WEBVTT - DNA Forensics

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Get in with technology with tech stuff from stuff Peter

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are welcome to tech Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland and joining

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>me in the studio today is the illustrious and Mr

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Ben Bowland of stuff they don't want you to know

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and car stuff, among other things. Welcome back to the show. Ben, Hey, Jonathan,

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. Oh man, illustrious? Is it

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the pain meds from my recent doctor visit? Or am

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving up in the world. It's literally that you're illustrated. Actually,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>there's true. Ben has had people mark all over him

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and crayon today. I'm not gonna ask why I don't

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>get into personal lives in the show. Well, you know,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a big deal. Whenever I could be on

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the show and I wanted to do something special, my

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>suits at the cleaners got a bunch of Sharpie's and

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>ask people to go nuts. Yeah, it's kind of like

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>body paint, but really they'll super like on the cheap

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>because we just can't. We don't have that in our budget, honestly,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>right note, but hope springs eternal. What's weird about having

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>um all these all these colors and markers all over me?

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Is that anything I touched literally is leaving a trace? Yeah,

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of you know, we were going to

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have a really in depth conversation on how catalytic converters work,

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but once I noticed you doing that, I thought, why

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>don't we talk about DNA forensics, like the traces people

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>leave behind. So, uh, that's why I decided to switch

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in the last minute. I hope you can roll with it.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, and just in in you know, Ben

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked a little bit about our our

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>mutual interest in the true crime uh discipline, the whole

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole true crime like field, and it turns out

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not the only ones in the office. There are

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>certain people in the office who have a really deep

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>interest in this sort of stuff, and so we thought,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, would be kind of fun to explore the

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>concept in different shows. So if you listen to all

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of How Stuff Work shows, you may have noticed things

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>popping up here and there that's not entirely by accident.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So uh really was one of those things where as

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we all started talking, we're like, hey, you know, I

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>would like to do something in that and we can

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of It's almost like an easter egg for those

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of you who subscribe to lots of different shows, and

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you should let us know if you thought it was

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>really cool. So from the technology standpoint, we thought DNA

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>forensics would be really really interesting to cover and to

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about how it actually works. Uh, what are the processes,

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the challenges, What are some of

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the things that people are doing with DNA forensics now

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that might end up helping, uh, like investigations in the future.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Where could it actually end up giving us a false positive,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>because there there is the possibility of that as well.

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But to start it all off, we really kind of

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>have to lay the groundwork. Yeah, I was gonna I

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna ask you. I hate to be the

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>bad kid in class right now, but what's what's DNA?

0:02:54.720 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>D oxy ribonucleic acid, man, Yeah, that's what is so obviously,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, anyone who's had science class, like a biology

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>class anything recently, you know all about DNA. But you know,

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>we gotta build from the ground up. So DNA is

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a molecule that carries the genetic instructions that govern the development, function,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and reproduction of organisms. DNA is found in all of

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>your cells. Essentially an entire blueprint of what makes you

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you is in every single one of your cells in

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the form of d N a uh, and the molecule

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is in that double helix form. So that says, if

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you were to make a ladder and then twisted into

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a twisty shape, that's the DNA double helix. The rungs

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in that letter are made up of pairs of what

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we call nucleotides. Alright, So each rung on the ladder

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is two different nucleotides that that bond together. Uh. There's

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>adenine and thymine. Those always pair up together. So those

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are your two base pairs of nucleotides that will always join.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's guanine and cytosine and those always join.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's the sequence of these pairs that end up

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>determining what makes you you, right, yeah, yeah, so it

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>could be. And these pairs can affect multiple the order

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of these pairs can affect multiple characteristics. Sure, yeah, absolutely.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And also what's really interesting to me is that point

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>nine of all the DNA that is in you is

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>shared with every other human Like we we have ninety

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of our DNA is in common, which means

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that makes you who you are as indifferent

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>from every other person, makes up just point one percent

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>of your DNA. But that's all it takes, is that

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>point one percent. That's about three million base pairs that

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>are unique to you unless you have an identical sibling.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Ah ah the old Now this goes into um, this

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>verges into some good detective fiction. Now, yes, that old trope,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the evil twin, Yeah, exactly, it wasn't me. It was

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>my evil twin or or evil triplet or evil quadruplet

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>really which we did an ill fated brain stuff but

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>it was, oh my gosh, we did. We did. Yeah.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>If you if you watch brain Stuff, the video series,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and you look up how twins work, Ben and I

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>did a funny At the time, I thought. I still

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>thought there were parts of it that were funny. Honestly, Ben,

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I still fully enjoy it, but my sense of humor

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is very corny. So but if you want to see,

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want to see me and Ben dressing up

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in two different types of outfits, like we're the good

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben and Jonathan and then there's the evil Ben and

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan and we each have an eye patch. Jonathan and

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I were talking and it was it was strange because

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about doing this episode, we said, wow,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:55.239
<v Speaker 1>how could we represent evil twins like I I patches?

