WEBVTT - Hedge Fund Exposure to Tech Hits Record High

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde live from New

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>York and.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ed Loudlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 4>Coming up.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>We are looking at hedge fund exposure to technology.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 4>It's hitting a record high.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>We get to the Outlook for Tech investing from Kristina

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Clark Barclay's Plus.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>We hear from YouTube CEO Neil Mohen on his plans

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>to make the video platform even bigger, and we sit

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>down with.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 4>The CEO of Ring for her first broadcast.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Interview as a connected camera company gets a new mission statement.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 4>But Ed first, we check in on.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>These markets and we are struggling with a macropacked picture

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.639
<v Speaker 2>right now. We've course seeing a wall of money coming

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>well from a supply side to the bond market. We

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 2>have a big auction for the seven year debt. We're

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>seeing forty four billion dollars. And remember auction appetite just

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 2>wasn't that great for the last.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Couple of days.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So we're seeing Nasdaq just being pulled down as yields

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 2>push higher, the sucks that sounder in Europe also down

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>by a percentage point.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 4>It's notable though that.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq is boiltcing off of its lows. We're off down

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 2>just three tenths of a percent. It's actually the best

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>performing major benchmark here in the United States. So there's

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>really other industry groups that runder pressure today. And as

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>they say that seven year yield just picking up some

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>five basis points four point six to two. We're seeing

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the longer end sell off harder move on though, And

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to give us the risk appetite a choice.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to the tech world, Crypto also under

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>pressure a little bit today. Bitcoin just to the downside,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>but not by March only a percentage point that we're

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven five hundred is currently where we trade. But look,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>there are some cautious sentiment out there at the moment.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Ed what are you looking at them?

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 4>On the micro So I'm looking.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>At the US listed share of BYD the ev maker.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>It's actually a pretty big story coming out of China.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>They have announced a hybrid drive train that is capable

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of doing more than twelve hundred miles or two thousand

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>kilometers on a single charge or single fill of the tank.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a hybrid drive train, and it's really continued to

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 3>boost BYD's US listed shares. It's got a lot of

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>people talking on social media. Check out Bloombo's coverage out

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>of Hong Kong and learn more about what byd is doing.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>The other big mover here in the United States is Apple.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple up more than a percentage point for most of

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the session. WWDC invites went out yesterday, I got mine.

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But the big news is also out of China. A

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 3>court in China has dismissed the case against Apple that

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 3>a consumer had brought on the issue of app store

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 3>fees and commissions, and in app fees and commissions. Later

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>in the program, we're going to go to Bloombo's Mark German.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>It might sound like a familiar story because it's happening

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 3>here in the United States too, this time the China

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>side of that discussion.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Caroline, Yeah, and just all of this in a picture

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>of how big tech bohemos have been doing and performing

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>at the moment. We know Apple's been under pressure for

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of months beginning of this year. Really,

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>but hedge Fund's positioning more broadly, the exposure to US

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>tech bohemos is we just had a new record high

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>and of course that's downto in video in many ways,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>it's strong earnings report last week.

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 4>It's all according to gorm Sexs Prime brokerage.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Their report is also saying that the so called Magnificent

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>seven is now accounting close to twenty one percent of

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Hedge Fund's total net exposure to US single stocks.

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>We want to get a sentiment check on.

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Big tech, on allocation and on companies going public. Kristin

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Roth de Clark is with US Global head of Technology

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Investment Banking at Barclay's, and you have so much wealth

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>of experience and expertise within the investment banking market within

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>technology in particular focus. You look at companies looking and

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I in going public. But what is ultimately the sentiment

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>of access to growth companies in the US right now?

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, there's been a real deretha of opportunity to

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 5>invent in growth tech in the public markets. If you

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 5>look just at the five hundred or so companies tech

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 5>companies that are public right now that are two billion

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 5>dollar market cap or more, there are only less than

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 5>thirty that are growing that have grown thirty percent in

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 5>the last year, and so the opportunity to invest in

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 5>growth isn't really there necessarily in the public market. Their

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 5>bid for IPOs is there from the investor side, but

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 5>we haven't seen that translate into much activity this year,

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 5>partially because of the rate environment and investors' corporates are

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 5>looking more to twenty twenty five as a year of optimism,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 5>I think in the new issue market.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>And we add that context of the day with yields

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>just pushing higher for longer, whether it's in Europe as well.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>We see German bond yields pushing higher as it looks

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>like inflation is hard to curtail. But is it just

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the rate environment? Is there also element of political issues?

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that why twenty twenty five is going to really

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 2>be the year to come?

