WEBVTT - Week 12 ULTIMATE PREVIEW!!! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>don do dennit? Yeah, welcome your host Friday from five

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>died from St. Francis Practice standfall, Ladies and gentlemen, your BFFs.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And with that we want to do inside up Studio

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. This easy. The BFFs Here is Frank stamfle

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sousman. Week twelve is upon us, Frggie.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Greggy? Happy Friday to you, t G.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I f decently fun game last night between the Houston

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Texas and the Indianapolis Colts. Dave said it was horrible, horrible.

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was a horrible game because he didn't

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>hit on any of his bets. That's the reason why

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but from a pure football perspective, lower scoring

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>divisional matchup. We knew that the Houston Tech has needed

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that game, and of course the hook comes into play

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the game, Greg, how did you

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>sleep last night? Buddy? I slept very well. I was

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>wide awake early this morning. I was like, Wow, why

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>am I wide awake right now? On a Friday? Huh day?

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I was excited. I got to work. How did it

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>be here having a roll on the weekend? Man? Did

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you sleep? I slept all right, much needed rest. Did

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>you sleep with a belly full of beer and wings? Greg?

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>You one of those things? And I'll let you guess

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>which the wings? No, not the word? Yeah, I had

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a great beer and wings, like you know your best

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>friend by now I was kidding, Frank, that was sarcasm.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I obviously knew it was clearly not the wings already. Yeah, wings,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and be here last night watching Colston Texas. Um. Judy

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>was so. Judy actually asked, which, just like who's this

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Jacobey Brissette guy? And like is he like good? I

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was kind of explain the background with the Patriots and

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>how it's all full circle very interesting? Yeah, I mean

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissette. He is what he is. I think it's

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a great job done by Frank rich Maybe not last night,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more conservative than they probably should have been,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, I mean to come in

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to the season a month before Andrew luck retires, who's

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>your franchise quarterback, and to perform the way that he has,

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been a pretty damn good season. I

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>agree last night it wasn't enough two yards shorts of

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>that first down on on fourth down, obviously towards the

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>end of the game, although there was no there was

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>no urgency by Frank Reich on that last trial. The

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>just the entire game, it was weird. It was a

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>very conservative game plan. You probably figured coming in that

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to run the football, and of course we

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't know who the running back was gonna be. It

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was definitively Jonathan Williams. I think all week, Greg, we

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>were mostly right about that. I remember when we ranked

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>these running backs from a waiver wire perspective, I had

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it Jonathan Williams, Niheam Hines, and Jordan Wilkins, and that's

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the way that it played out last night. Jonathan Williams

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>sixties seven percent of the snaps, seventeen routes on thirty

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one Brissette dropbacks, six carries, three targets. Just a massive,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>massive workload. Uh nightheam Hines played thirty three per cent

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps, nine carries, three targets. Solid game, I

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, He's probably gonna get eight to ten touches

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>finished with you know, uh, eleven touches, So solid game

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for night. He behinds Jordan Wilkins Greig one snap, one route, ran,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>zero carries, zero targets. We know who the guy is

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. Assuming Marlon Mack is out for the next

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>however many weeks. You don't know anything is when Marlon

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>mac comes back, right, Because Johnathan Williams kind of earned

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a role now, hasn't it. Yeah, he certainly has, you know.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And what I said earlier on in the week, the

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>reason why I like Jonathan Williams was that he proved

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Colts coaching staff that he can handle a workload,

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that he can perform well. Last week he ran for

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred yards on thirteen carries. So I think

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that he earned their trust and that's why they ended

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up giving him. You know, I don't think anybody saw

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this type of workload coming. Twenty nine touches in this

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>game for Jonathan Williams, but you know, he made the

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>most of it. Didn't run incredibly efficiently here only four

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>yards for Arry, but he did enough and he scored

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown as well. He had a few receptions. It

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was you know, look, if you started Johnathan Williams, you

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>are very very happy with what you ended up getting. Yeah,

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I was freakinglutely. He was unbelievable for the Colts. Last night.

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>On the other side of the Houston Texans, DeAndre Hopkins

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>had a big time game that see why Hilton typ

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a game that we expected. Hopkins with those two touchdowns

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>long touchdowns as well, which was awesome. And then will

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Fuller welcome back like he missed no time because he

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was the same exact role he always plays on this team.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It was insane. Man just stepped right back in. And

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>admittedly I said yesterday, don't know what to expect from

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller, but he stepped up in a big way

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>against a a solid secondary. Right the Colts don't have

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>any locked down cornerbacks. They play more zone coverage than

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know most defenses. But Will fuller Man made the

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>most of this opportunity of the snaps yesterday, ran thirty

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>one routes on thirty three Watson dropbacks, finished with game

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>highs across the board, eleven targets, thirty nine percent targets share,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>seven receptions a hundred and forty yards. What sucks, Greg

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is we still know that the floor is low at

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>times a little fuller because he leaves with injury. He

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is a big he's a big play threat. But if

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not converting on those big plays, then you know

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we we could see a lower floor from him. This

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna end up being one of his better boom plays,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and he was. He wasn't in the lineup for anybody.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine. I'll look that up to see what

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>his start percentage. He was not in our lineup. DeAndre

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins was awesome last night, had that blow up game

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that we were hoping for for a while. T Y Hilton. Greg,

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we knew what the risk was going into

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this game, and I had him ranked as my wide

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver fourteen. I was very aggressive. It was a good

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>matchup going up against Houston. I wasn't just playing off

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrative that he owns them. They are a bad secondary.

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of wide receivers have done well

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>against him, not just t Y Hilton, but ultimately in

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the spot, Greg, you could see that he was limited.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>He was jogging up and down the sideline a lot

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game. The Colts had sixty seven offensive plays

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in this rain game. He played on twenty five of them,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So twenty five out of sixty seven snaps. No, that's

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we're used to seeing from t Y Hilton.

