WEBVTT - TechStuff Looks at CISPA

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello, everybody,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Poulette, and

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at how stuff works dot Com.

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as usual as senior writer Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, Oh my gosh, I know I've I've changed

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>things up. I got tired of pulling out quotes, and

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>so I have decided spontaneously and without precedent, to drop

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it and uh and just just say Holly or whatever.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>You know. I wonder how many listeners we have from

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that early period when you used to do that all

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the time. Yeah, the hey there, and then I after

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey there. I think I went to various greetings from

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and then I started doing random quotes

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of I think it was for movies, and then music,

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and then I went to novels. Yeah, you know, you've

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>got to change things up every now and then. We've

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we've done more than four episodes now. So but let's

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Let's talk about what our topic is

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be today, because it's it's a heavy topic

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and this was something that was requested by several of

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>our listeners. Well, it's not much of a surprise that

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>people would be interested in hearing about it. It's been, uh,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot of time in the news right around

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the time that we're recording this, which is very early.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>May I just technically we're recording this on Star Wars Day.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>May the fourth be with you, that's right. And uh,

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it is all about the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Act of eleven, also known as SISPA and CISPA is

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that a lot of people have

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>probably heard about. I mean, it's one of those you know,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like I've seen the acronym pop up on Twitter a lot. Yeah,

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense. I mean, it's you know, it's it

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>does involve traffic on the Internet and uh, and so

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly anyone who uses the Internet is interested in this

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, at least from a tangential perspective, even

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>if they don't know what all the deal is. Now

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of confusion out there too, because I

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of people who assume that SISPA is

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>just a reworded approach to doing SOPA or Pippa, which

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are the piracy acts that were proposed in Yeah, and

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>those were acts against piracy, not for so I don't

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>want to give the wrong impression, but yeah, but those

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>those were all um about, uh, you know, finding ways

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to allow the government to to pursue people who pirated

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property. Yeah, and we're talking about the United States government.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we do have a lot of foreign won't

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign to us, foreign to US, their domestic to themselves.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we have are more domestic than others. That's true.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Well, we we do have a lot of

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>listeners from around the world, many many countries around the world.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So nonetheless, since the Internet is uh a worldwide entity

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the content we're talking about is

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>born in the United States, it would have an effect

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on traffic worldwide. And and Soap and Pippa were both

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>actually directed by the United States to to target sites

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that were outside the jurisdiction of the United States in

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>order to find a way to combat piracy. Because as

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>christ just pointed out, you know, the Internet is a

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>global entity. It does not belong to the United States.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>It is not housed in the United States. It is

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>truly all over the world. Which causes some issues when

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about legislation, because clearly one country cannot claim

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to legislate over other countries in the

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>world that are our sovereign nations. So SOAP and PIPPA

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>were both approaches to try and head off piracy that

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was hosted in in UH in countries other than the

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>United States, Like, how do you protect the interests of

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>companies within the United States when he attacks themselves or

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the theft or however you want to frame it is

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>occurring outside the border. Well, CISPA is not about that,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>at least not on its surface. CISPA was truly it's

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the the actual purpose of it, according to the

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>act itself is and I quote, to provide for the

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sharing of certain cyber threat intelligence and cyber threat information

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>between the intelligence community and cybersecurity entities and for other

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>purposes and for other purposes. I hate that phrase. That's

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>like the job description as a sign. Yes, that is

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing to see on a job description because

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you're you're like, I'm the senior vice president of finance

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at such and such, like go make me some coffee.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean, Well, it's other duties and I

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>just assigned them to you exactly. Yeah. Anyway, So although

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that rarely happens to senior executives, true from what I understand,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>could it happens to senior writers any a? So the uh,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not true. I'm making a joke. I

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>love you. How stuff words dot com and Discovery Communications

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and sparing company. Uh, the some restrictions apply. Your knowledge

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>may vary. The so, yeah, this this is really to

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>protect The idea anyway, is that it would help protect

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States from cyber attacks by allowing the government

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to share information that's normally of classified or secret levels

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 1>with other entities, which could include cyber security firms, so

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>companies that are specifically formed around the idea of protecting

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>data and making secure systems and detecting intrusions that kind

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing, as well as other companies so Internet service

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>providers could be an example, or even other types of

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>private companies. It's also meant to allow these companies, these

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>private entities that have no connection to the government other

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>than the fact that they happen to be within the

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>realm of the United States. UH, allows them to share

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>information with the government. And the key word there's it