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 5>I think at this point a lot of issuers are saying,

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, twenty twenty five will get through the election cycles,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 5>will get you to a place where we hopefully start

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 5>to see rates come back down, so to kind of

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 5>there are some issuers coming out in twenty twenty four

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 5>and certainly getting a lot of attention from investors, but

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 5>there's more optimism I think in twenty twenty five, and

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 5>that's true for both growth companies but also super profitable

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 5>businesses Inside private equity, A lot of the private equity

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 5>firms are opting to do private minority stake sales to

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 5>establish marks and get a little bit of liquidity instead

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 5>of going to the IPO market.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 6>This year, christin good morning. Hello.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I hear from a lot of founders, a lot of CEOs,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people right now that are much more

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 3>open minded to doing some M and A or even

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 3>going private.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Why is that.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, take private activities increased significantly this year. It's up

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 5>fifty percent in the tech industry from last year. Part

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 5>of that is is an acceptance of kind of where

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 5>we are from a valuation standpoint, But the other part

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 5>is on the financing side. The last couple of years,

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 5>the financing for LBOs have been driven by the direct

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 5>lenders in the private credit market. We're now starting to

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 5>see some of the more traditional funding sources in the

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 5>broadly syndicated market available as well.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Convertible issuance is interesting, take my word for it, it's interesting.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>One case study out this morning is Lenovo doing an

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>arrangement with Saudi Arabia through one of its investment firms

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 3>on very favorable terms.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 6>But it's also kind of a quid pro.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Quo right where there's the financing side of it that

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Lenovo has to set up an R and D facility

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 3>in that country.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 6>I've heard it elsewhere.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I've heard of shareholders selling out of the

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 3>stock buying up convertible notes in the same name.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 6>What are you seeing in that market?

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, the convertible market I think will be pretty active

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 5>this year. There are a couple of interesting things that

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 5>have changed with this higher for longer sentiment. One in

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 5>particular is that we're now seeing issuers refinance floating rate

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 5>debt with convertibles and they're saving up to fifty percent

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 5>in interest expense with premiums that are one hundred percent,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, So it's it makes a lot of sense.

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 4>For some of these large cap issuers.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 5>The other thing we're seeing in the convertible market is

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 5>large cap issuers doing a convert to repurchase shares, and

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 5>so I think that the convert activity will only increase

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 5>meaningfully this year, especially in this environment.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it interesting that, ultimately, at a time where markets

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 2>go from record high to record high there's less and

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>less access to getting into the public market, and so

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>much of the enthusiasm we talk about on a daily

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>basis is in the private markets. There's also a lot

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of talk around M and A and I'm interested as

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>to what you're anticipating there from.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Even fewer publicly traded companies going forward.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so the take privates we've talked about, I think

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 5>that we've also seen an increase in strategic activity in

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 5>a meaningful way, and we'll continue to see that throughout

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 5>the balance of the year. And then some of the

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 5>smaller M and A that's happening tends to be a

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 5>little you know, some of these early stage AI technology businesses,

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 5>but they're scaling very rapidly, so that could over the

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 5>next twelve, eighteen, twenty four months mean much larger scale

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 5>M and A and adding to this already massive IPO backlog.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Kristen, for all of the growth stage technology companies out

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>there that are watching the show right now, be it

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the founders or staff, what's a good reason to go public?

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>What is a good motivation to list your company?

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 5>Well, the biggest reason right now the companies are opting

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 5>to go public tends to be employee liquidity, you know,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>being private for a number of years, giving their employees

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity to start to find wealth in a publicly

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 5>traded stock, or to validate a technology or the staying

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 5>power of a private company. Some companies opt to go

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 5>public because their customers are worried they're not going to

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 5>be around, are not going to have long term funding,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 5>and so they, you know, from a reputational standpoint, want

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 5>to be public. And the last is probably you know,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>the investors looking for liquidity, and again private equity is

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I think there will be a number of IPOs that

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 5>come out over the next couple of years because we

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen a lot of activity out of private equity

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 5>and returning capital to LPs. But right now they're you know,

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 5>for the most part, finding liquidity in the private market

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 5>more appealing than the IPO market, although we're seeing some

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 5>really attractive assets coming public, just in a more limited basis.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Kristin Roth to Clark Global Head of Technology Investment Banking.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Above is terrific way to start the program. Thank you

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 3>so much. We'll like to continue the conversation on the

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 3>tech IPO landscape later in the hour with Eric Hippo

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>of lera hippo. Really interesting conversation, interesting person, another interesting person,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>don't want to miss are coming up. In the first instance,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 3>we're going to hear from YouTube CEO Neil Mohen on

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 3>the company's plans for expansion.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 6>Caroline some shares, some shares in.