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>He had a few drops yesterday. He looked rusty. If

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you started t Y Hilton, Greg, you don't feel good

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. Obviously, not only a few points yesterday, will

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Fuller did was holding onto his uh his was a

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>quad at one point, um or maybe it's his hamstring

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>after coming up after we cash did't miss any plays

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>or any snaps or anything like that. But I thought

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it was was notable and he was holding onto it. Um.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he was like almost like expecting pain and there wasn't,

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a good thing. He does have, of course,

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>ten days to recover now. Kiki QT inactive last night.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to fall from grace for this guy. You know,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if I was talking to some friends last night that

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I just totally got wrong was like

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>liking KIKIQT this year, m v as DONALDO Allison, all

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys. He expected a lot from that. You thought

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you could get most of the late year drafts, So

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>put up something no nuts most of the year for

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>all three break. When we come back, we'll dive game

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>by game. You know all of your rankings. We'll see

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what you think when we have some a lot of

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>decisions that we have to make them gonna ask you

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about that. On the other side, I mean a lot,

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do, not a lot of time to

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's a fantasy BFFs. You're on Sports CD.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now upon us, and you can become

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person away one million dollars in a Fandueler

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings tournament by setting their lineups using the Daily Order

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing Dailey

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>into promo code action for its ten percent discount, and

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that's promo code Action for its ten percent discount dailor

0:08:40.640 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>order dot com where millionaires are made. Well well, well, well,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back with you here on a Friday edge the BF apps,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in with you? Thanks for watching us on

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Pluto TV channel number five seventeen. Stick with us, and

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>uh we'll make you smarter and better fantasy players and

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>hopefully winners, hopefully hopefully Indeed. All right, So I asked Frank,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of questions our own league, and

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, when can I do that? And he said

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the show, So let's get right

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to it. Frank, did Westbrook, Jacksonville, Sterling Sheppard, Giants? What

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>did you do? I'm gonna go with Dede Westbrook. I

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>know he let a lot of people down last week,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but the way to attack the Tennessee Titans defense is

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.599
<v Speaker 1>through the air. They don't have a great secondary. I

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>want to see Sterling Sheppard back for one game and

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Sheppard play us on the outside when we get

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants game a little bit later on, I'll

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you why I Golden Tate. But the outside cornerbacks

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Chicago Bears have played really well so far

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this season, Greg, So between those two, I don't really

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>love either. But this is what we've been forced into

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't start Will Fuller last night. Let's go

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>d D. Let's go d D. I don't know Man

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the Sterley Shepherd move. I know he's

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>based in Chicago. D He kind of stinks and he's

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>constantly injured. He leaves the game. Well, Greg, the Chicago

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Bears have one of, if not the best pass for

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>us in the league, and Daniel Jones is probably going

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to fumble eight times. I'm pretty excited about that. Giants

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bears, let's seriously start there. Though. Officieve Lions gotten healthy.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>With the Giants coming off of a bye week's Sakoon

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Bar he has been able to get a little bit

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>healthier as well. Daniel Jones obviously in a bad spot.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>A constant question that we're getting, Frank is what do

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we expect from Golden Tate with Sterley Shepherd back facing

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>off against his tough Bears defense. Yeah, I would still

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>expect Golden Tate to be the guy. There's no Evan

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Ingram in this game. Rhett Ellison has been ruled out.

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, the third and fourth drink tight end

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Giants are now playing for them, which means

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think more targets for the wide receivers, more targets

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>for Sae Kwon Barkley as well. When it comes to

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate, Greg, since he has returned in week five,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>he leads the team with of their targets share. He

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>has ninety four point three PPR points from weeks one.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>From weeks five through ten, I left out week eleven

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because they were on a bi last week. Over that span,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Golden Tate is a top ten wide receiver in

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues. The way to attack Chicago is in the slot.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>They allow the eighteenth most slot PPR points per game

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>so far this season. So I still think that Golden

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Tate is gonna see his eight ten targets. I think

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna, you know, he's gonna be a reception

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>beast again this week. I think that they're gonna have

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of the ball quickly out of Daniel

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Jones hand, because again that Chicago Bears pass for us

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is very good and the Giants have struggled allowing pressures

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on Daniel Jones. So I would expect another game at

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of Golden Tate. He's inside my top twenty four, Greg

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>inside your top twenty four, Despice, Sterling Sevard coming back

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a Golden Tate owner. Feel good? So thanks man. If

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine Daniel Jones is throwing the ball thirty times in

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this game, right, that seems fair. Golden Tap gets ten targets,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd gets six to eight, and then you have,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, between twelve and fourteen targets for Barkley, Darius Slayton,

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fourth tight end, whatever it might be

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at Simons. And I think that that target breakdown really

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. You know, people were asking

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about Darius Slayton earlier on in the week, and and

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he was a popular waiver wire pick up

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last week when he was on by he crushed the

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets. But that is a secondary that struggles

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>against outside wide receivers. And no, at the time when

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we picked up Darius Slayton, we thought, you know, Sterling

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd might be out for the rest of the season.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Now he has clear concussion protocol, he's gonna play. So

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>things have changed for Darius Leaden, same with Brandon Couch

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>clearingcussion protocol. They play on Monday night now, so we'll

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>get to that obviously on Monday. The other side of that,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it quickly because I mentioned it was Jacksonville, Tennessee.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly not a sexy game by any means. But

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I know yesterday inside the pit, you and Vent you

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking of talk Bears before we got into that game.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Because to the other side, the Bears I want to

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I'm glad, I'm glad you want to go

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>back here. David Montgomery in a good spot, no doubt

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>about that. But the guy I really wanted to mention

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Bears was Taylor Gabriel because I think he's

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in a fine spot this week as well. If you're

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>one of these teams that are affected by the four

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>good teams on a buy, I think Taylor Gabriel is

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like a fine dart throat. I'm with you. I liked

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>him as a waiver wire pick up. Over the past

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>four games for the Chicago Bears. He actually leads the

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>team with twenty three percent target share, leads a team

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in receptions receiving yards as well. The Giants allow, you know,

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most Fantasy points to opposing wide receivers so

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>far this season. Taylor Gabriel just had fourteen targets on

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night Football against the ramp So I'm with you.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Taylor Gabriel is a fine dart throw. I

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>like David Montgomery as a high end RB two going

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>up against the Giants defense here. And I think terriko

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And is sneaky as well. You know, on the season,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>he has an eighteen percent target share. It seems like

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Trabiski has been you know, throwing him a few of

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>those dump off targets a little bit more so far

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>this season. The Giants have a out a touchdown or

