WEBVTT - Netflix Earnings, Global Monetary Policy

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Aisia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. You can join Brian

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Curtis and myself for the stories, making news and moving

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>markets in the APAC region. You can subscribe to the

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>show anywhere you get your podcast and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 2>App after the bill. Today, Netflix posted its best start

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>to the year since twenty twenty, Netflix adding nine point

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>three three million customers in the first quarter of twenty

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. That's nearly double the average estimate from analysts.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Despite that, Netflix shares we're down about five percent in

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>late trading. The streamer reported a weaker than expected second

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>quarter revenue forecast. Joining us now for some discussion of

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>this is Gita Ranganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence US media analyst, to

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>take a closer look. So, Gita, Netflix, Well, pretty strong rebound,

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to say, albeit with a few qualifications.

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>On balance, how do you read these results?

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Very very strong results, without a doubt. We're seeing really

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>good momentum when it comes to the subscribers. And the

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>big story of course for Netflix is that they are

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>trying to balance subscriber growth along with their financial metrics.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>So the most important metrics here being you know, revenue growth,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and they were guiding to or they were targeting rather

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 3>double digit revenue gains, which they delivered and will continue

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 3>to deliver it through the rest of the year. And

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>then of course is profitability. They're one of the only

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 3>streamers right now to have very very strong profitability metrics,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and you know, they actually upped their guidance when it

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>came to operating margins. So on balance, a very very

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 3>strong report card, although you did point out the slightly

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 3>muted outlook, which is why we're seeing the share reaction.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Gaeta, I'm trying to understand whether or not this growth

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is being powered by original programming or crack down on

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>password sharing, which is it?

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 4>So it really is.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the biggest driver of this subscriber momentum that

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing is really the password sharing initiative. Netflix had

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 3>initially identified about one hundred million global households that we're

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>not paying for the service, and we know that they've

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>cracked down on password sharing across all of their global markets,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>so this is really the biggest driver. They haven't exactly

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 3>outlined how much they've captured or how much is left.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 3>But you know, just kind of given the guidance and

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they alluded to, you know, much slower

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 3>subscriber growth in the second half of twenty twenty four

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>versus the first half, suggests to us that, you know,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 3>the positive tailwinds from this password sharing crackdown will start

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 3>to fade pretty soon.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Now. Netflix shares were up seventy one percent since October, so,

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to be fair, a five percent pullback is probably not

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>very likely an indictment. It was a good quarter, and

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 2>you said that, but it's important to talk about the

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>qualifications too, and Doug raised one. Perhaps another might be

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>that it's going to the company is going to stop

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 2>reporting the number of subscribers. Now, that would raise a

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>few questions among some what do you see as the

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 2>reasons for that?

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 4>What are you hearing?

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, I think what they said is that there

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 3>really are so many moving parts to this story. Right

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>in the in the early days of growth, it was

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>really just a very very kind of a plain vanilla story.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>You had more subscribers, you charge them whatever amount you

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>were charging them, and you know, you kind of had

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>this whole growth model. It's kind of become much more

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>nuanced right now because we're kind of reaching this very

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 3>mature stage in the Netflix narrative, and they are they

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of growth levers right Aizing is is

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge lever that is going to kind of start

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>ramping up. They're probably going to start introducing new plans

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>at different price points in different countries, and so it's

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of becoming harder and harder for them to parse

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>out everything. And I think that is one of the

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>reasons why they are suggesting that they don't want to

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>be tied down to the subscriber metric because we know

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 3>that every time Netflix reports, you know, the subscriber numbers,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 3>there is just so much volatility and so much noise

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>surrounding that one number.

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Now, the lack of that number is also creating a

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 4>lot of noise.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at markets outside the US and Canada,

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>away from North America, how is this company performing right now? Globally?

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Where is the strength coming from?

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 3>The strength is really broad based. I mean, we know

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>that the US and Canada is a mature market. It's

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>almost you know, seventy seventy five percent penetrated that said it.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you looked at the first quarter numbers,

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 3>this was one of the strongest subscriber gains in the

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>US and Canadian markets. But you know, growth is coming

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 3>from other markets as well. If you look outside of

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the US, we you know, Europe tends to be a

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 3>very very strong market, continues to perform very well. So

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 3>is Asia Pacific, which is relatively underpenetrated market. And so

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>there's obviously a lot of optimism for a growth upside

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 3>in many, many years to come.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I'm curious in terms of revenue drivers, how's

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the AD tier doing.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>So the AD tier, they haven't really given us a

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of color here other than to say that they

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 3>are building, you.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Know, the infrastructure for this business.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 3>They do have, you know, programming which will kind of

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 3>serve that AD business well. And when I talk about

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 3>the programming catering specifically to the AD business, it's.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Really live sports.