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 4>The public trading market that are still available.

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Salesforce absolutely just seeing it up about six tens percent.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Unlike the rest of the market, we're higher.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>We are anticipating their earnings after the bell reporting their

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 2>fiscal first quarter earnings.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 4>Look, how much are we able to see data.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Cloud, which obviously helps organize corporate data for analytics for

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the all important AI space. How much is that going

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>to help with their focus on margins as well?

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>This is a Bluebogo technology.

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 3>How YouTube became must watch TV. That's the latest episode

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of the Circuit where Bloomberger Regional's host Emily Chang sits

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 3>down with YouTube CEO Neil Mohen about transforming the platform

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 3>into the world's biggest streamer.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 7>To this, YouTube's really kind of its own sort of

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 7>unique thing. We're not a social media platform, we're not

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 7>traditional media in the sense, we're not linear television. We're

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 7>really sort of our own thing. And so if we

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 7>live up to that vision, we think we're really still

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 7>in the early days of our growth story and fulfilling

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 7>what our mission is, which is to give everyone a

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 7>voice and show them the world.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 8>Based on Nielsen's latest data, YouTube is now by far

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 8>the biggest streamer in the world, Netflix close behind, and

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 8>then everybody else drops way down who Disney Max. But

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 8>you don't get the awards or the critical acclaim. What

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 8>more does YouTube have to prove?

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 7>I do think that YouTube is getting recognized as that

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 7>platform on television screens. We just surpassed a billion hours

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 7>of watch time on living room screens, and you mentioned

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 7>the Nielsen ratings. That is certainly something that when I

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 7>speak to our advertising partner, the brands that look to

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 7>build connections with consumers on our platform, they recognize that

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 7>and they they see it as a place not just

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 7>of this broad reach, you know, the number one streaming

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 7>platform here in the US, but also reach that is

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 7>engaged and from a brand's perspective, that is something that

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 7>they are really recognizing. Like I said, it's still the

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 7>early days of our journey, but I do start to

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 7>hear that more and more from our partners.

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 8>YouTube is printing money for Google, as I understand it,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 8>upwards of fifteen billion dollars a year. Where will the

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 8>future revenue growth come from. Talk to us about that

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 8>strategy and how it will play in.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 7>If you think about YouTube today compared to what YouTube

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 7>was five years ago or certainly ten years ago, there

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 7>are an order of magnitude more creators on our platform.

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 7>We have a breadth of monetization offerings to support this

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 7>creator economy, not just ads, but subscription business. You know

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 7>that was the fifteen billion dollars subscription business across all

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 7>of Google, but also direct to fan funding like channel

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 7>memberships and things like that. So there's an enormous amount

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 7>of scale and complexity in the ecosystem that requires us

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 7>to rethink how we're going to support that creator ecosystem.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>YouTube CEO Neil Maan, along with Bloomberg's Emini Chang. You

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 2>can catch the full episode of The Circuit tonight six

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 2>pm right.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Here on Blomberg Television.

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about open AI because Helen Toner is a

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>former board member of open ai and has actually said

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that the board didn't know about the original twenty twenty

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 2>two launch of chat CBT until afterwards and that they

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>only found out about it on well Twitter or x.

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Bloomberg's Seth Figman for more on what

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 2>seems to be more.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Discussion in the press coming from Helen Toner.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 2>She'd already written a piece with Tash as well another

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>previous board member, about some of their worries about AI governance.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 4>This keeps building.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean it's remarkable. I have a former board

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 9>member who's just going rogue at this point and really

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 9>bashing the company, or at least its current leadership. The

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 9>claim about Chatchibt is remarkable. Here's their biggest, best known

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 9>product them they're saying that the Borg had no previous

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 9>awareness that it was going to be launched. Now there's

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 9>a caveat there. When they released this product, it was

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 9>kind of a slow burn. Initially, people didn't know it

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 9>was going to be as big as it became. But

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 9>the bigger takeaway from this piece is that she's really

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 9>gegging at the idea that there was a long series

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 9>of times where they were either misinformed, uninformed, or felt

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 9>like they were being manipulated by Sam Altman. And for

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 9>months now it's been a guessing game in and out

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 9>of Silicon Valley. What Precipititikea the ouster last year. This

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 9>is really the most that we've seen so far that

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 9>gets at that question.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Seth As you know, I remember the weekend as Sam

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Outman's Ousta Helen Tona didn't pick up the phone.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 6>She hadn't had much to say.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Then in the last twenty four hours or forty eight hours,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 3>she's had quite a lot to say. But the issue

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>is the relationship with Sam. See something Sam Oltman told

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg last year.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 8>Have listen, you have an incredible amount of power at

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 8>this moment in time. Why should we trust you?

