WEBVTT - TechStuff Looks at Ballistics

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello everyone,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to text stuff. My name is Chris Polette

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as usuals who wants to start

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>off this podcast with a bang is senior writer Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Spade's jaw was long and bony, his chin jutting

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>v under the more flexible V of his mouth. Very nice,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. You know we did a podcast on nuclear

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>weapons recently, Yes, we did, um, and right in the

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of it, for reasons that I can't even fathom,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I started thinking about other kinds of weapons, and I thought,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it would be kind of interesting to

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do a podcast on ballistics, which is basically the science

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of figuring out moving stuff and projectiles. Yeah, yeah, I

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I was. I agree, that was a cool idea. Yeah,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a science of deals with motion of projectiles. But

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>of course it's been used. Sorry, I didn't mean an interrupt.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say that, you know, ballistics, it also

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of shorthand for a specific branch of forensics,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>which is really what we're focusing on today. Yes, because

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>when you get down to it, the actual study of

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ballistics is in large part a matter of physics. Yes. Yes,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of science involved in this. We know

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>how we much we hate science, dad gum it um.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for the scientists, but fortunately for crime mystery writers.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Bullets do not always behave themselves in terms of physics, Like,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they generally go where they're supposed to go, but they

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't always follow the normal path when they get there. Yeah,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that it's all due to little, tiny

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>individual differences on a very small scale. Because we don't

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mean to say that bullets somehow defy the laws of physics. No,

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but they don't always. They don't always travel like a

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>predictable path. Right. You might think, oh, well, if so

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and so was standing here and shot such and such

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>over there, then the bullets should be right here. That's

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not always the case. Even even saying the cartridge

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for the the case for the cartridge should be right here,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not always the case either. So to really understand this,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we need to talk a little bit

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about how the forensics part of ballistics all came about

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Yes, and and really ballistics people

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>have been trying to get the science behind uh forensics

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ballistics down for quite some time, but it hasn't really

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>been that long that we really got it down pat.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the nineteenth century, Uh, there were people

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>who were trying to figure out how to do this,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but they were the methods they were using were not

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at all scientific, right, And to understand how you would

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to use ballistics to try and identify a

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>weapon that fired a particular projectile, you have to understand

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about what goes on with these projectiles.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So sometime around oh, the late fifteen century, the people

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>who were creating firearms at that time discovered something which

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was that if you were to have a barrel of

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a weapon have some grooves in it to help direct

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the projectile to spin as it comes out of the barrel,

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you improve the stability of that projectile's flight path. Yeah.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Previously they were what you call smooth bore, which was

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>basically a a smooth tube. The inside of it was smooth,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so you would, uh, you know, say, take your musket

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and fire, uh, fire a shot from it. Um. Actually,

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this is I was getting ready

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss this in my head, but I think we

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>should mention this. Um. You know those early muskets where

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you would you know, uh, you'd have to get everything ready.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to put the wadding and the and the

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>powder in and then the musket ball and tamp it

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>all down with the rod before you could fire the weapon.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether it's matchlock or flint lock, which we

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about in another podcast. Um, but you have a

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>basically a roundsh ball made of lead which is fired

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>using um, the explosive gunpowder and the the gases propelled

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of the tube and you know they go, well,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they go where they go generally go in the direction

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that the barrel was pointing. Yes, more specific than that, Yeah,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>it h They weren't nearly as accurate as a rifled barrel,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what which is what Jonathan was just talking about,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>where the there are grooves inside the barrel and they

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are UM and they travel in a spiral pattern. I

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly, didn't we talk about something in the rim

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>when they started grooving the barrel? But they weren't They

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>weren't in a spiral pattern. They were straight m may

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have been I can't remember, I'm sorry, But eventually they

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>did hit onto the fact that a helical groove spiral

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>groove would uh where where that would create enough spend

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so that the projectile would become much more stable. Of like,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>this is the same sort of idea you get when

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a football player throwing a football American football.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>American football player, um your hands. You know when you

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.119
<v Speaker 1>hear about like when you hear about like a tight

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>spiral that helps that projectile in this case the American

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>football maintain a precise flight path. Well, while that was

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>very useful in making firearms more accurate, it was not

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the out of as a way of identifying a firearm

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>based upon a projectile that had been fired for several centuries.