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>allows because the fear among people who oppose this act

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is that it would compel these companies to share information. So,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in other words, one of the main concerns around this act,

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a legitimate concern, is that the government

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>might come up to say a company like Facebook and say, hey, Facebook,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>we suspect that there are eight or nine people that

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we have on this list who are involved in some

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of terrorism group cyber terrorism. You know, they're playing

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a big hacking attack and they have, uh, they have

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>accounts on Facebook, and we're able to access some of

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that information, but we really want all the information you

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have on them. So could you please give us all

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the data you have on these people, including all the

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>messages they send to each other, messages they send to

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>other people that are not connected to the eight names

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on this list, uh, their their contact information, everything you

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>have on them we want And then Facebook would say sure,

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>here you go. And that's the big fear is that

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this would allow the government to get access to private

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>information that most of the time we would say the

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>government has no business knowing um, and they would do

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it under the the umbrella of trying to protect national

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>security from cyber threats. Now, if you actually read the

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the full proposed legislation, which I have, you see that

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of see where where the the representatives

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>who introduced this. In the United States, we have the

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives and we have the Senate. These are

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>two bodies that propose legislation, and once it passes through

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one body, it has to go to the other and

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>pass through that one as well before it goes to

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States, who can then either

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>sign the the the bill into law, or veto it,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or just let it sit there. That's really those are

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the three options. Really. Yeah, by the way, the President

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of United States currently has said he would veto SISPA

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>vitos can be overridden. But that's you know, that's kind

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of beyond the scope at this discussion. Anyway, it's it's

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gone through the House of Representatives. It will next go

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate. It was pasted, Yes, it was past.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh the vote, that's right, And it was not straight

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>down party lines, but in general, more Republicans voted in

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>favor of it and more Democrats voted against it. But

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>but there was bipartisan support and bipartisan opposition. So it's

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>not it's not cut and clear. It's not like this

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is a Republican issue. Now, this is this is broader

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>than that. Yeah. And as a matter of fact, you

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>can you can see different lists of the organizations and

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>companies that are foreign against it and the same thing

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll see. Uh, you'll see there. Um, some of the

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>companies that you might expect to be for it are

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>again said in vice versa, and some of the other

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>lobbying groups and grassroots support organizations that you know, try

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to get people involved in the issues like this. Um,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting to see the people who are working

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>together for or against the bill. Yeah. I mean, this

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is another example of how SISPA is different from SOPA

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and PIPPA because SOPA and PIPPA, there were quite a

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>few major companies, technology companies that opposed that legislation, right

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the SOPA and PIPPA like companies like Google and Facebook

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>opposed those but in fact, sorry to interrupt ahead, some

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of them were very outspoken. They they had the Internet

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>blackout days where they would take their sites, uh you know,

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>make the first page sort of uh uh, Well, this

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is what you would see if this legislation passes, and

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be a very drab you know, uh start

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>contrast to what you would see on the you know,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>everyday site. Either this I would be taken down or

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>there was like a censored bar over the logo and

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you could proceed from there into the site, but you know,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>would be shut down and when you first got there,

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just with an explanation. Yeah, yeah, so that it would

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>inform people what was going on. Well, some of those

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>companies are actually in support of SISPA, now, not Google.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Google has yet to come out one way or the

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>other on the issue. A lot of them are are

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>mute on the topic, right, But Facebook said that they

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>supported or they the company representatives in Facebook spoke out

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in support of SISPA, and Microsoft did as well and

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>then sort of backed off. But um, there are several

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>companies that have spoken out in favor of it. And

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>uh again that that illustrates that there's a difference here. Now,

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there were points during the debate of SISPA while it

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>was going through the House about adding in language or

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>or modifying language that would also have it applied to

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property theft. Yeah, the Center for Democracy and Technology

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>used to support the bill but dropped off after the

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bill was modified and then that language subsequently was dropped again. UH.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Problem pretty much at the last minute, so that it

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't it didn't expressly include intellectual property theft as one

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons for the bill itself. UH. And like

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I said, the bill really what what its purposes is

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to allow intelligence agencies like the FBI, the CIA, the

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>n s A. UH. These are all intelligence agencies within

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States and law enforcement in the case of FBI.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But these are agencies that are all about collecting information

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and using that to try and protect the interests of

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And the issue is a lot of

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the information is very sensitive and the government is not

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to share that information with with non government, non