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 10>You shouldn't, I think at this moment in time, like

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 10>people deserve basically as much time asking questions as they want,

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 10>and I'm trying to show up and do it. But

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 10>more to that, like no one person should be trusted here.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 10>I don't have super voting shares, like I don't want them.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 6>The board can fire me. I think that's important.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 3>So at its route, there's Sam Altman pushing to commercialize

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the technology, and then there's different iterations of the board

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 3>who seem unaware.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't really know where to go next with that.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, you're right again, it's pretty remarkable. I think there's

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 9>been a drip drip from Helen. She's become a little

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 9>bit more comfortable being public about her concerns. You're right,

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 9>For months, we really couldn't get much detail. What we've

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 9>heard was essentially that there was a long simmering build

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 9>up of mistrust and miscommunication, and in her latest statements

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing a little bit more on that.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>The current context is that you can't trust Sam when

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes to discussions with celebrities when it comes to that,

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>ultimately is what people are now realizing, rightly or wrongly.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>What was cast into the public discourse has of course

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 2>been Scarlett Johnson and the calls or what time they happened,

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and AI really trying to just lay out the order

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>of a currency of when they discussed using the voice

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>at Scarlett u Hansson and when they're already talked to

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 2>actors and actresses.

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 4>But there is a feeling of distrust.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 9>Going I think so I think they're taking pains now

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 9>go to be as transparent as they can be. What's

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 9>funny is that for all of the tension that they've

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 9>have at board members never cross a famous actress. I

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 9>think that's where you're going to really lose the public.

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Seth Fiegerman. We'll see what the next response is from

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>open Ai. Amid all of this, we thank him for

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 2>walking us through it. Meanwhile, open Ai has actually got

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>some competition, you know it, and one of them is

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 2>from Francis mistral Ai, which has launched in early twenty

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty three as a European rival, but it's now eyeing.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 4>The United States.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>We're going in Blomberg's Matt Berg and for more and

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>they're hiring a key member of talent, right.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 11>So this has been a major hire. And this is

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 11>a really closely watched start up here in Europe, and

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 11>there's really no precedence for company aside from maybe Spotify

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 11>having becoming a global technology success out of Europe, and

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 11>that seems to be ambision of Mistro at least that's

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 11>what their investors are signaling.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 11>There's reports that that in probably a less than fourteen months,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 11>they've now gone from zero to a company worth six billion,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 11>and so there's a lot of expectations and a pretty

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 11>high evaluation they have to meet.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Mark give me a sense of mistrual size and scale,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Like we report on them a lot they're a little

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 3>bit shy. They've been regulatory focuses in Europe. Tell me

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 3>about the basics.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 11>Yes, the basics are pretty small.

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 6>That's sort of thing that I mean.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 11>I think that from my sense it's probably a team

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 11>of maybe around fifty at this point. I mean, it

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 11>could be a little biggeran that, but but you know there,

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 11>that's sort of their mo is that we are leaner,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 11>We're building these smaller, more agile AI models. They're open source.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 11>They're very at this point very close to the French

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 11>government in a sense that one of their co founders

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 11>and it's kind of their policy chief is the prior

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 11>French Digital minister. Macrone has talked about supporting them. Last

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 11>week I gave this really interesting comments about how he

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 11>preferred that they would grow big on their own and

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 11>remain independent. The sort of subtext there was, don't sell

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 11>to a big tech American firm.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 6>The bag Smartberg in terrific reporting out of Yurope. We

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 6>really appreciate it.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to BLIEMBG Technology. Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm callin hid in New York.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Quick check on your markets today because we are more

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and about born costs bonields rising. That's dragging some of

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 2>the stock markets lower. Ashley the NASDA and then as

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 2>that one hundred outperforming other key US benchmarks, but we

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>are lower by four tens percent on the big tech

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 2>benchmark of the nas that one hundred tenure yield as

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a thirtyer yield across the board. In fact, we're seeing

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>born costs rising as we have another big auction forty

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 2>four billion dollars a.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Seven year deck coming.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Will there be not as much demand as was hoped

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 2>like we've seen in the previous two auctions. We're up

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 2>six basis points bitcoin. On the downside, we're off by

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>nine tens percent sixty seven thousand. Moving on though, as

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>we try to mark through what is a slight tempering

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>of risk appetite. The socks is one of the ones

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>that underperforms the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index off by one and

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>a half percent. Every single chip maker down, but that's

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 2>because they've been rallying so hard in previous weeks.