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until the eighteen hundreds and uh actually I

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have the earliest this. This is all from a website

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>called Firearms I d and it was created by a

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>guy named Scott Doyle who did some amazing research on ballistics,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the history of it, and all of the elements that

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>go into identifying firearms. If you are interested in the subject,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I recommend you check out firearms, I d because it

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is truly exhaustive. I'm only going to give a small

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>fraction of what he made available. So the earliest of it,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he found the earliest documented case of identifying a firearm

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>UH in a criminal case happened in eighteen thirty five

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in London. And what had happened was a homeowner was

0:06:55.960 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>killed by by a gun and a servant was suspected

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of being the perpetrator. And UH, a fellow named Henry

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Goddard UM who was with the London Police or with

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a branch of the London Police, was assigned the case.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And he examined the the the projectile that killed this

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>shop owner and determined that it was made by a

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>particular mold um by UH, which meant that it came

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>from a specific company. And then he looked at the

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>paper patch that was used in the the the firing

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now, this paper what it did was it

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>created a seal between the powder and the projectile so

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that when the powdering knights and the gases expand, the

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>projectile would have a good seal on it, so it

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>would it would fly out properly. And you saw that

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>this paper patch had been made from some newspaper that

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>had been in the room. He actually found the page

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>where the newspaper had been torn to make that patch,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and so they were able to determine that it was,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact the servant who appeared to have fired on

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this shop owner. And so that was the first case.

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Now in that case, it wasn't an idea, you know,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically checking the bullet for the spiral marks that would indicate, um,

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what gone fired it, because that's that's something else we

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>should mention, these rifling marks. Uh. In fact, that's why

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we call it a rifle. There's these rifling marks that

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are on the bullet itself. That's that's caused. As a

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>bullet travels down this this grooved barrel, it cards little

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>scratches into the bullet. And so these scratches are unique

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to a particular weapon. Even even two weapons of the

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>same make and model will produce different scratches, at least

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>on a on a tiny let. You know, beyond a

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>superfluous glance, you'll be able to see that there are

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>different prances, and so it's almost like a fingerprint. If

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you are able to see, you know, tell that two

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>different bullets are close enough and identity that these these

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>markings are really really you know, to all intentsive purposes, identical.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You can say that they were both fired by the

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>same weapon. So if you happen to have that weapon

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in your possession and you've done a bunch of test

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>firings and all the bullets are coming out the same

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>way and they matched the bullet that was used in

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a crime, you can feel pretty confident saying that that,

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in fact was the weapon that was used in that crime. Um.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean there, um, there are many cases

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in which you know, this has been this has been used.

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the first I read, and I

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>read an excellent article by Katherine Ramsland um in uh

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in which he was talking about do you remember learning

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>about Sacco and Vanzetti in your American history class? This

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>very controversial, absolutely absolutely. Um. This was a case in which, uh, um,

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the payroll was being delivered to a shoe factory and

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a a couple of guys came up and shot the guards,

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, they basically made off with the money,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh so they started looking for information. This, by

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, was April fifty, um, and this is when

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they started looking. Uh. This really was the incident that

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>made modern ballistics a science, I think, UM, just from

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>from the way they handled it. So UM, the investigators

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>behind this UH collected all the evidence they could, including

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the spent shell casings. UM. They went back to looking

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at the manufacturers of of weapons. UM. There were about

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>six at the time that they looked at, and UH

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>they turned out to be Remington, Winchester, and Peters UM

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that that could use these these casings UM. And what

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they what they ended up doing was they started, uh,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking around at you know, what they could

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get from this information. And as it turns out, one

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>of the incriminating factors was the fact that for one

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the weapons that they had, the only bullets that

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they could find, uh that would fit that weapon were

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in Saco's pocket. UM, which is pretty incriminating evidence, but

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly that's circumstantial, you know. UM. So what

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they did was they talked to somebody who had worked

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>with UH sort of preliminary ballistics technology. His name was

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Albert H. Hamilton's and UH he actually had been um

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>working with UH with other cases and UH he wasn't

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>completely scientific um in his methods, but he he actually

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>got stuck in the middle of the case. And during

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this uh the Sacco and Vanzettie case, UM came in

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with new weapons that were UH similar to the ones

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that they had and basically disassembled them in front of

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the judge who noticed that he was swapping parts with

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the other gun and went, no, you can't do that,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and they threw it out. But they did give the

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>information to Calvin Goddard, someone who is quite famous in

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>ballistics forensics. Yeah, he's he's I would argue that he's

