him,
Speaker 1: then they want to impeach him again. But if the
Speaker 1: words come out, we can now project the great state
Speaker 1: of Michigan where Linda lives has now re elected Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: forty fifth president of the United States. Well, guess what,
Speaker 1: we'll be shocking the world again. Can it happen? Absolutely?
Speaker 1: How do we make it happen? Well, you have to
Speaker 1: get up, get engaged and vote. One of the first
Speaker 1: things you need to do is make sure you get
Speaker 1: registered in time to vote. So as a helpful handy
Speaker 1: handity handy voting guide, we have put down the dates
Speaker 1: of every state when you need to register a lot
Speaker 1: of them. You've got a register by March, So you
Speaker 1: want to get your registration in now, so when November comes,
Speaker 1: you're not gonna say why can't I participate? Now's the time?
Speaker 1: Uh eight hundred nine four one. Sean, you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, We'll take a quick break.
Speaker 1: We have breaking news. James O'Keefe is at it again.
Speaker 1: What did you do? This time? We will explain on
Speaker 1: the other side Hannity nine Eastern on Fox Quick Break.
Speaker 1: Right back, we'll continue. So Trump gets reelected with cities burned?
Speaker 1: Do you think that some of these, like Megan people
Speaker 1: could even be re educated? I mean, we gotta try.
Speaker 1: We'll start in Milwaukee and then when when are you
Speaker 1: ready to be in Milwaukee? Eat all right? Project Veritas
Speaker 1: and James O'Keeffe have done it again. This is the
Speaker 1: exclusive audio. We haven't played it yet. Tomorrow the video
Speaker 1: of this will be released. What were you listening to? Oh?
Speaker 1: Part one? I always love James O'Keefe as part one,
Speaker 1: Part two, Part three, part ten, and it just because
Speaker 1: then you focus on just how bad every one thing
Speaker 1: is rather than a big video dump, and then you
Speaker 1: can absorb the insanity of all of this. Now, this
Speaker 1: is all part about Bernie twenty twenty field organizers. You
Speaker 1: know they're stating, effing cities will burn if President Trump
Speaker 1: wins reelection, praising the gulags, calling for violent action the
Speaker 1: names of the people. Kyle Jurich, Iowa, field organizer for
Speaker 1: the Bernie Sanders campaign, effing cities burn if Trump's re elected,
Speaker 1: effing cities that Stalin had a reason, a reason to
Speaker 1: you gulogs, claiming goulogs were better than what the CIA
Speaker 1: has told us. That they were saying the greatest way
Speaker 1: to break a effing billionaire of their like privilege and
Speaker 1: their idea that their superior smack go out and break
Speaker 1: rocks for twelve hours a day. Now, there, you're a
Speaker 1: working class person saying free speech has repercussions. There are
Speaker 1: consequences for your effing actions. You shouldn't expect. You should
Speaker 1: expect a violent reaction. You deserve a violent reaction. Oh,
Speaker 1: a lot of peace of love can't take out solo money.
Speaker 1: But you can say that about conservatives and the American people.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't surprise anybody though, Join now. James O'Keefe, CEO, Founder
Speaker 1: Project Veritas, how are you sing your John? Thank you
Speaker 1: for having me on. And it's the eve of another big, big,
Speaker 1: huge launch at Project Veritas, kicking off twenty twenty with
Speaker 1: a bang here on some absolutely radically crazy maybe radicals
Speaker 1: too generous, but but the talitarian violence, all types of
Speaker 1: things being exposed in this expose. Release tomorrow. Okay, so
Speaker 1: this is just a small sampling of what we got.
