WEBVTT - The Ticking Clock on US Treasury: Unveiling the Near-Failure Auction and Its Implications - Mark Moss Show

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Welcome back to another episode of The Mark Moss Show.

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We're always talking about building your wealth, building your freedom,

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and protecting both because times are changing and they are

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>changing fast. Today, I want to talk about what happened

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>last week with an almost failed US Treasury auction. Now

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that may sound very boring, but trust me, it is not.

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>We are coming very close to the end game. As

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, mainstream has finally picked up on

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this narrative and they are calling for the endgame. In

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the endgame could be coming in the next ninety days.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, we have a chart that

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we are watching that predicts when this end game could come.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>That endgame is when, yes, the government runs out of money.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>We have a failed treasury auction, and even worse can happen. Now,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>let's dig into all this. What actually happened last week?

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>How bad is it? What is the trend showing us?

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>What is this chart that we're watching, What happens in

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety days that could cause us all to fall apart

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>unless some big things are happening and done, which I

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think they will. Of course, I'm an inflation bowl. I'm

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna explain to you why all of that works. What's

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the big news here? Right off the bat, The big

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>news is that last week we saw the US treasury

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>auction almost fail, and so what does that mean. So

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the government is spending more than they're bringing in. You

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>know that they finance that through deficits, the deficit spending.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>There is the amount of shortage that they have, and

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they finance that through borrowing money. The way they borrow

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>money is by selling bonds, So then people have to

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>come buy those bonds. Now, prices are always the equilibrium

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>of supply and demand. So if there's more supply, if

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the government's trying to sell more debt, then there is demand,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>then there are buyers. The price has to go up

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to enhance entice the buyers. And that's exactly what we

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>saw and it was catastrophic. As a matter of fact,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>it was the worst treasury auction that we've seen since

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven. And the treasuries, what the government had to

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>pay went up up so high that it created a

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>massive tel I'm going to break this down. And it

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>was so bad that the credit rating agencies Moodies came

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out and move the sentiment of the government down to negative,

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>citing the very fact that they have unsustainable debt and

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't afford it. As a matter of fact, we

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>saw Moody's, which is the one that did this. They

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>lowered its outlook on the US credit rating to negative.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It went from stable to negative, citing large fiscal deficits

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and a decline in debt affordability. So it is not

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>crazy people like me on the internet, on YouTube and

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>podcasts seeing this thing. The credit rating agency says, these

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>large fiscal deficits, the amount of debt that you're short

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>every year, and the declining in the affordability of your

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>debt are major problems. Of course, the government didn't like it.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>President Biden got all mad about it. But look, it

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is what it is, they said. I said, it's a

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>rising concern for investors, contributing to a sell off that

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>took US government bond prices to the lowest level in

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years. According to the chief economist from the US

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>at Natoxis, deficits will remain large as an interest costs

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>take up a larger share of the budget. The debt

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>burden will continue to grow. And it's not just continue

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to grow. It turns into a debt spiral. It turns

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>into a coil that winds up and gets power and

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>then blasts off. So we're going to talk about that,

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but let's just talk about what happened first of all.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I don't want to go exactly all

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the way through exactly how this works, but let's just

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>take a look at exactly what happened last week. So

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>what we saw is that again the Treasury, we went

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to market to try to raise this money. Now there's

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things that are important that I want

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to start with first. So first of all, it's not

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>just you and I seeing this. It's not just a

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>moody seeing this. The Treasury itself already knows this. And

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>how do I know that they know this. It's because

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>they've said so. And what they're doing is they're trying

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to game the system. So what they do is they

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>announce how much they're going to be borrowing. So what

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw is that the Treasury announced they would be

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>borrowing seven hundred and seventy six billion for the fourth

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter of twenty twenty three. And the reason why it's

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>important is because they announced that they're going to be

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>borrowing less than they had borrowed the prior quarter. Seventy

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.559
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars less. So what they're trying to say is, look, look,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>our deficit spending is going down. We're borrowing less money

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>than we borrowed last time. Instead of eight hundred and

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion, now it's only seven hundred and seventy six billion. Okay,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>big deal, But they're trying to show that it's going down.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. They're lying. And what do I mean

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>by they're lying. What we can see is that they

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>announce this number, but they go back and revise it later. Oh,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>turns out we needed to borrow more. We're going to

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>borrow more than we had projected, and every quarter it's

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. It's not just that we see it.