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>probably considered by many people to be the father of

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this technology. He worked with a guy named Charles Waite

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at in New York with the Bureau of Forensic Ballistics,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and he was using microscopes and a helixometer, which is

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a probe that you could use to look at gun

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>barrels UM. I imagine that was used in the manufacturing

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>of these weapons. UM. But what he did was he

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 1>fired these the weapons used or or in Sacco and

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Vanzetti's possession, UM into a wad of cotton and compared

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the casing and the bullet to the ones recovered in

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. And they were similar enough UM to incriminate

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Now um, Vanzetti, I mean, they put

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>both of them to death, but Vanzetti said he was innocent,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh apparently Zacho's uh last words were long live anarchy,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't exactly uh he he doesn't exactly say, well,

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I didn't do any of that, but yeah,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and and in later years too, they've still they continue

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to examine that and uh, right now, although it's still

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>controversial whether or not these guys were railroaded or whether

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or not they actually did commit the crime. Um, uh,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they still say that. Uh, the weapons still support Goddard's

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>findings even years later. So the technology we're using now

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>suggest that those weapons were the ones used them. That

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Forensic Ballistics was formed in in April nineteen

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five in New York City, and the whole purpose

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>behind it was that by nine you remember, back in

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thirty five, was the first time we see someone

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to identify a firearm, uh, after a crime has happened.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>The firearm itself was the one that was used. By

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety five, there had been a lot of pioneers who

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>worked on this idea of identifying firearms based upon the

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>projectiles they fired, and uh, The problem was that the

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the resources were scattered, right. I mean you had you

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>had some communities that might have an expert that resides

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>within that community, but then you know, you might have

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of miles of area where there is no expert,

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no one to call upon. And so the Bureau

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was formed as a resource for law enforcement agencies across

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States. There were other countries that were doing

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>similar things. Actually, a lot of this early research where

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea was, hey, look, they're these markings on this bullet.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>They're consistent with every bullet that's fired from this particular gun,

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're different from all the ones that are fired

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>from that gun. That kind of work was being done

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. In fact, there were a lot

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of people in France who wrote a lot of instrumental

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>early papers on identifying firearms based upon their projectiles or Yeah.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And then two, the FBI, the Federal Bureau of Investigation

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States was directed by a their

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>jaunty head of staff, Jagger Hoover. I think that's the

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>first time I've ever heard is I think that's what

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Jay stands for, right, John T. Edgar Hoover. Um, No,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not at all, uh, he know, it was more like,

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>really you said that, really it was a question mark,

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like the sarcastic kind. It wasn't actually an interrobang, gotcha.

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So he directed that the FBI should create a lab

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>for ballistics forensics as well, and so this was becoming

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>really serious business. And then we're there were a lot

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of early cases between you know, the late eighteen hundreds

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and and nineteen twenty that established that this was a

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>legitimate means of investigation. So let's talk a little bit

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>more about what you actually do when you're trying to

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>identify whether or not a particular bullet was fired from

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a particular gun. First of all, it helps if we

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>if we talk about bullets and cartridges because we and

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we've done this in another podcast, but it always helps

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of I think people who are generally

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar with guns don't know the anatomy of a gun. Yep.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of why I wanted to mention that

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about the muskets Um because you know, after a while

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they realized that the system that we're about to talk about,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes the weapons much more reliable using those things

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and faster to operate because rather than having to put

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the powder in the in the wadding and all that

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff in there, and and prepare the weapon to be fired.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I saw I can't even remember what show

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it was. I saw a thing on TV where they

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>had somebody firing and must get as fast as they could,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>just to see how quickly a trained um musketeer could

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fire a weapon. It's about three times per minute. Three

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>times per minute is considered an excellent time. Yeah, I know,

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen I've seen artillery cruise that we're using, uh

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>period cannon's um Actually it wasn't a cannon, but anyway,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was an artillery gun, period artillery gun.

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And they talked about how even with a well trained

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>group of troops who were familiar with the weapon, three

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>times a minute was considered to be the peak performance.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>So one of the biggest innovations was the idea of

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>why don't we take the system of gunpowder and wadding

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and shot and all that, and why don't we try

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and figure out a way of packaging it all into

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>one thing that you load into a gun once and

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>then you fire. So instead of having to load in

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>all these separate pieces and pack them together and hope

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that it fires correctly. It's all packaged together there, and

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea behind the cartridge. In fact, the earliest

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>cartridges were these little paper cartridges that had everything packed together,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and uh, they were used in the Civil War mainly.