Speaker 1: So you obviously got in the inner workings of the
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders campaign. Uh, pretty shocking stuff. Cities blanking, cities
Speaker 1: will burn, of Trump's reelected defending the use of goulogs. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's just what's really just redoc indoctrination. I guess they
Speaker 1: want us to be good little socialist liberals like they were.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, yeah, I mean this is this is as
Speaker 1: usual with what we do. It's it's um. Uh, the
Speaker 1: content very much speaks for itself. But there's conversations here
Speaker 1: about expecting violent reactions to speech, acts of violence. Um,
Speaker 1: this is maybe the most shocking things you'll ever see
Speaker 1: in a political campaign in American history being said here
Speaker 1: by by by this employee for for Bernie Sanders. And
Speaker 1: you know this, this whole idea that cities will burn,
Speaker 1: that Milwaukee will burn. Right now, Bernie Sanders is the
Speaker 1: leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, and we kind
Speaker 1: of want to show people what these people really believe,
Speaker 1: what do they actually stand for. And maybe it doesn't
Speaker 1: shock you, Sean, but I think it shocks a lot
Speaker 1: of Americans, and they're going to probably come out and
Speaker 1: say this guy's an isolated incident. They may fire him,
Speaker 1: but you let them know at this point that you
Speaker 1: have these tapes, these videotapes. I am in the process
Speaker 1: as I'm you guys are huge supporters of our work,
Speaker 1: and you've always believed in me personally and professionally, Sean,
Speaker 1: So I'm kind of giving you guys a first a
Speaker 1: first tease, a first hint at this. But as I speak,
Speaker 1: we are actually in the process of of tracking down
Speaker 1: the various people who this man reports to getting a
Speaker 1: comment from the campaign today in lieu of tomorrow's launch.
Speaker 1: All right, so you've got video, and I know the
Speaker 1: way you work because we have highlighted your work for many,
Speaker 1: many years. And by the way, I note, you're actually
Speaker 1: a lot of people I understand now trying to work
Speaker 1: for you. I know people that have worked that listen
Speaker 1: to this program, that have reached out and gotten into
Speaker 1: contact with Project Veritas, and they want to do the
Speaker 1: dangerous work of going under cover. You usually have numerous
Speaker 1: projects going on at once, but one of your tactics, techniques,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it, is that when you
Speaker 1: have a big story, you don't give out the whole
Speaker 1: story at once. How many days of features will we
Speaker 1: be having? Is it should I book you for the
Speaker 1: whole week or just half the week? Well, I think
Speaker 1: I think we're going to do something unusual tomorrow in
Speaker 1: the sense that this guy's got says so many things
Speaker 1: of which you only have heard one or two there
Speaker 1: on the radio. Dude, this, I mean, this is you
Speaker 1: can't even write this this This guy is talking about
Speaker 1: I mean the Soviet Union, about about the net necessity
Speaker 1: for political violence, and he's paid. There's just twenty thirty
Speaker 1: minutes of content. We're going to try to do some
Speaker 1: unusual things. I don't want to say what they all are,
Speaker 1: because Sean, I'm fighting, as you know, a media apparatus
Speaker 1: which is designed to protect these people, So we have
Speaker 1: to play things a little differently in the media. However,
Speaker 1: there are there are There's definitely more to come. There
Speaker 1: always is, I think, And this is an unusual circumstance
Speaker 1: because I think all these people believe this, and many
Speaker 1: more than one say it explicitly. So it's going to
Speaker 1: be their move. It's a chess move. What are they
Speaker 1: going to do? They're gonna fire this guy? Are they
Speaker 1: going to say? Is isolated and if they say that.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm going to ask Bernie Sanders at the debate.
Speaker 1: We'd like to know from him, how many more people
Speaker 1: in your campaign believe these things? And what are you
Speaker 1: going to do when we when not if we reveal
Speaker 1: those other people, it's gonna have a very interesting dynamic.
Speaker 1: Sean to see the reaction from the campaign to these tapes, Well,
Speaker 1: I think they're gonna what maybe fire one, two, three
Speaker 1: people and say, oh, we had no idea that radical
Speaker 1: left a socialist that I guess talk about stalin in
Speaker 1: the greatest ways and putting people in gulags and concentration
Speaker 1: camps and re education camps, and you know, it just
Speaker 1: sounds like everything that I've ever known about radical leftists.
Speaker 1: They believe they're superior. They feel that they're they're well
Speaker 1: justified to empower a government to go out and steal
Speaker 1: other people's money and give it to those people that
Speaker 1: don't have the same amount. That's their perfect utopia. It
Speaker 1: never works out for anybody, but that's what they believe.
Speaker 1: I think they haven't revealed it in the past until
Speaker 1: until right now. I think it's all you know, this
Speaker 1: is what we do. We we we exposed people on
Speaker 1: their own words. What are they not revealed to the
Speaker 1: to the public, And right now you're seeing it for
Speaker 1: the first time, and it's what you're going to see more.
Speaker 1: I can't say everything we're going to do, but you're
Speaker 1: going to see many, more than one example of this
Speaker 1: explicit just horrendous totalitarian stuff that these people really believe.