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Clearly because you know, the goatee is not gonna work

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for right because and like neither of us were going

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to end up shaving just so that I can be

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>the good twin. But both of us are the kind

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of person who would have an I patch. And actually

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I ended up taking a quick walk to a nearby

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>toy store to pick some up. Um. So, at any rate,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>if you do have an identical sibling, your identical sibling

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>shares your DNA. There they are identical, like the DNA.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>If you were to compare the two and look at

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>those base pairs, they're going to be the same all

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the way down, right. So that's one of the that's

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the exceptions, really the exception. So our DNA

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>can be found in twenty three pairs of chromosomes. That's

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>what humans have. Not all animals have that many, so

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have fewer and etcetera, etcetera. So chromosomes are ribbons of

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>protein essentially have a strand of DNA that are wrapped

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>up in that and within each pair, one chromosome comes

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>from your mother. One chromosome comes from your father, and

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>that's what uh you know, those are the ingredients that

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>come together to create the unique individual that is you

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and or your identical siblings. Uh So, if we took

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>look at each person's DNA and pay attention to the

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>order of those base pairs, we get something like a

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA fingerprint. It is unique to that person. But we

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>can't just look at one section. We have to look

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at several different sections also known as loci in the

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the parlance of forensics to get a robust fingerprint profile. So,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>just as we would look at a fingerprint and look

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for points of comparison to from from a from a

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint that we've gathered from a suspect, let's say, and

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a fingerprint that was left at the scene of a crime,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you would have to look at several different points to

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>make sure that all those points correspond to one another

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to say that there's a match. Same thing with DNA

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>DNA forensics, you would look at several different locations along

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a strand of DNA and see if the same sequence

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of nucleotides were appearing on both sets, because that would

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you what are the statistical probabilities of the person

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that you suspect and the the evidence that was left

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>behind are one and the same, right, Okay, So each

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>time there's a new location, the more loci there are,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the more certitude you have that you've got your catch. Yeah,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say, look at just one location,

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>then that would mean you would have a very you know,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there's actually quite a good chance, depending upon the sequence,

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that coincidence could could completely explain away any any uh

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>duplication there. Right, So it could just be coincidence. It

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>could be that this person just coincidentally has that same sequence.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>As you add more loci, that becomes less and less likely.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh FBI. The FBI has thirteen that they suggest the

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>thirteen specific loca that's their standard, and that that results

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in about a one in a billion chance that if

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you were to take all thirteen loca and compare the

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>two strength you know, the stuff that was left at

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the evidence and the suspect or whatever is in the database.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>If you were to compare the two and they were

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to come up equal at all thirteen, it's a one

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in a billion chance that somebody else besides the person

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at, possesses that. So seven of the six

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>other people in the world. Yeah, it's like flash forward

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to that day in court where someone's doing that horrible

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>reference joke and going, so you're saying that there's a chance. Yeah,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>And and honestly, people who are analyzing the stuff, they

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>speak in statistical probabilities, because you cannot say for certain

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that this person left behind that DNA. You can say, like,

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what is the statistical probability that they did, And then

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at other elements of the case, right, like saying,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, can we put the person in that area,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because let's say that it's in a small town. Well,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's a one in a billion chance and you

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>know that the suspect was in that small town, that's

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn compelling. Yeah, because why are the chances that

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the other one of the other six people in the

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>entire world was also in that small town? Not good?

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So where do we get the DNA evidence from? Well,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that people leave behind, Uh, pretty much anything that

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has cells like living tissue that was left behind our

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>living or stuff where living cells could have been in

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>before being deposited at the crime scene. So stuff like

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>blood or saliva or semen or skin cells, mucus, earwax, sweat. Yeah,

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>all of that, All of that can leave behind cells

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can pull DNA from that. What about hair,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hair not so much, not not not for traditional DNA

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hair follicles, Yes, but hair it self is dead. Those

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are dead cells. So you can do some some DNA analysis,

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but not the standard kind that most people use in DNA.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>For instance, Uh, fingernails, same thing, but fingernails often come

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with other tissue attached to it, and that's where you

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>find the DNA. So if we want to look at

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the history of people actually saying, hey, why don't we

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>use this this DNA stuff to try and help with investigations,

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to look back to the nineteen eighties when

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>a brit named Alec Jeffries, who now you may refer

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to as Professor Sir Alec John Jeffreys f R s okay, good,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Professor Sir Alec John Jeffries, FRSH that would be his

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>full title. Now, he hit upon the idea of using

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>DNA as a means of genetic fingerprinting, and he realized

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that the unique sequences of DNA could serve as a

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>means to link an individual to a scene where DNA

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>samples were found, and his process was first applied in

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the court system in nineteen eight five. In that case,

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it was an It was an immigration case. It wasn't

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>like a murder or a rape or something like that.

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It was to ascertain if the identity of a British

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>boy was actually related to a family who had originally

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>immigrated to the United Kingdom from elsewhere. And he did. Uh.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>The first time it was used in a criminal case

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>would be seven. That was yeah, not not long after,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and that wasn't a case. Uh. The the suspect was

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>named Colin Pitchfork, which is a heck of a name,

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about nominative determinism. Yeah, and he was arrested on

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>suspicion of rape and murder. And he was the first

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>criminal caught as a result of DNA screening. So this

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was DNA screen that led to his capture. He actually

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>confessed to his crimes, so the DNA didn't lead to

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>his conviction. He confessed, uh, and he received life in

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>prison as a result. So I wanted to talk a

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit before we get into some of the pros

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and cons about what actually happens with DNA's because you

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>hear or like DNA forensics and you're like what goes

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>into that. Yeah, this is a great thing to contextualize

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, because there are a lot of fans and

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff who have probably seen and scoffed at the

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>various entertaining but inaccurate crime shows on order spe CSI,

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>CSI being the big one, like they're there are are

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>forensic specialists who say that c s I is probably

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the most damaging things that have happened to

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>their their career path ever, because people have unrealistic expectations. Specifically,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>juries have unrealistic expectations, which can hurt a trial case

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>because juries will often one want DNA UH data when

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not even relevant to a case, Like they're like,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessary for them to make a determination in

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a case, but they want it because it's one of

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>those things that people associate with. Oh, d NA gets

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>you the the locked in answer was that person air?

