WEBVTT - Nvidia Becomes First $5 Trillion Firm, Lifted by AI Boom 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and Edva though in San Francisco.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up in Vidio, the first

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>five trillion dollar company as President Trump puts Blackwell at

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the heart of talks with China.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 3>We had the interview with Nvidio CEO Jensen one.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Plus Alphabet, Microsoft and Meta all sut to report results

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 4>after the closing bell today will drill down on what investors.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Are looking for.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>An AI startup character AI will ban kids from having

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 2>conversations with chatbots on its platform.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 3>We have more in that story later this hour, but first.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 4>We check in on these markets that are at a

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 4>new record high five straight days of gains on the

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Nasdaq one D We're up four.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Tenths of percent.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 4>It is our worth more than thirty three trillion, this

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 4>entire benchmark. But there's one keen juggernaut ed underneath that

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 4>and you're looking.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>At it, yep, and that is in Nvidia.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia is the first company to reach five trillion dollars

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of market value of market capitalization, and one of the

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>things we reflected on on the gain in the shares,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 2>if we could pre bring up that chart, is the

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>idea that that value jump has happened very quickly from

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the four trillion dollar milestone. Why is the stock hire

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 2>by four percent today in the session. It's because President

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Trump on board Air Force one saying will be speaking

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>about Blackwell.

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a super duper chip.

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>I think we may be talking about that with President Ji,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and of course President Trump due to meet with China's leader.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>That's where the focus is.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>But in Vidia's role in it is what's driving the market.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's stay on in video and bring in bloombergs Ian King,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>who leads our coverage as a semiconductor sector. The news

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>is that the President has said that he will discuss

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell with China's President G. There is some explaining to

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>do because the understanding of the market was this is

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell architecture for a deprecated lower power chip for China,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily the leading edge, but there is actually quite

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot we don't know.

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, absolutely right, And if you just go by

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 6>what the President has said yesterday or today and what

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 6>he said previously, there's a gap.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 6>Our understanding was they might be allowed to send part

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 6>of this new chip line to China, but only a

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 6>very reduced version of it. That was the understanding that

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 6>would be better than what they can do now. That

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 6>will be good for revenue. But if he's referring to

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 6>the whole of the Blackwell line to effectively in Video's

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 6>best chips, that's a massive expansion of the opportunity and

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 6>would obviously explain a lot of excitement, but it's unlikely

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 6>that that's the case.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 4>What's extraordinary is the level of excitement even prior to

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 4>that statement on Air Force one, the fact that Jensen

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 4>one was outlining how much rampant demand there is for

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Reuben and Blackwell, even without any China demand whatsoevery in.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, No, you're absolutely right, and I think that would

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 6>probably be the bigger driver of what's going on today

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 6>if we sort of look at the Wall Street reaction.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 6>As you said, he put that number of half a

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 6>trillion dollars of sales that he's sure he's going to

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 6>get for these new chips over a five quarter period.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 6>So it's a little bit uncertain when it will exactly

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 6>hit and how it will line up with Wall Street estimates,

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 6>But you've got to remember that total revenue estimates for

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 6>the company over the next couple of years are in

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 6>the three hundred range. So five hundred is a lot

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 6>more than three hundred. So regardless of how exactly that

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 6>lines up and whether that's all captured in one year,

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 6>is still a huge number. And really, as we saw

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 6>from our TV interview with him yesterday, and as we

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 6>saw from his appearance at the Big Show here in Washington,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 6>he's saying, look what bubble, don't worry about it.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Ian.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>You've covered this industry since the late nineties, and you know,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I was reflecting at the top of the show that

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the jump in market cap from four trillions five trillions

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>quite recent. But there was so many headlines yesterday from

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Jensen Wong himself. You know, we heard from him for

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 2>like an hour and a half in total after the keynote.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Was there anything that was really important that jumped out

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that you think might have got lost in the wash

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of all of the news that happened.

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, he was trying. He's playing whackam all right.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 6>The biggest concern is that we're building ahead of the

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 6>actual business case for AI. So a lot of what

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 6>he said was like, hey, we're doing this this that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 6>was signing these deals to get rid of some of

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 6>these blockages, were bringing these new products to market to

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 6>get rid of some of these perceived blockages. Oh, by

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 6>the way, here's our guaranteed revenue. And guess what, I'm

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 6>on a plane to Asia to try and help sort

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 6>out this big problem with China. So there was a

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 6>huge amount of information given, but it was all channeled

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 6>in the same direction, which is AI is real. We're

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 6>going to make sure it's real, and we're going to

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 6>get rid of some of these problems.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 5>Mexican King, Well, thank you so much for the roundup.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 4>And look in was just talking about the florry of

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 4>partnerships that were announced yesterday. One key one of them

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 4>in Video Planning to make a one billion dollar equity

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 4>investment in Nokia. The announcement saw a massive search look

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>at it in Nokia shares.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 5>We of course sat down with Jensen Wang.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 4>And Nokia CEO Justin Hootard about the news.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 8>For national security reasons, for economic reasons, our industry should

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 8>be built on American technology, and for the very first

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 8>time we can do that.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 9>We have a brand new product line.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 8>That takes advantage of computing, accelerated computing and AI, and