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 4>Maybe we've got a little bit of profit taking going on.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Certainly the case for the Maderna, we're off by almost

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>five percent, had a horrible day yesterday, but that's after

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 2>it had a record winning streak of ten straight days

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of gains profit taking. This is a company also injecting

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>generator of AI throughout its focus on healthcare. We're looking

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 2>at Amazon actually one of the outperformers on the day.

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 2>We're up three quarters of percent. Nice little headline there

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that they're once again expanding their partnership deal with Germany's

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>sap SO. A key focus there on the power of

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>generative AI coming into bedrock and aws more broadly.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 4>And then we've got more on Amazon.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we do.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 3>For years the Amazon unit, Ring touted its crime fighting

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 3>features thanks to its selling smart doorbells that let homeowners

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>remotely monitor their residences. But today the kind of footage

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Ring users share is less about suspicious activity and more

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 3>about pets or wild animal sightings and water balloon fights.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 3>And it's all part of how Ring is trying to

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 3>reinvent itself, aiming for more of a mashup between something

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 3>akin to Nextdoor or even TikTok.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 6>Here to discuss the why is.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Ring CEO Liz hammern in actually the first sort of

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 3>sit down interview since you've been CEO. Actually, you and

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 3>I met almost one year to the day you are

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>one year in this role. The best place to start

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.959
<v Speaker 3>is probably why a new mission? What prompted you to say, Okay,

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Ring's got to be a different company.

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, our new mission was really prompted by

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 12>my last year of going out and talking to our

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 12>customers and talking to our employees and seeing how people

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 12>were using our cameras. And one of the things that

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 12>we found is that while our mission around safety and

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 12>security is still very relevant, people use these cameras to

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 12>feel safe and secure, but they were also using them

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 12>for so much more for convenience. Did my packages arrive

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 12>for presence and control? How busy is my small business?

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 12>Do I need to send more staff or a connection?

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 12>People do love to watch their pets with their Ring cameras,

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 12>and we were finding as we were building new products

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 12>that their mission was limiting and just too narrow. And

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 12>so our new mission is just more expansive for how

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 12>people use our products and how we want to build products.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 3>The expensive part is interesting. Full disclosure. We are a

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Ring family. You know, often when my father in law's

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 3>here in San Francisco, he's worrying about whatever's going on

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 3>at home down in Socow. He consults his phone to

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 3>check it on ring these new areas, do you see

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of a meaningful split or even can you give

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>me a proportion of what sales you think are driven

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>by security versus I guess what is social interaction?

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 12>I think that it's about, you know, why do I

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 12>buy and then how do I use it? And a

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 12>lot of white people buy is they want to be

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 12>connected to their homes. Their homes one of their most

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 12>valuable assets. They want to see what's going on, They

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 12>want to feel safe and secure. But what they find

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 12>is there's any number of convenience features to using it.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 4>I suspect that what.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 12>Your father shows you is not just security in safety features,

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 12>but funny things that happen at home, or surprising weather,

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 12>or any number of things that make you connected to

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 12>your home or small business.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 2>That connection is allowing you to well make some revenue,

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>drive twenty dollars a month subscription and you now are

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>aiming and have attained profitability.

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Is that sustainable?

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 12>Is yes?

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I believe so.

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 12>I think this is actually just the beginning of you know,

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 12>significant continued significant business growth. You know, last year we

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 12>grew double digits, and where we see continued continued growth here,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 12>especially as we think about Ring really being a video

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 12>service company. When people talk to you about their Ring

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 12>cameras and they're not showing you their camera as iconic,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 12>you know, as our hardware is, they're showing you video

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 12>on your phone, and that video service is incredibly valuable,

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 12>and as we invest in computer vision and AI to

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 12>make it even more valuable, we think the business will

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 12>continue to be profitable and grow.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Lizio expertise has been in the world of connected cameras.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 2>You came from dot Com, You've got a lot of

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 2>business expertise.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 4>Prior to joining and leading Ring. Was now the moment

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 4>to turn on the money pipeline?

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Or is it more where Amazon is within a focus

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>on profitability rather than growth at all costs.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think that I'm not sure I would

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 12>would think about it as is it this binary decision?

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 12>I mean, the business is very healthy, and the natural

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 12>course of this business is to be profitable based on

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 12>the size of the business and the customer demand. And frankly,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 12>the vast majority of our customers subscribe to our subscription

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 12>service and that is a big driver of our business health.