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Were they not there? Um, just run the DNA enhance

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the photograph. I don't see what the problem right exactly. Yeah,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>let's pull up one of those three dimensional holographic images

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're just we're just throw every single science fiction

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>CSI trope in there. So early forensic analysis actually used

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a process called restriction fragment length polymorphism or r f LP,

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and that involves taking a sample of DNA that has

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>repeating base pairs like they can repeat from anywhere between

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>one and thirty times. They're called variable number tandem repeats

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or v N t r s. And what they would

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>do is they would dissolve this DNA in an enzyme

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to break the strand at specific locations along that the DNA.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So uh saying like um, when there are this many repetitions,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this enzyme is going to break the strand at that point.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So that way we can measure how long the strand

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>DNA is in a out point. Yeah. So imagine that

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got like a ribbon, right, and let's say that

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the ribbon is maybe three ft long, and you're going

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to cut out a six inch segment of that ribbon.

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Use this enzyme and it cuts it at the very

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>specific locations along that strand that you want. You do

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with the material that was left behind

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at the scene. So let's say you've got you've got

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your your DNA sample from your suspect, you've got the

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sample from the scene, and you compare the two and

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially measuring them against each other, like literally measuring

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the length of them, because it's those repeating pairs that

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>determine how long that segment is. So if the two

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>are about the same length, or actually they are the

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>same length, then you know, or at least you you

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have a good uh inclination to say that this person

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was the one who left behind that DNA. That's not

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>really used that frequently anymore, but more frequently now we

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>use a method called short tandem repeat analysis, which is

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more reliable, more popular. And in this method, analysts take

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a sample of DNA and they count the repetition of

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>those base pairs along certain locations the loci of that sample.

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So four or five base pair repeats like where you

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>get you know, your your those nucleo tide pairings I

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about, Sometimes those pairings repeat in a sequence, right,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>They look for uh, preferably four or five base pair

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>repeat segments, so that way, because it's less likely than

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if you would have two or three in a row. Yeah,

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the more you have in a row, the less likely

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to find that exact same repetition in another

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in an unrelated person's DNA. And these are by the

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>way called tetra nucleotide or penta nucleotide repetitions because of

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the number tetra being four, penta being five. Um. There

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>those are best in order to indicate an accurate man match.

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So the FBI, like I said, says, thirteen specific locai

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to find this, you would do this in thirteen different

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>locations along the strand of DNA. And if you were

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to find these, uh, these base pair repeats that are

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>identical in both and both samples, that's a really good

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>indication that they belong to the same person. And this

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this investigation technique, while it is, while it's pretty solid

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's solid science behind it, it doesn't work in

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>every In every case, it's not a silver bullet. And

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of some dark territory. Yeah. Yeah. In fact,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>there there are a lot of reasons why, uh, this

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>can be this can be problematic. Um. One other thing

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about before we get into the

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>challenges specifically things like contamination and chain of possession and

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>chain of custody, thank you, Before we get into that,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is to talk about all right, so you know, I

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>gave these these overviews of how they're analyzing the DNA,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but One of the big issues here is that often

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the field and you're looking for anything

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that has, you know, remnants of DNA on it, you

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>may not have a very large sample to work with. Right,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a tiny amount of DNA. How do

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you make sure you can do the tests you need

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with a tiny little amount? And the answer is you

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>duplicate the crap out of it? What how? Yeah? Okay,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>so this is this is gonna get super weird because

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get into molecular biology and chemistry but starting

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and I want to let okay, So they use a

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>process called polymerase chain reaction or PCR to duplicate a

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>specific region of the DNA in a sample. So this

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>process was developed in three by Carrie Mollis who actually

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>he won a Nobel Prize in chemistry for his work

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in this field. And what they'll do is they'll take

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>samples of DNA. They'll take a string of DNA, so

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got your double helix, right, and then you heat

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it to between ninety four and ninety six degrees celsius

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for a few minutes. Yeah, so it's almost boiling um

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>for a few minutes. And this is to d nature

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the sample, which means that the DNA straightens out, so

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer twisted ladder. It's a ladder, and the

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>rungs split apart, So those base pairs split and you

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>get two strands two half strands of d N A alright,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So then you end up changing the temperature. You lower

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it to between fifty and sixty five degrees celsius for

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes, so that first one only takes a

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>few minutes to so you lower it down to fifty

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to six degrees celsius for a few more minutes. That

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>allows the left and right primers. These are small sections

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of DNA that have matching nucleotides to the two separated

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>pieces that you've created. Think of them as almost like

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>half zippers. So you've got the right and left half

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of a zipper on either like that. They're spreading out

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>there there there's apart from one another. You've got a

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>small section that interlocks with each side. Because that you've

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>got the the complementary base pairs. Uh, those will then

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>connect to those sections. Now that's only a tiny little

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>part overall part of the full DNA, but um they

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>then raise the temperature to seventy two degrees celsius for

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes to allow the tach polyme race. Now,

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the material that can then build and synthesize

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>new DNA to the two separate strands. So if you

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>think about it like a video game. All right, so

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you get your little you get your little segment that's

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>locked onto the half ladder of DNA, the stuff you

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>started off with in the first place. At one end

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, imagine that you get a little bitty blob,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.959
<v Speaker 1>all right, that little big blob just builds the corresponding

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>rungs and goes down the line rebuilding the d N

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>A and it doesn't you know, there's one on both sides.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a primer on each half strand of DNA. So

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this process, you end up with

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>two strands of DNA. Okay, I see, now you started

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>with one, but because you've used this molecular biology slash

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>chemistry approach, you've been able to duplicate it. And then

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you repeat that process. So you do it again. Those

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>two become four, the four become a. You see how

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this expands very rapidly. You do it over and over,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>so that way even if you started with a very

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>small sample of DNA, by the end, you've got plenty

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to work with, so you don't have to worry about

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had one little drop of sweat at

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the scene and and we blew it on on a

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>test that didn't work out. You don't have to worry

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about that. I'm sorry to be like, uh, emotionally or

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>mentally a nine year old here, Jonathan, but can we

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>can we make it a booker? I just love picturing

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>us as cops or like, no, no one knows who