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The Treasury actually told us this. Let's break this down.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So what we can see is that they came out

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with an announcement and they said that, you know, we're

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be borrowing less money than projected. But there's

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more in this that I want to unpack. And what

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is that. Well, there's three things, three points that were

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the statement from Janet l in the Treasury that

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to break down. First off, the

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>first thing they said is quote primary dealers explicitly noted

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a high degree of uncertainty overall around the deficit and

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>growth forecasts, reinforcing the Treasury's need to maintain flexibility in

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>their issuance strategy. That's what this is what Jane Allen

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasury said. So what does that mean, Well, the primary

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>dealers who's that? That's the banks. This is like the

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Golden Sacks. These are the buyers of last resort. These

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>are the buyers that the government mandates to buy the

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>debt for them. So they're saying that these buyers of

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.559
<v Speaker 1>last resort at the banks are seeing this high degree

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty around the deficit and the growth forecast. Exactly

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>what Moody said. So yelling herself is saying, we see

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they're saying this, and so what it means is that

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they're admitting that the primary dealers are uncomfortable with this.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>They're admitting that they're concerned about the demand for these treasuries.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>They're concerned with being stuck with this. They don't want

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Remember this point. We're going to come

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>back to it at the end when we break down

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the math. Point Number two is that the

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasury anticipates that one additional quarter of increases to cupon

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>auction sizes will likely be needed beyond the increases announced today.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean? That's what I was just saying.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Every single time they announce how much they need to borrow,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they go back and revise that. So what they're saying

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>is that the Treasury is expecting to add to the

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>amount they need to borrow this quarter beyond these estimates.

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>So they're telling you right there that they're basically lying

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. They're saying, Hey, we're probably going to have

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to to this, so we're going to show you the

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>short number we're probably going to add to it. I

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know who they're really fooling by this. I mean,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm just some guy on the internet here

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and I see that every month or every quarter they

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>go back and revise this. They're telling us that they're

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do it right here, Who are they really

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>fooling here? Number three, they said that the Treasury continues

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to make significant progress on its plans to implement a

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>regular buyback program in twenty twenty four. That's the big one.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>What are they saying. They're saying that the Treasury is

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ready to implement a program to buy back their own debt,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>basically buy their own debt, sort of like what Japan does,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a snake eating its own tail. What

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they're saying is, we're not done here. We have many

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>more magic tricks up our sleeve. This is something I

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot. You know, there's lots of brilliant

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>market analysts out there, way more brilliant than me. One

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites has been Harry Dent Junior. I've read

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like five of his books. His research is so good

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe actual his research is correct. His assumptions have

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>been wrong. His research is right, his assumptions are wrong.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>He's continually called for a crash, a crash, a crash,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a crash, crash that never comes. And the reason why

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it never comes is because he just continues to fail

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to realize how many more tricks the FED has up

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>their sleeve. If things worked normally, he would be right.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>But they don't. And what they're telling us right here

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is they have more magic tricks up their sleeve. This

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is why Harry Dan's wrong, This is why Peter Shift's wrong.

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>This is why all of these people calling the Michael

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Burry's are wrong. They're all confists to happen, but they

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>fail to realize how many more tricks they have up

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>their sleeve. If you just tune in, you're listening to

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the Markmas Show. I have a whole lot more to

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>cover when I come back about what is going on

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with the treasuries and where we're going. You don't want

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to miss it, don't go away, I'll we're back, all right,

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Mark mass Show. We're talking about what happened last

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>week where we almost had a failed auction. So let's

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>break down how that happened. So there was a thirty

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>year auction, so you have everything from t bills up

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the bonds, and that's the duration anywhere from months to

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>years or decades in this matter. And they sell these entranches.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So in the thirty year auction, they wanted to sell