Speaker 1: They really believe this in their hearts and their act.
Speaker 1: Some of them are actually saying that Bernie believes it too.
Speaker 1: So it's just going to be very exciting. And by
Speaker 1: the way, Sean, yes, a lot of people are coming
Speaker 1: to want to work for Project Veritas because of thanks
Speaker 1: to you, A lot of people on your program listening
Speaker 1: Project veritas dot com, slash brave, you can apply to
Speaker 1: do this undercover investigative reporting. And a lot of the
Speaker 1: people that we have recently hired for twenty twenty have
Speaker 1: gotten these tapes. You'll see there. You'll hear their voices
Speaker 1: asking the questions. And these are patriots, people who signed
Speaker 1: up to be investigative reporters, and we thank them for
Speaker 1: getting involved. And it's going to be a very exciting week, Sean.
Speaker 1: I can't wait to see the reaction to these tapes tomorrow.
Speaker 1: You've done a lot of these projects, some of them
Speaker 1: have been so blockbuster. Where does this rate with some
Speaker 1: of your best work? That's answering that question is always
Speaker 1: more of an art than a science. Because I didn't
Speaker 1: think the ABC tape would be as big as it was.
Speaker 1: That was the hidden camera ABC recording of Jeffrey Stein
Speaker 1: where where they squash the story. They admitted they did
Speaker 1: it to protect the Clintons. It's always hard to know,
Speaker 1: but this audio is so shocking. I mean the stuff
Speaker 1: this guy is saying, you couldn't even write it. I
Speaker 1: mean the Soviet Union and goologs and murdering people and
Speaker 1: violence and what they're gonna do if Bernie doesn't win.
Speaker 1: And I really think this is going to be a
Speaker 1: big deal. Bernie and Warren or neck and neck, and
Speaker 1: there's a debate tomorrow night. I think he'll be asked
Speaker 1: about this. Sean. I think if there's one thing the
Speaker 1: voters don't tolerate, it's being lied to. So when they
Speaker 1: see all of these people believe these things and mean it,
Speaker 1: and then they're gonna the voters gonna ask themselves, well,
Speaker 1: what do you what do you actually believe? Mister Sanders,
Speaker 1: what are your what are your intentions? And if he
Speaker 1: says I don't agree with all of the people that
Speaker 1: work for me, it just creates a very very strange dynamic,
Speaker 1: because Sean, this is what these people believe. This is
Speaker 1: what socialism is. This. If you haven't read the Gulog Archipelago,
Speaker 1: you should read it. This is what socialism is. These
Speaker 1: people are articular leading socialist principles taking to the extreme.
Speaker 1: So I think it's I think it's just going to
Speaker 1: really change the dynamics of the election. To be honest
Speaker 1: with you, I think this investigation might change the dynamics
Speaker 1: of the election this month. Wow. Great work. We'll be
Speaker 1: looking forward to it. We'll have you back on the
Speaker 1: air tomorrow part two, and we'll get the video version
Speaker 1: of it as well. If you get it to us,
Speaker 1: we'll put it up on Hannity tonight. That's up to you.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you get the work done in time,
Speaker 1: but you can let us know. We'd love to put
Speaker 1: it up. Thank you so much, Sean. All right, James
Speaker 1: will be in touch. James O'Keefe eight hundred ninety four one. Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. All right,
Speaker 1: let's go to our busy telephones here as we say hi,
Speaker 1: oh our friend Velma and Vegas. We do need to
Speaker 1: Vada that needs to turn red this year. Velma, did you?
Speaker 1: Did you? I heard you? I'm sorry, won't help so Velo.
Speaker 1: One day, all of a sudden, I'm looking at my phone.
Speaker 1: I have an iPhone, and across my credit card comes
Speaker 1: seven hundred ninety five dollars for the Wind Hotel. I'm thinking, now,
Speaker 1: hang on a second, i haven't been to the Wind Hotel.
Speaker 1: I'm not listen. And guess what. I tried to save
Speaker 1: you money. You tried to save me money. He doesn't
Speaker 1: look like it. Yeah, I did, I did. I tried.
Speaker 1: They said I did too. It was gonna be higher. Oh,
Speaker 1: they gave me a break and so it was like seven.
Speaker 1: Is that about right? Seven hundred? God, that's awful, well done.
Speaker 1: I love well. That's all that matters. They listen, that's
Speaker 1: all that matters. I get treated like roft you there?