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But then actually that was sort of the step between

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>where you put the cartridge in and then and then

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the musket ball right right the shot. Yeah, the cartridge

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>contained essentially all the stuff that you would have put

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in previously besides the shot itself. Well, the modern day

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>cartridges have the the fuel that's going to push the

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the bullet forward and the bullet itself all packed together.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a case that's typically made out of

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>something like brass or maybe steel, depends on the particular manufacturer,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and the ammunition involved pretty typically brass, and then you

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have a bullet at the end. The bullet is the

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>actual projectile that will fire out of the gun. The

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>case remains behind. Now, the case also contains it contains powder,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>primer and a primer mix and uh, and that's the

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that when a firing pin from the weapon hits

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the primer, that ignites the primer, which then in turn

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>ignites the powder which creates this massive amount of gas.

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Massive in a relative term, I should say um amount

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of gas within the case. That's what pushes that that

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>bullet out of the weapon. So the case remains behind.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>The case is actually altered by this because the gases

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are pretty hot. Then they pushed pretty hard, so the

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>case itself will change a little bit. Then you have

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to extract the case from the weapon and put a

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>new cartridge in its place in the chamber of the

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>weapon in order to fire it again. And of course

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we've also talked about machine guns. So if you're talking

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about an automatic weapon, you put in you have a magazine,

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>some feeding mechanism, feeding mechanism that will automatically pop the

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>next it will pop the spent cartridge out of the

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>weapon and uh load the next cartridge in and ready

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to be fired. And it happens very very quickly. So

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but it operates on the same same principle. So here's

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing, a couple of interesting things. First of all,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the rifling with the grooves within the

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>barrel which are going to cut into the bullet, making

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a fingerprint on that bullet, so that if you were

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to find two bullets fired by the same gun, and

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you were to compare them side by side, you should

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to see the same markings on both because

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to carve it out the same way. Well,

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of thing goes plays for the cartridge

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>or like the case, rather for the cartridge. Um, the case,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the spent cartridge is going to have some markings on

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it as well. Um, some of it maybe scratches just

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>from you know, the way that it sits in the chamber,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>or if the there if there's an extractor, if there's

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an actual mechanical element in there that kicks that spent

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>cartridge out, that can leave a mark on the case

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>as well. So that way, if you don't maybe you

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>don't even have the bullets, maybe you just have the

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>spit cases, you can compare those and see. So I

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Step one of identifying the weapon is identifying what caliber

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of bullet was used and you know what kind of

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>cartridge was used, because that will limit the type of

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>weapons that could have fired that particular ammo, right, because

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>not every gun fires every immunition. Because anyone who has

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>ever worked with guns nose they're very specific kinds of

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>ammo that work with particular guns and you cannot you

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>cannot interchange them. Nope, nope. UM. And uh you know

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>each each weapon Now, each manufacturer when they make when

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they put the grooves in there and the the section between. UM.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Basically the ridges around the grooves are called lands. UM.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Those metal ridges basically are what helped the bullet reach

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>its destination by providing it the spin and accuracy. UM.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But they also are are uh common to manufacturers. So

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one weapons manufacturer might put six grooves in the barrel,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one might use four. UM. So one of the things

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>these marks left and they are unique to every weapon. UM.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>These marks are going to help the forensics investigator if

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>if if they can find the bullets, they're going to

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to identify which manufacturer made the gun. That

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>will help track it down. And then from there they

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>can look at other things that will help them at

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>least narrow down. He said, well, this couldn't have been uh,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this couldn't have been the gun that fired because it's

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not even the same manufacturer. It's not the right people.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>So we can rule this out. From there, they can

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>look at specific guns because multiple manufacturers can make the

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>same type of gun. Yes, so yeah, so narrowing it

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>down to your First you look at the caliber of

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the bullet, uh and the case so that you can

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>determine what kind of m O was used. That narrows

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it down to a range of weapons that might be

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>able to fire that looking at the actual pattern on

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the bullet itself and uh, well we'll give you at

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>least an idea of the specific type of weapon used

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and the manufacturer. And then again comparing that bullet with

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>one like a test bullet fired from a weapon will

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>let you know if it's fired from the same weapon.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're you keep narrowing it down. This is very scientific.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're talking about going from the general to

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the very specific, and so you're just eliminating all the