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty four billion dollars of that. And what happens is

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>there's something called a bid to cover ratio. It's a

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>BTC and that means how many bids, how much demand

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is there for the supply that they're offering, and what

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this is usually represented in a number and we saw

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that this one came in at two point two four percent,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't really maybe mean anything to you. So we

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of look at history and we can

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>see this is typically around two point five or two

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>point six, So to go from two point six to

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>two point two, that's very low. And what we can

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>see is that it looks like foreign demand was off,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>but really I don't think it's exactly that. So what

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>do I mean by this? What we can see from

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury report is there's basically three tranches of buyers

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that they tell us. One they tell us about the

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>primary dealer. The primary dealers again are these buyers of

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>last resort. These are these banks. The second one is

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>what we call direct bidders. These are institutions and these

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are individuals. And then third we have indirect bidders. Indirect

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>bidters are the foreign demand. These are foreign buyers. And

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>what we can see for this thirty year auction, if

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we look back through a few auctions of this year January, October,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and now November, we can see that in January, the

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>primary dealers, which are the buyers of last resort, the

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ones mandated to buy, took up nine percent of the

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>bonds in November. They well, actually before we talk about

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk. Let's let's talk. Okay, Well, let's talk

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with that. So they bought nine percent in January. In

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>November they were forced to pick up almost twenty five percent,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so they have to suck up the difference. They had

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to buy nine in January twenty five percent. So what happened, Well,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the indirect bidders, which are the foreign buyers, in January

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>picked up seventy five percent. In November, they only picked

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>up sixty percent. The direct bidders picked up sixteen percent

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in January and picked up fifteen percent November, So the

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>direct bidders were about the same percentage. It was the

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>indirect bidders that fell off from seventy five percent to

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent, and so the primary dealers had to pick

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>up the difference from nine to twenty five percent. But

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not the whole story. What I really want to

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>show you is that it's the amount of auction that

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount being auctioned off, it's the supply. So what

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we can see is that the foreign buyers, the indirect bidders,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>actually bought more bonds in November than in January. So

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in January they bought thirteen point four billion. In November

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they bought fourteen point three billions. They actually bought an

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>extra billion dollars worth of bonds. The problem isn't as

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>much the demand side. There's still demand. They actually bought

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars more than they bought before. The problem

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is there's too much supply. The problem is the treasury

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is spending way too much money and borrowing too much.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>This is very important. As we get to this later part,

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to understand why. But the problem is the

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>government cannot and just will not stop spending. We're now

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>fighting multiple wars. Janet Yellen's out there saying we can

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fight multiple wars. Sure, we're fighting a war on in Ukraine.

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We're fighting a war on Israel. We're fighting a war

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on terrorism, We're fighting a war on obesity, we're fighting

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a war on poverty, we're fighting war, We're fighting every

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>single war you can imagine. And we're spending more and

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>more money. And the problem is is there's not enough

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>people willing to buy that debt. Now, like I said,

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not a demand problem. The demand actually went up.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>They actually bought more, But what happened because there was

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>more supply than there was demand. Then the price that

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they had to offer the Treasury I had to offer

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the buyers went up. Now, this is what happened. This

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>is what showed. This is how it shows how bad

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this was. And so in this bid tocover ratio, since

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there was enough buyers, the price had to go up.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So basically, the Treasury was hoping to sell this debt

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for less than what they had to do it what

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they had to sell it at, and the tail went

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>up by five basis points, five basis points. This is

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>what we call a gigantic tail, five basis points. We

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that since, like I said, two thousand and eleven.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>So let's put this into context here a little bit.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>If we had a lower bid to cover ratio and

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it went up let's say six percent, we're at five.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>If it went up to six percent, that'd pretty much

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be a complete disaster. And what that would show the

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>world is that there's so much dysfunction the treasury market

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that they can't trust it anymore. All right, That's what

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it would show. Now because of that, because the yield

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>went up, then the bonds went up as well, and

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they moved so much where it went down, they moved

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in opposite. We're seeing these move and five basis point

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>move is sort of like risk asset that might be