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 8>we have a great partner to help us deal with Nokia.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 2>The market reaction kind of speaks for itself. There was

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a time where Nokia was already looking to America. You've

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 2>been in the role since April. But may I start

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 2>by asking you what role the administration played in bringing

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>you both together? If this is indeed a strategic priority.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 10>I don't think there was anything specific that the administration

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 10>did other than they've created the environment to support innovation.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 10>I mean, Jensen's talked about manufacturing, but it's also about

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 10>R and D and innovation and technology leadership. And if

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 10>you think about where this world is going, and all

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 10>those incredible devices are gonna be built on video platforms, robotics,

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 10>autonomous vehicles, augmented reality, virtual reality, we need a different

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 10>kind of network in the future and that's what we realized,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 10>and that's why we wanted to forge this partnership so

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 10>that we're building a network leveraging AI for AI services,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 10>and that's really the big change here.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>The technology is flowing both ways.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what is it that you will be able

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 2>to do with Nokia, Jensen un able to do on your.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 8>Own well, first of all, Nokia is in all of

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 8>the world's base stations, and this air scale platform of

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 8>Nokia's millions of base stations around the world, if our

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 8>computers are not inside that base station doesn't help. It's

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 8>no different than in videos tech computing platforms not inside

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 8>of cars doesn't help. And so the first thing is

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 8>we need a partner to get us into the world

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 8>space station. We also remember we're bringing AI to radio networks,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 8>AI to RAM so that we can make wireless tech

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 8>communications a lot more efficient. Second, we're bringing AI for

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 8>the radio, meaning on top of these radio networks and

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 8>these telecommunication network we're going to be able to provide

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 8>AI services, which is going to be able to make

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 8>it easier for us to do robotics and autonomous vehicles

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 8>and industrial automation and reach all of the different places

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 8>around the world. That's kind of hard to deal with.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 8>Wi Fi, celluar reads everything. And so we now have

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 8>this fabric that we can deploy AI computing services on

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 8>top of it. It's going to be completely revolutionary.

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 3>In your world and in your market.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Huawei is an influential player not just in Europe, I

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>think also about the Middle East and Africa. How important

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>is the relationship with Nvidia to be able to counter,

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, what Huawei does in those markets.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I look. I think for us, one of the

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 10>principles I've had with my team is coming in has

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 10>been do what we can do that no one else

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 10>can do, and that is air scale. What we do

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 10>with any rand software, the software that runs on it

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 10>that we're going to be putting on on the Nvidia

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 10>Arc platform, that do what we can do well, and

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 10>partner with the.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 9>Best everywhere else.

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 10>And this is a clear opportunity to partner with the best.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 10>And by the way, that's where America and the Western

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 10>world succeeds because we don't necessarily have one company doing

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 10>everything like Whuawei. We succeed because we partner aggressively. And

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 10>you if you watch GtC today, it was hard to

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 10>not find it obvious that you're partnering with everybody. But

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 10>that's the advantage is this partnership. So we do what

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 10>we do best, we let in Video do what they

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 10>do best, and ultimately our customers win and ultimately for America,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 10>I think America will win because there'll be more innovation faster.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 8>Nobody knows telecommunications better than Nokia. They've been at it

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 8>for a long time. They're all over the world, and

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 8>between our two partnerships, we know how wireless telecommunications we

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 8>have and we have accelerated computing all in this partnership.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang and Nokia CEO Justin Hotard. There,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>let's get more on Nvidia this deal with Nokia. Vlad

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Galibov joins us. He's senior research director at Omdia, where

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 2>he's responsible for cloud and data center research. Under this arrangement,

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that the technology flows both ways, but it's basically about

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>wireless tech for use at the edge. You know, it

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>was a huge surprise just going on the reaction of

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Nokia shares, but it's it's Nvidia moving into yet another

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>new segment.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 3>What's your reaction to it, please?

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 11>So it is I think we have seen the transition

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 11>towards a virtualized radio access network be a little bit

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 11>slower than what we would like. With this partnership, Nokia

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 11>is basically promising to rewrite it. Stack up data is harder,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 11>stack updated software, stack optimize on Nvidia's software libraries and

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.599
<v Speaker 11>on Nvidia hardware. So I think it's very significant.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Why does Nvidia need to make a one billion dollar

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>equity investment in Nokia and own three percent of it

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 2>in order to do this.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 11>I think that what we've seen in the past, whenever

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 11>you ask a company to rewrite their software stack, it

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 11>is costly. In fact, Amazon did something similar a little

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 11>bit more under the radar when they started shipping their

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 11>ARM CPU. What they did is they would enable software

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 11>developers through funding to optimize their code for ARMED, to

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 11>migrate their code from Excity six to ARM. In essence,

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 11>what Nvidia is asking nok to do is to optimize

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 11>their code for whatever is already virtualized from Xcity six

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 11>to ARM, but also to move from a physical RAN

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 11>appliances to a virtual RAN.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>What's extraordinary, Vlad here is the bigger picture.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 5>This is in Vidia time and time again.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Basically making investments for people to ensure that in Vidio

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 4>technology is integral across every industry group if you just

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 4>go through not here when you think it telecoms, but

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 4>they did deals across Lucid, across Uber. We think about

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 4>robotaxes and thinking not just tell them communications I think

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 4>are the future of software. When we think about what

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>they've been doing with Palenteer of flood. Is there any

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 4>other wide open space for in Vidia to get into.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 11>I think you're absolutely right. This is in Nvidia utilizing

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 11>its cash stockpile in a very smart way by entering

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 11>another market. The mobil infrastructure market itself is only thirty

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 11>five billion, so I think Jensen understands that this is

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 11>not going to be the holy grail. This is one

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 11>of the many investments. I think that you see something

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 11>very similar that I think will become more prominent in storage.

