WEBVTT - No Nap Rooms: Credit, Peace, 24X

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, like something could like happen, right, something

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>crazy could happen, right, Something crazy could happen while we're

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 2>recording this and I have to go talk about it

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in like fifty two minutes.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Is that exciting? Like you come in here an hour

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>before you go on television, and like you turn off

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>your phone. Obviously your phone is sitting right in front

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of you, but like, let's pretend you turn off your

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>phone and focus entirely on the Money Stuff podcast, And

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like what if something crazy happens and you get out

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of if you're at like two fifty nine and you

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>go on air and they're like something crazy happening and

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like yeah.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>They're like Katie, quick break this headline about the asteroid

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that took out California, and I'm like, we're receiving reports

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>or something like that.

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you keep your life exciting.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I do love adrenaline, like I crave adrenaline, but you know,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I get tired.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm pretty tired. I was out to a dinner

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>until like midnight last nightly six hours later than my

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>usual bedtime. So I'm in bad shape.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's crazy pants. Matt came over at nine in

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the morning with a smile on his face, and I

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>was like, how are you upright?

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I had a fun dinner last night, but it was

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>way past my bedtime. So now I'm going to do

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this and then collapse.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>No, then you're going to go watch the clothes on

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Television.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Our body batteries are turning in different directions. You are

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going to you're adrenaline filled asteroid reporting, and I'm going

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to nap. I did go over to you yesterday and

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>asked if you knew where the nap rooms.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>At bloom I can't tell you.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>If there's bloom no naprooms at Bloomer.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.919
<v Speaker 2>If there's Bloomberg people listening, they don't exist.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>No nap rooms. Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You're a weekly podcast where we talked about stuff really

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to money. I'm Matt Levine. Am I right? The Money

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff column for Bloomber opens.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Boomberg Television.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Like we're in the like pest control season of the podcast.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about book.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>There are like two hundred Bloomberg headlines on the last

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>three days about cockroaches.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel like the jokes over. We've squeezed as

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>much Series a J cockroach as we can, so let's

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>give it a rest. It's been like in the title,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>so many newsletters that I've gotten over the past four hours.

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it will not be in the title of this podcast.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Un last week screw up. They're right. So Jamie Diamond

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Jape Morion Earnings call used the very conventional metaphors. Yeah,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>but when you see one cockroaches, there probably more. He's

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about the First Brands and Tricolor bankruptcys failures. Yeah,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>credit bad things, kabooms, kabooms actually the real word that

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I love. And Mark Rowan said this, he said, it

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>does not surprise me that we were seeing late cycle accidents.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Accident is what you call this. Like the word for

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened with First Brands and Tracklor was accident. Yeah,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>you made some loans, you didn't get paid.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Back, Oops, you spilled the milk.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Just it's like accident is the term. But yeah, so

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there have been some pretty big accidents in the credit space,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and one dumb thing that is happening is that there

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is a dispute about whether they exist in the private

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>credit space or the public credit space. But I don't

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's at all interesting, like at all. But basically

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>JP Diamond got on a call and it was like,

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you see the problems with private credit because these you know,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>companies on a bankround and then all the private credit

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>guys are like those are like publicly financed banks led

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>their deals, Like those are not and like they're not

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like private credit private credit. They're not like direct loans

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>from like the classic. They're not like LBO, you know,

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like the core of private credit. Like I don't know,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they were funded by funds, Like are they private credit

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in some loose sense sure? Or some of them bank

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>led and like you know with their bonds Like yeah,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whatever. But the point is it's not

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like JP Morgan making bank loans on its packs, and

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not like core you know, direct credit.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. A funny detail in all of this is that

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Diamond didn't specifically call out private credit.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, though he did talk about like BDC's.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Being yeah yeah, yeah, I know, but like it's not

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>like he said, like, oh, these guys made bad loans,

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. He did talk a little bit about

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, BDC's trading at a discount to their NAV

