1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,440
Speaker 1: Get ready for a whirlwind of judicial confirmations this week.

2
00:00:03,560 --> 00:00:06,840
Speaker 1: Under pressure from Republicans in the prospect of ads running

3
00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:10,200
Speaker 1: against him, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is ramping up

4
00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:13,760
Speaker 1: confirmations this week. He set up votes for four nominees

5
00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:16,800
Speaker 1: to the federal appellate courts less than two weeks ago.

6
00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:19,680
Speaker 1: At a press conference in the Rose Garden, President Trump

7
00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:22,639
Speaker 1: complained that the Democrats were holding up votes on his

8
00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:26,320
Speaker 1: judicial nominees, but he bragged about the number of judges

9
00:00:26,400 --> 00:00:30,360
Speaker 1: he's had confirmed. They are obstructing, they're doing. It's really

10
00:00:30,400 --> 00:00:32,640
Speaker 1: what I'm telling you. They're not good politicians, but they're

11
00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:36,160
Speaker 1: very good at obstruction. Something that people aren't talking about

12
00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:39,159
Speaker 1: is how many judges we've had approved, whether it be

13
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:42,960
Speaker 1: the Court of Appeals, circuit judges, whether it be district judges.

14
00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:48,239
Speaker 1: Nine of Trump's judicial nominees, including Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorstch,

15
00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:50,639
Speaker 1: have been confirmed by the Senate. At the same time,

16
00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:55,279
Speaker 1: during his administration, President Obama had five judicial nominees, including

17
00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:59,480
Speaker 1: Supreme Court Justice Sonya Sotomayor, confirmed, joining us as Carl

18
00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:02,840
Speaker 1: Tobio S Professor at the Union University of Richmond School

19
00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:06,960
Speaker 1: of Law and an expert on judicial nominations, Carl in

20
00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:10,600
Speaker 1: one week votes on four nominees to the federal courts

21
00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:13,600
Speaker 1: of appeals. That's one level below the Supreme Court. How

22
00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:18,639
Speaker 1: fast is that? It's very fast? Um, way ahead of

23
00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:22,520
Speaker 1: I think Obama and Bush. Um. And it's it's important

24
00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:25,440
Speaker 1: to remember. And I think Senator fine Signed, a ranking

25
00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:32,000
Speaker 1: member on Senate Judiciary Committee, said and criticized moving nominees

26
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:37,920
Speaker 1: that quickly. I think the Democrats never did that, undrew Obama. Uh.

27
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:41,640
Speaker 1: In terms of stacking so many in one week, it's

28
00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:45,520
Speaker 1: very difficult to prepare, as she said, Um for that

29
00:01:45,560 --> 00:01:48,960
Speaker 1: many nominees study their records and be ready to actually

30
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:51,800
Speaker 1: debate it in a substantive manner when you have all

31
00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:56,360
Speaker 1: of those in one week, Carl, taken as a group,

32
00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:59,720
Speaker 1: how would you characterize Donald Trump's nominees? Maybe let's just

33
00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:03,120
Speaker 1: start with the appeals court level. How conservative are these

34
00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:06,120
Speaker 1: people that he is putting up there? Well, I think

35
00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:08,919
Speaker 1: they are very conservative. I don't think there's much question

36
00:02:08,960 --> 00:02:12,400
Speaker 1: about that in a number of them. Of course, we're

37
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:18,120
Speaker 1: recommended or even compiled um by the Federalist Society and

38
00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:23,600
Speaker 1: Heritage Foundation for the initial group of twenty from whom

39
00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:28,799
Speaker 1: Justice Coursage was selected. Uh. Many of those have been

40
00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:33,760
Speaker 1: nominated now to the appeals courts. Uh. They're very conservative,

41
00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:37,120
Speaker 1: but most of them are very well qualified as well,

42
00:02:37,160 --> 00:02:41,000
Speaker 1: except for one. Uh we just found out yesterday who

43
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:46,960
Speaker 1: received a unanimously not qualified rating by the American Bar Association.

44
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:51,960
Speaker 1: Which judge is that or which perspective judge? It's Steve

45
00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:57,200
Speaker 1: graz who is from Nebraska, nominated to the A Circuit

46
00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:00,760
Speaker 1: and he has a hearing tomorrow. UH, and we'll see

47
00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:04,960
Speaker 1: how that goes. To Carl, talk about the two nominees

48
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:09,800
Speaker 1: that were subjected to intense criticism by Senate Democrats. One,

49
00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:14,760
Speaker 1: Amy Coney Barrett is on track to be confirmed today

50
00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,320
Speaker 1: to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

51
00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:24,040
Speaker 1: Tell us what the objections were. Uh. I think the

52
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:31,080
Speaker 1: objections were that she had not had any appellate experience

53
00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:37,120
Speaker 1: UM as a lawyer. Uh. And there were concerns about

54
00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:48,200
Speaker 1: questions that she might not be unbiased on certain questions UM.