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yards rushing who are running back in five

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of their last six games. So I like David Montgomery

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as a high n RB two. I like to reco

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and as a solid flex playing PPR leagues. Anything else

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>with the Bears that you wanted to mention. If we

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>like Toreco and if we like some of the past catchers,

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>then if you're playing a super flex league, I think

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Tisky will be are decent. Here's the problem. Aren't you

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>concerned he gets benched? What if he has a bad

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>first half, the offense doesn't go anywhere. I mean, he's

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>had a bad season and he hasn't been bench greg

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>He was benched last game. Come on, that was a

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>hit pointer, right, you're not concerned? You should. I don't

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>love Trebinsky, obviously, but in a super flex league, he's

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>inside my top twenty at the quarterback position. I'll leave

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it at that, all right. Can I go to the

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>other game now a little quickly. It's the Jaguars and

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. It's not a sexy game. And as I

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned you and then you were going, uh cloating and

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not gloating, but like plucking up Derrick Henry in this season?

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about him this weekend against Jacksonville? Yea, so,

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry has scored a touchdown in eight of ten games,

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>which is just crazy. A lot of his fan to

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>see production is just due to rushing yards and scoring

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns because we know that he doesn't catch passes. But

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know he has seventy percent of his team's red

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>zone carries on the season. That is the fourth most

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>among running backs so far this year. Jacksonville is allowing

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a league high five point four one yards per carry.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>They just got destroyed by Marlon Mack and Jonathan Williams

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>last week in Week eleven. So yes, once again, I

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like Derrick Henry Leonard four Net. You know, Doug Moron

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>has come out and said they're gonna get back to

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>running the football and giving him a big workload. It's

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be easier said than done here. I mean,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna give him a big workload. Is it gonna

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be successful in it? That's a tough one because Tennessee

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>has actually been better against the run so far this season. Greg.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>They are fourth in run defense d v o A.

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The last time Leonard four Nett faced this Titans defense,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if you remember correctly, Greg, he had a sixty nine

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>yard run. That was nice. E finished with sixties six

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>total rushing yards in that game, not really nice. So

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he struggled in that game outside of that one long run.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>If you have Leonard Fournett, you're using him. But I

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think you have to, you know, have realistic projections based

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on the way he has played and based on the

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>way that the Titans have played defense against the run

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so far this season. Greg, Yeah, absolutely. With the d

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>D Westbrook he spoken about before, J Shark has been

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable you're using d J. Chalk. I mean I didn't

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>touch on him just because he's a top ten wide receiver.

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>The Titans have struggled against wide receivers, you know, D. D.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook more of a lower end wide receiver. Three. I

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>don't love it when it comes to the Titans tight ends.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting because I want to like John hu Smith.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He flashed a little bit before there by, but de

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Landy Walker has been practicing on limited basis. It looks

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's actually going to play in this game. So

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, between Delaney Walker and John Hu Smith, I

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>would probably just stay away and see the way that

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this situation kind of plays itself, doesn't play for whatever reason,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll start John. Yeah, Donah would be in the flyer

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:57.239
<v Speaker 1>discussion end and one potentially Yeah, probably definitely behind the Hollisters,

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ryan Griffins, the pickups that we like. He would

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>be bed like someone like Dawson Knox to who I

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>actually like a decent bitness. I don't hate Dawson Knox either.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>This week, Um, for the record, we have a minute

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half left, so I don't want to get

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a game that you're gonna go all over. We'll come

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>back with that in a bit. But Cleveland and Miami.

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna start everybody from Cleveland this week, obviously O'Dell

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and Jarvis and Chubb. But the ones I need to

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ask you about, there's two of them. One Kareem Hunt

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>against Miami and to the returning David to Joku against Miami.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel comfortable, joke? They've already said it's not

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be activated for this game. Really, I thought

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought I read he was going to be activated. Okay, yeah,

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that was the latest that I saw. We

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can look it up during the breaks. I mean I

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>thought going to be activated. Yeah. I know that he's

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>been practicing and he's eligible to return, But the last

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>update that I saw was David and Joku will not

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be activated for this game. I do like Jarvis Landry

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, Greg, I have him inside my top

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen wide receiver says he's out this week. Yeah. The

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>targets have been there for Jarvis Landry to revenge game

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>against the Miami Dolphins as well Odell Beckham. This should

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be the get right spot for him. If I like

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham, if I like Jarvis injury, I love Baker Mayfield. Man,

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I have missed my QB seven on the week. This

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>could easily backfire on me, but I think that he

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>shows up. The Miami Dolphins just allowed a QB one

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>overall performance to Josh Allen. He threw for three touchdowns.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>He rushed for an additional touchdown. Greg, I like Kareem Hunt.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been talking my top twenty four, which seems crazy,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but the Browns are ten and a half point favorites

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in this game. I think that he's actually gonna get

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>some carries later on in this game. He has seventeen

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>targets over his first two games. Obviously you're using Nick Chubb. Greg.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we can talk a little bit

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>more about DeVante Parker, Um, But outside of that, I

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what else you're gonna talk about in

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>this game. Um. From a Dolphins perspective, we're not Patrick

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Lair Fattery games here. Next NFL season is now upon us,

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can be going the eighth person away one

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a Fandueler Draft Kings tournament. My setting

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>lineup using the Daily Order dot Com DFS a lot

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of optimizer if you were playing daily Fantasy sports and

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>not using Daily Order dot Com. You're doing it wrong.

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Sign it down for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>smarter DFS projections, and better results. Into promo code action

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for as ten percent discount. That's promo code action for

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>as ten percent discount. Taylor dot com where millionaires are made.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You want the edge, put your money with your mouth

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is take a shot by opening a sports waging account

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>with FanDuel New Jersey's larger sports book a bandul dot

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash grid will you will receive a free beat

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>up to five dollars. It's a free bet up to

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars. When you open a sports wager account

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at a FanDuel dot com slash grid point spreads game totals,

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>props arlas in game wagering on college and pro sports.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You're in control. Go to FanDuel dot com slash grid

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to open your new account and claiming your free wager

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>about your five hundred dollars today. If you have a

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem called one hundred gamblers on we went in

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>over New Jersey only eligibility restrictions supply see website for details. Frankie,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>as we went to break, I told you the news

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker is of visually doubtful for this weekend. Might

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ray will hope they'll be able to play, but doubtful

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is the official injury designation. Yeah, so that puts John O.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Smith into the discussion as a streaming tight end, a

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, top fifteen ish tight end. Here are his

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>four target totals with in the games that Delaney Walker

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has been out. It's been three, seven, five, and six,

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So specifically those past three games. If you're giving me

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at least five targets out of the tight end position,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, I'm gonna have some interest. He's an athletic guy.