0:11:55.920 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>UH certified entities. Yeah, don't talk badly about this information.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It will start to cry well at any rate. Like

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>they are not allowed to actually share that information by law.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And this this legislation would allow them to then share

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>information with parties that could actually affect whatever is going on. So,

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:22.239
<v Speaker 1>for example, if the CIA has has created some dossier

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about a domestic group of folks who are trying to

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get together and cause problems on the internet. Let's say

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's an anonymous group of people Let's say the

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>CIA has gathered up this information to SEGA. The CIA

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>may want to pass on this information about these anonymous

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>individuals two to private companies. They might be cyber security companies,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they might be Internet service providers, and the purpose of

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sending the information might be to help head off an

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>attack or to uh to just be on the alert

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for potential attacks, or maybe even to track down these

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>people so that whatever intelligence agency is interested in them

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>can actually go and say, hey, you know, we need

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk remember that thing or you were going to

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>do about that, We need to chat about this. So

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the idea of it being all about

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>sharing information on the surface seems like it's a wise thing,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and that the more people know about what's going on,

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the more likely they can head off disaster. Because that's

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the big issues about cybersecurity is that, you know,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the systems, the systems can only be so secure. What

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>can help us is knowing more about what's going on

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so that we can anticipate things and uh either head

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>them off or reduce the effectiveness of an attack upon

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>any given system. The problem is that this is giving

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the government and these entities a little bit more freedom

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to share information than a lot of people are comfortable

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with UM and that there are things built into the

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>bill itself that make it pretty worrisome. For example, one

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the amendments or or not an amendment, I'm sorry,

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the passages within this bill gives all the

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>entities involved exemption from legal recourse if they cooperate with

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the federal government. So, in other words, let's say that

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>your I s P sends the federal government a list

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of information about all the sites you visit, all the

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>packets of data that you send through that Internet service provider.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>They send that information to the government in its efforts

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute you for something. Well, you would not be

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>able to turn around and sue the Internet service provider

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:55.119
<v Speaker 1>for violating your privacy because they would have exemption underneath

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this legislation. So in other words, it's like a get

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out of jail free hard for any company that is

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>part of this. That's that's you know, sharing information in

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this way as covered by this bill, which is scary.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's probably also why a lot of companies are like, yeah,

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm behind this, because this means if the government comes

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to me and says I need this information and I

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>give that information, I don't have to worry about a

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>multimillion dollar lawsuit hitting hitting me, and then I'm gonna

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>take a hit and my shareholders are going to be

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>really upset because my company just had to spend all

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this money to settle out of court with this other

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>person because we sent their information to the government. This

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this passage would say, uh, yeah, you can sue us,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but you have no grounds to stand on because the

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>law says we can do this and you can't sue us.

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if there is a feeling among some of

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the companies that going along with this legislation would make

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the federal government more inclined to look favorably on them

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and other business matters as well. I can't read their minds,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, and I don't know that anybody has come

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>out and said, well, you know, we really love the

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>government because hey, guys, you're awesome. Within within the bill itself,

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there's language that that is meant to protect against that,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but whether or not that holds any real authority remains

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to be seen. Like there's there's a passage in there

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that says that the the uh, the articles within SISPA

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>could not be used for regulatory purposes. So the government

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>would not be able to regulate the Internet or Internet

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>traffic using CISPA as its foundation. Also, no entity can

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>use the information that they're sharing two uh to gain

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a competitive advantage over some other entity. So in other words,

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>if you get you know, this information from the federal government,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you could not somehow leverage that to give yourself a

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>better business stance, because that's not what it's meant for. Now,

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>how that ends up being enforceable or detective? You got me?

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't. I don't understand, especially when

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you're talk about classified information. This information remains classified, right,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So if the government has this classified information and they

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>have authorized a particular entity to have the information, that

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>entity can't share the information with other other you know people,

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they if they're within that umbrella with the federal government.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>There can be sharing between entities and the government, but

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you can't release it to the general public. So, you know,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>how would the government the government would have to acknowledge

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what the information is if a company were to try

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and use it to gain leverage in the competitive market space. Thus,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the information that was private becomes public. This is problematic, right,

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>How where where do you draw the line between, all right,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this intelligence is all about national security, and we need

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to make sure it's secret. We cannot acknowledge it, we

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>cannot reveal it, and we need to make sure the

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>market remains fair and that companies don't take advantage of

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this new avenue of information. Uh, you know, if they

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if they do take action, then you've got a compromise

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>between those two silos. And and that's a problem. It's