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>stole the vus. We have only this single. The Mysterious

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Picker has struck again. Yeah, yeah, okay, so you're in Yeah,

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>well we weren't talking about urine. We were talking about

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the boogers. All right, you got me. But this is

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>but this is a great that that's a great explanation

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of how this occurs. Because given that you're essentially destroying

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the evidence every time that you you conduct this kind

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of this this kind of investigation, than being able to

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>reproduce it is fundamental. Yeah, it's absolutely key because again,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>if you do not have very much of that material,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>then you really have to be careful. And there are

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that can complicate this, and that's

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of where we were leading to a little bit earlier.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of reasons why you cannot just

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>say that DNA forensics is going to solve, you know,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the crimes out there as long as someone's left something behind.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Because even though it's versatile, even though we have this

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing capability, life is weird and things can go wrong,

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and they can go wrong either accidentally or on purpose.

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that can happen is multiple people could

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be involved in a an incident crime of some sort,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the more people who are involved, the harder

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it is to be absolutely certain that the DNA samples

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're working with all linked to a specific individual. In fact,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>there are currently some changes in the way DNA can

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>be handled UH in cases court cases actually to the

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>point where it's in the legal case since UH in

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas and other places as well, and so forensics labs

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>are having to put in greater restrictions because forensics analysts

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>would go into testify in court cases and say there's

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a one in a billion chance this belonged to someone else.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you start to factor in that there is

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>more than one person's DNA found at the scene and

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the contamination issues that result from that. Then people would

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>say like, all right, well, really it's more like one

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in a thousand or one in a hundred. And then

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point you might say, well, the DNA evidence

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>is not strong enough for it to be a compelling

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>argument for the guilt or innocence of a person, because

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there's enough like if you're in a really dense urban

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>area and you say there's a one in a hundred

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>chance that's you know, it's it's hard to say that

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't introduce reasonable doubt that it doesn't meet the burden

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of reasonable doubts, But and then you have to try

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to chase down all the other possibilities. And that's that's

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if there are multiple people involved. But even if there's

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not multiple people involved, obviously you have to be very

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>cognizant of the possibility of contamination. Yeah, okay, we we

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can talk about this a little bit because we this

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that you might not see on Hollywood as

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>often as you see it in real life. Yes, actually, Jonathan,

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so let's say you know the let's say you're the detective,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>right and Noel is the prosecutor, and I'm the I'm

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the JABRONI at the scene. You was supposed to pick

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>up the stuff and bring it, right Yeah, So you're

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you're your job is to actually go in and collect

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the evidence before anyone else can go through that area,

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, because as soon as you introduce other people,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>then you've introduced other DNA that could be left at

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the scene. But I've been having a I've been having

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a crazy time work lately, and I've been cutting corners

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a little and everybody knows. Nobody said anything yet because

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not a big deal yet. But here's what happens. Uh,

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>while I'm on while I collect the evidence, let's see,

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I get blood samples, and I'm on the way back,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I stop it cook out because my diet is as

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>much of a train wreck as my life and I'm

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>not and because i'm personally I shake hands with six

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>people as I'm walking back into our building. I don't

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>wash my hands. And I also kept the sample for

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>some reason in the bag from cookout. Yeah, that would

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>there there might be a chance that that was encountered

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>some form of contamination from the scene to the point

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>where you get to the lab and then you you

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>run the d NA. Yeah, right, Well, clearly the suspect

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was a roast pig, right, Yeah, clearly suspect was a

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>roast pig. Or even more dangerously, clearly the suspect, uh,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the suspect maybe someone that already pings in our database

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>who just got out of prison for grand theft auto

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and now works out of cookout. Yeah. Yeah, that's I

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that that's a you know, it's it seems like

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a convoluted example except for the fact that this

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of stuff that can happen r Yeah,

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I would say it's possible, but that one

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is not plausible. No, no, But but the example you

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>give does show that there has to be great care

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>are the the people who come in to collect the

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>evidence have to do so before there can be a

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of disturbance of the crime scene. Because the more

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 1>disturbance there there is, like I said, the more chances

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>other people will leave behind DNA skin cells or or

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>um sweat or blood or whatever it might be. Um

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>might be that there were other people who were involved

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in it who have no or you know, people who

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the person who stumbled upon the scene left something

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>behind without intending to like cutting a hand on a

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on a piece of glass or something, letting themselves into

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>see what's happened. Yeah, even something as simple as that.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's that you have to be aware of

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>contamination there. You also have to be aware of contamination

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>through the moment you've collected it, all the way through

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the testing phase. So that's where the chain of custody

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>comes in. By the way, if you ever see people

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like putting stuff in plastic bags in order to preserve it,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much a fiction because play stick will will

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>contain moisture, right anything, Any moisture that's in the bag

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>will stay there, and moisture can can degrade DNA samples.

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So usually they're actually put in paper, so it's usually

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a paper envelope or a paper bag that's quickly labeled.

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And then there's this chain of custody that must be

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>documented through the entire process until it gets to the lab,

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and then at the lab. Even at the lab, they

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have to be very careful with the equipment they're using.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>They have to make certain that it's completely clean. That

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>way you don't end up cross contaminating from a previous

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>test into your current test. That's happened a couple of times.