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 11>I think that in Vidia has a lot more room

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 11>to grow in a networking I think you'll see it

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 11>growing a lot more in customer piece a consumer PC, right,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 11>because that's one of the things it wants to do.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 11>With Intel. I think you end up seeing it probably

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 11>in their robot revolution in the future. They also said

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 11>they want to be in cars, so I think that

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 11>we can see that Jensen's strategy is just maximize your

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 11>presence and specifically get your programming environment, the cold environment,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 11>to be ubiquitous.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 5>Just tell us how ubiquitous it already is.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Flat because I think so many of us make the

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 4>quick assumption that it's all about hardware and se inconductors,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 4>but this is a full tech stack, and the fact

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 4>that they're so ingrained in terms of software as well.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 4>It's almost become the de facto king across every other

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 4>big tech company.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 11>Yes, in fact, I myself underestimated it a little bit

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 11>because you know, one of the things we know is

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 11>a Nvidia advantage was the Envy Link, and we are

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 11>starting to see more challengers in the networking domain. But

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 11>the reality is the networking is not as sticky as software.

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 11>Software is extremely sticky. The thing is they have made

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 11>such a rich suite of tools, in essence, a programming

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 11>language and so many tools that make it easier for

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 11>different skill sets of programmers to develop. I think that's

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 11>what's so impressive about the Nvidia software portfolio, and the

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 11>fact that you can use it in for many optimized functions.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 11>I think that's what's very interesting. In essence, Jensen is asking,

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 11>she's army of developers, I want you to help this industry,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 11>in this industry, and this industry and this industry. That's

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 11>I think what's the most impressive.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Flat The biggest disclosure that Jensen Woe made was the

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 2>five hundred billion dollar figure of revenues that they say

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>will come from just Blackwell Rubin specifically over five fiscal

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>quarters excluding China. When that number went up on the

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>screen on stage, a lot of people reacted, how far

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 2>ahead is that figure than the model that you had

0:13:58.880 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 2>for the data center.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Bus says that n video is doing.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 11>It's I knew you were going to ask me this,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 11>so I did. Of course, that was what we were

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 11>also watching yesterday. It's about one hundred billion high. So

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 11>this creates about one hundred billion opportunity. I think it's

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 11>very significant, particularly if we end up seeing the Black

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 11>Veil deal with China, because that means that we then

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 11>have more than one hundred billion of upside. I think

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 11>when I think about the one hundred billion of upside

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 11>that Jensen is showing us, I think of it as

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 11>a backlog an order pipeline. There are a few concerns

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 11>that I have along the way in terms of that

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 11>materializing in my forecast. So I am going to start

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 11>exploring bicking it in. But some of the things that

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 11>I am concerned about are physical infrastructure availability and supply

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 11>chain readiness, and power availability in the data center. I

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 11>would say that these are the three things that I

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 11>am most concerned about. Is all of the components that

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 11>we need there in the supply chain. Specific is the

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 11>physical infrastructure ready for the data centers because there's very

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 11>long lead times on some physical infrastructure. And then finally

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 11>it's the power.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Black Can I jump in very briefly here because when

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 4>you think about the supply chain, you think about the

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>other components that are needed within data centers. S k

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Heinez says, it's full twenty twenty six chips late, it's

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 4>sold out exactly.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 11>So the thing is with ESK Hannix, they are in

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 11>the blackwell, but the rubbin is done with some sung

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 11>So I think that there's some smart hedging of bets

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 11>there from a memory perspective, But there's so many other aspects.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 11>There's packaging material and again in videos being very careful

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 11>with how to balance the packaging material supply chain, but

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 11>Nvidia has only been able to control the semiconductor part

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 11>of supply chain. I'm worried about some fundamental materials like

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 11>precious metals used in the building of the servers and

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 11>the electrical equipment.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 4>So why where metals are key concern when we're thinking

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 4>about US and China. Vlad Galibov joy to have you

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 4>on Senior research director at Omdia. Thank you coming up

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 4>more on Nvidia and it's border impact on the tech markets.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 5>It's a blue meg.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Tech Nvidia has become the first five trillion dollar company.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>This is CEO Jensen.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Wang's spree of deals propels the AI frenzy to new heights.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Marghi Patel for Moore. She's a senior

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 2>portfolio manager and head of the capital allocation team at

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>all Spring Global Investments. Six hundred and twenty nine billion

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>dollars in assets under advisement, about eleven billion dollars worth

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>of Nvideo shares in your fun Margie, your reaction to

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>this company being the world's first five trillion dollar market

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>value company.