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>not a big problem as far as the average consumers concern.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>The average consumers more concerned about the fact that, hey,

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of like wire tapping without a warrant.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>The government essentially can ask a company to give it information,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and the company can give that information, no warrants, nothing,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>no no legal uh loopholes that you have to leap through.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just request. Now, with that in mind, like I said,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with the way the information is worded in the bill,

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the company is not compelled to share information. So the

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>federal government comes to Facebook and asks for that information

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about those aid individuals, Facebook can tell the government, we're

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to share that unless you have a warrant.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And in that case, whichever intelligence agency it is that's

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in question. Would theoretically have to go through the whole

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>process of securing a warrant, serving at the Facebook, and

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then waiting to get the information. Uh now, how likely

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is it that companies are going that that support this

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to do that. That depends on each individual company.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>For some companies, it makes perfect sense for them to

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>say no, because if they said yes, they risk alienating

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>their user base. I know that if I if I

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>had an I s P and I found out that

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I s P was sharing information about users to the

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>government without the use of a warrant, I would not

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>want that I s P as my I s P.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that I'm doing anything clandestine or illegal.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>It's just I don't like the idea of companies just

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>freely handing over private information to the government without there

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>being a legal reason to do so, you know, I

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>mean that just that just doesn't seem right. It's almost

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the same as imagine having a government official show up

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at your door one day, and that government officials job

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is to follow you around and watch everything you do

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>and write a report every single day about everything you do,

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't matter if you're doing something right or wrong.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just what they do. Wait, you mean they don't

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>do that to you? Well, you know, not that I'm guilty.

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I feel guilty for putting you on that list. That

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>was a great aper fool's joke, but it's had implications

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that went beyond what I had originally intended in five years. Yeah,

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>well you know, um aper fools. Well yeah, I think

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the the I think the language in the bill is

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what gives people uh so much trouble is that it

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it started off broader, admittedly, but it's still broad

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>enough where it gives a lot of power that um.

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, people feel that the government shouldn't have um.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, that's that's the nature of a lot

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of these these bills that have gone through. I was

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the main criticisms of SOPA UM, so you

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>know that that's what's given so much pause to a

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of these organizations that have come out against it. Well,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there's also there's a specific phrase within the bill itself

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>which says notwithstanding any other provision of law. So what

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that means is that SISPA overrides all other laws when

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to sharing information. So any privacy law that

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>would protect your privacy is negated. By SISPA exactly. So

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if even if you had a state law or there

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>was some other law in the books that would protect

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>your rights as a citizen to specific private information, SISPA

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>overrides it and says doesn't count. As long as it

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>falls under this category, it does not count. And there's

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>nothing there's no burden of evidence on the part of

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>any any entity, whether it's the government or the private company,

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to show that this is a justifiable approach for any

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>given case. It's not like there's a burden of proof

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that you must meet in order to count as this

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whole sharing of information to head off cyber crime. There's

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing there in the bill that says in order for

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this to apply, you must meet these criteria. So, in

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>other words, you might as well just say privacy laws

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>don't exist, because CISPA means that it's not. It's they

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>don't they don't apply. Well. Mozilla UH, the organization that

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>creates and maintains the Firefox web browser, made a statement

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>against it that says, while we wholeheartedly support aim more

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>secure internet, SISPA has a broad and alarming reach that

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>goes far beyond internet security. The bill infringes on our privacy,

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>includes vague definitions of cybersecurity, and grants immunities to companies

0:22:55.160 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and government that are too broad around information misuse. Um.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, end quote. And then they go

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on to say that they hope the Senate takes a

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a careful consideration of the issues before promoting, before passing

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>this legislation. And and we should also point out there

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>are at least two other bills within the Senate itself

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that that also are cybersecurity bills. And so that's a

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated matter in the Senate because it's you know, it's

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this bill would also address the same issues that other

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>bills that are on in consideration are already you know,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they're already there. So so it may be that the

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Senate just as you know, this doesn't even make sense

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because we have these other bills here that address the

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>same problem but don't have the same issues. Or cybersecurity

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is sort of difficult to to capture anyway, um, far

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>more than than you know, physical security. There there are

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just so many loopholes and ways to get into electronic

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>systems compared to a physical system. Yes, and uh, you

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>know they're they're it's difficult to do. And I think

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons that the legislation is so broad. Um. Also,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it is much easier to um prosecute cybersecurity cases when

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you have the help of other agencies working together, which

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is what the idea is, is, you know, giving people