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>other options until what you're left with is the only,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the only uh possible answer. And um, there are

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different ways that that these the cartridges

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can have marks on. Besides the ejection UM mark, there

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>could be firing pen marks, so you can see how

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the firing pin struck the bottom of the cartridge. That

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>will tell you a lot about the type of weapon.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Like there's certain weapons that have a very distinct firing

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>pen mark, So like a square one a good indicator

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>that that was a glock that fired the weapon. And

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there are certain marks that are you're going to find

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that are common to particular types of weapons, So forensics

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>experts will use that when they're actually examining UM bullets.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's say there's a there's a crime case.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's make this more specific, there's a crime case in

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>which someone was shot UM and the police have recovered

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a weapon from a suspect. They do not know if

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the weapon is the one that was used in the crime.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>They do know that it matches the same UM model

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and maker of the weapon that was used in the crime.

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's all I know. The forensics expert what they

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>will do is they'll take the gun. Uh, They'll take

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>possession of the gun that's from the suspect, and they'll

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>fire it into a water tank. And the water tank

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is a long tank of water several and it's usually

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>around ten feet long. It's got about three ft wide

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>three ft high full of water. And on one end

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of this water tank, which is sealed on all sides,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which is important you don't want any stray bullets flying out,

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a hole through one side a tube where you

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>can fire through that tube, it goes into the water.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>The water is meant to slow down the progress of

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the bullet, and as it slows down, it'll come to

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>arrest at the bottom of the tank. You the forensics

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>expert will retrieve that bullet, and then they take that

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bullet and the bullet used in the crime, assuming they've

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>recovered a bullet, because otherwise there's no point in doing this.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So they've recovered a bullet from the crime itself. You

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>put that and the test bullet or several test bullets

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>into a macroscope, a comparison macro scope, and you might think, hey, Jonathan,

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>what's a macroscope, I've heard of microscopes. Well, macroscope is

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a device that does magnify things, but it

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>usually magnifies them by a pretty small multiplier compared to

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a microscope. You know, microscopes you're talking about multiplying magnifying

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>something by a hundred times or more. Macroscopes tend to

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>be five, ten, maybe twenty times, so it's not it's

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>not giving you that incredibly up close look that a

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>microscope would. It's called a comparison macroscope because you can

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>actually put in two different items. So in this case,

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you put the bullet from the crime and the bullet

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>from the test, uh onto the little platform it actually

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and here's there with some sticky stuff some some you know,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially glue, um, and then you put it through

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the microscope. The microscope directs the images up to the

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>viewfinder where you look in and you can actually see

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>side by side the two projectiles, so it looks like

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they are you know, right next to

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>each other, even though they're actually on two different little

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms on the macroscope itself, and it allows you to

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>take a really close could compare those markings at a

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a nice magnified level to determine whether or not they

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>are identical, or whether or not the markings are identical. Obviously,

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the bullets can't be yeah, because someone is probably saying, yeah,

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but Jonathan, why do they have to fire it into

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a water tank? I mean, why couldn't they just you know, uh,

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the crime scene and shoot it off the

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>wall and see what happens. Well for one thing, of course,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>again you don't want stray bullets. But um, you know,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if any if a lot of people

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>know that. I mean it probably his common sense when

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you think about it. But bullets the forms quite a

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>bit in the process of firing them. UM. Actually, I

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>remember UH my rifle recourse at camp when I was

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a kid. UM. Every once in a while, UH, the

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>instructor would take us down to the end of the

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>range and there was a big pile of dirt there.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So the bullets would go through the targets and hit

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the dirt and stopped there. So we would go in

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and dig some of them out and they would come

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>out in the oddest shapes. The thing is, UM, you

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>want the bullet to be identifiable enough so that you

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>can really see the markings on it. UM. And shooting

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>it against something else that will catch it. UH. You know,

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it will also be deformed by the impact if the

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>water slows it down and it basically just drops to

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the tank. Once it it's more forward

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>momentum stops. UM, then it's going to be much less

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>affected by the impact of of uh its landing and

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>UM then you can get a good idea of what

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually going to look like in the marks that

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are on it and and sometimes the bullets retrieved from

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>crime scenes are in really bad shape. I mean because

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they've they've gone through various materials, especially if you know

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they maybe hit like a door frame or something or

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever. Uh, And it can be a challenge

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to identify them just because the bullets themselves may not

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be indecent enough shape for you to be able to