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, it really shows us. This representation is huge sea

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 12>change in technology, which is artificial intelligence, and certainly it's

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 12>the leader, it's way ahead.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 13>But honestly, it's like a tsunami.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 12>There's one big wave and the and there's wave after

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 12>wave after wave, and we really don't know if we're

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 12>even near the peak of artificial intelligence really being incorporated

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 12>in all the different industries. So this is a qualitative

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 12>change that we've never seen in our investment careers.

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 4>So Margie, just to focus in on in Video at

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 4>this moment, do you add to.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 5>That stake that you currently have.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 4>We've still got seventy three buys out there from the

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 4>analyst community and in one sell even at a five

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollar valuation.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's very hard to be negative on in Vidia

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 12>unless you see some negative development in the company. And

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 12>just because the stock has gone up, and actually looking

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 12>at my portfolio, I actually have some stocks that have

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 12>actually are performed in Vidia this year gone up even

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 12>more so, I would say that as long as a

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 12>gross path looks pretty good for n India, that it

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 12>would be a worthwhile add.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at Micron for example, of one hundred

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 4>and fifty percent so far this year. Some of the

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 4>alterias that have really managed to be swept up in

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 4>what's needed in data centers and compute more broadly, where

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 4>hasn't the market seen enough value yet?

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think really all the oxygen is being sucked

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 12>out of other areas of the market and going into

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 12>artificial intelligence, data storage, data centers, all the rest of that,

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 12>and I think we're still continuing on that trail. All

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 12>those companies have high cash flow to fund these activities.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 12>There's no sign that they're losing their enthusiasm to make

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 12>investments to keep.

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 13>A leading edge and viata.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 12>And really, if you look at some of those stocks,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 12>like Micron's a great example. If the worst thing you

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 12>can say about it is the price has gone up

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 12>a lot, that doesn't mean you ought to sell it here.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 12>So I think we're still somewhere in the middle of

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 12>this huge wave of changing the whole economy, changing technology,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 12>and it's really too soon to say stocks are too high.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 13>I'm going to bail out.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 3>On that note, Margie.

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I spoke to Jensen one yesterday afternoon and I had

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to ask about his view on a market bubble.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's listen to what he said.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 8>I don't believe we're in the eyebubble, and the reason

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 8>for that is we're going through a natural trend position

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 8>from an old computing model based on general purpose computing

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 8>to accelerated computing. We also know that AI has now

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 8>become good enough because of reasoning capability, research capabilities, its

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 8>ability to think. It's now generating tokens and now generating

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 8>intelligence that's worth paying for.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Jensen's argument is the same it has been for the

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>last two years, we're in the early innings of a

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>shift from general purpose computing to accelerated computing. But the

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 2>different bit now is he's saying AI is worth paying for.

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that he's saying there's real revenues on the

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 2>software side. Is that the evidence here is that the argument, well, I.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 12>Think it's really not so much. We haven't actually seen

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 12>revenue pourion. But I think it's a change that companies

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 12>are making because they see that this is what they

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 12>need for their future. And I think it's totally different.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 12>As he was making the point from say the Internet

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 12>Bubble that people often make a comparison with the Internet

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 12>bubble was about degregulation of the telecom industry and it

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 12>was about moving data and voice faster through pipes. It

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 12>wasn't a material change. This is artificial intelligence. All the

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 12>new chips and so forth are really a fundamental change

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 12>in how we perform all kinds of tasks related in

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 12>our economy. And I think because it's happened so fast,

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 12>it's really only been say one year or two years,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 12>it's hard to adjust to say we're looking on the

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 12>verge of a whole new world and how we approach technology.

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 12>So I think that's why people are a little discombobulated

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 12>seeing how fast these socks have taken off.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 13>But they all have the cash flow to finance's growth.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 12>So it isn't as if they're artificially borrowing money to

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 12>make investments that look pie in the sky.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 13>This looks the beginning of something.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Margie, you mentioned cash flows. What's your position on

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the circular financing concern about Nvidia?

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think those partnerships where they've made equity acquisition

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 12>and some of these companies is just a business partnership.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 12>It seems perfectly reasonable when they're striking up a deal

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 12>between two companies. And again coming back to the companies

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 12>like Invidia, they aren't borrowing money to financi's activity. They

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 12>really have enormous cash flow that they're using and deciding

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 12>how to best.

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 13>To allocate that.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 12>So I think that companies, particularly the large companies, have

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 12>an idea of where they can best get the long

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 12>term returns on their cash flow, and that's what we're seeing.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Margie Vitelli Allspring, thank you so much for joining us

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 4>today on all Things at AI time out for talking tech.

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 4>And first, Amazon is planning to invest another five billion

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 4>dollars in data centers in South Korea. That's on top

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 4>of the more than four billion dollars that are committed

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 4>with partner sk Group back in June. Now, the new

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 4>funding will support the buildout of AI infrastructure to twenty

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 4>thirty one plus go to Group.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's raise.

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 4>It's fully of forecast, citing new initiatives and cost cuts.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Indonesia's largest internet company posted its fifth straight positive quality

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>result has been steadily narrowing losses since it's twenty two.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 4>IPO still investors remin cautious. The stock has fallen about

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent of the last twelve months. And Apple, while

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 4>it's preparing major refreshes to its mac Boogair, iPad Mini

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 4>and iPad airlineup, with plans to give the devices higher

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 4>end OLED displays. Now that's according to sources, the iPad

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Mini will likely be the first A game in the upgrade,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 4>arriving as soon as next year.