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>but I think.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just such as the efficient markets way.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying they made right, right, right, But it did

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>so happen that Mark Lipschultz of Blue Out was asked

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 2>about his comments and appears that he took them personally,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's where he told, of course JP Morgan to

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>look inwards and the banks to look inwards at their loans.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>So it is this fun blame game that has played

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>out this week. I feel like we wouldn't be talking

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 2>about it so much had Jamie Diamond not said cockroaches.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that game is defin a good like

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 2>tangible illustration for us to all seize upon.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>But it is like taking a step back, like it

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>is the case that like these accidents, as Mark running

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>call them, are like true like bubbly signs like you

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>don't make loans to like people who are double or

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>triple or one hundred times pledging their assets, which like

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there are some allegation that no one really knows. There's

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>some allegations Tray Color and or First Brands were maybe

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you know a little loose with collateral. You don't make

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>those loans unless you're really trying hard to make loans, right,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I wrote about, like one thing that I think

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is interesting about first brands is like the people who

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of exposure. You know, there's like this

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Jefferis run fund. There's this like trade finance origination platform.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>They have like enormous amounts of exposure specifically to first brands.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Like what does that mean? It means like you're running

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a fund and you're like, you know, ideally you'd like

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to have diversified you know, trade finance receivables or whatever,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>but like you just need to find paper to put

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>into the fund. And if someone is like I'm going

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>to generate a lot of paper for you, then like

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd love to deal with that person, right, Like you'd

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>love to deal with the first bend if they're like,

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we can you know, sell you as much as you need,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And so it create some that is for people to

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sell you as much paper as you need, which means

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>either becoming very overlevered to generate paper for you, or

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just like writing fake paper or like you know, triple

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>pledging things so that they can like sell you more

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff because they sell your stuff and you get the money,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and like that's you know, that's the trade they're in.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So it does feel very toppy. Yeah, like Mark Owen said,

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>accidents but also late cycle accidents, and like this is

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a private credit thing, just the credit generally these days,

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a lot of people going around being like, yeah,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it feels toffee. Yeah, we're going to keep doing it. Yeah,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think one of the most insightful things

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>ever said about finance was when Chuck Prince in two

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven said, as long as the music is playing,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got to get up and dance. Like that's what

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it is, man.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 2>We all know we're coming to the end of the song.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Like, if you're in the business of making loans, you

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>can't be like we're not making loans. Yeah, too many

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>loans are too frisky right now, We're not going to

0:06:59.720 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can't do that yet. A dance, Yeah, got

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>a dance, even if it's slate cycle and you know

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 2>everyone's tired. It is interesting. I mean this has been

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>held up as an example of we are in a

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 2>toppy environment. So too, I said, we weren't going to

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about open Ai, but the open Ai Walmart deal.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>That has been a lot of hay has been made

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 2>on social media about how truly we've reached the top or.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone like the headline and something like, of course it's

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a bubble.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Of course are here, we are in a bubble. I

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>do want to talk a little bit more about this

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 2>other comment that Mark Lipschultz said, because it seems like

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>he did take this very personally. One of the things

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>he said, when it comes to market caps, there are

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 2>people who have meaningful interests in the industry not continuing

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to grow and succeed. Blackstone's market cap exceeds the market

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>cap of most financial institutions in the world today. It's

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>not as if that's not coming from someone, and of

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>course there are people who don't like it. Which is

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>interesting that he use Blackstone specifically and not Blue asl

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>But Blue Aule has a market cap of about twenty

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollars. Blackstone is somewhere closer to two hundred

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 2>billion JP Morgan is over eight hundred billion. But this

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>is the point we've spoken about before, is how the

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 2>stock market values some of these private credit players even

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 2>though their assets are much smaller than like a traditional

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>asset manager or even the asset management arms of these banks.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think the point he's making is like when

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he says that that market cup has to be coming

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere, it's not like a comparison to the aum