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They can use them in the red zone. Uh, they

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>spread the ball around a lot in Tennessee. But yeah,

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>he's in that conversation now. Is a streaming tight end

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure, Greg fair enough. Johnny Smith very much in

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. So eventually putting in your line on the

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>back end tight end one, I know you want to

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about two other tight ends that are certainly in

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the tight end one conversation. That's Darren Waller for the Raiders,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's Ryan Griffin for the New York Jets. Be

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a fun one at MetLife stadium, a high scoring, a

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>family thing. I know, we like a lot of the

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>principles that are in this one. Yeah, forty six and

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a half total in this game. Not a lot of

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>high totals. The only game over fifty is that Bucks

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>and Falcons game in the Week twelve slate. But I

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>do like both of the tight ends in this spot.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, Darren Waller has been hurt by hunter Renfroze

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>targets over the middle of the field. There's no doubt

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>if you look over the past four or five games

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>for Waller, the targets haven't been as high, the ceiling

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been as high. And of course Foster Moreau just

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>won't go away, and he just scores a touchdown every

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>now and then. He does just enough to be annoying

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to Darren Waller fantasy owners. But you have to continue

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to roll with Waller based on his target chair this

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>season and just his overall upside the way that he

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>has played so far this year. When it comes to

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Griffin, Greg just coming off a monster game over

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards and a touchdown against Washington, Oakland allows

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the third most fantasy points to opposing tight ends, So

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that is an area of the field where

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jets will want to target. And I have Ryan

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Griffin ranks inside my top ten tight ends this week,

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so I do like him ad a bit. I don't

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>know if people realize this. Greg. It doesn't scare me

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>off Levian Bell, you know, maybe it might scare you

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>from a DFS perspective. His snap percentages have been and

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent over the past two weeks. He still

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>is averaging one touches per game over that span, but

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that Levian bell snaps have gone down recently.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 1>They've been using Ballal Powell a little bit more. When

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Jets wide receivers. Loves Jamison Crowder had

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it inside my top twenty four last week. He showed

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>up against Washington Um. The Oakland Raiders allow the ninth

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing wide receivers, so I do

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like Crowder. I think Robby Anderson again, like Taylor Gabriel.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you need a dart throw, it's a

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>good matchup going up against this Raiders defense. But the

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Jets offensive line does not allow to allow him enough

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>time to allow Donald enough time to pass the ball

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>down the field, Greg. When it comes to Donald and

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, I have both of these guys inside my

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>top twelve quarterbacks and you know, you might find a

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit crazy, but I have Derek Carr ten, I

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have Donald at a leven. Just behind those guys Josh Allen,

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo, Tom Brady. I'm stripping the name off the

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>back of the jersey. I love the matchups here for

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Yeah, absolutely, so I'm with you. Uh,

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I have Car. I would have Car and Donald over

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>those guys as well. It's really, like I said, a

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>high scoring matchup we expect. I think both of these

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 1>tight ends are in the top ten conversation as well. Um,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Jameson Crowder has given life to this Jets

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>offense with Sam Donald back at the quarterback stop on our.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Renfro as well has been really really good over the

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>last month or so. I believe I've been silver tweeting

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>out how he's a top twenty wide receiver over that

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>time in PPR leagues. So I think it was actually

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Bowl he was like eighteen and one like twenty and

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the other. So Hunter has been pretty solid in his

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>second half of the rookie year. Yeah, if you need

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>a PPR play, a bye week replacement, a low end

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Three. Again, really good matchup against the New

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>York Jets. I expect some points back and forth here.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I also think Tyro Williams gets back in the end

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>zone this week. Greg, I have Tyro Williams as a

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>low end wide receiver too. He's also inside my top

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty four alongside j Mson Crowders. So I do like

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys. A decent bit imagined Tom Brady.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Arguably the game of the days, the New England Patriots

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Dallas Cowboys. You have, as I said

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on the FanDuel Harry, even banging the table, even stopping

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>your feet, you will leave Dallas wins this one outright.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You think Dallas is the better team that you like,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott is Ekiel Elliott and the rest of the

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>guys this week. So I think it's interesting, right we

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>always talk about the Patriots are gonna take away the

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>number one weapon for an opposing team. What are they

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna take away from the Dallas Cowboys this week? Because

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Imri Cooper has been banged up, but you probably would

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>argue that he has been the top weapon for the

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys so far this season. I don't know for

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that they're the better team, Greg, but I think

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that the New England Patriots have a lot of deficiencies

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on offense right now. They can't run the ball effectively.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Now they I believe they might be getting Isaiah winnback.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>That's going to help their offensive line, should help their

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to run, but their past catchers are banged up.

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed san News said he's gonna try to practice today

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>here on a Friday, November twenty. Philip Dorset in concussion protocol,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>so you know they could be rolling out Edelman, Nikkil,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Harry Ben Watson as their main pass catchers. I think

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that this game is at least close competitive. I like

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys in the spot. I think there's a chance

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that they win it, and the way to attack the

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Patriots defense recently, Greg has been to run the football.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm expecting a pretty good game out of Ezekiel Elliott.

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I know that the efficiency hasn't been there for him,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the workload has. I expect a good game for him.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I am a little bit worried about a Marie Cooper

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Gallup. I have them lower than I have

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>had them the past couple of weeks. I have a

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Marie Cooper as my wide receiver six team. He's normally

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>been a wide receiver one toss. Michael Gallup is more

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of a you know, middling high end wide receiver three,

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas last week he was a wide receiver to play

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for me, I think that I think it's hard to

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys and not really like the wide receivers,

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you are, um, unless you think have

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the big Zke get. I think Zeke is gonna have

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a big games. I think that Jason Witten can have

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky game here. So my thing is rank he is.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I said to see last week that Dak Fresh has

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>been awesome over the last couple of weeks. I want

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to see him do it against a real defense. Patriots

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously are as real as they get, so I'm not

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily with you or Gabe on the Cowboys. Probably not

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna plays a wager on this one, but I want

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to see it against the real Devens before we start

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>crowning Dak. When it comes to QB rankings, it's worth

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioning I have Dak Prescott as myke QB nine, So

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I still have him ahead of Sam Donald and I

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>wrestled with Car because I like Car and I like Donald.