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>something like we might see in the cryptocurrency markets, not

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the US treasury bond market. The US treasure bond is

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the global reserve asset. It's supposed to be what we

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>would consider a risk free asset. It's supposed to be

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the most secure asset in the world. It's not supposed

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to trade like a like a cryptocurrency, it's not supposed

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to trade a like a meme stock. But yet here

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it is. And this is the problem. We haven't seen

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this much dysfunction in the treasury market since the two

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight financial crisis. Now we can see this

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in an index called the move INDEXMOVE and it measures

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this high volatility and it shows us how bad the

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>market conditions really are. And like I said, we haven't

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>seen this much dysfunction. We haven't seen this much problems

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in this treasury market, in the largest, deepest, most risk

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>free market in the world, since twenty ten. And so

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's no doubt that we're seeing investors booped from both

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the amount of debt that the Treasury is trying to

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>issue as well as how bad that auction went. But

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>here's where things really get interesting. What we're witnessing is

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we're witnessing a showdown, a showdown of the Federal Reserve

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Treasury, the US government. I've been talking about

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this for a while. As a matter of fact, I

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>made a video, I want to say it was late

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>last year on my main YouTube, pianel Mark Moss talking

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about this exact thing, how the Fed and Treasury were

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at war. They were battling each other. You see, the

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Treasury wants to continue to spend money. They want to

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to pay for UBI, and pay for more for welfare,

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and pay you not to work, and they want to

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>pay for wars, and they want to pay for all

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>these things, but they don't have the money to do it.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The Federal Reserve. They want the Federal Reserve to give

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>them the money, but the Fed doesn't want to. Why

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because the Fed wants to control the dollar. They want

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the dollar to remain strong. They're also trying to fight inflation.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>If the Fed continues to give the Treasury more money

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend than inflation continues to go up. So the

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Treasury wants to spend money causing inflation. The Fed's trying

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to bring inflation down. That's the battle. And so what

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the FED is trying to do is trying to make

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you and I broke, so you and I spend less

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>money to help bring inflation down. What the problem is,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You and I aren't the ones causing the massive amounts

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of inflation. It's the Treasury doing this. But as the

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is trying to sell these and there's not enough

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>people buying them, where are they getting the money to

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>do that? Because right now the FED is in what

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we call QT, or quantitative tightening. So the FED doesn't

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>want to buy these bonds right now. As a matter

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of fact, the FED wants to sell the bonds. And

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same time they want to sell the bonds,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to raise the rates. But how can the

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Fed be selling bonds into the market when the Treasury

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is trying to sell bonds in the market and there's

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not enough buyers for them. Well, one of the ways

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing is the Treasury has been tapping into

0:16:55.080 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the reverse repo facility. Now reverse repo facility was over

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollars and they've been taking the money from

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the reverse repor facility, and it's been drained going into

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the short end what we call t bills of this

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of this debt, and this has been tapped, and it's

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>been draining at a pretty rapid rate, and we're down

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to about one point four trillion in that right now.

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, at the rate we're going, this is

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to run out very soon, and we know the

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>exact date at the current run rate. I'm going to

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about that in a second when I come back.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tuning in, you listening to the Mark

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Mass Show, talking through what happened with the Treasury almost

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>failed auction last week and what this means. I'll be

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>back with more a minute. Don't go away, We're back,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in your

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark Mash Show. We're talking about what

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>happened last week with the Treasury auction, how it almost failed,

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and what this means and what to expect moving forward. Now.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I was saying that the Treasury has been pulling money.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Money has been coming out. I want to say they're

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>pulling out, but money's been coming out of this reverse

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>repo facility. And going into these short dated tea bills.