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 6>It's an interesting time.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 3>Amazon Panos Panais come in to lead the Devices and

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Services group broadly, how has your relationship been with him

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and how do you work together because there's a lot

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 3>of I guess interruptibility between Ring the Amazon ecosystem.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, well Panas and I actually work together

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 12>back in my days at Microsoft. So it's awesome to

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 12>have to have him leading Devices and Services for Amazon.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 12>And you know, we work together to ensure that all

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 12>of our products work together. And so you know, many

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 12>customers connect their Ring cameras to Alexa, and about a

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 12>third of our doorbell customers actually use an Echo device

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 12>as their time.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>It's competitive, you know, I get advertisements all the time

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 3>for other similar camera based technologies. What would you say

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 3>is rings point of differentiation technologically speaking?

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 6>What is it that you are doing better or at

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 6>a higher level than the others?

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think it's a combination of our software and

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 12>our hardware. But really the differentiation is in software. And

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 12>as you point out, there's lots of cameras on the market,

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 12>but what makes them unique is really how the software

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 12>takes advantage of the hardware capabilities.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm so looking at this footage is hilarious. This guy

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to scare this bear off through different camera And

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I've actually watched many friends trying to be terrified about

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 2>squirrel inside their house due to some sort of camera.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 2>What's so interesting is you oversee other parts as well.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 2>There's Blink camera, there's Key in home delivery services that

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, and people using these sorts of technologies for

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 2>efficiency and for knowing when you've got deliveries sidewalk wireless

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 2>network or miss a meshweb network.

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to the world of thermostats and other

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 2>connected areas in your part of business, are you, Liz,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Because for me, that's a differentiation the Google.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Office, for example, in nest so for.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 12>Rings specifically and Blink and the areas that I oversee.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 12>We're really focused on this notion of understanding what's going

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 12>on at your homer business and then with Key providing

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 12>access to it. And so although those products are interesting,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 12>they're not they don't really fit with our mission of

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 12>keeping people close to what's important. And so I think

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 12>we're just really focused on the products that do that,

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 12>and I think we're pretty busy and full just fulfilling

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 12>on that mission.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Alice, the director in New York, is going to bring

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 3>up that footage of the bear again.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 6>I see that all the time.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 3>I see images just like those, what are those wild

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 3>bore or something squirrel fantastic, But I see them on

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 3>TikTok and I see them on Instagram reels.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 6>That's where the content is shared.

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 3>So how does Ring derive a benefit from the enthusiasm

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 3>of the customer who then takes it and shares it elsewhere.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think in two ways.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 12>One is our customers to feel like they get a

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 12>lot of value out of their products, and one of

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 12>those values is being able to download videos and share

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 12>them however they would like. And then it also drives

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 12>awareness of the products. So people who maybe aren't yet

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 12>Ring customers see those videos and think, oh, I really

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 12>want to make sure I can stay connected to my home.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 3>It's like it's like marketing, you know, through through social

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 3>and it's like ownership spreading the word like Tesla does

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 3>with its evs. I find that all Raccoon Ring CEO

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Liz hammern it's just fantastic to finally get you on

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the show one year into the job.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much, Car. You've got some other news headlines.

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I too, what a great conversation, but it's time for

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 2>talking tech now and first up, Nobel Laureate Paul Roma

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>issuing warning about artificial intelligence speaking to Blue MEGDV in

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong. The economics professor Liken sy Ai market run

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to the crypto hype mubble.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Take a listen right now.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 13>There's way too much confidence about the future trajectory of AI.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 13>Would people project this forward? I think they're at risk

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 13>of making a very serious mistake. We've benefited from skilled

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 13>scaling up compute and ingesting a whole lot of data.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 13>Scaling up computes pretty easy. It's just war machines, more chips.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 13>But what's going to happen is we're not going to

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 13>have enough data.

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, talking of hyper not around AI. The US and

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 2>UK arms of accounting firm PwC. They're set to start

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>selling open ai products directly to clients, and the agreement

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 2>will allow PwC to become the first reseller of chatchpt

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>enterprise products geared towards business use.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 4>In terms of the deal, we're not disclosed.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 2>And a lawsuit challenging webscraping practices of open Ai and

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft has been dismissed.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 4>By a federal judge in California.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 2>The complaint accused open Ai and Microsoft of violating property

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and privacy laws by stealing data to train AI systems. Now,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the judge slam the attorneys who file the complaints for

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 2>being excessively long and meandering, calling the suit quote unnecessary.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 4>And distracting youan while.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we'll talk about the state of the US

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 2>IPO market.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Leric Hippo of.