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. There is a lot to

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>get through in the earnings context. That throw up the

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>board and let's go through it one by one. Five

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Serve is a name that we have not used as

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 2>much on this program, but the stock is down forty

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>two percent at one point, down forty seven percent in

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the session, absolutely slashing its EPs guidance. Left one analyst

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 2>at Jeffrey's saying that the level of this miss in

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the quarter gone and the cut to its outlook is

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 2>difficult to comprehend. That's a payments processing name. Very interesting.

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Going also to telecommunication Verizon another one that we're watching

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 2>are almost three percentage points the US of largest mobile

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 2>service provider, of course, actually had a loss in wireless

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>phone subscribers in three Q. But new CEO has this

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>aggressive growth plan that we're looking at. Then there's Etsy,

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 2>so this is kind of interesting. There's the earning story Caro,

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>and then there's the change of the top. And you

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>spoke with the company about that CEO change.

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Tell me more.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And it's actually a trusted veteran of Etsy that's

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 4>coming to the four who's been at the business since

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty eleven and ran deepop and the company that they

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 4>bought a few years ago. And we're talking really here

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 4>about Christy Ptelgoyle being brought up from Chief Growth Officer

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 4>to be CEO as of January the first, just Silverman

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 4>and I chattered to him yesterday, and really, here's a

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 4>man who's been at the Helm for eight years.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 5>He's did this company through the.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Lockdown crisis, through supply chain crisis, and now he's positioning

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 4>this business for artificial intelligence. Remember they did the deal

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 4>with open ai already, and he thinks Etsy is uniquely

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 4>positioned to win an AI. But he really thinks the

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 4>more brutal more clearly, Cruti Patel Goyle is the person

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 4>to steer it, with her really having done every single

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 4>job he says over at Etsy apart from head of engineering,

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 4>and he really thinks the amount of artificial intelligence and

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 4>personalization she brought to deepop is going to be the

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 4>winning formula. It feels as though there's some nervousness out

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 4>there from the investor community right now, whether it's about

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 4>the CEO or whether about of course, maybe about the

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 4>forward looking guidance from some of its earnings. But let's

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 4>talk about earnings more broadly right now, because after the

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 4>bell we've got Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta all set to

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 4>report results. Let's take a look at what investors can

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 4>expect and start with Meta. Bloemerg tech reporter Riley Griffin

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 4>joins us. Now for Meta, we know the capital expenditure

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 4>has been there. We know the focus has been on

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 4>hiring and talent. What really Zark has to prove out

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 4>is that it's really winning formula for advertising sales.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 14>No doubt, and we will be watching that capital expenditure

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 14>number quite closely. So Meta has guided that it expects

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 14>to spend as much as seventy two billion this year

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 14>on capex, a lot of that going to AI, infrastructure,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 14>data centers, talent. Any revisions to that number will certainly

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 14>interest Wall Street. We'll also be looking, as you said,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 14>at the core advertising business. So analysts want to see

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 14>about fifty billion this quarter coming in and they're forecasting

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 14>about fifty seven billion for the next Whether there is

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 14>any weakness in those numbers will give pause to investors

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 14>who are concerned that they're not going to see that

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 14>return on investment from AI. So if we see beats there,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 14>it will be a good day for Meta.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 9>Just really quick, Riley.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 2>We're also now thinking about Meta's debt pile and it's

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 2>borrowing to fund these projects.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 3>What do you know, Well, in.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 14>A lot of ways, Meta has been able to keep

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 14>debt off its balance sheet. Think about the really notable

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 14>deal with Blue Owl to finance construction at what's going

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 14>to be Meta's biggest data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 14>So they are taking really creative approaches to ensure that

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 14>that debt isn't showing up. On today's quarterly report the.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Books, Riley Griffin, thank you very much that stay with

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 2>earnings this time, Alphabet, Bloomberg Big Tech reported Davy Alba

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 2>here with the latest and actually with Alphabet really consistent

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 2>spending Davy, but also Cloud and like GCP in recent

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 2>weeks has been really interesting.

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>What do we need to look for?

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, absolutely, ed, I think Capex and Cloud are the

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 15>key units to watch out for. Last quarter, we saw

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 15>that Alphabet changed its guidance to eighty five billion dollars

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 15>for spending on AI infrastructure for twenty twenty five, which

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 15>was a ten billion increase over its last guidance. So

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 15>you know, Google is really showing its commitment to AI here.