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of banks. It's a comparison to like their lending business. Right,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, you know, I think he's making more broadly,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the point that like the business of making a lot

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of categories of loans is shifting from being a thing

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that banks, yeah, at least intermediate and under it, to

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>being a thing that is kind of being led and

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>originated and held in the balance sheets of private credit firms. Yeah, which,

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>again I don't know how interesting it is to like

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>debate about whether the problems you're seeing or like private

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>credit problems or bank problems. But like, on the one hand,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the private credit people make a good point, Like,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for I say this a lot, but like the funding

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>model of private credit is a lot more systemically stable

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>than the funding model of banks. Right, instead of having deposits,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you have long term equity capital. That seems good. The

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>private credit people will also argue that like they have

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>better underwriting incentives because they hold it on their books,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas banks obviously hold a lot of loans on their books,

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but you think about a lot of what they do

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is originate the distribute model, where they maybe have less

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game on their underwriting. On the other hand,

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks are regulated, and you do get the sense that

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it is such a good fundraising environment for private credit firms,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>such a frothy like if you want to sell your

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>private credit firm a lot of like traditional asset measures,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's like you do have some pressures to put

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>all this gusher of money to work, and that might

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>looseen your underwriting standards as well.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Can I say one more thing about cockroaches? By all means,

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>this is so gross, Yeah, Jamie Diamond. So first of all,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 2>exactly what he said on the call was my antenna

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>goes up when things like this happens. And my first

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 2>reaction was, like an antenna like that on a cockroach.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You're saying he feels for the cockroaches, Well, it's just

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he can put himself in the shoes of both the

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>lender and then he's gonna say the shoes of the cockroaches.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But perhaps he tipped his hands there. I don't know,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 2>but cockroaches do have antennas, and so does Jamie Diamond.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>What's a second on your priority list? Yeah, all right,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't win again. Well, someone won the Nobel Peace Prize,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>but also the Insider Trading Prize, but it wasn't inside

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>did somebody?

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Somebody won the Nobel Peace Prize was Maria Corinam, a

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>shadow Venezuela and democracyativist. And also somebody won an amount

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of money on polymarket some some Yeah, the sum appears

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to be had fifty thousand dollars, which is like depends.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>On your like, I could find something to do it.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bad payday for someone hanging out on polymarket.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like institutional grade. You know, you can't like

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>run a hedge fund by like occasionally by once every

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>year making fifty thousand dollars on the Nobel Peace Prize winner.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>But it's something, right, It's like, it's true, it's a

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>nice individual person's bet it. But anyway, there were some

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>suggestions that it was inside of treading because it was

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>done kind of right before the announcement, like in the

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, hours later ampter then announcement and

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact, a spokesman for the Norwegian No Balance Dude said,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we have noticed that some have made significant financial gains

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>by placing bets on this year's prize. We will investigate

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>whether this means that someone has unlawfully obtained information from us,

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>because presumably they knew before they announced it, right, And

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>so if like someone in the circle of trust that

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the Norwegian Nobel Institute went and like placed an anonymous

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>crypto trade on polymarket, then would.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>It have been amazing for what it's worth. Oh yeah,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 2>real sign of the times anyway.

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>A real sign of the times. And then that's what

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they seem to have thought happened, But it probably turns

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>out one never knows, because these things are all like

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>somewhat anonymous. But like, you know, there's an interview of

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy who like allegedly did it, and he's like,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can look to the there's all this

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>public stuff basically like when they hit the button on

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the announcement, Like there's a lot of assets on the website,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>like there's a picture of my shadow for sure, and

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they upload those assets before they hit the button, before

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they like put out the actual press relief. And so

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're like scraping the folder on the website that

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>has all the assets. You can see like you know,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>something with her name in the web page, and then

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you can make an informed pat and so that maybe

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Here that is really funny. Also to your point that

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty grand is an institutional money, I have to imagine

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that next year this inefficiency in the market won't exist,