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Lere Hippo coming up next, this Bluemo technology. We talked

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 2>about a little bit earlier the lack of IPOs in

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the market, and in a recent op ed Lara Hippo

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>managing partner, Eric Hippo argues, then the number of public

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 2>US companies is plumitting, and that's bad news for the

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 2>democratic component of the economy, saying exit opportunities, they're critical

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 2>to the promise of American innovation and neglecting them or

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 2>their collective detriment and polase to say, we're welcoming to

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the show now, Lara Hippo managing partner, Eric, as you

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>helped write that out and now thinking about broadening out

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the conversation. You articulate why it's bad for want to

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>be investors and indeed for future growth and financial benefits

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to many, Eric, But why is this happening from your perspective.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's happening mostly due to regulations, so that's the

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>number one factor. Number two factor is that companies are

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>choosing to stay private longer because there's more private capital.

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit of a conundrum because obviously all of

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this private capital is expecting an exit at some point,

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>which is likely to be the public markets. So we

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>used to have eight thousand public companies back in the nineties.

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>We are down to less than four thousand at this phase.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll be down to two thousand in another twenty years.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand is about the size of the London Stock Exchange,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, went from four thousand to two thousand.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So our stock exchanges are shrinking, not in terms of valuations,

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of the number of public companies, meaning

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that the remaining companies have higher and higher market capitalizations

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's very difficult for young, innovative, growing companies to

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>go public.

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Can we think about this, Eric, through the lens of

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a case study, If you don't mind, I think about

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk Inc. You know, he's documented the challenges of

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>being a public company CEO of Tesla, and if you,

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 3>by comparison, look at his private companies SpaceX, xai X,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the company formerly known as Twitter. Many would argue that

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 3>he's able to innovate with more freedom because he's free

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 3>of the responsibility or scrutiny or even the transparency required

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 3>of being a public company. What would your response be

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 3>to that case study? In that line of argument, I

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 3>would say.

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>That Elon is pretty distinct and remarkable by himself, and

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's been able to raise billions of dollars in

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the private market for his companies and stay private a

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>lot longer. This is not within the reach of most

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>most private companies. Most private companies are able to raise

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the tens of millions or hundreds of

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>millions at most, but to have access to billion dollars

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars in capitalization, you need the public market

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for this. So when when when Elon's company these go public,

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they're already pretty substantial companies, and so that's not the norm.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 6>The norm.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>What we're looking for is the ability to have public

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>companies being capitalized around one to five billion dollars. That's

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>where there is almost no IPOs and this is where

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of the point of entry. If you

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>let's take the example of n Video and Video went

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>public in the late nineteen nineties at a market cap

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of about six hundred million dollars and thet's say that

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's about the billion dollars in today's money. That company

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>now is worth almost three trillion dollars. So a remarkable

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>rise and a lot of a lot of the public shareholders,

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the people who were able to buy those shares in

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the early days that have become if they kept them,

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have become very, very rich. That's the kind that's the

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of momentum that we're looking for.

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 2>But therefore, if it's regulation that stifled, it is it

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 2>less regulation that's needed. And therefore, how do you protect

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 2>an investor base with less regulation.

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's going to be judicious regulation, you know. The

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the the tipping point really was the Sobbing Socksley Act

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and two. A lot of smaller public

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>companies were forced to either dealist or merge or go

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or go private given the burdens imposed by the by

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>socks By that but that particular act, So this, in

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>my mind, this needs to be reviewed. Do we really

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>need all of these controls or these internal controls. You know,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.719
<v Speaker 1>we're assuming, we're kind of assuming that people go public,

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>are have something to hide, have have you know, bad

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>intentions of sorts. We need to go back to uh,

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know a place where we we we allowed uh capitalism.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Eric, I just were pushed back on that slightly.

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, one reason that it's such a privilege to

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 3>host this show, Caroline, is that we come across all

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 3>kinds of founders who dream of taking their technology startup

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 3>public because of the prestige or because it gives their

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 3>staff liquidity, who may be long serving. You know, in

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 3>many instances that that's the dream, and it's still intact.

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're an investor and you're part of this ecosystem.

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you not recognize that still being a part of

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the dream.

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 6>Very much so.