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>There actually been a couple of cases. Yeah, there was

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a case where, uh, there was a victim of a

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>crime and there was another crime that was committed, and

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the initial DNA test results of the crime that was

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>committed came back with the victim from the other crime

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as a positive. And they realized that the reason why

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that was happening was that there were two different DNA

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>tests that had been performed, and the victim from the

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 1>first one that their DNA had not been completely cleaned

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the system before they started doing the next test,

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and so they were getting these false positives, and they

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>knew it couldn't have been the victim because the victim

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was the victim was victimized, the victim was not capable

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of committing that crime. Um, so it was already like

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that proved that there was an

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>issue here. And in almost every case, in fact, I'll

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and say the vast majority of cases, this

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>has to do with a person either mistakenly or purposefully

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not following procedure or not making certain that that everything

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is on the up and up. Rather than the process

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>itself being a failure, it's it's a human error, either

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>intentional or otherwise introduced typically um and so another thing

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that you have to worry about is whether or not

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>someone has purposefully introduced DNA. There have been cases where

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to try and either uh to hide one's

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>involvement in a crime or to implicate someone else specifically

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in a crime, people have left behind samples of DNA

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to throw people, throw investigators off the track.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Whether again, whether it is to protect yourself, Like let's

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>say that you committed the crime, and you leave behind

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the DNA of you know, your your your hated cousin,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>so that your cousin takes the rapid you don't, or

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you're an investigator and you're like, well, there's this really

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>awful guy, and we want to get him for this crime.

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We really like him for this crime, but we don't

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>have the direct evidence for him. However, I do have

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this DNA from a separate incident. I can leave this

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>behind the crime scene collected, and therefore we can finally

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>get the guy. I'm pretty sure he did it anyway,

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, solid solid stick, Steve four percent sure. So

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that's again, this is not something that happens all the time.

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not not something that's even prevalent, but it's it's

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that you have to be aware of.

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why these things like the chain of custody is

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so important to maintain. I have a question, sure, uh,

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if I'm jumping ahead here, please ask.

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But I was kind of foreshadowing this when we're asking

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about hair follicles. So the it sounds like the home

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>run for h for DNA testing would be something, as

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you said, containing living cells, so blood, bodily fluid, stuff

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. But if that's a home run, the kind

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that people are much more likely to leave

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>behind would be things like hair follicles or flakes of skin.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, So, what what's the deal with that? How?

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>How does that work? It's still the same same process

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that these are things that can leave

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>behind traces of DNA like as long as as long

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as they For instance, let's say that you have you're

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at a murder scene scene and you are you are investigating.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the things you're going to look for are

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>traces of any skin under the victim's fingernails, because that

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a an indication that the victim fought back against

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>his or her murderer and may in fact have samples

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of that skin underneath his or her fingernails, And so

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you can collect that and then do the same process

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about. You can extract the DNA from

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>those cells and then do the same process to duplicate

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that DNA and then run it either against suspects DNA

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>or or use a database. We mentioned the databases briefly

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Yeah, let's do that, because there

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of different ones. There. There are state databases,

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a national database, and then there's the FBI's database.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh So these are all databases that continue in the

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA information of various people who have been booked for

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>specific types of crimes. It's not every crime. Don't worry,

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the FBI does not have your genetic blueprint because one

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>time you purposely parked in a handicap spot. Although Jonathan

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and Nolan I do judge you for that, Yes, we

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think you should definitely never do that. If you don't,

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if you do not have a the handicap label, uh,

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>then don't park in that spot. But now these are

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically pretty serious crimes where that's really the only way

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that they that that the state or federal government is

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to to collect a DNA sample from you to

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>use in this database. When they've got a lot of people,

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got some statistics here to yeah, please hit me. Okay,

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's go with the big one, right, Okay,

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>The big one here in the States is the National

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>DNA Index or in d I S. That's the that's

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the feed's that's the FBI. It contains a little under

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>twelve million offender profiles, specifically eleven million, eight hundred nine

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty seven. It has to a little over

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>two million R s D profiles and a little over

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand forensic profiles. That's as of June. If

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you visit the FBI's website, you can learn a lot

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>about their biometric analysis, which does also contain print work.

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's sort of a mixtape of all the stuff

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that they could use to investigate. And here's the thing

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you can do if you live in the US and

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you would like to feel a little bit less comfortable

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>each day, Okay, it's there's a breakdown by state, so

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you can see how many offender profiles are are located

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>in your state. Here in Georgia. In our case, it's

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>two hundred nine thousand, nine hundred and thirty eight. Considering

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the population of Georgia, that is a significant number. Right,

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you can see the forensics profiles the arrestees. You can

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>also see the number of investigations aided in labs participated. Now,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I want to point out is

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that this also goes back into the drawbacks or the

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>challenges of forensics, is that forensic labs can get really

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>backed up with this stuff, Like the backlogs can be

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can be crazy because while I I you know, I

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that process just for duplicating the DNA, that can

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of hours to do that process, and

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then of course you've got all the cleaning of the

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>material that has to happen in order for you to

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to use it again. That's not that doesn't

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>even involve the actual analysis of the DNA that tends

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to require a forensic specialist to do this. It's not

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>like it's all automated, although there are more and more

0:35:55.880 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>automated systems that help, but generally speaking, it's it's sort

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of an augmented approach where you still have a forensic

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>expert do the the look you know they're doing. They're

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at the DNA to look at those base pairs

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and actually makes certain visually that they are in fact identical.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.919
<v Speaker 1>So it takes a lot of time. And meanwhile, while

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you're doing all this, more samples are coming in. So

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a backlog that starts to build up, and depending

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>upon the area and the number of labs that are available,

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it might be a very serious backlog. And there was

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>also a pre existing backlog because if we look at

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>how recently this occurred, and off air we talked about this.

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>In the course of your research, you send in some

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>great stuff about cold cases. Yeah, so there was already

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a built in backlog for this technology, and they're already

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>been cases of people who were in jail for years, decades, Yeah,

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who were innocent. Yeah, yeah, where the DNA evidence ended

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 1>up clear daring them like it could not possibly have

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>been that person. Um. And you know, actually, that's when

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I say that there are some serious restrictions in tax

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>us about this multi person DNA approach. It's specifically so

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is every attempt to make certain that innocent

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>people aren't incarcerated there is a huge obviously, there's a

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>huge pressure on law enforcement to to assign guilt and

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and bring somebody in for particularly awful crimes. And

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.399
<v Speaker 1>there's an enormous pressure because of course, the community wants

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to feel safe, they want to feel that something is

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>being done that has to be balanced against making sure

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you get the right person. Yeah. Yeah, because we know

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that we live in an age of instant gratification. Yeah,

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>things should be right immediately and right the first time,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and right now and right now. Yes, the three rights.