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Like maybe they'll hit the button and then they'll upload

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the photo.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's some of this, like like this is a

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>trade that occasionally exists in US public company earnings. Yeah,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because you can, like, if you know, like the URL

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of like last quarter's earnings, you can just like change

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Q two to Q three in that URL and just

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>refresh that page until something pops up, which might be

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>before they officially announced earnings. Yeah, and so this is

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>like a well known enough trade that companies are a

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>little better about not doing that now. So right, you

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>think that like they will be a little bit more

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>information secure next year, or they won't. I don't know.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe they're not that bothered, but I just

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like that that body who.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually, like if you're the Nobel Institute and it turns

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>out that some junior staffer was using your information to

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>make fifty grand, you'll be annoyed with them. If it

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>turns out that someone on the committee that selects the

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>winner was betting on it, then you'll be really.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Annoyed bad because that's like, don't like that.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not insider trading. That's like you know market.

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's like rigging the game.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>That's rigging the game. It's like instead of betting on

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>who's going to win the Nobel Peace Prize, you're like

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>giving the Nobel Peace Prize to the person you bet on.

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems really really bad. No allegation to that happened.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But if it's just like someone script your website, like

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>who cares? Give them the money?

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Who cares? That's a very Kathy would out of referencing,

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of course, last week's podcast No right.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>No. I know people time out prediction markets. You know,

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I've quoted chain Complain saying it's like their goal is

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to help people understand and price the future, and people

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>really want prediction markets to create incentives to make the

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>world more informed, and it's like the ideal is like,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have a bet. I'm like, will Russia

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>invade Ukraine or whatever, right, and like you have people

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>who are really informed geopolitical analysts making bets, and then

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you have like a Russian general making bets, and then

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like you actually know right, and then like the market

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>implied odds are really informative, and so people can make

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>economic decisions based on this like probability that exists in

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a prediction market. Like that's kind of an interesting ideal

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and would be useful in a lot of purposes. And

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we've talked about here, the problem with

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that is like it's not clear. There is a lot

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of dumb money on like yeah, the market of like, well,

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Russia invade at Ukraine, and so it's hard to make

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. It's hard to be institutional grade,

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and so like if you're a Russian general, you might

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>be like, well I can make ten thousand dollars and

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly be shot, so I won't do it right. So

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's like hard to incorporate information. And then

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like you have examples like this where it's like whoever

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this is like put a lot of work into figuring

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>out who was going to win the Nobel Prize twelve

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>hours early, and like one is that the sort of

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that will inform anyone's economic decisions about like the

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one's hedging who's going to win the Nobel Prize right.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Two is knowing it twelve hours early? That useful? And

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>then three like the reaction might be that they just

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>stop putting these assets on the web twelve hours early,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and then it's like.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, yeah, the trade is something like you haven't.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Made anyone more informed about anything in any useful way.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just yeah, you get the money.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well to that point, I mean you write in

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>your newsletter that the point is that the Nobel Peace

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Prize prediction market is working the way it is supposed to.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 2>It incentivizes people to find out information and incorporate it

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 2>into prices, which I agree with, but it feels kind

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of unsatisfying because you think about the example of you know,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 2>equity markets and a hedge fund analyst scraping a website

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 2>for earnings. Makes that market a little bit more efficient,

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and then it informs how companies invest capital and allocate capital,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 2>whereas here it's just someone now knows this early and

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>like there's no follow through on that, which is satisfying.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>People care about who in the Nobel Prize, but it

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have like economic consequences. They're not a lot of hedgers.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, yeah, but you know this is like what

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I've said about sports campling too. Right. It's like, if

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>you like create an ecosystem where people professional and like

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>semi professional and like just hardworking and smart people are

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>dabbling in prediction markets, then like there's possible spillover to

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>like economically meaningful prediction markets. Right, There's some possibility that

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the people who spend eight hours building some scraping tools

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to predict the novel PCE prize will then go on

