WEBVTT - Why Do So Many Price Tags End in .99?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works. Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Christian Sager. So the other day I was shopping

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bavmorda's Trebuche and Millinary Emporium, and I started wondering,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>why do so many prices end in the number nine?

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't the stores want that extra penny? You might have

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>wondered the same thing too, and if you have, it's

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not just your imagination. Studies have shown that many retailers

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately used prices within five cents of the nearest dollar,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>within one cent of the nearest ten cents, within five

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars of the nearest one hundred dollar or one thousand dollars,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and within one dollar of the nearest ten dollar amount.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Prices like this are often known as charm prices, odd prices,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>magic prices, or psychological pricing. Price tags ending in the

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>number nine are especially common. But why these days? Two

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>main psychological theories of charm pricing have emerged For the

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>purpose of this episode. Will call them the rounding off

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>theory and the bargain signaling theory. The rounding off theory

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>states that shoppers tend to pay a lot more attention

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to the first digits in a list of a price.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So when you see a product labeled twenty nine nine,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>even though it's one penny off from thirty bucks, the

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>theory goes that you mentally round down to think of

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>it as a twenty dollar price point based on that

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>first digit. Now, the bargain signaling theory suggests that odd

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>prices work the same way sales signs do, meaning they

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>imply to shoppers that the price listed is especially good.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the weird specificity of something priced at five night

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>or two thirty nine makes us think that the store

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is selling this bag of gummy bears at the lowest

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>price point they can possibly afford. Or maybe we've all

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>been conditioned by marketing to associate odd prices, especially the

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.639
<v Speaker 1>ones ending in nines, with sales and discounts. There seems

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to be some evidence for both the rounding off theory

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and the bargain signaling theory. In two thousand three, researchers

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>showed that in some cases, you could actually increase demand

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for an item by raising the price so that it

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>ended in a nine, which would seem to contradict rational economics.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>One example, they studied a thirty four dollar dress in

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a Clothing Catalog by raising the price from thirty four

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars to thirty nine dollars. Demand for the dress actually

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>went up when they raised the price to forty four dollars. However,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the trend didn't hold, so it wasn't just that buyers

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>liked paying more for their clothes. Since thirty four and

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine both start with the same digit, this would

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>seem to favor the bargain signaling theory rather than the

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rounding off theory. Something about the nine just seemed to

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>make people think they were getting a good deal. But

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>there's evidence for the rounding off effect as well. For example,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand five study found that prices ending in

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>nine cents caused shoppers to make math errors that even

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar prices did not. It worked like this test. Shoppers

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>were given an allowance of exactly seventy three bucks, and

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they were then asked to estimate how many products they

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>could buy with this allowance. It turned out that when

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>endings were in the picture, shoppers overestimated their spending power.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>In other words, they thought they could buy significantly more

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>products at prices like to ninety nine and five ninety

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>nine than they could at three dollars or six dollars.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>This seems to suggest that we do tend to round

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>down and ignore the final digits and prices, even though

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes no economic sense to do so. So, it

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like our penchant for buying at the nines might

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be explained by a mixture of our tendency to round

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>down to the leftmost digit and our beliefs at nines

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>inherently indicate bargains. Check out the brainstuff channel on YouTube,

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and for more on this and thousands of other topics,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>visit hastuff works dot com.