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 15>And then Cloud has been booming. You know, we've reported

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 15>recently on the huge, high profile deal with Anthropic for

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 15>Cloud to provide its specialized AI chips to the AI

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 15>startup Anthropic, and this was deal valued in the tens

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 15>of billions of dollars, So that is a unit that

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 15>we will be certainly watching very closely. We also know

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 15>that Cloud has existing commitments from AI startups that it

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 15>knows will boost revenue for its unit up to fifty

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 15>eight billion by twenty twenty seven.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think will Street anam is anticipating what about

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 4>a thirty percent growth for the cloud computing part of

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 4>the business. But in terms of scale, Davy just remind us,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what is it about eighty five percent of

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 4>revenue still comes from advertising. That's still going to be

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 4>where the real driver of revenue is going forward. Is

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 4>there any worry about well competitive threat, particularly when it

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 4>comes to search.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely. Search is still the core financial engine of Alphabet

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 15>that has long been the case, and it's you know,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 15>being it's being pressured to prove that it can still

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 15>be a driver of growth. And as AI rifle Circle,

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 15>particularly open Ai with its AI powered search tools and

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 15>a new web browser that it's launching, this unit is

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 15>certainly under pressure right now.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, all lies on Atlas Bloemags Davy Alba. Thank you

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 4>as we head towards the closing bell and that set

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 4>of numbers and rounding out the big earnings is of

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 4>course going to be Microsoft, the tech giant, hot off

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 4>the heels of that relationship reset we've seen with open Ai.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 4>Let's begain Michael Turn's managing director and senior technology analyst

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 4>over at Wells Fargo Securities.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Interesting to Microsoft.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Trading down a bit today, but yesterday really got a

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 4>lift past four trillion dollar market capitalization because we thought

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 4>that clarity is there in terms of relationship with open Ai.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 4>What clarity do you want from the numbers tonight?

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, the tech.

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 16>Investing market is going to be focused on Microsoft's capex.

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 16>We're a billion above street at thirty one billion and

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 16>expecting more than one hundred and twenty five billion.

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 9>This fiscal year from Microsoft.

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 16>Microsoft investors are clearly focused on two things.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 9>Your growth. Can the reacceleration continue.

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 16>We've seen really strong net new Azure revenue trends over

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 16>the past couple of quarters from the company, as well

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 16>as what you're alluding to, the opening relationship. We caught

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 16>it a sigh of relief yesterday, just that that announcement

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 16>is out and we're seeing you saw the stock react

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 16>well yesterday. Just some signs that the companies are working

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 16>more closely together. Still after I think a lot of

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 16>back and forth around what's happening between the two companies right.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, Michael, But based on your model for Microsoft, like

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 2>has has this unknown about the relationship with open now,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I really been and overhang on the stock.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 16>I think, you know, I think it's the first time

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 16>in a long time we've started a field questions on

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 16>cloud market share. Azure has been the dominant market share

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 16>gainer since chat.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 9>GPT took the world by storm.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 16>We've seen Azure just continue to outpace growth of the

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 16>other hyperscalers. We're talking about a business that's approaching one

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 16>hundred billion of annual revenue growing near forty These are

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 16>unprecedented rates.

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 9>But you know, with some of.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 16>The deals that we've seen announced away from Microsoft starting

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 16>to show up, there have been questions around just the

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 16>size and scale of the aspirations of open Ai and

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 16>how much of that occurs to Microsoft versus the broader

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 16>cloud hyperscaler ecosystem.

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, this is it, this is the conversation.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's let's do this.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So GCP has a one million TPU deal with Amthropic.

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft has started having a relationship with Amthropic AWS and

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Bedrock is kind of thinking, well, what else can we offer?

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Grock is now available on Azure. I think basically the

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>landscapes changed.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Does the higher.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Ary change now aws as your GCP.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 16>I mean, we think Microsoft still has the lead in

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 16>terms of market perception. That relationship with open Ai has

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 16>been very advantageous. So we think Microsoft share games have

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 16>been primary a function of two reasons. Number one, just

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 16>the later stage movers to cloud are disproportionunately more skewed

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 16>towards Microsoft and more traditional businesses, whereas Amazon when the

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 16>early adopters, Microsoft seen the next wave of come to cloud,

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 16>and then the relationship with open Ai is really improved

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 16>the perception of innovation with an Azure and created an

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 16>environment where startups or building using Azure really for the

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 16>first time. And I think everyone wants access to opening

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 16>Ice technology, which is embedded into Copilot. You can directly

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 16>tap the opening IAPI through Azure. That's an exclusive agreement.

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 16>Those things are holding firm. So we're still very confident

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 16>in Microsoft's position, but the world has changed. What we

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 16>underestimated was just how big the size of just a

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 16>training market would be within the AI cloud market. So

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 16>we're just seeing growth that we haven't seen in technology

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 16>in quite a long time, and to.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 4>Prefer maybe Microsoft did too. The issue for them is supply,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 4>not demand. They're having to turn to other companies you

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 4>analyze Call We've they're looking at Nebious an end scale

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 4>to really be able to fulfill some of its overall

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 4>cloud needs. How are you thinking about capital Expendit show

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 4>rising for Microsoft in the next full year twenty.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 16>Six, I mean, we think it continues to go higher.

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 16>We're modeling above consensus right now, or a billion above

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 16>consensus for this quarter. We updated that just based on

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 16>some of what you're saying. We hear the capacity constraints

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 16>in the market. We hear data center capacity is still

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 16>coming online. We think the most important thing beyond what

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 16>Azure presents for the quarter is where they guide the

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 16>December quarter should have a little bit less capacity constraints.