55
00:03:48,360 --> 00:03:52,760
Speaker 1: And there was some questioning in the Judiciary committee about

56
00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:58,720
Speaker 1: whether she could put aside her her faith. I think

57
00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:01,720
Speaker 1: was away. It was phrased, and I think it was

58
00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:06,600
Speaker 1: awkwardly asked by a couple of senators. UM, and someone

59
00:04:06,680 --> 00:04:09,400
Speaker 1: said that's a religious test. I don't think that was

60
00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:15,559
Speaker 1: what anybody had in mind. UM. But she has um

61
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:19,000
Speaker 1: a very strong record of scholarship, and I think she

62
00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:24,000
Speaker 1: handled the questions very well in her hearing. So I expect,

63
00:04:24,040 --> 00:04:28,080
Speaker 1: as you suggest, that she will be confirmed. She had

64
00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:31,800
Speaker 1: a cloture vote yesterday, and UH is on track, as

65
00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:37,279
Speaker 1: you suggest, for confirmation today or tomorrow, Carl. The Alliance

66
00:04:37,320 --> 00:04:40,880
Speaker 1: for Justice, which is a liberal group, put out a

67
00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:45,520
Speaker 1: statement yesterday that said that because of all the Russia investigation,

68
00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:51,040
Speaker 1: because of questions about whether the Trump campaign was involved

69
00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:54,800
Speaker 1: in collusion with with the Russian government in the campaign,

70
00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:58,599
Speaker 1: the group said, this is no time for lifetime appointments

71
00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:03,160
Speaker 1: to the bench. Is there something to that? Is there?

72
00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:06,080
Speaker 1: If we get to the point where there are, um,

73
00:05:06,120 --> 00:05:11,159
Speaker 1: you know, real questions about either this president's legitimacy or

74
00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:13,920
Speaker 1: you know, whether impeachment might be around the corner, our

75
00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:17,240
Speaker 1: democrats justified in taking that into account in really trying

76
00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:22,400
Speaker 1: to slow down judicial nominations. Well, I don't think we're

77
00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:25,520
Speaker 1: there yet. I didn't. If we get to that point, UM,

78
00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:29,240
Speaker 1: people need to discuss it and debate it. But I

79
00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:31,880
Speaker 1: think as long as the Republicans have a majority, they're

80
00:05:31,920 --> 00:05:36,200
Speaker 1: not likely uh to do very much about that. Um.

81
00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:39,279
Speaker 1: And it does seem rush this week, to be sure,

82
00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:43,840
Speaker 1: in terms of stacking the four in one week, I

83
00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:48,200
Speaker 1: don't think there's any question about that Republican. Has anyone

84
00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:52,400
Speaker 1: has McConnell addressed the fact that he held up there?

85
00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:54,680
Speaker 1: They're blaming the Democrats for holding these up. He held

86
00:05:54,760 --> 00:05:59,480
Speaker 1: up and killed Merrick Garland's nomination to the Supreme Court. Well,

87
00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:05,000
Speaker 1: amaze the people like Amy Coney Barrett are nominated for

88
00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:11,560
Speaker 1: seats that very highly qualified Obama nominees were nominated for

89
00:06:11,839 --> 00:06:15,000
Speaker 1: and had no hearing because they were blue slipped by

90
00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:20,000
Speaker 1: Republican home stage senators. Uh. And McConnell was the foremost

91
00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:24,720
Speaker 1: leader of that group. Uh. So that's I think the

92
00:06:24,760 --> 00:06:29,280
Speaker 1: fact that we all know Carl only about thirty seconds left.

93
00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:32,680
Speaker 1: But should we be concerned that the president has firmed

94
00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:35,120
Speaker 1: out so much of the process of selecting these prospective

95
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:39,240
Speaker 1: judges to the Federalist Society and other conservatives, Well, I

96
00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:43,360
Speaker 1: think it is a real question. Um. It seems to

97
00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:44,760
Speaker 1: me it ought to be done in the White House

98
00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:48,440
Speaker 1: completely by the White House, Uh, not by interest groups

99
00:06:48,800 --> 00:06:51,760
Speaker 1: of any sort. So I think that's unfortunate. I think

100
00:06:51,760 --> 00:06:55,400
Speaker 1: it's also unfortunate that McConnell seems pressed by the threat

101
00:06:55,440 --> 00:07:00,719
Speaker 1: that judicial confermation network or run ads. Again, Tim, that

102
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:03,160
Speaker 1: doesn't seem like a very good way to run the government.

103
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:06,640
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for being here, Carl. As always, that's

104
00:07:06,680 --> 00:07:10,119
Speaker 1: Carl Tobias, professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

105
00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:12,600
Speaker 1: That's it for this edition of Bloomberg Long. We'll be

106
00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:15,200
Speaker 1: back tomorrow one pm Wall Street Time. Hope you'll be

107
00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:17,880
Speaker 1: as well. Thanks to our producer David Suckerman and our

108
00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:21,640
Speaker 1: technical director Chris try Comey. Coming up next Bloomberg Markets

109
00:07:21,640 --> 00:07:24,160
Speaker 1: with Carol Master and Corey Johnson. Carol's here to tell

110
00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:27,000
Speaker 1: us what's the top thing on their agenda. So June,

111
00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:29,200
Speaker 1: you've heard of Google, You've heard of Facebook, you've heard

112
00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:32,840
Speaker 1: of Twitter. Well, representatives from those big tech companies they're

113
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:35,640
Speaker 1: testifying for Congress on the extent of Russian influence on

114
00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:37,760
Speaker 1: their networks and in in the election. So I'm gonna be

115
00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:41,120
Speaker 1: covering that. I'll be listening to that for sure. That's

116
00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:43,040
Speaker 1: coming up next on Bloomberg