Speaker 1: Why do you get treated so well there? Because they
Speaker 1: love you? It's time to call for you. Why do
Speaker 1: they know that I'm the one that's sending you there? Oh? Yes,
Speaker 1: they know, and they love you and they love me,
Speaker 1: but they agree with me and not you. Like you're
Speaker 1: gonna vote for Trump this year? Right? You got to
Speaker 1: be kid. Oh, so you're gonna vote for socialist. I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna vote for I'm a vote for who I think.
Speaker 1: Well we'll have this country. Well, give me a name.
Speaker 1: Who are you thinking of voting for? What? I'm not
Speaker 1: giving you a name? Why are you afraid? You should be?
Speaker 1: You should be a little more chill. We sent you
Speaker 1: for a manny, we sent you for a petty, we
Speaker 1: sent you for a makeover, we sent you for everything.
Speaker 1: All right, hang on one second, we're gonna find out
Speaker 1: who Velma's really voting for. On the other side of
Speaker 1: this break, I'm just reelected with can cities burned. Don't
Speaker 1: think that some of these, like Megan people could even
Speaker 1: be re educated. Ok, we gotta try the second round.
Speaker 1: We'll start in Milwaukee and then when when you ready
Speaker 1: to be in Milwaukee. All right, we'll get to Velma
Speaker 1: on the other side of the breakcare we're gonna take
Speaker 1: your calls eight hundred nine four one, Shawn if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. Oh and
Speaker 1: we have another prediction. By the climate change dooms days
Speaker 1: that's now gone belly up number years ago, environmental extremist movement,
Speaker 1: climate change doomsayers. Yet they were saying, we're now ten
Speaker 1: days into twenty twenty, and they said that global warming
Speaker 1: would reduce the glaciers at Glacier National Park to giant
Speaker 1: puddles of water by twenty twenty. That's what they said.
Speaker 1: Glacier National Park is removing signs that Warren Glaciers would
Speaker 1: be gone by twenty twenty. Guess what, They're still there.
Speaker 1: How did they get it wrong all of the time.
Speaker 1: I don't know what. I don't even know how to
Speaker 1: really read this, But the Pew survey has come out
Speaker 1: young people in the US express far more skeptical views
Speaker 1: of America's global standing than older adults. Young people are
Speaker 1: gonna like my interpretation of this. They're also more likely
Speaker 1: to say it would be acceptable if another country became
Speaker 1: a military power as the US. That's really dumb. Most
Speaker 1: Americans say the US stands above all other countries, or
Speaker 1: it's one of the greatest countries along with some other
Speaker 1: fifty five percent. One in five say other countries that
Speaker 1: are better than the US. Okay, slightly more than a third.
Speaker 1: Adults eighteen to twenty nine say other countries that are
Speaker 1: better than the US as the highest share of any group.
Speaker 1: You know why, to be very blunt, because they've been pampered.
Speaker 1: Most kids, they haven't had to work or work very hard.
Speaker 1: They go to school, they're not out in the workforce.
Speaker 1: Once they get that first paced stub and they see
Speaker 1: how much they pay to the government and how expensive
Speaker 1: life is, and they start paying all their own bills,
Speaker 1: not mom and dad, and start paying those taxes. I
Speaker 1: think they're gonna change their ways. All right, we'll hit
Speaker 1: the phones next, starting with Velma eight hundred nine for
Speaker 1: one seawan our number five to the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: We'll take calls for the final half hour of the program.
Speaker 1: Today got an awesome Hannity nine Eastern Say DVR, Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel. All right, let's get back to Velma in Vegas.
Speaker 1: All right, Velma, so your birthday came. We give you
Speaker 1: the same birthday present every year, and that is we
Speaker 1: send you to the Win Hotel and Casino. And all
Speaker 1: I know is how is it possible to spend eight
Speaker 1: hundred dollars on a map? But well, I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: they gave me like, oh my god, two hour massage.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, it was box them. Then they gave
Speaker 1: me like a hundred minutes of a facial and you know,
Speaker 1: and then I got my feet in my old Neil's done.