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 16>So I think investors will be listening carefully to see

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 16>how they characterize Azure growth for December as well. But

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 16>you're right, this is a good problem to have for

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 16>Microsoft in many ways. We have a business that we're

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 16>saying as one hundred billion in scale and can't even

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 16>keep up with demand right now. Just unprecedented levels of interest.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 4>What about the productivity tools? How much of a lock

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 4>in does it have because of the.

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Software we can't get away from it.

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 16>I think it's been the toughest mode to crack in software.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 16>We've seen many companies try and the honustrays as we've

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 16>just all been condition to work in Microsoft and very effectively.

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 16>Copilot is a way to extend I think the productivity

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 16>use case that is pretty interesting. From the numbers perspective,

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 16>Investors are focused in on Microsoft three sixty five Commercial Cloud,

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 16>which does embed the Copilot metrics as well. That business

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 16>is forecast to grow thirteen to fourteen percent this quarter

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 16>or any upside would likely be attributed to Copilot and

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 16>could create I think the next big unlock for Microsoft

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 16>to the productivity business could start to show growth improvement

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 16>alongside Azure.

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Michael Touring Software, an list of equity research at Wells Fargo.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>AI startup Character AI will ban kits from having conversations

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>with chatbots on its platform. This follows growing pressure from

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 2>lawmakers and a wrath of lawsuits alleging the company so

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>characters are responsible for harms to children. Bloomberg's AI reporter

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Rachel Metz has the story Character for some time has

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 2>been a very interesting startup and platform to follow, and

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I think we've even talked about some of the risks

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 2>around the concept of an AI avatar, but this is

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 2>a very specific line of reporting. I think best just

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 2>to summarize it for us.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean Character AI.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 17>When it got its start a few years ago, the

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 17>idea was that anybody could create or use any kind

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 17>of chatbot. I mean they wanted people to make anything, really,

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 17>so you'd see like video game character style chatbots like Mario.

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 17>You'd see impersonations of celebrities like Elon Musk, so on,

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 17>and so forth, all different kinds of things. It's kind

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 17>of it's part of a wild West of the scene

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 17>of AI chatbots that we're really in right now. But

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 17>what you also saw is immediately this was very appealing

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 17>to teenager in particular, like a huge portion of their

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 17>users have always skewed younger, and over time we've seen

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 17>a number of lawsuits being filed in general against companies

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 17>that are offering AI chatbots, alleging certain types of harms

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 17>to users, but in particular a bunch of them have

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 17>been filed by parents against Character AI due to harms

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 17>that they allege have happened to their teenagers, up to

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 17>and including suicide.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 4>And then the regulators have become involved. FTC opens a

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 4>regulatory investigation into all makers of these sort of AI

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 4>chatbots as to how much children should be continuing conversations

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>with them. We've got others can State of California trying

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 4>to regulate at RACHEL.

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.720
<v Speaker 5>So are they running this in some way and how.

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 4>Do they execute the limitation on age here?

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean, I think this is a really interesting strategy.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 17>Just yesterday we saw a bill introduced in the Senate

0:35:56.000 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 17>that seeks to outlaw the use of AI chatbots by

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 17>people who are under eighteen, and and that's you know,

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 17>like right in that same timeframe, we're seeing Character AI

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 17>saying Hey, actually, that's basically what we're doing here. I mean,

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 17>they're going to let their kid users who are roughly

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 17>between the ages of thirteen and seventeen use different features,

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 17>but they will not be able to have these end

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 17>lists back and forth chats with their so called characters,

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 17>that's what they call their chatbots. And I think, yeah,

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 17>it is in many ways an effort to get ahead

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.959
<v Speaker 17>of some of the issues, but the company also told me, look,

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 17>we think we don't know that there's still a lot

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 17>we don't know about how these chatbots can impact kids,

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 17>and so we think that this is the best thing

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 17>to do right now.

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 4>Rachel Matt, it's a great story. We urge people to

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 4>go and read it. Thank you very much. Indeed, let's

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 4>stay in the world of AI startups because one of

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the biggest backers in the industry is also one of

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 4>its biggest winners. Nvidia has been growing the number of

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 4>startup investments and makes each and every year when it

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 4>mergs AI editors, I think of and is here to

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 4>talk us through it because it's not so venture capital company,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 4>but its strategic part, the VC arm of it is

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 4>just becoming a jugglenaw in the space.

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, it's definitely become the five trillion dollar benefactor of

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 18>most of the AI industry right now. What we reported

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 18>here is that just through October of this year, Indigia

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 18>has backed fifty nine different AI startups, which already outpaces

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 18>all of what it did last year. I think it's

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 18>more than triple orquadruple will Get did a couple of

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 18>years ago. And there's no sign of it slowing down,

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 18>and I think there's a clear desire here to kind

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 18>of support the wider ecosystem and industry and ways that

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 18>probably come back and benefit India.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>One of the things we mentioned in the story is

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 2>circular financing or the circular nature of what's happening in

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the AI ecosystem.

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>What would NVIDIAs say about that?

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.439
<v Speaker 18>You know what they've said to us and to other

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 18>outlets certainly is that there is no obligation here that

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 18>the companies that it provides money to have to then

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.720
<v Speaker 18>turn around and buy Invigia chips. And that may be true.