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, at the rate we're draining this facility down,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>it's looking to run out pretty quickly. As a matter

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of fact, at the current run rate we're at, this

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>could be empty in the next ninety days. It's a

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty big deal. If that is empty and the Fed

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to buy the debt, what's going to happen? Well,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>remember we talked about the statement that the Treasury put out,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and in that statement they talked about a bond buy

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>back program and talked about how they wanted to get

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it up and running. Well, my guess is that's the

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>magic trick they have up their sleeve. If they run

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>out of money in the reverse repol facility and the

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Fed won't buy it, what will they do, Well, they'll

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just buy it themselves. They'll just buy it themselves. They'll

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to buy whichever bonds they want to make

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>sure there's enough liquidity in the treasury market. Who cares

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if nobody wants them, We'll just buy on ourselves, right,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Why not? But how could you say? How could the

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Fed achieve what they're trying to achieve, which is selling

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>off their bonds at a time when again there's no demand,

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see how their's a way. I don't

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>see how the FED could possibly continue to raise rates

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in this environment and continue to sell off bonds at

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the same time. Now, this is what I've been saying.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I made a video about it on my main YouTube,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>pianel Mark Moss, And today I saw a headline come

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>out from what we call the Fed's mouthpiece, Nick Timrose.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick Timrose is somebody that seems like the FED sort

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of leaks information to and then Timros leaks it out

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to the press. Why does this even happen, Well, because

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the FED doesn't want to surprise anybody. You know, I

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you what's going on, and I sort of read

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>between the lines for a year. But it's not like

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this big secret. Guess the FED tells us this information.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>They have this information leaked out because they do not

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>want to surprise the markets. They're trying to tell you

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>months in advance of what's going to happen. So, for example,

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in November of twenty twenty one, they told us they

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to start raising rates. As soon as that happened,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin started selling off first, because it's the most sensitive

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to risk assets. Then the Nasdaq, which of the tech stocks,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>started selling off. But they didn't actually start raising rates

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>until like February of the following year, so it was

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months. They told us they were going

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but they didn't actually do it for

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months. See, they want to give you

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time to start planning, so they're not trying

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to surprise the market, which is why they use people

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like Nick Timrose in the press to leak this information.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And so today he said that the October payroll report

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and inflation report strongly suggests that the Fed's last rate

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>rise was back in July. The big debate at the

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>next FED meeting is shaping up to be over whether

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and how to modify the postmeding statement to reflect the

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>obvious the central Bank is on hold, so the Fed whisper,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>he's telling us that the Fed is done hiking rates

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>because how can they? How can they continue to raise

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>rates when the government is raising this debt like crazy?

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>How can they? And the answer is they can't. And

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer is it looks like they're going to formally

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>announce that they're on hold. The next part is how

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>can they continue to let bonds roll off of their book.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>How can they continue to sell bonds in the market

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>when there's not enough people buying the bonds that there is.

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>The answer is, I don't really see a way to

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>do that. It looks like the Treasury again in this

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>battle over Fed versus Treasury, it looks like the Treasury

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 1>has the Fed boxed in right now. They got them

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of painted into a corner, if you will, because

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>if the Fed, the Fed's sort of damned if you do,

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>damn if you don't. If the Fed signals that pause

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>were a pivot, what happens, Well, the equity markets, the

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>risk on assets, the assets are going to go to

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the moon, and they're trying to avoid that. They're trying

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to they're trying to bring those down right now. But

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>if they announce this pause or a pivot, they're going

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to run back up. If the Fed signals or moves

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>right higher, then this is going to hurt the US treasuries,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>which is going to make it harder for the Treasury

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to borrow money. But it's already too hard for the

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Treasure to borrow money. If that happens, then the treasure

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>would collapse under its own weight. For demand. So what

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>do they do? Well, that's a big problem. This is

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the painted into a corner, if you will. We're stuck

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in this doom loop where if the treasury rates go up,

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So if the FED raises rates, then the interest that

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury has to pay goes up. If they have

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay more interest, then that creates a larger deficit.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>If there's a larger deficit, they have to take on

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>more debt. If they take on more debt, then they

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have more long term yields going up, which means even

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>larger deficits. And if there's even larger deficits, then they

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>need more debt. And this is a vicious cycle, a flywheel.