Speaker 1: And that's when I told them to cut back on
Speaker 1: the because jail, because all this stuff is really explicit,
Speaker 1: but nothing like because you get, you get treated so
Speaker 1: much better. I mean they treat me. They everything is
Speaker 1: so timely, and they wait on me even to go
Speaker 1: in the bathroom and they out they're waiting on me
Speaker 1: to come out the bathroom. I mean, you get I
Speaker 1: see how rich people live now, I mean they just
Speaker 1: it's just awesome. I would never ever in a million
Speaker 1: years do what you did. Never listen, we don't between
Speaker 1: the church. Well, what do you think my life is.
Speaker 1: It's not sunshine, rainbows and lollipops, you know. But let
Speaker 1: me tell you. I need a date. My husband took
Speaker 1: off work so we could keep the children. I'm telling
Speaker 1: you I need this break and I enjoyed it. Okay,
Speaker 1: So you wait, whoa, So you got hang up for
Speaker 1: eight hundred bucks, you get a two hour massage, then
Speaker 1: you get massage. That's oh my gosh, okay, and then
Speaker 1: you get by the way when you do the massage
Speaker 1: that they kind of like make you wear a towel
Speaker 1: at least. Yeah, they they touched on you, but they
Speaker 1: saw the way they do it. They pull each part off.
Speaker 1: You know, they're not exposing your whole body. Okay, so
Speaker 1: they like do one piece of the time. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: expose my whole body to nobody. But I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: the thing of it is, you're not even uncomfortable the
Speaker 1: way they do it. They do it. No, they're professionals.
Speaker 1: I understand. Then you're going to a great resort. You're
Speaker 1: going out and these people are awesome. And then right, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: they're professional and I'm just then they remember I was,
Speaker 1: They remembered you I was before, but they know that
Speaker 1: you are and we talk about you. Oh boy, I do.
Speaker 1: I just tell them how much I love you and
Speaker 1: stuff and how good you around children, uncle, and how
Speaker 1: you know. That's all nothing, nothing personal, nothing, just that
Speaker 1: you know, all right? So no, no, no, I got
Speaker 1: So you go in for the two hour massage. Do
Speaker 1: you fall asleep when they do it? Or do you
Speaker 1: stay away? Sometimes? You know what I probably did that
Speaker 1: with the lady because I asked her was a snort
Speaker 1: and she kind of smile. So you were snoring while
Speaker 1: you were getting your massage. Who knows, I just Sean,
Speaker 1: you are so relaxed. I'm telling you these people are
Speaker 1: and you know what, I had a one. Well, maybe
Speaker 1: it's just me. Or did you prefer a woman over
Speaker 1: a man? I didn't ask. I didn't specify nobody this time,
Speaker 1: but the last one I asked for a young handsome man.
Speaker 1: You asked for a young handsome man. Did you get one?
Speaker 1: You think I want a ugly man? Oh? Yes, I did. Yes?
Speaker 1: And did you like the young hands well, now that okay.
Speaker 1: Now you got a woman this time. Did you like
Speaker 1: the young handsome man or the woman better? Well? I
Speaker 1: like the woman better because she did it longer. Oh well,
Speaker 1: maybe you got the two hour package instead of the
Speaker 1: one hour package. If I was rich, I would have
Speaker 1: one of them people to have a round with me
Speaker 1: and I would have those massages. Probably. Let me tell you,
Speaker 1: I could afford it massage, and I'm I don't want
Speaker 1: any strangers touch a man. But you don't realize, Sean,
Speaker 1: you need to relax. I'm relaxed. I'm fine, don't worry, okay,
Speaker 1: but it would make you know you ma, Then you
Speaker 1: get the and then you get the hang on, then
Speaker 1: you get the manny in the beginning, you know you.
Speaker 1: Oh my daughter, my daughter hated it when I took
Speaker 1: her to get a manny petty because I would try
Speaker 1: to hire two or three people to do it at once. No,
Speaker 1: you was it. Apparently she was embarrassed at that. You
Speaker 1: know what, I had one person working on my hand
Speaker 1: and one person working on my feet at the same time.
Speaker 1: I liked that too. Oh so you had two women
Speaker 1: working on you this time. I'm telling you, Sean, I love,
Speaker 1: love love going there. I love and I appreciate you
Speaker 1: so because there's no way I can't afford that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, So then you get the manny petty, you
Speaker 1: get your hair done and everything too. Or what I did, oh, Sean,
Speaker 1: would have you would have been way out of a
Speaker 1: lot of money with that. If you get your hair
Speaker 1: done well, I usually get I get false one lashes.