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, the wheels of justice. How's the old saying,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>go man? They grind slow but exceedingly fine, Yes, as

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>opposed to go round and round. Yes, the wheels in

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the bus. I was thinking, you know, we would be here,

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>terrible lawyers. Yeah, we would be Actually, I know I

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>would be. I remember participating in a mock trial in

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>school and not knowing what the heck I was doing?

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>What was your what was your rule? I was defense

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was terrible. It was terrible. I did not

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do it. I was I was. I was

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>bullied into it and I it was awful. I can

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>see you doing like a judge or maybe a bailiff,

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>who's over it, like, sit down? Yeah, no, I was.

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh my my client would have gotten the chair. It

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was terrible for a very minor offense too, That's how

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bad I was. So anyway, getting back into DNA forensics,

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, yeah, you mentioned cold cases, I've got one

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>specific one I'll mention, and it's not it's one that

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:00.479
<v Speaker 1>has not been um scene to completion yet. In other words,

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there there hasn't been a conviction yet in this case.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But it does show how how far reaching this can go.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>So in December, the body of a young lady named

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Crystal Lynn bez bes lana Wich was found along the

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Provo River in Utah. She was seventeen years old when

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>she was killed, and she had been sexually assaulted and murdered. Uh,

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps bludgeoned to death with rocks. That was what the

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>police believed at the time. Now, the original investigator of

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the crime, it was a guy who became the the

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>deputy sheriff, I believe, but Todd Bonner decided to continue

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>investigation even long after all the leads were drying up,

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like they just could not find any leads. Uh, and

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in a lab was able to extract what's called touch

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>d n A. It was left behind on a granite

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>rock that the police had believed was used in killing

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this young lady. And the lab used a vacuum instrument

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to pull this touch DNA off the granite rock and

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>then put it through this analysis process and the results

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up matching DNA from a suspect that people were

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in but had no direct connection to the crime.

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>The suspect's name was Joseph Michael Simpson, and they got

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the sample DNA from a discarded cigarette butt he had

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>tossed aside a cigarette but the cops scooped it up,

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they tested the DNA, they found a match. They arrested

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>him back in Uh. He has a previous conviction for murder.

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>He had actually been out on parole for eight months

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>before before Brasilanta, which is death. Yeah, so he had

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>been in jail for several years but got paroled and

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>then uh, eight months later Brisilana, which was dead, and

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been linked to this and arrested for the crime.

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, the last I checked into this case,

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was back in the last I checked

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>into this case. It's still not it still hasn't been tried.

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>There's been request for more evidence on the prosecution side,

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>including uh, an actual DNA sample from Simpson himself to

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>confirm that the findings are in fact accurate, so in

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>other words, not just from the cigarette, but but from

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Simpson in custody. And then there's also a request to

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>get a print sample because of a partial print that

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was left behind on the victim herself. So uh, this

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>case is not one that's like cut and dry and

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's definitive, but it does indicate that this approach is

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>able to start pulling up connections that otherwise would have

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>been unlikely or even impossible to make. And this brings

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>us to this is just a sidebar, Okay, this brings

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>us to a dangerous thing. And you know, of course

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that I who can sometimes be a cartoon of myself

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and am required to mention this. What do you think

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>about the idea of blanket DNA sampling? They're taking every citizen.

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, some prominent members of the UK legal system

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have advocated this for all British citizens, and Kuwait is

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing. Well, let me put it to

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you this way. Okay. There's always the argument that some

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>people will make that if you're not doing anything wrong,

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>then what do you have to fear? Right, Well, here's

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what you have to fear. I'm gonna tell you. Okay,

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So there have been at least a couple of companies

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that have shown that through a little bit of your DNA,

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they can do a very similar process to duplicating DNA,

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which means that they can synthesize your DNA, which means

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>then that if your DNA can be synthesized, it could

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>be cre aided and dropped somewhere. And you had never

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>been to that place. Oh wow, So all of a

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sudden you get a summons for some horrendous crime in

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 1>uh Iceland or something. You say, I've never been Yeah,

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the weirdest thing because I've never been there. Like,

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>but this is match to your DNA. There's a one

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and a billion chance that someone else did this, um

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and you you know that's that's a thing like, that's

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in a world where technologically it is possible to

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>do this. Now is that likely to happen? So it's

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely like and it's in the realm of possibility but

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not plausibility. However, as long as it's possible, then I

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>would argue that it is too invasive to demand from

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your population that everyone submit to d N A like

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>submitting a DNA sample. Yeah. Yeah, what about let's take

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a step further. What about the idea that there would

0:43:56.160 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be what about the idea that this stuff, which is

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you set a blueprint in some ways. Also it's it's

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>similar to Metadataeah okay, let's I can see where you're saying.