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>We call it the debt death spiral. And so there's

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>just no way the FED can absolutely win here. They

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>could continue to do that and they could just completely

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>destroy the government in the US Treasury, but then there's

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:08.239
<v Speaker 1>no Fed, and so what can they do? What is

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the likely scenario here? I don't know what's going to

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>happen because my crystal ball doesn't work so well. But

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you what I think is likely to

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>happen here based off of history of how the FED works,

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the FED is usually too slow to respond,

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>just like they lowered rates too low and kept them

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at zero through the pandemic and through twenty twenty, and

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>then when we saw that inflation was starting to rage on,

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they said, oh, no, inflation is not a problem. Oh,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation is transitory. Oh it's going to go away. And

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they kept rates way too low for way too long.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And now we're dealing with this problem, and so they'll

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>probably keep rates way too high for way too long.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>At this point. They're going to try to manage that,

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but I would expect that these rates will stay way

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>too high for too long. In this yield curve, you've

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>been hearing about the yield curve in version showing that

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a recession coming. And as I've talked about, it's

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not the yield curb inverting, it's the problems when it uninverts,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and I expect it to uninvert within the next couple

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of months. When that happens, then we'll see the price

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of bonds continue to probably take a massive hit. We're

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see a massive flight to hard assets and

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>moneies like bitcoin and gold and other anti inflationary assets.

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're already starting to see this. So,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, I've been talking about I think last week

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked about how it's almost sort of a scam.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We have all the governments, the institutions, the sovereigns are

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>having this massive rush to hard assets while you and

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I are being tricked into holding FIAT. You and I

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>are being told, oh, there's this big crash coming and

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to be in cash right now, we're being

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tricked into buying US dollar nominated assets when everyone else

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is buying hard assets right now. What do I mean

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they're buying hard assets? Well, we talked about this. We

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can see the central banks around the world are net

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>sellers of US treasuries. They don't want to hold their surplus.

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Right So, if you're a nation, you export goods and

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you receive back dollars, the difference is your surplus your profit.

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Where do you park that? Where do you park those

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds billions dollars? Well, that typically has been held in

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries, but that's paper, that's FIAT, and they don't

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>want to hold those paper FIAT when they know the

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>government is continued to print so much more So that's

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>why the central banks around the world have been net

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sellers of US treasuries and what are they buying. They're

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>buying hard assets. They've been net buyers of gold, but

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not just buying gold. As a matter of fact,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese have bought half of all the lithium mines

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, So they want to buy hard assets

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in the ground. We have nations that have assets in

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the ground, like Saudi Arabia and even Russia saying we're

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to put out as much oil anymore. We

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>would rather hold the oil in the ground than hold

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>our surplus in US treasuries. So we're already seeing this

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>mad rush USh to these hard assets. Meanwhile, we're watching

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, energy assets, hard assets and other assets going

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>through the roof, and we're being misled. Now, what I

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>want to do is I want to break down the

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>three types of assets that we have. I want to

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>break them down three different categories so you can you

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 1>can think through how to do this. I want to

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>walk you through a mental mindset on how you can

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think through this, how you can prepare your portfolio for

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what I think is coming ahead. Again, like I said,

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>my crystal ball is a little foggy, so I don't

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know exactly, but I'm want to walk you through what

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I think is the most possible, the most probable, and

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing to position myself for it. How I

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think through that, and how you can do the same,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, what you should be watching so you

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can see how all this unfolds. If you're just tuning in,

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you listening to the Mark mas Show, we're talking about

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>how this failed treasury auction is sort of coming to

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a head and where this goes the next ninety days.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Be aware of this. It's a big deal. I'll be

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>back with more in a minute. Don't go away, I'll

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>be back, all right, Welcome back. If you just tune in,

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>what the heck happened last week with this almost failed

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>US Treasury auction and what this means now I walk

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>through all the mechanics of this. I talked about this

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>eventual showdown that's coming, and I just don't see any

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>way the Fed is able to continue to raise rates

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in this environment and continue to sell off bonds. There's

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>just no way unless magically, Well there is a way.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>There's always a way, So what would it take magically

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the US government, the treasury would have to spend equal

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or less than the amount of money they're bringing in. Somehow,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>they'd have to shave about two trillion dollars per year

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>off their spending. What would you say The odds of