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the matchup. But when it comes to Doc,

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he's just played so well. Greg, at least eighteen fantasy

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>points in every game this season. A lot of those

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have been really good matchups. He has three touchdown passes

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly in three straight games. I'm not playing he's gonna

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>do that against the Patriots. Um, I don't have it

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>up off the off the top of my head here, Greg.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But again, the matchups they've they've been good for deck.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here, it's been the Lions, the Vikings, and

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Those are those are good matchups you could

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>throw on those teams. But I think Uh to be

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a top ten quarterback this week. If Dak finishes with

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>two seventy five and two or two seventy five and

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one with some rushing yardage, I still think that he

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 1>could finish as a top ten quarterback this week. I'm

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more worried about Tom Brady. He's throwing

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the ball a lot, but not doing not doing it

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of success. So I do like the

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys a decent bit in the spot alright, Cowboys against

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Juliettiman obviously a really good spot for New England.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>We haven't got a reward on Snewer door, say right,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the designation is gonna Nothing has come out definitively on

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>those guys. Yet. I realized I didn't get a chance

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Patriots running backs. It's, you know,

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure this out. You know what it's like,

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>right if you own one of these guys. It's frustrating

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>every single week, Sony Michelle, he has touchdown dependent. He

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is not running the ball efficiently the past three games.

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>James White leads his team with of the snaps and

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think in more competitive games you are going to

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>see more James White. So look in PPR leagues. James White.

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a high inflex he is what he is every

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>single week. If he gets in the end zone, he'll

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>end up being an RB two. But based on his

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>target share, um, you know, James White is obviously in

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>play here. Dallas has allowed the third most receptions to

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>running back so far this season. Sony Michelle more of

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a middling RB three flex play and I don't feel

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>good about Sony Michelle, you can't. You're not gonna feel

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>good about him until he has that next three touchdown performance,

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna come when he's on everyone's bench. Greg,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I know you know obviously it's it's inevitable. Yeah, And

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you like Ben Watson as a streamer. He's

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning. Dallas has struggled big time against tight ends,

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and again the Patriots pass catchers are banged up. Man.

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll bring it up again. I brought it up during

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the break. I'll say it on the air. We came

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>back with Johnny Smith, john Smith or Ben Watson. I'll

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>take Ben Watson just because it's been a better matchup.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. Tight ends again have done very well against

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. The Jaguars have been a little bit

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>tougher on tight ends. All right, let's move on frights.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Another game. It's Pittsburgh and Cincinnati Steelers are without Juicemith Schuster.

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>There wereout James Conner this week, but Johnson does look

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to play on Sunday. Uh coming back

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in this concussion pretty quickly after they played Thursday Night

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Football a week or so ago. The Bengals they don't

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really have anybody A. J Green has been ruled out

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on and Tate may not play. He's questionable in this one,

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I doubt I agree. We saw a lot of Joe

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>mix in last week, but as Gabe was telling me

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier that Ryan Finley starting for like three point three

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>yards per attempt. At this point, it's been brutal for him. Now.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He's very bad. Joe Mixon like it was awesome last week,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he's been awesome in the past two weeks. Be awesome

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers defense, probably not awesome. I think he's

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>still in the RB two discussion. Who would have thought, Greg,

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan Finley starting for the Cincinnati Bengals is what

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was needed to unlock the potential of Joe Mixon. This

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is just it doesn't make any sense because you would

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think that with Ryan Finley on the field, teams creep

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>up their safeties, they play more men in the box.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's tougher for Joe Mixon to find holes. But that

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been the case with Finley starting. Joe Mixon has

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>seen sixty eight percent of this nest. That has gone

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up from when Andy Dalton was starting forty five carries

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>over the past two weeks, seventy of the Bengals carries

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>ten percent targets, share six red zone carries. Uh, it's

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not a great matchup. Pittsburgh has been good against the run,

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>but I think based on the way Joe Mixon has

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>played the past two weeks, they're leaning more on the

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>run with Ryan Finley as the quarterback. He's a vlume

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>play that might score a touchdown because they're now using

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>him inside the red zone. So to me, Joe Mixon

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is an RB two. I think Tyler Boyd squeaky wheel

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>game here. The Steelers have struggled a little bit against

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>slot wide receivers. They have allowed a slot receiver to

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdown in three of their last four games.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that Tyler Boyd is a must start,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think he is a solid to high end

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Three. You know, a lot of people see

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what he did last week and they're automatically gonna say

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no way I can use Tyler Boyd. You know,

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>once these guys start chirping a little bit, that's when

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they start to get some targets. Based on everyone being

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>banged up for Cincinnati, I think that Tyler Boyd does

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>see probably eight ten targets in this game. In Week twelve,

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Greg on the other side, Juju has been ruled out,

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>James Conner has been ruled out. We've been talking about

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers running backs all week. I still think Jalen

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Samuel's is the main guy. And then after that, your

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>guest is as good as mine. I would probably lean

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>towards Trey Edmunds just because he has been the running

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>back active over the past couple of weeks. And yes,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Deonte Johnson replaces James washing Cinema in my rankings as

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a low wind wide receiver three a lot more games.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yet you know, not a lot of time to do

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it well well quickly for the next twenty minutes. BFS

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>wrap up after this NFL season is now upon us,

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can become the eighth person away one million

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a Fandel Draft Kings tournament. My setting their

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>lineups using the Daily Order dot Com DFS a lot

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of optimizers. If you're playing daily Fantasy Sports and not

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>using Daily Order dot Com, you're doing there wrong. Sign

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up now for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>smarter DFS projections, and better results. Into promo code action

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.959
<v Speaker 1>for a ten percent discount. And that's promo code action

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for a ten percent discount. Daily Order dot com where