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the authority to share information like that. Yeah, no, the yeah,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the purpose for the challenge, Yeah, it's it's I completely

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>understand the government's approach and and uh and when I

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>say the government, I really should say that that. You know,

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about people like Representative Mike Rodgers, who was

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy who wrote this the original. Yes, he's the

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>one who who wrote the original as Sispa language. And um,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I can totally understand where he's coming from because one

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>of the if you ever have read any information about

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>criminal procedures, about investigative procedures that that ended up being

0:24:55.840 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>for cases that spanned either multiple jurisdictions or you had

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>both federal and state enforcement agencies involved. One of the

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>things that always struck me whenever I read those reports

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was how much easier things could have gone had these

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>different agencies shared their resources more freely. And in many cases,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the agency is trying to hog all

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the credit, which is often how it's portrayed. Right. Often

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like the law enforcement official who wants to have

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the collar and he doesn't want anyone else taking credit

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for it. That's how popularly we perceive the TV shows

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and books novels as well. But but in reality that

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the cases that handling information is very delicate. You know,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the way you handle information is of paramount and importance

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>than any kind of investigative effort, whether it's law enforcement

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>or journalism whatever, right the way you into information is

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>as important as as anything else. And so whenever you

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>get into a situation where you're talking about sharing information,

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you automatically have to worry about that because how strong

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is the link between the two entities, you know, how

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>how secure is that is the other entity reliable if

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>you share information with that entity, is it going to

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>actually affect your investigation in a negative way? And these

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of considerations you have to make. And

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so while it's easy in hindsight to say, ah, if

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>only the FBI had talked to this one local police station,

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they would have caught this guy, you know, years before hand,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>very easy to say that in in hindsight, same sort

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>of thing here is that you know, you're thinking, well,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>if only all these different groups, whether they are in

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>federal government agencies or private companies, if only they could

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>actually talk to each other, then perhaps they could head

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>off attacks from uh, say, hackers in China. You know,

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they might be able to You might have one agency

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that knows about it, but because of their policies, they

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>don't share the information and so the attack goes on

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as planned and people are hurt by it. The idea

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>here is that by sharing all this information we would

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>be better off for it. The problem is that kind

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of ignores the impact it can make on the actual

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>US citizen. So while it's while it's laudable that that

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>representatives are looking for ways to protect our cyber infrastructure,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, as you pointed out, a very difficult thing

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to do. There's so many loopholes both technical and personal

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>in those systems that's hard to protect. It's laudable that

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do this, but unfortunately the fact that

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it sort of throws out privacy rights for U. S

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>citizens means that it could potentially do far more harm

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>than good, and it also could mean another step toward

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a very big brother kind of government, and I often

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I love that kind of science fiction. I mean,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I love the dystopian science fiction, this so brave new world,

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff where you've got this uh this

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>government agency that is really oppressive and intrusive in our lives.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't think we are anywhere close to that

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of level. But when you see stuff like this

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>going through government and getting past, you think maybe that's

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not entirely unrealistic, because these are sort of paving the

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>way to that sort of environment. And I think most

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of us would agree that that's not a desirable outcome.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't want the thought police chasing me down

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time, you know, but I don't again, not

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that that's where we're we're definitely headed. But

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>when you see this kind of stuff, you can say,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, this it feels like it's a little just

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it's stepped just a little further away from the fixed

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>inside of of the bookstore, right like that. It's just

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>edging a little closer to nonfiction. It's not there yet,

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but if we aren't careful, then that could happen. So

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it is completely understandable why people are uh up in

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>arms about this and um again, just as understandable as

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it is that this kind of legislation is being debated

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. It's not an easy issue to solve.

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish it were, because then we wouldn't you know,

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we would have had a podcast about video games. Well

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's about Star Wars. It is kind of funny though,

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because after the the reaction to public reaction to SOPA

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and Pippa, with so many people being aware of the bills,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>especially SOPA. Um um, it's it's kind of funny to

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>see how SISPA has sort of snuck in under the

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>radar so far if you fewer people are talking about

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at it. I see more information on it in the

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the tech uh press than I do in uh you

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>know that the general media. Um. So it's it is

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny that it's being Um it's out there

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and people are interested in and curious about it, but

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it's far on on a far lesser scale now. Um,

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if you are interested in it, UM, I would recommend

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a an interesting site that you might go to, open

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Congress dot org. Um. There there's a lot of information there,

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>especially uh you know, on on all kinds of things,