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>They have a deal for WWE content starting in you know,

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five. They're also kind of dipping a toe

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>dipping their toes a little bit with live events. So

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 3>they have this big boxing match between Mike Tyson and

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Jake Paul which is coming up in July and that

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of allows them to test, you know, the appetite

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>the market for live sports, and we think they will

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>become a bigger player in the live sports market. That

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>actually helps them scale their advertising ambitions, I think pretty significantly.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 3>And what we are kind of projecting at Blueberg Intelligence

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 3>is that advertising will be roughly ten to fifteen percent

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 3>of their business. This is a forty five billion dollar

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 3>business in twenty twenty five, the total business, that is,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>and we think advertising will be about ten to fifteen

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>percent of that.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Geta what do we know about what Netflix intends to

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>spend on new content going forward? Do they have the

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>pockets to continue driving on the content side, Oh.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 4>They absolutely do.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 3>So they've taken actually a pretty disciplined approach. So for

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 3>this year they reaffirmed their content budget of about seventeen

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars. Going forward, we think it'll go up by

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 3>about you know, ten to fifteen percent. It probably will

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>reach about twenty billion dollars or so in the next

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>two years time. But again that's well within you know,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the range, and they are definitely taking a very disciplined

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 3>approach again not just with their original content, but also

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>they're going in more for licensed content, which tends to

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>be much more effective and economical.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>So we see that Netflix is number one. I think

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Prime is number two. Right, how are we shaking

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 2>out When we look at all of the big streamers.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Netflix clearly wins, not just in terms of subscriber numbers.

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Obviously they have two hundred and seventy million subscribers. They

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>are the biggest streaming service across the world. But then again,

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not just that, it's also you know, engagement, and

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>that is the one key metric that they kept on

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>talking about over and over again in you know, the

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>earnings call in their earnings newsletter today, because they do

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>have they said they have roughly half a billion people

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>across the globe tuning in every night into Netflix about

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>two two and a half hours. And so as they

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 3>have that engagement, that kind of then speaks to so

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 3>much more monetization capabilities, right, so they can increase prices,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 3>They have a captive audience that they can.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Sell to advertisers.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>So really kind of improves the growth outlook for the

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>company on so many different fronts.

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 2>KEETERA. Irong Andathan Bloomberg, Intelligence US media analyst, joining us

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in our Studios is Harold Vanderlinda, who's head of age

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>specific equity strategy at HSBC. Perhaps a big sell off

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>is underway. We've got higher for long grown rates, investors

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>setting the bar pretty high, and a strong dollar. You

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 2>see it that way or do you see things as

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe more like half full.

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 5>No, I think you're nailing the Sorry, you're hitting the

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 5>nail of that. We've gone from a scenario where by

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 5>in the beginning of the year we were talking about

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 5>maybe four, five, six, seven, I think even the one

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 5>point in terms of people that seven rate cuts. Now

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 5>what we then saw what inflation was coming down, it

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 5>flattened out, and now it's actually ticking up a little

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 5>bit and the market is really reshifting that right, So

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 5>it's saying there might be no rate cut at all,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 5>and some people are talking about rate hike. Now that

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 5>has that changes the macro environment for Asian equities completely, right.

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 5>So we have a stronger dollar, we have higher bond

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 5>yields and all of these things, and that just doesn't

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 5>help Asian equity. So yeah, that's where that pressure is

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 5>coming from.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But if I look at the fact that this is

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe an illustration of very strong American growth. Demand may

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>still be a part of the story. And if you're

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>an exporter anywhere in the APAC region, the outlook for

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>business is going to be pretty good, is it not.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that's a nice thing of equities, right,

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 5>there's always something somewhere happening. So, yeah, you're right exports.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 5>But if you look at the totality of Asia, or

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 5>for example, at the Chinese market, the vast majority of

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 5>companies are domestic oriented companies, so they they won't be

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 5>impacted so much by the strong US. They just have

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 5>to deal with the domestic issues. But the ones that

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 5>are exporters, and most of the Asian exporters are really

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 5>in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, they benefit on they benefit

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 5>on the demand side and on the currency side because

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 5>their currency is getting weaker and in so far they

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 5>produce something in Korea, Japan or Taiwan, it means that

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 5>they have a little bit of currency till winds as

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 5>well helps.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And we're getting chirked around a little bit with some

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of the data. Like I was having a look at

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the Philadelphia Fed Factory Index. You know, it topped estimates.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 2>In fact in a very big way. The index all

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 2>the way up at fifteen point five, the survey only two,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>but then price is paid, we're at twenty three versus

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>three point seven before. So I mean, how do you

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 2>actually digest this kind of data? Makes sense of it?