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>that are happening about zero, So that's not going to happen.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So what happens Well, as we've already talked about, the

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>FED mouthpiece Nick Timrose, what we call the Fed Whisper,

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>has come out and said that it looks like the

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>FED is done hiking rates. At the same time we

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>saw this week the new CPI numbers came out, the

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>consumer price inflation data came out, and it looks like

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED has won the war on inflation. Pretty interesting

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>timing for these reports to come out, because the FED

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>has to stop tightening, they have to stop raising rates,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they have to stop still enough bonds, but they can't

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do that if inflation is still raging. So it's pretty

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting the new CPI reports come out showing that they've

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>basically won the war on inflation at the same time

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that Timrose, the FED Whisper, is coming out and saying

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're done again. Like I said, the problem is

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that if the FED comes out and announces a pause

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or a pivot, then we're going to see risk assets

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>take off. So don't look for them to come out

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and officially announce it. Instead, it's going to be through

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>some stealth ways. So like, for example, the Treasury is

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>creating this new funding facility where they're going to buy

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>their own bonds, this bond buy back program, and they'll

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>buy that. Maybe the FED will give them some money

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>off the books. Right, they're going to say this is

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>not QE, but it is QI. So technically QE works

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain way, it's a certain function, but non technically

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>or I guess technically, even though QE has to work

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a certain way, Ultimately, what it does is it adds

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>more liquidity to the system. What it also does is

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it shows that the Fed's willingness, the Fed's willingness to

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>bail out or fund the liquidity in the system. And

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so whether they don't do it through the exact mechanism

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that's technically called quantitative easing, if they do it a

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>certain way, it still achieves the same results. Now, a

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of this is what they do through what we

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>call job owning, where the Fed's trying to move the

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>markets based off of just what they're saying. So they're

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you that they'll do something even though

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they haven't, and so we can see that what they

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do has an effect on the markets. Whether it's technically

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>quantity of easy or not doesn't really matter. It achieved

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the same result. So that's what we'll see. So for example,

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in March of twenty twenty three, because they had jacked

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>up the rates so high, we saw banks starting to fail.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You remember that, we saw Silicon Valley Bank, We saw

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever the banks were, the Felt three banks, some Restronto Banks,

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and I think First Republic

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Bank all failed. And what they do well, they created

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a new funny facility called the BTFP and it wasn't QE,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but it sort of injected a few hundred billion dollars

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>liquid into the system to keep the whole thing from

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>crashing down. Now, I did a whole video on my

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>main YouTube channel breaking this down the difference of how

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED functions in the market today and how it's

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>changed since two thousand and eight. So I don't have

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it in front of me, but just some basic math

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was in two thousand and eight. We saw the housing

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>market actually start melting down in two thousand and six.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So in two thousand and six we saw building permits,

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a leading indicator. If you're not pulling building permits,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>then you're not going to be building in the future, obviously,

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and we saw those drop by twenty six percent in

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six. But yet they didn't do anything.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It took about like a year and a half before

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they started to like lower rates. The trigger for the

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>great financial crash in two thousand and eight was really

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>bear Stearns going bankrupt, and it took them, I want

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, was it about eight or nine months before

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they did anything, and they organized a baillout of like

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollars, so it took eight or nine months.

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Now fast forward and look at this in twenty twenty three,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 1>when the banks failed, within six days they moved up.

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>They moved and had this money set up, this funding

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and fifth fully set up. So they went from taking

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, seven eight months to now taking six days.

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So it shows the willingness of them to act. In

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty we saw them instantly moving to the markets

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and set up multiple funding facilities. In fact, I think

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there was thirteen funding facilities. They were actively buying even

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks into the market. They were buying bonds, they're buying

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed securities, they're buying all these things. Then they

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>even went a step further and they started setting up

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar swap lines. So now all the other banks around

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the world will give you money as well. Think of

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this as like credit cards. Think about if the banks

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just sent you out, like, hey, here's five new credit cards.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>If anything were to happen to you where you know,

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't make your car payment, your house payment, whatever,

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just put it on the credit card, no big deal.