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to spend sixteen hours building scraping tools to predict the

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>next Russian invasion, right, because like the similarish skill sets. Maybe, yeah, maybe,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like maybe Russia's uploading its battle plans to a website.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. There's some notion that if prediction markets get

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger and attract capital and skill, then ultimately the thing

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you really want, which is that they inform people about

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities of economically meaningful future events. Some possibly that

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>will come true. And like it's not in a straightforward

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>linear way where it's we start with the most important

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>markets and get really sos they get people to really

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>get predictions of the most important markets. It's we start

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>with places where you can make money, and then that

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>attracts money, and then that attracts more sophistication.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 2>It probably also informs your behavior in other markets. Like

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 2>if the prediction market for who is Russia going to

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>invade next gets really informative and liquid, and you could

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>imagine watching that and then going and buying a bunch

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>of calls on oil.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely, although I mean right now, surely the oil

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>market is more predictive of geopolitical events. No, you know,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>most prediction markets, but I don't know.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 2>The frustrating thing about oil, it's my least favorite commodity

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk about. It never prices in a sustainable risk premium.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>So maybe you wouldn't buy calls on oil, or maybe

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 2>you would, I don't know, buy treasuries.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Right This is one of the arguments for prediction markets.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of ways to implement predictions about future

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical events. And what that means is that you can't

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the price of oil or the price of

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>treasuries and read out a prediction about future events because

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they kind of reflect a lot of different possible events. Yeah,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>whereas if there's just like a contract, will Russia invade wherever,

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>then you can look at that contract and read off

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the probability. Yeah.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like very pure pleasure. Yeah right, congratulations to.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fifty grand probably less than the Nobel Peace Prize price.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 2>How much is it?

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You get a gold medal.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty good. Yeah, A look at the satisfaction.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's pretty good.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like winning the Nobel Piece prisence is in

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>some ways the worst. It's like, there's a decent chance

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're like imprisoned or exiled.

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>That's true. But in the event that you're not, imagine

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 2>all the speaking engagements and fees that you can command.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, that's fair, that's fair, lucrative business winning a

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>piece press.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, a bunch of people are going to write

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in and tell you how much.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course change. I think it's.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 2>It's fun because we could google it. We're not going

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 2>to do that, right, just yeah, staring at me.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>We're up to eighteen five stock trading.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Eighteen five, baby, but you know in twenty twenty six,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>eventually we'll get to twenty three five?

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Is a thing called the twenty four X Exchange, the

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four Exchange twenty four X National Exchange. The intuition

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is that we want to trade stocks twenty four hours

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a day, but like you can't do that because you

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have to like restart the computers, so they're more modest.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Target is trading slacks twenty three hours a day, five

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>days a week, and their progress starts that as they

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>launched eighteen hour a day trading five days a week,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>which is I feel like.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Their name should be twenty.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Three rec No, that's the thing, like if you're twenty

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>four twenty four, that's the number of hours in a day.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>If you say twenty three, I feel like what I know,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 2>But it's disingenuous.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's why it's funny. Yeah, but like you know,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to be funny anyway, though. But they're now

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen hours, which is like, you know, kind of

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like extended hours.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Really all you need.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's all I need. I as we've

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>established good about at six o'clock. But if you're, for instance,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in Japan and you want to trade American stocks, it

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is convenient to be able to do it in the

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>middle of your day.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess like it's a global market, yeah.