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>millionaires are made. Drink right six games ago, Freggie, how

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>much time to do it? Let's go, Let's just jump

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>right in here on. Let's go to the NFC South

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>where we have two big NFC South matchups, two matchups

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that have a tone of fantasy implications. Will begin with

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons because they're facing off in the best

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>magic you possibly have, Damn May Buccaneers, which means a

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>lot is in play for Matt Ryan and friends. Start. Everybody, Greg,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>well maybe not everybody fifty one and a half total

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game, But I do like Matt Ryan, and

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I know we called Jamis Winston a an interception machine

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the week, but if you look at

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>his game log, it's actually quite incredible what he's been

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do from a fantasy perspective. He turns the

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ball over two to three times every single week. You

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>know that that's gonna be a lock, But if you

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>look at his game log, he's still giving you eighteen

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five fantasy points every single week. There's just

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so much volume. When it comes to Jamis Winston, you

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta continue to start Mike Evans and Chris Godwin. I

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>know that it's been a tougher go recently for Chris Godwin,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's very boom or bust with Mike Evans.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But that boom when he booms is quite amazing. And

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not ready to just completely crown this

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Falcons defense. I do like them as a stream because

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know Jamis is gonna turn the ball over. But

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.239
<v Speaker 1>let me let me see it three weeks in a row.

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Because I still think that d J. Moore had a

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>good game last week against this Falcons defense. Curtis Samuel

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>could have had a better game. I know that there

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was a few drops involved there. So I'm still trusting

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons wide receivers Greg when it comes to the

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>when the Bucks wide receivers, excuse me. When it comes

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to the running backs, I do not like Ronald Jones

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the spot. I have him as a lower end

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>RB three, a lower and flex. Over the past three weeks,

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he's playing of the Snaps, Darry Gooma, Wally Peyton, Barber

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen percent. They all have at least three red zone

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>touches during that span. It's still a very frustrating situation.

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>If you can get away from Rojo Vntra, I'm sorry,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>please do so this week. On the other side, Greg Uh,

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you love Matt Ryan, you love Julio Jones, you love

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley in the spot, I have both Julio and

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Ridley inside my top twelve this week. This Buck secondary

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is legitimately that bad, and I think that their run

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>defense is starting to show some cracks recently as well.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Carson had a hundred rushing yards against him. Kenyan Drake

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>had six receptions. Kamara had ten receptions last week. Those

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>are each of the past three games. Brian Hill played

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of the snatch last week. Greg, he has

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty five carries over his last two games. To me,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I am going back to the well with Brian Hill

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as a high end flex option this week. I know

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that on paper you think it's a tough match against

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. It's shown a few more cracks recently. I

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>think the volume is gonna be there for him. I

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>don't love the Brian Hill start this week. He's not

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in tide my top twenty four. He's not like a

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>must start play. He's he's a flex play. I go

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>back to all the other guys I mentioned yesterday, Darius Guys,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuel's post. I would use all three of those

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>over Brian Hill. Okay, yep, it's like there's me an

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of where you have them. Then okay, um, anything

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>else in this game before we move on. Now, just

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>start all the wide receivers. Would you start Cameron Brad No,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to know. Okay, I can't, dude, I like,

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you never know if O. J. Howard's gonna bounce back

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>this game. I understand the targets were there for Cameron Braid.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons are you know, middle of the pack against

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. I trust the wide receivers on Tampa Bay.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>That's about as far as I can go, all right.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 1>And the other NFC South game between Carolina and New Orleans.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen was brutal last week. Over the past month,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>he's been terrible. New Orleans Saints obviously got back to

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>their winning ways last week. It's a great great spot

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for Alvin Camara. I believe he's the top running back

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on your rankings this week. He is a top three

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>running back. Fine so he's top three running back. You

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>said that any week UM with Kamara, I believe in

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>store right awesome, awesome match. I think Michael Thomas as

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>well for Carolina UM d J. Moore and he wants

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about him. He's been fantastic recently, some touchdown

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 1>positive touchdown aggression better becoming his way. Probably not Greig.

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Julio two point oh. When it comes to

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>d J Moore, He's getting a ton of targets, a

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>ton of receptions and yards, not scoring any touchdowns. I'm

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's gonna happen this week. Marshawn Lattimore looks

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's not gonna play again. He hasn't practiced all week.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Haven't seen the practice report yet for today, but normally

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't practice Wednesday, you don't practice Thursday. I'm not

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling good about Marshawn Lattimore. D J Moore double digit

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>targets in four of his last five games. You're going

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to continue to fire him up. Curtis Samuel for me,

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>high end wide receiver three. The upside is kind of

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>limited for these two, just because Kyle Allen has not

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>played well over the past month. Just three touchdowns eight

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>interceptions for Kyle Allen during that span. Obviously you're using

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. You don't need me to tell you that.

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>From a DFS perspective, you better find some value plays

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to use McCaffrey, because it is getting

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>really really tough out there to use Christian McCaffrey. Greg

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>brew Brees since returning has three touchdown passes in two

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of three games. Carolina has allowed over three passing yards

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and four of their last six. We know that they

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>struggle against the run, they're actually starting to struggle against

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the past now as well. So I'm firing up Drew

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Brees obviously using Michael Thomas. I don't want to fool

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>around with Ted Gain and Trey Kwan Smith. You never

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>know on a weekly basis who it's going to be

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>between those two. I think Jared Cook is a fine

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>low end tight end one. He scored the touchdown last week,

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>only had two targets. Kamara really love him for DFS.

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Greg Caroline allowing four point eight yards per carried of

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>running backs the third most Fantasy points. I think Latavias

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Murray is actually in play as a flax option as well,

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>even if you get you know, ten to twelve touches,

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>those touches can be really efficient against this Panthers. He

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>had ten touches last or ten carries last week, including

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the first carry the game. As twelve you are run

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>up the middle. So I think we'll Tavia's Murray certainly

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in play against the bad Carolina Panthers rush defense. I

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 1>think he's desperation flex What do you can tas Murray

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Hill. I have Brian Hill a few spots times.

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand that the the matchup is better for Latavious Murray,

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but for me, I am expecting Brian Hill to get fifteen,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen touches in this game, hopefully hopefully obviously um that happens.