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>make a good comparison. But this is to try and

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>make the the conditions as ideal as possible so that

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you can at least narrow things down. You know, the

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>goal really is to see if you can eliminate that

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gun from suspicion, because if you can, then you know

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you're on the wrong track and you can go direct

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>your attention elsewhere and not waste time on something that

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately is a dead end. So um yeah, I mean

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's your basic approach. It's kind of interesting, like

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole process of developing this. I mean, there were

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>there were earlier UH forensics experts who would compare bullets.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have the luxury of a comparison macroscope to use,

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so in many cases they were using photography. They would

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>take um pictures of these bullets and try and enlarge

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the photographs as large as they could and compare them

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that way, and try and find as many points of

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>comparison as they could between the two to determine whether

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>or not a bullet was in fact fired by the

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>same weapon as another bullet. So again, points of comparison,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just like with fingerprints, you know, you look for a

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>certain number, and if you you figure that if you

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>find now uh like a dozen or two dozen points

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of comparison that are identical, the chances of that being

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just coincidence are pretty slim. So that's when you sit

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there and say, no, I'm pretty sure this bullet was

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fired by the same gun as the one that I tested.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And another thing that that Goddard did along with his partner, um,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the very early days of all this, he

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>started they started compiling a database of information about different

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>weapons UM, which is, if you think about it, rather

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>crucial uh to doing this because it allows you to

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>know you know in which direction and which angle a

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>particular manufacturers uh lands are going to show up inside

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the barrel. UM helps you eliminate you know, they can

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>look at a bullet and go, oh, well, I know

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's not this or this or this or this,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and by the scientific method, I've at least narrowed it

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>down to one manufacturer and from there, you know, and

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and having all that information in a database and comparing

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the weapons and I'm sorry, the bullets side by side,

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it gives you, um the ability to scientifically rule things

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>out step by step. And he really created a method

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and a plan for doing this that set the stage

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for what we know as modern ballistics work. Yeah, and

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's if you read about again, I do urge you

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to check out more information about the progression of of

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>keep gathering this information because it goes beyond just comparing

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>bullets to each other. The history of forensics is pretty

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and in some ways sometimes darkly humorous and in

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some cases just bizarre. Like you'll you'll find out about

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>people sheriffs who found a victim who had um a

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hole in their shirt and there was suspicion that perhaps

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a a gun had the person had been shot by

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a gun and then a bullet had toward the whole.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So the sheriff would take the shirt out to a

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>firing range and fire bullets into it to see if

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the tears that were made by the bullets were similar.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>To the one that was on the shirt in the

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>first place. Well, they can tell um whether a wound

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is an entrance wound or an exit wound somewhat by

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the the type of hole that it leaves. I mean,

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're um, right on top of somebody, uh, it

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>will um do more damage. If you're firing at somebody

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at point blank range. Um, then if you are farther away.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But you can tell by the direction of the fabric,

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it if it's going into the wound,

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>then you could see uh generally that it's probably an

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 1>entrance wound. And if the fibers are are spreading outward,

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>then it's probably. And it depends on the bullet too.

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there are bullets that do a lot more

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>damage on on one side or another, so that that

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>factors into it too. Of course they'll talk about things

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like blood spatter. Um. I have a great story here,

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to tell them so all right,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So in uh in nineteen o three, a fellow named E. J.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Churchill in London, England, provided testimony uh do testimony that

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>regarded an experiment he had performed that involved shooting bullets

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>into sheep's skulls. Yeah, so skulls of sheep, not actual sheep.

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>At this point that the sheep have already shuffled off

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the wooly mortal coil and their skulls have remained. And

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>what had happened was, um, it was all revolving around

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a case where there was a young woman who or

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a woman, I don't know if she was young, actually

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a woman who was shot and killed in Essex, England,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh, they figured that she had been shot by

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a thirty two caliber revolver, and so Churchill took a

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>similar revolver with the same sort of ammunition and a

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of sheep skulls and started shooting the sheep

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>skulls at various distances to determine to kind of compare

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the damage done, to see how far away the shooter

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>might have been from the victim by observing, you know,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the damage done to the sheep skulls, and he came

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that the the revolver was shot somewhere

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>between six and twelve inches away from the victim, and

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this was used. This testimony was used in the court case.