Speaker 1: I didn't do that. Why not because I didn't want
Speaker 1: you to have to pay no more money. No, No,
Speaker 1: if you're gonna do it, you might as well do it. No, No,
Speaker 1: that was too and Linda make sure next time she
Speaker 1: gets the long fake eyelashes at the Wind Hotel. You're
Speaker 1: getting the winding, but you want to get the long
Speaker 1: fake eyelashes, right, I get. I get not real long
Speaker 1: because I wear glasses. Now you know I'm old, Okay,
Speaker 1: so glass, I get the medium limp okay. So all right?
Speaker 1: So if we could add to enhance the experience. But
Speaker 1: you want two masseuse? Do you want a guy and
Speaker 1: a girl? This way you can see and you know
Speaker 1: at the same time. No, Well you could decide which
Speaker 1: one does the better job professionally telling you Sean, I
Speaker 1: had to. I chose the first time I asked for
Speaker 1: a man, a young man. No, no, no, you said
Speaker 1: a young That's not what you said. You said a
Speaker 1: young good looking man. Yeah, what what you want about
Speaker 1: a hug? That's the thing of it is, I was
Speaker 1: being funny. Let me ask you quite what if the
Speaker 1: person that they sent over was was not particularly attractive,
Speaker 1: would you say, Nope, you don't You're not attractive enough. No,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't hurt no about his feelings like that, you would,
Speaker 1: but inside you'd be very disappointed. Well, I had those people.
Speaker 1: They're accommodated. They gave me a good looking flat stomach,
Speaker 1: a good looking guy. Okay, now, how does your husband
Speaker 1: feel about these little encounters that you're having over there
Speaker 1: with the Massah? I didn't that's that I said. How
Speaker 1: how is your husband react to you getting your massage
Speaker 1: by a good looking, hot young guy. Did I tell him?
Speaker 1: I don't know if I told you? I did? You
Speaker 1: don't know. Well you if you didn't tell him, that
Speaker 1: means you didn't tell him on purpose? Sure, what you're serious?
Speaker 1: You know that I'm honest. Well, then then why I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying there's anything nefarious. Listen, you get a
Speaker 1: massage for health reasons. You get a massage, uh, for
Speaker 1: physical ailments, you get a massage for physical training, all
Speaker 1: sorts of reasons, therapeutic reasons for you. I want them
Speaker 1: as sage cuff. It feels good, it relaxes you. It
Speaker 1: Oh it just I mean, it's just awesome, all right,
Speaker 1: love it? Well, next time you can go for the
Speaker 1: whole work and get the phony eyelashes put on after
Speaker 1: and you can get I get maybe you want to
Speaker 1: get your hair done, Sean, that is enormous money. Well
Speaker 1: you can get a colored and you know, maybe you're talking.
Speaker 1: You're talking at the wind Hotel. You're talking a lot
Speaker 1: of money. All right, do you want me? You want
Speaker 1: me to put restrictions on your present or you want
Speaker 1: the full on present, because I'm willing to go to
Speaker 1: give you the full on works. You can get the
Speaker 1: works should you get. Here's what I do so wonderful.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you we'll get you two massuse man,
Speaker 1: young good looking or a woman whenever you prefer. I
Speaker 1: just want one at a time. Now, I ain't put
Speaker 1: him one at a time. I mean, okay, hey I'm
Speaker 1: not threesome. Well, but nobody I know who said anything
Speaker 1: about that. You see where your mind goes. Who goes
Speaker 1: right in the gutter. I don't know. You said a
Speaker 1: man and a woman, and then it's me. That's three
Speaker 1: people in there. Well, you said the last time you
Speaker 1: wanted a young hot guy to do yours. You said that.
Speaker 1: I didn't say that. I told you you asked me
Speaker 1: the first time you were me, I asked for a
Speaker 1: young good looking guy. Yeah, okay, the second time I
Speaker 1: didn't request and you didn't tell your husband. But go ahead,
Speaker 1: look at you. What you're trying to say. I'm saying
Speaker 1: that just the facts, ma'am. I'm just giving out the facts.
Speaker 1: You didn't tell your husband that you asked for a
Speaker 1: young good looking guy to give you the massage. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Maybe that was last year. I don't know
Speaker 1: if I did or not. No, I'm pretty sure you didn't,
Speaker 1: based on how you're telling the story. Hey' you a trip.