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I like Ted gain over trackline Smith called a gut

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>called ever you want the rhyme reason to it, you know,

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But if we're talking about dart throws, you like the

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gabriels Robert Robber matchups. I mean not that's just

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>better matters, but like I feel like the Panthers have

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>struggled against the past recently. I just like that they're

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>more of a guarantee Theoryically, I don't know, yes, yeah,

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>they are on the they are on the field more,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have to worry about someone like Michael

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Thomas getting as many targies. I mentioned Darius Guys in

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>most Garborough a few times now. These two teams play

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>each other, that the Lions and the Jeff Driskell against

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Swayne Hasket. Oh my god, what a game we got here.

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I have both both Scarborough and Darius Guys ranked inside

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>my top twenty four this week. Greg, call me crazy.

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about both scarbro all week long. The

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins allowed the seventh most fantasy points to opposing

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>running backs when it comes to Darius Guys, Yes, they

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>used three running backs last week. They were trailing for

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that game. That is why Wendell Smallwood

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>played of the snaps. But Darius Guys, you saw it.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>In the second half. They started to go away from

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson started to get Darius Guys a little bit

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more involved. Greg. Someone in the chat asked how many

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>touches do you expect Darius Guys to get this week?

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, I think twelve to fifteen. I was gonna

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's gonna be in that mix. And

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the Detroit Lions are not a good defense.

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed seventeen total touchdowns of running backs this year,

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the second most fantasy points to the position. I'm in

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 1>on both Darius Guys and Bo Scarbro. I really hope

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>this one does not blow up in my Come on man,

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>one time, one time. We've the lines running back in

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the last month. May this one be right. You should

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to use Terry McLaurin in this spot too,

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but he was in a good spot against the Jets

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>last How you feel good about it? It's you know,

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the Lions defense has has struggled overall. They are one

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>of three teams that allow an average of four total

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>yards of offense every single week, and they allow the

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth fourth most fantasy points to quarterbacks. But you just

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can't trust Dwayne Haskins right now. I think if you're

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>playing a deeper league, pay attention to Kelvin Harmon. He

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>actually led this team in targets last week, Greg and

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he has another rookie wide receiver for them, so I

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>think him and Haskins were playing together on the scout team.

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Just saying in deeper leagues, how deep is a league?

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>At Kelvin Harmon NFFC high stakes leagues. I mean we're

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about ten bench spots. Kevin Harmon owned that league,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, so let me go pick him up.

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, there you go with that up next Denver

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and Buffalo. Good one here. Theoretically, no game. Obviously, Bill

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is gonna destroy them. We've talked a lot about nobody

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>circles the wagons. Greg, we feel like a lot about

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Noah Fan This week, I was a really tough spot

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for him. Where did he fall ultimately in your Tighten rankings?

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So I have no A Fan as my tight end twelve. Okay,

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>based on volume? Where's the John Smith fall? I hadn't

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>updated them yet based on Delaney Walker being out, but

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I can kind of ballpark this right now at the

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, John nu Smith, I'll put him

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>up to tight end seventeen. So I'll have him just

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>behind Ross Dwelly, our guy, Jason Witten, and Dawson Knox.

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Then John new Smith's gonna slod in right behind those guys.

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.399
<v Speaker 1>But based on the target share the volume that Noah

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Fan has been receiving, Brandon Allen does not throw to

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the running backs as much as Joe Flacco did. It's

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>basically no A Fan, Tim Patrick and Courtland Sutton in

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the past game. So, uh, it's a really tough matchup

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>for Noah Fan. I realized that, But I mean, you're

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about a tight end that's now receiving double digit

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 1>targets in a game. You gotta like that type of volume. Greg, Absolutely,

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>you have no choice, but like the volume no A Fan,

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>even though the matchup was brutal. He's a number two

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>options on the team outside of a Courtland Sunton. And

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that Genarius White's gonna be on Courtland Sutton,

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:08.479
<v Speaker 1>which means maybe no offense, maybe Tim Patrick, Tim Patrick game,

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 1>probably not. I'm still trusting Courtland Sutton if I own him.

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>He's not the Sis. One week, I have him inside

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>my top twenty. I have him at wide receiver eighteen.

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So the reason the reason I asked a little bit,

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he's had him before after Marie Cooper. This week you

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have after I have him after. Yes. So I actually

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>put out a poll before the show, Gregg asking about

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers with tough matchups, and I have them ranks

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>all in order. It's a Marie Cooper wide receiver sixteen.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>John Brown Courtland Sutton and then Cooper cup I have

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>them in that order from wide receiver sixteen through nineteen.

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw this pole that you put up. It is

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>like the hardest pole that you have had in a

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>very long time. It's good. That means it's a good point.

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Literally sat here being like, I don't I don't know

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.839
<v Speaker 1>what to say. John Brown is if you trust John Brown,

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the percentages, two percent, that's the

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>closest poll we've ever had. It's a good pull. It's

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>an excellent pol Frank, well done, well done. So I

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>still do trust John Brown in the spot. I understand

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 1>he's likely gonna see Chris Harris. We saw Chris Harris

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>get beat for a deep touchdown against Stephon Diggs last week.

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>We know if there's one thing that John Brown is

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to do, it is beat somebody deep

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>behind the defense catch that deep ball. But the targets

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have been incredibly consistent for John Brown as well, Greg

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>He is fourth in the NFL among wide receivers with

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a twenty six percent target share. So do not get

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>scared off of John Brown, in my opinion. Devin Singletary

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>has played six of the snaps nice over over the

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>past four weeks for the Buffalo Bill since week eight,

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent targets share, so you know he's seeing more snaps.

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He's seeing more targets than frank Or, but frank Or

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.919
<v Speaker 1>will not go away. Ten red zone opportunities for Devin

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Singletary during that span. Frank Gore has eight, so single

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Terry more of a low n RB two. I'm not

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a hire on him this week, as I have been

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks. Denver allows just three point

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carried running backs. Dalvin Cook struggled against

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this Denver Broncos defense last week. Greg, So, I think

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a tougher match up here for Devin Singletary. Uh

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and then Josh Allen. People are gonna have a lot

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of questions, Greg. He is my QB twelve. I would

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>use both Donald and Derek Carr ahead of him, but

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not completely off of him. That rushing, that rushing

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>production gives him a pretty safe floor team my league.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He's Jacoby Brissette last night over Josh, I wouldn't have

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 1>done that. Eagles and Seahawks up next from Philadelphia. Good

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>spot for DK metcalf rank yeah, especially because Tyler Lockett

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is still banged up. We don't know if Tyler Lockett

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to play in this game. But again, you

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>can't have success on the outside against this Philadelphia Eagles defense.