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>If they would just send us all out, you know,

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars in credit cards that we could

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>just use if we needed, that would probably insulate us

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so we wouldn't have this recession. And that's exactly what

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they've done. They went around and gaven all these swap

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>lines out to all these banks. Now it's not just

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the friendly nations. I think there's about thirteen nations or

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I should say central banks that we have these open

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with at the same time. And so we've seen this

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental transformation of how these central banks work in the markets,

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and not just how they work, but even the speed

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and timing of how they work. And so they've gone

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>from this sort of reactive lagging approach to now a

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pre emptive moving in advance to prevent these things from happening.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And so my base case is that we have massive

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>amounts of inflation in front of us. My base case

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is that we do not have a deflationary crash where

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>everything falls in half and home prices are worth fifty

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>percent and stocks worth fifty percent. I believe we have

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an inflationary crash. Now. Either way, a crash is bad. Right.

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>A crash is bad because prices will move up more

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>than an income and we won't have enough money to

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>pay for the things that we want to maintain our

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>quality of life. So if you lose your job, your

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>quality of life goes down because you can't buy the

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>same things, or you get a lower paying job, you

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>can't buy the same things. But if prices go up,

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you're also in the same boat. You could still have

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>your same job, but prices have gone up so much

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't afford those things. See, either way, a deflationary

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or inflationary crash is bad. I'm expecting an inflationary crash. Now,

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>could there be a deflationary crash? First? There certainly could be,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is what most people think. So even the

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Harry Dents and the leaderships of the world think that

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll have this big crash he's calling Harry dentis calling

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for an eighty percent market crash, and then he thinks

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that the FED will come in and blow this sky high.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's That's not my base case. It's

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly possible. I'm not putting that out of the realm

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with possibility. It's certainly possible. I don't think that's the

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>most probable scenario of my case. I think we sort

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of just continue to trudge along, continue to move sideways,

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>chop back and forth. We see a lot of volatility.

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Potentially we see some big swings, some ten to fifteen

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>percent swings. I don't think we see the sixty eighty

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>percent like Harry Dent says, and I believe that will

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>cause the FED to blow this sky high. Now, going

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>back to charting this since two thousand and eight, we

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>saw that the FED intervening in the market to tune

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 1>of about one point two trillion dollars. It's about seven

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred billion roughly the first bellout package total amount

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 1>of one point two billion in two thousand and eight,

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and it took the markets. The market's dropped sm P

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dropped about sixty percent and took about seven

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>years to recover its high. In twenty twenty, because the

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>FED moved so fast, the market didn't drop sixty percent

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and only dropped thirty percent, dropped half as much and

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of taking seven six seven years to recover, it

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>took six or seven months to recover. You seeing how

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they changed the way they interacted to the market, and

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the market didn't fall as far and it recovered much faster.

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It was to the tune of about ten trillion. Instead

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of one trillion, it was ten trillion. I believe that

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED will have to intervene, probably to the tune

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen to twenty trillion, and so instead of a

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent drop, maye we'll see a fifteen percent drop.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>But it's what happens after that, you see. After two

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, stocks gold went on to make crazy

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>knew all time highs. After twenty twenty, stocks went on

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>to make even crazier a new toime all time Hyes,

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>risk assets like bitcoin et cetera. And I leave in

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. If this happens, it'll be the same thing.

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what happens in the next to nine

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>months or twelve months. I firmly believe that in the

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>next three to five years, home prices are up fifty percent,

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices, food prices, all those prices are fifty percent.

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Bick Wind's up to three hundred percent. That's what I

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think happens now between now and then. I don't know.

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It's anybody's guess. Potentially, there's so many black swans out

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there that this could catch the FED off guard, but

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it looks to me like they're preempting it, and we're

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing it from the Treasury announcement right here. Anyway, you

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to the Mark Mas Show breaking down this FED

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Treasury auction, what happened, and what I think happens in

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the future. That's what I got for you today. Hopefully

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 1>have enjoyed this. Leave me a review on the podcast

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening, And that's what I got. Until next time,