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the the accused suspect was found guilty and

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>put to death. So the experiments early on were very practical,

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea of we have this one set

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances, we need to try and recreate it as

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>closely as possible to to deter whether or not the

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>scenario we have in our mind is actually at all accurate.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and you know, like I said, the history

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of forensics is filled with stories that make that one

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>seem tame and boring in comparison. Well, and and there

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>are others that are oddly similar, um, that make you

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>realize that it isn't always exact because um. Ramslin mentioned

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a case that happened in Oklahoma where a robber used

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a three seven magnum and uh, there was a witness

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and he shot her right in the head. I'm just sorry, um.

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh what happened was the bullet went into her skull,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but it traveled around the inside of her skull before leaving,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and she ended up surviving and testifying against the robber.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>On In another case, Uh, somebody got shot in the

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wrist with a twenty two, which is a much smaller

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>caliber bullet um, and the bullet went into a vein,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>traveled into the heart and killed the persons don't always

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>do well. And I also think I've even heard of

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>people getting shot in the head and the bullet hits

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the skull and doesn't penetrate the skull, but rather goes

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>underneath the skin, travels around the skull, and pops out

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the other side without actually penetrating the skull itself. I remember,

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I distinctly remember when I was living in North Carolina,

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a police dog getting shot in the head and that happening.

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, uh, yeah, this is getting really much more

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>gruesome than I had intended. You don't mean, I don't

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>mean for it to be gruesome, but I think it's

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a situation. Well, I mean, the dog, the dog lives. Um,

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a situation that shows you that, you know,

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we sort of assume that if you get shot, if

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you get shot in the right place and at the

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>bright distance, that you know, they're a few chances that

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna make it if somebody's doing what they're supposed

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>to be or what they intend to do, let's say,

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with the weapon. Um. But bullets don't always behave themselves,

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which is why these ballistic forensics are so important because

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they've gotten it down to a science,

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>so at least you have a better idea of what's

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>going on. And we should also point out that that this,

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've been talking a lot about bullets. Uh,

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the story is completely different if you were to talk

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about things like shotguns. They do not have the rifled barrels.

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So I mean you're firing shot at that point, not

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>not a little lots of little balls. Usually occasionally you

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>might have a slug shot slug, but at any rate, yeah,

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>taser's yeah, totally different story there. But in those cases

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's that you have to look for different things. You

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>can't you know, obviously you can't compare bullets like you

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>could with rifled weapons. Um. And in fact, Scott Doyle

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>on his site rights, it should be noted that not

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>all firearms lead consistent, reproducible marks. But overall, there's been

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>my experience that around eighty percent of the firearms that

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I examine produce what is sometimes called a mechanical fingerprint

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on the bullets and cartridge cases that pass through them.

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible even for you to get a

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>gun that, through some reason or another, Uh, the marks

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that come out the end up on the bullets and

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the cartridges are not I'm not reproducible, and it could

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.959
<v Speaker 1>just be that there's, you know, some sort of weird

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>faulty part of that gun. You know, it's there's a

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of different factors that could that could cause that.

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>And in those cases, of course, then you can't you know,

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the ballistics evidence as far as comparing bullets to each

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>other is no longer really reliable. You have to rely

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on other kinds of evidence in in that uh, in

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that sort of case, I would be interesting to know

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>if any UH law enforcement authorities who have worked with

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>forensics and ballistics have are listening to our show, you know,

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so please let us know if you you are, because

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting stuff, and thank you for the work

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that you do because it makes a difference. Yeah, we

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>had some helicopter pilots right in after we did our

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>helicopter episode, which was kind of cool. No one offered

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to take me on a trip. It's not a it's

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>not criticism, it's just a statement of fact. I think

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he's hinting, even after I said distinctly that that's on

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>my bucket list anyway. What I have not had my

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>cheerios this morning all right, so we're gonna wrap this

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>discussion up anyway. Yeah, that's It's a pretty fascinating form

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of of of forensics, a scientific inquiry really. Um, I

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>found it very interesting when I was reading up on it,

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, the history in particular I found fascinating.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have any subjects you would like us

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to tackle in future episodes, you can let us know

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or Twitter are handled. There is text stuff

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>H s W or you can shoot us an email

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>at the address tech stuff at Discovery dot com and

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I will talk to you again really soon.

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check out our new video podcast, Stuff

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Future. Join how Stuff Work staff as we

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>explore the most promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow. The

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>hou stepp Works iPhone app has arrived. Download it today

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, brought to you by the reinvented two thousand

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve camera. It's ready, are you