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell that to my Mohammed sanow Love from last week.

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But DK Metcalf, the targets have been there for him recently.

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Completely wrong about him coming into the year. I thought

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he was a one trick pony. But maybe that's all

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>right in the Seattle Seahawks offense because Russell Wilson arguably

0:43:57.480 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the best deep ball thrower in the game. So I

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>do like to a meccalf as a high end wide receiver. Three.

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what's going on with this Eagle's running

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>back situation. Miles Sanders played of the snaps last week

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>but didn't wasn't able to make the most of that opportunity.

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I do like Hollister, He's inside my top ten. I

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do like both zach Ertz and Dallas Goddard as well.

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Greg And you're using Russell Wilson. If Tyler Lockett plays,

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you're obviously using him as well. But maybe just you know,

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tick down your expectations a little bit because he is

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>still banged up. Um, I don't really like Carson Wentz

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. I know that the Seattle Seahawks defense

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is not good, but this Eagles offense has not and

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been clicking over the past you know, a

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>month or so either. So I have Carson Wentz, you know,

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>outside my top fifteen quarterbacks. Graig, I don't really like

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>him very much. Alright, one last year to get to

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it's Sunday Night football, the Niners and the Green Bay Packers.

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The Niners, you kind of know what you're getting, so

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy we can skip over that. But for

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners, we don't know the status of Deebo Samuel.

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:54.399
<v Speaker 1>We don't know the status of Emanuel Sanders. We don't

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>know the status of George Kittle. Who do you wait

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for and who do you just say goodbye to? I

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that George Kittle is going to play in

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:03.879
<v Speaker 1>this game. But you know, if someone in your league

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>dropped Ross Dwelly, and you're a George Kittle owner picked

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>him up, and you know, if he doesn't go, then

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you used Ross Willy. If he does, then then obviously

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you get George Kittle in your lineup. Um. Pay attention

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to the practice report today, see what happens here, because

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're gonna get some points back and

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>forth year Greg, which means Deebo Samuel. The targets have

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>been there. I want to like him, but he's banged up.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So it is a very it's a very tough situation here,

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>but definitely something to pay attention to. You love those

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Niners running backs going up against this Green Bay Packers defense.

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Wag your talk is out next fall by out the

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>window for Frank Stanfell. I'm Gregg Sousman. Have a great weekend.

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll see him Monday. We hope NFL season is now

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>upon us and you can be going the eighth person

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>away in one million dollars in a Fandueler Draft Kings tournament.

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>My setting lineup using the Daily Order dot Com DFS

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of optimizer. If you're playing Dailey Fantasy Sports

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong.

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Sign it now for the NFL Access with a faster, optimized,

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>smarter DFS projections and better results into promo code action

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for a ten percent discount. And that's promo code action

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 1>for a ten percent discount. Taylor Order dot Com where

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>millionaires are made. What did happen? Here's what you missed

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on the BFFs. Jordan Wilkins, Greig one snap, one route,

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>ran zero carries, zero targets. We know who the guy

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be, assuming Marlon Mack is out for the

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>next however many weeks you don't know anything is when

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Marlon mac comes back, right, Because Jonathan Williams kind of

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>earned a role now, hasn't it. Yeah, he certainly has,

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, And what I said earlier on in the week,

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I like Jonathan Williams was that he

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>proved to the Colts coaching staff that he can handle

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the workload, that he can perform well. Last week he

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:56.800
<v Speaker 1>ran for over a hundred yards on thirteen carries, So

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that he earned their trust and that's why

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they ended up giving him. You know, I don't think

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody saw this type of workload coming twenty nine touches

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in this game for Jonathan Williams, But you know, he

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>made the most of it. Didn't run incredibly efficiently here,

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>only four yards per carry, but he did enough and

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>he scored a touchdown as well. He had a few receptions.

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It was. You know, look, if you started John and Williams,

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you are very very happy with what you ended up getting. Yeah,

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>freaking litely, he was unbelievable for the Colts. Last night.

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>On the other side of the Houston Texans, DeAndre Hopkins

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>had a big time game that see why Hilton typ

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a game that we expected. Hopkins with those two touchdowns

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 1>long touchdowns as well, which was awesome. And then Will

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Fowler welcome back like he missed no time because he

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 1>was the same exact role he always plays on this team.

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It was insane. Man just stepped right back in And

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 1>admittedly I said yesterday, don't know what to expect from

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:48.879
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller, but he stepped up in a big way

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 1>against a a solid secondary. Right the Colts don't have

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>any lockdown cornerbacks. They play more zone coverage than you know,

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>most defenses. But will Fuller man made the most of

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity of the snaps yesterday. Ran thirty one routes

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on thirty three Watson dropbacks. Finished with game highs across

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the board eleven targets, thirty nine percent target share, seven

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>receptions a hundred and forty yards. What sucks, Greg is

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 1>we still know that the floor is low at times

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for a little fuller because he leaves with injury. He

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is a big he's a big play threat. But if

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not converting on those big plays, then you know

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>we we could see a lower floor from him. This

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is gonna end up being one of his better boom plays.

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And he was. He wasn't in the lineup for anybody.

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine I'll look that up to see what

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>his start percentage. He was not in our lineup. DeAndre

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins was awesome last night. Had that blow up game

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 1>that we were hoping for for a while. T Y Hilton, Greg,

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we knew what the risk was going into

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>this game, and I had him ranked as my wide

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver fourteen. I was very aggressive. It was a good

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>matchup going up against Houston. I wasn't just playing off

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the narrative that he owns them. They are a bad secondary.

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, lot of wide receivers have done well against him,

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not just t Y Hilton, but ultimately in the spot great.

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You could see that he was limited. He was jogging

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>up and down the sideline a lot in this game.

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>The Colts had sixties seven offensive plays in this game.

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Game he played on twenty five of them,