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So the ability then to build this enormous sample size

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>let's say the entire population of the UK. I think

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 1>right now they're only at maybe five of the population

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>because you have to get you know, you have to

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 1>get pinched. So if they had this enormous sample size,

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>then they could start comparing and collating and analyzing this

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff on a larger scale such that they would be

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>able to possibly again possibly not plausibly, uh predict um,

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not epigenetic trends, but but predict the likelihood of someone

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>incurring a certain disease or something. Well, we're getting into

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>more of a genomic sequencing at that point. Yeah, we're

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 1>getting into gatica. Yeah. Yeah, when you're when you're getting

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>into genomic sequencing, it's it's much further. It's it's a

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>much longer process because again, this is very close to

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>when they call a genetic fingerprinting. It makes sense to

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>call it that because you're really just looking at the

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>physical resemblance of two strands, right, Like like two drawings,

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and there are two drawings of ladders, and if the

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>two drawings of ladders are the same, then you know

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got a one and a billion chance of it

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not being that person. So that's a lot different than

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>going through and identifying things like which genes do what

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we still don't even know, right, So in

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 1>case you guys are not terribly familiar with with genetics,

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the genes can be pretty complicated things. Think about like

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a giant switchboard, right, You've got an enormous switchboard and

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's like a thousand switches on little metal toggle switches,

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the classic updown toggle switches, right, unlabeled that you have

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a bank of lightbulbs in front of you, also unlabeled.

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>You flip one switch and one light bulb comes on.

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You flip a set can switch. That lightbulb stays on.

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Three other lightbulbs come on. You turn off the first switch.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Only one lightbulb goes off, and you start thinking, Okay, wait,

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what how is this real? Well, that's the thing about

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>genes is that they it's not so simple as to

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>say that this one gene is in charge of this

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>one trait. It's it can be much more complicated, where

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a a selection of genes that some are active,

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>some are not active. Um. So because of that, even

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if you've got all the DNA from an entire population,

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to say, well, this one person

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>suffered from a particular inherited disease. Let's examine the DNA

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and then compare it to other people who have suffered

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>from that same disease and see where the points of

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>comparison are. But that is, I mean, it's a monumental

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 1>task because you've just it's beyond taking thirteen points along

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a strand and comparing the them against a second sample. Right,

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a it's another it's almost like a a

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>an order of magnitude greater in the amount of effort

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>that you have to take. Yeah, that's a really good

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. And that that a squatches some

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of my apien predictions. I do have one other question,

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, So we talked about in identical twins. Right there,

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:25.959
<v Speaker 1>there is another there's another possibility where a person could

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>get pinched with the wrong DNA. Are you going with

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a clone? What's your Well, there's a there's another possibility. Wait,

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. It's not the same as identical twins, but

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it throws another monkey wrench into this. Uh chimeras. Oh interesting? Yeah, okay,

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh all right, Well I want to hear your thought

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>process on this, because this is not something I specifically

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>looked into, because chimerism is not that it's super rare. Yeah,

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not that it's like an episode of SPU for

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that time. Um, and so yeah, it's true though it

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds crazy. And you guys talked about this on one

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of your other shows, right yeah, and Forward Thinking we

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about chimeras, and yeah, it was one of those

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>things where where the more you talked about it, the

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>more the more like unsure I was that I was

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 1>reflecting the reality because it seems so weird. It seems

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>very very strange. So it's a person composed of two

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>genetically distinct types of cells, So you might have Um,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the first time I was discovered it was

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>related to blood type, right, yeah, I believe so I

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>believe you're correct, So somebody had more than one blood type,

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>which is already so trippy to me. I just felt

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like to do the to do justice to this topic,

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we would have to mention that that is one of

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>those very very exceedingly rare cases where DNA testing is

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.399
<v Speaker 1>not a and a silver bullet. Yeah, so you could

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bizarre like this is almost like a science

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>fiction novel approach. Yeah, like to the point where you're like,

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for this to work, so many things would have to

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>fall in line perfectly that you might as well say

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible. But imagine that you have a scenario in

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>which you have a chimera and DNA is left behind

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at the scene, but it's only one type of DNA somehow,

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the sample they get is somehow just the

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>other type of DNA, thus exonerating your your perpetrator. Um. Practically, Yeah,

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:39.959
<v Speaker 1>there's no, that's impossible. The only way that that could

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 1>really affect it is if there were somehow a chimera

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on the involved in this scene and it became a

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:51.359
<v Speaker 1>contaminating factor, because then they would say, well, aside from

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the victim, it seemed it appears that there were three

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>people here. Yes, that that would certainly, that would certainly

0:49:56.920 --> 0:50:00.320
<v Speaker 1>cause problems, right, that would certainly cause confusion in the

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>whole process. But it's also so rare for someone to

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be a criminal. I think it's already yeah, begging, beggaring

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>belief right right, like like like you you already have.

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Like if you think of the population of people who

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:15.280
<v Speaker 1>have some form of of that, you know, the chimera

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>DNA thing going on, and then within that population, what

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:24.799
<v Speaker 1>percentage of those people are our master criminal? Yeah, are

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are committing these sort of crimes. It's got to be

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty small number. I'm sorry, man, I'm sorry. I

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 1>just had to bring it up. No, No, it's fine, Like, yeah,

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, but what if So one other

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to talk about. I almost forgot about this.

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:45.959
<v Speaker 1>So did you read up about the um the technology

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of reconstructing a person's face using just DNA material, and you,

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.439
<v Speaker 1>like you, you had sent that to me off there,

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was initially skeptical when I was looking at it.

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's called Snapshot, and it's from a company

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>called Parabond and Snapshot what it's what it attempts to

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>do is take the information from a DNA sample and

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>create a essentially a police sketch of a person, a

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional uh representation of what a person might look like. Now,

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>when I say might look like, you've got to be

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>super generous with this because if all you have is

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the DNA, if that's all you have, like, you don't

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have any any knowledge of what the person's face looks like, otherwise,

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>how old they are, they're high, or anything. What you'll

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to do is probably approximate their skin tone,

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:46.840
<v Speaker 1>their ethnicity, their gender at least their biological gender, the

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>their hair color, their eye color, that kind of stuff,

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they have freckles, that kind of thing.