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>For American stocks and slacks generally, and so it does

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of make sense that everyone should be able to

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>trade all the time.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Also, you know, maybe you're in Japan, maybe you're just

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 2>up at three in the morning.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, I try to be generous, like twenty four x

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Exchange actually says, you know, this is for you know,

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>investors worldwide. And I don't really think that the paradigmatic

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>user of twenty four hour trading is someone drunk on

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>their computer at three am. But I kind of think

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 1>that I think about that person a lot. I think

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a fun. Yeah, I'm not going to do it justice.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a famous great pit in like hedgehund market Wizards

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Schueger book, where he interviews one hedgehund manager

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>who says, I want to hire people who wake up

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>early on Sunday morning and log in to poker sites

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to pick off the drunks coming home in another time zone. Nice,

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>because what you're doing there is understanding where you have

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the most edge and then just exploiting your edge, doing

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it somewhat inconveniently for yourself in a just a cold

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>bloodedly rational way anyway, Right, there's some people in a

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>world of twenty four R trading who would come home

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>drunk from the bar at three am and be like,

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, fire up Robin.

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Hood's options, my single triple leverage EUTF now.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again, I don't think that's the main use

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>case for twenty four R trading, but it's the funniest

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>use case. Yeah.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, hopefully, you know, as this gets online, we'll figure

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 2>out who exactly the players at three am Eastern are.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>It might be Japanese retail players. It might be people

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 2>drunk coming home from the barn. It might almost said barn,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I say that a lot more often than bar.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>You come home from the barn more often than the bar.

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Or it might be you know, sophisticated US investors looking

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>to pick off Japanese retail investors. I don't know.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I mean. The other thing, like, the thing

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think is interesting is we have this ecosystem

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of news gets disclosed outside of regular

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>market hours because you don't want to be Traditionally, you

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be in the situation of disclosing a

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>merger at ten am and everyone reacting to that sequentially

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and like reading the press release and saying, oh, I

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>should buy the stock, and some people not having gotten

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the press release yet and like selling it outdated prices.

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just a mess. And so what everyone does is

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>they announce earnings at seven am or four or five pm,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so people have time to digest the earnings before the

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>stock opens for trading next And the purpose of after

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>hours trading really is to let people react to news

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. So instead of, you know, if a

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hurricane hits at midnight, instead of waiting until the next

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>day to dump your stocks, you can dump your stocks

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at twelve oh one. And when you say that, I

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's intuitively appealing to a lot of people. Oh

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>I can trade as soon as the thing happens. But

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like kind of bad for retail investors. Yeah,

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what it means is that instead of everyone reacting to

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>news at the same time, because you have a buffer

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>between when it's announced and when it can be traded,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you have people reacting to news as they get it,

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>as they analyze it, and so you're gonna have a

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people trading at wrong prices. And I do

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's the point where that's the appeal of after

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hours trading is like you'll just get more volatility, you'll

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>get more wrong prices. If you think you're skilled and

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy a gamble or a game of skill, you'll

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have more opportunities to log on at nine o'clock and

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>be like, I know what this news means, I'm going

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to trade on it. I actually wrote this week about

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Meme ETF. Yeah, the Roundtole Meme Slack ETF that

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was closed and then revived this week, and you know,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it was revived at the very small like the first

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>day of trading had it very small, Yeah, thousand dollars

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple hundred thousand dollars on it, and it traded

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of normally during the day, and then in the

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>after our session it shot up because like you know,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a few retail investors who are buying it, and

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the marketmakers all went home because it was after I

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was trading in this tiny little ETF, and so there's

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>no arbitrage mechanism, and so people are just buying it

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at crazy premiums to nav which should not happen in

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the ETF, but does if no professionals are awake. And

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think if you have like more twenty four hours trading,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna have more trading where no professionals are awake,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and things trading at wrong prices, and like people want

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to trade it wrong.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Prices, You're gonna have uglier charts. Basically, Yeah, if.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You ugly tart means someone like made a very bad

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>trade and someone else made a very good trade. Yeah.