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's a lot of data coming at us, But

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 5>I think the overriding picture is simply of just unexpected

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 5>and credible strength in the US economy.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>And that leads to higher prices.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 5>That leads to higher prices and these sort of things.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 5>Then in addition to that, you have oil prices potentially

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 5>being a bit volatile. That I mean, the Middle East

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 5>has got all sorts of issues there, so that could

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 5>lead to oil prices. So all of these things could

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 5>fuel into higher prices. Now if you you can also

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 5>find good reasons to believe that actually these inflation numbers

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 5>will come off again and these sort of things. So

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 5>we'll have to see how it goes. But that means

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>that the market is just very uncertain on what the

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 5>path of inflation is and therefore what the path of

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 5>interest rates is. That creates that volatility in the stock market.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I'm noting now is that

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Japanese inflation for the month of March came in at

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a monthly reading of two point seven percent. That was

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit below the consensus. I think that Street

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was looking at two eight. But we know that Japanese

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>currency has been under pressure, still trading around a thirty

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:57.359
<v Speaker 1>four year low against the greenback. What choices do policymakers

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in Japan have, whether it's the Ministry of Finance can

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>dering intervention in the foreign exchange or the BOJ.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is difficult for them because the currency has

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 5>been very, very weak. And no we have that there's

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 5>this meeting in the IMF, so maybe something will be

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 5>discussed there. Who knows, but yeah, the currencies are we

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 5>and we've now seen also when Yellen was around that

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 5>the Koreans and the Japanese have publicly stated that they

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 5>feel somewhat uncomfortable with that. With that currency weakness, Well,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 5>what can they do? The problem? The ultimate problem simply

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 5>is that they have an interest rate policy that is

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 5>still close to zero. Now you might say, yeah, they've

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 5>increased a little bit, but we're talking about minuscule changes.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 5>So interest rates in Japan remain very very low, and

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 5>in so far the US is strong and interest rates

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 5>remain high. Yeah, that means that you have a massive

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 5>interest rate differential. And you see this with Japanese households.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 5>They're taking their money out of Japan and putting into

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 5>the US because that's where they get five percent on

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 5>a deposits or something like that. In Japan you get nothing.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Some Japanese companies are benefiting from China growth, but you know,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not easy to estimate China growth. We put a

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>piece out on the terminal today that Bloomberg calculation suggests

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>that China will contribute more to global growth in the

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>next five years than all the G seven combined. It's

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 2>a staggering number. Yeah, twenty one percent versus twenty percent. Now,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>we know that in the short term, China's kind of

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>gearing up for the May Day holiday and there could

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>be a lot of spending. How do you see China

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 2>moving here in the short term now?

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 5>Now, So, when the GDP numbers came out at the

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 5>beginning of the year, a lot of people said for

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 5>around five percent, I thought it would be much weaker.

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 5>I even know people say I can't believe that particularly number. No,

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 5>we now have more data, macro data coming out out

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 5>of China that supports that actually the economy is chucking

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 5>along reasonably a bit faster than what the market was forecasting.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 5>But we also look at earnings. Now you can say, well, earnings,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 5>you can accountants can fiddle around with that, but cash

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 5>earnings what we call cash flow money that you flow

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 5>in and out. There's nothing to fiddle there. And actually

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 5>it's not too bad. Yeah, the earnings growth has held

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 5>a reason to you. Oh, I've got about fifteen percent

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 5>cash earnings about eight nine percent. That's probably in line

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 5>with the macro numbers that we get. So there is

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 5>growth in China and it's probably a little bit better

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 5>than what people would have thought it would be three

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 5>or six months ago.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Harold, thanks so much for coming into our studios and

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>sharing your insights with this. Harold Vanderlinde, had of Asia

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Equity Strategy at HSBC. Our guest is David Finnerty,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Effects and rates strategist, to take a closer look

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>at markets. So the mood has changed quite a lot

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>here over the past couple of weeks, David, we talked

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>about higher for higher for longer rates there in some

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of those comments from leading fed proponents, and also the

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>bar seems to be pretty high now for earnings. We

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>saw that with a lot of the after hour is

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>selling and the dollar, ever stronger, is also kind of

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>wreaking havoc on markets. Do you see that holding for

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>a while that kind of mood?