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 18>What's also true is that ob Nvidia is the market

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 18>leader for AI chip, So if it helps prop up

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 18>dozens or hundreds of AI startups with capital, some of

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 18>that money is going to come back to Nvidia, and

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 18>ultimately that feels part of a larger strategy. As we

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 18>all know, in Vidia is very dependent on a handful

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 18>of large tech firms who buy up the majority of

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 18>its chips. If it can build future market leaders or

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 18>even smaller firms with more capital, that's going to benefitting

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 18>and help diversify its revenue stream.

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 4>This great anecdote in the story coming from ourvindustry universe

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 4>suits over at Perplexity, just saying how Jensen gets it

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 4>done in terms of giving him access to GPUs that

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 4>he needs exactly.

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 18>I think it's not just about financial resources, it's about

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 18>technical know how, it's about the network, and fundamentally, it's

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 18>about being able to brand yourself as an Nvidia backed

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 18>company that carries a lot of bonafides.

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Right now, Blue BIG's AI editor Seth Figman, thank you

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>very much. Now coming up, we will stay with Nvidia

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 2>as President Trump says he'll be discussing Blackwell chips with

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Chinese President Jijing, ting that conversation's next.

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 5>We are going back to our top story.

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 4>President Trump is set to meet with Chinese President's using

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 4>pink tomorrow, with discussions expected to include in videos new

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 4>black Well chips. Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Mike Sheppard joins

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 4>us now, and video has just added a third of

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 4>a trillion in the last two training days. Yes, there

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 4>was a raft of its own announcements, but when I

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 4>say new black Well ships, that's sort of the operative

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 4>word here.

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 5>New Are they going.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 4>To be allowed to sell some sort of dumb down

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 4>version of a Blackwell architecture into China.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 7>Mike Well, that is the proposal of President Donald Trump

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 7>is express willingness to entertain. Over the summer, he said

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 7>that a deprecated version of the cutting edge black weld

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 7>chip would be something he would be open to allowing

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 7>sales of in China, but it's unclear whether the Chinese

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 7>would welcome it, and also what the reaction might be

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 7>here in Washington among Republicans and Democrats who remained skeptical

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 7>about the wisdom of selling such advanced technology to a

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 7>geopolitical rival.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Carroll, what's so extraordinary is that what we heard articulated

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 4>by Jensen, and here we have President Trump talking about

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Blackwell being in the discussion point Jensen went out and said,

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I've got half a trillion dollars worth of orders for

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Reuben and the newer architecture and Blackwell put together, with

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 4>zero coming from China.

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 5>So what do you think the likelihood is.

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Here that China even acquiesces, even wants to be buying

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 4>any of this.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's a great question because so far China has

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 7>rejected the even dumber down chips the AH twenties that

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 7>President Donald Trump had relented on allowing sales of in China.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 7>Earlier this year. You remember in April the Trump administration

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 7>blocked the sales of the Age twenty, which have been

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 7>designed for the China market. Then relented in August, but

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 7>at that point authorities in Beijing said no, thank you

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 7>and encourage local firms instead to buy domestically. And this

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 7>is part of the Chinese government's effort to build up

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 7>its own supply chain domestically, to try to turn to

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 7>local producers and build up their own industry. So the

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 7>question is will they even want the I guess dumbed

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 7>down version of the blackwell should President Donald Trump persuade

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 7>Hijinping to accept it?

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 7>One of the theories has been that maybe China is

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 7>holding out for a more advanced version of the AI

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 7>chips the Nvidia makes in hopes of deploying them across

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 7>their industry. There's no question that they outperform on a

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 7>chip per chip basis what is in the Chinese market.

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 7>But one thing that China has been able to do

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:54.439
<v Speaker 7>is produce its AI chips, including Huawei as send at

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 7>scale and deploy them at scale, and that makes up

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 7>perhaps for some of the deficiencies and individuals chip performance

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 7>that we've seen, so it'll be interesting to see how

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 7>this all plays out and whether other bargaining chips may

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 7>get tossed into the conversation as well.

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Caro on the pun, will we see Jensen and President

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Trump meet well?

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.439
<v Speaker 7>The two men indicated yesterday that they might see each

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 7>other somewhere on the sidelines at the APEC summit in

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 7>South Korea. Jensen left. We're not sure exactly what time

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 7>he left Washington, but by now he would.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 13>Be at least close to soul.

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 7>The President's meeting Machesian paying a schedule for ten pm

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 7>our time tonight, so we'll be watching to see if

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 7>the Jensen and Donald Trump crosspads. The two men regularly

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 7>meet and speak by phone, Jensen said yesterday, so surely

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 7>they will be in touch, and if Blackwell is approved,

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 7>we might see an even bigger reveal.

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 4>And we wish them all well with their jet lag.

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloombgs Mike Jefford, we thank you so much. She's been

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 4>all across what's happening in Washington, and GtC.

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 5>Does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. Tell you

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 5>what we're also all across. After the closing bell.

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Join us to help break down the earnings out of

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 4>these key companies Meta Alphabet, Microsoft, All focus on capital expenditure,

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 4>All focus on how much demand there have for nvideo products.

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 5>Of course, don't forget to check out our podcast as well.

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 5>You can find on the termin as well as Apple

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 5>and Spotify. This is Bloomberg