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's in some cases almost their only dream, right,

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that's that's your exit. So if you let's take a

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>typical company in a private portfolio of Cetera's mind. Company

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>does one hundred million dollars in annual recurring revenues, you know,

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>has a grows thirty to fifty percent a year, has

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ibidah of about you know, twenty million dollars. Again, I'm

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>using a general case, and they want to go public,

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So what's going to happen? They the cost of going

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>public is going to cost them ten to fifty million

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, right, so that's over half of their abida.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly the valuation that they might command in the

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>public market is way then it should be as a

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>result of this. So there's plenty of companies in that

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.919
<v Speaker 1>situation who are would like to go public. They're they've

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>been in business for ten years or more. There their

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>employees need that liquidity for their for their own equity,

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really possible for them to do so.

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 3>Eric Hippo, Managing partner Larry Hippo. I can say with

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 3>certainly that Caroline and I both followerly enjoyed that conversation.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 3>The Chinese court dismissed the case filed by a local

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 3>consumer against Apple's commission and fees for purchases via its

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 3>app store, granting the US company some reprieve as it

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 3>faces growing scrutiny around the world over its practices.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Mark German is here.

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 3>With more Mark give US the details of this specific

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 3>case and why it's important.

0:35:55.760 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, a consumer in China sued Apple locally over the

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 14>company's thirty percent are up to thirty percent take rate

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 14>on applications, saying that this stifles competition. This is the

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 14>same thirty percent. This is the same situation that we've

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 14>seen play out in the US, playing out in Australia

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 14>with Epic Games. Obviously, the European Union has been largely

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 14>against this, and this is a time where Apple actually got.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 6>A rare win.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 14>Apple has been fined in many places. They're losing portions

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 14>of lawsuits over this cut. The cut is at the

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 14>heart of a continued battle between Apple and a judge

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 14>in California, and this is something Apple is likely going to.

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Have to shake up.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 14>You've already seen Apple throughout the concept of the thirty

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 14>percent as part of the Digital Markets Act in the

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 14>European Union, and over time, I expect even more significant

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 14>changes to the Apple revenue share agreements in the US

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 14>and elsewhere as well as this legal pressure and pressure

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 14>from both consumers and developers continues to heat up to.

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Heat up, and now China the outline, Madam, and great

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>wrap of it all well, thank you so much. Meanwhile,

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>let's go from Apple to Meta, because Matt has just

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 2>removed hundreds of Facebook accounts associated with covert influence campaigns

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>from China, Israel, Iran, Russia and other countries, some of

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 2>which used AI tools to generate disinformations, according to the

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 2>company's quarterly threat report.

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's bring in the moos Kurt Wagner, and.

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming maybe they used AI to find this disinformation too.

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.879
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, they use AI and algorithms to detect a lot

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 15>of this stuff and do it at the scale that

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 15>they need to for Facebook's products, right, I mean, they

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 15>have billions of users, billions of pieces of content. That's

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 15>not really something that they can necessarily do manually, although

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.439
<v Speaker 15>they do have teams that then, you know, once things

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 15>are detected, kind of going and do some investigating manually.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 15>But I think the important part here is that, you know,

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 15>we are seeing a little bit more generative AI content that.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 6>Is being used to mislead people.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 15>And I think that this is not a surprise, but

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 15>it's something as we head into the twenty twenty four election,

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 15>as we head into you know, important Senate races, this

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 15>is something that they're paying close attention to.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 3>K when Meta finds this content, generative, AI driven or otherwise,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 3>what do they do in response?

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:13.959
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, their goal and they've been doing this for years

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 15>to be clear, this is not a brand new thing.

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 15>But their goal is to basically wipe out these organizations,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 15>wipe out these you know, groups before they're able to

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 15>gain any kind of traction. They've gotten very good at

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 15>doing that since twenty sixteen election, you may remember. And

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.280
<v Speaker 15>so most of the time when they're sharing this stuff,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 15>you know, they're catching these things before it reaches a

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 15>huge audience. And I think that's the big key. Now,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 15>sometimes things do you know, slip through, but ultimately they're

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 15>trying to find these groups and eliminate them before they

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 15>can reach some type of scale.

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 2>And Nick Claik, the President of Global Affairs, we you're saying,

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got to detect, you've got to label this AI

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 2>generated content in particular kut Wagner, great breakdown as we

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 2>face what's more than thirty elections worldwide this year, and

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 2>look that does.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 4>It for this rather busy edition of remote technology.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Yet, Yeah, there has been no stop in the flow

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 3>in the water of tech. Real quick, I won't be

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 3>on the show tomorrow. I'm away on a top secret mission.

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Stay tuned. Check out the pod many of you do

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 3>on your way to work, way home from work, or

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 3>just hanging out Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and we published all

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg platforms from San Francisco and New York City.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Queue the beautiful pictures. This is Bloomberg technology.