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 6>I think yeah. Overall, I'd say yes. I think the

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 6>equity market, if you look at it now, is so

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 6>much good news was baked into it then I don't

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 6>think it takes a lot of bad news to just

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 6>give it a nudge down. You know, the S and

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 6>P look at run from forty two hundred up to

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 6>fifty two basically without much of a correction. So some

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 6>sort of correction is quite standard with US yields. I

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 6>think the hawkishness has heavily baked in. I think to

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 6>get more hawkish in the near to mean really it's

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 6>all data dependent now, and you really need strong, strong

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 6>data now. Having said that, we don't really have much

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 6>data out next week until the USPCE, So without that,

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 6>it's like, well, how do yours push higher? And actually

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 6>pushing down slightly now because of Middle East tensions? So

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 6>if US shields don't push much higher, that does to

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 6>some degree limit what the dollar can do. Having said

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 6>that the dollar does benefit in a risk off sneer,

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 6>But overall, I think the moves we've seen have sort

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 6>of been baked in, and I don't think exactly, you know,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 6>I think there's more risks to USU was pushing lower

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 6>in the terms slightly and a bit more risk off sentiment.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at the price section today, this

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>weakness that we were seeing in equity markets in the APAC,

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>where is that money rotating? Is it moving into the

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>US treasury market? Is it a haven bid that we're

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing now? I'm looking accrued up nearly one point eight percent.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>The dollar is stronger the end, showing a little bit

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of strength here, not by much. Do you have a

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of how this money is moving through the market

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>right now as we see weaker equities in the APAC?

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's tough to say. I mean it it fluctuates.

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 6>Middle East was on the way here. I think I

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 6>saw some central headlines coming across from some of the

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 6>team saying that something may have been happening in Iran.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 6>And if that is the case, then obviously the market

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 6>is very jittery when it comes to anything in the

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 6>Middle East at the moment. So the safe haven flows.

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Is this where the money tends to go to very quickly,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's like just go ask questions lates have

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 6>is something going on in that area and obviously oil

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 6>was reacting into it as well. Obviously that could calm

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 6>down once the dust as settled, but the knee jerk

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 6>reactions always just go to the safe havens until we

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 6>have a clever picture of what's going on.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 2>We talked about a number of factors that could be

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>leading to risk off sentiment. In some cases, it's way

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>worse under the hood than it is with the headline number.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>For instance, the S and P down just two tents

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>of a percent, but it was quite a little bit

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of selling attached to some key names that people are

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 2>heavily exposed to. I wonder whether or not yields getting

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>up on the ten year up around you know, four

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and a half to five percent, Whether five percent could

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>be a real kind of inflection point, really sucking in

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money by acid allocators.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think five. Obviously five is the nice round numbers,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 6>so it could draw a lot of interest. I don't

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 6>think there's a five percent is the number, but I

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 6>think look, anything around this level just you know, four

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 6>sevens to five or anything around that is certainly of

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 6>interest to people. Of course, the catches you come in

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 6>something your funds and you're trying to go long duration.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 6>You've been burned so many times before that it's a

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 6>bit like broken record and you're worried. Now cap tip

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 6>with this rhetoric coming out of the Fed like, hey,

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 6>we are considered rate hike if needed, or that possibilities

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 6>on the table if the data backs up, and of

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 6>course should that happen again, this is all lots of caveats,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 6>but the ideas and you will see you see whats

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 6>go even higher. So I think the interesting thing becomes

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 6>is you go, oh, four to seven is attractive, but

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 6>you go our five's attractive, and you get the five,

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 6>and you go, actually five point two is attractive. So

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 6>it's a bit of a moving line in the sand.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's really only when the markets see

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 6>that data flip and the confident that the data's flipped,

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 6>that the rate hikes off the table and the rate

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 6>cuts are back in, then I think the market will

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 6>jump very quickly into treasure.