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not just SIS but this is um, this is basically

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of legislation that's going through and uh, if

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a member of the site, you can vote yea

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or nay on it whether you're interested. Um. It's sort

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of a a straw pole, if you will, on how

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>people feel about it. Of course, it's it's completely on

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>scientific and if you're uh, you know, somebody who lives

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, you can um use tools on

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the site to write for or against legislation UH to

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>your representatives and senators, which is a pretty cool tool. UM.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So I would totally recommend that site to anybody who's

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in it. But it also gives you not opportunity

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to read the uh the text of legislation CISPA and others,

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and see where it is. Sure it is. We

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>should also mention whenever you read this legislation for the layman,

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it can be a little dense. I was gonna say,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>try not to doze off, because uh, you know, we

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta remember our the United States is is governed by lawyers.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this is about creating law. So

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's written like a law. It's it's legal language doesn't

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>tend to be so dense that it's indecipherable. And also

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't mention CISPA itself is one of the more

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>succinct eleven pages eleven pages of document that I had

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the one I've got eighteen. So yeah, so of course

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I did not include the amendments that were added, and

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I had those, I had to read those separate. But

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I was disappointed that there weren't any pictures. Yeah, well,

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>what after all the pictures of various kinds of pirates

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Sopa and Pippa stuff. You know, some of

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>them will let you connect some dots, and some of

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>them you could color in the peg leg. Yeah, the

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>buckled swashes were awesome. We're obviously being a little silly

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, but no, yeah, I think it's I think

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really good. And other nations also have similar tools,

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>depending upon where you are and and the kind of

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>government your nation has. Uh So it's always good to

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.959
<v Speaker 1>take into account that sort of thing, to do some research,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>see see what impact you as a citizen can have.

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases it may be that you want

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to uh to contact a representative, a senator or whatever,

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and mentioned that you are in favor of something you

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>know not everything has to be Oh, this is bad,

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to destroy the world. It's also good for

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you to show support for things that you think are

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really UM applicable and import it in and uh, I

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think taking an active role as a citizen is a

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>really important thing to do. I've done it on on

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple occasions. I probably still don't do it as much

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as I should, but um, I'm getting there. And beyond

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>just you know, going to the polls and voting, it's

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that should not be the beginning and end of your

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>role as a citizen, if possible, especially if these things

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are really important to you. So anyway that, do you

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have anything else you wanted to add about CISPA in

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>particular and not in particular, but I I do think

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that you know, this is not a black

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and white situation. You know, I personally have sort of

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a grave view of of CISPA, where I see some

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>merit in and I see some problems with it. So UM,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's especially important to become as informed. You know,

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>don't don't take accounts that you read uh online or

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, stories you hear in the news. Don't

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>take those uh too hard, too much without doing some

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>research yourself and and citing for yourself how you feel

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about these issues. Um, at least that's my advice. Yeah, no,

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I I agree entirely. So I'm going to go and

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of meal tyn to settle my nerves

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so that we can record our second podcast of our

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast recording marathon. Yeah. I'm surprised Jonathan that you, uh you,

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have the lad I told you. I told you.

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's because it's because things are not always It's

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not evil empire versus the rebellion. May the fourth be

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with you. Um, It's it's not that, it's it's one

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>group of legislators who are trying to tackle a legitimately

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult problem and perhaps going about the wrong way, maybe

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in ways that you know, they just don't anticipate the

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of problems that would exist, whereas those of us

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>who it could affect anticipate it a lot. So, I mean,

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>it's I understand it's a complex issue, which is probably

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>why don't get so angry. Um, But if you want,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we can pick another topic and I'll get really ticked

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>off about it all. Right, then, how about how about

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the progression of obi Wan Kenobi as a character through

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the original trilogies and then the prequels of Star Wars.

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>That really gets me mad. And our producer Tyler can

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>let you know because I went on about a ten

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 1>minute rant about it before we started recording. Alright, then

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited. Okay, so we'll we'll we'll chat about that offline,

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, that's not really tech stuff. But you guys,

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have any requests for topics that we should cover,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like why is Jonathan mad at Obi wan Kenobi, let

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>us know. Send us a message in Facebook or on Twitter.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Are handle there is tech Stuff h s W or

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you can fire off a quick email. Our address is

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff at Discovery dot com and Chris and I

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really soon for more on

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how Stuff

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>works dot Com brought to you by the reinvented tieth

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve Camry. It's ready. Are you