Speaker 1: You know that I'm honest, and you know I'm gonna
Speaker 1: let me ask you. Would your husband have been annoyed
Speaker 1: at that? You're not what? My husband is so sweet?
Speaker 1: I didn't ask of me, sweet, I'm asking would he
Speaker 1: have beenefit? Would he be annoyed that you went and
Speaker 1: you requested a young good looking man to give you
Speaker 1: a massage? Every little kid of everything you do? Now,
Speaker 1: oh so you did. Now you're admitting you purposefully hid
Speaker 1: it from him. I told you I think I did. No,
Speaker 1: I don't think you did. No, But you see you
Speaker 1: would if you have a choice, now now that you've
Speaker 1: had one, now that you're had one with a young
Speaker 1: good looking guy, and now you had one with the woman,
Speaker 1: when you go back next time, you're gonna ask for
Speaker 1: the young good looking guy again? Or no? No, I
Speaker 1: want that woman. That woman was excellent. He was too,
Speaker 1: now he was too, But that woman, I think she
Speaker 1: did longer. And I liked that. Okay, so now you're
Speaker 1: into a woman doing it, not the young good looking guy.
Speaker 1: I like that lady that. I hope she's there. She's
Speaker 1: been there a long time, so I hope she's still there.
Speaker 1: And when you send me back again, I'm gonna request her. Wow,
Speaker 1: it sounds like a heck of a day. How long
Speaker 1: does all that take? It was a wonderful day. And
Speaker 1: I hope you know for the reason we're kidney obviously
Speaker 1: about the whole experience. But I gotta tell you it
Speaker 1: seems like a present you really love and enjoy. Oh,
Speaker 1: my Lord, and I give you and God God first,
Speaker 1: and then Sean Hannity, all the praises, all the glory,
Speaker 1: all honor, all but whatever. I don't need praise, honor
Speaker 1: or whatever. No, you you stick at God. I'm a nobody. Sean,
Speaker 1: you are wonderful. And also to my children. They went
Speaker 1: on Amazon, got what they wanted, the good What did
Speaker 1: Uncle Sean buy him this year? What they got the
Speaker 1: electronic thing? This til I got something? You know he
Speaker 1: can he don't be Sean. He turned thirteen Monday. Hey,
Speaker 1: my son is in college and is all he's. All
Speaker 1: they like to do is play these games all day.
Speaker 1: Your your nephews, and my children are twelve and thirteen.
Speaker 1: Don't you know? God is good? Yes, God is good.
Speaker 1: I agree with I agree with that statement. God is good.
Speaker 1: I told God, just let me raise my leup to
Speaker 1: raise my two children, then he can call me on home. Okay,
Speaker 1: can we can we stop with the dying talk down
Speaker 1: for a second? I forgot you. Well, listen, if you're
Speaker 1: gonna die, you might want to die on the table,
Speaker 1: you know, when you're get in a massage. I'd be
Speaker 1: sort of like a little bit of heaven on earth.
Speaker 1: And what That's a good way to die, wouldn't wouldn't
Speaker 1: be the worst way. It wouldn't be the worst way.
Speaker 1: You know. The funniest thing is, I know Linda likes
Speaker 1: the stuff. Everyone Jason likes it. I'm not I'm not
Speaker 1: letting strangers touch me. I don't have you ever tried it?
Speaker 1: Just track briefly and I walked out. Are you serious?
Speaker 1: I didn't like it? Okay, okay, I don't understand that.
Speaker 1: I first I can't relax anyway. Sitting that little, I
Speaker 1: feel like I'm waste of my time, so waste of
Speaker 1: my time because you busy and you like to be
Speaker 1: busy and all that. Because I'm not gonna tell you,
Speaker 1: because you said you already relaxed, I'm so super relaxed,
Speaker 1: and next two hundred ninety five days, I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: super duper relaxed. No worry, he said, all no fear,
Speaker 1: no worry, nothing, All right, Velma, we love you. Do
Speaker 1: me a favor, Kiss my nephews, and tell the mister
Speaker 1: I said hello, and he's boy. He has. I actually
Speaker 1: feel for your husband a little bit. You know what.
Speaker 1: My husband, I'm gonna tell you, he's got a handful.
Speaker 1: You're a handful. You know what. When God made me,
Speaker 1: he broke them old he did. And you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm such a wonderful person. What can I say, Honey, No,
Speaker 1: I am just the poor guy. I mean you have
Speaker 1: to be. I thought you love me. I love you.