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>We had comments from the Japanese Finance minister. Suzuki was

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the interest rate grap the differential between the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>US and Japan, and that's really what's been weighing on

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the end. Yeah, maybe there are a few other factors.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Then we get this reading today on consumer inflation in Japan. Okay,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>excluding fresh food, we're up two point six percent. That's

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>still above the boj's target, but it's below estimates. Is

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that in keeping with this idea that the Bank of

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Japan will continue to tighten or are they kind of

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in a holding pattern right now, particularly when of the

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>data is not making a compelling case.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 6>I think base of the rhetoric Bank of Japan has

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 6>said one thing and done the other. So, but if

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 6>you're based with the rhetoric, I think at the moment

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 6>they are in the holding pattern. I mean, the consensus

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 6>in the markets is if they're going to hike, it

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 6>looks more like October or potentially September, which sort of

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 6>makes sense. You're going to wait till all the way

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 6>data is fed through, which comes through in basically July August.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 6>You get all the impacts on the labor cost earnings

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 6>fully fed through, and then you obviously have the call

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 6>leave reports later in that in that third quarter. So

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 6>I think they'll wait till then. Obviously the next week

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Bankageman and got in your way, there's gonna be grilled

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 6>on the exchange way. I think there's gonna be no

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 6>shock on that. I don't think they'll do any thing.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 6>But how he reacts to the exchange rate. People can

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 6>be looking at that words of you know, well, would

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 6>you consider right high and one of the governors said yes,

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 6>They said, okay, that's not really what you'd be using

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 6>the exchange rate policy muntly policy for. But you know

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 6>they'll be looking to see what your aid as says

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 6>in the comment and go from that.

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So, in terms of risk gone and risk off, not

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>being too specific about one market here or one market there,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 2>we do have the dollar and yields getting kind of

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>close to I guess levels that you know there might

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>be some resistance to get to the other.

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 4>Side of that.

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it also quite possible that if you if you

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>got you know, all sort of beared up here, that

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>you could get your face ripped off because the rally

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>can come back at any time.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, I think certainly with the dollar. Look, I've

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 6>been a big dollar ball the whole year, but even

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 6>now I just put a piece that will be going

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 6>to shortly say that I think the neartime upsides a

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 6>bit limited for the dollar, and the reason's been is,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, ye would have the market prices only pricing

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 6>thirty eight bases point cuts this year. That's not really

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 6>that much and you need a lot more data to

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 6>back that up, which can happen, certainly, but you need

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 6>time for that and the other things to factor is

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 6>also the other side of the effects equation, certainly on

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 6>the euro, which is the bigger side, biggest portion of

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 6>a dollar index or the bloomboat dollar index. Germany's economies

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 6>starting to turn the corner, that being my data starting

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 6>to improve, and I think if that starts to happen,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 6>the market sunny, it starts going, well, we were too

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 6>aggressive on the FED ruck cuts this year. Are we

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 6>too aggressive on the ECB rate cuts this year? Yes,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 6>tune's can be rate cut up, but after that these

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 6>be is very vague. So something you go, well, why

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 6>should I go from three cuts down to two? If

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 6>you do, that's europositive, dollar negative. So I do think

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 6>the upside it's a lot more harder for the dollar

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 6>to rally in the near term. Having said that, as

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 6>you alluded to, the downside is a bit limited because

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 6>you're here, aren't going to tank anytime soon, and if

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 6>they really did, it would because a big risk off,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 6>which is dollar positive anyway, So dollar upside is limited.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 6>I think a period of consolidation in the near term

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 6>is what's going to happen.

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>David, very quickly, before we let you go, I want

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to get your thoughts on the Chinese currency. We haven't

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>talked much about what's happening in China. We're seven twenty

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>five seventy right now. If shore you want what's your

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>outlook here?

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think, obviously to fix the state around the

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 6>seven to ten level. I thought they may go back

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 6>in the seven or nine handle. But when the PBOC

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 6>didn't do that, when it had the opportion earlier this week,

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 6>then it did say, well, we can let it go

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 6>weak if we wanted to. But again, though we're going

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 6>to let it go very, very gradually. They're in no

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 6>hurry to have to get towards the seven thirty or

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 6>above seven thirty anytime soon, so I think any weakness

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 6>will be a grind.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Shall we say?

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, David, thank you for joining us. David Finnerty,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg EFX and Rate Strategist.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>This has been the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing you

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific.

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app.