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.319
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, you're not gonna be able to tell

0:51:57.360 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>their age. You're not gonna tell their high or weight,

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So you can't you can't tell how heavy said or

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>thin they may be. How you don't know how much

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>how much like what sort of wrinkles would you need

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to add in if they're you know, if they're older. Yeah,

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know any of that, uh, And you wouldn't

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>know their skull shape, Like you wouldn't know their face shape,

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>right like the DNA wouldn't. So so what you can

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>do is create like a very generic looking person but

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with those traits. So it may not be so useful

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of using this as a means of

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to track down the suspect. There may not come

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in handy. Where it might help is if you have

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>unidentified remains. So let's say you've found the remains of

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a person and you're able to extract some DNA information,

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're not able to ascertain the identity of this

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this person. Uh, this would allow you once if you

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have the person's like skull, like if if that's part

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of the remains that are left behind, you then know

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at least the dimensions of the skull. And they're also

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.840
<v Speaker 1>other technologies that allow people to approximate what a person's

0:53:03.880 --> 0:53:07.759
<v Speaker 1>face looks like based upon their skull shape. So combining

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>those two where you you say, all right, this is

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what they're they probably look like based upon the the

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shape of their skull. Plus here are their characteristics that

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they had according to their DNA, then you might be

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>able to create a few different looks for that particular

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>individual that might help in identifying who that person was. Yeah,

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that I think is the most tremendous possibility

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of this technology, absolutely right, because we're seeing already that

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the study of DNA and and the application of this

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of science has fundamentally changed the nature of crime

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and investigation. Yeah, to the point where again it can

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>affect juries, uh and there, and their perception of a

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>case to the so so it can be a frustration,

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>right like if you have if you have other lines

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of evidence that clearly indicate that the person accused of

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the crime has committed it, but because there was there

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was no DNA evidence, or maybe there was some problem

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:17.919
<v Speaker 1>with the chain of custody, that can create enough doubt

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>in a jury's mind. A jury that's been conditioned to

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.879
<v Speaker 1>believe the DNA evidence is the end all be all

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that it can it can cause problems in that case.

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the thing is that human beings

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>were messy, right Like we're not just messy and that

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 1>we leave DNA behind. We're messy in the way we

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 1>try to process information. And so sometimes you know, when

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 1>you go through an entire process of when a crime

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is committed, to figuring out who potentially did it, to

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>apprehending that person, to then trying that person for the crime,

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:55.239
<v Speaker 1>to then deciding whether or not they're guilty. I mean,

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there's so much stuff going on through that whole process that,

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestly, I think we should have a whole

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>podcast devoted to it, you know what. I think that's

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a great idea. Yeah, I mean I'm not talking about

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>an episode. I mean we gotta have a podcast, like

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>an entire show, a show specifically dedicated to this kind

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:18.399
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Yeah, you know, I completely agree, and we'd

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like to hear from you if you agree as well.

0:55:21.239 --> 0:55:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You if you like this stuff, you can check out Oh, Jonathan,

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to put you on the spot here because

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>as he puts you on the show, would you like

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to come, uh look at some stuff like this with

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Nolan I over on stuff they don't want you

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to know. Yeah? Absolutely, all right, certainly. Okay, Well you

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>agreed on air, so that counts. That's like a pinky problem. Here.

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing is that if you were to pull

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the how Stuff Works podcasters and ask them, would you

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>be interested in occasionally hosting a show about crime? I

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think an overwhelming majority of us would say yes. Like,

0:55:57.840 --> 0:55:59.919
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. It's the quiet ones you gotta worry

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>about right, Scott, Benjamin crazy interested in this stuff, so interested. Yeah,

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he'll be coming up on your show a

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit later, right, Yeah, I'm gonna have him on

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to talk about Volkswagen and the scandal

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 1>about Volkswagen's method of cheating emissions testing. So we're gonna

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go into great detail. That's gonna be in

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks, so you guys keep an ear

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>out for that. But uh so it'll be crime, It'll

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just be corporate crime. So Ben, thank you so much

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the show. Obviously, guys, you gotta check

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>out stuff they don't want you to know. Check out

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>car stuff, check out all the videos that then works

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on brain stuff, what the stuff. These are great shows,

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh you know, if you are not familiar with them,

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>check them out because if you like this, you're gonna

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:53.400
<v Speaker 1>love those. That's that's a guarantee. You're too kind of Johnathan.

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it immensely. I'm glad I grew a little

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of face scruff so you can't see me blushing.

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope that if you are checking out and enjoying

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff, that you are also checking out some of

0:57:06.960 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's other work. We we work together on a number

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of weird not just to get rich quick schemes, but

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>those two and our hair brained inventions. Yeah, our boy.

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you. If we can boil an egg,

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a six minute egg two and a half minutes, it's good.

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten Yeah, it's still poisonous, but yeah, okay, yeah,

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't eat it, but you can boil it. So

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you can also check out I really um, I personally

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>am a fan of forward thinking, both the video and

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the audio series. Uh and it is worth your time

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if you ever want to laugh your keystro off. You

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:45.919
<v Speaker 1>can also check out some of Jonathan's work on brain

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff and what the Stuff. Yeah, you can't even watch

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>us be twins? Oh man, you might. You might not

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know what. I still like it. It

0:57:56.560 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is very cheesy. I mean, I'm you know, if you

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>find cheesy humor to be totally cringeworthy, then you probably

0:58:02.640 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see it. But if you want to

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>hear me make like the worst James Bond villain style

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>accident possible. Oh I love it all right, guys. If

0:58:11.280 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you have any other suggestions or tech stuff, whether it

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is a topic or a guest host or someone I

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>should interview, anything like that, or you just have comments

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about this particular episode, send them to me. My email

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 1>address is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or drop me a line on Facebook, Twitter or Tumbler.

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I use tech stuff H s W at All three

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon for more

0:58:40.800 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on this and happens of other topics. Because it has

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to have works dot com