Speaker 1: I love you a lot. I love your husband, love
Speaker 1: your family, love the kids. I love everybody. He don't
Speaker 1: even know my husband. That's because he won't come see me.
Speaker 1: I've invited it specifically I met him once. He likes
Speaker 1: you too. He just don't see it. He likes you too.
Speaker 1: He appreciates everything you do. That's because I buy all
Speaker 1: the big expensive gifts for the kids. He's been money too, now,
Speaker 1: I know. I think that I think the more when
Speaker 1: I got them to mini motorcycles, I think that he
Speaker 1: was a little You guys were a little worried that.
Speaker 1: I know, well they they cheering is very dere As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, we've been to start teaching he
Speaker 1: start teaching Anthon how to drive. Listen. I can't believe it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: anthing he'll be when he get fourteen? Can't he get
Speaker 1: his A fifteen? He can get Now, if you're not
Speaker 1: gonna vote for Trump, who you're gonna vote for? I
Speaker 1: don't know because I'm not I'm the people that I
Speaker 1: wanted to gone, So I don't know what who I'm
Speaker 1: a vote for. I'd say you don't. I think you
Speaker 1: should vote for Trump because the economy has never been better.
Speaker 1: Solomoni's dead, Okay, Dad, he's dead. Hey, whatever, Okay, we
Speaker 1: have seven million, seven million. I don't agree with them,
Speaker 1: and I don't you know what who did you who
Speaker 1: did you see? Who? Did you want met a black
Speaker 1: person that, like Donald Trumper wanted him back and off? Okay,
Speaker 1: who did you want to run? Who did I want
Speaker 1: to run? Yeah? I don't know, but I didn't. I didn't.
Speaker 1: The people that I wanted are gone. Who it wasn't?
Speaker 1: Try what difference doesn't make their gone? You can't remember
Speaker 1: their names? You love them that much? You don't even
Speaker 1: remember their name? Yes, I do, I know everyone. Okay,
Speaker 1: which ones were you interested in? I was interested in?
Speaker 1: So you can start talking about it. I'm not I
Speaker 1: was interested. Do you know what I really wanted? A woman?
Speaker 1: Because women, women know how to take care of bits.
Speaker 1: And you have this thing about I pick a male masseuse,
Speaker 1: a female massuse, male president, and a female president. I'm
Speaker 1: the same things. Women are good at it. Women of
Speaker 1: their detailed were very orient and what are you as
Speaker 1: you're saying? Men are chop liver though? Well, I love men.
Speaker 1: Men are do a lot of things. They can take
Speaker 1: you out to dinner, ain't wine and danyea? Oh well
Speaker 1: that's very nice of them for dinner. They at least
Speaker 1: they're good for something. And women are all about business.
Speaker 1: We're all about business. Okay. I love women I think
Speaker 1: they're awesome. I love everybody. Velma, we love you too.
Speaker 1: God bless you. Okay, honey, bye bye bye. I don't
Speaker 1: even know what to I don't even know what to
Speaker 1: say to all that. So all of a sudden, my
Speaker 1: phone goes off. I'm sure you are the one that
Speaker 1: set it up, Linda, meaning um And you know, because
Speaker 1: all the charges you're all your Grubhub every day comes across,
Speaker 1: which is a food delivery service in New York, comes up.
Speaker 1: You know, all day long, these guys are ordering food.
Speaker 1: They eat once, they eat twice, they eat three times.
Speaker 1: Is keep ordering it in which I don't care at all?
Speaker 1: Um And, but I see eight hundred dollars wind Hotel
Speaker 1: and Gus. You know what the hell is that? Uh?
Speaker 1: I has to be Velma because Velma got our present.
Speaker 1: All right, that's gonna wrap things up for today. So
Speaker 1: what does Nancy Pelosi up to this time? Well, we
Speaker 1: don't know the exact day we're ever gonna hand over
Speaker 1: the articles of impeachment, Well, one day sometime, who knows when. Anyway,
Speaker 1: full coverage tonight. What will the House do? Kevin McCarthy
Speaker 1: also in the Senate, what is their role Martha McSally
Speaker 1: checks in, Oh, we have a new guest tonight, Vince Ellison.
Speaker 1: Oh you're gonna love. We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Only two hundred ninety four days to go. It'll go fast.
Speaker 1: Buckle up,