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Well you touched on something that I think we've talked

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 2>about before. It is like, Okay, a world where you

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 2>do have twenty four or twenty three hour trading five

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>days a week, is whether or not you'd still get

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>like these windows around the open and the clothes where

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 2>everyone is sort of trained to trade the most.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you would, because professionals have a rhythm to

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>their day where they want to stop trading at the close.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, yeah, not all but like you know in

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>tix ones it's clinton time.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah not even like to go home, but because like

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you need a benchmark to mark against. And then also

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>just because of that like timing tradition, there is so

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>much concentrated liquidity there and so if you're a huge

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>investor who needs to move a lot of shares doing

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that at the close is really useful. I do wonder,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I never fully understood how crypto closes work

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>because crypto just sort of from day one as a

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven market, and so.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 2>For traditional currencies as well.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. Yeah, there's no like clothes, right, and

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like in stocks, there's very clearly a close and a

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of apparatus, you know, index funds and mutual fund

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>withdrawals and redemptions and benchmarks and everything are all kind

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.479
<v Speaker 1>of organized around the clothes. And if you did move

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to twenty four to seven training, if you just did

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>it in a natural, like nonpath dependent way, you'd be like, well,

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>when is the clothes? Yeah, I don't think that's ever

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. I think it's always going to be

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the main exchanges will have a close at four, And

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>even if the main exchanges offer you know, seventeen hours

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of extended hours and everything is kind of technologically the

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>same during the regular session and the extended session, I

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>think there will still be a close that everyone can

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>point to and where a lot of liquidity will be concentrated.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I feel that way too, Like I do struggle

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>to imagine a world where this is the norm.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just continuous, twenty four hour day, like nothing, no clothes. Yeah,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't seem feels like it goes against just the

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>rhythm of being a human.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it does. It goes against like the stock markets rhythm.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you say the rhythm of being a human,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and I hear you. But like stock market, you can

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>buy an Amazon anytime you want, you know.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was going to say, I mean humans did

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 2>make the stock market, right, yeah.

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, no, right, right right. There is a human

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>rhythm and there is a computer rhythm, and like humans

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>have become adapted to the computer. And the stock market

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is from a time of you show up there and

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you leave to go have dinner, right, whereas like you know,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is from a time of computers and you log

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in at midnight and buy something, right, And crypto is

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>from a time of computers, and so you log in

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at midnight and buy a crypto. Yeah, And I think

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that is creeping into the stock market, but I think

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we're a long away from it entirely taking over the

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>stock market.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I did want to point out one thing that you

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>wrote which actually made me grateful for the environment that

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 2>we live in right now. You talk about how a

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 2>decade ago it was possible to think that investing would

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>gradually become doller and more efficient and more automated, and

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that people would just let robots and professionals manage their

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>retirements and basically we wouldn't have any of the silliness

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that we do now.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That was like when I said it was possible to

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>think that, Like I linked to something I wrote kind

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of predicting that. So that was dumb.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, you called yourself out, But I occasionally get tired.

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>As discussed, we all get tired of the silliness and

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the headlines. But I think that the world that you

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 2>described sounds a lot more tiresome.

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So well, you say that as a person who goes

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on TV to talk about financial news every day for

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>several hours.

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you write about it.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I agree. I agree, like all this dumb stuff.

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, once every five times I write about memestocks

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>or crypti or whatever, I roll my asthm, like I

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>hate writing about this. Yeah, clearly, I was like, Wow,

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at least that's something right about No, I agree. I

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.959
<v Speaker 1>think it's a person as an investor, if you stopped

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking about memestocks and like just you know, had like

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>robots perfectly investors, like reasonably perfectly investors stock and you

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't worry about it. You could spend more time like

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>reading books.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right maybe right, Like it's a better world.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's works for you know, making jokes in a

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>financial new letter.

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're all here for.

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I have to go talk about all the silly things

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>on the television, how fun and the asteroid if it

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>hit yet?

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Luck with that? And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to The Money

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuffnewletter on Bloomberg.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>every day on the close between three and five pm Eastern.

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>email to money Pod at Bloomberg dot net ask us

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a question. We might answer it on the air.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamazarakus and Mooses On.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was imposed by Blake.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Maples, Amy Keane as our executive producer.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>And Sage Falman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>back next week. Welcome our Stuff